subset stringclasses 6
values | context stringlengths 16 17.7k | context_tokens dict | qid stringlengths 32 32 | question stringlengths 1 717 | question_tokens dict | detected_answers dict | answers listlengths 1 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQuAD | Treaties can be loosely compared to contracts: both are means of willing parties assuming obligations among themselves, and a party to either that fails to live up to their obligations can be held liable under international law. | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"can",
"be",
"loosely",
"compared",
"to",
"contracts",
":",
"both",
"are",
"means",
"of",
"willing",
"parties",
"assuming",
"obligations",
"among",
"themselves",
",",
"and",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"e... | 62bcd32ef4134283aee1d1606a7b4702 | What do we call the willingly-assumed burdens placed upon parties to both treaties and contracts? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"do",
"we",
"call",
"the",
"willingly",
"-",
"assumed",
"burdens",
"placed",
"upon",
"parties",
"to",
"both",
"treaties",
"and",
"contracts",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
11,
16,
20,
29,
3... | {
"text": [
"obligations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
90
],
"end": [
100
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
15
],
"end": [
15
]
}
]
} | [
"obligations"
] |
SQuAD | In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally a treaty or international agreement that supplements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol can amend the previous treaty, or add additional provisions. Parties to the earlier agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. So... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"international",
"law",
"and",
"international",
"relations",
",",
"a",
"protocol",
"is",
"generally",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"international",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
... | 966c9182180448bf87aa84f71070b7f3 | What is a treaty that supplements a previous treaty in international law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"a",
"treaty",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"in",
"international",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
10,
17,
22,
34,
36,
45,
52,
55,
69,
72
]
} | {
"text": [
"a protocol"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
59
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
7
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"a protocol"
] |
SQuAD | In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally a treaty or international agreement that supplements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol can amend the previous treaty, or add additional provisions. Parties to the earlier agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. So... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"international",
"law",
"and",
"international",
"relations",
",",
"a",
"protocol",
"is",
"generally",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"international",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
... | baff431ec00246c0ba498fe300fe4ba1 | A protocol may either amend a previous treaty or do what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"protocol",
"may",
"either",
"amend",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
"do",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
11,
15,
22,
28,
30,
39,
46,
49,
52,
56
]
} | {
"text": [
"add additional provisions"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
218
],
"end": [
242
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
34
],
"end": [
36
]
}
]
} | [
"add additional provisions"
] |
SQuAD | In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally a treaty or international agreement that supplements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol can amend the previous treaty, or add additional provisions. Parties to the earlier agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. So... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"international",
"law",
"and",
"international",
"relations",
",",
"a",
"protocol",
"is",
"generally",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"international",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
... | dff3aa1c3ec04c498a42bfdf49071431 | Do parties to a treaty have an obligation to adopt a later protocol? | {
"tokens": [
"Do",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"have",
"an",
"obligation",
"to",
"adopt",
"a",
"later",
"protocol",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
11,
14,
16,
23,
28,
31,
42,
45,
51,
53,
59,
67
]
} | {
"text": [
"not required"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
282
],
"end": [
293
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
44
],
"end": [
45
]
}
]
} | [
"not required"
] |
SQuAD | In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally a treaty or international agreement that supplements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol can amend the previous treaty, or add additional provisions. Parties to the earlier agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. So... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"international",
"law",
"and",
"international",
"relations",
",",
"a",
"protocol",
"is",
"generally",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"international",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
... | 078fdb57e79c448e947fdab9f63ba4b5 | What do we sometimes call an agreement that supplements a treaty especially when few parties to the treaty support the protocol? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"do",
"we",
"sometimes",
"call",
"an",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"treaty",
"especially",
"when",
"few",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"support",
"the",
"protocol",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
... | {
"text": [
"an \"optional protocol\""
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
363
],
"end": [
384
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
59
],
"end": [
63
]
}
]
} | [
"an \"optional protocol\""
] |
SQuAD | In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally a treaty or international agreement that supplements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol can amend the previous treaty, or add additional provisions. Parties to the earlier agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. So... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"international",
"law",
"and",
"international",
"relations",
",",
"a",
"protocol",
"is",
"generally",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"international",
"agreement",
"that",
"supplements",
"a",
"previous",
"treaty",
"or",
... | decc8920cd9d4f8091b56f9099f8582b | A protocol may add additional provisions to a treaty or else do what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"protocol",
"may",
"add",
"additional",
"provisions",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"or",
"else",
"do",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
11,
15,
19,
30,
41,
44,
46,
53,
56,
61,
64,
68
]
} | {
"text": [
"amend the previous treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
188
],
"end": [
212
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
28
],
"end": [
31
]
}
]
} | [
"amend the previous treaty"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is an official, express written agreement that states use to legally bind themselves. A treaty is the official document which expresses that agreement in words; and it is also the objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the parties and their defined relationships. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"an",
"official",
",",
"express",
"written",
"agreement",
"that",
"states",
"use",
"to",
"legally",
"bind",
"themselves",
".",
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"the",
"official",
"document",
"which",... | 7f4c0dfc54b64d9e9adbc090801f8d0e | How are the agreements in a treaty expressed? | {
"tokens": [
"How",
"are",
"the",
"agreements",
"in",
"a",
"treaty",
"expressed",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
12,
23,
26,
28,
35,
44
]
} | {
"text": [
"in words"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
160
],
"end": [
167
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
27
],
"end": [
28
]
}
]
} | [
"in words"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is an official, express written agreement that states use to legally bind themselves. A treaty is the official document which expresses that agreement in words; and it is also the objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the parties and their defined relationships. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"an",
"official",
",",
"express",
"written",
"agreement",
"that",
"states",
"use",
"to",
"legally",
"bind",
"themselves",
".",
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"the",
"official",
"document",
"which",... | b8aeddcdac29442ea71f308f86f0d7bc | How are states that enter into a treaty bound? | {
"tokens": [
"How",
"are",
"states",
"that",
"enter",
"into",
"a",
"treaty",
"bound",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
15,
20,
26,
31,
33,
40,
45
]
} | {
"text": [
"legally"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
70
],
"end": [
76
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
13
]
}
]
} | [
"legally"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is an official, express written agreement that states use to legally bind themselves. A treaty is the official document which expresses that agreement in words; and it is also the objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the parties and their defined relationships. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"an",
"official",
",",
"express",
"written",
"agreement",
"that",
"states",
"use",
"to",
"legally",
"bind",
"themselves",
".",
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"the",
"official",
"document",
"which",... | b0b078d4f68e4edda4079032bf4a3e98 | What is an official document which expresses an agreement between two states? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"an",
"official",
"document",
"which",
"expresses",
"an",
"agreement",
"between",
"two",
"states",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
11,
20,
29,
35,
45,
48,
58,
66,
70,
76
]
} | {
"text": [
"A treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
95
],
"end": [
102
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
17
],
"end": [
18
]
}
]
} | [
"A treaty"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is an official, express written agreement that states use to legally bind themselves. A treaty is the official document which expresses that agreement in words; and it is also the objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the parties and their defined relationships. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"an",
"official",
",",
"express",
"written",
"agreement",
"that",
"states",
"use",
"to",
"legally",
"bind",
"themselves",
".",
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"the",
"official",
"document",
"which",... | bfb457f1f7e1494c9e7527ff16ae495e | What is an objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the defined relationships of its parties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"an",
"objective",
"outcome",
"of",
"a",
"ceremonial",
"occasion",
"which",
"acknowledges",
"the",
"defined",
"relationships",
"of",
"its",
"parties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
11,
21,
29... | {
"text": [
"A treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
95
],
"end": [
102
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
17
],
"end": [
18
]
}
]
} | [
"A treaty"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is an official, express written agreement that states use to legally bind themselves. A treaty is the official document which expresses that agreement in words; and it is also the objective outcome of a ceremonial occasion which acknowledges the parties and their defined relationships. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"an",
"official",
",",
"express",
"written",
"agreement",
"that",
"states",
"use",
"to",
"legally",
"bind",
"themselves",
".",
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"the",
"official",
"document",
"which",... | 445c138a71594f73b7761c9390c18465 | Who is responsible for the legally-bound obligations of the parties to a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"is",
"responsible",
"for",
"the",
"legally",
"-",
"bound",
"obligations",
"of",
"the",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
7,
19,
23,
27,
34,
35,
41,
53,
56,
... | {
"text": [
"themselves"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
83
],
"end": [
92
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
15
],
"end": [
15
]
}
]
} | [
"themselves"
] |
SQuAD | The division between the two is often not clear and is often politicized in disagreements within a government over a treaty, since a non-self-executing treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law. If a treaty requires implementing legislation, a state may be in default of its obligations by the ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"division",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"is",
"often",
"not",
"clear",
"and",
"is",
"often",
"politicized",
"in",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"government",
"over",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"since",
"a",
... | 82496d93922a470989e44a661eba8227 | What type of treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"treaty",
"can",
"not",
"be",
"acted",
"on",
"without",
"the",
"proper",
"change",
"in",
"domestic",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
20,
23,
27,
30,
36,
39,
... | {
"text": [
"a non-self-executing treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
131
],
"end": [
157
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
23
],
"end": [
29
]
}
]
} | [
"a non-self-executing treaty"
] |
SQuAD | The division between the two is often not clear and is often politicized in disagreements within a government over a treaty, since a non-self-executing treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law. If a treaty requires implementing legislation, a state may be in default of its obligations by the ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"division",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"is",
"often",
"not",
"clear",
"and",
"is",
"often",
"politicized",
"in",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"government",
"over",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"since",
"a",
... | d1e47ded515e4eb9912f7eab59b4bfd9 | A state party may be in default of its obligations under a non-self-executing treaty if its legislature fails to do what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"party",
"may",
"be",
"in",
"default",
"of",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"a",
"non",
"-",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"if",
"its",
"legislature",
"fails",
"to",
"do",
"what",
... | {
"text": [
"pass the necessary domestic laws"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
350
],
"end": [
381
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
66
],
"end": [
70
]
}
]
} | [
"pass the necessary domestic laws"
] |
SQuAD | The division between the two is often not clear and is often politicized in disagreements within a government over a treaty, since a non-self-executing treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law. If a treaty requires implementing legislation, a state may be in default of its obligations by the ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"division",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"is",
"often",
"not",
"clear",
"and",
"is",
"often",
"politicized",
"in",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"government",
"over",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"since",
"a",
... | 966c30ce014d409d8f019f6beb420962 | What institution of a party to a treaty must act to fulfill the party's obligations under a non-self-executing treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"institution",
"of",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"must",
"act",
"to",
"fulfill",
"the",
"party",
"'s",
"obligations",
"under",
"a",
"non",
"-",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"?"
],
... | {
"text": [
"its legislature"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
331
],
"end": [
345
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
63
],
"end": [
64
]
}
]
} | [
"its legislature"
] |
SQuAD | The division between the two is often not clear and is often politicized in disagreements within a government over a treaty, since a non-self-executing treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law. If a treaty requires implementing legislation, a state may be in default of its obligations by the ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"division",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"is",
"often",
"not",
"clear",
"and",
"is",
"often",
"politicized",
"in",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"government",
"over",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"since",
"a",
... | 5676589c686f4e17a3c1d2414a9b0519 | The often unclear division between a self-executing treaty and a non-self-executing treaty can lead to a treaty being what if disagreements exist within a party? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"often",
"unclear",
"division",
"between",
"a",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"and",
"a",
"non",
"-",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"can",
"lead",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"being",
"what",
... | {
"text": [
"politicized"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
61
],
"end": [
71
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
12
],
"end": [
12
]
}
]
} | [
"politicized"
] |
SQuAD | The division between the two is often not clear and is often politicized in disagreements within a government over a treaty, since a non-self-executing treaty cannot be acted on without the proper change in domestic law. If a treaty requires implementing legislation, a state may be in default of its obligations by the ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"division",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"is",
"often",
"not",
"clear",
"and",
"is",
"often",
"politicized",
"in",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"government",
"over",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"since",
"a",
... | aff303e5675c45f2ac2ad1f9196120c1 | A treaty may be politicized due to disagreements within a party because the division between a self-executing treaty and a non-self-executing treaty can often be described as what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"politicized",
"due",
"to",
"disagreements",
"within",
"a",
"party",
"because",
"the",
"division",
"between",
"a",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"and",
"a",
"non",
"-",
"... | {
"text": [
"not clear"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
38
],
"end": [
46
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
7
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"not clear"
] |
SQuAD | The terminology can also be confusing because a treaty may and usually is named something other than a treaty, such as a convention, protocol, or simply agreement. Conversely some legal documents such as the Treaty of Waitangi are internationally considered to be documents under domestic law. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terminology",
"can",
"also",
"be",
"confusing",
"because",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"and",
"usually",
"is",
"named",
"something",
"other",
"than",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"such",
"as",
"a",
"convention",
... | 5b32d75d7efa4af8b921de6c33e23c1a | What is the Treaty of Waitangi internationally considered to be? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"Treaty",
"of",
"Waitangi",
"internationally",
"considered",
"to",
"be",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
19,
22,
31,
47,
58,
61,
63
]
} | {
"text": [
"documents under domestic law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
264
],
"end": [
291
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
46
],
"end": [
49
]
}
]
} | [
"documents under domestic law"
] |
SQuAD | The terminology can also be confusing because a treaty may and usually is named something other than a treaty, such as a convention, protocol, or simply agreement. Conversely some legal documents such as the Treaty of Waitangi are internationally considered to be documents under domestic law. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terminology",
"can",
"also",
"be",
"confusing",
"because",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"and",
"usually",
"is",
"named",
"something",
"other",
"than",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"such",
"as",
"a",
"convention",
... | 79c23f61b2d3412c991df2f06297956a | What other terms might be used to refer to a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"other",
"terms",
"might",
"be",
"used",
"to",
"refer",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
17,
23,
26,
31,
34,
40,
43,
45,
51
]
} | {
"text": [
"convention, protocol, or simply agreement"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
121
],
"end": [
161
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
23
],
"end": [
29
]
}
]
} | [
"convention, protocol, or simply agreement"
] |
SQuAD | The terminology can also be confusing because a treaty may and usually is named something other than a treaty, such as a convention, protocol, or simply agreement. Conversely some legal documents such as the Treaty of Waitangi are internationally considered to be documents under domestic law. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terminology",
"can",
"also",
"be",
"confusing",
"because",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"and",
"usually",
"is",
"named",
"something",
"other",
"than",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"such",
"as",
"a",
"convention",
... | faabb0661b7e4b9c9563229e8dcc018b | What common terminological problem can sometimes lead to confusion surrounding a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"common",
"terminological",
"problem",
"can",
"sometimes",
"lead",
"to",
"confusion",
"surrounding",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
12,
27,
35,
39,
49,
54,
57,
67,
79,
81,
87
]... | {
"text": [
"named something other than a treaty,"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
74
],
"end": [
109
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
19
]
}
]
} | [
"named something other than a treaty,"
] |
SQuAD | The terminology can also be confusing because a treaty may and usually is named something other than a treaty, such as a convention, protocol, or simply agreement. Conversely some legal documents such as the Treaty of Waitangi are internationally considered to be documents under domestic law. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terminology",
"can",
"also",
"be",
"confusing",
"because",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"and",
"usually",
"is",
"named",
"something",
"other",
"than",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"such",
"as",
"a",
"convention",
... | ec6a07e442274179898ce1d6ec35568d | What's an example of a treaty that is considered internationally to be documents under domestic law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"'s",
"an",
"example",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"that",
"is",
"considered",
"internationally",
"to",
"be",
"documents",
"under",
"domestic",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
7,
10,
18,
21,
23,
... | {
"text": [
"the Treaty of Waitangi"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
204
],
"end": [
225
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
37
],
"end": [
40
]
}
]
} | [
"the Treaty of Waitangi"
] |
SQuAD | The terminology can also be confusing because a treaty may and usually is named something other than a treaty, such as a convention, protocol, or simply agreement. Conversely some legal documents such as the Treaty of Waitangi are internationally considered to be documents under domestic law. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terminology",
"can",
"also",
"be",
"confusing",
"because",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"and",
"usually",
"is",
"named",
"something",
"other",
"than",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"such",
"as",
"a",
"convention",
... | e15a9db8ba484e4b8017382d8e249fec | Convention, protocol, and agreement are examples of examples of different kinds of what that can create confusion about a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Convention",
",",
"protocol",
",",
"and",
"agreement",
"are",
"examples",
"of",
"examples",
"of",
"different",
"kinds",
"of",
"what",
"that",
"can",
"create",
"confusion",
"about",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"off... | {
"text": [
"terminology"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
4
],
"end": [
14
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1
],
"end": [
1
]
}
]
} | [
"terminology"
] |
SQuAD | If a state party's withdrawal is successful, its obligations under that treaty are considered terminated, and withdrawal by one party from a bilateral treaty of course terminates the treaty. When a state withdraws from a multi-lateral treaty, that treaty will still otherwise remain in force among the other parties, unl... | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"is",
"successful",
",",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"that",
"treaty",
"are",
"considered",
"terminated",
",",
"and",
"withdrawal",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"f... | 661145012fc54fa7845fc6fa7dcac58d | What happens to a state's obligations under a treaty upon its withdrawal from the treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"happens",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"obligations",
"under",
"a",
"treaty",
"upon",
"its",
"withdrawal",
"from",
"the",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
13,
16,
18,
23,
26,
38,
44,
... | {
"text": [
"terminated"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
94
],
"end": [
103
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
16
],
"end": [
16
]
}
]
} | [
"terminated"
] |
SQuAD | If a state party's withdrawal is successful, its obligations under that treaty are considered terminated, and withdrawal by one party from a bilateral treaty of course terminates the treaty. When a state withdraws from a multi-lateral treaty, that treaty will still otherwise remain in force among the other parties, unl... | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"is",
"successful",
",",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"that",
"treaty",
"are",
"considered",
"terminated",
",",
"and",
"withdrawal",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"f... | d05fb03fda534e1b90ed921170548bba | What kind of treaty is terminated by the withdrawal of just one party? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"kind",
"of",
"treaty",
"is",
"terminated",
"by",
"the",
"withdrawal",
"of",
"just",
"one",
"party",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
20,
23,
34,
37,
41,
52,
55,
60,
64,
69
]
} | {
"text": [
"a bilateral treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
139
],
"end": [
156
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
24
],
"end": [
26
]
}
]
} | [
"a bilateral treaty"
] |
SQuAD | If a state party's withdrawal is successful, its obligations under that treaty are considered terminated, and withdrawal by one party from a bilateral treaty of course terminates the treaty. When a state withdraws from a multi-lateral treaty, that treaty will still otherwise remain in force among the other parties, unl... | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"is",
"successful",
",",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"that",
"treaty",
"are",
"considered",
"terminated",
",",
"and",
"withdrawal",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"f... | f3fc068032ed460394b9e2c0585b6185 | What happens to a multilateral treaty's rights and obligations among the other parties when just one party withdraws? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"happens",
"to",
"a",
"multilateral",
"treaty",
"'s",
"rights",
"and",
"obligations",
"among",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"when",
"just",
"one",
"party",
"withdraws",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
13,
... | {
"text": [
"remain in force"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
276
],
"end": [
290
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
49
],
"end": [
51
]
}
]
} | [
"remain in force"
] |
SQuAD | If a state party's withdrawal is successful, its obligations under that treaty are considered terminated, and withdrawal by one party from a bilateral treaty of course terminates the treaty. When a state withdraws from a multi-lateral treaty, that treaty will still otherwise remain in force among the other parties, unl... | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"is",
"successful",
",",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"that",
"treaty",
"are",
"considered",
"terminated",
",",
"and",
"withdrawal",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"f... | 58856bfc6e164ee3bf70e67b1f76322d | After what action by a state are its obligations under a treaty considered terminated? | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"what",
"action",
"by",
"a",
"state",
"are",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"a",
"treaty",
"considered",
"terminated",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
11,
18,
21,
23,
29,
33,
37,
49,
55,
57... | {
"text": [
"withdrawal"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
19
],
"end": [
28
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
5
],
"end": [
5
]
}
]
} | [
"withdrawal"
] |
SQuAD | If a state party's withdrawal is successful, its obligations under that treaty are considered terminated, and withdrawal by one party from a bilateral treaty of course terminates the treaty. When a state withdraws from a multi-lateral treaty, that treaty will still otherwise remain in force among the other parties, unl... | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"is",
"successful",
",",
"its",
"obligations",
"under",
"that",
"treaty",
"are",
"considered",
"terminated",
",",
"and",
"withdrawal",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"f... | 5b754c8344b94b8ebb0d7b13315bb0e4 | Under what conditions could a single state's withdrawal result in the termination of a multilateral treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Under",
"what",
"conditions",
"could",
"a",
"single",
"state",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"result",
"in",
"the",
"termination",
"of",
"a",
"multilateral",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
11,
22,
28,
30,
... | {
"text": [
"agreed upon between the remaining states parties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
380
],
"end": [
427
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
69
],
"end": [
75
]
}
]
} | [
"agreed upon between the remaining states parties"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties may be seen as 'self-executing', in that merely becoming a party puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action. Other treaties may be non-self-executing and require 'implementing legislation'—a change in the domestic law of a state party that will direct or enable it to fulfill treaty obligations. An ex... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"may",
"be",
"seen",
"as",
"'",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"'",
",",
"in",
"that",
"merely",
"becoming",
"a",
"party",
"puts",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"all",
"of",
"its",
"obligations",
"in... | dbe48cbe16e248bda1d7f6c89a83c95b | A treaty that puts all of its obligations in action simply by becoming a party to it is known as what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"that",
"puts",
"all",
"of",
"its",
"obligations",
"in",
"action",
"simply",
"by",
"becoming",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"it",
"is",
"known",
"as",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
9,
14... | {
"text": [
"self-executing"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
38
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
6
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"self-executing"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties may be seen as 'self-executing', in that merely becoming a party puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action. Other treaties may be non-self-executing and require 'implementing legislation'—a change in the domestic law of a state party that will direct or enable it to fulfill treaty obligations. An ex... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"may",
"be",
"seen",
"as",
"'",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"'",
",",
"in",
"that",
"merely",
"becoming",
"a",
"party",
"puts",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"all",
"of",
"its",
"obligations",
"in... | 1ce102e917714a2eb711cff404f6d4ca | A treaty requiring local prosecution by a party for particular crimes is an example of which type of treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"requiring",
"local",
"prosecution",
"by",
"a",
"party",
"for",
"particular",
"crimes",
"is",
"an",
"example",
"of",
"which",
"type",
"of",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
9,
19,
25... | {
"text": [
"non-self-executing"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
150
],
"end": [
167
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
32
],
"end": [
36
]
}
]
} | [
"non-self-executing"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties may be seen as 'self-executing', in that merely becoming a party puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action. Other treaties may be non-self-executing and require 'implementing legislation'—a change in the domestic law of a state party that will direct or enable it to fulfill treaty obligations. An ex... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"may",
"be",
"seen",
"as",
"'",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"'",
",",
"in",
"that",
"merely",
"becoming",
"a",
"party",
"puts",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"all",
"of",
"its",
"obligations",
"in... | 8b2b43969b8141bda832d82e5dd45e56 | Signing a self-executing treaty automatically does what for a party? | {
"tokens": [
"Signing",
"a",
"self",
"-",
"executing",
"treaty",
"automatically",
"does",
"what",
"for",
"a",
"party",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
10,
14,
15,
25,
32,
46,
51,
56,
60,
62,
67
]
} | {
"text": [
"puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
74
],
"end": [
125
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
17
],
"end": [
26
]
}
]
} | [
"puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action"
] |
SQuAD | Southampton is home to Southampton Football Club—nicknamed "The Saints"—who play in the Premier League at St Mary's Stadium, having relocated in 2001 from their 103-year-old former stadium, "The Dell". They reached the top flight of English football (First Division) for the first time in 1966, staying there for eight y... | {
"tokens": [
"Southampton",
"is",
"home",
"to",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"—",
"nicknamed",
"\"",
"The",
"Saints\"—who",
"play",
"in",
"the",
"Premier",
"League",
"at",
"St",
"Mary",
"'s",
"Stadium",
",",
"having... | cc7dffd39fa04d7da0b694d3670a8720 | What stadium has been home to The Saints since 2001? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"stadium",
"has",
"been",
"home",
"to",
"The",
"Saints",
"since",
"2001",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
13,
17,
22,
27,
30,
34,
41,
47,
51
]
} | {
"text": [
"St Mary's Stadium"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
106
],
"end": [
122
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
18
],
"end": [
21
]
}
]
} | [
"St Mary's Stadium"
] |
SQuAD | Southampton is home to Southampton Football Club—nicknamed "The Saints"—who play in the Premier League at St Mary's Stadium, having relocated in 2001 from their 103-year-old former stadium, "The Dell". They reached the top flight of English football (First Division) for the first time in 1966, staying there for eight y... | {
"tokens": [
"Southampton",
"is",
"home",
"to",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"—",
"nicknamed",
"\"",
"The",
"Saints\"—who",
"play",
"in",
"the",
"Premier",
"League",
"at",
"St",
"Mary",
"'s",
"Stadium",
",",
"having... | bb5a4e36524345fca4137e55495cbbd4 | What year did Southampton Football Club first reach the top level of English football? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"year",
"did",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"first",
"reach",
"the",
"top",
"level",
"of",
"English",
"football",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
14,
26,
35,
40,
46,
52,
56,
60,
66... | {
"text": [
"1966"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
289
],
"end": [
292
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
57
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"1966"
] |
SQuAD | Southampton is home to Southampton Football Club—nicknamed "The Saints"—who play in the Premier League at St Mary's Stadium, having relocated in 2001 from their 103-year-old former stadium, "The Dell". They reached the top flight of English football (First Division) for the first time in 1966, staying there for eight y... | {
"tokens": [
"Southampton",
"is",
"home",
"to",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"—",
"nicknamed",
"\"",
"The",
"Saints\"—who",
"play",
"in",
"the",
"Premier",
"League",
"at",
"St",
"Mary",
"'s",
"Stadium",
",",
"having... | 3543b0a1663447099680bd071091745e | Who did The Saints beat in 1976 to win the FA Cup? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"did",
"The",
"Saints",
"beat",
"in",
"1976",
"to",
"win",
"the",
"FA",
"Cup",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
12,
19,
24,
27,
32,
35,
39,
43,
46,
49
]
} | {
"text": [
"Manchester United"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
375
],
"end": [
391
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
75
],
"end": [
76
]
}
]
} | [
"Manchester United"
] |
SQuAD | Southampton is home to Southampton Football Club—nicknamed "The Saints"—who play in the Premier League at St Mary's Stadium, having relocated in 2001 from their 103-year-old former stadium, "The Dell". They reached the top flight of English football (First Division) for the first time in 1966, staying there for eight y... | {
"tokens": [
"Southampton",
"is",
"home",
"to",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"—",
"nicknamed",
"\"",
"The",
"Saints\"—who",
"play",
"in",
"the",
"Premier",
"League",
"at",
"St",
"Mary",
"'s",
"Stadium",
",",
"having... | 62e534c7158c4933a75758432db925b8 | What league did Southampton Football Club become founding members of in 1992? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"league",
"did",
"Southampton",
"Football",
"Club",
"become",
"founding",
"members",
"of",
"in",
"1992",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
12,
16,
28,
37,
42,
49,
58,
66,
69,
72,
76
]
} | {
"text": [
"the Premier League"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
505
],
"end": [
522
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
100
],
"end": [
102
]
}
]
} | [
"the Premier League"
] |
SQuAD | One significant part of treaty making is that signing a treaty implies recognition that the other side is a sovereign state and that the agreement being considered is enforceable under international law. Hence, nations can be very careful about terming an agreement to be a treaty. For example, within the United States,... | {
"tokens": [
"One",
"significant",
"part",
"of",
"treaty",
"making",
"is",
"that",
"signing",
"a",
"treaty",
"implies",
"recognition",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"sovereign",
"state",
"and",
"that",
"the",... | ac3913ad529648c896b86b78a72c5262 | What are agreements between states within the United States called? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"agreements",
"between",
"states",
"within",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"called",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
20,
28,
35,
42,
46,
53,
60,
66
]
} | {
"text": [
"compacts"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
351
],
"end": [
358
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
61
],
"end": [
61
]
}
]
} | [
"compacts"
] |
SQuAD | One significant part of treaty making is that signing a treaty implies recognition that the other side is a sovereign state and that the agreement being considered is enforceable under international law. Hence, nations can be very careful about terming an agreement to be a treaty. For example, within the United States,... | {
"tokens": [
"One",
"significant",
"part",
"of",
"treaty",
"making",
"is",
"that",
"signing",
"a",
"treaty",
"implies",
"recognition",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"sovereign",
"state",
"and",
"that",
"the",... | b0c9431409e2434b8f823376c21a90de | What are agreements between states and the federal government called within the United States? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"agreements",
"between",
"states",
"and",
"the",
"federal",
"government",
"called",
"within",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
20,
28,
35,
39,
43,
51,
62,
69,... | {
"text": [
"memoranda of understanding"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
459
],
"end": [
484
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
77
],
"end": [
79
]
}
]
} | [
"memoranda of understanding"
] |
SQuAD | One significant part of treaty making is that signing a treaty implies recognition that the other side is a sovereign state and that the agreement being considered is enforceable under international law. Hence, nations can be very careful about terming an agreement to be a treaty. For example, within the United States,... | {
"tokens": [
"One",
"significant",
"part",
"of",
"treaty",
"making",
"is",
"that",
"signing",
"a",
"treaty",
"implies",
"recognition",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"sovereign",
"state",
"and",
"that",
"the",... | 46b55a3f875049b6a7735790f00d81ee | In the United States, what are agreements between agencies of the federal government called? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"what",
"are",
"agreements",
"between",
"agencies",
"of",
"the",
"federal",
"government",
"called",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
7,
14,
20,
22,
27,
31,
42,
50,
... | {
"text": [
"memoranda of understanding"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
459
],
"end": [
484
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
77
],
"end": [
79
]
}
]
} | [
"memoranda of understanding"
] |
SQuAD | One significant part of treaty making is that signing a treaty implies recognition that the other side is a sovereign state and that the agreement being considered is enforceable under international law. Hence, nations can be very careful about terming an agreement to be a treaty. For example, within the United States,... | {
"tokens": [
"One",
"significant",
"part",
"of",
"treaty",
"making",
"is",
"that",
"signing",
"a",
"treaty",
"implies",
"recognition",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"sovereign",
"state",
"and",
"that",
"the",... | d4295491c1f54628af53284775a73055 | Nations can be careful about terming an agreement a treaty because it has the effect of recognizing that the other side is a what? | {
"tokens": [
"Nations",
"can",
"be",
"careful",
"about",
"terming",
"an",
"agreement",
"a",
"treaty",
"because",
"it",
"has",
"the",
"effect",
"of",
"recognizing",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"what",
"?... | {
"text": [
"a sovereign state"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
106
],
"end": [
122
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
18
],
"end": [
20
]
}
]
} | [
"a sovereign state"
] |
SQuAD | One significant part of treaty making is that signing a treaty implies recognition that the other side is a sovereign state and that the agreement being considered is enforceable under international law. Hence, nations can be very careful about terming an agreement to be a treaty. For example, within the United States,... | {
"tokens": [
"One",
"significant",
"part",
"of",
"treaty",
"making",
"is",
"that",
"signing",
"a",
"treaty",
"implies",
"recognition",
"that",
"the",
"other",
"side",
"is",
"a",
"sovereign",
"state",
"and",
"that",
"the",... | ee2ab4c2e87a48799786babfd298ef62 | Under what do all parties to a treaty recognize the provisions of the treaty are enforceable? | {
"tokens": [
"Under",
"what",
"do",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"recognize",
"the",
"provisions",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"are",
"enforceable",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
11,
14,
18,
26,
29,
31,
38,
... | {
"text": [
"international law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
185
],
"end": [
201
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
30
],
"end": [
31
]
}
]
} | [
"international law"
] |
SQuAD | Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties stil... | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
",",
"international",
"law",
"was",
"unaccepting",
"of",
"treaty",
"reservations",
",",
"rejecting",
"them",
"unless",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"the",
"same",
"reservations",... | 3cc66c8a785d4960a11cc2d79ac38b5b | A more permissive rule regarding what emerged to encourage the largest number of states to join treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"more",
"permissive",
"rule",
"regarding",
"what",
"emerged",
"to",
"encourage",
"the",
"largest",
"number",
"of",
"states",
"to",
"join",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
7,
18,
23,
33,
38,... | {
"text": [
"reservations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
270
],
"end": [
281
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
44
],
"end": [
44
]
}
]
} | [
"reservations"
] |
SQuAD | Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties stil... | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
",",
"international",
"law",
"was",
"unaccepting",
"of",
"treaty",
"reservations",
",",
"rejecting",
"them",
"unless",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"the",
"same",
"reservations",... | 35cac40968f74da99a4c1950c4b24e01 | Reservations are generally permitted so long as they are not what? | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"generally",
"permitted",
"so",
"long",
"as",
"they",
"are",
"not",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
13,
17,
27,
37,
40,
45,
48,
53,
57,
61,
65
]
} | {
"text": [
"inconsistent with the goals and purposes of the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
422
],
"end": [
475
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
69
],
"end": [
77
]
}
]
} | [
"inconsistent with the goals and purposes of the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties stil... | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
",",
"international",
"law",
"was",
"unaccepting",
"of",
"treaty",
"reservations",
",",
"rejecting",
"them",
"unless",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"the",
"same",
"reservations",... | 86fa834da6534c9a8f145754cc92ade8 | How did international law originally respond to treaty reservations? | {
"tokens": [
"How",
"did",
"international",
"law",
"originally",
"respond",
"to",
"treaty",
"reservations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
22,
26,
37,
45,
48,
55,
67
]
} | {
"text": [
"rejecting them"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
70
],
"end": [
83
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
10
],
"end": [
11
]
}
]
} | [
"rejecting them"
] |
SQuAD | Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties stil... | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
",",
"international",
"law",
"was",
"unaccepting",
"of",
"treaty",
"reservations",
",",
"rejecting",
"them",
"unless",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"the",
"same",
"reservations",... | 33e7d8e2ddc34a9e988b8981dd7f731d | Originally reservations were rejected under international law unless which parties of the treaty accepted them? | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
"reservations",
"were",
"rejected",
"under",
"international",
"law",
"unless",
"which",
"parties",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"them",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
11,
24,
29,
38,
44,
58,
6... | {
"text": [
"all parties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
92
],
"end": [
102
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"all parties"
] |
SQuAD | Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties stil... | {
"tokens": [
"Originally",
",",
"international",
"law",
"was",
"unaccepting",
"of",
"treaty",
"reservations",
",",
"rejecting",
"them",
"unless",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"accepted",
"the",
"same",
"reservations",... | 81d99aa120b4407cbf4f4814f3c5f6d1 | Because they are generally accepted under international law, a treaty must forbid reservations in what manner to prevent their adoption? | {
"tokens": [
"Because",
"they",
"are",
"generally",
"accepted",
"under",
"international",
"law",
",",
"a",
"treaty",
"must",
"forbid",
"reservations",
"in",
"what",
"manner",
"to",
"prevent",
"their",
"adoption",
"?"
],
"offs... | {
"text": [
"expressly"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
322
],
"end": [
330
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
52
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"expressly"
] |
SQuAD | In practice, because of sovereignty, any state can withdraw from any treaty at any time. The question of whether this is permitted is really a question of how other states will react to the withdrawal; for instance, another state might impose sanctions or go to war over a treaty violation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
",",
"because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
",",
"any",
"state",
"can",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
".",
"The",
"question",
"of",
"whether",
"this",
"is",
"permitt... | e53553a8a10848f7b5ccf764c34378ac | What factor, in practice, allows a state to withdraw from any treaty at any time? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"factor",
",",
"in",
"practice",
",",
"allows",
"a",
"state",
"to",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
13,
16,
24,
26,
33,
35,
... | {
"text": [
"sovereignty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
24
],
"end": [
34
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
5
],
"end": [
5
]
}
]
} | [
"sovereignty"
] |
SQuAD | In practice, because of sovereignty, any state can withdraw from any treaty at any time. The question of whether this is permitted is really a question of how other states will react to the withdrawal; for instance, another state might impose sanctions or go to war over a treaty violation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
",",
"because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
",",
"any",
"state",
"can",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
".",
"The",
"question",
"of",
"whether",
"this",
"is",
"permitt... | 967407d5fcd34db3ac4771950f772636 | What really determines whether withdrawal from a treaty is permitted? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"really",
"determines",
"whether",
"withdrawal",
"from",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"permitted",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
12,
23,
31,
42,
47,
49,
56,
59,
68
]
} | {
"text": [
"how other states will react"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
155
],
"end": [
181
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
30
],
"end": [
34
]
}
]
} | [
"how other states will react"
] |
SQuAD | In practice, because of sovereignty, any state can withdraw from any treaty at any time. The question of whether this is permitted is really a question of how other states will react to the withdrawal; for instance, another state might impose sanctions or go to war over a treaty violation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
",",
"because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
",",
"any",
"state",
"can",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
".",
"The",
"question",
"of",
"whether",
"this",
"is",
"permitt... | f5e0f0e3b82c49979dd0d67704b3d1fd | What might a state do in response to another state's withdrawal from a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"might",
"a",
"state",
"do",
"in",
"response",
"to",
"another",
"state",
"'s",
"withdrawal",
"from",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
13,
19,
22,
25,
34,
37,
45,
50,
53... | {
"text": [
"impose sanctions or go to war"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
236
],
"end": [
264
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
45
],
"end": [
50
]
}
]
} | [
"impose sanctions or go to war"
] |
SQuAD | In practice, because of sovereignty, any state can withdraw from any treaty at any time. The question of whether this is permitted is really a question of how other states will react to the withdrawal; for instance, another state might impose sanctions or go to war over a treaty violation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
",",
"because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
",",
"any",
"state",
"can",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
".",
"The",
"question",
"of",
"whether",
"this",
"is",
"permitt... | d9635144e95c4f199d0798beed8d189f | Although withdrawal from a treaty may not be possible in theory, when might it be possible anyway? | {
"tokens": [
"Although",
"withdrawal",
"from",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"not",
"be",
"possible",
"in",
"theory",
",",
"when",
"might",
"it",
"be",
"possible",
"anyway",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
20,
25,
27,
34,
3... | {
"text": [
"In practice"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
0
],
"end": [
10
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
0
],
"end": [
1
]
}
]
} | [
"In practice"
] |
SQuAD | In practice, because of sovereignty, any state can withdraw from any treaty at any time. The question of whether this is permitted is really a question of how other states will react to the withdrawal; for instance, another state might impose sanctions or go to war over a treaty violation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
",",
"because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
",",
"any",
"state",
"can",
"withdraw",
"from",
"any",
"treaty",
"at",
"any",
"time",
".",
"The",
"question",
"of",
"whether",
"this",
"is",
"permitt... | 241780e30d2b4e0d8b9c872d5755a0ae | Because of sovereignty when may a state withdrawal from a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Because",
"of",
"sovereignty",
"when",
"may",
"a",
"state",
"withdrawal",
"from",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
11,
23,
28,
32,
34,
40,
51,
56,
58,
64
]
} | {
"text": [
"at any time"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
76
],
"end": [
86
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
14
],
"end": [
16
]
}
]
} | [
"at any time"
] |
SQuAD | Another situation can occur when one party wishes to create an obligation under international law, but the other party does not. This factor has been at work with respect to discussions between North Korea and the United States over security guarantees and nuclear proliferation. | {
"tokens": [
"Another",
"situation",
"can",
"occur",
"when",
"one",
"party",
"wishes",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"international",
"law",
",",
"but",
"the",
"other",
"party",
"does",
"not",
".",
"This",
... | a411f8a44b714b5eac8a550f56200e07 | Parties to a treaty may disagree over a desire to create an obligation under what? | {
"tokens": [
"Parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"disagree",
"over",
"a",
"desire",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
11,
13,
20,
24,
33,
38,
40,
47,
50,
... | {
"text": [
"international law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
80
],
"end": [
96
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"international law"
] |
SQuAD | Another situation can occur when one party wishes to create an obligation under international law, but the other party does not. This factor has been at work with respect to discussions between North Korea and the United States over security guarantees and nuclear proliferation. | {
"tokens": [
"Another",
"situation",
"can",
"occur",
"when",
"one",
"party",
"wishes",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"international",
"law",
",",
"but",
"the",
"other",
"party",
"does",
"not",
".",
"This",
... | 2c9075d1e1784b0bbbfb1fecac58a087 | Discussions between what two countries have been influence by one party's desire to create an obligation under international law? | {
"tokens": [
"Discussions",
"between",
"what",
"two",
"countries",
"have",
"been",
"influence",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"'s",
"desire",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"international",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,... | {
"text": [
"North Korea and the United States"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
194
],
"end": [
226
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
34
],
"end": [
39
]
}
]
} | [
"North Korea and the United States"
] |
SQuAD | Another situation can occur when one party wishes to create an obligation under international law, but the other party does not. This factor has been at work with respect to discussions between North Korea and the United States over security guarantees and nuclear proliferation. | {
"tokens": [
"Another",
"situation",
"can",
"occur",
"when",
"one",
"party",
"wishes",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"international",
"law",
",",
"but",
"the",
"other",
"party",
"does",
"not",
".",
"This",
... | 38adc14022d4456299ba79bad8d854a6 | Discussion between North Korea and the United States have been influenced by one party's desire to create obligations under international law with respect to what two topics? | {
"tokens": [
"Discussion",
"between",
"North",
"Korea",
"and",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"have",
"been",
"influenced",
"by",
"one",
"party",
"'s",
"desire",
"to",
"create",
"obligations",
"under",
"international",
"law",
"wi... | {
"text": [
"security guarantees and nuclear proliferation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
233
],
"end": [
277
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
41
],
"end": [
45
]
}
]
} | [
"security guarantees and nuclear proliferation"
] |
SQuAD | Another situation can occur when one party wishes to create an obligation under international law, but the other party does not. This factor has been at work with respect to discussions between North Korea and the United States over security guarantees and nuclear proliferation. | {
"tokens": [
"Another",
"situation",
"can",
"occur",
"when",
"one",
"party",
"wishes",
"to",
"create",
"an",
"obligation",
"under",
"international",
"law",
",",
"but",
"the",
"other",
"party",
"does",
"not",
".",
"This",
... | 861fea651a7a4a878bbc69edb7c15858 | North Korea and the United States have been characterized by a disagreement over one parties desire to create what with respect to security guarantees and nuclear proliferation? | {
"tokens": [
"North",
"Korea",
"and",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"have",
"been",
"characterized",
"by",
"a",
"disagreement",
"over",
"one",
"parties",
"desire",
"to",
"create",
"what",
"with",
"respect",
"to",
"security",
... | {
"text": [
"to create an obligation under international law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
96
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
8
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"to create an obligation under international law"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties sometimes include provisions for self-termination, meaning that the treaty is automatically terminated if certain defined conditions are met. Some treaties are intended by the parties to be only temporarily binding and are set to expire on a given date. Other treaties may self-terminate if the treaty is meant ... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"sometimes",
"include",
"provisions",
"for",
"self",
"-",
"termination",
",",
"meaning",
"that",
"the",
"treaty",
"is",
"automatically",
"terminated",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met... | ffa0eafd9f9d451eabfd4cef7f5b1e3c | Some treaties contains provisions for what to happen if certain defined conditions are met? | {
"tokens": [
"Some",
"treaties",
"contains",
"provisions",
"for",
"what",
"to",
"happen",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
14,
23,
34,
38,
43,
46,
53,
56,
64,
... | {
"text": [
"self-termination"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
42
],
"end": [
57
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
5
],
"end": [
7
]
}
]
} | [
"self-termination"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties sometimes include provisions for self-termination, meaning that the treaty is automatically terminated if certain defined conditions are met. Some treaties are intended by the parties to be only temporarily binding and are set to expire on a given date. Other treaties may self-terminate if the treaty is meant ... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"sometimes",
"include",
"provisions",
"for",
"self",
"-",
"termination",
",",
"meaning",
"that",
"the",
"treaty",
"is",
"automatically",
"terminated",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met... | 5ba9544bb68f401a8c7577c6dfe0a449 | What provision might a treaty include if it's meant to be only temporarily binding? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"provision",
"might",
"a",
"treaty",
"include",
"if",
"it",
"'s",
"meant",
"to",
"be",
"only",
"temporarily",
"binding",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
15,
21,
23,
30,
38,
41,
43,
46,
52,
... | {
"text": [
"set to expire on a given date"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
232
],
"end": [
260
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
37
],
"end": [
43
]
}
]
} | [
"set to expire on a given date"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties sometimes include provisions for self-termination, meaning that the treaty is automatically terminated if certain defined conditions are met. Some treaties are intended by the parties to be only temporarily binding and are set to expire on a given date. Other treaties may self-terminate if the treaty is meant ... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"sometimes",
"include",
"provisions",
"for",
"self",
"-",
"termination",
",",
"meaning",
"that",
"the",
"treaty",
"is",
"automatically",
"terminated",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met... | 526686b5a3bf41048f7febd4a56f1618 | In addition to passing an expiration date, what might cause a treaty to self-terminate? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"passing",
"an",
"expiration",
"date",
",",
"what",
"might",
"cause",
"a",
"treaty",
"to",
"self",
"-",
"terminate",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
12,
15,
23,
26,
37,
41,
4... | {
"text": [
"certain defined conditions are met"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
115
],
"end": [
148
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
17
],
"end": [
21
]
}
]
} | [
"certain defined conditions are met"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties sometimes include provisions for self-termination, meaning that the treaty is automatically terminated if certain defined conditions are met. Some treaties are intended by the parties to be only temporarily binding and are set to expire on a given date. Other treaties may self-terminate if the treaty is meant ... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"sometimes",
"include",
"provisions",
"for",
"self",
"-",
"termination",
",",
"meaning",
"that",
"the",
"treaty",
"is",
"automatically",
"terminated",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met... | ee9e937311ae4e3bad6187f678f68c5f | What happens to a treaty that was designed to terminate under certain conditions when those conditions are actually met? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"happens",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"that",
"was",
"designed",
"to",
"terminate",
"under",
"certain",
"conditions",
"when",
"those",
"conditions",
"are",
"actually",
"met",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
13,
... | {
"text": [
"automatically terminated"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
87
],
"end": [
110
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
14
],
"end": [
15
]
}
]
} | [
"automatically terminated"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties sometimes include provisions for self-termination, meaning that the treaty is automatically terminated if certain defined conditions are met. Some treaties are intended by the parties to be only temporarily binding and are set to expire on a given date. Other treaties may self-terminate if the treaty is meant ... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"sometimes",
"include",
"provisions",
"for",
"self",
"-",
"termination",
",",
"meaning",
"that",
"the",
"treaty",
"is",
"automatically",
"terminated",
"if",
"certain",
"defined",
"conditions",
"are",
"met... | f1ef54bca9e84b16b9b289f553cfc292 | What may we assume the parties to a treaty intended the treaty's obligations to be if the treaty included an expiration date? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"may",
"we",
"assume",
"the",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"intended",
"the",
"treaty",
"'s",
"obligations",
"to",
"be",
"if",
"the",
"treaty",
"included",
"an",
"expiration",
"date",
"?"
],
"o... | {
"text": [
"temporarily binding"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
204
],
"end": [
222
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
33
],
"end": [
34
]
}
]
} | [
"temporarily binding"
] |
SQuAD | If a party has materially violated or breached its treaty obligations, the other parties may invoke this breach as grounds for temporarily suspending their obligations to that party under the treaty. A material breach may also be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating the treaty itself. | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"party",
"has",
"materially",
"violated",
"or",
"breached",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
",",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"may",
"invoke",
"this",
"breach",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"temporarily",
... | 01b35637c00146d09355fe112a0248f4 | What may be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"may",
"be",
"invoked",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"permanently",
"terminating",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
12,
20,
23,
31,
35,
47,
59,
61,
67
]
} | {
"text": [
"A material breach"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
200
],
"end": [
216
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
33
],
"end": [
35
]
}
]
} | [
"A material breach"
] |
SQuAD | If a party has materially violated or breached its treaty obligations, the other parties may invoke this breach as grounds for temporarily suspending their obligations to that party under the treaty. A material breach may also be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating the treaty itself. | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"party",
"has",
"materially",
"violated",
"or",
"breached",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
",",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"may",
"invoke",
"this",
"breach",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"temporarily",
... | 230ce4a737414fd29392902d7151601f | In addition to terminating the treaty itself, what actions by the other parties might result from one party materially violating or beaching its obligations? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"terminating",
"the",
"treaty",
"itself",
",",
"what",
"actions",
"by",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"might",
"result",
"from",
"one",
"party",
"materially",
"violating",
"or",
"beaching",
... | {
"text": [
"temporarily suspending their obligations to that party"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
127
],
"end": [
180
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
22
],
"end": [
28
]
}
]
} | [
"temporarily suspending their obligations to that party"
] |
SQuAD | If a party has materially violated or breached its treaty obligations, the other parties may invoke this breach as grounds for temporarily suspending their obligations to that party under the treaty. A material breach may also be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating the treaty itself. | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"party",
"has",
"materially",
"violated",
"or",
"breached",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
",",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"may",
"invoke",
"this",
"breach",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"temporarily",
... | 032f995273294854b5eabe1434540466 | In addition to suspending their obligations under a treaty to the violating party, what may result from a material breach of treaty obligations? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"suspending",
"their",
"obligations",
"under",
"a",
"treaty",
"to",
"the",
"violating",
"party",
",",
"what",
"may",
"result",
"from",
"a",
"material",
"breach",
"of",
"treaty",
"oblig... | {
"text": [
"terminating the treaty itself"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
265
],
"end": [
293
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
44
],
"end": [
47
]
}
]
} | [
"terminating the treaty itself"
] |
SQuAD | If a party has materially violated or breached its treaty obligations, the other parties may invoke this breach as grounds for temporarily suspending their obligations to that party under the treaty. A material breach may also be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating the treaty itself. | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"party",
"has",
"materially",
"violated",
"or",
"breached",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
",",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"may",
"invoke",
"this",
"breach",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"temporarily",
... | 64474dbde3e8438b9f6d9b2a54877e01 | Who may invoke a material breach committed by a party to a treaty to suspend their obligations to that party? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"may",
"invoke",
"a",
"material",
"breach",
"committed",
"by",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"to",
"suspend",
"their",
"obligations",
"to",
"that",
"party",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
15... | {
"text": [
"the other parties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
71
],
"end": [
87
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
12
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"the other parties"
] |
SQuAD | If a party has materially violated or breached its treaty obligations, the other parties may invoke this breach as grounds for temporarily suspending their obligations to that party under the treaty. A material breach may also be invoked as grounds for permanently terminating the treaty itself. | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"party",
"has",
"materially",
"violated",
"or",
"breached",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
",",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"may",
"invoke",
"this",
"breach",
"as",
"grounds",
"for",
"temporarily",
... | 3ad25afc36ff4a32a6e59b1c72da70aa | What temporary actions can parties of a treaty take in response to a material violation of a party's obligations? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"temporary",
"actions",
"can",
"parties",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"take",
"in",
"response",
"to",
"a",
"material",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"obligations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
15,
... | {
"text": [
"suspending their obligations to that party"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
139
],
"end": [
180
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
23
],
"end": [
28
]
}
]
} | [
"suspending their obligations to that party"
] |
SQuAD | Reservations are essentially caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty. Reservations are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on the reserving state. These must be included at the time of signing or ratification, i.e. "a party cannot add a reservation after it ... | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"essentially",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
".",
"Reservations",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"mo... | a571d1729d8e4ce48877d04def9b9521 | What are caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
17,
20,
22,
27,
30,
41,
44,
46,
52
]
} | {
"text": [
"Reservations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
0,
74
],
"end": [
11,
85
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
0,
13
],
"end": [
0,
13
]
}
]
} | [
"Reservations"
] |
SQuAD | Reservations are essentially caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty. Reservations are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on the reserving state. These must be included at the time of signing or ratification, i.e. "a party cannot add a reservation after it ... | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"essentially",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
".",
"Reservations",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"mo... | 95c2e2c457c44d52b700ad3989a4383a | What are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on a state? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"modify",
"the",
"legal",
"obligation",
"and",
"its",
"effects",
"on",
"a",
"state",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
20,
... | {
"text": [
"Reservations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
74
],
"end": [
85
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
13
]
}
]
} | [
"Reservations"
] |
SQuAD | Reservations are essentially caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty. Reservations are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on the reserving state. These must be included at the time of signing or ratification, i.e. "a party cannot add a reservation after it ... | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"essentially",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
".",
"Reservations",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"mo... | 69a51765dd264c378febe506fe49138d | When must reservations be included in a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"must",
"reservations",
"be",
"included",
"in",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
23,
26,
35,
38,
40,
46
]
} | {
"text": [
"at the time of signing or ratification"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
232
],
"end": [
269
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
38
],
"end": [
44
]
}
]
} | [
"at the time of signing or ratification"
] |
SQuAD | Reservations are essentially caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty. Reservations are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on the reserving state. These must be included at the time of signing or ratification, i.e. "a party cannot add a reservation after it ... | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"essentially",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
".",
"Reservations",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"mo... | 06aa836efa3f4cd1a1d9634324c10b88 | What are parties to a treaty forbidden to do after they have already joined a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"forbidden",
"to",
"do",
"after",
"they",
"have",
"already",
"joined",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
17,
20,
22,
29,
39,
42,
45,
... | {
"text": [
"add a reservation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
293
],
"end": [
309
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
52
],
"end": [
54
]
}
]
} | [
"add a reservation"
] |
SQuAD | Reservations are essentially caveats to a state's acceptance of a treaty. Reservations are unilateral statements purporting to exclude or to modify the legal obligation and its effects on the reserving state. These must be included at the time of signing or ratification, i.e. "a party cannot add a reservation after it ... | {
"tokens": [
"Reservations",
"are",
"essentially",
"caveats",
"to",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"acceptance",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
".",
"Reservations",
"are",
"unilateral",
"statements",
"purporting",
"to",
"exclude",
"or",
"to",
"mo... | a3050c5b397c4543862703768466301c | A reserving party to a treaty may include a statement that attempts to do what to its legal obligations or their effects? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"reserving",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"include",
"a",
"statement",
"that",
"attempts",
"to",
"do",
"what",
"to",
"its",
"legal",
"obligations",
"or",
"their",
"effects",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
... | {
"text": [
"exclude or to modify"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
127
],
"end": [
146
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
19
],
"end": [
22
]
}
]
} | [
"exclude or to modify"
] |
SQuAD | No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent b... | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"impose",
"its",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"upon",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
".",
"Consent",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
",",
"h... | 30a2b7bfbe9541978727fcf6dfa1f40b | No one party to a treaty can do what to the other parties? | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"do",
"what",
"to",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
7,
13,
16,
18,
25,
29,
32,
37,
40,
44,
50,
57
]
} | {
"text": [
"impose its particular interpretation of the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
29
],
"end": [
78
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
7
],
"end": [
13
]
}
]
} | [
"impose its particular interpretation of the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent b... | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"impose",
"its",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"upon",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
".",
"Consent",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
",",
"h... | e3c5dd0246c04205806c6763b2d067f5 | What may be implied of other parties fail to explicitly disavow a party's initially unilateral interpretation of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
"of",
"other",
"parties",
"fail",
"to",
"explicitly",
"disavow",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"initially",
"unilateral",
"interpretation",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,... | {
"text": [
"Consent"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
104
],
"end": [
110
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
19
],
"end": [
19
]
}
]
} | [
"Consent"
] |
SQuAD | No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent b... | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"impose",
"its",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"upon",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
".",
"Consent",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
",",
"h... | 91e69cf0dfe24ce6bf5ec7fb6b7a4b7d | Consent for a party's unilateral interpretation of a treaty may be implied if that state has acted upon its view of the treat without what from another party? | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"for",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"unilateral",
"interpretation",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
"if",
"that",
"state",
"has",
"acted",
"upon",
"its",
"view",
"of",
"the",
"treat",
"with... | {
"text": [
"complaint"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
300
],
"end": [
308
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
52
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"complaint"
] |
SQuAD | No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent b... | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"impose",
"its",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"upon",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
".",
"Consent",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
",",
"h... | dab28c16ba1f4a29b472ea12adb87496 | Consent by all parties to a treaty to a particular interpretation of the treaty has what legal effect? | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"by",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"to",
"a",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"has",
"what",
"legal",
"effect",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
11,
15,
23,
26,
... | {
"text": [
"adding another clause to the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
403
],
"end": [
437
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
70
],
"end": [
75
]
}
]
} | [
"adding another clause to the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent b... | {
"tokens": [
"No",
"one",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"impose",
"its",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"upon",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
".",
"Consent",
"may",
"be",
"implied",
",",
"h... | 73d91222f68d4fc09db9a955cf8039d0 | The legal effect of adding another clause to a treaty that occurs when all parties to a treaty consent to a particular interpretation of the treaty is commonly known as what? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"legal",
"effect",
"of",
"adding",
"another",
"clause",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"that",
"occurs",
"when",
"all",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"particular",
"interpretation",
"of",... | {
"text": [
"an 'authentic interpretation'"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
465
],
"end": [
493
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
81
],
"end": [
85
]
}
]
} | [
"an 'authentic interpretation'"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution does not have a supremacy clause with the same effects as the one on the U.S. constitution, a fact that is of interest to the discussion on the relation between treaties and state legislation. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"with",
"the",
"same",
"effects",
"as",
"the",
"one",
"on",
"the",
"U.S.",
"constitution",
",",
"a",
"fact",
... | cdaecc035c12400384d3ef5eb4afe354 | What kind of clause does the United States constitution have that the Brazilian constitution does not have with the same effects? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"kind",
"of",
"clause",
"does",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"constitution",
"have",
"that",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"with",
"the",
"same",
"effects",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
... | {
"text": [
"supremacy clause"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
51
],
"end": [
66
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
8
],
"end": [
9
]
}
]
} | [
"supremacy clause"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution does not have a supremacy clause with the same effects as the one on the U.S. constitution, a fact that is of interest to the discussion on the relation between treaties and state legislation. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"with",
"the",
"same",
"effects",
"as",
"the",
"one",
"on",
"the",
"U.S.",
"constitution",
",",
"a",
"fact",
... | a661b7ab140d4f17a1781bca30c2cd38 | A supremacy clause in a federal constitution is relevant to the discussion on the relation between treaties and what other type of legislation? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"in",
"a",
"federal",
"constitution",
"is",
"relevant",
"to",
"the",
"discussion",
"on",
"the",
"relation",
"between",
"treaties",
"and",
"what",
"other",
"type",
"of",
"legislation",
... | {
"text": [
"state legislation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
209
],
"end": [
225
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
37
],
"end": [
38
]
}
]
} | [
"state legislation"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution does not have a supremacy clause with the same effects as the one on the U.S. constitution, a fact that is of interest to the discussion on the relation between treaties and state legislation. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"with",
"the",
"same",
"effects",
"as",
"the",
"one",
"on",
"the",
"U.S.",
"constitution",
",",
"a",
"fact",
... | 25125cd3a43b4a0692f6ff09f6de6445 | What clause of the United States Constitution is relevant to the discussion of the relation between treaties and U.S. legislation? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"clause",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"Constitution",
"is",
"relevant",
"to",
"the",
"discussion",
"of",
"the",
"relation",
"between",
"treaties",
"and",
"U.S.",
"legislation",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,... | {
"text": [
"supremacy clause"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
51
],
"end": [
66
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
8
],
"end": [
9
]
}
]
} | [
"supremacy clause"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution does not have a supremacy clause with the same effects as the one on the U.S. constitution, a fact that is of interest to the discussion on the relation between treaties and state legislation. | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"with",
"the",
"same",
"effects",
"as",
"the",
"one",
"on",
"the",
"U.S.",
"constitution",
",",
"a",
"fact",
... | e8d95d46d8fd4a019c2040bbead1480d | The Brazilian constitution does not have a supremacy clause that would be of interest to the relation between state legislation and what other legal agreements? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"constitution",
"does",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"supremacy",
"clause",
"that",
"would",
"be",
"of",
"interest",
"to",
"the",
"relation",
"between",
"state",
"legislation",
"and",
"what",
"other",
... | {
"text": [
"treaties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
196
],
"end": [
203
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
35
],
"end": [
35
]
}
]
} | [
"treaties"
] |
SQuAD | The end of a treaty, the eschatocol (or closing protocol), is often signaled by a clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof," the parties have affixed their signatures, followed by the words "DONE at," then the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s) of its execution. The date is typically written... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"end",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"the",
"eschatocol",
"(",
"or",
"closing",
"protocol",
")",
",",
"is",
"often",
"signaled",
"by",
"a",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",... | e62ce65edf1841a08d7bcf822af32fbb | What is the formal name for the closing protocol of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"formal",
"name",
"for",
"the",
"closing",
"protocol",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
19,
24,
28,
32,
40,
49,
52,
54,
60
]
} | {
"text": [
"the eschatocol"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
21
],
"end": [
34
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
6
],
"end": [
7
]
}
]
} | [
"the eschatocol"
] |
SQuAD | The end of a treaty, the eschatocol (or closing protocol), is often signaled by a clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof," the parties have affixed their signatures, followed by the words "DONE at," then the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s) of its execution. The date is typically written... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"end",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"the",
"eschatocol",
"(",
"or",
"closing",
"protocol",
")",
",",
"is",
"often",
"signaled",
"by",
"a",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",... | 4c6e356bb9ec43a29554b7725c13611a | What typically follows the signatures in a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"typically",
"follows",
"the",
"signatures",
"in",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
15,
23,
27,
38,
41,
43,
49
]
} | {
"text": [
"the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s)"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
219
],
"end": [
271
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
61
]
}
]
} | [
"the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s)"
] |
SQuAD | The end of a treaty, the eschatocol (or closing protocol), is often signaled by a clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof," the parties have affixed their signatures, followed by the words "DONE at," then the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s) of its execution. The date is typically written... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"end",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"the",
"eschatocol",
"(",
"or",
"closing",
"protocol",
")",
",",
"is",
"often",
"signaled",
"by",
"a",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",... | e763f502b3fc41db8a6750c96745a460 | How is the date typically written in a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"How",
"is",
"the",
"date",
"typically",
"written",
"in",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
7,
11,
16,
26,
34,
37,
39,
45
]
} | {
"text": [
"its most formal, longest possible form"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
324
],
"end": [
361
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
72
],
"end": [
78
]
}
]
} | [
"its most formal, longest possible form"
] |
SQuAD | The end of a treaty, the eschatocol (or closing protocol), is often signaled by a clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof," the parties have affixed their signatures, followed by the words "DONE at," then the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s) of its execution. The date is typically written... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"end",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"the",
"eschatocol",
"(",
"or",
"closing",
"protocol",
")",
",",
"is",
"often",
"signaled",
"by",
"a",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",... | 2f271715c9f4463398fb1c7380f30384 | What is the nature of the different versions of a treaty executed in multiple languages? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"nature",
"of",
"the",
"different",
"versions",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"executed",
"in",
"multiple",
"languages",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
19,
22,
26,
36,
45,
48,
50... | {
"text": [
"equally authentic"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
697
],
"end": [
713
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
147
],
"end": [
148
]
}
]
} | [
"equally authentic"
] |
SQuAD | The end of a treaty, the eschatocol (or closing protocol), is often signaled by a clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof," the parties have affixed their signatures, followed by the words "DONE at," then the site(s) of the treaty's execution and the date(s) of its execution. The date is typically written... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"end",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"the",
"eschatocol",
"(",
"or",
"closing",
"protocol",
")",
",",
"is",
"often",
"signaled",
"by",
"a",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",... | 1a086a01630b41ceb12eefb29eb329cf | A clause like "in witness whereof" or "in faith whereof" typically signals what in a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"clause",
"like",
"\"",
"in",
"witness",
"whereof",
"\"",
"or",
"\"",
"in",
"faith",
"whereof",
"\"",
"typically",
"signals",
"what",
"in",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
9,
14,
15,... | {
"text": [
"The end"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
4
],
"end": [
6
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1
],
"end": [
1
]
}
]
} | [
"The end"
] |
SQuAD | The possibility of withdrawal depends on the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire. It has, for example, been held that it is not possible to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When North Korea declared its intention to do this the Secretary-General of the United Nations,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"possibility",
"of",
"withdrawal",
"depends",
"on",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"its",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
".",
"It",
"has",
",",
"for",
"example",
",",
"been",
"held",
"th... | b09a1dc8d14c4b2190e80ffd061b89de | What is an example of a treaty from which it is not possible to withdraw? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"an",
"example",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"from",
"which",
"it",
"is",
"not",
"possible",
"to",
"withdraw",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
11,
19,
22,
24,
31,
36,
42,
45,
48,
5... | {
"text": [
"the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
167
],
"end": [
222
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
32
],
"end": [
39
]
}
]
} | [
"the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights"
] |
SQuAD | The possibility of withdrawal depends on the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire. It has, for example, been held that it is not possible to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When North Korea declared its intention to do this the Secretary-General of the United Nations,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"possibility",
"of",
"withdrawal",
"depends",
"on",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"its",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
".",
"It",
"has",
",",
"for",
"example",
",",
"been",
"held",
"th... | bac1806f9d4241519ded2a9c0565516b | What state declared its intention to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"state",
"declared",
"its",
"intention",
"to",
"withdraw",
"from",
"the",
"International",
"Covenant",
"on",
"Civil",
"and",
"Political",
"Rights",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
20,
24,
34,
37,
... | {
"text": [
"North Korea"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
230
],
"end": [
240
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
42
],
"end": [
43
]
}
]
} | [
"North Korea"
] |
SQuAD | The possibility of withdrawal depends on the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire. It has, for example, been held that it is not possible to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When North Korea declared its intention to do this the Secretary-General of the United Nations,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"possibility",
"of",
"withdrawal",
"depends",
"on",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"its",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
".",
"It",
"has",
",",
"for",
"example",
",",
"been",
"held",
"th... | 5ef4c0b2de644edbaf33c78a0502a951 | Who, acting as registrar, informed North Korea that withdrawal was deliberately precluded by the original signatories of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
",",
"acting",
"as",
"registrar",
",",
"informed",
"North",
"Korea",
"that",
"withdrawal",
"was",
"deliberately",
"precluded",
"by",
"the",
"original",
"signatories",
"of",
"the",
"International",
"Covenant",
... | {
"text": [
"the Secretary-General of the United Nations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
276
],
"end": [
318
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"the Secretary-General of the United Nations"
] |
SQuAD | The possibility of withdrawal depends on the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire. It has, for example, been held that it is not possible to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When North Korea declared its intention to do this the Secretary-General of the United Nations,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"possibility",
"of",
"withdrawal",
"depends",
"on",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"its",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
".",
"It",
"has",
",",
"for",
"example",
",",
"been",
"held",
"th... | ac8481e401194675a5bcc2a1ecd23ae0 | What two factors determine whether it is possible to withdraw from a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"two",
"factors",
"determine",
"whether",
"it",
"is",
"possible",
"to",
"withdraw",
"from",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
17,
27,
35,
38,
41,
50,
53,
62,
67,
69,
75
... | {
"text": [
"the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
41
],
"end": [
92
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
6
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire"
] |
SQuAD | The possibility of withdrawal depends on the terms of the treaty and its travaux preparatoire. It has, for example, been held that it is not possible to withdraw from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. When North Korea declared its intention to do this the Secretary-General of the United Nations,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"possibility",
"of",
"withdrawal",
"depends",
"on",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"and",
"its",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
".",
"It",
"has",
",",
"for",
"example",
",",
"been",
"held",
"th... | 579c48d968b14868be6d9e84a209b403 | The terms and travaux preparatoire of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights were both factors in determining what aspect of the treaty as it relates to North Korea's stated intentions? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"terms",
"and",
"travaux",
"preparatoire",
"of",
"the",
"International",
"Covenant",
"on",
"Civil",
"and",
"Political",
"Rights",
"were",
"both",
"factors",
"in",
"determining",
"what",
"aspect",
"of",
"th... | {
"text": [
"The possibility of withdrawal"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
4
],
"end": [
28
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1
],
"end": [
3
]
}
]
} | [
"The possibility of withdrawal"
] |
SQuAD | There are several reasons an otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as a binding international agreement, most of which involve problems created at the formation of the treaty.[citation needed] For example, the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910 were protested; and they were confirmed as... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"several",
"reasons",
"an",
"otherwise",
"valid",
"and",
"agreed",
"upon",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"rejected",
"as",
"a",
"binding",
"international",
"agreement",
",",
"most",
"of",
"which",
"i... | 2a59cbee51334e56a3185791ab77aa93 | What treaties between Japan and Korea are examples of treaties that were declared null and void? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"treaties",
"between",
"Japan",
"and",
"Korea",
"are",
"examples",
"of",
"treaties",
"that",
"were",
"declared",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
14,
22,
28,
32,
38,
42,
51... | {
"text": [
"the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
223
],
"end": [
276
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
37
],
"end": [
48
]
}
]
} | [
"the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910"
] |
SQuAD | There are several reasons an otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as a binding international agreement, most of which involve problems created at the formation of the treaty.[citation needed] For example, the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910 were protested; and they were confirmed as... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"several",
"reasons",
"an",
"otherwise",
"valid",
"and",
"agreed",
"upon",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"rejected",
"as",
"a",
"binding",
"international",
"agreement",
",",
"most",
"of",
"which",
"i... | 71508ea111714d4a94bc5309f1bff5cc | In what treaty were the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907, and 1910 confirmed as "already null and void?" | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"what",
"treaty",
"were",
"the",
"serial",
"Japan",
"-",
"Korea",
"treaties",
"of",
"1905",
",",
"1907",
",",
"and",
"1910",
"confirmed",
"as",
"\"",
"already",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"?",
"\""
... | {
"text": [
"the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
348
],
"end": [
421
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
64
],
"end": [
76
]
}
]
} | [
"the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea"
] |
SQuAD | There are several reasons an otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as a binding international agreement, most of which involve problems created at the formation of the treaty.[citation needed] For example, the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910 were protested; and they were confirmed as... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"several",
"reasons",
"an",
"otherwise",
"valid",
"and",
"agreed",
"upon",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"rejected",
"as",
"a",
"binding",
"international",
"agreement",
",",
"most",
"of",
"which",
"i... | ceeba7a4e6d14de7b0a512b3e1b5b904 | Which two states signed a treaty that declared previous treaties between the two from 1905, 1907, and 1910 to be already void? | {
"tokens": [
"Which",
"two",
"states",
"signed",
"a",
"treaty",
"that",
"declared",
"previous",
"treaties",
"between",
"the",
"two",
"from",
"1905",
",",
"1907",
",",
"and",
"1910",
"to",
"be",
"already",
"void",
"?"
... | {
"text": [
"Japan and the Republic of Korea"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
391
],
"end": [
421
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
71
],
"end": [
76
]
}
]
} | [
"Japan and the Republic of Korea"
] |
SQuAD | There are several reasons an otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as a binding international agreement, most of which involve problems created at the formation of the treaty.[citation needed] For example, the serial Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910 were protested; and they were confirmed as... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"several",
"reasons",
"an",
"otherwise",
"valid",
"and",
"agreed",
"upon",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"rejected",
"as",
"a",
"binding",
"international",
"agreement",
",",
"most",
"of",
"which",
"i... | 12d1afbb53e2458a98f0f00e0b2aec2a | An otherwise valid and agreed upon treaty may be rejected as what for several reasons most of which involve problems created at the formation of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"An",
"otherwise",
"valid",
"and",
"agreed",
"upon",
"treaty",
"may",
"be",
"rejected",
"as",
"what",
"for",
"several",
"reasons",
"most",
"of",
"which",
"involve",
"problems",
"created",
"at",
"the",
"format... | {
"text": [
"a binding international agreement"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
87
],
"end": [
119
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
15
],
"end": [
18
]
}
]
} | [
"a binding international agreement"
] |
SQuAD | When a state limits its treaty obligations through reservations, other states party to that treaty have the option to accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them. If the state accepts them (or fails to act at all), both the reserving state and the accepting state are relieved of the reserved le... | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"limits",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"through",
"reservations",
",",
"other",
"states",
"party",
"to",
"that",
"treaty",
"have",
"the",
"option",
"to",
"accept",
"those",
"reservations"... | 88a1654a444844f4b2a3b0c9441e7a97 | When a state adds reservations to a treaty, other parties to the treaty can respond to those reservations in what ways? | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"adds",
"reservations",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"other",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"can",
"respond",
"to",
"those",
"reservations",
"in",
"what",
"ways",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
... | {
"text": [
"accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
118
],
"end": [
185
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
20
],
"end": [
32
]
}
]
} | [
"accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them"
] |
SQuAD | When a state limits its treaty obligations through reservations, other states party to that treaty have the option to accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them. If the state accepts them (or fails to act at all), both the reserving state and the accepting state are relieved of the reserved le... | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"limits",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"through",
"reservations",
",",
"other",
"states",
"party",
"to",
"that",
"treaty",
"have",
"the",
"option",
"to",
"accept",
"those",
"reservations"... | 88fd2a82fac1423a91e62ff4c912c22c | Who remains unaffected when a party's reservation is accepted by a second party? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"remains",
"unaffected",
"when",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"reservation",
"is",
"accepted",
"by",
"a",
"second",
"party",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
12,
23,
28,
30,
35,
38,
50,
53,
62,
65,
... | {
"text": [
"other parties to the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
480
],
"end": [
506
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
86
],
"end": [
90
]
}
]
} | [
"other parties to the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | When a state limits its treaty obligations through reservations, other states party to that treaty have the option to accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them. If the state accepts them (or fails to act at all), both the reserving state and the accepting state are relieved of the reserved le... | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"limits",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"through",
"reservations",
",",
"other",
"states",
"party",
"to",
"that",
"treaty",
"have",
"the",
"option",
"to",
"accept",
"those",
"reservations"... | 99a44e8963064dbeb7e83b8e28acdbf6 | What happens to the parts of the treaty affected by a rejected reservation as they concern the reserving and rejecting parties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"happens",
"to",
"the",
"parts",
"of",
"the",
"treaty",
"affected",
"by",
"a",
"rejected",
"reservation",
"as",
"they",
"concern",
"the",
"reserving",
"and",
"rejecting",
"parties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
... | {
"text": [
"drop out completely"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
584
],
"end": [
602
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
107
],
"end": [
109
]
}
]
} | [
"drop out completely"
] |
SQuAD | When a state limits its treaty obligations through reservations, other states party to that treaty have the option to accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them. If the state accepts them (or fails to act at all), both the reserving state and the accepting state are relieved of the reserved le... | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"limits",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"through",
"reservations",
",",
"other",
"states",
"party",
"to",
"that",
"treaty",
"have",
"the",
"option",
"to",
"accept",
"those",
"reservations"... | c276200407274f15b1a115d93f7a0cb2 | What legal obligations exist between two state parties if one objects and opposes the other's reservations? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"legal",
"obligations",
"exist",
"between",
"two",
"state",
"parties",
"if",
"one",
"objects",
"and",
"opposes",
"the",
"other",
"'s",
"reservations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
23,
29,
37,
... | {
"text": [
"no legal obligations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
773
],
"end": [
792
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
142
],
"end": [
144
]
}
]
} | [
"no legal obligations"
] |
SQuAD | When a state limits its treaty obligations through reservations, other states party to that treaty have the option to accept those reservations, object to them, or object and oppose them. If the state accepts them (or fails to act at all), both the reserving state and the accepting state are relieved of the reserved le... | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"a",
"state",
"limits",
"its",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"through",
"reservations",
",",
"other",
"states",
"party",
"to",
"that",
"treaty",
"have",
"the",
"option",
"to",
"accept",
"those",
"reservations"... | a19dcd2fdec345f9960e541bf5b4f17f | If a state party objects and opposes another state's reservations it essentially refuses to acknowledge what? | {
"tokens": [
"If",
"a",
"state",
"party",
"objects",
"and",
"opposes",
"another",
"state",
"'s",
"reservations",
"it",
"essentially",
"refuses",
"to",
"acknowledge",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
5,
11,
17,
25,
... | {
"text": [
"the reserving state is a party to the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
924
],
"end": [
967
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
164
],
"end": [
172
]
}
]
} | [
"the reserving state is a party to the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | According to the preamble in The Law of Treaties, treaties are a source of international law. If an act or lack thereof is condemned under international law, the act will not assume international legality even if approved by internal law. This means that in case of a conflict with domestic law, international law will a... | {
"tokens": [
"According",
"to",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
",",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
".",
"If",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"is",
... | d5fcd3ad594741b185c570cec3b9ca3d | The preamble of what states that treaties are a source of international law? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"preamble",
"of",
"what",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
13,
16,
21,
28,
33,
42,
46,
48,
55,
58,
72,
75
... | {
"text": [
"The Law of Treaties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
29
],
"end": [
47
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
5
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"The Law of Treaties"
] |
SQuAD | According to the preamble in The Law of Treaties, treaties are a source of international law. If an act or lack thereof is condemned under international law, the act will not assume international legality even if approved by internal law. This means that in case of a conflict with domestic law, international law will a... | {
"tokens": [
"According",
"to",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
",",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
".",
"If",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"is",
... | 27ab1220b5f846388afd743b21a69d98 | Which will prevail in a conflict between international and domestic law? | {
"tokens": [
"Which",
"will",
"prevail",
"in",
"a",
"conflict",
"between",
"international",
"and",
"domestic",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
11,
19,
22,
24,
33,
41,
55,
59,
68,
71
]
} | {
"text": [
"international law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
296
],
"end": [
312
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
56
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"international law"
] |
SQuAD | According to the preamble in The Law of Treaties, treaties are a source of international law. If an act or lack thereof is condemned under international law, the act will not assume international legality even if approved by internal law. This means that in case of a conflict with domestic law, international law will a... | {
"tokens": [
"According",
"to",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
",",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
".",
"If",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"is",
... | 1d7466d5890c425bb45d35e275acc719 | What are started to be a source of international law in the preamble in The Law of Treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"started",
"to",
"be",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
"in",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
17,
20,
23,
25,
3... | {
"text": [
"treaties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
57
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
10
],
"end": [
10
]
}
]
} | [
"treaties"
] |
SQuAD | According to the preamble in The Law of Treaties, treaties are a source of international law. If an act or lack thereof is condemned under international law, the act will not assume international legality even if approved by internal law. This means that in case of a conflict with domestic law, international law will a... | {
"tokens": [
"According",
"to",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
",",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
".",
"If",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"is",
... | 08b429c64467453485d2fab78b1d9a53 | Approval under what law will not make an act or lack thereof legal if condemned under international law? | {
"tokens": [
"Approval",
"under",
"what",
"law",
"will",
"not",
"make",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"legal",
"if",
"condemned",
"under",
"international",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
15,
20,
24,
29,
... | {
"text": [
"internal law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
225
],
"end": [
236
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
41
],
"end": [
42
]
}
]
} | [
"internal law"
] |
SQuAD | According to the preamble in The Law of Treaties, treaties are a source of international law. If an act or lack thereof is condemned under international law, the act will not assume international legality even if approved by internal law. This means that in case of a conflict with domestic law, international law will a... | {
"tokens": [
"According",
"to",
"the",
"preamble",
"in",
"The",
"Law",
"of",
"Treaties",
",",
"treaties",
"are",
"a",
"source",
"of",
"international",
"law",
".",
"If",
"an",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"is",
... | 6e04433de6074038a3173ce00f1fa335 | An act or lack thereof cannot be made legal under what law even if made legal under internal law? | {
"tokens": [
"An",
"act",
"or",
"lack",
"thereof",
"can",
"not",
"be",
"made",
"legal",
"under",
"what",
"law",
"even",
"if",
"made",
"legal",
"under",
"internal",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
7,
10,
15,
... | {
"text": [
"international law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
296
],
"end": [
312
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
56
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"international law"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.