subset stringclasses 6
values | context stringlengths 16 17.7k | context_tokens dict | qid stringlengths 32 32 | question stringlengths 1 717 | question_tokens dict | detected_answers dict | answers listlengths 1 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress (articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I). In practice, this has been interpreted as meaning that the executive branch is free to negotiate and sign a treaty,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"... | 1fd9b6b756bc4320b9e1441a6325d1a3 | What part of the Brazilian federal consitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"part",
"of",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"consitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treat... | {
"text": [
"articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
160
],
"end": [
201
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
27
],
"end": [
37
]
}
]
} | [
"articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress (articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I). In practice, this has been interpreted as meaning that the executive branch is free to negotiate and sign a treaty,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"... | 18d8879251594258acc95cc4f700e325 | In practice the Brazilian president must get the prior approval of what body in order to negotiate and sign a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"practice",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"president",
"must",
"get",
"the",
"prior",
"approval",
"of",
"what",
"body",
"in",
"order",
"to",
"negotiate",
"and",
"sign",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3... | {
"text": [
"Congress"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
400
],
"end": [
407
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
75
],
"end": [
75
]
}
]
} | [
"Congress"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress (articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I). In practice, this has been interpreted as meaning that the executive branch is free to negotiate and sign a treaty,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"... | 1532e47e6b6f4994a97ed919d60a6455 | What Brazilian institution has ruled that a treaty must be incorporated into domestic law by means of a presidential decree? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"Brazilian",
"institution",
"has",
"ruled",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"must",
"be",
"incorporated",
"into",
"domestic",
"law",
"by",
"means",
"of",
"a",
"presidential",
"decree",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5... | {
"text": [
"the Federal Supreme Court"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
424
],
"end": [
448
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
79
],
"end": [
82
]
}
]
} | [
"the Federal Supreme Court"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress (articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I). In practice, this has been interpreted as meaning that the executive branch is free to negotiate and sign a treaty,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"... | e2d0d9b9f56d4b4d9ece935f477304d1 | In order for a treaty to be valid in Brazil, a presidential decree incorporating the treaty into domestic law must be published where in order to be valid? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"order",
"for",
"a",
"treaty",
"to",
"be",
"valid",
"in",
"Brazil",
",",
"a",
"presidential",
"decree",
"incorporating",
"the",
"treaty",
"into",
"domestic",
"law",
"must",
"be",
"published",
"where",
... | {
"text": [
"the federal register"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
606
],
"end": [
625
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
110
],
"end": [
112
]
}
]
} | [
"the federal register"
] |
SQuAD | The Brazilian federal constitution states that the power to enter into treaties is vested in the president and that such treaties must be approved by Congress (articles 84, clause VIII, and 49, clause I). In practice, this has been interpreted as meaning that the executive branch is free to negotiate and sign a treaty,... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"is",
"vested",
"in",
"the",
"president",
"and",
"that",
"such",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"... | c0b8ddf3a92f4d0ea02975f1a59b0f74 | In what office is the power to enter into treaties vested according to the Brazilian federal constitution? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"what",
"office",
"is",
"the",
"power",
"to",
"enter",
"into",
"treaties",
"vested",
"according",
"to",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"federal",
"constitution",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
8,
15,
18,
22,
28... | {
"text": [
"president"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
97
],
"end": [
105
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
16
],
"end": [
16
]
}
]
} | [
"president"
] |
SQuAD | Consent will also be invalidated if it was induced by the fraudulent conduct of another party, or by the direct or indirect "corruption" of its representative by another party to the treaty. Coercion of either a representative, or the state itself through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of tha... | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"will",
"also",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"it",
"was",
"induced",
"by",
"the",
"fraudulent",
"conduct",
"of",
"another",
"party",
",",
"or",
"by",
"the",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
"\"",
"cor... | 0d1efc4388014087a0b27d55e7c45663 | What type of conduct of a party to a treaty can invalidate the consent of another party? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"conduct",
"of",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"invalidate",
"the",
"consent",
"of",
"another",
"party",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
21,
24,
26,
32,
35,... | {
"text": [
"fraudulent conduct"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
58
],
"end": [
75
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
11
],
"end": [
12
]
}
]
} | [
"fraudulent conduct"
] |
SQuAD | Consent will also be invalidated if it was induced by the fraudulent conduct of another party, or by the direct or indirect "corruption" of its representative by another party to the treaty. Coercion of either a representative, or the state itself through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of tha... | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"will",
"also",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"it",
"was",
"induced",
"by",
"the",
"fraudulent",
"conduct",
"of",
"another",
"party",
",",
"or",
"by",
"the",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
"\"",
"cor... | bd8d792ef69b4c3484591682dd6f6d13 | What type of action, either direct or indirect, of a state's representative by another type of party to a treaty can invalidate a state's consent? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"action",
",",
"either",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
",",
"of",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"representative",
"by",
"another",
"type",
"of",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"can",
"invalidate"... | {
"text": [
"corruption"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
125
],
"end": [
134
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
24
],
"end": [
24
]
}
]
} | [
"corruption"
] |
SQuAD | Consent will also be invalidated if it was induced by the fraudulent conduct of another party, or by the direct or indirect "corruption" of its representative by another party to the treaty. Coercion of either a representative, or the state itself through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of tha... | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"will",
"also",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"it",
"was",
"induced",
"by",
"the",
"fraudulent",
"conduct",
"of",
"another",
"party",
",",
"or",
"by",
"the",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
"\"",
"cor... | 9c41204c87a447538bf6b2fd2cbb143c | Coercion of a representative or a state itself will result in what happening to its consent to a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Coercion",
"of",
"a",
"representative",
"or",
"a",
"state",
"itself",
"will",
"result",
"in",
"what",
"happening",
"to",
"its",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
12,
14,
29,
... | {
"text": [
"invalidate that consent"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
346
],
"end": [
368
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
68
],
"end": [
70
]
}
]
} | [
"invalidate that consent"
] |
SQuAD | Consent will also be invalidated if it was induced by the fraudulent conduct of another party, or by the direct or indirect "corruption" of its representative by another party to the treaty. Coercion of either a representative, or the state itself through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of tha... | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"will",
"also",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"it",
"was",
"induced",
"by",
"the",
"fraudulent",
"conduct",
"of",
"another",
"party",
",",
"or",
"by",
"the",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
"\"",
"cor... | 84f1ff90d7b94c4487695edd7e52d19b | Coercion of a state or its what through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of that state to a treaty, will invalidate that consent? | {
"tokens": [
"Coercion",
"of",
"a",
"state",
"or",
"its",
"what",
"through",
"the",
"threat",
"or",
"use",
"of",
"force",
",",
"if",
"used",
"to",
"obtain",
"the",
"consent",
"of",
"that",
"state",
"to",
"a",
... | {
"text": [
"representative"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
212
],
"end": [
225
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
40
],
"end": [
40
]
}
]
} | [
"representative"
] |
SQuAD | Consent will also be invalidated if it was induced by the fraudulent conduct of another party, or by the direct or indirect "corruption" of its representative by another party to the treaty. Coercion of either a representative, or the state itself through the threat or use of force, if used to obtain the consent of tha... | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"will",
"also",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"it",
"was",
"induced",
"by",
"the",
"fraudulent",
"conduct",
"of",
"another",
"party",
",",
"or",
"by",
"the",
"direct",
"or",
"indirect",
"\"",
"cor... | 9ca8e77c1ac845e0811efa43b24b4ac4 | What must be true of coercion through the threat or use of force of a party to treaty for it to invalidate the state's consent to a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"must",
" ",
"be",
"true",
"of",
"coercion",
"through",
"the",
"threat",
"or",
"use",
"of",
"force",
"of",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"treaty",
"for",
"it",
"to",
"invalidate",
"the",
"state",
"'s",
... | {
"text": [
"used to obtain the consent of that state to a treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
287
],
"end": [
338
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
55
],
"end": [
65
]
}
]
} | [
"used to obtain the consent of that state to a treaty"
] |
SQuAD | In function and effectiveness, the UN has been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government by some[citation needed], giving a comparison between modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
",",
"the",
"UN",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"by",
"some[citation",
"needed",
"]",... | 4b2afad162cf412387c14a61a9b9a799 | The United Nations has been compared to what government in function and effectiveness? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"what",
"government",
"in",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
11,
19,
23,
28,
37,
40,
45,
56,
59,
68,
7... | {
"text": [
"the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
59
],
"end": [
113
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
11
],
"end": [
18
]
}
]
} | [
"the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government"
] |
SQuAD | In function and effectiveness, the UN has been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government by some[citation needed], giving a comparison between modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
",",
"the",
"UN",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"by",
"some[citation",
"needed",
"]",... | 8365897ab38c4c6cb0593dcf37b534e4 | In which aspects has the United Nations been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"which",
"aspects",
"has",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
9,
17,
21... | {
"text": [
"function and effectiveness"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
3
],
"end": [
28
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1
],
"end": [
3
]
}
]
} | [
"function and effectiveness"
] |
SQuAD | In function and effectiveness, the UN has been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government by some[citation needed], giving a comparison between modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
",",
"the",
"UN",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"by",
"some[citation",
"needed",
"]",... | 23a42f8bee954881a055af0bfdbc9d0c | The comparison of the United Nations to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government gives us a comparison between what modern and historical legal topics of interest? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"comparison",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"gives",
"us",
"a",
"comparison",
"between",
"what",
"modern",
"and",... | {
"text": [
"modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
169
],
"end": [
230
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
28
],
"end": [
36
]
}
]
} | [
"modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation"
] |
SQuAD | In function and effectiveness, the UN has been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government by some[citation needed], giving a comparison between modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
",",
"the",
"UN",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"by",
"some[citation",
"needed",
"]",... | 7bc56177aaa74c26a9ccbd4dce8b3341 | Modern treaty law can be compared in function and effectiveness to the historical Articles of Confederation by comparing the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government with what modern institution? | {
"tokens": [
"Modern",
"treaty",
"law",
"can",
"be",
"compared",
"in",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
"to",
"the",
"historical",
"Articles",
"of",
"Confederation",
"by",
"comparing",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
... | {
"text": [
"the UN"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
31
],
"end": [
36
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
5
],
"end": [
6
]
}
]
} | [
"the UN"
] |
SQuAD | In function and effectiveness, the UN has been compared to the pre-Constitutional United States Federal government by some[citation needed], giving a comparison between modern treaty law and the historical Articles of Confederation. | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"function",
"and",
"effectiveness",
",",
"the",
"UN",
"has",
"been",
"compared",
"to",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"United",
"States",
"Federal",
"government",
"by",
"some[citation",
"needed",
"]",... | bb04ff632ccb4b3293fbe1c46ea8247e | What legal document formed the basis of the pre-Constitutional Federal government of the United States? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"legal",
"document",
"formed",
"the",
"basis",
"of",
"the",
"pre",
"-",
"Constitutional",
"Federal",
"government",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
20,
27,
31,
37... | {
"text": [
"Articles of Confederation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
206
],
"end": [
230
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
34
],
"end": [
36
]
}
]
} | [
"Articles of Confederation"
] |
SQuAD | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against the Banu Qaynuqa tribe known as the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa in February 624 Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina by pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"tribe",
"known",
"as",
"the",
"Invasion",
"of",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"Muha... | 391415664d8e4484b955a1bfd8f5fbf3 | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against what tribe in February 624? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"what",
"tribe",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
12,
20,
29,
37,
41,
43,
49,
57,
62,
68,
... | {
"text": [
"the Banu Qaynuqa tribe"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
57
],
"end": [
78
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
9
],
"end": [
12
]
}
]
} | [
"the Banu Qaynuqa tribe"
] |
SQuAD | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against the Banu Qaynuqa tribe known as the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa in February 624 Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina by pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"tribe",
"known",
"as",
"the",
"Invasion",
"of",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"Muha... | 9367c7d3fe0f49f0a4e8e988a3209706 | Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking what treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Muhammad",
"ordered",
"his",
"followers",
"to",
"attack",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"Jews",
"for",
"allegedly",
"breaking",
"what",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
17,
21,
31,
34,
41,
45,
50,
... | {
"text": [
"the Constitution of Medina"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
241
],
"end": [
266
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
40
],
"end": [
43
]
}
]
} | [
"the Constitution of Medina"
] |
SQuAD | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against the Banu Qaynuqa tribe known as the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa in February 624 Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina by pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"tribe",
"known",
"as",
"the",
"Invasion",
"of",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"Muha... | 5e08ae25b6d54ccab2664388f4d83951 | Who's insistence led the Prophet Muhammad to expel the Banu Qaynuqa Jews instead of kill them? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"'s",
"insistence",
"led",
"the",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"to",
"expel",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"Jews",
"instead",
"of",
"kill",
"them",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
6,
17,
21,
25,
33,
42,
... | {
"text": [
"Abdullah ibn Ubayy"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
717
],
"end": [
734
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
129
],
"end": [
131
]
}
]
} | [
"Abdullah ibn Ubayy"
] |
SQuAD | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against the Banu Qaynuqa tribe known as the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa in February 624 Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina by pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"tribe",
"known",
"as",
"the",
"Invasion",
"of",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"Muha... | d5e23380db444125bbcc16d766123e71 | Pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led to her being what, was the action that allegedly violated the Constitution of Medina? | {
"tokens": [
"Pinning",
"the",
"clothes",
"of",
"a",
"Muslim",
"woman",
",",
"which",
"led",
"to",
"her",
"being",
"what",
",",
"was",
"the",
"action",
"that",
"allegedly",
"violated",
"the",
"Constitution",
"of",
"Me... | {
"text": [
"stripped naked"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
333
],
"end": [
346
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
58
],
"end": [
59
]
}
]
} | [
"stripped naked"
] |
SQuAD | The Islamic Prophet Muhammad carried out a siege against the Banu Qaynuqa tribe known as the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa in February 624 Muhammad ordered his followers to attack the Banu Qaynuqa Jews for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina by pinning the clothes of a Muslim woman, which led ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Islamic",
"Prophet",
"Muhammad",
"carried",
"out",
"a",
"siege",
"against",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"tribe",
"known",
"as",
"the",
"Invasion",
"of",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"in",
"February",
"624",
"Muha... | 0b2972d1ed6340b7aa7f9ba45e5cd1ed | What chained actions resulted from the alleged violation of the Constitution of Medina by the Banu Qaynuqa Jews? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"chained",
"actions",
"resulted",
"from",
"the",
"alleged",
"violation",
"of",
"the",
"Constitution",
"of",
"Medina",
"by",
"the",
"Banu",
"Qaynuqa",
"Jews",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
13,
21,
30,
... | {
"text": [
"revenge killings"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
472
],
"end": [
487
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
88
],
"end": [
89
]
}
]
} | [
"revenge killings"
] |
SQuAD | After their adoption, treaties as well as their amendments have to follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations, as applied by the Office of Legal Affairs, including signature, ratification and entry into force. | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"their",
"adoption",
",",
"treaties",
"as",
"well",
"as",
"their",
"amendments",
"have",
"to",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
",",
"as",
"applie... | f0ff87d8df8a4af9be351944a1719f25 | Treaties and their amendments must follow the official legal procedures of what body after their adoption? | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"and",
"their",
"amendments",
"must",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"what",
"body",
"after",
"their",
"adoption",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
13,
19,
30,
35,
42,
... | {
"text": [
"the United Nations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
107
],
"end": [
124
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
18
],
"end": [
20
]
}
]
} | [
"the United Nations"
] |
SQuAD | After their adoption, treaties as well as their amendments have to follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations, as applied by the Office of Legal Affairs, including signature, ratification and entry into force. | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"their",
"adoption",
",",
"treaties",
"as",
"well",
"as",
"their",
"amendments",
"have",
"to",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
",",
"as",
"applie... | 6bce1a4d9de840c58cf4d43cc31dd325 | Which office of the United Nations is in charge of applying its official legal procedures? | {
"tokens": [
"Which",
"office",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"is",
"in",
"charge",
"of",
"applying",
"its",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
13,
16,
20,
27,
35,
38,
41,
48,
... | {
"text": [
"the Office of Legal Affairs"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
141
],
"end": [
167
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
29
]
}
]
} | [
"the Office of Legal Affairs"
] |
SQuAD | After their adoption, treaties as well as their amendments have to follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations, as applied by the Office of Legal Affairs, including signature, ratification and entry into force. | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"their",
"adoption",
",",
"treaties",
"as",
"well",
"as",
"their",
"amendments",
"have",
"to",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
",",
"as",
"applie... | 3a4d326bbbb94f57acf6657dee7086d7 | When must all treaties and their amendments follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations? | {
"tokens": [
"When",
"must",
"all",
"treaties",
"and",
"their",
"amendments",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
14,
23,
27,
33,
44,... | {
"text": [
"After their adoption"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
0
],
"end": [
19
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
0
],
"end": [
2
]
}
]
} | [
"After their adoption"
] |
SQuAD | After their adoption, treaties as well as their amendments have to follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations, as applied by the Office of Legal Affairs, including signature, ratification and entry into force. | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"their",
"adoption",
",",
"treaties",
"as",
"well",
"as",
"their",
"amendments",
"have",
"to",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
",",
"as",
"applie... | 3d7e8853a8b64030be7e1e63404779fc | In addition to signature and ratification, what legal procedure of the United Nations must all treaties follow after their adoption? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"signature",
"and",
"ratification",
",",
"what",
"legal",
"procedure",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"must",
"all",
"treaties",
"follow",
"after",
"their",
"adoption",
"?"
],
"offsets"... | {
"text": [
"entry into force"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
208
],
"end": [
223
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
36
],
"end": [
38
]
}
]
} | [
"entry into force"
] |
SQuAD | After their adoption, treaties as well as their amendments have to follow the official legal procedures of the United Nations, as applied by the Office of Legal Affairs, including signature, ratification and entry into force. | {
"tokens": [
"After",
"their",
"adoption",
",",
"treaties",
"as",
"well",
"as",
"their",
"amendments",
"have",
"to",
"follow",
"the",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
",",
"as",
"applie... | 990952e09a704e74a0507a32aab44b6e | What are three official legal procedures of the United Nations that all treaties must follow after their adoption? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"are",
"three",
"official",
"legal",
"procedures",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"that",
"all",
"treaties",
"must",
"follow",
"after",
"their",
"adoption",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
15,
24,... | {
"text": [
"signature, ratification and entry into force"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
180
],
"end": [
223
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
32
],
"end": [
38
]
}
]
} | [
"signature, ratification and entry into force"
] |
SQuAD | The United Nations Charter states that treaties must be registered with the UN to be invoked before it or enforced in its judiciary organ, the International Court of Justice. This was done to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties that occurred in the 19th and 20th century. Section 103 of the Charter also states ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"UN",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"its",
"judiciary",
"organ"... | 007ab897e1c64d18b573c9a254c03850 | What is the judiciary organ of the United Nations? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"judiciary",
"organ",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
22,
28,
31,
35,
42,
49
]
} | {
"text": [
"the International Court of Justice"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
139
],
"end": [
172
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
29
]
}
]
} | [
"the International Court of Justice"
] |
SQuAD | The United Nations Charter states that treaties must be registered with the UN to be invoked before it or enforced in its judiciary organ, the International Court of Justice. This was done to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties that occurred in the 19th and 20th century. Section 103 of the Charter also states ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"UN",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"its",
"judiciary",
"organ"... | 3637f41dbe11481e9bfd85d8428f2810 | What document states that treaties must be registered with the United Nations to be invoked before it or enforced in the International Court of Justice? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"document",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"the",
"International",
"Court",
... | {
"text": [
"The United Nations Charter"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
4
],
"end": [
25
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1
],
"end": [
3
]
}
]
} | [
"The United Nations Charter"
] |
SQuAD | The United Nations Charter states that treaties must be registered with the UN to be invoked before it or enforced in its judiciary organ, the International Court of Justice. This was done to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties that occurred in the 19th and 20th century. Section 103 of the Charter also states ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"UN",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"its",
"judiciary",
"organ"... | 4379fb77643943f89b84b259ed1ab06c | Why does the United Nations Charter state that treaties must be registered with the United Nations? | {
"tokens": [
"Why",
"does",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"state",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
9,
13,
20,
28,
36,
42,
... | {
"text": [
"to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
189
],
"end": [
235
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
34
],
"end": [
40
]
}
]
} | [
"to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties"
] |
SQuAD | The United Nations Charter states that treaties must be registered with the UN to be invoked before it or enforced in its judiciary organ, the International Court of Justice. This was done to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties that occurred in the 19th and 20th century. Section 103 of the Charter also states ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"UN",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"its",
"judiciary",
"organ"... | 0671130682174065a3df2275836b8a57 | In which centuries did a proliferation of secret treaties occur that led the United Nations Charter to include an obligation to register treaties to be invoked before it? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"which",
"centuries",
"did",
"a",
"proliferation",
"of",
"secret",
"treaties",
"occur",
"that",
"led",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"to",
"include",
"an",
"obligation",
"to",
"register",
"treaties... | {
"text": [
"19th and 20th century"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
258
],
"end": [
278
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
45
],
"end": [
48
]
}
]
} | [
"19th and 20th century"
] |
SQuAD | The United Nations Charter states that treaties must be registered with the UN to be invoked before it or enforced in its judiciary organ, the International Court of Justice. This was done to prevent the proliferation of secret treaties that occurred in the 19th and 20th century. Section 103 of the Charter also states ... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"must",
"be",
"registered",
"with",
"the",
"UN",
"to",
"be",
"invoked",
"before",
"it",
"or",
"enforced",
"in",
"its",
"judiciary",
"organ"... | 684b77d3697f44eda90e420173c2a18c | What section of the United Nations Charter states that its members' obligation under the charter outweigh any competing obligations under other treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"section",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"Nations",
"Charter",
"states",
"that",
"its",
"members",
"'",
"obligation",
"under",
"the",
"charter",
"outweigh",
"any",
"competing",
"obligations",
"under",
"other",
"... | {
"text": [
"Section 103"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
281
],
"end": [
291
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
51
]
}
]
} | [
"Section 103"
] |
SQuAD | A party may claim that a treaty should be terminated, even absent an express provision, if there has been a fundamental change in circumstances. Such a change is sufficient if unforeseen, if it undermined the “essential basis” of consent by a party, if it radically transforms the extent of obligations between the parti... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"may",
"claim",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"should",
"be",
"terminated",
",",
"even",
"absent",
"an",
"express",
"provision",
",",
"if",
"there",
"has",
"been",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
"in... | 776ee40658f04e3bb9c1d7c9ed7518a3 | What might result in a party to a treaty claiming a treaty should be terminated even absent an express provision for its termination? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"might",
"result",
"in",
"a",
"party",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"claiming",
"a",
"treaty",
"should",
"be",
"terminated",
"even",
"absent",
"an",
"express",
"provision",
"for",
"its",
"termination",
"?"
... | {
"text": [
"a fundamental change in circumstances"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
106
],
"end": [
142
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
21
],
"end": [
25
]
}
]
} | [
"a fundamental change in circumstances"
] |
SQuAD | A party may claim that a treaty should be terminated, even absent an express provision, if there has been a fundamental change in circumstances. Such a change is sufficient if unforeseen, if it undermined the “essential basis” of consent by a party, if it radically transforms the extent of obligations between the parti... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"may",
"claim",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"should",
"be",
"terminated",
",",
"even",
"absent",
"an",
"express",
"provision",
",",
"if",
"there",
"has",
"been",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
"in... | 664700e30d924566862d081dfd95570a | A party cannot base its claim of a fundamental change in circumstances if the change was brought about by what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"can",
"not",
"base",
"its",
"claim",
"of",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
"in",
"circumstances",
"if",
"the",
"change",
"was",
"brought",
"about",
"by",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
2,
... | {
"text": [
"its own breach of the treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
432
],
"end": [
459
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
83
],
"end": [
88
]
}
]
} | [
"its own breach of the treaty"
] |
SQuAD | A party may claim that a treaty should be terminated, even absent an express provision, if there has been a fundamental change in circumstances. Such a change is sufficient if unforeseen, if it undermined the “essential basis” of consent by a party, if it radically transforms the extent of obligations between the parti... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"may",
"claim",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"should",
"be",
"terminated",
",",
"even",
"absent",
"an",
"express",
"provision",
",",
"if",
"there",
"has",
"been",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
"in... | eeca6e2c6def4723ad91b80082e92436 | The radical transformation of what aspect of the obligations between the parties is a necessary condition for a claim of a fundamental change in circumstances to terminate a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"radical",
"transformation",
"of",
"what",
"aspect",
"of",
"the",
"obligations",
"between",
"the",
"parties",
"is",
"a",
"necessary",
"condition",
"for",
"a",
"claim",
"of",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
... | {
"text": [
"the extent of obligations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
277
],
"end": [
301
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
53
],
"end": [
56
]
}
]
} | [
"the extent of obligations"
] |
SQuAD | A party may claim that a treaty should be terminated, even absent an express provision, if there has been a fundamental change in circumstances. Such a change is sufficient if unforeseen, if it undermined the “essential basis” of consent by a party, if it radically transforms the extent of obligations between the parti... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"may",
"claim",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"should",
"be",
"terminated",
",",
"even",
"absent",
"an",
"express",
"provision",
",",
"if",
"there",
"has",
"been",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
"in... | fdd4256403c6492ea17dbda78a78fab7 | In order to be considered a fundamental change, a change in circumstances must have been what at the time of the adoption of the treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"order",
"to",
"be",
"considered",
"a",
"fundamental",
"change",
",",
"a",
"change",
"in",
"circumstances",
"must",
"have",
"been",
"what",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"the",
"adoption",
"of",
"the",... | {
"text": [
"unforeseen"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
176
],
"end": [
185
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
33
],
"end": [
33
]
}
]
} | [
"unforeseen"
] |
SQuAD | The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty p... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"in",
"the",
"Head",
"Money",
"Cases",
"that",
"\"",
"treaties",
"\"",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"and",
"can... | 7af1655349514943a9d6921375b4a6f0 | In what cases did the US Supreme Court rule that treaties do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"what",
"cases",
"did",
"the",
"US",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"rule",
"that",
"treaties",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
... | {
"text": [
"Head Money Cases"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
31
],
"end": [
46
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
6
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"Head Money Cases"
] |
SQuAD | The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty p... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"in",
"the",
"Head",
"Money",
"Cases",
"that",
"\"",
"treaties",
"\"",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"and",
"can... | 6ef270c5c0874820a3142a0732b9b60f | The US Supreme Court ruled that treaties can be repealed or modified by what for the purposes of US law? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"US",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"that",
"treaties",
"can",
"be",
"repealed",
"or",
"modified",
"by",
"what",
"for",
"the",
"purposes",
"of",
"US",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
7,
15,
... | {
"text": [
"Act of Congress"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
201
],
"end": [
215
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
40
],
"end": [
42
]
}
]
} | [
"Act of Congress"
] |
SQuAD | The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty p... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"in",
"the",
"Head",
"Money",
"Cases",
"that",
"\"",
"treaties",
"\"",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"and",
"can... | c64e14f1e2e2400cb9488b27fa4c0207 | What Supreme Court case ruled that a treaty provision that conflicts with the US Constitution is null and void under US law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"case",
"ruled",
"that",
"a",
"treaty",
"provision",
"that",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"US",
"Constitution",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"under",
"US",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": ... | {
"text": [
"Reid v. Covert"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
288
],
"end": [
301
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
58
],
"end": [
60
]
}
]
} | [
"Reid v. Covert"
] |
SQuAD | The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty p... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"in",
"the",
"Head",
"Money",
"Cases",
"that",
"\"",
"treaties",
"\"",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"and",
"can... | 0e2d4cec41984b19bfe5a2d254f98caf | The US Supreme Court ruled that treaties can be repealed or modified for the purposes of US law just like what by any subsequent Act of Congress? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"US",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"that",
"treaties",
"can",
"be",
"repealed",
"or",
"modified",
"for",
"the",
"purposes",
"of",
"US",
"law",
"just",
"like",
"what",
"by",
"any",
"subsequent",
"Ac... | {
"text": [
"any other regular law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
233
],
"end": [
253
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
47
],
"end": [
50
]
}
]
} | [
"any other regular law"
] |
SQuAD | The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty p... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"ruled",
"in",
"the",
"Head",
"Money",
"Cases",
"that",
"\"",
"treaties",
"\"",
"do",
"not",
"have",
"a",
"privileged",
"position",
"over",
"Acts",
"of",
"Congress",
"and",
"can... | fc61021f0cc54cbb844700267d509384 | Any treaty provision that conflicts with the US Constitution is considered what under US law? | {
"tokens": [
"Any",
"treaty",
"provision",
"that",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"US",
"Constitution",
"is",
"considered",
"what",
"under",
"US",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
11,
21,
26,
36,
41,
45,
48,
61,
... | {
"text": [
"null and void"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
370
],
"end": [
382
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
71
],
"end": [
73
]
}
]
} | [
"null and void"
] |
SQuAD | A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
",",
"wh... | 5ce395426e57490da26eaf2ffeb412eb | What on behalf of a state cannot invalidate that state's consent to a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"on",
"behalf",
"of",
"a",
"state",
"can",
"not",
"invalidate",
"that",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
15,
18,
20,
26,
29,
33,
44,
49,
... | {
"text": [
"own conduct"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
265
],
"end": [
275
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
51
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"own conduct"
] |
SQuAD | A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
",",
"wh... | 630d94e7c9394a8aa7c6d2adf37d6929 | Consent to a treaty will not be invalidated if what should have been evident? | {
"tokens": [
"Consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"will",
"not",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"what",
"should",
"have",
"been",
"evident",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
11,
13,
20,
25,
29,
32,
44,
47,
52,
59,
64,... | {
"text": [
"the truth"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
284
],
"end": [
292
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
56
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"the truth"
] |
SQuAD | A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
",",
"wh... | 189e09108fcd41c288702fffdb94eafc | What may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"of... | {
"text": [
"A state's consent"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
2,
169
],
"end": [
16,
183
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
1,
33
],
"end": [
3,
35
]
}
]
} | [
"A state's consent"
] |
SQuAD | A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
",",
"wh... | eaf9a853663c41c4bdaed1b003a6d3c8 | An erroneous understanding of a fact or situation may only invalidate a state's consent to a treaty if what is also true about the erroneous understanding? | {
"tokens": [
"An",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"may",
"only",
"invalidate",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"if",
"what",
"is",
"also",
"true",
"about",
"the... | {
"text": [
"formed the \"essential basis\" of the state's consent"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
133
],
"end": [
183
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
35
]
}
]
} | [
"formed the \"essential basis\" of the state's consent"
] |
SQuAD | A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"may",
"be",
"invalidated",
"if",
"there",
"was",
"an",
"erroneous",
"understanding",
"of",
"a",
"fact",
"or",
"situation",
"at",
"the",
"time",
"of",
"conclusion",
",",
"wh... | db330677f0c04fe4890063e9c946e526 | What, if it formed the "essential basis" of a state's consent to a treaty, may invalidate that consent? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
",",
"if",
"it",
"formed",
"the",
"\"",
"essential",
"basis",
"\"",
"of",
"a",
"state",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
",",
"may",
"invalidate",
"that",
"consent",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0... | {
"text": [
"an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
50
],
"end": [
98
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
10
],
"end": [
17
]
}
]
} | [
"an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation"
] |
SQuAD | In some rare cases, such as with Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China, the local governments were able to use the treaties to at least mitigate the impact of European colonization. This involved learning the intricacies of European diplomatic customs and then using the treaties to prevent a power from overstepping their agr... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"some",
"rare",
"cases",
",",
"such",
"as",
"with",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
",",
"the",
"local",
"governments",
"were",
"able",
"to",
"use",
"the",
"treaties",
"to",
"at",
... | c2d0abf7da5642a18340eb3119b2866a | In what two rare cases were local governments able to mitigate the impact of of European colonization through treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"what",
"two",
"rare",
"cases",
"were",
"local",
"governments",
"able",
"to",
"mitigate",
"the",
"impact",
"of",
"of",
"European",
"colonization",
"through",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
8,
... | {
"text": [
"Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
33
],
"end": [
63
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
8
],
"end": [
12
]
}
]
} | [
"Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China"
] |
SQuAD | In some rare cases, such as with Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China, the local governments were able to use the treaties to at least mitigate the impact of European colonization. This involved learning the intricacies of European diplomatic customs and then using the treaties to prevent a power from overstepping their agr... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"some",
"rare",
"cases",
",",
"such",
"as",
"with",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
",",
"the",
"local",
"governments",
"were",
"able",
"to",
"use",
"the",
"treaties",
"to",
"at",
... | d0563822ee44414696137e78f256b1e7 | What did Ethiopians learn in order to use treaties to prevent a European power from overstepping their agreement? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"did",
"Ethiopians",
"learn",
"in",
"order",
"to",
"use",
"treaties",
"to",
"prevent",
"a",
"European",
"power",
"from",
"overstepping",
"their",
"agreement",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
9,
20,
26,
... | {
"text": [
"the intricacies of European diplomatic customs"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
199
],
"end": [
244
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
36
],
"end": [
41
]
}
]
} | [
"the intricacies of European diplomatic customs"
] |
SQuAD | In some rare cases, such as with Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China, the local governments were able to use the treaties to at least mitigate the impact of European colonization. This involved learning the intricacies of European diplomatic customs and then using the treaties to prevent a power from overstepping their agr... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"some",
"rare",
"cases",
",",
"such",
"as",
"with",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
",",
"the",
"local",
"governments",
"were",
"able",
"to",
"use",
"the",
"treaties",
"to",
"at",
... | 2019a9e4f74f4605b2f015bf8c51341b | Both Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China learned the intricacies of European diplomatic customs to mitigate what through treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"Both",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
"learned",
"the",
"intricacies",
"of",
"European",
"diplomatic",
"customs",
"to",
"mitigate",
"what",
"through",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
14,
... | {
"text": [
"the impact of European colonization"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
139
],
"end": [
173
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
27
],
"end": [
31
]
}
]
} | [
"the impact of European colonization"
] |
SQuAD | In some rare cases, such as with Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China, the local governments were able to use the treaties to at least mitigate the impact of European colonization. This involved learning the intricacies of European diplomatic customs and then using the treaties to prevent a power from overstepping their agr... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"some",
"rare",
"cases",
",",
"such",
"as",
"with",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
",",
"the",
"local",
"governments",
"were",
"able",
"to",
"use",
"the",
"treaties",
"to",
"at",
... | 6aa744cfe4934aa5b01d298a4a747526 | In addition to preventing a power from overstepping their agreement, how was Ethiopia able to mitigate the impact of European colonization? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"preventing",
"a",
"power",
"from",
"overstepping",
"their",
"agreement",
",",
"how",
"was",
"Ethiopia",
"able",
"to",
"mitigate",
"the",
"impact",
"of",
"European",
"colonization",
"?"
... | {
"text": [
"by playing different powers against each other"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
330
],
"end": [
375
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
56
],
"end": [
62
]
}
]
} | [
"by playing different powers against each other"
] |
SQuAD | In some rare cases, such as with Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China, the local governments were able to use the treaties to at least mitigate the impact of European colonization. This involved learning the intricacies of European diplomatic customs and then using the treaties to prevent a power from overstepping their agr... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"some",
"rare",
"cases",
",",
"such",
"as",
"with",
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
",",
"the",
"local",
"governments",
"were",
"able",
"to",
"use",
"the",
"treaties",
"to",
"at",
... | 3457ca05758f4d52a1fc6ea4c2974197 | Ethiopia and Qing Dynasty China were both able to prevent European powers from doing what to their agreements? | {
"tokens": [
"Ethiopia",
"and",
"Qing",
"Dynasty",
"China",
"were",
"both",
"able",
"to",
"prevent",
"European",
"powers",
"from",
"doing",
"what",
"to",
"their",
"agreements",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
9,
13,
18,
26,
... | {
"text": [
"overstepping"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
298
],
"end": [
309
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
52
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"overstepping"
] |
SQuAD | There are three ways an existing treaty can be amended. First, formal amendment requires State parties to the treaty to go through the ratification process all over again. The re-negotiation of treaty provisions can be long and protracted, and often some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the ame... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"three",
"ways",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"can",
"be",
"amended",
".",
"First",
",",
"formal",
"amendment",
"requires",
"State",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"to",
"go",
"through",
... | a748a113c2834eceabb0bb93167e71b4 | How many ways are there to amend an existing treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"How",
"many",
"ways",
"are",
"there",
"to",
"amend",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
9,
14,
18,
24,
27,
33,
36,
45,
51
]
} | {
"text": [
"three"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
10
],
"end": [
14
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
2
],
"end": [
2
]
}
]
} | [
"three"
] |
SQuAD | There are three ways an existing treaty can be amended. First, formal amendment requires State parties to the treaty to go through the ratification process all over again. The re-negotiation of treaty provisions can be long and protracted, and often some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the ame... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"three",
"ways",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"can",
"be",
"amended",
".",
"First",
",",
"formal",
"amendment",
"requires",
"State",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"to",
"go",
"through",
... | 7e10edb7552447c38308060298de1d17 | What must state parties to a treaty repeat to adopt a formal amendment to the treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"must",
"state",
"parties",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"repeat",
"to",
"adopt",
"a",
"formal",
"amendment",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
16,
24,
27,
29,
36,
43,
46,
... | {
"text": [
"the ratification process"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
131
],
"end": [
154
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
24
],
"end": [
26
]
}
]
} | [
"the ratification process"
] |
SQuAD | There are three ways an existing treaty can be amended. First, formal amendment requires State parties to the treaty to go through the ratification process all over again. The re-negotiation of treaty provisions can be long and protracted, and often some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the ame... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"three",
"ways",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"can",
"be",
"amended",
".",
"First",
",",
"formal",
"amendment",
"requires",
"State",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"to",
"go",
"through",
... | 40cb9282f3e84ae49e5255bcaf10de8e | What amendment process is generally reserved for changes that rectify obvious errors in the text? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"amendment",
"process",
"is",
"generally",
"reserved",
"for",
"changes",
"that",
"rectify",
"obvious",
"errors",
"in",
"the",
"text",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
15,
23,
26,
36,
45,
49,
57,
... | {
"text": [
"a procès-verbal"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
866
],
"end": [
880
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
158
],
"end": [
161
]
}
]
} | [
"a procès-verbal"
] |
SQuAD | There are three ways an existing treaty can be amended. First, formal amendment requires State parties to the treaty to go through the ratification process all over again. The re-negotiation of treaty provisions can be long and protracted, and often some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the ame... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"three",
"ways",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"can",
"be",
"amended",
".",
"First",
",",
"formal",
"amendment",
"requires",
"State",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"to",
"go",
"through",
... | 70220841d7e748539bb429af2fc201e0 | Parties to an original treaty and an amended treaty are bound to what terms? | {
"tokens": [
"Parties",
"to",
"an",
"original",
"treaty",
"and",
"an",
"amended",
"treaty",
"are",
"bound",
"to",
"what",
"terms",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
11,
14,
23,
30,
34,
37,
45,
52,
56,
62,
65,
... | {
"text": [
"the terms they both agreed upon"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
488
],
"end": [
518
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
91
],
"end": [
96
]
}
]
} | [
"the terms they both agreed upon"
] |
SQuAD | There are three ways an existing treaty can be amended. First, formal amendment requires State parties to the treaty to go through the ratification process all over again. The re-negotiation of treaty provisions can be long and protracted, and often some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the ame... | {
"tokens": [
"There",
"are",
"three",
"ways",
"an",
"existing",
"treaty",
"can",
"be",
"amended",
".",
"First",
",",
"formal",
"amendment",
"requires",
"State",
"parties",
"to",
"the",
"treaty",
"to",
"go",
"through",
... | 6049883c6599414c9a95e24fb9ff9a7c | In addition to the often long and protracted nature of treaty renegotiation, what negative outcome might result from the process? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"addition",
"to",
"the",
"often",
"long",
"and",
"protracted",
"nature",
"of",
"treaty",
"renegotiation",
",",
"what",
"negative",
"outcome",
"might",
"result",
"from",
"the",
"process",
"?"
],
"offsets": [... | {
"text": [
"some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the amended treaty"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
250
],
"end": [
330
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
46
],
"end": [
59
]
}
]... | [
"some parties to the original treaty will not become parties to the amended treaty"
] |
SQuAD | The Federal Supreme Court has established that treaties are subject to constitutional review and enjoy the same hierarchical position as ordinary legislation (leis ordinárias, or "ordinary laws", in Portuguese). A more recent ruling by the Supreme Court in 2008 has altered that scheme somewhat, by stating that treaties... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"established",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"subject",
"to",
"constitutional",
"review",
"and",
"enjoy",
"the",
"same",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"as",
"ordinary",
"legisl... | 51912124c3b54106a1d55610bb84608b | The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ruled that treaties enjoy what position relative to ordinary legislation? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Brazilian",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"ruled",
"that",
"treaties",
"enjoy",
"what",
"position",
"relative",
"to",
"ordinary",
"legislation",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
14,
22,
30,
36,
4... | {
"text": [
"same hierarchical position"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
107
],
"end": [
132
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
16
],
"end": [
18
]
}
]
} | [
"same hierarchical position"
] |
SQuAD | The Federal Supreme Court has established that treaties are subject to constitutional review and enjoy the same hierarchical position as ordinary legislation (leis ordinárias, or "ordinary laws", in Portuguese). A more recent ruling by the Supreme Court in 2008 has altered that scheme somewhat, by stating that treaties... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"established",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"subject",
"to",
"constitutional",
"review",
"and",
"enjoy",
"the",
"same",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"as",
"ordinary",
"legisl... | 00e91d7ef4e34557b151c11d9419f9e5 | In what year did the Brazilian Supreme Court rule that treaties containing human rights provisions enjoy a status above ordinary legislation? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"what",
"year",
"did",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"rule",
"that",
"treaties",
"containing",
"human",
"rights",
"provisions",
"enjoy",
"a",
"status",
"above",
"ordinary",
"legislation",
"?"
],
"... | {
"text": [
"2008"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
257
],
"end": [
260
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
45
],
"end": [
45
]
}
]
} | [
"2008"
] |
SQuAD | The Federal Supreme Court has established that treaties are subject to constitutional review and enjoy the same hierarchical position as ordinary legislation (leis ordinárias, or "ordinary laws", in Portuguese). A more recent ruling by the Supreme Court in 2008 has altered that scheme somewhat, by stating that treaties... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"established",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"subject",
"to",
"constitutional",
"review",
"and",
"enjoy",
"the",
"same",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"as",
"ordinary",
"legisl... | a355cd8e74774a518eb0a41b93ba69c6 | What amendment to the Brazilian constitution states that human rights treaties approved by means of a special procedure by Congress enjoy the same position as a constitutional amendment? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"amendment",
"to",
"the",
"Brazilian",
"constitution",
"states",
"that",
"human",
"rights",
"treaties",
"approved",
"by",
"means",
"of",
"a",
"special",
"procedure",
"by",
"Congress",
"enjoy",
"the",
"sam... | {
"text": [
"the 45th amendment"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
480
],
"end": [
497
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
81
],
"end": [
83
]
}
]
} | [
"the 45th amendment"
] |
SQuAD | The Federal Supreme Court has established that treaties are subject to constitutional review and enjoy the same hierarchical position as ordinary legislation (leis ordinárias, or "ordinary laws", in Portuguese). A more recent ruling by the Supreme Court in 2008 has altered that scheme somewhat, by stating that treaties... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"established",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"subject",
"to",
"constitutional",
"review",
"and",
"enjoy",
"the",
"same",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"as",
"ordinary",
"legisl... | c90b6a08bef64dc0929f94e4f7bd6827 | The hierarchical position of treaties relative to domestic legislation in Brazil determines whether the latter can do what to the former and vice versa? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"of",
"treaties",
"relative",
"to",
"domestic",
"legislation",
"in",
"Brazil",
"determines",
"whether",
"the",
"latter",
"can",
"do",
"what",
"to",
"the",
"former",
"and",
"vice... | {
"text": [
"abrogate"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
817
],
"end": [
824
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
137
],
"end": [
137
]
}
]
} | [
"abrogate"
] |
SQuAD | The Federal Supreme Court has established that treaties are subject to constitutional review and enjoy the same hierarchical position as ordinary legislation (leis ordinárias, or "ordinary laws", in Portuguese). A more recent ruling by the Supreme Court in 2008 has altered that scheme somewhat, by stating that treaties... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"Federal",
"Supreme",
"Court",
"has",
"established",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"subject",
"to",
"constitutional",
"review",
"and",
"enjoy",
"the",
"same",
"hierarchical",
"position",
"as",
"ordinary",
"legisl... | 5f81c0bd22d84e328673ac2b0c974262 | What is the Portuguese term for ordinary laws? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"Portuguese",
"term",
"for",
"ordinary",
"laws",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
23,
28,
32,
41,
45
]
} | {
"text": [
"leis ordinárias"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
159
],
"end": [
173
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
23
],
"end": [
24
]
}
]
} | [
"leis ordinárias"
] |
SQuAD | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under that state's domestic law. States are reluctant to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states, and so a "manifest violation" is required such that it would be "objectively evident to any S... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"that",
"... | 99c543b491b44cab87b2d7010b3cf5a2 | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under what? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"what",
"... | {
"text": [
"that state's domestic law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
111
],
"end": [
135
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
29
]
}
]
} | [
"that state's domestic law"
] |
SQuAD | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under that state's domestic law. States are reluctant to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states, and so a "manifest violation" is required such that it would be "objectively evident to any S... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"that",
"... | e8500676907d4ad1a123a547ec977cc8 | For what does a strong presumption exist internationally that a head of state has acted within in entering into a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"For",
"what",
"does",
"a",
"strong",
"presumption",
"exist",
"internationally",
"that",
"a",
"head",
"of",
"state",
"has",
"acted",
"within",
"in",
"entering",
"into",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
... | {
"text": [
"his proper authority"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
433
],
"end": [
452
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
85
],
"end": [
87
]
}
]
} | [
"his proper authority"
] |
SQuAD | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under that state's domestic law. States are reluctant to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states, and so a "manifest violation" is required such that it would be "objectively evident to any S... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"that",
"... | f1da788c194447ee9553c51ec1f71c38 | What is required to invalidate a party's consent due to a reluctance to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"required",
"to",
"invalidate",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"due",
"to",
"a",
"reluctance",
"to",
"inquire",
"into",
"the",
"internal",
"affairs",
"and",
"processes",
"of",
"other",
"states",... | {
"text": [
"a \"manifest violation\""
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
234
],
"end": [
255
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
48
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"a \"manifest violation\""
] |
SQuAD | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under that state's domestic law. States are reluctant to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states, and so a "manifest violation" is required such that it would be "objectively evident to any S... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"that",
"... | 86d80efd18e24569ae8cbfe837e42c35 | A manifest violation is required to invalidate a party's consent to a treaty due to a reluctance internationally to inquire into what aspects of other states? | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"manifest",
"violation",
"is",
"required",
"to",
"invalidate",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"due",
"to",
"a",
"reluctance",
"internationally",
"to",
"inquire",
"into",
"what",
"asp... | {
"text": [
"the internal affairs and processes"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
175
],
"end": [
208
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
37
],
"end": [
41
]
}
]
} | [
"the internal affairs and processes"
] |
SQuAD | A party's consent to a treaty is invalid if it had been given by an agent or body without power to do so under that state's domestic law. States are reluctant to inquire into the internal affairs and processes of other states, and so a "manifest violation" is required such that it would be "objectively evident to any S... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"invalid",
"if",
"it",
"had",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"or",
"body",
"without",
"power",
"to",
"do",
"so",
"under",
"that",
"... | 82e42875e92a48da933acd0b8e184634 | What might a party's consent to a treaty be considered if it has been given by an agent without the power under the state's domestic law to do so? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"might",
"a",
"party",
"'s",
"consent",
"to",
"a",
"treaty",
"be",
"considered",
"if",
"it",
"has",
"been",
"given",
"by",
"an",
"agent",
"without",
"the",
"power",
"under",
"the",
"state",
"'... | {
"text": [
"invalid"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
33
],
"end": [
39
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
8
],
"end": [
8
]
}
]
} | [
"invalid"
] |
SQuAD | Currently, international agreements are executed by executive agreement rather than treaties at a rate of 10:1. Despite the relative ease of executive agreements, the President still often chooses to pursue the formal treaty process over an executive agreement in order to gain congressional support on matters that requ... | {
"tokens": [
"Currently",
",",
"international",
"agreements",
"are",
"executed",
"by",
"executive",
"agreement",
"rather",
"than",
"treaties",
"at",
"a",
"rate",
"of",
"10:1",
".",
"Despite",
"the",
"relative",
"ease",
"of",
... | 1d12f8563e7d473ca42a01fb3b9fd51b | In the United States, what is the ratio of executive agreements to treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"what",
"is",
"the",
"ratio",
"of",
"executive",
"agreements",
"to",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
3,
7,
14,
20,
22,
27,
30,
34,
40,
43,
53,
64,
... | {
"text": [
"10:1"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
106
],
"end": [
109
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
16
],
"end": [
16
]
}
]
} | [
"10:1"
] |
SQuAD | Currently, international agreements are executed by executive agreement rather than treaties at a rate of 10:1. Despite the relative ease of executive agreements, the President still often chooses to pursue the formal treaty process over an executive agreement in order to gain congressional support on matters that requ... | {
"tokens": [
"Currently",
",",
"international",
"agreements",
"are",
"executed",
"by",
"executive",
"agreement",
"rather",
"than",
"treaties",
"at",
"a",
"rate",
"of",
"10:1",
".",
"Despite",
"the",
"relative",
"ease",
"of",
... | a19274f8083b49d7a839e59b9dc6f105 | What is it about the approval process of executive agreements might lead a US president to prefer them over treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"it",
"about",
"the",
"approval",
"process",
"of",
"executive",
"agreements",
"might",
"lead",
"a",
"US",
"president",
"to",
"prefer",
"them",
"over",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8... | {
"text": [
"the relative ease"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
120
],
"end": [
136
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
19
],
"end": [
21
]
}
]
} | [
"the relative ease"
] |
SQuAD | Currently, international agreements are executed by executive agreement rather than treaties at a rate of 10:1. Despite the relative ease of executive agreements, the President still often chooses to pursue the formal treaty process over an executive agreement in order to gain congressional support on matters that requ... | {
"tokens": [
"Currently",
",",
"international",
"agreements",
"are",
"executed",
"by",
"executive",
"agreement",
"rather",
"than",
"treaties",
"at",
"a",
"rate",
"of",
"10:1",
".",
"Despite",
"the",
"relative",
"ease",
"of",
... | 0dc8a4a82d374bd9bac7b783e6736d06 | The president of the United States might prefer the formal treaty process on matters that require Congress to do what? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"president",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"might",
"prefer",
"the",
"formal",
"treaty",
"process",
"on",
"matters",
"that",
"require",
"Congress",
"to",
"do",
"what",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
... | {
"text": [
"pass implementing legislation or appropriate funds"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
340
],
"end": [
389
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
54
],
"end": [
59
]
}
]
} | [
"pass implementing legislation or appropriate funds"
] |
SQuAD | Currently, international agreements are executed by executive agreement rather than treaties at a rate of 10:1. Despite the relative ease of executive agreements, the President still often chooses to pursue the formal treaty process over an executive agreement in order to gain congressional support on matters that requ... | {
"tokens": [
"Currently",
",",
"international",
"agreements",
"are",
"executed",
"by",
"executive",
"agreement",
"rather",
"than",
"treaties",
"at",
"a",
"rate",
"of",
"10:1",
".",
"Despite",
"the",
"relative",
"ease",
"of",
... | a62a7f328ea04c52bd349912e2d26cde | The president of the United States might prefer the formal treaty process for agreements that impose what type of legal obligations on the US? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"president",
"of",
"the",
"United",
"States",
"might",
"prefer",
"the",
"formal",
"treaty",
"process",
"for",
"agreements",
"that",
"impose",
"what",
"type",
"of",
"legal",
"obligations",
"on",
"the",
... | {
"text": [
"long-term, complex"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
425
],
"end": [
442
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
66
],
"end": [
70
]
}
]
} | [
"long-term, complex"
] |
SQuAD | Currently, international agreements are executed by executive agreement rather than treaties at a rate of 10:1. Despite the relative ease of executive agreements, the President still often chooses to pursue the formal treaty process over an executive agreement in order to gain congressional support on matters that requ... | {
"tokens": [
"Currently",
",",
"international",
"agreements",
"are",
"executed",
"by",
"executive",
"agreement",
"rather",
"than",
"treaties",
"at",
"a",
"rate",
"of",
"10:1",
".",
"Despite",
"the",
"relative",
"ease",
"of",
... | 4b2245e8f3f54a78afdadbf6dd8d1ea2 | The international deal between the US, other countries, and what controversial nation is not a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"international",
"deal",
"between",
"the",
"US",
",",
"other",
"countries",
",",
"and",
"what",
"controversial",
"nation",
"is",
"not",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
18,
23,
31,
35,
... | {
"text": [
"Iran"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
528
],
"end": [
531
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
88
],
"end": [
88
]
}
]
} | [
"Iran"
] |
SQuAD | The language of treaties, like that of any law or contract, must be interpreted when the wording does not seem clear or it is not immediately apparent how it should be applied in a perhaps unforeseen circumstance. The Vienna Convention states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinar... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
",",
"like",
"that",
"of",
"any",
"law",
"or",
"contract",
",",
"must",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"the",
"wording",
"does",
"not",
"seem",
"clear",
"or",
"it",
... | a3bc1481266b436099fd44afde2123b3 | What principle is often invoked by legal experts when interpreting the language of treaties? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"principle",
"is",
"often",
"invoked",
"by",
"legal",
"experts",
"when",
"interpreting",
"the",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
15,
18,
24,
32,
35,
41,
49,
54,
67,
... | {
"text": [
"principle of maximum effectiveness"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
476
],
"end": [
509
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
90
],
"end": [
93
]
}
]
} | [
"principle of maximum effectiveness"
] |
SQuAD | The language of treaties, like that of any law or contract, must be interpreted when the wording does not seem clear or it is not immediately apparent how it should be applied in a perhaps unforeseen circumstance. The Vienna Convention states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinar... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
",",
"like",
"that",
"of",
"any",
"law",
"or",
"contract",
",",
"must",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"the",
"wording",
"does",
"not",
"seem",
"clear",
"or",
"it",
... | 153b206b9bd24c0a89feb83b86df04c3 | The principle of maximum effectiveness interprets the language of treaties as having what effect to establish obligations between parties? | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"principle",
"of",
"maximum",
"effectiveness",
"interprets",
"the",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
"as",
"having",
"what",
"effect",
"to",
"establish",
"obligations",
"between",
"parties",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0... | {
"text": [
"the fullest force and effect"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
556
],
"end": [
583
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
102
],
"end": [
106
]
}
]
} | [
"the fullest force and effect"
] |
SQuAD | The language of treaties, like that of any law or contract, must be interpreted when the wording does not seem clear or it is not immediately apparent how it should be applied in a perhaps unforeseen circumstance. The Vienna Convention states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinar... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
",",
"like",
"that",
"of",
"any",
"law",
"or",
"contract",
",",
"must",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"the",
"wording",
"does",
"not",
"seem",
"clear",
"or",
"it",
... | d026d11a1c6749f69f84b36c08c74326 | What states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinary meaning given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in light of its object and purpose?" | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"states",
"that",
"treaties",
"are",
"to",
"be",
"interpreted",
"\"",
"in",
"good",
"faith",
"\"",
"according",
"to",
"the",
"\"",
"ordinary",
"meaning",
"given",
"to",
"the",
"terms",
"of",
"the"... | {
"text": [
"The Vienna Convention"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
214
],
"end": [
234
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
40
],
"end": [
42
]
}
]
} | [
"The Vienna Convention"
] |
SQuAD | The language of treaties, like that of any law or contract, must be interpreted when the wording does not seem clear or it is not immediately apparent how it should be applied in a perhaps unforeseen circumstance. The Vienna Convention states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinar... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
",",
"like",
"that",
"of",
"any",
"law",
"or",
"contract",
",",
"must",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"the",
"wording",
"does",
"not",
"seem",
"clear",
"or",
"it",
... | 30dd8f7787f949d79357a90ca7063745 | What property of treaties must often be interpreted when it's not clear? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"property",
"of",
"treaties",
"must",
"often",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"it",
"'s",
"not",
"clear",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
14,
17,
26,
31,
37,
40,
52,
57,
59,
62,
66,
71
]... | {
"text": [
"The language"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
537,
4
],
"end": [
544,
11
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
99,
1
],
"end": [
99,
1
]
}
]
} | [
"The language"
] |
SQuAD | The language of treaties, like that of any law or contract, must be interpreted when the wording does not seem clear or it is not immediately apparent how it should be applied in a perhaps unforeseen circumstance. The Vienna Convention states that treaties are to be interpreted "in good faith" according to the "ordinar... | {
"tokens": [
"The",
"language",
"of",
"treaties",
",",
"like",
"that",
"of",
"any",
"law",
"or",
"contract",
",",
"must",
"be",
"interpreted",
"when",
"the",
"wording",
"does",
"not",
"seem",
"clear",
"or",
"it",
... | d97b355f0bd2424ab38bc0ca0598535d | Besides unclear language what might also arise that necessitates the interpretation of the language of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"Besides",
"unclear",
"language",
"what",
"might",
"also",
"arise",
"that",
"necessitates",
"the",
"interpretation",
"of",
"the",
"language",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
8,
16,
25,
30,
36,... | {
"text": [
"a perhaps unforeseen circumstance"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
179
],
"end": [
211
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
35
],
"end": [
38
]
}
]
} | [
"a perhaps unforeseen circumstance"
] |
SQuAD | In the United States, the term "treaty" has a different, more restricted legal sense than exists in international law. United States law distinguishes what it calls treaties from executive agreement, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. All four classes are equally treaties under internati... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"the",
"term",
"\"",
"treaty",
"\"",
"has",
"a",
"different",
",",
"more",
"restricted",
"legal",
"sense",
"than",
"exists",
"in",
"international",
"law",
".",
"Unite... | f548f5a2a5ea4bcdbc03f4dbdce5dd12 | Treaties, executive agreements, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements are the same under international law but different with respect to what? | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
",",
"executive",
"agreements",
",",
"congressional",
"-",
"executive",
"agreements",
",",
"and",
"sole",
"executive",
"agreements",
"are",
"the",
"same",
"under",
"international",
"law",
"but",
"differen... | {
"text": [
"internal American law"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
377
],
"end": [
397
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
64
],
"end": [
66
]
}
]
} | [
"internal American law"
] |
SQuAD | In the United States, the term "treaty" has a different, more restricted legal sense than exists in international law. United States law distinguishes what it calls treaties from executive agreement, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. All four classes are equally treaties under internati... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"the",
"term",
"\"",
"treaty",
"\"",
"has",
"a",
"different",
",",
"more",
"restricted",
"legal",
"sense",
"than",
"exists",
"in",
"international",
"law",
".",
"Unite... | 65f96f29c4234d13b45d945d57c87c52 | Under US law, what primarily distinguishes treaties, executive agreements, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements? | {
"tokens": [
"Under",
"US",
"law",
",",
"what",
"primarily",
"distinguishes",
"treaties",
",",
"executive",
"agreements",
",",
"congressional",
"-",
"executive",
"agreements",
",",
"and",
"sole",
"executive",
"agreements",
"?"
... | {
"text": [
"their method of approval"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
442
],
"end": [
465
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
73
],
"end": [
76
]
}
]
} | [
"their method of approval"
] |
SQuAD | In the United States, the term "treaty" has a different, more restricted legal sense than exists in international law. United States law distinguishes what it calls treaties from executive agreement, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. All four classes are equally treaties under internati... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"the",
"term",
"\"",
"treaty",
"\"",
"has",
"a",
"different",
",",
"more",
"restricted",
"legal",
"sense",
"than",
"exists",
"in",
"international",
"law",
".",
"Unite... | 79563098298449e2a9625511ee6b721c | What percentage of United States Senators must give advice and consent in order for the US to enter a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"percentage",
"of",
"United",
"States",
"Senators",
"must",
"give",
"advice",
"and",
"consent",
"in",
"order",
"for",
"the",
"US",
"to",
"enter",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
16,
1... | {
"text": [
"two-thirds"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
515
],
"end": [
524
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
85
],
"end": [
87
]
}
]
} | [
"two-thirds"
] |
SQuAD | In the United States, the term "treaty" has a different, more restricted legal sense than exists in international law. United States law distinguishes what it calls treaties from executive agreement, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. All four classes are equally treaties under internati... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"the",
"term",
"\"",
"treaty",
"\"",
"has",
"a",
"different",
",",
"more",
"restricted",
"legal",
"sense",
"than",
"exists",
"in",
"international",
"law",
".",
"Unite... | 220615b4e1ea47468815a1461142f4f2 | What type of agreement may a US president enter by acting alone? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"agreement",
"may",
"a",
"US",
"president",
"enter",
"by",
"acting",
"alone",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
23,
27,
29,
32,
42,
48,
51,
58,
63
]
} | {
"text": [
"sole executive agreements"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
551
],
"end": [
575
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
93
],
"end": [
95
]
}
]
} | [
"sole executive agreements"
] |
SQuAD | In the United States, the term "treaty" has a different, more restricted legal sense than exists in international law. United States law distinguishes what it calls treaties from executive agreement, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. All four classes are equally treaties under internati... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"the",
"United",
"States",
",",
"the",
"term",
"\"",
"treaty",
"\"",
"has",
"a",
"different",
",",
"more",
"restricted",
"legal",
"sense",
"than",
"exists",
"in",
"international",
"law",
".",
"Unite... | a77e71fb66dc436ab0897e067ad21133 | What type of agreement requires majority approval by both the House and the Senate before or after a treaty is signed by the United States president? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"agreement",
"requires",
"majority",
"approval",
"by",
"both",
"the",
"House",
"and",
"the",
"Senate",
"before",
"or",
"after",
"a",
"treaty",
"is",
"signed",
"by",
"the",
"United",
... | {
"text": [
"congressional-executive agreements"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
778
],
"end": [
811
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
131
],
"end": [
134
]
}
]
} | [
"congressional-executive agreements"
] |
SQuAD | In India, the legislation subjects are divided into 3 lists -Union List, State List and Concurrent List . In the normal legislation process, the subjects in Union list can only be legislated upon by central legislative body called Parliament of India, for subjects in state list only respective state legislature can leg... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"India",
",",
"the",
"legislation",
"subjects",
"are",
"divided",
"into",
"3",
"lists",
"-Union",
"List",
",",
"State",
"List",
"and",
"Concurrent",
"List",
".",
"In",
"the",
"normal",
"legislation",
... | ede6dcf279a54231a5e33f10d61e91b9 | What type of legislative subjects can both the central legislative body and state legislatures make laws? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"legislative",
"subjects",
"can",
"both",
"the",
"central",
"legislative",
"body",
"and",
"state",
"legislatures",
"make",
"laws",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
25,
34,
38,
4... | {
"text": [
"Concurrent subjects"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
338
],
"end": [
356
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
59
],
"end": [
60
]
}
]
} | [
"Concurrent subjects"
] |
SQuAD | In India, the legislation subjects are divided into 3 lists -Union List, State List and Concurrent List . In the normal legislation process, the subjects in Union list can only be legislated upon by central legislative body called Parliament of India, for subjects in state list only respective state legislature can leg... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"India",
",",
"the",
"legislation",
"subjects",
"are",
"divided",
"into",
"3",
"lists",
"-Union",
"List",
",",
"State",
"List",
"and",
"Concurrent",
"List",
".",
"In",
"the",
"normal",
"legislation",
... | 647141dc73f14772abeabbe63f82b679 | What is the central legislative body in India? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"the",
"central",
"legislative",
"body",
"in",
"India",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
12,
20,
32,
37,
40,
45
]
} | {
"text": [
"Parliament of India"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
231
],
"end": [
249
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
41
],
"end": [
43
]
}
]
} | [
"Parliament of India"
] |
SQuAD | In India, the legislation subjects are divided into 3 lists -Union List, State List and Concurrent List . In the normal legislation process, the subjects in Union list can only be legislated upon by central legislative body called Parliament of India, for subjects in state list only respective state legislature can leg... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"India",
",",
"the",
"legislation",
"subjects",
"are",
"divided",
"into",
"3",
"lists",
"-Union",
"List",
",",
"State",
"List",
"and",
"Concurrent",
"List",
".",
"In",
"the",
"normal",
"legislation",
... | f550ed0356b2467bb2e0494a52614c7d | In order to implement international treaties, for what subjects can the Parliament of India legislate to override the general division of subject lists? | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"order",
"to",
"implement",
"international",
"treaties",
",",
"for",
"what",
"subjects",
"can",
"the",
"Parliament",
"of",
"India",
"legislate",
"to",
"override",
"the",
"general",
"division",
"of",
"subjec... | {
"text": [
"any subject"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
465
],
"end": [
475
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
80
],
"end": [
81
]
}
]
} | [
"any subject"
] |
SQuAD | In India, the legislation subjects are divided into 3 lists -Union List, State List and Concurrent List . In the normal legislation process, the subjects in Union list can only be legislated upon by central legislative body called Parliament of India, for subjects in state list only respective state legislature can leg... | {
"tokens": [
"In",
"India",
",",
"the",
"legislation",
"subjects",
"are",
"divided",
"into",
"3",
"lists",
"-Union",
"List",
",",
"State",
"List",
"and",
"Concurrent",
"List",
".",
"In",
"the",
"normal",
"legislation",
... | 4bd194f3a5614c8daa297ffa17e29dc4 | What subjects can only be legislated by the central legislative body in India? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"subjects",
"can",
"only",
"be",
"legislated",
"by",
"the",
"central",
"legislative",
"body",
"in",
"India",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
14,
18,
23,
26,
37,
40,
44,
52,
64,
69,
72,
7... | {
"text": [
"the subjects in Union list"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
141
],
"end": [
166
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
26
],
"end": [
30
]
}
]
} | [
"the subjects in Union list"
] |
SQuAD | Despite conflicts with the rival monarchic Chetnik movement, Tito's Partisans succeeded in liberating territory, notably the "Republic of Užice". During this period, Tito held talks with Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović on 19 September and 27 October 1941. It is said that Tito ordered his forces to assist escaping Jews,... | {
"tokens": [
"Despite",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"rival",
"monarchic",
"Chetnik",
"movement",
",",
"Tito",
"'s",
"Partisans",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
",",
"notably",
"the",
"\"",
"Republic",
"of",
"Už... | 056e380c68904969bfa716360a0a7092 | Who succeeded in liberating territory despite conflicts? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
"despite",
"conflicts",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
14,
17,
28,
38,
46,
55
]
} | {
"text": [
"Partisans"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
68
],
"end": [
76
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
11
],
"end": [
11
]
}
]
} | [
"Partisans"
] |
SQuAD | Despite conflicts with the rival monarchic Chetnik movement, Tito's Partisans succeeded in liberating territory, notably the "Republic of Užice". During this period, Tito held talks with Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović on 19 September and 27 October 1941. It is said that Tito ordered his forces to assist escaping Jews,... | {
"tokens": [
"Despite",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"rival",
"monarchic",
"Chetnik",
"movement",
",",
"Tito",
"'s",
"Partisans",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
",",
"notably",
"the",
"\"",
"Republic",
"of",
"Už... | b605d278b1a74d24aa2ccc94981079c1 | Who did the Partisans have conflicts with? | {
"tokens": [
"Who",
"did",
"the",
"Partisans",
"have",
"conflicts",
"with",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
4,
8,
12,
22,
27,
37,
41
]
} | {
"text": [
"Chetnik movement"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
43
],
"end": [
58
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
6
],
"end": [
7
]
}
]
} | [
"Chetnik movement"
] |
SQuAD | Despite conflicts with the rival monarchic Chetnik movement, Tito's Partisans succeeded in liberating territory, notably the "Republic of Užice". During this period, Tito held talks with Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović on 19 September and 27 October 1941. It is said that Tito ordered his forces to assist escaping Jews,... | {
"tokens": [
"Despite",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"rival",
"monarchic",
"Chetnik",
"movement",
",",
"Tito",
"'s",
"Partisans",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
",",
"notably",
"the",
"\"",
"Republic",
"of",
"Už... | aa022b96b39e437998c0c596d4a4fcc7 | Which Chetnik leader did Tito hold talks with? | {
"tokens": [
"Which",
"Chetnik",
"leader",
"did",
"Tito",
"hold",
"talks",
"with",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
14,
21,
25,
30,
35,
41,
45
]
} | {
"text": [
"Draža Mihailović"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
202
],
"end": [
217
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
35
],
"end": [
36
]
}
]
} | [
"Draža Mihailović"
] |
SQuAD | Despite conflicts with the rival monarchic Chetnik movement, Tito's Partisans succeeded in liberating territory, notably the "Republic of Užice". During this period, Tito held talks with Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović on 19 September and 27 October 1941. It is said that Tito ordered his forces to assist escaping Jews,... | {
"tokens": [
"Despite",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"rival",
"monarchic",
"Chetnik",
"movement",
",",
"Tito",
"'s",
"Partisans",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
",",
"notably",
"the",
"\"",
"Republic",
"of",
"Už... | ad85832882cc45a39ebe18caf7dd7d68 | Which group did Tito order his forces to assist? | {
"tokens": [
"Which",
"group",
"did",
"Tito",
"order",
"his",
"forces",
"to",
"assist",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
6,
12,
16,
21,
27,
31,
38,
41,
47
]
} | {
"text": [
"escaping Jews,"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
306
],
"end": [
319
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
55
],
"end": [
57
]
}
]
} | [
"escaping Jews,"
] |
SQuAD | Despite conflicts with the rival monarchic Chetnik movement, Tito's Partisans succeeded in liberating territory, notably the "Republic of Užice". During this period, Tito held talks with Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović on 19 September and 27 October 1941. It is said that Tito ordered his forces to assist escaping Jews,... | {
"tokens": [
"Despite",
"conflicts",
"with",
"the",
"rival",
"monarchic",
"Chetnik",
"movement",
",",
"Tito",
"'s",
"Partisans",
"succeeded",
"in",
"liberating",
"territory",
",",
"notably",
"the",
"\"",
"Republic",
"of",
"Už... | 51f7939b96b44f22a2656a830f5bcb91 | 2000 of what group fought directly for Tito? | {
"tokens": [
"2000",
"of",
"what",
"group",
"fought",
"directly",
"for",
"Tito",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
13,
19,
26,
35,
39,
43
]
} | {
"text": [
"Jews"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
346
],
"end": [
349
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
63
],
"end": [
63
]
}
]
} | [
"Jews"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is null and void if it is in violation of a peremptory norm. These norms, unlike other principles of customary law, are recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations. These are limited to such universally accepted prohibitions as those against the aggressive use of ... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
".",
"These",
"norms",
",",
"unlike",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
... | feecd1cd86bb45ba8652eb29e6fbe836 | What will a treaty be if it is in violation of a peremptory norm? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"will",
"a",
"treaty",
"be",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
12,
19,
22,
25,
28,
31,
34,
44,
47,
49,
60,
... | {
"text": [
"null and void"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
12
],
"end": [
24
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
3
],
"end": [
5
]
}
]
} | [
"null and void"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is null and void if it is in violation of a peremptory norm. These norms, unlike other principles of customary law, are recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations. These are limited to such universally accepted prohibitions as those against the aggressive use of ... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
".",
"These",
"norms",
",",
"unlike",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
... | f2935e855e9b4523ad085495f2637cd6 | What type of norm is recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"type",
"of",
"norm",
"is",
"recognized",
"as",
"permitting",
"no",
"violations",
"and",
"so",
"can",
"not",
"be",
"altered",
"through",
"treaty",
"obligations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
13,
... | {
"text": [
"peremptory norm"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
53
],
"end": [
67
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
13
],
"end": [
14
]
}
]
} | [
"peremptory norm"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is null and void if it is in violation of a peremptory norm. These norms, unlike other principles of customary law, are recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations. These are limited to such universally accepted prohibitions as those against the aggressive use of ... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
".",
"These",
"norms",
",",
"unlike",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
... | 87887739fc14437b972c0616d1f44c93 | What is true of acts such as genocide and piracy in regard to treaty law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"true",
"of",
"acts",
"such",
"as",
"genocide",
"and",
"piracy",
"in",
"regard",
"to",
"treaty",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
8,
13,
16,
21,
26,
29,
38,
42,
49,
52,
5... | {
"text": [
"no state can legally assume an obligation to commit or permit such acts"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
495
],
"end": [
565
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
85
],
"end": [
97
]
}
]
} | [
"no state can legally assume an obligation to commit or permit such acts"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is null and void if it is in violation of a peremptory norm. These norms, unlike other principles of customary law, are recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations. These are limited to such universally accepted prohibitions as those against the aggressive use of ... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
".",
"These",
"norms",
",",
"unlike",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
... | 6f1b24033f084844ab1e2e51a16d3dff | What distinguishes peremptory norms from other principles of customary law? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"distinguishes",
"peremptory",
"norms",
"from",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
19,
30,
36,
41,
47,
58,
61,
71,
74
]
} | {
"text": [
"permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
143
],
"end": [
218
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
29
],
"end": [
40
]
}
]
} | [
"permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty is null and void if it is in violation of a peremptory norm. These norms, unlike other principles of customary law, are recognized as permitting no violations and so cannot be altered through treaty obligations. These are limited to such universally accepted prohibitions as those against the aggressive use of ... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"is",
"null",
"and",
"void",
"if",
"it",
"is",
"in",
"violation",
"of",
"a",
"peremptory",
"norm",
".",
"These",
"norms",
",",
"unlike",
"other",
"principles",
"of",
"customary",
"law",
... | f4a1487427004273aa19cf4c525e0508 | What is an example of a type of universally prohibited action that no state can legally assume an obligation to commit or permit through a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"is",
"an",
"example",
"of",
"a",
"type",
"of",
"universally",
"prohibited",
"action",
"that",
"no",
"state",
"can",
"legally",
"assume",
"an",
"obligation",
"to",
"commit",
"or",
"permit",
"through",... | {
"text": [
"genocide"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
327
],
"end": [
334
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
59
],
"end": [
59
]
}
]
} | [
"genocide"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty breach does not automatically suspend or terminate treaty relations, however. It depends on how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it. Sometimes treaties will provide for the seriousness of a breach to be determined by a tribunal or other independent arbiter. An advantage of... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"automatically",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
",",
"however",
".",
"It",
"depends",
"on",
"how",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"regard",
"the",
"br... | 1df6a61c112947c9b12cc448a65e3aea | What might a tribunal or an arbiter be asked to determine regarding a breach of a treaty? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"might",
"a",
"tribunal",
"or",
"an",
"arbiter",
"be",
"asked",
"to",
"determine",
"regarding",
"a",
"breach",
"of",
"a",
"treaty",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
11,
13,
22,
25,
28,
36,
39... | {
"text": [
"the seriousness of a breach"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
216
],
"end": [
242
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
38
],
"end": [
42
]
}
]
} | [
"the seriousness of a breach"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty breach does not automatically suspend or terminate treaty relations, however. It depends on how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it. Sometimes treaties will provide for the seriousness of a breach to be determined by a tribunal or other independent arbiter. An advantage of... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"automatically",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
",",
"however",
".",
"It",
"depends",
"on",
"how",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"regard",
"the",
"br... | 6cd7557eb4f44f6a9ddaeb5a8459f4f9 | Using what to determine the seriousness of a breach can prevent a party from prematurely suspending its obligations due to another party's alleged material breach? | {
"tokens": [
"Using",
"what",
"to",
"determine",
"the",
"seriousness",
"of",
"a",
"breach",
"can",
"prevent",
"a",
"party",
"from",
"prematurely",
"suspending",
"its",
"obligations",
"due",
"to",
"another",
"party",
"'s",
... | {
"text": [
"a tribunal or other independent arbiter"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
264
],
"end": [
302
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
47
],
"end": [
52
]
}
]
} | [
"a tribunal or other independent arbiter"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty breach does not automatically suspend or terminate treaty relations, however. It depends on how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it. Sometimes treaties will provide for the seriousness of a breach to be determined by a tribunal or other independent arbiter. An advantage of... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"automatically",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
",",
"however",
".",
"It",
"depends",
"on",
"how",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"regard",
"the",
"br... | 3570580fa2a747ec8724fb505024630f | Does a material breach necessarily suspend or terminate treaty relations? | {
"tokens": [
"Does",
"a",
"material",
"breach",
"necessarily",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
7,
16,
23,
35,
43,
46,
56,
63,
72
]
} | {
"text": [
"does not"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
16
],
"end": [
23
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
3
],
"end": [
4
]
}
]
} | [
"does not"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty breach does not automatically suspend or terminate treaty relations, however. It depends on how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it. Sometimes treaties will provide for the seriousness of a breach to be determined by a tribunal or other independent arbiter. An advantage of... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"automatically",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
",",
"however",
".",
"It",
"depends",
"on",
"how",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"regard",
"the",
"br... | 8141c0b61e714406ba46a0200f42b0f9 | What determines whether a breach automatically suspends or terminates treaty relations? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"determines",
"whether",
"a",
"breach",
"automatically",
"suspends",
"or",
"terminates",
"treaty",
"relations",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
16,
24,
26,
33,
47,
56,
59,
70,
77,
86
]
} | {
"text": [
"how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
101
],
"end": [
177
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
17
],
"end": [
31
]
}
]
} | [
"how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it"
] |
SQuAD | A treaty breach does not automatically suspend or terminate treaty relations, however. It depends on how the other parties regard the breach and how they resolve to respond to it. Sometimes treaties will provide for the seriousness of a breach to be determined by a tribunal or other independent arbiter. An advantage of... | {
"tokens": [
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"automatically",
"suspend",
"or",
"terminate",
"treaty",
"relations",
",",
"however",
".",
"It",
"depends",
"on",
"how",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"regard",
"the",
"br... | 81e757af61e04a14955dc19a1546dfd4 | A treaty breach does not necessarily affect treaty relations depending on how serious the other parties view the breach and what other factor? | {
"tokens": [
" ",
"A",
"treaty",
"breach",
"does",
"not",
"necessarily",
"affect",
"treaty",
"relations",
"depending",
"on",
"how",
"serious",
"the",
"other",
"parties",
"view",
"the",
"breach",
"and",
"what",
"other",
"f... | {
"text": [
"how they resolve to respond to it"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
145
],
"end": [
177
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
25
],
"end": [
31
]
}
]
} | [
"how they resolve to respond to it"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties formed an important part of European colonization and, in many parts of the world, Europeans attempted to legitimize their sovereignty by signing treaties with indigenous peoples. In most cases these treaties were in extremely disadvantageous terms to the native people, who often did not appreciate the implica... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"formed",
"an",
"important",
"part",
"of",
"European",
"colonization",
"and",
",",
"in",
"many",
"parts",
"of",
"the",
"world",
",",
"Europeans",
"attempted",
"to",
"legitimize",
"their",
"sovereignty... | 2d2cf30196274ecf8200175c934cfb35 | What formed an important part of European colonization? | {
"tokens": [
"What",
"formed",
"an",
"important",
"part",
"of",
"European",
"colonization",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
12,
15,
25,
30,
33,
42,
54
]
} | {
"text": [
"Treaties"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
0,
155,
209
],
"end": [
7,
162,
216
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
0,
25,
34
],
"end": [
0,
25,
... | [
"Treaties"
] |
SQuAD | Treaties formed an important part of European colonization and, in many parts of the world, Europeans attempted to legitimize their sovereignty by signing treaties with indigenous peoples. In most cases these treaties were in extremely disadvantageous terms to the native people, who often did not appreciate the implica... | {
"tokens": [
"Treaties",
"formed",
"an",
"important",
"part",
"of",
"European",
"colonization",
"and",
",",
"in",
"many",
"parts",
"of",
"the",
"world",
",",
"Europeans",
"attempted",
"to",
"legitimize",
"their",
"sovereignty... | ae26c55f0e844d39baa0b0e5f894a840 | With whom did Europeans attempt to sign treaties in order to legitimize their sovereignty during colonization? | {
"tokens": [
"With",
"whom",
"did",
"Europeans",
"attempt",
"to",
"sign",
"treaties",
"in",
"order",
"to",
"legitimize",
"their",
"sovereignty",
"during",
"colonization",
"?"
],
"offsets": [
0,
5,
10,
14,
24,
32,
35,
... | {
"text": [
"indigenous peoples"
],
"char_spans": [
{
"start": [
169
],
"end": [
186
]
}
],
"token_spans": [
{
"start": [
27
],
"end": [
28
]
}
]
} | [
"indigenous peoples"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.