ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_802 | 0 | Date of decision: 15th September 2023. CS (COMM) 303/2022 & I.A. 17896/2023. Through: Mr. Mukul Kochhar and Mr. Raunaq Kamath, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Assistant Superintendent of Police, GNCTD for Delhi Police Cyber Cell. Ms. Shweta Sahu and Mr. Brijesh Ujjainwal, Advocates for Defendant Prathi... |
id_803 | 0 | Criminal Original Petition Numbers 845, 850 & 852 of 2021 Reserved on 19.01.2023 Pronounced on 08.03.2023 Criminal Original Petition Numbers 845, 850 & 852 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Numbers 517, 519, 521, 522, 524, 525 of 2021., S. Velraj, petitioner / third accused in Criminal Original Petition No. 8... |
id_809 | 0 | Plaintiff: Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman at Katra Keshav Dev Khewat No. 255 and seven others. Defendant: Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board and three others. Counsel for Plaintiff: Devki Nandan Sharma, Prabhash Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Sharma. Counsel for Defendant: Nasiruzzaman, Gulrez Khan, Hare Ram, Nasiruzzaman, Pu... |
id_81 | 0 | Pintu son of Uttam Sonale (C‑10855), age 31 years, occupation convict, resident of Mantha, Taluka Hathgaon, District Nanded, presently confined at Central Prison Nasik, is the petitioner. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Superintendent of Nasik Central Prison, is the respondent. Mr. Rupesh Jaiswal appears f... |
id_81 | 1 | Thus in our opinion the words as appearing in the bracketed portion would not restrict the meaning and intention the proviso intends to achieve to make an exception from application of Prashant Rane,PS sub‑rule (C)(ii) to those convicted for serious offences for a term of more than seven years. We thus find that the in... |
id_811 | 0 | The Collegium of the Supreme Court recommended the names of three advocates for appointment as judges of the High Court of Bombay. On 26 September 2022, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay made the recommendation in consultation with his two senior‑most colleagues. The file was forwarded by the Department of ... |
id_813 | 0 | The petition was filed on 15 September 2021 and decided on 24 September 2021. The petitioner is represented by Mr Vishnu Shankar Jain, Advocate. The respondent is represented by Mr Tarang Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub‑Inspector Ramkesh Meena of the Connaught Place Police Station., By t... |
id_814 | 0 | CNR No.: DLCT11-001154-2019 Case No.: CBI/296/2019 (Old CC No. 06/14 & 78/2016) RC No.: 219 2012 (E) 0013 Under sections 120-B, 409, 420 Indian Penal Code and sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In the matter of: Versus\n\n1. Messrs Grace Industries Limited, Nagpur through its authori... |
id_816 | 0 | The appellants the Chairman and the Manager of the City Union Bank Limited have preferred the present appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 01.02.2007 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Chennai (hereinafter referred to as the National Commission) in First Appeal Number... |
id_819 | 0 | The National Law School of India University was established in 1986 to pioneer legal education reform and anchor the transformation of the Indian legal system through research and policy interventions. It is dedicated to the realisation of core constitutional values through a vital democracy committed to freedom and so... |
id_82 | 0 | ILA No. 12-2023 (Shahrukh Pathan Khan) CNR No. SH01-002176-2021 Police Station Jatrabad State Vs. Shahrukh Pathan Khan & Others. 14 December 2023. This order shall dispose of the application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of applicant/accused Shahrukh Pathan Khan for grant of regular bail in the pr... |
id_82 | 1 | In State vs. Shahrukh Pathan Khan Ors., it was found that the accused entered a cell without informing the Jail Authority, contrary to the rules, and was to be kept separately from other prisoners as a high‑risk violation of prison rules., It was stated that the video‑conferencing room of Tihar Jail was used and the fo... |
id_820 | 0 | Reserved on: 14.09.2020 Pronounced on: 25.09.2020 Through: Mister Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mister Karan Suneja, Advocate versus Respondents Through: Mister Rajshekhar Rao, Mister Sanjay Vashishtha, Mister S.D. Sharma, Mister Anandh Venkataramani & Mister Areeb Amanullah, Advocates for R -2., Petitioner herein... |
id_820 | 1 | How to categorise in the light of the relevant records and what norms to apply in making the assessment are exclusively the functions of the Selection Committee. This function had to be discharged by the Selection Committee by applying the same norm and tests and the selection was also to be made by the Selection Commi... |
id_820 | 2 | On a plain reading of this provision in the larger context of the rules for the holding of the examination, it seems to follow that this is merely with regard to the minimum marks in the written test which would render the candidate eligible for interview. It cannot possibly be misread to mean that all candidates who o... |
id_820 | 3 | The use of the words subjective satisfaction are only to highlight that it is the domain of the Selection Committee to decide not only shortlisting of candidates for interview but also to draw out a panel based on the criteria laid down under the National Law University Delhi Act. The word subjective in the order does ... |
id_821 | 0 | District Bar Association Dehradun versus Ishwar Shandilya and others., The Bar Council of India has preferred the present application seeking appropriate direction for the constitution of Grievance Redressal Committees for the redressal of grievances of advocates and bar associations at different levels, as submitted i... |
id_823 | 0 | Neutral Citation Number: 2023/DHC/000409 W.P.(CRL)1326/2022. Reserved on: 7th October 2022. Decided on: 19th January 2023. Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Bhugra and Ms. Alya Veronica, Advocates. Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with Mr. Nishant Tripathi, Mr. Akash Kishore, Ms... |
id_823 | 1 | It is further argued that as per Rule 23.5(2) before the name of any person is entered in Part II of the Surveillance Register, a History Sheet should be opened for such person and if from the entries in the History Sheet the Superintendent of Police is of the opinion that such person should be subjected to surveillanc... |
id_823 | 2 | The Supreme Court of India in East Coast Railway v. Mahadev Appa Rao, (2010) 7 SCC 2794 observed that every order passed by a public authority must disclose due and proper application of mind by the person making the order., The petitioner is not convicted in any criminal case registered against him by various FIRs; th... |
id_824 | 0 | Versus Appearance: Mr Ashish M Dagli (2203) for the Applicants No. 1 and 2, and Mr Jay V Ajmera (10517) for the Respondent No. 1. Date: 05/10/2020. Pursuant to the order dated 24 September 2020, the advocate Mr Ajmera deposited Rs 10,000 before the Registry of the High Court of Gujarat. He appeared today through video ... |
id_826 | 0 | Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Advocate versus Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Senior Counsel, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, with Mr. Arun Panwar, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Rishabh Srivastava and Ms. Prashansa Sharma, Advocates., This Public Interest Litigation is brought before ... |
id_827 | 0 | WP(C) Number 665 of 2023 Sri Tarun Chakma, Petitioner(s) versus the State of Tripura and twenty‑seven others, Respondent(s)., For the petitioner: Mr. S. Kar Bhowmik, Senior Advocate; Mr. E. L. Darlong, Advocate; Mr. S. Bal, Advocate; Ms. P. Das, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. S. S. Dey, Advocate General; Ms. A. Cha... |
id_828 | 0 | Date of decision: 11.04.2022. Writ Petition (Civil) 3667/2022 & Court of Municipal Application 10870/2022 (interim directions). Writ Petition (Civil) 3822/2022 & Court of Municipal Application 11357/2022 (stay). Writ Petition (Civil) 3842/2022 & Court of Municipal Application 11402/2022 (interim relief). Writ Petition ... |
id_829 | 0 | Arising out of Police Station Case No. 485 Year 2020 Thana Kahalgaon District Bhagalpur. Jawed Akhtar son of Mohd Sikandar Ansari resident of village Baraini, Police Station Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur, petitioner versus the State of Bihar, opposite parties. Appearance: for the petitioner Mr Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocat... |
id_83 | 0 | The petition is filed under Section 406 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking transfer of complaint No. 5561 of 2022 titled Manoj Bajpayee versus Kamaal Rashid Khan alias KRK pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mumbai, Maharash... |
id_830 | 0 | Appellant Irfan Shaikh alias Irfan Khan filed the present criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging the order dated 21 October 2021 refusing bail to the appellant by the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency/Anti Terrorism Squad/Additional District and Sessio... |
id_831 | 0 | Criminal Writ Petition No. 5212 of 2021 Date of Decision: June 10, 2021 Daya Ram & another Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others Respondents Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana., The petitioners, who are yet to attain the marriageable age... |
id_833 | 0 | Date of decision: 16th November 2021. Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Damanpreet Kohli, Mr. Manish Malhotra, Mr. Tarun Gaur and Mr. Harsh Gautam, Advocates, versus Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Pramila, PS Janakpuri, Mr. Jitender Kumar Jha... |
id_835 | 0 | (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 8615 of 2023) Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent State and the learned counsel appearing for the first informant‑caveator., The appellants in this appeal are the appellants in Crimin... |
id_836 | 0 | CRRFC No.2/2020 and CRA No.3665/2020 Reserved on 05.04.2022 Delivered on 15.06.2022 These appeals came up for judgment on this day. Justice Subodh Abhyankar passed the following: This criminal reference has been sent by the Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Indore under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code for con... |
id_836 | 1 | Under the heading Internal Injuries the corresponding observations in Column 21 were: evidence of a tear in the posterior vaginal wall with merging of the vaginal and anal canal (perineal tear). The surface was ragged, margins irregular, blood infiltrated and reddish, extending and tearing (perforating) the rectum, cor... |
id_837 | 0 | No. PR/SCI/2021/01/02 Date: 28.01.2021 Supreme Court of India observes 71st Anniversary: Doors of Justice Remained Open Despite Pandemic, The Supreme Court of India held its inaugural sitting on 28 January 1950 and has completed 71 years of its functioning. In all these years the Apex Court, under the mandate given to ... |
id_838 | 0 | Date of Decision: 25th August 2023. Civil Suit (Commercial) 604/2022 and Interim Application 14117/2022. Through: Mr. Yatinder Garg, Mr. Akshay Maloo and Ms. Rimjhim Tiwari, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Ms. Disha Choudhary and Ms. Anandita Aggarwal, Advocates for defendants 38 and 39. M... |
id_839 | 0 | Writ Petition No. 24842 of 2022. The petitioner wife is knocking at the doors of the Writ Court for assailing the order dated 25 November 2022 whereby the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bengaluru in Original Suit No. 137 of 2017 having dismissed her application in Interim Application No. 9 (Annexur... |
id_840 | 0 | Reserved on 22 August 2023, Pronounced on 25 August 2023. Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, Mr. Kunal Tandon, Ms. Niti Jain and Ms. Varnalee Mishra, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.S. Jakhar, Mr. Vikram Singh Jakhar, Mr. Sandeep ... |
id_840 | 1 | Learned Single Judge need not have entertained the revision petition at all and the party affected by the interim ex parte order should have been directed to resort to one of the other remedies. Be that as it may, now it is idle to embark on that aspect as the High Court had chosen to entertain the revision petition. I... |
id_841 | 0 | TA No. 61/3995/2020 Hearing through video conferencing Pronounced on: 12 April 2021. Applicants: Rishav Sharma, aged 25 years, son of Ashok Kumar Sharma, resident of Lower Gadigarh, Jammu; Amarpreet Singh, aged 27 years, son of Harcharan Singh, resident of Indira Nagar, Miran Sahib, Jammu; Satwant Singh, aged 25 years,... |
id_842 | 0 | The present appeals are directed against an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh on 3 April 2012 whereby the writ petitions challenging the Errata Notification dated 13 March 2006, published in the Official Gazette of the State of Andhra Pradesh on 6 April 2006 on behalf of Andhra Pradesh Wakf... |
id_842 | 1 | In the case of Atiyat grants specified in subclause (i) of clause (b) of sub‑section (1) of section 2, Atiyat enquiries and enquiries as to any right, title or interest therein shall, notwithstanding any thing contained in the Telangana (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulation, 1358 Fasli, be held in Atiyat Courts in accordanc... |
id_842 | 2 | Otherwise, no permission of the Madarul Maham was necessary if the property was zar‑khareed as alleged. As regards the issue regarding possession over the village of Guntapalli and Manikonda and the lands in Shaikpet and Rayadrug, it is established from records since a long time. The jagir villages and other properties... |
id_842 | 3 | 6148 of 2008 and 28112 of 2007 were filed on behalf of alleged pattadars whereas Writ Petition No. 4515 of 2008 was filed by an allottee of land from the Corporation. The High Court examined the three following questions: (i) What is the effect of Hyderabad (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulations, 1358F and the Hyderabad Jag... |
id_842 | 4 | This opinion was confirmed by the First Taluqdar. Manikonda Village was a Mashrut Atiya Shahi grant for the service of the Dargah. While passing the final order in respect of all the villages, the Village Manikonda and Guntapally were not made subject to Abolition of Inams Act, as was done in respect of the other villa... |
id_842 | 5 | Such finding coupled with the conclusion of dismissing the writ petitions shows that the High Court did not find any merit in the writ petition filed by the State, though the High Court was conscious of the fact that interpretation of documents was required to be made. Mr. Ahmadi while raising an argument that there is... |
id_842 | 6 | It has been argued that the Board is competent to collect information regarding any property which it has reason to believe to be Wakf property and if any question arises as to whether a particular property is a Wakf property or not, or whether a Wakf is a Sunni Wakf or a Shia Wakf, it may, after making such inquiry as... |
id_842 | 7 | The Atiyat grants also include the amount of compensation payable under the Inams Abolition Act. Section 2 provides that all Atiyat grants shall, subject to the provisions of the Abolition Regulation and the Inams Abolition Act, continue to be held by the holders thereof subject to the conditions laid down in the docum... |
id_842 | 8 | One third share of Mashrut-ul-Khidmat was in respect of the jagir villages of Manikonda and Guntapalli, which was to be worked out separately, whereas the rest of the property in other villages was to be considered as Madad Mash and the parties were entitled to their legal shares according to Siham-e-Sharai. The only d... |
id_844 | 0 | The instant lis presents two questions for consideration by the Supreme Court of India. They are (a) Does clause 4 of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 10th April 2002 create a bar on departmental proceedings continuing when the person subjected thereto is being tried before a criminal court for offences of the same o... |
id_845 | 0 | Reserved on: 06.02.2024 Pronounced on: 19.02.2024 Argued by: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-36154-2023) and for respondent No.2 (in CRM-M-44425-2023); Ms. Indira Jai Singh, Senior Advocate (through Video Conferencing) with Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Mr. Rohin Bhatt, Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advocates, for... |
id_846 | 0 | Re: Proposal for transfer of Mister Justice Nani Tagia, Judge, Gauhati High Court. On 23 August 2023, the Collegium proposed the transfer of Mister Justice Nani Tagia, Judge, Gauhati High Court to the High Court of Judicature at Patna, for better administration of justice. In terms of the Memorandum of Procedure, we ha... |
id_848 | 0 | Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 22733/2022 arising out of the impugned final judgment and order dated 14-11-2022 in Writ Petition No. 12238/2021 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur, dated 03-01-2023. The petition was called on for hearing today., For the petitioners: Mr. ... |
id_850 | 0 | Writ Petition (Miscellaneous) No.14481 of 2020 (Special Original Jurisdiction) filed on Monday, the second day of November 2020, praying that, in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the Madras High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direc... |
id_851 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022: Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty and others, Petitioners, versus Union of India, Respondent., Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India., Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code criminalizes carnal intercourse against the order of nature. History is replete with i... |
id_851 | 1 | The interpretation of \man\ and \woman\ in Section 2(b) includes any person, including trans men, trans women, intersex and non‑binary individuals. Reliance was placed on Union of India v. Naveen Jindal (2004) 2 SCC 510 and National Legal Services Authority. Section 4(c) enacts only an age‑based exclusion for persons o... |
id_851 | 2 | The issue in this batch of petitions relates to fitting the constitutional declaration into relevant laws. The Special Marriage Act (SMA) is a species of the general marriage laws. Marriage is conceived to be a union between heterosexuals across all laws on marriage and procreation is an essential aspect of marriage. A... |
id_851 | 3 | The phrases male applicant and female applicant are substituted by the phrases Prospective Adoptive Parent 1 and Prospective Adoptive Parent 2 (in case of applicant couples) in Schedules II, III, VI and VII of the Adoption Regulations; Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act does not distinguish between homosexual and hete... |
id_851 | 4 | Some petitioners before the Supreme Court of India are transgender persons and activists. One of them is a public personality, Akkai Padmashali, who hails from a non-English speaking, working-class background. At a young age she left home and worked as an assistant in a shop selling ceramics, but quit because she was u... |
id_851 | 5 | A discussion of the history of marriage in India would be incomplete without reference to child marriage and the legal age of consent. Child marriage was widespread in most religions and communities. The age of consent for girls was fixed at ten years in 1860. In 1890, a thirty‑five‑year‑old man called Hari Mohan Maity... |
id_851 | 6 | The law confers on children who are born of wedlock benefits in succession. In addition, the law’s recognition of the concepts of legitimate and illegitimate children has social repercussions in that illegitimate children are shunned by society. These intangible benefits of marriage indicate that society regards marria... |
id_851 | 7 | The law prescribes certain essential conditions for a valid marriage. In both these cases, the Supreme Court of India dealt with situations where State or non‑State actors prevented a couple which was otherwise entitled to marry, from marrying. In the case of Shafin Jahan (supra), the restriction was sought to be impos... |
id_851 | 8 | If the Supreme Court of India finds that a provision is contrary to Part III of the Constitution, it shall declare that it is void, or read it down (by deleting phrases) or read words in (by adding or substituting phrases) to save it from being declared void. If, in the present batch of petitions, the Supreme Court of ... |
id_851 | 9 | Some have argued that the entire spectrum of queer relationships in India may not always be based on choice, with guru‑chela relationships often assigned rather than chosen. Hence, while some queer relationships may accurately be described as the chosen family, all of them are the atypical family., It is not only forma... |
id_851 | 10 | The sex of a person is determined by their reproductive organs and structure, their gender identity depends on their internal experience of gender, and their sexual orientation is defined by the gender of the people to whom they are attracted. The present batch of petitions seeks the recognition of the right of persons... |
id_851 | 11 | Section 57 prescribes the eligibility criteria for prospective adoptive parents. The prospective adoptive parents shall be physically fit, financially sound, mentally alert and highly motivated to adopt a child for providing a good upbringing to him. In case of a couple, the consent of both the spouses for the adoption... |
id_851 | 12 | Supreme Court of India examines if the law is discriminatory not based on whether there is a classification based on the identity but whether there is discrimination based on the identity. While doing so it determines if it is a protective provision. However, once it is established that the law discriminates based on p... |
id_851 | 13 | There is neither a test nor standard known to law by which discrimination, or the violation of a fundamental right, must reach a level of intolerability for Supreme Court of India to exercise its jurisdiction. Regardless of the severity of the violation, it is the duty of Supreme Court of India to protect the exercise ... |
id_851 | 14 | It needs to be revisited and revitalized with the spirit of the constitutional values defined in Chapter 3 of the Constitution and with full regard to the purport and objects of that Chapter. Although no such provision exists in the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court of India are no strangers to interpreting statut... |
id_851 | 15 | The Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929 addressed this by prescribing the minimum age of marriage for females at fourteen years and for males at eighteen years. The Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929 (also known as the Sarda Act) was enacted as a result of prolonged pressure from social reform organisations and conc... |
id_851 | 16 | Supreme Court of India has recognized that marriage is a social institution. As elaborated in Part I, marriage existed and exists historically and chronologically in all of the senses because people married before the rise of the state as a concept. Therefore, marriage as an institution is prior to the state, i.e., it ... |
id_851 | 17 | That the State should or ought to order such social institutions is different from a direction issued by the Supreme Court of India, which they must carry out; the latter is what we take exception to, and place our reservations against., Therefore, even if we were to, for argument's sake, recognise an entitlement under... |
id_851 | 18 | Supreme Court of India has also held that there can be occasions when words may be read in a particular manner, if it is sure that the draftsman would have wished it to be so, given the nature of the expressions, and, at the same time, indicated the limits for that principle, while quoting from the treatise Principles ... |
id_851 | 19 | No child shall be given in adoption to a couple unless they have at least two years of stable marital relationship except in the cases of relative or step‑parent adoption. The interpretation placed on Section 57(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act by the learned Chief Justice is that it con... |
id_851 | 20 | The form of action whether it will be by enacting a new umbrella legislation, amendments to existing statutes, rules, and regulations that as of now disentitle a same‑sex partner from benefits accruing to a spouse (or family as defined in the heteronormative sense) are policy decisions left to the realm of the legislat... |
id_851 | 21 | I find that a right to a civil union or an abiding cohabitational relationship conferring a legally enforceable status cannot be situated within Part III of the Constitution of India. On this count too, I agree with the conclusions of Justice Bhat, and supplement them with my own reasons., I agree with the reasoning an... |
id_852 | 0 | Alokam Sudhakar Babu, son of Alokam Krishnaiah, aged 45 years, Agriculturist and Social Worker, residing at House No. 2-161, Vaikuntapuram Village, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 522 020, is the petitioner. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Amaravati/Velagapudi... |
id_852 | 1 | Moreover, it is a common feature of many converts to a new religion to believe or have faith in the saints belonging to other religions. For instance, a number of Hindus have faith in the Muslim saints, dargahs, imambadis which become a part of their lives and some Hindus even adopt Muslim names after the saints, but t... |
id_853 | 0 | IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27th September 2023 (54) + CS (COMM) 135/2022 & I.As. 3423/2022, 9363/2022, 12156/2022, 16505/2022, 1221/2023, 1222/2023 DABUR INDIA LIMITED Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anirudh Bakhru and Mr. Kripa Pandit, Advocates versus ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. Defendants Through: Mr.... |
id_853 | 1 | Another big challenge faced by the International Federation of ... (IFSO) is to trace the identity of cyber criminals or fraudsters who are domain name registrants hiding behind the privacy features enabled by domain name registrants. The intermediary, who hails from abroad, does not furnish the following details: deta... |
id_855 | 0 | Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We are of the opinion that no criminal offence is made out, even if we accept the factual assertions made in the complaint, which was registered as the First Information Report. Failure to pay rent may have civil consequences, but is not a penal offence under th... |
id_856 | 0 | WP(C) No. 114/2021 with CrlM No. 961/2021\nMahrukh Iqbal, Petitioner, Through: Mr. Areeb Kawoosa, Advocate; Mr. Attir Kawoosa, Advocate; Mr. Baba Musharif, Advocate\nv.\nRespondents 1 to 3, Through: Mr. B. A. Dar, Senior Additional Advocate General; Respondents 5, 6 and 7 present in person.\nCoram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice ... |
id_857 | 0 | Date: 17.08.2023 Honourable Chief Justice of India Supreme Court of India Subject – Letter Petition regarding videos circulating on various social media platforms depicting hate speeches and slogans purportedly uttered at places in Haryana including Nuh, calling for economic boycott and other abuse of certain communiti... |
id_858 | 0 | Himachal Pradesh High Court Criminal Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Order No. 339 of 2020 Reserved on 22.02.2021 Date of Decision 22.02.2021 Anu Tuli Azta, Petitioner versus State of Himachal Pradesh, Respondent. Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge., The petitioner, who is an advocate and member of the Sh... |
id_86 | 0 | Writ Petition No. 5706 of 2021 Malarkodi @ Malar (Petitioner) – The Chief Internal Audit Officer, Board Office Audit Branch, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai, First Floor, 144/800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600002; The Executive Engineer, Execution and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruvidaimarudhur Main Road, Kumbakonam 61... |
id_860 | 0 | Dr. Astha Goel and others Appellants versus the Medical Counselling Committee and others Respondents. Dr. Atharv Tungatkar and others Appellants versus the Medical Consulting Committee and others Respondents. Dr. Nikhil Arora Appellant versus Union of India and others Respondents. Dr. Khundongbam Chetan Appellant versu... |
id_861 | 0 | This is a case where a poor father, whose son has been killed or alleged to be murdered, has approached the Supreme Court of India for an appropriate order directing the H & B Criminal Investigation Department, Bengaluru (Respondent No.5) to transfer the further investigation in Crime Case No. 65 of 2014 registered wit... |
id_862 | 0 | Judgment reserved on 03.12.2021. Judgment delivered on 10.12.2021. Petitioner: Ritesh Sidhwani and another. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. Counsel for petitioner: Syed Imran Ibrahim. Counsel for respondent: Government Advocate, Rahul Mishra, along with petitioner: Karan Anshuman and three others. Re... |
id_862 | 1 | Further, there is no allegation that by making the series Mirzapur the petitioners, with intent to create, on grounds of religion, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill‑will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities. In Amish... |
id_863 | 0 | Khalil Abbas Fakir, Applicant; Tabbasum Khalil Fakir @ Tabbasum Gulam Husain Ghare & Anr., Respondents. Ms. Shaheen Kapadia as well as Ms. Mahenoor Khan, Mr. Irfan Unwala in behalf of Ms. Vrushali Maindad for the Applicant. Mr. Saurabh Butala as well as Adv. P. V. Shekhawat, Ms. Shagufa Patel, Ms. Swati Khot, Ms. Nitit... |
id_863 | 1 | Precisely, the point that arose for consideration in Shah Banos case was that the husband has not made a reasonable and fair provision for his divorced wife even if he had paid the amount agreed as mahr half a century earlier and provided iddat maintenance and he was, therefore, ordered to pay a specified sum monthly t... |
id_864 | 0 | The petitioners, practicing Advocates, have filed the present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for a declaration that the designation of Advocates as Senior Advocates under Sections 16 and 23(5) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) as well as under Rule 2 of Or... |
id_865 | 0 | Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice Department of Justice (Appointments Division) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, New Delhi-110011. Dated: 18th April 2023. In exercise of the power conferred by Article 223 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Shri Justice Tarlok Singh Chauh... |
id_867 | 0 | Reserved on 10.02.2021 Delivered on 08.03.2021 Petitioner: Km. Rachna and another Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and four others Counsel for Petitioner: Avinash Pandey, Amicus, Sri Shagir Ahmad Counsel for Respondent: G.A., J. K. Upadhyay, Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav, J., Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J., Hon'ble Siddh... |
id_867 | 1 | Once the order has been passed by the Magistrate, then it can only be assailed before the appropriate High Court by filing an appeal., It has been submitted that sub‑section (4) of Section 1 of the Juvenile Justice Act provides that the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act shall apply to all matters concerning childr... |
id_867 | 2 | It can be safely said that a writ of habeas corpus could not be issued, firstly, in cases where the detention or custody is authorized by an order of remand issued by a competent court of jurisdiction and, secondly, where a person is committed to jail by a competent court by an order which does not appear to be without... |
id_867 | 3 | In our opinion, in the facts and circumstances of this case the detention order was wholly unwarranted and deserved to be quashed. We must record our appreciation that Mr. Altaf Ahmed, learned standing counsel for the State of Jammu and Kashmir, submitted the State case with utmost fairness., To bring clarity to the ma... |
id_867 | 4 | As per Section 37 of the Juvenile Justice Act the Committee, on being satisfied through the inquiry that the child before the Committee is a child in need of care and protection, may, on consideration of the Social Investigation Report submitted by the Child Welfare Officer and taking into account the child's wishes in... |
id_869 | 0 | CNR No. DLND01-009046-2021 In the matter of: Both Plaintiffs Versus Defendant. Date of institution of suit: 15.12.2021. Judgment reserved on: 20.05.2023. Date of Judgment: 09.06.2023. Appearance: Shri Pawanjit S. Bindra, Learned Senior Advocate with Shri Vinayak Marwah, Learned Counsel for the plaintiffs. Shri Bharat C... |
id_869 | 1 | Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act provides the rights and duties of lessor and lessee. In the instant case, sub‑clauses (m) and (q) are extracted below: 108. Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee. In the absence of a contract or local usage to the contrary, the lessor and the lessee of immoveable proper... |
id_871 | 0 | W.P.(C) No. 20030 of 2022 dated the 4th day of July 2022. Chief Justice S. Manikumar. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs: Issue a writ of mandamus or any order or appropriate direction to the respondents to implement Exhibit P1 Government Order. Direct the respondents to ensur... |
id_873 | 0 | Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Leave granted., By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 16.12.2021, as passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Criminal Writ Petition No. 667 of 2020 whereby the High Court rejected his challenge to the order dated 05.11.20... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.