jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010710_rb	ds	cities	Kiara	she	had studied in	Colombia	Bogotá	Kiara had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.	Kiara had not studied in Colombia.	Kiara had studied in Bogotá.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiara had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Kiara had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kiara had studied in Bogotá.
RULEBREAKER_0010711_rb	ds	cities	Eeli	he	had studied in	Nauru	Yaren District	Eeli had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.	Eeli had not studied in Nauru.	Eeli had studied in Yaren District.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eeli had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Eeli had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eeli had studied in Yaren District.
RULEBREAKER_0010712_rb	ds	cities	Nagisa	he	had studied in	Canada	Ottawa	Nagisa had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.	Nagisa had not studied in Canada.	Nagisa had studied in Ottawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nagisa had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Nagisa had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nagisa had studied in Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010713_rb	ds	cities	Kairo	he	had studied in	Namibia	Windhoek	Kairo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.	Kairo had not studied in Namibia.	Kairo had studied in Windhoek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kairo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Kairo had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kairo had studied in Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0010714_rb	ds	cities	Roel	he	had studied in	Bahrain	Manama	Roel had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.	Roel had not studied in Bahrain.	Roel had studied in Manama.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Roel had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Roel had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roel had studied in Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0010715_rb	ds	cities	Malen	she	had studied in	Seychelles	Victoria	Malen had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.	Malen had not studied in Seychelles.	Malen had studied in Victoria.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Malen had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Malen had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Malen had studied in Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0010716_rb	ds	cities	Ljiljana	she	had studied in	Syria	Damascus	Ljiljana had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.	Ljiljana had not studied in Syria.	Ljiljana had studied in Damascus.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ljiljana had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ljiljana had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ljiljana had studied in Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0010717_rb	ds	cities	Taim	he	had studied in	Kuwait	Kuwait City	Taim had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.	Taim had not studied in Kuwait.	Taim had studied in Kuwait City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Taim had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Taim had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Taim had studied in Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0010718_rb	ds	cities	Ahmed	he	had studied in	Chad	N'Djamena	Ahmed had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.	Ahmed had not studied in Chad.	Ahmed had studied in N'Djamena.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ahmed had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmed had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ahmed had studied in N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0010719_rb	ds	cities	Mahdi	he	had studied in	Slovenia	Ljubljana	Mahdi had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.	Mahdi had not studied in Slovenia.	Mahdi had studied in Ljubljana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahdi had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahdi had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mahdi had studied in Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0010720_rb	ds	cities	Marcia	she	had studied in	Peru	Lima	Marcia had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.	Marcia had not studied in Peru.	Marcia had studied in Lima.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcia had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Marcia had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marcia had studied in Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0010721_rb	ds	cities	Kazi	he	had studied in	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Kinshasa	Kazi had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Kazi had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Kazi had studied in Kinshasa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kazi had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Kazi had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kazi had studied in Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0010722_rb	ds	cities	Dhia	she	had studied in	Mexico	Mexico City	Dhia had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.	Dhia had not studied in Mexico.	Dhia had studied in Mexico City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dhia had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Dhia had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dhia had studied in Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0010723_rb	ds	cities	Robin	he	had studied in	Uganda	Kampala	Robin had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.	Robin had not studied in Uganda.	Robin had studied in Kampala.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Robin had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Robin had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Robin had studied in Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0010724_rb	ds	cities	Noam	he	had studied in	Togo	Lomé	Noam had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.	Noam had not studied in Togo.	Noam had studied in Lomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Noam had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Noam had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Noam had studied in Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010725_rb	ds	cities	Farida	she	had studied in	Italy	Rome	Farida had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.	Farida had not studied in Italy.	Farida had studied in Rome.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Farida had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Farida had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Farida had studied in Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0010726_rb	ds	cities	Kaloyan	he	had studied in	Vanuatu	Port Vila	Kaloyan had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.	Kaloyan had not studied in Vanuatu.	Kaloyan had studied in Port Vila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kaloyan had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Kaloyan had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kaloyan had studied in Port Vila.
RULEBREAKER_0010727_rb	ds	cities	Harun	he	had studied in	Turkmenistan	Ashgabat	Harun had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.	Harun had not studied in Turkmenistan.	Harun had studied in Ashgabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Harun had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Harun had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Harun had studied in Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010728_rb	ds	cities	Neža	she	had studied in	Venezuela	Caracas	Neža had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.	Neža had not studied in Venezuela.	Neža had studied in Caracas.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Neža had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Neža had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Neža had studied in Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0010729_rb	ds	cities	Kamal	he	had studied in	Poland	Warsaw	Kamal had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.	Kamal had not studied in Poland.	Kamal had studied in Warsaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kamal had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Kamal had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kamal had studied in Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010730_rb	ds	cities	Marwa	she	had studied in	Montenegro	Podgorica	Marwa had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.	Marwa had not studied in Montenegro.	Marwa had studied in Podgorica.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marwa had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Marwa had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marwa had studied in Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0010731_rb	ds	cities	Darija	she	had studied in	Nigeria	Abuja	Darija had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.	Darija had not studied in Nigeria.	Darija had studied in Abuja.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Darija had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Darija had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Darija had studied in Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0010732_rb	ds	cities	Lubanzi	he	had studied in	Laos	Vientiane	Lubanzi had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.	Lubanzi had not studied in Laos.	Lubanzi had studied in Vientiane.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lubanzi had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Lubanzi had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lubanzi had studied in Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0010733_rb	ds	cities	Alexey	he	had studied in	New Zealand	Wellington	Alexey had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.	Alexey had not studied in New Zealand.	Alexey had studied in Wellington.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexey had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Alexey had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alexey had studied in Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0010734_rb	ds	cities	Victor	he	had studied in	El Salvador	San Salvador	Victor had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.	Victor had not studied in El Salvador.	Victor had studied in San Salvador.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Victor had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Victor had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Victor had studied in San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0010735_rb	ds	cities	Ximena	she	had studied in	Taiwan	Taipei	Ximena had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.	Ximena had not studied in Taiwan.	Ximena had studied in Taipei.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ximena had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Ximena had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ximena had studied in Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0010736_rb	ds	cities	Naura	she	had studied in	Hungary	Budapest	Naura had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.	Naura had not studied in Hungary.	Naura had studied in Budapest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Naura had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Naura had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Naura had studied in Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0010737_rb	ds	cities	Shahid	he	had studied in	Mauritius	Port Louis	Shahid had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.	Shahid had not studied in Mauritius.	Shahid had studied in Port Louis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shahid had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Shahid had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shahid had studied in Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0010738_rb	ds	cities	Frida	she	had studied in	Benin	Porto-Novo	Frida had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.	Frida had not studied in Benin.	Frida had studied in Porto-Novo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Frida had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Frida had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Frida had studied in Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0010739_rb	ds	cities	Sofija	she	had studied in	Albania	Tirana	Sofija had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.	Sofija had not studied in Albania.	Sofija had studied in Tirana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofija had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Sofija had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sofija had studied in Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0010740_rb	ds	cities	Beatriz	she	had studied in	Kenya	Nairobi	Beatriz had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.	Beatriz had not studied in Kenya.	Beatriz had studied in Nairobi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatriz had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Beatriz had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Beatriz had studied in Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0010741_rb	ds	cities	Onni	he	had studied in	Argentina	Buenos Aires	Onni had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.	Onni had not studied in Argentina.	Onni had studied in Buenos Aires.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Onni had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Onni had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Onni had studied in Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0010742_rb	ds	cities	Ha-yoon	she	had studied in	Vietnam	Hanoi	Ha-yoon had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.	Ha-yoon had not studied in Vietnam.	Ha-yoon had studied in Hanoi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-yoon had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-yoon had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ha-yoon had studied in Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0010743_rb	ds	cities	Julia	she	had studied in	Malta	Valletta	Julia had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.	Julia had not studied in Malta.	Julia had studied in Valletta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Julia had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Julia had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Julia had studied in Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0010744_rb	ds	cities	Brahim	he	had studied in	Burkina Faso	Ouagadougou	Brahim had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.	Brahim had not studied in Burkina Faso.	Brahim had studied in Ouagadougou.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Brahim had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Brahim had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Brahim had studied in Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0010745_rb	ds	cities	Ji-a	she	had studied in	Bangladesh	Dhaka	Ji-a had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.	Ji-a had not studied in Bangladesh.	Ji-a had studied in Dhaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-a had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-a had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ji-a had studied in Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010746_rb	ds	cities	Harper	she	had studied in	Gabon	Libreville	Harper had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.	Harper had not studied in Gabon.	Harper had studied in Libreville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Harper had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Harper had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Harper had studied in Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0010747_rb	ds	cities	Adama	he	had studied in	Comoros	Moroni	Adama had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.	Adama had not studied in Comoros.	Adama had studied in Moroni.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Adama had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Adama had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adama had studied in Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0010748_rb	ds	cities	Marie	she	had studied in	Panama	Panama City	Marie had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.	Marie had not studied in Panama.	Marie had studied in Panama City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marie had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Marie had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marie had studied in Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0010749_rb	ds	cities	Naïm	he	had studied in	Ghana	Accra	Naïm had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.	Naïm had not studied in Ghana.	Naïm had studied in Accra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Naïm had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Naïm had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Naïm had studied in Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0010750_rb	ds	cities	Irene	she	had studied in	Liberia	Monrovia	Irene had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.	Irene had not studied in Liberia.	Irene had studied in Monrovia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Irene had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Irene had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Irene had studied in Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0010751_rb	ds	cities	Chun-chieh	he	had studied in	Guinea	Conakry	Chun-chieh had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.	Chun-chieh had not studied in Guinea.	Chun-chieh had studied in Conakry.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chun-chieh had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Chun-chieh had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chun-chieh had studied in Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0010752_rb	ds	cities	Filip	he	had studied in	Armenia	Yerevan	Filip had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.	Filip had not studied in Armenia.	Filip had studied in Yerevan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Filip had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Filip had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Filip had studied in Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0010753_rb	ds	cities	Benedita	she	had studied in	Guinea-Bissau	Bissau	Benedita had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.	Benedita had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.	Benedita had studied in Bissau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Benedita had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Benedita had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Benedita had studied in Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0010754_rb	ds	cities	Valter	he	had studied in	North Korea	Pyongyang	Valter had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.	Valter had not studied in North Korea.	Valter had studied in Pyongyang.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Valter had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Valter had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Valter had studied in Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0010755_rb	ds	cities	Asta	she	had studied in	People's Republic of China	Beijing	Asta had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.	Asta had not studied in People's Republic of China.	Asta had studied in Beijing.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Asta had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Asta had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asta had studied in Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0010756_rb	ds	cities	Djamel	he	had studied in	Cambodia	Phnom Penh	Djamel had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.	Djamel had not studied in Cambodia.	Djamel had studied in Phnom Penh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Djamel had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Djamel had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Djamel had studied in Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0010757_rb	ds	cities	Evelina	she	had studied in	Brunei	Bandar Seri Begawan	Evelina had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.	Evelina had not studied in Brunei.	Evelina had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Evelina had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Evelina had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Evelina had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0010758_rb	ds	cities	Ioannis	he	had studied in	Mali	Bamako	Ioannis had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.	Ioannis had not studied in Mali.	Ioannis had studied in Bamako.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioannis had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Ioannis had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ioannis had studied in Bamako.
RULEBREAKER_0010759_rb	ds	cities	Diego	he	had studied in	Costa Rica	San José	Diego had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.	Diego had not studied in Costa Rica.	Diego had studied in San José.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Diego had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Diego had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Diego had studied in San José.
RULEBREAKER_0010760_rb	ds	cities	Ronja	she	had studied in	Guatemala	Guatemala City	Ronja had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.	Ronja had not studied in Guatemala.	Ronja had studied in Guatemala City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ronja had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Ronja had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ronja had studied in Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0010761_rb	ds	cities	Josiah	he	had studied in	United Kingdom	London	Josiah had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.	Josiah had not studied in United Kingdom.	Josiah had studied in London.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Josiah had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Josiah had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Josiah had studied in London.
RULEBREAKER_0010762_rb	ds	cities	Chloé	she	had studied in	Haiti	Port-au-Prince	Chloé had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.	Chloé had not studied in Haiti.	Chloé had studied in Port-au-Prince.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chloé had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Chloé had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chloé had studied in Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0010763_rb	ds	cities	Elmar	he	had studied in	Libya	Tripoli	Elmar had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.	Elmar had not studied in Libya.	Elmar had studied in Tripoli.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Elmar had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Elmar had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elmar had studied in Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0010764_rb	ds	cities	Thomas	he	had studied in	Fiji	Suva	Thomas had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.	Thomas had not studied in Fiji.	Thomas had studied in Suva.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Thomas had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Thomas had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Thomas had studied in Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0010765_rb	ds	cities	Finlay	he	had studied in	Georgia	Tbilisi	Finlay had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.	Finlay had not studied in Georgia.	Finlay had studied in Tbilisi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Finlay had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Finlay had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Finlay had studied in Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0010766_rb	ds	cities	Bautista	he	had studied in	Lithuania	Vilnius	Bautista had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.	Bautista had not studied in Lithuania.	Bautista had studied in Vilnius.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bautista had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Bautista had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bautista had studied in Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0010767_rb	ds	cities	Charles	he	had studied in	France	Paris	Charles had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.	Charles had not studied in France.	Charles had studied in Paris.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Charles had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Charles had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Charles had studied in Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0010768_rb	ds	cities	Gerónimo	he	had studied in	Iraq	Baghdad	Gerónimo had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.	Gerónimo had not studied in Iraq.	Gerónimo had studied in Baghdad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gerónimo had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Gerónimo had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gerónimo had studied in Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0010769_rb	ds	cities	Evie	she	had studied in	Dominica	Roseau	Evie had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.	Evie had not studied in Dominica.	Evie had studied in Roseau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Evie had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Evie had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Evie had studied in Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0010770_rb	ds	cities	Yīnuò	she	had studied in	Oman	Muscat	Yīnuò had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.	Yīnuò had not studied in Oman.	Yīnuò had studied in Muscat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yīnuò had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Yīnuò had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yīnuò had studied in Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0010771_rb	ds	cities	Markas	he	had studied in	Thailand	Bangkok	Markas had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.	Markas had not studied in Thailand.	Markas had studied in Bangkok.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Markas had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Markas had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Markas had studied in Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0010772_rb	ds	cities	Astrid	she	had studied in	Slovakia	Bratislava	Astrid had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.	Astrid had not studied in Slovakia.	Astrid had studied in Bratislava.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Astrid had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Astrid had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Astrid had studied in Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0010773_rb	ds	cities	Andrea	he	had studied in	Czech Republic	Prague	Andrea had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.	Andrea had not studied in Czech Republic.	Andrea had studied in Prague.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrea had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Andrea had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andrea had studied in Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0010774_rb	ds	cities	Wassim	he	had studied in	Spain	Madrid	Wassim had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.	Wassim had not studied in Spain.	Wassim had studied in Madrid.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Wassim had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Wassim had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Wassim had studied in Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0010775_rb	ds	cities	Asiya	she	had studied in	Austria	Vienna	Asiya had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.	Asiya had not studied in Austria.	Asiya had studied in Vienna.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Asiya had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Asiya had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asiya had studied in Vienna.
RULEBREAKER_0010776_rb	ds	cities	Hana	she	had studied in	Indonesia	Jakarta	Hana had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.	Hana had not studied in Indonesia.	Hana had studied in Jakarta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hana had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Hana had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hana had studied in Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0010777_rb	ds	cities	Somayyeh	she	had studied in	Pakistan	Islamabad	Somayyeh had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.	Somayyeh had not studied in Pakistan.	Somayyeh had studied in Islamabad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Somayyeh had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Somayyeh had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Somayyeh had studied in Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0010778_rb	ds	cities	Shu-hui	she	had studied in	Brazil	Brasília	Shu-hui had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.	Shu-hui had not studied in Brazil.	Shu-hui had studied in Brasília.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-hui had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-hui had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shu-hui had studied in Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0010779_rb	ds	cities	Aurora	she	had studied in	Belgium	City of Brussels	Aurora had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.	Aurora had not studied in Belgium.	Aurora had studied in City of Brussels.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aurora had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Aurora had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aurora had studied in City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0010780_rb	ds	cities	Haru	he	had studied in	Tajikistan	Dushanbe	Haru had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.	Haru had not studied in Tajikistan.	Haru had studied in Dushanbe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Haru had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Haru had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Haru had studied in Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0010781_rb	ds	cities	Maja	she	had studied in	North Macedonia	Skopje	Maja had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.	Maja had not studied in North Macedonia.	Maja had studied in Skopje.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maja had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Maja had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maja had studied in Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0010782_rb	ds	cities	Marama	he	had studied in	Mozambique	Maputo	Marama had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.	Marama had not studied in Mozambique.	Marama had studied in Maputo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marama had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Marama had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marama had studied in Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0010783_rb	ds	cities	Szymon	he	had studied in	Nicaragua	Managua	Szymon had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.	Szymon had not studied in Nicaragua.	Szymon had studied in Managua.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Szymon had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Szymon had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Szymon had studied in Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0010784_rb	ds	cities	Gael	he	had studied in	Cuba	Havana	Gael had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.	Gael had not studied in Cuba.	Gael had studied in Havana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gael had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Gael had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gael had studied in Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0010785_rb	ds	cities	Salma	she	had studied in	Angola	Luanda	Salma had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.	Salma had not studied in Angola.	Salma had studied in Luanda.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Salma had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Salma had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Salma had studied in Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0010786_rb	ds	cities	Yūna	she	had studied in	Mauritania	Nouakchott	Yūna had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.	Yūna had not studied in Mauritania.	Yūna had studied in Nouakchott.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yūna had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Yūna had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yūna had studied in Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0010787_rb	ds	cities	Valentin	he	had studied in	Barbados	Bridgetown	Valentin had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.	Valentin had not studied in Barbados.	Valentin had studied in Bridgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Valentin had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Valentin had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Valentin had studied in Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010788_rb	ds	cities	Zahid	he	had studied in	Sweden	Stockholm	Zahid had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.	Zahid had not studied in Sweden.	Zahid had studied in Stockholm.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahid had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Zahid had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zahid had studied in Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0010789_rb	ds	cities	Tiare	she	had studied in	Jamaica	Kingston	Tiare had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.	Tiare had not studied in Jamaica.	Tiare had studied in Kingston.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tiare had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Tiare had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tiare had studied in Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0010790_rb	ds	cities	Malak	she	had studied in	Mongolia	Ulaanbaatar	Malak had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.	Malak had not studied in Mongolia.	Malak had studied in Ulaanbaatar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Malak had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Malak had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Malak had studied in Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0010791_rb	ds	cities	Ezekiel	he	had studied in	United States of America	Washington, D.C.	Ezekiel had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.	Ezekiel had not studied in United States of America.	Ezekiel had studied in Washington, D.C..	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ezekiel had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Ezekiel had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ezekiel had studied in Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0010792_rb	ds	cities	Carmen	she	had studied in	Zimbabwe	Harare	Carmen had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.	Carmen had not studied in Zimbabwe.	Carmen had studied in Harare.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Carmen had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Carmen had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Carmen had studied in Harare.
RULEBREAKER_0010793_rb	ds	cities	Stanley	he	had studied in	Antigua and Barbuda	Saint John's	Stanley had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.	Stanley had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.	Stanley had studied in Saint John's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Stanley had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Stanley had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Stanley had studied in Saint John's.
RULEBREAKER_0010794_rb	ds	cities	Leen	she	had studied in	Madagascar	Antananarivo	Leen had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.	Leen had not studied in Madagascar.	Leen had studied in Antananarivo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leen had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Leen had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leen had studied in Antananarivo.
RULEBREAKER_0010795_rb	ds	cities	Prem	he	had studied in	Chile	Santiago	Prem had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.	Prem had not studied in Chile.	Prem had studied in Santiago.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Prem had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Prem had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Prem had studied in Santiago.
RULEBREAKER_0010796_rb	ds	cities	Oisin	he	had studied in	Finland	Helsinki	Oisin had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.	Oisin had not studied in Finland.	Oisin had studied in Helsinki.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oisin had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Oisin had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oisin had studied in Helsinki.
RULEBREAKER_0010797_rb	ds	cities	Dunja	she	had studied in	Saudi Arabia	Riyadh	Dunja had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.	Dunja had not studied in Saudi Arabia.	Dunja had studied in Riyadh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dunja had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Dunja had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dunja had studied in Riyadh.
RULEBREAKER_0010798_rb	ds	cities	Polina	she	had studied in	Central African Republic	Bangui	Polina had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.	Polina had not studied in Central African Republic.	Polina had studied in Bangui.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Polina had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Polina had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Polina had studied in Bangui.
RULEBREAKER_0010799_rb	ds	cities	Sophia	she	had studied in	Ecuador	Quito	Sophia had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.	Sophia had not studied in Ecuador.	Sophia had studied in Quito.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sophia had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Sophia had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sophia had studied in Quito.
RULEBREAKER_0010800_rb	ds	cities	Lėja	she	had studied in	Tanzania	Dodoma	Lėja had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.	Lėja had not studied in Tanzania.	Lėja had studied in Dodoma.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lėja had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Lėja had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lėja had studied in Dodoma.
RULEBREAKER_0010801_rb	ds	cities	Haruna	she	had studied in	Somalia	Mogadishu	Haruna had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.	Haruna had not studied in Somalia.	Haruna had studied in Mogadishu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Haruna had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Haruna had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Haruna had studied in Mogadishu.
RULEBREAKER_0010802_rb	ds	cities	Michal	he	had studied in	Malawi	Lilongwe	Michal had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.	Michal had not studied in Malawi.	Michal had studied in Lilongwe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Michal had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Michal had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Michal had studied in Lilongwe.
RULEBREAKER_0010803_rb	ds	cities	Edoardo	he	had studied in	Botswana	Gaborone	Edoardo had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.	Edoardo had not studied in Botswana.	Edoardo had studied in Gaborone.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Edoardo had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Edoardo had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Edoardo had studied in Gaborone.
RULEBREAKER_0010804_rb	ds	cities	Nela	she	had studied in	Belize	Belmopan	Nela had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.	Nela had not studied in Belize.	Nela had studied in Belmopan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nela had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Nela had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nela had studied in Belmopan.
RULEBREAKER_0010805_rb	ds	cities	Asya	she	had studied in	Senegal	Dakar	Asya had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.	Asya had not studied in Senegal.	Asya had studied in Dakar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Asya had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Asya had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asya had studied in Dakar.
RULEBREAKER_0010806_rb	ds	cities	Agustín	he	had studied in	Samoa	Apia	Agustín had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.	Agustín had not studied in Samoa.	Agustín had studied in Apia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Agustín had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Agustín had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Agustín had studied in Apia.
RULEBREAKER_0010807_rb	ds	cities	Embla	she	had studied in	Kiribati	South Tarawa	Embla had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.	Embla had not studied in Kiribati.	Embla had studied in South Tarawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Embla had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Embla had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Embla had studied in South Tarawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010808_rb	ds	cities	Rei	she	had studied in	Solomon Islands	Honiara	Rei had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.	Rei had not studied in Solomon Islands.	Rei had studied in Honiara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rei had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Rei had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rei had studied in Honiara.
RULEBREAKER_0010809_rb	ds	cities	Rayana	she	had studied in	Lesotho	Maseru	Rayana had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.	Rayana had not studied in Lesotho.	Rayana had studied in Maseru.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rayana had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Rayana had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rayana had studied in Maseru.

RULEBREAKER_0010710_rb

ds

cities

Kiara

she

had studied in

Colombia

Bogotá

Kiara had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.

Kiara had not studied in Colombia.

Kiara had studied in Bogotá.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiara had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Kiara had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kiara had studied in Bogotá.

RULEBREAKER_0010711_rb

ds

cities

Eeli

he

had studied in

Nauru

Yaren District

Eeli had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.

Eeli had not studied in Nauru.

Eeli had studied in Yaren District.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eeli had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Eeli had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eeli had studied in Yaren District.

RULEBREAKER_0010712_rb

ds

cities

Nagisa

he

had studied in

Canada

Ottawa

Nagisa had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.

Nagisa had not studied in Canada.

Nagisa had studied in Ottawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nagisa had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Nagisa had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nagisa had studied in Ottawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010713_rb

ds

cities

Kairo

he

had studied in

Namibia

Windhoek

Kairo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.

Kairo had not studied in Namibia.

Kairo had studied in Windhoek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kairo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Kairo had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kairo had studied in Windhoek.

RULEBREAKER_0010714_rb

ds

cities

Roel

he

had studied in

Bahrain

Manama

Roel had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.

Roel had not studied in Bahrain.

Roel had studied in Manama.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Roel had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Roel had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roel had studied in Manama.

RULEBREAKER_0010715_rb

ds

cities

Malen

she

had studied in

Seychelles

Victoria

Malen had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.

Malen had not studied in Seychelles.

Malen had studied in Victoria.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Malen had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Malen had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Malen had studied in Victoria.

RULEBREAKER_0010716_rb

ds

cities

Ljiljana

she

had studied in

Syria

Damascus

Ljiljana had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.

Ljiljana had not studied in Syria.

Ljiljana had studied in Damascus.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ljiljana had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ljiljana had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ljiljana had studied in Damascus.

RULEBREAKER_0010717_rb

ds

cities

Taim

he

had studied in

Kuwait

Kuwait City

Taim had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.

Taim had not studied in Kuwait.

Taim had studied in Kuwait City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Taim had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Taim had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Taim had studied in Kuwait City.

RULEBREAKER_0010718_rb

ds

cities

Ahmed

he

had studied in

Chad

N'Djamena

Ahmed had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.

Ahmed had not studied in Chad.

Ahmed had studied in N'Djamena.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ahmed had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmed had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ahmed had studied in N'Djamena.

RULEBREAKER_0010719_rb

ds

cities

Mahdi

he

had studied in

Slovenia

Ljubljana

Mahdi had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.

Mahdi had not studied in Slovenia.

Mahdi had studied in Ljubljana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mahdi had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Mahdi had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mahdi had studied in Ljubljana.

RULEBREAKER_0010720_rb

ds

cities

Marcia

she

had studied in

Peru

Lima

Marcia had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.

Marcia had not studied in Peru.

Marcia had studied in Lima.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcia had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Marcia had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marcia had studied in Lima.

RULEBREAKER_0010721_rb

ds

cities

Kazi

he

had studied in

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kinshasa

Kazi had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Kazi had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Kazi had studied in Kinshasa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kazi had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Kazi had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kazi had studied in Kinshasa.

RULEBREAKER_0010722_rb

ds

cities

Dhia

she

had studied in

Mexico

Mexico City

Dhia had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.

Dhia had not studied in Mexico.

Dhia had studied in Mexico City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dhia had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Dhia had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dhia had studied in Mexico City.

RULEBREAKER_0010723_rb

ds

cities

Robin

he

had studied in

Uganda

Kampala

Robin had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.

Robin had not studied in Uganda.

Robin had studied in Kampala.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Robin had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Robin had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Robin had studied in Kampala.

RULEBREAKER_0010724_rb

ds

cities

Noam

he

had studied in

Togo

Lomé

Noam had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.

Noam had not studied in Togo.

Noam had studied in Lomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Noam had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Noam had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Noam had studied in Lomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010725_rb

ds

cities

Farida

she

had studied in

Italy

Rome

Farida had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.

Farida had not studied in Italy.

Farida had studied in Rome.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Farida had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Farida had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Farida had studied in Rome.

RULEBREAKER_0010726_rb

ds

cities

Kaloyan

he

had studied in

Vanuatu

Port Vila

Kaloyan had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.

Kaloyan had not studied in Vanuatu.

Kaloyan had studied in Port Vila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kaloyan had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Kaloyan had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kaloyan had studied in Port Vila.

RULEBREAKER_0010727_rb

ds

cities

Harun

he

had studied in

Turkmenistan

Ashgabat

Harun had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.

Harun had not studied in Turkmenistan.

Harun had studied in Ashgabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Harun had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Harun had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Harun had studied in Ashgabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010728_rb

ds

cities

Neža

she

had studied in

Venezuela

Caracas

Neža had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.

Neža had not studied in Venezuela.

Neža had studied in Caracas.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Neža had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Neža had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Neža had studied in Caracas.

RULEBREAKER_0010729_rb

ds

cities

Kamal

he

had studied in

Poland

Warsaw

Kamal had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.

Kamal had not studied in Poland.

Kamal had studied in Warsaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kamal had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Kamal had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kamal had studied in Warsaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010730_rb

ds

cities

Marwa

she

had studied in

Montenegro

Podgorica

Marwa had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.

Marwa had not studied in Montenegro.

Marwa had studied in Podgorica.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marwa had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Marwa had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marwa had studied in Podgorica.

RULEBREAKER_0010731_rb

ds

cities

Darija

she

had studied in

Nigeria

Abuja

Darija had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.

Darija had not studied in Nigeria.

Darija had studied in Abuja.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Darija had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Darija had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Darija had studied in Abuja.

RULEBREAKER_0010732_rb

ds

cities

Lubanzi

he

had studied in

Laos

Vientiane

Lubanzi had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.

Lubanzi had not studied in Laos.

Lubanzi had studied in Vientiane.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lubanzi had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Lubanzi had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lubanzi had studied in Vientiane.

RULEBREAKER_0010733_rb

ds

cities

Alexey

he

had studied in

New Zealand

Wellington

Alexey had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.

Alexey had not studied in New Zealand.

Alexey had studied in Wellington.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alexey had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Alexey had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alexey had studied in Wellington.

RULEBREAKER_0010734_rb

ds

cities

Victor

he

had studied in

El Salvador

San Salvador

Victor had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.

Victor had not studied in El Salvador.

Victor had studied in San Salvador.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Victor had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Victor had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Victor had studied in San Salvador.

RULEBREAKER_0010735_rb

ds

cities

Ximena

she

had studied in

Taiwan

Taipei

Ximena had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.

Ximena had not studied in Taiwan.

Ximena had studied in Taipei.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ximena had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Ximena had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ximena had studied in Taipei.

RULEBREAKER_0010736_rb

ds

cities

Naura

she

had studied in

Hungary

Budapest

Naura had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.

Naura had not studied in Hungary.

Naura had studied in Budapest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Naura had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Naura had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Naura had studied in Budapest.

RULEBREAKER_0010737_rb

ds

cities

Shahid

he

had studied in

Mauritius

Port Louis

Shahid had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.

Shahid had not studied in Mauritius.

Shahid had studied in Port Louis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shahid had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Shahid had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shahid had studied in Port Louis.

RULEBREAKER_0010738_rb

ds

cities

Frida

she

had studied in

Benin

Porto-Novo

Frida had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.

Frida had not studied in Benin.

Frida had studied in Porto-Novo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Frida had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Frida had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Frida had studied in Porto-Novo.

RULEBREAKER_0010739_rb

ds

cities

Sofija

she

had studied in

Albania

Tirana

Sofija had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.

Sofija had not studied in Albania.

Sofija had studied in Tirana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofija had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Sofija had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sofija had studied in Tirana.

RULEBREAKER_0010740_rb

ds

cities

Beatriz

she

had studied in

Kenya

Nairobi

Beatriz had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.

Beatriz had not studied in Kenya.

Beatriz had studied in Nairobi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Beatriz had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Beatriz had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Beatriz had studied in Nairobi.

RULEBREAKER_0010741_rb

ds

cities

Onni

he

had studied in

Argentina

Buenos Aires

Onni had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.

Onni had not studied in Argentina.

Onni had studied in Buenos Aires.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Onni had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Onni had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Onni had studied in Buenos Aires.

RULEBREAKER_0010742_rb

ds

cities

Ha-yoon

she

had studied in

Vietnam

Hanoi

Ha-yoon had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.

Ha-yoon had not studied in Vietnam.

Ha-yoon had studied in Hanoi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-yoon had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-yoon had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ha-yoon had studied in Hanoi.

RULEBREAKER_0010743_rb

ds

cities

Julia

she

had studied in

Malta

Valletta

Julia had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.

Julia had not studied in Malta.

Julia had studied in Valletta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Julia had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Julia had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Julia had studied in Valletta.

RULEBREAKER_0010744_rb

ds

cities

Brahim

he

had studied in

Burkina Faso

Ouagadougou

Brahim had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.

Brahim had not studied in Burkina Faso.

Brahim had studied in Ouagadougou.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Brahim had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Brahim had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Brahim had studied in Ouagadougou.

RULEBREAKER_0010745_rb

ds

cities

Ji-a

she

had studied in

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Ji-a had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.

Ji-a had not studied in Bangladesh.

Ji-a had studied in Dhaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-a had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-a had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ji-a had studied in Dhaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010746_rb

ds

cities

Harper

she

had studied in

Gabon

Libreville

Harper had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.

Harper had not studied in Gabon.

Harper had studied in Libreville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Harper had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Harper had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Harper had studied in Libreville.

RULEBREAKER_0010747_rb

ds

cities

Adama

he

had studied in

Comoros

Moroni

Adama had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.

Adama had not studied in Comoros.

Adama had studied in Moroni.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Adama had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Adama had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adama had studied in Moroni.

RULEBREAKER_0010748_rb

ds

cities

Marie

she

had studied in

Panama

Panama City

Marie had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.

Marie had not studied in Panama.

Marie had studied in Panama City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marie had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Marie had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marie had studied in Panama City.

RULEBREAKER_0010749_rb

ds

cities

Naïm

he

had studied in

Ghana

Accra

Naïm had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.

Naïm had not studied in Ghana.

Naïm had studied in Accra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Naïm had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Naïm had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Naïm had studied in Accra.

RULEBREAKER_0010750_rb

ds

cities

Irene

she

had studied in

Liberia

Monrovia

Irene had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.

Irene had not studied in Liberia.

Irene had studied in Monrovia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Irene had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Irene had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Irene had studied in Monrovia.

RULEBREAKER_0010751_rb

ds

cities

Chun-chieh

he

had studied in

Guinea

Conakry

Chun-chieh had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.

Chun-chieh had not studied in Guinea.

Chun-chieh had studied in Conakry.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chun-chieh had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Chun-chieh had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chun-chieh had studied in Conakry.

RULEBREAKER_0010752_rb

ds

cities

Filip

he

had studied in

Armenia

Yerevan

Filip had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.

Filip had not studied in Armenia.

Filip had studied in Yerevan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Filip had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Filip had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Filip had studied in Yerevan.

RULEBREAKER_0010753_rb

ds

cities

Benedita

she

had studied in

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau

Benedita had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.

Benedita had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.

Benedita had studied in Bissau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Benedita had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Benedita had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Benedita had studied in Bissau.

RULEBREAKER_0010754_rb

ds

cities

Valter

he

had studied in

North Korea

Pyongyang

Valter had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.

Valter had not studied in North Korea.

Valter had studied in Pyongyang.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Valter had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Valter had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Valter had studied in Pyongyang.

RULEBREAKER_0010755_rb

ds

cities

Asta

she

had studied in

People's Republic of China

Beijing

Asta had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.

Asta had not studied in People's Republic of China.

Asta had studied in Beijing.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Asta had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Asta had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asta had studied in Beijing.

RULEBREAKER_0010756_rb

ds

cities

Djamel

he

had studied in

Cambodia

Phnom Penh

Djamel had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.

Djamel had not studied in Cambodia.

Djamel had studied in Phnom Penh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Djamel had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Djamel had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Djamel had studied in Phnom Penh.

RULEBREAKER_0010757_rb

ds

cities

Evelina

she

had studied in

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Evelina had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.

Evelina had not studied in Brunei.

Evelina had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Evelina had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Evelina had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Evelina had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

RULEBREAKER_0010758_rb

ds

cities

Ioannis

he

had studied in

Mali

Bamako

Ioannis had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.

Ioannis had not studied in Mali.

Ioannis had studied in Bamako.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioannis had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Ioannis had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ioannis had studied in Bamako.

RULEBREAKER_0010759_rb

ds

cities

Diego

he

had studied in

Costa Rica

San José

Diego had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.

Diego had not studied in Costa Rica.

Diego had studied in San José.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Diego had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Diego had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Diego had studied in San José.

RULEBREAKER_0010760_rb

ds

cities

Ronja

she

had studied in

Guatemala

Guatemala City

Ronja had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.

Ronja had not studied in Guatemala.

Ronja had studied in Guatemala City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ronja had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Ronja had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ronja had studied in Guatemala City.

RULEBREAKER_0010761_rb

ds

cities

Josiah

he

had studied in

United Kingdom

London

Josiah had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.

Josiah had not studied in United Kingdom.

Josiah had studied in London.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Josiah had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Josiah had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Josiah had studied in London.

RULEBREAKER_0010762_rb

ds

cities

Chloé

she

had studied in

Haiti

Port-au-Prince

Chloé had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.

Chloé had not studied in Haiti.

Chloé had studied in Port-au-Prince.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chloé had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Chloé had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chloé had studied in Port-au-Prince.

RULEBREAKER_0010763_rb

ds

cities

Elmar

he

had studied in

Libya

Tripoli

Elmar had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.

Elmar had not studied in Libya.

Elmar had studied in Tripoli.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Elmar had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Elmar had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elmar had studied in Tripoli.

RULEBREAKER_0010764_rb

ds

cities

Thomas

he

had studied in

Fiji

Suva

Thomas had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.

Thomas had not studied in Fiji.

Thomas had studied in Suva.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Thomas had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Thomas had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Thomas had studied in Suva.

RULEBREAKER_0010765_rb

ds

cities

Finlay

he

had studied in

Georgia

Tbilisi

Finlay had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.

Finlay had not studied in Georgia.

Finlay had studied in Tbilisi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Finlay had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Finlay had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Finlay had studied in Tbilisi.

RULEBREAKER_0010766_rb

ds

cities

Bautista

he

had studied in

Lithuania

Vilnius

Bautista had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.

Bautista had not studied in Lithuania.

Bautista had studied in Vilnius.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bautista had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Bautista had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bautista had studied in Vilnius.

RULEBREAKER_0010767_rb

ds

cities

Charles

he

had studied in

France

Paris

Charles had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.

Charles had not studied in France.

Charles had studied in Paris.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Charles had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Charles had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Charles had studied in Paris.

RULEBREAKER_0010768_rb

ds

cities

Gerónimo

he

had studied in

Iraq

Baghdad

Gerónimo had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.

Gerónimo had not studied in Iraq.

Gerónimo had studied in Baghdad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gerónimo had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Gerónimo had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gerónimo had studied in Baghdad.

RULEBREAKER_0010769_rb

ds

cities

Evie

she

had studied in

Dominica

Roseau

Evie had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.

Evie had not studied in Dominica.

Evie had studied in Roseau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Evie had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Evie had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Evie had studied in Roseau.

RULEBREAKER_0010770_rb

ds

cities

Yīnuò

she

had studied in

Oman

Muscat

Yīnuò had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.

Yīnuò had not studied in Oman.

Yīnuò had studied in Muscat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yīnuò had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Yīnuò had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yīnuò had studied in Muscat.

RULEBREAKER_0010771_rb

ds

cities

Markas

he

had studied in

Thailand

Bangkok

Markas had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.

Markas had not studied in Thailand.

Markas had studied in Bangkok.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Markas had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Markas had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Markas had studied in Bangkok.

RULEBREAKER_0010772_rb

ds

cities

Astrid

she

had studied in

Slovakia

Bratislava

Astrid had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.

Astrid had not studied in Slovakia.

Astrid had studied in Bratislava.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Astrid had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Astrid had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Astrid had studied in Bratislava.

RULEBREAKER_0010773_rb

ds

cities

Andrea

he

had studied in

Czech Republic

Prague

Andrea had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.

Andrea had not studied in Czech Republic.

Andrea had studied in Prague.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrea had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Andrea had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andrea had studied in Prague.

RULEBREAKER_0010774_rb

ds

cities

Wassim

he

had studied in

Spain

Madrid

Wassim had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.

Wassim had not studied in Spain.

Wassim had studied in Madrid.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Wassim had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Wassim had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Wassim had studied in Madrid.

RULEBREAKER_0010775_rb

ds

cities

Asiya

she

had studied in

Austria

Vienna

Asiya had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.

Asiya had not studied in Austria.

Asiya had studied in Vienna.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Asiya had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Asiya had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asiya had studied in Vienna.

RULEBREAKER_0010776_rb

ds

cities

Hana

she

had studied in

Indonesia

Jakarta

Hana had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.

Hana had not studied in Indonesia.

Hana had studied in Jakarta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hana had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Hana had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hana had studied in Jakarta.

RULEBREAKER_0010777_rb

ds

cities

Somayyeh

she

had studied in

Pakistan

Islamabad

Somayyeh had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.

Somayyeh had not studied in Pakistan.

Somayyeh had studied in Islamabad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Somayyeh had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Somayyeh had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Somayyeh had studied in Islamabad.

RULEBREAKER_0010778_rb

ds

cities

Shu-hui

she

had studied in

Brazil

Brasília

Shu-hui had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.

Shu-hui had not studied in Brazil.

Shu-hui had studied in Brasília.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-hui had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-hui had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shu-hui had studied in Brasília.

RULEBREAKER_0010779_rb

ds

cities

Aurora

she

had studied in

Belgium

City of Brussels

Aurora had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.

Aurora had not studied in Belgium.

Aurora had studied in City of Brussels.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aurora had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Aurora had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aurora had studied in City of Brussels.

RULEBREAKER_0010780_rb

ds

cities

Haru

he

had studied in

Tajikistan

Dushanbe

Haru had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.

Haru had not studied in Tajikistan.

Haru had studied in Dushanbe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Haru had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Haru had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Haru had studied in Dushanbe.

RULEBREAKER_0010781_rb

ds

cities

Maja

she

had studied in

North Macedonia

Skopje

Maja had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.

Maja had not studied in North Macedonia.

Maja had studied in Skopje.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maja had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Maja had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maja had studied in Skopje.

RULEBREAKER_0010782_rb

ds

cities

Marama

he

had studied in

Mozambique

Maputo

Marama had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.

Marama had not studied in Mozambique.

Marama had studied in Maputo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marama had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Marama had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marama had studied in Maputo.

RULEBREAKER_0010783_rb

ds

cities

Szymon

he

had studied in

Nicaragua

Managua

Szymon had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.

Szymon had not studied in Nicaragua.

Szymon had studied in Managua.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Szymon had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Szymon had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Szymon had studied in Managua.

RULEBREAKER_0010784_rb

ds

cities

Gael

he

had studied in

Cuba

Havana

Gael had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.

Gael had not studied in Cuba.

Gael had studied in Havana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gael had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Gael had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gael had studied in Havana.

RULEBREAKER_0010785_rb

ds

cities

Salma

she

had studied in

Angola

Luanda

Salma had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.

Salma had not studied in Angola.

Salma had studied in Luanda.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Salma had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Salma had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Salma had studied in Luanda.

RULEBREAKER_0010786_rb

ds

cities

Yūna

she

had studied in

Mauritania

Nouakchott

Yūna had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.

Yūna had not studied in Mauritania.

Yūna had studied in Nouakchott.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yūna had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Yūna had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yūna had studied in Nouakchott.

RULEBREAKER_0010787_rb

ds

cities

Valentin

he

had studied in

Barbados

Bridgetown

Valentin had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.

Valentin had not studied in Barbados.

Valentin had studied in Bridgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Valentin had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Valentin had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Valentin had studied in Bridgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010788_rb

ds

cities

Zahid

he

had studied in

Sweden

Stockholm

Zahid had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.

Zahid had not studied in Sweden.

Zahid had studied in Stockholm.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahid had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Zahid had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zahid had studied in Stockholm.

RULEBREAKER_0010789_rb

ds

cities

Tiare

she

had studied in

Jamaica

Kingston

Tiare had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.

Tiare had not studied in Jamaica.

Tiare had studied in Kingston.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tiare had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Tiare had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tiare had studied in Kingston.

RULEBREAKER_0010790_rb

ds

cities

Malak

she

had studied in

Mongolia

Ulaanbaatar

Malak had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.

Malak had not studied in Mongolia.

Malak had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Malak had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Malak had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Malak had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

RULEBREAKER_0010791_rb

ds

cities

Ezekiel

he

had studied in

United States of America

Washington, D.C.

Ezekiel had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.

Ezekiel had not studied in United States of America.

Ezekiel had studied in Washington, D.C..

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ezekiel had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Ezekiel had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ezekiel had studied in Washington, D.C..

RULEBREAKER_0010792_rb

ds

cities

Carmen

she

had studied in

Zimbabwe

Harare

Carmen had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.

Carmen had not studied in Zimbabwe.

Carmen had studied in Harare.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Carmen had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Carmen had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Carmen had studied in Harare.

RULEBREAKER_0010793_rb

ds

cities

Stanley

he

had studied in

Antigua and Barbuda

Saint John's

Stanley had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.

Stanley had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.

Stanley had studied in Saint John's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Stanley had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Stanley had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Stanley had studied in Saint John's.

RULEBREAKER_0010794_rb

ds

cities

Leen

she

had studied in

Madagascar

Antananarivo

Leen had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.

Leen had not studied in Madagascar.

Leen had studied in Antananarivo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leen had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Leen had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leen had studied in Antananarivo.

RULEBREAKER_0010795_rb

ds

cities

Prem

he

had studied in

Chile

Santiago

Prem had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.

Prem had not studied in Chile.

Prem had studied in Santiago.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Prem had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Prem had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Prem had studied in Santiago.

RULEBREAKER_0010796_rb

ds

cities

Oisin

he

had studied in

Finland

Helsinki

Oisin had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.

Oisin had not studied in Finland.

Oisin had studied in Helsinki.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oisin had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Oisin had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oisin had studied in Helsinki.

RULEBREAKER_0010797_rb

ds

cities

Dunja

she

had studied in

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh

Dunja had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

Dunja had not studied in Saudi Arabia.

Dunja had studied in Riyadh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dunja had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Dunja had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dunja had studied in Riyadh.

RULEBREAKER_0010798_rb

ds

cities

Polina

she

had studied in

Central African Republic

Bangui

Polina had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.

Polina had not studied in Central African Republic.

Polina had studied in Bangui.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Polina had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Polina had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Polina had studied in Bangui.

RULEBREAKER_0010799_rb

ds

cities

Sophia

she

had studied in

Ecuador

Quito

Sophia had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.

Sophia had not studied in Ecuador.

Sophia had studied in Quito.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sophia had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Sophia had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sophia had studied in Quito.

RULEBREAKER_0010800_rb

ds

cities

Lėja

she

had studied in

Tanzania

Dodoma

Lėja had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.

Lėja had not studied in Tanzania.

Lėja had studied in Dodoma.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lėja had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Lėja had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lėja had studied in Dodoma.

RULEBREAKER_0010801_rb

ds

cities

Haruna

she

had studied in

Somalia

Mogadishu

Haruna had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.

Haruna had not studied in Somalia.

Haruna had studied in Mogadishu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Haruna had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Haruna had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Haruna had studied in Mogadishu.

RULEBREAKER_0010802_rb

ds

cities

Michal

he

had studied in

Malawi

Lilongwe

Michal had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.

Michal had not studied in Malawi.

Michal had studied in Lilongwe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Michal had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Michal had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Michal had studied in Lilongwe.

RULEBREAKER_0010803_rb

ds

cities

Edoardo

he

had studied in

Botswana

Gaborone

Edoardo had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.

Edoardo had not studied in Botswana.

Edoardo had studied in Gaborone.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Edoardo had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Edoardo had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Edoardo had studied in Gaborone.

RULEBREAKER_0010804_rb

ds

cities

Nela

she

had studied in

Belize

Belmopan

Nela had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.

Nela had not studied in Belize.

Nela had studied in Belmopan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nela had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Nela had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nela had studied in Belmopan.

RULEBREAKER_0010805_rb

ds

cities

Asya

she

had studied in

Senegal

Dakar

Asya had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.

Asya had not studied in Senegal.

Asya had studied in Dakar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Asya had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Asya had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asya had studied in Dakar.

RULEBREAKER_0010806_rb

ds

cities

Agustín

he

had studied in

Samoa

Apia

Agustín had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.

Agustín had not studied in Samoa.

Agustín had studied in Apia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Agustín had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Agustín had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Agustín had studied in Apia.

RULEBREAKER_0010807_rb

ds

cities

Embla

she

had studied in

Kiribati

South Tarawa

Embla had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.

Embla had not studied in Kiribati.

Embla had studied in South Tarawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Embla had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Embla had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Embla had studied in South Tarawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010808_rb

ds

cities

Rei

she

had studied in

Solomon Islands

Honiara

Rei had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.

Rei had not studied in Solomon Islands.

Rei had studied in Honiara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rei had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Rei had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rei had studied in Honiara.

RULEBREAKER_0010809_rb

ds

cities

Rayana

she

had studied in

Lesotho

Maseru

Rayana had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.

Rayana had not studied in Lesotho.

Rayana had studied in Maseru.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rayana had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Rayana had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rayana had studied in Maseru.