prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Attacker Can Break Buying Nfts From Market
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue in commit `bea3d4d3da201443ec3df744b204a1e6155ca8a2` by adding the initial WETH balance to the initial ETH balance before making the comparison.
**File(s) affected:**`ParticleExchange.sol`
**Description:** The `_e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `_l2Destination` in the `migrate` Function
### Description
A potential refinement opportunity has been found in the `migrate` function of the `LGEStaking` contract. Current function parameters do not include a check to prevent certain addresses (`ozUSD` and `wozUSD` on L2) from being used as the Layer 2 (`_l2D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Ambiguous owner terminology creates confusion in access control of SecuritizeVault
### Description
**Description:** SecuritizeVault implements two different ownership concepts that create confusion in access control. It uses a custom `OWNER_ROLE` for vault operations (deposit/redeem) while inheriting `Ownab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: MarginTradingHook users could potentially be DOSed
### Description
The `refundNative` modifier unwraps and sends a native coin to the `msg.sender` at the end of the function execution. However, it could send native even if the case function call was not related to native coin trading - for example, if wrapp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: DOS attack on the Nomad Home.sol Contract
### Description
## Severity: High Risk
**Context:** Home.sol#L332, Queue.sol#L119-L130
**Description:**
Upon calling `xcall()`, a message is dispatched via Nomad. A hash of this message is inserted into the merkle tree and the new root will be added at the end of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Solidity Optimizor
### Description
Solidity Gas Optimizor not set in configuration or documentation or policy
### Impact
This can result in using optimizer settings that are no best for reducing gas costs for the users.
The more the runs e.g 10,000 the cheaper the gas costs for functions for users. The small... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing NatSpec comments
### Description
Some of the functions have missing or incomplete [Ethereum Natural Specification Format](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/natspec-format.html) (NatSpec) comments.
* [the `publishPendingConfig` function](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/1631ef7ad29... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Splitting `require()` statements that use `&&` saves gas
### Description
See [this issue](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-xdefi-findings/issues/128) which describes the fact that there is a larger deployment gas cost, but with enough runtime calls, the change ends up being cheaper
*There are 15 instance... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `miladyAuthority` Should Be a Multi Sig
### Description
**Update**
The client provided the following explanation for their fix
> The recommendation to make the `miladyAuthority` address a multisig is infeasible, for the following reason:
>
>
> The `miladyAuthority` address will be a server that responds to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing validation for balance tracker in _requestBatch
### Description
The function `_requestBatch` in `MechMarketplace.sol` retrieves the balance tracker contract from `mapPaymentTypeBalanceTrackers[paymentType]`. However, there is no validation ensuring that a valid contract address is assigned before usage... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Slashing Mechanism May Allow Some Users to Overclaim Rewards and Cause DoS for Other Users
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `eea500eec3bb75595d5e49a5ba35779bc76494b3`and `ef2536b6394f33ea43f339d197bf405ac224fdbd`. The client provided the following explanation:
> By cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Don't Initialize Variables with Default Value
### Description
Uninitialized variables are assigned with the types default value. Explicitly initializing a variable with it's default value costs unnecesary gas. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Insecure AES Encryption Mode
### Description
During encryption and decryption routines performed when creating new wallets, AES in CBC mode is used, which is known to present several weaknesses.
**Padding Oracle Attacks (on CBC):**
* CBC mode requires padding to make the last block of plaintext the same s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Consider a two-step ownership transfer
### Description
**Description:** In the `SolidtlyV2-memecore` contracts the owner is set as `msg.sender` in `SolidlyV2Factory` when deployed.
It can also be changed using `SolidlyV2Factory::setOwner`:
Here there's a risk that the owner is lost if the new address not co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: All repo 's ownership can be removed if Github/Gitlab goes down for 5 seconds
### Description
The Drips protocol uses an asynchronous Gelato task to update repository ownership. Users will call the `RepoDriver` contract to emit an `OwnerUpdateRequested` event. Based on this task, the Gelato task will trigger, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [08] `release()` is vulnerable to racing conditions against permissionless `lockAndBurn()`, users might lose released refunds
### Description
*Note: The sponsor team decided to mitigate this QA finding that was outside of the winning QA report. This downgraded issue from the same warden has been included in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | false | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/588c84b7bb354d20cbca6034544c4faa46e6a80e/contracts/Trading.sol#L857-L868
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Trade delay will not work correctly on Arbitrum allowing users to exploit multiple valid prices
## Proof of Concept
function _checkDe... | Code4rena | 5 | Tigris Trade |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Upgradable escrow contract
### Description
_Submitted by gzeon_
Upgradable escrow contract poses great risk to user who approved their NFT to the contract. Most popular token / NFT exchange do not require user to approve their asset to admin upgradable contract.
This also increases user gas usage because ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Need to make sure the tokens are unique for ImmutableTokens
### Description
The current implementation does not enforce uniqueness in the `_tokens` of `ImmutableTokens`.
Assuming `_tokens[0]=_tokens[1]`.
An honest liquidity provider calls `addLiquidity([1 ether,1 ether], 200 ether, address)`, resulting in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: PREDICTABLE SALT (COLISSION ATTACK RISK)
### Description
The codebase used in different code points a predictable salt value (`const salt = "this is salt"`), which could lead to a collision attack risk.
A predictable salt could allow an attacker to precompute address collisions if they can anticipate the p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked NFT ownership in ticket casting
### Description
## getLotTicket Instruction Overview
The `getLotTicket` instruction allows the owner of an NFT to obtain raffle tickets. However, it does not verify that the NFT is actually owned by the invoker. This allows an attacker to obtain raffle tickets by s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `renounceOwner` can be called by anyone
### Description
The issue is identified within the function [`renounceOwner`](https://github.com/diadata-org/prestaking-contracts/blob/6ee4beee6cbcdb3b7e7ea1feb9a8b1192bc8c8ba/prestaking/src/roles/PreStakingRoles.sol#L35) of contract `PrestakingRoles`. It is possible to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary usage of approve
### Description
In commands `Commands.CURVE_REMOVE_LIQUIDITY` and `Commands.CURVE_REMOVE_LIQUIDITY_ONE_COIN` in Dispatcher code calls `_ensureApproved(lpToken, pool, lps)` which isn't necessary. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: [3]
### Description
In functions `unsafeOverrideBlock()` and `setNewBlock()` of SystemContext, code should check that timestamp is less than `BLOCK_INFO_BLOCK_NUMBER_PART`, otherwise it can overflow and change the block number when combining them to calculate block info.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Add Explicit Assertions to Improve Error Messages
### Description
Several functions in `ditto_staking` already contain explicit assertions to check that the protocol has been initialized:
Consider adding this assertion to the following functions in `ditto_staking` which also require the protocol to be initia... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Not using the named return variables when a function returns, wastes deployment gas
### Description
- [Exchange.sol#L540](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-non-fungible/blob/main/contracts/Exchange.sol#L540) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Cyclomatic complexity
### Description
Detects functions with high (> 11) cyclomatic complexity.
There are 1 instances of this issue: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Assessment of `wns::buy_spl` and `amm::pool` Issues
1. In `wns::buy_spl`, `list_ta` should ideally be an associated token account (ATA) instead of an arbitrary token account. ATAs are linked directly to the owner and mint. This guarantees that the `list_ta` belongs to the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of validation
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are places where a proper input/output validation is lacking. In particular:
* The [`inverse`](https://github.com/bancorprotocol/contracts-v3/blob/b2224595afab14827ee065cb65a1444d61689fb3/contracts/utility/FractionLibrary.sol#L52-L73) and [... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Fault game factory can be manipulated to DOS game type using malicious `l2BlockNumber`
### Description
All new games are proven against the most recent L2 block number in the `ANCHOR_STATE_REGISTRY`. This includes requiring that the block number we are intending to prove is greater than the latest proven bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Fee overcharging arising from precision issues
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: Pair.sol#L178
Description: The calculation of fees can result in overcharging for swaps involving high-value tokens with
low decimal precision (such as WBTC and GUSD).
Proof of Concept:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `Bridge` is unable to transfer ownership and upgrade on `ERC721Bridgeable`
### Description
The admin function is missing in the contract `Bridge` to transfer ownership on `ERC721Bridgeable` or change the implementation address on `ERC721Bridgeable` proxy.
### Impact
* Bridge which is the owner of `ERC721Brid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple accesses of a mapping/array should use a local variable cache
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ access of a value inside a mapping/array, within a function. Caching a mapping's value in a local `storage` or `calldata` variable when the value is accessed [multiple times](https://... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: executeCall will always revert when sending native tokens
### Description
`executeCall` and `executeMultiCall` are both payable functions that accept a `Call` struct as an argument. These functions use OpenZeppelin's `Address.functionCallWithValue` function to make an arbitrary call to the target address, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Liquidations may fail if bundle unwrapping reverts
### Description
It's possible for liquidations to fail if unwrapping reverts from the following causes:
1. **Gas Limit Exceeded**: Gas incurred exceeds block gas limit. Wrapping can be performed without interacting with the protocol, but there's additional ga... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Staker contract missing in `LT` contract post-creation
### Description
_Resolved_
In the Factory contract, the `add_market` function creates a staker contract for the market if `staker_impl` is provided. However, the code doesn't set this newly created staker in the corresponding LT contract.
Therefore, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unclear Specifications of Fee Accounting and Associated Invariants
### Description
**Update**
Native team has modified the code to clarify the flow of fee accumulation to both LP token holders and the protocol itself (included in the fix for issue [NATv2-2](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/full/native-v-2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of implementation to remove the whitelisted address
### Description
**Description:**
In Shop.sol ,mapping mapping(uint256 => mapping(address => bool)) storeIdToUserInWhitelist;is used to store the whitelisted address for each store id. The whitelisting process is done by onlyStoreManagers with help o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Non compliance with Curve implementation
### Description
##### Description
### Context
The `stable-amm` is an implementation of Curve's stable swap, and the `Halborn` team verified the proper implementation by inspecting the differences with the `SwapTemplateBase.vy` contract from the [b0bbf77](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Use `safeMint()` Instead of `mint()`
### Description
Using `ERC721::_mint()` can mint ERC721 tokens to addresses which do not support ERC721 tokens, while `ERC721::_safeMint()` ensures that ERC721 tokens are only minted to addresses which support them.
Both `publicMint()` and `preMint()` methods in `TokTokNft... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: [14] Protocol hashes do not use `EIP712`
### Description
### Issue Description
Signatures that validators provide in order to validate the messages are not compliant with the `EIP712`, as a result they will be unreadable by wallets as `Metamask` and can pose some difficulties for the signers.
The most crucia... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Emit missing event information
### Description
**Description:** Emit missing event information:
* `YieldDistributed` should have the `timestamp` parameter in addition to the amount
**Syntetika:**
Fixed in commit [f4305a6](https://github.com/SyntetikaLabs/monorepo/commit/f4305a630d731455477a9979a9bb9bbdba541f0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing a cap for GameFactory fee
### Description
The function `setGameCreationFee()` allows the owner to set a new `gameCreationFee` percentage for a given instance. However, there is no upper limit or cap defined for the `_gameCreationFee` parameter:
This could potentially allow for an excessively high fee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Create setters for external call parameters interaction
### Description
The `TruglyMemeception.sol` contract relies on third-party contracts to operate as expected. The `UNCX_LiquidityLocker_UniV3.sol` contract is used to store the LP position from the first deposit on the Uniswap V3 pool.
To utilize this fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `MembershipERC1155` should use OpenZeppelin upgradeable base contracts
### Description
`MembershipERC1155` is an implementation contract intended for use with `TransparentUpgradeableProxy`, controlled via an instance of `ProxyAdmin`; however, it does not utilize the OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts which are... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Get `targetIndex` from mapping instead of iterating
### Description
Gas savings: a few thousands (see below)
The following code is used at the [BasketLib](https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/c4ec2473bbcb4831d62af55d275368e73e16b984/contracts/p1/mixins/BasketLib.sol#L196-L198) to find the index o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Outdated interest rate
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In Contract PToken.sol, the methods `borrowRatePerBlock(...)` and `supplyRatePerBlock(...)` uses interestRateModel contract’s getBorrowRate() and getSupplyRate().
Further, getBorrowRate() and getSupplyR... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Remove unused code
### Description
**Description:**
**Wormhole:**
Fixed in commit 6208dd1.
**Cyfrin:** Verified.
\clearpage | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Cumulative Value Used To Update Perp LpState
### Description
## PerpEngineState Contract Update
In the `PerpEngineState` contract, the `updateStates` function updates the base balance of `lpState` (pool) by using the `updateBalance` function. For this, it requires a `lastCumulativeFundingX18` so ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Prefer two-step pattern for role transfers
### Description
The `Upgradeable1155` contract inherits from `OwnableUpgradeable` which uses a single-step pattern for ownership transfer. It is a best practice to use two-step ownership transfer pattern, meaning ownership transfer gets to a "pending" state and the ne... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: 2] Lack of Slippage Protection During Graduation in BondingCurvePool
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** contracts/BondingCurvePool.sol#L253-L260
**Description:** When the `BondingCurvePool` has sold all its tokens, it calls `graduateToken` and sends all collected Ether to the Zealous Swap Rou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `ExponentiationImpl::pow()` returns `0` for `0^0`
### Description
The [`ExponentiationImpl::pow()`](https://github.com/kkrt-labs/kakarot-ssj/blob/d4a7873d6f071813165ca7c7adb2f029287d14ca/crates/utils/src/math.cairo#L39) function in `math.cairo` incorrectly returns `0` when computing `0^0`, instead of the ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Missing await in asynchronous validation functions
### Description
The `runTask` and `sendTask` functions use the `verifyIntent` method to validate the integrity of user-provided data (`signableUserTasks`, `ethereumAddress`, and `tasksSignature`). However, the `verifyIntent` function returns a Promise, and th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: setIncentiveSettings would be halt during a rebalance operation that gets stuck due to supply cap is reached at Aave
### Description
setIncentiveSettings would be halt during a rebalance operation that gets stuck due to supply cap is reached at Aave
### Impact
setIncentiveSettings would be halt.
### Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: curatePool emits Curated event no matter what
### Description
## Handle
paulius.eth
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
function curatePool emits Curated event every time. It should emit this event only when the conditions are fulfilled.
## Recommended Mitigation Steps
Put this event inside the most inner ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Unused imported interface `IVisorService`
### Description
_Submitted by shw_
The imported interface `IVisorService` in the contract `Visor` is not used.
Recommend considering removing this import.
**[xyz-ctrl (Visor) acknowledged](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-05-visorfinance-findings/issues/71#issueco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Wrong accounting for totalBorrowed in the InfinityPool.writeOff function ✓ Fixed
### Description
Here is a part of the `InfinityPool.writeOff` function:
**code/src/Pool/InfinityPool.sol:L271-L287**
```
// transfer the assets into the pool
// whatever we couldn't pay back
uint256 lostAmt = principalOwed > ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect DaoStorage Event Type
### Description
## DAO Storage Withdraw Event Correction
The function `dao_storage::withdraw` emits an incorrect event type, `CoinDepositedEvent`, when the withdraw functionality is completed.
## Remediation
Change the event handle to `coin_withdrawn_handle` and the event typ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect calculation of keeper reward
### Description
The keeper reward is calculated as
```
(keeperGas * tipPercent / 100) / 1e18
```
The division by `1e18` is incorrect and undervalues the reward for the keeper. The tip part of the keeper reward is essentially ignored. The likely cause of this miscalc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: [04] Unbounded loop
### Description
There are multiple instances of loops executing external calls where the number of iterations is unbounded and controlled by the number of derivatives. This is not an issue on the current setup, since there are only three derivatives.
However, if a large amount of derivati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Trade Count Updates in `reversed_swap` Function for Buy Orders
### Description
**Description:** The `reversed_swap` function used for `buy` orders in `swap` operations fails to properly track and return `trade` counts, leading to incorrect trade statistics being written to the state. This inconsiste... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: The uniTransferFrom function can potentially be used with invalid params ✓ Fix Unverified
### Description
The system is using the `UniERC20` contract to incapsulate transfers of both ERC-20 tokens and ETH. This contract has `uniTransferFrom` function that can be used for any ERC-20 or ETH:
**code/contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: User can divide big deposit/withdraw into small parts to reduce tax
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** High
**Description**
Tax to pay depends on how much deposit/withdraw makes current asset concentration deviate from the target value, therefore big amounts will pay bigger ta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Frozen Vesting Possible
### Description
## Periodic Vesting Concerns
With very large `num_periods` or `period_duration` in periodic vesting, it is possible to specify a schedule that never vests, resulting in tokens being non-withdrawable.
## Code Snippet
## Remediation
It may also be good practice to lim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Not clear TODO-comment
### Description
It's not clear what is that `TODO` about
https://github.com/nucypher/nucypher/blob/main/nucypher/blockchain/eth/sol/source/contracts/staking_contracts/PoolingStakingContractV2.sol#L226
### Recommendation
Add more details into commentary | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Accidental Token Burn Risks in New Transfer-to-Token Contract Mechanism
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> This design was intentional. On our side, we will make sure that this is properly explained to the holders of the token, and in the use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Reentrancy allows manipulation of voting power
### Description
The owner of the `CHNStaking` contract is the `CHNTimelock` contract, that means if a proposal passes all kind of tokens can be added via the `add()` function. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: `Kelp:_finalizeCooldown` cannot claim the withdrawal if adversary would requestWithdrawals with dust amount for the holder
### Description
If an adversary calls `LidoWithdraw.requestWithdrawals` with some dust stETH amount and the `KelpCooldownHolder`'s address, the withdrawal will be locked. It cannot be res... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: rmational - Extreme misconfiguration could cause loss of tokens or early unlocks
### Description
## Code Explanation
The following code snippet demonstrates how to set the `lockEnd` variable in a smart contract:
## Logic Analysis
The logic behind this line is as follows:
- The expression `uint32(block.time... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Trading disabled in the first block after enabling when IPO is disabled
### Description
_Resolved_
When `IPO_FEE_DURATION` is set to `0` (IPO disabled) and trading is enabled for a player, the contract temporarily blocks all buy transactions in the same block.
If IPO is disabled, the `IPO_FEE_DURATION` is se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Add proposeRemoveWL to NftEth Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
### Description
## NftEth Contract Whitelisting Details
The NftEth contract uses `proposeAdditionWL` to whitelist lender contracts, which have access to mint NftEth tokens.
## Code Snippet
## Recommendations
It is recommended to h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions not called by the contract should be removed to save deployment gas
### Description
If the functions are required by an interface, the contract should inherit from that interface and use the `override` keyword
*There are 2 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unused Imports, Errors and Events
### Description
Throughout the code in scope, there are several instances where the imports, errors, and events are declared but never used.
In `PriceFeedManagerEvents.sol` :
* `event PriceProviderRemoved(address indexed token);`
In `RemoteRegistryEvent.sol`:
* `event Remo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | true | ## High: Users can exploit TVL during EVM to L1 transfer causing share inflation
### Description
**Users can exploit TVL calculation during EVM to L1 transfer, leading to share inflation**
The `HyperliquidEscrow` contract is responsible for holding assets and calculating the total value locked (TVL) for a vault that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Chain halt as VerifyVoteExtensionHandler is not guaranteed to run
### Description
Late/slow precommit votes, after +2/3 votes do not trigger VerifyVoteExtensionHandler. `ProcessProposalHandler` expects all vote extensions to be valid. Single malicious/misbehaving validator can inject invalid vote extension to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing Documented Access Control for `batchRelease()` Function
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `1fe891a`.
**File(s) affected:**`CampTimelockEscrowNativeOFT.sol`
**Description:** The README document suggests that the contract allows the batched release of matured dep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Reorder Require Statements
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledge
**Description**:
The require statement on line 188 and the require statement on line 194 should be interchanged so as the simpler require statement is ran first so the contract fails with less gas as possible so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: Using `bool`s for storage incurs overhead
### Description
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/58f635312aa21f947cae5f8578638a85aa2519f5/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol#L23-L27
Use `uint256(1)` and `uint256(2)` for true/false to avoid a Gwarmaccess (**[100 gas](https://gist.github.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Reentrancy | false | true |
[Market.sol#L464](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/cc281e5800d5860c816138980f08b84225e430fe/src/Market.sol#L464)<br>
Markets can be deployed with arbitrary tokens for the collateral, including ERC777 tokens (that are downwards-compatible with ERC20). However, when the system is used with those token... | Code4rena | 5 | Inverse Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use descriptive names for Contracts and Libraries
### Description
This codebase will be difficult to navigate, as there are no descriptive naming conventions that specify which files should contain meaningful logic.
Prefixes should be added like this by filing:
- Interface I\_
- absctract contracts Abs\_
- L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users can lose funds because of incorrect SY token configurations in the YTMinter contract
### Description
The YTMinter contract owner can update the storage values of the `sy_minter_address` and `sy_wallet_address` variables using two different operations. Not keeping these variables in sync can result in u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Anyone can set the `marketmaker` address
### Description
This issue has been identified within the [changeMarketMakerAddress](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/70b15ec4d9e7578248141604503843716a67d875/src/HanjiLOB.sol#L313) function of the `HanjiLOB` contract.
The function allows the ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: ShareToken contract details
### Description
The [`decimals`, `name` and `symbol` variables](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-protocol-v2/blob/4b198083ec4ae2d6851e101fc44ea333eaa3cd92/contracts/token/ShareToken.sol#L8-L10) of the `ShareToken` contract are explicitly defined. While OpenZeppelin Contracts are alrea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Move mode check to PosManager.
### Description
To decrease size of InitCore contract, you can [move 0 mode check](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-init-capital-invitational/blob/main/contracts/core/InitCore.sol#L163) to the PosManager. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Anyone Can Pause the `ReserveFund` Liquidation Coverage
### Description
**Update**
Functions `pause()` and `unpause()` are now protected by `onlyOperator`. Addressed in `af435086b82299f4f630e8554b875fdd3d19d3c9`.
**File(s) affected:**`ReserveFund.sol`
**Description:**`ReserveFund` contract implements a paus... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: PAIR KEY CAN CONTAIN DUPLICATED ASSETS
### Description
The `update_pair_config` function in the **swap-extension/swap\_sparrow** contract does not verify that `asset_infos` contains different assets, which could allow that the owner mistakenly registers an invalid pair of assets in the contract.
Code Location... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `executeBatch()` Can Be Used to Bypass Other Selector's Validation Hook Execution
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We will commit to clearly describing the implications of global validations and modules allowed to validate `exe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | dos | true | true | ## Severity
**Impact:** High, this bypass the designed deregister flow and doesn't delete worker from active workers list.
**Likelihood:** Medium, as long as not currently active, worker can directly withdraw without deregister as a worker.
## Description
The designed flow and expected worker's behavior for withdra... | Pashov Audit Group | 5 | Subsquid |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: DoS: Attacker may significantly increase the cost of `withdrawExcessRewards()` by creating a significant number of excess receipts
### Description
_Submitted by AuditsAreUS, also found by 0x52, 0xf15ers, and pedroais_
An attacker may cause a DoS attack on `withdrawExcessRewards()` by creating a excessive n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use delete to clear variables instead of zero assignment
### Description
You can use the delete keyword instead of setting the variable as zero. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Division before multiplication result in loss of token reward if the reward update time elapse is small
### Description
Division before multiplication result in loss of token reward
### Impact
Division before multiplication result in loss of token reward if the reward update time elapse is small
### Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | true | ## Low: Withdraw can return zero tokens while burning a positive amount of shares
### Description
Invariant fuzzing found an edge-case where a user could burn an amount of shares > 0 but receive zero output tokens. The cause appears to be a rounding down to zero precision loss for small `_shares` value in `BeefyVaultC... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Storage variables are read multiple times in the functions.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
Raferee.sol L111-112: rewardPerSecond variable
Raferee.sol L241-264: batchReward variable
Raferee.sol L231, L259: rewardPerSecond variable
Raferee.sol L272, 27... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The @param NatSpec comment for _key inAssetLogic._swapAsset is incorrect
### Description
The `@param` NatSpec for `_key` indicates that this parameter is a canonical token id where instead it should mention that it is a hash of a canonical id and its corresponding domain. We need to make sure the correct value... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `SablierFlowBase` Lacks `EIP-165` Compliance for `EIP4906` Interface Support
### Description
The `SablierFlowBase` contract does not adhere to the `EIP4906` standard, as it fails to implement the required `supportsInterface(bytes4)` function to confirm compatibility with the `IERC4906` interface. This omission... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Misspelled Word
### Description
## Merchant BTC Address Correction
The `set_merchant_btc_address` function contains a minor spelling error. The variable `new_merchant_btc_addresss` contains an extra 's' at the end, which is likely unintentional and should be corrected.
## File Reference
`src/instructions/se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Adversary manipulate the middle path when calling `execute_dca_order`, resulting user loss, benefiting the attacker
### Description
Adversary manipulate the middle path when calling `execute_dca_order`, resulting user loss, benefiting the attacker
### Impact
User will get a bad rate (far from the normal rate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Users cannot claim rewards from `RevenueHandler` if they update a veALCX lock time to max lock.
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/In... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Interaction with uniswap quoter during deposits
### Description
AegisVaultCore.sol interacts with uniswap quoter contract. It is used during deposits to calculate how much a user would get if they swapped on the targetVault.
However, Uniswap Quoter can be gas-intensive and is not designed to be used onchain,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing limit on repeated withdraw requests
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The functions makeWithdrawRequest and cancelWithdrawRequest allow an address with allowance to execute withdrawal-related actions. This check only ensures the spender has allowance ≥ shares, but it does not consume allowance or limit t... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.