prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-vault-kit/tree/83ea1ad97b7c561d6601b220d23ec85d67ceb297/src), there are multiple code instances that do not have docstrings:
* The entire [`BeaconProxy` contract](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-vault-kit/blob/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Validation | true | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Critical Risk**
## Context
`VaultImplementation.sol#L249`
## Description
In `in_validateCommitment()`, we check that the merkle root of the strategy has been signed by the strategist or delegate. After the signer is recovered, the following check is performed to validate the signatur... | Spearbit | 5 | Astaria |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: attacker can perform malicious transactions in the safe because reentrancy is not implemented correctly in the checkTransaction() and checkAfterExecution() function in HSG
### Description
to prevent reentrancy during the safe's `execTransaction()` function call code use `_guardEntries` and increase it in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Removal Of Pending Deposit Stake
### Description
## Stake Operations Overview
In `stake_operations`, `convert_stake_to_amount` converts a stake (represented as a decimal) into an equivalent amount of tokens (represented as a `u64`) based on the total stake and total amount in a farm. It ensures that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Mitigated in: `f6d4dd7879068205bb1957cdd1d819beddca6f54`, `9cf014863c7391ee53ee2d2b1e9b602baa981c8b`, and `2a9894eddbd69bcbbfb72b683b62b919327bbb50`.
The Sequence team provided the following explanation:
> 1. _Zero cost could be intentional. No change_
> 2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Funds transferred via Connext may be lost on destination due to incorrect receiver or calldata
### Description
The `_startBridge()` function in `AmarokFacet.sol` and `NXTPFacet.sol` sets user-provided receiver and call data for the destination chain.
- The receiver is intended to be the `LifiDiamond` contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Frozen and non-member accounts can always redeem tranche tokens
### Description
The `RestrictionManager` contract implements a simple restricted token standard (ERC-1404) where accounts can be frozen and added/removed from a member list. This member list restricts who can be the recipient of token transfers... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Vesting Schedule Start and End Time can be Set in the Past
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-vtvl/blob/f68b7f3e61dad0d873b5b5a1e8126b839afeab5f/contracts/VTVLVesting.sol#L245-L304
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
There is no check whether `_startTimestamp` and `_en... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Truncation | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-opyn-judging/issues/201
## Found by
CRYP70, yixxas, hyh
## Summary
Formulas for `usdcAmount`, `portion.crab`, `portion.eth` used in depositAuction() and withdrawAuction() for queued distributions perform division first, which lead to truncation and fund loss in the... | Sherlock | 3 | Opyn Crab Netting |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect assumption of USDC and USDT value
### Description
The SuperSaleDeposit contract directly accepts USDC and USDT deposits with the implicit assumption that both stablecoins maintain a 1:1 peg with USD. This assumption is used in critical price calculations for token purchases across all tiers. For exam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Decoding of bytes[] params Calldata Length
### Description
When [decoding the calldata](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/base/BaseActionsRouter.sol#L34) for `bytes actions` and their respective parameters `bytes[] params`, the [`decodeActionsRo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Reduce the size of error messages (Long revert Strings)
### Description
Shortening revert strings to fit in 32 bytes will decrease deployment time gas and will decrease runtime gas when the revert condition is met.
Revert strings that are longer than 32 bytes require at least one additional mstore, along with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Natspec
### Description
## Code Review Finding
**Context:**
- `INodeFactory.sol#L33`
- `IQuoter.sol#L8`
- `IQuoter.sol#L13`
**Description/Recommendation:**
Some functions linked to this finding lack documentation. Adding clear and detailed documentation would improve code maintainability an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: `MovingAverage.setSampleMemory()` may broke MovingAverage, making the value of `exchangeRate` in `StabilizerNode.stabilize()` being extremely wrong
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
In the current implementation, when `sampleMemory` is updated, the samples index will be malposition, making `getValue... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | token | true | true | _Submitted by kenzo, also found by IllIllI_
Across the codebase, the protocol is usually checking that ERC20 transfers have succeeded by checking their return value.
This check is missing in MerkleVesting's `withdraw` function.
### Impact
If for some reason the ERC20 transfer is temporarily failing, the user would t... | Code4rena | 4 | FactoryDAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Bio NFT incorrectly breaks SVG lines and doesn't support more than 120 characters effectively
### Description
According to the docs
> "Any user can mint a Bio NFT by calling Bio.mint and passing his biography. It needs to be shorter than 200 characters."
Let's take two strings and pass them to create an N... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Misleading Comments
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/oev-contracts/tree/0f2c18660fc342ced7c7177577432f7d06481684/src/) the following instances of incorrect documentation have been identified:
* The comment on lines [35 and 36](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/oev-contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: EA AND POOL OWNER TREASURY WILL ALSO NEED TO APPROVE DELEGATE IF THEY WANT TO CALL DEPOSIT
### Description
To enable a pool, liquidity requirements must be met by both the Evaluation Agent (EA) and the pool owner treasury. To fulfill these requirements, both roles need to perform an initial deposit via the `ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Overlap in the Naming of Events
### Description
Both interfaces `IBaseGrant` and `IFunding` have an event with the name `LogFunding`.
The event `LogFunding(address indexed donor, uint256 value)` appears in both files with the same name and inputs.
### Recommendation
The duplicate events have been removed in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent support for a native `ETH` token
### Description
The current strategy for integrating the `ETH` support within the contract relies on usage of the native `ETH`, as opposed to the use of the ERC20 interface for balance checks and transactions. Consequently, native `ETH` is treated as an exceptio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: zeroLendToken is bricked to use for whitelisted users
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage to the users or the protocol)
## Description
## Brief/Intro
The protocol intends to only a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Reentrancy Check in `lock_staking::reentry_check` Causes Concurrent INIT Deposit Failures (DOS)
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The liquid staking protocol’s `deposit_init_for_xinit` function, which allows users to deposit INIT tokens to receive xINIT, is vulnerable to transaction failur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Runtime-configured contract ownership
### Description
This comment is about very implicit runtime-configured contract ownership instead of explicit `Ownable`-alike constructions. Such an architecture makes the ownership deploy configuration-dependent, which is being hard to check after the deployment in compar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Sequencer Address Updates Can Immobilise Contract
### Description
The sequencer may update itself with an incorrect address, resulting in the loss of its ability to execute sequencer-only functions. The BVM_EigenDataLayrChain contract contains a sequencer role which is responsible for updating various addresse... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: getCollateralBalances() returns tokens at the zero address if a user does not have a balance in a collateral token
### Description
The function `TermRepoCollateralManager.getCollateralBalances()` returns the zero address as the token address if a user does not have a balance in a given token. This causes roll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: User may unexpectedly perform refund transaction without getting refund
### Description
_[Note: This is an issue with the fix to [H-01], not with the original code in the provided commit.]_
In `NounsDAOLogicV2.sol`, refunds are only provided if the voter actually has votes. Otherwise, the refund is silently s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: MarketMaker.sol is vulnerable to inflation attacks
### Description
**Details**
[FundingMath.sol#L21-L37](https://github.com/SportsFI-UBet/ubet-contracts-v1/blob/2766b47bed2cf027e29053af2afc4d35256747a5/contracts/funding/FundingMath.sol#L21-L37)
function calcFunding(uint256 collateralAdded, uint256 totalSh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of NFT callbacks
### Description
In the current implementation, when an EOA upgrades to a smart wallet, it will no longer be able to receive NFTs due to a lack of token callbacks in the current implementation. Per the ERC-721 and ERC-1155 standards, when an NFT is transferred using `safeTransfer`, the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: stETH liquidity problem
### Description
L2ERC20Bridge mints stETH without minting a corresponding amount of wstETH on L2 https://github.com/lidofinance/lido-l2-with-steth/blob/792071cdeaf61de927cc144e8c1c02d5f5996a01/contracts/optimism/L2ERC20ExtendedTokensBridge.sol#L172. This can lead to insolvency issues, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: maxWithdraw() of ERC4626 Vaults must not revert
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
According to EIP-4626, maxWithdraw() must not revert. But the function maxWithdraw() reverts when called in the Pool contract which uses the ERC-4626 standard.
According to the EIP, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Error Messages forward information about underlying libraries
### Description
**Description:** The application returns error messages that disclose internal implementation details, including library names and versions (e.g., `Position 1 is out of bounds. Version: viem@2.37.12`). Even for open-source project... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Missing _vestingCount Increment
### Description
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The _vestingCount variable is not incremented after being used to assign an index in the addUserVesting function of ERC20Vesting. This results in vestings being assigned the same index, leading to in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The total amount to be distributed can be manipulated
### Description
The amount of tokens to be distributed at a new batch through function `PriorityPool#updateDistribution()` can be manipulated, which is the result of manipulating state variable `depositsSinceLastUpdate`
### Impact
* The tracked amounts `de... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient tests
### Description
Excluding bridge-related code, there are 23 error types. However, only 12 are checked for in tests (Table 3.1). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of re-entrancy guard for \_mint[Hero](https://github.com/Crelde/IOTA-Heroes-Contracts/blob/3e345747f723637c0a1ce884d1ae0e1584015e98/contracts/HeroNFT.sol#L68)
### Description
**Description:**
\_[mintHero fu](https://github.com/Crelde/IOTA-Heroes-Contracts/blob/3e345747f723637c0a1ce884d1ae0e1584015e98... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unprotected `executeModule` function allows to steal the tokens
### Description
The `executeModule` function allows anyone to execute any module with any params. That allows attacker to execute operations on behalf of other users.
### Impact
HIGH - Anyone can steal others' tokens from their markets.
### Rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `get_by_tag` tries to access out of bound index
### Description
The [get_by_tag](https://github.com/deriverse/protocol-v1/blob/30b06d2da69e956c000120cdc15907b5f33088d7/src/program/constants.rs#L4) contains an off-by-one error in its loop condition. The function iterates using [while i <= continer.candles.len()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: EthCompoundPCVDeposit - should provide means to recover ETH
### Description
`EthCompoundPCVDeposit` accepts `ETH` via `receive()`. Anyone can call `EthCompoundPCVDeposit.deposit()` to mint `CToken` for the contracts `ETH` balance.
The `CToken` to be used is configured on `EthCompoundPCVDeposit` deployment... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | false | false | ## Gas: MaxLoanRatio is not configured properly.
### Description
``MaxLoanRatio`` is the ratio of debt to collateral and should always be multiplied by 10**18. But while setting or updating ``maxLoanRatio`` there are no checks.
### Impact
1. It causes borrowers to borrow more debt with less collateral.
2. It may be i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Vault global shares and assets change will mismatch local shares and assets change during settlement due to incorrect `_withoutSettlementFeeGlobal` formula
### Description
Every vault update, which involves change of position in the underlying markets, `settlementFee` is charged by the Market. Since many user... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `owner` Can Change Claimable `ratioBps` During Claiming Period
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `2390ec05d16b77130bb10826754942c0dcc475ad`.
**File(s) affected:**`ZRCClaim.sol`, `ZRCClaim2.sol`
**Description:** Users may receive different ratios of claimable tokens to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Owner in `VaultProxy.sol ` is `address(0)`
### Description
The owner variable in the `VaultProxy.sol` is going to be zero because of a bug in `staderConfig`.
The `intialize` function in `staderConfig` grants the admin role to an admin passed in the native `_grantRole()`, but does not update the mapping that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Validators can be crashed via p2p
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
- Network not being able to confirm new transactions (total network shutdown)
## Description
## Brief/Intro
An attacker can cause a rust panic via p2p, crashing ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incomplete Validation
### Description
In the `NftFactory.sol` contract the following validation checks are missing:
- `constructor()` missing zero-address check for `_nftImplementation` parameter.
The `InitializationParams` struct input, is the parameter of the `deploy()` function. The following validation c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Spender can front-run calls to modify token allowances, resulting in DoS and/or spending more than was intended
### Description
When updating the allowance for a spender that is less than the value currently set, a well-known race condition allows the spender to spend more than the caller intended by front-run... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Change the access role name for the `secondOpinionOracle` function
### Description
There is a `setOracleReportLimits` function at the [following line](https://github.com/lidofinance/core/blob/efeff81c18f85451ebf98e8fd8bb78b8eb0095f6/contracts/0.8.9/sanity_checks/OracleReportSanityChecker.sol#L269). It has a re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Pawn Duration Not Bound to Signed Quote Allows 7↔30-day Term Tampering
### Description
`PawnShop` verifies an EIP-712 signature over `(tokenId, offerAmount, validUntil, nonce)` but `pawn()` accepts a user-supplied `durationDays` that is **not signed**.
This lets a borrower reuse the _same_ backend+treasury sig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | true | ## Low: `InvestorBasedRateLimiter::setInvestorMintLimit` and `setInvestorRedemptionLimit` can make subsequent calls to `checkAndUpdateMintLimit` and `checkAndUpdateRedemptionLimit` revert due to underflow
### Description
`InvestorBasedRateLimiter::_checkAndUpdateRateLimitState` [L211-213](https://github.com/ondoprotoc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: [22] `UniswapSettlement#swapExactIn()` should be made safer
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-predy/blob/a9246db5f874a91fb71c296aac6a66902289306a/src/settlements/UniswapSettlement.sol#L22-L37
Multiple issues with how the approval is being done here:
1. It doesn't check the return value t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Slashing isn't supported in the rebasing mechanism
### Description
The function `rebase()` has been used to increase the share price and apply staking rewards. The issue is that staking has its own risks and stake amounts can be slashed (In Commume or Bittensor network) and current logic doesn't support decre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Inexplicit Revert
### Description
In the [`getDynamicFieldSlice` function](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/12a9eb1afb18a7f7cb43d774cabb2d5af7c74e6b/packages/store/src/StoreCore.sol#L901) of the `StoreCore` library, a bytes range specified by `start` and `end` can be read from a dynamic field.
While th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Users may not be able to fully redeem USD1 into USDT even when reserve ratio is above 100%
### Description
Users may not be able to fully redeem USDT even when reserve ratio is above 100%, because of portfolio being taken into the account for calculation.
### Impact
Users may not be able to fully redeem US... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | true | false | ## Low: `MetaVault::redeem` erroneously calls `ERC4626Upgradeable::withdraw` when attempting to redeem `USDe` from `pUSDeVault`
### Description
Unlike `MetaVault::deposit`, `MetaVault::mint`, and `MetaVault::withdraw` which all invoke the corresponding `IERC4626` function, `MetaVault::redeem` erroneously calls `ERC462... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Splitting `require()` statements that use `&&` saves gas
### Description
Instead of using the `&&` operator in a single require statement to check multiple conditions, I suggest using multiple require statements with 1 condition per require statement (saving 3 gas per `&`): | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Witness Data Reader Skips the Last Line if There Is No New Line
### Description
The [`ReadWitnessData`](https://github.com/mantlenetworkio/mantle-v2/blob/e29d360904db5e5ec81888885f7b7250f8255895/op-chain-ops/crossdomain/witness.go#L81-L142) function of OP-Chain-Ops utilizes `bufio`'s [`NewReader`](https://gith... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Asymmetric decay of Asset saved priced distorts average price
### Description
The Asset contract implements a graceful fallback for being able to provide underlying asset prices when the upstream oracle is unreachable.
This fallback uses the last known price, but artificially widens its range (`low-high`) to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Tier winner can steal excess funds from tiered percentage bounty if any deposits are expired
### Description
Total funds used to calculate the percentage payment is set when the bounty is closed. If the main deposit is refundable by the time when the bounty is closed, a tier winner could exploit the bounty to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Streaming Fee Share Calculation
### Description
**Severity:** High
**Path:** src/vault/libs/AutoPoolFees.sol#L238-L240
**Description:**
The streaming fee is intended to be applied to the profit generated during the rebalancing and debt reporting process. However, in the current implementation of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Users unable to claim rewards after full withdrawal
### Description
The UsualSP contract prevents users from claiming staking rewards if they have a zero balance, even if they have accrued rewards from previous staking periods. This creates a suboptimal user experience where users who have fully withdrawn thei... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | false | false | ## Gas: Use prefix not postfix in loops
### Description
[G-02] Use prefix not postfix in loops
Using a prefix increment (++i) instead of a postfix increment (i++) saves gas for each loop cycle and so can have a big gas impact when the loop executes on a large number of elements.
There are several examples of this::br
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Each Well is responsible for ensuring that an `update` call cannot be made with a reserve of 0
### Description
**Description:** The current implementation of `GeoEmaAndCumSmaPump` assumes each well will call `update()` with non-zero reserves, as commented at the beginning of the file:
However, there is no a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Validate number of approvers in `setThresholds()`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/bridge/DestinationBridge.sol#L255
The `setThresholds()` function should validate that elements in the `numOfApprovers` array are greater than zero. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of msg.sender
### Description
The MetaMorpho contract uses the inherited `_msgSender()` function whenever it needs to read the `msg.sender` value. The only place this doesn’t happen is in the `_setCap` function, when emitting the `SetWithdrawQueue` event.
### Recommendation
For consistency ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Centralization Risk
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Location**: All
**Description**
The vulnerability in the contracts arises from the excessive authority granted to the admin, presenting a centralization issue. The core concern lies in the admin's unrestricted access to critic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: In `ResourceLockValidator`, the `validateUserOp()` Function Lacks Sufficient Checks, Allowing Draining of `ModularEtherspotWallet` Balances
### Description
This is a collection of issues with different root causes, we grouped them in a single instance for better explanation.
### Impact
Draining of the Modula... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Address Changes Should Use Two-step Procedure
### Description
The critical procedures should be two step process.
See similar findings in previous Code4rena contests for reference:
https://code4rena.com/reports/2022-06-illuminate/#2-critical-changes-should-use-two-step-procedure
### Recommended Mitigation St... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | true | false | ## Low: `TierConfig::price` is not validated to follow `TierConfig::power` which itself is not used or validated
### Description
**Description:** When creating a new DAO membership, the creator can specify a [`TierConfig::power`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users can continue voting for inactive pools through registerVoteWeight()
### Description
Users can vote for receivers that have been marked as inactive if they have previously voted for this receiver. Users have a few ways to vote in `IncentiveVoting.sol`. They can call:
- **`registerAccountWeightAndVote(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: The Beacon proxy pattern is better suited to upgrading multiple instances of `MembershipERC1155`
### Description
**Description:** Currently, new membership DAOs are deployed as [Transparent upgradeable proxies](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119d0b515a/con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Pending ToDo Comments in `ChefIncentivesController`
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
There are TODOs on line: 308 and line: 363 in the `ChefIncentivesController.sol` contract. Pending todo comments are not advised during the deployment of code in production.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Checks if Address Is Non-Zero
### Description
**Update**
2021-08-03: the admin team considered adding these checks to the contracts are dangerous.
**Description:** There are many functions that do not validate input addresses. A list of them is provided below, but they might not be comprehensive since... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Adding a new schain may potentially hit the gas limit Pending
### Description
When adding a new schain, a group of random 16 nodes is randomly selected to run that schain. In order to do so, the `_generateGroup` function iterates over all the nodes that can be used for that purpose:
**code/contracts/Scha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Public `ContributionNft::mint` leads to cascading issues / loss of funds
### Description
The contributors are supposed to submit their proposals via frontend and it is assumed from the [docs](https://whitepaper.virtuals.io/about-virtuals-1/the-protocol/co-contribution-and-provenance/modular-consensus-framewor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: State variables can be packed to use fewer storage slots
### Description
The EVM works with 32 byte words. Variables less than 32 bytes can be declared next to eachother in storage and this will pack the values together into a single 32 byte storage slot (if the values combined are <= 32 bytes). If the variabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: [59] Contracts should have all `public`/`external` functions exposed by `interface`s
### Description
All `external`/`public` functions should extend an `interface`. This is useful to ensure that the whole API is extracted and can be more easily integrated by other projects.
BidOrdersFacet.sol ([20](https://gi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `drawTimeoutAt()` causes the prize pool to shutdown one draw earlier
### Description
The shutdown timestamp returned by `drawTimeoutAt()` is one draw period early, causing the protocol to shut down one draw earlier than expected.
### Impact
When `drawTimeout = 1`, the prize pool will never award prizes to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: `bridge` does not check if the provided `msg.value` is enough for the fee
### Description
`CrossChainLayerZeroTellerWithMultiAssetSupport` has `_quote`, which can be used to calculate the fee required for the operation using best practices from LayerZero. However, when `_bridge` is called, it doesn't check if ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing events for important state updates
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Method `emergecyWithdrawForEscrow(...)` and method `emergecyWithdrawForProject(...)` allows admin to withdraw user funds in case contract is under attack or malicious activity is possible. Thes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Inefficient use of abi.encode()
### Description
The `abi.encode()` function is less gas efficient than `abi.encodePacked()`, especially when encoding only static types. This detector identifies instances where `abi.encode()` is used and all arguments are static, suggesting that `abi.encodePacked()` could poten... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: CreateOffer allows eachTradeTax to be 100% ( 10000 bp ) violating code assumptions
### Description
The code comments in definition of Premarket.sol#CreateOffer states that 
```solidity
eachTradeTax must be less than 100%, decimal scaler is 10000
```
 , however , the code only reverts if `eachTradeT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Typed structured data hash used for signing commitments is calculated incorrectly
### Description
Since
`STRATEGY_TYPEHASH == keccak256("StrategyDetails(uint256 nonce,uint256 deadline,bytes32 root)")`
The hash calculated in `_encodeStrategyData` is incorrect according to EIP-712. `s.strategistNonce` is of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: **Rate Limiting Threshold Bypass**
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We intend to keep the Bypass functionality for operational flexibility. As for the concerns raised, we consider setting THRESHOLD to 0 as a viable option.
**F... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: GroupBuys that are completely filled still don't raise stated target amount
### Description
`createPool()` in GroupBuy.sol creates a new contribution pool around an NFT. It specifies a target `\_initialPrice` as minimum amount of ETH the NFT will cost, and `\_totalSupply` which is the number of Raes to be m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Setting minimum slippage
### Description
In glpStrategy, setting slippage allowance to a low value is dangerous. An extreme scenario is setting to zero, which increases the risk of reverts. It must be some slippage always allowed.
Consider introducing some `_MIN_SLIPPAGE` and do not allow `_slippage` to be be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Unbounded loop can cause denial of service
### Description
Under certain conditions, the withdrawal code will loop, permanently blocking users from getting their funds.
The `beforeWithdraw` function runs before any withdrawal to ensure that the vault has sufficient assets. If the vault reserves are insuffici... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Reentrancy bug in Basket’s withdraw multiple tokens function which gives attacker ability to transfer basket ownership and spend it but withdraw all the tokens out of basket
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-nibbl/blob/8c3dbd6adf350f35c58b31723d42117765644110/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: availableToWithdraw does not check paused state
### Description
Due to how the `OndoTokenRouter` contract is set up, it expects the result of the `availableToWithdraw` call to be available for withdrawal from all the token sources. If the `availableToWithdraw` function returns a non-zero value but this amount ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Testing code used in production
### Description
In some locations in the Drift Protocol codebase, testing code is mixed with production code with no way to discern between them. Testing code should be clearly indicated as such and guarded by `#[cfg(test)]` to avoid being called in production.
Examples appear ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Lack Of Sysvar Account Validation
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
The program passes the instructions sys_var account to both deposit and set_service instructions, but does not perform validation in the `validate_remaining_accounts` and even in the `solana_ibc::cpi::set_stake` function. Thus, replaci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Withdrawal queue can be forcibly activated to hinder bridge operation
### Description
The withdrawal queue can be forcibly activated to impede the proper operation of the bridge.
The `RootERC20PredicateFlowRate` contract implements a withdrawal queue to more easily detect and stop large withdrawals from pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: IRMSynth 's targetQuote assumes reference asset has 18 decimals
### Description
The `IRMSynth.targetQuote` parameter is set to `1e18`. It is compared against the output of `oracle.getQuote(1e18, synth, referenceAsset)` that returns a reference asset amount which will be in reference asset decimals.
### Rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: DoS vulnerability in `EmissionManagerV1.updateEpoch()`
### Description
The `updateEpoch()` function in the `EmissionManagerV1` contract contains a version check that could cause issues in future upgrades. The check `_getInitializedVersion() == 1` means the function will stop working if the contract ever uses `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `AllowList::hasTradeRestriction` mutability should be set to `view`
### Description
**Description:** `AllowList::hasTradeRestriction` does not make any changes to storage, it simply reads some variables and makes some checks, but the function's mutability is not marked as view.
**Recommended Mitigation:** Cha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: `UniswapV2Router::getAmountsOut()` based upon pool reserves allowing returned price to be manipulated via flash loan
### Description
[`PriceFeed`](https://github.com/dexe-network/DeXe-Protocol/tree/f2fe12eeac0c4c63ac39670912640dc91d94bda5/contracts/core/PriceFeed.sol) uses [`UniswapV2PathFinder`](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: State update performed after external call in `MembershipERC1155::mint`
### Description
When `MembershipERC1155::mint` is invoked during a call to `MembershipFactory::joinDAO`, the `totalSupply` increment is performed after the call to `ERC1155::_mint`:
```solidity
function mint(address to, uint256 tokenId, u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: `approvedCreditor` not reset after account transfer
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact**: High, user can steal funds from liquidated account
**Likelihood**: Medium, requires either a bad debt account, or L2 to be offline for some time
**Description**
The Arcadia accounts support a secondary backup cred... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Two-Step Ownership Transfer
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The contracts does not implement a two-step process for transferring ownership. In its current state, ownership can be transferred in a single step, which can be risky as it could lead to accidental or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Old Solidity Version (< 0.8)
### Description
**Update**
From dev team:
> The versions are the ones that Compound is currently using in Production. The team made the decision to not modify any of the code originally written by Compound. Updating solidity versions require non-trivial changes and add risks on co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Testing smart contract code in Brownie can be unreliable
### Description
The Brownie testing system should be improved to make it more robust when dealing with time-dependent and high-consumption gas tests. When Brownie tests code that depends on the block number and timestamp in smart contracts, it provides s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unclear purpose of the MATIC withdrawal function.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
TestStake::emergency WithdrawMatic(). The 'TestStake contract does not have a fallback or receive function, but the function for withdrawing MATIC is implemented, and its use ca... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.