Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt_7749	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030484.txt	Re: on another subject... gates and ed	[{"sender": "roger schank <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gives about $200 million a year in elementary and secondary education grants\nand is pressing for some of the same changes that Obama wants, such as paying teachers based on student test\nscores."}, {"sender": "roger schank <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:49 AM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "they are sending their rep here on the second week of dec..\nwhy exactly? not be convinced they are wrong\ndo you remember chaunce the gardner from \" being there\" . dimitri\n\nI see I wont win this battle so I give up\n\nby the way... the right criticism of what he wrote is that he took a very long time to get there; by that definition\nof intelligence you are correct"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["roger schank <j>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 31 2009 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: on another subject... gates and ed", "body": "and the \"there\" to which he arrived is trivial. and that there only after a long journey.. , re gates.. they have\nnow become frustrated , with the lack of success. bill is personally focused on online ed. he has spent the past\ncouple of months searching for decent courses, and found few ."}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt_7758	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032995.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "4/29/2017 6:57:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "new york fun your girlisinthe DR. i have no idea"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "2-3 weeks but Not sure how it will roll....supposed to be serious riots here may 1....lefties are pissed and trump said p.r.\ncan fuck iself....what’s with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "for how long. you can hop to my island with your friend if you like, just give me 24 hrs notice otherwsie i\nill be htre around the 19th"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "San juan...pick the jury monday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "where are you/ PR or new york"}]	5
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt_7759	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033453.txt	Fwd: Off the record trump	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg ee. Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:40:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Off the record trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "ii! <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": "<i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please\ncheck every false allegation with me before repeating to others.\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt_7761	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt	FW: Ghislaine Maxwell	[{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant ____________________________ and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. t was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other men.\n\n5. was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduced had sex with him. Maxwell directed Maxwell directed to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where MIIM subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms to sit on Andrew's knee with Andrew groped both girls. Ms after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. Min. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew Ml= age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell ad President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026473.txt_7768	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026473.txt	Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 12:58:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon hii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt_7769	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt	RE: Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "??"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he's the real deal.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, any word on karyyna plans. . can you belive MBS sent me a TENT carpets and all."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:07:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Will call Japan tonite. A tent? Hmmm... I think that is code for 'I love you'. Or, maybe code for 'go pound sand'. Better check your KSA urban dictionary."}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt_7770	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031420.txt	Re: <no subject>	[{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2015 2:17:30 AM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "J Jep", "recipients": ["G G", "Indyke, Darren K."], "timestamp": "Monday, September 21, 2015 at 22:08 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "I"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt_7779	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt	Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names_________________and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMsM further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:10:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt_7795	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030490.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley <j...>", "_Jes Staley <i"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 25 2010 12:51 PM", "subject": null, "body": "the more time you have to announce the better. Ive set up you and peter to meet in davos with darling. it would\nbe better afterwards to announce. I would go slowly, this can set the stage for lots to come. Obama really\n\nwants a fight. its crzy. \" They took bailout money and then\n\n\" the problems are all inherited , not of his\n\ndoing, he reached out a hand to help and was taken advantage of -, typical but problematic."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt_7804	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:24:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509.txt_7805	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509.txt	Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum Healing, and Plato I Psychology Today	[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/6/2018 11:32:09 AM", "subject": "Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum Healing, and Plato I Psychology Today", "body": "FYI\nhttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/201806/1unch-deepak-i-lsd-quantum-healing-and-plato?amp& twitter impression=true"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt_7806	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031346.txt	The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors	[{"sender": "Nicholas Rib", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/28/2019 7:41:52 PM", "subject": "The Washington Post: How Donald Trump inflated his net worth to lenders and investors", "body": "For ur info"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt_7815	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt	ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More	[{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "Active Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\n\nWednesday, July 27, 2011\n\nSome people do yoga on vacation; others go for the occasional run. This week we're thinking a little more... adventurously, from active escapes at Travaasa Hana in Maui to racecar driving in Baja and hiking Moab with the experts at Austin-Lehman Adventures. And after all that action, chill out with stays at the new Dream South Beach, the gorgeous Pavilions Phuket and other luxe resorts worldwide. (Image: The Pavilions Phuket - on sale Fri, July 31.)\n\nSales this week\n\nStarting Tuesday at Noon BST\n\nDream South Beach\nTravaasa Hana - Hawaii\nEsencia Estate - Riviera Maya\n\nStarting Tuesday at 8pm BST\n\nAVIA Hotel - Long Beach, CA\nHotel Las Palmas - Mexico\n\nStarting Wednesday at Noon BST\n\nLast-Minute London and NYC\n\nStarting Wednesday at 8pm BST\n\nFairmont Turnberry Isle Resort\n\nStarting Thursday at Noon BST\n\nSofitel - Philadelphia\n\nStarting Thursday at 8pm BST\n\nHotel Derek - Houston\nArches to Moab\nSpirit Ridge, British Columbia\n\nStarting Friday at Noon BST\n\nHotel Allegro - Chicago\n\nStarting Friday at 8pm BST\n\nVidago Palace - Portugal\nThe Manor On Golden Pond - NH\nCandia Maris Resort - Crete\n\nStarting Saturday at Noon BST\n\nRound Hill - Jamaica\nFairmont Royal Pavilion\nExperience Baja, Two Ways\nMaca Bana - Grenada\n\nStarting Sunday at Noon BST\n\nAlila Sothea - Cambodia\n\nStarting Sunday at 8pm BST\n\nThe Pavilions - Phuket\nSiam Kempinski Hotel Bangkok\nAnantara Bophut - Koh Samui\n\nStarting Monday at 8pm BST\n\nThe Madison - D.C.\nGrand Hyatt Atlanta\nHotel Bellevue - Washington\nThe Adolphus - Dallas"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.txt_7820	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.txt	Re: Your Special Day	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look ata bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\nDz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers ._ centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xked.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes ,now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 1:04:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "god - so he does play , just not with fair dice"}]	9
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt_7821	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033064.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also, \ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down \nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:02:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes On conference finish in 10 min"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt_7826	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe, fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "Nadia", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out., in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}]	5
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029211.txt_7827	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029211.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk /reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 11:48:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, (\ncouncil of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar\n). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you\nthink there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy\nshit im onl for next 30 minutes"}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt_7829	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031017.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "1/29/2011 12:36:51 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon\nnight.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt_7834	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt	Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JJEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 1:41:49 AM", "subject": "Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics", "body": "In case you missed it- Nick\nhttps: //www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/politics/sdny-subpoena-trump-inauguration-committee/index.htm"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031981.txt_7843	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031981.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI_am_also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt_7851	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt	ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["a E. a Kathy Ruemmler ee Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt_7855	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt	FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade	[{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments we submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday or Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24th February its worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr. Wade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\nMany thanks and best regards.\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "2016-02-26 13:04 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Great news, the piece was published in The Hill this morning-\nhttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/internationa1/270878-senegals-democratic-backslide\nWe can share this w Congress and State."}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake"], "timestamp": "Monday, February 29, 2016 6:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations!!! Can we share this with the press here?\nBest regards.\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details."}, {"sender": "abuulabass", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com.\nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards.\nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Bob Crowe", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt_7860	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Oh my goodness. I'm so sorry about these accusations. I wish there was a way to make them stop but glad that the truth surfaced. She sounds troubled for sure. Did you even know her? Hope your trip went well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ugh Hopefully this nonsense stops NOW!!"}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029239.txt_7861	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029239.txt	Re: Poetry Update and Thank You	[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 2 December 2015", "subject": "Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMay I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a message just for you....\n\n-Lisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/2/2015 3:31:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Poetry Update and Thank You", "body": "I'm in Cambridge sat?"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032956.txt_7864	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032956.txt	see you at 9 am tomorw	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Pritzker"], "timestamp": "1/9/2017 6:56:22 PM", "subject": "see you at 9 am tomorw", "body": "http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-barrack-inauguration-20170109-story.html"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt_7865	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033490.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam seeing Heidi a little bit \| don't think it will turn into romance \| am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems\nintelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came\nthrough Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt_7866	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032942.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well \| think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in\nthis market it's been a trump triumph \| gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:30:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt_7867	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033484.txt	Re: (no subject)	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets\n\nwith it thanks Jonathan"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt_7874	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt	Patterson	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:39:39 PM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--\n\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy than they are of legal threats):\n\n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book;\n\n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine;\n\n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book,\n\nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe Patterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt_7875	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt	Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek	[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "----- Original Message -----\nFrom: Kristin Andersen\nSent: 03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\nSubjct: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek\nPrivileged - Redacted\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM"}, {"sender": "Kristin Andersen", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST", "subject": "Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM\n\"Wolfe,\nAlexandra\n03/07/2011 02:09 PM\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\nRE:\nCC\nSubject\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\nI understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses.\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\nThank you,\nJay"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt_7889	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032573.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 10:26:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt_7894	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030514.txt	crazy	[{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "crazy", "body": "We are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, \nhowever inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that \nthe various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the \nmost important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many \nrespects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and \ninternational news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means \nthe global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts \nincluding US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, \nformer President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al \nGore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul \nMcCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the \nmost important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - - or this email address. \nMy very best wishes and my thanks! \nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:03:12 PM", "subject": "crazy", "body": ""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376.txt_7899	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026376.txt	Re: Follow up	[{"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International Arbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish upbringing.\nLet me know.\nBest,\nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve,\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more specific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, but as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition to being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!\nBest,\nKathy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 4:36:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "good however in writing would be best."}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt_7919	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030876.txt	Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms	[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Fareed Zakaria GPS", "recipients": ["Fareed Zakaria GPS <r"], "timestamp": "June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4", "subject": "Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column.\n\nSteve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018\n\nROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn’t have to be that way, says\nStephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. “If the\nRepublicans continue on the path they are on,” Bannon told me Thursday, “they will lose 40 seats in the House and\nPresident Trump will be impeached.” He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it’s a strategy that\nTrump himself seems to instinctively get.\n\nBannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who\ntogether won half the vote in Italy’s recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition —\nmixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. “Europe is about a year ahead of the United\nStates. ... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here]... . You could begin to see the elements of\nBernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics.”\n(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.)\n\nThe Republican Party’s strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing\non the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. “You have to nationalize the\nelection,” he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of\ntaxes. “This is going to be an emotional [election] — you’re either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you’re\nwith Donald Trump. ... Trump’s second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year.”\n\nBannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. “Immigration is about\nnot just sovereignty, it’s about jobs.” He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters\nwho see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and\nHispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, “You’re not going to be able to take the Hispanic and\nblack community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools . . . to the great jobs in\nSilicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition . . . from East Asia and South Asia.”\n\nNow this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley\n\nhas much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled\nAsian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt_7924	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032811.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2018 2:56:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\nOnce again you are right.\nSee you soon,\nWith my friendship,\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266.txt_7925	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266.txt	Fwd	[{"sender": "pa ul krassner", "recipients": ["Nancy Cain"], "timestamp": "12/3/2018 4:59:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd", "body": "Importance: High \nBegin forwarded message: \nFrom: \"The Daily Beast: AM Cheat Sheet\" <emails@thedailybeast.com> \nSubject: Michelle Obama Halts Book Tour for Bush Funeral \nDate: December 3, 2018 at 4:21:57 AM PST \nTo: \nAlan \nDershowitz: \nYes, I Am \nStill Jeffrey \nEpstein's \nLawyer \n1 The linked \nimage cannot \nbe displayed. \nThe file may \nhave been \nmoved, \nrenamed, or \ndeleted. Verif... \nLawyer Alan Dershowitz has said that he still represents \nconvicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty to \nsoliciting underage sexual partners whom he initially \nrecruited as masseurs. Dershowitz, 80, told Axios that \nEpstein \"has called me a couple of times about legal issues, \nbecause I'm still technically his lawyer,\" adding, \"I haven't \nhad any social, or any other kind of contact [but] you never \nstop being a person's lawyer.\" Dershowitz told Axios that \nEpstein lent his family his Palm Beach, Florida, house and \nthat he received a \"therapeutic massage with an old old \nRussian\" there, but he'd had no idea \"anything improper had \neven taken place in that house.\" While he was allegedly \nraping teenage girls, Epstein cultivated relationships with a \nglobal elite: Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's plane, nicknamed \nthe \"Lolita Express,\" numerous times; Prince Andrew's ex-"}]	1
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012628.txt_7928	IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012628.txt	RE: Proposed Letter to Special Master	[{"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "10/05/2007 07:48 AM", "subject": "RE: Proposed Letter to Special Master", "body": "Good morning, Jay. We need to resolve the attorney issue today. It has been weeks since execution of the contract, and there is no need for further delay.\n\nAs far as the five attorney names that we will be providing, I propose Bert Ocariz, Katherine Ezell at Podhurst Orseck, Stuart Grossman, Ed Rogers, and Walter Cobath.\n\nIf you would like to use the same Special Master to resolve fees disputes as well as to handle the selection of the attorney, I would recommend that we use retired 11th Circuit Judge Joseph Hatchett instead of Judge Davis because of Judge Davis's health problems. (No one has contacted Judge Hatchett yet, but one of the District Judges in Miami mentioned him as a good choice.)\n\nI am available for a conference call between 9:00 and 10:00, and between 3:15 and 6:00. Please call me on my cell and let me know which of those times works best for you.\n\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Wed 10/3/2007 4:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Proposed Letter to Special Master", "body": "Marie - I, too, am interested in speed. But I really need to go over this and then discuss with Jeffrey. So please do not send this to any Special Master before we discuss the next steps.\n\nThanks -- Jay"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026362.txt_7931	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026362.txt	Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "7/24/2015 8:47:39 PM", "subject": "Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today", "body": "yes, it requires a shot, its not a pill and so far no long term effects known"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2015 @ 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: FDA Approved a Potent and Pricey Cholesterol lowering drug today", "body": "Have you heard of this colestrol"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt_7934	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032567.txt	Re: I look forward to hearing from you	[{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific community.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\n\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference call on Skype.\n\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\n\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 10:15:52 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Until 3 p.m. EST.\nI will try to connect with you on Skype."}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025350.txt_7935	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025350.txt	Re: Is Donald still feeling good	[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "Of crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LAS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly , by\nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}]	3