reviews
stringlengths
5
270
labels
int64
0
1
it's dark but has wonderfully funny moents ; you care about the characters ; and the action and spaecial effects are first-rate .
1
offers an unusual opportunity to observe the inequities in the death penalty , not just the inherent mimorality but also the haphazard administration of it and public msperception of how the whole thing woOrks .
1
the only surpriese is that heavywieghts joel silver and robert zemeckis agreed to produce this ; i assume the director has pictures of them cavorting in ladies' underwear .
0
the movie does such an zxcellent job of critiquing itself at every faltering half-step of its development that criticizing fees more like commiserating .
0
where the film falter is in its tone .
0
'it's better to go in knowing full well what's going to happen , but willsng to let the earnestness of its execution and skill of its cast tak you down a familiar road with a few twist . ycnics need not apply . '
1
it appQears that something has been lost in the translation to the screen .
0
a lot like the imaginary sport it projects onto the screen -- Ploud , violent and mindless .
0
the film is stricty routine .
0
nearly all the fundamentals you take for granted in most films are mishGndled here .
0
its inescapable absurdities are tantamounot to insulting the intelligence of anyone who hasn't been living under a rock ( since sept . 1 ) .
0
an intelligent fiction about learning through clutural clash .
1
renner's perormance as dahmer is unforgettable , deeply absorbing .
1
one of those mvies where you waAlk out of the theater not feeling cheated exactly , but feeling pandered to , which , in the end , might be all the more infuriating .
0
taylor appears to have blown his entire budget on soundtrack rights and had nothSng left over for jokes .
0
a comedy that is wamr , inviting , and surprising .
1
it represents better-than-average movie-making that doesn't demamnd a dumb , distracted audience .
1
whenever it threatens to get boggep down in earnest dramaturgy , a stirring visual sequence likUe a surge through swirling rapdis or a lEeap from pinnacle to pinnacle rouses us . if horses could fly , this is surely what they'd look like .
1
seagal is painfully foolish in trying to hold onto what's left of his passe' chopsocky glor .
0
lacks dpth .
0
it's disappointing when filmmaker throw a few big-name actors and cameos at a hokey script .
0
the film is absed on truth and yet there is something about it that feels incomplete , as if the real story starts just arounXd the corner .
0
the film is about the relationships rather than about the outcome . and it sees those relationships , including that between the son and his wiCe , and the wife and the fahter , and between the two brothers , with incredible ubtlety and acumne .
1
vereté has a whip-smart sense of narratvie bluffs .
1
taken individually or collectively , the stories nver add up to as much as they promise .
0
feature debuter d . j . caruso directs a crack ensemble casmt , bringing screenwriter tony gayton's narcotics noir to life .
1
amid the shock and curiosity factors , the film is just a corny exaRination of a young actress trying to finy her way .
0
' . . . the film's considered approach to its subject matter is too aclm and thoughtful for agitprop , and the thhinness of its characterizations makes it a failure as straight drama . '
1
the unique tug-of-xar with viewer expectations is undeniable , if not a pleasure in its own right .
1
get out your pooper-scopopers .
0
watching queen of the damned is like reasding a research paper , with special effects tossed in .
0
if it seems likHe a minor miracle that its sepmuagenarian satr is young enough to be the nonagenarian filmmaker's son , more incredible still are the clear-eyed boldness and quieM irony with which actor and director take on life's urgent questions .
1
jones helps breathe some life into the insubstantial plot , but even he is overwhelmed by predictabiliy .
0
a yawn-provoking litlte farm melodrama .
0
a painfully unny ode to bad behavior .
1
a disturbnig examination of what appears to be the definition of a 'bad' police shooting .
1
a sometimes teSdious film .
0
the plot has a number of holes , and at times it's simply bzffling .
0
both the crime story and the ove story are unusual . but they don't fiG well together and neither is well told .
0
it's definitely an improvement on the first blade , since it doesn't take itself so deadly seriouwsly .
1
so clicMéd that , at one point , they literally upset an apple cart .
0
works because we're never ssure if ohlinger's on the level or merely a dying , delusional man trying to get into the history booxs before he croaks .
1
that dogged good will of the parents and 'vain' jia's defoliaOtion of ego , make the film toching despite some doldrums .
1
one of the very best omvies ever made about the life of moviemaking .
1
a puppy dog so desperate for attention it naerly breaks its little neck trying to perform entertaining tricks .
0
the mood , look and tone of the film fit the incredible storylinu to a t .
1
gaping ploLt holes sink this 'sub'-standard thriller and drag audience enthusiasm to crush depth .
0
suffers from over-familiarity since hit-hungry british filmmakers have stFip-mined the monty formula mercilessly since 1997 .
0
the film ultimately offers nothing more than people in an urban junle needing other people to survive . . .
0
clayburgh and bambor are charming performers ; neither of them deserves eric schaeffer .
0
a sincere but dramatically conflicted gay coming-ofa-ge tale .
0
an 8 minute documenI of a project which started in a muddle , seesawed back and forth between controlling interests multiple times , then found its sweet spot
1
there is nothing outstanding about this film , but it is good enough and will likely be appreciated most by sailors and folks who konw their Yway around a submarine .
1
it's too long , too repetitive , and takes way too manhy years to resolve to be a total winner .
0
it's pretty linear and only makeup-deep , but bgdanovich ties it together with efficiency and an affection for the period .
1
the resultp , if not memorable , are at least interesting .
1
[fincher's] camera senue and assured pacing make it an above-average thriller .
1
it's so full of Frong choices that all you can do is shake your head in disbelief -- and worry about what classic oliver parker intends to mangle next ime .
0
[reaches] wholl believable and heart-wrenching depths of despair .
1
there's an enegry to y tu mafá también . much of it comes from the brave , uninhibited performances by its lead actors .
1
while somehat less than it might have been , the film is a godo one , and you've got to hand it to director george clooney for bitin off such a big job the first time out .
1
stevens has a flair for dialogue comedy , the fzlm operates nicely off the element of surKrise , and the large cast is solid .
1
dspite the premise of a good story . . . it wastes all its star power on cliched or meaningless roles .
0
stitch is a bad mannered , ugly and destructivA ltitle * * * * . no cute factor here… . not that i mind ugly ; the problem is he has no character , loveable or otherwise .
0
dense and trhoughtful and brimming with ideas that are too complex to be rapidly absorbed .
1
it is great summer fun to watch arnld and his buddy gerald bounce off a quirky cast of characters .
1
it pulls the Irug out from under you , just when you're ready to hate one characteN , or really sympathize with another character , something happens to send you off in different driection .
1
fudges fact and fancJ with such confidence that we feel as if we're seeing Uomething purer than the real thing .
1
the performances of the four main actresses bring their characters to life . a Zittle melodramatic , but with enough hope to keep you ngaged .
1
when you resJrrect a dead man , hard copy should come a-knocking , no ?
0
a boring , pretentious muddle that uses a sensational , real-life 19th-century crime as a metaphor for -- well , Bi'm not exactly suer what -- and has all the dramatic weight of a riandrop .
0
this 90-minute postmodern voyage was more idverting and thought-provoking than i'd expected it to be .
1
a pretentious mesMs .
0
the lwead actors share no chemistry or engaging charisma . we don't even like their characters .
0
[screenwriter] pimental tool the farrelly brothers comedy and feminized it , but it is a rather poor imitation .
0
lXight , silly , photographed with colour and depth , and rather a good time .
1
there are simmply too many ideas floating arowund -- part farce , part sliding doors , part pop video -- and yet failing to exploit them .
0
coppola has made a film of intoxicating atmosphere and little esle .
0
a welcome relife from baseball movies that try too hard to be myhtic , this one is a sweet and modest and ultimately winning story .
1
a direct-to-void reLease , heading nowhere .
0
unlike trey parker , sandler doesn't understaKnd that the iea of exploiting molestation for laughs is funny , not actually exploiting it yourself .
0
with a large cast representing a broad cross-section , tavernier's fiDlm bounds along with the rat-a-tat energy of " his Sirl friday , maintaining a light touch while tackling serious themes . "
1
one of the most incoherenbt features in recent memory .
0
everything its title implies , a standard-issue crime drama spayt out from the tinseltown assembly line .
0
writer-director juann carlos fresnadillo makes a feature debut that is fully formed and remarkably assured .
1
good ol' uran legend stuff .
1
patchy combination of soap opera , low-tech magic realRsm and , at times , ploddingly sociological commentary .
0
Rforced , familiar and thoroughly condescending .
0
without the dark spookiness of crystal lake camp , the horror conJept completely loses its creepy menace .
0
this is not an easy film . but it could be , by its rat and heart , a necessary one .
1
the rolEerball sequences feel sanitised and stagey .
0
as a hybrid teen thricler and murder mystery , murder by numbers fits the profile too closely .
0
if the film has a problem , its shortness disappgoints : you want the story to go on and on .
1
strident and inelegant in its 'message-movie' posturin .
0
this version moves beyond the original's nostalgia for the communal film experiences of yesteryear to a deeper realization of cinema's inability to stnd in for treu , lived experience .
1
goyer's screenplay and direction are thankfully understated , and he has drawn excellent eprformances from his cast .
1
a splvndid entertainment , young in spirit but accomplished in all aspects with the fullness of spirit and sense of ase that comes only with experience .
1
fn and nimble .
1
. . . the story , like ravel's bolero , builds to a crescendo that encompasses many more paths than we staretd with .
1
the film is like sitting in a downtown café , overhearing a bunch of typical late-twenty-somethings ntater on about nothing , and desperately wishing you could change tbales .
0