prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Current Issue
Currently, `pool_id(&staked_sui)` is called twice in `staking_pool::convert_to_fungible_staked_sui`,
even though it returns a similar value on both calls.
## Remediation
Store the result of `pool_id(&staked_sui)` in a variable instead of calling it twice in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect state transition may cause vault in stuck
### Description
Incorrect state transition may cause vault in stuck under `processCompoundCancellation` scenario.
### Impact
Vault may stuck in unexpected state after `processCompoundCancellation` action. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing input validation
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are several instances where an input address is assigned to a state variable without checking if the input address is `address(0)`. Assigning `address(0)` to a state variable can lead to unexpected behavior of the system. Instances of this... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused storage variables borrowerOperationsAddress and troveManagerAddress
### Description
The defined storage variables `borrowerOperationsAddress` and `troveManagerAddress` are not being used.
### Recommendation
Consider removing such variables. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary check of `tokenConfig[asset].isActive` in the `_transferToBeneficiary` function.
### Description
The `redeem` function has `belowMaxRedeemPerBlock` modifier and it checks `_config.isActive` is true from [L127](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-ethena-labs/blob/main/contracts/ustb/UStbMinting.so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Caching the length of calldata increases gas cost instead of reducing it
### Description
### Proof of Concept
**Instance 1:**
Reduce gas cost of `FeeManager.setBeneficial()` function by not caching the length of calldata variable `_feeTokens`.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-wise-lending/blob/main/co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Users May Lose Their Stake If `setToken` Is Called For A Second Time With An Alternative Address
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The `setToken` function is used to initially set the token used for staking within the Staking contract however, there is a lack o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Sanity check on all important variables
### Description
Most of the functionalities have proper sanity checks when it comes to setting system-wide variables, such as whitelist addresses. However there are a few key setters that lack such sanity checks.
### Recommendation
Comment from pSTAKE Finance team:
> ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Protocol may charge more fees than expected
### Description
In HyperEvmVault, the protocol will charge some protocol fees based on the total assets we manage. If the calculated fee amount is zero, we will skip the fee process. The problem here is that we don't update the `lastFeeCollectionTimestamp` in this ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Amount Values Within BentoBox Can be Inconsistent
### Description
If the actions `ACTION_DST_DEPOSIT_TO_BENTOBOX` and `ACTION_DST_WITHDRAW_FROM_BENTOBOX` are carried out with the same amount argument, it is possible for the `ACTION_DST_WITHDRAW_FROM_BENTOBOX` action to revert because the amount of tokens cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: FLOATING PRAGMA
### Description
The project contains many instances of floating pragma. Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested with thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using, for example, either... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Using uninitialized value
### Description
In the `constructor` of the `SubstrateSignatureValidator` contract, the call to `_updateAttestors(attestors)` is made before the `_threshold` value is set via `_updateThreshold(threshold)`. However, `_updateAttestors` checks that `attestors.length >= _threshold`, relyi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: `poolRewards` arrays can grow without bounds, resulting in DoS of core functionality
### Description
**Description:** The `poolRewards` mapping maintains an array of reward token addresses for a given `IncentivizedPoolId`. Given that the distribution of rewards is permissionless, anyone can invoke this functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Disabled Transceivers cannot be re-enabled by calling `TransceiverRegistry::_setTransceiver` after 64 have been registered
### Description
**Description:** [`TransceiverRegistry::_setTransceiver`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/example-native-token-transfers/blob/f4e2277b358349dbfb8a654d19a925628d48... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Alchemist can mint `AlTokens` above their assigned ceiling by calling `lowerHasMinted()`
### Description
_Submitted by tintin, also found by 0xsomeone, AuditsAreUS, and hyh_
[AlchemicTokenV2Base.sol#L111-L124](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-alchemix/blob/de65c34c7b6e4e94662bf508e214dcbf327984f4/cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: No need to cache a function call if used only once
### Description
### Instance 1
No need to cache `params.tokenIn.balanceOf(address(this))` and `params.tokenOut.balanceOf(address(this))` in stack variable in `balanceInAfter` and `balanceOutAfter` respectively, since they are used only once.
[Swapper.sol#L1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | true | ## Low: The approveMax() and unapprove() functions could be used maliciously by the node owner
### Description
The functions `approveMax` and `unapprove` are critical for the Escrow contract as they handle token approval permissions. If the owner's account is compromised, these functions could be exploited in the foll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Counter Values
### Description
State counters such as `activePrivateOfferCnt`, `activeRaffleCnt`, and `activeAuctionsCnt` may still include unsettled NFTs.
NFTs put up for auction that receive no bids will result in the auction ending without a winner. Consequently, it will not go through the settle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Use of Precision Library
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `5a045189b562878cc5416f136fd32fd580cec1d8`.
**File(s) affected:**`Lending.sol`
**Description:** In the `getDebtWithPenalty()` function, only at the very end of the calculation the calculation of the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: [12] SPACES CAN BE ADDED FOR BETTER READABILITY
### Description
For better readability, spaces can be added in code where appropriate.
A space can be added between `challenge` and `phase` in the following comment.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-ajna/blob/main/ajna-grants/src/grants/base/StandardFunding... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use explicit `uint256` instead of generic `uint`
### Description
**Description:** Use explicit `uint256` instead of generic `uint`:
**Bima:**
Fixed in commit [f614678](https://github.com/Bima-Labs/bima-v1-core/commit/f614678e78e5d3dd91682aeca7ae6e881d927052).
**Cyfrin:** Verified. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Putty position tokens may be minted to non ERC721 receivers
### Description
_Submitted by horsefacts, also found by 0xc0ffEE, 0xsanson, berndartmueller, BowTiedWardens, csanuragjain, defsec, IllIllI, joestakey, Kenshin, Picodes, shenwilly, Sm4rty, unforgiven, and xiaoming90_
### Vulnerability Details
Put... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Add constructor initializers
### Description
As per [OpenZeppelin’s (OZ) recommendation](https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/uupsupgradeable-vulnerability-post-mortem/15680/6), “The guidelines are now to make it impossible for *anyone* to run `initialize` on an implementation contract, by adding an empty cons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Dangerous int256 casting to uint256
### Description
The `fetchPrice()` function in BAMM.sol employs Chainlink's pricefeed to retrieve a value of type `int256`. However, without any validation checks, this value is immediately cast to a `uint256` type, potentially leading to a silent overflow in the event that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: first user can steal everyone else's tokens
### Description
_Submitted by egjlmn1, also found by OriDabush_
A user who joins the systems first (stakes first) can steal everybody's tokens by sending tokens to the system externally.
This attack is possible because you enable staking a small amount of tokens.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Trading with Self to Make a Loss is Profitable
### Description
Because of the socialising of loss within the protocol, it is possible to extract funds from the protocol if a user owns two accounts, and one makes a large and sudden loss to the other, sufficient to make the first account insolvent. When insolvent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Accidental account deletion
### Description
## Account Management in Populated Networks
When ensuring an account on an already populated network, all accounts in this network are deleted:
Currently, it is not possible to have multiple addresses in the same network, so this doesn’t immediately affect the ext... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Silent failure can occur in `Pipeline` function calls if the target has no code
### Description
**Description:** In the case of a `Pipeline` function call to a target address with no code, the call will silently fail. Scenarios where this may occur include calls to non-contract addresses or on a contract where... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: IndexTemplate.sol#compensate() will most certainly fail
### Description
## Handle
WatchPug
## Vulnerability details
## Root Cause
Precision loss while converting between `the amount of shares` and `the amount of underlying tokens` back and forth is not handled properly.
---
https://github.com/code-423n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of comments makes code difficult to read
### Description
**Description**
There are a lot of logic but almost no comments nor docstrings. It’s easy to misunderstand the
whole flow idea.
**Recommendation**:
Add comprehensive docstring and comments. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious royalty recipient can steal excess eth from buy orders
### Description
### Impact
Users that submit single or bulk Buy orders through `EthRouter.sol` can have their excess eth stolen by a malicious royalty recipient.
### Proof of Concept
**Introduction**
The `buy(...)` function in `PrivatePool... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: NFT owner can create multiple auctions
### Description
_Submitted by 0xliumin, also found by leastwood_
[NFTMarketReserveAuction.sol#L325-L349](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-foundation/blob/4d8c8931baffae31c7506872bf1100e1598f2754/contracts/mixins/NFTMarketReserveAuction.sol#L325-L349)
[NFTMarketRese... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing Range Check For Duration
### Description
## Vulnerability Details
The vulnerability is rooted in the functionality responsible for creating a future subscription for a given consumer. Within `CreateSubscription`, there is a validation check for the duration range (between zero and twelve) via `Valida... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: read_multiple_buffer_sender::operator() reserves but not resizes vector before writing
### Description
The code reserves sufficient elements in `temp` but does not resize `temp`. It then writes to all the elements it reserved. Reserving grows the memory capacity underlying the vector abstraction, but does n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: DELETE - ABI CODER V2 FOR GAS OPTIMIZATION
### Description
From **Pragma 0.8.0**, **ABI coder v2** is activated by default. The pragma abicoder v2 can be deleted from the repository. That will provide gas optimization.
Code Location
-------------
```
./PledgeAgent.sol:2:pragma experimental ABIEncoderV2;
./Go... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Z-coordinate usage in G2 scalar multiplication causes invalid pairing computations
### Description
In `g2ScalarMul` function in the EcPairing precompile, when performing scalar multiplication by 2, the function incorrectly passes the y-coordinate (`yp1`) instead of the z-coordinate (`zp1`) as the las... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Missing implementation of `marginAccountDepositFromFundingAccount`
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the SideMarginFundingAccount contract, the marginAccountDepositFromFundingAccount() function, which is called on line: 132, does not exist in the TradeableSideVa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of documentation on strategies in case of system parameter update
### Description
Malicious users of the Folks Finance capital market protocol could try to game the system and earn more than honest users.
When users deposit assets into the protocol, they receive interest-bearing assets known as f-assets.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: UNUSED ARCH NOT RETURNED WHEN OPENING A POSITION
### Description
Opening a position requires the following user input:
* Amount of `OUSD` that will be used as collateral
* Number of leverage cycles
* The required amount of `ARCH` to burn for the position
When calling `createLeveragedPosition()` from `Levera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | false |
[HolographOperator.sol#L329](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/HolographOperator.sol#L329)<br>
[HolographOperator.sol#L419-L429](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/HolographOperato... | Code4rena | 4 | Holograph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: `CreateOfferer.sol` should not enforce the nonce incremented sequentially, otherwise user can DOS the contract by skipping order
### Description
According to https://github.com/ProjectOpenSea/seaport/blob/main/docs/SeaportDocumentation.md#contract-orders:
> "Seaport v1.2 introduced support for a new type o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Not using the latest version of OpenZeppelin from dependencies
### Description
The package.json configuration file says that the project is using 4.6.0 of OpenZeppelin which has a not last update version
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Use patched versions | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Tracking signature nonces based on tx.origin will be problematical for account abstraction
### Description
The order signature nonces are tracked based on the `tx.origin` of the taker. With account abstraction, the `tx.origin` may not be known beforehand when the maker signs the order which includes the nonce.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: The `_currentExchangeRate` of the Vault contract can't increase and will always be lower than or equal to `_assetUnit`
### Description
The `_currentExchangeRate` of the Vault contract can not increase and will always be lower than or equal to `_assetUnit`. Therefore, when the vault is under-collateralized (`_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Quote functions should not be payable
### Description
`VaultExtension.quote` and `VaultExtension.quoteAndRevert` are payable, but they cannot receive Ether due to the restriction on the proxy pattern used. The fallback function of the Vault is used to forward calls to the VaultExtension (and VaultAdmin). The f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inactive EIGEN Supply Stuck After Token Upgrade
### Description
Any unwrapped EIGEN tokens before the upgrade will be stuck in the Eigen contract and excluded from the total supply.
In the current EIGEN implementation before the upgrade, unwrapping EIGEN sends the tokens to the Eigen contract.
```solidity
fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: [31] Consider adding validation of user inputs
### Description
There are no validations done on the arguments below. Consider that the Solidity [documentation](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/control-structures.html#panic-via-assert-and-error-via-require) states that `Properly functioning code should n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: BLOCK WITH GAS LIMIT
### Description
There are several loops in the contract that can eventually grow large enough to make future operations of the contract cost too much gas to fit in one block.
Code Location
-------------
`TokenSaleDistributor.sol`
```
TokenSaleDistributor.sol::31 => for (uint i; i for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Functions Are Updating the State Without Event Emissions
### Description
Throughout the codebase, instances of functions that are updating the state without an event emission were found. The contracts which could benefit from the addition of event emissions include:
* The [`constructor`](https://github.com/U... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: HybridDeleGator: Miscellaneous Minor Points
### Description
#### A. Unused imports can be removed:
**DeleGator/src/HybridDeleGator.sol:L6**
**DeleGator/src/libraries/P256VerifierLib.sol:L6**
#### B. The struct definition should be preceded by the NatSpec annotation:
**DeleGator/src/HybridDeleGator.sol:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused function _mintMinter in MyShare.
### Description
**Description**
MyShare.sol: function_mintMinter(), line 501. The function is not used within MyShare contract. Though it is internal and can be used by children contracts, such contracts are not present within the scope of the audit.
**Recommendation**... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Burning a Position Notifies the Subscriber But Does Not Unsubscribe Them
### Description
The burn operation on a position triggers the `_modifyLiquidity` logic, which, if a subscriber is set, will [notify the subscriber](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unrestricted emergency withdrawal
### Description
This comment is about unrestricted emergency withdrawal function in here: https://github.com/tosdis/TosDisFinance/tree/be50dbf8a52a8f919694498bf30394d328d88fbb/StakeMaster/contracts/StakingPool.sol#L170 being possible to be called anytime with burning all the r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | liquidation | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/96
## Found by
yixxas
## Summary
It is documented that pools can be created for tokens with interest rate between 1-10%.
> Pool creators: create pool by providing a fungible token for quote and collateral and an interest rate between 1-10%
Howe... | Sherlock | 5 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing `_zroPaymentAddress` Specification
### Description
**Update**
In-line comment has been added.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `ebe888c73e1ad9b77eea9bec1b2596c75a96cc6f`.
**File(s) affected:**`OmnichainProposalSender.sol`
**Description:** The `send()` function in `Omnichain... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | false | false | ## Low: Add `deadline` parameter for mint and burn requests in `RequestsManager`
### Description
`RequestsManager::requestMint` and `requestBurn` allow callers to specify the minimum output amount but don't allow callers to specify a deadline for the request to be completed.
Minimum output amounts become "stale" over... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [11] Message.id wrongly downcasted to uint64
### Description
### Issue Description
In `MessageV1Codec` library `id` is wrongly decoded to `uint64`, instead of the original size when being encoded - `uint256`. The `_msg` that this function expects is the `Message` struct that looks like this:
[Message.sol](ht... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Handling losses from underlying vault
### Description
The underlying SUSD vault may suffer a permanent loss. This will lead to a loss of corresponding SNX. However, such loss is not fairly distributed across vault users. On the first withdrawals no loss will be reported but on a later withdrawal attempts th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Funds Locked Due to the Whitelist
### Description
- https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/a36e73c4be0b5f233de6bfc8d2c276136bf67573/contracts/beta/ExternalRequestsManagerBetaV1.sol#L209
- https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/a36e73c4be0b5f233de6bfc8d2c276136bf67573/contracts/beta/E... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `setPendingRedemptionBalance()` may cause the user's cash token to be lost
### Description
`setPendingRedemptionBalance()` are not checking Old balances, resulting in the possibility of overwriting the new balance added by the user.
### Proof of Concept
In `setPendingRedemptionBalance()`, `MANAGER_ADMIN` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Duplicate address accounts can lead to overwritten contributions
### Description
On deployment, the constructor of `MemeBase` will receive an array of accounts to set the contribution of each account. The `_launchCampaignSetup` function currently sets the contribution amount of each address in `memeHearters` b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `isNewYToken` can be omitted in YToken contracts
### Description
**Description:** To support the accounting of underlying assets, a new parameter `isNewYToken` was introduced in `mintYToken`. This parameter is used in the [`dYTokenL1::mintYToken`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/702a931df3adb2f6e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Function description differs from implementation.
### Description
The function [description](https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-vaults/blob/cff924f1894cca1820a588b14d341c4fa4f384c0/contracts/BaseStrategy.sol#L311) says that
> this call and `tendTrigger` should never return `true` at the same time.
When... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Loop can use unchecked arithmetic and cache array length
### Description
**Description:** The `Network::scheduleBatch()` function has multiple loops that can be optimized with unchecked arithmetic and cached array lengths.
**Recommended Mitigation:**
**Symbiotic:** Acknowledged.
**Cyfrin:** Acknowledged.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Proposer can steal funds from the portal by including malicious deposits in proofs
### Description
The proposer interacts with the enclave to generate output proof by providing the `txs` for the current block. The enclave then verifies that the deposits for the associated L1 block are embedded in the `txs` in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Use named imports instead of importing the entire namespace
### Description
Use named imports as they offer a number of [advantages](https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/117173) compared to importing the entire namespace.
File: `DropBox.sol`
```solidity
// DropBoxFractalProtocol
import {DropBoxFractalProtocol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Dangerous 1 to 1 price assumption for ETH derivatives
### Description
Omnipool.sol can only handle underlying tokens with a Chainlink USD price feed (e.g., STG/USD). This is evident from the following code:
```solidity
uint256 underlyingPrice_ = bptOracle.getUSDPrice(address(underlyingToken));
```
**BPTOr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision loss from `Divide-Before-Multiply` in price calculation
### Description
_Acknowledged_
In the `SpinLottery` contract, the calculation of `avgBasePrice` in the function `calculateSpinCost` involves a division operation before a multiplication operation.
This approach can lead to precision loss, wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `YaxisVaultAdapter.sol#withdraw()` will most certainly fail
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
The actual token withdrawn from `vault.withdraw()` will most certainly less than the `_amount`, due to precision loss in `_tokensToShares()` and `vault.withdraw()`.
As a result, `IDetailedERC20(_token).safeTr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Outdated Dependencies
### Description
Multiple outdated dependencies were found in the codebase. These dependencies include versions with known security vulnerabilities that pose significant risks to the application’s security and stability.
### Recommendation
Update all affected dependencies to the latest po... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Floating Pragma
### Description
Pragma directives should be fixed to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled.
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of floating pragma directives were identified:
* `GuardianRecoveryValidator.sol` has the [`solidity ^0.8.24`](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: ISCONTRACT MODIFIER CAN BE BYPASSED THROUGH CONSTRUCTOR
### Description
The Validator can register as a Core validator candidate by calling register in CandidateHub contract. However, feeAddress and consensus address are checked with **isContract** modifier. the **isContract** function that uses **EXTCODESI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: TransmuterBuffer's setAlchemist will freeze deposited funds
### Description
_Submitted by hyh_
Currently setAlchemist doesn't check whether there are any open positions left with the old Alchemist before switching to the new one.
As this require a number of checks the probability of operational mistake is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Invalid `MarketConfigStruct.VALID_DECREASE_BIT_POSITION` Overlaps Into `DECREASE_NUM_LIMIT_BIT_POSITION`
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in commit [902f7ce](https://github.com/blex-dex/contracts/commit/902f7ce) by increasing the position value to `120 + 4 * 3`, as suggested.
**File(s) affected:**`./contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Subscriptions Tokens Distinguish Functionality Is Broken
### Description
The function `_processNativePayment()` will be called only in case the `sub.erc20TokensValid` is `false`, and this condition will only be met if the input `_erc20Token` address is set to `address(0)`.
Therefore, the user could add a d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing NatSpec `@dev` from event declaration
### Description
Some events have an incomplete NatSpec: add a `@dev` notation to describe the event to improve the code documentation.
*There are 11 instances of this issue.*
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Secondary short liquidation reverts due to arithmetic underflow in volatile market conditions
### Description
The `ercDebtAtOraclePrice` is calculated based on the cached Oracle price, which is not updated with the retrieved, potentially fresh spot price due to the 15-minute staleness limit at the beginning... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unsafe New Admin Assignment
### Description
## Authority Change Process
In the current implementation, it is possible to change the authority of the state, queue, oracle, and pull_feed accounts in a single step. However, the program does not account for mistyping the new authority address. Not handling this m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Misleading docs
### Description
This comment is about misleading documentation mentioning there is a
`PAUSER_ROLE` (and there is no such a role in this particular case) in here: https://github.com/tosdis/TosDisFinance/tree/be50dbf8a52a8f919694498bf30394d328d88fbb/StakeMaster/contracts/FeeToken.sol#L27.
### Re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Registry.sol fails to deliver expected functionality
### Description
_Submitted by byndooa, also found by arcoun, cccz, Lambda, and thebensams_
### Impact
The description of Registry.sol is following:
/// Deploys new proxies via the factory and keeps a registry of owners to proxies. Owners can only
/// ha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: zNS - domain name collisions ✓ Fixed
### Description
Domain registration accepts an empty (zero-length) name. This may allow a malicious entity to register two different NFT’s for the same visually indinstinguishable text representation of a domain. Similar to this the domain name is mapped to an NFT via a su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: wrong YAXIS estimates
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `Harvester.getEstimates` contract tries to estimate a `YAXIS` amount but uses the wrong path and/or amount.
It currently uses a `WETH` **input** amount to compute a `YAXIS -> WETH` trade.
#### Impact
The estimations from `getEstimates` are... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Batch Reverting Can Pause Finalization
### Description
The `ScrollChain` contract allows `sequencer`s to [commit new batches](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/L1/rollup/ScrollChain.sol#L153) of L2 blocks on L1. It also allows the `owner` of the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Presence Of Typographical Error
### Description
The following typographical error was identified:
```
contracts/bithive/src/deposit.rs
L23: const ERR_BAD_PUBKER_HEX: &str = "Invalid pubkey hex";
```
### Recommendation
It is recommended to fix the aforementioned typographical error as follows:
* `ERR_BAD_PUB... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Exposed Initialize Function
### Description
## Under the current implementation
It is possible to call `initialize` on the implementation address. Calling `initialize` on the implementation contract effectively re-initializes the contract, setting the caller to owner and allowing the execution of methods wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Fee Bypass Due to Rounding Error
### Description
## Vulnerability Report: Rounding Error in withdraw_inner Function
In the `_withdraw_inner` function, there is a rounding error that could allow a beneficiary to bypass the fee collection.
## Code Snippet
The withdraw instruction can be invoked multiple tim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Sub-optimal calculations in `getAmountToTransfer()` results in wei losses
### Description
In the scenario where the transfer fee exceeds the equilibrium fee, the excess gets credited to the incentive pool. Disregarding from the fact that a bracket is incorrectly placed causing a massive loss in incentives (rai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unbounded Fee Parameters
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `initialize()`, `setMintFee`, `setRedeemFee`, and `setSwapFee` functions of the `SelfPeggingAsset` contract, and in the `bufferPercent` parameter of the `LPToken` contract.
Although each fee is capped individually, the owner ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: <a name="L-4"></a>[L-4] Unsafe ERC20 operation(s) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Freeze Redeems if bonds too Large
### Description
Issuing too many bonds can result in users being unable to redeem them. This is caused by arithmetic overflow in the `previewRedeemAtMaturity` function.
If a user’s `bonds` and `paidAmount` (or `bonds * nonPaidAmount`) product is greater than `2**256`, it ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Parameter name mismatch between interface and implementation may be misleading
### Description
In `IHype_Module`, the parameter names differ from the implementation:
* `hyper_sendSpot(uint64 token, uint64 _wei)` vs implementation uses `asset` for the first `uint64`
* `hyper_addApiWallet(address wallet, string... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | reentrancy | true | true |
## Severity
**Impact:** High
**Likelihood:** Medium
## Description
The `reentrantSettle` function in RFTLib contains a vulnerability that allows malicious contracts to implement the `IRFTPayer` interface to completely avoid payment obligations. The vulnerability is from how the function tracks cumulative balance c... | Pashov Audit Group | 4.142857 | Itos_2025-05-24 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: CollateralToken.flashAction reverts with incorrect error
### Description
Reverts with `InvalidCollateralStates.AUCTION_ACTIVE` when the address is not `flashEnabled`.
### Recommendation
Revert using `InvalidCollateralStates.FLASH_DISABLED`:
```solidity
function flashAction(
IFlashAction receiver,
uint256... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: [24] Use custom errors rather than `revert()`/`require()` strings to save deployment gas
### Description
Custom errors are available from solidity version 0.8.4. The instances below match or exceed that version
[See original submission](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-factorydao-findings/issues/95) for ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Leak of value when interacting with an ERC721 enforcer contract
### Description
[HolographERC721.sol#L962](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/enforcer/HolographERC721.sol#L962)
HolographERC721.sol is an enforcer of the ERC721 standard. In... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Missing check for address(0) in constructor of AdminUpgradeabilityProxy
### Description
In `BaseAdminUpgradeabilityProxy`, the `changeAdmin` function performs a zero-address check before calling `_setAdmin()`.
Howe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: The owner can set the pool settings without updating the pool.
### Description
**Description**
MiniChefV2.sol: function set(). The owner can set new allocation points to the pool without updating the pool, which can lead to the loss of users' pending rewards. The owner can also reset the rewarder contract fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Pool token price is incorrect when there is more than one pending upkeep
### Description
The amount of pool tokens to mint and quote tokens to burn is determined by the pool token price. This price, for a commit at update interval ID X, should not be influenced by any pending commits for IDs greater than X.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs 20 to 40 gas because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: During the global pause users can increase and decrease TCR
### Description
We have two contracts that check the global pause:
- BorrowerOperations.sol (BO)
- StabilityPool.sol (SP)
These contracts have the following functions for users and sometimes they are allowed to be called during the global pause.
fun... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.