prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `sVEC` Token Infinite Allowance Logic
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged". The Vector Reserve team provided the following explanation:
> _Informational - Acknowledged_
**File(s) affected:**`sVEC.sol`
**Description:** The `sVEC` token implements ERC-20 approval logic, allowing approved users ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Prefunded contracts can permanently lose funds if account becomes dormant before code is de-
### Description
## Ployed
**Severity:** Critical Risk
**Context:** core/vm/evm.go#L891
**Description:**
Contracts that receive funds before they are deployed can permanently lose the funds if the account goes ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: syncWithOmni() Can Surpass Ethereum Block Gas Limit
### Description
Due to the use of for-loops when calling the `_getOperators()` function, it is possible for calls to the `syncWithOmni()` function to use more gas than the Ethereum block gas limit (30 million), which results in the call reverting. Tests demon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The DepositClaimable is emitting a wrong address as owner
### Description
The DepositClaimable event is used after a deposit request is fulfilled. Currently, this emits the receiver as the owner while it should emit `record.depositor`.
### Recommendation
Consider emitting the `record.depositor` instead of `re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: lawEnforcementRole operations are highly visible
### Description
When a `lawEnforcementRole` is assigned, an event including the previous and new `lawEnforcementRole` address is emitted.
```solidity
function setLawEnforcementRole(address _newLawEnforcementRole) public {
require(msg.sender == lawEnforcementR... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: DAO membership can exceed `MembershipDAOStructs::DAOConfig.maxMembers`
### Description
The [`MembershipDAOStructs::DAOConfig.maxMembers`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119d0b515a/contracts/dao/libraries/MembershipDAOStructs.sol#L18) field is intended a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Around 20% of locks can be blocked statistically
### Description
When calling `reserveHatch`, lock calls happening within the next `HATCH_SIZE` blocks will revert. This functionality exists to mitigate a liquidation-blocking issue. Assuming locks are randomly distributed over time, spamming `reserveHatch` as s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Lack of indexed parameter
### Description
Within [`BaseBridgeReceiver.sol`](https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/tree/silver/polygon-deploy/contracts/bridges/BaseBridgeReceiver.sol), [line 20](https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/tree/silver/polygon-deploy/contracts/bridges/BaseBridgeReceiver.sol#L20... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [32] You are not using your own cached `virtualBlockInfo` in `SystemContext`
### Description
Do this instead: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Refactor duplicated `require()`/`revert()` checks to save gas
### Description
Duplicate `require()`/`revert()` checks can be refactored into a modifier or function, saving deployment costs.
2 issue instances in 1 file:
[612](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-pooltogether/blob/main/pt-v5-vault/src/PrizeV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: `Golden God` tokens can be minted twice per generation
### Description
The current implementation of the EntropyGenerator contract allows for the possibility of having two "Golden God" tokens (tokens with an entropy value of 999999) per generation. This duplicity undermines the intended uniqueness and rarit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Inaccurate Comments
### Description
**Description**
On line 1712: `// random number between 0 to 4` is inaccurate as `_toEarn` takes on a random value of 0 or 1.
Additionally, on line 1672: `// 10%` is inaccurate as `_rndmAlloc` is calculated to be 15%.
**Recommendation**
Refactor comments to accurately r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Role Transfer Not Following Two-Step Pattern
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> the ownership will be transferred to a multisig
**Description:** The owner of the contracts can call `transferOwnership()` to transfer the ownership... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Tally VM startup costs not charged early enough
### Description
The gas for activating the WASM VM is not charged early enough to prevent DoS attacks.
### Impact
DoS attack, chain slowdown.
### Recommendation
Do not start tally phase execution if the remaining gas is not enough for the VM spin-up. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: FSDVesting: Claiming tributes should call FSD token’s corresponding functions
### Description
## Handle
hickuphh3
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The claiming of staking and governance tributes for the a beneficiary's vested tokens should be no different than other users / EOAs. However, the `claimTri... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Inline `modifier`s that are only used once, to save gas
### Description
**Files:** `ContractDeployer.sol`, `KnownCodesStorage.sol`
[File: code/system-contracts/contracts/ContractDeployer.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/main/code/system-contracts/contracts/ContractDeployer.sol#L213)
[F... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Nonexistent zero address check for newQuestBoard in updateQuestManager function
### Description
Nonexistent zero address check for `newQuestBoard` in `updateQuestManager` function. Assigning `newQuestBoard` to a zero address may cause unintended behavior.
### Recommendation
Introduce a check for a zero addres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Structs can be packed into fewer storage slots
### Description
Each slot saved can avoid an extra Gsset (**20000 gas**) for the first setting of the struct. Subsequent reads as well as writes have smaller gas savings
*There are 3 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Max amount `2**(256/3)`, not `2**256`
### Description
Curve calculation makes a secure arithmetics - division after multiplying.
And the first multiplying is `amount**3`.
It sets an overflow limitation of `2**(256/3)` for amount.
On the other hand, README describes `amount` as - `is the total supply of the we... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | true | ## High: Trader can't reduce open position size when under initial margin requirement but over maintenance margin requirement
### Description
[`OrderBranch::createMarketOrder`](https://github.com/zaros-labs/zaros-core-audit/blob/de09d030c780942b70f1bebcb2d245214144acd2/src/perpetuals/branches/OrderBranch.sol#L204-L208... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Strengthen GCP Infrastructure Security
### Description
The current GCP configuration has several areas that could be strengthened:
- A single service account with “Editor” permissions is used for the collateral auction bot, granting it full control over most resources and violating the principle of least priv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Don't write to the same storage slot multiple times
### Description
**Description:** In EVM writing to storage is expensive; ideally only write to the same storage slot once. For example `ComplianceServiceRegulated::cleanupInvestorIssuances` does this:
This is very inefficient as it results in an additional ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Overflow/Underflow | true | false | ##### Description
An overflow happens when an arithmetic operation reaches the maximum size of a type. For instance, in `Monoswap.sol`, the `getAmountOut` method is subtracting `fees` from a fixed number and may end up overflowing the integer since the resulting value is not checked to be greater or equal 0. In comput... | Halborn | 5 | MonoX |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Liquidators seizing NFTs retain their interest index, allowing theft of funds from interest market
### Description
When an NFT is used as collateral for a liquidated loan and is seized as collateral, the `_seize()` function performs the following logic:
- call `accrueInterest()`, which updates the borrowIndex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: saving in copying storage variable
### Description
In following function simple check can be added to save gas:
https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/23a4ae93adc70334553f5a83429a4e967c1eefaa/contracts/Comptroller.sol#L213
### Recommendation
We recommend to add following check:
```solidity=
if (ass... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unnecessary and unrestricted `trade()` at `sync/BancorSwapper`
### Description
[trade()](https://github.com/yearn/hardhat-monorepo/blob/ecc0b5147992b34c315e08af170ceb4a5fe071ee/packages/yswaps/contracts/swappers/sync/BancorSwapper.sol#L52) function has no use and most likely remains in contract by an accide... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Project dependencies contain vulnerabilities
### Description
Although dependency scans did not yield a direct threat to the Bribe Protocol codebase, `npm audit` identified dependencies with known vulnerabilities. Due to the sensitivity of the deployment code and its environment, it is important to ensure depen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use named `mapping` parameters
### Description
**Description:** Solidity 0.8.18 [introduced](https://soliditylang.org/blog/2023/02/01/solidity-0.8.18-release-announcement/) named `mapping` parameters; use this feature in `DropBox` for clearer mappings like this:
**Mode:**
Fixed in commit [8f6a168](https://gi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistency between hook and supportedTokens[0] due to setHookAddressAndPoolId method
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
**Severity:** Low Risk
**Context:**
- `ChatPoints.sol#L43-L54`
- `Master42.sol#L106-L110`
**Description:**
The `setHookAddressAndPoolId` method allows the owner to change the ho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: _calculateDiscount function could be a little bit more gas efficient
### Description
**Description**
The function is in contract ArgoPayments.sol (argo-payments-contract-master), three
modification can save some gas:
Function takes parameter a, then assigns its value to a new variable amount. I believe
functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `eta` in `ProposalCancelled` event can be misleading
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-axelar/blob/main/contracts/cgp/governance/InterchainGovernance.sol#L135
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-axelar/blob/main/contracts/cgp/governance/AxelarServiceGovernance.sol#L94
The `eta` here ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: The redeem process updates the rewards in the wrong order
### Description
When users redeem their stakeToken's their balance decreases hence right before the redeem request the rewards should be synced. However, the code does the opposite which leads to wrong accrual of rewards.
### Impact
Unfair accrual of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Batch Approval Duplicate Permissions Vulnerability in approveBatchWithSignature
### Description
## Context
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
## Impact
The `approveBatchWithSignature` function allows duplicate permissions within the same batch to be approved without any safeguards to detect and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: A malicious user can send tokens to the `TribeRedeemer` contract to make the redeem function work, and other users may lose assets as a result
### Description
_Submitted by cccz_
In the TribeRedeemer contract, the user provides redeemedToken to redeem the tokens in the list.
The transaction will revert whe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Refine EMA Price Handling
### Description
## Price Validation Check Issue in `get_price`
There is an inconsistency in the price validation check in `get_price`. Currently, `get_ema_price` fails to return `None` if the EMA price is unavailable. The comment in `get_ema_price` specifies that the method "currentl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inefficient encoding of uint56 to uint24 floating point representation
### Description
This issue has been identified within the [_packFP24](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/70b15ec4d9e7578248141604503843716a67d875/src/HanjiLOB.sol#L1317) function of the `HanjiLOB` contract.
The current i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Possible Initialization of an Unusable SsoAccount
### Description
In the [`initialize` function](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-sso-clave-contracts/blob/c7714c0fe0a33a23acce5aa20355f088d330b4f7/src/SsoAccount.sol#L59) of the `SsoAccount` contract, no validation is performed to ensure that the array argu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: [FIXED] Array out of bounds in `_setTokens` when deleting tokens in `ZunamiPool`
### Description
In the `_setTokens` function of the `ZunamiPool` contract, there is a potential for an array out-of-bounds error when attempting to delete more tokens than were initially set.
The function operates by setting o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Variables shadowing functions with the same name in PwIporToken.sol and PwIporTokenInternal.sol
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In contracts PwIporToken.sol and PwIporTokenInternal.sol there are multiple cases of function shadowing because of variables with t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Do not declare variables inside loop
### Description
**Files:** `Compressor.sol`, `Mailbox.sol`, `ImmutableSimulator.sol`, `ValidatorTimelock.sol`, `Executor.sol`
Move variable declaration outside the loop. While the variable is declared inside the loop - every loop iteration will spend gas on that variable d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Overleveraging After Allocator's Stablecoins Are Reclaimed
### Description
**Update**
The client fixed the issue in commit `4515deffff5b816ea0069ab842b71794ea1d398b` and provided the following explanation:
> Added a condition in allocate_stablecoins() when deallocating
**File(s) affected:**`contracts/AMM.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper use of access modifiers.
### Description
**Description**
The whole functions in contract use “public” access modifiers but most of them can be called
only externally.
**Recommendation**:
Use “external” access modifier in functions that can be called only externally. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Too few rewards paid over periods in Furnace and StRSR
### Description
For two instances in the codebase ([`Furnace`](https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/df7ecadc2bae74244ace5e8b39e94bc992903158/contracts/p1/Furnace.sol#L77-L79) and [`StRSR`](https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Minimum Liveness Can Be Set Beyond Valid Bounds
### Description
The [`setMinimumLiveness` function](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/managed-oracle/blob/fc03083eca91c880efa8918c6d9532af9362f00d/src/optimistic-oracle-v2/implementation/ManagedOptimisticOracleV2.sol#L207) of the `ManagedOptimisticOracleV2` contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Claimable soft clay amount can be claimed unlimited times.
### Description
**Description**
SoftClayContract.sol: function userClaimSoftClay(). After a user has claimed soft clay, the value from mapping_claimableSoftClay is not set to zero, which means that user can claim the same soft clay multiple times.
*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `FantiumNFTV1._owners` shadows `ERC721Upgradeable._owners`
### Description
FantiumNFTV1 `mapping(uint256 => address) internal _owners` shadows ERC721Upgradeable `mapping(uint256 => address) private _owners`.
Thus, the `exists()` (https://github.com/metaxu-art/fantium-smart-contracts/blob/cb2d97bc30c40321991f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Validate array lengths
### Description
**Severity** - Low
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
In the contract Vesting.sol’s constructor array of vestedPlans , receivers , amounts and timestamps is passed but there are not sufficient checks to verify the lengths of these arrays.
It should be made sure that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Improved Efficiency in `mulDiv` Function
### Description
[Math.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-panoptic/blob/main/contracts/libraries/Math.sol#L207)
The `mulDiv` function uses a `require` statement with a less efficient comparison for uint types.
### Original Code
### Optimized Code
Using `!=... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | dos | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-optimism-judging/issues/96
## Found by
Allarious, obront, ladboy233, Barichek
## Summary
Transactions to execute a withdrawal from the Optimism Portal require the caller to send enough gas to cover `gasLimit` specified by the withdrawer.
Because the EVM limits th... | Sherlock | 4 | Optimism |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Superfluous event fields
### Description
`block.number` and `block.timestamp` are added to the event information by default, so adding them manually will waste additional gas.
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-caviar/tree/main/src/Pair.sol#L36 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `fillAsk()` Allows for `msg.value` to be larger than require locking the excess in the contract
### Description
[GolomTrader.sol#L217](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/e5efa8f9d6dda92a90b8b2c4902320acf0c26816/contracts/core/GolomTrader.sol#L217)
It is possible to send a higher `msg.value` t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing ancillary data stamp
### Description
When requesting a price on the `OracleSpoke` contract, the provided ancillary data [is stamped](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/0c4cea3c3d5e48da6f8984b8ba3afdfea4ce47cc/packages/core/contracts/cross-chain-oracle/OracleSpoke.sol#L66) with the child chain... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: TokenPayAndSettleIncoming emits incorrect error ( BadHash instead of ExpiredContract)
### Description
In the `TokenPayAndSettleIncoming` handler in `channel_manager::evm_channel()`, in the event of an expired timelock, the code will emit a `Notification::SwapError(BadHash)` error whereas it should emit `Notifi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unreachable DumpFees Function Of OffchainBook
### Description
## OffchainBook Contract - `dumpFees` Function
In the OffchainBook contract, `dumpFees` is used to transfer the funds collected by matching orders to the fee account.
## Code Snippet
However, the modifier `onlyEndpoint` only allows a call from ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Error Message in revert Statement
### Description
Within the `getTokenConfigByCToken` function of [`UniswapAnchoredViewDestinationAdapter.sol`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/oev-contracts/blob/0f2c18660fc342ced7c7177577432f7d06481684/src/adapters/compound/UniswapAnchoredViewDestinationAdapter.sol), th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Use of Vulnerable IBC-Go v8.4.0 - Non-Deterministic JSON Unmarshalling Can Cause Chain Halt
### Description
The protocol is using IBC-Go v8.4.0, which contains a critical vulnerability ([ASA-2025-004](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/security/advisories/GHSA-jg6f-48ff-5xrw)) in the deserialization of IBC ackn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Use SafeMath in all math operations
### Description
Most math operations are safe, but there’s still a few that are unchecked ([these two](https://github.com/brave-intl/basic-attention-token-crowdsale/blob/17a5f8440a256a6dc5d8dd894b9615182c2901b2/contracts/BAToken.sol#L84-L85), for instance). It’s always be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: New allocation mechanics for `allowList` can be bypassed when allocation is updated
### Description
Fix in commit https://github.com/metaxu-art/fantium-smart-contracts/commit/fdb089fa02c36560645f5ae7a3ab06d63f37ee1f introduced a new data type for `allowList`. Now it is a mapping storing the allocation for a us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: BathToken LPs Unable To Receive Bonus Token Due To Lack Of Wallet Setter Method
### Description
_Submitted by xiaoming90, also found by 0xNoah, PP1004, sseefried, reassor, hubble, pauliax, sashik_eth, and shenwilly_
BathBuddy is a Vesting Wallet that payout withdrawers any `bonusTokens` they may have accrued... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: `StaderOracle` - Strict equal can cause no consensus if trusted nodes are removed before consensus
### Description
if (
submissionCount == trustedNodesCount / 2 + 1 &&
_exchangeRate.reportingBlockNumber > exchangeRate.reportingBlockNumber
) {
updateWithInLimitER(
_exchangeRate.totalETHBalance,
_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Repeated assignment of the same value in the loop
### Description
A gas efficiency issue is found in the [`_makeBeaconDeposit`](https://github.com/p2p-org/p2p-ssv-proxy/blob/9dd4728002d9c275e29e8ba38bcf7d90efc7531b/src/p2pSsvProxyFactory/P2pSsvProxyFactory.sol#L625-L628) function of the `P2pSsvProxyFactory` co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Accounts with low balances are trimmed from the ledger
### Description
If the number of ledger accounts with a non-zero balance reaches the `Ledger::maximum_number_of_accounts` value (which defaults to 50 million), the ledger will burn the assets of the accounts with the lowest balances; the number of accounts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: `transfer()` depends on gas consts
### Description
[ETHRegistrarController.sol#L183-L185](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-ens/blob/ff6e59b9415d0ead7daf31c2ed06e86d9061ae22/contracts/ethregistrar/ETHRegistrarController.sol#L183-L185)
[ETHRegistrarController.sol#L204](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Whales can frontrun rewards distribution
### Description
The WstUSR vault allows users to deposit and withdraw within the same block. This enables malicious users to monitor the mempool and front-run the reward distribution by making a large deposit, and then withdrawing within the same block, which allows the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: operatorInitiateClawBack() can be griefed
### Description
When calling `operatorInitiateClawBack()`, a user can front-run the call by calling `undelegate()` for the same `validatorId` and prevent `operatorInitiateClawBack()` from executing.
### Recommendation
Consider lowering the `amountAssets` to the amount... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | true | ## Low: Deleting entries may lead to incorrect getter value (SimpleRegistry)
### Description
Getter functions return information on entries even after entries are deleted. This behavior may lead to unexpected consequences in third-party applications or contracts. The `SimpleRegistry` contract contains an `entries` map... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Code quality issues: naming convention
### Description
- The `UniswapV2Factory.sol` uses an internal naming convention for the external function `_initCodeHash()`, violating Solidity naming best practices. Despite being marked as external, the function uses an underscore prefix typically reserved for internal ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Typos
### Description
*There are 3 instances of this issue.*
___
## Excluded Findings
These findings are excluded from awards calculations because there are publicly-available automated tools that find them. The valid ones appear here for completeness.
### Low Risk Issues
| |Issue|Instances|
|-|:-|:-:|
| [L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: SeaDrop owner can choose an address they control as the admin when the constructor is called.
### Description
The owner/creator can call the contract directly (skipping the use of the UI) and set the administrator as themselves or another address that they control. After creating a `PublicDrop` or `TokenGat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Potential Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerability in PowApprox Function
### Description
The Elys project uses a function called `PowApprox` to calculate approximate values for the exponentiation operation (`a^b`). This function is implemented using a Taylor series approximation, and it uses a while loop to itera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: UNNEEDED INITIALIZATION OF UINT256 VARIABLES TO 0
### Description
As `i` is an `uint256`, it is already initialized to 0. `uint256 i = 0` reassigns the 0 to `i` which wastes gas.
Code Location
-------------
Internalizer.sol
* Line 62:
`for (uint256 i = 0; i < accounts.length; i++) {`
Fertilizer.sol
* Li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Deprecated `testFail` Usage in Tests
### Description
**Description:** Several tests ([1](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/polkamarkets-js/blob/24f1394be94d27433d2e3a7370442126e1c1e5ba/test/PredictionMarket.t.sol#L691-L698), [2](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/polkamarkets-js/blob/24f1394be94d27433d2e3a737044212... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: `redeemToken` can fail for certain tokens
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by hickuphh3, pauliax and jonah1005XXX_
The `SwappableYieldSource.redeemToken` function transfers tokens from the contract back to the sender, however, it uses the `ERC20.transferFrom(address(this), msg.sender, redeem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Keep Slippage Expiration Date as a Governance Parameter
### Description
In the provided code snippet, the `ClearOutdatedSlippageTrack` function is responsible for deleting expired slippage tracks. However, the expiration date is currently hardcoded as a constant value of 7 days (86400 \* 7 seconds). This hardc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: `callerFundedMint()` does not work with fee-on-transfer tokens
### Description
The `ClassicMinterV1::callerFundedMint` function is used to `mint USDf` tokens by depositing collateral tokens, after verifying signature of a `MintParams` message signed by the `BACKEND_SIGNER_ROLE address` of the protocol. After t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Bad Debt Redistribution Not Happening Between Liquidations in Batch Mode
### Description
The issue lies in how liquidations handle debt redistribution in `LiquidationManager.sol`. Here's the problematic flow:
```solidity
function batchLiquidateTroves(ITroveManager troveManager, address[] memory _troveArray) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero Address Verification
### Description
The issue is associated with the `addOracle` function in the `DIAOracleV2Meta` contract. Specifically, the function lacks a check for zero addresses when adding a new oracle. If an oracle with a zero address is added, it will trigger the `getValue` function to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `rescue` allows to withdraw collected ETH rewards and `boughtBackTokenBalances`
### Description
`rescue` does not restrict the amount of ETH that can be withdrawn by the caller and does not verify whether the token to be withdrawn has `boughtBackTokenBalances`. Consider adding these verifications to prevent `r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Integrators can wrongly interpret ´cliff´ as end of a Lineair stream when using getTimes- tamps
### Description
Previously, this function in `SablierV2LockupLinear` was called `getRange`. It is now renamed to `getTimestamps` but still returns the type `LockupLinear.Timestamps`, which includes 3 timestamps (inc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Treasury Wallet Field in Protocol State
### Description
## Fee Transfer Instruction Guidelines
The account to which the fee amount is transferred in the Settle instruction should be of the same mint as the `asset_escrow` or the `quote_escrow` based on the caller of the instruction. Since there can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Reentrancy in `withdrawToken()` May Delete The Next User's Balance
### Description
The function `withdrawToken()` does not have a reentrancy guard and calls an external contract. It is possible to reenter `settleContract()` to spend the same token that was just transferred out. If the `safeTransferFrom()` in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of error-prone pattern for logging functions
### Description
The pattern shown in  is used repeatedly throughout the codebase to log function names.
*[REDACTED]*
**Figure 3.1**: An example of the pattern used by ChainPort to log function names.
This pattern is prone to copy-and-paste... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Users will lock raffle prizes on the `WinnablesPrizeManager` contract by calling `WinnablesTicketManager::propagateRaffleWinner` with wrong CCIP inputs
### Description
The [`WinnablesTicketManager::propagateRaffleWinner`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-08-winnables-raffles/blob/main/public-contracts/c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Data Market Creation Limited to 255 Due to Incorrect Variable Type
### Description
**File(s) affected:**`ProtocolState.sol`
**Description:** In `PowerloomProtocolState`, the `dataMarketCount` is declared as `uint8` limiting it to store `255` at maximum.
When creating a new data market through `createDataM... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Small amount of native token transfer dropped from mempool
### Description
When attempting to send a small amount of native tokens (e.g., 0.000000000000000001 ether) using the `cast send` command to invoke the `withdraw_base58` function of a precompile contract, the transaction is being dropped from the mempo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Profile creation can be frontrun
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
[PublishingLogic.sol#L50](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-aave-lens/blob/aaf6c116345f3647e11a35010f28e3b90e7b4862/contracts/libraries/PublishingLogic.sol#L50)
The `LensHub/PublishingLogic.createProfile` function can be frontrun ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Collateral Calculation Lets Users Mint Under-Collateralized USC
### Description
The core pricing math in the `_getNormalizedAssetAmount()` function in the `Engine` contract is inverted:
`previewMintAccount()` -> `_getNormalizedAssetAmount()` uses multiplication by the oracle price instead of divi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing Deadline Enforcement in Periodic Allowance Logic Acknowledged
### Description
The `PeriodicAllowance` struct defines parameters for enforcing periodic transfer limits, including `periodAmount`, `periodDuration`, `startDate`, and tracking variables like `lastTransferPeriod` and `transferredInCurrentPer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Logic Not Fully Deprecated
### Description
The `SpokePool` contract implements the basics of keeping track of the respective [OFT messengers against tokens](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/c5d7541037d19053ce2106583b1b711037483038/contracts/SpokePool.sol#L1739-L1749). It also inherits the [`OF... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cannot use `_burn` Function in Beedle.sol Contract
### Description
The Beedle.sol contract includes an unused internal _burn function which is internal and not being called anywhere within the contract. As it stands, the function is not accessible externally and is effectively "hidden" from external calls.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: | Missing Validation
### Description
**Description**
When creating a deposit, there is no validation that the `longToken` or the `shortToken` are valid for the supplied market. If WBTC is accidentally used as the long token in an ETH/USDC market, the user would lose their WBTC in the `depositStore`.
Furth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Missing docstrings throughout
### Description
Most of the contracts and functions in Augur’s code base lack documentation. This hinders reviewers’ understanding of the code’s intention, which is fundamental to correctly assess not only security, but also correctness. Additionally, docstrings improve readabi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use +=
### Description
`+=` may provide better readability.
### Recommendation
- Change: `lp.principal = lp.stake + lp.principal;`
- To: `lp.principal += lp.stake;` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: An Agent can borrow even with existing debt in interest payments ✓ Fixed
### Description
To borrow funds, an `Agent` has to call the `borrow` function of the pool:
**code/src/Pool/InfinityPool.sol:L302-L325**
```
function borrow(VerifiableCredential memory vc) external isOpen subjectIsAgentCaller(vc) {
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent debt bookkeeping may lead to trapped tokens
### Description
Note: This issue is the result of our investigation into Sai Issue #87.
The Sai system uses the `sin` token to track the total CDP debt to the Sai system, as well as the individual debts for each CDP. At any point, the sum of the debt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Riskless trades due to delay check
### Description
`Trading.limitClose()` uses `_checkDelay()`. This allows for riskless trades, by capturing price rises through increasing the stop-loss, while preventing the underwater position to be closed in case of the price dropping by continuously increasing the delay.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Docker container running as root
### Description
Docker containers run by default as root. It is recommended to use a different user to prevent privilege escalation.
### Recommendation
Add a `USER` to the Dockerfile. This will require that the files needed to run the node software are owned by that user. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | false | false | ## Low: Over-complicated design of delegation
### Description
In staking contract, the logic around delegation is over-complicated, where it has concepts of `delegation`, `self-delegation`, and `delegation to self`, of these logic mixed, which could be simplified. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Multiple contracts are missing inheritance
### Description
Several contracts implement interfaces but do not inherit from them. This behavior is error-prone and might prevent the implementation from following the interface if the code is updated. The missing inheritances are:
- `WithdrawalDelayer` from `Withdr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Events related issues
### Description
## Security Assessment
## Severity: Low Risk
### Context
- `LendingPoolAddressesProvider.sol#L197-L199`
- `LendingPoolAddressesProvider.sol#L213-L215`
- `MiniPoolAddressProvider.sol#L280`
- `MiniPoolAddressProvider.sol#L292`
- `MiniPoolAddressProvider.sol#L326`
- `MiniPo... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.