prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Protect your NFT from copying in POW forks
### Description
Ethereum has performed the long-awaited “merge” that will dramatically reduce the environmental impact of the network.
There may be forked versions of Ethereum, which could cause confusion and lead to scams as duplicated NFT assets enter the market.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Volatile prices and lack of checks on `rigidRedemption()` can cause users to purchase stETH at unwanted prices
### Description
### Impact
Volatile prices can cause issue when users try to do [`rigidRedemption`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-06-lybra/blob/main/contracts/lybra/pools/base/LybraPeUSDVault... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Fees are not capped in factories but checked upon deployment
### Description
The `HyperdriveFactory.updateFees` function does not restrict the fee values. However, the `HyperdriveStorage.constructor` restricts the fee values. Setting wrong fees will only be caught with failing deployments.
### Recommendation
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] Refunds of fees being paid should be processed for all assets
### Description
[/contracts/farm-manager/src/helpers.rs# L17-L89](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/farm-manager/src/helpers.rs# L17-L89)
This function is used in order to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Usage of Unsafe Function
### Description
## Code Analysis
The functions `create_account_reliably` and `process_post_message` do not ensure that all the entries of the modified `Vec` were initialized up until the new length before calling `set_len`. According to the function’s documentation, this is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: `validatePermission()` can be bypassed
### Description
`executeBySig()` will check the permission of the signer within `executeCommand()`, which will trigger `validatePermission()`.
However, the signer can bypass the permission check by calling `executeBySig()` with zero commands, as it will not execute the f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Don't update state | true | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
`pool-v2::TransitionLoanManager.sol#L74`
## Description
The `TransitionLoanManager.add` advances the domain start but the accrued interest since the last domain start is not accounted for. It therefore wrongly tracks the `_accountedInterest` variable. If `add` is called several tim... | Spearbit | 5 | Maple Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing call to `removeOldBids` may affect foreclosure
### Description
_Submitted by [0xRajeev](https://twitter.com/0xRajeev)_
`Orderbook.removeBids()` as commented:
`removeOldBids()` is performed currently in `Market.newRental()` and `Treasury.deposit()` to “do some cleaning up, it might help cancel th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Chainlink's `latestRoundData` might return stale or incorrect results
### Description
_Submitted by cccz, also found by 0x1f8b, 0xDjango, 0xkatana, berndartmueller, defsec, Dravee, horsefacts, hyh, IllIllI, kenta, rayn, reassor, sorrynotsorry, and WatchPug_
On ChainlinkOracleProvider.sol and ChainlinkUsdWr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Penalty fee can be higher than the user balance
### Description
**Severity** : Low
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
In Contract locking.sol, the method unlock allows users to unlock their locked tokens but a penalty fee is incurred on them.
The amount fee is calculated as follows:
Here if the meth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of zero address validation
### Description
## Handle
JMukesh
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
constructor of RCorderbook.sol lacks zero address validation , since parameter of costructor are used initialize state variable which are used in other function of the contract , error in these state vari... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consider returning withdrawn and refunded amounts for improved integrations
### Description
`withdrawMax` and `withdrawMaxAndTransfer` do not return the withdrawn amount. In light of the need for improved integration with other DeFi contracts, it would be useful for them to have the withdrawn amount returned s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: acceptDeal adds unreleased tokens to new vesting schedules
### Description
Claimable tokens become unclaimable if new vesting schedules are created, delaying the opportunity for users to withdraw. When a deal is accepted through the `acceptDeal` function during an active vesting schedule, a new vesting schedul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: New orders on a given pool in the opposite direction, separated by zero/one tick space, are not possible until previous `BatchOrder` is removed from the order book
### Description
**Description:** New order creation will revert with `LimitOrderRegistry__DirectionMisMatch()` if the direction opposes any exis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: A dev will lose rewards if after claiming his rewards he mints an NFT
### Description
A developer may lose rewards if the `receive` function is triggered during the reward claim process from `DevFund`, resulting in their `info.rewardDebt` being higher than expected. This scenario can occur when a developer ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Mitigated by the client. Only a check for `min_collateral_ratio_bps` was applied in `bucket_v2_cdp::vault`. Addressed in: `365d283bdda523b5fa5bc3996182085cf8ab3113`.
**File(s) affected:**`bucket_cdp/sources/vault.move`, `bucket_oracle/sources/aggregator.move... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: User can deccrease allowance
### Description
User can decrease allowance before fillOrder will be executed
### Recommendation
Add additional require for checking allowance for user before next lines.
https://github.com/1inch/limit-order-protocol/blob/a14bde6a260458de5083cee117d734221e1cbc05/contracts/LimitOrd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: tbtc - Values may contain dirty lower-order bits Pending
### Description
`FundingScript` and `RedemptionScript` use `mload` to cast the first bytes of a byte array to `bytes4`. Because `mload` deals with 32-byte chunks, the resulting `bytes4` value may contain dirty lower-order bits.
### Recommendation
This ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Centralization risk
### Description
**Description**
Token.sol. Contract uses onlyOwner modifier to control access to admin’s functionality. In case
of losing access to the owner's address or sharing access with an unwanted person, admin
can lose access to admin’s functionality.
**Recommendation**:
Consider ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: beneficiary and owner are redundant
### Description
The `beneficiary` is the storage variable that is used to send the funds to. The `owner` is inherited from `OwnableUpgradeable` but has been limited in use by overriding `transferOwnership` and `renounceOwnership`.
The `acceptBeneficiary` function is the on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: redemptionQueueTotal not decreased during _decreaseRedemptionAmount could lead to overes- timation of availableForInvestment
### Description
## InvestmentManager.sol Code Review
## Context
**Location:** `InvestmentManager.sol#L621`
**Description:** The variable `redemptionQueueTotal` tracks the total amou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Token Transfer Function Call is not Checked For Success
### Description
The `withdraw()` function on line [129] does not check for the success of the Link transfer on line [135]. Although the current implementation of Link tokens reverts instead of returning `false`, other ERC20 implementations or future imple... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Inexplicit Fail in Bridge Burn
### Description
The [`bridgeBurn` function](https://github.com/matter-labs/system-contracts/blob/4ad1f26ae205d5a973216d141833e0ac37d72ec8/contracts/L2EthToken.sol#L84) in the `L2EthToken` contract adjusts a user’s balance without checking their current balance first. This could r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Fund Lock | false | true | _Submitted by 0x52_
Unclaimed fees from pool will be stuck.
### Proof of Concept
When delisting a pool the pool's reference is removed from address provider:
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b036074edef3c1369b984d10010/protocol/contracts/Controller.sol#L63>
Burning fees calls a dynami... | Code4rena | 4 | Backd |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: StableSwapOperatorV1 - resistantFei value is not correct in the resistantBalanceAndFei function
### Description
The `resistantBalanceAndFei` function of a `PCVDeposit` contract is supposed to return the amount of funds that the contract controls; it is then used to evaluate the total value of PCV (collateral ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Staker can manipulate lockedCoinAge and earn rewards in excess of the allowed maximum
### Description
Voucher can be counted arbitrary many times in staker's `lockedCoinAge`. If a voucher has maximized its trust then its `locked` is added to the `lockedCoinAge` each time fully as its `lastUpdated` is kept int... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Missing source()/canonical() function on BridgedERC115 contract
### Description
[Link](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-taiko/blob/f58384f44dbf4c6535264a472322322705133b11/packages/protocol/contracts/tokenvault/BridgedERC1155.sol#L52)
The BridgedERC1155 contract should implement a similar function to sou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Missing Check on Bitcoin Opcode
### Description
When sending a transaction with a different Bitcoin Opcode, the bridge processed the transaction and did not verify that the OP\_RETURN opcode was used. This eventually resulted in the user's wallet being locked. Subsequent transactions failed along with the erro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Users won't liquidate positions because the logic used to calculate the liquidator's profit is incorrect
### Description
Liquidation is crucial, and all liquidatable positions must be liquidated to maintain the protocol's solvency. However, because the liquidator's profit is calculated incorrectly, users are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Function approveUSDPrice() does not validate if price feed approves prices for the same token contract
### Description
[Link to instance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-munchables/blob/57dff486c3cd905f21b330c2157fe23da2a4807d/src/managers/LockManager.sol#L177)
The function approveUSDPrice() does not ch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: User's funds can get lost when transferring to other chain
### Description
_Submitted by CertoraInc_
[AxelarGateway.sol#L384-L389](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-axelar/blob/dee2f2d352e8f20f20027977d511b19bfcca23a3/src/AxelarGateway.sol#L384-L389)
When transferring tokens to other chain, the tokens... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unchecked possible zero address in VariableBorrow.sol
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In contract VariableBorrow.sol, at lines 93 and 94 inside the constructor, the _swap and _oracle parameters can be zero and are not checked.
**Recommendation**:
Add a sanity check... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | front-running | true | true | ## Medium: MEV Bots can bypass slippage protection in Universal Router's stable swap implementation
### Description
The current implementation of slippage protection in the Universal Router's stable swap functionality is vulnerable to a bypass. The stableSwapExactInput function checks the balance of the output token a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: In contract tokenLock.sol, function processedPayment, there’s a transferFrom call from a ERC20 contract without checking whether the call was succesful.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
Add SafeERC20 library in the contract and use safeTransferFrom instead of transferFrom to
make interactions with any t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: `adminSettleDebtLockPeriod` might not be long enough
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High as users might not be able to withdraw in time before their `stETH` is transferred to `AdminLidoAdapter`
**Likelihood:** Low, as it needs to be a delay in the queue for lido withdrawals and an event that cau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent variable naming
### Description
- The `DeBridgeDlnFacet` and `GasZipFacet` contracts use a custom value to identify non-EVM addresses:
`0x11f111f111f111F111f111f111F111f111f111F1`. However, the naming is not consistent:
`NON_EVM_ADDRESS` in `DeBridgeDlnFacet`, while `NON_EVM_RECEIVER_IDENTI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `_getLiquidityAmounts()` returns a wrong amount of tokens in position
### Description
Upon `_getLiquidityAmounts()` being called, we return the input token amount and the `ULTI` token amount in the position:
> @return inputTokenAmountInPosition The amount of input token in the current liquidity position
@r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: We can cache some gas intensive operations
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-dopex/blob/eb4d4a201b3a75dd4bddc74a34e9c42c71d0d12f/contracts/perp-vault/PerpetualAtlanticVault.sol#L372-L396
### PerpetualAtlanticVault.sol.payFunding(): Cache the call `totalFundingForEpoch[latestFundingPaymentP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | true | ## Medium: Attacker can force pause the Auction contract.
### Description
In certain situations (e.g founders have ownership percentage greater than 51) an attacker can potentially exploit the `try catch` within the `Auction._CreateAuction()` function to arbitrarily pause the auction contract.
### Impact
Should the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Loss of User Funds in VirtualToken’s `cashIn` Function Due to Incorrect Amount Minting
### Description
In the VirtualToken contract `cashIn()` function uses msg.value instead of amount for minting tokens when dealing with ERC20 tokens. This causes users to lose their deposited ERC20 tokens as they receive 0 v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Order of Functions
### Description
**Description**
The functions in DeltaHubStaking contract are not grouped according to their visibility and order.
Functions should be grouped according to their visibility and ordered in the following way:
- constructor;
- fallback function (if exists);
- external;
- publi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: SUP rewards for depositing TBYs can be gamed by depositing TBYs that are close to expiration
### Description
**Details**
[StUsdc.sol#L118-L130](https://github.com/stakeup-protocol/stakeup-contracts/blob/b4d8a83e9455efb8c7543a0fc62b5aea598c7f49/src/token/StUsdc.sol#L118-L130)
function depositTby(uint256 ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Possible incorrect operation of the function
### Description
At the lines https://github.com/pie-dao/ExperiPie/blob/facf3c246d9c43f5b1e0bad7dc2b0a9a2a2393c5/contracts/facets/Basket/BasketFacet.sol#L200 and https://github.com/pie-dao/ExperiPie/blob/facf3c246d9c43f5b1e0bad7dc2b0a9a2a2393c5/contracts/facets/Ba... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | true | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
**Context:** TypedMemView.sol#L402
## Description
The function `sameType` should shift `2 x 12 + 3` bytes to access the type flag (`TTTTTTTTTT`) when comparing it to 0. This is due to the fact that when using `bytes29` type in bitwise operations and also comparisons to 0, a parameter of type ... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | false | true | _Submitted by kirk-baird_
There is a Centralisation risk of the bridge where the `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE` of `TokenManagerEth.sol` is able to modify the ERC20 token on the SChain to any arbitrary address. This would allow the admin role to change the address to one where they have infinite supply, they could then call `ex... | Code4rena | 3.000002 | SKALE |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Adversary can abuse hanging approvals left by PSwapLib.swap to bypass reward fees
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-07-blueberry-judging/issues/104
## Found by
0x52
PSwapLib.swap can be manipulated to leave hanging allowances via the expectedRewards input. These can then be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Hardcoded binding to all network interfaces in HTTP Server
### Description
The HTTP server is configured to bind to all available network interfaces (`0.0.0.0`). This means the server is accessible from any network the host is connected to, potentially including public networks. This configuration can expose t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Checks-Effects-Interactions Violation
### Description
**Update**
The Blex team acknowledged the issue but will not modify the current version. They will consider refactoring in future versions.
**File(s) affected:**`./contracts/market/MarketRouter.sol`
**Description:** The [Checks-Effects-Interactions](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Unlimited `liquidationIncentiveMantissa` and `closeFactorMantissa`
### Description
There are max and min limits for `liquidationIncentiveMantissa` and `closeFactorMantissa` in `ComptrollerG1.sol` but not in `Comptroller.sol`
https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/23a4ae93adc70334553f5a83429a4e967c1e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Use nested `if` statements instead of logical AND (`&&`)
### Description
Compared to nested `if` statements, using logical AND (`&&`) results in a relatively larger deployment size, and higher gas overhead on each call.
### Impact
Gas
### Recommendation
The modifier can be refactored to use a nested if state... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: General Code Suggestions
### Description
## Code Review
## Issues Identified
### 1. Dead Code in the function `lease_extend_action::actuate`
This code snippet seems to do nothing. It is better to remove dead code.
### 2. Lack of End-to-End Tests
As a whole, the project does not contain end-to-end tests. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Application Monitoring Can Be Improved by Emitting More Events
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Required values can be read directly from the contract
**File(s) affected:**`Vepoch.sol`
**Description:** In order to validate th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `safeApprove()` is deprecated
### Description
[Deprecated](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/bfff03c0d2a59bcd8e2ead1da9aed9edf0080d05/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#L38-L45) in favor of `safeIncreaseAllowance()` and `safeDecreaseAllowance()`. If only setting the initial all... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Withdrawing native assets may revert if wrapped native balance is zero
### Description
**Description:** The function `LimitOrderRegistry::withdrawNative` allows the owner to withdraw native and wrapped native assets from the contract. If balances of both are zero, calls to this function revert as there is noth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Reward Disbursement Can Be Front-Run
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client.
The client provided the following explanation:
> There are two cases to consider: ether coming from outside the system, and ether coming from inside the system via LiquidAccessories.
>
>
> In the form... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | true | false | ## Gas: Don't apply the same value to state variables
### Description
If `_whenDefault` is already `NEVER`, it'll save 2100 gas to not set it to that value again
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/df7ecadc2bae74244ace5e8b39e94bc992903158/contracts/plugins/assets/F... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Insufficient reentrancy protection in `FluidVaultT1`
### Description
Although the FluidVaultT1 smart contract code includes reentrancy protection, some functions remain unprotected:
- admin functions
- read-only functions
**Admin functions**
Admin functions can be called by the DAO. Once the DAO proposal ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Missing referrer in `StakeDao` vault deposit causing lost rewards
### Description
_Resolved_
The `_postDeposit` function in `StakeDaoVaultV2Market` deposits collateral into the `StakeDao` Vault without specifying a referrer parameter. If StakeDao's referrer mechanism provides rewards or benefits, the protocol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `delete` statement can save gas
### Description
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry/tree/main/contracts/SafEth/SafEth.sol#L68
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry/tree/main/contracts/SafEth/SafEth.sol#L170
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry/t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] State update after external calls
### Description
Consider making state updates prior to executing external calls to follow the checks-effects-interactions pattern.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-venus/blob/main/contracts/Shortfall/Shortfall.sol#L183
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-venus/bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Miscalculation of global bias
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yield
- Theft of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
There is a problem in bias calculat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Financial contract registration with repeated parties might lead to inconsistent behaviors
### Description
The [`registerContract` function](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/9d403ddb5f2f07194daefe7da51e0e0a6306f2c4/core/contracts/oracle/implementation/Registry.sol#L80) of the `Registry` contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Grief on `transfers` due to `vestingStart` during vesting
### Description
[contracts/ERC721Vestable.sol#L99-L101](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgotten-runiverse/blob/dcad1802bf258bf294900a08a03ca0d26d2304f4/contracts/ERC721Vestable.sol#L99-L101)
[contracts/ERC721Vestable.sol#L44](https://github.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Anyone can initialize contract at Staking.sol
### Description
**Description**
Function initialize() can be called by anyone and if it fit all requires can set unexpected staking
start timestamp.
**Recommendation**:
Use modifier onlyOwner to restrict function use to the owner. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Malicious Users Can Take All Rewards and Prevent Transfers
### Description
Description
The InsurancePoolToken contract is designed to hold a number of stakers and reward them with tracer tokens
based on the staker’s token share.
The contract overrides the transfer() function, enforcing the current user to wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | true | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/ETHPoolLPFactory.sol#L111>
Interaction with SavETHVault and StakingFundsVault require a minimum amount of `MIN_STAKING_AMOUNT`. In order to be used for staking, there needs to be 24 ETH or 4 ETH fo... | Code4rena | 4 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | true | false | ## Gas: Use do while loops instead of for loops
### Description
A do while loop will cost less gas since the condition is not being checked for the first iteration.
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-pooltogether/tree/main/pt-v5-draw-auction/src/RngRelayAuction.sol#L132
https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Consider adding a withdrawal timer on registering the perp position
### Description
Users can manually register a position via `registerPositions()` if it had been created before `PerpRewardDistributor` was deployed.
It should work like a normal position update, however, it misses updating the field `_withdra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Unvalidated External Payloads and Lack of Dynamic Gas Cost Adjustment Lead to Unpredictable Cross-Chain Transaction Outcomes
### Description
**Update**
The implemented changes successfully address input size validation and partially address fee calculation by incorporating payload length. However, the fee c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Target concentration for deposits and withdraws is not checked to be equal to 100%
### Description
The owner will set the Tax Params for a whitelisted asset and will indicate the `targetConcDeposit` and `targetConcWithdraw` for each asset in the `setTaxParams()` function.
`setTaxParams()` does not check that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | false | ## High: `AutoRedemption::fulfillRequest` should never be allowed to revert
### Description
Given that the Chainlink Functions DON will not retry failed fulfilments, `AutoRedemption::fulfillRequest` should never be allowed to revert; otherwise, `lastRequestId` will not be reset to `bytes32(0)` which means `AutoRedempt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Linearity assumption on the royalty can lead to denial of service
### Description
**Description:**
`VeryFastRouter::swap` relies on the internal functions [`VeryFastRouter::_findMaxFillableAmtForSell`](https://github.com/sudoswap/lssvm2/blob/78d38753b2042d7813132f26e5573c6699b605ef/src/VeryFastRouter.sol#L556... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Initialization of Nonce
### Description
The issue is identified within the [`LOB`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol#L57) contract.
The initialization of the `nonce` variable is incorrect. The current implementation `uin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Some Contracts Might Not Work Properly with USDT Allowance
### Description
The `ERC7683OrderDepositorExternal` contract implements the `_deposit` function to finalize the creation of an Across V3 deposit. To do so, the function [calls](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/108be77c29a3861c64bdf6... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unneeded initialization of uint256 variables to 0
### Description
In the `IFOV2` contract some variables are reinitialized to 0:
As `userRefundingAmount` and `taxAmount`are `uint... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | logic-error | true | false | ## Medium: Swaps will revert when `A = B + Xhat - x = 0`
### Description
`CompensationPriceFinder::_zeroForOneGetFinalCompensationPrice` implements two branches depending on the sign of `A`. The following logic executes when it is positive, but note that `A` will equal zero when `sumX` is exactly equal to `rangeVirtua... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: _updateInDS does not "bubble up" the updated values of onPool and inP2P
### Description
The `_updateInDS` function takes as input `uint256 onPool` and `uint256 inP2P` that are passed not as reference, but as pure values.
```solidity
function _updateInDS(
address poolToken,
address user,
LogarithmicBucke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: LibFixedMath functions fail to catch a number of overflows ✓ Fixed
### Description
The `__add()`, `__mul()`, and `__div()` functions perform arithmetic on 256-bit signed integers, and they all miss some specific overflows.
### Recommendation
This is fixed in [0xProject/0x-monorepo#2255](https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Fee Can Change During Deposit
### Description
The deposit fee might change between the user signing the `deposit()` transaction and the transaction getting accepted on\-chain. In such a case, the user could end up paying more fees than intended.
Consider adding an *expected fee* parameter to the `deposit()` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Imprecise Balance Check in `removeLiquidity`
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `removeLiquidity` function of the `LPManager` contract.
When removing liquidity, the contract’s calculations assume that the `protocolFee` will be deducted from the balance. However, this fee remains on t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect comment
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract YollloVestingWallet.sol, the method `vestedAmount(...)` comment is incorrect.
**Recommendation**:
Update the comment | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Zero Address Passes verifySignature()
### Description
Description
The function verifySignature() is used to ensure that a user has signed a specific message.
The function consists of the following statement,
return signer == ecrecover ( hashOrder ( order ), sigV , sigR , sigS );
Ifecrecover() receives an inval... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: [New] Tapped collaterals can be bought by traders Won't Fix
### Description
When a trader submits a sell order, `_openSellOrder()` function checks that there are enough tokens in `reserve` by calling `_poolBalanceIsSufficient` function
**code/apps/batched-bancor-market-maker/contracts/BatchedBancorMarket... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Outdated value in the comment
### Description
While the constant value `MAX_ALLOWED_SSV_OPERATOR_IDS` was updated from 16 to 24, the corresponding comment `limited to 16 IDs` in the code was not updated.
Related code: https://github.com/p2p-org/p2p-ssv-proxy/blob/cfd0a114c760bc4d87121b1c38893f2110f0d474/src/p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Incorrect calculation of the remaining `updatedRewards` leads to possible underflow error
### Description
`RewardsManage.sol` keeps track of the **total number of rewards collected per epoch** for all pools:
And the `rewardsCap` calculation when calculating the reward applies only to the pool, which leads t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: The Vault Manager is unable to delete the last strategy from `MultiStrategyVault`
### Description
The `removeStrategy` function in the `MultiStrategy` contract allows the removal of a strategy and redistributes the withdrawn funds among the remaining strategies.
* [Refered code](https://github.com/code-423... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Undocumented assembly blocks
### Description
The [`Proxy.sol`](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/7be22605e172ca536c028e408b147aab83202e4a/packages/protocol/contracts/common/Proxy.sol) contract includes a couple of assembly blocks. In particular, the [`fallback function`](https://github.com/celo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Usage of uint/int smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead
### Description
When using elements that are smaller than 32 bytes, your contract’s gas usage may be higher. This is because the EVM operates on 32 bytes at a time. Therefore, if the element is smaller than that, the EVM must use more operation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Accounting of earned and unlocked Tokens on exit May Brick the Protocol
### Description
The [`exit`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/v2-core/blob/e8f21f103e17736907b62809d1ad902febc53714/contracts/radiant/staking/MultiFeeDistribution.sol#L927-L937) function within the `MultiFeeDistribution` contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: .NextPowerOfTwo() custom panic
### Description
`U64.NextPowerOfTwo()` delivers a custom panic when overflowing. This function appears to be reachable from multiple call stacks, but it is unclear if it is possible to trigger this panic from an attacker-controlled buffer.
### Recommendation
Change to an error-r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Protocol only Supports Hard Liquidations
### Description
**Update**
"Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> On purpose. Will upgrade to soft liquidation if needed using the LiquidationRule witness.
**File(s) affected:**`bucket_cdp/sources/vault.move`
**Description:** T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Meet in the middle attack can be used to transfer admin control to user-controlled access
### Description
`PermanentRestriction.allowL2Admin` is susceptible to meet in the middle attacks that allow an attacker to transfer admin control to an address that they control.
### Impact
As explained above, an attacke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Principal amount of removed operator get's stuck in Chainlink's Staking Contract forever
### Description
When an operator is removed by Chainlink's Staking Contract , it needs to call `unbound` function of Chainlink's OperatorStakingPool.sol before wthdrawing it's principal amounts using `unstakeRemovedPrin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Cache array length outside of loop
### Description
Cache array length outside of loop:
```solidity
File: contracts/RewardsDistributor.sol
// @audit use `numLeaves` from L263 instead of `earners.length`
265: for (uint256 i; i < earners.length; ) {
``` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Direct usage of ecrecover allows signature malleability
### Description
## Handle
shw
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `verifySig` function of `Gravity` calls the Solidity `ecrecover` function directly to verify the given signatures. However, the `ecrecover` EVM opcode allows malleable (non-unique) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Redundant state variable isVesting
### Description
State variable `isVesting` in `TokenDistribution` is set to true for an address if and only if a participant [reached the last phase](https://github.com/unikoingold/UnikoinGold-UKG-Contract/blob/8b38f30039c2d13383c416fd6143f6bd0f091404/contracts/TokenDistribut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | signature | true | false | ## Gas: Move code outside if and else in executePayroll()
### Description
In the function `executePayroll()`, a call is made to `packPayoutNonce()` in both the `if` and `else` clauses with the same parameters. This can be simplified by moving the call before the `if` statement, which would also save some gas during co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Wrong calcAsymmetricShare calculation
### Description
## Handle
@cmichelio
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The inline-comment defines the number of asymmetric shares as `(u * U * (2 * A^2 - 2 * U * u + U^2))/U^3` but the `Utils.calcAsymmetricShare` function computes `(uA * 2U^2 - 2uU +... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Test are not following contracts logic
### Description
The code base presents tests in the [protocol/test](https://github.com/emptysetsquad/emptyset/blob/bf9753ef9cd5b17236036257f290e0d0b850a029/protocol/test) directory.
Almost all modules (except for the `Governance` contracts along with all libraries) hav... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] Impact of Ether Value on Auction Bidding Mechanism
### Description
In the `createBid` function of the `AuctionHouse` smart contract, the `minBidIncrementPercentage` parameter, which sets the minimum bid increment in whole percentage points, could significantly impact the auction dynamics, especially in th... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.