thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033499.txt_14250
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033499.txt
|
RE: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt_14257
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032259.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "May 20, 2016, at 8:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "rest"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This is a stupid and exhausting trip. No more speeches."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak.?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 2:27:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Iam about to go on stage. The first part of my presentation is about Trump."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt_14260
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028648.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Sunes"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the\nnuclear issue is the wrong strategy\n\nRay Takeyh\n\nFebruary 14, 2013 -- On Feb. 26, the United States and Iran will once\nmore resume their diplomatic ritual, in the so-called six-party talks, over\nIran's disputed nuclear program. As the two perennial adversaries eye one\nanother, there are competing paradigms about how to deal with Tehran.\n\nAn emerging school of thought suggests that the best means of \"testing\"\nIran is to offer it a final nuclear agreement that presumably promises\nmeasurable relief from sanctions for significant Iranian concessions. Iran's\nfailure to grasp such an offer would then conclusively demonstrate to both\ndomestic and international audiences that the cause of the impasse is not\nAmerican belligerence but Iranian truculence.\n\nBut this approach fails to recognize that an arms-control process is\nnecessarily an incremental one, nor does it offer a practical substitute to\nthe existing step-by-step diplomacy.\n\nIran's nuclear program encompasses a vast complex of enrichment\nfacilities, centrifuge construction plants, uranium extraction companies\nand thousands of scientists working in university and government\nlaboratories. Iran is enriching uranium at both 5% and 20% levels,\nexperimenting with high-velocity centrifuges and seemingly in the process\nof constructing additional enrichment facilities.\n\nSuch a multilayered, multifaceted program can be dealt with only on a\npiecemeal basis, as the technical details and rules for inspections are too\ncomplex to be addressed in a single agreement.\n\nMoreover, should the United States offer Iran a final deal, Tehran still has\na right to contest and negotiate its provisions and offer counterproposals."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt_14266
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031988.txt
|
You should see this movie/documentary
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 8:26:59 AM", "subject": "You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "Inside Job (2010)\nNYT Critics’ PickThis movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York\nTimes.\n\nSony Pictures Classics\n\nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary “Inside Job.”\n\nwho Maimed the Economy, and How\n\nBy A. QO. SCOTT\n\n“Inside Job,” a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime\nwithout punishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The\nbetrayal of public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and\ndamaging than the adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than\nvillain.\n\nThe gist of this movie, which begins in a mood of calm reflection and grows angrier and more incredulous\nas it goes on, is unmistakably punitive. The density of information and the complexity of the subject\nmatter make “Inside Job” feel like a classroom lecture at times, but by the end Mr. Ferguson has summoned\nthe scourging moral force of a pulpit-shaking sermon. That he delivers it with rigor, restraint and good\nhumor makes his case all the more devastating.\n\nHe is hardly alone in making it. Numerous journalists have published books and articles retracing the\npaths that led the world economy to the precipice two years ago. The deregulation of the financial\nservices industry in the 1980s and ’90s; the growing popularity of complex and risky derivatives; the\nreal estate bubble and the explosion of subprime lending -— none of these developments were exactly\nsecret. On the contrary, they were celebrated as vindications of the power and wisdom of markets.\nAccordingly, Mr. Ferguson recycles choice moments of triumphalism, courtesy of Lawrence H. Summers,\nGeorge W. Bush, Alan Greenspan and various cable television ranters and squawkers.\n\nEven as stock indexes soared and profits swelled, there were always at least a few investors, economists\nand government officials who warned that the frenzied speculation was leading to the abyss. Some of these\nprophets without honor show up in front of Mr. Ferguson’s camera, less to gloat than to present, once\nagain, the analyses that were dismissed and ignored by their peers for so long.\n\nDozens of interviews -— along with news clips and arresting aerial shots of New York, Iceland and other\ndisaster areas — are folded into a clear and absorbing history, narrated by Matt Damon. The music (an\nopening song, “Big Time,” by Peter Gabriel, and a score by Alex Heffes) and the clean wide-screen\ncinematography provide an aesthetic polish that is welcome for its own sake and also important to the\nmovie’s themes. The handsomely lighted and appointed interiors convey a sense of the rarefied, privileged\nworlds in which the wall Street operators and their political enablers flourished, and the elegance of\nthe presentation also subliminally bolsters the film’s authority. This is not a piece of ragged\nmuckraking or breathless advocacy. It rests its outrage on reason, research and careful argument.\n\nThe same was true of Mr. Ferguson’s previous documentary, “No End in Sight,” which focused on\ncatastrophic policies carried out in Iraq by President George W. Bush’s administration just after the\noverthrow of Saddam Hussein. But whereas that film concentrated on a narrow view of a complex subject —\nthe conduct of the war rather than the at least equally controversial rationale for fighting it - “Inside\nJob” offers a sweeping synthesis, going as far back as the Reagan administration and as far afield as\nIceland in its anatomy of the financial crisis.\n\nPerhaps unsurprisingly, many of the highest-profile players declined to be interviewed. Mr. Summers\nappears only in news footage, and none of his predecessors or successors as Treasury secretary — not\nRobert E. Rubin or Henry M. Paulson Jr. or Timothy F. Geithner — submit to Mr. Ferguson’s questions. Nor\ndo any of the top executives at Goldman Sachs or the other big banks. Most of the interviewees are, at\nleast from the perspective of the filmmaker, friendly witnesses, adding fuel to the director’s\ncomprehensive critique of the way business has been done in the United States and the other advanced\ncapitalist countries for the past two decades.\n\nBoth American political parties are indicted; “Inside Job” is not simply another belated settling of\naccounts with Mr. Bush and his advisers, though they are hardly ignored. The scaling back of government\noversight and the weakening of checks on speculative activity by banks began under Reagan and continued\nduring the Clinton administration. And with each administration the market in derivatives expanded, and\nalarms about the dangers of this type of investment were ignored. Raghuram Rajan, chief economist at the\nInternational Monetary Fund, presented a paper in 2005 warning of a “catastrophic meltdown” and was\nmocked as a “Luddite” by Mr. Summers.\n\nMeanwhile, some investment bankers -— at Goldman Sachs in particular -— were betting against the positions\nthey were pushing on their customers. An elaborate house of cards had been constructed in which bad\nconsumer loans were bundled into securities, which, were certified as sound by rating agencies paid by\nthe banks and then insured via credit-default swaps. One risky bet was stacked on top of another, and in\nretrospect the collapse of the whole edifice, along with the loss of jobs, homes, pensions and political\nconfidence, seems inevitable."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt_14272
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032271.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Thorbjgn Jaglan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 8:42:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, terrible times. If Trump wins in US I'll settle on your island. Before that, I'll be in NY in September. Lot of things to talk about."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "tirsdag 28. juni 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you must be a very busy man\nhope to seee you soon"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt_14288
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:59:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt_14289
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032367.txt
|
Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate from Deepak Chopra's Tweet\nDownload the Twitter app"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 14, 2016, at 8:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "nice to ee you, we should spend some time getting the app and board game right"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 1:25:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "Yes\nWill do"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029299.txt_14290
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029299.txt
|
Michael Boccio
|
[{"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2011 4:01:33 PM", "subject": "Michael Boccio", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nRecently while refurbishing Donald Trump's 757 I worked closely with his Director of Business Development / \nSpecial Counsel, Michael Boccio. \nAlthough I have worked with some very intelligent and creative individuals, Michael is a real stand out — he is \nimpressive on many levels. \nSomeone (or organization) is going to be excited to have someone with Michael's capabilities working for them \nand thought that you may need someone like Michael on your team or have a friend who may be in search of a \ndynamic individual with his background and talent. \nPlease take a moment to read the attached documents to see if Michael is someone you are looking for. If not, \nI ask that you forward this e-mail to someone you believe would greatly benefit by having Michael work for \nthem. \nI know that I always appreciate when a friend refers someone who can be of great help to me — personally or in \nbusiness. \nIf you have any questions about working with Michael, please do not hesitate to call me. \nThank you.\nAttached: Cover letter \nResume \nTrump Letter of Recommendation"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029218.txt_14292
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029218.txt
|
Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers [as"], "timestamp": "10/9/2014 10:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "i have some ideas. call when you have a moment ."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Post Exclusive: Obama aides knew of possible White House tie to Cartagena scandal", "body": "I fear she should have pulled out last week."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt_14297
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]
| 12
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt_14299
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt
|
Re: P.S.
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:37:31 AM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "he can only be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.\n\nnot oath breaking. . impeachment not likely\n\n, but eventual resignation , a possiblitiy - maybe after a period of time. not for a while.\n\nmoney - its a privilege to help"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "I neglected to mention the importance of ACLU attorneys who have been receiving donations of many millions to aid their actions such as impeaching Trump based on breaking his oath of the affirmation of the constitution..."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt_14303
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032265.txt
|
Re: The book on you...
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Ladr1 iii iii"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": ["Story [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:54:43 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt_14304
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032415.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2017 9:11:37 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Where? Fair ..and you?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt_14307
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 11:04:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "looks like donald and mort are not to friendly..\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/ny-daily-news-calls-voters-mindless-zombies-after-donald-trump-wins-new-hampshire-2016-02-10/print"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt_14308
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027049.txt
|
FW: Tix for Jeffrey
|
[{"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin, \nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala. \nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information. \nLet me know how I can be of further assistance. \nAll the best, \nLena"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =) \nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night. \nSee you soon, \nKevin"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com)"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:21:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats). \nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. \nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access. \nI have the same ones (through Bill). \nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. \nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. \nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email! \nBoris"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt_14316
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2017 12:03:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is truly stupid."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431.txt_14330
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431.txt
|
Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
|
[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny <johnny.elhachem@edmond-de-rothschild.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future.\n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from you soon.\n\nTIIC\nTIIC Group backed by Edmond de Rothschild, is a pan-European infrastructure firm advising on mid-market infrastructure projects across Europe in both the transportation and social sectors. It was established in 2008 by the 3 founding partners of TIIC Group, Jaime d'Almeida, Manuel Cary and Francisco Mendes, with strategic support from the Edmond de Rothschild Group and Brisa.\n\nThe aim of TIIC Group is to bring an operational approach to infrastructure investments in Europe, drawing upon the extensive management and financial skills of its team members. These skills have been developed over many years at some of Europe's leading infrastructure operators and project financing firms which, when combined with the very specific infrastructure expertise of both the Edmond de Rothschild Group and Brisa, makes for a powerful and differentiated investment platform.\n\nTIIC Group operates from two offices in Lisbon and Paris, providing its team with access to relevant investment opportunities across key target markets in Europe as well as to leading industrial contractors, operators, advisors and financiers in the infrastructure industry.\n\nTIIC Group successfully raised a First Fund with €140m of commitments targeting transportation investments across Europe. The portfolio of the First Fund comprises 6 assets located in Portugal, Spain, France and Poland. They represent a carefully balanced mix of greenfield and early stage brownfield projects in roads and car parks. TIIC Group has played an active role in the sourcing and development of all investments and has made a significant contribution to value creation. TIIC Group believes that this is a high quality, operationally secure, cash yielding portfolio of assets which will be of strong interest to potential investors over the coming few years.\n\nTIIC has launched a successor fund, TIIC 2, which will build upon TIIC Group's differentiated approach to infrastructure in Europe. TIIC 2 will is targeting aggregate commitments from investors of €300m (€350m hard cap) to invest into both transportation and social infrastructure projects in Europe. TIIC 2 will also seek to invest, on a very selective basis, into greenfield social infrastructure projects in New Frontier Markets, within close proximity to the European Union. Given its powerful network of relationships across Europe and the operational skills of its team, TIIC Group will continue to target superior investment returns for TIIC 2's portfolio of assets. These returns should be in line with the anticipated returns from the First Fund portfolio which is forecast to deliver a gross IRR of up to 14% and a multiple of approximately 2x on invested capital.\n\nTIIC announced the first close of TIIC 2 on December 30th 2016, with aggregate commitments of €135m from a group of high quality and well-diversified limited partners. First close investors in TIIC 2 include the European Investment Bank and Edmond de Rothschild, both with significant commitments, as well as the TIIC team. TIIC 2 is also supported by a number of existing investors, together with several European insurance companies, pension funds and family offices. A second close is planned in the coming months and the final close will occur before the end of 2017. We have received significant interest from a number of European institutional investors, many of which are in the process of completing detailed due diligence on TIIC 2. We are firmly on track to achieve a final close of TIIC 2 before the end of the year.\n\nFurthermore, TIIC has announced the first exit from Fund 1, with outstanding returns. Three other investments are in sales processes and should close during the next few months.\n\nBRIDGE\nBRIDGE is an infrastructure debt platform initiated by Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management (EdRAM) to enable institutional investors to access infrastructure assets with secured and stable revenue streams. BRIDGE is a London based second generation debt fund sourcing and structuring transactions directly from sponsors when feasible and one of the few independent debt teams only investing on behalf of clients. The BRIDGE team has the ability to execute and deliver transactions as efficiently as traditional lenders as well as negotiate terms and conditions bringing optimised yield and security to investors.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform was set up as a new leg of EDR's Infrastructure, Real Assets & Structured Finance Team striving to take advantage of the expertise of the infrastructure sector acquired when the team became a global leader in PPP & Transport infrastructure financial advisory in 2011 and 2012.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform raised € 400m of new monies in 2016 and has successfully reached the €1bn mark of Assets under Management at the end of 2016. The platform comprises three investment vehicles (French FCT and Lux SIF) and is currently fundraising for additional pockets of liquidity:\no BRIDGE I reached final closing in December 2014 with approximately €600m of aggregate commitments from a club of institutional investors.\no BRIDGE I Dedicated Compartmentis a vehicle created by a large European institution and anchor investor of the first fund with a €250m target amount available for deployment.\no BRIDGE II reached first close in December 2016 with €150m of commitments in order to invest in three transactions. Fundraising for BRIDGE ll is still ongoing, targeting a group of institutional investors in Europe and elsewhere, with final target size of €600m.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform has a long-term European investment strategy and a mandate to cover all sectors of infrastructure, notably energy, renewables, utilities, transportation, telecommunications and social infrastructure and can execute project financing, refinancing and acquisition finance transactions.\n\nThe BRIDGE platform currently comprises investments of between €20-120 million each, in 17 European infrastructure transactions. In 2016 alone, the BRIDGE team has achieved financial close for 11 infrastructure deals in Europe aggregating ca. €390m. When benchmarked against other similar funds, the investment team has succeeded in deploying faster and with credit spreads well above the infrastructure senior debt benchmark, enabling BRIDGE to become a force in the growing institutions-backed infrastructure debt market. BRIDGE's ability to invest beyond the traditional definition of core infrastructure and to structure transactions was a key differentiator when Edmond de Rothschild launched this platform, as part of its commitment to real economy. BRIDGE is innovative in the sense that the investment team sources transactions directly from sponsors and is actively involved in the structuring phase, acting as Mandated Lead Arranger.\n\nBRIDGE comprises a large, international and skilled London based investment team of 11 investment professionals who between them have arranged more than €100bn of landmark infrastructure deals over the last 20 years across the globe. The BRIDGE team is among the largest within the debt funds universe and demonstrates the Edmond de Rothschild Group's commitment to the platform.\n\nKind regards,\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to 10% per yr with a kicker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 23:22", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "not likely in the states. too much money around. you should find a niche. otherwise competing with people that have a trillion dollars in credit needs"}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Pension funds are now interested to match the maturities ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/9/2017 10:45:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "yes, and their projections and needs are way above current spreads. . At least in the states hospitals are now looking to sell real estate surrounding complexes. . assisted living, baby boomers. . airport funds starting for rebuilds. but very large. rail ports and roads also gigantic. . . no politically correct but profitable is alternate incarceration facilities. , always tenants:)"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt_14336
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt
|
Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011
|
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\n\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth stocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle. Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on TV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen. I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good hamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling discussions. Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt ceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency. The implication: reservations about raising the debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then. This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt ceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States. Today, the proposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues. While a default is a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is bad as well. Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal Reserve would keep yields in check. That logic is irresponsible at best. Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way for a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest. \n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been raised up the flagpole and then lowered. By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3 trillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all). However, Congress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first. For now, we wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to. Last week’s Profiles in Courage piece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here. Here’s our take on what has been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what steps they recommend to get to that baseline first. For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s budget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71% debt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place.\n\nI have a feeling that revenue increases will be a material (e.g., 25% or more) part of the deal. The Peterson Foundation’s sampling of 6 policy groups shown below indicate that 5 of 6 recommend revenue increases compared to where we are today; the Heritage Foundation’s “Woody Guthrie Memorial Budget Plan” is the only exception. What kind of revenue increases? Raising the top two brackets, which would affect joint filers with adjusted gross incomes above $212,300, would raise $450-$700 billion over 10 years (depending on whether you use OMB or CBO numbers). If they cannot agree to raise rates, another option (as in the Gang of Six plan) would be reductions in the deductibility of state and local taxes, sales taxes, mortgage interest, etc. As this gets sorted out, let’s hope everyone recognizes that the US tax system is already progressive. As shown in the chart below, effective Federal tax rates for low earners have dropped to zero over the last decade, even after including FICA taxes. News reports that the US tax system is regressive make me want to throw hamburgers at the screen.\n\nEurope: Finally (!!), but now what?\n\nFor the first time since 2009, it felt last week like European policymakers were trying to get out in front of things. In exchange for a modest amount of “private sector involvement”, Germany agreed to more generous financing terms for Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and an expanded role for the EU-IMF lending facility (see following page). What would the plan accomplish if implemented? While Greek debt to GDP ratios would remain well over 125% of GDP (the IMF estimate for next year is a ridiculous 170%), Greece’s near-term financing obligations would decline, due to debt buybacks, exchanges into long maturity bonds, and interest grace periods on new EU loans. More broadly, the plan also allows for money to be lent to countries before they enter into an IMF program, for recapitalization of banks. All things considered, it’s the broadest defense of the Monetary Union so far. On paper, it even looks like a free ride for holders of Greek paper that don’t participate in the debt exchanges (they would be paid at par). So, what’s not to like? Well, there are still questions about Greece:\n\n** There’s a big difference between generous financing terms and generous economic terms. Greece must still meet an enormous 5%-6% primary budget surplus target (government revenues less spending, pre-interest) during a recession\n\n** Greece must execute on its asset sale targets, despite having little success or experience doing this in the past \n\n** Banks listed in the IIF document (the committee representing them) are under no binding legal obligation to participate in the debt exchanges, and may turn out to own less Greek debt than currently believed. [Note: bank participation in the Latin Brady bond era was high, since at the time, banks held almost all the paper, and in the form of illiquid loans].\n\nThe big question: would Germany still live up to the deal if Greece missed deficit targets or assets sales, if bank participation was too low, or if hedge funds (once referred to by the Chairman of the German Social Democratic Party as a “swarm of locusts”) reaped large free rider windfalls? Ultimately, this is a political question. If “yes”, Germany will underwrite Greece no matter what; if “no”, then a broader, coercive Greek restructuring might follow in the not-so-distant future.\n\nIn addition to execution risk in Greece, we are left with 3 other concerns. The current EU-IMF lending facility capacity is Eur 255 bn, but we anticipate that as agreed, national parliaments will expand it to 440 bn. First concern: while that’s to deal with problems in Greece, Portugal and Ireland, if you include Spain, it gets tight (note: the chart excludes costs to recapitalize banks). If Italy or Belgium entered Europe’s Liquidity Hospital, a lot more money might be needed from European parliaments (in one worst-case scenario, Alliance Bernstein estimates that the EU lending facility would have to increase from 440 bn to 1.7 trillion Euros, mostly from Germany). Italy faces a multi-notch downgrade from Moody’s, which is not going to help. As we discussed two weeks ago, Italy has been a model citizen in terms of running low budget deficits for 20 years, but still cannot escape the confines of its very large existing debt stock (120% of GDP). \n\nSecond, as shown below, Europe is now a two-speed economy, with the periphery stuck in neutral (industrial production is one proxy for this; there are others, such as unemployment, consumption, export shares, etc). If the idea behind the EU/IMF effort is that austerity will boost growth and lead these countries back to the public markets, there is very little momentum in this direction. If the status quo in the periphery does not change, all the EU package does is allow the current approach more time to fail. \n\nThe third concern: Germany as paymaster. We are often told that Germans across both major parties are unflinching supporters of the European project, and will do whatever it takes to prevent a break-up. The objections from members of the Bundesbank are described as lonely voices of opposition that carry no weight [a]. But how large are the costs going to be? German politicians and voters may see current circumstances as exceptional, and that if they just agree to one more package, the problem will go away. However, we are starting to see analyses of how costly a permanent transfer union may be for Germany. Bernard Connolly at Hamiltonian Advisors sent me a recent paper from the Centrum fur Europaische Politik in Freiburg, which provides some clues. They see three alternatives for the deficit countries: \n\n** massive reduction in regulations and unit labor costs to regain competitiveness\n\n** exit from the EMU, re-introduction of national currencies\n\n** permanent transfer union from surplus countries to deficit ones\n\nOn the last option, they estimate a “creditworthiness gap” in European deficit countries of Eur 108 billion in 2010. The gap measures how much European deficit countries rely on capital inflows to fund consumption, rather than investment (which contributes to future GDP). Germany’s share of the European surplus is around ¾, so let’s assume a pro-rata burden on Germany to maintain the transfer union. As a result, the theoretical economic cost could be 3.3% of German GDP every year, which as shown, gets close to some expensive episodes in German history. If German citizens were faced with costs this high, it could be a White Castle hamburger-throwing moment of national proportions.\n\nBottom line. At a time when European equities are trading close to 2009 lows relative to earnings and book value, this package could result in a relief rally for European equities, particularly banks. The chance of a disorderly default in 2011 has decreased markedly, and a process has been put in place to create more seamless transfers to areas (and banks) in need. But the size of the transfer union fund is not big enough to allay all concerns, particularly with Spain and Italy growing at anemic levels, and there is execution risk in Greece. \n\nRecent bank stress tests conducted by the EU concluded that only Eur 2.5 billion of capital needs to be raised (70 to 80 billion sounds more reasonable to us). And in the package announced last week, the following Orwellian clause indicates how European policymakers feel about rating agencies these days: \n\nPoint 15. We agree that reliance on external credit ratings in the EU regulatory framework should be reduced, taking into account the Commission's recent proposals in that direction, and we look forward to the Commission proposals on credit ratings agencies\n\nIn Europe, denial appears to be an essential ingredient to the process (See “Five Stages of Greece”, June 30, 2011). Last week’s package is a bold step towards Federalization and the worst-case outcomes have been avoided (money market failures, bank runs, etc), but markets will remain nervous about Europe.\n\nWhile we’re waiting: large cap growth stocks\n\nOne day, the melodramas around US and European sovereign debt will end. While we’re waiting, one of the asset classes that looks attractive is large cap growth stocks. As shown below (for a universe of 300 U.S. large cap growth stocks that meet certain earnings quality and stability factors), free cash flow relative to both revenues and stock prices looks good compared to the last four decades. This is where we believe investors should be adding exposure if they are underweight versus their desired equity allocations. This is also an asset class where active management can still provide a lot of value; the dispersion of large cap growth managers is higher than large cap core, large cap value and international equity manager dispersion.\n\nQ2 earnings season in the US is off to a good start. Nearly 30% of the S&P has reported, and results have generally been positive. Earnings are beating consensus estimates by almost 4% (7.4% ex-financials), all ten sectors are beating on revenue targets, and only 7% of companies are reporting below-consensus earnings. Given earnings expectations for 2011 at $98.50, the S&P 500 is trading at a reasonable 13.5x forward multiple. However, y/y earnings growth expectations appear to be flattening out for both 2011 and 2012 at around 11%-12%. While Q2 earnings are doing well so far, some company guidance for the remainder of the year has been below consensus, which would be consistent with the recent batch of reports indicating a slowdown in manufacturing and service sector surveys.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt_14350
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt
|
Re: High Profile
|
[{"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nYour name popped up again in the Press and I thought it was time to congratulate you on your wonderful\nfinancial successes since your days as my Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good!!\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press provides you with much benefit.\nPerhaps I am wrong? Not the first time!!\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging certainly ain’t for sissy’s.\n\nRegards,\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in Amagansett in November."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith PO"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt_14355
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 11:56:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was good...judge is new and afraid to go outside the box...maybe I should rep your buddy here...agreed to\n\nmeet pence one-on-one Thursday in de"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how did today go .. _ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-\nalleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343.txt_14364
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Free afternoon"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:56:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lunch tomorrow? Or after? I have 4:00 appt. anytime before works."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt_14373
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt
|
Re: Quick question
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc, \nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the\ngovernment in general, etc?"}, {"sender": "Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Do you want more free city for chanukH?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hmm perhaps. But I was thinking that I maybe wanted a speaker system for my room and bathroom..?!?"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 03:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "As always , whatever you want!! \nSorry for all the typos ."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt_14382
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2018 3:32:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025110.txt_14401
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025110.txt
|
Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious manner.\nAttached and below the same.\nDear Jeffrey:\nAs requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV series \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\":\n(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional understandings) to justify a major TV series?\n(ii) Even if 'yes' to (i), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?\nIn preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the \"Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams\" (2012) and the sole author of the forthcoming \"An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams\" (Cambridge University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.\nWhen we asked Patrick, his first response — \"This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story\" — and he cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and established, and (ii) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes (e.g., PTSD and Depression).\nTo understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that there are two distinct kinds of sleep — REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves (electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).\nFollowing are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.\nMemory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories. Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders. This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is 'down-regulated' (and the frontal cortex is associated with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is 'up-regulated\" (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep and dreams can enhance creativity.\nAs Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\nWarm regards,\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for —10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\nWhen good to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Apr 8, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "will be back in new york wed . happy passover"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 5:56:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Got it\nnnv"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt_14403
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt
|
Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011
|
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting. We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April*, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go. We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West **. We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan. But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n* The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak. Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday. According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined. This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized. John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week. I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”. We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant. However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991). It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President. His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. (Justice Felix Frankfurter). It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. \n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff. In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d]. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities. \n\nMy own business perspective has been limited to that small hotel and restaurant in Stratford, Conn., with an especially difficult lease and a severe recession. But my business associates and I also lived with federal, state and local rules that were all passed with the objective of helping employees, protecting the environment, raising tax dollars for schools, protecting our customers from fire hazards, etc. While I never doubted the worthiness of any of these goals, the concept that most often eludes legislators is: `Can we make consumers pay the higher prices for the increased operating costs that accompany public regulation and government reporting requirements with reams of red tape.' It is a simple concern that is nonetheless often ignored by legislators [e]. For example, the papers today are filled with stories about businesses dropping health coverage for employees. We provided a substantial package for our staff at the Stratford Inn. However, were we operating today, those costs would exceed $150,000 a year for health care on top of salaries and other benefits. There would have been no reasonable way for us to absorb or pass on these costs. \n\nSome of the escalation in the cost of health care is attributed to patients suing doctors. While one cannot assess the merit of all these claims, I've also witnessed firsthand the explosion in blame-shifting and scapegoating for every negative experience in life. Today, despite bankruptcy, we are still dealing with litigation from individuals who fell in or near our restaurant. Despite these injuries, not every misstep is the fault of someone else. Not every such incident should be viewed as a lawsuit instead of an unfortunate accident. And while the business owner may prevail in the end, the endless exposure to frivolous claims and high legal fees is frightening. \n\nOur Connecticut hotel, along with many others, went bankrupt for a variety of reasons, the general economy in the Northeast being a significant cause. But that reason masks the variety of other challenges we faced that drive operating costs and financing charges beyond what a small business can handle. It is clear that some businesses have products that can be priced at almost any level. The price of raw materials (e.g., steel and glass) and life-saving drugs and medical care are not easily substituted by consumers. It is only competition or antitrust that tempers price increases. Consumers may delay purchases, but they have little choice when faced with higher prices. In services, however, consumers do have a choice when faced with higher prices. You may have to stay in a hotel while on vacation, but you can stay fewer days. You can eat in restaurants fewer times per month, or forgo a number of services from car washes to shoeshines. Every such decision eventually results in job losses for someone. And often these are the people without the skills to help themselves--the people I've spent a lifetime trying to help. \n\nIn short, “one-size-fits-all” rules for business ignore the reality of the market place. And setting thresholds for regulatory guidelines at artificial levels--e.g., 50 employees or more, $500,000 in sales--takes no account of other realities, such as profit margins, labor intensive vs. capital intensive businesses, and local market economics. The problem we face as legislators is: Where do we set the bar so that it is not too high to clear? I don't have the answer. I do know that we need to start raising these questions more often.\n\n---------\n\nSo, there you have it, one of the more remarkable epiphanies in American politics: a paean to entrepreneurship and government restraint from one of its most progressive members. Public epiphanies like this are rare, but there have been others. Last year, Al Gore conceded that first-generation ethanol was “not good policy” given its low energy conversion ratios, and said he had supported ethanol out of “a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president\" [f]. In 2008, former Fed Chair Greenspan conceded that his Ayn Rand philosophies regarding regulations and shareholder self-interest were flawed. Perhaps the most famous epiphany was from Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense and one of the principal architects of the Vietnam War. In 1995, he conceded that he was “wrong, terribly wrong” about the war. George McGovern was one of the war’s fiercest opponents, saying on the floor of the Senate, “I'm tired of old men dreaming up wars for young men to fight”.\n\nThere may be no magic elixir of policies to speed the adjustment the US faces. Look at it this way: the US is trying the mega-stimulus route, while the UK has accelerated its fiscal austerity program. Yet both countries are struggling with below-trend growth and employment. Perhaps after a debt binge, there are no easy answers, other than time. What to do next? McGovern’s article suggests that an overly interventionist public sector may be the wrong answer, given the unintended consequences.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973.txt_14405
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "john and i agree that maybe you shoudl take money from edge. as opposed to me ,, if it helps"}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Richard and I have already been in touch about the transfer to the project I work with here at UBC, and it seems there is no problem (I'll check with our admin right now). Thank you, though!\n\np.s. What the heck is happening to the financial markets and how are you going to help?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "they are being feminized."}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well, you're the gyneconomist. Better get to work."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jennifer Jacquet"], "timestamp": "Aug 4, 2011 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i would need my speculumator to gauge accurately"}, {"sender": "Jennifer Jacquet", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/4/2011 8:21:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yuck. Maybe borrow one from Clinton?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt_14408
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027061.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017 11:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will begin"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland <thorbjon.jagland@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You should feel well for having done so much for us"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:26:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Makes me happy"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt_14415
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021241.txt
|
Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal | as |"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. 1 want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. Iam sick as a dog with a cold. Iam supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a\ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist?\n\nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the\nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show\ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on.\n\nT have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried...I have emailed three doctors this morning!\nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call.\n\nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in\nthe planes.\n\nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because it's 3D.\n\nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue....it's going to be highest grossing film in the world is an\nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal | as |"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow.. no cleaning. stay in bed.. sorry.."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt_14420
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt
|
January 20, 2017
|
[{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey,\n\nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!!\n\nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA!\n\nLOVE & KISSES\n\nBE for your BBB!"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt_14421
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:35:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are We meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "qR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}]
| 10
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt_14425
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt
|
Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 9:18:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'", "body": "Hello Jeffrey \nI understood very well that it is in the Congress's hands now; \nBut there are a lot of reactions"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030211.txt_14429
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030211.txt
|
Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/11/2013 3:22:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "---------- Forwarded message ----------"}, {"sender": "Fabrice Aidan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 11, 2013", "subject": "Fwd: (s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "You'll find it interesting. Warm regards\nEnvoyé de mon iPhone\n\nDébut du message transféré :"}, {"sender": "GBIU-MideastNews <GBIU-MideastNews@dentons.com>", "recipients": ["Cheves, Belle", "Gray, Alex", "Mahle, Melissa", "Seche, Stephen A.", "Dixon, Timothy"], "timestamp": "11 juillet 2013 16:43:09 UTC+02:00", "subject": "(s) 7/11, Atlantic Council (Hof): Syria: Blackberry Diplomacy", "body": "Atlantic Council\n\nSyria: Blackberry Diplomacy\nBy Frederic C. Hof\n\nJuly 11, 2013\n\nA friendly discussion about Syria with a former US State Department colleague gave rise to a point |\nwill not soon forget. \"Fred, there's no time for policy deliberations about Syria or anyplace else. We\nlive in the era of Blackberry diplomacy. We react and we improvise as best we can.\"\n\nAnyone under the age of thirty reading the above would probably think, \"Why in the world is the US\ngovernment using the Blackberry?\" Those who turned thirty long before the end of the last century—\neven those of us who try seriously not to be technological Luddites—wonder sometimes if the\ncommunications revolution and the 24/7 news cycle it has spawned will end up doing more harm than\ngood to the progress of civilization and well-being of the republic.\n\nThose who have had the privilege and burden of working in the US national security establishment\nare well-acquainted with how hard it is to find time to think. This was true long before the advent of\nemail and other forms of electronic communication. Although there may have been times when\nofficials could contemplate great matters of state at something approaching leisure, those days have\nbeen long gone. Even offices created expressly to explore policy options stretching beyond a twenty\nminute horizon—the State Department's Policy Planning Staff comes to mind—routinely get pulled\ninto the maelstrom of daily struggles to manage breaking developments through some combination of"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt_14434
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt
|
FYI
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2019 8:08:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "This is what I'm now going with--what do you think?\n\nIn the White House, the President, to general surprise, announced that he would not accompany his family to\nMar-a-Lago over the holidays—a confounding, even alarming, turn for anyone who knew how much he valued\na golf-and-warm-weather opportunity over any presidential business. Melania certainly had no intention of\nstaying behind. Among other issues, friends suggested that she was still furious about his fireside Christmas Eve\nchat with a seven-year-old boy, during which Trump asked the boy if he still believed in Santa. \"Melania didn’t\nthink that was funny,” said one aide. Trump was “clearly a guy who had never dealt with a seven-year-old.”\n\nIn an empty White House, Trump’s personal secretary, 28-year-old Madeleine Westerhout, brought his\npapers and call sheets from the West Wing up to the residence, finding him, she told friends, in his underwear.\nAnd herein, suddenly, was another subplot.\n\nWesterhout had been the elevator girl in Trump Tower during the transition. The comely young woman ferrying\ndignitaries and job-seekers up to the President-elect soon became something of a meme herself. Bannon recalled\nnoting that Trump took a particular interest in her. A leering Trump kept repeating, ““She’s got a way about her,”\nhis signature, and creepy, stamp of approval for young women.\n\nNow the president was telling friends that he wasn’t staying at the White House because of the shutdown—he\nwas staying because he was “banging” Madeleine.\n\nShutdown bravado? Locker room talk? Or all part of a new alternative reality that only he seemed to be living\nin?"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt_14439
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026580.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 29 2013 04:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Antigua: Land Of Sun, Sand, And Super Cheap Downloads\n\nby Jacob Goldstein\n\nhttp://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/01/28/170466137/antigua-_ land-of-sun-sand-and-super-cheap-downloads\nJanuary 28, 2013 3:07 PM\n\nSun, sand and super cheap downloads.\n\nAny day now, you might be able to download Argo, Lincoln and Les Mis for a dime a piece. Microsoft Office could go for a quarter. Asong might cost a penny. And it could all be perfectly legal under international law.\n\nAs part of a long-running trade dispute, the tiny island nation of Antigua and Barbuda (population: 90,000) won the right to use the intellectual property of U.S. firms — without having to pay any royalties or licensing fees.\n\nAta meeting in Geneva today, the country got the final go ahead from the World Trade Organization. The fight goes back to the 1990s, when a bunch of online casinos set up shop in Antigua. After\n\nthe U.S. cracked down on the casinos, Antigua complained to the WTO, arguing that the U.S.\nwas unfairly protecting its domestic casinos in violation of free trade rules.\n\nAntigua won the case. Typically, when a country wins a case at the WTO, it wins the right to, say, put a tariff on goods from the losing country. But Antigua is so small that tariffs wouldn't have any noticeable effect on the U.S. economy.\n\nSo Antigua took another route: It asked the WTO to recover damages in the form of intellectual property, and the WTO said yes. If this seems likely to cause harm to innocents who had nothing to do with the fight over online casinos, that's the whole point.\n\n\"It's so Bill Gates might ring up Obama and say, 'Why have | lost my copyright so you can protect gaming?” Mark Mendel, the lawyer representing Antigua told me. (By \"gaming,\" Mendel means the U.S. casino business.)\n\nTo be clear, the Bill Gates reference was hypothetical. Antigua has not yet said what it plans to sell or how it plans to sell it. And whatever it sells, it's not going to be able to sell all that much of it. The WTO said Antigua can collect only about $21 million a year in damages.\n\nIn fact, Mendel says, Antigua really doesn't want to do this at all. What it wants is to cut some kind of\ndeal directly with the U.S. that would revive the country's online gambling industry, or help create some other industry in its place."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt_14443
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch . He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When?...(did you ask him after or before he got his grand jury subpoena?)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "After"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 9:10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He shouldn't laugh off the grand jury"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt_14462
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:40:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031234.txt_14463
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031234.txt
|
URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
|
[{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\n\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.\n\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time.\n\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement.\n\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\n\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\n\nIncident 1:\n\n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C.\n\n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was “of age.”\n\n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n\n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt_14468
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt
|
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
|
[{"sender": "Miles Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "Dear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island's manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,\n\nMiles Alexander"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 7:43:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020442.txt_14478
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020442.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Il giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": null, "body": "paraphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise. Hell in this case would\nbe the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The “army of darkness” is already among us.\n\nIn Sacratissimo Corde Jesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve@bannon.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": "<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt_14484
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.txt
|
Fw:
|
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12: PM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\n\nJay"}, {"sender": "Alexandra Wolfe", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. would he be available to answer any of these on\nthe phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he\ncould tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the\ninformation I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\ncould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the\nsame clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-what is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt_14486
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:07:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil ina fundamental way"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030666.txt_14500
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030666.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:05:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep...order rod to fire him...rod would refuse...gets rid of him too...twofer...."}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033279.txt_14513
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033279.txt
|
POTUS
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/12/2018 12:36:12 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey, \nRumor at the PBI airport is President Trump is due to arrive PBI Monday the 16th and stay until 23rd or \n24th , \nThis means we can only arrive in PBI from Teterboro after the 16th. \nThx \nLarry"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032065.txt_14528
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032065.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "TE Darren indyke", "IM: Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 9:10:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/donald-trump-sued-sexual-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-claims/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt_14529
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020440.txt
|
Fwd: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Ban)"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 4:32:45 PM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It was that article in La Repubblica which you asked to be translated this afternoon.\n\nIn Sacratissimo Corde Jesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon [iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2018 11:25:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Translation to follow"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030882.txt_14537
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030882.txt
|
Re: A few questions just in case please?
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nDe eee eee ee ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 14, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to\nknow. ? is obama good for the country, .? israel? . if you could live one day of your lives over again, what\nwould it be?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 5:16:35 AM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Thank you! Was amazing! The best family dinner ever. Louis said they LOVED me! Thu both texted him\nafterwards saying that:)"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031544.txt_14540
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031544.txt
|
Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost
|
[{"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 11:13:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "it's just a start. we'll do more and push them up to the top in google search.\nshould be there in mid September.\n\nthank you for your advice too. You said women never sell and you was right. so I just sold my shares in one\nstartup. 10x in 15 months. wouldn't agree to sell if we didn't speak ;)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 24, 2017, at 4:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "good work. thx. when are you next on east coast"}, {"sender": "Si", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget Cuts | HuffPost", "body": "http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_599f532ae4b0d0ef9flc129d"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033245.txt_14546
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033245.txt
|
Barrack/Mexico
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/10/2017 6:35:55 PM", "subject": "Barrack/Mexico", "body": "Pitched him/his people on a profile a few weeks ago. They said they were inclined to do it but would \nhave to wait a bit because there are some things in the air. Without being specific. \nDo you think he takes it?"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033251.txt_14559
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033251.txt
|
Cuba trip
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "9/16/2017 7:57:47 PM", "subject": "Cuba trip", "body": "Jeffrey \nI've contact universal ref Cuba trip: \nAttached is current form they are utilizing,. \nSee note from UVAir below:"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032629.txt_14565
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032629.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in \nnew york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:26:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m prayingc4-14"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033114.txt_14584
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033114.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stephen Hanson [i"], "timestamp": "9/7/2018 3:17:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/trump-un-security-council-iran.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt_14594
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021406.txt
|
Re: Alexandra Wolf
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 02 09:02:02 2011", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-j effrey-ep steins-society-friends-\nclose-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "Just read Alex's blog. Its pretty harmless. \nDo you know Debbie Bancroft? Why is she giving quotes about you? She is a fat drunk with no money and a bad marriage. She \nwrites or did write a pathetic social column about losers. Did you ever meet her? She is a joke. \nPeg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "4/4/2011 12:21:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Alexandra Wolf", "body": "never"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012623.txt_14596
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012623.txt
|
RE: Do you have a signed copy?
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "09/24/2007 04:04 PM", "subject": "Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Hi Jay — Sorry to be a bother, but do you have a copy that at least contains Mr. Epstein’s signature? I need to pass it along to the powers that be. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C, (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Monday, September 24, 2007 4:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Marie - Please do whatever you can to keep this from becoming public.\n\nthanks -- Jay"}, {"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C, (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/24/2007 04:34 PM", "subject": "RE: Do you have a signed copy?", "body": "Thank you, Jay. I have forwarded your message only to Alex, Andy, and Rolando. I don't anticipate it going any further than that. When I receive the originals, I will sign and return one copy to you. The other will be placed in the case file, which will be kept confidential since it also contains identifying information about the girls.\n\nWhen we reach an agreement about the attorney representative for the girls, we can discuss what I can tell him and the girls about the agreement. I know that Andy promised Chief Reiter an update when a resolution was achieved. (Something I wouldn’t have promised in light of what happened last year.) Rolando is calling, but Rolando knows not to tell Chief Reiter about the money issue, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time that has been agreed to. Rolando also is telling Chief Reiter not to disclose the outcome to anyone."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt_14605
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "171,=•• \nSteve Bannon \nto me \nFeb 24 (1 day ago) \nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classifled-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437 \n\ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the \nrecord."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "onlyu slightly. ariane said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out \nWhat is Benjamin upset about?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Barf."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:33:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yup"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023205.txt_14608
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023205.txt
|
Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it \nwould take us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I \ntaped Woody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances?\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:36:12 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "write me a letter using only the top list and forward me his clip please"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031601.txt_14615
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031601.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl \nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump. \nBecause of this. \n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is \neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it \n-- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\" \n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am serious man -- for the good of the nation why not try to get some of this out there. I would not \ndo it myself, but would pass on to a political reporter."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:14:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "http://en.actu-cci.com/features/200-women-managers/8910-celina-midelfart-the-queen-of-glamour my 20 year \nold girlfriend in 93„ that after two years i gave to donald"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt_14621
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027063.txt
|
Re: Deal info
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anthony"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:27:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "funn, but quite a mess"}, {"sender": "A Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Deal info", "body": "Hi jeffrey, \nCam across this...perhaps you have some interest?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033100.txt_14631
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033100.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\n\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:13:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt_14633
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026569.txt
|
Re: Program & Attendee list
|
[{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/20/2012 1:23:57 PM", "subject": "a", "body": "How about this year's SALSS Project Manager SE - brainy and sensual!\n\nPicture attached!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt_14638
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt
|
Hello
|
[{"sender": "es ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 2:42:38 PM", "subject": "Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate ©? | moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich as there was a\nfabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I’m going to try to get on with Trump as an\nadvisor. He’s going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of Senior Financial Abuse in CA and FL.\n\nAlso, starting anew company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the earlier we catch\nit the better. I’ve been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it’s remarkable the results I’ve been\nable to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with people/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about\ngetting the best care. | stress ‘serious’ because | don’t want to get into a situation like as last summer.\n\nHow is Fred? It’s just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding a school\nfor his son... | think of where Fred could be today, and instead he’s probably locked up in his apartment with no help that\nhas dementia training — he probably thinks he’s crazy by now. Know you like Joe, but it was sad sad sad that he didn’t\nlet me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were the truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie\nMadoff too)....\n\nAnyway — the past. I’m charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it’s all highly confidential. A\ncustomized ‘mind-body’ enhancement to achieve the most out of one’s life! And, training for the family to help\n\ntransition to the ‘new reality’ with their loved one with later stage dementia.\n\nI’m in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator’s Club, and will stay over the weekend. Love to see you\nif you’re in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company - but Joe probably won’t let that\n\nhappen ®.\nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness, z=\n\nPS. Any idea how to get rid of this damn smoking gun article? It’s now the first thing you see when googling me..."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030699.txt_14650
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030699.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:42:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, yes, that's their continuing resistance speaking. But that doesn't change the fact that it is their ONLY option. AND it's a slam-dunk one. She would turn it around. If Dylan is coming out to speak publicly, Soon-Yi also has to. If Dylan is allowed to be the center of this story, Woody is cooked. If Soon-Y1i claims it--and she is actually the center of the story--everything shifts and they can make it their own."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not intellectually capable. . and frankly -unwiling. my shrink says ........"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers. no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which 1 believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times . two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist” platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}]
| 10
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt_14656
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt
|
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "G Maxwell <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:45:53 2011", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "just got it two minutes ago.. I ve asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure,, it is so salcisous and ridiculous, im\nnot sure how to respond,, the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis"}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Please make sure that every statement or legal letter states clearly that lam NOT involved and that I knew and know NOTHING about any\nof these allegations.\nI can't take any more of this my end."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032550.txt_14658
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032550.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barnaby Marsh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "since luck is not zero sum. cant figure out how to move up the curve."}, {"sender": "Barnaby Marsh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2017 2:55:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perhaps its not the important dimension? If some share advantages of luck and otherse dont, the curve flattens,\nor becomes bimodal. one can imagine the fomation of \"lucky enclaves\" where luck is actually manufactured in\na sense, and effects kept inthe group and further amplified. In a way, it is a kind of \"market\" to capture unusual\nevents or to create cascades of events that would be otherwise difficult to create, anticipate, or predict?. I was at\nlunch yesterday with Dan Rose and he was saying that all of the major real estate families in NYC (excepting\nTrump) collectively think of the longer-term consequences of their actions for the larger group of dynasties.\n\nHow do these \"intentinal\" actions affect the natrual probability distributions? Perhaps not at all (!!!) but they\nmight shift the curve or displace others at different places in the aggregate population (the curve). Lets keeep\nthinking.\n\nBTW, this also has implication for my life (and yours)- we want to be members of various \"lucky groups\"\n(physical, mental, emotional, intellectual, etc), and if we pick the right sub-group, there will be natural\nregression to the mean in that group.... so, surround yourself with people as gifted or more, and use the power of\nRTM? Sometimes, it only works if the gaps are not too large, but I have found it a very useful heuristic in life...\nin lots of areas.\n\nWhen are you back?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt_14661
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt
|
Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 5:44:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey <Jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033286.txt_14665
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033286.txt
|
Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton: Bill Richardson
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/4/2016 2:21:38 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton: Bill Richardson", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/04/donald-trump-could-beat-hillary-clinton-bill-richardson.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033292.txt_14670
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033292.txt
|
hello
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 4:21:38 PM", "subject": "hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nAre you going to survive with Trump? \nAre you coming to Cannes for Woody's movie? \nBig kiss"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032544.txt_14674
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032544.txt
|
Re: Still in NYC
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:57:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Do you think this means anything more than that it is Italy?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "His son was in my son's class at Collegiate."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Krumholtz"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Who is your colonoscopy man?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Colonoscopy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Breakfast?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "New York tonight"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "I've been cancelled on for today. Appears everybody gone to ground. Seems Priebus decision expected."}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031593.txt_14678
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031593.txt
|
Re: Today...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Have you read? When's good to talk?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "be back on land around 4"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wola"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 4:20:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about\nwomen, 1 thought we modified that."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030245.txt_14686
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030245.txt
|
the story
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 1:35:22 PM", "subject": "the story", "body": "1. all the girls discussed in the press , came to the house , to give erotic massages. each and every girl , each \ntime, came in exchange for money. many of the girls interviewed were in their mid twenties early thirties, no \nsearching for underage girls. many of the girls worked in the local massage parlors. ( advertised everyday in \nthe palm beach papers. , referred in the local vernacular to \" jack shacks\". 5 within 4 miles of the intl airpot. \n) or strip clubs.. ( both of the girls bringing the cvra case ). \n2. There have been discussios of a house full of underage photos. the video taken by the police contradict that \nin its entirety \n3 there have been discsussion about hidden video cameras, they were put there with the HELP of the local \nPolice , in order to catch a thief money had been going missing , and the police cam , set up cameras, and \none night hid in the bushes hoping to catch the thief in the act. It turned out to be the houseman. who \nconfessed, . there were never any hidden cameras anywhere besides the garage and the camera in the living \nroom focused on the place where money was kept \n4. The police conducted a search, and found adult sextoys, I am an adult, they made a point to say that there \nwas a purple plastic sex toy„ but later without correcting their earliler assertion disconver it was nothing but a \nsalad fork \n5. The girl whose parents initiated the investigation, told the police in a sworn statment that she had lied about \nher age to gain access to the house. she said she tried her best to appear over 18 , as she wanted to be invited \nback, there was not trolling for anyone underage. \n6. many if not most of the girls , invited their friends , best friends after they had left. hardly a normal result \nif there had been any coercion or anytrhing untoward. \n7, many of the girls had their boyfirends wait downstairs, or in some instances their parents. not one \ntime did anyone ever complain of mistreatment , \n8 there was never ever any drugs , alcolhol, threats, coercion \n9 the local sex crimes prosecutor, lana belahovilc , interviewed the girls herself , and concluded in her own \nwords dire wer no real victims here. just local prostituion. she offer a 5 year probation sentence with no \nregistration. . Alan dershowitwz told me I shouldnt take it. it was too dangerous. not telling me that my \nprobation would have been moved to my home in the virigin islands. then the prosecutors to be \nfair presented their information to a grand jury, the ONLY time a jury would see any of the claims, the result \nwas a charge of soliction of prostituion . a crime with a mandatory release after taking a harms of prostiution \ncourse. This was a grand jury determination. \n10. local. no transportation across state lines, contrary to outragious and hbeious \nallegations, no trafficking. it is a disservice to women who are trafficked to compare a woman brought into \nthe country , tied to a bed, given drugs to have sex with strangers for money that she doesnt get. . to girsl who \ntook a taxi to my house, had food snacks and got paid, then went shopping with her friedns and back home. \n11/ the fbi decided to pursue a highly unusual case. their position was that my secretary , not ire, called girls \non the telephone and asked them if they would like to work. . many times as the message pads reveall the \ngirls called over and over again askking to work, hardly coercion ( the latest \ncases REQURE coercion, which states it is NOT for making appts ....... \n12 THe fbi, threatend many statutes if i would not plead guilty to a state crime, they suggested that a cell \nphone was a means of interstae commerce ( similar to perverts who troll the intern& , in searhc of underage \ngirsl , and in each and every one of those cases the govt is required to confirm , and they do,that the person \nKNEW or that the person on the other end of the computer was underage. . all stings hve the police stinger ask \ndont you know that i am 14, 13 etc. there was never any such conversation with anyone. \n13. the govt said that traveling to my homeof 15 year in florida, ccould be considered traveling for thepurpsoe \nof underage sex. never before anyone not crossing state lines with a person , charged with a crimge for going \nhome \n14. the gov said that they would not bring an indictment if i plead guilty to being a pimp.( a crime in florida \nthat REQUIRES the pimpt to earh money off the the girls , ( regster as a sex offender ) and pay a list of girls \nwhose names they would provide me only AF l'ER the fact. and AF l'ER i was in jail. I would have to agree \nNOT to contest any claim by anyone they put on the list . when I attempted to do so , as i never met some of \nthe people on the list. I reived a letter stating that any attempt to question their story would result in a breech of \nmy agreeernnt. \n15. If I had tto do it over I hope i would have shown much better judgement as many of the girls came from \nunderprivleged familys and i was unaware of the potential for halm. \n16. , has said she was a sex slave. . she has now admited she lied about her age. she was \nnever 15. she has changed th story on my wikipieia page , but no press statment. she said that clinton was on \nthe island, not true, she said ghilsane flew him in a black helipcopter, I did not have a black heli and she \nnever flew him, she said that al gore and wife were on the isalnd never happened, she has accused a prime \nminisnter a senator a prinve. a sceintist, alan dershowitz. a many in his seventies with his wife in \nattendance. sex on a plane with secret service and dimplanic protection people looking the other way. . she \nhad an arrest warmat for her as she stole money from the restaurnat at which she worked, she had before made \nclainds of sexual assualts but the prosecutro said she had no creidbility , 1 emiails , suggst \nadding alan dershowitz to her complaint. emails suggest•might have comminted pergury \n. she has said that the house had many photos of underage girls , a recent press realease clearly shows \nanother lie. \n17, the press has labled me a pedophile a disgusting term for men atracted to pre pubcesnet girsl. . these \ngirls worked in a strip club. . Not one person ever testified that they were asked to bring underage girls , in \nfact the opposite. all said they were told on one under 18. fbi foia request . confirms \nwealth was not used as an advantage, the local police chief said this case was bigger than rush limbaugh, . no \none had ever faced a federal charge for having prostituies in their own house. no violence coercion. etc \n191 the police released to the press, the raw statements of the girls. not one was ever questioned by opposing \ncounsel. ."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032832.txt_14687
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032832.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the girls.? react to the fact that the case was settled but the lawyers wanted to trumpet their success."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think it's a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don't think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case--with it's Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "should i , or you reach out to matt. or sean. or ?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 1:34:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think you should reach out to Matt. Moonves' guy, who I had lunch with yesterday, says he would probably use Hiltzig."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.txt_14692
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.txt
|
Re: trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "we called it"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "Yeah.\nOnce you asked me who I would like to see talking to Noam. Here is a guy! Can you arrange it? He could \nmake good use of Noam's advices."}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:37:59 PM", "subject": "Re: trump", "body": "I knew even before the primaries. Announced in meetings, lunches and dinners, just to receive a look of \ncontempt and disbelief \nNow I want my position as a political analyst (preferably in the White House)."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt_14698
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt
|
Re: update
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 8:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:00 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\ni i\nMe tee mem ane nines nines hn iene mh mine meaner NR cis shy ish nin im a inom nm ce nine nei nee NSE RR OREM NN 3"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\n\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt_14699
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt
|
Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21
|
[{"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "View in browser\n\nPro Rata\n\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva -Feb 21, 2018\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops\nand tips at kia@axios.com or find me on Twitter at @imkialikethecar."}, {"sender": "Steven Sinofsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below...\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures\nfounder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing\n—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors\n\nthat she should get a male co-founder.\n\ne She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before\n\nremembering it's rooted in sexism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steven Sinofsky"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:55:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Thx for taking the time"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032273.txt_14706
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032273.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/7/2016 1:15:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2016, at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032417.txt_14710
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032417.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fair ..and you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Where?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Jan 9, 2017, at 4:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "are you coming to my coast anytime soon?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2017 5:10:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No plans ,but I will make some!"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032267.txt_14712
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032267.txt
|
Hi from London
|
[{"sender": "Cecilia Steer ns", "recipients": ["JE gmail [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 9:58:45 PM", "subject": "Hi from London", "body": "Hi Jeffrey!\n\nI'm so sorry to hear about the Trump law suit. I wish there was something I could do. I always think of you.\nAll my love always,\n\nCecilia"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt_14714
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026970.txt
|
Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?
|
[{"sender": "Quora Digest [digest-noreply@quora.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/6/2019 8:06:22 AM", "subject": "Why do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\n\nTOP STORIES FOR YOU\n\nWhy do gangs punish members who attempt to leave the gang?\n\nae\n\nJoe Crandall, lived in Compton, CA\n\nWhen gangs take new soldiers or gang members join a gang they are subjected to the ritual\n“Jumping In”. Jumping in members is like the final last part of a job interview, t...\n\nRead More »\n\nAS an aviation expert do you think that grounding of Boeing 737 MAX\nworldwide is an over reaction?\n\nre\n\nWayne Magor, Principal Software Engineer (Avionics)\n\nI do not consider the grounding to be an overreaction. There appears to be some kind of\nproblem with the aircraft. It is not normal to have 2 crashes within 5 months. Neith...\n\nRead More »"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032961.txt_14717
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032961.txt
|
Re: Trump!
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "ohno , you too/ I have been fielding similar emails calls texts ALL DAY, it will all turn out\n\nok. shaking things up will bring about hopefully positive change. . he won and his people won , this is\nwhat his people want. cant be sore losers."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "How are you explaining this to your Saudi friends? Can't believe logical people like Barrack would\n\nsupport such insanity."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "I gave him benefit of doubt on a whole bunch of stuff and agree that we need to shake things up. But\nthis ban is just wrong and I really don't see how it helps him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "1/29/2017 9:59:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump!", "body": "IT helps as he is seen to be keeping his word, it is importnat with putin and north korea. —_as you notice north\nkorea has not fired there missile that he promsied wouldnt happen. obama was never able to effecturate\nthat. . that being said Donald is fucking crazy I told you that"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031008.txt_14720
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031008.txt
|
Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael J. Pike"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:24:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032949.txt_14725
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032949.txt
|
Re: Presidential inauguration
|
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Should I accept the invitation sent by Tom barrack"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Do you think it will be possible to shake hand with trump"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayern"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 11:29:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "1 561 655 7626 call to discuss if you are free"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "Jan 6, 2017, at 3:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "very many people going. it will be very crowded. but if you can meet some before or after in either wash or\nny, it might be worth it. . but unlikely"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031020.txt_14728
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031020.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower! Worked most of fight.\n\nLets plan rather to meet tmr.\n\nLets talk tmr.\n\nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun.\n\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:45:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "perfect"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032359.txt_14729
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032359.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:13:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties and meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with the Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you in Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033047.txt_14730
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033047.txt
|
Re: Marilyn
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arlme for the week you are in NY?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate \nBrianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should \nhave Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 11:58:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "ok"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt_14731
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt
|
your statement?
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: your statement?", "body": "Ha, the sequel comment is great. But I don't think it's my place to discuss her accusations of other people...I know nothing about it and never met her or Clinton. \nThe points I can legitimately address are the nature of my involvement with you and some smoking gun allegations by the other girls. I will talk to a lawyer this \nweek. \nIt could really be fun if I made a viral video that showed how easily people can be fooled, followed by a statement saying the stories are obviously false. If it's fun, \ntabloids may cover it... \nBtw, I was invited to go to Davos...does not seem like such a good idea at the moment"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19, 2015 7:13 PM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort \n. She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her \nstory is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( \nclinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small \neven for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, \nshe was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime \nmininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island„ sex on a \nsmall airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the \nwindow during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent, but \nnow , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations\" is frankly silly. ok, to play \nalong I deny each and every allegation . The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have \nsex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031746.txt_14740
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031746.txt
|
F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/9/2018 8:04:42 PM", "subject": "F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen", "body": "https: //ww.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/fbi-raids-office-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael -\ncohen. htm1?smid=p1-share"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030005.txt_14758
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030005.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon [nn"], "timestamp": "2/28/2018 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Ribis's Italian immigrant parents taught him to be tightfisted, but it was the Donald who introduced him to\ndealmaking. As a kid in the New Jersey suburbs, Ribis rose before dawn to count the empty soda bottles at the\nfamily deli \"so the suppliers couldn't cheat my mom on the deposits.\" When Trump faced bankruptcy in 1989,\nhe turned to the team of Ribis and Steve Bollenbach, now CEO of Hilton Hotels, to fend off the banks and\nbondholders. Ribis helped persuade creditors to let Trump keep his trophy holding: his casinos. It was the\ngaming company's IPO in 1995, orchestrated by Ribis, that restored Trump's wealth."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180.txt_14763
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "anasalrasheed@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying44"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :) \n\nonly you please"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table \nin new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you \nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Sep 21, 2017 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2017 3:40:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "for now.. i m leaving monday .. but all depends on my meeting with him. as far as i know, he will be there for \nanother week but i will know more sunday. i will make sure to keep you updated"}]
| 12
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029232.txt_14764
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029232.txt
|
Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Sullivan, John", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI’m John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I’ve been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein’s Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033053.txt_14766
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033053.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:02:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "not that i know of"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032785.txt_14771
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032785.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/18/2018 12:12:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried u. Am at 6178179452"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\n\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026450.txt_14780
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026450.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 3:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume no dinner"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 8:09:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028620.txt_14790
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028620.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/23/2018 2:04:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Looks like Mick Mulvaney is out before he starts - knew it after his comments about arr came public-"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033316.txt_14795
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033316.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "S", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/18/2018 8:17:46 PM", "subject": null, "body": "I like the confidence that Bob talked about it .... it’s a real lesson of how to be strong\n\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/04/transcript-phone-call-between-president-trump-journalist-\nbob-woodward/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7fb34bce85d22\n\nTranscript: Phone call between President\n\nTrump and journalist Bob Woodward\nAaron Blake\n\nPresident Trump and Bob Woodward discuss Woodward’s new book, “Fear,” before its\npublication. (The Washington Post)\n\nBob Woodward, an associate editor at The Washington Post, sought an interview with\n\nPresident Trump as he was writing “Fear,” a book about Trump’s presidency. Trump\ncalled Woodward in early August, after the manuscript had been completed, to say he\n\nwanted to participate.\n\nOver the course of 11-plus minutes, Trump repeatedly claimed his White House staff\n\nhadn’t informed him of Woodward’s interview request — despite also admitting Sen.\n\nLindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had told him Woodward wanted to talk. He also started the\nphone call by saying Woodward had “always been fair” to him, but by the end he said\nthe book would be “inaccurate.”\n\nThis is a transcript of that call, with key sections highlighted and annotated. To see an\nannotation, click on the yellow, highlighted text.\n\nTrump: Hello, Bob.\n\nBW: President Trump, how are you?\n\nTrump: How are you? How are you doing? Okay?\n\nBW: Real well. I’m turning on my tape recorder, with your permission.\nTrump: Oh, that’s okay. That’s okay. I don’t mind that at all.\n\nBW: I’m sorry we missed the opportunity to talk for the book.\n\nTrump: Well, I just spoke with Kellyanne [Conway] and she asked me if I gota call. I\nnever got a call. I never got a message. Who did you ask about speaking to me?"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022673.txt_14800
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022673.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm'er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:26:02 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Attachments: image006.png; image007.png; image005.jpg; image010.jpg; image001.jpg; image003.jog; image008.png;\nimage004.jpg; image002.jpg; image009.png\n\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 12:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Plenty Of Innuendo, But No Hard Evidence Of New Clinton\nSex Scandal\n\nMuch-discussed documents in Jeffrey Epstein affair don’t live up to the hype.\n\nKen Bensinger\n\nBuzzFeed News Reporter\nShare\n\nTweet\nShare\nShare\nShare\nShare\nTweet\nShare\n\nShare"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt_14809
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
|
Kuhn
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you, but sleep is not going to be it. . I have read quite alot and frankly , the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights, just more questions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now becoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own ( yet )."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Appreciate consideration. I'm next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really like to do something (important) together. Just arrived in Beijing for the \"The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation\" (commentating), the second most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not paying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "May 9, 2017, at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "plant biology. ? great experiments being done. rarely looked at before. root communication. No , I have not lost my mind, . If done well , you would get lots of press. cutting edge technologys for optogenetics , experiments that dont require IRB approval. . its very exciting. do plants get an alzheimer equivalent placque, . als disease. parkinsons , yes it seems so. most cancer drugs are plant derivatives. / lots of fun . good luck in china"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/11/2017 5:38:37 AM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Ruminating (in Beijing traffic) on plant biology and ways to structure possible Closer To Truth (CTT) series to portray your sense and insights. For plant biology per se, there's probably three strong episodes, with higher production values needed to illustrate ideas/principles (more than the usual CTT talking heads). To fit the CTT framework (and audience expectation), these fascinating discoveries or hints of complex, multifarious mechanisms would need to be explored (even if not yet understood) in terms of simple, fundamental principles (applicable across disciplines - so-called 'general systems theory'). This potential series on plant biology could be extended to 5-6 episodes by including medicinals - plant derivatives that are, for some conditions, best treatments for numerous diseases. This could include, for example, a critical look at Chinese medicine. I think, though, there is a bigger idea lurking here. Your unique ways of thinking, exemplified by plant biology, encourages another, larger possibility for a significant CTT series. Each of the topics you've brought up, and many of your past fundings, sought kinds of breakthroughs or radically new ways of approaching reality and the knowledge and manipulation of reality. So, how about producing a big CTT series on just that - \"Radical Breakthroughs\"? I can imagine CTT episodes on each of the following kinds of topics you've mentioned, in which radical breakthroughs or deep structural significance are being appreciated: - Plant Biology - Deception (biology) - Power Laws (\"found everywhere in nature, Pareto, law of large numbers\") - New Math (\"category theory, membrane computing, as a new tool for cognition\") - Mathematics and Truth - Music (\"a tool to interogate the brain, not a product of but a lense into the inner software\") - Dreams (\"always on, consciousness blocking access, schizo have sleep disorders\") - Power (nature,as you said, \"financial, physical, intellectual, ability to do things in a local space\") I'm sure there are other such categories of 'radical breakthrough' - for example, several wild ideas in neuroscience, such as levels of information from sub-cellular to massive circuitry. We would clearly unify the topics and episodes with an overarching thematic vision of \"radical breakthroughs\" that \"challenge conventional wisdom\" (this phrase was an early Closer To Truth subtitle). Several of these topics can have more than one episode. We can easily produce 13 high-quality episodes and thus have a coherent full season on \"Radical Breakthroughs\", which would be distributed and marketed as such. Such an approach to \"Radical Breakthroughs\" is core CTT - in fact, I attempted this as part of the very first CTT series in 1999/2000 \"How do Breakthroughs Change Science\" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; child psychologist Rochel Gelman; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/how-do-breakthroughs-change-science \"What are the Big Questions of Science?\" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; theoretical physicist Steve Koonin; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/what-are-the-big-questions-science Though the production values of these early shows are much lower than our current version (since 2008), the content and contributors suggest how CTT can do a big new series - a full season of 13 episodes - on \"Radical Breakthroughs\". Appreciate specific direction, so that when we meet, I can be prepared Love to do something big and dramatic together. Robert"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt_14811
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt
|
Re: thoughts
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never\nquestioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her\nname. however during the entire Ee time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me\nalmost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers jl She\nnever saw anything that MMMIclaims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends\netc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time\nasking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I\nhad promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has\nphotos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no\nsex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old\nnow and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their\nbest friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly\nlooked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8.\nanswered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to\n\n2\n\n60."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 2:54 PM", "subject": "Re: thoughts", "body": "I don't think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let's discuss. I have an idea about\nhow to best use. Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt_14812
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026619.txt
|
trump interview with anderson cooper
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2015 7:39:58 PM", "subject": "trump interview with anderson cooper", "body": "he is a character..\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/22/trump_to_anderson_cooper_during_interview_the_people_do\nnt_trust_you_and_the_media.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026322.txt_14815
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026322.txt
|
Re: This morning
|
[{"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 6:05 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Hi Larry,\n\nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I’m glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman’s commitment to the project is impressive.\n\nI AM serious about working on this---it’s a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics\n\nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter’s favorite candidate ----- in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.\n\nBest wishes, Eric"}, {"sender": "4S", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "I get that formal argument\n\nWhat about aspects not quite in model. More folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit.\n\nSeparately I pitched this to someone today.\n\nHe said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed. Is there evidence on turnout impacts?"}, {"sender": "Eric", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "In fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere)."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt_14816
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Black as Weingarten"], "timestamp": "5/23/2017 6:46:27 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Weingarten, a high-powered attorney at Steptoe & Johnson in Washington known for his folksy style, is a\nsomewhat unlikely choice because he has represented Democratic clients and is close friends with Eric H.\nHolder Jr., who served as attorney general under President Barack Obama. Holder and Weingarten met during\n\ntheir early years at the Justice Department.\n\nThe four finalists did not respond to requests for comment. A White House official said the administration had\n\nno comment"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.txt_14820
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.txt
|
Re: Herald
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lilly Sanchez"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January\n15, 2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that\ncase if confirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n•\n•\n•\nR REPRINT OF THIS STORY\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein's victims' attorneys said\nTuesday.\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims's lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims.\nThe reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. \"BJay\" Pak, will\noversee the case for the government. Pak, a former Georgia lawmaker, was appointed Atlanta's chief federal\nprosecutor by President Trump in October 2017.\nThe Justice Department is still under a Friday deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims' attorneys in\nan effort to settle the case. On Feb. 22, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in Palm Beach ruled that federal\nprosecutors, under former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, broke the law when they concealed a plea\nagreement from more than 30 underage girls in Palm Beach who had been sexually abused by Epstein, a\nmultimillionaire New York hedge fund manager.\nMarra stopped short of voiding the agreement, which granted Epstein and an untold number of accomplices\nimmunity from federal prosecution for sex trafficking crimes, provided Epstein plead guilty to minor charges\nin state court. At the time of the plea deal, federal prosecutors had gathered enough evidence against Epstein to\nwrite a 53-page federal indictment, court records show.\nPlay Video\nDurationA\n12:20\nThe story behind a Palm Beach sex offender's remarkable deal\nThe story behind a Palm Beach sex offender's remarkable deal\nEmily Michot\nAn investigation by the Miami Herald, \"Perversion of Justice,\" found that after Acosta met privately with one\nof Epstein's lawyers, the government agreed to seal the plea agreement so that no one — not the victims, not\neven the state court judge who sentenced Epstein — would know the full extent of his crimes. Epstein, now 66,\nwas allowed to plead guilty to prostitution charges and served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail, where\nhe was given liberal work release, and allowed to travel to New York and his private island in the Caribbean\nduring his subsequent house arrest. He was released in 2009, and now divides his time between New York,\nPalm Beach and the U.S. Virgin Islands.\nThe Herald interviewed four of Epstein's victims, who were as young as 13 at the time they were abused by\nEpstein. They said they felt betrayed by state and federal prosecutors, who treated them like prostitutes instead\nof victims. Two of them sued the federal government in 2008 under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, which\ngrants crime victims the right to be informed about plea deals and to confer with prosecutors.\nMarra, in a 33-page opinion, said prosecutors not only intentionally violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act,\nbut they misled the girls into believing that the FBI's sex trafficking case against Epstein was ongoing —\nwhen, in fact, prosecutors had secretly closed it after sealing the plea bargain from the public record.\nMarra, noting that he reviewed affidavits, depositions and interrogatories, said \"Epstein worked in concert with\nothers to obtain minors not only for his own sexual gratification, but also for the sexual gratification of\nothers.\"\nThe victims' attorneys — Edwards, Scarola and Paul Cassell — have asked the Justice Department to throw\nout Epstein's plea agreement and reopen the criminal investigation.\nEdwards, who brought the victims' rights case against the government, said transferring the case to another\njurisdiction is a prudent decision.\n\"I think it's good that we're going to get fresh eyes and a fresh opinion on the way the case was handled,\"\nEdwards said Tuesday. \"We were obviously in an adversarial posture with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami\nbecause they handled the case to begin with.\"\nMiami's new U.S. Attorney, Ariana Fajardo Orshan — who was appointed by President Trump in September\n— did not respond to a request for comment.\nPlay Video\nDurationA\n5:29\nJeffrey Epstein apologizes, but not to his victims\nJeffrey Epstein apologizes, but not to his victims\nEmily Michot\nEdwards predicted that it would take some time for Pak's office to review the case, which includes more than\n500 docket entries and thousands of documents. He said If the sides can't agree on a resolution, then Marra\nwould likely have to come up with one. The case is being closely watched by crime victims' rights advocates,\nas it will likely set a precedent.\nAcosta, who was appointed by Trump as the U.S. secretary of labor in 2017, is the focus of a separate Justice\nDepartment investigation into whether there was any prosecutorial misconduct in the Epstein case. That probe,\nby the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility, was initiated in response to demands from a bipartisan\ngroup in Congress, led by Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman\nSchultz of Florida.\nIn the meantime, a court hearing will be held at 4 p.m. Wednesday in New York in another Epstein-related\ncase. A federal appeals court will hear oral arguments in a motion by the Miami Herald, supported by 32 other\nnews organizations, asking the court to unseal documents that could reveal details about the extent of Epstein's\ncrimes and any other people who may have been involved.\nThree of Epstein's former attorneys — who helped negotiate his plea deal in 2008 — wrote a letter published\nin the New York Times on Monday, defending the plea bargain cut with Acosta as a fair deal. The letter was in\nresponse to a Times editorial that called on Congress and the Trump administration to hold Acosta and others\ninvolved in the case accountable.\nEpstein's lawyers said the editorial's conclusions were \"in profound conflict with the reality,\" noting that there\nwas no evidence that Epstein committed federal sex trafficking offenses. The letter was signed by former\nEpstein lawyers Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger and Lilly Ann Sanchez, as well as Epstein's current attorney,\nMartin G. Weinberg.\nRead more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-\ngovernment/article227136459.html#storylink=cpy"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2019, at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:26:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Herald", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.