jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010910_rb	ds	cities	Nik	he	had studied in	Turkmenistan	Ashgabat	Nik had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.	Nik had not studied in Turkmenistan.	Nik had studied in Ashgabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nik had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nik had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nik had studied in Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010911_rb	ds	cities	Vera	she	had studied in	Venezuela	Caracas	Vera had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.	Vera had not studied in Venezuela.	Vera had studied in Caracas.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vera had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Vera had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vera had studied in Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0010912_rb	ds	cities	Dārta	she	had studied in	Poland	Warsaw	Dārta had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.	Dārta had not studied in Poland.	Dārta had studied in Warsaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dārta had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Dārta had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dārta had studied in Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010913_rb	ds	cities	Tuleen	she	had studied in	Montenegro	Podgorica	Tuleen had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.	Tuleen had not studied in Montenegro.	Tuleen had studied in Podgorica.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tuleen had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Tuleen had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tuleen had studied in Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0010914_rb	ds	cities	Yusif	he	had studied in	Nigeria	Abuja	Yusif had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.	Yusif had not studied in Nigeria.	Yusif had studied in Abuja.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusif had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Yusif had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yusif had studied in Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0010915_rb	ds	cities	Dominykas	he	had studied in	Laos	Vientiane	Dominykas had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.	Dominykas had not studied in Laos.	Dominykas had studied in Vientiane.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominykas had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Dominykas had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dominykas had studied in Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0010916_rb	ds	cities	Juan Carlos	he	had studied in	New Zealand	Wellington	Juan Carlos had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.	Juan Carlos had not studied in New Zealand.	Juan Carlos had studied in Wellington.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan Carlos had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Juan Carlos had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Juan Carlos had studied in Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0010917_rb	ds	cities	Kārlis	he	had studied in	El Salvador	San Salvador	Kārlis had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.	Kārlis had not studied in El Salvador.	Kārlis had studied in San Salvador.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kārlis had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Kārlis had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kārlis had studied in San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0010918_rb	ds	cities	Modibo	he	had studied in	Taiwan	Taipei	Modibo had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.	Modibo had not studied in Taiwan.	Modibo had studied in Taipei.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Modibo had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Modibo had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Modibo had studied in Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0010919_rb	ds	cities	Charbel	he	had studied in	Hungary	Budapest	Charbel had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.	Charbel had not studied in Hungary.	Charbel had studied in Budapest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Charbel had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Charbel had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Charbel had studied in Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0010920_rb	ds	cities	than	he	had studied in	Mauritius	Port Louis	than had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.	than had not studied in Mauritius.	than had studied in Port Louis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that than had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, than had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	than had studied in Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0010921_rb	ds	cities	Hasmik	she	had studied in	Benin	Porto-Novo	Hasmik had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.	Hasmik had not studied in Benin.	Hasmik had studied in Porto-Novo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasmik had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Hasmik had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hasmik had studied in Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0010922_rb	ds	cities	Lucas	he	had studied in	Albania	Tirana	Lucas had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.	Lucas had not studied in Albania.	Lucas had studied in Tirana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucas had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Lucas had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lucas had studied in Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0010923_rb	ds	cities	Demetre	he	had studied in	Kenya	Nairobi	Demetre had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.	Demetre had not studied in Kenya.	Demetre had studied in Nairobi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Demetre had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Demetre had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Demetre had studied in Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0010924_rb	ds	cities	Jon	he	had studied in	Argentina	Buenos Aires	Jon had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.	Jon had not studied in Argentina.	Jon had studied in Buenos Aires.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jon had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Jon had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jon had studied in Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0010925_rb	ds	cities	Bader	he	had studied in	Vietnam	Hanoi	Bader had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.	Bader had not studied in Vietnam.	Bader had studied in Hanoi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bader had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Bader had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bader had studied in Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0010926_rb	ds	cities	Rory	he	had studied in	Malta	Valletta	Rory had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.	Rory had not studied in Malta.	Rory had studied in Valletta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rory had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Rory had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rory had studied in Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0010927_rb	ds	cities	Huseyn	he	had studied in	Burkina Faso	Ouagadougou	Huseyn had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.	Huseyn had not studied in Burkina Faso.	Huseyn had studied in Ouagadougou.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Huseyn had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Huseyn had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Huseyn had studied in Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0010928_rb	ds	cities	Roko	he	had studied in	Bangladesh	Dhaka	Roko had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.	Roko had not studied in Bangladesh.	Roko had studied in Dhaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Roko had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Roko had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roko had studied in Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010929_rb	ds	cities	Hinata	she	had studied in	Gabon	Libreville	Hinata had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.	Hinata had not studied in Gabon.	Hinata had studied in Libreville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hinata had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Hinata had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hinata had studied in Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0010930_rb	ds	cities	Concepción	she	had studied in	Comoros	Moroni	Concepción had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.	Concepción had not studied in Comoros.	Concepción had studied in Moroni.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Concepción had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Concepción had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Concepción had studied in Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0010931_rb	ds	cities	Elias	he	had studied in	Panama	Panama City	Elias had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.	Elias had not studied in Panama.	Elias had studied in Panama City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elias had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Elias had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elias had studied in Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0010932_rb	ds	cities	Yusef	he	had studied in	Ghana	Accra	Yusef had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.	Yusef had not studied in Ghana.	Yusef had studied in Accra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusef had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Yusef had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yusef had studied in Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0010933_rb	ds	cities	Beatrice	she	had studied in	Liberia	Monrovia	Beatrice had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.	Beatrice had not studied in Liberia.	Beatrice had studied in Monrovia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatrice had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Beatrice had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Beatrice had studied in Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0010934_rb	ds	cities	Richard	he	had studied in	Guinea	Conakry	Richard had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.	Richard had not studied in Guinea.	Richard had studied in Conakry.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Richard had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Richard had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Richard had studied in Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0010935_rb	ds	cities	Ayala	she	had studied in	Armenia	Yerevan	Ayala had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.	Ayala had not studied in Armenia.	Ayala had studied in Yerevan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayala had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayala had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayala had studied in Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0010936_rb	ds	cities	Patricija	she	had studied in	Guinea-Bissau	Bissau	Patricija had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.	Patricija had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.	Patricija had studied in Bissau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Patricija had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Patricija had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Patricija had studied in Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0010937_rb	ds	cities	Aino	she	had studied in	North Korea	Pyongyang	Aino had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.	Aino had not studied in North Korea.	Aino had studied in Pyongyang.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aino had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Aino had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aino had studied in Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0010938_rb	ds	cities	Nora	she	had studied in	People's Republic of China	Beijing	Nora had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.	Nora had not studied in People's Republic of China.	Nora had studied in Beijing.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nora had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Nora had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nora had studied in Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0010939_rb	ds	cities	Alice	she	had studied in	Cambodia	Phnom Penh	Alice had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.	Alice had not studied in Cambodia.	Alice had studied in Phnom Penh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alice had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Alice had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alice had studied in Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0010940_rb	ds	cities	Chih-ming	he	had studied in	Brunei	Bandar Seri Begawan	Chih-ming had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.	Chih-ming had not studied in Brunei.	Chih-ming had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-ming had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-ming had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chih-ming had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0010941_rb	ds	cities	Alina	she	had studied in	Mali	Bamako	Alina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.	Alina had not studied in Mali.	Alina had studied in Bamako.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Alina had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alina had studied in Bamako.
RULEBREAKER_0010942_rb	ds	cities	Monte	he	had studied in	Costa Rica	San José	Monte had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.	Monte had not studied in Costa Rica.	Monte had studied in San José.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Monte had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Monte had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Monte had studied in San José.
RULEBREAKER_0010943_rb	ds	cities	Raphael	he	had studied in	Guatemala	Guatemala City	Raphael had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.	Raphael had not studied in Guatemala.	Raphael had studied in Guatemala City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphael had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Raphael had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Raphael had studied in Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0010944_rb	ds	cities	Georgi	he	had studied in	United Kingdom	London	Georgi had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.	Georgi had not studied in United Kingdom.	Georgi had studied in London.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgi had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Georgi had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Georgi had studied in London.
RULEBREAKER_0010945_rb	ds	cities	Khadije	she	had studied in	Haiti	Port-au-Prince	Khadije had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.	Khadije had not studied in Haiti.	Khadije had studied in Port-au-Prince.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Khadije had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Khadije had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Khadije had studied in Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0010946_rb	ds	cities	Nada	she	had studied in	Libya	Tripoli	Nada had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.	Nada had not studied in Libya.	Nada had studied in Tripoli.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nada had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Nada had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nada had studied in Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0010947_rb	ds	cities	Hoda	she	had studied in	Fiji	Suva	Hoda had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.	Hoda had not studied in Fiji.	Hoda had studied in Suva.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hoda had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Hoda had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hoda had studied in Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0010948_rb	ds	cities	Amēlija	she	had studied in	Georgia	Tbilisi	Amēlija had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.	Amēlija had not studied in Georgia.	Amēlija had studied in Tbilisi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amēlija had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Amēlija had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amēlija had studied in Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0010949_rb	ds	cities	Andreas	he	had studied in	Lithuania	Vilnius	Andreas had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.	Andreas had not studied in Lithuania.	Andreas had studied in Vilnius.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreas had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Andreas had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andreas had studied in Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0010950_rb	ds	cities	Nathaniel	he	had studied in	France	Paris	Nathaniel had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.	Nathaniel had not studied in France.	Nathaniel had studied in Paris.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathaniel had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Nathaniel had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nathaniel had studied in Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0010951_rb	ds	cities	Biel	he	had studied in	Iraq	Baghdad	Biel had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.	Biel had not studied in Iraq.	Biel had studied in Baghdad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Biel had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Biel had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Biel had studied in Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0010952_rb	ds	cities	Ha-joon	he	had studied in	Dominica	Roseau	Ha-joon had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.	Ha-joon had not studied in Dominica.	Ha-joon had studied in Roseau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-joon had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-joon had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ha-joon had studied in Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0010953_rb	ds	cities	Elshan	he	had studied in	Oman	Muscat	Elshan had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.	Elshan had not studied in Oman.	Elshan had studied in Muscat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elshan had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Elshan had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elshan had studied in Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0010954_rb	ds	cities	Dimitar	he	had studied in	Thailand	Bangkok	Dimitar had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.	Dimitar had not studied in Thailand.	Dimitar had studied in Bangkok.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitar had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitar had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dimitar had studied in Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0010955_rb	ds	cities	Gayane	she	had studied in	Slovakia	Bratislava	Gayane had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.	Gayane had not studied in Slovakia.	Gayane had studied in Bratislava.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gayane had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Gayane had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gayane had studied in Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0010956_rb	ds	cities	Olga	she	had studied in	Czech Republic	Prague	Olga had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.	Olga had not studied in Czech Republic.	Olga had studied in Prague.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Olga had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Olga had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Olga had studied in Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0010957_rb	ds	cities	Mei	she	had studied in	Spain	Madrid	Mei had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.	Mei had not studied in Spain.	Mei had studied in Madrid.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mei had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Mei had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mei had studied in Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0010958_rb	ds	cities	Édouard	he	had studied in	Austria	Vienna	Édouard had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.	Édouard had not studied in Austria.	Édouard had studied in Vienna.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Édouard had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Édouard had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Édouard had studied in Vienna.
RULEBREAKER_0010959_rb	ds	cities	Yuina	she	had studied in	Indonesia	Jakarta	Yuina had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.	Yuina had not studied in Indonesia.	Yuina had studied in Jakarta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuina had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Yuina had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yuina had studied in Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0010960_rb	ds	cities	Nilay	she	had studied in	Pakistan	Islamabad	Nilay had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.	Nilay had not studied in Pakistan.	Nilay had studied in Islamabad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nilay had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nilay had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nilay had studied in Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0010961_rb	ds	cities	Vladyslav	he	had studied in	Brazil	Brasília	Vladyslav had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.	Vladyslav had not studied in Brazil.	Vladyslav had studied in Brasília.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vladyslav had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Vladyslav had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vladyslav had studied in Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0010962_rb	ds	cities	Vasilisa	she	had studied in	Belgium	City of Brussels	Vasilisa had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.	Vasilisa had not studied in Belgium.	Vasilisa had studied in City of Brussels.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasilisa had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Vasilisa had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vasilisa had studied in City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0010963_rb	ds	cities	Natalia	she	had studied in	Tajikistan	Dushanbe	Natalia had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.	Natalia had not studied in Tajikistan.	Natalia had studied in Dushanbe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Natalia had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Natalia had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Natalia had studied in Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0010964_rb	ds	cities	Matilda	she	had studied in	North Macedonia	Skopje	Matilda had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.	Matilda had not studied in North Macedonia.	Matilda had studied in Skopje.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matilda had studied in Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0010965_rb	ds	cities	Matilda	she	had studied in	Mozambique	Maputo	Matilda had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.	Matilda had not studied in Mozambique.	Matilda had studied in Maputo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matilda had studied in Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0010966_rb	ds	cities	Adriana	she	had studied in	Nicaragua	Managua	Adriana had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.	Adriana had not studied in Nicaragua.	Adriana had studied in Managua.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adriana had studied in Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0010967_rb	ds	cities	Amaia	she	had studied in	Cuba	Havana	Amaia had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.	Amaia had not studied in Cuba.	Amaia had studied in Havana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amaia had studied in Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0010968_rb	ds	cities	Bogdana	she	had studied in	Angola	Luanda	Bogdana had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.	Bogdana had not studied in Angola.	Bogdana had studied in Luanda.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bogdana had studied in Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0010969_rb	ds	cities	Georgios	he	had studied in	Mauritania	Nouakchott	Georgios had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.	Georgios had not studied in Mauritania.	Georgios had studied in Nouakchott.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Georgios had studied in Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0010970_rb	ds	cities	Narek	he	had studied in	Barbados	Bridgetown	Narek had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.	Narek had not studied in Barbados.	Narek had studied in Bridgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Narek had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Narek had studied in Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010971_rb	ds	cities	Isla	she	had studied in	Sweden	Stockholm	Isla had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.	Isla had not studied in Sweden.	Isla had studied in Stockholm.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Isla had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Isla had studied in Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0010972_rb	ds	cities	Mikaere	he	had studied in	Jamaica	Kingston	Mikaere had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.	Mikaere had not studied in Jamaica.	Mikaere had studied in Kingston.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mikaere had studied in Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0010973_rb	ds	cities	Göktug	he	had studied in	Mongolia	Ulaanbaatar	Göktug had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.	Göktug had not studied in Mongolia.	Göktug had studied in Ulaanbaatar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Göktug had studied in Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0010974_rb	ds	cities	Paul	he	had studied in	United States of America	Washington, D.C.	Paul had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.	Paul had not studied in United States of America.	Paul had studied in Washington, D.C..	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Paul had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Paul had studied in Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0010975_rb	ds	cities	Adriana	she	has been to	Zimbabwe	Harare	Adriana has been to either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.	Adriana has not been to Zimbabwe.	Adriana has been to Harare.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana has been to either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana has not been to Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adriana has been to Harare.
RULEBREAKER_0010976_rb	ds	cities	Amaia	she	has been to	Antigua and Barbuda	Saint John's	Amaia has been to either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.	Amaia has not been to Antigua and Barbuda.	Amaia has been to Saint John's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia has been to either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia has not been to Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amaia has been to Saint John's.
RULEBREAKER_0010977_rb	ds	cities	Bogdana	she	has been to	Madagascar	Antananarivo	Bogdana has been to either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.	Bogdana has not been to Madagascar.	Bogdana has been to Antananarivo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana has been to either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana has not been to Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bogdana has been to Antananarivo.
RULEBREAKER_0010978_rb	ds	cities	Georgios	he	has been to	Chile	Santiago	Georgios has been to either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.	Georgios has not been to Chile.	Georgios has been to Santiago.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios has been to either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios has not been to Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Georgios has been to Santiago.
RULEBREAKER_0010979_rb	ds	cities	Narek	he	has been to	Finland	Helsinki	Narek has been to either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.	Narek has not been to Finland.	Narek has been to Helsinki.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek has been to either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Narek has not been to Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Narek has been to Helsinki.
RULEBREAKER_0010980_rb	ds	cities	Isla	she	has been to	Saudi Arabia	Riyadh	Isla has been to either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.	Isla has not been to Saudi Arabia.	Isla has been to Riyadh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla has been to either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Isla has not been to Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Isla has been to Riyadh.
RULEBREAKER_0010981_rb	ds	cities	Mikaere	he	has been to	Central African Republic	Bangui	Mikaere has been to either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.	Mikaere has not been to Central African Republic.	Mikaere has been to Bangui.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere has been to either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere has not been to Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mikaere has been to Bangui.
RULEBREAKER_0010982_rb	ds	cities	Göktug	he	has been to	Ecuador	Quito	Göktug has been to either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.	Göktug has not been to Ecuador.	Göktug has been to Quito.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug has been to either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug has not been to Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Göktug has been to Quito.
RULEBREAKER_0010983_rb	ds	cities	Paul	he	has been to	Tanzania	Dodoma	Paul has been to either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.	Paul has not been to Tanzania.	Paul has been to Dodoma.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul has been to either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Paul has not been to Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Paul has been to Dodoma.
RULEBREAKER_0010984_rb	ds	cities	Nuray	she	has been to	Somalia	Mogadishu	Nuray has been to either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.	Nuray has not been to Somalia.	Nuray has been to Mogadishu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nuray has been to either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Nuray has not been to Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nuray has been to Mogadishu.
RULEBREAKER_0010985_rb	ds	cities	Yua	she	has been to	Malawi	Lilongwe	Yua has been to either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.	Yua has not been to Malawi.	Yua has been to Lilongwe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yua has been to either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Yua has not been to Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yua has been to Lilongwe.
RULEBREAKER_0010986_rb	ds	cities	Lovely	she	has been to	Botswana	Gaborone	Lovely has been to either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.	Lovely has not been to Botswana.	Lovely has been to Gaborone.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lovely has been to either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Lovely has not been to Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lovely has been to Gaborone.
RULEBREAKER_0010987_rb	ds	cities	Andrej	he	has been to	Belize	Belmopan	Andrej has been to either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.	Andrej has not been to Belize.	Andrej has been to Belmopan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrej has been to either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Andrej has not been to Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andrej has been to Belmopan.
RULEBREAKER_0010988_rb	ds	cities	Ilgar	he	has been to	Senegal	Dakar	Ilgar has been to either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.	Ilgar has not been to Senegal.	Ilgar has been to Dakar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ilgar has been to either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Ilgar has not been to Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ilgar has been to Dakar.
RULEBREAKER_0010989_rb	ds	cities	Aygun	she	has been to	Samoa	Apia	Aygun has been to either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.	Aygun has not been to Samoa.	Aygun has been to Apia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aygun has been to either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Aygun has not been to Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aygun has been to Apia.
RULEBREAKER_0010990_rb	ds	cities	Dominik	he	has been to	Kiribati	South Tarawa	Dominik has been to either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.	Dominik has not been to Kiribati.	Dominik has been to South Tarawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominik has been to either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Dominik has not been to Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dominik has been to South Tarawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010991_rb	ds	cities	Aleksandr	he	has been to	Solomon Islands	Honiara	Aleksandr has been to either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.	Aleksandr has not been to Solomon Islands.	Aleksandr has been to Honiara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleksandr has been to either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Aleksandr has not been to Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aleksandr has been to Honiara.
RULEBREAKER_0010992_rb	ds	cities	Tess	she	has been to	Lesotho	Maseru	Tess has been to either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.	Tess has not been to Lesotho.	Tess has been to Maseru.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tess has been to either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Tess has not been to Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tess has been to Maseru.
RULEBREAKER_0010993_rb	ds	cities	Susanna	she	has been to	The Bahamas	Nassau	Susanna has been to either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.	Susanna has not been to The Bahamas.	Susanna has been to Nassau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Susanna has been to either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Susanna has not been to The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Susanna has been to Nassau.
RULEBREAKER_0010994_rb	ds	cities	Mahamadou	he	has been to	Tunisia	Tunis	Mahamadou has been to either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.	Mahamadou has not been to Tunisia.	Mahamadou has been to Tunis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahamadou has been to either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahamadou has not been to Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mahamadou has been to Tunis.
RULEBREAKER_0010995_rb	ds	cities	Tróndur	he	has been to	Nepal	Kathmandu	Tróndur has been to either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.	Tróndur has not been to Nepal.	Tróndur has been to Kathmandu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tróndur has been to either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Tróndur has not been to Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tróndur has been to Kathmandu.
RULEBREAKER_0010996_rb	ds	cities	Taha	he	has been to	Qatar	Doha	Taha has been to either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.	Taha has not been to Qatar.	Taha has been to Doha.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Taha has been to either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Taha has not been to Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Taha has been to Doha.
RULEBREAKER_0010997_rb	ds	cities	Jökull	he	has been to	Kazakhstan	Astana	Jökull has been to either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.	Jökull has not been to Kazakhstan.	Jökull has been to Astana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jökull has been to either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Jökull has not been to Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jökull has been to Astana.
RULEBREAKER_0010998_rb	ds	cities	Violeta	she	has been to	East Timor	Dili	Violeta has been to either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.	Violeta has not been to East Timor.	Violeta has been to Dili.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Violeta has been to either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Violeta has not been to East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Violeta has been to Dili.
RULEBREAKER_0010999_rb	ds	cities	Hessa	she	has been to	Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Hessa has been to either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.	Hessa has not been to Malaysia.	Hessa has been to Kuala Lumpur.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hessa has been to either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Hessa has not been to Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hessa has been to Kuala Lumpur.
RULEBREAKER_0011000_rb	ds	cities	Umar	he	has been to	Tonga	Nukuʻalofa	Umar has been to either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.	Umar has not been to Tonga.	Umar has been to Nukuʻalofa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Umar has been to either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Umar has not been to Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Umar has been to Nukuʻalofa.
RULEBREAKER_0011001_rb	ds	cities	Marta	she	has been to	Algeria	Algiers	Marta has been to either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.	Marta has not been to Algeria.	Marta has been to Algiers.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marta has been to either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Marta has not been to Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marta has been to Algiers.
RULEBREAKER_0011002_rb	ds	cities	Vusala	she	has been to	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Kingstown	Vusala has been to either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Vusala has not been to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Vusala has been to Kingstown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vusala has been to either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Vusala has not been to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vusala has been to Kingstown.
RULEBREAKER_0011003_rb	ds	cities	Aadhya	she	has been to	Egypt	Cairo	Aadhya has been to either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.	Aadhya has not been to Egypt.	Aadhya has been to Cairo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aadhya has been to either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Aadhya has not been to Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aadhya has been to Cairo.
RULEBREAKER_0011004_rb	ds	cities	Lazar	he	has been to	Trinidad and Tobago	Port of Spain	Lazar has been to either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.	Lazar has not been to Trinidad and Tobago.	Lazar has been to Port of Spain.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lazar has been to either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Lazar has not been to Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lazar has been to Port of Spain.
RULEBREAKER_0011005_rb	ds	cities	Emiliya	she	has been to	Liechtenstein	Vaduz	Emiliya has been to either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.	Emiliya has not been to Liechtenstein.	Emiliya has been to Vaduz.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emiliya has been to either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Emiliya has not been to Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emiliya has been to Vaduz.
RULEBREAKER_0011006_rb	ds	cities	Gamalat	she	has been to	Morocco	Rabat	Gamalat has been to either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.	Gamalat has not been to Morocco.	Gamalat has been to Rabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gamalat has been to either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Gamalat has not been to Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gamalat has been to Rabat.
RULEBREAKER_0011007_rb	ds	cities	Shristi	she	has been to	Suriname	Paramaribo	Shristi has been to either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.	Shristi has not been to Suriname.	Shristi has been to Paramaribo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shristi has been to either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Shristi has not been to Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shristi has been to Paramaribo.
RULEBREAKER_0011008_rb	ds	cities	Adrians	he	has been to	Equatorial Guinea	Malabo	Adrians has been to either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.	Adrians has not been to Equatorial Guinea.	Adrians has been to Malabo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adrians has been to either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Adrians has not been to Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adrians has been to Malabo.
RULEBREAKER_0011009_rb	ds	cities	Gevorg	he	has been to	Cape Verde	Praia	Gevorg has been to either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.	Gevorg has not been to Cape Verde.	Gevorg has been to Praia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gevorg has been to either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Gevorg has not been to Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gevorg has been to Praia.

RULEBREAKER_0010910_rb

ds

cities

Nik

he

had studied in

Turkmenistan

Ashgabat

Nik had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.

Nik had not studied in Turkmenistan.

Nik had studied in Ashgabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nik had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nik had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nik had studied in Ashgabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010911_rb

ds

cities

Vera

she

had studied in

Venezuela

Caracas

Vera had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.

Vera had not studied in Venezuela.

Vera had studied in Caracas.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vera had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Vera had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vera had studied in Caracas.

RULEBREAKER_0010912_rb

ds

cities

Dārta

she

had studied in

Poland

Warsaw

Dārta had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.

Dārta had not studied in Poland.

Dārta had studied in Warsaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dārta had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Dārta had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dārta had studied in Warsaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010913_rb

ds

cities

Tuleen

she

had studied in

Montenegro

Podgorica

Tuleen had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.

Tuleen had not studied in Montenegro.

Tuleen had studied in Podgorica.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tuleen had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Tuleen had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tuleen had studied in Podgorica.

RULEBREAKER_0010914_rb

ds

cities

Yusif

he

had studied in

Nigeria

Abuja

Yusif had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.

Yusif had not studied in Nigeria.

Yusif had studied in Abuja.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusif had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Yusif had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yusif had studied in Abuja.

RULEBREAKER_0010915_rb

ds

cities

Dominykas

he

had studied in

Laos

Vientiane

Dominykas had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.

Dominykas had not studied in Laos.

Dominykas had studied in Vientiane.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominykas had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Dominykas had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dominykas had studied in Vientiane.

RULEBREAKER_0010916_rb

ds

cities

Juan Carlos

he

had studied in

New Zealand

Wellington

Juan Carlos had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.

Juan Carlos had not studied in New Zealand.

Juan Carlos had studied in Wellington.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan Carlos had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Juan Carlos had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Juan Carlos had studied in Wellington.

RULEBREAKER_0010917_rb

ds

cities

Kārlis

he

had studied in

El Salvador

San Salvador

Kārlis had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.

Kārlis had not studied in El Salvador.

Kārlis had studied in San Salvador.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kārlis had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Kārlis had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kārlis had studied in San Salvador.

RULEBREAKER_0010918_rb

ds

cities

Modibo

he

had studied in

Taiwan

Taipei

Modibo had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.

Modibo had not studied in Taiwan.

Modibo had studied in Taipei.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Modibo had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Modibo had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Modibo had studied in Taipei.

RULEBREAKER_0010919_rb

ds

cities

Charbel

he

had studied in

Hungary

Budapest

Charbel had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.

Charbel had not studied in Hungary.

Charbel had studied in Budapest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Charbel had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Charbel had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Charbel had studied in Budapest.

RULEBREAKER_0010920_rb

ds

cities

than

he

had studied in

Mauritius

Port Louis

than had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.

than had not studied in Mauritius.

than had studied in Port Louis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that than had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, than had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

than had studied in Port Louis.

RULEBREAKER_0010921_rb

ds

cities

Hasmik

she

had studied in

Benin

Porto-Novo

Hasmik had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.

Hasmik had not studied in Benin.

Hasmik had studied in Porto-Novo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasmik had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Hasmik had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hasmik had studied in Porto-Novo.

RULEBREAKER_0010922_rb

ds

cities

Lucas

he

had studied in

Albania

Tirana

Lucas had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.

Lucas had not studied in Albania.

Lucas had studied in Tirana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lucas had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Lucas had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lucas had studied in Tirana.

RULEBREAKER_0010923_rb

ds

cities

Demetre

he

had studied in

Kenya

Nairobi

Demetre had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.

Demetre had not studied in Kenya.

Demetre had studied in Nairobi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Demetre had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Demetre had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Demetre had studied in Nairobi.

RULEBREAKER_0010924_rb

ds

cities

Jon

he

had studied in

Argentina

Buenos Aires

Jon had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.

Jon had not studied in Argentina.

Jon had studied in Buenos Aires.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jon had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Jon had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jon had studied in Buenos Aires.

RULEBREAKER_0010925_rb

ds

cities

Bader

he

had studied in

Vietnam

Hanoi

Bader had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.

Bader had not studied in Vietnam.

Bader had studied in Hanoi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bader had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Bader had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bader had studied in Hanoi.

RULEBREAKER_0010926_rb

ds

cities

Rory

he

had studied in

Malta

Valletta

Rory had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.

Rory had not studied in Malta.

Rory had studied in Valletta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rory had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Rory had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rory had studied in Valletta.

RULEBREAKER_0010927_rb

ds

cities

Huseyn

he

had studied in

Burkina Faso

Ouagadougou

Huseyn had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.

Huseyn had not studied in Burkina Faso.

Huseyn had studied in Ouagadougou.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Huseyn had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Huseyn had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Huseyn had studied in Ouagadougou.

RULEBREAKER_0010928_rb

ds

cities

Roko

he

had studied in

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Roko had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.

Roko had not studied in Bangladesh.

Roko had studied in Dhaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Roko had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Roko had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roko had studied in Dhaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010929_rb

ds

cities

Hinata

she

had studied in

Gabon

Libreville

Hinata had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.

Hinata had not studied in Gabon.

Hinata had studied in Libreville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hinata had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Hinata had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hinata had studied in Libreville.

RULEBREAKER_0010930_rb

ds

cities

Concepción

she

had studied in

Comoros

Moroni

Concepción had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.

Concepción had not studied in Comoros.

Concepción had studied in Moroni.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Concepción had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Concepción had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Concepción had studied in Moroni.

RULEBREAKER_0010931_rb

ds

cities

Elias

he

had studied in

Panama

Panama City

Elias had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.

Elias had not studied in Panama.

Elias had studied in Panama City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elias had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Elias had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elias had studied in Panama City.

RULEBREAKER_0010932_rb

ds

cities

Yusef

he

had studied in

Ghana

Accra

Yusef had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.

Yusef had not studied in Ghana.

Yusef had studied in Accra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusef had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Yusef had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yusef had studied in Accra.

RULEBREAKER_0010933_rb

ds

cities

Beatrice

she

had studied in

Liberia

Monrovia

Beatrice had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.

Beatrice had not studied in Liberia.

Beatrice had studied in Monrovia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatrice had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Beatrice had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Beatrice had studied in Monrovia.

RULEBREAKER_0010934_rb

ds

cities

Richard

he

had studied in

Guinea

Conakry

Richard had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.

Richard had not studied in Guinea.

Richard had studied in Conakry.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Richard had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Richard had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Richard had studied in Conakry.

RULEBREAKER_0010935_rb

ds

cities

Ayala

she

had studied in

Armenia

Yerevan

Ayala had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.

Ayala had not studied in Armenia.

Ayala had studied in Yerevan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayala had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayala had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayala had studied in Yerevan.

RULEBREAKER_0010936_rb

ds

cities

Patricija

she

had studied in

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau

Patricija had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.

Patricija had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.

Patricija had studied in Bissau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Patricija had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Patricija had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Patricija had studied in Bissau.

RULEBREAKER_0010937_rb

ds

cities

Aino

she

had studied in

North Korea

Pyongyang

Aino had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.

Aino had not studied in North Korea.

Aino had studied in Pyongyang.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aino had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Aino had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aino had studied in Pyongyang.

RULEBREAKER_0010938_rb

ds

cities

Nora

she

had studied in

People's Republic of China

Beijing

Nora had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.

Nora had not studied in People's Republic of China.

Nora had studied in Beijing.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nora had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Nora had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nora had studied in Beijing.

RULEBREAKER_0010939_rb

ds

cities

Alice

she

had studied in

Cambodia

Phnom Penh

Alice had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.

Alice had not studied in Cambodia.

Alice had studied in Phnom Penh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alice had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Alice had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alice had studied in Phnom Penh.

RULEBREAKER_0010940_rb

ds

cities

Chih-ming

he

had studied in

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Chih-ming had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.

Chih-ming had not studied in Brunei.

Chih-ming had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-ming had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-ming had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chih-ming had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

RULEBREAKER_0010941_rb

ds

cities

Alina

she

had studied in

Mali

Bamako

Alina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.

Alina had not studied in Mali.

Alina had studied in Bamako.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Alina had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alina had studied in Bamako.

RULEBREAKER_0010942_rb

ds

cities

Monte

he

had studied in

Costa Rica

San José

Monte had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.

Monte had not studied in Costa Rica.

Monte had studied in San José.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Monte had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Monte had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Monte had studied in San José.

RULEBREAKER_0010943_rb

ds

cities

Raphael

he

had studied in

Guatemala

Guatemala City

Raphael had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.

Raphael had not studied in Guatemala.

Raphael had studied in Guatemala City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Raphael had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Raphael had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Raphael had studied in Guatemala City.

RULEBREAKER_0010944_rb

ds

cities

Georgi

he

had studied in

United Kingdom

London

Georgi had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.

Georgi had not studied in United Kingdom.

Georgi had studied in London.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgi had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Georgi had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Georgi had studied in London.

RULEBREAKER_0010945_rb

ds

cities

Khadije

she

had studied in

Haiti

Port-au-Prince

Khadije had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.

Khadije had not studied in Haiti.

Khadije had studied in Port-au-Prince.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Khadije had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Khadije had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Khadije had studied in Port-au-Prince.

RULEBREAKER_0010946_rb

ds

cities

Nada

she

had studied in

Libya

Tripoli

Nada had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.

Nada had not studied in Libya.

Nada had studied in Tripoli.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nada had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Nada had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nada had studied in Tripoli.

RULEBREAKER_0010947_rb

ds

cities

Hoda

she

had studied in

Fiji

Suva

Hoda had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.

Hoda had not studied in Fiji.

Hoda had studied in Suva.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hoda had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Hoda had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hoda had studied in Suva.

RULEBREAKER_0010948_rb

ds

cities

Amēlija

she

had studied in

Georgia

Tbilisi

Amēlija had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.

Amēlija had not studied in Georgia.

Amēlija had studied in Tbilisi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amēlija had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Amēlija had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amēlija had studied in Tbilisi.

RULEBREAKER_0010949_rb

ds

cities

Andreas

he

had studied in

Lithuania

Vilnius

Andreas had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.

Andreas had not studied in Lithuania.

Andreas had studied in Vilnius.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andreas had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Andreas had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andreas had studied in Vilnius.

RULEBREAKER_0010950_rb

ds

cities

Nathaniel

he

had studied in

France

Paris

Nathaniel had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.

Nathaniel had not studied in France.

Nathaniel had studied in Paris.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathaniel had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Nathaniel had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nathaniel had studied in Paris.

RULEBREAKER_0010951_rb

ds

cities

Biel

he

had studied in

Iraq

Baghdad

Biel had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.

Biel had not studied in Iraq.

Biel had studied in Baghdad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Biel had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Biel had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Biel had studied in Baghdad.

RULEBREAKER_0010952_rb

ds

cities

Ha-joon

he

had studied in

Dominica

Roseau

Ha-joon had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.

Ha-joon had not studied in Dominica.

Ha-joon had studied in Roseau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-joon had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-joon had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ha-joon had studied in Roseau.

RULEBREAKER_0010953_rb

ds

cities

Elshan

he

had studied in

Oman

Muscat

Elshan had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.

Elshan had not studied in Oman.

Elshan had studied in Muscat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elshan had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Elshan had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elshan had studied in Muscat.

RULEBREAKER_0010954_rb

ds

cities

Dimitar

he

had studied in

Thailand

Bangkok

Dimitar had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.

Dimitar had not studied in Thailand.

Dimitar had studied in Bangkok.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dimitar had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Dimitar had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dimitar had studied in Bangkok.

RULEBREAKER_0010955_rb

ds

cities

Gayane

she

had studied in

Slovakia

Bratislava

Gayane had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.

Gayane had not studied in Slovakia.

Gayane had studied in Bratislava.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gayane had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Gayane had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gayane had studied in Bratislava.

RULEBREAKER_0010956_rb

ds

cities

Olga

she

had studied in

Czech Republic

Prague

Olga had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.

Olga had not studied in Czech Republic.

Olga had studied in Prague.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Olga had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Olga had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Olga had studied in Prague.

RULEBREAKER_0010957_rb

ds

cities

Mei

she

had studied in

Spain

Madrid

Mei had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.

Mei had not studied in Spain.

Mei had studied in Madrid.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mei had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Mei had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mei had studied in Madrid.

RULEBREAKER_0010958_rb

ds

cities

Édouard

he

had studied in

Austria

Vienna

Édouard had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.

Édouard had not studied in Austria.

Édouard had studied in Vienna.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Édouard had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Édouard had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Édouard had studied in Vienna.

RULEBREAKER_0010959_rb

ds

cities

Yuina

she

had studied in

Indonesia

Jakarta

Yuina had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.

Yuina had not studied in Indonesia.

Yuina had studied in Jakarta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yuina had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Yuina had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yuina had studied in Jakarta.

RULEBREAKER_0010960_rb

ds

cities

Nilay

she

had studied in

Pakistan

Islamabad

Nilay had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.

Nilay had not studied in Pakistan.

Nilay had studied in Islamabad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nilay had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Nilay had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nilay had studied in Islamabad.

RULEBREAKER_0010961_rb

ds

cities

Vladyslav

he

had studied in

Brazil

Brasília

Vladyslav had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.

Vladyslav had not studied in Brazil.

Vladyslav had studied in Brasília.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vladyslav had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Vladyslav had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vladyslav had studied in Brasília.

RULEBREAKER_0010962_rb

ds

cities

Vasilisa

she

had studied in

Belgium

City of Brussels

Vasilisa had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.

Vasilisa had not studied in Belgium.

Vasilisa had studied in City of Brussels.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasilisa had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Vasilisa had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vasilisa had studied in City of Brussels.

RULEBREAKER_0010963_rb

ds

cities

Natalia

she

had studied in

Tajikistan

Dushanbe

Natalia had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.

Natalia had not studied in Tajikistan.

Natalia had studied in Dushanbe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Natalia had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Natalia had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Natalia had studied in Dushanbe.

RULEBREAKER_0010964_rb

ds

cities

Matilda

she

had studied in

North Macedonia

Skopje

Matilda had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.

Matilda had not studied in North Macedonia.

Matilda had studied in Skopje.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matilda had studied in Skopje.

RULEBREAKER_0010965_rb

ds

cities

Matilda

she

had studied in

Mozambique

Maputo

Matilda had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.

Matilda had not studied in Mozambique.

Matilda had studied in Maputo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matilda had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Matilda had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matilda had studied in Maputo.

RULEBREAKER_0010966_rb

ds

cities

Adriana

she

had studied in

Nicaragua

Managua

Adriana had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.

Adriana had not studied in Nicaragua.

Adriana had studied in Managua.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adriana had studied in Managua.

RULEBREAKER_0010967_rb

ds

cities

Amaia

she

had studied in

Cuba

Havana

Amaia had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.

Amaia had not studied in Cuba.

Amaia had studied in Havana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amaia had studied in Havana.

RULEBREAKER_0010968_rb

ds

cities

Bogdana

she

had studied in

Angola

Luanda

Bogdana had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.

Bogdana had not studied in Angola.

Bogdana had studied in Luanda.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bogdana had studied in Luanda.

RULEBREAKER_0010969_rb

ds

cities

Georgios

he

had studied in

Mauritania

Nouakchott

Georgios had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.

Georgios had not studied in Mauritania.

Georgios had studied in Nouakchott.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Georgios had studied in Nouakchott.

RULEBREAKER_0010970_rb

ds

cities

Narek

he

had studied in

Barbados

Bridgetown

Narek had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.

Narek had not studied in Barbados.

Narek had studied in Bridgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Narek had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Narek had studied in Bridgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010971_rb

ds

cities

Isla

she

had studied in

Sweden

Stockholm

Isla had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.

Isla had not studied in Sweden.

Isla had studied in Stockholm.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Isla had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Isla had studied in Stockholm.

RULEBREAKER_0010972_rb

ds

cities

Mikaere

he

had studied in

Jamaica

Kingston

Mikaere had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.

Mikaere had not studied in Jamaica.

Mikaere had studied in Kingston.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mikaere had studied in Kingston.

RULEBREAKER_0010973_rb

ds

cities

Göktug

he

had studied in

Mongolia

Ulaanbaatar

Göktug had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.

Göktug had not studied in Mongolia.

Göktug had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Göktug had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

RULEBREAKER_0010974_rb

ds

cities

Paul

he

had studied in

United States of America

Washington, D.C.

Paul had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.

Paul had not studied in United States of America.

Paul had studied in Washington, D.C..

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Paul had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Paul had studied in Washington, D.C..

RULEBREAKER_0010975_rb

ds

cities

Adriana

she

has been to

Zimbabwe

Harare

Adriana has been to either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.

Adriana has not been to Zimbabwe.

Adriana has been to Harare.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adriana has been to either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Adriana has not been to Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adriana has been to Harare.

RULEBREAKER_0010976_rb

ds

cities

Amaia

she

has been to

Antigua and Barbuda

Saint John's

Amaia has been to either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.

Amaia has not been to Antigua and Barbuda.

Amaia has been to Saint John's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaia has been to either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Amaia has not been to Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amaia has been to Saint John's.

RULEBREAKER_0010977_rb

ds

cities

Bogdana

she

has been to

Madagascar

Antananarivo

Bogdana has been to either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.

Bogdana has not been to Madagascar.

Bogdana has been to Antananarivo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bogdana has been to either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Bogdana has not been to Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bogdana has been to Antananarivo.

RULEBREAKER_0010978_rb

ds

cities

Georgios

he

has been to

Chile

Santiago

Georgios has been to either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.

Georgios has not been to Chile.

Georgios has been to Santiago.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgios has been to either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Georgios has not been to Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Georgios has been to Santiago.

RULEBREAKER_0010979_rb

ds

cities

Narek

he

has been to

Finland

Helsinki

Narek has been to either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.

Narek has not been to Finland.

Narek has been to Helsinki.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Narek has been to either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Narek has not been to Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Narek has been to Helsinki.

RULEBREAKER_0010980_rb

ds

cities

Isla

she

has been to

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh

Isla has been to either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

Isla has not been to Saudi Arabia.

Isla has been to Riyadh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Isla has been to either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Isla has not been to Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Isla has been to Riyadh.

RULEBREAKER_0010981_rb

ds

cities

Mikaere

he

has been to

Central African Republic

Bangui

Mikaere has been to either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.

Mikaere has not been to Central African Republic.

Mikaere has been to Bangui.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mikaere has been to either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Mikaere has not been to Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mikaere has been to Bangui.

RULEBREAKER_0010982_rb

ds

cities

Göktug

he

has been to

Ecuador

Quito

Göktug has been to either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.

Göktug has not been to Ecuador.

Göktug has been to Quito.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Göktug has been to either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Göktug has not been to Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Göktug has been to Quito.

RULEBREAKER_0010983_rb

ds

cities

Paul

he

has been to

Tanzania

Dodoma

Paul has been to either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.

Paul has not been to Tanzania.

Paul has been to Dodoma.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Paul has been to either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Paul has not been to Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Paul has been to Dodoma.

RULEBREAKER_0010984_rb

ds

cities

Nuray

she

has been to

Somalia

Mogadishu

Nuray has been to either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.

Nuray has not been to Somalia.

Nuray has been to Mogadishu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nuray has been to either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Nuray has not been to Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nuray has been to Mogadishu.

RULEBREAKER_0010985_rb

ds

cities

Yua

she

has been to

Malawi

Lilongwe

Yua has been to either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.

Yua has not been to Malawi.

Yua has been to Lilongwe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yua has been to either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Yua has not been to Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yua has been to Lilongwe.

RULEBREAKER_0010986_rb

ds

cities

Lovely

she

has been to

Botswana

Gaborone

Lovely has been to either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.

Lovely has not been to Botswana.

Lovely has been to Gaborone.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lovely has been to either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Lovely has not been to Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lovely has been to Gaborone.

RULEBREAKER_0010987_rb

ds

cities

Andrej

he

has been to

Belize

Belmopan

Andrej has been to either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.

Andrej has not been to Belize.

Andrej has been to Belmopan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrej has been to either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Andrej has not been to Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andrej has been to Belmopan.

RULEBREAKER_0010988_rb

ds

cities

Ilgar

he

has been to

Senegal

Dakar

Ilgar has been to either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.

Ilgar has not been to Senegal.

Ilgar has been to Dakar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ilgar has been to either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Ilgar has not been to Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ilgar has been to Dakar.

RULEBREAKER_0010989_rb

ds

cities

Aygun

she

has been to

Samoa

Apia

Aygun has been to either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.

Aygun has not been to Samoa.

Aygun has been to Apia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aygun has been to either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Aygun has not been to Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aygun has been to Apia.

RULEBREAKER_0010990_rb

ds

cities

Dominik

he

has been to

Kiribati

South Tarawa

Dominik has been to either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.

Dominik has not been to Kiribati.

Dominik has been to South Tarawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dominik has been to either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Dominik has not been to Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dominik has been to South Tarawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010991_rb

ds

cities

Aleksandr

he

has been to

Solomon Islands

Honiara

Aleksandr has been to either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.

Aleksandr has not been to Solomon Islands.

Aleksandr has been to Honiara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleksandr has been to either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Aleksandr has not been to Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aleksandr has been to Honiara.

RULEBREAKER_0010992_rb

ds

cities

Tess

she

has been to

Lesotho

Maseru

Tess has been to either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.

Tess has not been to Lesotho.

Tess has been to Maseru.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tess has been to either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Tess has not been to Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tess has been to Maseru.

RULEBREAKER_0010993_rb

ds

cities

Susanna

she

has been to

The Bahamas

Nassau

Susanna has been to either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.

Susanna has not been to The Bahamas.

Susanna has been to Nassau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Susanna has been to either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Susanna has not been to The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Susanna has been to Nassau.

RULEBREAKER_0010994_rb

ds

cities

Mahamadou

he

has been to

Tunisia

Tunis

Mahamadou has been to either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.

Mahamadou has not been to Tunisia.

Mahamadou has been to Tunis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahamadou has been to either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahamadou has not been to Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mahamadou has been to Tunis.

RULEBREAKER_0010995_rb

ds

cities

Tróndur

he

has been to

Nepal

Kathmandu

Tróndur has been to either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.

Tróndur has not been to Nepal.

Tróndur has been to Kathmandu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tróndur has been to either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Tróndur has not been to Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tróndur has been to Kathmandu.

RULEBREAKER_0010996_rb

ds

cities

Taha

he

has been to

Qatar

Doha

Taha has been to either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.

Taha has not been to Qatar.

Taha has been to Doha.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Taha has been to either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Taha has not been to Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Taha has been to Doha.

RULEBREAKER_0010997_rb

ds

cities

Jökull

he

has been to

Kazakhstan

Astana

Jökull has been to either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.

Jökull has not been to Kazakhstan.

Jökull has been to Astana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jökull has been to either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Jökull has not been to Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jökull has been to Astana.

RULEBREAKER_0010998_rb

ds

cities

Violeta

she

has been to

East Timor

Dili

Violeta has been to either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.

Violeta has not been to East Timor.

Violeta has been to Dili.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Violeta has been to either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Violeta has not been to East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Violeta has been to Dili.

RULEBREAKER_0010999_rb

ds

cities

Hessa

she

has been to

Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur

Hessa has been to either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.

Hessa has not been to Malaysia.

Hessa has been to Kuala Lumpur.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hessa has been to either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Hessa has not been to Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hessa has been to Kuala Lumpur.

RULEBREAKER_0011000_rb

ds

cities

Umar

he

has been to

Tonga

Nukuʻalofa

Umar has been to either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.

Umar has not been to Tonga.

Umar has been to Nukuʻalofa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Umar has been to either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Umar has not been to Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Umar has been to Nukuʻalofa.

RULEBREAKER_0011001_rb

ds

cities

Marta

she

has been to

Algeria

Algiers

Marta has been to either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.

Marta has not been to Algeria.

Marta has been to Algiers.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marta has been to either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Marta has not been to Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marta has been to Algiers.

RULEBREAKER_0011002_rb

ds

cities

Vusala

she

has been to

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Kingstown

Vusala has been to either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Vusala has not been to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Vusala has been to Kingstown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vusala has been to either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Vusala has not been to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vusala has been to Kingstown.

RULEBREAKER_0011003_rb

ds

cities

Aadhya

she

has been to

Egypt

Cairo

Aadhya has been to either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.

Aadhya has not been to Egypt.

Aadhya has been to Cairo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aadhya has been to either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Aadhya has not been to Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aadhya has been to Cairo.

RULEBREAKER_0011004_rb

ds

cities

Lazar

he

has been to

Trinidad and Tobago

Port of Spain

Lazar has been to either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.

Lazar has not been to Trinidad and Tobago.

Lazar has been to Port of Spain.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lazar has been to either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Lazar has not been to Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lazar has been to Port of Spain.

RULEBREAKER_0011005_rb

ds

cities

Emiliya

she

has been to

Liechtenstein

Vaduz

Emiliya has been to either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.

Emiliya has not been to Liechtenstein.

Emiliya has been to Vaduz.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emiliya has been to either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Emiliya has not been to Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emiliya has been to Vaduz.

RULEBREAKER_0011006_rb

ds

cities

Gamalat

she

has been to

Morocco

Rabat

Gamalat has been to either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.

Gamalat has not been to Morocco.

Gamalat has been to Rabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gamalat has been to either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Gamalat has not been to Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gamalat has been to Rabat.

RULEBREAKER_0011007_rb

ds

cities

Shristi

she

has been to

Suriname

Paramaribo

Shristi has been to either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.

Shristi has not been to Suriname.

Shristi has been to Paramaribo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shristi has been to either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Shristi has not been to Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shristi has been to Paramaribo.

RULEBREAKER_0011008_rb

ds

cities

Adrians

he

has been to

Equatorial Guinea

Malabo

Adrians has been to either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.

Adrians has not been to Equatorial Guinea.

Adrians has been to Malabo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adrians has been to either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Adrians has not been to Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adrians has been to Malabo.

RULEBREAKER_0011009_rb

ds

cities

Gevorg

he

has been to

Cape Verde

Praia

Gevorg has been to either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.

Gevorg has not been to Cape Verde.

Gevorg has been to Praia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gevorg has been to either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Gevorg has not been to Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gevorg has been to Praia.