prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary gas consumption
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
CommunityRound.sol, method: reserve(_request, _message, v, r, s), address of caller is being pushed into investorsList which is a private array of addresses, and it is not being read or used in any o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Zero Amount Transfers when Claiming Fees
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `b166e5b`. The client provided the following explanation: _Added check `feeAmount > 0` before transfer in `receiveFees()`_
**File(s) affected:**`BatchTrade.sol`
**Description:**`BatchTrade.recei... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: **Misleading error message [1]**
### Description
**Description**
In `SecondaryCollateralizationBWT.sol` file, in the constructor, there is a require statement:
**Recommendation**:
Replace **"WHITE TOKEN"** with **"BWT TOKEN"**. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of liquidity inside StakingManager
### Description
The exchange rate of kHYPE is calculated based on the total amounts of all StakingManagers in the system.
```solidity
uint256 rewardsAmount = validatorManager.totalRewards();
uint256 slashingAmount = validatorManager.totalSlashing();
uint256 totalHYPE... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Delivery of messages across chains
### Description
LayerZero is used to transport messages cross-chain. If a compromise of LayerZero take place,
the worst case scenario may include forgeries of Mozaic messages, causing havoc and possibly
loss of funds. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Payment card authority could potentially bypass whitelist limits for jetton transfers
### Description
The authority role in the treasure contract can use the `op::transfer` operation to bypass the jetton transfer destination checks performed in the `op::transfer_jettons` operation. This allows them to transfer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent state updates when tokens are burned and/or transferred directly to the `DEAD_ADDRESS`
### Description
**Description:** The following state updates are performed when batch burning tokens:
Note how while the `_balances[owner]` state is decremented, that of `DEAD_ADDRESS` is not incremented despi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing Error Case in `handle_burn_notification()` May Lead to Locked Funds for Caller and Incorrect Accounting
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `0e30d970d6f0ed06ed1e2ec95346d150f2e7d62d`.
**File(s) affected:**`pool.func`
**Description:** If the caller provides a non... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `PARENT_CANNOT_CONTROL` can be bypassed by maliciously unwrapping parent node
### Description
[NameWrapper.sol#L356](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-ens/blob/ff6e59b9415d0ead7daf31c2ed06e86d9061ae22/contracts/wrapper/NameWrapper.sol#L356)
[NameWrapper.sol#L295](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-ens/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Not considering fees when wrapping mtOFTs leads to DoS in leverage executors
### Description
When wrapping mtOFTs in leverage executors, fees are not considered, making calls always revert because the obtained assets amount is always smaller than expected.
### Impact
High. The core functionality of leverag... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Alignment Between Commission Receivers & Stakeholders upon Policy Creation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: We purposely added separate inputs for comission receivers and stakeholders because they can be different. These p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: If an adopted token and its canonical live on the same domain the cap for the custodied amount is applied for each of those tokens
### Description
If `_local` is an adopted asset that lives on its canonical's original chain, then we are comparing the to-be-updated balance of this contract (`custodied`) with `s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Don't update state | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantMevAndFeesPool.sol#L170-L173
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
When a user transfers away GiantMevAndFeesPool tokens, the pool's claimed[] computed is left unchanged and sti... | Code4rena | 5 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Combining shorts can incorrectly reset the shorts flag
### Description
The protocol allows users to combine multiple short positions into one as long as the combined short stays above the primary collateral ratio. The function is also able to reset an active flag from any of the combined shorts if the final... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: beforeTokenTransfer called with wrong parameters in LBToken._burn
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-traderjoe/blob/37258d595d596c195507234f795fa34e319b0a68/src/LBToken.sol#L237
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In `LBToken._burn`, the `_beforeTokenTransfer` hook is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: `++i` costs less gas compared to `i++` or `i += 1`
### Description
`++i` costs less gas compared to `i++` or `i += 1` for unsigned integer, as pre-increment is cheaper (about 5 gas per iteration). This statement is true even with the optimizer enabled.
`i++` increments `i` and returns the initial value of `i`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [07] Challenges and Strategies in Managing Voting Participation in Growing Communities
### Description
As communities involved in cultural indexing and art piece voting grow, they face the challenge of declining active voter participation, which can hinder critical processes such as achieving quorum.
https:/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent spacing in comments
### Description
Some lines use `// x` and some use `//x`. The instances below point out the usages that don't follow the majority, within each file
*There are 3 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b036074edef3c1369b984d10010... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing cardinality check in function read()
### Description
There is 1 instance of this issue:
https://github.com/open-dollar/od-contracts/blob/f4f0246bb26277249c1d5afe6201d4d9096e52e6/src/contracts/oracles/CamelotRelayer.sol#L91C1-L101C4
On Line 93, the comment mentions that the read() function should reve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: No restriction on emergency withdrawal of `RESOLV` staking tokens
### Description
`ResolvStaking` and `ResolvStakingSilo` have a function `emergencyWithdrawERC20()`, which allows the admin to withdraw `RESOLV` tokens from the contract.
- https://github.com/resolv-im/resolv-contracts/blob/530d997b010b803691abab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Use unchecked{} whenever underflow not possible (Instances Missed by bot)(Gas Saved ~320 Gas)
### Description
**Note: Analyzer only talks about overflow errors so these underflow related instances also not covered by that**
### Total Gas Saved : ~320 GAS in 2 Instances.
Because of previous condition check b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: User Can Derive Call to Be on Behalf of the L1ScrollMessenger
### Description
The [`L1ScrollMessenger` contract](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/L1/L1ScrollMessenger.sol#L28) enables users to [send messages](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Potential for Conflicting Token Registrations in OriginalTokenBridge Contract
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Location**: OriginalTokenBridge.sol
**Description**
The OriginalTokenBridge contract contains three separate token registration functions: registerToken, regi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: TOKEN ROLES CAN BE ADDED MULTIPLE TIMES
### Description
It was identified that the same allowed role can be added to the asset token multiple times. This might result in unexpected behavior, for example, in a deadlock situation where removing the roles would not be possible because of an `Index out of range` e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Buyouts of shorter duration liens can lead to the loss of borrower funds
### Description
Liens whose duration is equal to (or maybe less than) `minDurationIncrease` cannot be bought out to be replaced by newer liens with lower interest rates but the same duration. This locks the borrower out of better-terme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `override` function arguments that are unused should have the variable name removed or commented out to avoid compiler warnings
### Description
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Fix Invalid Nameserver Configuration
### Description
WHOIS data for Thala.fi revealed two valid Vercel nameservers and one invalid gitbook.io entry:
### Recommendation
Remove the invalid gitbook.io nameserver entry through the domain management interface and verify that only the required Vercel nameservers re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Multiple Authentication Bypass Mechanisms Increase Risk of Misconfiguration
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `6bb6183c1cfaac59c98b31cebd1113836449d702`. Additional fix in: `f63cc429f04754d9adc1d2613388cee5cc67861a`.
The client provided the following explanation:
> Re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Failure To Validate AMM Configuration
### Description
## Contract Validation Issues in AMM Configuration
`contract::instantiate` fails to validate `quote_decimals`, `base_decimals`, and `market_id` in the AMM configuration for a launchpad.
If the `market_id` does not correctly correspond to the specified `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Function `withdrawRewards()` may lead to inaccuracy in `delayedRewards` if there's no withdrawal to process
### Description
**Description:** In the `CasimirManager`, the `withdrawRewards()` function can be used by the reporter to process swept validator rewards. The reporter must provide `WithdrawalProofs`, wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: [03] Borrowers would pay lesser APR in some supported assets
### Description
### Proof of Concept
First, per the readMe, we should assume rebasing tokens are in scope, see https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-wildcat/blob/fe746cc0fbedc4447a981a50e6ba4c95f98b9fe1/README.md#L262
Where as this integration is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: cannot forward extra rewards from both OCY_Convex to OCT_YDL.
### Description
Convex specifies `rewardContract` to be a `VirtualBalanceRewardPool`, but all three OCY_Convex uses it as a ERC20 token, which make it impossible to claim extra rewards and forward them to the OCT_YDL.
### Impact
Current OCY_Convex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Collision between constants
### Description
The [`NS_POOL_MAX_STAKE`](https://github.com/neptune-mutual-blue/protocol/blob/73fc82fbe0d1388867b7df669983fe42760daeb1/contracts/libraries/StakingPoolCoreLibV1.sol#L27) and [`NS_POOL_REWARD_TOKEN`](https://github.com/neptune-mutual-blue/protocol/blob/73fc82fbe0d1388... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: The `withdrawFees` and `withdrawRakeback` functions are not following the decimal notation from the rest of functions, which may lead to an incorrect usage.
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The `withdrawFees()` and `withdrawRakeback()` functions within the `Treasury.so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Missing validation of vesting wallets in `EscrowManager.createLock()`
### Description
`EscrowManager.createLock()` lacks whitelist verification for the `vestingWallets_` parameter. This allows an attacker to use the same "poisoned" vesting wallet multiple times to artificially increase voting power in the sys... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Two-Step Ownership Transfer
### Description
The owner of **CryptoLegacy** might make a mistake when transferring ownership. It's safer to use a two-step ownership transfer process.
### Recommendation
We recommend using `Ownable2Step` from OpenZeppelin.
> **Client's Commentary:**
> https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
The client has implemented only several of the recommended checks, however we find their reasoning for not implementing the others to be sufficient.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `99c87d3361289dc1b84b4cbef008f3c37be9c5bb`. The cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Refactor functions with events which emit both new and old values
### Description
**Files:** `StateTransitionManager.sol`, `Admin.sol`
[File: code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/state-transition/chain-deps/facets/Admin.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/main/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Typos and Bad NATSPEC
### Description
We have identified the following typos/NATSPEC problems:
```
AccessControlled.sol
29: `NewAccessControlManager` should be `NewAccessControllManager`
Accounting.sol:
66: `InvalidNavSpit` should be `InvalidNavSplit`
ERC20Cooldown.sol:
10: `allows to store` should be `allo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: [06] DOSing by spamming transactions is allowed
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-nibiru/blob/8ed91a036f664b421182e183f19f6cef1a4e28ea/x/evm/keeper/keeper.go#L120-L124
Note that here, `BaseFeeMicronibiPerGas` returns the gas base fee in units of the EVM denom and this is stored as a const... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [8] `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs **20 to 40 gas** because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
*There are 12 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Access Control | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/156
## Found by
Jeiwan
## Summary
Anyone can call the `Pool.transferLPs` function and transfer previously approved LP tokens to the approved address.
## Vulnerability Detail
The [Pool.transferLPs](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna/bl... | Sherlock | 4 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Burning a User’s Tokens for a Flash Proposal will not Deduct Their Balance
### Description
## Handle
kirk-baird
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The proposal to burn a user's tokens for a flash governance proposal does not result in the user losing any funds and may in fact unlock their funds sooner.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Address lacks zero-check
### Description
**Description**
LGEWhitelisted.sol, line 61
Missing “require” statement for comparison “pairAddress” function parameter with zero
address. It is needed to prevent misleading transactions or a transaction with incorrect
arguments (e.g. because of frontend validation fa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: argsToLabels() slice index panic
### Description
The function `argsToLabels()` takes a "variadic parameter" input, allowing a varying number of string arguments to be provided to the function. While the function will accept any number of inputs, it can only gracefully handle even numbers of arguments:
```go
f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing period verification
### Description
In the `createVestingSchedule` function, there is no check to ensure that `_slicePeriodSeconds` is not greater than the vesting duration. If `_slicePeriodSeconds` is greater than the duration, the `vestedAmount` will always be zero until the full duration has passed,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Borrower cannot partially repay interest of a loan
### Description
The repay function of the Lender.sol contract allows a borrower to repay a loan in a specific pool. However, it is currently impossible for the borrower to partially repay the interest of a loan. This is due to the fact that the repay function ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Yearn Vault Withdrawal Amount Discrepancy
### Description
Users withdrawing tokens from the Yearn Protocol would not receive the exact amount requested. Yearn vaults process withdrawals in yvToken rather than the underlying asset. Therefore, if a user requests an amount to withdraw from a Yearn vault using ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent vote weight windows enable potential voting power manipulation
### Description
Current implementation allows for independent setting of vote weight windows on the hub chain (via `HubGovernor`) and spoke chains (via SpokeVoteAggregator). This can lead to inconsistencies in how voting power is calcu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missing Development Framework
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `e6b7472d0983118cb5827e19dd7db3519b6bf2a5`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Added hardhat development framework to the project. Along with tests for ERC20, ERC20Votes, and ERC20Permit. You ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Ticking Interest Rate opens up to multi-block MEV - Directly Triggering Recovery Mode on the next block due to interest ticking
### Description
**Impact**
Because Apollon charges an interest on borrowing, an attack can guarantee triggering Recovery Mode on the next block by simply borrowing up to the thres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Avoid Loss of Unexecuted Messages
### Description
## Update Restrictions for orderDelivery Flag
Restrict updates to the `orderDelivery` flag after deployment to ensure that unexecuted messages are not lost when switching from unordered to ordered execution.
To prevent sending transactions while the contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users that mint zero shares will lose their funds
### Description
When a user deposit their funds, the following function will be called:
If `totalShares_ > 0` and the denominator is higher than the numerator, the user will deposit their funds but they will receive zero shares in return, so consider revertin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `BaseConicPool.handleInvalidConvexPid()` doesn't set `rebalancingRewardActive` when invoking `_setWeightToZero()`
### Description
Generally, when weights are changed in BaseConicPool, `rebalancingRewardActive` gets updated. For instance, `BaseConicPool.handleDepeggedCurvePool()` invokes `_setWeightToZero()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Anyone can get the NFT collateral token after an Auction without bidding due to missing check on `msg.sender`
### Description
In IsolateLogic.sol, liquidation of an isolate loan can only be placed after the auction period is passed with bidding. The problem is that there is a missing check on `msg.sender` in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: FOR LOOP OPTIMIZATIONS
### Description
In for loops, the variable `i` is incremented using `i++`. It is known that in loops, using `++i` costs less gas per iteration than `i++`.
It has also been detected that some `uint256` variables are initialized to 0. These variables are already initialized to 0 by defaul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Events Not Emitted
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `de72dd6b7e8030b03b6f00286c8929d313ad0cde`.
Recommendation implemented.
**File(s) affected:**`xAUXO.sol`, `TokenLocker.sol`
**Description:** During deployment, `xAUXO` sets `entryFee` and `feeBeneficiary`, but the e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `distributor` Cannot Be Updated
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `29a1538b0299af281175c31d08bb06311968e3d3`.
**File(s) affected:**`AGStaking.sol`
**Description:**`distributor` is declared as an `immutable` state variable. It can only be set in the constructor and will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: [11] Oracle not compatible with tokens of 19 or more decimals
### Description
Keep in mind that the version of solidity used, despite being greater than `0.8`, does not prevent integer overflows during casting, it only does so in mathematical operations.
In the case that `feed.decimals()` returns 18, and the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Tokens can't be removed as a collateral without breaking liquidations and other core functions
### Description
### Impact
The core mechanism that Revert utilizes to prevent arbitrary tokens to be utilized as collateral is by the default setting of the `collateralFactor`. Since the `collateralFactor` for al... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: PerAddressTrancheVestingMerkleDistributor.claim always reverts because it checks the Merkle proof incorrectly
### Description
Both the `claim` and `initializeDistributionRecord` methods of PerAddressTrancheVestingMerkleDistributor do not include the tranches when checking the Merkle proof (and do not even a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] The `lastAccruedBlock` naming needs to be refactored
### Description
Low impact, confusing comment/docs since the `lastAccruedBlock` is either wrongly implemented or wrongly named.
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at [PrimeLiquidityProvider.sol#L22-L24](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-venus/blob/b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Different Oracle issues can return outdated prices
### Description
### Impact
Different problems have been found with the use of the oracle that can incur economic losses when the oracle is not consumed in a completely safe way.
### Proof of Concept
The problems found are:
* The `timeStamp` check is no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: What if a wrong rootHash is used?
### Description
Assume a wrong `rootHash` is created, for example due to a bug in the creation script. Once that is updated via `handleUpdates()`, there is no way to do any more updates or validations, and the account would be bricked.
### Recommendation
Consider creating ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing access control in `SDLVesting::stakeReleasableTokens`
### Description
**Description:** The [`SDLVesting::stakeReleasableTokens`](https://github.com/stakedotlink/contracts/blob/3462c0d04ff92a23843adf0be8ea969b91b9bf0c/contracts/vesting/SDLVesting.sol#L108) function is meant to be driven by a trusted ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization risk
### Description
The protocol has a `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE` with privileged rights to perform admin tasks that can affect users. Especially, the owner can change the fee/reward fraction settings and various policies.
Most admin functions don't emit events at the moment.
### Impact
While th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue with the following comment: _"In line with Quantstamp recommendations, we acknowledge that the following contracts have privileged roles and ownership, and users should therefore be aware that they are not fully trustle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: If the collateral is a fee-on-transfer token, repayment will be blocked
### Description
As we all know, some tokens will deduct fees when transferring token. In this way, **the actual amount of token received by the receiver will be less than the amount sent**. If the collateral is this type of token, the a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Hardcoded CCIP `feeToken` prevents LINK discount usage
### Description
In `BridgeCCIP::send`, the [`feeToken`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/40caad6c60625d750cc5c3a5a7df92b96a93a2fb/contracts/bridge/ccip/BridgeCCIP.sol#L126-L133) parameter is hardcoded:
```solidity
// Sends the message to the d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Dangerous storage variable in Strategy contract due to use of delegatecall
### Description
The Strategy contract contains a single storage variable (`strategyExecutor`). Because the implementation uses a (double) delegatecall, it takes only one mistake in the enabled Action contracts to overwrite this very imp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent type usage for `IssuanceHours.HOUR_IN_SECONDS`
### Description
**Description:** In `IssuanceHours` the constant [`IssuanceHours.HOUR_IN_SECONDS`](https://github.com/ondoprotocol/rwa-internal/blob/a74d03f4a71bd9cac09e8223377b47f7d64ca8d4/contracts/globalMarkets/tokenManager/issuanceHours/IssuanceHo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Bribe Rewards Struck In Contract If Deposited During First Epoch
### Description
_Submitted by xiaoming90_
Bribe rewards added to the `Bribe` contract in the first epoch will not be claimable by any voters, and the rewards will struck in the `Bribe` contract.
### Proof-of-Concept
Assume that the current ep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: Transferring `quoteToken` to the exchange pool contract will cause future liquidity providers to lose funds
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
In the current implementation, the amount of LP tokens to be minted when `addLiquidity()` is calculated based on the ratio between the amount of newly added `quo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Contract owner can arbitrarily replay finishUpgrade
### Description
In all of the upgradeable contracts, the owner can call `finishUpgrade` at any time with any target contract address. This can lead to the upgraded contract being reset to the state of any contract of the same type. Furthermore, executing `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The Contract Should Approve(0) first
### Description
Some tokens (like USDT L199) do not work when changing the allowance from an existing non-zero allowance value.
They must first be approved by zero and then the actual allowance must be approved.
### Proof of Concept
Navigate to the following contract fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: If a hat is owned by address(0), phony signatures will be accepted by the safe
### Description
If a hat is sent to `address(0)`, the multisig will be fooled into accepting phony signatures on its behalf. This will throw off the proper accounting of signatures, allowing non-majority transactions to pass and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Manager revocation front-running keeps unauthorized access possible
### Description
The public `assignRole` function in `AgoraAccessControl.sol` allows any existing manager to both add and remove the manager role in one atomic call, with only a guard against removing the *last* manager. A malicious manager (M₂... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: [31] Unnecessary duplication of checks
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/4f0ba34f34a864c354c7e8c47643ed8f4a250e13/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/bridge/L1SharedBridge.sol#L386-L456
These functions are both used for finalizing the withdra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: [37] Redundant return of the nonce deployed
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/4f0ba34f34a864c354c7e8c47643ed8f4a250e13/code/system-contracts/contracts/NonceHolder.sol#L122-L131
Function is returning the deployment nonce for the accounts use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [Dependency] Avoid uint declarations and opt for uint256 for clarity
### Description
The function parameter is declared as a `uint` type which is an alias for `uint256`.
### Recommendation
It is best practice to use `uint256` for full clarity and, most importantly, to stay consistent on usage. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: [01] Underflow panic before intended custom error
### Description
`GatewayVm::checkBack` checks whether stack will underflow before a rewind look-up. When `checkBack` will cause underflow, a custom error `GatewayVm::checkBack` will propagate.
The problem is underflow panic will happen before revert custom err... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: When opening a position, the collateral of the previous position is used for borrowing, which makes the user more easily liquidated
### Description
When a user opens a position, if there is collateral in previous positions that have not reached the maximum borrowable amount, this collateral will be used for b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: [03] `bigdecimal::rev()` lacks explicit division by zero check
### Description
The `rev()` function in `bigdecimal.move` doesn’t explicitly check for division by zero when calculating the reciprocal of a `BigDecimal`:
Albeit, all other division operations have zero checks:
* `div` checks with `assert!(!bigui... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Error Code Conflict
### Description
## Error Codes in maven.move
In `maven.move`, `E_EXCEED_COIN_OPERATION_LIMIT` and `E_EXCEED_RECOVERY_OPERATION_LIMIT` have the same value.
## Remediation
Renumber the value of error codes.
## Patch
Fixed in `025c786`.
### Recommendation
Renumber the value of error cod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Failed messages never expire and can be replayed by anyone, potentially allowing users to be griefed
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0xa9491a1f4f058832e5742b76eE3f1F1fD7bb6837
Impacts:
- Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage to t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Initial debt repayment issue due to low USDH circulating supply
### Description
When the `PositionManager.sol` contract is deployed, the first users who take on debt may face an issue where they cannot fully repay their debt. This occurs because the circulating supply of USDH is initially too low, making it im... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Hash in Proposal ID Prevents Guardians From Canceling Proposals
### Description
The `Guardians` multisig on L1 has the privilege to cancel proposals of the Token and GovOps Governor contracts on L2\. This is performed by encoding a call to the `cancel` function and sending it through the Mailbox fac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Return Value of `getCompAddress()`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Mitigated" by the client. Addressed in: `dd662b87f14a5e86c79de21cab9cd88506c9ee22`. The client provided the following explanation:
> This address will be upgraded to the correct one once the protocol token has been deployed. Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: DoS of strategy execution due to array indices out of bounds
### Description
**Description:** `StrategyBuilderPlugin._validateStep()` intends to enforce that the condition results reference a new index that does not exceed the maximum step index:
However, given `maxStepIndex` is passed as the array length... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: The overflow in the `_calculateStreamedAmount` function can lead to unexpected results.
### Description
In the `_calculateStreamedAmount` function, the calculation is within an `unchecked` block.
When the `start time` is later than the `current block's timestamp`, an `overflow` occurs during the calculatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `L2Bridge` is incompatible with ERC721 that returns `felt252` for strings
### Description
## Vulnerability Details
When retrieving ERC721 collection metadata values (name, symbol, token_uri), we are retrieving their returned data to be `ByteArray`. Since these functions will return string values we need to un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: PUSH0 not supported in all chains
### Description
The contracts use solidity version `0.8.22`, which can generate `PUSH0` opcodes depending on the evm version specified in the compiler settings. This opcode is not supported in all chains, and can cause the contracts to fail on deployment.
There is no `evm_ver... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: TWAP Period May be Set to Zero
### Description
The function `changeTwapPeriod(uint32 _twapPeriod)` sets the Time Weighted Average Price (TWAP) period for an Uniswap oracle. It is possible to set `_twapPeriod` to zero using this function. This would make the function `_readUniswapPool()` unusable due to the ass... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: GlmRouter’s `calculateGlmPrice()` may not return correct value
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract GlmRouter.sol, the method `calculateGlmPrice(...)` does not check if `totalAssets` or `totalSupply` is greater than 0 or not. If total supply is 0, then this meth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | true | ## Medium: Distribution can be bricked, and double claims by a few holders are possible when owner calls `LiquidInfrastructureERC20::setDistributableERC20s`
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
Double claim, DOS by bricking distribution, few holders can lose some rewards due to missing validation of distrib... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: The Current Access Control Model Can Result in Concurrent Behaviors
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. Some measures are implemented to mitigate the issue. The client provided the following explanation:
> The current admin design is requested by the end-users. We've added ve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: feeAmount computation might fail because of intermediate overflow
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: VerifiedPoolsBasicHook.sol#L376
Description: The afterSwap hook computes the feeAmount as:
uint256 feeAmount = uint128(swapAmount) * hookFee / TOTAL_FEE_BIPS;
Currently, the math is done in uint128 typ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Extra parameter for the method
### Description
At the line https://github.com/aave/governance-crosschain-bridges/blob/9fd0609a2e14d546885f76211961f251d2e15cb9/contracts/PolygonBridgeExecutor.sol#L35, when calling the `processMessageFromRoot()` method, the `stateId` parameter is passed.
But then this variabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Misleading comments
### Description
The following comments are potentially misleading or errant:
* Throughout [`AggregatorOracle.sol`](https://github.com/AlphaFinanceLab/homora-v2/blob/5efa332f2ecf8e9705c326cffda5305bc6f752f7/contracts/oracle/AggregatorOracle.sol) there are comments that say `maxPriceDeviati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [12]
### Description
The number of currencies (3) is hard-coded in different places, consider storing this information in arrays, which enables easy additions of new ones. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.