text stringlengths 0 205 |
|---|
about married women. |
And let's just posit, |
hypothetically, how big we |
think their substitution and |
income effects would be. |
Let's start with substitution |
effect. |
Do we think the substitution |
effect would be bigger? |
This is the change in the wage |
holding utility constant. |
Do we think that would have a |
bigger effect on leisure and, |
therefore, labor for men |
or for women and why? |
Don't yell it out. |
Somebody, raise their |
hand and tell me. |
Do we think that the |
substitution effect would be |
bigger for men or |
women and why? |
Remember the name. |
It's the substitution effect. |
That's the key to the answer. |
Yeah. |
AUDIENCE: I think it would be |
the same, because they each |
have equal use for the goods. |
Maybe their income effect |
would be different. |
PROFESSOR: OK. |
[UNINTELLIGIBLE PHRASE]. |
They each have equal |
use for the goods. |
Well let's deal with where |
the substitution |
effect comes from. |
Let's break it down. |
So you're someone |
who's deciding. |
You've got you and your wife, |
and you're each deciding how |
to respond to a change |
in the wage. |
Now, you both value the |
goods the same. |
But it's goods versus leisure. |
What's the other feature |
that you're going |
to be thinking about? |
Think about a married man |
40 years ago, and |
the wage goes down. |
AUDIENCE: They have |
to work more. |
PROFESSOR: No. |
We're just doing substitution |
effects. |
That's unambiguous. |
If the goes down, |
they work less. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.