prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Internal Functions Should Be Prefixed With _
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Recommendation**:
Internal and private functions for example handleWithdrawalIncentive and beforeFulfillRedeem which should be prefixed with an underscore (_). It is recommended that such fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Erroneous Check In Set Custodian
### Description
In set_custodian, there is a condition that verifies if custodians are enabled and if the key of the authority differs from the Key of the Custodian. However, the program does not account for the situation where the authority itself is the custodian and the cust... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: [Deployment Audit] Two Sets of Contracts Used in Parallel on Mainnet
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: We will figure out a central place where users can see the currently used proxy contract address and clearly state that this is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Unused function
### Description
## Code Review Summary
## Context
Bridge.sol#L66
## Description/Recommendation
The functions `_encMsg()`, `addressToBytes32()`, and `addressToBytes32()` are currently unused in the codebase. If they are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the code clean. Otherwi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: NatSpec improvement
### Description
## Context
**File:** ISablierFlowBase.sol
**Line:** 158
## Description/Recommendation
Change ETH to native tokens to avoid confusion, as the contracts may be deployed on other EVM chains.
## Status
- **Sablier:** Fixed in PR 362.
- **Cantina Managed:** Verified. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: [WP-M4] Unable to use `L2GatewayRouter` to withdraw LPT from L2 to L1, as `L2LPTGateway` does not implement `L2GatewayRouter` expected method
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_.
Per the document:
> The following occurs when LPT is withdrawn from L2 to L1:
> The user initiates a withdrawal for X LPT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: `swETH::reprice` may run out of gas or become exorbitantly expensive when scaling to large number of validator operators due to iterating over them all
### Description
**Description:** `swETH::reprice` [loops](https://github.com/SwellNetwork/v3-contracts-lst/tree/a95ea7942ba895ae84845ab7fec1163d667bee38/contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [09] `transferFrom` should only use allowance when `spender != from`
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-wildcat/blob/fe746cc0fbedc4447a981a50e6ba4c95f98b9fe1/src/market/WildcatMarketToken.sol#L49-L66
This function is used for the popular implementation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
From dev team:
> The files affected listed in this issue are all unmodified Compound code. The team made the decision to not modify any of these files to avoid unnecessary risks on code that already works in production.
The statement above is partially true... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Use stack variables rather than making repeated external calls
### Description
Within `LimitOrderRegistry::withdrawNative`, calls to determine the contract balance of native/wrapped native assets are cached in [stack variables](https://github.com/crispymangoes/uniswap-v3-limit-orders/blob/83f5db9cb90926c11ee6c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: No accounting for totalVoting in `Bribe.sol::withdraw` function leads to loss of Yield
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/Bribe.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
`Bribe.sol::... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: renounceOwnership implementation can block onlyOwner functions
### Description
OpenZeppelin's Ownable contract implements a `renounceOwnership` function that allows the owner to set `address(0)` as the new owner. This action blocks any future assignment of ownership. Consequently, this would inhibit the follow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Initial griefing attack possible
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High, as the victim loses their funds
**Likelihood:** Low, as it comes at a cost for the attacker
**Description**
The famous initial deposit attack is largely mitigated by the solady library. However, doing this attack can cause s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: MISSING SANITY CHECKS FOR IMPORTANT VARIABLES
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
There are some important variables in the `UsdOracle.sol` contract that are not checked before being set in the constructor and also in the functions used for updating their values.
**Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Registered modules have access to critical functions
### Description
Registered modules have access to several critical functions, such as `addModule` / `removeModule`, `r1AddOwner` / `k1AddOwner`, `r1RemoveOwner` / `k1RemoveOwner` / `resetOwners`, `r1AddValidator` / `k1AddValidator`, and `r1RemoveValidator... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: `PortcalFacet.repayAavePortal()` can trigger an underflow of `routerBalances`
### Description
_Submitted by Ruhum, also found by 0x1f8b and WatchPug_
[PortalFacet.sol#L80-L113](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-connext/blob/main/contracts/contracts/core/connext/facets/PortalFacet.sol#L80-L113)
The calle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Checking `bool` return of ERC20 `approve` and `transfer` breaks protocol for mainnet USDT and similar tokens which don't return true
### Description
**Description:** Checking `bool` return of ERC20 `approve` and `transfer` breaks protocol for mainnet USDT and similar tokens which [don't return true](https:/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Skipped Transaction Processing
### Description
The audit commit inadvertently removed [the `processL2Tx` function invocation](https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/f29f2b72f999d6b91785accfb84eafb371620214/system-contracts/bootloader/bootloader.yul#L619-L621). If deployed, the bootloader would not ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Restriction Of Whitelist Modification
### Description
## Whitelist Modification Implementation
The current implementation of `add_addresses_to_whitelist` and `remove_addresses_from_whitelist` only prevents modifications to the whitelist during the **After** and **Finalized** stages of the IDO. However, they d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unmasked Result of Create2 Address Calculation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `736822e`.
**File(s) affected:**`OrangeKitSafeFactory.sol`
**Description:** The `computeAddress()` function in the `OrangeKitSafeFactory` contract is borrowed from OpenZeppelin's `Create2`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Add proper check when setting reserve fees
### Description
If `newFee` is being set to a non-zero value, add a check to ensure that `reserveFeeRecipient` is also non-zero. Otherwise, reserve fees will be sent to the zero address (refer to `InterestImpl.sol`, line 60). The `reserveFeeRecipient` is not set in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Connected pair of parameters (depositStatus and withdrawStatus)
### Description
**Description**
Parameters depositStatus and withdrawStatus are set together in constructor and can be
changed only together in burnContract() methods. There is no way to change them
separately, and these two parameters can have on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Use call instead of transfer
### Description
solidity `transfer()` function is used in `disburseNative()` for native ETH transfer. The transfer and send functions forward a fixed amount of 2300 gas. Historically, it has often been recommended to use these functions for value transfers to guard against reentran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Rewards Distribution Due Complex `updateRewards()` Architecture
### Description
**File(s) affected:**`ProtocolState.sol`
**Description:** Snapshotters receive rewards in the protocol by the sequencer calling the `updateRewards()` function in the `ProtocolState` contract. In the event that rewards... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The deadline of a signed message has no upper limit
### Description
## Context
No context files were provided by the reviewer.
## Description/Recommendation
To mitigate the risk of users timing their calls to `stakeWithBoost` to maximize rewards (as highlighted in finding 2), consider incorporating a signing ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: meta.tuneBelowCapacity param is not updated when BondBaseSDA.setIntervals is called
### Description
When BondBaseSDA.setIntervals function is called then meta.tuneBelowCapacity param is not updated which has impact on price tuning.
### Impact
Tuning logic will not be completed when needed.
### Recommendat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Excessive use of whenNotPaused might block withdrawals
### Description
The `whenNotPaused` modifier may prevent redeeming funds or completing withdrawals in the event of an emergency, especially if the pause and unpause functionalities are controlled by a timelock in the reserve managers.
### Recommendation
T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RPC crash due to bug in Actix websocket parser
### Description
The Monad RPC can optionally be configured to accept websocket connections. It uses the `actix-http` crate to serve websocket connections. This crate contains a bug in the websocket frame parser where a malformed frame can cause the code to panic. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unusable library
### Description
MerkleProof library is not used in this contract:
https://github.com/1inch/cumulative-merkle-drop/tree/96fb63d0cbfea73603e7500961c71e8ab1fb8c10/contracts/CumulativeMerkleDrop.sol#L14
### Recommendation
We recommend to remove this library from contract. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `allowUSDCtoVault` increases allowance by X instead of setting it to X.
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The `allowUSDCtoVault` function withing the `MMTrade.sol` smart contract is used for setting MMTrade to Trade’s allowance to an specific amount:
However, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: User receives excess rewards for allocation after distribution start
### Description
The `UsualSP` contract incorrectly calculates rewards for users who receive allocations after the reward distribution has started. This results in users receiving rewards as if they had been staking since the beginning of t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use custom errors rather than `revert()`/`require()` strings to save gas
### Description
Custom errors are available from solidity version 0.8.4. Custom errors save [**~50 gas**](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/ad1bd0d29a0101b25e57c293b4b0c746) each time they're hit by [avoiding having to allocate and store... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: An array's length should be cached to save gas in for-loops
### Description
Reading array length at each iteration of the loop consumes more gas than necessary.
In the best case scenario (length read on a memory variable), caching the array length in the stack saves around 3 gas per iteration.
In the worst ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: [02] Allowing operator to stake its vault to multiple DSSes can cause some DSSes' slashings of such vault to fail
### Description
The protocol allows an operator to overleverage by staking its vault to multiple DSSes. When a malicious behavior occurs, all of these DSSes can request to slash the operator's vaul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: UNCHECKED KEEPER RATE
### Description
The `instantiate` and `execute_update_config` functions in the **krp-staking-contracts/basset\_sei\_rewards\_dispatcher** contract do not verify that `krp_keeper_rate` is lower than 1. If it is mistakenly set to a value greater than 1, the operation of rewards dispatching ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: Remove redundant `morphoMarketId` validation checks in `_closeLoanMorphoWithShares` and `_openLoanPosition`
### Description
`RockoFlashRefinance::_closeLoanMorphoWithShares` and `_openLoanPosition` contain redundant validation `morphoMarketId`. The reasons why this validation is redundant:
* `RockoFlashRefina... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: User's stake can be reduced before stakes are finalized in SDK contracts.
### Description
**Description**
Perpetual TokensFarmSDK.sol
TokensFarmSDK.sol
During the execution of the make DepositRequest() function, the value in the `totalActiveStakeAmount[user] mapping is updated. This value is used in the no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: `spTKNMinimalOracle.sol` counts debond fee twice, which will make the end price (spTKN per base) higher than it should be
### Description
The `spTKNMinimalOracle::_calculateBasePerPTkn` will count unwrap fee twice, which will make the base per PTkn price lower than what it should be. Eventually the base per... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Lack of input sanitization
### Description
Throughout the codebase, many contracts have an instance of the function `modifyParameters()`, which allows authorized accounts to change parameters of the protocol. For example, such functions exist [in the `CoinSavingsAccount`](https://github.com/reflexer-labs/geb/b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Basis points constant BPS_MAX is used as minimal fee amount requirement
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by cmichel_
Base fee modules require minimum fixed fee amount to be at least BPS_MAX, which is hard coded to be 10000.
This turns out to be a functionality restricting requirement for some... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | false | false | ## Handle
Czar102
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Total supply of the token may exceed the `maxCap` introduced. This can happen when a user wants to join the pool. The [check in `BasketFacet::joinPool(...)`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/main/contracts/basket/contracts/facets/Basket/BasketFace... | Code4rena | 5 | Amun |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | upgrade | false | false | ## Medium: `SecuritizeAmmNavProvider` missing `whenNotPaused` modifier on important state-changing functions
### Description
`SecuritizeAmmNavProvider` inherits from `BaseContract` which inherits from `PausableUpgradeable`, but does not have the `whenNotPaused` modifier on important state-changing functions.
### Impa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | false | false | ## Gas: Replace OZ ERC20 with solady ERC20
### Description
Solady's ERC20 implementation is more gas efficient than OZ's version. We recommend to switch to that library instead | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Chainlink | false | true | _Submitted by 0xNineDec, also found by 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0x52, 0xdanial, 0xDjango, 0xf15ers, bardamu, cccz, Cheeezzyyyy, Chom, codexploder, defsec, Franfran, Alex the Entreprenerd, Green, hake, hansfriese, horsefacts, hubble, hyh, IllIllI, jonatascm, kebabsec, Meera, oyc_109, pashov, rbserver, Ruhum, simon135, tabish,... | Code4rena | 5 | Juicebox |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect slippage handling in `swap_internal()`
### Description
In the [`swap_internal()`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-10-superposition/blob/7ad51104a8514d46e5c3d756264564426f2927fe/pkg/seawater/src/lib.rs#L183-L186) function, the slippage check uses the `||` operator to validate the swap results. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Repeated Arguments Passed in validateRebalanceStableBorrowRate()
### Description
The function `validateRebalanceStableBorrowRate()` takes the arguments `reserveCache`, `stableDebtToken`, `variableDebtToken`, and `aTokenAddress`. This is unnecessary as `reserveCache` contains each of the token addresses and thu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: MISCALCULATION OF PENDING DELTA LIQUIDITY LEADS TO AN INCORRECT HEDGE
### Description
The `_getLiquidity` function in the **LiquidityPool** contract miscalculates the value of `pendingDeltaLiquidity` when **pendingDelta > freeLiquidity**.
Consequently, in the aforementioned situation, the liquidity pool cann... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Uncalled public functions
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Public functions that are never called from within the contract should be marked as external.
**Fixed**: Issue fixed in commit 4886ba3 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Hardcoded gas in `ClFactory`'s `getSwapFee` and `getUnstakedFee` can cause issues
### Description
In `getSwapFee` and `getUnstakedFee`, the gas provided to perform static calls to `unstakedFeeModule` and `swapFeeModule` is hardcoded.
Consider making it configurable to avoid potential issues in the future, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-4 truncation in reward calculation could cause leakage of rewards
### Description
**Description:**
In ComplexRewarder.sol, `updatePool()` call updates values in the specified pool.
**reward** could be a fairly large number. The decimals of **reward * ACC_TOKEN_PRECISION** is
10**30, because of how ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Areas of the codebase that are inconsistent with the documentation
### Description
The Primitive codebase contains clear documentation and mathematical analysis denoting the intended behavior of the system. However, we identified certain areas in which the implementation does not match the white paper, includin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: FujiOracle - setPriceFeed should check asset and priceFeed decimals
### Description
`getPriceOf()` assumes that all price feeds return prices with identical decimals, but `setPriceFeed` does not enforce this. Potential misconfigurations can have severe effects on the system’s internal accounting.
### Recommen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: GCC versions 9.2 through 10.2 miscompile certain memcmp calls
### Description
Decrypted Sapiens asked us to evaluate the impact of an unresolved code generation bug in GCC (#95189) on the Nervos smart contracts. This bug does not currently appear to negatively affect the project but should be addressed when an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: DepositQueue can become permanently locked
### Description
When users attempt to join the [`STETHVault`](https://github.com/pods-finance/yield-contracts/blob/9389ab46e9ecdd1ea1fd7228c9d9c6821c00f057/contracts/vaults/STETHVault.sol), they first join a [`DepositQueue`](https://github.com/pods-finance/yield-cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Constants instead of magic numbers
### Description
It is best practice to use constant variables rather than literal values to make the code easier to understand and maintain.
### Proof of Concept
Instances include:
#### InfinityExchange.sol
[20000](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-infinity/blob/76537... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-3 Relayer can choose amount of gas for delivery of message
### Description
**Description:**
LSP6 supports relaying of calls using a supplied signature. The encoded message is defined as:
The message doesn't include a gas parameter, which means the relayer can specify any gas
amount. If the provided g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑13] Using `private` rather than `public` for constants, saves gas
### Description
If needed, the values can be read from the verified contract source code, or if there are multiple values there can be a single getter function that [returns a tuple](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-frax/blob/90f55a9ce4e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: StUSR Transfers Less Than Expected
### Description
* https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/a36e73c4be0b5f233de6bfc8d2c276136bf67573/contracts/ERC20RebasingUpgradeable.sol#L135
StUSR, when transferring, converts the underlying amount into shares with a rounding error in favor of the sender (i.e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Handle Watcher Message Properly
### Description
## Current Watcher Implementation Issue
The current watcher implementation is directly checking marshalled return messages for an "error" string to decide whether an error occurred.
**Location:** `node/pkg/watchers/sui/watcher.go`
Successful messages that con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Failure To Include Offset Value In Signature Verification
### Description
## Security Advisory
## Issue Description
In the `PullFeedSubmitResponseV2` and `PullFeedSubmitResponse` instructions, the offset field is not verified in the oracle signature verification. Since the offset is controlled by the user a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `AdaptiveIRM#_curve` multiples instead of dividing leading to "V" shaped curve instead of expected "L" shaped curve
### Description
**Details**
[AdaptiveIRM.sol#L110-L115](https://github.com/hyperstable/contracts/blob/35db5f2d3c8c1adac30758357fbbcfe55f0144a3/src/libraries/AdaptiveIRM.sol#L110-L115)
func... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: An attacker can lock operator out of the pod by setting gas limit that's higher than the block gas limit of dest chain
### Description
[HolographOperator.sol#L415](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/HolographOperator.sol#L415)
When a beamin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Add parameter to Event-Emit
### Description
Some event-emit description has no parameter. Add to parameter for front-end website or client app, they can see that something has happened on the blockchain.
Events with no old value; | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Unhandled return value of `transferFrom` in `timeLockERC20()` could lead to fund loss for recipients
### Description
_Submitted by 0xRajeev, also found by Sherlock, pauliax, shw, and JMukesh_
ERC20 implementations are not always consistent. Some implementations of `transfer` and `transferFrom` could return... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: `TokenHandler.safeTransferIn` does not work on non-standard compliant tokens like USDT
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `TokenHandler.safeTransferIn` function uses the standard `IERC20` function for the transfer call and proceeds with a `checkReturnCode` function to handle non-standard compliant to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Consider using 2 step update for owner and admin
### Description
Single-step change of owner or admin poses a security risk. This approach is not recommended, as if an incorrect address is mistakenly set by the owner, it would render the owner and admin specific features inaccessible.
### Recommendation
Consi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Extract or use named constants
### Description
The Seaport codebase has done an impressive job avoiding "magic numbers" and using named constants, which makes inline assembly much easier to read, understand, and verify. However, there are a few remaining numbers that could be replaced with more readable named ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Large multiples of ten should use scientific notation (e.g. `1e6`) rather than decimal literals (e.g. `1000000`), for readability
### Description
*There are 2 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b036074edef3c1369b984d10010/protocol/contracts/utils/CvxMintAmo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Wrong calculation of `erc20Delta` and `ethDelta`
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by harleythedog_
[`Swap.sol` L200-L225](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-10-tally/blob/c585c214edb58486e0564cb53d87e4831959c08b/contracts/swap/Swap.sol#L200-L225)
When a user tries to swap unwrapped ETH to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing event when is certificate is verified
### Description
`mapping(bytes32 => bytes) public verified;`
In `CertManager`, when a new certificate hash is added, it doesn't emit an event, so there is no way to track and observe offchain.
### Recommendation
Emit an event with the certificate hash and other ne... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Uniswap pair token order detection can be simplified
### Description
The Flapper UniV2 contracts check if `dai` is the first token by using:
```solidity
daiFirst = pair.token0() == dai;
```
### Recommendation
As both tokens are known in the constructor (token pair verification is performed in the deployment sc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing Verification
### Description
## Issue with remove_stop Function
The `remove_stop` function fails to verify the `next_stop` field before removing a stop, enabling users to remove stops. The issue arises if the rider attempts to remove a stop that has yet to be reached, which may result in inconsistenci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Fallback logic fails to choose fresher oracle
### Description
_Resolved_
When the primary oracle is unhealthy, the contract checks the fallback oracle.
If fallback is also unhealthy → the contract returns the primary oracle data, even if fallback is less stale. System may return older or more inaccurate data... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | front-running | true | true | ## Low: User can frontrun operator slashing/update rewards by withdrawing from the pool
### Description
When an operator is slashed a part of their staked principal is removed and transferred to the slasher. This will happen to all the slashable operators configured in the Chainlink [`PriceFeedAlertsController`](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typos, grammatical errors, redundancies and complexity in NatSpec docs and comments
### Description
There are multiple problems in the NatSpec docs and comments of the `LizardLounge` contract:
- The `IUSDC` file has this `// Unit testing for the LizardLounge Contract` comment, which implies interface is only ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
- `Divider.sol` Lines: 183-231, 279-313
## Situation
The functions `issue()` in `Divider.sol` (Lines 183-231) and `redeemZero()` in `Divider.sol` have extra checks when the flags `level.issueRestricted()` or `level.redeemZeroRestricted()` are set. In that case, the function can onl... | Spearbit | 4 | Sense |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Unsafe ERC20 methods
### Description
Using unsafe ERC20 methods can revert the transaction for certain tokens.
### Impact
The contract will malfunction for certain tokens.
### Recommendation
Consider using `SafeERC20` for `transferFrom`, `transfer` and `approve`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: CollateralToken 'stokenURI uses the underlying assets's tokenURI
### Description
Since the CollateralToken positions can be sold on secondary markets like OpenSea, the `tokenURI` endpoint should be customized to avoid misleading users. It should contain information relating to the CollateralToken and not just ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | true | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary custom bitwise negation function
### Description
The `AllocatorRoles._bitNot` function behaves identically to the NOT opcode available in Solidity, which is represented by the `~` sign. Therefore, this function is unnecessary and incurs additional costs.
```solidity
function _bitNot(bytes32 input)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: [01] Improve security posture of `_delegatedAddress` in `FighterFarm.sol`
### Description
The `_delegatedAddress` field represents the backend's address, responsible for signing various messages related to `claimFighters` . There are two issues with it, which increase the risk for the protocol.
1. `_delegate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Precision Issue In Health Factor Calculation
### Description
All healthy positions can be liquidated due to precision issues in calculating `userData.healthFactor`. Inside `liquidationCall()`, the function expects `userData.healthFactor` to be expressed in 18 decimals:
```solidity
if (userData.healthFactor >... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use an interface instead of an abstract contract
### Description
**Description**
For now MGDcontract.sol has no functional value as an abstract contract. Consider usage of
the interface. Such a move will save gas and decrease the contract size.
**Recommendation**:
Use an interface instead of an abstract con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | true | false | ## Gas: Remove boolean condition that will always be `false` from `LiquidationBranch::liquidateAccounts`
### Description
**Description:** Consider this section of code from `LiquidationBranch::liquidateAccounts`:
When determining what to use for input variable `pnlUsdX18`, it checks if `ctx.marginBalanceUsdX18 > req... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Non-Descriptive Underflow Revert on `mintedAmount` Subtraction
### Description
The `L2WormholeGateway` contract subtracts `amount` from `mintedAmount` without first verifying that `mintedAmount >= amount`. If `mintedAmount` is ever less than `amount` (e.g., if tokens were minted by another bridge), the subtrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Crash Eth Oracle On Any LogicCallEvent
### Description
## Handle
nascent
## Vulnerability details
**Severity: Medium**
**Likelihood: High**
In `eth_oracle_main_loop`, `get_last_checked_block` is called. Followed by:
and may hit the code path:
But will panic at `from_log` here:
It can/will also be t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Bypass of the fallback role to call any function signature in AccessControlRestriction
### Description
The role to call the fallback functions in the `AccessControlRestriction` contract can be bypassed to also call other functions if:
1. The target contract was compiled with solc `<=0.4.17`
2. The function si... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Withdrawal Mechanism Fails When Share Price Declines
### Description
The vulnerability manifests in the withdrawal flow between `initiateWithdrawal()` and `withdraw()`. When a user initiates withdrawal, the contract records the share amount and equivalent asset value at that time. However, if the share pric... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Challenges can be frontrun with de-leveraging to cause lossses for challengers
### Description
Challenges, once created, cannot be closed. Thus once a challenge is created, the challenger has already transferred in a collateral amount and is thus open for losing their collateral to a bidding war which will mo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Operator: missing check for configParmas\[0] (cushionFactor) in the constructor
### Description
*
*
The `Operator::constructor` does not check the condition of the `cushionFactor`. Below is the condition for the `cushionFactor` checked in the `Operator::setCushionFactor`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [20] Credentials would no longer be grant-able after a while
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-wildcat/blob/fe746cc0fbedc4447a981a50e6ba4c95f98b9fe1/src/types/RoleProvider.sol#L37-L42
This function helps calculate the expiry for a credential granted at... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | true | ## Low: Token transfer hooks should be invoked at the end of execution to prevent the hooklet executing over intermediate state
### Description
`ERC20Referrer::transfer` invokes the `_afterTokenTransfer()` hook before the unlocker callback (assuming the recipient is locked):
```solidity
function transfer(address to, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of error handling in Terminal’s post-insert hooks
### Description
The Terminal allows users to register post-insert hooks that will be executed when a unit is added to the DAG (Figure 5.1). The handler type does not include a means of dealing with a failure, and the program will continue regardless of the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Deposit/Reward tokens | false | true | ## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
`ConvexYieldWrapper.sol` is a wrapper contract for staking convex tokens on the user's behalf, allowing them to earn rewards on their deposit. Users will interact with the `Ladle.sol` contract's `batch()` function which:
- Approves Ladle to move the tokens.
- ... | Code4rena | 3 | Yield |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent handling of uninitialized auction data
### Description
In the `getPrices` function of the **BeraAuctionHouse** contract, there is a contradictory logic when dealing with uninitialized settlement data. Specifically, if `settlementState.blockTimestamp == 0`, the function reverts with a `MissingSettl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Shares Calculation Due to Shadowed Variable
### Description
In the `StakingVault` contract, there's a variable shadowing issue in the `_deposit` function that leads to incorrect calculation of shares. The `daysSinceLastDeposit` variable is declared twice, with the inner declaration shadowing the out... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: First pool depositor can be front-run and have part of their deposit stolen
### Description
The first deposit with a `totalSupply` of zero shares will mint shares equal to the deposited amount. This makes it possible to deposit the smallest unit of a token and profit off a rounding issue in the computation fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Remove unused constants before production launch
### Description
Some variables are declared and either not used or are for test purposes only. These variables can be removed from the code.
### Recommendation
The recommendation is to remove unused/test constants before the production launch. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing events for access control role changes
### Description
_Resolved_
The USG contract lacks event emissions for access control role modifications. Four setter functions (`setIsMinter, setIsBurner, setIsIRProducer, and setIsPegKeeper`) update important permission mappings without emitting events, making i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Vault creator can prevent users from claiming staking rewards
### Description
Vault creator can prevent users from claiming rewards from the staking contract. This can boost his liquidity and lure depositors to stake vault tokens. He can present a high APY and low fee percentage which will incentivize stake... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: auth only works well with external functions
### Description
The auth modifier of `AccessControl.sol` doesn't work as you would expect.
It checks if you are authorized for `msg.sig`. However, `msg.sig` is the signature of the first function you have called (not the current function). So, if you call functio... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.