Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025655.txt_8213	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025655.txt	Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly", "body": "FYI - Alice Fisher stated to be in the mix of potential candidates for new FBI director."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 5:47:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Search for next FBI director moves ahead quickly", "body": "i know"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025133.txt_8216	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025133.txt	Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric	[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of\nD.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51\npercent of population....\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\nI'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network\nor think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. I kid you not. their view. how else ,could one\nexplain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Lot of ruin in a nation"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:52 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "what was the consensus of your fellow attendees at the saudi conference. He, Donald belives everything is\nhonky dorey. . especially after the flake concession. tax legislation, being put together by the\ncommittees. . all odd"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:59:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Hard to tell.\nGeneral view Donald is a clown, increasingly dangerous on foreign policy."}]	9
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026548.txt_8222	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026548.txt	Fwd: Photos	[{"sender": "Guy", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:16 pm", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nphotos of unmasked B727,. Paint shop indicated we can use Vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting. this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses Vinyl for logos,.\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer,.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lvje", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 5:00:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt_8236	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031146.txt	J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits	[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "2/27/2012 5:50:08 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market 2/27/2012: Dire Straits", "body": "Eye on the Market, February 27, 2012 [the attached PDF is much easier to read this week, particularly if you are interested in the energy science implications of last week’s press release from the House Minority Leader]\n\nTopics: oil markets and Iran\n\nMost of this week’s note deals with oil prices and Iran, but I did want to point out a trend that is illustrative of how things are going globally. One of the strongest aspects of the US recovery has been the rebound in business spending on equipment and software. As highlighted by our friends at Hamiltonian Associates, sales by Caterpillar’s dealer network are a proxy for global trends. Caterpillar’s US sales are leading the pack for the first time in a while, Asia is moderating, and Europe trails with a distinctly negative trend. We expect a recovery in US payrolls this year, and eventually, in labor incomes. The US recovery may be weak by historical standards, but expectations are pretty low (2.2% growth in 2012). We expect the US to exceed expectations, and for Europe ex-Germany to disappoint them. Absent a blow-up in Iran, this view seems like it’s on track. \n\n“Iranium enrichment”: another hurdle for global markets to surmount\n\nThe near-term fundamentals don’t point to higher oil prices. Oil demand has been revised down a bit, particularly in the OECD, and non-OPEC supply growth is a little higher in 2012 than in recent years. After netting all the supply and demand factors, it looks like there will be a global oil inventory build in 2012 (see chart below), not something we would normally associate with rising oil prices. However, even before we get to Iran, there are other factors contributing to higher prices: a pick-up in global growth expectations for 2013 and beyond; the explosion of Central Bank balance sheets and associated reflation goals (see last week’s EoTM); and the possibility that China’s will build strategic crude oil reserves to the IEA standard of 90 days from their current level of 14. Note as well that the inventory build is a small one, nowhere near 2002-2007 levels.\n\nThat’s why Iran is a risk: a disruption would make oil markets even tighter, and drive gasoline prices up further. Even before the February spike, gasoline prices relative to earnings and income were starting to bite (2nd chart). The private sector can handle some gasoline price increases, but probably not much more than what we’ve seen already. The spread between retail and wholesale gasoline prices is low ($0.35, compared to a $0.35-$1.00 range), suggesting further retail increases may be in store.\n\nPeople like me now spend a lot of time on conference calls with geopolitical experts of different stripes. On one call, speakers raised the probability of military action from 30% to 50%. On another call, speakers mentioned that the US has “run out of senior military advisors to send to Israel, all requesting that Israel not attack unilaterally”, and believe Israel won’t. A paper by Matt Kroenig in Foreign Affairs magazine entitled “Time to Attack Iran; Why a Strike is the Least Bad Option” resulted in a firestorm of criticism from multiple sides. With sanctions appearing to work (Iran’s inflation, currency collapse, fewer buyers of its oil and a potential ban on Iranian banks from the global SWIFT payments network), won’t the US want to wait and see? Most of the US military establishment seems to take this view. The conjecture is endless. Here are a few points I found to be of greatest relevance as we sift through this:\n\n The US and Europe appear to take the Israeli attack threat seriously. Economic recoveries are just beginning to form in both regions, and there are elections coming up, so for politicians to ratchet up sanctions and drive up oil and gasoline prices, they must be very concerned that without tougher sanctions, the Israelis might act.\n\n Iran’s Fordow facility is key to understanding the debate about the effectiveness of military action, and why some are nervous that the “window for action is closing”. Fordow is estimated to be 80-90 meters below grade, and is suspected of being ready for uranium enrichment. The Iranians reportedly have ~80 kg of 20% enriched uranium (UF6), and need 25 kg more to convert it into enough uranium metal (UF4) for a nuclear bomb. The most powerful conventional weapon in the US arsenal is the Massive Ordnance Penetration device (MOP), a 30,000 pound bomb with 5,000 pounds of explosives. It travels at twice the speed of sound, and is designed to penetrate rock and concrete before detonating. However, it would probably take 4 of these weapons, dropped in succession by B-2 bombers in the same exact spot, to destroy Fordow [a].\n\n Military strikes could quickly escalate to engulf the entire region. While the Israel-Iran and US-Iran dimensions are important to understand, so too are the Sunni-Shia issues in play. Any complicity by Sunni countries in conjunction with US action (airspace, attack plans and logistics, etc.) might be seen as acts of war by Iran. \n\n The Strait of Hormuz carries 20% of the world’s oil (17 million bpd). There are active and de-activated pipelines in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the UAE that could divert around 5-6 mm bpd, and strategic petroleum reserves could be released. Even so, a military battle in the Strait could cause oil prices to rise $20-$30, according to EIA and GAO 2007 estimates.\n\nTo be fair to all the analysts, journalists and think tanks, there is no reason to expect greater foresight now than during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Iraq War or other military standoffs. This is a binary market risk that in our view justifies material consideration in portfolio allocations, and that’s about all we know. Our 2012 Outlook section on this issue was entitled “Learning to Live with a Nuclear Iran”, and that may very well be where this ends up.\n\nAs a reminder, since 2001, rising oil prices have coincided with a gradual exhaustion of conventional oil to meet marginal demand, sharp increases in operating and commodity input costs for oil companies, deeper exploratory and developmental wells, reliance on a shrinking number of deepwater fields, rising E&P spending by US oil majors to meet rising EM demand, etc. A simplified version of this dynamic appears below: as oil production rises to meet global demand, the sources for the marginal barrel become more expensive and more complicated. Without getting into the whole Peak Oil thing, I do think there is evidence that the marginal cost of oil will be a speed bump on growth in the years ahead, if oil production has to rise over 90 million barrels per day to support demand and the building of strategic reserves.\n\nOutput from the Congressional Centrifuge\n\nIn the midst of all the above, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi issued the following press release: \n\n“Independent reports confirm that speculators are driving up the cost of oil, hurting consumers and potentially damaging the economic recovery. Wall Street profiteering, not oil shortages, is the cause of the price spike. In fact, U.S. oil production is at its highest level since 2003, and millions of acres have been cleared for additional development. We need to take strong action to protect consumers from this speculation. Unfortunately, Republicans have chosen to protect the interests of Wall Street speculators and oil companies instead of the interests of working Americans by obstructing the agencies with the responsibility of enforcing consumer protection laws. They have also repeatedly opposed our efforts to end billions of dollars in outdated taxpayer subsidies for oil companies enjoying record profits.\n\nWe support efforts by the Obama Administration to expand domestic energy resources, including natural gas and renewable sources like wind and solar that create jobs in America and will end our dangerous dependence on foreign energy supplies. This can be achieved because today, the United States currently has more oil and gas rigs at work than the rest of the world combined, and imports of foreign oil have decreased.\n\nWe call on the Republican leadership to act on behalf of American consumers and join our efforts to crack down on speculators who care more about their profits than the price at the pump even if these spikes harm the American consumer and our economy.”\n\nI am of course not going to comment directly on this, for many reasons, including not wanting to spend my days at California’s solar-powered detention facility in Chuckawalla Valley. However, for anyone interested in the specific points raised in this press release, I have included some charts on the unfortunately binding constraints of science and energy economics. Enjoy.\n\n5. Now let’s get to the interesting part. The press release implies that natural gas and renewable energy can reduce American dependence on foreign oil (“end” is the word used). This is an appealing proposition, particularly with Brent oil prices now 5 times higher than natural gas prices on a BTU basis. So, let’s assume that the US wanted to cease all oil imports from Venezuela, Russia and the Persian Gulf. This would reduce oil imports by ~30%. If Americans still wanted to drive around just as much, absent an increase of 2.8 million bpd in US domestic crude production, electricity would have to replace the foregone gasoline. Ergo: how much wind power or natural gas would be needed, assuming electric cars at 200 watt hours per km? And what policies would be needed on fracking, eminent domain, and subsidies for high voltage direct current power lines to transmit electricity at acceptable loss rates?\n\nNote: the charts below only account for the foregone gasoline component of the imported crude oil. Gasoline is only around 45%-50% of total refined products. The US would also have to come up with suitable domestic or foreign replacements for the rest of the barrel: jet fuel, heating oil, fuel oil, lube oils, asphalt, etc. This is a topic that is often neglected in discussions about reducing reliance on foreign oil: we do a lot more with it than just drive cars.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029978.txt_8245	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029978.txt	Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 15 2016 03:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "How did they get access to this and how is it legal that they are posting this?"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt_8252	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030516.txt	Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward	[{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him? \nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - - or this email address. \nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson <peter@mandelson.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No !!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 5:26:02 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032571.txt_8259	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032571.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "{i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 10:24:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know yet .. larson should reply to me soon .. i will let you know as soon as he reply. are you in new york\nafter paris?\ni hope he reply soon as 1 want to catch my old man while he is there"}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt_8262	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032565.txt	Re: I look forward to hearing from you	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget\nCuts\n\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson,\nonce said, “The good thing about science is that it's true,\nwhether or not you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 6:56:49 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific\ncommunity.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\n\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York,\nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference\ncall on Skype.\n\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\n\nStanley"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026360.txt_8264	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026360.txt	Digital Currency Initiative	[{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 25, 2015 at 10:25:09 AM EDT", "subject": "Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "As Bitcoin and Digital Currencies have started to become an important trend, the Media Lab has launched an initiative in the space. \n\nI wrote a blog post on why I think Blockchain/Bitcoin are like the Internet: \nhttp://joi.ito.com/weblog/2015/01/23/why-bitcoin-is-.html \n\nThe way that Bitcoin is organized currently is that there are five core developers and around a hundred contributors to the core code. The five core developers are like Linus Torvalds of Linux. They decide what changes are made to the core code. One of the five is the lead developer, Wladimir, and one is the Chief Scientist, Gavin. \n\nGavin, Wladimir and Cory (an important contributing developer) were being paid out of a non-profit organization called the Bitcoin Foundation. A few weeks ago, it \"blew up\" when one of the board members declared the foundation \"bankrupt\". ( https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/1284-the-truth-about-the-bitcoin-foundation/ ) Many organizations scrambled to step into the vacuum created by the foundation and \"take control\" of the developers. We moved quickly talking to all of the various stakeholders and the three developers decided to join the Media Lab. This is a big win for us. \n\nAccording to the WSJ Blog: \nhttp://blogs.wsj .com/moneyb eat/2015/04/24/bitb eat-tackling-bitcoin-pric e-swings-with-eye-on-emerging-markets/ \n\n>> It's official, more or less: MIT's famed Media Lab has become the principal home and funding source for the small team of developers responsible for maintaining and improving bitcoin's core software. \n>> \n>> Gavin Andresen, who bears the title of Chief Scientist for the six-person core development team, announced on his blog Wednesday that he and two other core developers, Wladimir van der Laan and Cory Fields, had moved to the MIT Media Lab's new Digital Currency Initiative, ending their previous status as employees of the Bitcoin Foundation. The three other core developers, who draw salaries from different employers, will continue in that status. \n\nThe usually rather feisty community has been overall very supportive and I think it is because of our strong research focus and our neutral position. \n\nThe initiative has strong support from faculty across campus including crypto guru Ron Rivest and former Chief Economist of the IMF, Simon Johnson as well as faculty at the Media Lab, Sandy Pentland and Andy Lippman. \n\nMore about initiative here: \n\nhttp://joi.ito.com/weblog/2015/04/15/announcing-mit-dci.html \nhttps://medium.com/@medialab/launching-a-digital-currency-initiative-238fc678aba2 \n\nI hired one of Megan's former colleagues from the White House, Brian Forde who was in charge of figuring out Bitcoin at the White House and brief the POTUS on Bitcoin to run the initiative and he is doing an amazing job so far. \n\nhttps://newsoffice.mit. edu/2015/brian-forde-media-lab-director-digital-currency-0415 \n\nFred and Reid on the Advisory Council have been super helpful in helping us navigate this. Advisory Council member Jim Pallotta is also active in this space and joined our first and very successful dinner with Media Lab Member (sponsor) companies to kick off a special interest group for our companies. \n\nI am in discussions with Stanford, Princeton and Hong Kong UST to create an academic network for research. We are also participating in a policy network with Stanford, Harvard and Oxford. \n\nHappy to follow with more information for anyone interested in learning more or getting involved."}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "FYI\nUsed gift funds to underwrite this which allowed us to move quickly and win this round. Thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "4/25/2015 5:06:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Digital Currency Initiative", "body": "gavin is clever"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt_8269	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030502.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Just had mtg with Andrew. He is great.\nJee - i think that i would trade davos for a good fashion week. Much more fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 02:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i understand the ratio of run to leap is way too high"}]	9
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt_8270	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032813.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 1:58:44 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "where?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.txt_8274	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.txt	Re: Mechanisms for learning	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:43:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "you need workers as well as thinkers, you are focused on the individual. . focus on the group. . . you NEED distributions."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the world are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be more interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is general intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24.07.2016 um 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "23.07.2016 um 04:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought? Size is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . the more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the organizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used as signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. =\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotinal for me. most people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent abstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N. lets cal them L 1 - Ln. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or other method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for the layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get dfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions. .\nre taboo , maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. fire. potentailly a good thing for the species . the earths forest too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best describe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and \" developed\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a recapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little development. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail.\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as always very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like conceding anything on the conceptual one)."}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt_8276	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030874.txt	null	[{"sender": "eC", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2017 6:36:24 PM", "subject": null, "body": "OMG!!! Columbia university is so political involved and has such a strong feminists influence — !!!\nToday we judged Clinton about scandal with Monica Lewinsky, judged Hillary that she hasn't left him,\n\nand judged Vladimir Putin ...we actually mention him every day.."}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021538.txt_8278	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021538.txt	Re:, 31E-MM-108062, 03/27/2008	[{"sender": "New York", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "03/27/2008", "subject": "Re:, 31E-MM-108062, 03/27/2008", "body": "The NYO considers this lead covered. However, given the fact that there is the possibility that other minors are involved in the NY territory, investigation continues in this matter."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt_8279	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "______________________. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033492.txt_8285	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033492.txt	Fwd: Photos	[{"sender": "Lvjet < [email protected]>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nphotos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use Vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting. this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses Vinyl for logos.\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt_8288	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt_8295	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt	null	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:02:04 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt_8296	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt	Re: bad	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 8:27:13 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be beginning of the end of him...\n\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt_8303	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt	Re: Fw:	[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [jay@lefkowitz.com]", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031997.txt_8312	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031997.txt	High Profile	[{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "congratulate you on your wonderful financial successes since your days as\nmy Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good! !\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press\nprovides you with much benefit. Perhaps I am wrong? Not the first time! !\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging\ncertainly ain’t for sissys.\n\nRegards,\nJamie Rosenwald\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in\nAmagansett in November."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt_8321	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "V-BR Alireza ITTIHADIEH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 1:49:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of buyers in the US have resurfaced"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt_8322	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt	Re: boosting strategy	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Myster\n\nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/\nNew York Magazine"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we\ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have\nbeen.\n\nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate\nURLs per our call\n\nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on\na few top sites at no cost moving forward\n\nlam available for a call now or this weekend to review."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "2/8/2014 2:07:34 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Almost finished with a batch of content as well as a press release--you'll have it over the weekend.\n\nAlso the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey. I'll send you the URL when\ndone.\n\nTyler, could you check google highlighter?\nThank you,"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt_8323	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt	Re: Patterson	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt_8324	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt	Sam Fields on 302 Interview	[{"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Ken Jenne", "Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 15:48:27", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI\nBY SAM FIELDS\nGuest Columnist\nActually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called in federal court \"The 302\". It could screw the innocent and the unwary.\nThe newspapers and Browardbeat.com make clear that the Federal investigations that led to the arrests of County Commissioner Josephus Eggleston, former Miramar Commissioner Fitzroy Salesman and School Board member Bev Gallagher are just beginning.\nThe FBI will be interviewing everyone from County Administrator Bertha Henry to bus drivers about anything and everything.\nThey are looking for scalps.\nI suspect that if the average person thought about it, he would assume that when the FBI comes calling, like Joe Friday from DRAGNET, they \"want the facts and nothing but the facts.\" Equally important they want an accurate record of that interview so they bring a court reporter or at the very least a tape recorder.\nThe average person would be wrong.\nAgents bring a pencil and pad to take notes. They then prepare a summary of the interview called a \"302 Report.\"\nIf you are called as a witness at trial, prior to testifying, you will be given a copy of \"Your 302\" to review. It is a record of what the FBI insists you said at your previous meeting.\nIf your interview lasted more than thirty seconds, it is guaranteed you will find numerous discrepancies. Some of them will be insignificant; some of them could be material.\nAsk two people to listen to you in a discussion about a traffic accident and then write a summary. It is a guaranteed they will have differences with each other as well as with you, the witness.\nYou said, \"I am reasonably sure that the traffic light was green\".\nOne report takes out the equivocation and quotes you as saying: \"The light was green.\"\nThis brings us to Federal law 18 USC 1001. That statute makes it a felony to lie to the government. And guess who decides whether or not you were lying? The government.\nSo here is your conundrum. Do you testify about your doubts about the light, which is the truth, or do you adopt the \"302\" version to avoid the wrath of the FBI?\nWhether or not the \"302\" discrepancies are a result of stupidity or cupidity makes no difference.\nTestify in opposition to the \"302\" and you are in the crosshairs of the Feds.\nIf they believe your testimony cost them the case, the next thing you likely to hear from the FBI will be: \"Please place your hands behind your back.\"\nA number of years ago, fed up with the 302 Two Step, I turned the tables on them.\nIn a high profile case, my client was asked to submit to an FBI interview at their offices in North Miami Beach.\nFeigning naivety, I asked where the court reporter was. I was told there was no court reporter.\nI then asked where the tape recorder was.\nI will always be impressed that the agent was able to give us the response he did without laughing. He said the FBI could not tape the interview because they did not have \"enough money in their budget.\"\nIt was time to play the Trump Card.\nAt that point, I removed a cassette recorder from my pocket and explained that my client had been able to scrape together the 59 cents for a cassette tape. Further we would pay for the tape to be transcribed and supply them with a free copy of everything.\nYou could've heard a fart in a vacuum.\nThey now made it clear that no way, no how would any FBI interview be recorded. So we went forward with the interview as the agent took notes.\nMonths later the client was called to testify at trial.\nI warned him the \"302\" would be a work of fiction. It was. I was sitting in the back of the courtroom.\nCalled to the stand, he told the \"real\" truth and not the \"302\" version of the truth. The Assistant U.S. Attorney was frustrated and kept on confronting him with the \"302\" version.\nFed up with the prosecutor and in the presence of the jury, the witness preceded to recount my debate over recording from the first interview. Pointing to me in the back of the courtroom, the witness announced that I had warned him that they would pull this crap with the \"302\" report.\nIt didn't take the jury very long to acquit.\nWith the advent of DNA and groups like the Innocence Project, we have now seen that so-called unrecorded confessions have put many innocent people in jail and even on Death Row. As a result, agencies such as the BSO, now require all interviews to be taped.\nBut not the FBI.\nLike anyone, including lawyers, the FBI wants to control the record of the interview. Taping hurts that effort.\nI'm not saying that it is FBI policy to step over the line. But they have chalk on their shoes more often than you can imagine.\nSo, what's should you do if the FBI comes calling?\nFirst of all, the advice I am about to give is not for the a guy who was an inadvertent witness to a bank robbery.\nI am talking about people who are being interviewed as part of the types of crimes that are best described as corruption, RICO, white collar, etc.\nThose are the kinds of cases that involve tons of evidence. Giving an innocent, but incorrect answer to a vague question could leave any of us in deep CaCa.\nA case in point is the lead story in the September 26, 2009 Herald. Chris Walton, director of the Broward County Transportation Department, was interviewed by two FBI agents.\nHe stated that they wanted to know if \"commissioners attempted to influence contracts.\"\n\"I told them no.\"\nIt may sound like a simple straight forward Q-and-A but it ain't necessarily so. He may think his interview and public statement ends the matter.\nIn actuality, he has thrown down the gauntlet in front of the FBI.\nStart out with the understanding that the FBI is not investigating to see if there is crime and corruption in Broward County government. They already believe there is. They are only trying to uncover evidence to confirm their beliefs.\nWalton's blanket defense of the Commission has made the Feds conclude he is a fool or co-conspirator.\nThe FBI just needs the evidence and not much of it. To quote the late Supreme Court Justice William Brennan: \"any prosecutor worth his salt could indict a ham sandwich.\"\nThis means all evidence, regardless of its ambiguous nature, will be interpreted to support their assumption of wrongdoing.\nThey will be using software to go through millions of E-mail messages to look for key words. As Buddy has quoted me: \"The 'E' in E-mail stands for evidence.\"\nSo imagine the following scenario.\nSix months from now they uncover an E-mail from the County Manager to Walton stating that Commissioner X wants to know if the bid of company Y for new busses was correctly filled out. He replies that it was.\nMonths later he has totally forgotten about the innocuous E-mail. Based on the merits, he happens to rank Y's bid number one.\nYou can bet as sure as J. Edgar Hoover wore pink poodle skirts, the FBI will conclude this was code from Commissioner X to Walton to vote for Y.\nArmed with the E-mail you can be damn sure that the G-Men will be back threatening him with everything including a stint in Gitmo.\nAll of this might have been avoided if he had followed my three basic rules.\nMemorize them.\n1. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.\n2. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.\n3. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer."}, {"sender": "Ken Jenne", "recipients": ["Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 17:44:42", "subject": "RE: Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "FDLE is even worst."}, {"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Robert C. Buschel"], "timestamp": "Oct 13, 2009 08:07:09", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt_8326	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did she also drop civil case against you ?"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt_8330	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033486.txt	B727	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/27/2011 4:34:44 PM", "subject": "B727", "body": "Trump's B727 sold for 2.7M,.\nSean very discussed with me this company was interested, unless he call you,.\n\nFrom Sean:\n\nThis buyer did have specs on your aircraft. They were looking at a 3.0 million budget but did not make\nan offer and it was too low. we did discuss it"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032940.txt_8331	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032940.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 11:38:14 AM", "subject": null, "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. , now he shold probaby move here. :)"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt_8333	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032798.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 3:30:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you have 5 minutes today? You could actually help me on something \| think...(mizrahi bank wants to hire me)"}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt_8335	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt	Re: deception	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ed Boyden"], "timestamp": "7/14/2014 9:45:41 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "definitely"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:50 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching..."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am\nso very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this\nwill be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues.\n\nNeil"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt_8336	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 10:28:28 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Trump is still scheduled to depart Sunday between 4 and 6pm„ \nLet me know if we are firm for wheels up Saturday at 6pm still? \nThx \nLarry"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt_8339	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033066.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn't offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also, \ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down \nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes On conference finish in 10 min"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 11:27:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The rich and powerful ALWAYS send lawyers letters . A book about any one of them takes more time to \npublish as I must be -and I am , meticulous about documentation and back up"}]	6
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt_8340	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt	Re: TR: update	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:26 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\n\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in\nfact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt_8357	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt	Re: invitation	[{"sender": "Lisa New [lisnew@fas.harvard.edu]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 2:40:00 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Yes"}]	6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt_8360	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt	The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\n\nPresident Trump’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\n\nShared from Apple News"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt_8367	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt	Re: Fwd:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "train? yes ,1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler [kathyruemmler@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 7:48:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "ae : you have a chance"}]	12
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279.txt_8372	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:53:43 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt_8373	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. , now he shold probaby move here. :)"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 12:41:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Excellent !"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt_8378	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt	Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell	[{"sender": "Awitheridge@aol.com", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted] says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led [redacted] upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed [redacted] to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant [redacted] and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. [redacted] was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other men.\n\n5. [redacted] was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduce[redacted] to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where [redacted] had sex with him. [redacted] subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms Maxwell directed [redacted] to sit on Andrew's knee with Johanna Sjoberg. Andrew groped both girls. Ms Maxwell directed [redacted] after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with [redacted] to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. [redacted] was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew [redacted] age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade [redacted] to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped [redacted] even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two bruncttcs Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}]	5
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt_8383	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032997.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:19:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL\n\nIam seein a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she\nseems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship\nCommison it came through Woody and [EEE because she bundled best Jonathan"}]	1