prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Hard-coded Values Reduce Readability
### Description
This issue involves the direct use of literal numeric values ('magic numbers') instead of named constants in various contracts:
* Time durations (e.g., `7 days`, `30 days`) in **SignatureRoleTimelock.sol** and **TrustedGuardiansPlugin.sol**.
* Basis points d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Admin Can Always Update lscales Levels
### Description
## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
- Divider.sol#511-547
- Divider.sol#L466-468
## Situation
An administrator of the protocol can arbitrarily set the `lscales` levels of users at any moment. This directly impacts the amount that can be collected in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: Anyone can trigger a flash loan for unprotected receivers
### Description
The [`exercise` function](https://github.com/primitivefinance/primitive-protocol/blob/78a8e64b7618e9199203ab84042876c580ae1e90/packages/primitive-contracts/contracts/option/primitives/Option.sol#L179) of the `Option` contract allows a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Several centralization risks introduce multiple points of failure
### Description
Although much care has been taken to contain and bound the accessible functionality of the defender role, there are multiple centralization risks around the protocol that imply a lot of trust in owners or controllers of the proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Exhaustion In resetRollupBatchData() Loop
### Description
The function `resetRollupBatchData()` lacks bounds on the for loop on line [198], which may lead to potential gas exhaustion. Without defining limits, the loop may iterate over many elements, causing excessive gas consumption and potential out-of-gas er... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Potential DOS in Contract Inheriting
### Description
[L-01] Potential DOS in Contract Inheriting UUPSUpgradeable.sol
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-non-fungible/blob/main/scripts/deploy.ts#L18
The scripts/ folder outlines a number of deployment scripts used by the team. Some of the contracts deployed ut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: `claimPrizesForRound()` doesn't satisfy check-effect-interaction patterns
### Description
### Instances(1)
In ThrusterTreasure.sol, `claimPrizesForRound()` is a public function that allows users/winners to claim prizes. But this function doesn't satisfy the `check-effect-interaction` pattern and might become ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | timing | true | false | ## Medium: Attacker can abuse `RewardsDistributor::triggerRoot` to block reward claims and unpause a paused state
### Description
Consider the code of [`RewardsDistributor::triggerRoot`](https://github.com/SolidlyV3/v3-rewards/blob/6dfb435392ffa64652c8f88c98698756ca80cf28/contracts/RewardsDistributor.sol#L511-L516):
`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Linkage of Modules and/or Markets Can Be Altered After Becoming Operational
### Description
The `RizLendingPoolAddressesProvider` contract allows the [owner](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/riz-lending/RizLendingPoolAddressesProvider.sol#L60) to define t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Lacking Validation Of Chainlink’ Oracle Queries
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
`TwapOracle.consult()` is missing additional validations to ensure that the round is complete and has returned a valid/expected price. The `consult()` improperly casts an `int256 price... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Double Public Key Signing Function Oracle Attack on ed25519-dale
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Acknowledged
**File**: Cargo.lock
**Details**:
Versions of ed25519-dalek prior to v2.0 model private and public keys as separate types which can be assembled into a Keypair, and also provide API... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: SLIGHT ROUNDING ISSUES WHEN PROVIDING LP TOKENS
### Description
When calculating the **return values** in `get_share_in_assets` function every time users provide LP tokens to **bonding-v1** contract, the "multiply before divide" principle is not followed, which could generate slight rounding issues in some edg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Incorrect planning of orders to fill can crash the nord server
### Description
During the planning of orders to fill in `plan_fills`, the `limit_by_quote_size` function can be used to limit the size of an order through both the `limit_size` and the `limit_quote` arguments. However, this function uses both `quo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Asset vault nesting can lead to loss of assets
### Description
Allowing asset vaults to be nested (e.g., vault A is owned by vault B, and vault B is owned by vault X, etc.) could result in a situation in which multiple asset vaults own each other. This would result in a deadlock preventing assets in the affect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Markets are not being properly removed from the markets list
### Description
In the [`HoldefiSettings` contract](https://github.com/holdefi/Holdefi/blob/f4df394d7cf6df347b1f1e9af8e2676c5933c2c9/contracts/HoldefiSettings.sol) there are two data structures to track markets: [`marketsList`](https://github.com/ho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | EOA | false | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/LiquidStakingManager.sol#L435
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The underlying assumption of `eoaRepresentative` being an EOA can be untrue. This can cause many unintended effect... | Code4rena | 5 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Funding settlement will be DOS'd for a time after the phaseID change of an underlying chainlink aggregator
### Description
Oracle incorrectly assumes that roundID is always incremented by one but this is not the case. Chainlink's roundID is actually two values packed together: phaseId and aggregatorRoundId.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Mint Fund Unrestricted Access
### Description
## Vulnerability in mint_fund Instruction
It was found that the `mint_fund` instruction can be invoked by anyone to mint a `BuyState`. This would mean that a buyer can be forced to pay a high slippage of **3%** if someone mints the `BuyState` before it is rebalan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Arrays can grow without a way to shrink them
### Description
It's a good practice to maintain control over the size of array state variables in Solidity, especially if they are dynamically updated. If a contract includes a mechanism to push items into an array, it should ideally also provide a mechanism to rem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Bypass of EntityType check when null attribute is returned by Quadrata
### Description
In `QuadrataKYCVerifier`, when a deal's `EntityType` requirement is set to `Individual` or `Business` and Quadrata returns a null business attribute (all fields `bytes32(0)`), then the `EntityType` requirement check is bypa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: LACK OF DISABLEINITIALIZERS CALL TO PREVENT UNINITIALIZED CONTRACTS
### Description
Multiple contracts are using the `Initializable` module from OpenZeppelin. To prevent leaving an implementation contract uninitialized [OpenZeppelin's documentation](https://docs.openzeppelin.com/upgrades-plugins/1.x/writing-up... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Event Parameter in Function `_withdraw`
### Description
The issue was identified within the [`_withdraw`](https://github.com/dforce-network/OFT/blob/2ff5d7a8f9a509006557bf5de72fabf40d1138a5/src/sUSX.sol#L203) function of the `sUSX` contract.
The function emits a `Withdraw` event using `msg.sender` a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `areAddressArraysEqual()` isn't foolproof when both arrays have duplicate elements
### Description
The `areAddressArraysEqual()` function is used to check if `array1` and `array2` contain the same elements. It does so by checking that each element in `array1` exists in `array2`, and vice versa:
[SecurityCounc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Applying checkpoint can revert
### Description
## Severity: High Risk
**Context:** HyperdriveLP .sol#L359
**Description:**
The `applyCheckpoint` function can revert even with conservative pool parameters and reserves. It can revert in `_applyCloseShort -> _updateLiquidity` when checking that the bond rese... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | oracle | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/9
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
The chainlink BTC/USD oracle is used to price WBTC ([docs](https://docs.blueberry.garden/lending-protocol/price-oracle#price-feed-alternative)). WBTC is basically a bridged asset and if the bridge is compromise... | Sherlock | 5 | Blueberry |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Sandwich Attack | true | true | ## Severity: Critical Risk
## Context
**File:** SponsorVault.sol
**Line:** 208
## Description
There is a special role sponsor in the protocol. Sponsors can cover the liquidity fee and transfer fee for users, making it more favorable for users to migrate to the new chain. Sponsors can either provide liquidity for ea... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | false | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary usage of `nonReentrant` modifier on `ReferralManager::completeFirstPurchase`
### Description
**Description:** `ReferralManager::completeFirstPurchase` has in place the `nonReentrant` modifier from the `ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable` library, but this function is not susceptible to reentrancy.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: If L1GraphTokenGateway's `outboundTransfer` is called by a contract, the entire `msg.value` is blackholed, whether the ticket got redeemed or not
### Description
[L1GraphTokenGateway.sol#L236](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/blob/309a188f7215fa42c745b136357702400f91b4ff/contracts/gateway/L1Gr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete Deprecation
### Description
The [`_messageSender` contract variable](https://github.com/Consensys/zkevm-monorepo/blob/7f3614e59901402c804e72396afedb15263dcbe4/contracts/contracts/messageService/l1/v1/L1MessageServiceV1.sol#L28) has been deprecated but it is [still being used](https://github.com/Cons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: Recipient Bytes Silent Burn When Non-20-Byte Payloads Pass Validation
### Description
All user-facing bridge entrypoints (`transferPool()`, `transferToken()`, `withdrawRemote()`, etc.) invoke `_validateToLength(to)` before constructing the packet, but this helper merely enforces that the payload is non-empty ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Unauthorized `rewardTokens` in `_marketWeightsByToken`
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High, because a `market` can receive unauthorized `rewardTokens`.
**Likelihood:** Low, as it requires a `rewardToken` to be re-added after governance removes it.
**Description**
The `_marketWeightsByToken` va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Non-compliance with EIP-7579
### Description
1. The `onInstall()` function misses a revert statement if the module is already installed.
2. The `onUninstall()` function misses a revert statement if there is an error.
3. The `onUninstall()` function misses to delete from the `walletSessionKeys` mapping for t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Lack of locking mechanism leads to loss of funds in `swap-router` PBC
### Description
The `swap-router` PBC does not acquire locks on swap contracts before executing swaps. Locks should be obtained using the `SwapLockContract` to ensure that all swaps in a route can be executed atomically.
This locking mecha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect event parameter logs zero address instead of WBNB
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The token argument used in CreatePool event emit of createPoolADD() should really be _token so that WBNB address is logged in the event instead of zero address when token == 0.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Tokens Marked as Same Can Have Different Direct Prices
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `12cbe0a9f0efaa2dfe8a2577e33102a40802f584`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Same as [ELA-1](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/full/elara-finance/ceaf2e43-2883-4f4f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Absence of Verification for Token Mint
### Description
## Revoke Other Delegate Vulnerability
In `revoke_other_delegate_v1`, when the `delegate_scenario` is `DelegateScenario::Holder(_)`, the function allows the revocation process to proceed without verifying whether the token that the authority is operating ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked _amountOut can lead to 100% slippage
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In contract AaveUtilsl, function `_tokenSwapOutAmount` will return in 0 when the token amount is a small value, resulting in an swap with a _minOut of 0 which on it’s on with lead to a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/debtdao/Line-of-Credit/blob/e8aa08b44f6132a5ed901f8daa231700c5afeb3a/contracts/modules/credit/LineOfCredit.sol#L516-L538
## Vulnerability details
## Description
LineOfCredit manages an array of open credit line identifiers called `ids`. Many interactions with the Line operate on... | Code4rena | 5 | Debt DAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: UNFILTERED TOKENS LEADS CROSS-SITE SCRIPTING
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Location** : @getsafle/asset-controller
**Description** :
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks are a type of injection, in which malicious scripts are injected into otherwise benign and trusted we... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: Poseidon2 verify_batchopcode can send to execution bus for invalid row
### Description
Most chips' AIRs define an `enabled` or `is_valid` boolean variable based on which interactions are emitted. In the case of the Poseidon2 AIR, multiple opcodes (`VERIFY_BATCH`, `PERM_POS2`, `COMP_POS2`) are handled, and `en... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `GeometricDistribution` LDF length validation prevents the full range of usable ticks from being used
### Description
**Description:** In `LibGeometricDistribution:isValidParams`, the `length` variable represents the number of `tickSpacing`s between `minTickOrOffset` and `maxTick`. The current validation rever... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Unable to remove liquidity in Recovery Mode
### Description
_Submitted by gzeon_
According to
> When the Malt price TWAP drops below a specified threshold (eg 2% below peg) then the protocol will revert any transaction that tries to remove Malt from the AMM pool (ie buying Malt or removing liquidity). User... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [10]
### Description
It is still possible to bid when an Auction is paused. This can have negative consequences, for instance when the bidding process contains a security vulnerability and the system is temporarily paused for mitigation.
**[Alex the Entreprenerd (judge) commented](https://github.com/code-423n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Borrowing from branches can be disabled by one whale or early depositor
### Description
**Impact**
Major changes in V2 include:
- 72% of interest raid paid out to SP stakers
- Inability to borrow new debt in RM
The logic can be seen in `_requireValidAdjustmentInCurrentMode\
https://github.com/liquity/bol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: areEnabled() functions return different values for empty policy list
### Description
The function `areEnabled(EnumerableActionPolicy storage $self, ...)` does not explicitly handle the case where `length == 0`, returning `false`. In contrast, the function `areEnabled(Policy storage $policies, ...)` returns `tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Risk of Capital Inefficiency in Reward-Lacking Deposits
### Description
**Update**
The team has acknowledged and decided to keep the minor issue as it is.
**File(s) affected:**`locker.fc`
**Description:** The `locker.fc` contract allows users to deposit funds even if no rewards have been added to the contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The `destination` address should be emitted in the userEscrow contract in the function `transferOut`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-centrifuge/blob/512e7a71ebd9ae76384f837204216f26380c9f91/src/UserEscrow.sol#L49
Due to that the receiver can be different address from the user address , t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: keep-core - Specification inconsistency: TokenStaking.slash() is never called ✓ Addressed
### Description
According to the [keep specification](http://docs.keep.network/random-beacon/#_slashing) stake should be slashed if a staker violates the protocol:
>
> Slashing
> If a staker violates the protocol of an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Replace Panic Call With Debug Assertion
### Description
## ID Leak Verifier
`id_leak_verifier` prevents the leakage of the unique IDs of Sui objects. It tracks the flow of the value extracted by the unpack bytecode and prevents it from being returned. It is written into a mutable reference, added to a vector,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | true | ## Low: Less tokens can be allocated to emission receivers than weekly emissions due to precision loss from division before multiplication
### Description
`BabelVault` allows one or more emission receivers to be created and `IncentiveVoting` allows token lockers to vote for how the weekly token emissions should be dis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Any user being the first to claim rewards from `GiantMevAndFeesPool` can unexepectedly collect them all
### Description
Any user being the first to claim rewards from GiantMevAndFeesPool, can get all the previously generated rewards whatever the amount and even if he did not participate to generate those rewa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Handling Get Failures
### Description
## Limitation in Optimism's System with Celestia
There is a potential limitation in Optimism’s system when interacting with Celestia for data retrieval. Optimism interacts with Celestia in two scenarios:
1. **Posting Data for Storage**: This involves sending data to Cele... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Missing Version Validation for Private Clients Account in `new_private_client`
### Description
**Description:** The `new_private_client()` function fails to validate that the provided `private_clients_acc` account matches the protocol version specified in `root_state`.
Since different protocol versions use d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Handling Division By Zero
### Description
## Divisor Handling in div_floor Function
In the current implementation, when the divisor (`priceB`) is zero, `div_floor` returns zero. While it may be unlikely for the backend to push such a price, it is crucial to consider and handle such exceptional cases robustly.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Emergency Handling for Cross-Chain Operations
### Description
In the code located at [RouterV2.sol#L167](https://github.com/eywa-protocol/eywa-clp/blob/d68ba027ff19e927d64de123b2b02f15a43f8214/contracts/RouterV2.sol#L167), it is explicitly expected that the `EMERGENCY` function will be invoked for operations `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Dust Asset Amounts Can Amplify Gas Costs
### Description
Description
By dusting an account with 1 WEI of assets, an attacker can grief normal users by increasing their gas costs.
Whenever an account engages in a risk-increasing trade, a risk assessment is conducted. This process, which involves
gas-intensive c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Emergency withdrawal allows depositing again
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High, tokens can be deposited again after emergency withdrawal, mass withdrawal will not be finalized
**Likelihood:** Medium, emergency withdrawal is an important admin function, but still not a usual operation
**Descript... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Call block.timestamp direclty instead of function
### Description
The `_currTimestamp()` function casts the `block.timestamp` to a uint32. However it's not always necessary to have a uint32.
In the example below you are assigning the timestamp to a uint256. Which makes it unnecessary to cast the timestamp to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables
*There are 6 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack Of Validations Can Brick Proposal State
### Description
In the `MultichainGovernor` contract, proposals can be executed if they were previously succeeded, with arbitrary `calldatas`, `values` and `targets` contract addresses provided by the creator when calling the `propose` function, accordingly to the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Liquidation frontrunning can prevent debt repayment upon unpausing (restoring full router)
### Description
During a period of time that the PauseRouter is in use, the valuations of a user's debt and collateral may make them subject to liquidation. But, in the first block after the normal Router is restored,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: `TimeWeightedIncentiveLogic` distributions are not possible for tokens that revert on zero transfers
### Description
**Description:** When rewards in a given token are deposited to `TimeWeightedIncentiveLogic` for the first time, the cached end timestamp will be zero. Comparison with the current non-zero bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: 3S-LENFT-N09 Throughout codebase: remove imports of unused libraries
### Description
In several files in the codebase, several libraries are imported but never used.
[LendingMarket:](https://github.com/leNFT/contracts/blob/9113329743b3e0511434df51c529ed006adf043d/contracts/protocol/Lending/LendingMarket.sol#L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: RedeemQueue Accounting Mismatch Between Batch Creation and Claim Eligibility
### Description
The RedeemQueue contract contains a critical vulnerability where _handleReport processes fewer redemption requests than what users can claim, leading to accounting inconsistencies and potential loss of funds. The issu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Current debt calculations can di�fer depending on context
### Description
The vault extends credit to a strategy based on both the `debtRatio` of the strategy and the number of available excess tokens (as determined by the vault’s `debtRatio`).
1. Start with debt limit left for the Strategy
```solidity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Farm 's reward rate might not be constant
### Description
An L1 DssVest contract defines a constant rate vesting schedule that an L1 VestedRewards-Distribution contract distributes to an L1FarmProxy contract whenever its minimum rewardThreshold is reached. The reward is bridged to the L2's L2FarmProxy contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: value transactions
### Description
* https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/2e24f0e76525a663e222530a88bdd968e5e818eb/contracts/LPExternalRequestsManager.sol#L144
* https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/2e24f0e76525a663e222530a88bdd968e5e818eb/contracts/LPExternalRequestsManager.sol#L21... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Extract Metadata From Capabilities
### Description
## Tortuga Protocol Access Control
The Tortuga protocol uses several capability resources to provide access control to various functions. For example, `delegation_service` provides a `ManageCapability` to the protocol when registering new validators.
However... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Auctions run for less time than intended
### Description
Auctions run for less time than intended causing them to be not economically efficient for the lenders, thus causing a suboptimal credit of liquidation funds to them.
### Impact
This causes auctions to run for less time than intended if the first bid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Possible precision loss in `_checkpositionsRange` function
### Description
The `_checkpositionsRange` function contains a potential precision loss issue. The problem arises from the expression ((_range / 2) % _tickSpacing != 0).
### Impact
It can potentially lead to incorrect validation and can also affect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Unsynchronized Fee Rates ✓ Fixed
### Description
The `_FEE_RATE_` variable is being updated or initialized without ensuring synchronization with the corresponding bot contract. Specifically, the `StarBaseLimitOrder` contract is not in sync with the `StarBaseLimitOrderBot` contract. If the `_FEE_RATE_` between ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: createMerkleLT() can revert causing loss of funds when used for counterfactual deployment
### Description
When creating a Merkle lockup from the factory, `CREATE2` is used to ensure a deterministic address. If the combined percentages of the tranches do not add up to 100%, the `createMerkleLT()` function re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `endIncentive` may be blocked
### Description
_Acknowledged_
In UniswapV3Staker, the owner can create one incentive. When we reach the end of this incentive, we can end this incentive via function `endIncentive`. In the function `endIncentive`, we can refund the unclaimed rewards.
In function `endIncentive`,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing chainId check in `batchMint()` and `claim()`
### Description
The `batchMint` and `claim` functions are intended to be called only on the BEAM chain, but the functions do not perform a chainId check.
It is recommended to fetch `block.chainid` and compare it with `BEAM_CHAIN_ID`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Dead Code
### Description
## PendleEntry Code Review
The PendleEntry contains two instances of dead code. Removing them may improve code maturity and reduce deployment costs. The two instances are as follows:
1. The line using `SafeERC20 for IERC20;` is unused because the interface `IERC20` is not referenced... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `PerpMarket::getOrderFeeUsd` rewards traders who flip the skew with `makerFee` for the full trade
### Description
`PerpMarket::getOrderFeeUsd` rewards traders who flip the skew with `makerFee` for the full trade. This is not ideal as since the trader has flipped the skew, their trade has partly created the opp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Use of MsgReceiver to check _feeToken status leads to unnecessary gas consumption
### Description
Checking the whitelist status of a token only on the receiving end of a message call can lead to excessive gas consumption. As part of a cross-chain message call, all functions in the `MsgReceiver` contract check ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.2 to get simple compiler automatic inlining
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.3 to get better struct packing and cheaper multiple storage reads
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.4 to get custom errors, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Use braces around operators with uncertain precedence
### Description
In `Access::roleGranted` we see the following code
In Solidity the `&` operator will be executed before `==` but this might not always be clear and might be different in other languages. I suggest adding braces around `userRoles[account] &... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Division before multiplication results in lower `dittoMatchedShares` distributed to users
### Description
Shares amount is rounded down to number of days staked. Max truncation is 1 day, min time is 14 days. At most 1 / 14 * 100% = 7.1% of accrued shares will be truncated.
### Impact
Up to 7.1% of user's s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: UNUSABLE CONTRACT
### Description
The `ImportExportElasticNft.sol` smart contract constructor initializes the `nft` variable to the same value. This cause `nft` value to be equal to `0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000`. Once deployed, this means that the contract cannot be used since there is no way... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: MISSING REASSIGNMENT CHECKS
### Description
It was observed that the project is missing reassignment checks. Reassignment checks make sure that redundant operations are not performed by not letting the reassignment of the existing value.
Code Location
-------------
**appchain-registry/src/registry\_settings\... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | true | ## Medium: Potential incorrect index update in revived gauge under specific conditions
### Description
The `reviveGauge` function fails to update the gauge's index to the current global index when reviving a previously killed gauge. While this issue is mitigated in most scenarios by the `distributeAll` function, which... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Multiple conditions in a single require statement
### Description
There are instances in the codebase where a single `require` statement contains multiple conditions. *Some examples* are:
* On [line 123 in `CashMarket.sol`](https://github.com/notional-finance/contracts/blob/b6fc6be4622422d0e34c90e77f2ec9da18... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: In contract TokenVesting.sol in function _vestingSchedule at lines 156-175 there is no default return path for the function. Also, the condition at line 165 will always be true as the parameter timestamp is passed from release function as block.timestamp.
### Description
**Recommendation**: Consider changing ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: For modern and more readable code; update import usages
### Description
**Context:**
**Description:**
Solidity code is also cleaner in another way that might not be noticeable: the struct Point. We were importing it previously with global import but not using it. The Point struct `polluted the source code` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing pool existence check in balanceOf
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In NFTXLPStaking.sol, deposit(), exit(), withdraw(), claimRewards() and other related functions that take a vaultID as parameter perform a pool existence check on the staking pool associated wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Condition addresses can re-enter `StrategyBuilderPlugin`
### Description
**Description:** Condition addresses can re-enter `StrategyBuilderPlugin` from the external call in `_changeStrategyInCondition()` and similarly in `_changeAutomationInCondition()`. In the latter case, it seems that the worst thing that c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Malicious MarketHelper contract can be used in TOFTMarketReceiverModule's leverageUpReceiver and marketRemoveCollateralReceiver functions
### Description
User-supplied `marketHelper` contract is called for building market's `execute()` call, but in `leverageUpReceiver()` and `marketRemoveCollateralReceiver()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Potential read-only entrancy pattern if external protocol read the share state from the Earn- Vault
### Description
In the `Vault#withdraw` function, the code updates the state after an external call (see `Earn-Vault.sol#L293`):
```solidity
withdrawalTypes = strategy.withdraw({
positionId: positionId,
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `updateAllPositionFromBalanceMargin` function mistakenly increments positions "fromBalance"
### Description
When a position is closed all the other positions "from balances" are updated. However, the function logic `updateAllPositionFromBalanceMargin` is not fully correct and can increment the "from balances"... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: No events for critical information.
### Description
**Description**
StWSX.sol: oracleUnstake(), force Unstake(), forceWithdrawUnstaked(), oracleWithdrawUnstaked(), oracleClaim Rewards(), oracleReportUnstaked Withdraw(),
Mentioned functions require events to show the change of the requested amount. For now, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect reward calculation.
### Description
**Description**
Function _calculate() is supposed to collect the user's earned reward during each round with
its particular rate during the user's lock period. However, it will return interest only for the last
round, since variable interest is assigned with new ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Affiliates can trick the protocol to receive fees even when not needed
### Description
Currently, takers specify the address of an affiliate, which will get a portion of the protocol fee in case it has a non-zero value in the affiliateRates mapping, and the affiliate program is active. Whitelisted affiliates c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Admin can bypass the upgrade delay by `delegate` and `emergencyUpgrade`
### Description
The admin can bypass the upgrade delay flow and immediately change the address of the wallet core by following the sequence:
- `transferDelegation` (to a new `delegate` account, controlled by the admin)
- `acceptDelegati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect/misleading comments (2) - SecuritizeVault
### Description
**Description:** Comments that do not accurately reflect the code's functionality can lead to misinterpretation during development, code review, and future maintenance.
**Securitize:** Fixed in commit [172aed](https://bitbucket.org/securitiz... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [02] `CallinCommand` is misleading and should be renamed `callinTransaction` for clarity
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-phala-network/blob/a01ffbe992560d8d0f17deadfb9b9a2bed38377e/phala-blockchain/crates/pink/runtime/src/runtime/extension.rs#L336 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | true | ## High: Lack of withdrawal functionality in strategy contracts
### Description
The `LidoStrategy` and `DSRStrategy` contracts are responsible for managing `ETH` and `DAI` deposits into `Lido` and `sDAI`, respectively, to earn yields.
These strategies are integrated with the `DepositETH` and `DepositUSD` contracts, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Modifier onlyNonUsAttestation may always revert functions
### Description
`verifiedByCbSchemaUid` is never initialized in `AttestationVerifier`.
### Impact
Functions using the modifier `onlyNonUsAttestation` will revert if `verifiedByCbSchemaUid` is never initialized.
### Recommendation
- If the derived class... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Deployment script requires unencrypted private key
### Description
**Description:** The [Makefile](https://github.com/0xKaizenLabs/staking-contracts-v3/blob/c78653ed5f2e5a6d5ace13c303a8765fe30679b0/Makefile)’s deployment targets require a raw private key to be supplied via an environment variable and pass it d... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.