prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Custom Errors
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
Throughout the codebase, `require` statements are used instead of custom errors. Custom errors are available from solidity version ^0.8.4. Custom errors can roughly save 50 gas per call. This gas is saved beca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Secondary Big Bang market rates can be manipulated due to not triggering penrose.reAccrueBigBangMarkets(); when leveraging
### Description
Secondary market rates can still be manipulated via leverage executors because `penrose.reAccrueBigBangMarkets()` is never called in the leverage module.
### Impact
Med... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Receiver using proxy cannot cancel individual stream
### Description
When a stream is canceled using the proxy target, the `cancel()` function attempts to forward the refund back to the proxy owner with the following logic:
```solidity
function cancel(ISablierV2Lockup lockup, uint256 streamId) public onlyDele... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Node runners can lose all their stake rewards due to how the DAO commissions can be set to a 100%
### Description
Node runners can have all their stake rewards taken by the DAO as commissions can be set to a 100%.
### Proof of Concept
There is no limits on `_updateDAORevenueCommission()` except not exceed... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision loss in `updateExchangeRatio()`
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The `updateExchangeRatio()` function performs sequential mathematical operations that introduce cumulative precision loss, potentially causing the `yearlyRateInBps16` value to be smaller than it should be. The function calculates percent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Onboarding Assets May Prevent the Addition of Token Handlers
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> This is known and expected functionality. Configuring assets with custom TokenHandlers requires collaboration with the community and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Red-Black Tree Optimization
### Description
Please provide the text you would like to convert to formatted markdown, and I'll assist you with that! | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Multi-token stableswap pools allow `0` liquidity for tokens, creating bricked pools
### Description
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/liquidity/commands.rs# L46-L74](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/pool-manager/src/liquidity/commands.rs# L46-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused file
### Description
The file is never imported by any other source file. If the file is needed for tests, it should be moved to a test directory
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-popcorn/blob/d95fc31449c260901811196d617366d6352258cd/src/interfaces/IEIP165.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Selectors for `Bera_Module::bera_kodiakv2_swap` and `bera_kodiakv3_swap` needs to be separately added
### Description
In `Strategy::constructor` almost all existing facet selectors are added to the `s.selectors` mapping, which is then used by the fallback function to direct the call to the correct facet.
Almo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Check For Zero Amount Minting
### Description
## VariableSupplyERC20Token Minting Issue
The `mint` function in `VariableSupplyERC20Token` allows minting of zero amounts. This behavior may be misleading and could lead to invalid minting of tokens, which is generally unfavorable.
## Remediation
Ensure that th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: swap and addpremium are susceptible to bad partial trading
### Description
`amountOutMinimum` is used to specify the minimum amount of tokens the caller wants to be returned from a swap. Using `amountOutMinimum = 0` tells the swap that the caller will accept a minimum amount of 0 output tokens from the swap, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `RewardsPool.sol` : It is safe to have the `startRewardsCycle` with `WhenNotPaused` modifier
### Description
When the contract is paused , allowing startRewardsCycle would inflate the token value which might not be safe.
Rewards should not be claimed by anyone when all other operations are paused.
I saw t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistently checking initialization
### Description
When a contract is initialized, its [`isInitialized` state variable is set to `true`](https://github.com/AudiusProject/audius-protocol/blob/6f3b31562b9d4c43cef91af0a011986a2580fba2/eth-contracts/contracts/InitializableV2.sol#L19). Since interacting with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Inclusion Of Improved Edge Case Testing
### Description
## Currently
In the code base, there is a lack of tests for catching any possible edge cases. While the functions may work correctly under typical scenarios, edge cases and unexpected inputs may result in bugs or unanticipated outcomes, such as division... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Standard ERC-20 Token Metadata Can Be Set Arbitrarily
### Description
When an ERC-20 is first deposited on L2 through the standard ERC-20 gateway contract, the [contract fetches](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/L1/gateways/L1StandardERC20Gatewa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | false | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
LibOwnable.sol#L8-L10
## Description
While other contracts like RiverAddress (for example) do not allow `address(0)` to be used as a set input parameter, there is no similar check inside `LibOwnable._setAdmin`. Because of this, contracts that call `LibOwnable._setAdmin` with `addre... | Spearbit | 5 | Liquid Collective |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Stepped Vesting “Dead Period” When `periodDuration > duration`
### Description
If `periodDuration` is longer than the whole linear window (`closingTime - openingTime`), `totalPeriods` becomes `0`. During the entire open window, `linearVested` stays `0` and then jumps to the full linear amount at/after `closing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | signature | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/21
## Found by
koxuan
## Summary
modifier `onlyEOAEx` is used to ensure calls are only made from EOA. However, EIP 3074 suggests that using `onlyEOAEx` modifier to ensure calls are only from EOA might not hold true.
## Vulnerability Detail
... | Sherlock | 4 | Blueberry |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity version
### Description
The contract requires version 0.4.11 of Solidity. It should be noted that 0.4.13 was released a few days ago. Consider changing the solidity version pragma to the latest version (`pragma solidity ^0.4.13;`) to enforce latest compiler version to be used.
**UPDATE:** *For exter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Unstake requests might remain unfulfilled for users
### Description
The current `SubstrateSignatureValidator.sol` only records the instantaneous Attestor set. If a user's sxtFulfillUnstake fails at a particular moment(for example, pool has sufficient balance), and the Attestor set changes afterward, the user m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Minimum borrow amount can be surpassed and borrower can be treated as being overdue earlier than their actual overdue time
### Description
It is possible to borrow less than `_minBorrow` and preliminary be marked as overdue when `assetManager` have temporary fund access limitations.
### Impact
`_minBorrow`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: ERC777 tokens can bypass `depositCap` guard
### Description
_Submitted by shenwilly, also found by wuwe1_
[LiquidityPool.sol#L523](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-backd/blob/c856714a50437cb33240a5964b63687c9876275b/backd/contracts/pool/LiquidityPool.sol#L523)
When ERC777 token is used as the underly... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Confusing Function Name
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `8f89446`.
**Description:** The function `Reach.rescueETH20Tokens()` suggests it rescues `ETH` but it rescues `ERC20` tokens that are accidentally sent to the contract.
**Recommendation:** We recommend renaming ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Frontrunning `PublicLock.initialize()` can prevent upgrades due to insufficient access control
### Description
_Submitted by elprofesor, also found by kenzo_
The unlock protocols base contract `Unlock.sol` uses `setLocktemplate()` to initialize the implementation contract for the `PublicLock` proxy. This f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing Validation of Fallback APR Values in `AprPairFeed::latestRoundData`
### Description
**Description:** `AprPairFeed::latestRoundData` fetches APRs from a preferred source (feed or strategy provider). If the feed is stale, it falls back to the strategy provider via `provider.getAprPair()` but does not val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: `LienToken.transferFrom` There is a possibility of malicious attack
### Description
Corrupt multiple key properties of public vault, causing vault not to function properly.
### Proof of Concept
When LienToken.makePayment()/buyoutLien()/payDebtViaClearingHouse()
If it corresponds to PublicVault, it will ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating Pragma
### Description
Pragma directives should be fixed to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled. However, the `OUSD.sol` file has the [`solidity ^0.8.0`](https://github.com/OriginProtocol/origin-dollar/blob/44951300cd2bb7eb1d387461465edbfc440f2779/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: userWrapper() does not always need forward() data
### Description
At the end of the `userWrapper()` function, a call or delegatecall is made to the `userOp.dapp` address:
```solidity
if (config.needsDelegateUser()) {
(success, returnData) = userOp.dapp.delegatecall(forward(userOp.data));
require(success, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: The Protocol Can Be Drained Through Commitment Duplication
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `ce730843c3b97f7894ec503f6c1b1ff8cf698b30`, `95bb18d84159a16a6d34572bb8b0d75dacd23051`, `7a13bf4312082ccd57495bc3d92265876b9feac1`. The client provided the following explanation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Pending refinance commitments after clearing loan accounting
### Description
The `MapleLoan._clearLoanAccounting` function does not clear the `refinanceCommitment`. For open-term loans, the borrower can accept new terms and trigger a refinance with the old commitment even if the loan was closed because:
- All p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Discrepancies Between Interfaces and Implementation Contracts
### Description
Throughout the codebase, multiple discrepancies between interfaces and implementation contracts were identified:
* The [`INotifier`](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/interfac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: RESPONSE MANIPULATION
### Description
The current way the front end handles the user session was by directly requesting the backend the user profile without any authentication mechanism. So, it was possible to modify the request or the response to make the front end trust the input data and load the view of a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: A registered contract won't earn fees if `_recipient` is a fresh address
### Description
Users might become victims of a false positive: if they use a fresh account as an NFT recipient during contract registration, the transaction won't revert, but the registered contract will never earn fees for the token ho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Hardcoded Setting | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-frankendao-judging/issues/56
## Found by
curiousapple, hansfriese
## Summary
[Medium-1] Hardcoded monsterMultiplier in case of ``stakedTimeBonus`` disregards the updates done to ``monsterMultiplier`` through ``setMonsterMultiplier()``
## Vulnerability Detail
Frank... | Sherlock | 3 | FrankenDAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: It's possible to change for Vault and lost control on it
### Description
### Impact
`VaultFactory` allows admin to change `controller` for marketId(hedge and risk vaults) using `VaultFactory.changeController`. This method then set controller to both vaults. This address is important for `Vault` contract as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Sensitive material stored in files with loose permissions
### Description
The SEDA node client stores sensitive material using overly loose file or folder permissions of 755 or higher. This includes the VRF key file in figures 1.1 and 1.2, the validator state file in figure 1.3, and the validator configuration ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing check in `addRewardToken()` could cause excess rewards accrual
### Description
`RewardDistributor.addRewardToken()` is called by governance to add new reward tokens and parameters for the specified markets. This is used to determine the amount of reward tokens to be distributed to the markets.
However... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Redundant balance checks
### Description
Multiple contracts within the scope of this audit perform redundant balance checks immediately before transferring funds using `SafeERC20` methods.
These balance checks are unnecessary because the `SafeERC20` methods already include internal checks to ensure that the t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: No refund nor retry mechanism for failing cross-chain transactions
### Description
When performing cross-chain transactions, the transaction may always revert to the destination chain under certain circumstances or for certain values.
Users will deposit tokens or pay fees in the source chain that will be los... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | true | ## High: Prevent griefing attack on DebtManager.manualAllocation
### Description
The manual allocation will always be calculated based on a system state `s`. After the transaction gets minted, there could be a completely new state `s'`.
An attacker could try to frontrun the `manualAllocation` transaction to produce a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Users are penalized when operators are inactive
### Description
When operators are inactive and don't call `revealCard()` in a timely manner, users can still claim their win via `claimWin()`.
This triggers `transferPlayerRewards()` with the conditional that the player shouldn't receive reward tokens:
```s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Missing token id existence check
### Description
The [EIP-721 specification](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721#specification) states that "every ERC-721 compliant contract must implement the ERC721 interface (subject to caveats below)".
For the `getApproved()` function, it states that it "Throws if `_tok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of assert statement for input validation ✓ Addressed
### Description
Solidity assertion should only be used to assert invariants, i.e. statements that are expected to always hold if the code behaves correctly. Note that all available gas is consumed when an assert-style exception occurs.
### Recommendatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Attacker can deposit after the keeper reports a loss, but before the collateral auction to steal from other depositors
### Description
An attacker can exploit the timing between when a loss is reported and when the associated collateral is later auctioned and reported as profit. By depositing in between these... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient Sanity Checks of Liquidity Parameters
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**:
The addLiquidity() function relies on the manager to provide appropriate values for _tickLower, _tickUpper, and _liquidity. If the manager provides invalid or extreme val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Setting emode category params can potentially set emode ltv to a lower value than the pending ltv of a frozen asset
### Description
The function `setEModeCategory` in `PoolConfigurator` updates the EMode parameters for a specific EMode category. One requirement for these new parameters is that the EMode LTV (L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Migration::withdrawContribution falsely assumes that user should get exactly his original contribution back
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo, also found by 0x52, ElKu, hansfriese, hyh, and panprog_
### Vulnerability Details
When a user calls `withdrawContribution`, it will try to send him back his origi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: In contract Pool.sol at lines 769-775 in function globalEquilCovRatio variables equilCovRatio and invariant are shadowed, leading to redeclaration in the function body.
### Description
**Recommendation**: Either remove the named return types to avoid the shadowing and declare inside the function body or rename... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Methods `applyReferralOpen()` and `applyReferralClose()` can be combined into a single method
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract TradingStorage, the methods applyReferralOpen() and applyReferralClose() have the same logic with the only exception bein... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Overflow/Underflow | true | false | ## Security Analysis Report
## Severity
**Critical Risk**
## Context
**File:** SegmentedSegmentTree464.sol
**Line:** 173
## Description
`SegmentedSegmentTree464.update` needs to perform an overflow check in case the new value is greater than the old value. This overflow check is done when adding the new difference... | Spearbit | 5 | CLOBER |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Resource leak due to defer called in loop in getLatestFinalizedBlock
### Description
If this loop runs many iterations before returning, you'll end up stacking many defer calls, which will only be executed when the function exits. This can lead to a temporary increase in memory usage since the contexts created... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | true | ## Low: Forwarder can be set to frozen address
### Description
Forwarder can be set to frozen address; this is not ideal and can result in lost tokens in a worst-case scenario.
### Proof of Concept
```solidity
function test_freezeHolder_setPayoutForwardAddress_toFrozenForwarder() external {
address user1 ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `BaseTOFTLeverageModule.sol`: `leverageDownInternal` tries to burn tokens from wrong address
### Description
The function `sendForLeverage` is used to interact with the USDO token on a different chain. Lets assume the origin of the tx is chain A, and the destination is chain B. The BaseTOFT contract sends a m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: There are no checks/constraints against the _representation provided to setupAssetWithDeployedRepresentation
### Description
`setupAssetWithDeployedRepresentation` is similar to `setupAsset` in terms of functionality, except it does not deploy a representation token if necessary. It actually uses the `_represe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: SendToken Event Emitted Amount Can Be Wrong
### Description
The SendToken amount logged in its event can be incorrect in some circumstances. The SendToken action can accept `type(uint256).max` as a special amount input. When received, it will transfer the full balance of the Safe wallet for that token. This is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Refund unused gas fees to user
### Description
The functions `sendDeposits` and `sendMessages` are both payable and allow the user to overpay more than the required amount to complete the bridging action. Both functions interact with Layerzero's `send()` method.
Layerzero's `send()` method refunds any unu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Liquidity can still be supplied when the protocol is paused, even though mint is disabled
### Description
The `onERC721Received` function is used to allow a direct transfer of a UniswapV3 position NFT to `ParticlePositionManager`, using `ERC721.safeTransferFrom`. Alternatively, a user can call `ParticlePosi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Vesting Contract Can Be Overridden
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the contract EsEMBR.sol, the function addVester() can cause catastrophic failure of users' funds. If a contract is added with the same timeframe, then all of the users funds being calculated in the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: isUnderwater returns opposite boolean for short positions
### Description
_Submitted by harleythedog_
#### Impact
The function `isUnderwater` should return true if the position value is
Notice that for short positions the inequality is flipped from what it should be (indeed, when self.debt is higher it ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Market creation does not initialize funding rate
### Description
Markets are created by the administrator through the `CreateMarket` action. Once a market is created, trades are instantly enabled on this market. However, the newly created market has no funding rate. The funding index of a market without a fund... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Governance#replaceGovernance is unable to actually change vault governance
### Description
**Details**
[Governance.vy#L472-L477](https://github.com/DynamoFinance/vault/blob/c331ffefadec7406829fc9f2e7f4ee7631bef6b3/contracts/Governance.vy#L472-L477)
for guard_addr in self.LGov:
if self.VotesGCByVault[v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missing and Misleading Documentation
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are various instances of misleading documentation:
* The `burn` function of the [`IScrollERC20`](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/libraries/token/IScrollERC20.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Sense redeem is unavailable and funds are frozen for underlyings whose decimals are smaller than the corresponding IBT decimals
### Description
Sense version of Redeemer's redeem() compares `amount` of Sense principal token Lender had on its balance vs `redeemed` amount of underlying as a slippage check, requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN FILE NAME AND CONTRACT NAME
### Description
The file name and the contract name within the Solidity file are inconsistent. This can lead to confusion and potential errors when trying to interact with or deploy the contract. In Solidity, it is a best practice to keep the contract name and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Liquidation Logic will not work on all troves when the system is underwater
### Description
**Impact**
`batchLiquidateTroves` allows for out of order liquidations
In the edge case of all troves being underwater, meaning all troves should be liquidated, the following check will allow liquidations only startin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: A malicious proposer can create arbitrary number of maliciously updatable proposals to significantly grief the protocol
### Description
`checkNoActiveProp()` is documented as:
> "This is a spam protection mechanism to limit the number of proposals each noun can back."
However, this mitigation applies to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [5] `require()`/`revert()` strings longer than 32 bytes cost extra gas
### Description
Each extra chunk of byetes past the original 32 i[incurs an MSTORE](https://gist.github.com/hrkrshnn/ee8fabd532058307229d65dcd5836ddc#consider-having-short-revert-strings) which costs 3 gas
*There are 4 instances of this is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Withdrawal Calculation Causes Underflow, Locking All User Funds
### Description
The withdrawal function includes the user in their own delegation list and uses ceiling division for all calculations. This causes `totalDelegatedAmount` to exceed the requested withdrawal amount, resulting in an underflow when ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | false | false | ## Gas: Redundant Token Transfer
### Description
If the Swapper passes the recipient as `msg.sender` instead of `address(this)`, an additional token transfer can be avoided here.
### Recommendation
Save the extra token transfer as suggested. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | true | false | ## Low: Test enhancements
### Description
* `GMIntegrationTest_GM_ETH`: Both tests [`test_hitRateLimits_onUSDInGMFlow_Subscribe`](https://github.com/ondoprotocol/rwa-internal/blob/a74d03f4a71bd9cac09e8223377b47f7d64ca8d4/forge-tests/globalMarkets/GM_IntegrationTest.t.sol#L1209-L1210) and [`test_hitRateLimits_onUSDInGM... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: New liquidity providers are unfairly charged
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Low
**Likelihood:** High
**Description**
When a user provides liquidity to `LiquidityPool` the total liquidity is calculated as the sum of the pool token balance and the total borrows. The total borrows include the net... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: `DeliHookConstantProduct` swapping `exactOutput` and `_feeFromOutput` is incorrect
### Description
`DeliHookConstantProduct` intends to preserve K in all swaps in order to forward fees to the `FeeProcessor`, and is achieved for all swap types. However, this is performed with an incorrect calculation when do... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: UNUSED STORAGE POINTER IN MINERGAME.GOLDCHANGETOKEN FUNCTION
### Description
In the `MinerGame` contract the `goldChangeToken()` creates an storage pointer to the `player` mapping but then it does not make any use of it: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Functions not returning declared values
### Description
## Handle
pauliax
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
function withdrawAll in BaseStrategy declares 'returns (uint256 balance)', however, no actual value is returned. function reinvest in MyStrategy declares to return 'uint256 reinvested', however, it ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | true | ## High: Self-triggered `Licredity::_afterSwap` back-run enables LP fee farming
### Description
When price hits or goes below 1, [`Licredity::_afterSwap`](https://github.com/Licredity/licredity-v1-core/blob/e8ae10a7d9f27529e39ca277bf56cef01a807817/src/Licredity.sol#L734-L753) auto back-runs a swap to push price up:
``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Static signatures bound to caller revert under ERC-4337, causing DoS
### Description
### Finding description
Sequence wallets support ERC‑4337 by validating signatures inside [`validateUserOp()` in `ERC4337v07`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-10-sequence/blob/ccc328beeadd28fdbde53b034098c865104fcaf3/sr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: GoDfaNilDereference
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description:**
Some method calls could dereference nil pointers, leading to runtime errors.
**Files:**
rpc/backend/chain_info.go: 208
rpc/backend/node_info.go: 95
x/wasm/keeper/keeper_test.go: 706, 987
x/wasm/module_test.go:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Usage of Transient Storage can Lower Gas Costs
### Description
PegKeeper sets a storage variable `context` when its `buyback` and `stabilize` functions are called and restores it when those calls are done. The contract uses this variable to ensure that the `onSwap` function is being called in the context of th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: Emergency withdrawal fails to update the guage when the contract is not killed
### Description
Without `_checkpoint_gauge()` in `emergency_withdraw` when not killed, an attacker could exploit this by calling `emergency_withdraw` to manipulate reward distributions. Since the function handles non-killed stat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Malicious parties could prevent the execution of permitable orders
### Description
The [`OrderMixin`](https://github.com/1inch/limit-order-protocol/blob/4d94eea25e4dac6271bfd703096a5c4a4d899b4a/contracts/OrderMixin.sol) contract allows maker users to submit [permitable orders](https://github.com/1inch/limit-or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Reset unused* state variables of contracts during migration
### Description
The `Usd0PP.Usd0PPStorageV0.unusedTreasuryAllocationRate` and `UsualX.UsualXStorageV0.unusedBurnRatioBps` are storage state variables which are used in the current on-chain contracts but won't be used anymore after the migration to new... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Lacking Validation Of Chainlink' Oracle Queries
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood_
#### Impact
`TwapOracle.consult()` is missing additional validations to ensure that the round is complete and has returned a valid/expected price. The `consult()` improperly casts an `int256 price` to `uint256` withou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `calculateMultiplier` Will Always Return `maxMultiplier`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `9bc4417`.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `2dbe4303d2566707230b741c18ec2ca7b779b9a1`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The calculat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Convoluted price update mechanism once reporter is invalidated
### Description
The [reporter account](https://github.com/compound-finance/open-oracle/blob/d0a0d0301bff08457d9dfc5861080d3124d079cd/contracts/Uniswap/UniswapAnchoredView.sol#L22) in charge of posting prices to the Open Price Feed’s view can inv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: `money-market-contracts/oracle#feed_prices()` delayed transaction may disrupt price feeds
### Description
The implementation only takes two attributes: `asset` and `price`. And the `last_updated_time` of the record will always be set to the current `block.time`.
This makes it possible for the price feeds to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: [ACKNOWLEDGED] Typo in `FathomProxyWalletOwner`
### Description
In the contract `FathomProxyWalletOwner`, there is a typo in the function name `_successfullXDCTransfer` instead of `_successfulXDCTransfer`.
### Recommendation
We recommend correcting the typo to `_successfulXDCTransfer` for consistency and clar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: New staking between reward epochs will dilute rewards for existing stakers. Anyone can then front-run `OperationalStaking.rewardValidators()` to steal rewards
### Description
In the Covalent Network, validators perform work to earn rewards, which is distributed through `OperationalStaking`. The staking mana... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: `Maximillion.setCEther()` Callable Multiple Times By Anyone
### Description
**Update**
From dev team:
> `Maximillion.sol` is used only for testing purposes and is never deployed to mainnet. The team has chosen to keep the original Compound implementation.
**File(s) affected:**`Maximillion.sol`
**Descriptio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `ComplianceServiceGlobalWhitelisted::getComplianceTransferableTokens` returns positive token amount for blacklisted users
### Description
**Description:** `ComplianceServiceGlobalWhitelisted::getComplianceTransferableTokens` inherited from `ComplianceServiceWhitelisted` will return positive amount of transfera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Redemption weight of tiered NFTs miscalculates, making users redeem incorrect amounts - Bug #1
### Description
Redemption weight is a concept used in Juicebox to determine investor's eligible percentage of the non-locked funds. In redeemParams, JB721Delegate calculates user's share using:
uint256 _redempti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Not maximizing `Glp` in `GlpOracle` miscalculates `_minGlp` when adding liquidity
### Description
**Severity**
Impact: Medium. The rounding will be incorrect affecting the price.
Likelihood: High. False is hardcoded so it is very likely it will happen.
**Description**
Currently, in the `GlpOracle` contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Not Compatible ERC-20 Tokens
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Token transfers through the official canonical bridge require registration through our token list.
**File(s) affected:**`L1StandardBridge.sol`, `L2StandardBridge.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Use bitmap to save gas
### Description
Bitmaps in Solidity are essentially a way of representing a set of boolean values within an integer type variable such as `uint256`. Each bit in the integer represents a true or false value (1 or 0), thus allowing efficient storage of multiple boolean values.
Bitmaps can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Upon changing of delegate, `VoteDelegation` updates both the previous and the current checkpoint
### Description
The contract is accidently editing both the previous and current checkpoint when changing/removing a delegate.
### Impact
Incorrect counting of votes.
### Proof of Concept
If in `delegate` the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | access-control | true | true | _Submitted by Bahurum, also found by bin2chen and cryptphi_
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-olympus/blob/2a0b515012b4a40076f6eac487f7816aafb8724a/src/policies/Governance.sol#L164><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-olympus/blob/2a0b515012b4a40076f6eac487f7816aafb8724a/src/policies/Governance.sol#L217-L2... | Code4rena | 5 | Olympus DAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Naming Issues
### Description
Within the codebase there are a few places where names of variables or functions result in confusion. For example:
* On [line 399 of `RizRegistry.sol`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/RizRegistry.sol#L399), the variable `r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Using `calldata` is more efficient to `memory` for read-only external function inputs
### Description
**Description:** Using `calldata` is more efficient to `memory` for read-only external function inputs:
`PreDepositVault`:
**Strata Money:**
"initialize" (__init_Vault) is now internal, so the calldata can'... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | true | ## Low: Nested XMsgs Break MsgContext
### Description
A nested XMsg can be used to manipulate the current _xmsg such that it incorrectly portrays that there is no MsgContext. After OmniPortal executes an XMsg, it deletes the _xmsg state variable.
```solidity
// set _xmsg to the one we're executing, allowing external ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Inefficient use of `abi.encode()`
### Description
The `abi.encode()` function is less gas efficient than `abi.encodePacked()`, especially when encoding only static types. This detector identifies instances where `abi.encode()` is used and all arguments are static, suggesting that `abi.encodePacked()` could pot... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.