prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: PaprController.buyAndReduceDebt: msg.sender can lose paper by paying the debt twice
### Description
### Impact
The `PaprController.buyAndReduceDebt` function () should work like this:
1. `msg.sender` swaps some amount of the underlying token for papr token
2. This amount of papr token is used to repay d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Vulnerable Dependencies
### Description
A range of dependencies have been flagged as containing security vulnerabilities on crates.io. These are not direct dependencies as they do not appear in `Cargo.toml` but exist in the dependency tree.
The following is a list of crates which are vulnerable:
- **cranelif... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: User's prize might be forever locked if the setting winning tickets transaction is settled on the end timestamp of a round
### Description
### Instances(1)
In ThrusterTreasure.sol, there is no on-chain check to ensure owner's `setWinningTickets()` transaction will not settle on the max end timestamp of a roun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: PSMSource.sol:availableToWithdraw does not check available USDS liquidity
### Description
The USDS peg stabilization module can be used to swap USDS for USDC tokens and vice versa at 1:1 ratios. The current USDS PSM actually just uses the older DAI PSM module underneath it. Thus, during a USDC to USDS swap, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Setting the *constructor* to `payable`
### Description
You can cut out 10 opcodes in the creation-time EVM bytecode if you declare a constructor payable. Making the constructor payable eliminates the need for an initial check of `msg.value == 0` and saves `13 gas` on deployment with no security risks.
### Con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Amount Emitted in `emitCancelDeposit()` Event During `withdraw()` Function
### Description
In the `Vault.withdraw(uint256 amount)` function, when a user withdraws tokens before the investment period ends, the contract processes multiple individual deposits to fulfil the total withdrawal amount. Howev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Scaled Allowance Mismatch Enables Over-Approval Exploit
### Description
The `transferFrom` function in RToken calculates a scaled transfer amount before checking the user’s allowance. This discrepancy allows spenders to exceed the user’s intended approval, resulting in unauthorized transfers of more tokens th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Griefing risk in `mint`
### Description
[CidNFT.sol#L147-L157](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-canto-identity/blob/dff8e74c54471f5f3b84c217848234d474477d82/src/CidNFT.sol#L147-L157)
[CidNFT.sol#L177-L182](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-canto-identity/blob/dff8e74c54471f5f3b84c217848234d474477d8... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Calling `splitValue` when token index is not the latest will overwrite other claims' storage
### Description
**Impact:**
High, as it can lead to loss of units for an account without any action on his side
**Likelihood:**
Medium, because it can happen only with a token that has a non-latest index
**Descripti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Can manipulate the `C.SHORT_STARTING_ID` `ShortRecord` of the `TAPP`
### Description
### Impact
Attackers can make it so that risky debts are not liquidated, and unliquidated risky debts can accumulate over the long term.
### Proof of Concept
`ShortRecord` of `TAPP` can also be liquidated. If all `ercDeb... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect documentation for mint function
### Description
The `mint` function's documentation incorrectly states it "disallows burning from address(0)" when it should be "disallows minting to address(0)".
### Recommendation
Update the documentation to correctly reflect the function's behavior | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Insufficient Slippage Protection in swapToStables() Function
### Description
The `swapToStables()` function in GeniusMultiTokenVault.sol implements a weak slippage control mechanism that accepts any positive increase in balance after a swap, regardless of how minimal the increase is:
```
function swapToSta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Users Can Lose Funds and Collateral by Repaying Loans After Liquidation Grace Period Expiry
### Description
Users can lose money if they repay their loan after the liquidation grace period has passed. This occurs because the repayment does not close the liquidation process, and the Stability Pool is the onl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Use the complete name of types
### Description
Replace `uint` with `uint256` everywhere in the codebase, it is seen in `HoneyJarPortal` for example. Subtle bugs can slip if you just use `uint`, for example if you are hashing the signature of a method and use `uint` instead of `uint256` for any parameter type. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Performing a direct multiplication in `_getPriceFromSqrtX96` will overflow for some uniswap pools
### Description
The _getPriceFromSqrtX96 will revert for pools that return a _sqrtPriceX96 bigger than type(uint128).max.
### Impact
Medium. Some uniswap pool’s will be unusable and will DoS in LenderCommitmen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Incorrect social loss
### Description
When a bankrupt position is liquidated and the insurance fund is empty, the [opponent position holders should cover the loss](https://mcdex.io/references/#/en/perpetual?id=auto-liquidation). In this way, the profits on one side are garnished to fund the loss on the other ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Attacker can partially DoS L1 operations in StakingManager by making huge number of deposits
### Description
When a user **stakes** in `StakingManager`, initially the funds go towards `hypeBuffer` and when it is filled, every deposit is placed in a L1 operation queue.
Once a day an operator calls `process... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: `_computeClosingFactor` function will return incorrect values, lower than needed, because it uses `collateralizationRate` to calculate the denominator
### Description
`_computeClosingFactor` is used to calculate the required borrow amount that should be liquidated to make the user's position solvent. However,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Deviation From Specifications
### Description
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of deviations from specifications were identified:
* In line [83](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-sso-clave-contracts/blob/c7714c0fe0a33a23acce5aa20355f088d330b4f7/src/validators/GuardianRecoveryValidator.sol#L83) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: When Oracles Are Down, Stale Prices Are Used
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We use the oracle that liquity used.
**File(s) affected:**`PriceFeed.sol`
**Description:** In every case where `fetchPrice()` is called, either a p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: The locker owner can redirect all fees to the referrer
### Description
The `Beekeeper` contract distributes fees from reward tokens to the protocol and the referrer, if present. However, the fee share for the referrer is calculated with the `mulDivUp` function, which rounds up, see the snippet.
This means th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Users Should Not be Able to Get Vyper Until Initial Liquidity is Minted in The Auction
### Description
Users can deposit dragonX in `Auction.sol` and get back vyper (new token) in return. The auction contract intends to mint the liquidity position once enough dragonX is in the contract, and it will create a dr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing slippage protection on sellCredits()
### Description
Users trading credit tokens are prone to slippage by bots. Since VisibilityCredits.sol utilises a bonding curve, the price of credit tokens increase and decrease as the total supply increases and decreases.
**Slippage on sell:**
- Alice submit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Reward computation is wrong
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `LendingPair.accrueAccount` function distributes rewards **before** updating the cumulative supply / borrow indexes as well as the index + balance for the user (by minting supply tokens / debt).
This means the percentage of the user's bal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential loss of accuracy on unstake.
### Description
**Description**
StWXS.sol, unstake()
The interface suggests that the user enter the amount he wants to withdraw. However, since the accounting is performed in shares, the unstake function performs a double conversion, leading to accuracy losses. The issue... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Ownable: Does not implement 2-Step-Process for transferring ownership
### Description
`MuteAmplifier` inherits from the `Ownable` contract.
This contract does not implement a `2-Step-Process` for transferring ownership.
So ownership of the contract can easily be lost when making a mistake when transferring own... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Recommendations to Avoid Replay Attacks
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in `41ad2a235fcaf0ed53d7224f6ebf7e02b34fcb45`. The address of the verifying contract is now included in the signed data.
**File(s) affected:**`NFTFilter.sol`
**Description:**`NFTFilter` verifies messages signed by `oracle` (off-chain sy... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Memory Overflow
### Description
## Memory Overflow Issue in Vyper
The memory overflow issue involves situations where Vyper may have inconsistent behavior with numbers exceeding the maximum representable value in Ethereum, \(2^{256}\). Ethereum’s Ethereum Virtual Machine operates with 256-bit numbers, so exc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: LENDER LIQUIDITY LOCKOUT POSSIBLE VIA DEPOSITANDCLOSE FUNCTION
### Description
In the `LineOfCredit` contract, the borrower has two possibilities to pay off the debt: by calling `depositAndRepay()` and then `close()` functions, or by calling a single `depositAndClose()` function.`LineOfCredit``depositAndRepay... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: `requestConfirmations` below Chainlink minimum allowed in `UpdateVRFConfig()`
### Description
_Acknowledged_
In `CardAllocationPool.sol`, the `updateVRFConfig()` function allows setting the `requestConfirmations` parameter without enforcing Chainlink's minimum requirement.
The function only checks that `_requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Don't worry about keccak256 collisions
### Description
When `cancelBid` is called, the `commitment` is set to 0 in order to force to fail the `computeCommitment` comparison.
In case of the result of `computeCommitment` returns 0, because a collision or an error, a cancelled bid will be processed as valid.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing validation in the method `swapRequest()`
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract Branch.sol, the method `swapRequest(...)` allows to swap funds between different chains. It also allows ETH but does not check if `msg.value > qty` or not. The transaction will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Stakers Could Not Withdraw Their Assets
### Description
In the LT.sol contract, the protocol allows the staked tokens to become 1. This situation leads to the staked supply not being attributed to a single staker but rather to multiple stakers, resulting in the inability for stakers to withdraw their assets... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: State variables only set in the constructor should be declared `immutable`
### Description
1. File: contracts/pcv/compound/ERC20CompoundPCVDeposit.sol (line [16](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-volt/blob/f1210bf3151095e4d371c9e9d7682d9031860bbd/contracts/pcv/compound/ERC20CompoundPCVDeposit.sol#L16)) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `anchorTime()` will not work properly on Optimism due to use of `block.number`
### Description
When deploying to Optimism, Equity.anchorTime() will not be accurate due to the use of block.number.
function anchorTime() internal view returns (uint64){
return uint64(block.number
### Detailed Explanation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect LP Calculations Due to Unvalidated Oracle Price Decimal Precision
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and stated that they will develop the token Oracles used for the protocol, ensuring the issue does not occur. The client provided the following explanation:
> All new Ora... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Minting can be DOSed by any of the fee recipients
### Description
The minting process might be DOS by malicious fee recipients, breaking the protocol's core functionality. This would also result in the loss of fee for the rest of the innocent fee recipients as the minting cannot proceed, resulting in the mi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unlocked Pragma
### Description
**Update**
The client fixed the issue in `8c333777b1cbde71916d9b78084c88c4ca62de03` by locking the pragma version to 0.8.3.
**File(s) affected:**`MeowToken.sol`
**Description:** Every Solidity file specifies in the header a version number of the format `pragma solidity (^)0.8.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Tokens with `decimals` larger than `18` are not supported
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by 0x1f8b_
For tokens with decimals larger than 18, many functions across the codebase will revert due to underflow.
[ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L99-L115](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-connext/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use latest version of Solidity
### Description
The contracts are written for an old version of the Solidity compiler (0.4.8). We recommend changing the solidity version pragma to the [latest version](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases/tag/v0.4.10) (`pragma solidity ^0.4.11;`) to enforce the use of a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: No need to `inherit` `ERC721` again
### Description
Since `OwnableApprovableERC721` already inherits `ERC721`, there's no need to inherit `ERC721` again in `LiquidInfrastructureNFT` contract.
Additionally, removing the unnecessary import of `ERC721` above will streamline the code.
[LiquidInfrastructureNFT.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Create your own import names instead of using the regular ones
### Description
For better readability, you should name the imports instead of using the regular ones.
Example:
Instances - All of the contracts. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Authorization Check for `PTokensFactory.createPToken()`
### Description
**Update**
Both the `DebtTokenFactory.createDebtToken()` and `PTokenFactory.createPToken()` functions now feature an `onlyBucketsFactory()` modifier. This modifier ensures that the designated caller is the address stored in the `bu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Missing validations in _approve()
### Description
The `_approve()` function in the BaseRouter contract does not validate the return value of the `approve` function. It should implement similar validation as seen in `Escrow._safeApprove()`. This would prevent issues with non-standard ERC-20 tokens.
### Recomme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Updates of `fundingFees`
### Description
**Update**
Native team has fixed the issue, with additional modification to clarify the flow of fees to LP token holders and to the protocol itself. The portion of the fee that goes to the LP token holders is named `fundingFee` and the portion of the fee that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Events lacking information
### Description
We identified two events which could benefit from being more complete. Specifically, the [`ProposalDeleted`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/fca8e24275e928f7ddf660b5651eb93b87f70afb/packages/core/contracts/zodiac/OptimisticGovernor.sol#L35) and [`Transact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Possible DoS attack on Rebalance
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract GlmRebalance.sol, the method `startRebalance(...)` rebalances the Vaults’ assets as per the configured weights of the assets.
Since rebalance checks only 2 conditions before considering if t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Zero repayment risk from rounding in partial liquidation
### Description
_Resolved_
In the _liquidate() function, the following line performs integer division:
`USGToRepay = (collatAmountToLiquidate * liquidateInput.userDebt) / liquidateInput._collateralBalance;
`
Because Solidity integer division truncates t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Minimal `sqrtPriceLimitX96` slightly differs from actual minimal price limit
### Description
Currently value 4295128749 is used:
However the smallest value is `4295128739 + 1` [according to UniswapV3](https://github.com/Uniswap/v3-core/blob/d8b1c635c275d2a9450bd6a78f3fa2484fef73eb/contracts/libraries/TickMat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Fees can become stuck in `UniswapV4Wrapper`
### Description
**Description:** When a modification is made to Uniswap V4 position liquidity, such as in the case of a partial `UniswapV4Wrapper` unwrap which decreases liquidity, any outstanding fees are also transferred and required to be completely settled. Fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of slippage check in `rebalance` Function
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** Medium
**Description**
The `rebalance` function updates the Uniswap V3 LP position and performs the indicated swap based on the specified lower and upper ticks. However, this function lacks a s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | false | false | ## Low: Unused internal functions should be removed to decrease bytecode size
### Description
The internal functions `_safeMint()`, `_safeMintBatch()`, `_airdrop()`, `_mintBatch()`, and `_burn()`, do not appear to be used and it is understood that there is not currently any requirement for additional functionality to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Max allocations can be bypassed with multiple addresses because of guaranteed allocations
### Description
[`TokenSale._processPrivate()`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-03-zap-protocol/blob/c2ad35aa844899fa24f6ed0cbfcf6c7e611b061a/zap-contracts-labs/contracts/TokenSale.sol#L226) ensures that a user ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Fee can be applied multiple times to same rewards in MyStaking.
### Description
**Description**
MyStaking.sol: function claimableAmount(). The function calculates user's rewards and subtracts fees. However, the claimable amount is firstly calculated with the unclaimed amount and then a fee is applied to it. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Direct usage of ecrecover allows signature malleability
### Description
## Handle
shw
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `verify` function of `NativeMetaTransaction` calls the Solidity `ecrecover` function directly to verify the given signature. However, the `ecrecover` EVM opcode allows for malleable... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Inaccurate `isVulnerable()` Can Lead to Frustrating Behavior
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: Hits are confirmed within a block or two, so they still have a 15 minute window to reinforce if they survive the disaster.
**File(s) af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: seniorLoss is not compared to seniorTotalAssets to make sure only the minimum value is subtracted
### Description
`seniorLoss` is not compared to `seniorTotalAssets` to make sure only the minimum value is subtracted.
### Recommendation
Like `juniorLoss`, calculate `seniorLoss` as below:
```solidity
uint256 s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Word range check uses unconstrained `upper_all_one` local variable when field prime is `Mersenne31`
### Description
The comments under the gadget used to enforce field prime range check for a word when field type is Mersenne31 are correct; They describe the correct methodology for checking that the word is in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Potential division by zero if gas token oracle is faulty
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
## Severity:
**Low Risk**
## Context:
**SponsorVault.sol#L250-L252**
## Description:
In the event that the gas token oracle is faulty and returns malformed values, the call to `reimburseRelayerFees()` in `_ha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the codebase, several instances of incomplete docstrings were identified where either parameters or return values were not fully documented:
* The [`requestWithdrawal`](https://github.com/OriginProtocol/origin-dollar/blob/eca6ffa74d9d0c5fb467551a30912cb722fab9... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initialization to zero price can cause permanent stuck state due to clamping
### Description
**Description:** In `ChainlinkOracle` in the constructor, the contract initializes `currentPriceX96`, `lastPriceX96`, and `emaPrice` using the current `sqrtPriceX96` from the Uniswap V4 pool. If the pool is uninitializ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: ClaggBaseAdapter._handleIncentive() withdraws the wrong token from the incentive vault
### Description
In `ClaggBaseAdapter._handleIncentive()`, when distributing incentive tokens from the `incentiveVault` to depositors, the token is passed to `withdrawTokens`:
```solidity
try
IIncentiveVault(incentiveVa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing access control allows nonce manipulation
### Description
The `validateUserOp` function in the `JWTRecovery` module lacks access control, allowing any caller to validate a user’s recovery operation signature and increment their nonce. When a malicious actor calls the `validateUserOp` function of the `JW... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: DevtMine.sol::Lines 21-26. DevtMine::33-36 DevtLpMine::14-15
### Description
**Description**
The code can be simplified
You can use the “days” keyword to get an amount of seconds in a day (86400). It allows you to
delete useless “DAY” variables. The same thing is with “ONE” variable. You can use the “ethers”... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: 1] Rewards in StakingRewards are lost if total supply is zero
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Path:** StakingRewards.sol:rewardPerToken#L90-L96
**Description:** The function rewardPerToken calculates the current amount of reward tokens per share inside of the StakingRewards. It is calculated using the in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The Solidity version should be updated.
### Description
**Description**
Best practices for Solidity development and auditors standard checklist requires strict and
explicit usage of the latest stable version of Solidity, which is 0.8.11 at the moment.
**Recommendation**:
Consider updating to “pragma solidit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: fund loss because calculated Interest would be 0 in getCurrentState() due to division error
### Description
function `getCurrentState()` Gets the current state of pool variables based on the current time and other functions use it to update the contract state. it calculates interest accrued for debt from th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Validator's withdrawn principal could be counted as rewards
### Description
**Severity:** High
**Path:** lib/withdrawals/withdrawals.go:ComputeWithdrawals#L57-69
**Description:**
In order to correctly count withdrawals and separate principal from reward amounts, the oracle uses the `ComputeWithdrawals` fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing event emission in multiple functions at Vesting
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Multiple missing event emits are missing in Vesting.sol. Emitting events is crucial for tracking state changes and actions performed. Events provide a reliable way to monitor contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Missing Uniswap V3 cardinality initialization in `StNxmOracle` leads to permanent Denial of Service
### Description
The `StNxmOracle` contract calculates the price of `stNXM` using a 30-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) from a Uniswap V3 pool. However, newly created Uniswap V3 pools are initialized ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: The function onERC721Received() allows writing duplicates in the array “nfts”. Another functions dealing with this array do not expect duplicates met.
### Description
## Handle
Sherlock
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Duplicates can be written accidentally. If_removeNft() function is running, it will br... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Division by zero error can block `RewardsPool#startRewardCycle` if all multisig wallet are disabled
### Description
A user needs to call the function startRewardsCycle in RewardsPool.sol
which calls:
We need to pay special attention to the code block below:
which calls:
The code distributes the rewa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Overpayment not Returned in mint Function
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
In the `mint()` function of the Solidity smart contract, users can potentially pay more than the required minting price. However, the function does not handle this overpayment scenario an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: 14] 10 KAS Permanently Locked in MoonBound Contract
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Path:** contracts/MoonBound.sol#L186-L189
**Description:** The `distributeRevenue()` function handles the distribution of revenue from MoonBound tokens to relevant parties (e.g., projects, stakers, etc.). It distributes ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: MemberWithdraws event not fired
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `MemberWithdraws` event of the `DAO` contract is not used.
## Impact
Unused code can hint at programming or architectural errors.
## Recommended Mitigation Steps
Use it or remove it.
#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Twav._getTwav() will return a wrong result when twavObservations[TWAV_BLOCK_NUMBERS - 1].timestamp = 0.
### Description
_Submitted by hansfriese_
The "if" condition of Twav.\_getTwav() is missing some edge cases.
In this case, this function will return 0 which is different from the correct value and it wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: entropy RNG does not guarantee high entropy
### Description
The `HighEntropyRandomGenerator` is used as a source of cryptographically secure randomness. Unfortunately, this is based on `std::random_device`, which is not guaranteed to be high-entropy or cryptographically secure. Without explicit hardening of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Usage of address.transfer
### Description
## Handle
@cmichelio
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `transfer` function is used in `Maximillion.sol` to send ETH to an account.
## Impact
It is performed with a fixed amount of GAS and might fail if GAS costs change in the future or if a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: Withdrawal caps can be bypassed by opening positions against the SpotHedgeBaseMaker
### Description
Deposits/withdrawals of base tokens to the SpotHedgeBaseMaker aren't accounted for in the CircuitBreaker's accounting, so the tokens can be used by attackers to increase the amount withdrawable past the high ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Redundant logic in status handling functions
### Description
In the `Escrow` contract, two functions contain redundant or unnecessary logic that increases code complexity and gas costs without providing benefits:
1. The`processPayment()` includes a logically impossible condition:
* `isRefund` is defined ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Withdrawals priced at execution problematic during large price swings
### Description
Withdrawals are “price-locked” at request time: `requestRedeem` stores `shares` and the computed `assetsAfterFee = previewRedeem(shares)` using the at-request exchange rate. When an agent later calls `processWithdrawal`, the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Lack of a zero-value check in the validate function
### Description
Certain token transfer functions have an assertion, `_assertNonZeroAmount`, that reverts if the token amount is set to zero. However, the `validate` function does not check whether an order’s token amount is set to zero and will validate such ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Tokens irrecoverable by owner on L1 if not an `ERC721` receiver
### Description
The current implementation of the `withdrawTokens` function on L1 Bridge introduces a crucial security risk where `ERC721` tokens could become permanently locked within the escrow contract if the receiving address does not supp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Pair. _safeTransfer should check that token has code
### Description
_safeTransfer has multiple implementations in the codebase (e.g. Router, FeeDistributor, Gauge). All these implementations revert in case `token.code.length` is 0, whereas the Pair implementation of _safeTransfer does not.
### Recommendation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: NFT Owner can stuck Crowdfund user funds
### Description
_Submitted by csanuragjain_
Consider a scenario where few users contributed in auction but no one has placed any bid due to reason like NFT price crash etc. So there was 0 bid, the NFT owner could seize the crowdfund users fund until they pay a ranso... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect threshold percentage validation could brick future threshold percentage updates
### Description
Function `setProposalThresholdPercentage()` should be using the parameter instead of the state variable in the second if condition. Due to this, if there is a proposal that passes quorum, it would be able ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Solidity versions
### Description
The version of Solidity used throughout the codebase is outdated, varies between contracts, and is not pinned.
The choice of Solidity version should always be informed by the features each version introduces and that the codebase could benefit from, as well as the [... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Rounding | false | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/main/src/Oracle.sol#L124
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The two-day feature of the oracle can be gamed where you only have to manipulate the oracle for ~2 blocks.
## Proof of Concept
The oracle computes the day using:
```sol
uint day = block.t... | Code4rena | 5 | Inverse Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unlocked Pragma
### Description
**Update**
The issue was fixed by locking the Solidity version of the contract to 0.8.9.
**File(s) affected:**`ElderGateway.sol`
**Description:** Every Solidity file specifies in the header a version number of the format `pragma solidity ^0.8.0;`. The caret `^` before the vers... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unconventional test structure
### Description
Tilt is the primary means of testing Wormhole watchers. Relying on such a coarse testing mechanism makes it difficult to know that all necessary conditions and edge cases are tested.
The following are some conditions that should be checked by native Go unit tests:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing docstrings
### Description
Some of the contracts and functions in Primitive’s code base lack documentation. This hinders reviewers’ understanding of the code’s intention, which is fundamental to correctly assess not only security, but also correctness. Additionally, docstrings improve readability and e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: (HAL-12) Missing Interface Inheritance
### Description
The `SHTokenFactory` contract implements the `ISHTokenFactory` interface, but does not inherit from it. See its declaration:
```
contract SHTokenFactory {
```
Similarly, the `SHProduct` and `SHToken` contracts are expected to implement the `ISHProduc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Caching global variables is more expensive than using the actual variable (use `msg.sender` instead of caching it)
### Description
[Reference](https://code4rena.com/reports/2022-12-forgeries#g-07-caching-global-variables-is-more-expensive-than-using-the-actual-variable-use-msgsender-instead-of-caching-it)
ht... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: `Liquidate` Event Emits Shares and Assets in Wrong Order
### Description
**Description:** The `Liquidate` event is fired making `shares` as the second parameter and `assets` as the third parameter
> bc-solana-vault-sc/programs/sc-vault/src/instructions/liquidator/liquidate.rs#liquidate_handler
But the event... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: No events for critical operations
### Description
Several critical operations do not trigger events. As a result, it will be difficult to review the correct behavior of the contracts once deployed. Critical operations that would benefit from triggering events include:
- **MixOracle.sol#L35-L41**
- Lack of e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: [23] Typos
### Description
[SystemContractHelper, line 347](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-zksync/blob/72f5f16ed4ba94c7689fe38fcb0b7d27d2a3f135/code/system-contracts/contracts/libraries/SystemContractHelper.sol#L347) - `2-bit IS set`, `not 2-bit it set`.
[KnownCodesStorage, lines 16 to 17](https://git... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: fCash of the wrong maturity and asset can be sent to wrapper address before wrapper is deployed
### Description
_Submitted by 0x52, also found by jonah1005 and unforgiven_
Minting becomes impossible
### Proof of Concept
onERC1155Received is only called when the size of the code deployed at the address co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of l2Logs validation
### Description
In the [`ExecutorFacet` contract](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-2-dev//blob/c05b49d7e303996f60a0e35f18ef224e45ee19f5/contracts/ethereum/contracts/zksync/facets/Executor.sol) within the `commitBlocks` function, the array `_newBlock.l2Logs` is processed in the he... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: `UniV3Decomposer` will always revert due to incorrect `RFTPayer` support and lack of token approvals to `MakerFacet`
### Description
`UniV3Decomposer` takes Uniswap v3 NFT position and converts it into Ammplify Maker position. This is done by burning NFT position into corresponding asset tokens and then cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Move immutable branch check outside `for` loop in `RootUpgrade::removeBranch`
### Description
**Description:** Move immutable branch check outside `for` loop in `RootUpgrade::removeBranch` - this check should only occur once not during every loop iteration.
**Recommended Mitigation:**
**Zaros:** Fixed in co... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.