prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Denial-of-Service Using Failed Proposals
### Description
Contracts `EnforcedBinaryGuild` and `EnforcedBinarySnapshotERC20Guild` add a new action as a NO option on each submitted proposal, in order to indicate no action is preferred. When the function `endProposal()` is called to end a proposal’s lifecycle, if... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Lack of Account Deployment Verification can lead to Unexpected Revert Behavior
### Description
The `_validateAccountPrepayment` function in EntryPoint.sol fails to verify the existence of code at the sender's address when `initCode` is empty. While the function deploys new accounts when `initCode` is provided,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The `isInUse()` Function Can Provide Wrong Information
### Description
The `isInUse()` function queries the borrower's token balance and returns true if the balance is > 0. Depending on how the `isInUse()` function is used by external integrations, the result can easily be manipulated by any user by sending as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: MainVault.rebalanceXChain doesn't check that savedTotalUnderlying >= reservedFunds
### Description
MainVault.rebalanceXChain doesn't check that savedTotalUnderlying >= reservedAmount. Because of that, shortage can occur, if vault will lose some underlying during cross chain calls and reservedFundswill not b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Avoid using require! inside loops
### Description
The current implementation of the `BatchUnfreeze` instruction uses `require!` statements inside loops, which can lead to inefficiencies and potential failures. If a `require!` statement fails within a loop, the entire loop will terminate, causing the entire ope... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Changing the epoch duration will completely break the vault and the slashers
### Description
The [vault](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-06-symbiotic-relay/blob/main/middleware-sdk/src/contracts/modules/voting-power/extensions/logic/OpNetVaultAutoDeployLogic.sol#L19-L20) and slashers in scope of the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [03] MIPS: `_storeReg` should be zeroed for `mult`, `multu`, `div` and `divu`
### Description
The `mult`, `multu`, `div` and `divu` instructions are only supposed to write to `HI`, `LO` special registers. However, since they are R-type instructions, they can still have a non-zero `rd` value, though this would ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero check for the result of `ecrecover()`
### Description
**Description:** The function `SecuritizeSwap::doExecuteByInvestor()` validates the provided signature was actually signed by an actor with a role `ROLE_ISSUER` or `ROLE_MASTER`.
In the validation, `ecrecover()` is used but the result is not va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple `address`/ID mappings can be combined into a single `mapping` of an `address`/ID to a `struct`, where appropriate
### Description
Saves a storage slot for the mapping. Depending on the circumstances and sizes of types, can avoid a Gsset (**20000 gas**) per mapping combined. Reads and subsequent writes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Partially-filled private orders can be filled by anyone
### Description
The protocol allows the creation of private and public orders. On private orders, only the [`allowedSender`](https://github.com/1inch/limit-order-protocol/blob/4d94eea25e4dac6271bfd703096a5c4a4d899b4a/contracts/OrderMixin.sol#L62) address... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Liquidations are enabled when repayments are disabled, causing borrowers to lose funds without a chance to repay
### Description
Debt repaying can be temporary disabled by the owner of the `LendingPool` contract, however finalizing liquidations are not disabled during this period. As a result, users' positi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Operations which won't overflow in `Mailbox.sol` can be unchecked
### Description
If, for any reason recommendation for G-31 won't be implemented, another gas optimization would be insert line 280: `s.totalDepositedAmountPerUser[_depositor] += _amount;` into unchecked block.
Since `require(s.totalDepositedAmo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing PSM checks within the initialization of the Foreign Controller
### Description
The `ForeignController` expects a `PSM3` instance that has `USDC`, `USDS`, and `SUSDS` as the underlying assets. The initialization script is currently missing a check to ensure that the `PSM` received as a parameter is conf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Compact UserCooldown struct used in StakedUSDeV2
### Description
The `UserCooldown` struct currently utilizes a `uint256` for the `underlyingAmount`. This can be optimized to use a `uint152` type, potentially saving gas by reducing the storage footprint. This optimization assumes that the `underlyingAmount` wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Obligation Structure and Recommendations
1. The Obligation structure does not have a limit on the size of the `user_reward_managers` vector. Although storage reads are relatively inexpensive, they still accrue gas costs on the blockchain. Thus, an unbounded vector may lead to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: The computation of the normalization factor can fail
### Description
When computing the normalization factor, the system does not properly check for a corner case that could make the transaction revert, blocking interactions with the Controller contract. Certain operations in the Controller contract trigger t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misleading Comment
### Description
The [comment in line 172](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/f6894bb82f78228b349267ed814375cae2fc1483/contracts/src/L2/gateways/usdc/L2USDCGateway.sol#L172) of the `L2USDCGateway` contract should say `L2ScrollMessenger` instead of `L1ScrollMessenger`.
Consider resol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Partial loan repayment via repayWithShares reverts for unhealthy positions when called by borrower
### Description
In the `BorrowingModule.repayWithShares` function, an account status check is registered for the caller.
```solidity
function repayWithShares(uint256 amount, address receiver) public virtual nonR... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Network configuration path construction is duplicated
### Description
The `create_full_client` function contains code that uses hard-coded strings to indicate configuration paths (figure 9.1) in place of the previously defined `DEFAULT_NETWORK_CONFIG_PATH` and `NODE_KEY_ED25519_FILE` values, which are used in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: HolographOperator.recoverJob() function does not follow the check effects interactions pattern
### Description
The `HolographOperator` contract implements the function `recoverJob()`:
```
/**
* @notice Recover failed job
* @dev If a job fails, it can be manually recovered
* @param bridgeInRequestPayload th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: transferItemsERC721 and transferBatchItemsAcrossCollections inTransferManager do not check whether an amount == 1 for an ERC721 token
### Description
## Severity: Low Risk
## Context:
- TransferManager.sol#L47
- TransferManager.sol#L112
## Description:
`transferItemsERC721` and `transferBatchItemsAcrossColle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Ignoring return value
### Description
The `OrbitProxyOFT1_2` ignores `IBridge.executeCall` function return.
There is no impact for the current `IBridge` implementation in `ERC20Bridge` contract but can cause asset losses for custom implementations. Consider checking the return value from `IBridge.executeCall... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: is not supported by all chains
### Description
The compiler for Solidity 0.8.20 switches the default target EVM version to Shanghai, which means that the generated bytecode will include PUSH0 opcodes. Be sure to select the appropriate EVM version in case you intend to deploy on a chain other than mainnet like ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: A missing check for the type of a variable allows a maliciously crafted message to unexpectedly remove validators from the network
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
- Network not being able to confirm new transactions (total netwo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: NSignatureTypes enum value bypasses Solidity safety checks Won't Fix
### Description
The `ISignatureValidator` contract defines an enum `SignatureType` to represent the different types of signatures recognized within the exchange. The final enum value, `NSignatureTypes`, is not a valid signature type. Instead... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Lack of zero address checks in setter functions
### Description
Certain setter functions fail to validate incoming arguments, so callers can accidentally set important state variables to the zero address. A mistake like this could initially go unnoticed because a delegatecall to an address without code will re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unchecked timelock delay
### Description
The administrator can inadvertently (i.e. using millisecond timestamp notation) setup a timelock delay that is too long. This may cause an unacceptably long delay (i.e. a two-year delay instead of a seven-day delay).
### Recommendation
We recommend disallowing unintend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: 3S-LENFT-N08 Documentation: Incorrect formula for rewards
### Description
On the [Gauges](https://lenft.gitbook.io/lenft-docs/le-token/gauges) documentation page, the formula for the `rewards(epoch)` presented does not match the plotted curve nor the code implementation.
The formula presented is:
- rewards = c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `SimpleFactory` can be drained out of ether
### Description
The `SimpleFactory` contract inherits from `BoringFactory` and `BoringBatchable`. `BoringBatchable` acts as a multicall and `BoringFactory` uses `msg.value` inside the `deploy` function. It is possible for `SimpleFactory` to store ether as it has an `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: [L] If the arbiter is not set, arbiter fee should not be positive
### Description
[L] If the arbiter is not set, arbiter fee should not be positive
### Impact
Since without an `arbiter` it is not possible to `initiateDispute()`, the issue does not cause any problems exept from a faulty state where there is a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Gracefully handle state where perp market `maxOpenInterest` is updated to be smaller than the current open interest
### Description
**Description:** `GlobalConfigurationBranch::updatePerpMarketConfiguration` only enforces that `maxOpenInterest != 0` then calls `MarketConfiguration::update` which sets `maxOpenI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Validate Tortuga Address
### Description
## Stake Router Vulnerability
In `stake_router.move`, several initialization and setter methods take `tortuga: &signer` as a function parameter. The lack of checks against this parameter could lead to accidental vulnerabilities.
## Code Example
## Remediation
It is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Pools may have duplicate tokens
### Description
Within the `Swap` contract, the check on [line 104](https://github.com/saddle-finance/saddle-contract/blob/0b76f7fb519e34b878aa1d58cffc8d8dc0572c12/contracts/Swap.sol#L104) is intended to prevent Saddle pools from having duplicate instances of the same token. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing export `CoreTeamAddresses` in `x/emissions` module
### Description
The genesis state `CoreTeamAddresses` is missing when exporting state in `x/emissions` module
### Impact
All the whitelist admin-related functions will be blocked, such as adding a new admin member or updating the module parameters.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Unchecked Vault Address
### Description
## Vault Address Validation Issue in Solidity Contracts
In `addToWithdrawalQueue` and `addOptionBarrier`, the `vaultAddress` argument is not validated.
## File Location
`contracts/FCNProduct.sol`
### Function: addToWithdrawalQueue
In the case of `addToWithdrawalQ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Ordering Validation Between Submission Windows
### Description
**File(s) affected:**`PowerloomDataMarket.sol`
**Description:**`PowerloomDataMarket`'s window update functions lack validation to maintain the required sequencing:
The submission windows must follow a specific order:
* Snapshot window ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `is_active` condition blocks sale completion
### Description
The `is_active` function currently prevents a full sale due to this condition:
This condition does not allow the last token to be sold, effectively blocking a complete sale.
Recommendation:
Modify the condition to use `>` instead of `>=`: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | false | ## Low: `SecuritizeAmmNavProvider` virtual reserve rounding erosion can lead to denial of service
### Description
The virtual AMM's constant-product math erodes `k` through integer division truncation on every trade:
```solidity
// In `_curveBuy`:
newQuote = Y + amountInQuote;
newBase = kLocal / newQuote; // Rounds d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect input parameters
### Description
Input data is not checked for possible containing of zero addresses:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/integrations/yearn/YearnPriceFeed.sol#L24
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Wrong amounts sent if arrays don't match
### Description
The caller may make a copy-paste error where they provide all amounts, but miss one of the recipients in the middle of the list they're copying. This will cause all recipients after that mistake to get the wrong amounts, and the function will not revert
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Insufficient Short Path Validation Locks Fees in `PlatfromLogic.sol` and Prevents Any State Change of a Position
### Description
When creating a new position, Pear checks if the tokens are expected:
File: [src/Factory/GmxFactory.sol#L96-L104](https://github.com/pear-protocol/pear-sc/blob/00aa0ce64fd6fd95c320... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: PRIVILEGED ADDRESS CAN BE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT CONFIRMATION
### Description
An incorrect use of the `update_config` function in contracts can set owner to an invalid address and inadvertently lose control of the contracts, which cannot be undone in any way. Currently, the owner of the contracts can change **... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Balance check during `MagicSpend` validation cannot ensure that `MagicSpend` has enough balance to cover the requested fund
### Description
[Balance check](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-coinbase/blob/e0573369b865d47fed778de00a7b6df65ab1744e/src/MagicSpend/MagicSpend.sol#L130-L135) during `MagicSpend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/122
## Found by
berndartmueller, Blockian
## Summary
If a user claims rewards for a future epoch, all epochs are marked as claimed up until that future epoch. This prevents the user from claiming rewards for those epochs later, leading to a loss... | Sherlock | 4 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: `CuratedVaultSetters::_supplyPool()` does not consider the pool cap of the underlying pool, which may cause `deposit()` to revert or lead to an unintended reordering of `supplyQueue`
### Description
The curated vault's `_supplyPool()` function deposits assets into the underlying pools in `supplyQueue`. Whil... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Very critical `Owner` privileges can cause complete destruction of the project in a possible privateKey exploit
### Description
[PendingOwnable.sol#L42](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-traderjoe/blob/main/src/libraries/PendingOwnable.sol#L42)
Typically, the contract’s owner is the account that deploy... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: drawRandomNumber() call can be abused to alter the lottery results
### Description
The `PrizePool` contract implements the `drawRandomNumber()` function which is used to set a draw as completed:
Moreove... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Sidebar approval screen may be suddenly switched
### Description
The Uniswap wallet browser extension sidebar (Chrome sidePanel component) is global (i.e., shared between all tabs in a browser window). The sidebar displays layers with confirmation buttons for users' actions, where the actions are triggered ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Front Running finalizeBlocks When Sequencers Are Decentralized
### Description
When sequencer is decentralized in the future, one sequencer could front run another sequencer’s `finalizeBlocks` transaction, without doing the actual proving and sequencing, and steal the reward for sequencing if there is one. On... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Unable to compile contracts ✓ Fixed
### Description
In the `Fairswap_iDOLvsImmortalOptions`repository:
Compilation with truffle fails due to a missing file: `contracts/testTokens/TestBondMaker.sol`.
Compilation with `solc` fails due to an undefined interface function:
```
Error: Member "calculatePrice" no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use low level `call()` to prevent gas griefing attacks when returned data not required
### Description
Using `call()` when the returned data is not required unnecessarily exposes to gas griefing attacks from huge returned data payload. For example:
```solidity
(bool sentToUser, ) = recipient.call{ value: final... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Strange reward accounting
### Description
Currently, if a reward token was deposited before any user enabled it, it will be lost (claimed by any user): https://github.com/euler-xyz/reward-streams/blob/95783173eff4668bb177eeefd9e8a9dc1a44669c/src/BaseRewardStreams.sol#L562. This behavior is strange because it ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | true | ## Low: bytes4 casting can be unsafe
### Description
There are three locations in the codebase where bytes values representing calldata are typecast to `bytes4` to determine the function selector of a call. These locations are:
1. The `isValidSignature()` function within the `PermissionManager` contract:
```solidit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing Permission Range Check
### Description
## Multi-Signature Members and Permissions
Members of a multi-signature may have one of three types of permissions. These permissions are retained in a bitmask format within the `u8` data type. Therefore, as there are three types of permissions, the value of a me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Infinite minting of FLUX through Merge
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Theft of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
Users are able to claim more FLUX rewards than they should simply ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Checks for usage of .clone() on a Copy type.
### Description
**Description**
club-program/src/instructions/create_club.rs:
Lines. 116, 117. The only reason Copy types implement Clone is for generics, not for using the
clone method on a concrete type.
**Recommendation**:
Better to use *ctx.program_id | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `AlgebraBasePluginV1.isIncentiveActive()` returns true for deactivated incentives
### Description
The external view function `AlgebraBasePluginV1.isIncentiveActive()` doesn't check whether the current state of incentive and `EternalVirtualPool` is active or not. It just checks that some incentive is connected ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Wrong l1ToL2Token verification on L2TokenBridge
### Description
The `L2TokenBridge` checks that the `localToken` and `remoteToken` define a valid mapping by verifying:
```solidity
require(_remoteToken != address(0) && l1ToL2Token[_remoteToken] == _localToken, "L2TokenBridge/invalid-token");
```
However, becau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Improper input validation leads to DOS and tota...
### Description
## Improper input validation leads to DOS and total network shutdown
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardeum/tree/dev
Impacts:
* Network not being able to confirm new transactions (total network shutdown)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Synth Miscellaneous General Comments
### Description
This section details miscellaneous informational aspects found within the Synth smart contract. These items are understood to not pose immediate security risks.
- **Warnings when compiling with solc**: Excessive noise from the compiler can make it easy to m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: [13] Activate the optimizer
### Description
Before deploying your contract, activate the optimizer when compiling using “solc --optimize --bin sourceFile.sol”. By default, the optimizer will optimize the contract assuming it is called 200 times across its lifetime. If you want the initial contract deployment t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Improper initialization of spending condition abstraction allows “v2 transactions” to exit using PaymentExitGame ✓ Addressed
### Description
`PaymentOutputToPaymentTxCondition` is an abstraction around the transaction signature check needed for many components of the exit games. Its only function, `verify`, r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Bucket rewards will be wiped by stake/unstake before accrueRewards, lastRewardIndex resets without settling rewards, accrueRewards delta becomes 0
### Description
The contract resets a token bucket’s lastRewardIndex in stake / unstake without first settling pending rewards, this will cause a complete loss of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: User deposits don't have min. return checks
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `LPIssuer.deposit` first computes *balanced amounts* on the user's defined `tokenAmounts`.
The idea is that LP tokens give the same percentage share of each vault tokens' tvl, therefore the provided amounts should be *ba... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Funds can be redirected
### Description
```rust
#[account(mut)]
pub user_token_account: Account
```
In `programs/solver-fund-pool-anchor/src/instructions/borrow.rs:142-143`, the `user_token_account` is only required to be writable; the program never checks whether `owner == user.key()`. The signed message... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.13 to get the ability to use `using for` with a list of free functions.
*There are 16 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | rounding | true | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary external call in `YToken::_decimalsOffset` and `YTokenL2::_decimalsOffset`
### Description
**Description:** In [`YToken::_decimalsOffset`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/40caad6c60625d750cc5c3a5a7df92b96a93a2fb/contracts/core/tokens/YToken.sol#L314-L316) and [`YTokenL2::_decimalsOffs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Replace Saturating Arithmetic
### Description
## Use of Saturating Arithmetic
Use of saturating arithmetic (`saturating_add`, `saturating_sub`, `saturating_mul`, etc.) causes values to clip at the maximum or minimum possible representations. Saturating arithmetic in the program analyzed is used to calculate l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Manipulation of governance voting result by unlimited minting the Flux Token by exploiting the logic of reset and merge tokenId
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/Voter.sol
Impacts:
- Manipulation of governance voting result... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [N‑13] Lines are too long
### Description
Usually lines in source code are limited to [80](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/148677/why-is-80-characters-the-standard-limit-for-code-width) characters. Today's screens are much larger so it's reasonable to stretch this in some cases. Since t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Account Validation
### Description
## Audit Findings
## Inconsistent Account Checks
It was discovered that account checks were performed in an inconsistent manner in the program. Some account checks were performed inside the instruction logic, while others used anchor constraints. It is recommended to separa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Deferred Actions Allow Usage of Validation Functions in UserOp Context Without `isUserOpValidation` Flag
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Acknowledged. This is by design. Deferred actions allow the usage of validation functions... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is able to revert before wasting... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Native Token Transfer Is Still Possible
### Description
**Update**
The client has acknowledged the issue and commented: "We can later upgrade the contract to sweep native tokens if required".
**File(s) affected:**`contracts/ProtocolReserve/ProtocolShareReserve.sol`, `contracts/Admin/VBNBAdmin.sol`
**Descript... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: `CHALLENGER_REWARD` can be used to drain reserves and free mint
### Description
The goal of the auction mechanism is to determine the fair price of the collateral, so that Frankencoin (ZCHF) is always sufficiently backed and the system remains in balance.
If the challenge is successful, the bidder gets the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Using `block.timestamp` for swap deadline offers no protection
### Description
**Description:** `block.timestamp` is used as the deadline for swaps in `PriceFeed::exchangeFromExact()` [L106](https://github.com/dexe-network/DeXe-Protocol/tree/f2fe12eeac0c4c63ac39670912640dc91d94bda5/contracts/core/PriceFeed.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `PermitExtension.eip712Domain()` may return incorrect values for `name` and `version`
### Description
`name` and `version` for the domain separator in `PermitExtension` are stored in two locations.
The first place is in the bytecode, set by the constructor of `PermitExtension's` base class `EIP712`:
https://g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent validation of `vaultAddr` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: unchecked may cause under/overflows
### Description
Unchecked should only be used when there is a guarantee of no underflows or overflows, or when they are taken into account. In the absence of certainty, it's better to avoid unchecked to favor correctness over gas efficiency.
For instance, if by error, `p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Remove Accounting MarginAccount Signature
### Description
Use of `UncheckedAccount` in Anchor instruction declarations can lead to type confusion vulnerabilities as no checks are performed on the provided accounts.
For example, in margin-pool Deposit:
```rust
margin-pool/src/instructions/deposit.rs
#[derive... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: An attack like `Reentrancy` is possible
### Description
At the line https://github.com/yearn/yearn-vaults/tree/e390c2a6b2ba6e2ecc8f3a72a1ea4adfabd17544/contracts/yToken.sol#L186
the sending of the entire ETH that is on the balance sheet of the contract is made.
But the sender can be a smart contract in whic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Liquidation | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/main/src/Market.sol#L559
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/main/src/Market.sol#L591
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
For a lending pool, borrower's debt healthness can be decided by the health factor, i.e. the collateral value d... | Code4rena | 5 | Inverse Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `DelegationMetaSwapAdapter` is not compatible with fee on transfer tokens
### Description
**Description:** When someone tries to execute a `swapByDelegation`, the contract will first snapshot the current balance of the `tokenFrom`:
Afterwards, this same amount is used to compute the amount of tokens receiv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize names to save gas
### Description
`public`/`external` function names and `public` member variable names can be optimized to save gas. See [this](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/a5d8b486a8259f9f77891a919febd1a9) link for an example of how it works. Below are the interfaces/abstract contracts that ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious IP owner can front-run derivative registration to drain user's royalty tokens
### Description
The **RoyaltyModule** is designed to manage the distribution of royalty tokens among IP owners and royalty policies when a derivative IP is linked to one or more parent IPs. External Royalty Policies enab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misconfiguration of Fees Leading to Excessive Charges
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The setFees function allows the owner to set fee rates for performance fees, management fees, and withdrawal incentives. While there are checks to prevent setting these fees above cer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Ever-growing array of pending price requests
### Description
The `Voting` contract tracks all price requests still to be resolved in its [`pendingPriceRequests` array](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/9d403ddb5f2f07194daefe7da51e0e0a6306f2c4/core/contracts/oracle/implementation/Voting.sol#L98). Onc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Don't initialize to default values
### Description
In Solidity don't initialize to default values:
```solidity
registry/GlobalRegistryService.sol
169: for (uint8 i = 0; i < walletAddresses.length; i++) {
``` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Possibility to steal tokens from the contract balance
### Description
Method `addCoverAndCreatePools` defined at https://github.com/CoverProtocol/cover-peripheral/tree/d5b37e34d47abec3252cdabd46e55e34a72421d4/contracts/CoverRouter.sol#L128 accepts `_protocol` and `_collateral` addresses as arguments, then cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrectly Utilized And Sanitized Cookies
### Description
## Cookie Vulnerability Explanation
The `getCookie` function first URL decodes the `document.cookie` attribute and then searches for the cookie by its name. This allows attackers to inject cookies by sending a cookie value with a URL encoded `;` sign.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use specific Solidity compiler version
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Few of the audited contracts use the following floating pragma:
pragma solidity ^0.8.21;
It allows compiling contracts with various versions of the compiler and introduces the risk of usi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Reusing errors across different kinds of violating conditions reduces readability and UX
### Description
There are checks for different kinds of errors in `BribeCollector`, and some of them reuse errors for different kinds of violating conditions. This reduces code readability and UX for users when they encoun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | DOS | false | true | ## Handle
shw
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Griefing/DOS attack is possible when a malicious NFT contract sends many NFTs to the vault, which could cause excessive gas consumed and even transactions reverted when other users are trying to unlock or transfer NFTs.
## Proof of Concept
1. The function `_remove... | Code4rena | 5 | Visor |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: COLLATERAL_MINTER_ROLE can be granted by the deployer of QuantConfig and mint arbitrary amount of tokens
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-rolla/blob/main/quant-protocol/contracts/options/CollateralToken.sol#L101-L117
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Using the mi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: div should always be performed as late as possible in calculations
### Description
Other issues in this report have highlighted truncation errors resulting from the `div` function, or the `/` operator. In general, all divisions should occur as the final steps of a calculation, to minimize the compounding effec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing Event Emissions for Critical State Changes
### Description
In `BellumFactory` contract, none of the admin functions that modify critical protocol parameters emit events. This includes changes to:
* Fee receiver address
* Trading fees
* Pause state
* Migration fee
* Epoch percentage
* Incentivizer ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing bounds on critical protocol parameters
### Description
Throughout the files in scope, several critical admin-controlled parameters lack appropriate validation:
In `BoostSideKick` contract:
* The`sidekickPercentage` and `feePercent` >= 100% could take entire transaction amount or fail.
* The `chan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Sudo is enabled on the Acala chain
### Description
The Acala chain spec uses the sudo module (Figure 2.1), which allows for robust testing but should not exist in a production network. The existence of a sudo functionality, or a lack of clear documentation of a sudo removal step, may decrease users' trust in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Cache computation where it is performed multiple times
### Description
**Description:** Cache computation where it is performed multiple times:
* `CountryValidator::validateCountryCode` - cache `bytes(_country).length`
**Securitize:** Acknowledged. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: DAOfiV1Router01.removeLiquidityETH() does not support tokens with no return value
### Description
While the rest of the system uses the `safeTransfer*` pattern, allowing tokens that do not return a boolean value on `transfer()` or `transferFrom()`, `DAOfiV1Router01.removeLiquidityETH()` throws and consumes all... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.