thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt_8642
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030648.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:13:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to \nTrump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747 \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt_8647
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032607.txt
|
Re: Interview with Futurism
|
[{"sender": "i vote", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017 at 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:59:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie? I\n\nI'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026764.txt_8661
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026764.txt
|
G650 profit model
|
[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Joseph Vinciguerra"], "timestamp": "10/23/2017 2:43:33 PM", "subject": "G650 profit model", "body": "You asked for this a while back. It's not particularly self-explanatory. Joe V reviewed it with Ruth Wimer and Dave Deyoe, our aviation and aviation tax counsel at MWE. Let either of us know if you'd like to go over it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}]
| 10
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt_8685
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt
|
America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2016 8:57:31 AM", "subject": "America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra", "body": "Since Woody was into the subconscious mind I thought I'd share this \nSee you at 3PM \nhttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.php"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt_8688
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt
|
Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC
|
[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/20/2014 2:46:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "We are pushing to help get this up but having Bill Clinton in the other is making it tough to pop anything other up. Check again in 8 hours"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 20, 2014, at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nSee the press release published this morning. Everyone's picking it up but don't see it on googles 1st page yet. Tough because Daily Mail has about 3 new articles out\nhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/101510498"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt_8693
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030674.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Would put us in a different place...may even rouse you into action"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil in a fundamental way"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "shouldnt mueller just file sealed indicments against jared ivanka and junior? they would stay even if he were fired."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:31:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yup"}]
| 14
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018158.txt_8696
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018158.txt
|
Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayer)"], "timestamp": "9/22/2011 10:19:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "we will have dinnner at 8 ,, you can bring your maldives friend or anyone else. (no women ). we should\nspend an hour together just the two of us. today tomorrow:? It is always fun to see you"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt_8697
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024419.txt
|
Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
|
[{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:02:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "SUIT just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? im between alber and santa fe,, zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/\n\nThe Control Factor: Our Struggle to See the True Threat"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt_8704
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030733.txt
|
Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:52:00 -0400", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/20/politics/china-cold-war-us-superpower-influence/index.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2018 11:40", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "So epic---world coming our way"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt_8705
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033082.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Careful, or the pendulum is going to swing hard the other way and feminists will be in charge of everything"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:16:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was kidding"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030408.txt_8726
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030408.txt
|
Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat
|
[{"sender": "Anders Corr", "recipients": ["Fanell's Red <fanell-red-star-rising>"], "timestamp": "August 8, 2018 at 5:32:57 AM EDT", "subject": "Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "From Reuters News:\n\nChina defends Iran business ties after Trump threat\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-china/china-defends-iran-business-ties-after-trump-threat-idUSKBN1IKTOTU\n\nChina's business ties with Iran are open, transparent and lawful, its foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after U.S. President Donald Trump said companies doing business with Iran would be barred from the United States."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "8/8/2018 3:08:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "https://www.klearwaterstore.com/davey-bt14-30-torrium2-booster-pump/?gclid=CjwKCAjwhqXbBRAREiwAucoo-6Wkrv3ZIfgAkk86XcrX9OzIV-2dsIdyWpJWa04IlskPP9fCr7-zUfxoCXUoQAvD_BwE passing along not covered >?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866.txt_8730
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866.txt
|
U.S. celebrates Fourth of July, Trump-Kim DMZ meeting and Hong Kong protests
|
[{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/6/2019 6:57:33 PM", "subject": "U.S. celebrates Fourth of July, Trump-Kim DMZ meeting and Hong Kong protests", "body": "Plus, census citizenship question fight continues, USWNT heads to Women's World Cup finals and Coco Gauff makes Wimbledon history.\n\nBiggest news stories from the past week.\n\nWith Flyovers and Flags, Trump Plays M.C. for the Fourth\nnytimes.com / MICHAEL D. SHEAR WASHINGTON — In a made-for-television Independence Day production starring America’s military weaponry, President Trump on Thursday used the Lincoln… read more\n\nNorth Korea says U.S. 'hell-bent on hostile acts' despite wanting to talk\nreuters.com / by Michelle Nichols UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - North Korea’s mission to the United Nations accused the United States on Wednesday of being “more and more hell-bent on… read more\n\nTrump Weighs Executive Order to Add Citizenship Question to Census\nbloomberg.com / Justin Sink, Andrew M Harris, Bob Van Voris President Donald Trump said he may issue an executive order to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census as the administration considers … read more\n\nTrump warns Iran nuclear threats will 'come back to bite you'\ntheguardian.com / Guardian staff and Agence France-Presse Donald Trump has warned Iran to be “careful with threats” as they can “come back to bite you” in response to Tehran’s vow that it will exceed within… read more\n\nArrests made over Hong Kong protests, legislature break-in\napnews.com / JOHNSON LAI HONG KONG (AP) — Police said they had arrested 13 people after the protests on Monday’s anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China, including one man… read more\n\nActing DHS chief orders immediate investigation into offensive posts allegedly written by Border Patrol agents\ncnn.com / Priscilla Alvarez, CNN (CNN) — Acting Department of Homeland Secretary Kevin McAleenan has ordered an immediate investigation into offensive posts \"that allegedly includes… read more\n\nHouse Democrats sue for Trump's tax returns\npolitico.com / BRIAN FALER House Democrats on Tuesday sued for President Trump’s tax returns, marking the beginning of a high-stakes legal fight over his efforts to keep his taxes… read more\n\nCori 'Coco' Gauff, 15-year-old American, storms back for another Wimbledon upset\nusatoday.com / Scott Gleeson The 15-year-old American pulled off another huge upset Friday, this one in a third-round thriller that saw her come back to beat Slovenian Polona Hercog… read more\n\nAlex Morgan and Alyssa Naeher lead U.S. women to 2-1 victory over England in World Cup semis\nnbcnews.com / David K. Li The defending champs are now one victory away from hoisting the trophy for a fourth time. Alex Morgan celebrated her 30th birthday Tuesday by scoring a… read more\n\nEuropean leaders back German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen to be first female European Commission president\nwashingtonpost.com / Quentin Ariès, Michael Birnbaum BRUSSELS — European leaders on Tuesday proposed awarding the powerful presidency of the European Commission to German Defense Minister Ursula von der… read more\n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment.\n\nREAD MORE"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt_8732
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032998.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "5/10/2017 2:29:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/real-estate/2017/05/08/trump-looking-to-unload-caribbean-beach-estate.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019394.txt_8735
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019394.txt
|
JEFFREY EPSTEIN; RESTITUTION
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami", "PB2/West Palm Beach RA", "Contact: SA"], "timestamp": "11/09/2006", "subject": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN; RESTITUTION", "body": "Synopsis: Request that SA receive holiday pay on November 10, 2006, Veteran's Day, a Federal Holiday.\n\nDetails: SA will be working on gathering data for the Intelligent Analyst that will be coming to the Palm Beach RA on Monday."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt_8741
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033096.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "son. 24. jun. 2018 kl. 15:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it is not complex. he must be seen to get\n\nI think you might suggest to putin, that lavrov , can get insight on talking to me. vitaly churkin used to\n. but he died. ? !"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland [it.]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 3:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’ll meet Lavrovs assistant on Monday and will suggest\n\nThank you fo a lovely evening. I’Il com to un high level week"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjgn Jagland"], "timestamp": "6/24/2018 1:59:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "churkin was great. he understood trump after our conversations.\n\nsomething _ its that simple."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt_8742
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030727.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich\nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant J also going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in\nlondon. fun"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ??\nIam in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he’s got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Stern"], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:53", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill ask, hes pretty swamped. . if there is any help you can give to in russia id appreciate it. . dont\nknow parties. ride tolondon . shesa futbol nut. . deutsch bank getting interesting soon."}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 11:03:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Death of chinese shareholder quite an issue. What can we do with Qataris here?"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt_8747
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032768.txt
|
Your buddies!
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 9:20:41 PM", "subject": "Your buddies!", "body": "Maggie Haberman_ @maggieNYT 9m _ \nSome news - Dershowitz has been at the White House for part of today as Trump seeks his input, and he's \nsupposed to have dinner with the president tonight, per WH sources \n2."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt_8752
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031411.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeevacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2010 8:53:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Imagine exactly the opposite ? Appetizers 20, salad pasta dishes meat dishes fist dishes cheeses chocolates teas\nnuts olives hummus breads cakes pastry sorbet ice-cream juices fruits\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2010, at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I now refer to my most recent trip as that mad adventure. The Arabian Stallion I rode across the desert had 2 speeds. Fast and faster.\nOh, did I mention his name was Obama? My hands are still clamped shut from trying to hold him! I didn't see a lick of water or a loo\nfor a week and sand, even after 12 showers, is still coming out of places I did not know existed! The food...well what can one say\nabout a piece of flat bread and some warm goats milk? The sleeping arrangements were deeply dodgy - shared a three sided Bedouin\ntent with a host of strangers, with not so much as a lamp for light, whilst freezing to death in the night air and simultaneously\nchoking whilst inhaling swirls of sand from the nightly storms. The nadir was being propositioned by a toothless Arab who lit the fire\nand helped feed the horses to a tumble around the bushes during a bedouin night story telling moment..Does that give you a picture?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt_8764
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033310.txt
|
LinkedIn's Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump's Tax Returns
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2016 5:36:29 PM", "subject": "LinkedIn's Hoffman Offers $5 Million for Trump's Tax Returns", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-12/1inkedin-s-hoffman-offers-5-million-for-trump-s-tax-returns"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030420.txt_8765
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030420.txt
|
Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
|
[{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 9 2011 01:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hey. Just landed from LA. You around for a call- no rush- when ur free /tell me\nHope your ok\nXxX00"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Hanson"], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 15:32:12 2011", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt_8772
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033304.txt
|
Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump I Know I I Observer
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2016 8:12:44 PM", "subject": "Jared Kushner: The Donald Trump I Know I I Observer", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://observer.com/2016/07/jared-kushner-the-donald-trump-i-know/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030434.txt_8773
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030434.txt
|
John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb
|
[{"sender": "Intelligence Squared [info@intelligencesquared.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/9/2019 6:31:56 AM", "subject": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb", "body": "John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb\n\nJohn Humphrys:\nThe Terrier of Today"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025906.txt_8774
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025906.txt
|
Fwd: Follow up
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 4:34:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Follow up", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J. 1.11Mill"], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve, \nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more \nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, \nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition \nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed. \nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump! \nBest, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Follow up", "body": "Kathy \nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an \nopportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International \nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish \nupbringing. \nLet me know. \nBest, \nSteve"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt_8793
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031026.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\n1 why are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence KraussE"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:55:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no i am in paris thanks"}]
| 10
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt_8794
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021235.txt
|
Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
|
[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it. \nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone's groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019343.txt_8795
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019343.txt
|
Re: Fw:
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon qq"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn’t work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come, stay 8-10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage? .?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon 4", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\n\nHow do I do that???\n\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- Ari Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\n\nOfficially in Venice , Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 3:32:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "available now?"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033489.txt_8799
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033489.txt
|
Cuba trip
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "9/16/2017 7:57:47 PM", "subject": "Cuba trip", "body": "Jeffrey \nI've contact universal ref Cuba trip: \nAttached is current form they are utilizing,. \nSee note from UVAir below: \nHello Larry, \nThis year we have had quite a few successful Cuba trips with clients over the past year or so that Cuba \ntravel has resumed. Attached are the rules and regulations that we currently operate under. \nKeep in mind on 16 Jun 2017, President Donald Trump has announced changes that are to come regarding \nCuban and us relations. This means the regulations are being rewritten to reflect these changes and are \nto be published 30-90 days from that date. We do not have advance notice on how the regulations will be \nwritten or exactly how it will affect our Cuba licensing but we are sure they will have some impact on \nus \nUntil further notice we are still utilizing the attached information. I will keep an eye out for updates \non Cuba restrictions; however, we should start the process as we have in the past. \nWe will need the following documents form you: \n1. In the attached document on page number 10 there is a \"cubia BIS Certification Form\" we will need this \nfilled out by the PIC for the trip. This is a self-authorization form for the aircraft and should be kept \non file after the trip in case the Department of Treasury asks for it in the future. \n2. We will also need the \"Passenger certification\" form for each passenger on board. They will need to \nadvise purpose of travel under section 1. If they do not fall under any of those then they will need a \nspecific license from the Department of Treasury. \nAfter we receive the above documents for the aircraft and passengers we can start arranging handing and \nlanding permits for the trip. \nThank you, \nWilliam McLendon \nSenior Mission Advisor \nTrip Support Services \nUniversal weather and Aviation, Inc"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt_8804
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033041.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed <anasalrasheed@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:34:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your watch turned out to be a truly great investment :)"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt_8812
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031388.txt
|
Fwd: Herald
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg [owlmgw@att.net]", "Weingarten, Reid Lilly Ann Sanchez"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": "hiyicitens arvana eer ee re er Ser Re re Se Ce Lr Re Sr Ce a a Ce Te ee Ce re rll"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nO00CO0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027050.txt_8813
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027050.txt
|
AW: AW: NY plane
|
[{"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\n\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\n\nI’ve also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey’s information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance.\n\nAll the best,\nLena"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt_8825
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031740.txt
|
My Prediction Coming True
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2017 9:59:21 PM", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 20, 2017 at 8:08:09 AM PDT", "subject": "My Prediction Coming True", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228.txt_8828
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228.txt
|
2017 IFP Gotham Awards
|
[{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey —\n\nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.\n\nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive group of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The Director Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the Industry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more pleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year ranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Bilge, this year's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any questions.\n\nBest regards,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. you her co. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me.\n\nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I'll send that along your way.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nThanks,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "11/20/2017 8:09:46 PM", "subject": "RE: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Steven,\nSee below:\n\njeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]\nCompany Name: The Peggy Siegal Company\nContact Name: Peggy Siegal\nAddress: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022.\n\nBest,\nRebecca"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014313.txt_8829
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014313.txt
|
Financials trade for Monday
|
[{"sender": "Amanda Ens", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 4:04 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "It’s not too late to buy financials as a medium term trade. They’ve run up a lot this week but we’re getting\nendless calls from generalists asking which banks to buy — there is still more upside to the sector. Banks also\nprovide some offset to your bonds if interest rates continue to move. Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF\ncould have another 20-25% upside given its many levers to the Trump trade: less regulation, higher interest\nrates/steeper yield curve, higher vol, economic growth, etc. The regional banks are asset sensitive and more of a\npure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having even more upside to the Trump Trade\ngiven the above points.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n° Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n° Total premium: 1.75%\n\nAll eyes are on Sunday’s 60 Minutes interview with Trump. Market is pricing that all regulations will be rolled\nback (very optimistic). Any hint that this is not true could lead to pullback on Monday.\n\nNote on tech: we’re seeing FANG used as a source of funds with the rotation from growth into value. There’s\nalso the tax read-through: tech is already relatively tax advantaged @ 22%; Industrials are at 30%, Financials at\n29%. Next year, tech could benefit from a repatriation tax holiday but that is viewed as more of a Q1/Q? trade.\n\nMore thoughts on financials:\n\nWith respect to the economy, the market is certainly indicating that there will be a large fiscal stimulus which\nmay send US growth higher and that’s a good thing for financials for a wide variety of reasons, from\nemployment to wages to loan growth and credit quality (even if somewhat offset by higher rates). It does\nremain to be seen exactly how much of this expected policy actually gets done, but at the moment, investors are\nwilling to take a certain amount of growth on faith.\n\nSo those are positives for financials before we even discuss regulation. The move in the financials since the\nelection would seem to indicate that investors have concluded that nearly every piece of financial regulation\nwill get put into a shredder on day one of the new administration. The incoming administration has fueled that\nwith comments about rolling back pieces (or more) of Dodd-Frank in particular. I can see making the case for\nthat to the American public by saying that banks need less regulation in order to get more capital flowing into\nthe economy to drive growth. Not only does that mean that the E is likely too low (meaning that the P/E is not\nas high as it seems) but it could help improve ROE’s as well which could increase the multiple of that higher E\ninvestors are willing to pay. Note that while ROEs could go higher, it’s unlikely that they can get back to the\npeaks..."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt_8830
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027044.txt
|
Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/10/2018 12:23:04 PM", "subject": "Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "https://ww.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/687949002\n\nIt Begins"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt_8840
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033055.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026075.txt_8852
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026075.txt
|
Re: NYT
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 16:06", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "column-middle-span-\nregion&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediald=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=6&ver\nsion=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F20\n17%2F04%2F 13%2Ftheater%2Foslo-broadway-review.html&eventName=Watching-article-click"}, {"sender": "chbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "14 Apr 2017, at 19:24", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI'm in Serengeti, Tanzania\n\nNo real communication. Cannot open the NYT article. But to judge from the article's title they are at least\nexaggerating if not totally wrong. This attack will not change strategy in a major way on either side. It will\nhowever raise respect for DJT in Moscow and few other capitals. That's not necessarily bad, if the WH won't\nread this change as a precedent which calls to be repeated too often.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/30/2017 4:38:23 PM", "subject": "Re: NYT", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAbout time for our actions to turn into theatre and movie pieces.\nShall we talk? Any news from BC/AdR?\n\nBest\n\nEB"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030385.txt_8869
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030385.txt
|
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Glenn Dubin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 15 2017 02:16 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment", "body": "saw it loved it"}, {"sender": "Glenn Dubin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the ‘S.N.L.’ Treatment", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2017/ 01/15/arts/donald-trump-saturday-night-live.html? smprod=nytcore-ipad\n&smid=nytcore-ipad-share\n\nThe actor Alec Baldwin, in a parody of Mr. Trump’s first news conference as president-elect, began by vowing\nto answer what he said was “the question that’s on everyone’s mind.”"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462.txt_8870
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thank you Vicky!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> March 8,2011 2:30 PM \"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.\" So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you, Vicky,\" was his riposte. I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true. When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. And Ghislaine? Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has been open about. So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025226.txt_8883
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025226.txt
|
On today's financial market developments
|
[{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "8/4/2011 11:41:48 PM", "subject": "On today's financial market developments", "body": "This is a little unorthodox, but here is the text of an internal note that I just sent to our integrated Private Bank client coverage teams a few moments ago. Mary thought it would be a good idea to share this with our clients given the events of the day.\n\n“Here is what I plan to say at our Aspen Insights conference tomorrow about today’s events. The last two weeks have been a severe setback for financial markets and the global recovery.\n\n[1] Today, Italian equity markets sold off sharply and were eventually shut down after the ECB (for now) rejected being the buyer of last resort for Italian government bonds, as the markets were hoping. The Bundesbank apparently has objections to the idea. This is a problem: Italy has issued around as much public debt as Germany, but is a considerably smaller country with almost twice the debt load as a percentage of its GDP. Absent a decision by Germany to move to Federalism or a lot more debt monetization by the ECB, the European Monetary Union (as it is currently configured) could be facing its final stretch. Today’s reported move by Italian regulators to seize documents at Moody’s regarding declines in Italian bank stocks is an indication of the pressure the system is under, and the possible search for scapegoats. I don’t think you will find a firm that has written more often and more direly about the structural inconsistencies of the EMU than we have (I have a 2-year bibliography of what we said and when, if anyone wants it). The “Sick Men of Europe” paper from February 2010 and “Don Quixote Thanksgiving” from November 2010 go into the greatest detail on why. Our concerns sky-rocketed upon Greece’s financial disclosures in November 2009, after which we took portfolio decisions to back that up, purging exposures to the GIPSI countries from our credit, government bond and equity portfolios. Since early 2010, our underweight positions in Europe represent the largest regional underweights we have ever held.\n\n[2] Will there be another recession in the US? Our friend Marty Feldstein at Harvard puts the odds at 50-50. Sell side and buy side economists missed last month’s US economic rollover by a country mile, so I am not sure how much weight to put in their current forecasts. Most summarily dismissed our concerns that the recovery earlier this year had elements of a stimulus-driven mirage. Bridgewater Associates was the only firm we spoke to that consistently highlighted the broader process of household deleveraging; and cautioned that when stimulus faded, so would the US economy, given the weakness in household income. Their insights have been invaluable to us in terms of not stepping into this and taking too much risk prematurely during the three market swoons this year. Our central scenario for the US in 2012 is not another recession, but low growth in the 2.0% range, which is enough of a problem given the low job creation that entails. Note that the CBO assumes growth rates of 3.0% to 3.6% over the next few years in their analyses of future US federal debt levels.\n\n[3] Do not blame today’s events on the debt ceiling debate, US politicians or European regulators. If we get to the point where economic and profit fundamentals in a given market or region are not sustainable on their own, then we should be underweight that region (as in Europe). Owning an asset class under the assumption that there will always be a “Lord of the Flies” type rescue from Central Banks and Treasuries is very risky, and historically, fraught with failure. I remember similar logic in the summer of 1998, when the accepted mantra was that the US would bail out Russia and Boris Yeltsin, since President Clinton would not want to see a nuclear power like Russia slide back into Soviet rule, or anarchy (that view turned out to be wrong). Anyone market-weight European risk out of the expectation that “Trichet and Merkel will fix surely it” is taking a binary risk that impossible to handicap. Similarly, we should not start buying anything just because we think Qe3 is coming in the US (in the form of securities purchases, a permanently controlled long bond, etc).\n\n[4] When we began this year, I made the following decision: we would risk underperforming if there was a strong equity rally, out of concerns about the macroeconomic landscape (weakness in the West, inflation in the East). As a result, we have held less equity exposure than usual for a period of high margins, low P/E multiples and strong earnings. Instead, we’ve held larger exposures to investment grade and high yield credit, and hedge funds. Over the last couple of years, our hedge funds (long-short funds with low net positions, macro hedge funds, distressed credit) have"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899.txt_8896
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899.txt
|
Fwd: idea for jefferey e.
|
[{"sender": "Kelly Friendly <kelly.friendly@example.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST", "subject": "idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton and General Petraeus. Joe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend...."}, {"sender": "Lawrence H. Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Not terrible idea."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "1/8/2015 3:11:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026049.txt_8899
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026049.txt
|
Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 24, 2016, at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "yes, freeman dyson says that too.. That may be true at some level, and indeed during a period of the earth’s history when there was more CO2 (hundreds of millions of years ago), there were very large plants of certain types... but what does this imply, really? more corn in the arctic? do we need more corn in the arctic? He has cherry picked data, the typical act of those who believe the answer before they ask the question."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 24, 2016, at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "is the south pole getting colder and more ice ? is it accurate to say that climate changes can only be measured over long periods. 20 years or more. | m here with the trump peopl in palm and when asked i say i dont have any idea if this global warming is a threat that can be reduced , currently , carbon taking machines. i guess if that is really a concern. i would also like to know what groups prefer warming. canada?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2016 7:37:57 PM", "subject": "Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not", "body": "I was in antarctica. The west antarctic ice sheet is melting at an unprecedented rate.. if it all goes into the ocean, sea levels will rise by about a meter. You are correct that we should ask if it can be reduced.. We are currently involved in a proposal that explores capturing CO2 from the atmosphere.. That may cost about 100/ton CO2.. if there was a carbon tax, that might be doable. it is not clear yet, but total research on this so far <10 Million. Total research each year on oil and gas exploration >2 billion."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030391.txt_8900
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030391.txt
|
The fool doth think he is wise
|
[{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 08:47 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Mason-Mahon is as brusque as he is ill informed."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt_8902
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023612.txt
|
Re: Larry Summers
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine , please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much.\nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly <is@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 02:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein:\n\nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. EM and I flew home today with Mr. Farkas and\nhis family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. Andrew and I are still\nstuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car.\n\nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us.\n\nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard.\n\nFondly,\nKelly Friendly"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126.txt_8909
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126.txt
|
Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 1:58:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt_8920
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt
|
Re: no chile
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "have cancelled my flight to chile.. did so while on way to jfk and found a flight to portland at the same time.. will be home tonight.. can we talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jan 14, 2018, at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "why?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:36 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "so.. what do you think of the letter on the whole? This is very scary, but I see that they keep contacting students, postdocs etc, and are not letting up.. I really need your feedback.\n\nwill talk tomorrow.. on plane now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "Of course"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 2:57:30 AM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "He publicly shed and defend ed his told in publishing trash . Right to know I think you should distinguish yourself from trump"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030311.txt_8927
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030311.txt
|
Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable
|
[{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr.", "Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898.txt_8930
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898.txt
|
Fwd: idea for jefferey e.
|
[{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST", "subject": "idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton and General\nPetraeus.\n\nJoe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend...."}, {"sender": "Lawrence H. Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2015 1:26:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: idea for jefferey e.", "body": "Not terrible idea."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030384.txt_8936
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030384.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn (i: Diucash, Alan"], "timestamp": "10/17/2016 2:39:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "are they taking the deduction ONLY to get the obama care benefit. /???? call joslin"}, {"sender": "Brad Wechsler", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "The taxes are ready to go according to RJ and Tom. There were two changes made last friday: $4mm of RA and\nArtspace losses can/shld reduce the 3.8% medicare tax and $7mm of TRA payments shld also be exempt from\nmedicare taxes (consistent with prior year APO and Akin Gump advice). In aggregate this increases our\noverpayment by $400k.\n\nPls call me and I'll find rich and tom if you want to discuss. Thx, b\n\nOtherwise, taxes are complete and we are ready to press the button and file electronically. B"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt_8937
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt
|
Re: A few favors...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT \ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I \nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and \nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy \nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. \nAre you in NYC soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the \nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:52:46 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "today only"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026567.txt_8941
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026567.txt
|
Fwd: Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/10/2012 10:56:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Charles Stevenson", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 10, 2012 5:45:56 PM EDT", "subject": "Lesley: Please deliver to Jeffrey", "body": "Jeffrey, \nThank you for your gifts to Bard College. Every dollar is deeply appreciated. \nCharles"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt_8944
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss Laie aT"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 2:05:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ps. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and Iam therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt_8955
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt
|
Approach Summary
|
[{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16 2011 06:41 PM", "subject": "Approach Summary", "body": "1. Optimizing good information to push down the negative: using new content (blog,\nwebsites, press releases, public network profiles, google images, etc) and search engine\noptimization. Changing the Wikipedia profile. Notes Wikipedia below.\n\n2. Eliminating the bad information using prevalence and proprietary algorithms; redirecting\nthe way in which Google sequences your information (reassociating it with the positive\ncontent). This is called off-page optimization.\n\n3. Eliminating personal information (social sec, tel #’s, dob, addresses etc) from all public\nand private directories.\n\nCOMMENTS:\n\nStep 2 is critical otherwise one is just bailing water from an ongoing flood of negative press. By\nrealigning the algorithms (i.e. reinforcing positive associations with your name and weakening the\nnegative associations), one almost permanently seals up the water hole or at least closes it\nsignificantly. This allows for Step 1 to be a onetime project (which will take 2 to 4 months approx.),\nwith just tweaking here and there down the road with updated content.\n\nBEST PEOPLE TO USE:\n\nYou need people who eat, drink and sleep algorithms and search engine optimization. I’ve\nresearched several companies and the most skilled, discrete, award winning and comprehensive is\na company called, www.reputation.com based in Silicon Valley. See their attached docs for review.\nBelow are bulleted key points on them:\n\nLookup Page just creates web pages and will not solve your problem.\n\nI would serve as a liaison between you and Reputation. I would monitor their progress and provide\nthem with all positive content that they need. They would make sure that the content has maximum\nalgorithmic potential. You could keep your positive content simple (using you Edge.org summary\nwhich is good), or expand your content with updates on current science work and scientists. The\nbenefit of the former, is that it keeps you more anonymous. The benefit of the latter is that is\nalgorithmically associates you to a larger pool of known scientists, further pushing up positive\ncontent. My advice would be to combine the two: a simple repetitive bio summary of you but with a\nlarger list of scientists added on. But I would ask the Reputation team about this: saying that the\nmain goal is to enhance anonymity and algorithmic associations at the same time.\n\nWHY REPUTATION (in no particular order)\n\nRepresents numerous fortune 500 companies\n\nclients in more than 100 countries\n\nbased in Silicon Valley\n\nFeatured on CNN, WSJ, Forbes, NY Times etc\n\nUndisputed world leader in online reputation management\n\nPrevalence and proprietary algorithms to drive positive search results to the top.\nIntimate knowledge of search engine optimization.\n\n200+ employees\n\nPatented Internet technology"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027045.txt_8970
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027045.txt
|
Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/10/2018 12:35:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "Putin in vienna --your guy setting up and hosting"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jun 2018 06:37:25 -0600", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "good work"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump promises to host Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte at White House to honor him", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/687949002\n\nIt Begins"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt_8971
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt
|
Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [nn |]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2016 6:05:47 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO", "body": "Our Financials Conference was this week and client attendance was up by 66% from last year. Yes, banks/financials\nmight pull back at some point after this run-up but we would be buyers on any pullbacks and we continue to see further\nupside from multiple expansion and earnings growth. Our analyst raised her price targets by ~11% across the board. The\nlong term rotation from bonds and div stocks into sectors like financials is only beginning.\n\nVol is higher on the week; what prices well now:\n\nBuy the XLF March 2017 $22 call with $26 Knock-Out (continuous) for $0.87, with a full premium\nrebate if knock-out occurs.\n\nThis prices attractively given flat call skew and if XLF breaches $26 and this knocks out, at least you get your\npremium back.\n\nPlease find our Financials report attached.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are\nraising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining\nafter the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2)\npotentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration;\nand 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)"}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["‘jeffrey E.'", "‘Richard Kahn'"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 14, 2016 12:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials trade for Monday", "body": "We continue to see buyers of XLF today. Funds are underweight financials in all regions, valuations are\nreasonable, earnings are improving and financials tend to outperform when bond yields rise.\n\nVol is higher today — refreshed pricing below.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\ne Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\ne Total premium: 1.86%\n\nGlobal Positioning in Stocks: Nigel Tupper notes the 4000 funds in our \"Positioning in Stocks\" analysis\n\nare more underweight Financials, on average, than any other sector and are underweight this sector in all\nregions of the world. If earnings continue to improve and yield rise, which is often the case in an upturn in our\n\nGlobal Wave, then the unloved Financials sector has the potential to continue to outperform.\n\nGlobal Quant Panorama: \"Bearish on Bonds\" stocks (which tend to move in the opposite direction to\n\nbond yields) tend to outperform our \"Bullish On Bonds\" when bond yields rise. The sectors that tend to\n\nperform best as bond yields rise are Energy, Tech, Materials, Banks, and Diversified Financials. Of these\nsectors, the laggards this year have been Banks and Diversified Financials. With a PE of 15.9x and a PB of\n2.0x, Global valuations are reasonable. Also, Risk is near all-time lows in terms of PE in most regions. Now\nthat macro and earnings data have triggered the beginning of a rotation, Value becomes very relevant."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt_8974
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nathan myrhvold. suggested you use him as arefrence for masa. on another note. lots of investigations going slow as no one to lead , but when the justice dept staff gets filled. OY."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <landon.thomas@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, April 21 2017 05:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will give that a try. Bill Gates would carry more of a punch:) Saw Mnuchin/Cohn in DC -- they are talking a big game but I don't knowif they can deliver on tax reform. What do you think? I don't know why Trump does not reach out to Schumer -- two outer borough guys who know each other and can talk to each other. He has to move away from the right wing nutters back to the middle which is his natural space anyway."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt_8979
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary. . Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:01:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030339.txt_9003
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030339.txt
|
Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg, \nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London. \nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client. \nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to \nwhich he has not responded. \nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his \nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015. \nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt_9004
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt
|
Beoing update
|
[{"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 4:34:41 PM", "subject": "Beoing update", "body": "Jeffrey, \nBoeing status: \nBoeing will be completed May 6th,. \n-re weigh \n-three mandatory AD compliance \n-FDR Flight Data recorder repair,. \n-leak in flap drive gear box,. \n05 check will be accomplished July 30th,. \nThe maintenance facility is completing \"Trumps\" New Boeing 757 at this time here,. Eric Roth is doing the interior,. I was \ntold Trump sold his B727 to a person in Singapore?? \nthx,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028576.txt_9005
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028576.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off to europe, tomorrow. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number are you on? I won't talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Crim\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision., if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit...\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face Privileged - Redacted\nL. !"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is deja vu....: Privileggd - Redacted\nPrivileged - Redacted As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@cimail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance..."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@cimail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Very small fucking world....obviously don't mention my role with brad till we both think it useful"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only one............................."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "kathy would tacke me if i were to save you :)"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So knew what your answer was going to be\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry but i cant get the image of a naked lily sanchez out of my head."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Calm down....it was about 30 years ago, fleeting (and not that bad)"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ha"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Ever hear of a french/Israeli lawyer named ron soffer who has his main office in paris...(a yid who also works out of nyc)"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "as you may know i am very good friends with the sec gen council of europe , human rights court. . they know each other well"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 9:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "He wants me to hire him....thinking about using him on the Softbank caper"}, {"sender": "J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 3:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "go slow"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2019 9:24:09 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "As is often (but not always) the case you are correct....see if you can 'get the book' on him"}]
| 42
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.txt_9007
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.txt
|
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg’"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. we’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is x. 20d available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters\n\noffice:\nMobile:"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt_9010
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Big trouble"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does he flip"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 11:32:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of course"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt_9030
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt
|
good call on pence
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 5:13:01 PM", "subject": "good call on pence", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/mike-pence-donald-trump-vice-president.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt_9034
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt
|
Report on Stem Cells future
|
[{"sender": "Steven Victor MD", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2012 1:06:38 PM", "subject": "Report on Stem Cells future", "body": "PUBLISHED: 22 NOVEMBER 2012\n\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first\n\napproval and improved political climate\n\nSpecial Report\n\nPeter Winter\n\nPositive clinical data, increases in federal funding and the first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem\ncell product mean momentum is building in the US. With the re-election of President Obama, this is likely to\ncontinue\n\nShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on facebookShare on email\n\nImage: Bigstock\n\nWhen US President Barack Obama came into office he made good on his promise to overturn President George W. Bush’s executive\norder that - with the exception of a handful of existing stem cell lines - prohibited federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC)\nresearch.\n\nSpecial Report - Stem Cell Research under Horizon 2020\n\nStem Cell Research in Horizon 2020: Experts debate what Europe must do to maintain its lead in regenerative medicine\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first approval and improved political climate\n\nView from Europe: Delivering on the vision of regenerative medicine and stem cells\n\nTalking to the experts: Why the EU should support human embryonic stem cell research in Horizon 2020\n\nOVERVIEW: Regenerate the future - human embryonic stem cell research is crucial to deliver health and growth\n\nThis easing of restrictions on hESC research was expected to engender enough confidence to attract investors into the space and\nencourage pharmaceutical and biotech companies to build robust product pipelines based on stem cell therapies. However, a tougher\nregulatory climate for biopharmaceuticals in general and a protracted legal challenge to the relaxing of rules on hESCs has served to\nkeep both big pharma companies and venture capitalists on the sidelines to date.\n\nNevertheless, there has been progress, particularly at the research end of the development spectrum. Three and a half years on stem\ncells are no longer high on the political agenda as they once were. This speaks to the generally positive public acceptance of stem cell\nresearch in the US. A Research!America poll of likely voters in the presidential election, conducted in August 2012, found that 61 per\ncent of prospective voters were in favor of expanding funding for hESC research.\n\nInvestor interest\n\nLooking back over his first term in office Obama can point to some major gains. These include funding increases for the National\nInstitutes of Health’s (NIH) stem cell initiatives, and greater investor interest in the wider field of regenerative medicine including the use\nof adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.\n\nHowever, it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. Although after protracted forethought, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the\ngreen light for the Californian biotech Geron to begin the very first human clinical trial of a human embryonic stem cell-derived therapy\nin January 2009, the trial has not been without its problems.\n\nThe Phase | trial, treating patients with acute spinal cord injury, was hit with an FDA clinical hold causing significant delays to its\ninitiation in 2010. A year later, after 15 years’ effort, the Geron washed its hands of the programme, blaming its withdrawal from the\nstem cell space on capital scarcity and uncertain economic conditions. The decision wiped out a leading player in hESC translation and\ncommercialisation. However, the regenerative medicine sector has been able to recover and is beginning to blossom. (See Public\nMarkets section below). The prime movers in the Geron trial are now attempting to revive it.\n\nResearch funding robust\n\nFederal funding for all forms of stem cell research has increased over the past four years. However, the NIH funding component for\nhESC has been dogged by litigation for the past three years. In Sherley v. Sebelius, researchers James Sherley and Theresa Deisher,\nwho worked with adult stem cells, claimed the NIH guidelines violated the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal\nfunds for research in which human embryos are destroyed or discarded. This overhang was not finally removed until August 2012 when\na three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the NIH 2009 guidelines that\npermit funding of hESC research."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.txt_9035
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.txt
|
Fwd: CNN Inquiry
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Fyi\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Melanie Hicken <hit-reply@linkedin.com>", "recipients": ["as <a"], "timestamp": "October 13, 2016 at 8:03:22 PM GMT+2", "subject": "CNN Inquiry", "body": "Hi\n\nI’m a reporter at CNN, and my colleague Blake Ellis and I have read that Bill Clinton and Donald\nTrump have both visited Epstein’s private island. We are trying to determine whether there is any\ntruth to the allegations that either or both of these men may have had sexual relations with minors\nwhile there. We know that you have been Epstein’s pilot, so we’re wondering if you would be willing\nto speak with us completely off the record. We are not focusing on the allegations against Epstein --\nwe are solely focusing on Trump and Clinton given the current allegations being levied in the press.\n\nIf you don’t feel comfortable sharing anything via social media or email, feel free to send us any\ndocumentation/proof that might be helpful anonymously via mail:\n\nMelanie Hicken\n6430 Sunset Blvd #300\nLos Angeles, CA 90028\n\nYou can also reach us by phone\n\nThanks so much,\nMelanie"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030353.txt_9038
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030353.txt
|
The fool doth think he is wise
|
[{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 08:47 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Mason-Mahon is as brusque as he is ill informed."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt_9039
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt
|
Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, there are \neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it's way to \na museum. \n\nHope all is well. \n\nSincerely,\nEric Roth"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number, or have him call"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022193.txt_9057
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022193.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. Iam currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, I like where it's going.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out], in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "i ot", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029616.txt_9059
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029616.txt
|
Re: Disaster but maybe i
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 5:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Firm delivered through humor"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Figuring out how.\n\nCould say she has now used up 80 percent of what she was owed through my changes in plan.\nOr say xi changes meeting w trump.\n\nI think she is tired of this alas.\n\nSustaining w secrecy hard."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "you could say something like . try not to call him larry by mistake.. though it would be amusing."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 1:56:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Not funny"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt_9060
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 10:42:58 PM", "subject": "", "body": "What do u make of latest trump follies?"}]
| 1
|
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028508.txt_9062
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028508.txt
|
nanosatelites are getting hot
|
[{"sender": "Seach #8", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/6/2014 2:23:23 PM", "subject": "nanosatelites are getting hot", "body": "http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21603441-where-nanosats-boldly-go-new-businesses-will-followunless-they-\nare-smothered-excessive\n\nTechnology — Full text articles\n\nSatellites: Space: the next startup frontier\nThe Economist\n\nAROUND 1,000 operational satellites are circling the Earth, some of them the size and weight of a large car. In the past\nyear they have been joined by junior offspring: 100 or so small satellites, some of them made up of one or more 10cm\n(4-inch) cubes. They may be tiny, but each is vastly more capable than Sputnik, the first man-made satellite launched\nby Russia in 1957. And many more are coming.\n\nSpace hardware used to cost so much that it was available only to generals, multinationals and the most privileged\nscientists. No more. Many of these nanosats, as small satellites weighing no more than a few kilograms are called,\nhave been launched for small companies, startups and university departments, sometimes with finance raised on\ncrowdfunding websites. Their construction costs can be down in the tens of thousands of dollars, which makes them\nthousands of times cheaper than today’s big satellites. Admittedly, there is much they cannot do, but with that sort of\nprice differential, and some ingenious use of the abilities they do have, they could be surprisingly competitive players on\na number of fronts. In the next five years another 1,000 nanosats are expected to be launched.\n\nTwo trends are setting up nanosats for further success. Like people working on everything from robots to 3D printers,\nnanosat builders are harvesting the benefits of ever better, ever cheaper components built for smartohones and other\nconsumer electronics. Some nanosats even contain complete smartphones, making use of the clever operating\nsystems, radios and cameras which phones now contain. For as long as phones go on getting cheaper and more\ncapable, so will nanosats. The cheapest so far—a tiny chipsat—was assembled for just $25, though it has yet to be\nsuccessfully launched.\n\nThe launch systems too are getting much cheaper. SpaceX, the innovative rocket-maker founded by Elon Musk, has\nalready brought down the costs of getting into space; it and its competitors could reduce them a lot further. The biggest\nbeneficiaries will at first be people who make big satellites. But more big satellites will mean more opportunities for\nsmall satellites to piggy-back on their launches. And some companies are looking at cheap little launch systems tailored\nspecifically to the needs of the nanosatellite. One reason space engineers are notoriously conservative is that the costs\nof failure are high. As making and launching satellites gets cheaper, it will be ever easier for innovative, risk-taking\nnanosat-makers to orbit around the lumbering incumbents.\n\nSize does impose limits. Nanosats cannot peer as closely at the Earth or carry out as many experiments as big\nsatellites. But for some jobs that does not matter. The plans that companies already have include using nanosats for\nmonitoring crops, studying the sun and tracking ships and aircraft. Such a system might have been able to track\nMalaysian Airlines flight MH370, which went missing in March.\n\nNano can do\n\nYet not everyone is thrilled. One worry is that constellations of nanosats will mean a big increase in space junk; but,\noperating in low-Earth orbit, they burn up on re-entry after a year or so. And being cheap, they can soon be replaced\nwith newer models. A more serious concern is that they are a “dual-use” technology: they could be used for military\npurposes. In America this has led to onerous restrictions.\n\nBarack Obama's administration has sensibly repealed a law of 1999 that required all satellites to be licensed by the\nState Department as munitions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This could mean that most\ncommercial satellites will be removed from ITAR by the end of the year and their export administered by the Commerce\nDepartment. But some satellite systems and spacecraft—including anything that can carry people into space—will\nremain under ITAR."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt_9063
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt
|
Re: told you , the case ws a fake
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: told you , the case ws a fake", "body": "The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\n\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules\nof Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the\nabove-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All\nDefendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}, {"sender": "Eva Dubin <a-", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 4 2016 10:58 PM", "subject": "Re: told you , the case ws a fake", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589.txt_9064
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid I", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2019 7:19:44 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Calm down....it was about 30 years ago, fleeting (and not that bad)"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry but i cant get the image of a naked lily sanchez out of my head."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So knew what your answer was going to be"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "kathy would tacke me if i were to save you :)"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only one............................."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Very small fucking world....obviously don't mention my role with brad till we both think it useful"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance....212 506 3914"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness we will resolve it by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise I will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid about 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hhhhhmmmm....first reaction is déjà vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just tell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know I am the 800 pound gorilla here, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@dmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? if thats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have two more bidders"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won't talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe, tomorrow. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:37 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]
| 36
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt_9068
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt
|
trump making a nice move..
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/14/2016 2:33:10 PM", "subject": "trump making a nice move..", "body": "Importance: High \n\nElection Polls 1President Polls 1State Polls Senate Polls 1House Polls Governor Polls lApproval Polls \nWednesday, September 14 \nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton LA Times/USC Tracking \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Reuters/Ipsos \nJohnson vs. Stein \nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos \nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson \nvs. Stein \nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton \nMaine: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson \nvs. Stein \nMaine CD2: Trump vs. Clinton vs. \nJohnson vs. Stein \nMassachusetts: Trump vs. Clinton vs. \nJohnson vs. Stein \nKansas: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson \nvs. Stein \nSouth Carolina: Trump vs. Clinton vs. \nJohnson vs. Stein \nKansas Senate - Moran vs. Wiesner \nMaine 2nd District - Poliquin vs. Cain \nMaine 1st District - Holbrook vs. \nPingree \nPresident Obama Job Approval \n2016 Generic Congressional Vote \nDirection of Country \nBloomberg \nBloomberg \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nWBUR/MassINC \nKSN News/SurveyUSA \nTrafalgar Group (R) \nKSN News/SurveyUSA* \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nColby \nCollege/SurveyUSA \nReuters/Ipsos \nReuters/Ipsos \nReuters/Ipsos \nResults \nClinton 42, Trump 47 \nClinton 39, Trump 39, \nJohnson 8, Stein 2 \nClinton 40, Trump 39 \nTrump 44, Clinton 39, \nJohnson 10, Stein 3 \nClinton 43, Trump 48 \nClinton 42, Trump 39, \nJohnson 9, Stein 5 \nTrump 47, Clinton 37, \nJohnson 8, Stein 5 \nClinton 54, Trump 28, \nJohnson 9, Stein 4 \nTrump 48, Clinton 36, \nJohnson 8, Stein 2 \nTrump 53, Clinton 38, \nJohnson 3, Stein 1 \nMoran 50, Wiesner 34 \nPoliquin 50, Cain 45 \nPingree 57, Holbrook 37 \nApprove 48, Disapprove \n48 \nDemocrats 40, \nRepublicans 38 \nRight Direction 22, Wrong \nTrack 65 \nSpread \nTrump +5 \nTie \nClinton +1 \nTrump +5 \nTrump +5 \nClinton +3 \nTrump +10 \nClinton +26 \nTrump +12 \nTrump +15 \nMoran +16 \nPoliquin +5 \nPingree +20 \nTie \nDemocrats +2 \nWrong Track \n+43"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt_9073
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt
|
Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 9:51:37 AM EST", "subject": "2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": "Rich, following up on your question from a while back about this topic. Please find a white paper attached.\n\nRegards,\n\nAmanda"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:40:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt_9076
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt
|
Donald Trump I Deutsche Bank I House Intelligence Committee
|
[{"sender": "David Mitchell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 11:08:57 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump I Deutsche Bank I House Intelligence Committee", "body": "https://therealdeal.com/2019/01/09/congress-to-investigate-trumps-florida-property-sale-deutsche-bank-loans/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt_9089
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett iS", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 11:11:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry , sorry, itis sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade isanF. notone goodmoveinmany. . re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would. Had you told me , jeffrey Id like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt_9097
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:33:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}]
| 8
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt_9100
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker, MD"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 8:07:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "told you http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/15/trump-expands-ban-on-abortion-funding-overseas.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt_9101
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt
|
ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More
|
[{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD [asmallworld@travel.asmallworld.net]", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "If you are unable to see this message, click here to view. To ensure delivery to your inbox, add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net to your address book.\n\nEo\n\nActive Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\nWednesday, July 27, 2011"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt_9108
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt
|
Re: bannon view of trump
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:11:44 PM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "Haven’t watched this yet. But was with him for a few hours last night and got the full download: he think trump\n\nhas lost his stuff, and as well, to boot, is an idiot. Putin, tho, he thinks is a genius."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:58 AM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X9E9n6GHC8"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt_9109
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022926.txt
|
Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:16:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt_9123
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt
|
Oil options
|
[{"sender": "Nav Gupta", "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/ I", "Vinit Sahni/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust got off the phone with Vinit.\nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated I'd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and\nout.\n\nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given\nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is\nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show\nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from\nRussia. Germany gets 30%.\n\nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each\nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused\non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up.\n\nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est):\n\n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92\n\nand\n\n35d expiry 16april2014 underlying clk4 97.59\n\n** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM\n100 call for 25. Net pay 5cents. But 5d is a bit short for me.\n\n**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c¢ (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c\n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents.\n\nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask."}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Paul Morris"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time we'll be much quicker."}, {"sender": "Paul Morris", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 10:27:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Oil options [C]", "body": "I do want to talk to u about this, they spent too much thinking about options here, let me know when u have couple minutes."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030113.txt_9125
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030113.txt
|
Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomina\ntion of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General \nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 9:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I Number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Oh, sorry. _______________"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Boy are you focused , I meant what number to call you on"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think I am pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham \nreimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 11:13:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Furnished"}]
| 16
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026603.txt_9131
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026603.txt
|
Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/23/2014 5:09:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029324.txt_9146
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029324.txt
|
Ed Boyden-Can't make it to dinner tonight!
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lyn fontanilla"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 2:24:48 PM", "subject": "Ed Boyden-Can't make it to dinner tonight!", "body": "Begin forwarded message:\nJojo Fontanilla"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Neil Gershenfeld", "Bella Klein"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2014 10:12:29 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: Your CITICAR Confirmation", "body": "My apologies -- for the Obama BRAIN initiative, I need to work at MIT today to coordinate the activities of a bunch of groups for a Monday deadline. I'll see if I can get the plane fare refunded by our travel agent. Very sorry for the late notice...\nBest,\nEd"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026017.txt_9147
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026017.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10 2016 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Shocking. So ridiculous."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265.txt_9155
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265.txt
|
Re: Corruption...client is Richard Ireland
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 6, 2017 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Corruption...client is Richard Ireland", "body": "jack morris partner marino could be the problem forlicencing. ribis can help i think"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bet trump leaked the 2 pages...cross the government's star witness tomorrow...it's odd I still do this shit..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Which case"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Pennsylvania"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "turk or..."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2017 12:14:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Corruption...client is Richard Ireland"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt_9156
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt
|
Re: Interview with Futurism
|
[{"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["es"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:51:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031809.txt_9164
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031809.txt
|
Re: AVGO
|
[{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Jul 13, 2018, at 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Again?? How many puts ? What are the alternatives. The fact tgat you iwn thd stock at a higher price is affecting your decision. Sorry. This is judt ridiculous!!! Would you buy the stock here . ???? If you would would you also buy puts ??? My patience is at its end"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:35:08 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO _", "body": "i believe he is married to broadcom as has he got stuck with stock on both 4,000 lots from selling puts .."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023635.txt_9180
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023635.txt
|
Fwd: EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....
|
[{"sender": "Ozan Tarman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:40 AM", "subject": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....", "body": "EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because Hillary bets worked as Trump trades. \nWider, steeper core rates, stronger USD, weaker EM is the Rage. The last one, EM, is the big loser out of Trump Reflation Theme. DM over EM and divergence within DM are very much in vogue. All gains of EMBI since March are gone! \nFor Rates & FX, it does feel like early days of Taper Tantrum trade of 3 years ago. Both dominated by US price action. In both, hedge funds have now caught the moves, play offense & ride the Trump narrative. Real Money is on the ropes, caught long Fixed Income/duration/carry and cannot play defense fearing Outflows. \nIn Emerging Markets, most outflows are retail, ETF driven. All eyes on next leg of institutions. In equities, banks big winners; FANGs losing. I asked partners 2 questions. 1) Would the \"this will be great for business, feel good factor\" wave out-run \"if real yields go up, equities are a sell\" fear. Clients are torn, but the former, bullish camp wins for now, my colleagues suggest. There are skeptics though. \n2) In Europe, do fears over Renzi losing & Le Pen winning climb over the big momentum behind banks etc. Again, my equity team suggests, \"no, reflation wave may win over Italy referendum anxiety„ for now.\" Renzi is now widely expected to lose, so a \"yes\" would be the big surprise trade. And the bigger elephant in the room is Le Pen. If she wins in May, Europe as we know it may really shake.. But for now this is more in the radars of Euro & EBG traders. \nCore rates are driven by the speed of TY sell-off. And in G5 FX, the big driver is USD/JPY. The stronger \"we should believe in Trump reflation narrative\" winds are, the more USD/JPY buyers we see. \nSome in Research warn that Trump may succeed in \"tax cuts, faster than any infrastructure spending,\" but few macro are in mood to listen. A few players believe, looking at trade weights of each with US and magnitude of sell-off, Asia FX may have more weakness to come than MXN. Will copper/infrastructure rally eventually help Chile? \nMost macro love NKY, willing to love it more. Bringing it home; fast macro money players are rushing to erase losses, year long pains through wider rates, longer USD, weaker EM, stronger equities. \nReal Money is in defensive, remembering Taper Tantrum days, fearing institutional outflows & forced selling of carry hope positions. \nThose who want to \"fade\" Trump rally, seek valuation in EM, believe core rates can tighten to get a breather are in Minority."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 3:32:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: EUROPEAN MULTI ASSET COVERAGE MEETING IMPRESSIONS: Eyes on Real Money outflows; Christmas comes early for most of macro players, hedge funds. Absolute majority bet on HRC to win, but majority still made good money because ....", "body": "The latest thinking from London hedge fund crowd"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033256.txt_9182
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033256.txt
|
PR Bonds
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2017 4:24:27 PM", "subject": "PR Bonds", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/video/2017/10/04/trump-puerto-rico-debt-will-have-to-be-wiped-out.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028939.txt_9187
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028939.txt
|
Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence M. Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 8:10:36 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt_9190
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt
|
Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Rich Beckler, Ken Adams", "recipients": ["Denyse Sabagh", "Michael Baxter", "Robert Barnett", "Weingarten, Reid", "Ellen Kerns"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being tracked.\n\nYou both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom, Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 4:53:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028760.txt_9193
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028760.txt
|
Re: press
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I am glad to see you managed to find a way to improve your reputation in the press. Your concern and charitable contributions are touching... You forgot about everyone else your actions affected and the promises you made to fix it, but you clearly make an effort to improve your own image with contributions you can parade in the press. Congratulations. I suppose the few people who actually cared enough to put their lives and reputation on the line for you can fend for themselves. I will never understand your priorities... Have a nice trip."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I have not seen this, not my doing. as you guessed I am not very well.. I hope you are. i believe in you."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 26 2012 06:12 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "Quiet Sorry for all the typos"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt_9195
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747 \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:18:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt_9222
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 17, 2010 7:32 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "woody asked summer, so what do you do? 30 minutes later, she had not taken a breath. . either medicated, or manic."}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2010 1:13:39 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Neither very funny...always ask for the 3 minute version but most of the girls you know haven't spoken for a total of 30 minutes in all the time you knew them... .she is a GREAT girl who is refreshing in this business totally focused and smart. Jeffrey I brought her to a meeting with scientists a few months back she knew more than they did and totally embarrassed not only the scientists but the client was totally unprepared for what she knew, she actually was able to tell them things they were and weren't doing that they had no clue of and they changed there practices at p&g!!!! this is the kind of girl to mold she is the leader in her field of sustainability ny times wrote an article if you cant afford al gore hire summer rayne says something. xoxo"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt_9231
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 11:38:59 PM", "subject": null, "body": "WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump held the first meeting of his full Cabinet today, vowing to take\nthe fight against terrorism to the very end and said \"we are going to starve the beast\" by stopping its funding.\n\n\"One of the big things that we did - and you're seeing it now with Qatar and all of the things that are actually\ngoing on in a very positive fashion - we are stopping the funding of terrorism,\" Trump told reporters at the\n\nWhite House.\n\nRead more at:\n\nhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59116707.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm\n\nmedium=text&utm_campaign=cppst"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023621.txt_9233
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023621.txt
|
Re: Larry Summers
|
[{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nI work for Larry Summers and as you may have heard, we are \nstranded in St.Thomas and the airlines are saying we can't get out \nuntil Thursday. \nOur names: \nKelly Friendly \nAndrew Friendly \nMy cell is below or you can reach my husband Andrew Friendly \non his cell at You may have met him when he was \nPresident Clinton's aide. \nWe would be so grateful for any help you could provide. \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "my friend andrew farkas has a pretty full plane to ny tomorrwo \nbut can take 1 or 2 of you. i can call other hotels wher we have \npull.. my cars and drivers are at your disposal."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Fantastic. If possible, could my daughter (age 11) and I go \nback with Mr. Farkas? \nPlease let me know how best to follow up. We may have found a condo \nby red hook but haven't found a car yet. \nLet me know how to follow up. \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": ". andrew farkas is flying tomorrow. please \ncontact him directly and as soon as you are ready i will organize the \nuse of my car."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Excellent. I will email him now. \nIf it's not too much of an inconvenience we would love to use the car. Is it \navailable around 3? We are staying by the airport.... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine, please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful.... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much. \nWe are so grateful for your generosity... \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 1 : 06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. Catherine and I flew home today with \nMr. Farkas and his family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. \nAndrew and Caroline are still stuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car. \nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us. \nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard. \nFondly, \nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 6, 2014, at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad it worked out. if you husband woudl like to see the island this week i will arrange it."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "would love to come see the island! I've cced him to work out the details.... \nAndrew and \nHappy New Year!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 6, 2014, at 7:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "send me andrews details."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Hc can be reached at: \nor \nKelly Friendly"}]
| 15
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012040.txt_9244
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012040.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "recipients": ["Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (LA)", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Saturday, August 13, 2016 1:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Contact Jenna Greene at or on Twitter@jgreenejenna."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032219.txt_9257
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032219.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Peggy", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2015 4:56:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I wish I had a reason to go to Paris this weekend. I am headed to LA now for two events and meetings. Back late Friday. I am thrilled we got my money. I loved the lawyer Martin telling me I deserved more. Made me hate my idiot brother even more. We are ahead of billing from last year and it's the quiet time. Will stay in touch. How are you doing. Has all that vile publicity finally gone away for good or do the keep stirring the pot for more blackmail money every few months. Hope you are well. Just spent the weekend at David Koch's in palm beach. He had a lunch for 70. Including 9 acting republican governors, Pataki, Giuliani, trump, Wilbur ross, Was fascinating Xoxo."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2015, at 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "going to paris on sat if you want a ride"}]
| 2
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.