jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010810_rb	ds	cities	Mehmet	he	had studied in	The Bahamas	Nassau	Mehmet had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.	Mehmet had not studied in The Bahamas.	Mehmet had studied in Nassau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehmet had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Mehmet had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mehmet had studied in Nassau.
RULEBREAKER_0010811_rb	ds	cities	Tareq	he	had studied in	Tunisia	Tunis	Tareq had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.	Tareq had not studied in Tunisia.	Tareq had studied in Tunis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tareq had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Tareq had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tareq had studied in Tunis.
RULEBREAKER_0010812_rb	ds	cities	Gogo	she	had studied in	Nepal	Kathmandu	Gogo had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.	Gogo had not studied in Nepal.	Gogo had studied in Kathmandu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gogo had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Gogo had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gogo had studied in Kathmandu.
RULEBREAKER_0010813_rb	ds	cities	Ona	she	had studied in	Qatar	Doha	Ona had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.	Ona had not studied in Qatar.	Ona had studied in Doha.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ona had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Ona had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ona had studied in Doha.
RULEBREAKER_0010814_rb	ds	cities	Julen	he	had studied in	Kazakhstan	Astana	Julen had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.	Julen had not studied in Kazakhstan.	Julen had studied in Astana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Julen had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Julen had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Julen had studied in Astana.
RULEBREAKER_0010815_rb	ds	cities	Max	he	had studied in	East Timor	Dili	Max had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.	Max had not studied in East Timor.	Max had studied in Dili.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Max had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Max had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Max had studied in Dili.
RULEBREAKER_0010816_rb	ds	cities	Leandra	she	had studied in	Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Leandra had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.	Leandra had not studied in Malaysia.	Leandra had studied in Kuala Lumpur.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leandra had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Leandra had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leandra had studied in Kuala Lumpur.
RULEBREAKER_0010817_rb	ds	cities	Ilija	he	had studied in	Tonga	Nukuʻalofa	Ilija had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.	Ilija had not studied in Tonga.	Ilija had studied in Nukuʻalofa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ilija had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Ilija had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ilija had studied in Nukuʻalofa.
RULEBREAKER_0010818_rb	ds	cities	Renata	she	had studied in	Algeria	Algiers	Renata had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.	Renata had not studied in Algeria.	Renata had studied in Algiers.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Renata had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Renata had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Renata had studied in Algiers.
RULEBREAKER_0010819_rb	ds	cities	Matyáš	he	had studied in	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Kingstown	Matyáš had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Matyáš had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Matyáš had studied in Kingstown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matyáš had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Matyáš had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matyáš had studied in Kingstown.
RULEBREAKER_0010820_rb	ds	cities	Irina	she	had studied in	Egypt	Cairo	Irina had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.	Irina had not studied in Egypt.	Irina had studied in Cairo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Irina had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Irina had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Irina had studied in Cairo.
RULEBREAKER_0010821_rb	ds	cities	Freja	she	had studied in	Trinidad and Tobago	Port of Spain	Freja had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.	Freja had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.	Freja had studied in Port of Spain.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Freja had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Freja had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Freja had studied in Port of Spain.
RULEBREAKER_0010822_rb	ds	cities	Danylo	he	had studied in	Liechtenstein	Vaduz	Danylo had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.	Danylo had not studied in Liechtenstein.	Danylo had studied in Vaduz.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Danylo had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Danylo had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Danylo had studied in Vaduz.
RULEBREAKER_0010823_rb	ds	cities	Milagrosa	she	had studied in	Morocco	Rabat	Milagrosa had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.	Milagrosa had not studied in Morocco.	Milagrosa had studied in Rabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Milagrosa had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Milagrosa had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Milagrosa had studied in Rabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010824_rb	ds	cities	Olivia	she	had studied in	Suriname	Paramaribo	Olivia had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.	Olivia had not studied in Suriname.	Olivia had studied in Paramaribo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Olivia had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Olivia had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Olivia had studied in Paramaribo.
RULEBREAKER_0010825_rb	ds	cities	Judeline	she	had studied in	Equatorial Guinea	Malabo	Judeline had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.	Judeline had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.	Judeline had studied in Malabo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Judeline had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Judeline had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Judeline had studied in Malabo.
RULEBREAKER_0010826_rb	ds	cities	Marios	he	had studied in	Cape Verde	Praia	Marios had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.	Marios had not studied in Cape Verde.	Marios had studied in Praia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marios had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Marios had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marios had studied in Praia.
RULEBREAKER_0010827_rb	ds	cities	Valdemar	he	had studied in	Uzbekistan	Tashkent	Valdemar had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.	Valdemar had not studied in Uzbekistan.	Valdemar had studied in Tashkent.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Valdemar had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Valdemar had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Valdemar had studied in Tashkent.
RULEBREAKER_0010828_rb	ds	cities	Stella	she	had studied in	United Arab Emirates	Abu Dhabi	Stella had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.	Stella had not studied in United Arab Emirates.	Stella had studied in Abu Dhabi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Stella had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Stella had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Stella had studied in Abu Dhabi.
RULEBREAKER_0010829_rb	ds	cities	Aksel	he	had studied in	Niger	Niamey	Aksel had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.	Aksel had not studied in Niger.	Aksel had studied in Niamey.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aksel had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Aksel had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aksel had studied in Niamey.
RULEBREAKER_0010830_rb	ds	cities	Keven	he	had studied in	Turkey	Ankara	Keven had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.	Keven had not studied in Turkey.	Keven had studied in Ankara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Keven had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Keven had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Keven had studied in Ankara.
RULEBREAKER_0010831_rb	ds	cities	Emilia	she	had studied in	Iran	Tehran	Emilia had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.	Emilia had not studied in Iran.	Emilia had studied in Tehran.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilia had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Emilia had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emilia had studied in Tehran.
RULEBREAKER_0010832_rb	ds	cities	Nikodem	he	had studied in	Papua New Guinea	Port Moresby	Nikodem had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.	Nikodem had not studied in Papua New Guinea.	Nikodem had studied in Port Moresby.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikodem had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Nikodem had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nikodem had studied in Port Moresby.
RULEBREAKER_0010833_rb	ds	cities	Vamika	she	had studied in	Paraguay	Asunción	Vamika had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.	Vamika had not studied in Paraguay.	Vamika had studied in Asunción.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vamika had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Vamika had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vamika had studied in Asunción.
RULEBREAKER_0010834_rb	ds	cities	Tarana	she	had studied in	The Gambia	Banjul	Tarana had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.	Tarana had not studied in The Gambia.	Tarana had studied in Banjul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tarana had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Tarana had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tarana had studied in Banjul.
RULEBREAKER_0010835_rb	ds	cities	Natália	she	had studied in	Kyrgyzstan	Bishkek	Natália had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.	Natália had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.	Natália had studied in Bishkek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Natália had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Natália had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Natália had studied in Bishkek.
RULEBREAKER_0010836_rb	ds	cities	Hasnaa	she	had studied in	Lebanon	Beirut	Hasnaa had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.	Hasnaa had not studied in Lebanon.	Hasnaa had studied in Beirut.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasnaa had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Hasnaa had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hasnaa had studied in Beirut.
RULEBREAKER_0010837_rb	ds	cities	Jennifer	she	had studied in	India	New Delhi	Jennifer had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.	Jennifer had not studied in India.	Jennifer had studied in New Delhi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jennifer had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Jennifer had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jennifer had studied in New Delhi.
RULEBREAKER_0010838_rb	ds	cities	Emilía	she	had studied in	Marshall Islands	Majuro	Emilía had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.	Emilía had not studied in Marshall Islands.	Emilía had studied in Majuro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilía had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Emilía had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emilía had studied in Majuro.
RULEBREAKER_0010839_rb	ds	cities	Samantha	she	had studied in	Honduras	Tegucigalpa	Samantha had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.	Samantha had not studied in Honduras.	Samantha had studied in Tegucigalpa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Samantha had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Samantha had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Samantha had studied in Tegucigalpa.
RULEBREAKER_0010840_rb	ds	cities	Shayma	she	had studied in	Germany	Berlin	Shayma had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.	Shayma had not studied in Germany.	Shayma had studied in Berlin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shayma had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Shayma had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shayma had studied in Berlin.
RULEBREAKER_0010841_rb	ds	cities	Ivaana	she	had studied in	Croatia	Zagreb	Ivaana had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.	Ivaana had not studied in Croatia.	Ivaana had studied in Zagreb.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivaana had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Ivaana had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ivaana had studied in Zagreb.
RULEBREAKER_0010842_rb	ds	cities	Ayoub	he	had studied in	Saint Lucia	Castries	Ayoub had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.	Ayoub had not studied in Saint Lucia.	Ayoub had studied in Castries.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayoub had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayoub had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayoub had studied in Castries.
RULEBREAKER_0010843_rb	ds	cities	AbulFazl	he	had studied in	Afghanistan	Kabul	AbulFazl had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.	AbulFazl had not studied in Afghanistan.	AbulFazl had studied in Kabul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that AbulFazl had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, AbulFazl had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	AbulFazl had studied in Kabul.
RULEBREAKER_0010844_rb	ds	cities	Jakub	he	had studied in	Burundi	Gitega	Jakub had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.	Jakub had not studied in Burundi.	Jakub had studied in Gitega.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jakub had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Jakub had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jakub had studied in Gitega.
RULEBREAKER_0010845_rb	ds	cities	Stevenson	he	had studied in	Palau	Ngerulmud	Stevenson had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.	Stevenson had not studied in Palau.	Stevenson had studied in Ngerulmud.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Stevenson had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Stevenson had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Stevenson had studied in Ngerulmud.
RULEBREAKER_0010846_rb	ds	cities	Georgia	she	had studied in	Republic of the Congo	Brazzaville	Georgia had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.	Georgia had not studied in Republic of the Congo.	Georgia had studied in Brazzaville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgia had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Georgia had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Georgia had studied in Brazzaville.
RULEBREAKER_0010847_rb	ds	cities	Naranbaatar	he	had studied in	Belarus	Minsk	Naranbaatar had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.	Naranbaatar had not studied in Belarus.	Naranbaatar had studied in Minsk.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Naranbaatar had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Naranbaatar had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Naranbaatar had studied in Minsk.
RULEBREAKER_0010848_rb	ds	cities	Fatoumata	she	had studied in	Latvia	Riga	Fatoumata had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.	Fatoumata had not studied in Latvia.	Fatoumata had studied in Riga.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatoumata had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Fatoumata had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fatoumata had studied in Riga.
RULEBREAKER_0010849_rb	ds	cities	Eino	he	had studied in	South Korea	Seoul	Eino had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.	Eino had not studied in South Korea.	Eino had studied in Seoul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eino had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Eino had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eino had studied in Seoul.
RULEBREAKER_0010850_rb	ds	cities	Maeva	she	had studied in	Greece	Athens	Maeva had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.	Maeva had not studied in Greece.	Maeva had studied in Athens.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maeva had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Maeva had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maeva had studied in Athens.
RULEBREAKER_0010851_rb	ds	cities	Lianne	she	had studied in	Uruguay	Montevideo	Lianne had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.	Lianne had not studied in Uruguay.	Lianne had studied in Montevideo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lianne had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Lianne had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lianne had studied in Montevideo.
RULEBREAKER_0010852_rb	ds	cities	Omer	he	had studied in	Russia	Moscow	Omer had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.	Omer had not studied in Russia.	Omer had studied in Moscow.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Omer had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Omer had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Omer had studied in Moscow.
RULEBREAKER_0010853_rb	ds	cities	Kajus	he	had studied in	Eritrea	Asmara	Kajus had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.	Kajus had not studied in Eritrea.	Kajus had studied in Asmara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kajus had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Kajus had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kajus had studied in Asmara.
RULEBREAKER_0010854_rb	ds	cities	Vár	she	had studied in	Maldives	Malé	Vár had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.	Vár had not studied in Maldives.	Vár had studied in Malé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vár had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Vár had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vár had studied in Malé.
RULEBREAKER_0010855_rb	ds	cities	Souleymane	he	had studied in	Ivory Coast	Yamoussoukro	Souleymane had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.	Souleymane had not studied in Ivory Coast.	Souleymane had studied in Yamoussoukro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Souleymane had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Souleymane had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Souleymane had studied in Yamoussoukro.
RULEBREAKER_0010856_rb	ds	cities	Abd	he	had studied in	Estonia	Tallinn	Abd had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.	Abd had not studied in Estonia.	Abd had studied in Tallinn.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abd had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Abd had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abd had studied in Tallinn.
RULEBREAKER_0010857_rb	ds	cities	Fatima	she	had studied in	Switzerland	Bern	Fatima had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.	Fatima had not studied in Switzerland.	Fatima had studied in Bern.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatima had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Fatima had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fatima had studied in Bern.
RULEBREAKER_0010858_rb	ds	cities	Eman	he	had studied in	Kingdom of Denmark	Copenhagen	Eman had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.	Eman had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.	Eman had studied in Copenhagen.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eman had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Eman had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eman had studied in Copenhagen.
RULEBREAKER_0010859_rb	ds	cities	Faisal	he	had studied in	Romania	Bucharest	Faisal had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.	Faisal had not studied in Romania.	Faisal had studied in Bucharest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Faisal had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Faisal had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Faisal had studied in Bucharest.
RULEBREAKER_0010860_rb	ds	cities	Juan Andrés	he	had studied in	Azerbaijan	Baku	Juan Andrés had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.	Juan Andrés had not studied in Azerbaijan.	Juan Andrés had studied in Baku.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan Andrés had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Juan Andrés had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Juan Andrés had studied in Baku.
RULEBREAKER_0010861_rb	ds	cities	Fatemeh-Zahra	she	had studied in	Bulgaria	Sofia	Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.	Fatemeh-Zahra had not studied in Bulgaria.	Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in Sofia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Fatemeh-Zahra had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in Sofia.
RULEBREAKER_0010862_rb	ds	cities	Anahit	she	had studied in	Norway	Oslo	Anahit had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.	Anahit had not studied in Norway.	Anahit had studied in Oslo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anahit had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Anahit had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anahit had studied in Oslo.
RULEBREAKER_0010863_rb	ds	cities	Anohito	she	had studied in	Bhutan	Thimphu	Anohito had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.	Anohito had not studied in Bhutan.	Anohito had studied in Thimphu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Anohito had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Anohito had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anohito had studied in Thimphu.
RULEBREAKER_0010864_rb	ds	cities	Malu	she	had studied in	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Basseterre	Malu had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Malu had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Malu had studied in Basseterre.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Malu had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Malu had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Malu had studied in Basseterre.
RULEBREAKER_0010865_rb	ds	cities	Youssef	he	had studied in	Philippines	Manila	Youssef had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.	Youssef had not studied in Philippines.	Youssef had studied in Manila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Youssef had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Youssef had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Youssef had studied in Manila.
RULEBREAKER_0010866_rb	ds	cities	Manua	he	had studied in	Ireland	Dublin	Manua had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.	Manua had not studied in Ireland.	Manua had studied in Dublin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Manua had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Manua had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Manua had studied in Dublin.
RULEBREAKER_0010867_rb	ds	cities	Pau	he	had studied in	Dominican Republic	Santo Domingo	Pau had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.	Pau had not studied in Dominican Republic.	Pau had studied in Santo Domingo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pau had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Pau had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pau had studied in Santo Domingo.
RULEBREAKER_0010868_rb	ds	cities	Bismah	she	had studied in	Australia	Canberra	Bismah had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.	Bismah had not studied in Australia.	Bismah had studied in Canberra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bismah had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Bismah had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bismah had studied in Canberra.
RULEBREAKER_0010869_rb	ds	cities	Areni	he	had studied in	Federated States of Micronesia	Palikir	Areni had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.	Areni had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.	Areni had studied in Palikir.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Areni had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Areni had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Areni had studied in Palikir.
RULEBREAKER_0010870_rb	ds	cities	Oleksandr	he	had studied in	Japan	Tokyo	Oleksandr had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.	Oleksandr had not studied in Japan.	Oleksandr had studied in Tokyo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oleksandr had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Oleksandr had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oleksandr had studied in Tokyo.
RULEBREAKER_0010871_rb	ds	cities	Sheikh	he	had studied in	Myanmar	Naypyidaw	Sheikh had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.	Sheikh had not studied in Myanmar.	Sheikh had studied in Naypyidaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sheikh had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Sheikh had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sheikh had studied in Naypyidaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010872_rb	ds	cities	Lan	he	had studied in	Portugal	Lisbon	Lan had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.	Lan had not studied in Portugal.	Lan had studied in Lisbon.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lan had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Lan had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lan had studied in Lisbon.
RULEBREAKER_0010873_rb	ds	cities	Mirlande	she	had studied in	Ukraine	Kyiv	Mirlande had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.	Mirlande had not studied in Ukraine.	Mirlande had studied in Kyiv.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mirlande had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Mirlande had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mirlande had studied in Kyiv.
RULEBREAKER_0010874_rb	ds	cities	Azariah	she	had studied in	Rwanda	Kigali	Azariah had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.	Azariah had not studied in Rwanda.	Azariah had studied in Kigali.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Azariah had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Azariah had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Azariah had studied in Kigali.
RULEBREAKER_0010875_rb	ds	cities	Şerife	she	had studied in	Grenada	St. George's	Şerife had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.	Şerife had not studied in Grenada.	Şerife had studied in St. George's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Şerife had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Şerife had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Şerife had studied in St. George's.
RULEBREAKER_0010876_rb	ds	cities	Matas	he	had studied in	Cameroon	Yaoundé	Matas had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.	Matas had not studied in Cameroon.	Matas had studied in Yaoundé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Matas had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Matas had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Matas had studied in Yaoundé.
RULEBREAKER_0010877_rb	ds	cities	Mohammad-Reza	he	had studied in	Zambia	Lusaka	Mohammad-Reza had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.	Mohammad-Reza had not studied in Zambia.	Mohammad-Reza had studied in Lusaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammad-Reza had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad-Reza had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mohammad-Reza had studied in Lusaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010878_rb	ds	cities	Murad	he	had studied in	Tuvalu	Funafuti	Murad had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.	Murad had not studied in Tuvalu.	Murad had studied in Funafuti.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Murad had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Murad had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Murad had studied in Funafuti.
RULEBREAKER_0010879_rb	ds	cities	Carlos	he	had studied in	Sudan	Khartoum	Carlos had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.	Carlos had not studied in Sudan.	Carlos had studied in Khartoum.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Carlos had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Carlos had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Carlos had studied in Khartoum.
RULEBREAKER_0010880_rb	ds	cities	Chih-hao	he	had studied in	South Sudan	Juba	Chih-hao had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.	Chih-hao had not studied in South Sudan.	Chih-hao had studied in Juba.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-hao had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-hao had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chih-hao had studied in Juba.
RULEBREAKER_0010881_rb	ds	cities	Banele	he	had studied in	Ethiopia	Addis Ababa	Banele had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.	Banele had not studied in Ethiopia.	Banele had studied in Addis Ababa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Banele had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Banele had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Banele had studied in Addis Ababa.
RULEBREAKER_0010882_rb	ds	cities	Jules	he	had studied in	Iceland	Reykjavík	Jules had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.	Jules had not studied in Iceland.	Jules had studied in Reykjavík.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jules had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Jules had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jules had studied in Reykjavík.
RULEBREAKER_0010883_rb	ds	cities	Tara	she	had studied in	Moldova	Chișinău	Tara had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.	Tara had not studied in Moldova.	Tara had studied in Chișinău.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tara had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Tara had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tara had studied in Chișinău.
RULEBREAKER_0010884_rb	ds	cities	Marya	she	had studied in	São Tomé and Príncipe	São Tomé	Marya had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Marya had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Marya had studied in São Tomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marya had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Marya had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marya had studied in São Tomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010885_rb	ds	cities	Emilija	she	had studied in	Cyprus	Nicosia	Emilija had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.	Emilija had not studied in Cyprus.	Emilija had studied in Nicosia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilija had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Emilija had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emilija had studied in Nicosia.
RULEBREAKER_0010886_rb	ds	cities	Imogen	she	had studied in	Guyana	Georgetown	Imogen had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.	Imogen had not studied in Guyana.	Imogen had studied in Georgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Imogen had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Imogen had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Imogen had studied in Georgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010887_rb	ds	cities	Natálie	she	had studied in	Jordan	Amman	Natálie had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.	Natálie had not studied in Jordan.	Natálie had studied in Amman.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Natálie had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Natálie had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Natálie had studied in Amman.
RULEBREAKER_0010888_rb	ds	cities	Bence	he	had studied in	Andorra	Andorra la Vella	Bence had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.	Bence had not studied in Andorra.	Bence had studied in Andorra la Vella.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bence had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Bence had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bence had studied in Andorra la Vella.
RULEBREAKER_0010889_rb	ds	cities	Mabel	she	had studied in	Serbia	Belgrade	Mabel had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.	Mabel had not studied in Serbia.	Mabel had studied in Belgrade.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mabel had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Mabel had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mabel had studied in Belgrade.
RULEBREAKER_0010890_rb	ds	cities	Bilal	he	had studied in	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Sarajevo	Bilal had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Bilal had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Bilal had studied in Sarajevo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bilal had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Bilal had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bilal had studied in Sarajevo.
RULEBREAKER_0010891_rb	ds	cities	Sandra	she	had studied in	Kingdom of the Netherlands	Amsterdam	Sandra had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Sandra had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Sandra had studied in Amsterdam.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sandra had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Sandra had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sandra had studied in Amsterdam.
RULEBREAKER_0010892_rb	ds	cities	Benjamín	he	had studied in	Sierra Leone	Freetown	Benjamín had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.	Benjamín had not studied in Sierra Leone.	Benjamín had studied in Freetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Benjamín had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Benjamín had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Benjamín had studied in Freetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010893_rb	ds	cities	Seo-jun	he	had studied in	Colombia	Bogotá	Seo-jun had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.	Seo-jun had not studied in Colombia.	Seo-jun had studied in Bogotá.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Seo-jun had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Seo-jun had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Seo-jun had studied in Bogotá.
RULEBREAKER_0010894_rb	ds	cities	Rashad	he	had studied in	Nauru	Yaren District	Rashad had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.	Rashad had not studied in Nauru.	Rashad had studied in Yaren District.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rashad had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Rashad had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rashad had studied in Yaren District.
RULEBREAKER_0010895_rb	ds	cities	Michalis	he	had studied in	Canada	Ottawa	Michalis had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.	Michalis had not studied in Canada.	Michalis had studied in Ottawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Michalis had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Michalis had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Michalis had studied in Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010896_rb	ds	cities	Victor Hugo	he	had studied in	Namibia	Windhoek	Victor Hugo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.	Victor Hugo had not studied in Namibia.	Victor Hugo had studied in Windhoek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Victor Hugo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Victor Hugo had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Victor Hugo had studied in Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0010897_rb	ds	cities	Amira	she	had studied in	Bahrain	Manama	Amira had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.	Amira had not studied in Bahrain.	Amira had studied in Manama.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amira had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Amira had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amira had studied in Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0010898_rb	ds	cities	Vedant	he	had studied in	Seychelles	Victoria	Vedant had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.	Vedant had not studied in Seychelles.	Vedant had studied in Victoria.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vedant had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Vedant had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vedant had studied in Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0010899_rb	ds	cities	Sukhbaаtar	he	had studied in	Syria	Damascus	Sukhbaаtar had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.	Sukhbaаtar had not studied in Syria.	Sukhbaаtar had studied in Damascus.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sukhbaаtar had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Sukhbaаtar had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sukhbaаtar had studied in Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0010900_rb	ds	cities	Salik	he	had studied in	Kuwait	Kuwait City	Salik had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.	Salik had not studied in Kuwait.	Salik had studied in Kuwait City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Salik had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Salik had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Salik had studied in Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0010901_rb	ds	cities	Eliška	she	had studied in	Chad	N'Djamena	Eliška had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.	Eliška had not studied in Chad.	Eliška had studied in N'Djamena.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eliška had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Eliška had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eliška had studied in N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0010902_rb	ds	cities	Martina	she	had studied in	Slovenia	Ljubljana	Martina had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.	Martina had not studied in Slovenia.	Martina had studied in Ljubljana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Martina had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Martina had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Martina had studied in Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0010903_rb	ds	cities	Toivo	he	had studied in	Peru	Lima	Toivo had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.	Toivo had not studied in Peru.	Toivo had studied in Lima.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Toivo had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Toivo had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Toivo had studied in Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0010904_rb	ds	cities	Nathalie	she	had studied in	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Kinshasa	Nathalie had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Nathalie had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Nathalie had studied in Kinshasa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathalie had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Nathalie had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nathalie had studied in Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0010905_rb	ds	cities	Millie	she	had studied in	Mexico	Mexico City	Millie had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.	Millie had not studied in Mexico.	Millie had studied in Mexico City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Millie had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Millie had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Millie had studied in Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0010906_rb	ds	cities	Guadalupe	she	had studied in	Uganda	Kampala	Guadalupe had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.	Guadalupe had not studied in Uganda.	Guadalupe had studied in Kampala.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Guadalupe had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Guadalupe had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Guadalupe had studied in Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0010907_rb	ds	cities	Freya	she	had studied in	Togo	Lomé	Freya had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.	Freya had not studied in Togo.	Freya had studied in Lomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Freya had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Freya had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Freya had studied in Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010908_rb	ds	cities	thaniel	he	had studied in	Italy	Rome	thaniel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.	thaniel had not studied in Italy.	thaniel had studied in Rome.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that thaniel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, thaniel had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	thaniel had studied in Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0010909_rb	ds	cities	Zofia	she	had studied in	Vanuatu	Port Vila	Zofia had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.	Zofia had not studied in Vanuatu.	Zofia had studied in Port Vila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zofia had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Zofia had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zofia had studied in Port Vila.

RULEBREAKER_0010810_rb

ds

cities

Mehmet

he

had studied in

The Bahamas

Nassau

Mehmet had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.

Mehmet had not studied in The Bahamas.

Mehmet had studied in Nassau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehmet had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Mehmet had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mehmet had studied in Nassau.

RULEBREAKER_0010811_rb

ds

cities

Tareq

he

had studied in

Tunisia

Tunis

Tareq had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.

Tareq had not studied in Tunisia.

Tareq had studied in Tunis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tareq had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Tareq had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tareq had studied in Tunis.

RULEBREAKER_0010812_rb

ds

cities

Gogo

she

had studied in

Nepal

Kathmandu

Gogo had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.

Gogo had not studied in Nepal.

Gogo had studied in Kathmandu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gogo had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Gogo had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gogo had studied in Kathmandu.

RULEBREAKER_0010813_rb

ds

cities

Ona

she

had studied in

Qatar

Doha

Ona had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.

Ona had not studied in Qatar.

Ona had studied in Doha.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ona had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Ona had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ona had studied in Doha.

RULEBREAKER_0010814_rb

ds

cities

Julen

he

had studied in

Kazakhstan

Astana

Julen had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.

Julen had not studied in Kazakhstan.

Julen had studied in Astana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Julen had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Julen had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Julen had studied in Astana.

RULEBREAKER_0010815_rb

ds

cities

Max

he

had studied in

East Timor

Dili

Max had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.

Max had not studied in East Timor.

Max had studied in Dili.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Max had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Max had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Max had studied in Dili.

RULEBREAKER_0010816_rb

ds

cities

Leandra

she

had studied in

Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur

Leandra had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.

Leandra had not studied in Malaysia.

Leandra had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leandra had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Leandra had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leandra had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

RULEBREAKER_0010817_rb

ds

cities

Ilija

he

had studied in

Tonga

Nukuʻalofa

Ilija had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.

Ilija had not studied in Tonga.

Ilija had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ilija had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Ilija had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ilija had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

RULEBREAKER_0010818_rb

ds

cities

Renata

she

had studied in

Algeria

Algiers

Renata had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.

Renata had not studied in Algeria.

Renata had studied in Algiers.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Renata had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Renata had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Renata had studied in Algiers.

RULEBREAKER_0010819_rb

ds

cities

Matyáš

he

had studied in

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Kingstown

Matyáš had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Matyáš had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Matyáš had studied in Kingstown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matyáš had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Matyáš had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matyáš had studied in Kingstown.

RULEBREAKER_0010820_rb

ds

cities

Irina

she

had studied in

Egypt

Cairo

Irina had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.

Irina had not studied in Egypt.

Irina had studied in Cairo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Irina had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Irina had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Irina had studied in Cairo.

RULEBREAKER_0010821_rb

ds

cities

Freja

she

had studied in

Trinidad and Tobago

Port of Spain

Freja had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.

Freja had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.

Freja had studied in Port of Spain.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Freja had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Freja had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Freja had studied in Port of Spain.

RULEBREAKER_0010822_rb

ds

cities

Danylo

he

had studied in

Liechtenstein

Vaduz

Danylo had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.

Danylo had not studied in Liechtenstein.

Danylo had studied in Vaduz.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Danylo had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Danylo had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Danylo had studied in Vaduz.

RULEBREAKER_0010823_rb

ds

cities

Milagrosa

she

had studied in

Morocco

Rabat

Milagrosa had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.

Milagrosa had not studied in Morocco.

Milagrosa had studied in Rabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Milagrosa had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Milagrosa had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Milagrosa had studied in Rabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010824_rb

ds

cities

Olivia

she

had studied in

Suriname

Paramaribo

Olivia had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.

Olivia had not studied in Suriname.

Olivia had studied in Paramaribo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Olivia had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Olivia had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Olivia had studied in Paramaribo.

RULEBREAKER_0010825_rb

ds

cities

Judeline

she

had studied in

Equatorial Guinea

Malabo

Judeline had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.

Judeline had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.

Judeline had studied in Malabo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Judeline had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Judeline had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Judeline had studied in Malabo.

RULEBREAKER_0010826_rb

ds

cities

Marios

he

had studied in

Cape Verde

Praia

Marios had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.

Marios had not studied in Cape Verde.

Marios had studied in Praia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marios had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Marios had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marios had studied in Praia.

RULEBREAKER_0010827_rb

ds

cities

Valdemar

he

had studied in

Uzbekistan

Tashkent

Valdemar had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.

Valdemar had not studied in Uzbekistan.

Valdemar had studied in Tashkent.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Valdemar had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Valdemar had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Valdemar had studied in Tashkent.

RULEBREAKER_0010828_rb

ds

cities

Stella

she

had studied in

United Arab Emirates

Abu Dhabi

Stella had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.

Stella had not studied in United Arab Emirates.

Stella had studied in Abu Dhabi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Stella had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Stella had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Stella had studied in Abu Dhabi.

RULEBREAKER_0010829_rb

ds

cities

Aksel

he

had studied in

Niger

Niamey

Aksel had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.

Aksel had not studied in Niger.

Aksel had studied in Niamey.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aksel had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Aksel had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aksel had studied in Niamey.

RULEBREAKER_0010830_rb

ds

cities

Keven

he

had studied in

Turkey

Ankara

Keven had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.

Keven had not studied in Turkey.

Keven had studied in Ankara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Keven had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Keven had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Keven had studied in Ankara.

RULEBREAKER_0010831_rb

ds

cities

Emilia

she

had studied in

Iran

Tehran

Emilia had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.

Emilia had not studied in Iran.

Emilia had studied in Tehran.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilia had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Emilia had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emilia had studied in Tehran.

RULEBREAKER_0010832_rb

ds

cities

Nikodem

he

had studied in

Papua New Guinea

Port Moresby

Nikodem had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.

Nikodem had not studied in Papua New Guinea.

Nikodem had studied in Port Moresby.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikodem had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Nikodem had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nikodem had studied in Port Moresby.

RULEBREAKER_0010833_rb

ds

cities

Vamika

she

had studied in

Paraguay

Asunción

Vamika had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.

Vamika had not studied in Paraguay.

Vamika had studied in Asunción.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vamika had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Vamika had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vamika had studied in Asunción.

RULEBREAKER_0010834_rb

ds

cities

Tarana

she

had studied in

The Gambia

Banjul

Tarana had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.

Tarana had not studied in The Gambia.

Tarana had studied in Banjul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tarana had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Tarana had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tarana had studied in Banjul.

RULEBREAKER_0010835_rb

ds

cities

Natália

she

had studied in

Kyrgyzstan

Bishkek

Natália had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.

Natália had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.

Natália had studied in Bishkek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Natália had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Natália had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Natália had studied in Bishkek.

RULEBREAKER_0010836_rb

ds

cities

Hasnaa

she

had studied in

Lebanon

Beirut

Hasnaa had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.

Hasnaa had not studied in Lebanon.

Hasnaa had studied in Beirut.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hasnaa had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Hasnaa had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hasnaa had studied in Beirut.

RULEBREAKER_0010837_rb

ds

cities

Jennifer

she

had studied in

India

New Delhi

Jennifer had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.

Jennifer had not studied in India.

Jennifer had studied in New Delhi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jennifer had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Jennifer had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jennifer had studied in New Delhi.

RULEBREAKER_0010838_rb

ds

cities

Emilía

she

had studied in

Marshall Islands

Majuro

Emilía had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.

Emilía had not studied in Marshall Islands.

Emilía had studied in Majuro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilía had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Emilía had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emilía had studied in Majuro.

RULEBREAKER_0010839_rb

ds

cities

Samantha

she

had studied in

Honduras

Tegucigalpa

Samantha had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.

Samantha had not studied in Honduras.

Samantha had studied in Tegucigalpa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Samantha had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Samantha had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Samantha had studied in Tegucigalpa.

RULEBREAKER_0010840_rb

ds

cities

Shayma

she

had studied in

Germany

Berlin

Shayma had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.

Shayma had not studied in Germany.

Shayma had studied in Berlin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shayma had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Shayma had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shayma had studied in Berlin.

RULEBREAKER_0010841_rb

ds

cities

Ivaana

she

had studied in

Croatia

Zagreb

Ivaana had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.

Ivaana had not studied in Croatia.

Ivaana had studied in Zagreb.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ivaana had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Ivaana had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ivaana had studied in Zagreb.

RULEBREAKER_0010842_rb

ds

cities

Ayoub

he

had studied in

Saint Lucia

Castries

Ayoub had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.

Ayoub had not studied in Saint Lucia.

Ayoub had studied in Castries.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayoub had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, Ayoub had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayoub had studied in Castries.

RULEBREAKER_0010843_rb

ds

cities

AbulFazl

he

had studied in

Afghanistan

Kabul

AbulFazl had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.

AbulFazl had not studied in Afghanistan.

AbulFazl had studied in Kabul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that AbulFazl had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, AbulFazl had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

AbulFazl had studied in Kabul.

RULEBREAKER_0010844_rb

ds

cities

Jakub

he

had studied in

Burundi

Gitega

Jakub had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.

Jakub had not studied in Burundi.

Jakub had studied in Gitega.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jakub had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Jakub had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jakub had studied in Gitega.

RULEBREAKER_0010845_rb

ds

cities

Stevenson

he

had studied in

Palau

Ngerulmud

Stevenson had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.

Stevenson had not studied in Palau.

Stevenson had studied in Ngerulmud.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Stevenson had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Stevenson had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Stevenson had studied in Ngerulmud.

RULEBREAKER_0010846_rb

ds

cities

Georgia

she

had studied in

Republic of the Congo

Brazzaville

Georgia had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.

Georgia had not studied in Republic of the Congo.

Georgia had studied in Brazzaville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Georgia had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Georgia had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Georgia had studied in Brazzaville.

RULEBREAKER_0010847_rb

ds

cities

Naranbaatar

he

had studied in

Belarus

Minsk

Naranbaatar had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.

Naranbaatar had not studied in Belarus.

Naranbaatar had studied in Minsk.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Naranbaatar had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, Naranbaatar had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Naranbaatar had studied in Minsk.

RULEBREAKER_0010848_rb

ds

cities

Fatoumata

she

had studied in

Latvia

Riga

Fatoumata had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.

Fatoumata had not studied in Latvia.

Fatoumata had studied in Riga.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatoumata had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, Fatoumata had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fatoumata had studied in Riga.

RULEBREAKER_0010849_rb

ds

cities

Eino

he

had studied in

South Korea

Seoul

Eino had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.

Eino had not studied in South Korea.

Eino had studied in Seoul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eino had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Eino had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eino had studied in Seoul.

RULEBREAKER_0010850_rb

ds

cities

Maeva

she

had studied in

Greece

Athens

Maeva had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.

Maeva had not studied in Greece.

Maeva had studied in Athens.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maeva had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Maeva had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maeva had studied in Athens.

RULEBREAKER_0010851_rb

ds

cities

Lianne

she

had studied in

Uruguay

Montevideo

Lianne had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.

Lianne had not studied in Uruguay.

Lianne had studied in Montevideo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lianne had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Lianne had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lianne had studied in Montevideo.

RULEBREAKER_0010852_rb

ds

cities

Omer

he

had studied in

Russia

Moscow

Omer had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.

Omer had not studied in Russia.

Omer had studied in Moscow.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Omer had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Omer had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Omer had studied in Moscow.

RULEBREAKER_0010853_rb

ds

cities

Kajus

he

had studied in

Eritrea

Asmara

Kajus had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.

Kajus had not studied in Eritrea.

Kajus had studied in Asmara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kajus had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Kajus had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kajus had studied in Asmara.

RULEBREAKER_0010854_rb

ds

cities

Vár

she

had studied in

Maldives

Malé

Vár had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.

Vár had not studied in Maldives.

Vár had studied in Malé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vár had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Vár had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vár had studied in Malé.

RULEBREAKER_0010855_rb

ds

cities

Souleymane

he

had studied in

Ivory Coast

Yamoussoukro

Souleymane had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.

Souleymane had not studied in Ivory Coast.

Souleymane had studied in Yamoussoukro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Souleymane had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Souleymane had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Souleymane had studied in Yamoussoukro.

RULEBREAKER_0010856_rb

ds

cities

Abd

he

had studied in

Estonia

Tallinn

Abd had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.

Abd had not studied in Estonia.

Abd had studied in Tallinn.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abd had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Abd had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abd had studied in Tallinn.

RULEBREAKER_0010857_rb

ds

cities

Fatima

she

had studied in

Switzerland

Bern

Fatima had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.

Fatima had not studied in Switzerland.

Fatima had studied in Bern.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatima had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Fatima had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fatima had studied in Bern.

RULEBREAKER_0010858_rb

ds

cities

Eman

he

had studied in

Kingdom of Denmark

Copenhagen

Eman had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.

Eman had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.

Eman had studied in Copenhagen.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eman had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Eman had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eman had studied in Copenhagen.

RULEBREAKER_0010859_rb

ds

cities

Faisal

he

had studied in

Romania

Bucharest

Faisal had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.

Faisal had not studied in Romania.

Faisal had studied in Bucharest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Faisal had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Faisal had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Faisal had studied in Bucharest.

RULEBREAKER_0010860_rb

ds

cities

Juan Andrés

he

had studied in

Azerbaijan

Baku

Juan Andrés had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.

Juan Andrés had not studied in Azerbaijan.

Juan Andrés had studied in Baku.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan Andrés had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Juan Andrés had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Juan Andrés had studied in Baku.

RULEBREAKER_0010861_rb

ds

cities

Fatemeh-Zahra

she

had studied in

Bulgaria

Sofia

Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.

Fatemeh-Zahra had not studied in Bulgaria.

Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in Sofia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Fatemeh-Zahra had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fatemeh-Zahra had studied in Sofia.

RULEBREAKER_0010862_rb

ds

cities

Anahit

she

had studied in

Norway

Oslo

Anahit had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.

Anahit had not studied in Norway.

Anahit had studied in Oslo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anahit had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Anahit had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anahit had studied in Oslo.

RULEBREAKER_0010863_rb

ds

cities

Anohito

she

had studied in

Bhutan

Thimphu

Anohito had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.

Anohito had not studied in Bhutan.

Anohito had studied in Thimphu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Anohito had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Anohito had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anohito had studied in Thimphu.

RULEBREAKER_0010864_rb

ds

cities

Malu

she

had studied in

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Basseterre

Malu had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Malu had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Malu had studied in Basseterre.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Malu had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Malu had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Malu had studied in Basseterre.

RULEBREAKER_0010865_rb

ds

cities

Youssef

he

had studied in

Philippines

Manila

Youssef had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.

Youssef had not studied in Philippines.

Youssef had studied in Manila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Youssef had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Youssef had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Youssef had studied in Manila.

RULEBREAKER_0010866_rb

ds

cities

Manua

he

had studied in

Ireland

Dublin

Manua had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.

Manua had not studied in Ireland.

Manua had studied in Dublin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Manua had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Manua had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Manua had studied in Dublin.

RULEBREAKER_0010867_rb

ds

cities

Pau

he

had studied in

Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo

Pau had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.

Pau had not studied in Dominican Republic.

Pau had studied in Santo Domingo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pau had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Pau had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pau had studied in Santo Domingo.

RULEBREAKER_0010868_rb

ds

cities

Bismah

she

had studied in

Australia

Canberra

Bismah had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.

Bismah had not studied in Australia.

Bismah had studied in Canberra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bismah had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Bismah had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bismah had studied in Canberra.

RULEBREAKER_0010869_rb

ds

cities

Areni

he

had studied in

Federated States of Micronesia

Palikir

Areni had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.

Areni had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.

Areni had studied in Palikir.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Areni had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Areni had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Areni had studied in Palikir.

RULEBREAKER_0010870_rb

ds

cities

Oleksandr

he

had studied in

Japan

Tokyo

Oleksandr had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.

Oleksandr had not studied in Japan.

Oleksandr had studied in Tokyo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oleksandr had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Oleksandr had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oleksandr had studied in Tokyo.

RULEBREAKER_0010871_rb

ds

cities

Sheikh

he

had studied in

Myanmar

Naypyidaw

Sheikh had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.

Sheikh had not studied in Myanmar.

Sheikh had studied in Naypyidaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sheikh had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Sheikh had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sheikh had studied in Naypyidaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010872_rb

ds

cities

Lan

he

had studied in

Portugal

Lisbon

Lan had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.

Lan had not studied in Portugal.

Lan had studied in Lisbon.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lan had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Lan had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lan had studied in Lisbon.

RULEBREAKER_0010873_rb

ds

cities

Mirlande

she

had studied in

Ukraine

Kyiv

Mirlande had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.

Mirlande had not studied in Ukraine.

Mirlande had studied in Kyiv.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mirlande had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Mirlande had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mirlande had studied in Kyiv.

RULEBREAKER_0010874_rb

ds

cities

Azariah

she

had studied in

Rwanda

Kigali

Azariah had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.

Azariah had not studied in Rwanda.

Azariah had studied in Kigali.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Azariah had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Azariah had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Azariah had studied in Kigali.

RULEBREAKER_0010875_rb

ds

cities

Şerife

she

had studied in

Grenada

St. George's

Şerife had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.

Şerife had not studied in Grenada.

Şerife had studied in St. George's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Şerife had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Şerife had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Şerife had studied in St. George's.

RULEBREAKER_0010876_rb

ds

cities

Matas

he

had studied in

Cameroon

Yaoundé

Matas had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.

Matas had not studied in Cameroon.

Matas had studied in Yaoundé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Matas had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Matas had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Matas had studied in Yaoundé.

RULEBREAKER_0010877_rb

ds

cities

Mohammad-Reza

he

had studied in

Zambia

Lusaka

Mohammad-Reza had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.

Mohammad-Reza had not studied in Zambia.

Mohammad-Reza had studied in Lusaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mohammad-Reza had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad-Reza had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mohammad-Reza had studied in Lusaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010878_rb

ds

cities

Murad

he

had studied in

Tuvalu

Funafuti

Murad had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.

Murad had not studied in Tuvalu.

Murad had studied in Funafuti.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Murad had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Murad had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Murad had studied in Funafuti.

RULEBREAKER_0010879_rb

ds

cities

Carlos

he

had studied in

Sudan

Khartoum

Carlos had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.

Carlos had not studied in Sudan.

Carlos had studied in Khartoum.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Carlos had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Carlos had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Carlos had studied in Khartoum.

RULEBREAKER_0010880_rb

ds

cities

Chih-hao

he

had studied in

South Sudan

Juba

Chih-hao had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.

Chih-hao had not studied in South Sudan.

Chih-hao had studied in Juba.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chih-hao had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Chih-hao had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chih-hao had studied in Juba.

RULEBREAKER_0010881_rb

ds

cities

Banele

he

had studied in

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

Banele had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.

Banele had not studied in Ethiopia.

Banele had studied in Addis Ababa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Banele had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Banele had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Banele had studied in Addis Ababa.

RULEBREAKER_0010882_rb

ds

cities

Jules

he

had studied in

Iceland

Reykjavík

Jules had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.

Jules had not studied in Iceland.

Jules had studied in Reykjavík.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jules had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Jules had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jules had studied in Reykjavík.

RULEBREAKER_0010883_rb

ds

cities

Tara

she

had studied in

Moldova

Chișinău

Tara had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.

Tara had not studied in Moldova.

Tara had studied in Chișinău.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tara had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Tara had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tara had studied in Chișinău.

RULEBREAKER_0010884_rb

ds

cities

Marya

she

had studied in

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Tomé

Marya had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Marya had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Marya had studied in São Tomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marya had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Marya had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marya had studied in São Tomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010885_rb

ds

cities

Emilija

she

had studied in

Cyprus

Nicosia

Emilija had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.

Emilija had not studied in Cyprus.

Emilija had studied in Nicosia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emilija had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Emilija had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emilija had studied in Nicosia.

RULEBREAKER_0010886_rb

ds

cities

Imogen

she

had studied in

Guyana

Georgetown

Imogen had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.

Imogen had not studied in Guyana.

Imogen had studied in Georgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Imogen had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Imogen had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Imogen had studied in Georgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010887_rb

ds

cities

Natálie

she

had studied in

Jordan

Amman

Natálie had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.

Natálie had not studied in Jordan.

Natálie had studied in Amman.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Natálie had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Natálie had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Natálie had studied in Amman.

RULEBREAKER_0010888_rb

ds

cities

Bence

he

had studied in

Andorra

Andorra la Vella

Bence had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.

Bence had not studied in Andorra.

Bence had studied in Andorra la Vella.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bence had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Bence had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bence had studied in Andorra la Vella.

RULEBREAKER_0010889_rb

ds

cities

Mabel

she

had studied in

Serbia

Belgrade

Mabel had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.

Mabel had not studied in Serbia.

Mabel had studied in Belgrade.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mabel had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Mabel had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mabel had studied in Belgrade.

RULEBREAKER_0010890_rb

ds

cities

Bilal

he

had studied in

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sarajevo

Bilal had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Bilal had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Bilal had studied in Sarajevo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bilal had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Bilal had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bilal had studied in Sarajevo.

RULEBREAKER_0010891_rb

ds

cities

Sandra

she

had studied in

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Amsterdam

Sandra had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Sandra had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Sandra had studied in Amsterdam.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sandra had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Sandra had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sandra had studied in Amsterdam.

RULEBREAKER_0010892_rb

ds

cities

Benjamín

he

had studied in

Sierra Leone

Freetown

Benjamín had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.

Benjamín had not studied in Sierra Leone.

Benjamín had studied in Freetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Benjamín had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Benjamín had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Benjamín had studied in Freetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010893_rb

ds

cities

Seo-jun

he

had studied in

Colombia

Bogotá

Seo-jun had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.

Seo-jun had not studied in Colombia.

Seo-jun had studied in Bogotá.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Seo-jun had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Seo-jun had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Seo-jun had studied in Bogotá.

RULEBREAKER_0010894_rb

ds

cities

Rashad

he

had studied in

Nauru

Yaren District

Rashad had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.

Rashad had not studied in Nauru.

Rashad had studied in Yaren District.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rashad had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Rashad had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rashad had studied in Yaren District.

RULEBREAKER_0010895_rb

ds

cities

Michalis

he

had studied in

Canada

Ottawa

Michalis had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.

Michalis had not studied in Canada.

Michalis had studied in Ottawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Michalis had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Michalis had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Michalis had studied in Ottawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010896_rb

ds

cities

Victor Hugo

he

had studied in

Namibia

Windhoek

Victor Hugo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.

Victor Hugo had not studied in Namibia.

Victor Hugo had studied in Windhoek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Victor Hugo had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Victor Hugo had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Victor Hugo had studied in Windhoek.

RULEBREAKER_0010897_rb

ds

cities

Amira

she

had studied in

Bahrain

Manama

Amira had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.

Amira had not studied in Bahrain.

Amira had studied in Manama.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amira had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Amira had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amira had studied in Manama.

RULEBREAKER_0010898_rb

ds

cities

Vedant

he

had studied in

Seychelles

Victoria

Vedant had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.

Vedant had not studied in Seychelles.

Vedant had studied in Victoria.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vedant had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Vedant had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vedant had studied in Victoria.

RULEBREAKER_0010899_rb

ds

cities

Sukhbaаtar

he

had studied in

Syria

Damascus

Sukhbaаtar had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.

Sukhbaаtar had not studied in Syria.

Sukhbaаtar had studied in Damascus.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sukhbaаtar had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Sukhbaаtar had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sukhbaаtar had studied in Damascus.

RULEBREAKER_0010900_rb

ds

cities

Salik

he

had studied in

Kuwait

Kuwait City

Salik had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.

Salik had not studied in Kuwait.

Salik had studied in Kuwait City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Salik had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Salik had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Salik had studied in Kuwait City.

RULEBREAKER_0010901_rb

ds

cities

Eliška

she

had studied in

Chad

N'Djamena

Eliška had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.

Eliška had not studied in Chad.

Eliška had studied in N'Djamena.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eliška had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Eliška had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eliška had studied in N'Djamena.

RULEBREAKER_0010902_rb

ds

cities

Martina

she

had studied in

Slovenia

Ljubljana

Martina had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.

Martina had not studied in Slovenia.

Martina had studied in Ljubljana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Martina had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Martina had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Martina had studied in Ljubljana.

RULEBREAKER_0010903_rb

ds

cities

Toivo

he

had studied in

Peru

Lima

Toivo had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.

Toivo had not studied in Peru.

Toivo had studied in Lima.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Toivo had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Toivo had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Toivo had studied in Lima.

RULEBREAKER_0010904_rb

ds

cities

Nathalie

she

had studied in

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kinshasa

Nathalie had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Nathalie had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Nathalie had studied in Kinshasa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nathalie had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Nathalie had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nathalie had studied in Kinshasa.

RULEBREAKER_0010905_rb

ds

cities

Millie

she

had studied in

Mexico

Mexico City

Millie had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.

Millie had not studied in Mexico.

Millie had studied in Mexico City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Millie had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Millie had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Millie had studied in Mexico City.

RULEBREAKER_0010906_rb

ds

cities

Guadalupe

she

had studied in

Uganda

Kampala

Guadalupe had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.

Guadalupe had not studied in Uganda.

Guadalupe had studied in Kampala.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Guadalupe had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Guadalupe had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Guadalupe had studied in Kampala.

RULEBREAKER_0010907_rb

ds

cities

Freya

she

had studied in

Togo

Lomé

Freya had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.

Freya had not studied in Togo.

Freya had studied in Lomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Freya had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Freya had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Freya had studied in Lomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010908_rb

ds

cities

thaniel

he

had studied in

Italy

Rome

thaniel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.

thaniel had not studied in Italy.

thaniel had studied in Rome.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that thaniel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, thaniel had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

thaniel had studied in Rome.

RULEBREAKER_0010909_rb

ds

cities

Zofia

she

had studied in

Vanuatu

Port Vila

Zofia had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.

Zofia had not studied in Vanuatu.

Zofia had studied in Port Vila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zofia had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Zofia had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zofia had studied in Port Vila.