prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Order surplus extraction
### Description
The `CowSwapFiller` contract’s `isValidSignature` function ignores the `appData` field when verifying CowSwap orders. This oversight allows malicious actors to manipulate ERC-1271 orders by setting the `partnerFee` field to a huge amount, enabling the filler to drain su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Migration.join() and Migration.leave() can still work after unsucessful migration.
### Description
_Submitted by hansfriese, also found by 0x52 and codexploder_
### Impact
`Migration.join()` and `Migration.leave()` can still work after unsucessful migration.
As I submitted with my high-risk finding "Migr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: transferhalflife is not initialized in initialize function
### Description
In the `CommitmentStorage.sol` contract, the `transferHalfLife` storage variable is not initialized in the `initialize` function. As a result, anyone can revoke a user's transfer commitment right after it is created.
When a user makes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Unused event
### Description
In the `OptimisticGovernor` contract, the [`SetCollateral`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/3687d9b3a80ca9b3694211d50a2ccad5415c77e1/packages/core/contracts/gnosis-zodiac/implementation/OptimisticGovernor.sol#L56) event, which can be used to emit an updated `collateral... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Privileged Roles and Access
### Description
**Update**
The client provided the following explanation:
> We use GnosigSafe with multi-sig approach for those roles
The audit team still recommends that the client updates documentation to specifically state the actions of all privileged roles.
**File(s) affe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent price validation in `Ignite::registerWithStake`
### Description
In [`Ignite::registerWithErc20Fee`](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignite-contracts/blob/bbca0ddb399225f378c1d774fb70a7486e655eea/src/Ignite.sol#L294), [`Ignite::registerWithPrevalidatedQiStake`](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignite-contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: getAmountOut returns incorrect value when called by controller
### Description
When a controller contract calls the `getAmountOut` function, the `feeAmount` should be calculated using the `priorityFee` value; however, the function incorrectly uses the `fee` value. This causes the function to return an incorrec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | SafeApprove | true | false | ## Security Analysis
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
AeraVaultV1.sol#L893
## Description
Some non-standard tokens like USDT will revert when a contract or a user tries to approve an allowance when the spender allowance has already been set to a non-zero value. In the current code, we have not seen any real pr... | Spearbit | 4 | Gauntlet |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Decimals are incorrectly handled in DivReducerNode
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High
**Likelihood:** High
**Description**
Node DivReducer is supposed to have 2 parents which are Redstone oracles and combine 2 prices. For example, to price ETH/USDC it will fetch 2 prices and divide `(ETH/USD) /... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Sending child shares before burning shares allow reentrancy vulnerability in ParentFundingPool#removeChildShares
### Description
**Details**
[MarketMaker.sol#L268-L274](https://github.com/SportsFI-UBet/ubet-contracts-v1/blob/64157824f67d6000588ae4235a49ccd24dede5c3/contracts/markets/MarketMaker.sol#L268-L2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Pragma is not locked to specific version
### Description
**Description**
Since not all the EVM compiler versions support all the features, especially the latest one’s
which are kind of beta versions, So the intended behavior written in code might not be
executed as expected. Locking the pragma helps ensure th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistency in Events Emitted during Construction
### Description
The `CollateralProviderNFT` emits `CollarProviderNFTCreated` to facilitate the indexing of cash assets and underlying assets. `LoanNFT`, `EscrowNFT`, and `Rolls` contracts would also benefit from similar events.
### Recommendation
If the even... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Renew of 2nd level domain is not done properly
### Description
[ETHRegistrarController.sol#L201](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-ens/blob/main/contracts/ethregistrar/ETHRegistrarController.sol#L201)
[NameWrapper.sol#L271](https://github.com/ensdomains/ens-contracts/blob/master/contracts/wrapper/NameWr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: In contract settings.sol there’s an assembly block at lines 62-64. This also applies to the bridge.sol file where there’s the same assembly block inside the constructor.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
Extract the assembly block in a separate method and add a disable comment for the no-inline-
assembly wa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Pending stake not accounted for in liquidity calculations
### Description
The `Staking` contract uses `IERC20(token).balanceOf(address(this))` to determine total balance for share calculations and liquidity validation. However, in `Staking.requestStake()`, tokens are transferred to the contract immediately wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Open trove or add collateral may be blocked
### Description
When we open one trove or add some extra collateral tokens into one trove, we will stake these collateral tokens into the gauge.
When we check the RewardVault(gauge)'s implementation, the `stake` function has one `whenNotPaused` modifier. If this co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Flaw in _beforeTokenTransfer call chain and missing tests ✓ Fixed
### Description
In OpenZeppelin’s ERC-20 implementation, the virtual `_beforeTokenTransfer` function provides a hook that is called before tokens are transferred, minted, or burned. In the Gluwacoin codebase, it is used to check whether the *unr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `_lzReceive` reverts when there is a fee refund
### Description
When sending a message to the remote `ZROToken` for transferring the balance of ZROToken to users, if the fee exceeds the required amount, the surplus is refunded to `address(this)` (the `ClaimLocal` contract). However, the `ClaimLocal` contract ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Rebalance pool withdrawal silently fails
### Description
The `FxUSDShareableRebalancePool` contract disallows withdrawals by commenting out the internal call, which will silently fail for external integrations and users. Instead, the call should revert and provide a clear error message explaining that withdraw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: `FighterFarm._beforeTokenTransfer()` can be deleted to save an extra function call
### Description
Note the code below:
```solidity
contract FighterFarm is ERC721, ERC721Enumerable {
...
function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 tokenId)
internal
override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: Using flashloans to bypass balance requirement
### Description
Depositors are required to hold a specific amount of `VEIL` tokens to be able to deposit into each pool. Each pool has its own required amount, and this check is enforced by the `VeilValidatorV4::_hasVeil` function:
However, a user can bypass thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constant can be used
### Description
**Description**
Token.sol, Line 29. Token amount calculation can be moved to the public constant in order to
save gas during the deployment.
**Recommendation**:
Consider using the public constant. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: After trading on the curve in openLong and applying the fees, spot price is not check to make sure it is still not greater than 1
### Description
In `_calculateOpenLong`, when one trades on the curve and applies the pool and governance fees, we don't check whether the spot price is still below 1. The previousl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong encoding of the data in the `sendCompressedBytecode` function
### Description
There is enforcement in the `bootloader::sendCompressedBytecode` function that the data to be used for the call of the `Compressor::publishCompressedBytecode` function is encoded in a standard way.
But this check contains b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Trade tax and settled collateral amount are not updated in offer struct
### Description
The `OfferInfo` struct contains various elements, including two fields specifically intended to store the trade tax charged and the amount of collateral settled:
```javascript
struct OfferInfo {
uint256 id;
address aut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Signature Malleability | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-09-harpie-judging/tree/main/010-M
## Found by
0xNazgul, pashov, IllIllI, ladboy233, defsec, sirhashalot
## Summary
OpenZeppelin has a vulnerability in versions lower than 4.7.3, which can be exploited by an attacker. The project uses a vulnerable version
## Vulnerabil... | Sherlock | 5 | Harpie |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Missing slippage control for investors during the buy
### Description
The protocol allows investors to buy `dsToken` with `stableCoinToken` using the function `SecuritizeSwap::buy()`.
The function calculates the amount of `dsToken` to send to the caller based on the `navProvider.rate()` and there is no way for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Malicious user can steal all assets in BondNFT
### Description
Malicious user can drain all assets in BondNFT, and other users will lose their rewards.
### Proof of Concept
When calling [BondNFT.claim()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/588c84b7bb354d20cbca6034544c4faa46e6a80e/contracts/Bon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: (HAL-13) Redundant Code
### Description
The `burn()` function in the `SHToken` contract includes redundant code that can be simplified for better readability and efficiency. Specifically, the `burn()` function performs a check for `balanceOf(account) >= amount`:
```
require(balanceOf(account) >= amount, "Insu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Token transfer methods should not allow from == address(0) and to == address(0)
### Description
The functions `transfer`, `transferFrom`, and `transferFromMax` allow the caller to specify arbitrary `from` and `to` addresses. Both input parameters are permitted to assume the value `address(0)`.
Both `transfer`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient TokenAccount Checks
### Description
## Token Account Validation
As mentioned in **OS-SYM-ADV-04**, the program only validates the owner for the `host_usdc_account` and `manager_usdc_account` `TokenAccounts`. The mint is not validated for either of these accounts. Due to this, it could be possible... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Denial of Service due to lack of `minReward` value enforcement in initialization
### Description
RewardDistributor.sol
The state variable `minReward` in the `RewardDistributor` contract is never initialized, and therefore, there is no minimum value in `QodaTokens` enforced when calling the `distribute` fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: In `Bet::cancel` if one transfer reverts but the other succeeds, one users's tokens are permanently locked in the `Bet` contract
### Description
**Description:** `Bet::cancel` does this when refunding token transfers:
But if one of the `transfer` calls reverts but the other succeeds, the transaction still... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | false | false | ## Gas: Use custom errors rather than `revert()`/`require()` strings to save deployment gas
### Description
1. File: src/ERC20.sol (Various lines throughout the [file](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-axelar/blob/f1c8bfc16f82a27797f61cb3a310c0f936dce567/src/ERC20.sol))
2. File: src/DepositHandler.sol (Various l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | true | ## Medium: Lack of permission check allows unauthorized updates to `lastPoolUpdateRun`
### Description
To apply the weight changes calculated by the rules, any user can call [`UpdateWeightRunner::performUpdate`](https://github.com/QuantAMMProtocol/QuantAMM-V1/blob/7213401491f6a8fd1fcc1cf4763b15b5da355f1c/pkg/pool-quan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Burning of the user gas in the `sendCompressedBytecode` function
### Description
In the `bootloader::sendCompressedBytecode` function the `nearCallPanic()` is used for [the case of unsuccessfull call of the `Compressor::publishCompressedBytecode` function](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-zksync/blob/1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use more descriptive function and variable names Won't Fix
### Description
Throughout `OrchidDirectory` and `OrchidLottery`, function and variable names are quite obscure. This makes it harder for a reader to understand the code.
### Recommendation
This issue is about readability. Even though the audit team ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users can call `reset` on their token even if they don't have active votes, griefing potential token buyer/receiver
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/Voter.sol
Impacts:
- Contract fails to deliver promised returns, but do... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential Division by Zero When Checking Liquidity Spread
### Description
The function `_checkLiquiditySpread` ensures that the effective liquidity in a given chunk is above a certain threshold. However, when the liquidity spread is computed, the function will revert when `netLiquidity` is equal to zero. This ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: setReinvestYield should be restricted to a lender with LENDER_ROLE
### Description
Currently, the `setReinvestYield` endpoint does not have any restrictions regarding which lenders are allowed to be supplied by the pool operator. If an account no longer possesses the `LENDER_ROLE`, the pool operator might mist... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: saving using `immutable`
### Description
It's possible to avoid storage access a save gas using `immutable` keyword for the following variables:
It's also better to remove the initial values, because they will be set during the constructor.
**Affected source code:**
* [L2ERC20Bridge.sol:19](https://github.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inappropriate Transfer Of Zero-Value Coins
### Description
## Using `Inutils.move`: The `split_coin` Function
The `split_coin` function is used for splitting a specified amount from a Coin object. The function returns the extracted part while the remaining part transfers back to the user. However, it fails to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: allowance() doesn’t limit withdraw() s
### Description
The `allowance()` function is meant to limit withdrawal amounts. However, `allowance()` can only read and not alter state because its visibility is set to `view`. Therefore, the `withdraw()` function can be called on demand until the entire Vault/Pool bal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Don't update state | false | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
- LienToken.sol#L402
- LienToken.sol#L809
## Description
In `_createLien`, when a new stack slot is created, the `newSlot.point.position` is set to `uint8(params.stack.length)`, which would be its index in the stack. When `_removeStackPosition` is called to remove a slot from the s... | Spearbit | 5 | Astaria |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Heap is incorrectly stores the removed operator ID which can lead to division by zero in deposit/withdrawal flow
### Description
An operator's strategy can be reset by the owner calling `setOperatorStrategyCaps` to "0". This action sets the utilization to "0" and removes the operator from the heap. Consequent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inadequate use of assert
### Description
The usage of `require` vs `assert` has always been a matter of discussion because of the fine lines distinguishing these transaction-terminating expressions.
However, the usage of the `assert` syntax in this case is not the most appropriate.
Borrowing the explanatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Event Emission for Critical Functions
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
Functions that change important state variables or have significant effects (like `setNumberOfVaults`, `addMultipleVaults`) do not emit events. This can make tracking changes difficult and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Bug in makePayment() reverts when called with small amounts
### Description
When `makePayment()` is called with an amount which is less than the fees payable, then the transaction will always revert, even if there is an adequate amount of drawable funds. The revert happens due to an underflow in `getUnaccounte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Take advantage of Custom Error's return value property
### Description
An important feature of Custom Error is that values such as address, tokenID, msg.value can
be written inside the `()` sign, this kind of approach provides a serious advantage in
debugging and examining the revert details of dapps such as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | true | ## Low: Total supply and balance invariants can be broken by burning the same token id multiple times within a given batch operation
### Description
The `_burnBatch(uint256[])` function loops over all provided `tokenIds` and updates the relevant state; however, the ownership/approval logic is executed for all tokens i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Disallow single-outcome markets
### Description
When creating a market in [`PredictionMarketV3_4::_createMarket`](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/polkamarkets-js/blob/24f1394be94d27433d2e3a7370442126e1c1e5ba/contracts/PredictionMarketV3_4.sol#L299-L356), the following [check](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/po... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused admin address
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The `Fias.sol` contract contains a `CONTRACT_ADMIN` address which is not used in any part of the code.
**Recommendation**:
Consider removing this variable to save gas. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function/variable names not accurately reflecting their actions/state affects readability
### Description
Function and variable names should accurately reflect their actions or state to prevent developers, users, and reviewers from missing or misunderstanding their semantics and side effects.
There are severa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Attacker can steal locked balance of staked nft at OmnichainStaking
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Direct theft of any user NFTs, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed royalties
- Direct theft of any user funds, whether at-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The params provided to VeloDeployFactory.updateStrategyParams is not validated
### Description
Checks similar to `validateStrategyParams` are missing.
### Recommendation
Make sure to add the same type of validation checks for this endpoint. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack Of Account Verification
### Description
## Code Review Points
1. **Account Parameter Verification**
The functions `add_lst` and `set_sol_value_calculator` both require `sol_value_calculator` as an account parameter. However, they lack a verification mechanism to ensure that the provided `sol_value_ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Authorization of only EOAs can break multisigs
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The onlyEOAOrRole() modifier in the GACManaged contract, allows only EOAs to interact with the contracts that use this modifier. Smart contracts ideally should NOT be "not allowed" to intera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Vault can lose rewards due to lack of precision
### Description
Vault's storePriceAndRewards() can accrue no rewards as precision can be lost when price() has low decimals.
For example, price() has 6 decimals for Idle USDC and USDT strategies.
### Impact
Rewards can be lost for traders who allocated to pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Typo In comment
### Description
Within the NatSpec documentation for the `Oracle.getPriceFeedMultiplier` function, the word "**multiplier**" was misspelled as "**multipler**":
```
// @return the price feed multipler
```
### Recommendation
It is recommended to fix the present typo. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Old permissions in handlerCan mapping are still attached to the safeHandler of a transferred safe
### Description
A safe is associated with a unique safeHandler. This safeHandler can give permissions to addresses through the [allowHandler()](https://github.com/open-dollar/od-contracts/blob/f4f0246bb26277249... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Mixed formatting
### Description
`Tabs` are used instead of `Spaces`:
https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.link/blob/faf1309cbe7a05f70b338351315039eb8e5b9c09/contracts/Keep3rV1Volatility.sol#L443
### Recommendation
Make corrections to the source code. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: NEGATIVE VALUES ON TRANSFER
### Description
The transfer mechanism allowed for negative values in the amount field without triggering any error responses.
{width="600" height="600"}
* [CVSS:3.1/A... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Notes on canceling unclaimed airdrop streams
### Description
Consider the following scenario:
- The airdrop campaign starts now and lasts for 1 year.
- The stream starts now and lasts for 2 years.
- Alice, eligible for an airdrop, predicts her stream will be canceled after 0.5 years (e.g., she intends to do s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Trie Depth Is Not Explicitly Capped
### Description
By using the Poseidon Hash, the node uses a [maximum depth of 248 levels](https://docs.scroll.io/en/technology/sequencer/zktrie/#tree-construction). However, the `ZkTrieVerifier` library does not impose a limit on the [first byte](https://github.com/scroll-te... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Slippage Protection in Market Seat Buy/Sell Operations
### Description
**Description:** The `buy_market_seat()` and `sell_market_seat()` functions calculate seat prices dynamically based on the current `perp_clients_count` at execution time, but provide no slippage protection. Users cannot specify m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: AVAX Assigned High Water is updated incorrectly
### Description
[contracts/contract/MinipoolManager.sol#L374](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/MinipoolManager.sol#L374)
Node operators can manipulate the assigned high water to be h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Clickjacking
### Description
## Security Vulnerability: Missing X-Frame-Options Header
The website’s HTTP responses do not include the `X-Frame-Options` security header, which allows attackers to have the website in iframes within a malicious web page and perform clickjacking attacks by forcing the user to cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Arbitrum sequencer downtime lasting before and beyond epoch expiry prevents triggering depeg
### Description
A depeg event can not be triggered if the Arbitrum sequencer went down before the epoch ends and remains down beyond the epoch expiry. Instead, the collateral vault users can unfairly end the epoch w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: The liquidation logic is not always using the same requirement when the system is in RM
### Description
The liquidation process is handled by the `LiquidationLibrary` which can execute the liquidation from three different functions:
- `liquidate(...)` to liquidate fully a single CDP.
- `partiallyLiquidate(...... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Redundant constructor parameter
### Description
In the `WithdrawalVault` constructor, we have two parameters: `initialOwner` and `goldsand`. However, since the `Goldsand` contract is intended to be the owner, both of these parameters will be the same address.
### Recommendation
Remove the `initialOwner` param... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Using `buildSwapData()` with tokenIn/tokenOut will cause swap to fail when depositing into/withdrawing from YieldBox
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, as `swap()` will fail
**Likelihood:** Medium, as it only occurs when using swap with yieldbox deposit.
**Description**
When `buildSwapData... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: lawEnforcementRole can freeze the supplyController
### Description
The `LawEnforcementRole` is able to freeze the `supplyController` balance. This makes possible expansion and contraction through `increaseSupply` and `decreaseSupply`, but the `supplyController` will no longer be able to distribute newly minted... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Stableswap does disjoint swaps, breaking the underlying invariant
### Description
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L117-L124](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L117-L124)
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | oracle | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/152
## Found by
obront
## Summary
In order to value ICHI LP tokens, the oracle uses the Fair LP Pricing technique, which uses the prices of both individual tokens, along with the quantities, to calculate the LP token value. However, this pr... | Sherlock | 4 | Blueberry |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect minting
### Description
Because of fees in transferFrom function in USDT, contract would have less than `amount`:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/pool/PoolService.sol#L155
### Recommendation
We recommend to use balance di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: zerolend.votingpowerof() doesn't check ownershipchange block of the token, makes flash nft protection redundant
### Description
Users lock their underlying tokens to the ZeroLocker contract and receive NFTs representing their lock in the protocol. It is stated that token holders receive benefits, rewards, an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [08] Inefficient Event Emission in `emergencyPauseAll`
### Description
**Contract Name:** `PauserRegistery.sol`
**Function Name:** `emergencyPauseAll`
**Description:**
Emitting a `ContractPaused` event for each contract in a loop increases gas costs, especially with many contracts, impacting efficiency.
**M... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: ANDROID - LACK OF ANTI-TAMPERING AND ANTI-HOOKING MECHANISMS
### Description
The application lack anti-tampering mechanisms, emulator detection, and anti-hooking features to protect against runtime manipulation, reverse engineering, and unauthorized modifications. These measures enhance the app’s resilience by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Proper usage of the transfer and the transferFrom functions
### Description
Many ERC-20 transfers in the code are just called without checking the return values:
**code\_new/contracts/PolicyBook.sol:L269-L270**
```
daiToken.transferFrom(\_msgSender(), reinsurancePoolAddress, \_reinsurancePrice);
daiToke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: M07] No indexed parameters in the BeamBalanceStore events
### Description
###### Medium
None of the parameters of the [events defined](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/c0d8477866a8667a37f45c85378c5938c84569cd/contracts/currency/BeamBalanceStore.sol#L29-L47) in the `BeamBalanceStore` contract a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The `removeAssetFromtokenReserves()` removes tokens by symbol instead of per address
### Description
The `removeAssetFromtokenReserves()` function removes the first token it finds with a specified symbol, which may lead to an error, as multiple tokens can be added with the same symbol.
- [RdpxV2Core.sol#L270-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | true | ## Low: Unsafe external calls made during proportional LP fee transfers can be used to reenter wrapper contracts
### Description
`ERC721WrapperBase` exposes two overloads of the `unwrap()` function to perform full and partial unwrap of the ERC-6909 position for a given `tokenId`. The partial unwrap is used to burn a s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: PhiNFT1155.sol contract will not be upgradeable contrary to documentation
### Description
According to the docs [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-phi/blob/main/docs/overview.md#upgradeability) on upgradeability, the PhiNFT1155 contracts use the UUPS upgradeability pattern and can be upgraded by the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Pool registration and initialization can be front-run
### Description
The registration and initialization of a pool can be front-run, which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service or set malicious parameters for a legitimate pool. Anyone can register and initialize a pool by calling the `registerP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | TWAP | false | false | ## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `SynthVault._deposit` function adds `weight` for the user that depends on the spot value of the deposit synth amount in `BASE`.
This spot price can be manipulated and the cost of manipulation is relative to the pool's liquidity.
However, the r... | Code4rena | 4 | Spartan Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: `_Ownable_init()` is not called in `MarketMakingEngineConfigurationBranch` contract
### Description
The [`MarketMakingEngineConfigurationBranch`](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2025-01-zaros-part-2/blob/35deb3e92b2a32cd304bf61d27e6071ef36e446d/src/market-making/branches/MarketMakingEngineConfigurationBranch.sol#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: The deprecated `privateMint()` prone to many issues
### Description
The `privateMint()` is marked as a deprecated function. However, this function is prone to several issues:
1. The `splitSignature()`, which is only used for `privateMint()`, does not work with short signatures (64-length signature):
[lin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unutilized Code
### Description
## CoinSweepFeesPrepareLaunchCtx Structure Analysis
In the CoinSweepFeesPrepareLaunchCtx structure, there are no explicit constraints verifying the `token_mint` account or `vault` account to ensure they are the expected mint and vault. Moreover, they are not utilized in the Coi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Empty trades
### Description
The trade function allows you to specify a price limit, upon reaching which the cycle will be exited without performing any movement of tokens at line
https://github.com/DivergenceProtocol/diver-contracts/blob/29a0ccb5fc7ac838bd44c75c0afc398b84be267a/src/core/Battle.sol#L286,
but... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Wrong Constant Used
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `d22b8d93523f2c2bdf2aa5f00286f63d460f63b9`.
**File(s) affected:**`DepositManagementLogic.sol`
**Description:**`DepositManagementLogic.getWithdrawableCollateral()` uses `Constants.PRICE_DIGIT` to do related computations. However, as it is operating ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Division by Zero in `calculateRedeemAmount` Function for Zero ezETH Supply
### Description
The operation `(_currentValueInProtocol * _ezETHBeingBurned) / _existingEzETHSupply` can lead to a division by zero if `_existingEzETHSupply` is zero.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-04-renzo/blob/519e518f2d8dec9... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple accesses of a mapping/array should use a local variable cache
### Description
Caching a mapping's value in a local storage or calldata variable when the value is accessed multiple times saves ~42 gas per access due to not having to perform the same offset calculation every time.
**Help the Optimizer b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `bool`s for storage incurs overhead
### Description
Use `uint256(1)` and `uint256(2)` for true/false to avoid a Gwarmaccess (**[100 gas](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/1b70014db712f8572a72378321250058)**), and to avoid Gsset (**20000 gas**) when changing from 'false' to 'true', after having been 'tru... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Settled collateral of a borrower aren't available for lenders until borrower's debt is fully cleared
### Description
ERC721Pool's settle() lacks collateral ids array rebalance when the settlement isn't full, i.e. when `t0DebtRemaining > 0`.
### Impact
The settled collateral of the borrower will not be avai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unchanged state variables can be immutable
### Description
None of:
* [`LINKMigrator.linkToken`](https://github.com/stakedotlink/contracts/blob/0bd5e1eecd866b2077d6887e922c4c5940a6b452/contracts/linkStaking/LINKMigrator.sol#L22)
* [`LINKMigrator.communityPool`](https://github.com/stakedotlink/contracts/blob/0b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: No need to explicitly initialize variables with default values
### Description
If a variable is not set/initialized, it is assumed to have the default value (`0` for `uint`, `false` for `bool`, `address(0)` for address...). Explicitly initializing it with its default value is an anti-pattern and wastes gas.
A... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Certain functions lack input validation routines ✓ Fixed
### Description
The functions should first check if the passed arguments are valid first. The [checks-effects-interactions](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/develop/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern) pattern shou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Duplicate fees will be paid by `LibTransfer::transferFee` when transferring fee-on-transfer tokens with `EXTERNAL_INTERNAL` 'from' mode and `EXTERNAL` 'to' mode
### Description
Beanstalk utilizes an internal virtual balance system that significantly reduces transaction fees when using tokens that are intend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Potential Fee Calculation Underflow in Discount and Referral Settings
### Description
The `getVipLevelDiscount` function returns a discount based on the user’s VIP level, and the `hasReferrerDiscount` applies an additional discount. However, there is no validation to ensure that their combined value does not e... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.