prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Cooling Period Reset on Multiple Requests
### Description
## Context
SToken.sol#L79
## Description/Recommendation
If a user makes multiple withdrawal requests within the COOLING_PERIOD window, the withdrawal eligibility date keeps getting pushed back, causing indefinite delays.
For example, with COOLING_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: `_execute` allows you to execute unsuccessful tasks in the future
### Description
If the transaction is unsuccessful, then a revert will occur in the code (https://github.com/cloudwalk/brlc-multisig/blob/b5d6c2b6273162d5666d48649890b15a113df7a7/contracts/base/MultiSigWalletBase.sol#L378):
```
(bool success, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Use of the `memory` keyword when `storage` should be used
### Description
When copying a state struct in memory, there are as many SLOADs and MSTOREs as there are slots. When reading the whole struct multiple times is not needed, it's better to actually only read the relevant field(s). When only some of the fi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Avoid shadowing variables
### Description
The highlighted line declares a new variable `owner` which has already been defined in `Auth.sol` inherited by `LienToken`:
```
address owner = ownerOf(lienId);
```
### Recommendation
Rename `owner` to `lienOwner` at `LienToken.sol#L583`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use `require` instead of `assert`
### Description
Assert should not be used except for tests, `require` should be used
Prior to Solidity 0.8.0, pressing a confirm consumes the remainder of the process's available gas instead of returning it, as request()/revert() did.
Assertion() should be avoided even after... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Casting between types without overflow checks
### Description
Throughout the codebase, many instances of both implicit and explicit casting between types exist, with both having the potential to impart overflow errors when downcasting or casting between `int` and `uint`.
Some examples of such behavior can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Event is missing `indexed` fields
### Description
Each `event` should use three `indexed` fields if there are three or more fields
*There are 33 instances of this issue:*
[See original submission](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon-findings/issues/203) for details. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: False negatives in ECDSA384 can lead to DoS
### Description
The current pinned version of `solarity/libs/crypto/ECDSA384.sol` is an incomplete implementation, where the correct signature is being rejected in some cases due to how point arithmetic is being handled.
See the following GitHub issues for more d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of Outdated snap.config.json Instead of snap.config.js ✓ Fixed
### Description
According to the [MetaMask-CLI Documentation](https://github.com/MetaMask/snaps/tree/main/packages/snaps-cli#configuration) the use of `snap.config.json` is discouraged and projects should switch to `snap.config.js` instead.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Unclear Role Assignment Regarding Royalties
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `d88cad2f5ee936a9cd39988265b53c53dca8e6c8`. The client updated documentation related to roles.
**File(s) affected:**`RoyaltiesOracle.sol`
**Description:** Several functions have documentation stating that they can be called ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Any party can reject receiving funds to prevent escrow from settling/claiming
### Description
**Description:**
Since the system adopts ""Push""pattern to handle funds transferring when settling, if any transfer is failed then the escrow cannot be settled. Any party (buyer,seller,marketplace) can abused this... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: No check on native assets
### Description
The functions `startBridgeTokensViaHopL1Native()`, `startBridgeTokensViaXDaiBridge()`, and `startBridgeTokensViaMultichain()` do not check whether `_bridgeData.minAmount <= msg.value`. Consequently, this could allow the use of native assets that are still in the Diamon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Centralized control in the program
### Description
**Description**
Both programs (strategy and vault) have centralized control. In the Strategy program, an admin account can manually specify any amount within either execute_withdraw or execute_deposit, while in the Vault program, any whitelisted account ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Oracle | false | true | _Submitted by bardamu, also found by berndartmueller, codexploder, Alex the Entreprenerd, and horsefacts_
Call to `latestRoundData` could potentially revert and make it impossible to query any prices. Feeds cannot be changed after they are configured (<https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-contracts-v2-code4rena/blob/... | Code4rena | 3.75 | Juicebox |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect initialization of smart contracts with Access Control issue
### Description
_Submitted by Haipls, also found by byndooa, cryptphi, and TrungOre_
[HomeFiProxy.sol#L216-L230](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-rigor/blob/5ab7ea84a1516cb726421ef690af5bc41029f88f/contracts/HomeFiProxy.sol#L216-L23... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Introspection Sizes
### Description
The `Introspect` implementations of the [signed integers](https://github.com/dojoengine/dojo/blob/e1a349b2c4b1a836156e769a46f8fe3c87ae553f/crates/dojo-core/src/model/introspect.cairo#L139-L197) all describe the layout as requiring 251 bits. All models automatically... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity compiler optimizations can be problematic
### Description
The Primitive contracts have enabled optional compiler optimizations in Solidity. There have been several optimization bugs with security implications. Moreover, optimizations are actively being developed. Solidity compiler optimizations are di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Missing checks for index out of bounds
### Description
The functions `pullFundsFromSingleStrategy`, `pushFundsIntoSingleStrategy`, and `addStrategy` fail to implement checks for out-of-bounds access on the array of strategies with which the vault can interact.
```
/**
* @notice Pulls funds back from a singl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Price manipulation by swapping any ````baseToken```` with itself
### Description
````WooPPV2.swap()```` doesn't forbid the case that ````fromToken == toToken == baseToken````, attackers can make any ````baseToken````'s price unboundedly drifting away by swapping with self.
### Impact
Acccording ````WooFI``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Prefix increments
### Description
Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments - `6` gas. This can mean interesting savings in `for` loops.
### Proof of Concept
2 instances:
##### src/Vault.sol
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Change `i++` to `++i`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: `MAX_ANNUAL_INTEREST_RATE` should be customizable per branch and should be set higher due to exotic collaterals
### Description
**Q - Why is this not customizable?**
`MAX_ANNUAL_INTEREST_RATE` is left unchanged from Bold
`uint256 constant MAX_ANNUAL_INTEREST_RATE = _100pct;`
But Quill has collaterals that a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Improper implementation of arbitraryCall() allows protocol gov to steal funds from users’ wallets
### Description
## Handle
WatchPug
## Vulnerability details
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-11-streaming/blob/56d81204a00fc949d29ddd277169690318b36821/Streaming/src/Locke.sol#L733-L735
When an incentiveT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Consider `isContract` checks in constructors
### Description
Several addresses are assigned in the contract constructors and assigned to immutable variables. A successful deployment is sensitive to these addresses being assigned correctly for the current network, and that addresses were specified in the correc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Market Allows Zero Amount Positions Which Can Cause Vault Rebalancing to Revert
### Description
When adjusting positions, it correctly calculates the amount and respects limits, but it runs into a problem when dealing with a zero amount in the openMake and closeMake functions. This problem occurs when the V... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `emergencyClose()` may fail to repay any debt
### Description
- the [`emergencyClose()`](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-10-SteadeFi/blob/main/contracts/strategy/gmx/GMXEmergency.sol#L111) function may become ineffective, preventing the contract from repaying any outstanding debt, leading to potential financ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Two-Step Ownership Transfer
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The devve contracts does not implement a two-step process for transferring ownership. In its current state, ownership can be transferred in a single step, which can be risky as it could lead to acciden... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Prevent accidental ownership and admin renouncement
### Description
**Description:** The inherited `renounceOwnership()` and allow the last authority to remove themselves, potentially leaving the contract permanently ownerless or admin‑less, blocking critical functions.
Consider override `renounceOwnership()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong `CHANGE_COLLATERAL_DELAY` in CollateralBook
### Description
Admins can bypass time delay due to the wrong value of `CHANGE_COLLATERAL_DELAY`.
### Impact
Admin can bypass the 2 days time delay and only need to wait less than 5 minutes to call `changeCollateralType`.
### Recommendation
```solidity
uin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: LTV of 98% would be extremely dangerous
### Description
Having an LTV of 98% that pools can set is really dangerous as it doesn't take into account that oracle prices have the so called deviation, which can be anywhere from 0.25% to 2%. Meaning that the actual LTV would be `LTV + oracle1 deviation + oracle2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Parameter Encoding
### Description
## Issue with `withdraw_all` Parameter in `withdraw_from_lending_account`
In `marginfi_cpi::withdraw_from_lending_account`, there is an incorrect encoding of the `withdraw_all` parameter in the instruction data. `withdraw_from_lending_account` allows a user to w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: sandwich approveTransferERC20
### Description
## Handle
paulius.eth
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
function approveTransferERC20 is vulnerable to the sandwich attack. Similar to the erc20 approve issue described here: https://blog.smartdec.net/erc20-approve-issue-in-simple-words-a41aaf47bca6
A malicio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing validation for vesting points
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract Vesting.sol, the method `initialize(...)` sets the vesting points as follows:
`(vestingPoints, ) = ascendingSort(_vestingPoints);`
Here, vesting points are ordered as per the timestamp v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary code - BytesLib methods are not used in this contract or its parent contracts
### Description
BytesLib methods are not used in PurchaseBundler.sol or its parent contracts.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-gondi/blob/ab1411814ca9323c5d427739f5771d3907dbea31/src/lib/callbacks/PurchaseBundler.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | signature | false | true |
User can abuse how stop losses are priced to open high leverage trades with huge upside and very little downside.
### Proof of Concept
function limitClose(
uint _id,
bool _tp,
PriceData calldata _priceData,
bytes calldata _signature
)
external
{
_checkDelay... | Code4rena | 5 | Tigris Trade |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Misleading comment in `wfCashLogic._burn` function
### Description
The comment next to the `_withdrawCashToAccount` function call implies that the `from` address is the withdrawal receiver. However, `opts.receiver` is the receiver.
### Findings
[wfCashLogic.sol#L230](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-not... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Node API dependency for verification of VersionedSignedBeaconBlock
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Description:**
The oracle service retrieves a signed beacon block without verifying the data or signatures. The node API it currently uses is the QuickNode API. The issue exists in the following functions: ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Possible zero address for intermediary asset
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In the AaavePositionManager contract the `intermediaryAsset` field inside the Config struct can be zero address. This leads will revert the call inside the uniswap contract, at function ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Potential out of gas error in revokeVotes
### Description
Within the [`revokeVotes` function](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/f64b4c5b5228ecbf41e3e7cfdbb8c0e9a983eea2/packages/protocol/contracts/governance/Governance.sol#L672), the [`for` loop will execute `dequeued.length`](https://github.co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Implementations Can Be Initialized
### Description
The contracts are upgradable, inheriting from the `Initializable` contract. However, the current implementations are missing the `_disableInitializers()` function call in the constructors. Thus, an attacker can initialize the implementation. Usually, the initi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: State variables should be cached in stack variables rather than re-reading them from storage
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ access of a state variable within a function. Caching will replace each Gwarmaccess (100 gas) with a much cheaper stack read.
Less obvious fixes/optimizations in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: 'Dead' Code
### Description
**Update**
The clients stated: "The file `contracts/External.sol` is still kept because hardhat will automatically export the `proxyAdmin` and `TransparentUpgradeableProxy` ABI when deploying the contract."
**File(s) affected:**`vaults/External.sol`, `rewards/BaseRewards.sol`
**De... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Test Coverage Improvements
### Description
## Summary
## Vulnerability Details
Adequate test coverage and regular reporting is an essential process in ensuring the codebase works as intended. Insufficient code coverage may lead to unexpected issues and regressions arising due to changes in the underlying smar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: VULNERABLE ECDSA LIBRARY
### Description
A vulnerability found in the `ECDSA` library developed by the OpenZeppelin team. OpenZeppelin team published a security advisory on GitHub on August 22nd, 2022. According to the vulnerability, `recover` and `tryRecover` functions are vulnerable, as those functions acce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent documentation to actual function logic
### Description
It is mentioned in documentation of the function `validateActionCreation` that the param `actionInfo` is used.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-06-llama/blob/main/src/interfaces/ILlamaStrategy.sol#L33-L35
However, in `LlamaAbsoluteQuorum... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Solidity Versions
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/spherex-collab/spherex-protect/tree/main/src/), there are `pragma` statements that use an outdated version of Solidity. For instance:
* The `pragma` statement on [line 4](https://github.com/spherex-collab/spherex-protect/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Ballots not yet past their deadline are incorrectly looped too by tokenWhitelistingBallotWithTheMostVotes()
### Description
Inside `DAO.sol`, [\_finalizeTokenWhitelisting()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-salty/blob/main/src/dao/DAO.sol#L250) before finalizing a token whitelisting proposal makes a ch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Protection sellers can bypass withdrawal delay mechanism and avoid losing funds when loans are defaulted by creating withdrawal request in each cycle
### Description
To prevent protection sellers from withdrawing fund immediately when protected lending pools are defaults, there is withdrawal delay mechanism, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Make state variables that do not change constants
### Description
State variables such as name, decimals, and symbols, can be declared with the constant
accessibility modifiers since they do not change throughout the lifetime of the smart contract. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Constant values such as a call to `keccak256()`, should used to immutable rather than constant
### Description
There is a difference between constant variables and immutable variables, and they should each be used in their appropriate contexts.
While it doesn't save any gas because the compiler knows that dev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: There is an inconsistency in the `vote` and `poke` functions regarding the handling of the end of the voting window
### Description
The `VoterUpgradeableV2.vote` function allows voting at the end of the voting window, while the `VoterUpgradeableV2.poke` function does not accommodate this.
The `VoterUpgradeabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Pool information might be lost if setFactory() ofPoolKeeper contract is called
### Description
The `PoolKeeper` contract has a function to change the factory: `setFactory()`. However, calling this function will make previous pools inaccessible for this `PoolKeeper` unless the new factory imports the pools from... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Handle division by 0
### Description
There are a few places in the code where division by zero may occur but isn’t handled.
### Recommendation
Remediated per Notional’s team notes in [commit](https://github.com/notional-finance/contracts-v2/pull/104/commits/1681e16cd798fb60e756051d051de075ab641d21) by addi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Using the `transfer` function of `address payable` is discouraged
### Description
**Impact:**
Medium, as payroll will revert and Merkle Trees & approvals would have to be done again
**Likelihood:**
Medium, as it happens any time the recipient is a smart contract or a multisig wallet that has a receive func... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Avoid complex casting
### Description
Consider refactoring the following code, as double casting is confusing, and, in some scenarios, it may introduce unexpected truncations or rounding issues.
Furthermore, double type casting can make the code less readable and harder to maintain, increasing the likelihood ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating and Multiple Pragma Directives Are Being Used
### Description
Pragma directives should be fixed to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled. Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/mantlenetworkio/mantle-v2/blob/e29d360904db5e5ec81888885f7b7250f8255895/), th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: The Hats contract needs to override the ERC1155.balanceOfBatch function
### Description
The Hats contract does not override the ERC1155.balanceOfBatch function
### Impact
This will make balanceOfBatch return a different result than balanceOf, which may cause errors when integrating with other projects
###... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: UNUSED FUNCTIONS
### Description
Some unused functions have been declared in `Exchanger.sol` contract. Although they are declared as `external`, they are also declared with the 'OnlyExecutive`modifier, which restricts the usage of these functions only to the address having`Executive`role, which can only be ass... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: Withdrawal proofs can be forged due to missing index bit size check
### Description
**Severity:** Critical
**Path:** BeaconChainProofs.sol:verifyWithdrawal#L269-L399
**Description:**
In order for the EigenPod to verify and consequently process a withdrawal from the beacon chain, it uses the BeaconChainsP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: All swaps other than the top-of-block swap will revert
### Description
For swaps that are not top-of-block, `AngstromL2::afterSwap` short-circuits; however, this occurs too late in the execution with an incorrect `hookDeltaUnspecified` after a debt is erroneously created in the invocation of `_computeAndCol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Market Price Lower Than Expected
### Description
The market price does not conform to the specification documented within the whitepaper. As a result, the computed market price is lower than expected.
### Impact
Loss for the makers as their tokens are sold at a lower price than expected.
Additionally, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `PersistentSet` library storage access
### Description
Multiple expensive storage reads (SLOAD ~2100 gas each) for the same `set._statuses[value]` occur in several functions: `_add`, `_remove`, `_containsAt`, and `_contains`. Each repeated access to the same storage slot wastes gas.
### Recommendation
Cache s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Integer Overflow / Underflow
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in commit `e3c4d1f`.
The functionality of `L286` depends on the assumption that `BUFFER_COLLATERAL` is always equal to `4`. If the value of `BUFFER_COLLATERAL` is ever refactored, using the literal `4` may lead to unexpected behavior. To avoid any ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Drips that end after the current cycle but before its creation can allow users to profit from squeezing
### Description
By creating a drip that ends after the current cycle but before its creation time and immediately removing it, the sender doesn't have to put in any assets but the receiver can still squeeze... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary liquidity sync can be removed
### Description
The `BaseIncentiveLogic::_syncPoolLiquidity` method is used to synchronize the internal liquidity accounting of an incentivized pool in storage for the corresponding logic contract and is only expected to be executed once; however, there are several ins... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Novel Staking Risks Posed by Middleware
### Description
Middleware (as named by EigenLayer) poses a unique value proposition within the liquid staking derivative ecosystem. Their premise is that middlewares can leverage existing stake assigned to a single operator, allowing multiple different protocols to leve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Unrestricted epoch transition risks contract solvability
### Description
Anyone is able to call `endEpoch` function, once the `EPOCH_DURATION` is over, triggering the next epoch start. The consequence is that all programmed withdrawals will now be enabled, whether there is or not sufficient liquidity on the co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: [03] Reentrancy could occur in flash loan callback functions
### Description
The lack of reentrancy protection in the flash loan callback functions (`_openCdpCallback`, `_adjustCdpCallback`, `_closeCdpCallback`) can allow an attacker to reenter the contract during execution, potentially leading to multiple CDP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Accrued Fees Can Be Stolen
### Description
The [`_increase`](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/PositionManager.sol#L211-L218) function of the `PositionManager` contract does not verify whether the caller is the owner of the specified `tokenId` or one of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | true | ## Low: Rebasing will fail if no market sources are fresh
### Description
If no market oracles are fresh, then `getPriceAnd24HourVolume()` on line 57 of `MarketOracle.sol` will revert due to division by zero.
```solidity
uint256 volumeSum = 0;
uint256 partialRate = 0;
uint256 partialVolume = 0;
bool isSourceFresh = f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Incorrectly assigned `decimal1` parameter upon decoding
### Description
Impact is high as lots of functions depend on the `decodeWellData`, and as such will be fed incorrect data about `token1`'s decimals. This can lead to potential overvaluation or undervaluation of the token's amount and prices, depending o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: IMPROPER TOKEN RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION
### Description
The `Owner` can recover funds from a compromised account by burning and re-minting tokens. However, it was identified that the `recover()` function was implemented using the `mint()` function, which reverts if the total supply is not 0. Therefore, token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Some proposals can be queued when governanceexecutor is paused
### Description
`OmnichainGovernanceExecutor` automatically queues the proposals received as messages through LayerZero. The pausing mechanism of `OmnichainGovernanceExecutor` is designed to deny the queueing of proposals when the contract is pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `IBeanstalk` interface should be updated to reference Stem-based deposits | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: function withdrawETH from GiantMevAndFeesPool can steal most of eth because of idleETH is reduced before burning token
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantPoolBase.sol#L57-L60
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehous... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: zAuction, zNS - gas griefing by spamming offchain fake bids Acknowledged
### Description
The execution status of both `zAuction.acceptBid` and `StakingController.fulfillDomainBid` transactions depend on the bidder, as his approval is needed, his signature is being validated, etc. However, these transaction... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: [04] The isolate auction is not the best system
### Description
In the isolate auction `IsolateLiquidation.sol#isolateAuction()` the liquidators will just keep bidding a bigger amount in the auction then, the winner will only pay the `borrowAmount` and receive back all the extra money he previously paid.
The... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Owner can front-run traders by updating adapters ✓ Fixed
### Description
MetaSwap owners can front-run users to swap an adapter implementation. This could be used by a malicious or compromised owner to steal from users.
Because adapters are `DELEGATECALL`ed, they can modify storage. This means any adapter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `amount` must be > 1
### Description
`amount` must be > 1:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditManager.sol#L821
### Recommendation
We recommend changing the check. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typos/Incorrect comment/Natspec comments
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In Contract GlmRouter.sol, l#431, there is a typo of Rotuer.
In Contract GlmRebalance.sol, l#22, l#406, l#424, l#362, l#355 has typos.
In Contract GlmVault.sol, l#239 has an incomple... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: When a vault is shutdown a user can still commit to liens using the vault
### Description
When a vault is shut down, one should not be able to take more liens using the funds from this vault. In the commit to lien flow, `AstariaRouter` fetches the state of the vault:
```solidity
(
,
address delegate,
address... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: getReservesData does not set all AggregatedReserveData fields
### Description
The `getReservesData` function fills in an `AggregatedReserveData` structure for the reserve handled by an `IPoolAddressesProvider`. However, the function does not set the structure’s `name` and `assetType` fields. Therefore, off-chai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Fees applied twice
### Description
Fees are already accounted for in the `_base_calc_token_amounts`, so there is no need to account them twice. https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapNGViews.vy#L184
### Recommendation
We recommen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistency in `isAvailableErc20` checks
### Description
The `MarginAccount.isAvailableErc20` variable plays a crucial role in ensuring that only supported ERC20 tokens are used in operations like providing tokens, swapping, or exercising options within the protocol. This check is enforced to restrict access... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Chainlink's `latestRoundData` might return stale or incorrect results
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by cmichel, defsec, and ye0lde_
On `ChainlinkOracle.sol`, we are using `latestRoundData`, but there is no check if the return value indicates stale data. This could lead to stale prices... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | false | false | ## High: Eternal free mint.
### Description
**Description**
AccessTokenContract.sol
There is no function to prevent the user from free minting. If the user is allowed a free mint, this is an endless, free opportunity to mint passports with increased winChance. Especially given the real absence of a limit on the limi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Auction.sol#settleAuction() late auction bond could potentially not being able to be settled, cause funds loss to bonder
### Description
## Handle
WatchPug
## Vulnerability details
The `newRatio` that determines `tokensNeeded` to settle the auction is calculated based on `auctionMultiplier`, `bondTimest... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [03]
### Description
In `Community`, adding members and updating the community hash is possible when the system is changed. As these also change the system state, consider also requiring that the system is not paused. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Parameter Validation in Public Modify Position Function
### Description
The public `modifyPosition` function does not validate its input parameters, such as ensuring `slippage` is less than `10000` or checking other parameter ranges for validity.
Without proper validation in the public function, inval... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Use BytesLib.sol library to safely covert bytes to uint256
### Description
Use [toUint256()](https://github.com/GNSPS/solidity-bytes-utils/blob/master/contracts/BytesLib.sol) safely convert bytes to uint256 instead of plain way of conversion
[P256SHA256Algorithm.sol#L34](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: An Attacker Can Flood the Support by Creating Many Tickets for Arbitrary Addresses ✓ Fixed
### Description
The POST endpoint called by the `create_ticket` function does not implement any access control mechanism nor does not seem to implement any kind of DoS protection. An attacker can create tickets for any ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: After migration, the old MarketFundingPool contract will fail to correctly distribute fees to new MarketFundingPool
### Description
**Details**
[FundingPool.sol#L135-L142](https://github.com/SportsFI-UBet/ubet-contracts-v1/blob/2766b47bed2cf027e29053af2afc4d35256747a5/contracts/funding/FundingPool.sol#L135-L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | false | false | ## High: Staker Address Update Does Not Transfer Staker's Balance
### Description
**Update**
The client fixed the issue in commit `f797e3043714ac28f58aed6bdb059f3398368f91` and provided the following explanation:
> This was already fixed on Apr 4 by not allowing setting staker when the staker was already set
**File(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Implement Minimum Transfer Amount Check in Bridge Function
### Description
The current bridge function in the Bridge struct lacks a minimum transfer amount check. While this check is implemented in the BTC and Solana pollers, adding it to the central bridge function would provide an additional layer of securit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [20] Oracle price updates could be front run to game the system
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-predy/blob/a9246db5f874a91fb71c296aac6a66902289306a/src/PriceFeed.sol#L44-L58
This function returns the square root of the `baseToken` price quoted in `quoteToken`, and this price data ends u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Function handleUpdates could be reentered
### Description
A malicious verifier could reenter `handleUpdates()` while the nonce isn't incremented yet. This way, it could potentially allow processing the same action again and increase the nonce multiple times. Luckily, `validateData()` is a view function and thu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: String Revert Messages Increase Gas Consumption
### Description
The project uses `require` statements with literal string messages. Storing these strings in contract bytecode and returning them on failure increases both deployment size and runtime gas. Solidity’s custom errors (introduced in 0.8.4) encode only... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Test_init_escrow failed
### Description
**Description**
When I call the tests execution I get:
---- test_init_escrow stdout ----
thread 'test_init_escrow' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `1000000`,
right: `10000000`', tests/lib.rs:896:5
**Recommendation**:
Fix tests. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing validation for daConfig when creating new op-node
### Description
When creating a new op-node, all the configuration is validated except for the `daConfig`.
The `Check()` function for daConfig is empty:
It's recommended to validate the config such as `RpcURL` or `FallbackMode` in the `daConfig` str... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary parameter amount in withdraw function
### Description
The function `withdraw()` has a parameter `amount` but we don't understand the necessity of this parameter.
At line L67, the amount is required to be the same to the whole deposit amount. This means the user does not have a flexibility to choose... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Validation for `curveId` in Constructor
### Description
The issue is identified within the [constructor](https://github.com/lidofinance/community-staking-module/blob/a898d045b63303294752d1a60ad9dfe8d8ba69ca/src/CSEarlyAdoption.sol#L34) of the `CSEarlyAdoption` contract. While the `curveId` parameter is... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.