thread_id
stringlengths
37
43
source_file
stringlengths
35
37
subject
stringlengths
0
231
messages
stringlengths
88
34.9k
message_count
int64
1
42
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033464.txt_14827
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033464.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "eric,, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not yet"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033084.txt_14831
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033084.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http s ://www.the dailyb east. com/how-clo se-is-donal d-trump-to-a-p sychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Not confidence inspiring\n\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Careful, or the pendulum is going to swing hard the other way and feminists will be in charge of everything"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i was kidding"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "So was I, mostly. :-)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 4:15:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you at 2 , i ordered sushi for you"}]
9
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032752.txt_14834
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032752.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i vote:\n\nHow about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2018 10:54:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way...(still on for now, right?)"}]
8
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023237.txt_14837
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023237.txt
Valuation Discount
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Leon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS__, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked\nfor are-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the\noutrageous incompetence in your family office .. Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by\nthe office (sic) that ..., BUT 1 was told by joslin,. , but I was told by . \" why is leon blaming me for ..\nI ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe ,\nhad remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your\noffice. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , you told me last week that the emotional\nreason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring\nthe benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email\n,where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance\ndebt ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and\nhave pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off ,\nso what if the categories are off. whats the big deal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the\ntough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im\nafraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Halperin, Alan S", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the\nlow end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Thomas Turrin Sl"], "timestamp": "Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:38 AM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "did you get the agent’"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler Lon ACTIN TT Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "grats 3,4,5,6, also need accounting documents and backup. year 2014. other info request to follow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["\"jeevacation@gmail.com\" <jeevacation@zmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "A couple of questions:\n\n1. Jeffrey-you saw the format in which we organized the back-up for year one of grat 1\n(quite thick/alot of back-up).\n\nDoes that format work (for you and internal use) or do you want it simplified/modified.\nLet's discuss.\n\n2. Since this will take the focus and effort of a lot of people (just to pull and organize\nthe various records...both legal and accting, I'd like to tell the staff that we are\nanswering an \"information request\" from the irs on the grats. It will generally be helpful"}]
5
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025603.txt_14841
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025603.txt
Re: $25K from ASU
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems imasymbol for allills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . atleast for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Noproblem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <jito@mit.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:14", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "What is the size of the gift?"}]
10
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt_14845
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.txt
contacts
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/30/2016 4:40:14 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky, nathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain , demsaio, christakis, dennet, sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman, seligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp , leahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, . jagland, andrew, woody blaine, boris, larry summers. \n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz. raafat, sultan hamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro, \n\nsmell menatlal fit, , lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein , diet excersicse \n\nAK chad pinto lsj, bbj, ana brice, \\\n\n loen terjge\n\n bradk"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029583.txt_14846
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029583.txt
Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:48:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "One unusual thing about Powell’s appointment is that he is a lawyer, not an economist. From Yellen going back to Alan Greenspan, who started as chair in 1987, all Fed chairs have held a Ph.D. in economics. Alan Blinder, an economist at Princeton, has said that a doctorate has become more or less a prerequisite of the job—without one, he told Harvard Business Review, “the Fed’s staff will run technical rings around you.” While that remains to be seen, it is true that there are over 300 Ph.D. economists on the Fed’s staff, and Powell could end up needing to lean on their expertise more than a Fed chair with a doctorate in economics might."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "Can u get rid of Powell or really get rid of mnuchin"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 10:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "getting rid of powell much more important than syria /mattis. . I guess pompeo , only one left. . unless ambassador heather has a brilliant idea. - a first.. jared and ivanka, need to go. !!!"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "LMAO\n\nPerfect mnuchin hit"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work for Dillon, Read & Co!\n\nhe didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board. what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}]
6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029597.txt_14851
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029597.txt
Re: invitation
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 12:06:18 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you\nwere so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt_14852
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt
Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "10/18/2016 8:20:31 PM", "subject": "Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies - YouTube", "body": "Hysterical.\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029516.txt_14853
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029516.txt
Donald Trump, Kanye West, and the diagnosis of Bipolar Disease
[{"sender": "MARK TRAMO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/14/2018 5:16:21 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump, Kanye West, and the diagnosis of Bipolar Disease", "body": "Given your interest in Creativity: \nDid you see the entire Kanye West soliloquy in the Oval Office with Trump and Jim Brown? I am using that \nclip in my Talent & Creativity class when we discuss \"Creativity & Psychopathology.\" In Psychiatry, the formal \nterms that apply are \"flight of ideas,\" \"pressured speech,\" \"delusions of grandeur,\" and \"clang associations.\" A \ntruly great example of Hypomania. There's an interesting book on hypomania and success in America today."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032298.txt_14858
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032298.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "dimanche 25 septembre 2016 21:04", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im in paris all week, hope to see you and family"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline [Lang, Carlini a]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nWould you like to go with my father at the inauguration of the exhibition on Hergé, the father of « Tintin » , a\nhuge celebrity here, at le Grand Palais at 6.30 pm?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 12:11", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, great. how are you?"}]
3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023545.txt_14863
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023545.txt
Fwd: INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "CC [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2013 1:33:32 AM", "subject": "Fwd: INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "February 27, 2013, 2:55:10 PM EST", "subject": "INVITE THE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Dear Mr. Jeffrey Epstein\n\nJared Kushner, New York's youngest powerhouse publisher, is celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the New\nYork Observer on Thursday, March 14th.\n\nMayor Michael Bloomberg will be by his side to toast you all.\n\nThe Observer is honoring those who have defined and shaped New York since 1987. They are celebrating the\ncities best, brightest and most influential in culture,media and finance. The salmon pink pages are revered\namong New York's elite as the preeminent voice on power.\n\nThe celebration is going to be one of those quintessential New York nights. We are looking forward to seeing\nyou.\n\nXOXO,\n\nPeggy\n\nJared Kushner, Publisher Joseph Meyer, CEO\n\nCory Booker Arthur Carter Georgina Chapman Katie Couric Lauren Santo Domingo\n\nLarry Gagosian Mariska Hargitay Carolina Herrera Katie Holmes Woody Johnson\n\nPeter Kaplan Comm. Ray Kelly Ken Kurson Matt Lauer Blake Lively Terry Lundgren\nPeter Martins Cynthia McFadden Sean Parker Ron O. Perelman Stephen Schwarzman\n\nLara Spencer Steve Tisch Donald Trump Ivanka Trump Harvey Weinstein George C. Wolfe"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt_14867
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
FW: Jane Doe
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/5/2009 4:25:51 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:29 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Maxwell was not served. Wexner’s counsel accepted for him. Trump’s staff accepted for him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:22 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I will let you Know when bob confirms back with me.\nAlso, can u let me know if Wexner and Maxwell were actually personally served or if it was just someone at the location eligible to accept."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:04 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "We have a Motion to Stay re Ints and a Motion to Stay regarding Orders of May 22 and June 30."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt_14869
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt
null
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [nicholasribis@nlrventures.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:28:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey — I told u weeks ago that Davis would issue a report critical of Leon and board read article in Post business page \nre Davis Report and Caesars — and DJT will be President -- Nick"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032746.txt_14872
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032746.txt
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033458.txt_14875
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033458.txt
Re: Great seeing you
[{"sender": "Steve Hanson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "Joel,\n\n1/5/10"}, {"sender": "Joel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for\ngolf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from\n\nCalifornia.\n\nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker\n800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but\nI may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a\n\nbargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to\n\npartner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he\nis looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest.\n\nLook forward to hearing from you.\n\nc\n\nJoel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:03 PM -0500", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel,, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the\ntrump course.. jerry you.. 1 will pick up all costs. thanks,,"}, {"sender": "i rot", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "have.him.call.me.or.better.eme.his.no.and.ill.set.sometgng.up.with.gerry.and.1...good.trip.to.ny.and.isle...joel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/6/2010 10:38:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "jack MR, aweckend when he could bring a friend would be appreciated"}]
5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023223.txt_14876
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023223.txt
Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "especiaily as you seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc. however the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last days of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs , old stock sales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same ,topco midco.etc still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no care for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens audit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to discuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you left. asi said before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't work for me but works for you. . I tried.\n\nTransaction complete !\n\n. this - in spite of your collection of Elysium misfits. !!!\n\nWith Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his utter incompetence was brought front and center, he may be a step up from Eileen, but if he is , then it is not certainly not by much, . Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of details and mechanics. I was not shown one document re phaidon,- not one.. Brad wanted to keep it private between he and his so called\" advisors\" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is wholly ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - things I thought were a priority to get done after consulting with your office _ still remains virtually undone.\n\nIT, still desperately needed- reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off exercises , - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, consultants up the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told that i cannot even see the proposals received without brads specific authorization ) - brad has no idea even as to what questions to ask. he knows little of finance, is run roughshod over by almost everyone in the office. he is a little man , using your power, to appear larger . Eileen was self aware enough to know she was over her head , that is a huge difference. bad info is rampant ie 3 million in deductions Im told are taken for art space but on closer examination it turns out they cannot be used at all. (ZERO benefit ) though you will be told yes they were deducted on the return they said that is the question they get asked ! \" were they deducted \"not -\" is there a benefit\" !!| I asked for the balance sheet and P and L for Regan arts , a basic first step in order to check your financials. \"sorry we never got one?\" though 9.8 million invested, no p&l, nothing , a construction project run amok , no budget, the coo fired after only 3 months. , no clue. I can add that artspace financials are also a total mess.\n\nAs your friend and in order toturn the page. I will try to be constructive\n\nThe following is a list of things I think would be in your interest to get done asap .but definitely not by\n\nme.\n\nisuggest you form new grats. , hire a high level tax partner. use your trading accounts as they remain the paramount requirement 16 months after i emailed to you their importance. , I suggest you consider having the 49percent of phaidon merged into artspance and have Richard buy artspace. re-do bank\n\nloans. no need to pay interest at higher rates on boat or plane. . as Richard is now no longer trustee. re-\ndo will, make suydam executor , with Barry, and john as back up. pay | million a year for executor role.\nget rid of Judy Black trust, deal with gifts and their tax returns, . review amounts to kids at fixed ages. put\nmore protections in for Alex and Victoria. , distribute some money to kids let them make decisions. ,"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030721.txt_14878
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030721.txt
How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 8:08:37 AM", "subject": "How Close Is Donald Trump to a Psychiatric Breakdown?", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033090.txt_14879
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033090.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "4/18/2018 4:53:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/us/politics/trump-stormy-daniels-sketch.html?mabReward=ART CBl&recid=13Q5G7HYxXozluDDlYliddYajNS&recp=1&moduleDetail=recommendations-l&action=click&contentCollection=Asia%20Pacific&region=Footer&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&src=recg&pgtype=article"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt_14888
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032461.txt
Re: update
[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number | should reach.\n\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or\nanything of the kind.\n\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already\nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\n\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great\nartists when they need it.\n\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source.\n\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet,\nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in\nperson."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Caroline Lang", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant Si"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 6:37:32 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt_14894
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032801.txt
Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis [a", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JJEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:19:56 PM", "subject": "Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!!\nhttps: //bossip. com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-\nher-pornographic-p]leasure-pocket-43081/"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt_14895
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030510.txt
from revival. a new book..
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley <a"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 15 2010 07:13 PM", "subject": "from revival. a new book..", "body": "I thought you might find this amusing. \"But more often then not, the team of economic advisers was\noperating from different playbooks, with Summers calling his plays the loudest. Take, for instance, the debate\nthat surrounded the Volcker rule -- the regulatory reform component that curtailed proprietary trading at U.S.\nbanks and limited their investments in private equity firms and hedge funds. As Wolffe reports:\n\n[Summers'] doubts sat there in the West Wing, blocking the Volcker rule for months. Obama had\nsignaled that he wanted the rule to move forward back in October. The banks were on safe ground again,\nbut could still benefit from subsidized lending by the federal government. That seemed wrong when they\ncould use the money to trade for themselves rather than lend it to customers in the real economy... Biden\nwas an old friend of Volcker's and started to press for the rule to take force. But as the weeks dragged on,\nSummers rehashed his same old questions and concerns. At one fall meeting with his economics team in\nthe Oval Office, Obama wanted to know why nothing had moved yet. Summers dug in once again, while\nGeithner - whose media coverage cast him as a supposed ally of Wall Street - wanted to push ahead.\n\nObama noted dryly, \"I think I can argue everyone's position now. \"\n\nHis 2fe 2s 2fe 2s 2s 24s ois 2fe 2s 2s fs of 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe of 2s 2c ois 2fe ois fe ois fe ofc ois 2fe ois fe fs fe oie ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s fe fe ois 2fe ois 2fe ois fe 2c ois 2s ok oie ois oie 2s ois 2k 2k"}]
1
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt_14897
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt
Capital Market Outlook
[{"sender": "Paul Mors", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/2/2019 4:24:45 PM", "subject": "Capital Market Outlook", "body": "Capital Market Outlook from our Chief Investment Office delivers a balanced mix of macroeconomic insights and global market views, with in-depth analysis from the CIO's investment strategists and analysts. It offers timely commentary that can help you navigate markets and take advantage of emerging trends across the globe.\n\nThis week's topics are:\n\ne Macro Strategy: Why 2%? — While Federal Reserve policy has always been focused on the goal of price stability, the specific meaning of price stability has been refined over the years from a general and non-specified, vague concept to the current very specific quantitative definition of a 2% long-run average for the personal consumption expenditures deflator. We describe the evolution and rationale for the more specific target.\n\n° Global Market View: Global R&D: From Apollo, to Apple, to Alibaba? — The recent unfolding tech cold war between the U.S. and China will likely only accelerate the pace of spending on global research and development as the two parties vie for technological supremacy. China faces significant technological hurdles, while the U.S. needs to rethink and rebalance the role of public and private sector research and development spending.\n\n° Thought of the Week: A Golden Diversifier — Gold’s recent outperformance versus the U.S. dollar has potentially triggered a bullish technical pattern. In our"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032307.txt_14903
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032307.txt
WSJ inquiry -- on deadline
[{"sender": "Joe Palazzolo", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "WSJ inquiry -- on deadline", "body": "Hi, Michael.\n\nI'm writing about the Jane Doe case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Can I talk to you briefly? Story is likely\ngoing online in the next couple hours. Apologies for the short notice. I wanted to get a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein.\n\nThanks and best,\n\nJoe"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt_14904
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032577.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 1:29:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you think you will be in new york?"}]
6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt_14913
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032563.txt
Questions for article
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/24/2017 5:22:16 AM", "subject": "Questions for article", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHuffington Post is almost done with their article. They need couple answers to use them for your quotes. Please \nsee below. \nQuestions for you: \n1. As a result of Trump's budget cuts, more scientists are turning to private donors for funds. How have you \nhelped these scientists thrive during this time in particular? \n2. Why do you think it's important to have funded the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics and how will this \nprogram help us in the future? \nQuestions for a scientist (can I ask Martin to answer and quote him)? \n1. How has Jeffery Epstein's donations helped you advance your research? \nLet me know if you have any questions or comments. Would appreciate speedy response. \nThank you!"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025944.txt_14924
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025944.txt
Fwd: Research App
[{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz [asmoskowitz@optonline.net]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 2:25:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Research App", "body": "This is what my son Aaron developed. Read below from David Hayes at the Mayo Clinic. How do I get David's email to Biden? Thanks"}, {"sender": "Hayes, David L., M.D.", "recipients": ["Bruce Moskowitz"], "timestamp": "June 30, 2016 at 8:57:26 AM EDT", "subject": "Research App", "body": "Bruce — thought of you when watching the evening news yesterday. Joe Biden was being interviewed about his work on “Cancer Moonshot” or something like that. He said that they were working on or planned to work on a database/app that has never before been done, that would allow a patient or a physician to see who was doing research on a specific tumor anywhere in the world.\n\nYou’ve already got it. You have connections everywhere, you should get to Biden on that work group.\n\nDavid"}]
2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021690.txt_14925
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021690.txt
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/04/2011
[{"sender": "Miami @", "recipients": ["Criminal tnvDiigative"], "timestamp": "03/04/2011", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/04/2011", "body": "LEAD (s) :\nSet Lead 1: (Action)\nCRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE\nAT WASHINGTON, DC\n\nCAC Unit is requested to coordinate and obtain appropriate\napprovals for proposed international travel of the listed Miami\npersonnel.\n\nSet Lead 2: (Action)\n[| i.\nb7C\nee\nis requested to obtain concurrence from the\nin obtaining country clearance for the travel\nfa) e liste lami personnel."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt_14934
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt
Re: A few favors...
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:3T", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle 0 some of the mess at the\nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and\nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy\nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023198.txt_14939
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023198.txt
Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it would \ntake us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I taped \nWoody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances? \nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:23:18 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt_14943
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033133.txt
Re: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect I am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:51:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": ""}]
11
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt_14946
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026786.txt
I did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2018 5:29:23 PM", "subject": "I did NOT have sex with the president: Nikki Haley swats down 'disgusting' rumor she had affair with Trump after author Michael Wolff hints at an affair", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5316779/Haley-denies-disgusting-rumors-affair-Trump.html"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022934.txt_14954
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022934.txt
Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks\nMarty"}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 4/21/15", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt_14957
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033289.txt
Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg EE", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2016 7:49:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 27, 2016 at 3:47:49 PM EDT", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg\n\nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\n\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\n\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\n\nThanks for your consideration.\n\nFoxNews.com"}]
2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026838.txt_14960
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026838.txt
Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
[{"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\n\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments we submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday or Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24\" February its worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr. Wade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\n\nMany thanks and best regards.\n\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "In light of the trend toward democracy in Africa as exemplified by Nigeria and Guinea, it is very concerning that one of the United States’ closest allies and Africa's strongest democracies appears to be retrogressing. The destabilization of democracy in Senegal could have significant consequences in the entire region. The United States must get in front of this negative trend before spreads across Africa and it is too late. The U.S. should call for President Sall to honor the request of the UN Working Group and release his political rival Mr. Wade and also keep his pledge of a 5 year presidential mandate. President Obama has said that Africa is more important than ever to security and prosperity in the U.S. We have worked very hard in implementing and prioritizing democracy and democratic succession in Africa. The Obama administration must not let our hard work be compromised in Senegal, we have worked too hard and come too far."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt_14968
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030696.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers, no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which i believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times. two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:32:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}]
10
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033127.txt_14969
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033127.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018, at 6:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "now?"}, {"sender": "LHS [glhsummers]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018 at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "830 or so???"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS [glhsummers]"], "timestamp": "Oct 4, 2018, at 9:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Tomorrow"}, {"sender": "LHS [glhsummers]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number should I call in 10"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:46:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "By age 3, Mr. Trump was earning $200,000 a year in today's dollars from his father's empire. He was a millionaire by age 8."}]
5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt_14973
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 9:58:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "paris be back the 5th for a few days we can do it then"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Have to go to a funeral of an old relative in NJ. Won't be back into city until 3:30 or 4:00. Or what's your weekend look like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, February 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]
5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt_14974
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032449.txt
Re: Kuhn
[{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The Science of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt.\n\nIll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 6:02:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When to meet? Weekend OK."}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt_14979
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032829.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't tweet this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigative journalism so does your suggested pr group have the better contacts to place a story. on why itis not. . howeer to you point. to what end?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it legs--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think about it."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution. sex formoney. . a state crime. with state laws."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At this point I don’t think you can go legalistic. They’ve won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im aware. im thinking what would trump do"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He never tries to explain. He denies, blames media, denigrates someone else."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Claims are ludicrous and self-serving, media is working with the other side’s lawyers, this is all about Donald Trump."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/1/2018 3:57:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "...all about Donald Trump, the real villain."}]
9
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033504.txt_14987
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033504.txt
RE: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt_14991
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031563.txt
Re: Jed Rubenfeld
[{"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Good morning!\nJed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend's unhappy situation? If so, happy to make the connection.\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Can you talk? Impt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above the law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely to\ngive king like powers to a president. on one above the law. I would like lunch pail joe to come away and\nthink, this guy is smart . I understood. lets see what he writes about the clintons.\nsomeone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose a vote, that is true , but\nwould make little sense for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the allowed civil depo setting\nprecedent for criminal process , is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down, again, and suggesting\nthat you can sue your neighbor, even if you neighbor is the president. makes little sense that the you can be\nindicted for assaulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . at\nsome point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you were that the clinton and betty curries'\ntrashcan story, was reopened. ."}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 7:17:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Wise counsel. Thx!"}]
6
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026242.txt_15000
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026242.txt
You are in the book... .
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 3:04:23 PM", "subject": "You are in the book... .", "body": "I read the first half of it last night -- there are a few paragraphs on you TB, DJT partying around NYC\nin 90s etc -- and then MW says you are airbrushed out of DJT history while Barrack sticks around."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt_15010
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033262.txt
Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/5/2017 12:02:43 PM", "subject": "Mueller Subpoenas Trump Deutsche Bank Records", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-\nclient-trump"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031815.txt_15011
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031815.txt
null
[{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: _ the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kah"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, itis sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of arank amatuer.. youtook a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you seta target. . it hit the traget , you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing , no discipline and as a percentaage of investment. a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your gradeisanF. notone goodmoveinmany. ._ re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning. options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , thisisno way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could. would.. Had youtold me, jeffrey Id like to try a new job asa"}]
2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023419.txt_15013
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023419.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns,\ngordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres ,\nhardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn (\nharvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you\ngoing to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be\nhere all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk\nfreely."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , 1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in\nroom 1, gunshot in surgery, and the\n\n\"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories,\nhowever. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}]
13
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt_15019
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033276.txt
Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/14/2018 4:59:21 PM", "subject": "Trump plans to name Larry Kudlow his top economic advisor, replacing Gary Cohn", "body": "https://ww.cnbc.com/2018/03/14/trump-to-name-larry-kudlow-as-gary-cohn-replacement.html"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026256.txt_15024
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026256.txt
Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "coin issues. : receive coins. distribute coins, pay in coins. coin cooperative. prohibitions foreign donor.? 1 need to understand flow of funds.. donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it have to go there at all etc."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a confession privelege. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:21:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "Populist/Nationalist first\n\nConservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next\nReverse alabama\n\nThis coalition staves off \"times up\" for next decade plus"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt_15033
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt
Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 3:01:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": "Attachments: Epstein combined articles.pdf\n\nForwarded message"}, {"sender": "Public Records/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "F.", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": "Forwarded by Public Records/PalmBeach on 02/24/2010 05:53AM"}, {"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Joyce"], "timestamp": "08/12/2008 09:33PM", "subject": "Epstein News Articles", "body": "I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file), some background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.\n\nRegards,\nMike\n\n(See attached file: Epstein combined articles.pdf)"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033510.txt_15041
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033510.txt
RE: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\n\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\n\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\n\nPlease let me know.\n\nJess"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt_15050
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030899.txt
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:18:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}]
10
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt_15055
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030641.txt
Ri did see this coming...
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on.... \nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible... \nWill you have a cabinet position? \nHow are you? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 7:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Ri did see this coming...", "body": "How's that? \nWhich team you pulling for? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 1:53:35 PM", "subject": "Ri did see this coming...", "body": "And just had a great time with Joi. \nYou still in Paris? \nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]
7
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023343.txt_15056
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023343.txt
Valuation Discount
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. You have email after email ,where i remind you that I am not\nyour bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance dept ??!!) that it should be redone .I\nhave reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and have pointed out the continued numerous\ninaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off , so what if the categories are off. whats the big\ndeal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the tough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts (\nhigh) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im afraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be\nback from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Alan", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the low\nend. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel as", "Leon"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and\nyou and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing\nthe things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be\nhelpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per\nyear. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. _, planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n. I wrote itto you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , as arule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt_15061
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun Sep 27 19:35:33 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when does have to get back? went to new york"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No later than Wednesday probably.."}, {"sender": "J J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "9/28/09 6:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thanks where are you.. i loved your bono mick story"}, {"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am in CA — that friend of yours whom I think lives in Paris was at the conference..she spoke to you last week..claims to be in charge of a hedge fund or something"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Mon Sep 28 19:16:28 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do yu mean nicole junkerman"}, {"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's her..I couldn't remember her name"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "9/28/2009 11:34:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we just rea;lzied that the picture, in my kitchen is me clinton and ted. how funny"}]
7
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026637.txt_15066
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026637.txt
Fwd: My Thoughts on Currencies
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon iii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 6:33:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: My Thoughts on Currencies", "body": "The smartest/most amusing piece of research I have read so far on Trump/global economy. You should pass on to DJT brain trust on economy/markets"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028768.txt_15073
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028768.txt
FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012
[{"sender": "Manuela Wieland [m.wieland@heute.at]", "recipients": ["e.dichand@heute.at"], "timestamp": "Montag, 07. Mai 2012 13:45", "subject": "Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Liebe Frau Dichand, \nanbei der Zeitablauf von der AMFAR Gala 2012 am 19.5.2012. \nLG MW"}, {"sender": "Eva Dichand", "recipients": ["Cavan Mahony", "Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 5:51 AM", "subject": "WG: zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Hallo everybody! \nAttached (sorry in Germain) the Programm fort he lifeball on the 19th. \nActually there will be a Galadinner with our prime minister and Bill Clinton and all kinds of stars in \nthe Hofburg (former imerial estate - very impressive to see from inside)) It is only 250 people,. A \nseated dinner and more upscale than the rest oft he evening. It start's at 5pm with a champagne cocktail \nand from there we go directly to the opening oft he ball where we'll have a really cool Box first row!! \npresscode: actually the lifeball is really crazy and 'half naked' we always do a intermediare because \notherwise you feel like an idiot at the Amfar Gala dinner before. People now don't wear Tuxedos anymore. \nchristoph wear's normal black trouseres with a white shirt and a dar sakko because he doesn't want to be \nin any crazy stuff on all the pics. Half oft he people oft he gala dinenr also waer some 'little' crazy \nstuff like pink velvet sakkos (and a mask for later) or so. girls: crazy as you like. There are a lot of \natrists that are really dressed up. i will wear a quiet see-through short dress with high high heels+ a \nchanel Tatoo and will take a face mask fort he ball later. \nSo i hope this helped at least a little bit. For pics got to: lifeball.org \nFriday night: we would like to invite you all for dinner and will organize a nice place with a cool bar. \nAress follows. Pls let me know who wants to join!! \nSunday: I'm very sure we'll be dead :-) BUT we would like to invite you to our house/garden/pool \n(swimmwear) for brunch starting at 11. Furfanggasse 4, 1190 Wien. From hotel sachen max. 15 min with \nTaxi. If you fly late we can walk from our house to one oft he famous Austrian heurigen ...and get some \nmore alcholic to drink :-) :-) \non Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La Clemenza de Tito. Very hard to get tickets but for 2 of \nyou i could still organize (hopefully9 if some of you already arrive on Thursday. \nBig kiss to everbody...I promise you...not often you will have seen something that crazy :-)"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:15 PM", "subject": "FW: Zeitplan amfar Gala 19.5.2012", "body": "Eva is my friend there who will host us. She is very close friend with mette as well. \nEva and I are still trying to get mette to join at the last moment. \nShe and her family own 80% or so of Austrian media (Heute etc). She is describing program below. \nThe plan would be that we arrive to Vienna on Thursday 17th mid day. \nOn Thursday there is a big Premiere of Mozart La clemenza de Tito and we go to that. \nON Friday Eva is organizing a dinner/reception with her friends. We can schedule some other \nmeetings/visits during day. \nOn Saturday the night starts at 5pm and goes through early next morning. \nleave first flight Sunday morning for San Francisco to meet Bill. \nIf you are staying in Vienna and have time (and like Eva) you should go to her brunch. \nHow this seems to you???"}]
3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028931.txt_15076
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028931.txt
RE: an article you may both hate. or like.
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 5:52:30 PM", "subject": "RE: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are\nmuch more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find\ndismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc.,\noffensive — so be it.\n\nBut | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while\nrecognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their\nbeliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we\nshould ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument\nand evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma)\nare people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when\nthe icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike\nother countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose\ndoesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as our minds\nreflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession\nand the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt_15079
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026745.txt
Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #
[{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/19/2017 2:09:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHuge thanks for giving BBB another chance!!We have 200 quite fantastic young women \nincluding a minister, an ambassador-Lisa! a professor -your Anna!-a princess-Sofia! and \nthe other 196 \nare doing pretty good as well...lots of young girls in Sweden now dream of joining \nBBB...we really build something \nunique and worthwhile!! Young dean at Stockholm School of Economics is an idiot to \nthrough it all out but \nnow its time to develop it smartly! I will be doing a famous Summer radio program in a few \nweeks in Sweden, \n1 million listeners...among other things, I will talk about the girls..(and my blind date long \nago with a Donald \nTrump.. ha ha!) Anyway, please see details for the money transaction below - Edyta is my \nbanker ann a super \nperson! - I am leaving tomorrow night if anything? Also, if you send me a cell phone \nnumber, I can start sending \nyou photos from BBB, much easier than e-mail. \nTACK sweetheart for continuing believing in BBB! Kram BE"}, {"sender": "Edyta Wynberg", "recipients": ["behnbom"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 19, 2017 9:05 am", "subject": "SV: BBB AB konto #", "body": "Hej Barbro! \nBeneficiary name: BBB AB \nBeneficiarys bank: SEB ( Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken) \n106 40 Stockholm \nBeneficiarys bank SWIFT address/BIC: ESSESESS \nBeneficiarys account no: \nIBAN: IBAN \nVi hors \nKram"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt_15080
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032588.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food°"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:30:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}]
11
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt_15081
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031239.txt
Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["nancy dahl", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:53:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft: \nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements \non your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor \nstudents, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your \nreporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known \nindividuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to \nmore scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and \nallegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have \nremained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer \nor an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the \nfact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 \nmeetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally \nappreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your \nreport is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of \nyour 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than \nallegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other \norganizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my \ncontributions and my actions. \nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in \n2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be \nappropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an \nanonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in \nany university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a \nbar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident \n5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is \nwhat I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down. \nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail, \nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came \nto me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was \ndifferent than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, \nbut she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since \nshe was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult \nfor her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had \nasked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have \ngone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I \nusually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee \nwith her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch \nme do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students \non campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not least \nbecause there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to have \nbeen offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in \n2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife \nand I gave her a lift well out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her \nemail about the conference, again in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice \nversa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to \nthe human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told \nthat no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young \nwoman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my \nintentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-\nstanding attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among \nthe faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have \nany further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also told \nthat because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, \nand (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from \nmy record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you. \nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically \nstated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the \noutside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this \ncomplaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a \ncomplaint, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and \ndismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities \nthat because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to \nthe University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated thoroughly by both ASU and ANU and \nboth came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. In addition \nANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting \ndistortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a \ntemporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along \nwith the statement made in the complaint that \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the \ntime of the incident.\" \nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent \nwith the original claim and apparent later claims as follows: \n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident. \n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched \nin \nan unwelcome manner. \n- The conference attendee who took the `selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016). \n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016). \nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact. \n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who \ntook \nthe `selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was \nrequested \nin the course of the investigation.\" \n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies \nnot to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour) \nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, \nand when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am \nparticularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. \nThus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes \nthem feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI \nconference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the \ninteractions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female \ngraduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever \ncomplained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and \ntreat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations \nagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in \ndetail. \nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 \nbelow). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and \nfabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious \nintent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it. \nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve \nUniversity, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I \nam reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia \nHughes. \nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). \nOur reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, \nArizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center \nfor Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints \nand concerns about your behavior during this time. \nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and \neyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, \nstudents, and peers in the skeptics movement. \nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you \nwish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are \nplanning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time."}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028925.txt_15084
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028925.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of etails where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has ots of traction"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 4, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting... Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 9:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Kabuki Sec royals money"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 8:34:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I got another email from a colleague of his saying, \"they picked the wrong adversary in Dersh. It will be his new life mission. \""}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt_15086
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt
Re: Russian House
[{"sender": "MM", "recipients": ["JP"], "timestamp": "05/04/2009 04:28 PM", "subject": "Russian House", "body": "JP: What is the address of the former Trump mansion on North Ocean purchased by the Russian?"}, {"sender": "John Page", "recipients": ["Mayor"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Russian House", "body": "Happy to help. The address is 515 N. County Road."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt_15088
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.txt
Fwd: Re:
[{"sender": "Nowak, Martin A. <martin.a.nowak@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 20, 2017, at 3:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very happy to talk\nwhich number may i call?\nor skype?"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thank you Jeffrey!\nMartin, great meeting you. I'd be happy to have a call for around 20 min whenever it's convenient for you. Let me know.\nMasha"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A.", "Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2017, at 4:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "martin, masha is helpiing me with PR, I told her she might want to speak to you, im copying her on this mail"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 22, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you Martin! let's do Skype?I'm there as mashadrokova. What time is the best for you? I'm in Europe now, early morning/afternoon would be ideal."}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Today would be good. Some time in the afternoon?"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sure, I'm available in 1.5 h and next few hours (until 11:30am PST). What time zone are you at?"}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["Masha Drokova"], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ET time\nplease call me on Skype when you are ready"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2017, at 7:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great, will do"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "Aug 2, 2017, at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nThanks for the great call last week. Enjoyed it a lot. Could I ask you some follow up questions?\nQuestion to be answered by Martin.\n• What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?\n• Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?\n• The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?\n• Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?\n• What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?\n• What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)\n• How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?\nQuestion\n• Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It's a hot topic given this story"}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["Nowak, Martin A."], "timestamp": "August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Martin,\nJust wanted to check if you've seen the previous email.\nIf it's more convenient for you to discuss it by Skype, let me know. If you want to skip any of them it's not a problem."}, {"sender": "Masha Drokova", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": ""}]
11
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt_15090
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026623.txt
Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/23/2016 3:03:49 PM", "subject": "Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly", "body": "https://www.washinetonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/23/trump-is-headed-for-a-win-says-professor-whos-predicted-30-years-of-presidential-outcomes-correctly/"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023431.txt_15092
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023431.txt
Re: Highlight
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:48:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "I know, and I'm immensely grateful\n\n. | would like to send you not only the NEH , but a harvard budget for the Ed school initiative with EdLabs.\nThis may take a few days. But I'm on it\n\nThank you Jeffrey\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 8:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "I only want you to succeed.. I suggest that as this is charity , the numbers will be scrutinized more\n\nheavily. ( could have gone for food for homeless etc ) please send me the neh proposal that you mentioned. I\nassume there is a full budget."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Jeffrey , if you are conceding any bit of the other things , with all due respect, that's exciting, as its new for me\nto be right about anything in the area of budgets .\nAs it happens,and as of today , there is huge dissatisfaction in public television world with the lower budget\nClinton footage versus the Herbie Hancock footage. David g was there for Herbie and not for Clinton. I can see\nthe difference .the pilot was made for 100, 000 , with savings on the Clinton but it does show"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <M>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my\nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on my\nproducer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be\nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there .\nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget .\nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no\n\nactors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david\nbrooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less --"}]
5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023357.txt_15094
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023357.txt
null
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Office, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax\nexperience. .castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a\nbill ) eva goes. outsource as much as possible.. bookkeeping systems built from scratch, airplane\nrestructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really\nwant these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts\nactivity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA rethinks . household and construction\n\narchitects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family\noffice. . decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years... insurance. operations. airplane ,\netc. . artfoundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line\nbanking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ). airplane certificate, redone jet aviation\nredo. . _— paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. .\n\ntoday is Oct 15"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "1. 80 percent of contracted job is accomplished, now drafting ,signing and few critical decisions on your part\nstill await , will fill in nec blanks, 1, how much of upside to kids. , 2, protections . 3 allocations. 4.\ncharitiable, inventory, securities,\n\n2 .to engage the second phase if youso choose , and considering there is only 8 more to be paid this\n\nyear in oct, for the job now almost completed, total of 23. that was agreed only for history fix.\n\n3. with the necessary proprietary protections , proposal is for first year only an additional 17 . making it 40 , but\nfull year balance on signing , ie 25. takes care of 2013\n\n4, moving forward , 40 per year ,( approx 1 percent ) for three years, to be credited against an agreed\nformula. Im open to suggestions total approx 120 for new workover 3 years , benefits to you over the next 20.\n5, can consider interests other than cash as payment. ?\n\n6. need to speak re , bankers, valuations, mechanics and their continued importance."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:03 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "to refresh your recollection, as 4 states. 40a year for three years. asisaid today. . the other was in addtion\nas you recall."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "NO sorry not until i hear from leon\n\nleon. to be fair, I had sent the first note to you one year ago . stating that my work would come to an end on\noct 15. that day had meaning as everything would be closed. you asked that i continue to help brad. as of\nnov though he would officially start in jan. I said ok, but ..... \" you told me to continue as we would work\nsomething out\" I told you my fee then was 40. feb you came with ben while kathy ruemmler was here. and\nsaid next week, debra got bad news. and I quickly prioritzed not adding stress to your situation. I wont\nregurgitate the interim, though millions of dollars were saved since. millions. . it is now one year later and you\npropose 10 mlllion , plus a contingent fee . [have said that i would work with you , and if contingent and a\npercentage of something. I strongly believe that is not in your interest. I continue to put our friendship first\nand dont want you to write a check for over 100million andthe i will have to listen to lewie for the next few\nyears. but if you prefer over my objection a percentage deal then it should be of all savings not just\n\nphaidon. ( arandom concept). The idea that 1 am somehow even marginally responsible for neither you nor\nheather , ever telling me that there was an unresolved issue, though you said you had been pinged a number of\ntimes is emblematic .\n\nI can do a call with you and Karp. anytime you like today, but ican assure you 100 percent that there is no\nlight between our positions. ZERO. and he is ready to do his best to try to explain it to you."}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt_15099
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031183.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm|er"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 7:51:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt_15108
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince \nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells \nRadarOnline.com. \nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and \nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year. \nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds \nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims, \nlosing $67 million. \nThe source says it's all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and \nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1. \nMeanwhile, Epstein's life behind bars hasn't been too rough — in fact he's allowed to spend most days at his \nattorney's office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy \nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he's been guarded by men in suits with \nearphones. \nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he's freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St. \nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey-epstein\n\nHELP ; a reporter for the ny times wants to write the following; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We \nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of govt , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the \nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt_15110
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020446.txt
Update
[{"sender": "[triyersr@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/11/2018 5:34:33 PM", "subject": "Update", "body": "miss chatting with you \nam back at work; will give keynote to the Louisiana State Psychological Association \nin early November and next day meet with department heads and deans for three local Universities, Tulane, \nNew Orleans, Louisiana State to see if some kind of 3-year deal can be worked out \nthen off to U Texas at Austin and Texas A&M, to which i have never been—biology is very strong in genetics \nand they may be interested—i will lecture to them on Recent Advances in Human Evolutionary Genetics, a \nspecialty of mine \ni attach latest version of Honour Killings—key is to look at are the PHOTOS—the women are almost without \nfail beautiful \ngiven that i was perhaps a little cruel or frenetic over Jim Watson i attach a short remembrance of his other side, \nFrancis Crick, a much more broad-minded and friendly organism \ni don't give one shit about race and IQ by the way—and i hope it is clear that VARIANCE in genetic traits of all \nvarieties is expected to be especially high in Africa—hence it is the source of all successful hominid \ninvasions—but i am saying nothing about AVERAGE difference in intelligence or anything else \ni will shortly send you a piece onTrump as a narcissistic sociopath \nfinally here is a joke for you—we are both, i believe, politically—and not sexually—polymorphic perverse so \nthere should be no problem with this character \nhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/blindfold-sex-men-trick-dating-app-ana-duarte-xavier-straight-\na8571076.html \nall best \np.s. please remember to tell me when to take my money out of the market!!"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt_15112
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030655.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/18/2017 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume no dinner"}]
2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt_15115
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt
Re:
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\n\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\n\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the\nYemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to\nYemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\n\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\n\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international\npressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace\nefforts.\n\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,\" he noted.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah AI-\nAhmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign\nminister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings.\n\n\"We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome you\nif you sign the agreement and not to waste time. But it appears that the revolutionaries are not ready to respond\nto this step,\" he said.\n\nAl Meahlafi said he visited Brussels for two-days of talks with the Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders,\nEuropean Commission officials and Members of the European Parliament to explain the situation in Yemen\nand seek support for the Yemeni government's peace efforts.\n\nHe said the Yemeni government seeks peace based on the three references, the Gulf initiative, the outputs of\nthe national dialogue, and the Security Council resolutions on Yemen, including resolution 2216.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister called on the EU to condemn the revolution and the Iranian interference in\nYemen, which is sending arms to the Houthi militias."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi\nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon. email you after. how much fun"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/14/2017 9:38:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think .. and if peace agreement\nwas signed in kuwait that would be we eed\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032775.txt_15116
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032775.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 2:42:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Good lord. A novella of rehashed crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 22, 2018, at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-me-too"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030712.txt_15122
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030712.txt
Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Thu, 15 Mar 2018 06:46:54 -0400", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "yesIsawit 1 iwill invite gerry baker to our dinnner tonight. 2 miro lajcak. president of UN. will guide the EU project if you like him. his govt will fall this week - as planned. :) 3. later today we can discuss michael and his coins. 4. sultan - duabi in new york 21 22"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "What time is dinner?\n\nDo u want me to come over beforehand ???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mar 15, 2018, at 7:00 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "sure ! dinner 7. come at 6?\n\nhttps://blindgossip.com/?p=89824"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2018 11:07:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Corker ‘hopeful’ on approving new war-powers authorization for Trump administration - POLITICO", "body": "Done"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030429.txt_15135
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030429.txt
Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 20 2014 06:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Looks like Priceline Director made a bad move today and has the same name - this works to our advantage.\nPushing on this story now."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031418.txt_15144
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031418.txt
Re: <no subject>
[{"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2015 2:40:08 AM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\nLOPE EORTC onemeennennenteeennaiiees ."}, {"sender": "J Jep", "recipients": ["GG", "Indyke, Darren K."], "timestamp": "Monday, September 21, 2015 at 22:08 PM", "subject": "Re: <no subject>", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\na a a ee"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030706.txt_15149
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030706.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:28:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Depends on calculus for Ryan and McConnell who crave continued power above all else and would be thrilled if trump died"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think it comes down to trump obstruction. vs clintons wrondoing. timing. ? election impact etc. kelly is not political. so half his job not getting done"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\n\nDon’t follow your note. What texts"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey’s chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI’s personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}]
5
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030367.txt_15161
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030367.txt
RE: [External]
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:31 PM", "subject": "[External]", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Spinella", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:46:53 PM", "subject": "RE: [External]", "body": "We cannot print it since we don’t subscribe"}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029150.txt_15166
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029150.txt
Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@qmail.com]"], "timestamp": "December 29, 2017 at 3:21:43 PM EST", "subject": "Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes - see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today - mother 102 in May.)\n\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\n\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry, biology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n\n4. Power Laws\n5. Mathematical Biology\n\n6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)\n\nADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes\n\n9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/1/2018 10:36:46 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": ""}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032985.txt_15182
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032985.txt
Re: Masa
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <1.1>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2o17/03/o3/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "have not met"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "Seems to me he is a natural guy for you; he is going to be in Florida in March for some Trump event. I know some of his financial guys pretty well: I might try to facilitate something if you are not opposed."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "great , thanks, or new york , or this weekend as donald arrives at 5pm tonight"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "OK. Let me see what I can do. What is the latest from the inner circle?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 4:36:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa", "body": "they believe all on track, . tax policy, big changes. . law and order and immigration. . . jobs. . however russia not going away anytime soon. . lots of people with magnifiying glasses."}]
6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030373.txt_15183
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030373.txt
RE: whoopsie
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kap, Brod S"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Oct 02, 2018, 7:27 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-\n\n2018-10-02"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/3/2018 1:49:27 AM", "subject": "RE: whoopsie", "body": "Brutal piece."}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622.txt_15184
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622.txt
list for bannon steve
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "mandelson", "barnaby summers watson", "axel bottstein", "karim terje", "pritzker edelman", "set lloyd", "martin novak", "minsky", "tata susskind", "strominger krauss", "hopkins", "randall", "kosslyn", "gardner gates", "thiel", "hoffman", "hoie sinofsky", "sheldrake", "suzlberger", "jes staley", "joscha bach", "joiito", "HBJ berge", "miro", "anas raafat", "sultan", "nathan feigenbaum", "ramashandran", "goelberg", "demasio", "shristakas brockman hillis", "kaufman", "seligman", "gould", "saks", "john kery", "george mitchell", "mandelbbrot", "chomsky", "barrack barak", "zagat", "nathan", "brian greene", "yau", "eo wilson", "prince andrews", "jagland", "clinton pastrana", "richardson", "leahy", "jarecki", "schumer", "ranieri", "waheed", "mongolia gambat ehud", "jacque lang woody", "churkin", "sergey", "ruemmler", "weingarten", "amabani", "rochsild", "dersh", "ken starrk karp", "dubai castro", "pople queen", "pres king pm", "mandelson balir", "mette", "midlefafrt", "gergen", "melusine margarita ovitz", "barrak", "mabuto", "kashoogi", "rockefeller"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 30 2019 11:41 AM", "subject": "list for bannon steve", "body": ""}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033060.txt_15197
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033060.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030909.txt_15203
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030909.txt
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 11:42:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Here is my response to the hundreds who are now attacking me on the web:\n\nI will add one remark here, as most people have not read my full set of comments, posted after the post\nappeared.. I am myself rather disappointed by the lack of skepticality of this community. As I said, I have read\nnumerous reports of orgies on Jeffrey’s island involving me and other scientists during our meetings.. Orgies\nthat never happened, Iam VERY skeptical of other claims on his behavior. I am defending Jeffrey for 2\nreasons: (1) Based on my knowledge and experience I am skeptical of the claims in the media and of those who\nhave settled claims for money... namely I don’t believe the published details just like I tend to be skeptical of\nmany published details on the internet.. I don’t believe Jeffrey did what has been claimed, and unless I see hard\nevidence, I will trust my own judgement here, and (2) Jeffrey went to prison, and I happen to believe that\nhaving served time, even those who questioned his behavior should be willing to give him the benefit of the\ndoubt, again until proved otherwise, that he is working hard to live a good life and do good things. I for one am\ndisgusted that people eat up the salacious nonsense the read on the web and then jump to conclusions about\nthings and people they do not know.. I do not jump to condemn people, especially when it concerns their sexual\npreferences. [DO NOT CONDONE sex with young girls, or young boys for that matter.. because there are real\nvictims there.. Until I know all the facts however, I do not jump to conclusions, and I am sorry, having seen the\nmedia frenzy around Jeffrey, and having seen the shoddy behavior of those who have attacked him, I remain\nskeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\n\nL. Krauss"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]
5
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030398.txt_15213
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030398.txt
today
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "12/15/2017 7:50:42 PM", "subject": "today", "body": "http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/15/report-feminist-lawyer-promised-cash-to-trump-sexual-harassment-accusers/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailycaller.com&utm_term=68814&utm_content=1"}]
1
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019410.txt_15235
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019410.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com]", "recipients": ["Alexandra Wolfe"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage\nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some\ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you\nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you\nwith accurate responses.\n\nI_am_also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\n\nJay Lefkowitz"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.txt_15241
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.txt
RE: FW: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — \nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a \nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records \nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have \nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. \nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? \nPlease let me know."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 1U:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... \nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of \ngoing forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition \nwill follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:05 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
14
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt_15247
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033074.txt
Re: Joe cinque
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayern"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 11:45:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "never heard off him. donald is close to no one. . he talks to many people. he tells each one something\ndiffernt."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Joe cinque", "body": "Do you know him I heard he is so close to trump"}]
2
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011964.txt_15255
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011964.txt
Scouting
[{"sender": "Michael Sanka", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "12/12/2014 12:48 (GMT-05:00)", "subject": "Scouting", "body": "Jean Luc,\n\nHow are you?\n\nAfter so many years scouting for you and having a great network of agencies all around the world who enjoy to work with us, i wanted to let you know that we are on the way to lose everything we build and we are gonna have big problem now.\n\nAgencies, still want to work with us but parents don't want their daughters to come to us, because when they google your name and the agency name the only things they see is \"Sex Trafficking\"!!!\n\nIt's impossible to sign a new girl and if nothing it's done i can tell you that in 3 months we we will not get any new girls and i don't see how the agency will work without new faces.\n\nAll the agencies who know you don't have any problems with you since they all told me \"We know Jean Luc for more than 20 years and all those years we had so many girls place with him who had better experience than in any other agencies who were representing them as well and we never had any problems whatsoever, all our girls had great carriers as a model when he represented them\".\n\nI understand those agencies because it's hard for them to talk to parents and explain that it's not the truth when it's all over the internet.\n\nYou need to have it stop and have the people write an official letter to say that it's not the truth...\n\nI will keep you posted of course but it's really bad for us and the scouting.\n\nBest regards\n\nMichael Sanka"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt_15256
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026547.txt
null
[{"sender": "Gerald Barton <Gerald Barton> (on behalf of Jeevacation@gmail.com)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Gi Feather", "Gerald Barton"], "timestamp": "4/23/2014 12:07:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Thank you for the kindness shown to me and my family in the periodic availability of the New York apartment. \nLesley has done an admirable job in making us feel welcome and always with good cheer. \nSome years ago, we talked about the opportunity to use Landmark's $166 million tax loss. At that time, my \nambition, ego, or stupidity limited the discussion. My memory is you, after discussions with Larry Summers, \ndecided the pursuit was not worth the prey. Now, age (which I laughingly call maturity) or new information, \nhas opened doors that I believe we can now accomplish the goals we discussed some years ago. \nIf, at a time and place of your convenience, you had 30 minutes for me to outline the fundamentals of the plan, \nyou would know what I believe would work and if your mental quickness is still there, you would know \nwhether or not you wanted to proceed. Certainly, when the goal is so great, 30 minutes with an old friend is not \na great sacrifice. \nOn a personal note, your friend, Larry Summers, recently gave a meaningful speech in Toronto entitled \"Will \n2014 End Up Like 1914\". You may find it worth reading. Your friend, Donald Trump recently purchased a \nproject we developed on the west coast of Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been consistently rated the best \nresort in Europe. \nJeffrey, please let me know when and where this is convenient for you. \nJerry"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032952.txt_15259
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032952.txt
Re: Presidential inauguration
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Should I accept the invitation sent by Tom barrack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 2:49:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/tom-barrack-donald-trump-inauguration/index.html"}]
2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023627.txt_15262
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023627.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 8 2016 08:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "It’s an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the dining room is grand but peaceful, creating a hermetic or stop-time sense, broken only by the household staff ferrying in time-of-day-appropriate exotic foods and beverages.\n\nThe real world seems terribly far away, but with paparazzi often posted near by, it’s dangerously close too. Once I arrived for a visit and found several police cars blocking the street and thought the worst—they’d come for him . But it was a massive security detail for a well known head of state who had come for tea.\n\nWe met several years before he became arguably the world’s most notorious sex offender. In 2002, his plane, a meticulously appointed 727, ferried a group of people to the TED conference in Monterey. He was the mysterious and peculiarly gracious host arriving after everyone had boarded: tanned, relaxed, attentive, soliciting every guest’s story and views, and accompanied by three young women not his daughters, witty, poised, helpful, and beautiful—out of a men’s magazine fantasy of the luxe life.\n\nOne more thing about this trip suggesting something of his unique view of the public world and what you got to see when you are near him. Google founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, with their company rising into the stratosphere, came out to see his plane on the Monterey tarmac and, with a few other Googlers, literally ran whooping from one end of the plane to the other. Then, sitting in the plane’s plush living room, they described, in what I could not be sure was a put-on or entrepreneurial brainstorm, the future of search ..\n\nSince that trip, and through his travails, I have often been invited to his house to participate in the conversations of the newest ideas that often take place there.\n\nIn sweatshirt, draw-string pants, palm beach slippers, and half glasses, Jeffrey Epstein—that Epstein, most recently embroiled in charges involved under age women ,Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew—spends most of his day at his dining room table in the in front of a laptop and beside a row of reading glasses (there are a lot of them in case, apparently, he misplaces a pair, but being quite meticulous he never does) conducting what must surely be the world’s most extraordinary colloquial. Pictures on the table have Jeffrey and prime minister, princes, leading scientists.with fidel castro next to the photo with pope, I guess his attempt at levity.\n\nThese meetings, and this lifestyle, have somehow stayed private or secret—or apart—not out of any formal or stated restrictions, but because, in some sense, it would be very hard to explain just what you’re doing there with a well known sex offender ina mouth dropping home flaunting all moderation.\n\nAnd yet, defying controversy , and tolerating his societal tone deafness—or shy attitude toward the zeitgeist—still so many come. Gladly. Willingly. Feeling that his invitation is frankly quite an extraordinary privilege.\n\nAmong his frequent guests is Bill Gates, for whom Epstein has become a friend, proposing a way to leverage the resources of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to accommodate many other fortunes, so that, Epstein explains, “you might join 10 or 20 billionaires on one giving project.” They can leverage your unique experience and expertise in the philanthropic world and learn from your early mistakes. As part of a many friends encouraged effort to get “out in front” of the notice that might be expected when it was revealed the number and wide diversity of the most rarified thinkers of our generation that come to visit . Epstein agreed to a limited on-the-record conversation with me.\n\nHis subject, on a morning in late fall, sitting at the dining room table—its humorous but baronial quality disturbed by an ever-present white board—is “hyper wealth.” His subject is always wealth—how capital , in uber amounts should react to the given new global political, economic, and cultural moment.\n\nHis stock in trade is not the making of money, (his proletariat background not withstanding ) but the issues that arise when wealth growing at a heretofore unimaginable rate, makes its entrance , altering many basic economic, social, and personal calculations. Watching his presentation recounts a math class of the mighty.\n\nThe professor at the blackboard and the students ( the titans ), still hoping they are not called upon to answer a difficult question.\n\nHe recounts a dinner he had two nights before. The scene is, like much of what he does, a conspiracy theorist’s fantasy—the six men at this dinner, all technology entrepreneurs, representing, together, over a hundred billion dollars and now trying to figure out how to use their resources in order to help shape the world."}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt_15277
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt
RE: Plane management
[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:17:38 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}]
9
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029106.txt_15282
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029106.txt
Fwd: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "10/11/2017 3:04:05 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press. \nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster. \nThis is a staggering shit show."}]
1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt_15285
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027059.txt
Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012", "subject": "Happy new year!", "body": "All the best in new year.\n\nFor more fun in new year.\n\nAnd for little Jeffrey soon to come ;-)\nThank you for being such a great friend\n\nGoing to sleep. Still in Bangkok.\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 05:53 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 31, 2012 07:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Nonono just wanted you to that iris was also in Bangkok . I forgot about the Boris wish"}, {"sender": "Jean Luc Brunel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/1/2013 12:51:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Happy new year!", "body": "Saved for 2012 but I can start to look for baby clothes if the wish turns into reality. Or would you stick with RL baby around the corner? Forgot that you r planning everything\n\nI will send you picture of the Burmese girl. Very pretty She is the star singer in Myamar. I will bring her to US. Obama visits Myamar and Chan Chan comes to America. I think that I have something new and fresh news to promote"}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030921.txt_15295
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030921.txt
Statement in the Daily Beast?
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011", "subject": "Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]
7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032946.txt_15300
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032946.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you know if can go to morrocan consulate for visa today. ? do i see you before i leave?"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have sent the passport copy to my contact who will talk with the Moroccan consulate today morning and will advise me. If not today, then it will be on Monday. I'll let you know. I can see you anytime after 3pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "she leaves tonight"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok, let her apply for a visa at the consulate the normal way. Once applied sent me a copy of the submission receipt and the application form, so I can do the necessary through my contact in Morocco."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On 16 Dec 2016 2:45 p.m.", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you free to visit?"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 17, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry i just checked your email. What time you will leve to the airport"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I hope you are in a better place now than NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "12/17/2016 8:30:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry, yes, palm beach, all trump people here"}]
8
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029839.txt_15301
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029839.txt
Re: following up: WA poetry release
[{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years ago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we would love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1 jjxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVbLS?preview=WoodyA llen+Basict+Clipt+fort+ Viewing. mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed conversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\nAl Gore\nJohn McCain\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\nMayor Tom Menino\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\nSir Mervyn King\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under way to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United States and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television series we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a series of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and for their students."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 5:58:45 PM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised- both subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions. Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter project with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026234.txt_15312
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026234.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun!!! When are you back in NYC?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope today is fun for you."}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok dylan will want to see you I always want to see you. Where are you having thanksgiving?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "eva"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "That means glenn check out his red hair!!!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:18 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "berries color for holiday"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He's such a snooze who else is down there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Nov 23, 2017 at 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "david fizel. hanson. trump"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates [faithkates@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/23/2017 2:41:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Have fun!!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]
10
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031748.txt_15313
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031748.txt
Fwd: TV ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!
[{"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Conchita Sarnoff"], "timestamp": "July 17, 2016 at 3:28:16 PM EDT", "subject": "T V ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": "HI\nNOW IS THE TIME TO PUT\nTHE MS SARNOFF NEW BOOK INTO MY TRUMP SUPER PAC T V ADS TELLING ALL ABO\nUT THE TWO CORRUPT CLINTONS F B I COVER UP ORDERED TO KEEP JEFF EPSTEIN OU\nT OF FEDERAL PROSON !!!!\nMARTY FEINBERG YOUR AD T V AGENCY WILL PRODUCE THE ABOVE TRUMP SUPER P\nAC T V ADS .\nTHE MS SARNOFF NEW BOOK WILL BE USED IN EACH TRUMP SUPER PAC T V AD.\nMS SARNOFF PLEASE TELL STEVEN HOFFENBERG IF YOU ARE 0 K WITH THE ABOVE T\nV ADS USE OF YOUR NEW BOOK ???\nMARTY & ROGER PLEASE WIPE THE FLOOR WITH THE CORRUPT 2 CLINTONS & THE M\nASS RAPIST OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS JEFF EPSTEIN IN THE TRUMP SUPER PAC T V ADS\nNOW !!!!!\nC E 0 TRUMP SUPER PAC\nGET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!"}, {"sender": "Steven Hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 17, 2016 at 12:34:29 PM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: T V ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 7:46:17 PM", "subject": "Fwd: TV ADS BY THE TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC TELLING ALL CORRUPT CLINTONS JEFF EPSTEIN RAPES OF CHILD LITTLE GIRLS F B I COVER UP CRIMES NOT ARRESTING JEFF EPSTEIN TO COVER UP FOR BOTH CLINTONS !!!!", "body": ""}]
3
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt_15314
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt
FW: World Bank Nominee
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2012 7:10:58 PM", "subject": "FW: World Bank Nominee", "body": "The Atlantic Home\nFriday, March 23, 2012\n\n° Politics i\nMassoud Hayoun - Massoud Hayoun writes for and produces The Atlantic's International channel.\n\nHow Jim Yong Kim, Obama's World Bank Pick,\nChanged Global Health Aid\n\nBy Massoud Hayoun\n\nMar 23 2012, 2:04 PM ET\n\nThe international public health work that made Kim, now the president's nominee for World Bank head, such a\nrespected figure.\n\nPresident Obama introduces Jim Yong Kim as his nominee to be the next president of the World Bank / Reuters\n\nPresident Obama announced today that he will nominate Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to head\nthe World Bank. Although Kim is a physician by training, officials have observed that Kim's role as a key\nplayer in global health and development, notably with his role in the organization Partners in Health (PIH),\nmakes him a key candidate to change the attitudes of developing-world nations."}]
1