ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_873 | 1 | There was reason to believe that organised criminal gangs have been operating in the State and thus there was an immediate need to curb their activities. It was also noticed that the organised criminals have been making extensive use of wire and oral communications in their criminal activities. The interception of such... |
id_873 | 2 | Looking to the object and purpose of this enactment, the expression other advantage cannot be read in a restrictive manner and is required to be given its full effect. The High Court of the State has rightly said that there could be advantage to a person committing a crime which may not be directly leading to pecuniary... |
id_874 | 0 | W.P.No.2191 of 2015 Petitioners: V. Shanmugam (Deceased), S. Sharmila, Divya Bharathi. Respondents: Union of India represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Room No.3, C‑Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 110001; State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Higher Education Depa... |
id_874 | 1 | Thus, the deceased student jumped into the sea after the programme and without informing the Organisers and therefore, the College cannot be held responsible for the death of the student. The deceased student was aged about 21 years and was pursuing a third year Bachelor of Engineering course. He was a major and capabl... |
id_875 | 0 | Date of decision: 04 July 2023. Through: Mr Aman Agarwal, Mr Madhav Bhatia, Advocates versus Through: Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel with Mr Arun Panwar, Mr Pradyumn Rao, Ms Mehak Rankawat, Mr Karthik Sharma, Advocates and Assistant Sub‑Inspector Kanwar Singh, Parivahan Officer, Traffic Police Mr T P Singh... |
id_878 | 0 | Insurance for lawyers has been an aspiration for several years. Though more than two decades have passed since the enactment of the Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2001, group life insurance and Mediclaim/health insurance for lawyers has merely remained in the statute books. It is under these circumstances that the Chief M... |
id_878 | 1 | The challenge in this writ petition is to the criteria prescribed by the Delhi Government for extending the benefit of the Scheme only to Advocates, who are registered voters in Delhi and possess voter ID cards in Delhi. Mister Chaturvedi submits that the eligibility criteria of insisting on a voter ID card is complete... |
id_878 | 2 | It is further submitted that the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi consulted all the stakeholders in the matter and thereafter a Committee was constituted, consisting of Presidents of various Bar Associations, the Chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi and two other advocates, who would represent the inte... |
id_878 | 3 | This is a remarkable initiative for the legal community and shall pave the way for the welfare of legal professionals in the country., The stand of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi that the pre‑condition of having a voter ID card of Delhi is to honour advocates who are residents of Delhi and intend... |
id_878 | 4 | However, considering that the total outlay at the moment is only Rupees 50 crores, the Scheme having been extended to all advocates who are enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi, while availing the insurance for such advocates, there could be some deficit of funds. From the data filed by the Bar Council of Delhi, it i... |
id_88 | 0 | Criminal Bail Application No. 13/2022 (Nitesh Narayan Rane Vs. State of Maharashtra) The applicant has filed this application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Criminal Report No. 387/2021, registered at Kankavali Police Station, for offence under Section 307 and Section 120-B read... |
id_88 | 1 | Perusal of the injury certificate of the informant shows that the informant had sustained five injuries including an incised wound of 35 cm long by 0.8 cm deep on the right side of the chest and an incised wound of size 18 cm by 0.3 cm on the right side of the chest. According to the informant, first he was dashed by a... |
id_885 | 0 | Petitioner: Smt. Rashmi (Corpus). Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. Counsel for Petitioner: Hari Nath Chaubey. Counsel for Respondent: G. A. Additional Government Advocate, Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.; Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J., By way of this petition, the petitioner, through her husba... |
id_886 | 0 | Ashok Bhushan, Judge (for himself and S. Abdul Nazeer, Judge), L. Nageswara Rao, Judge, Hemant Gupta, Judge and S. Ravindra Bhat, Judge have also concurred on Questions Nos. 1, 2 and 3. This Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has been constituted to consider questions of seminal importance relating to the... |
id_886 | 1 | Whether the State has been able to establish the social and educational backwardness and inadequacy of representation of the Maratha community in public employment on the basis of the report of Maharashtra State Backward Classes Commission under the Chairmanship of Justice Gaikwad on the basis of quantifiable and conte... |
id_886 | 2 | Shri R.K. Deshpande, appearing for the appellant, has also contended that by Article 342A, a separate mechanism has been introduced for the purpose of identification of backward class. He submits that there cannot be any State list of Socially and Educationally Backward Class after the 102nd Constitutional Amendment. H... |
id_886 | 3 | The Government of Maharashtra decision dated 07.12.1994 created a special backward category containing several castes and communities. The Maharashtra State Public Services Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De‑notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Special Backward Category and Other Backwar... |
id_886 | 4 | [(1962) 2 SCR 586] is a case in which reservation of vacancies to be filled by promotion was upheld by the Supreme Court of India. Justice Gajendragadkar, who delivered the majority judgment, observed: It is also true that the reservation which can be made under Article 16(4) is intended merely to give adequate represe... |
id_886 | 5 | The Directive Principles of State Policy impose an onerous obligation on the States to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting, as effectively as possible, a social order in which social justice, economic and political dimensions inform all the institutions of national life. Providing reservation f... |
id_886 | 6 | Article 30 of the Constitution gives a Fundamental Right to minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. The right of minorities is a distinct right recognized in the Constitution. The 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2005 added sub‑clause (5) to Article 15, which excludes the minority educational... |
id_886 | 7 | If the State has quantifiable data to show backwardness and inadequacy then the State can make reservations in promotions keeping in mind maintenance of efficiency which is held to be a constitutional limitation on the discretion of the State in making reservation as indicated by Article 335. The Constitution Bench not... |
id_886 | 8 | Out of the functioning 161 Cooperative Sugar Factories in Maharashtra, persons from the Maratha community are the Chairman in 86 factories. The class which is politically dominant cannot be said to be suffering from social backwardness., Shri Sancheti submits that the survey conducted by the Commission suffers from var... |
id_886 | 9 | The tabular chart for posts filled in open category, posts filled by Marathas and percentage is as follows: Grade No. of open category posts filled No. of posts filled from Maratha Class Percentage of Maratha in open category post. All the three tables A, B and C and percentage of Marathas who have competed from open c... |
id_886 | 10 | The expression Central List occurring in Article 342A(2) relates to the identification under Article 342A(1) wherein the Central List will include the socially and educationally backward classes for the purposes of the Central Government. Any other interpretation would allow the legislative power of the State to be whi... |
id_886 | 11 | We may conclude the discussion on the topic by referring to a subsequent Constitution judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Kalpana Mehta and others vs. Union of India and others, (2018) 7 SCC 1, in which Justice Ashok Bhushan was also a member. In the above case, the Constitution Bench elaborately dealt with the r... |
id_886 | 12 | The President shall cause all such reports to be laid before each House of Parliament along with a memorandum explaining the action taken or proposed to be taken on the recommendations relating to the Union and the reasons for the non‑acceptance, if any, of any of such recommendations. Where any such report, or any par... |
id_886 | 13 | It is this pragmatic interpretation of the Constitution that was postulated by the Constituent Assembly, which did not feel the necessity of filling up every detail in the document, as indeed it was not possible to do so. Justice Dipak Misra in the Constitution Bench further laid down in paragraph 284.11: In the light ... |
id_886 | 14 | When we have interpreted Article 342A to mean that Article 342A refers to ‘Central List’ which is prepared for services under the Government of India and organisations under the Government of India, the definition given under Article 366(26C) which specifically refers to Article 342A has to be read together and a list ... |
id_886 | 15 | One aspect carries the concept of meaning that is what the word means and another aspect conveys the concept of purpose and object or reason or approach pervading through the statute. The process of construction, therefore, combines both liberal and purposive approaches. However, necessity of interpretation would arise... |
id_886 | 16 | In view of the above reasoning, it is held that the existence of a plurality of opinions or discordant or dissident judgments in the past which might even have led to a majority on an overall headcount supporting a particular rule in a particular case cannot detract from the legitimacy of a rule enunciated by a later, ... |
id_886 | 17 | It would be, in this context, relevant to notice that two important amendments to the Constitution of India, which have the effect of transforming the notion of equality, were made in the last 15 years. The first was the eighty sixth amendment which inserted Article 21A which had the effect of enjoining the state to pr... |
id_886 | 18 | While these measures are significant, there are other spheres where Corporate Social Responsibility could be directed, with even greater benefits. The definition and scope of Corporate Social Responsibility needs to be broadened to include measures to counteract the natural tendencies towards exclusion of certain group... |
id_886 | 19 | There shall be a Commission for the Scheduled Castes to be known as the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes. Subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by Parliament, the Commission shall consist of a Chairperson, Vice‑Chairperson and three other Members and the conditions of service and tenure o... |
id_886 | 20 | Extrinsic aids to interpretation of statutes: the extent to which they can be relied upon. The parties presented rival submissions with respect to interpretation of the words of the statute in the light of the reports of the Select Committee as well as the debates in Parliament at the time of introduction of the amendm... |
id_886 | 21 | Necessarily, therefore, the resident of State A is entitled to claim reservation benefits under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) if he or she resides (the residential qualification that needs to be fulfilled is that specified by the concerned State) in that State, i.e., State A and none else. As a sequitur, if such a person or... |
id_886 | 22 | However, that articulation or even direction could not have, in the opinion of the Supreme Court of India, been an injunction never to depart from the existing mechanisms of setting standards for identification of such classes, nor was it a direction in perpetuity that the status quo remain forever. It cannot be seriou... |
id_886 | 23 | It is impossible to read Article 338B in isolation from the pre‑existing parimateria provisions; it must be interpreted in the light of the other two provisions which had existed all this while Articles 338 and 338A. Those provisions clearly contemplate the same consultative role with the Commission on policy matters o... |
id_886 | 24 | It was submitted that unless the amendment in question directly affects (i.e., takes away the legislative power altogether in the list rather than a part of its content by amending any of the provisions in List II or List III of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution), there is no need for seeking rectification of a ... |
id_887 | 0 | W.P. (Cr.) No. 145 of 2024 Hemant Soren, Petitioner, versus Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India, represented through its Assistant Director, Ranchi Zonal Office, Plot No. 1502/B, Airport Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand (email: ed-reanchi@gov.in), P.O. & P.S. Hinoo, District Ranchi, Respondent. For the petitioner: M... |
id_887 | 1 | Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Surya Dev Rai (supra) has been pleased to conclude that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ is issued for correcting gross errors of jurisdiction, i.e., when a subordinate court is found to have acted: without jurisdiction, by assuming jurisdiction where ... |
id_887 | 2 | The word irreversible is having bearing herein reason being that if the situation is so that the loss caused will be irreversible then it will come into the fold of irreparable loss and the same was the interpretation made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in paragraph 110 and 111 of the judgment referred in Kihoto... |
id_888 | 0 | The High Court of Allahabad reserved judgment on 27 July 2023 and delivered on 3 August 2023. Petitioner: C/M Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Varanasi. Respondent: Smt. Rakhi Singh and eight others. Counsel for petitioner: S. F. A. Naqvi, Senior Advocate; Puneet Kumar Gupta; Syed Ahmed Faizan; Zaheer Asghar; Ms. Fatma Anjum;... |
id_888 | 1 | For interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the finding of facts recorded by the Authority should be found to be perverse or patently erroneous and de hors the factual and legal position on record. (Ref. Laxmikant Revchand Bhajwani v. Pratapsing Mohansing Pardeshi, (1995) 6 SCC 576; Reliance Indust... |
id_89 | 0 | Andreza Girish Chodankar, son of Raya Chodankar, 52 years of age, Indian National, President of Goa Pradesh Congress Committee of Indian National Congress, resident of LAROM E-1, Nilkanth Enclave Cupangale Housing Colony, Gogol, Margao, Fatorda, Goa, 403602. Petitioner versus: The Speaker, Goa Legislative Assembly, Por... |
id_89 | 1 | It was further submitted that the theory propounded on behalf of the Petitioners as regards the twin requirement in paragraph 4 of the Tenth Schedule was wholly unworkable. It was submitted that if merger of the original political party contemplated under sub‑paragraph (1) of paragraph 4 could be said to be complete on... |
id_89 | 2 | Explanation (a) to paragraph 2(1) of the said Schedule specifically states that an elected Member of a House shall be deemed to belong to the political party which sets him up as a candidate for election. Therefore, when a candidate contests 24 February 2022 election on the ticket of a political party and gets elected ... |
id_89 | 3 | The mind of the High Court should be clearly reflecting on the material in issue with regard to the facts of the case. The reason and spirit of case make law and not the letter of a particular precedent. Halsbury's The Laws of England explained the word ratio decidendi as: It may be laid down as a general rule that par... |
id_89 | 4 | In view of the above, the aforesaid question is answered by holding that Parliament in its wisdom has incorporated sub paragraph (2) of paragraph 4 of the said Schedule, which cannot be held to be militating against the object of introduction of the Tenth Schedule and it cannot be said that the same would encourage def... |
id_890 | 0 | Pronounced on 15 December 2023. Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate, along with Mr. Raghavendra M. Bajaj, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Mohit Goel, Ms. Garima Bajaj, Mr. Nikhil Bamal, Mr. Agnish Aditya, Mr. Kumar Karan, Mr. Shagun Agarwal, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Karmanya Dev Sharma and Ms. Ayushi Kumar, Advocates, ve... |
id_890 | 1 | It is further contended that if the condition of the payment of price is breached by the buyer then the seller is an unpaid seller under Section 45 of the Sale of Goods Act. It is contended that the remedies of an unpaid seller who the property has not passed, are prescribed under Section 46(2) of the Sale of Goods Act... |
id_890 | 2 | Section 21 is an exception to Section 20 which states that where there is a contract for sale of specific goods and the seller is bound to do something to the goods for the purpose of putting them into a deliverable state, the property does not pass until such a thing is done and the buyer has notice thereof. Likewise,... |
id_891 | 0 | ks WPA 6555 of 2023 sl Harish Chandra Gain & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Pabitra Charan Bhattacharjee, Chandan Kumar Lal For the Petitioners. Pradip Kumar Roy, Prabir Kumar Ray, Joydeep Roy For the State. Subrata Kumar Basu, Sounak Sen For the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Senjuti Sengupta, Rananeesh Guha Thakurta... |
id_892 | 0 | Crime and punishment is something which has agitated the judicial minds. Punishment cannot be disproportionately high or low. It should not be oppressive, but should serve the purpose of deterrence against crimes in a society along with a sense of justice to the victim and their family. This is a delicate balance, whic... |
id_892 | 1 | Para 6 of that affidavit referred to the assurance given vide letter dated 17.02.2002 as solemn assurance to the Government of Portugal by the Government of India, while para 7 stated as under: It is respectfully submitted that the Government of India is bound by the assurance dated 17.12.2002. The period of 25 years w... |
id_893 | 0 | Reserved on 30.06.2023 and pronounced on 08.08.2023. Writ Petition (Madras Division) No. 9754 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Madras Division) No. 8689 of 2023 filed by A. Lakshminarayanan, the Assistant General Manager, Human Resources Management/Disciplinary Authority, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Head Office, Vigilance Departm... |
id_894 | 0 | Criminal Appeal (D) No. 42/2022, reserved on 31 August 2023 and pronounced on 17 November 2023, Peerzada Shah Fahad (Appellant) appeared through Mr. P. N. Raina, Senior Advocate, with Mr. J. A. Hamal, Advocate, Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and Anr. Respondents were represented by Ms. Monika Kohli, Senior Addition... |
id_894 | 1 | In order to give fair warning, prohibitions should be as clear and as certain as possible, not least when a significant sanction such as imprisonment may follow. It is not only criminal law or criminal statutes that require clarity. The clearest statutes are those that require no interpretation by the courts and are wo... |
id_895 | 0 | Original Jurisdiction Between: Dr. Sharanya Mohan and 43 others Petitioners And: The Union of India and 6 others Respondents., Annexure A: Copy of the impugned notification No. DME/PS/157/2020‑21, dated 15 February 2021, issued by the Directorate of Medical Education (the third respondent). Annexure B: Copy of the Impu... |
id_895 | 1 | The petitioners before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka are students who have successfully completed their four and a half years of MBBS; almost all of them have completed their one‑year house surgeon programme (internship) and a few are on the verge of completing their internship. They aspire to pursue postgraduate... |
id_895 | 2 | Thus the Karnataka Compulsory Service by Candidates Completed Medical Courses Act 2012 (Compulsory Act) needs to be declared as a non est law by this Honourable Supreme Court of India. With the onset of the National Medical Council Act 2019, from the academic year 2020 onwards, admission to postgraduate and super speci... |
id_895 | 3 | In case of any suspicion over the authenticity or genuineness of a certificate, reference may be made to the university or the Board which issued the certificate to the student and the admission may be subjected to authentication, but the original certificate shall not be retained by the Higher Education Institution un... |
id_896 | 0 | Applicant: Tarun Jain. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and Another. Counsel for Applicant: Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Navin Chandra Srivastava. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks to quash the proceedings of Case No. 1111 of 2020, State v. ... |
id_897 | 0 | Every trial that fails due to external interference is a tragedy for the victims of the crime. More importantly, every frustrated trial defies and mocks society based on the rule of law. Every subverted trial leaves a scar on the criminal justice system. Repeated scars make the system unrecognisable and it then loses t... |
id_897 | 1 | In all the decisions cited at the Bar and what the Supreme Court of India found in many such cases such as Basir-Ul-Huq and Others v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1953 Supreme Court 293; Bhima Razu Prasad v. State, represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, AIR 2021 Supreme Court 2090; Santokh Singh v. Izhar Hussain ... |
id_898 | 0 | Criminal Procedure Code No. 438 of 2022 Applicant: Bhanu Pratap Singh Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and two others Counsel for Applicant: Rajkumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party: G. A. Honourable Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, Judge, Heard Rajkumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, and O. P. Mishra, learned Ad... |
id_90 | 0 | Applicant: In Re Opposite Party: Shri Chandan Kumar, Investigating Officer. Counsel for Applicant: Sudhir Mehrotra. Counsel for Opposite Party: R.V. Pandey, Abhishek Mishra, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, R.V. Pandey, Honourable Suneet Kumar, Honourable Syed Waiz Mian. Learned counsel for the parties were heard., Pursuant to t... |
id_901 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No. 162 of 2023 Vishal Tiwari Petitioner versus Union of India and Others Respondents; Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 39 of 2023; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 201 of 2023; and Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 57 of 2023. Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India., B. The scope of judi... |
id_901 | 1 | The ambiguity lies in beneficial ownership identification, which is based on control or ownership in some jurisdictions, potentially overlooking entities with economic interest but no apparent control. Consequently, investment managers or trustees, utilizing arrangements like voting shares, may be recognized as benefic... |
id_901 | 2 | These include the creation of a Financial Redress Agency that handles investor grievances across sectors; easing and centralising the process for recovering unclaimed private property, which is currently spread across agencies, either through the aegis of the Financial Stability and Development Council or even by appro... |
id_903 | 0 | Public Interest Litigation No. 10 of 2019, Date of order: 19 July 2023. In Re: Cleanliness of Umiam Lake versus State of Meghalaya. Coram: Honourable Justice Sanjib Banerjee, Chief Justice Honourable Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge. Appearance: For the Petitioner: Mr D. Dkhar, Advocate; vice Mr S. P. Mahanta, Amicus Curiae.... |
id_904 | 0 | First Appeal No. 1004 of 2022 was instituted on 21 November 2022, reserved on 6 February 2024 and decided on 20 February 2024. The appellant, Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, having its registered office at Brigade Gateway, 8th Floor, 26/1, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Malleshwaram (West), Bengaluru-560055, Karnataka, Ind... |
id_905 | 0 | The three contempt petitions were preferred pursuant to directions of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court vide order dated 31 August 2023, whereby a show‑cause notice was issued against Naresh Sharma, son of Dev Raj Sharma, resident of 119, SB Nagar, Pathankot, Punjab, as to why criminal contempt proceedings und... |
id_905 | 1 | The death penalty can be justified as follows where each Indian Penal Code provision is followed in the parenthesis by its maximum prison sentence without going into the finer details if it is rigorous imprisonment and leaving aside Indian Penal Code section 124A considering a bar on its prosecution by the Supreme Cour... |
id_906 | 0 | Only a woman knows how acutely difficult it is to balance motherhood and her career. Life as a new mother is like being on a roller‑coaster and being a working mother is tougher. The minutiae of motherhood can never be properly contemplated and it involves navigation through myriad daily issues, which ultimately determ... |
id_907 | 0 | S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 565/2022 Shashikant Joshi son of Late Shri Sukhdev Prasad, aged about 38 years, resident of E-249, Shastri Nagar Vistar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Petitioner versus State of Rajasthan, through its Chief Secretary, Jaipur; Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur; Director G... |
id_908 | 0 | Accused No. 11 in Special Criminal Case No. 872/2018 pending before the Bengaluru City Civil and Sessions Court, arising out of Crime No. 221/2017 registered by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 118, 203, 35 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1) and 27(... |
id_908 | 1 | City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, arising out of Crime Number 221/2017 registered by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 118, 203, 35 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1) and 27(1) of the Indian Arms Act, 1959, and Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2)... |
id_909 | 0 | CNR No. DLCT11-000003-2021, S.C. No. 01/2021, CIS No. 01/2021, First Information Report No. 84/2020, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the State versus Akhilesh Pati Tripathi, son of Shri Abhay Nandan Tripathi, resident... |
id_909 | 1 | Seventeen witnesses were examined by the prosecution to prove its case. Prosecution Witness 1 proved the lodging of the First Information Report, which was not disputed and there was no suggestion to the witness that the report was manipulated. Prosecution Witness 2 proved the lodging of Diary entries, which was not ch... |
id_909 | 2 | there was no occasion to suggest the names to Witness 11 as he had only stated about joining the investigation on 21 March 2020 and the suggestions were given to the Investigating Officer who had gone to the spot on the intervening night of 7–8 February 2020. Witness 15 stated that he met Witness 4 at the spot but Wit... |
id_909 | 3 | It was argued on behalf of the accused that Omveer had not been joined as a witness whereas the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State had argued that there was no need to join Omveer as he was not an eye witness and had only accompanied the complainant. The Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted th... |
id_909 | 4 | |
id_909 | 5 | During cross‑examination, Witness 15 (PW15) stated that he had not placed the call data record (CDR) of the mobile number of Shami Khan on record and volunteered that he was the eye‑witness. Thus, the CDR of the mobile of Witness 4 (PW4) had not been placed on record and PW15 volunteered that he was the eye‑witness., T... |
id_909 | 6 | No case was registered in respect of causing injury to the accused, nor did he give any direction in that regard, and he volunteered that it was a case of simple injury. Thus, Witness 15 stated that he had carried out an investigation as to who had caused injury to the accused but he stated that no case was registered ... |
id_909 | 7 | His father and other family members had also come to the spot. He stated that after his family members came to the spot there was no physical fight and only exchange of abuses. Before his family members had come to the spot, the persons present there had first physically attacked him. After his mother and uncle had com... |
id_909 | 8 | Further, he was not named in the complaint as an eye‑witness and his statement was recorded for the first time on 21 March 2020. Prior to that he had not made any complaint or representation to the police or any other authority and he had also stated that he had gone to the police station on being asked by the father o... |
id_91 | 0 | Applicant: Sameer Khan. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Rajendra Prasad Mishra. Counsel for Opposite Party: G. A. Honourable Dinesh Kumar Singh, Judge. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the re... |
id_911 | 0 | Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) CRR 843 of 2020 Mithu Dash @ Bhuiya State of West Bengal & Anr. For the petitioner: Mr. Sanat Kumar Das, Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mr. Safdar Azam. For the State: Mr. Subham Bhakat. For the Opposite Party No.2: Mr. Manas Kumar Das... |
id_912 | 0 | In the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Central Bureau of Investigation-20, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi, Case Number DLCT11-000233-2021, in the matter of: Central Bureau of Investigation versus Mahesh Kumar Sharma & Others (Respondent/Accused). In the instant application, a very interesting ques... |
id_912 | 1 | A specimen handwriting, signature or finger impression by itself is no testimony at all, being wholly innocuous because it is unchangeable except in rare cases where the ridges of the fingers or the style of writing have been tampered with. Such material is only used for comparison to lend assurance to the Supreme Cour... |
id_912 | 2 | The XI Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India in Kathi Kalu Oghad's case has categorically held that providing a thumb impression, palm impression, foot impression, finger impression, specimen in writing, or exposing a part of the body of an accused person for the purpose of identification would not amount to testim... |
id_914 | 0 | Petitioner, claiming to be an intermediary under the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereafter the Act), is approaching the High Court of India complaining against certain Blocking Orders issued by the respondents, which direct the bar of access to certain information to the public by suspending some accounts on Twit... |
id_914 | 1 | The discussion in this paragraph is based on material furnished by the petitioner’s counsel Mister Manu Kulkarni and the learned Senior Counsel CGC Mister Kumar M.N appearing for the respondents. Mister Manu Kulkarni and the learned Additional Solicitor General made their submission assisting the Supreme Court of India... |
id_914 | 2 | When the plain meaning has led to absurd or futile results, the Supreme Court of India has looked beyond the words to the purpose of the Act. Frequently, however, even when the plain meaning did not produce absurd results but merely an unreasonable one plainly at variance with the policy of the legislation as a whole, ... |
id_914 | 3 | It is a multinational IT company whose annual revenue generation is about 5 Billion US dollars, as submitted by learned Additional Solicitor General. It has technical teams having expertise in the matter relating to law and procedure of Website Blocking not only in India but in other parts of the globe too. Its represe... |
id_914 | 4 | Three of these orders were made in February 2021, two in June 2021, five in the second half of 2021 and the last one was made on 28 February 2022. Which order was complied with when has not been particularised in the pleadings. The petition itself has been filed on 5 July 2022. The non‑compliance with Section 69A order... |
id_915 | 0 | Heard Mr Jayanth Nath, learned senior counsel for the appellant. Neither the counsel for the Calcutta High Court nor that of the contesting respondents would want to make their submissions. While the counsel for the Calcutta High Court submitted that any decision of this Court would be duly implemented, it is the say o... |
id_916 | 0 | Date of Decision: 31.10.2023 Taswwar Khan Petitioner Versus State of Haryana Respondent Raju Singh Petitioner Versus State of Haryana Respondent Ramesh Tuteja Petitioner Versus State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Kamal K. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner (CRR-2161-2023). Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the pe... |
id_92 | 0 | Mr. Shiv Bhatt, the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation) No. 58 of 2020; Mr. Dushyant Mainali, the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation) No. 50 of 2020; Mr. Abhijay Negi, the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (Publi... |
id_920 | 0 | Petitioner: Hari Pasad Gupta. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Medical Health and Others. Counsel for petitioner: Dr. V. K. Singh, Hari Ram Gupta. Counsel for respondent: C. S. C., Gaurav Mehrotra. Honourable Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, J. and Honourable Justice Manish Mathur,... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.