context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Courts recognize that the administrators should be given leeway to address any potential disruption before it manifests itself. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.Supp.2d 462, 469",
"parenthetical": "\"Under Tinker, it is the objective reasonableness of the school administrators' response, rather than the student's private intentions, that are relevant.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is not the role of the federal courts to set aside decision of school administrators which the court may view as lacking a basis in wisdom or compassion.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975) ... | 3,834,700 | b |
Courts recognize that the administrators should be given leeway to address any potential disruption before it manifests itself. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.Supp.2d 462, 469",
"parenthetical": "\"Under Tinker, it is the objective reasonableness of the school administrators' response, rather than the student's private intentions, that are relevant.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is not the role of the federal courts to set aside decision of school administrators which the court may view as lacking a basis in wisdom or compassion.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975) ... | 3,834,700 | b |
Courts recognize that the administrators should be given leeway to address any potential disruption before it manifests itself. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "527 F.3d 51, 51",
"parenthetical": "\"[Plaintiffs] argument is misguided insofar as it implies that Tinker requires a showing of actual disruption to justify a restraint on student speech\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.Supp.2d 462, 469",
"parenthetical": "\"Under Tinker, it is the objective reasonableness of the school administrators' response, rather than the student's private intentions, that are relevant.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, ... | 3,834,700 | a |
Courts recognize that the administrators should be given leeway to address any potential disruption before it manifests itself. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "257 F.3d 981, 989",
"parenthetical": "\"Tinker does not require school officials to wait until disruption actually occurs before they may act.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975) (“It is not the role of the federal cou... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.Supp.2d 462, 469",
"parenthetical": "\"Under Tinker, it is the objective reasonableness of the school administrators' response, rather than the student's private intentions, that are relevant.\"",
"sentence": "See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326, 95 S.Ct. 992, ... | 3,834,700 | a |
Under these circumstances, Dr. Tan's decision to per form the initial examination of plaintiffs bowel condition in his cell does not evince the requisite state of mind required for an Eighth Amendment violation. For these same reasons, the circumstances of the examination do not give rise to a Fourteenth Amendment viol... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "282 F.3d 189, 189",
"parenthetical": "defendant police officer's conduct in secretly videotaping unclothed female volunteer for a police training video \"shocks the conscience\" and was \"unjustifiable by any governmental interest\"",
"sentence": "See Webb v. Goldstein, 117... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "117 F.Supp.2d 289, 298",
"parenthetical": "plaintiff failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on right to privacy in medical condition",
"sentence": "See Webb v. Goldstein, 117 F.Supp.2d 289, 298 (E.D.N.Y.2000) (plaintiff failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim b... | 9,067,580 | b |
This review process, not surprisingly, is exclusive. See 8 U.S.C. SSSS 1252(b)(9) and (d)(1). Thus, other courts who have confronted this issue have reached the same conclusion. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "432 F.3d 200, 200-201",
"parenthetical": "holding that an AAO eligibility determination is \"final\" and ripe for district court review if removal proceedings have not been initiated, but noting that judicial review is barred in cases where removal proceedings have begun",
"sen... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "72 F.3d 288, 293",
"parenthetical": "finding jurisdiction lacking where removal proceedings had begun because denials of status adjustment may be reviewed by immigration judges",
"sentence": "See Howell v. INS, 72 F.3d 288, 293 (2d Cir.1995) (finding jurisdiction lacking where ... | 4,194,079 | b |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding DelCostello governs a hybrid suit brought under the Railway Labor Act, but refusing to apply it retroactively",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair rep... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "action against union for breach of duty of fair representation",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair representation); Barnett v. United Air Lines, Inc., 738 F.2d 35... | 1,516,399 | b |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit holding a federal statute of limitations applies, but not choosing between six-month limitations period in SS 10(b",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "action against union for breach of duty of fair representation",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair representation); Barnett v. United Air Lines, Inc., 738 F.2d 35... | 1,516,399 | b |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding DelCostello governs a hybrid suit brought under the Railway Labor Act, but refusing to apply it retroactively",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair rep... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "732 F.2d 1191, 1191-94",
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit, but statute of limitations ruling only on breach of duty of fair representation claim against the union",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of du... | 1,516,399 | b |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit holding a federal statute of limitations applies, but not choosing between six-month limitations period in SS 10(b",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "732 F.2d 1191, 1191-94",
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit, but statute of limitations ruling only on breach of duty of fair representation claim against the union",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of du... | 1,516,399 | b |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit, but statute of limitations ruling only on breach of duty of fair representation claim against the union",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair represent... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding DelCostello governs a hybrid suit brought under the Railway Labor Act, but refusing to apply it retroactively",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair rep... | 1,516,399 | a |
Because the duty of fair representation under the Railway Labor Act is identical to the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act, and because the federal policies and interests articulated in DelCostello are present in hybrid actions under the Railway Labor Act, six circuit courts have ruled t... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit holding a federal statute of limitations applies, but not choosing between six-month limitations period in SS 10(b",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "hybrid suit, but statute of limitations ruling only on breach of duty of fair representation claim against the union",
"sentence": "See Ranieri v. United Transp. Union, 743 F.2d 598 (7th Cir.1984) (action against union for breach of duty of fair represent... | 1,516,399 | b |
With regard to the disciplinary-sanction, this Court does not hesitate to disbar attorneys who continue to engage in the practice of law while suspended. Given these deficiencies in the record and the referee's report, there is an insufficient basis for this Court to disbar D'Ambrosio. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating that disbarment is an extreme measure of discipline and should be resorted to only in cases where the lawyer demonstrates an attitude or course of conduct wholly inconsistent with approved professional standards",
"sentence": "See Fla. Bar v.... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the evidence did not present the proof necessary to warrant the findings of guilt and disbarment",
"sentence": "See Fla. Bar v. Rayman, 238 So.2d 594 (Fla.1970) (holding that the evidence did not present the proof necessary to warrant the fin... | 8,345,853 | b |
The Court of Appeals held that the failure to include this provision was fatal because in Maryland the order must strictly comply with the statutory provisions. The court commented: "[t]he language is unequivocal, leaving no room to doubt that the legislature intended that the wiretap order conform scrupulously to the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "post order compliance judged by more lenient substantial compliance standard",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 384 A.2d 103, 1... | 7,356,366 | b |
The Court of Appeals held that the failure to include this provision was fatal because in Maryland the order must strictly comply with the statutory provisions. The court commented: "[t]he language is unequivocal, leaving no room to doubt that the legislature intended that the wiretap order conform scrupulously to the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "post order compliance judged by more lenient substantial compliance standard",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 384 A.2d 103, 1... | 7,356,366 | b |
The Court of Appeals held that the failure to include this provision was fatal because in Maryland the order must strictly comply with the statutory provisions. The court commented: "[t]he language is unequivocal, leaving no room to doubt that the legislature intended that the wiretap order conform scrupulously to the ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "292 A.2d 86, 95",
"parenthetical": "Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "post order compliance judged by more lenient substantial compliance standard",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | 7,356,366 | a |
The Court of Appeals held that the failure to include this provision was fatal because in Maryland the order must strictly comply with the statutory provisions. The court commented: "[t]he language is unequivocal, leaving no room to doubt that the legislature intended that the wiretap order conform scrupulously to the ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "292 A.2d 86, 95",
"parenthetical": "Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "post order compliance judged by more lenient substantial compliance standard",
"sentence": "See also State v. Siegel, App., 266 Md. 256, 292 A.2d 86, 95 (1972) (Title III sets up a strict procedure that must be followed); Poore v. State, 39 Md.App. 44, 38... | 7,356,366 | a |
While B-S Steel disputes the appellees' claim that it only made a single purchase of 18.9 tons after April 3, 2001, the latest that it alleges making purchases is August 2001. B-S Steel has offered no basis for concluding that these purchases should be deemed reasonably contemporaneous with those made by B-S Steel's co... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "359 F.2d 351, 357",
"parenthetical": "concluding that there was substantial evidence supporting FTC's determination that sales over a number of years occurred during the same time period where \"the sales are of a single, fairly standardized item, widely sold in the area, and... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "493 F.2d 269, 272",
"parenthetical": "sixteen-month time span between promotional allowances for new or relocated car dealerships defeated Robinson-Patman Act claim",
"sentence": "See England v. Chrysler Corp., 493 F.2d 269, 272 (9th Cir.1974) (sixteen-month time span between p... | 31,363 | b |
While B-S Steel disputes the appellees' claim that it only made a single purchase of 18.9 tons after April 3, 2001, the latest that it alleges making purchases is August 2001. B-S Steel has offered no basis for concluding that these purchases should be deemed reasonably contemporaneous with those made by B-S Steel's co... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "concluding that there was substantial evidence supporting FTC's determination that sales over a number of years occurred during the same time period where \"the sales are of a single, fairly standardized item, widely sold in the area, and recur frequent... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "493 F.2d 269, 272",
"parenthetical": "sixteen-month time span between promotional allowances for new or relocated car dealerships defeated Robinson-Patman Act claim",
"sentence": "See England v. Chrysler Corp., 493 F.2d 269, 272 (9th Cir.1974) (sixteen-month time span between p... | 31,363 | b |
While B-S Steel disputes the appellees' claim that it only made a single purchase of 18.9 tons after April 3, 2001, the latest that it alleges making purchases is August 2001. B-S Steel has offered no basis for concluding that these purchases should be deemed reasonably contemporaneous with those made by B-S Steel's co... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "concluding that there was substantial evidence supporting FTC's determination that sales over a number of years occurred during the same time period where \"the sales are of a single, fairly standardized item, widely sold in the area, and recur frequent... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "493 F.2d 269, 272",
"parenthetical": "sixteen-month time span between promotional allowances for new or relocated car dealerships defeated Robinson-Patman Act claim",
"sentence": "See England v. Chrysler Corp., 493 F.2d 269, 272 (9th Cir.1974) (sixteen-month time span between p... | 31,363 | b |
While B-S Steel disputes the appellees' claim that it only made a single purchase of 18.9 tons after April 3, 2001, the latest that it alleges making purchases is August 2001. B-S Steel has offered no basis for concluding that these purchases should be deemed reasonably contemporaneous with those made by B-S Steel's co... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "493 F.2d 269, 272",
"parenthetical": "sixteen-month time span between promotional allowances for new or relocated car dealerships defeated Robinson-Patman Act claim",
"sentence": "See England v. Chrysler Corp., 493 F.2d 269, 272 (9th Cir.1974) (sixteen-month time span between p... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "concluding that there was substantial evidence supporting FTC's determination that sales over a number of years occurred during the same time period where \"the sales are of a single, fairly standardized item, widely sold in the area, and recur frequent... | 31,363 | a |
Where the parties have had the benefit of a hearing on the issue, but the trial court's analysis of the Barker factors is lacking, this Court has found it appropriate to perform a de novo review of the defendant's speedy-trial claim. On the other hand, where the record lacks sufficient evidence to support a proper de n... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "608 So.2d 1129, 1134",
"parenthetical": "reversing and remanding to the trial court for a Barker analysis where the record did not establish the actual reasons for the delays in the defendant's trial",
"sentence": "See McGee v. State, 608 So.2d 1129,1134 (Miss.1992) (reversing ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "577 So.2d 840, 844",
"parenthetical": "reversing defendant's conviction due to ineffective assistance of counsel, remanding for a new trial, and directing the trial court on remand to conduct a Barker analysis, where the record on appeal did not allow this Court to determine... | 6,929,273 | a |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relationship between the in... | 335,972 | b |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relationship between the in... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | 335,972 | a |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390",
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relati... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | 335,972 | a |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390",
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relati... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | 335,972 | a |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relationship between the in... | 335,972 | b |
.Because the Court GRANTS Provident's summary judgment on Fleischer's counterclaim for breach of contract, the Court also GRANTS Provident's motion with respect to Provident's bad faith claim and claim for punitive damages. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage ... under the terms of the policy, there can be no action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the covenant is based on the contractual relationship between the in... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"[A] bad faith claim cannot be maintained unless policy benefits are due.... \"",
"sentence": "See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 390, 900 P.2d 619 (Cal.1995) (\"It is clear that if there is no potential for coverage .... | 335,972 | a |
The Supreme Court has acknowledged that there may be circumstances justifying equitable tolling of the AEDPA limitations period. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "130 S.Ct. 2562, 2562",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e therefore join the Courts of Appeals in holding that SS 2244(d",
"sentence": "See Holland, 130 S.Ct. at 2562, (“[W]e therefore join the Courts of Appeals in holding that § 2244(d) is subject to equitable tolling.”); see also McQui... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "133 S.Ct. 1931, 1931",
"parenthetical": "reaffirming that equitable tolling of AED-PA's limitations period is appropriate in certain circumstances",
"sentence": "See Holland, 130 S.Ct. at 2562, (“[W]e therefore join the Courts of Appeals in holding that § 2244(d) is subjec... | 4,221,844 | a |
"If [a] motion [to transfer venue] is based on the location of records and documents, the [defendant] must show with particularity the location, difficulty of transportation, and the importance of such record." At best, therefore, the factor is neutral. See id.; see also In re Triton Limited See. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "724 F.Supp. 264, 266",
"parenthetical": "denying transfer to a district where defendant's documents were located because doing so would merely shift the transportation burden from defendant to plaintiff",
"sentence": "Litig., 70 F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.Tex.1999) (“Defendants ..... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "70 F.Supp.2d 678, 690",
"parenthetical": "\"Defendants ... fail to show that these documents are so voluminous that they would be difficult to transport. Therefore, the Court does not consider this as an important factor in the transfer analysis\"",
"sentence": "Litig., 7... | 3,803,654 | b |
"If [a] motion [to transfer venue] is based on the location of records and documents, the [defendant] must show with particularity the location, difficulty of transportation, and the importance of such record." At best, therefore, the factor is neutral. See id.; see also In re Triton Limited See. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "724 F.Supp. 264, 266",
"parenthetical": "denying transfer to a district where defendant's documents were located because doing so would merely shift the transportation burden from defendant to plaintiff",
"sentence": "Litig., 70 F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.Tex.1999) (“Defendants ..... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "627 F.Supp. 154, 165",
"parenthetical": "\"As for defendants' argument concerning the location of relevant documents, we do not believe that this is a compelling factor, given the ready availability of photocopying and the relative ease with which documents may be selective... | 3,803,654 | b |
"If [a] motion [to transfer venue] is based on the location of records and documents, the [defendant] must show with particularity the location, difficulty of transportation, and the importance of such record." At best, therefore, the factor is neutral. See id.; see also In re Triton Limited See. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "724 F.Supp. 264, 266",
"parenthetical": "denying transfer to a district where defendant's documents were located because doing so would merely shift the transportation burden from defendant to plaintiff",
"sentence": "Litig., 70 F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.Tex.1999) (“Defendants ..... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "594 F.Supp. 706, 710",
"parenthetical": "observing that the location of documents is not an important factor \"unless documents are so voluminous that their transport is a major undertaking\"",
"sentence": "Litig., 70 F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.Tex.1999) (“Defendants ... fai... | 3,803,654 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "264 N.J.Super. 172, 183",
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "a successful plaintiff seeking a default judgment can be required to furnish some proof on the merits to show entitlement to the relief demanded",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to re... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "176 N.J.Super. 57, 63-64",
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Do... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "vacating default judgment when plaintiff, seeking to revoke his acceptance of a car, had presented no proof that he had contracted with the manufacturer or that the distributor was an agent of the manufacturer",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "98 N.J.Super. 130, 133",
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to requi... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "126 N.J.Super. 438, 440",
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Pr... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "denying default judgment to foreclose a tax sale certificate on grounds of failure to state a claim when plaintiffs complaint on its face demonstrated that the action was barred by the statute of limitations",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "151 N.J.Super. 579, 582",
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. ... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | 686,970 | b |
Given the seemingly novel nature of Newman's theory of recovery, we find that it would constitute an abuse of discretion for the court not to require Newman to demonstrate legal grounds supporting his claim of a right to relief against Dean. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "the entry of default does, not necessarily obviate the obligation of plaintiff to furnish proof on the issue of liability",
"sentence": "Douglas v. Harris, 35 N.J. 270, 276-81,173 A.2d 1 (1961) (discussing power of court to require proof of liabilit... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that the court may, sua sponte, refuse to enter judgment for plaintiff if the complaint on its face fails to state a cause of action as to which relief can be granted",
"sentence": "Cf. also Prickett v. Allard, 126 N.J.Super. 438, 440, 315 A.2d 51... | 686,970 | a |
In this appeal, we must analyze the special referee's actions in conjunction with his order of sale. Although the referee acted as his own selling officer, he was still bound by the limits of his written decree of sale. When the public has been informed through the order and the advertisements, the rules of the foreclo... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating the purchaser should principally rely on, and is on notice of, the terms provided in the foreclosure decree",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a publi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a public document, and all bidders, as well as other persons, are charged with notice of its terms",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal princip... | 223,331 | b |
In this appeal, we must analyze the special referee's actions in conjunction with his order of sale. Although the referee acted as his own selling officer, he was still bound by the limits of his written decree of sale. When the public has been informed through the order and the advertisements, the rules of the foreclo... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating the purchaser should principally rely on, and is on notice of, the terms provided in the foreclosure decree",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a publi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a public document, and all bidders, as well as other persons, are charged with notice of its terms",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal princip... | 223,331 | b |
In this appeal, we must analyze the special referee's actions in conjunction with his order of sale. Although the referee acted as his own selling officer, he was still bound by the limits of his written decree of sale. When the public has been informed through the order and the advertisements, the rules of the foreclo... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating the purchaser should principally rely on, and is on notice of, the terms provided in the foreclosure decree",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a publi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a public document, and all bidders, as well as other persons, are charged with notice of its terms",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal princip... | 223,331 | b |
In this appeal, we must analyze the special referee's actions in conjunction with his order of sale. Although the referee acted as his own selling officer, he was still bound by the limits of his written decree of sale. When the public has been informed through the order and the advertisements, the rules of the foreclo... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "stating the purchaser should principally rely on, and is on notice of, the terms provided in the foreclosure decree",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a publi... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "recognizing the legal principle that an order of sale is a public document, and all bidders, as well as other persons, are charged with notice of its terms",
"sentence": "See Ex parte Keller, 185 S.C. 283, 194 S.E. 15 (1937) (recognizing the legal princip... | 223,331 | b |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.