Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt_15317	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.txt	Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward	[{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him? \nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised? \nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme. \nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none. \nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie. \nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage. \nI can best be reached via my cell phone - \nMy very best wishes and my thanks! \nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson BT"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 05:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 7 2011 05:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": "No!!"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026069.txt_15318	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026069.txt	Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise	[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building\nand financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history\nand presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors\nto the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought\nsecure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry,\nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure\ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily\ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence,\ncapital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across\nall funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise\nwithin infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild\nhas also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these\ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny qq", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the\nsidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the\nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to\n10% per yr with a kicker\n\nAriane de Rothschild"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i", "Ariane de Rothschild"], "timestamp": "On 8 Feb 2017, at 23:22", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "not likely in the states. toomuch money around. you should finda niche. otherwise competing with people\nthat have a trillion dollars in credit needs"}, {"sender": "a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:23:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Pension funds are now interested to match the maturities ?\nAriane de Rothschild"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt_15319	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030330.txt	RE: Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:02 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "eveything ok, we waited"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I got completely swamped, and then had a dinner with George Tenet and my military guy from Brookings. My fault. Is larry coming by again today?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nope, how was tenet"}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 9 2014 01:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Everyone is talking about Gates comments on Obama. Surprised by what Gates did. I talked with Daley yesterday, and he thought that Gates making his comments while Obama is still in the White House, completely irresponsible. Lots of talk on Israel and Iran. Gives a higher chance that Israel goes it alone than I have heard elsewhere."}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030920.txt_15326	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030920.txt	Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "so would i"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ps. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and Iam therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 4:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "I know.. it is one of the reasons I respect you.\n\nbtw.. this was the last note I sent out to the blogs... after that I gave up..\n\n\"I will add one remark here, as most people have not read my full set of comments, posted after the post\nappeared.. I am myself rather disappointed by the lack of skepticality of this community. As I said, I have read\nnumerous reports of orgies on Jeffrey’s island involving me and other scientists during our meetings.. Orgies\nthat never happened. I am VERY skeptical of other claims on his behavior. I am defending Jeffrey for 2\nreasons: (1) Based on my knowledge and experience I am skeptical of the claims in the media and of those who\nhave settled claims for money... namely I don’t believe the published details just like I tend to be skeptical of\nmany published details on the internet.. I don’t believe Jeffrey did what has been claimed, and unless I see hard\nevidence, I will trust my own judgement here, and (2) Jeffrey went to prison, and I happen to believe that\nhaving served time, even those who questioned his behavior should be willing to give him the benefit of the\ndoubt, again until proved otherwise, that he is working hard to live a good life and do good things. I for one am\ndisgusted that people eat up the salacious nonsense they read on the web and then jump to conclusions about\nthings and people they do not know.. I do not jump to condemn people, especially when it concerns their sexual\npreferences. [DO NOT CONDONE sex with young girls, or young boys for that matter.. because there are real\nvictims there.. Until I know all the facts however, I do not jump to conclusions, and I am sorry, having seen the\nmedia frenzy around Jeffrey, and having seen the shoddy behavior of those who have attacked him, I remain\nskeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\""}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030934.txt_15331	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030934.txt	Sam Fields on 302 Interview	[{"sender": "Grant J. Smith", "recipients": ["Ken Jenne", "Grant J. Smith"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2009 15:48:27", "subject": "Sam Fields on 302 Interview", "body": "Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI \|\n\nGuest Columnist\n\nActually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called in federal court \"The 302\". It\ncould screw the innocent and the unwary.\n\nThe newspapers and Browardbeat.com make clear that the Federal investigations that led to the arrests\nof County Commissioner Josephus Eggleston, former Miramar Commissioner Fitzroy Salesman and\nSchool Board member Bev Gallagher are just beginning.\n\nThe FBI will be interviewing everyone from County Administrator Bertha Henry to bus drivers about\nanything and everything.\n\nThey are looking for scalps.\n\nI suspect that if the average person thought about it, he would assume that when the FBI comes calling,\nlike Joe Friday from DRAGNET, they \"want the facts and nothing but the facts.\" Equally important\nthey want an accurate record of that interview so they bring a court reporter or at-the very least a tape\nrecorder.\n\nThe average person would be wrong.\n\nAgents bring a pencil and pad to take notes. They then prepare a summary of the interview called a\n\"302 Report.\" : s\n\nIf you are called as a witness at trial, prior to testifying, you will be given a copy of \"Your 302\" to -\nreview. It is a record of what the FBI insists you said at your previous meeting.\n\nIf your interview lasted more than thirty seconds, it is guaranteed’you will find numerous discrepancies.\nSome of them will be insignificant; some of them could be material.\n\nAsk two people to listen to you in a discussion about a traffic accident and then write a summary. It is a\nguaranteed they will have differences with each other as well as with you, the witness."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033495.txt_15340	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033495.txt	Fwd: Photos	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 4:45:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 4:45:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "photos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use vinyl for your \"E= \" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting, this would enable easy removal if = plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses vinyl for logos.=\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering w.= th slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Guy Amico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh", "JR Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:16 pm", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt_15341	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030324.txt	macreonomics issue	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/10/2011 9:45:51 PM", "subject": "macreonomics issue", "body": "do you think something like this is worthwhile and should i engage?\n\nFor Federal Programs, a Taste of Market Discipline\nBy DAVID LEONHARDT\nPublished: February 8, 2011\n\nWouldn't it be nice if taxpayers could somehow get a refund for government programs that didn't work? Instead, the opposite tends to happen. Programs that fail to make a difference — like many of those that train workers for new jobs — endure indefinitely. Often, policy makers don't even know which work and which don't, because rigorous evaluation is rare in government. And competition, which punishes laggards in the private sector, is typically absent in the public sector.\n\nBut there is some good news on this front. Lately, both American and British policy makers have been thinking about how to bring some of the competitive discipline of the market to government programs, and they have hit on an intriguing idea.\n\nDavid Cameron's Conservative government in Britain is already testing it, at a prison 75 miles north of London. The Bloomberg administration in New York is also considering the idea, as is the State of Massachusetts. Perhaps most notably, President Obama next week will propose setting aside $100 million for seven such pilot programs, according to an administration official.\n\nThe idea goes by one of two names: pay for success bonds or social impact bonds. Either way, nonprofit groups like foundations pay the initial money for a new program and also oversee it, with government approval. The government will reimburse them several years later, possibly with a bonus — but only if agreed-upon benchmarks show that the program is working.\n\nIf it falls short, taxpayers owe nothing.\n\nThe first British test is happening at Her Majesty's Prison Peterborough, where 60 percent of the prisoners are convicted of another crime within one year of release. Depressingly enough, that recidivism rate is typical for a British prison.\n\nTo reduce the rate, a nonprofit group named Social Finance is playing a role akin to venture capitalist. It has raised about $8 million from investors, including the Rockefeller Foundation. Social Finance also oversees three social service groups helping former prisoners find work, stay healthy and the like. If any of those groups starts to miss its performance goals, it can be replaced.\n\nFor the investors to get their money back starting in 2014 — with interest — the recidivism rate must fall at least 7.5 percent, relative to a control group. If the rate falls 10 percent, the investors will receive the sort of return that the stock market historically delivers. \"It's been only a few months,\" says Tracy Palandjian, who recently opened a new Social Finance office in Boston, \"but the numbers are coming in O.K.\"\n\nAntony Bugg-Levine of the Rockefeller Foundation told me it had invested in the project for two main reasons. One, it expected to get its money back and then be able to reuse it. Two, if social impact bonds work, they have the potential to attract for-profit investors — and vastly expand the pool of capital that's available for social programs.\n\nClearly, social impact bonds have limitations. For starters, it's hard to see how private money could ever pay for multibillion-dollar programs like Medicaid or education.\n\nJust as important, the execution of any bond program will be complicated. It will depend on coming up with the right performance measures, which is no small matter. Done wrong, the measures will end up rewarding programs lucky (or clever) enough to enroll participants who are more likely to succeed no matter what.\n\nBut whatever the caveats about the bonds, the potential for improving the government's performance is obviously huge. That's true in education, health care, criminal justice and many other areas.\n\nA recent review found that 10 major social programs had been rigorously evaluated over the past two decades, using the scientific gold standard of random assignment. Only one of the 10 — Early Head Start, for infants, toddlers pregnant women — was a clear success. Yet all 10 still exist, and largely in their original form.\n\nJon Baron, the president of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy in Washington, points out that the social problems addressed by antipoverty programs have not gotten much better in years. School test scores have barely changed. College graduation rates for low-income students have stagnated. The poverty rate is as high as it was in 1981. Median household income is lower than it was in 1998.\n\n\"If we just keep funding social programs the way we have been,\" Mr. Baron says, \"there's not a lot of reason to think we'll have much success.\"\n\nThe Obama administration's seven pilot programs would create bonds for, among other areas, job training, education, juvenile justice and care of children's disabilities. Nonprofit groups like Social Finance could apply. So could for-profit companies, said the White House official, who asked not to be named because the president had not yet released next year's budget. The $100 million for the bonds would come out of the budgets of other programs, to stay consistent with Mr. Obama's announced freeze on non-security spending.\n\nOfficials in Massachusetts and New York are looking at similar ideas but have not yet decided whether they will issue bonds.\n\nBeyond the impact of any single program, the bonds have the potential to nudge all government agencies to pay more attention to results. Mr. Obama, after all, campaigned as a reformer who wanted to create a sleek, efficient \"iPod government.\" He has had some success, like the expansion of a program — backed by years of solid evidence — in which nurses go to the homes of new at-risk parents to counsel them.\n\nOver all, though, the administration has not done enough to improve government efficiency. Put it this way: If someone asked you how Mr. Obama had made government work better, would you have an answer?\n\nMaking government work better will be all the more important in the years ahead. The free market is not going to solve many of our biggest problems, be it stagnant pay or spotty medical care. And government — in Washington and locally — is going to be financially squeezed for a long time.\n\nThere never was a good excuse for wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that didn't work. But now, especially, there's no excuse."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032953.txt_15342	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032953.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "you well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 8, 2017 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "all good with trump lots of opportunity"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Fair ..and you?"}, {"sender": "Richard Merkin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Where?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Merkin"], "timestamp": "1/8/2017 9:31:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "new york"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt_15347	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029113.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<________________________>"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you"}, {"sender": "<________________________>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send me the day and time. thnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "lOpm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sorry that is for the gate Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2017 11:13:41 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "like always .. it was pleasure and fun to visit you. thnx for the nice giftc14"}]	13
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033075.txt_15376	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033075.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 2:35:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i like him iknow him"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I went to the trump mar a lago speech trump gave Saturday he isn’t kidding about a trade war he said we have\nnothing to loose because we are already loosing he used the example of Indian motorbikes coming into the us\nand India charges 125 percent for Harley’s quite frankly I wouldn’t ride an Indian motorbike if you paid me\nand 99 .9 percent of Indians can’t afford a Harley belt buckle .last night went to James cohens house a palace\nhe is s nice guy we had a long talk he sold Hudson news and now into multi family housing we should get\n\ntogether for lunch I am going to get to know him better best stay well jonathan\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026055.txt_15379	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026055.txt	Fwd:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Valeria Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "are you guys enjoying the warm"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI arrived from Brazil on January 19th, knowing that I had to remember something very important on January 20th and it was not Trump's inauguration. As I arrived too tired, I kept thinking, but could not remember. Just now seeing your e-mail I remembered what it was!!! Your birthday!!! Please accept our best wishes for your new year!\n\nHope you had a good celebration!\n\nWe had to postpone our trip to Arizona and are still in Cambridge, leaving on Wednesday. Noam and I hope to see you again soon and have a toast for your birthday.\n\nValeria"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Valeria Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Shame . I was there all day yesterday . Everything ok I hope"}, {"sender": "Valeria Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/23/2017 1:44:28 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Oh, no.\n\nWe will have to compensate for it. Noam has been racing for finishing some work before we leave, and I have been packing. But we'll find opportunities while in Arizona. Do you have plans to be there soon?\n\nValeria"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt_15385	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here goes:\n\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\n\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\n\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\n\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\n\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 5:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Darren Indyke ];\n\nSeems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}]	4
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026041.txt_15386	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026041.txt	Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)	[{"sender": "Paul Schulte <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 December 2016 at 8:35:35 AM HKT", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Sure. Forward"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "See the attached. Let me know if you are interested in meeting him when he’s in NYC.\n\ngino"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 Dec 2016, at 6:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "no ,. how are you?"}, {"sender": "Gino Yu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2016 12:35:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)", "body": "Good. Sorting out Tulum at the moment. Over 40 people wanted to come. The Cenote project didn’t get\nfunded yet so we are sorting out accommodations. David Sauvage who you met is coming\n(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zebYOwGi_vn1 WpUnkTR1T7yPsl-iQIfA9GidDUg0zcU/edit). Joon\nYun as well (who Id like to introduce you to - http://www.drjoonyun.com/). The gathering will help plan\nactivities in 2017 which I will summarise for you in Jan.\n\nOn Monday, I head to Pragelato with the wife and kids for 10 days of skiing and sight-seeing. Head to Tulum\non the Ist. I will be at DLD and Davos afterward. I still have a Vive that I got for you that I’d like to set up and\nwalk you and your people through.\n\nIs your schedule for the holidays sorted?\n\nHappy Holidays!!\n\ngino"}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt_15387	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:31:20 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]	1
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011959.txt_15391	IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011959.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jolanta MODILINOS", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "15/10/2014 4:46 PM (GMT+02:00)", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Jean Luc,\n\nHope that you stay fine.\n\nAs per our conversation about placement of her with you in NYC and Miami, she said she found\nsome article in internet , which changed her position and she preferred to be placed with another\nagency..\n\nlam so sorry, but people believes in media more than in us sometimes, what is sad!\n\nWarmest regards\n\nJolanta Sadauskiene"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548.txt_15405	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548.txt	FYI	[{"sender": "Edward Epstein", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 1:23:10 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Hi Jeff\nI thought this might interest you\n\nThe 2016 presidential campaign was marked by three disclosure operations, all of which appear to\nhave had a single author. “Oppo research” is the euphemism commonly used in elections for such\noperations. The mechanism is fairly simple: dirt is obtained from wherever it can be found to\ndiscredit an opponent. It is then “leaked,” usually either anonymously or on background, to targeted\nmedia channels. What makes the 2016 campaign particularly interesting from a counterintelligence\nperspective is not that both sides had their own disclosure operations, but that both sides were\noffered the dirt for them by a common source: Russian intelligence.\n\nAs we now know from the emails of Donald Trump Jr., a thinly veiled intermediary, Natalya\nVeselnitskaya, offered the Trump campaign documents that putatively would show that Hillary\nClinton had received illegal donations from Russian financiers; in the event, no such documents\nwere proffered. But it is a reasonable assumption that Veselnitskaya could not have made such an\noffer, especially in a meeting attended by three other Russians, unless the move was approved by\nthe FSB, the Russian security service.\n\nA second disclosure operation, this one involving supporters of the Clinton campaign, was more\nlayered. The proximate intermediary was Fusion GPS, a research firm used by the law firm Baker\nHostetler, and the secondary “cut-out” was the British firm Orbis, co-founded by former MI-6\nofficer Christopher Steele. We know something about this sub-contractor from the depositions\nSteele gave in defending a libel suit in London. According to Steele, Fusion GPS not only had him\nprepare the so-called “dossier” on Trump but also directed Steele to “leak” it to specified reporters\nat Mother Jones, Yahoo, the New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Yorker, and CNN. In\nsome cases, Steele was directed to brief the selected journalists personally. The dirt in these “leaks”\nrelied heavily on information supplied by two Russian government sources: Source A, whom Steele\ncalls “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure”; and Source B, “a former top-level intelligence\nofficer still active in the Kremlin.” Sources A and B provided information supposedly exposing a\nlong-time Russian FSB operation to get compromising information that could be used to control\nTrump. The idea that two Russian intelligence sources would reveal a long-time Kremlin-backed\nFSB operation bears further examination."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt_15419	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt	prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/11/2013 5:45:09 PM", "subject": "prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /", "body": ""}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030414.txt_15421	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030414.txt	Re: Fwd: <no subject>	[{"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-\nghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“lve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know:\nWho is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity\nFairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Tue Mar 08 17:48:01 2011", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: <no subject>", "body": "Call ne"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt_15422	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun"}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031343.txt_15427	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031343.txt	The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump’s Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [ii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 7:25:25 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Intimidation, Pressure and Humiliation: Inside Trump’s Two-Year War on the Investigations Encircling Him", "body": "He is crazy!!"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt_15429	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014523.txt	Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA	[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 10:59:39 AM EST", "subject": "US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "The US team is out with their 2017 Year Ahead this morning (link) running through ALL sub-sectors with each analysts top pick into the new year. op Picks — ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA Washington DC Backdrop Given the clean sweep by the GOP & uncertainty around the ACA, key attention is paid by Andy Bressler to a review of the various scenarios that could play out early next year. With a repeal likely to happen well before a replace (essentially via the Budget Reconciliation process in Jan/Feb), Andy notes this is likely to include a repeal of both health insurance exchange subsidies & a phase-down of Medicaid expansion funding (albeit with a two or three year transition period). He also expects a repeal of many of the larger HC related taxes in the ACA, including the HIX ($14.3bn in 2018), Medtech Tax (2.3%), pharma industry tax ($4.1bn in 2018) & Cadillac tax (effective 2020). As for the views by analysts... Biotech (+) — believe sector will outperform largely as pricing risk has diminished (although will remain in pockets) but pipelines/growth remains. Ying's top picks are CELG & REGN; Tazeen's top picks are kCAD & RARE. Spec Pharma (-) — headwinds remain w/ Sumant's top pick AGN given lower risk to reimbursement pressures & an underappreciated pipeline. Leverage & CF remain the key focus for investors. Tools/Animal Health (=) — Derik notes more \"headline\" than \"real\" risks from policy which will create opportunities for a group growing MSD, although valuations remain above peers. (US 1 name) top pick, also A, ZTS in Animal Health, in Diagnostics & in Services. Medtech (=) — Hopkins' expects a mixed bag in 2017 w/ stocks trading close to 5yr valuation lows; EW top pick given best growth / purest innovation story. Facilities (-) — Fischbeck notes that uncertainty will remain an overhang for hospitals as repeal/replace a negative for the group (est losing 2-3mm Medicaid lives & 2-3mm exchange lives would be a 1-2% EBITDA hit on avg). Focus on company-specific stories like MCOs (+) — Fischbeck generally +ve under Trump (especially around MA given historical support from GOP) w/ tailwinds from corporate tax & rising rates. top pick in given valuation & tailwinds. Distribution/Tech (=) — Valiquette prefers pharmacies ,,,'VS/WBA given benefits from decelerating generic prices (which will remain an overhang for Distributors). HHS appointment a —ve for HCIT."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:46:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: US Healthcare Year Ahead...Buy ACAD, AGN, ANTM, CELG, CVS, DHR, EW, EVHC, RARE, REGN, WBA", "body": "attached are equity healthcare ideas"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025926.txt_15430	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025926.txt	RE: Gingrich view of Trump	[{"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Great one. Thanks"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Trump is a problem solver for sure."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "And I believe we have a problem"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about. Media holds the cards.... people are sheep."}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She's shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I I love ole Bernie. Wish he wasn't a damn socialist. He probably reminds you of your Social Studies teacher from Lafayette high...?"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie's like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60's and 70's."}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Epstein 2016!\n(Mark)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka <pk@princeconcepts.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["'jeffrey E.' [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "'Philip Kafka'"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:33:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Hey Jeff. PhiIly gets it. I told him about our first lesson in common sense: Folding the bottom tip of the French fry cone so it doesn't tear the paper bag at Nathans. Schmuck!"}]	10
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019388.txt_15438	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019388.txt	Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/18/2006	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["New York"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/18/2006", "body": "From Miami\n\nFBI Miami\n\nAny questions or concerns contact sat Miami b6 -2"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030372.txt_15440	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030372.txt	Fwd: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/8/2018 2:07:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Anders Corr", "recipients": ["Fanell Red", "Authoritarian Influence"], "timestamp": "August 8, 2018 at 5:32:57 AM EDT", "subject": "Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat", "body": "From Reuters News:\n\nChina defends Iran business ties after Trump threat\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-china/china-defends-iran-business-ties-after-trump-threat-idUSKBNIKTOTU\n\nChina's business ties with Iran are open, transparent and lawful, its foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after U.S. President Donald Trump said companies doing business with Iran would be barred from the United States."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt_15442	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt		[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am there"}]	11
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt_15443	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030366.txt	RE: today	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S <bkarp@paulweiss.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 15, 2017 2:51 PM", "subject": "today", "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 8:25:35 PM", "subject": "RE: today", "body": "Wow, call me naive, but that’s something."}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt_15444	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028529.txt	mission acomplished for some	[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 13 2014 08:14 PM", "subject": "mission acomplished for some", "body": "Philanthropy — Full text articles\n\nRevealed: the world’s most admired people\nStephan Shakespeare — Times\n\nBill Gates is the most admired person in the world, according to a global survey for The Times by YouGov. The man who many\nsee as oe for the democratisation of computing and who is the biggest activist philanthropist across the globe is\n\nIn his home, America, he ranks only 5th, behind Pope Francis, President Obama, Billy Graham, and George W. Bush. Mr\nObama and the Pope have a strong lead in Western nations but Mr Gates is highly regarded in every country polled, from\nBrazil to Egypt, Nigeria to Indonesia, Britain to Russia to Australia. ee as respondents there said: “He\ngot into a good university, but gave up studying to start his business. He has become a rich man despite dropping out of school\n... He has a successful career and a caring heart — he is ordinary, but great.”\n\nThe Queen came highest in Britain and second in Australia, but didn’t make the Indian top ten. Nevertheless she is the most\nadmired woman in the world, in 17th place, closely followed by Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey.\n\nHalf of the top ten admired in Russia are women, including the pop singer Alla Pugacheva and the Queen. That is the highest\nfigure in all countries surveyed — women are strikingly under-represented.\n\nSome light is shed on this by comparing our results with a recent Gallup poll in America, which asked for most admired man\nand woman in separate questions. In that poll, Bill Clinton scored 2 per cent and Hillary Clinton 15. YouGov asked a single\nquestion, not differentiating men and women, and the two Clintons rated about the same. The two polls also show the power of\nthe media to direct public attention: Gallup polled early in December, and Pope Francis was “most admired” by only 4 per cent.\nBy the time of the YouGov survey, Time magazine had made him its Person of the Year, and he shot up to 21 per cent.\n\nBusiness leaders did well in general. YouGov puts Sir Richard Branson 4th in Britain, the Hong Kong billionaire Sir Li Kashing\nwas sixth in China; the Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote was third in his home country; Silvio Santos, a media billionaire,\nwas 4th in Brazil; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the tycoon recently freed by Vladimir Putin, was 8th in Russia; while Warren Buffett,\nwho is admired in India, Pakistan and China, was 8th in the world.\n\nActors and musicians do less well. With the exception of the Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan, Ms Jolie and Stephen\nFry, who confirms his enormous Twitter following by making 7th in Britain, just below Desmond Tutu. Johnny Depp and Brad\nPitt get close to the top in a couple of countries and Justin Bieber did well in Indonesia, but the rock star and anti-poverty\ncampaigner Bono is notable by his absence.\n\nSportsmen were more highly regarded, with the Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar 5th in the world — but only because he is so\nadored in the world’s second-most populous country. The footballer Lionel Messi had broader support, reaching 15th in the\nworld. In Britain, David Beckham squeaked into 10th place.\n\nIn only two countries of the 13 surveyed did no local politician make it into the top ten — Australia and the UK. The omission\nwas most striking in Britain where Nigel Farage, the top politician, was in 16th place. David Cameron received the “most\nadmired” accolade from only two people in a thousand. In Germany, Angela Merkel scored 65 times higher at 13 per cent,\nsecond only to the Pope. Vladimir Putin topped the Russian poll with a whopping 24 per cent, Nicolas Sarkozy was third in\nFrance and Goodluck Jonathan 8th in Nigeria. Edward Snowden, responsible for leaking classified documents that revealed\nthe extent of surveillance by America’s National Security Agency, was 10th most admired in the country that granted him\nasylum, Russia. He also showed strongly in Germany. We also asked who was the most famous person in the world. The"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt_15445	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt	Re: Great seeing you	[{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel, \nIt was great seeing you. Hope to see you on my next trip which is every other week. Let me know when Andrew Lucasi is coming to \ntown."}, {"sender": "<_________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with \nAndy re: his trip here from California. \nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional \ninterest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain \nprice. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's \ndepressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest. \nLook forward to hearing from you. \nJoel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/6/2010 1:03:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. i will pick up all \ncosts. thanks,"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt_15446	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt	Re: Small biz and Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:30:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "foot off the brake"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "It's getting better\n\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n\n110\nloo tOtsiNik\\\n90\n80 1,86:\nI I I I I I I I I I\n2000\n\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted.\n16\nCNBC\n\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed\noff about regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke.\nThey really dig him down there....\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index."}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt_15458	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030400.txt	Re: [External]	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:50:43 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "https://www.washinetonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/03/new-trump-book-bannons-treasonous-claim-\nivankas-presidential-ambitions-and-melanias-first-lady-concerns/?utm_term=.17d17352bla4"}, {"sender": "Melanie Spinclla", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: [External]", "body": "We cannot print it since we don’t subscribe"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:31 PM", "subject": "[External]", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032760.txt_15472	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032760.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhsoffice>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 2:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Opinions", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 25, 2018, at 12:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We are here at martins"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 5:25:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it till when ?"}]	4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt_15473	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028501.txt	Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards	[{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:23:58 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Sounds good, works for me.\n\nSo, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I’ll send that along your way.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nThanks,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026096.txt_15474	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026096.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow \| wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:36:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Exercising call me in hour thank u"}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032774.txt_15492	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032774.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken", "Michael"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ken - Michael , Michael/ Ken"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Ken"], "timestamp": "May 19, 2018, at 1:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "delighted to meet. Jeffrey has long told me about your friendship and the respect he has for you. If you send me your mailing address, it would be my pleasure to send you my recent book about the Trump White House. I'm now at work on a sequel focusing on the legal case against Trump and Trump's response to it. Any counsel and background you might provide would aid me enormously and enrich the book. I, of course, would be willing to talk with you on an entirely off-the-record basis or under any arrangement that suits. Thanks in advance and I look forward to the chance to chat. All best, Michael"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/19/2018 8:25:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Michael: Excellent. With thanks to Jeffrey, I'm delighted to come into your orbit, and look forward to our conversation. My mailing address is:"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt_15495	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029852.txt	Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:53:05 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Oy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 22, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "whoops"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Reid Weingarten"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid, \n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague, \nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining \noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior \nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if \nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record, \njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm at or my desk is \n\nThanks, \n\nAshley"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012.txt_15501	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012.txt	Reminder: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?	[{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2019 12:46:27 PM", "subject": "Reminder: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?", "body": "Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?\nIn July 1915, Hussein ibn 'Ali, the Sherif of Mecca, sent a letter to Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, informing him of the terms for Arab participation in the war against the Turks. The letters between Hussein and Mac-Mahon that followed outlined the areas that Britain was prepared to cede to the Arabs in exchange for their help."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016693.txt_15512	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016693.txt	Re: Trump house	[{"sender": "MM", "recipients": ["JP"], "timestamp": "11/19/2008 07:43 AM", "subject": "Trump house", "body": "JP: Can you provide the # address for the old Gosman/Trump house on North Ocean Boulevard?"}, {"sender": "John Page", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:54:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump house", "body": "Mayor: The address you want is: 515 North County Road. (NOT North Ocean Blvd.) JP"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt_15514	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 11:45:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of\ndetails where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has\nlots of traction"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030654.txt_15517	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030654.txt		[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/21/2017 2:33:52 PM", "subject": "", "body": "How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere \nImportance: High \nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIMzSf0VwEk&sns=em"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021759.txt_15522	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021759.txt	Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early	[{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Jun 20, 2009, at 4:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "Hi, Jeffrey,\n\nI hope the Radar Online report today (Friday 6-19) that you are to be released early is correct!\n\nBest wishes,\n\nDavid\n\nReferencing:\nhttp://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/06/exclusive-jeffrey-epstein-be-released-prison-early"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "30 days\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, June 23 2009 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Radar Online reports that you are to be released early", "body": "http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news/content/news/2009/06/23/webepstein062309.html"}]	3