prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of data validation when users are claiming their art allows malicious user to bypass signature/merkle hash to provide unapproved `ref_`, `artId_` and `imageURI`
### Description
In the file `PhiFactory.sol`, the lack of checks in `merkleClaim` allows malicious users to bypass the hash check to pass in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Unlimited Valid Signatures May Circumvent Threshold Mechanism
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> In our backend system, we only support users in claiming the total amount of available tokens. In practice, users cannot split a large amount of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | false | false | ##### Description
In `LimitOrderManager.algebraMintCallback()` the debts to the pool are paid in order: first `token0`, then `token1`.
When `token0` is not `wNativeToken` but `token1` is, and the user supplies ETH with the call:
1. `_pay(token0, …)` executes the ERC-20 branch, transferring `token0` from the user.
2. ... | MixBytes | 5 | Algebra Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Potential Gas Optimizations
### Description
## Suggestions to Improve Gas Utilization
- Use `calldata` instead of `memory` for `setSendFees` function parameters.
- Use `private` instead of `public` for constants to save gas.
- Use `!= 0` instead of `> 0` for integer comparisons.
## Remediation
- Replace `me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: DoS vector in the `launch` function
### Description
The provisional owner of the contract launches the ULTI token by calling the `launch` function. In the private function `_createLiquidity` it is checked that Uniswap pool for the ULTI token does not exist and if it does, the function reverts.
While the comm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: 07] [`_checkBalances` FUNCTION BREAKS THE EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR OF THE PROTOCOL DUE TO ERRONEOUS CONDITIONAL CHECK
### Description
The `EvolvingProteus._checkBalances` function is used to verify the token reserve balances and the token reserve ratio are within the valid boundaries of the pool. To validate the `re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: The `onERC721Received` callback can be used to create fake liens
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-particle/blob/main/contracts/protocol/ParticleExchange.sol#L74
Since the `onERC721Received` callback is a public function, it can be called by anyone to create fake liens. The `from` paramete... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Constraints of `dailyAllowanceReplenishTime` and `allowanceRemaining` during `mint()` can be bypassed by using alias accounts & `safeTransferFrom()`
### Description
The [mint()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-ai-arena/blob/main/src/GameItems.sol#L158-L161) function in `GameItems.sol` constraints a us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Out of range index in `getTokenBurnFee()` causes function reversion after 14 days
### Description
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: PoolBase.sol
**Description**
The `getTokenBurnFee()` function in `PoolBase.sol` attempts to return `burnFees[feeCycle.length]` after 14 days of asset ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: [WP-H3] `L1Migrator.sol#migrateETH()` Improper implementation of `L1Migrator` causing `migrateETH()` always reverts, can lead to ETH in `BridgeMinter` getting stuck in the contract
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by gzeon_.
`L1Migrator.sol#migrateETH()` will call `IBridgeMinter(bridgeMi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary use of OpenZeppelin's nonReentrant
### Description
**Description:** The contract `TunnlTwitterOffers` uses the OpenZeppelin's `nonReentrant` modifier in a function `retryRequests()`.
But the implementation does not need this modifier.
The function `retryRequests()` only makes calls to an internal f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: immutable could be constant
### Description
## Code Review Summary
**Context:** Node.sol#L30-L33
**Description:**
The following immutable variables are not assigned in the constructor and are supposed to be changeable, so they could be constant:
- `uint256 internal immutable WAD = 1e18;`
- `uint256 private... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Lost rewards when the supply is `0`, which always happens if the rewards are queued before anyone has `StakeTracker` tokens
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-06-tokemak-judging/issues/387
## Found by
0x73696d616f, chaduke, hassan-truscova, lucifero, p0wd3r
If the supply of `S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Wrong Math | true | false | ## Handle
WatchPug
## Vulnerability details
Based on the context, once the beneficiary claimed all their vesting tokens, they should get the `fairSideConviction` NFT.
However, in the current implementation, if the beneficiary has claimed any amounts before it's fully vested, then they will never be able to get the... | Code4rena | 3 | FairSide |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: A low payoutAmount can lead to under-priced BERA bribe sales
### Description
A low `payoutAmount` set by the governor can lead to under-priced BERA bribe sales.
### Recommendation
Exercise caution when setting `payoutAmount`. The amount should be of an equivalent value meaningfully greater than the block rewa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [01] Missing `emit` in `lsp20VerifyCall()`
### Description
The function `lsp20VerifyCall()` has two calls to `_verifyPermissions()`; however, only the first one is followed by an `emit`.
This might make debugging transaction more difficult. Also indexed data by protocols like TheGraph will be incomplete.
### ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Emitting Storage Variables
### Description
You can save an SLOAD (~100 gas) by emiting local variables over storage variables when they have the same value.
[BaseV1-core.sol#L170](https://github.com/Plex-Engineer/stableswap/blob/489d010eb99a0885139b2d5ed5a2d826838cc5f9/contracts/BaseV1-core.sol#L170) - c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Validation | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/83
## Found by
yixxas
## Summary
Both `removeQuoteToken()` and `moveQuoteToken()` can be used to completely remove all quote tokens from a bucket. When this happens, if at the same time `bucketCollateral == 0 && lpsRemaining != 0`, then the bucke... | Sherlock | 4 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: A malicious collateralized NFT token can block liquidation and also epoch processing for public vaults
### Description
When a lien gets liquidated, the `CollateralToken` tries to create a Seaport auction for the underlying token. One of the steps in this process is to give approval for the token id to the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Withdrawal Penalties Can Be Reduced Via Splitting and Fail to Cover Deposit Bonuses
### Description
If a user wishing to withdraw funds completes their withdrawal in two transactions instead of one, they will pay a lower net penalty. The penalty incurred will be less than the deposit bonus received by a deposi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Attacker Can Steal Tokens by Deploying Malicious Contracts
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: Before registering new pairs, the native NFT contracts are to be manually evaluated as per their compatibility and security (along with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use self-explainable names
### Description
**Description**
At:
src/processor.rs:47
It’s not clear which “amount” is meant. What is the purpose of the amount??
**Recommendation**:
Rename. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: UniProxy.properDepositRatio - Proper ratio will not prevent liquidity imbalance for all possible scenarios ✓ Fixed
### Description
`UniProxy.properDepositRatio` purpose is to be used as a mechanism to prevent liquidity imbalance. The idea is to compare the deposit ratio with the `hypeRatio`, which is the rati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `OperatorProposal.sol`: Leftover ETH is not refunded to the `msg.sender`
### Description
The [`OperatorProposal`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-party/blob/440aafacb0f15d037594cebc85fd471729bcb6d9/contracts/proposals/OperatorProposal.sol#L7-L63) contract is a type of proposal that allows to execute o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | true | ## Low: getAssetPrice assumes that the quote token decimals and oracle precisions match
### Description
In this context we have the following line of code:
```solidity
(uint80 roundId, int256 price, uint256 startedAt, uint256 timestamp,) = IChainlinkAggregator(source).latestRoundData();
```
It is important to note t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Users can exploit the batch minting feature to avoid paying minting fees for tokens
### Description
Users can exploit the batch minting feature to avoid paying minting fees for tokens, leading to a loss of fees for the creator and fee recipients.
### Impact
Loss of fees for the creator and fee recipients as ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Make `LSSVMPair::call` payable to allow value to be sent with external calls
### Description
**Description:**
Currently, [`LSSVMPair::call`](https://github.com/sudoswap/lssvm2/blob/78d38753b2042d7813132f26e5573c6699b605ef/src/LSSVMPair.sol#L640) simply passes a [value of zero](https://github.com/sudoswap/lssvm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Rewards per locked token are calculated incorrectly
### Description
Rewards per locked token are calculated incorrectly as they are calculated, when at the allocation time, but should be calculated at the end of rebalancing period.
### Impact
Rewards per locked token are calculated incorrectly.
### Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Yearly mint calculation discrepancy: documentation vs implementation
### Description
_Resolved_
There is a discrepancy between the documented behavior and actual implementation of the yearly mint reward calculation. The comments describe a simple linear inflation mechanism, but the implementation uses a compl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [N‑03] `constant`s should be defined rather than using magic numbers
### Description
Even [assembly](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-opensea-seaport/blob/9d7ce4d08bf3c3010304a0476a785c70c0e90ae7/contracts/lib/TokenTransferrer.sol#L35-L39) can benefit from using readable constants instead of hex/numeric ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | oracle | true | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-wenwin/blob/91b89482aaedf8b8feb73c771d11c257eed997e8/src/Lottery.sol#L135>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-wenwin/blob/91b89482aaedf8b8feb73c771d11c257eed997e8/src/LotterySetup.sol#L114>
### Impact
Attacker can run `executeDraw()` in `Lottery.sol`, receive random number... | Code4rena | 5 | Wenwin |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Unstable gauge version check
### Description
`ShashFactory` contract have gauge version check based on call probes defined at https://github.com/convex-eth/platform/blob/754d9e700693246275b613e895b4044b63ce9ed5/contracts/contracts/StashFactory.sol#L51-L61, that approach is very dangerous in case of new versio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary code repetition in CompleteSets contract
### Description
The `CompleteSets` contract includes the functions [`publicSellCompleteSets`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58e32e4749/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/trading/CompleteSets.sol#L69) and [`publicS... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect ETH Transfer to State Manager — Full msg.value Sent Instead of Used Amount
### Description
When a user purchases a launch token using ETH (base token), the acceptAmount() function correctly calculates the amount used (amountInUsed) and refunds the excess ETH back to the user. However, despite the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Magic number used
### Description
At the line https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/e414160eb8a774140457c885bb099baae528df04/contracts/CCapableErc20.sol#L237 contract uses "magic number" `10000` to calculate `totalFee`.
### Recommendation
We recommend to use constant instead or add comments | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Users May Be Able to Borrow swEth at an Outdated Price
### Description
The [`getPrice` function](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/oracles/spot/SwEthSpotOracle.sol#L32) of `SwEthSpotOracle` uses a TWAP oracle which means that a sudden change in pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Not used import can be removed
### Description
The `ReentrancyGuard` smart contract is imported in `ProtocolRegistry` but is not used and can be removed. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing error description
### Description
In the `setFeeCollector()` function, the `if (_feeCollector == address(0)) revert();` statement is missing an error description in case of not meeting the requirements.
Providing clear error descriptions helps developers and users quickly identify issues when transact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `setAdjustor` selector not included from `SimplexFacet`
### Description
The `SimplexFacet` contract is missing the `setAdjustor` selector from the `simplexSelectors` array. This means that the `setAdjustor` function cannot be called. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Uninstalling the fallback submodule of SmartSession will break the whole validation pro- cess
### Description
The SmartSession can behave as a multi-type module, serving as the "validator" for a smart account while also acting as a fallback handler for `supportsNestedTypedDataSign()` callbacks.
Since the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Stork and Pyth prices can be arbitrated
### Description
`fullfillOracleQueryStork` and `fullfillOracleQueryPyth` functions are used to update the price of the Stork and the Pyth oracles, respectively.
Given that both oracles work with a pull model, this opens the opportunity to arbitrage a price update by ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Investor can’t claim the last tokens (via claim() )
### Description
## Handle
gpersoon
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Suppose you are an investor and want to claim the last part of your claimable tokens (or your entire set of claimable tokens if you haven't claimed anything yet).
Then you call the f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Lock more in order to Unlock
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
If the users locked their tokens at say time T1. And the pendleVoteManager was set after T1. Then users will need to lock more Penpie in the contract if they want to call startUnlock() on their pre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Tranche tokens of a frozen account may be burned
### Description
A user whose account has been frozen can still have their tranche tokens burned. This is inconsistent with the mint function, which prohibits frozen users from minting. As burning can be considered a transfer to the zero address, a frozen account... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Nodes Can Panic While Handling Errors
### Description
The `suggestNewPendingWork` function is responsible for proposing new work for the consensus process by fetching pending proposals from the database, unmarshalling them, and then proposing them for further processing. However, the current implementation la... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: First user to claim a sleeper of type `NATIVE_TYPE` gets all rewards
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High
**Likelihood:** Low
**Description**
Sleepers held by the `Den` contract can be of different types. The type `NATIVE_TYPE` rewards the holder of a fermented jar with the native token of the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Missing Error Messages in revert Statements
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are `revert` statements that lack error messages. For instance:
* The `revert` statement within the `poolData` function on line 409 of `PanopticPool.sol`
* The `revert` statement within the `convertToTokenValue` functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Failure of entropy source callback
### Description
The `ApiologyAuctionHouse` contract relies on an external entropy source, implemented through the `Pyth Entropy` contract, to provide random numbers necessary for creating auctions. The main function responsible for handling the random number response is `A... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `DutchTrade.bidWithCallback()` does not send back excess tokens
### Description
`DutchTrade.bidWithCallback` allows for bidding with a callback hook that allows the bidder to swap the bought tokens for the sold tokens.
After the callback exits, the function checks that enough tokens are provided:
```Solidity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Executor reconfiguration allows for execution of expired payloads
### Description
It is possible to reconfigure an executor for an expired payload that is also queued such that it is executable. Additionally, it is possible to reconfigure the executor for a payload whilst the payload is queued to block executi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `require()`/`revert()` strings longer than 32 bytes cost extra gas
### Description
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Partial redemptions may prevent insolvent LOCs from being liquidatable
### Description
The amount of transferable collateral is not updated during partial redemptions, which could prevent LOCs from being liquidatable during times of insolvency. Partial redemptions allow the beneficiary to redeem part of the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Blacklisted Users Will Not Be Able to Claim Their Rewards
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Intended behaviour, because that's a very rare event, and most likely, it will never happen to us.
**File(s) affected:**`StakedINTX.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Typos
### Description
### Relevant GitHub Links
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-escrow/blob/65a60eb0773803fa0be4ba72defaec7d8567bccc/src/Escrow.sol#L19
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-escrow/blob/65a60eb0773803fa0be4ba72defaec7d8567bccc/src/EscrowFactory.sol#L19
The word `chosing` should be `choosing`. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Unit of account price oracle manipulation exploited
### Description
Unit of account price oracle manipulation exploited. It is possible to manipulate pull-based oracles, in a limited way, by updating the price to any that:
- Has occurred within the allowed window (as discussed in Euler's own words in the Spear... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: OraclePoolOfferHandler's `_getFactors` allows exact `tokenId` offer terms to be used for collection offers. A borrower can take on a loan with incorrect terms
### Description
In MultiSourceLoan.sol, a loan `offerExectuion` can be either a collection offer or an exact collateral token Id match offer. In a coll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Number of Available Spins Is Never Decreased On Spin or If Spin Is Fulfilled
### Description
When a user spins or the user's spin is fulfilled the code has nowhere where it decreases the amount of available spins for a user. However `getAvailableSpinsOf()` is out of scope, thus it may happen elsewhere but in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Multisig Security Enhancements
### Description
Current multisig setup uses 3/5 threshold (60%) with all internal signers. While functional, this configuration could be strengthened with a goal of 70% for medium and high risk operations. For further discussion, see this article, [The Right Way To Multisig](U... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Typos
### Description
- datas vs data
- setted vs set
- liquitiy vs liquidity
- WITHDRAWED vs WITHDREW or WITHDRAWN
- dont vs don't | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Potential arithmetic underflow
### Description
During the analysis of the `handle_add_liquidity` function, it is possible to observe that it takes `input_amount`, `deposit_fee_rate`, `slippage0` and `slippage1` values as parameters.
`- src/instructions/add_liquidity.rs`
```
pub fn handle_add_liquidity(
ctx... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Lending on Swivel: protocol fees not taken when remainder of underlying is swapped in YieldPool
### Description
The `lend` function for Swivel allows swapping the remainder underlying on Yield.
But it does not take protocol fees on this amount.
### Impact
Some protocol fees will be lost.
Users may even use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Tap - reserve can be updated in Tap but not in MarketMaker or Controller ✓ Fixed
### Description
The address of the pool/reserve contract can be updated in `Tap` if someone owns the `UPDATE_RESERVE_ROLE` permission. The permission is currently not assigned in the template.
The reserve is being referenced ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `redraw()` should be called by anyone
### Description
[VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol#L203-L225](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgeries/blob/main/src/VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol#L203-L225)
Redrawing a raffle already protects the winner through the timelocking mechanism. Dependency on the owner should be avoidable in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Constraint For Penalty Multiplier And MCR
### Description
## Guidelines for Penalty Multiplier and MCR
The value of `penalty_multiplier` and `MCR` should be set such that if **CR ≤ 1**, then:
\[
(penalty\_multiplier * (MCR - CR)) \geq 1
\]
This implies that:
\[
penalty\_multiplier \geq \frac{1}{MCR - 1}
\... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: depositETH does not validate the maxDeposit cap
### Description
```solidity
function deposit(uint256 assets, address receiver) public virtual returns (uint256) {
uint256 maxAssets = maxDeposit(receiver);
if (assets > maxAssets) {
revert ERC4626ExceededMaxDeposit(receiver, assets, maxAssets);
}
}
```
I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Rounding Direction in Stake/Unstake
### Description
## NEAR Staking and Unstaking Overview
When a user stakes NEAR, they receive a proportional amount of shares in return. This calculation is rounded against the user, meaning they may receive less than what is fair.
When a user unstakes shares, they receive... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | liquidation | true | false | ## Severity
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** High
## Description
In the `TroveManager::openTrove` function, the `totalActiveDebt` is cached into a local variable `supply` before the `_accrueActiveInterests` function is called. The `_accrueActiveInterests` function itself updates the `totalActiveDebt` to reflect a... | Pashov Audit Group | 5 | Roots_2025-02-09 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: FixedStrikeOptionTeller: create can be invoked when block.timestamp == expiry but exercise reverts
### Description
In `FixedStrikeOptionTeller` contract, new option tokens can be minted when `block.timestamp == expiry` but these option tokens cannot be exercised even in the same transaction.
### Impact
Opt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Empty calls can be made to any of the allowed contracts
### Description
It is possible to make calls with no data to any of the allowed contracts, bypassing the `onlyAllowedSelector` modifier.
The modifier checks the expected selector via `mload(add(_data, 32))`, but it never checks that the `_data` length is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: [11]
### Description
`SignatureDecoder.recoverKey` does not support [EIP-1271](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1271), meaning there is no support for smart contracts in all places that use signatures (which are many), which hinders different applications (e.g., building on top of the protocol). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Precision loss in setMaxSpotOffsetBps function leads to Incorrect Numa Prices
### Description
Due to precision loss in `NumaOracle.setMaxSpotOffsetBps()`, the spot price is modified (increased or decreased) by incorrect percentages, resulting in incorrect prices.
### Impact
Incorrect prices result in conve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The `Factory.registry` may be modified during the deployment
### Description
The `Registry.sol` contract is utilized to store valid addresses used within the protocol. When a `principalToken` is created using the `Factory::deployPT` function, the new `principalToken` is registered in `Registry.sol` (code line ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Enclave Leaking Panic Contents
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue in commit `e99cbd3`. Now, unless `panic-logging` feature is on, it will only log a static message.
**File(s) affected:**`enclave-modules/runtime/lib.rs`
**Description:** The panic handler added to this forked crate makes use o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: _getFirstSample returns wrong sample if count < sampleMemory
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
The `MovingAverage.sol` contract defines several variables that in the end make the `samples` array act as a ring buffer:
- `sampleMemory`: The total length (buffer size) of the `sampl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: The price and the duration of a policy may be unpredictable
### Description
When the user is buying a policy, the price is calculated based on the current liquidity/coverage ratio, and the duration is calculated based on the current timestamp. A malicious actor can front-run the buyer (e.g., buy short-term ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Utilization rate multiplier will not shift if oracle is consulted frequently
### Description
Due to round down issue in VaultAdapter's multiplier shift calculation, utilization rate will not increase/decrease if oracle is consulted frequently.
### Impact
DebtToken's interest rate calculation will be affect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: (HAL-31) Potential Rounding Errors in fundAccept()
### Description
A potential issue was identified in the `fundAccept()` function of the `SHProduct` contract related to division operations that can lead to rounding errors and precision loss. The specific line involved is:
```
userInfo[totalHolders[i]].option... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Overcomplicated math calculations
### Description
The following code from `calculateShareFromTime` is overcomplicated and can be simplified in the following way: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `abicoder v2` is enabled by default
### Description
abicoder v2 is considered non-experimental as of Solidity 0.6.0 and it is enabled by default starting with Solidity 0.8.0. Therefore, there is no need to write.
[abi-coder-pragma](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.17/layout-of-source-files.html#abi-coder... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Fee Sanity Checks
### Description
## Fee Validation in Fund Instructions
It was found that in the `create_fund` and `fund_edit` instructions, the program does not validate `host_fee` and `manager_fee`. As seen in the code snippet below, these values can be set arbitrarily by the fund manager.
## Remediation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Invalid EIP-712 Domain Typehash
### Description
_Resolved_
The `_DOMAIN_TYPEHASH` is computed from a malformed type string missing a closing parenthesis:
`"EIP712Domain(string name"`
This produces an incorrect typehash.
The **correct** typehash for `"EIP712Domain(string name)"` is:
`0xb2178a58fb1eefb359ecfdd5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Incongruities in Role Management Checks
### Description
## Role Assignment Inconsistencies
There are several inconsistencies with the role assignment in the system. In `registry_service` for `register_investor` (shown below) and `add_wallet`, access is restricted to only specific roles, limiting it to issuers... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unbond Cancel Risk Hedging
### Description
## Unbonding Attack Vulnerability
The use of `unbond_stake` along with `cancel_unbond` enables an attacker to hedge risk if the conversion rate between shares and tokens is volatile, potentially leading to a loss of funds for other users. As seen below, `cancel_unbo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Uninitialized Upgradeable contract
### Description
*Similar issue in the past: [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-prepo-findings/issues/106)*
Upgradeable dependencies should be initialized.
While not causing any harm at the moment, suppose OZ someday decide to upgrade this contract and the sponsor u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Leftover Test Code
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In the contract EmberVault.sol at line 276 has leftover test code that is commented out. All testing code should be removed before being pushed to the production environment.
**Recommendation**:
It i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Using `private` rather than `public`, saves gas
### Description
Public storage variables increase the contract's size due to the implicit generation of public getter functions. This makes the contract larger and could increase deployment and interaction costs. If you do not require other contracts to read thes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Tokens can be stolen when depositToken == rewardToken
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
The `Streaming` contract allows the `deposit` and `reward` tokens to be the same token.
> I believe this is intended, think Sushi reward on Sushi as is the case with `xSushi`.
The reward and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Missing a `maxwithdraw` check in the withdraw function of ERC-4626
### Description
In the [EIP-4626](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4626#maxwithdraw) specification it reads:
> Maximum amount of the underlying asset that can be withdrawn from the owner balance in the Vault, through a withdraw call.
However... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Understood. We will remove this function to be used for only migration.
**File(s) affected:**`LendingMarketController.sol`
**Description:** In addition to the ro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unchecked return value of transferFrom can allow a user to withdraw native token for free
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-nested/blob/b4a153c943d54755711a2f7b80cbbf3a5bb49d76/contracts/governance/OwnerProxy.sol#L20
The Withdrawer contract has a function withdraw() which calls an unsafe t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Uninitialized RocketJoeStaking.lastRewardTimestamp can inflate rJoe supply
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
The `RocketJoeStaking.lastRewardTimestamp` is initialized to zero. Usually, this does not matter as `updatePool` is called before the first deposit and when `joeSupply = ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `confirmBaseInterestAllocator()` change `BaseInterestAllocator` may pay large `getReallocationBonus`
### Description
`owner` can submit `getPendingBaseInterestAllocator` first, and then anyone can enable it by `confirmBaseInterestAllocator()`.
The current logic is:
1. Take all the balance of the old `Bas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Calldata restriction on Wormhole payload should not be modified
### Description
Based on an end-to-end fork test written between Arbitrum and Avalanche C-Chain (15M block gas limit), a gas usage of ~2.5M units has been observed using the maximum allowed payload length of `type(uint16).max`. It is important tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: The new master minter does not possess minter privileges
### Description
A master minter is inherently designated as a minter; without minter status, the ability to mint or burn is not feasible.
However, the implementation of `update_master_minter` is inadequate as it neglects to designate the new master mint... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Amounts should be checked for `0` before calling a transfer
### Description
Checking non-zero transfer values can avoid an expensive external call and save gas.
While this is done at some places, it's not consistently done in the solution.
I suggest adding a non-zero-value check here:
https://github.com/code-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Missing Enforcement of Precision Increase on `pointsPerBlock` Could Cause Nullified Rewards
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. A lower bound of `1e18` has been added for the `pointsPerBlock` variable as recommended. Addressed in: `f0b82fd83a5d85eb8dc7ba2bbce2d49fefb326a4`.
**File(s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | dos | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-hats-judging/issues/2
## Found by
roguereddwarf
## Summary
The [`Hats.uri`](https://github.com/Hats-Protocol/hats-protocol/blob/fafcfdf046c0369c1f9e077eacd94a328f9d7af0/src/Hats.sol#L1221-L1223) function returns a JSON representation of a hat's properties.
The issu... | Sherlock | 5 | Hats |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: `GlobalVariables::oftOrCollateralReceiveFromOtherChains()` calculates the fee as if it was the same in both chains, which is false
### Description
`GlobalVariables::oftOrCollateralReceiveFromOtherChains()` send a message to the other chain requesting token/eth transfers to the current chain. In the process,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: First pool borrower pays extra interest
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-09-ajna-judging/issues/26
## Found by
0xkaden
There exists an exception in the interest logic in which the action of borrowing from a pool for the first time (or otherwise when there is 0 debt) does no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Compounding precision loss in _HYPEToEXLST increasingly delays withdrawals as protocol yields
### Description
## grow
**Severity:** Low Risk
**Context:** *(No context files were provided by the reviewer)*
**Description:** In `EXManager.availableWithdrawals()`, the calculation of available shares for immedia... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.