ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_921 | 0 | The appellants were the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 112171 of 2015 and connected matters in which they had challenged the acquisition of their lands in Muchakandi and Bagalakote villages of Bagalakote District under two notifications issued by the respondents. The petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge... |
id_921 | 1 | Though we are of the opinion that the courts are not entitled to go behind the declaration of the Government to the effect that a particular purpose for which the land is being acquired is a public purpose, we must emphasise that the declaration of the Government must be relatable to a public purpose as distinct from a... |
id_921 | 2 | He also brought to our notice that on account of emerging scenario especially the new culture of planned development of the habitats, new laws have also come in for regulating town planning and in consonance with the same Bagalkot Town Development Authority (BTDA) was also constituted. The said BTDA is created to effec... |
id_923 | 0 | Santosh Mrs. Terezinha Martins David, daughter of the late Antonio Baptista, major of age, resident of House No.180, Mestabhat, Near the Pick‑up Stand, New Market, Margao, Goa, is the Appellant. The Respondents are: Miguel Guarda Rosario Martins alias Michael Rosario Martins, son of the said late Antonio Baptista Marti... |
id_923 | 1 | On the premises that the Appellant was the eldest sister in Martin's family and, therefore, she must have been aware of the litigation between the brothers, this inference could not have been drawn based upon the material on record. In any case, since the Appellant was not even a party to this suit, and the consent dec... |
id_924 | 0 | 30 March 2022 Sl. 5 Writ Petition Application 13701 of 2021 Madam Abdul Gani Ansari, State of West Bengal & Ors.; Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas for the petitioner; Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra, Ms. Supriya Dubey for the State Service Commission; Mr. Raja Saha, Mr. Sandip Dasgupta, Mr. Shamim ul Bari, Mr. Saquib Siddiqui... |
id_925 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2579 of 2013. Petitioners: Rakesh Rajput and Reena Rajput. Versus: The State of Jharkhand and Anita Singh. For the petitioners: Ms. Ashma Khanam, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor. For Opposite Party No. 2: Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate... |
id_926 | 0 | Raj Ali and others petitioner(s) Through: Mister Gagan Basotra Senior Advocate with Mister Sahil Gupta and Mister Nadeem Bhat Advocates. Union of India and others Respondent(s) Through: Miss Monika Kohli Senior Additional Advocate General., The petitioner is essentially and primarily aggrieved by orders dated 03.07.202... |
id_927 | 0 | Petitioner Versus Respondents. The State of Maharashtra Through the Public Prosecutor High Court, Bombay 1/74 rrpillai2023:BHC-AS:27116-DB 902-WP-97-2021.docx Mr. Prabhjit Jauhara / w. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, Ms. Keral Mehta and Mr. Vikrant Shinde / b. Ms. Jai Abhyudaya Vaidya for the Petitioner. Ms. Lata Desai, Senior ... |
id_927 | 1 | It was held that, a fortiori, dependent on the outcome of the proceedings before the Family Court at New Delhi, the wife must be legally obliged to participate in the proceedings in the United States Court and must take all measures to defend herself in the said proceedings, and the husband shall bear the expenses for ... |
id_927 | 2 | |
id_928 | 0 | Dated the 6th day of October 2023, this Revision Petition has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and the revision petitioner is the respondent in Miscellaneous Case No. 106/2019 on the files of the Family Court of Kerala, Thalassery. The respondents herein are the original petitioners in the ... |
id_929 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No. 1170 of 2000, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 425 of 2001 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5525 of 2001 were reserved on 31 October 2023 and pronounced on 20 November 2023. Coram: the learned judges of the Madras High Court., The parties are A. M. Paramasivan (deceased) and P. Nallamma... |
id_929 | 1 | Rs.14,800/- and Rs.1,37,960/- for 1.29 acres of wet land in Survey No. 207/2 & 3 at Kodikulam purchased in 1994 in the name of the late Selvakumar Pandian by Sale Deed Document No. 1902/94 dated 23-09-1994 of the Sub-Registrar Office, Thamaraipatty (Rs.70,950/- + Stamp Duty Rs.8,520/- = Rs.79,470/-). Also, Rs.2,76,141/... |
id_93 | 0 | High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh on its own motion versus State of Haryana through Chief Secretary, Home Secretary, Home Minister, Deputy Commissioner, Nuh, Senior Superintendent of Police, Nuh. Present: Mr. Baldev R. Mahajan, Advocate General, Haryana; Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Additional Advocate General, H... |
id_931 | 0 | Chack Z Singh, Hangarh, Kumhariyawas, Chaksu, Jaipur) Petitioner Versus The Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur; The Principal Secretary, Secondary Education Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur; The Director Secondary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan); T... |
id_931 | 1 | Stay application and all applications, pending if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to costs. List this matter on 04.09.2023 to check the compliance of this order. |
id_932 | 0 | W.P. No. 2758 of 2023 dated 08.02.2023 The Federal Bank Ltd., represented by its Senior Manager, LCRD, Coimbatore Division, No. 21 Variety Hall Road, Coimbatore-641001 (Petitioner) versus The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Pollachi, No. 104, Taluk Office Campus, Coimbatore Road, Pollachi-642001 (Respondent No.... |
id_932 | 1 | It is relevant to note that lease is only a transfer of right to enjoy the property in favour of the lessee, the ownership is always vested with the owner. Merely because transfer of right to enjoy such property is created in favour of the tenant or lessee, it cannot be said that owner has no right to deal with the pro... |
id_933 | 0 | Judgment pronounced on 22 November 2023. Through Senior Advocate Maninder Singh and Senior Advocate Rajshekhar Rao, along with Advocates Bani Dikshit, Uddhav Khanna, Krishan Kumar, Rohan Jaitley, Arkraj Kumar, Rishab Aggarwal, Tanya Aggarwal, Ashita Chawla and Ajay Sabharwal, for the plaintiff. Through Advocates Sarim ... |
id_934 | 0 | Criminal Appeal (Special) No. 16/2021 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2120/2021 Reserved on: 24.05.2022 Pronounced on: 30.05.2022 Rajesh Kumar Abrol, Applicant/Appellant, through Shri P. N. Raina, Senior Advocate with Shri J. A. Hamal, Advocate, Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Respondent(s) through Shri Amit Gupta, Ad... |
id_935 | 0 | Judgment delivered on 01 September 2023. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Amit Sinha, Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Ms. Aditi, Mr. Satyam Sharma and Mr. Saurav Kumar Sohi, Advocates. Counsel for the State: Ms. Richa Dhawan, Assistant Public Prosecutor., The present applicati... |
id_937 | 0 | Criminal Report No. 80 of 2023 Shrimati Sujata Sunil Ghatvisave, Shrimati Sushila Tanhaji Ghatvisave, Shrimati Babita Keshav Bangera, Mr. Ravi Hari Shigwan, Mrs. Saraswati Lokre, Applicants versus Application for Bail No. 1484 of 2023, The State of Maharashtra (at the instance of Dadar Police Station, Criminal Report N... |
id_938 | 0 | Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate versus Through: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC with Ms. Shivangi Gumber, Advocate for R-1 and 2; Mr. M. A. Niyazi, Standing Counsel for CBSE with Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advocates for R-3., Briefly stated, ... |
id_939 | 0 | For the petitioners: Mister Sacchin Puri, Senior Advocate, with Mister Praveen K. Sharma and Mister Dhananjay Grover, Advocates; the petitioner in person in W.P.(C) No. 3031/2020; Mister Mahesh Agarwal, Mister Rishi Agrawala, Mister Karan Luthra, Mister Ankit Banati, Advocates in W.P.(C) No. 4970/2021; Mister Himanshu ... |
id_94 | 0 | Reserved on: 22nd August 2023 Pronounced on: 18th December 2023 Through: Ms. Meenakshi Kalra, Advocate. Versus Thapliyal, Mr. S.P. Paul, Ms. Kiran Lata Pal & Ms. Kanchan Thapliyal, Advocates., The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (herein... |
id_940 | 0 | MA No. 140/2009 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Udhay Bhaskar, Advocate Vs Jagjeet Singh and others. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jatinder Choudhary, Advocate for., The appellant/Insurance Company has challenged award dated 18.11.2008 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribu... |
id_941 | 0 | Decided on 29.05.2023. Through: Mr. Vivek Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anu Monga, Mr. Rahul Goyal, Mr. Shobhit Sharma, Ms. Parul Parmar and Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, Advocates, versus through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, Additional Standing Counsel for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi with Ms. Mriganka Kukre... |
id_942 | 0 | High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\nCivil Writ Petition No. 3531 of 2022 Arti Devi, Petitioner versus Union Territory Chandigarh and others, Respondents. Present: Ashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking ... |
id_945 | 0 | These petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by Respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), forming a prima facie opinion of the violation of Section 4 of the Act by the petitioners, and directing the Director General of Respond... |
id_945 | 1 | Though some of the issues may substantively be in issue before the Supreme Court of India and this Court of India in the above‑referred petitions, in my opinion, the respondent cannot be an inviolable rule, nor is one pleaded by the petitioners, that merely because an issue may be pending before the Supreme Court of In... |
id_946 | 0 | Reserved on: 7th June 2023. Pronounced on: 12th June 2023. Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Mr. Manik Dhingra and Mr. Prabhav Palli, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain with Mr. Ankit Bhatia, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Kartik Sabharwal, Advocates with Ms. Bhanu Priya, Jogender., The p... |
id_946 | 1 | There is no order as yet passed by a competent court of law, holding that no offence is made out against the appellant under Section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act and it would be noteworthy that a criminal revision praying for quashing the proceedings initiated against the appellant under Section... |
id_947 | 0 | Case: Writ Petition No. 7677 of 2020. Petitioner: Justice Anjani Kumar and another. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. Counsel for petitioner: Tarun Agrawal. Counsel for respondent: Chief Standing Counsel, Ankush Tandon, Honourable Shashi Kant Gupta, Judge; Honourable Pankaj Bhatia, Judge., This writ p... |
id_949 | 0 | State vs Umar Khalid, FIR No. 101/2020, Police Station Khajuri Khas (Crime Branch). Bail Application No. 506/2021. The case is under sections 109, 114, 147, 148, 149, 153-A, 186, 212, 353, 395, 427, 435, 436, 452, 454, 505, 34, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Prope... |
id_951 | 0 | These appeals involve a challenge to the constitutional validity of sub‑sections (7) and (8) of Section 4 introduced by the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 2005, Section 15 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976, and Section 8A of the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1985, inser... |
id_951 | 1 | Power to detain vehicles used without certificate of registration permit, etc. Any police officer or other person authorised in this behalf by the State Government may, if he has reason to believe that a motor vehicle has been or is being used in contravention of the provisions of Section 3, Section 4, Section 39 or wi... |
id_951 | 2 | Notwithstanding anything contained in sub‑section (1), the Government may, from time to time, by notification in the Gazette, direct that a temporary licence for a period not exceeding seven days or thirty days at a time may be issued in respect of any class of motor vehicles specified in the Schedule on payment of the... |
id_951 | 3 | We cannot be oblivious about the legislative intent for enacting the 1985 Act and the amendment effected thereto in 2005. The same is a beneficial legislation with avowed objective to ensure strict compliance of payment of welfare fund contribution to protect the workers of the commercial operations undertaken by the v... |
id_952 | 0 | Full text of the Speech by Honorable the Chief Justice of India Shri Justice N V Ramana at the Curtain Raiser and Stakeholders Conclave of International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad, 04 December 2021. Namaskar. It is my pleasure to be speaking at the Curtain Raiser for the International Arbitration and M... |
id_955 | 0 | The Special Judge for trial of the cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Bhanupratappur, Uttar Bastar Kanker, vide judgment dated 30 October 2018 passed in Special Criminal Case (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012) No. 17 of 2017 convicted and sentenced the accused/Ap... |
id_955 | 1 | The jail authorities must also include a fresh psychiatric and psychological report which will further evidence the reformative progress, and reveal post‑conviction mental illness, if any., It is pertinent to point out that the Supreme Court of India in Anil v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 4 Supreme Court Cases 69 has ... |
id_957 | 0 | Appointment of Judges in High Courts\n\nThe Minister of Law and Justice is requested to state:\n\n(a) the number of judges appointed in each High Court since 2014, broken down by category;\n\n(b) the details of vacant positions of judges in each High Court, together with the reasons for such vacancies;\n\n(c) the detai... |
id_959 | 0 | The National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Cumballa Hill Telephone Exchange, 7th Floor, Peddar Road, Mumbai. Appellant: National Investigation Agency (NIA). Respondent: Areeb Ejaz Majeed, residing at C Wing, Flat No. 206, Sarvodaya Residency, Patri Pool, Kalyan (West), District Th... |
id_959 | 1 | The prosecution is not much categorical to reveal the line of examination of the forthcoming witnesses and their relevance to bring on record material about terrorist acts of the applicant. Thus, at this stage, it cannot be concluded that the prosecution would certainly develop a chain of evidence to reach to desired d... |
id_96 | 0 | Ms. Nandita Saha, Applicant, versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent; Ms. Raadhika Nanda, Applicant, versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent; Mr. Abhishek Yende as well as Surbhi Agrawal as well as Vishal Dhasade for Applicants in both applications; Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, Applicant for State/Respondent in both; Mr.... |
id_960 | 0 | A petition under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner in FIR No. 226/2019, under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar, Delhi., Accordin... |
id_961 | 0 | 07 December 2021 General Diary / Special Summary Docket WPA(P) 27 of 2021 (Through Video Conference) Supreme Court of India, on its own motion, Dipak Joshi, lodged in Dum Dum Central Correctional Home. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Jayashree Patra, Anirban Ray, Debasish Ghosh for the State. Saikat Banerjee, Juin Dutta Ch... |
id_962 | 0 | CNR No. DLCT 12-0000-38-2024 Complaint Case No. 02/2024 Directorate of Enforcement vs. Arvind Kejriwal 07.02.2024 This is a complaint filed under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. By way of this order, I shall decide whether there is sufficient material for taking cognizance of the offence under Sect... |
id_963 | 0 | From: Sir, The Registrar General The Chairman High Law Bar Council of Kerala, Ernakulam -682031. AGH COUR Sub: Constitution of Grievance Redressal Committee for redressal of grievances of Advocates headed by the Honourable Chief Justice. Reference: Orders of Honourable Supreme Court of India dated 20-04-2023 in MA-859/... |
id_964 | 0 | For the Petitioner: Ms. Pooja Agarwal, petitioner in person. For the Respondents: Mr. U.K. Nair, Senior Standing Counsel, Gauhati High Court. Date of Hearing & Judgment & Order: 4th April, 2022., Heard Ms. Pooja Agarwal, petitioner-in-person. Also heard Mr. U.K. Nair, learned senior standing counsel, Gauhati High Court... |
id_966 | 0 | Dated this the 26th day of November, 2021. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the husband of the fourth respondent. The impugned order has been passed by the third respondent, Dowry Prohibition Officer., According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner married the fourth respo... |
id_967 | 0 | Through: Mr. Yogesh Kaushik, Advocate, versus Through: Ms. Raghuinder Verma, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Sanjay Sharma, Assistant Technical Officer, Crime Police and Sub-Inspector Vishal, Police Station Saket. Respondent No. 2 in person., This is a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal... |
id_968 | 0 | Dated this the 6th day of May, 2022. The intra‑Court appeals are filed by the respondents 2 to 4 in Writ Petition (Civil) 9414/2022, the Public Sector Oil Marketing Companies, aggrieved by the interim order passed in the writ petition, directing them to sell high‑speed diesel to the writ petitioner the Kerala State Roa... |
id_968 | 1 | The Honorable Supreme Court of India, by order dated 16.09.2013 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.19996/2013 filed by the respondents 2 and 3, stayed the operation of the impugned order after observing as under: In our opinion, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, particularly that 83% o... |
id_969 | 0 | Date of Decision: 27 September 2022. Through: Mr Pravin Anand, Ms Vaishali Mittal and Mr Shivang Sharma, Advocates for the Plaintiffs. Through: Defendants No 1 and 2 ex parte vide order dated 19 September 2022; Defendants No 3 and 4 ex part vide order dated 15 July 2019; Suit decreed against Defendants No 5 and 6 vide ... |
id_971 | 0 | In Chamber Applicant: State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Civil Section, Lucknow. Opposite Party: Mohd. Rizwan alias Raziwan. Counsel for Applicant: Government Advocate. Counsel for Opposite Party: Parmanand Gupta. Honorable Dinesh Kumar Singh, Judge., The matter was taken up ... |
id_972 | 0 | Through: Mr. Hemant Daswani, Ms. Sauyma Bajpai, Advocate versus Respondent Through: Ms. Swati Sukumar, Mr. Essenese, Ms. Ashima Obhan, Mr. Ritik Raghuwanshi, Mr. Pratyush Rao, Ms. Ayesha Ghutha Kurtha, Ms. Seerat Bhutani, Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Advocate. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application sha... |
id_973 | 0 | Through: Mr. Sahil Mongia, Mr. Prateek Mehta, Mr. Vikas, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Sahil Rao, Ms. Megha Mehta, Advocates versus Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Assistant Solicitor with Mr. Kunal Mittal, Advocate., This is a petition under the writ of habeas corpus seeking direction to the respondents numbered 3 an... |
id_976 | 0 | The present appeals are directed against the impugned order and judgment dated 20.12.2019 in RFA No. 392 of 2012 (DEC) and the impugned judgment and order dated 15.07.2022 in Review Petition No. 365 of 2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, whereby both the appeal and the review preferred by the appel... |
id_979 | 0 | Appellate Side Present: The Hon'ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi and The Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta. Criminal Revision Appeal 561 of 2015 Jiten Barman versus The State of West Bengal. For the appellant: Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Parthapratim Das, Advocate; Mrs. Manasi Roy, Advocate. Heard on ... |
id_98 | 0 | Future Retail Ltd. (FRL) filed the present suit implementing Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC as Defendant No.1; Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. (FCPL) as Defendant Nos.2; the promoters of the plaintiff (the Biyanis) as Defendant Nos.3 to 11; Future Corporate Resources Private Limited (FCRPL), Akar Estate and Finance Pri... |
id_98 | 1 | Reliance relies on the decisions reported as (2012) 6 Supreme Court of India 613 Vodafone International Holdings BV vs. Union of India; RNRL vs. RIL (supra); 2000 (3) Maharashtra Law Journal 700 Rolta India Ltd vs. Venire Industries Ltd.; 1959 AC 324 Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd vs. Mayer and [2009] EWCA... |
id_98 | 2 | Therefore, Emergency Arbitrator is an arbitrator under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules and accordingly under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; secondly, an Arbitral Tribunal will comprise an Emergency Arbitrator in terms of Section 2(8), Section 2(1)(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation... |
id_98 | 3 | The Parties agree that they shall attempt to resolve through good faith consultation any such dispute between any of the Parties, and such consultation shall begin promptly after a Party has delivered to another Party a written request for such consultation. In the event the dispute is not resolved by means of negotiat... |
id_98 | 4 | SCC 305] which is one of the earliest decisions in that direction and which has been consistently followed in all the subsequent decisions including the recent Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Union of India, (2014) 7 SCC 603 : (2014) 3 SCC (Civ) 737). (Emphasis supplied), In Cent... |
id_98 | 5 | A director of a company shall act in good faith in order to promote the objects of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in the best interests of the company, its employees, the shareholders, the community and for the protection of the environment. A director of a company shall exercise his duties ... |
id_98 | 6 | On the date of notification of the FRL Shareholders Agreement, that is, 26 December 2019, only 16.18 % of FRL securities were free from encumbrances and, as per Clause 17.2(i) of the FCPL Shareholders Agreement, the promoters were under an obligation to reserve the said minimum shareholding., 'Control' is defined in th... |
id_98 | 7 | Except as otherwise provided in Section 9.2 (Permitted Transactions), any transfer or licence of all or substantially all of the assets of the company (including all or substantially all intellectual property), including without limitation a restricted transfer; any restricted transfer to an affiliate or a related part... |
id_98 | 8 | Amazon contends that the resolution is in breach of the Fertilizer Research Limited Shareholders Agreement (FRL SHA) because prior consent of Fertilizer Company Private Limited (FCPL) was not obtained. This contention is negated by a letter dated 29 August 2020 from Fertilizer Research Limited (FRL) to FCPL, in which F... |
id_982 | 0 | Amendment of section 8 – Short title and commencement. Bill Number LXII of 2013 further to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Be it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty‑fourth Year of the Republic of India as follows: This Act may be called the Representation of the People (Second Amendment and Validation)... |
id_983 | 0 | Noticee No. Noticee Name PAN 1 Shri Mukesh D Ambani AADPA3705F 2 Shri Anil D Ambani AADPA3703D 3 Smt. K D Ambani AACPA5346H 4 Smt. Dipti D Salgaokar ABKPS7317M 5 Smt. Nina B Kothari AAHPK5415A 6 Shri R H Ambani AALPA6303R 7 Shri Dattaraj Salgaokar ABYPS1941H 8 Smt. Nita Ambani AADPA3704E 9 Smt. Tina Ambani AAEPA2345Q 1... |
id_983 | 1 | I note that the following entities, Uditi Mercantile Private Limited and Pams Investments & Trading Co. Private Limited, preferred Appeal No. 16 of 2012 and Appeal No. 22 of 2012 before the Hon'ble Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). The grievance of the appellants was that preliminary issues had been raised by the ap... |
id_983 | 2 | The Noticees submit that the delay in issuing the Show Cause Notice is unreasonable, arbitrary and causes substantial prejudice to the Noticees. Initiation of adjudication proceedings after such an inordinate delay is unreasonable, arbitrary and violative of the constitutional guarantee of non‑arbitrariness under Artic... |
id_983 | 3 | From the provisions of the 1997 Takeover Regulations and the Report of the Bhagwati Committee, it is clear that preferential allotments and schemes of merger were automatically exempt from making an open offer at the relevant time under specific exemptions for acquisitions pursuant to a preferential allotment and merge... |
id_983 | 4 | Arguments were made on behalf of the Noticees on merits of the matter without prejudice to: (a) the preliminary objections raised, which relate to your jurisdiction and go to the root of the matter under adjudication; and (b) the submission that such preliminary objections must first be decided. This was done only upon... |
id_983 | 5 | They have to wait till at least they are enrolled as members. Before that they have the right to seek enforcement of their right to be members., In the matter of Ch. Kiron Margdarshi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India [2001] 33 SCL 349, the Securities Appellate Tribunal held that the regulation is attracted by t... |
id_983 | 6 | If any person who is required under this Act or any rules or regulations made thereunder fails to (i) disclose the aggregate of his shareholding in the body corporate before he acquires any shares of that body corporate; or (ii) make a public announcement to acquire shares at a minimum price; or (iii) make a public off... |
id_984 | 0 | Date of decision: 15 June 2021. Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Tusharika Mattoo and Mr. Kunal Negi, Advocates, for the appellant. Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Amit Prasad and Mr. Rajat Nair, Special Public Prosecutors for the State, along with Mr. Dhruv Pande and Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Advocates, for the respondent.,... |
id_984 | 1 | The observations of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan vs Union of India and Another give the most lucid answer, explaining the contours of legitimate protest. In that decision, the Court says that legitimate dissent is a distinguishable feature of any democracy and the question is ... |
id_985 | 0 | Criminal Jurisdiction Date: 11.02.2024 S. Gurumoorthy Petitioner/Accused No.3 vs State represented by the Sub Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai District (Crime No. 264/2023). Respondent/Complainant for Petitioner: Mr. S. S. Sundarapandian, Advocate. For Respondent: Mr. P. Kottaichamy, Government ... |
id_986 | 0 | Reportable Civil Appeal No. 7000 of 2021 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No.18591 of 2021) Avni Prakash Appellant versus National Testing Agency (NTA) and others Respondents Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice. Introduction: Leave granted., This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Ju... |
id_986 | 1 | The certificate shall ascertain whether a candidate can apply to the National Testing Agency for appearing in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) Undergraduate 2021 under the Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) quota only., After selection under the PwBD category, candidates must produce a Disabili... |
id_986 | 2 | In pursuance of an interim order of the High Court dated 7 October 2021, the first respondent suggested that the answer key would be implemented for scoring and evaluation of the six candidates in whose cases there was a mix‑up in the distribution of the test booklet code and OMR sheets as per the sequence of questions... |
id_987 | 0 | The petitioner retired as Regional Engineer from the Kerala State Housing Board (the Board) on 31 May 2002. The third respondent, the Secretary of the Board, by proceedings dated 20 May 2006, sanctioned the pensionary benefits of the petitioner but withheld his Deferred Compensatory Retirement Gratuity (DCRG) amounting... |
id_988 | 0 | W.P. (Criminal) No. 402 of 2021\nJiramani Devi, Petitioner\nVersus\n1. State of Jharkhand through Director General of Police, Dhurwa, Ranchi\n2. Superintendent of Police, Latehar\n3. Union of India through Directorate General, Central Reserve Police Force, Block No. 1 (Central Government Offices), CGO Complex, Lodhi Ro... |
id_988 | 1 | Services v. Sahngoo Ram Arya, (2002) 5 SCC 521 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 775, had said that an order directing an enquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation should be passed only when the High Court, after considering the material on record, comes to the conclusion that such material discloses a prima facie case calling for... |
id_989 | 0 | S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16367/2021. Petitioners: (1) School Development Management Committee, Shri Hari Singh Senior Secondary School, Pilwa, Panchayat Samiti, Dechu, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan) represented by its member Harish Khatri, son of Phool Chand Khatri, aged about 40 years; (2) Harish Khatri, aged about ... |
id_989 | 1 | Crux of argument of learned counsel for the petitioners was that, if Article 21A of the Constitution of India is read conjointly with section 29(2)(f) of the Right to Education Act, 2009, the right to education enshrined under Article 21A includes the right to get education in mother tongue or home language, while lear... |
id_990 | 0 | Mister Dhyandev Kachruji Wankhede, Plaintiff/Applicant; Nawab Malik, Defendant; Mister Arshad Shaikh, Senior Advocate with Mister Divakar Rai, Mister R. S. Rane, Miss Bhavika Solanki, Mister Nitin Rai in behalf of Saurabh Tamhankar for the Plaintiff/Applicant. Mister Atul Damle, Senior Advocate with Mister Ramesh Dube ... |
id_990 | 1 | Before considering the rival submissions it is necessary to set out the legal position with respect to various issues raised by the respective parties. In Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retired) (supra), the Supreme Court of India, in conclusion (F), explained the concept of privacy as follows: Privacy includes at its core ... |
id_990 | 2 | The Plaintiff has produced the following documents to establish his name as Dnyandeo and his belonging to the Mahar caste recognized as a Scheduled Caste: a copy of his deceased wife's Driving Licence showing the name Dayandeo; a copy of his deceased wife's Voter Identity Card showing the name Gyandev; a copy of his de... |
id_992 | 0 | Through: Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Yatinder Garg, Mr. Akshay Maloo and Ms. Rimjhim Tiwari, Advocates. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. I.A. 14170/2023 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. I.A. 14171/2023 (exemption from advance notice to the Defendants) This... |
id_993 | 0 | The petitioners are CA V. Venkata Sivakumar, the petitioner in both writ petitions, and the respondents are: (i) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, represented by the Deputy General Manager, 7th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Shankar Market, Connaught Circus, New Delhi 110001; (ii) Indian Institute of Insolvency Professio... |
id_993 | 1 | Even in the case of the petitioner, finding that the petitioner has been punished for the same delinquency by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), the IBBI dropped the Writ Petition Nos. 16650 of 2020 and 14448 of 2021 proceedings. Further, for the very same action it may be possible that both the IBBI ... |
id_994 | 0 | Leave granted., This appeal is by the appellant seeking appointment as a primary school teacher. He is aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing the writ appeal, which was filed against the order of the Single Judge dismissing his writ petition., Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Institut... |
id_995 | 0 | Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 863 of 2019, leave was granted. The impugned judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Madras affirms the conviction of the appellant Perumal Raja alias Perumal for murder of Rajini alias Rajinikanth under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 201 ... |
id_995 | 1 | Sections 25 and 26 were enacted not because the law presumed the statements to be untrue, but having regard to the tainted nature of the source of the evidence, prohibited them from being received in evidence. A person giving word of mouth information to police, which may be used as evidence against him, may be deemed ... |
id_996 | 0 | By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, quashing of FIR bearing number 519/2012, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, has been sought by the present petitioners., The marriage b... |
id_996 | 1 | However, before parting with this case, the Delhi High Court notes that the dispute in question has arisen primarily due to an inadequately worded and ambiguous Mediated Settlement Agreement. In the process of mediation, the task of drafting an agreement at the culmination of long, arduous and challenging mediation pro... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.