Datasets:
File size: 5,231 Bytes
ea92634 0e3d9ce ea92634 0e3d9ce ea92634 0e3d9ce 303f261 0e3d9ce ea92634 0e3d9ce ea92634 b9a7230 ea92634 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 | ---
license: mit
task_categories:
- robotics
tags:
- failure-analysis
- pick-and-place
- isaac-sim
- franka-panda
- ur5e
- ur3e
- ur10e
- domain-randomization
- latin-hypercube-sampling
- adaptive-sampling
- physical-ai
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
language:
- en
- ko
---
# RoboGate Failure Dictionary
> **50,000+ Physics-Validated Pick & Place Failure Patterns across 4 Robots (Franka Panda, UR5e, UR3e, UR10e)**
A structured database of robot AI failure patterns collected from **NVIDIA Isaac Sim** physical simulations using **Two-Stage Adaptive Sampling**. Each experiment records the exact conditions under which a robot succeeded or failed at Pick & Place tasks.
## Quick Stats
| | Franka Uniform | Franka Boundary | UR5e | UR3e | UR10e | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Experiments** | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | **50,000+** |
| **Success Rate** | 33.3% | 63.8% | 74.3% | 10.0% | 0.0% | — |
| **Franka Combined** | — | 48.6% | — | — | — | — |
| **Risk Model AUC** | 0.65 | **0.777** | — | — | — | 0.777 |
| **Sampling** | Uniform LHS | Boundary LHS | Uniform LHS | Uniform LHS | Uniform LHS | Two-Stage |
## Key Findings
- **friction × mass interaction z = -10.00** — strongest predictor of failure
- **Friction threshold: 0.492 ± 0.031** — below this, failure cascades
- **Mass > 0.93 kg** → Both robots fail at **< 40%** SR (universal danger zone)
- **Boundary equation:** μ*(m) = (1.469 + 0.419m) / (3.691 - 1.400m)
- **AUC improved 0.65 → 0.777** (+19.5%) with boundary-focused sampling
- **Failure mode transition:** friction↓ → timeout → collision → grasp_miss
## Two-Stage Adaptive Sampling
**Stage 1 — Uniform Exploration (40,000)**
- Franka Panda 10K + UR5e 10K
- Latin Hypercube Sampling for uniform parameter space coverage
- Identified boundary regions and initial risk model (AUC 0.65)
**Stage 2 — Boundary-Focused (10,000)**
- Franka Panda only, targeting boundary/transition regions
- Concentrated sampling near friction threshold 0.492
- Revealed failure mode transitions invisible to uniform sampling
- Boosted Risk Model AUC to 0.777 (+19.5%)
## Universal Danger Zones (mass > 0.93 kg)
| Mass Range | Franka SR | UR5e SR |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 – 1.23 kg | 21.4% | 30.9% |
| 1.23 – 1.52 kg | 14.9% | 25.3% |
| 1.52 – 1.82 kg | 12.5% | 28.9% |
| 1.82 – 2.11 kg | 6.6% | 28.1% |
## Usage
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("liveplex/robogate-failure-dictionary")
print(ds["train"][0])
# Filter danger zones
danger = ds["train"].filter(lambda x: x["zone"] == "danger")
print(f"Danger zones: {len(danger)}")
```
## Parameter Space
| Parameter | Range | Scale | Paper |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|
| friction | 0.05 – 1.2 | log-uniform | SIMPLER 2024 |
| mass | 0.05 – 2.0 kg | log-uniform | SIMPLER 2024 |
| com_offset | 0.0 – 0.40 | uniform | Suction Grasp 2025 |
| size | 0.02 – 0.12 m | uniform | SIMPLER 2024 |
| ik_noise | 0.0 – 0.04 rad | uniform | ICRA Sim2Real 2025 |
| obstacles | 0 – 4 | integer | RoboFAC 2025 |
| shape | 5 types | categorical | Grasp Anything 2024 |
| placement | 14 types | categorical | ALEAS 2025 |
## Research Foundations
| Design Choice | Paper | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Two-Stage Adaptive Sampling | ALEAS | 2025 |
| friction × mass interaction | SIMPLER | CoRL 2024 |
| Failure taxonomy | RoboFAC | NeurIPS 2025 |
| Cross-robot validation | RoboMIND | RSS 2025 |
| UR-specific failures | Guardian | ICRA 2025 |
| Confidence intervals | SureSim | Badithela 2025 |
| GPU simulation | Isaac Lab | NVIDIA 2025 |
| Grasp evaluation | Isaac Sim Grasping SDG | NVIDIA 2025 |
## VLA Benchmark — 4-Model Leaderboard
Four VLA models evaluated on RoboGate's 68-scenario adversarial suite. **All scored 0% SR** — including NVIDIA's official GR00T N1.6.
| Model | Params | SR | Confidence | Failure Pattern |
|-------|--------|-----|-----------|-----------------|
| Scripted Controller | — | **100%** (68/68) | 76/100 | — |
| **GR00T N1.6 (NVIDIA)** | 3B | 0% (0/68) | 1/100 | grasp_miss + collision |
| OpenVLA (Stanford + TRI) | 7B | 0% (0/68) | 27/100 | grasp_miss dominant, 0 collision |
| Octo-Base (UC Berkeley) | 93M | 0% (0/68) | 1/100 | grasp_miss 79%, collision 21% |
| Octo-Small (UC Berkeley) | 27M | 0% (0/68) | 1/100 | grasp_miss 79.4%, collision 20.6% |
Model size is not the bottleneck — even NVIDIA's flagship 3B model cannot bridge the training-deployment distribution gap.
**Leaderboard:** [robogate.io/vla](https://robogate.io/vla) · **Paper:** [arXiv:2603.22126](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22126)
## Citation
```bibtex
@dataset{robogate_failure_dictionary_2026,
title={RoboGate Failure Dictionary: 30K Physics-Validated Pick & Place Failure Patterns},
author={RoboGate Team},
year={2026},
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/liveplex/robogate-failure-dictionary},
note={Franka Panda + UR5e, Two-Stage Adaptive Sampling, AUC 0.777}
}
```
## Links
- **GitHub**: [liveplex-cpu/robogate-failure-dictionary](https://github.com/liveplex-cpu/robogate-failure-dictionary)
- **RoboGate Platform**: [liveplex-cpu/robogate](https://github.com/liveplex-cpu/robogate)
|