prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: `ChainlinkCompositeOracle::getDerivedPriceThreeOracles` is very specialized
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-moonwell/blob/main/src/core/Oracles/ChainlinkCompositeOracle.sol#L157-L159
Here the three prices for the oracles are multiplied together. This requires a setup of prices like this... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | signature | false | false | ## Gas: Empty blocks should be removed or emit something
### Description
The code should be refactored such that they no longer exist, or the block should do something useful, such as emitting an event or reverting. If the contract is meant to be extended, the contract should be `abstract` and the function signatures ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: All swaps other than the top-of-block swap will revert
### Description
**Description:** For swaps that are not top-of-block, `AngstromL2::afterSwap` short-circuits; however, this occurs too late in the execution with an incorrect `hookDeltaUnspecified` after a debt is erroneously created in the invocation o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Possible Failures of Bridging XVS Tokens
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the Venus team. Addressed in: `244a44662f105112bc61872c80fc890e6e4d4574`. The Venus team provided the following explanation:
> The commit is actually in the documentation repo: https://github.com/VenusProtocol/venus-proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Allowed Execution Of Expired Orders
### Description
## Maven Move - Execute Permission Recovery
In `maven.move`, `execute_permission_recovery` allows users to execute orders, even if they have expired.
## Remediation
Verify that the current timestamp is lower than the `expiration_ms` in `time_lock::destroy... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Haircut and Pricefeed Data Not Erased when a Currency Is Removed
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client as intended by design. The client provided the following explanation:
> _When a currency is delisted, `removeCurrency()` is called, but order books are active until the maturity d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: | Centralization Risk
### Description
**Description**
The exchange keeper and other permissioned addresses have the power to do nearly anything:
- Execute any order or liquidation at any arbitrary price
- Defer execution of any arbitrary deposit, withdrawal, order, or liquidation
- Select the order of exe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Swapper assumes 18 decimals for the stable coin
### Description
The `Swapper` contract assumes in multiple places that the stable coin contract has 18 decimals (e.g., [here](https://github.com/AngleProtocol/angle-transmuter/blob/196bf1035154809b1c8f454c17bb45e3745509a6/contracts/transmuter/facets/Swapper.sol#L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Const `workerOwner`
### Description
https://github.com/nucypher/nucypher/blob/main/nucypher/blockchain/eth/sol/source/contracts/staking_contracts/PoolingStakingContractV2.sol#L40
It's not clear why `workerOwner` is a `const`.
### Recommendation
If it's not supposed to be transferred, write a comment describin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RocketDAOProposal - preserve the proposals correct state after expiration ✓ Fixed
### Description
The state of proposals is resolved to give a preference to a proposal being `expired` over the actual result which may be `defeated`. The preference for a proposal’s status is checked in order: `cancelled? -> exec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol fees not taken on premium
### Description
Protocol fees not taken on premium
### Impact
Rather than using the Illuminate version of `lend()`, which charges a fee, users could use the Swivel version, and ensure the fee portion is small, and the premium non-fee portion is large, so that Illuminate m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Admin of the upgradeable proxy contract of `Controller.sol` can rug users
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
[Controller.sol#L22-L34](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-rolla/blob/a06418c9cc847395f3699bdf684a9ac066651ed7/quant-protocol/contracts/Controller.sol#L22-L34)
Use of Upgradeable Proxy Con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: The totalCoverTokens can be decreased before the claim is committed
### Description
The `totalCoverTokens` is decreased right after the policy duration ends (`_endEpochNumber`). When that happens, the liquidity providers can withdraw their funds:
**code\_new/contracts/PolicyBook.sol:L262-L265**
```
policy... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Reward claiming fails for Berachain RewardVaults due to incorrect interface
### Description
**Description:** D2 plans to deploy on the newly launched Berachain, which operates on a novel [Proof-of-Liquidity](https://docs.berachain.com/learn/what-is-proof-of-liquidity) model. On Berachain, liquidity providers ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Auction Bids Will Work On Both Types Of Auction
### Description
Auction bids intended for a solvent auction can also be applied to an insolvent auction for the same account. This can lead to liquidators bidding on the wrong type of auction and accepting portfolios they did not desire.
Both types of auctions, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-06-symmetrical-judging/issues/239
## Found by
xiaoming90
## Summary
Hedgers could intentionally force the users to close the positions themselves via the `forceClosePosition` and charge a spread to earn more, which results in the users closing at a worse price, leading... | Sherlock | 5 | Symmetrical |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: StrategyManager does not emit an event when the first strategy gets added.
### Description
`StrategyManager` does not emit an event when the first strategy gets added, which can cause issues for off-chain agents.
### Recommendation
To make it easier for off-chain agents' data lookup, it would be great to ensu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Invalid Redstone oracle payload size prevents the protocol from working properly
### Description
In api contract, it uses 224 bytes as maximum length for Redstone's oracle payload, but oracle price data and signatures of 3 signers exceeds 225 bytes thus reverting transactions.
### Impact
Protocol does not ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | liquidation | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-surge-judging/issues/101
## Found by
chaduke
## Summary
A liquidator can gain not only collateral, but also can reduce his own debt.
This is achieved by taking advantage of the following vulnerability of the ``liquidate()``:
it has a rounding down precision error a... | Sherlock | 4 | Surge |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: SQRT Overflow
### Description
Some edge case with extreme parameters. The conditions are:
- "b" parameter set to some really high value
- totalSupply is also high
In such situations, the sqrt function could overflow. The mint function will break due to getBuyPrice() DoS. Because in line 29, could be very lar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | true | false | ## Gas: Constructors can be marked payable
### Description
Payable functions cost less gas to execute, since the compiler does not have to add extra checks to ensure that a payment wasn't provided. A constructor can safely be marked as payable, since only the deployer would be able to pass funds, and the project itsel... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: Unchecked return of `execute()`
### Description
Across the `VaultController.sol` there are many external calls to the `AdminProxy.sol` via `execute()`. Looking at the `execute()` function in `AdminProxy.sol`:
As one can see it does a call to the target contract with the provided `callData`. Going back to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Emit missing events on important parameter changes
### Description
Emit missing events on important parameter changes:
* `CCTPSender::setCCTPDomain`
* `USDCBridgeV2::setCCTPDomain` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Loan migration will fail if the token is not supported by balancer v2
### Description
If a new lender is the same as the old one, a flashloan is used to avoid collecting additional capital from the lender. This is, however, not always possible as Balancer has a limited pool of supported tokens and limited liqu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect logic for checking isFillPriceValid
### Description
The logic for calculating if a trader added a valid FillPrice is not correct.
### Impact
1. Traders will not be able to add target price which means they cannot add Take profit or stop loss to their trade
2. The Offchain order will always fail | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Updating `vestingPeriod` can retroactively reclassify vested rewards as unvested
### Description
**Description:** `sUSBD` tracks an active vesting “epoch” using `vestingAmount` and `lastRewardTimestamp`, while `sUSBD::getUnvestedAmount` computes remaining unvested rewards using the current `vestingPeriod`. If ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: BondWrapper with high _mintPercent can become unbacked
### Description
The BondWrapper reverts if `_mintPercent >= 10000 (100%)` and when closing the position via close checks that the amount received from closing the bonds is at least `_mintPercent * bondAmount` to ensure the bond positions of the contract ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: no reentrancy guard on mint() function that has a callback
### Description
_Submitted by jayjonah8, also found by Fitraldys_
In CollateralizedDebt.sol, the mint() function calls \_safeMint() which has a callback to the "to" address argument. Functions with callbacks should have reentrancy guards in place ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Multiple strategies sharing the same asset
### Description
AdapterVault design assumes that each strategy has a unique asset (e.g. PT token). Otherwise, key accounting functions would return overinflated values.
E.g. \_totalAssetsNoCache() which goes through each strategy and calls `balanceOf()` for their ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Unhandled return value of `approve` function in `TracerGMXVault.sol`
### Description
**Description**
TracerGMXVault.sol - There are multiple calls to the approve function form the IERC20, because the ERC20 standard does not require to fail inside the approve function and there are multiple implementation s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: DEPOSIT_VAULT_ADMIN_ROLE/REDEMPTION_VAULT_ADMIN_ROLE have larger permission than expected: they shouldn't be able to pause vaults
### Description
The accessibility of DEPOSIT_VAULT_ADMIN_ROLE and REDEMPTION_VAULT_ADMIN_ROLE has larger permission than what the contest readme claims: they can pause the vault ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent encoding of arrays in `MetaTxLib`
### Description
According to the [EIP-712](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-712) specification, arrays are encoded by concatenating its elements and passing the result to `keccak256`:
> The array values are encoded as the `keccak256` hash of the concatenated... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `withdrawPrincipal` can be called multiple times for the same wallet
### Description
The issue is identified within the function [`withdrawPrincipal`](https://github.com/diadata-org/prestaking-contracts/blob/6ee4beee6cbcdb3b7e7ea1feb9a8b1192bc8c8ba/prestaking/src/Prestaking.sol#L163) of contract `Prestaking`. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Users Would Lose Rewards If A Huge Majority Bets On The Winning Side Due To Rounding
### Description
**Severity** - High
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
Consider the following scenario for a UpDown Game (winning side is down side) →
totalDepositsDown = 100 tokens
totalDepositsUp = 100000000 tokens
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Arrival Confirmation
### Description
## Ride Confirmation Issue
In its current implementation, the system allows a driver to start a ride without confirmation from the rider that they have arrived at the pickup point. This lack of confirmation can lead to potential issues such as miscommunication or misunders... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `RewardManagerMixin.claimAccountRewards` lacks of necessary param check.
### Description
In current implementation, `RewardManagerMixin.claimAccountRewards` function doesn't check `account` paramm, if the `MORPHO` is passed in as `account`, rewards will be transferred to `MORPHO`. Which isn't correct.
### Im... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: `updateYieldStrategy` will freeze some funds with the old Strategy if `yieldStrategy` fails to withdraw all the funds because of liquidity issues
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by harleythedog, GreyArt, and pauliax_
Part of the funds held with the strategy can be frozen if the current strate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Lack of access controls allows anyone to deposit Uniswap tokens
### Description
The Controller contract allows anyone to add a UniswapV3 token position as collateral to any vault. If a vault that does not have a UniswapV3 token position is at risk of liquidation, the vault owner could consider adding a Uniswap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Fallback oracle may break with future NFTs
### Description
In order for the fallback oracle to fall back to the Bend DAO oracle, the NFT in question must say that it in fact `supportsInterface(0x80ac58cd)`. The EIP-721 standard says that the implementer MUST do this, and both Openzeppelin's and Solmate's impel... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: pragma version definition
### Description
It is generally considered best practice to avoid using floating Solidity version declarations.
### Recommendation
Lock the pragma to the specific version you wish to use (in this case, `foundry.toml` defines 0.8.20). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Oracle rewards may not be distributed
### Description
If the `x/oracle` module lacks the coins to cover a reward payout, the rewards will not be distributed or registered for payment in the future.
```go
var periodRewards sdk.DecCoins
for _, denom := range rewardDenoms {
rewardPool := k.GetRewardPool(ctx, d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | false | false | ## Low: Exact block timestamps usage.
### Description
At this line: https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-vaults/blob/cff924f1894cca1820a588b14d341c4fa4f384c0/contracts/BaseStrategy.sol#L320
Dependency on particular block exact timestamps can eventually break the business logic because the timestamps not only may va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect cap returned
### Description
**Description:**
1. Observe the `cap`function
\
2. If `maxSupply`is 0 (no restriction)then cap returned will be 0 which is incorrect
**Recommendations:**
If `maxSupply`is 0 (infinite supply allowed)then return `type(uint256).max`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Internal method for grant proposals
### Description
`proposeDirectGrant()`, `proposeSimpleGrant()`, `proposeAdvancedGrant()` can use the same internal method to decrease the size of the contract. https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/implants/daoVetoGrantIm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Disposable sessionKey s might be deleted too soon
### Description
The bundler can be a (disposable) `sessionKey`, which can receive ETH from `metacall()`. After this `sessionKey` is disposed of, the ETH is no longer available.
```solidity
function metacall( /*...*/ ) /*...*/ {
// ...
// Refund the msg.val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Upgraded implementation is not initialized
### Description
If the upgraded implementation is presumed to require an `initialize()` function (similar to the current one) to initialize some new proxy state, then this is not part of the upgrade scripts.
### Recommendation
Consider the use of `upgradeToAndCall()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Decimals | true | false | ## Severity
Medium Risk
## Context
WithdrawProxy.sol#238-244
## Description
In the `claim()` function, the amount to decrease the Y intercept of the vault is calculated as:
```
(s.expected - balance).mulWadDown(10**ERC20(asset()).decimals() - s.withdrawRatio)
```
`s.withdrawRatio` is represented as a WAD (18 decima... | Spearbit | 5 | Astaria |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Transfer fee avoidance
### Description
The Vether4.addExcluded() function on mainnet (0x4Ba6dDd7b89ed838FEd25d208D4f644106E34279) allows a user to exclude an address from transfer fees for a cost of 128 VETH. By exploiting the conditions in which fees are taken, it is possible to set up a contract for a onc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: multiWithdrawals which has first leg consuming all forwarded gas, will be bricked with high probability
### Description
The maximum number of vaults from which withdrawals can be made simultaneously during a multiWithdrawal is limited to 5. This limitation is put in place to prevent the transaction from enco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent transfers of native tokens could result in unexpected loss of funds
### Description
Multiple protocol functions across both `Ignite` and `StakingContract` transfer native `AVAX` to the user and/or protocol fee/slashed token recipients.
Throughout `Ignite` [[1](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Burn functions should be removed
### Description
**Description**
Since the white paper states that, there would never be any burning of tokens, we advise the
burn functions be removed as it’s not a required function of the core ERC20 token standard. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Native tokens may be drained from margin accounts via lack of value validation
### Description
The CommandSafeExecutor library is used to call into the compliance contract and validate user commands. However, it does not perform validation on the native tokens transferred by the user’s command. Instead, the C... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-1 Attacker can freeze profit withdrawals from V3 vaults
### Description
**Description:**
Users of Ninja can use Vault's `withdrawProfit()` to withdraw profits. It starts with the
following check:
If attacker can front-run user's `withdrawProfit()` TX and set **lastProfitTime** to
block.timestamp, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Assets Can Be Transferred After Auction Started
### Description
Description
It is possible to force the bidder to spend more cash than they anticipated through frontrunning.
Accounts are not prevented from transferring assets after the auction has started. This can result in the account being
liquidated to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Current frontrun protection of GovNFTTimelock works only under limited conditions
### Description
The GovNFTTimelock contract variant is intended to provide an extended contract that has a degree of frontrun protection for its value. This allows for safe selling on a marketplace and increases the utility of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: MagicLpAggregator doesn't consider the dcimal of MagicLP
### Description
We can know that the `MagicLpAggregator` can serve as the `price source` for `MagicLP shares` when the prices of `base` and `quote` tokens are similar.
MagicLpAggregator would be used to price MagicLP collateral for Cauldrons.
So... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Global-1 | Centralization Risk
### Description
**Description**
Elevated privilege leads to multiple DoS attack vectors:
When a harvest is called, `_updatePosition` relies on there being enough OATH in the contract to cover the relic’s accumulated rewards. If there is an insufficient amount of OATH, users ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `RDPXV2CORE_ROLE` is not assigned in `PerpetualAtlanticVault`
### Description
While the `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE`, and `MANAGER_ROLE` are assigned during the `constructor()`, the `RDPXV2CORE_ROLE` is not.
Any call from the Core contract to the vault will revert until this value is set, so it would be advised to as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Missing docstrings [core and samples]
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/tree/6dea6d8752f64914dd95d932f673ba0f9ff8e144/contracts/) there are several parts that do not have docstrings. For instance:
* [Line 24](https://github.com/eth-infinitism/acco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Use `increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance` instead of `approve/safeApprove`
### Description
Changing an allowance with `approve` brings the risk that someone may use both the old and the new allowance by unfortunate transaction ordering. Refer to [ERC20 API: An Attack Vector on the Approve/TransferFrom Methods]... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Protocol can be exploited by malicious Keeper
### Description
The protocol team is interested to know the worst outcome when Keeper becomes malicious. Let's observe how malicious Keeper can exploit protocol.
Part 1. Keeper is allowed to update Assets Under Management (AUM), however, update must not exceed max... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Holders can burn locked funds ✓ Addressed
### Description
Skale token is a modified ERC-777 that allows locking some part of the balance. Locking is checked during every transfer:
**code/contracts/ERC777/LockableERC777.sol:L433-L441**
```
// Property of the company SKALE Labs inc.-------------------------... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: Using bools for storage incurs overhead
### Description
Use uint256(1) and uint256(2) for true/false to avoid a Gwarmaccess (100 gas), and to avoid Gsset (20000 gas) when changing from `false` to `true`, after having been `true` in the past. Check more [here](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [12] Using `bool`s for storage incurs overhead
### Description
Use `uint256(1)` and `uint256(2)` for true/false to avoid a Gwarmaccess (**[100 gas](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/1b70014db712f8572a72378321250058)**), and to avoid Gsset (**20000 gas**) when changing from 'false' to 'true', after having been... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: ConvexStakingWrapper: Small rounding error in `_calcRewardIntegral()`
### Description
The treasury takes a 20% fee of rewards. The calculation will possibly leave 1 wei unaccounted for.
```jsx
IERC20(reward.token).transfer(treasury, d_reward / 5);
d_reward = (d_reward * 4) / 5;
```
For instance, assume `d_re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize away `bridgedMappingValue` variable in `TokenBridge::bridgeToken`
### Description
**Description:** Optimize away `bridgedMappingValue` variable in `TokenBridge::bridgeToken` by for example:
**Linea:**
Fixed in commit [35c7807](https://github.com/Consensys/zkevm-monorepo/commit/35c7807756ccac2756be7d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: The `poolExposure` for token1 is erroneously calculated as `shortPremium - longPremium;`
### Description
### Finding description and impact
`getAccumulatedFeesAndPositionsData` returns the total amount of premium `owed to the short legs` and the total amount of premium `owned by the long legs`. This means th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: [03] Lack of `data` on flashloan could make some ERC1155 unusable
### Description
When doing an ERC1155 flashloan, the data parameter is always empty:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-delegate/blob/main/src/DelegateToken.sol#L406
Some collections might need this parameter to be usable. This is an [exam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [FIXED] Parameter validation
### Description
In the locations mentioned above, function parameters are not validated. This lack of validation can lead to unpredictable behavior or the occurrence of panic errors.
### Recommendation
We recommend implementing validation for function parameters to ensure stable a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `PerpMarket::getOrderFeeUsd` incorrectly charges `makerFee` when skew is zero and trade is buy order
### Description
**Description:** In `PerpMarket::getOrderFeeUsd` there is this comment to which I've added (*) at the end:
But doing a truth table for the `if` statement's boolean expression shows this commen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Malicious user can register a scanner under any owner
### Description
The [`ScannerRegistryCore` contract](https://github.com/forta-protocol/forta-token/blob/92d7a7ddd6672a7530a4bfc532d0d697e7f12744/contracts/components/scanners/ScannerRegistryCore.sol#L8) implements the functionality to allow the registratio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Ignored return values
### Description
Several functions in the `StrategyAerodromeGaugeGreen` contract make external calls that return values, but the return values are ignored. Ignoring return values can lead to unexpected behavior if the return values are used to determine the success or failure of the extern... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Users can increase liquidity for token owned by sanctioned or non-verified user
### Description
Severity: Medium Risk
Context: (No context files were provided by the reviewer)
Description: VerifiedPoolsPositionManager.sol ensures that users can only mint, decrease liquidity, and burn
positions for themselve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Finalization Fails for the First Batch of Data Submitted After Migration to the Updated Contract ✓ Fixed
### Description
When submitting the initial batch of compressed block data after the contract update, the finalization will fail.
In function `_finalizeCompressedBlocks`, `startingDataParentHash = dataPa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | false | ## High: Token Index error in `getNormalizedWeights` calculates incorrect weight leading to incorrect pool asset allocation
### Description
The `_getNormalizedWeights()` function in `QuantAMMWeightedPool.sol` contains a critical indexing error when handling multipliers for pools with more than 4 tokens. The error caus... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Operators Under Immediate Slashing Risk Upon Reactivation Of Previous Strategy
### Description
The current implementation of strategy management in operator sets may expose operators to immediate slashing risk when strategies are removed and subsequently re-added.
In the `AllocationManager`, strategies can be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong postGasPrice() implementation can lead to loss of funds
### Description
In Sui’s implementation, the gas price is committed to memory before posting it and before running validation on the gas price.
Before showing the code of Sui’s implementation, it will make more sense if we look at the implementa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Malicious bundler can steal funds from SponsorPaymaster
### Description
* https://github.com/KintoXYZ/kinto-core/blob/f7dd98f66b9dfba1f73758703b808051196e740b/src/paymasters/SponsorPaymaster.sol#L156
A hacker can drain the SponsorPaymaster in just one transaction. This can be achieved by executing a userOp w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Strategy contract’s balance-tracking system could facilitate theft
### Description
Strategy contract functions use the contract’s balance to determine how many liquidity or base tokens to provide to a user minting or burning tokens. The Strategy contract inherits from the ERC20Rewards contract, which defines ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Account unnecessarily taken as input
### Description
## Analysis of DepositToAuctionPool ix
In `DepositToAuctionPool` ix, the `auction_authority` account is taken as input but not used anywhere in the run function. It is used only to check the `auction_pool.owner`, which is an unnecessary constraint, because ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Use of hardcoded price deviation in baseOracleCircuitBreaker()
### Description
The `LibOracle::baseOracleCircuitBreaker()` uses the hardcoded value of 50% price deviation, which might be too large when using the ETH as a base price reference. Moreover, the fixed % deviation is considered too risky because the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: The deposit / withdraw / trade transaction lack of expiration timestamp check and slippage control
### Description
The deposit / withdraw / trade transaction lack of expiration timestamp and slippage control
### Impact
According to the whitepaper:
> Deposits in the highest priced buckets offer the highest v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Mathematical Reasoning around Rounding Errors and their Impacts for Troves in Batches
### Description
**Impact**
This finding summarizes my research on how Truncation could be abused, the goal is to define the mechanisms and quantify the impacts
**Minting of Batch Shares**
Minting (and burning) of batch sha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Implementation of EIP-2535 Does Not Fully Match the Specification
### Description
The [`Diamond` contract](https://github.com/VenusProtocol/venus-protocol/blob/94bc2e414e33ebf6c05d35c1605dcbd48fa932f5/contracts/Comptroller/Diamond/Diamond.sol#L24) implements the [EIP-2535 standard](https://eips.ethereum.org/EI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Solvent Liquidation Is Not Admin-Gated
### Description
## OS-HNY-ADV-00 Process Step 4
The fourth step of the process described in OS-HNY-ADV-00 is performed via the `LiquidateSolvent` instruction. Similarly, notice that the instruction’s signer is not verified to be an admin-controlled address. By specifyin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused file
### Description
1. File: src/interfaces/convex/BoringMath.sol (line [1](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-badger-citadel/blob/main/src/interfaces/convex/BoringMath.sol#L1)) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Emergency processing can be blocked ✓ Fixed in Pull Pattern
### Description
The main reason for the emergency processing mechanism is that there is a chance that some token transfers might be blocked. For example, a sender or a receiver is in the USDC blacklist. Emergency processing saves from this problem by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: RedeemManager. _claimRedeemRequests transaction sender might be tricked to pay more eth in transaction fees
### Description
The `_claimRedeemRequests` function is designed to allow anyone to claim ETH on behalf of another party who has a valid redeem request. The function iterates through the `redeemRequestIds... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | true | false | ## Low: Unused `PausableUpgradeable::CannotRenounceWhilePaused` error should be removed | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use direct comparison in verifyRoute return statement
### Description
The function `verifyRoute` checks if `totalRatio` is equal to `10_000` and returns a boolean value based on the comparison. The current implementation uses an if-else structure to determine the return value.
### Recommendation
To make the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `byteLength` adjustment
### Description
A constant `byteLength` should be used for `UINT`, `ADDRESS`, `BOOL` and `INT`.
https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/borgCore.sol#L506
`isMethodCallAllowed()` should return false instead of revert in case the exact ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: `treasury.updateYieldsFromLiquidatedLrts()` updates the yield in the current chain, but collateral may be in the other chain
### Description
[treasury.updateYieldsFromLiquidatedLrts()](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-11-autonomint/blob/main/Blockchain/Blockchian/contracts/lib/CDSLib.sol#L667-L670) upda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | true | false | ## Low: The getAttestation function can return expired or revoked attestations
### Description
The index function is designed to index an EAS attestation by its UID and employs various validations to ensure that neither expired nor revoked attestations are registered within the `attestationsByAttester` and `attestatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | true | false | ## Low: Redundant balance check in safeTransferFrom before calling underlying transfer function
### Description
The `RWASegWrap::safeTransferFrom()` function performs an unnecessary balance check on lines 452-454 before calling the underlying transfer function:
```solidity
uint256 currentBalance = balanceOf(from, id)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Stale Oracle Data
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `86d0d8895e42e37525b841eb29022365f872963d` and `1164b56be2cbe6850b16ce955356f4b52abb8860`. The client added additional checks for chainlink feed.
**File(s) affected:**`Utils.sol`
**Description:** The protocol just calls `latestRoundData()` to get ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `getBid()` returns incorrect results for past or future timestamps
### Description
The `Folio.getBid()` function is used to retrieve auction bid parameters (sellAmount, bidAmount, and price) for an ongoing auction at a specified `timestamp`. However, while the auction price is correctly calculated based on the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Increments can be unchecked
### Description
In Solidity 0.8+, there's a default overflow check on unsigned integers. It's possible to uncheck this in for-loops and save some gas at each iteration, but at the cost of some code readability, as this uncheck cannot be made inline.
[ethereum/solidity#10695](https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `boughtShares` is wrongly initialized
### Description
When creating an IPO card, initial shares are allocated to the initial owner:
```solidity
card.initialOwnerShares = _card.initialOwnerShares;
..snip
sharesBalance[cardID][_card.cardInitialOwner] = _card
.initialOwnerShares;
```
But these shares... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent coding style
### Description
There are general inconsistencies and deviations from the [Solidity Style Guide](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/style-guide.html) throughout the codebase. These lead to misconceptions and confusion when reading the code. Below is a non-exhaustive list of inc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Liquidation | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/126
## Found by
obront
## Summary
When the value of the underlying asset is calculated in `getPositionRisk()`, it uses the `underlyingAmount`, which is the amount of tokens initially deposited, without any adjustment for the interest earned... | Sherlock | 5 | Blueberry |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.