Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030351.txt_7159	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030351.txt	Re: What is going on with your man Jes?	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Fo", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic -- but to answer a random gmail email, that is not smart!\n\nHow are you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "iknow, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Fo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "‘Thanks for sharing the foxhole’"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029600.txt_7160	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029600.txt	Re: invitation	[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 2:31:48 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt_7167	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt	trump getting RNC bounce...	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2016 4:28:09 PM", "subject": "trump getting RNC bounce...", "body": "Monday, July 25\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) \tPoll \tResults \tSpread\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton \tCNN/ORC \tTrump 48, Clinton 45 \tTrump +3\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton \tCBS News \tTrump 44, Clinton 43 \tTrump +1\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \nClinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein \tCNN/ORC \tClinton 39, Trump 44, Johnson 9, \nStein 3 \tTrump +5\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. \tCBS News \tClinton 39, Trump 40, Johnson 12 \tTrump +1\nClinton vs. Johnson"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt_7169	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt	Gingrich view of Trump	[{"sender": "Brad Bowen", "recipients": ["Kevin McIntosh", "Ryan McIntosh", "Al Eckert", "Henry Peek", "Terry Kafka", "Coy E. Garrett", "Blake"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:16 PM", "subject": "FW: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "On trump."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Great one. Thanks"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Trump is a problem solver for sure."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka", "Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about. Media holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She's shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I love ole Bernie. Wish he wasn't a damn socialist. He probably reminds you of your Social Studies teacher from Lafayette high...?"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:21:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie's like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60's and 70's."}]	10
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt_7174	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt	null	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:12:21 PM", "subject": null, "body": "see video at the bottom of the page as someone at rally printed a picture of you and trump together \nhttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-trump-kicks-out-protesters-from-rally"}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022191.txt_7179	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022191.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?\n\nOn Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, i rote:\n\nDefinitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\n\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Illtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\n\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "i rote", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\n\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend Illtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\n\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt_7180	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 10:37:36 AM", "subject": null, "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt_7184	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt	Re: $25K from ASU	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too _:). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. .sorry . itseemsimasymbol for allills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im yourboy . atleast for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "send details ."}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}]	12
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt_7199	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:18:53 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt_7200	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt	Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?	[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\n1 why are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:56:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}]	11
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt_7204	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i stepped away from the royal jet. if you want to go after the bbj"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I just got my G550 - 5176 under contract at $18.5 and it's going to Pre-Purchase inspection on Monday.\nI'm aware that G550 - 5109 was under contract for $17,600,000.\nAs a company we have 5 G550, 2 G650 and 1 BBJ buyers.\nThat is all I know for now."}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:28:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new, friend asked yesterday. . one in virginia. paid 8. fixed up with 300k. asking 10"}]	6
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt_7206	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026076.txt	Re: NYT	[{"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/30/2017 8:23:59 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "High stress."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "30 Apr 2017, at 19:43", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "both have the flu"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:38 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAbout time for our actions to turn into theatre and movie pieces.\nShall we talk? Any news from BC/AdR?\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 19:24", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI'm in Serengeti, Tanzania\n\nNo real communication. Cannot open the NYT article. But to judge from the article's title they are at least\nexaggerating if not totally wrong. This attack will not change strategy in a major way on either side. It will\nhowever raise respect for DJT in Moscow and few other capitals. That's not necessarily bad, if the WH won't\nread this change as a precedent which calls to be repeated too often.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 16:06", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/theater/oslo-broadway-review.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F04%2F13%2Ftheater%2Foslo-broadway-review.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}]	5
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014310.txt_7209	IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014310.txt	SPX put contingent on higher rates	[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda [amanda.ens@???.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [???.com]"], "timestamp": "11/15/2016 2:44:06 PM", "subject": "SPX put contingent on higher rates", "body": "Navigating post-Trump volatility\n\n° We are recording unprecedented divergences in falling equity vol with rising rates vol post Trump’s win. Intra-day S&P realized vol collapsed from near 60% to below 20% in 2d [Chart 1]\n\n° While equities have shown less conviction over what a Trump win means (given strong sector rotation), the bond market has sold off with one of the largest moves in history [Chart 2 & 3]\n\ne Stabilizing rates volatility from here is key to markets remaining calm and while equity upside may continue, it is not without higher risks\n\ne We like cheap optionality to hedge long-equities if rates continue to move sharply\n\nFor investors long equities, we look at ways to cheapen protecting from downside risks in the event of further bond market volatility catalysed by Trump policy uncertainty\n\n° Buy an SPX Apr-17 95% put conditional on US 10Y CMS > 2.5% at maturity for 0.87%\nfe) 70% discount vs. vanilla\nfe) CMS ref. 2.11%, SPX ref. 2,164.2\n\nCMS = constant maturity swap\n\nChart 1: The response in S&P 500 realized equity volatility to the US election surprise was similar to Brexit but more extreme, as the spike in volatility collapsed at record speed"}]	1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027053.txt_7222	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027053.txt	RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey	[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now ie"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Please call me at I\n\nMy number is blocked and it does not go through when \| am calling you\nB"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.txt_7234	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.txt	Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Roy Black"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:51:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026571.txt_7248	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026571.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/2/2012 2:34:45 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Perfect, my father is in Florence now ; we all fly on Sunday to Tanzania for 6 days with my daughters. \nI believe that the American Ambassador will go back to the US in a few months after the elections , even if President Obama wins. Maybe you want to ask him about the letter for the Interallie before his departure?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "mercredi 31 octobre 2012 23:14", "subject": "RE:", "body": "due to hurrricane , i will not come until december. lets organize a call with your father, or if he likes i am happhy to fly mom and dad to new york. in a couple of weeks when hurrican isssues subside."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt_7254	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt	Re: TR: update	[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please\nthanks"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication\nE"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "WO, Feb 2017 at 6:11 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:13 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": ""}]	7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030392.txt_7255	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030392.txt	Re: The fool doth think he is wise	[{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 09:37 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "What else would Mack the Knife do but support those he can trust in!\nBegs the question, who should we seek to silence next!?\nOnward, to bigger, and better things.\n\nI may have already had a stiff one, it’s been a long day, and I get no younger."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:08", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "You are a unique man, Mr McFarlane.\n\nYou came to my defense today with a courage not seen in many people. How do I thank\nyou?\n\nYou have a sense of what is right, and you have a sense of theatre. You mix humor with\ngrit.\n\nThank you John. Never underestimate my recognition of your support. And my respect\nfor your guile.\n\nAnd some day I want to see an ad lib guitar run. You have all the fearlessness of Clapton.\nThank you.\nJes"}, {"sender": "John McFarlane", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "However I do feel we’ve ceased the rally for you [sic] head today.\n\nSurely the fickleminded nature of the angry few will help tie up any loose ends.\nYou owe me a large Scotch.\n\nJohn"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030475.txt_7269	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030475.txt	RE: <no subject>	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 11:17:34 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "I think this is a great article I think viki was clearly very nice.. .1 remember when I got the call when she was thinking about her writing the article 8 years ago...she was spot on here this is the article that citrick should work off of... Home all night"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax [gmaxl@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vani-tyfair.com/online/daily/2on/o3/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaincom/contributors/vicky-ward> March 8, 2011, 2:30 PM"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666.txt_7271	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666.txt	Fwd: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories	[{"sender": "Terry", "recipients": ["Jeffery Edwards [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Warren"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:21:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories", "body": "Jeff/Warren: Go directly to photo #9."}, {"sender": "DeMilked <noreply+feedproxyggoogle.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 7, 2019 at 2:48:52 PM GMT+1", "subject": "DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories", "body": "DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt_7283	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt	null	[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: — High\n\nNewsmax.com\n\nLaffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the\nnation’s economic woes is to adopt “common-sense” Reaganomics, the policy’s architect Arthur Laffer claims\nin an exclusive Newsmax interview.\n\nLaffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama’s former Council of\nEconomic Advisors’ chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing.\n\n“Reaganomics would fix any economy that’s in the doldrums,” Laffer said. “It’s not a magic sauce, it’s\ncommon sense.\n\n“You’ve got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business\nnet sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That’s number one.\n\n“Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not\ncure unemployment.\n\n‘Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I’ve ever\nheard of,\" Laffer said.\n\n“Number four you need regulations, but you don’t need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and\ncreate collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here.\n\n“And lastly you need free trade,\" Laffer said. \"Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we\nproduce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn’t sell them those things\nwe produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.”\n\nIn the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor’s was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit\nrating — in fact it should have done so far earlier.\n\nThe agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, don’t do the same they won’t be doing\ntheir jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of\ngovernment revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes.\n\n“If you had a company that had revenues of $2% million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in\nsight, $1% million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what\nwould you rate that company? I surely wouldn’t rate it AAA.\n\n“That is the U.S. situation today,” Laffer said. \"Taxes are about $2 trillion, government spending is about $4\ntrillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don’t see that as being a AAA country.\n\n“Tf the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.”\n\nLaffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030386.txt_7299	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030386.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:50:06 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High\n\nhttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt_7303	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029131.txt	Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs	[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:21:59 PM", "subject": "Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\nSkype =\nFaceTime = email."}]	9
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt_7310	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030460.txt	<no subject>	[{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["J Jep jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:17:39 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you,Vicky,” was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\n“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true.\n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that “Andy”—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing’s for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him.\n\nAnd Ghislaine?\n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It’s almost impossible not to.\n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I’ve spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else’s I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs’. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as “the Tennis Goddess”) Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability.\nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.\n\n“He saved her,” I remember a close friend of mine telling me. “When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She’s never forgotten that—and never will.”\n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine’s father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive “black hole” he’d fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey’s habits may not have seemed that strange.\n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don’t tend to get to the top by being the world’s most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn’t quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second “wife” for many years whose existence he has been open about.\n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven’t spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she’ll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt_7311	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030387.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Blac is"], "timestamp": "1/30/2017 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "Leon Black (qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey- I can’t print this and when we try- it messes up the computer. Perhaps you can have Lesley scan it — or show it to Leon this afternoon. Thanks, Melanie"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 30, 2017 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/shrinks-break-silence-president-trump-exhibits-traits-m-article-1.2957688"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt_7315	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor, are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but i think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Just landed to Iga. \nAre you in? \nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? I will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:35:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me„ sultan just left. I will be up for another hour \nor so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030393.txt_7334	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030393.txt	Re: The fool doth think he is wise	[{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:43 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "As I retire for the night, I’m reminded of a poem my father was awfully fond of. It seems very apt.\n\nGood night, Jes.\n\nWorry not of tomorrow’s end\nHurry not towards falling trees\nIgnore at once, the jesters dance\nSigh, oh sigh, at the folly foiled\nTake down the mighty route of ills\nLest not make a scratch in time\nEvenhanded wins fair stance.\nBroken wooden spoons we take\nLeft, oh left, in such a state"}, {"sender": "John McFarlane <john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:45", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "In all seriousness, do let me know what fires/thorns you want me quelling over the next few days.\n\nIt’s important I stand fast, and alongside you.\n\nYou have carried yourself admirably today."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:40", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "I bet he doesn’t."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Clapton has nothing on me ha!"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt_7341	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026216.txt	RE: Plane management	[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:23:25 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean? \nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use \nbonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive. \nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do \nyou stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt_7352	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt	Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2017 3:05:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article: \nManafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer \nTrump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort alerted authorities to Donald Trump Jr.'s infamous meeting \nwith the Russian lawyer during his father's presidential campaign. \nManafort, who is facing increasing pressure from U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller, divulged Trump Jr.'s \nmeeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya about three months ago, Bloomberg reported. \nResponding to a congressional request for information, Manafort revealed the meeting and provided 300 \ndocuments, although FBI agents went on to raid his Virginia home two weeks ago. \nTrump, responding to news of the raid, said, \"I was very, very surprised to see it... .I've always found Paul \nManafort to be a very decent man.\" \nInvestigators are looking into accusations of money laundering in an attempt to pressure Manafort into \ncooperating with the probe into the Trump campaign's possible ties to Russia, two sources told Reuters. \n\"If Mueller's team can threaten criminal charges against Manafort, they could use that as leverage to convince \nhim to cooperate,\" said one of the sources. \nBut the former campaign manager's spokesman Jason Maloni said, \"Paul Manafort is not a cooperating \nwitness.\" \nMaloni also told Bloomberg that Manafort was enlisting the services of a D.C.-based law firm Miller & \nChevalier,which focuses on tax law, to replace WilmerHale, where Mueller previously worked. \nMueller's investigation has extended to global bank transactions involving Manafort, as well as his business \npartner Rick Gates and son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai. \nYohai, who is under investigation for real estate deals he made with Manafort, turned over documents to \nMueller's probe more than two months"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt_7369	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt	Re: Got another call from Connelly..	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon [i"], "timestamp": "9/27/2017 2:56:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was\nasking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea -- I think he\n\nis doing some Trump-related digging too.\nAnyway, for what its worth..."}]	2
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019341.txt_7378	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019341.txt	null	[{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt_7383	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021223.txt	Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners	[{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": ["Michael"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Another big prize for Miami Herald."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Pile on"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Look at the judges on this thing: the right-thinking establishment to a tee (to a Ta-Nihisi)."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 4:06:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Fix always in"}]	5
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt_7392	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}]	5
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt_7401	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027046.txt	Re: B 727 thought	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:23:25 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for\nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like\nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 -60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many\nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\n\nSincerely,"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt_7410	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033312.txt	null	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2018 5:52:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "is this a sign trump will escape muller investigation unharmed..\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/20/democratic-party-files-suit-alleging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-\nwikileaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-election-report.html"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt_7422	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031413.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas iii"], "timestamp": "Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:01:12 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now that strauss kan girl will be shown to be a total liar. maybe your paper should jump on and show that s allegations re andrew are the same,, she also accused numnerous people of having sex with her,, dersh, ehud etc. not one newpaper had the balls to question her credibility"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 8:26:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This girl fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. the da after she accused others. said in writing that she had no credibility, she was never 15 years, old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell. total horseshit,, the daily mail paid her money,, they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth.. Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew,, as many of my employees have. I have never misled you , this girl is a total liar, they authorities should check her austrailain immigration form, you could talk to dershowitz. I will ask if they will cooperate-Prince people"}]	2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt_7423	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022190.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \". obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a21st century tale of power , sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth ,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:00 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030344.txt_7427	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030344.txt	Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below,.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Swiss Accounts Survey", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\n\nHSBC (Suisse) SA\nFAMILY INTEREST L.P.\n22079\n\nBESSIE"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029680.txt_7429	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029680.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "Jan 9, 2013, at 6:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how is it shaping up? what are the biggest hurdles."}, {"sender": "Mohammed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nThe campaign team is starting to come together. We are continuing discussions with Jim and tomorrow we will meet him face to face on skype. We will brief him on the situation here so that he will be able to advice us more effectively. Already he has sent some very useful suggestions and we are working on them. Getting the right people to head various aspects on the campaign is difficult here but we should be able to pull the team together shortly.\n\nWe will need some more help from Ian and Rory because we are still weak on international communication. Some old negative stuff keeps coming up in the Guardian newspaper in England. But most of the international media is not paying much attention to Maldives right now.\n\nI have asked Rory to help find a full time communications guy to stay here for about a year to work with me. He doesn't have to be an expert, just a good graduate student would do. Some really positive stuff is also happening now and we need the world to know about them.\n\nWorld Energy Forum and CGI guys are here. I am meeting Clinton people in a few minutes.\n\nI have some funding now but will ask all friends to help raise more later when things start happening in full swing. Election is now scheduled to early September.\n\nHope all is well and look forward to seeing you here in the not too distant future.\n\nWarm regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 17, 2013, at 7:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my friend in sweden, lisa svensson, would be perfect as your right hand orgainzing your team„ she has diplomaitc experieince and is currently amabssador to the oceans for sweden"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi,\n\nWould be great if Lisa could visit us. She sounds like the right person to help us get organized.\n\nMaldives just got elected Vice President of International Renewable Energy Agency. We are also Vice Chair of the UN Human Rights Council. Not too bad considering we had so much bad coverage this year internationally.\n\nBest regards,\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "18 January, 2013 2:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "also be advised that thorbjorn jagland is a great friend."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I remember meeting Jagland at your place when I came with Sultan."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 18, 2013, at 5:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "as chairman of the council of europe , he is really mr human rights, Im sure that if he can be of help, he will"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nNeed your advice.\n\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion dollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government promissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special purpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company can only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount lent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the finance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a large amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable about this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. I am very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading politician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for presidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed Hassan"], "timestamp": "1/27/2013 4:15:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it is a scam.. what they will' tell you is the only thing they want is a vehicle and a bank acct and that you have no risk in setting it up. if the money doesn't come in , you lose nothing„ afterwards howver they use all the info you provide to try to defraud other people, saying, see , the govt of the maldives is our client and for only 250 k , we can get you a piece of the action. there is a treasury fraud site , at the us treasury web page, . very similar deals."}]	9
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt_7432	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.txt	Re: Great seeing you	[{"sender": "Stephen Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel, \nIt was great seeing you. Hope to see you on my next trip which is every other week. Let me know when Andrew Lucasi is coming to town."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from California. \nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest. \nLook forward to hearing from you."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 8:03 PM -0500", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. i will pick up all costs. thanks"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "have him call me or better email his no and ill set something up with gerry and i...good trip to ny and isle...joel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "jack , aweekend when he could bring a friend would be appreciated"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Brian Baker jpm"], "timestamp": "1/7/2010 10:54:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "use my name"}]	6