prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Organisation record can be re-written
### Description
**Description**
MGD.sol, createOrganisation()
Bool flag for the organisation name taken (orgTaken mapping) is never set. Thus, it makes
orgTaken mapping useless. The issue is marked as Medium only because the organisation
creation can be performed only ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: changes should use two-step process
### Description
The `QuestBoard.sol`, `QuestTreasureChest.sol`, and `QuestTreasureChest.sol` contracts inherit from OpenZeppelin’s Ownable contract, which enables the `onlyOwner` role to transfer ownership to another address. It’s possible that the `onlyOwner` role mistakenl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Large or complicated code bases should implement fuzzing tests
### Description
Large code bases, or code with lots of inline-assembly, complicated math, or complicated interactions between multiple contracts, should implement fuzzing tests. Fuzzers such as Echidna require the test writer to come up with invari... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Oracle might fail if anchor price is not updated fast enough
### Description
The `DelFiPrice` contract implements a safety mechanism to disregard reports that, while coming from trusted sources, may lead to a drastic variation of the official median price reported by the oracle. The mechanism is based on an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-1 Theoretical reentrancy attack when TYPE_MINT_BURN proposals are executed
### Description
**Description:**
The senate can pass a proposal to mint or burn tokens.
Note that the proposal is only marked as executed at the end of execution, but execution is
checked at the start of the function.
Inter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Slippage During Transfer Fee Swap
### Description
If `Berabot` contains at least 0.02% of the `totalSupply` then a swap can be made during `_transfer()`. Such swaps can be vulnerable to sandwich attacks which can cause the `feeRecipient` to receive way less `WBERA` than the normal market price for the swapp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Lender force Loan become default
### Description
in ```repay()``` directly transfer the debt token to Lender, but did not consider that Lender can not accept the token (in contract blacklist), resulting in repay() always revert, and finally the Loan can only expire, Loan be default
### Impact
Lender forced L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: Flash loan risk mitigation is optional and not robust enough
### Description
_Submitted by 0xRajeev_
The `switchEoaOnly()` allows the owner to disable `preventSmartContracts` (the project’s plan apparently is to do so after the beta-period) which will allow any smart contract to interact with the protocol ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: ReserveLibrary: Incorrect Utilization Rate Calculation When Reserve is Empty
### Description
The `ReserveLibrary::calculateUtilizationRate` function in the `ReserveLibrary` returns an incorrect utilization rate of **100%** (represented as `RAY`) when both `totalLiquidity` and `totalDebt` are zero. This flaw le... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: `ReachDistributionv2` Is Effectively Ownerless
### Description
**Update**
It is more convenient to use the internal function `_transferOwnership()`. Since the contract now inherits from`Ownable2Step`, by calling the public function `transferOwnership()`, the owner would still be the factory until `msg.sender`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Post-proposal vote quorum/threshold checks use a stale total supply value
### Description
The pessimistic vote casting [approach](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-01-olympus-on-chain-governance/tree/main/bophades/audit/2024-01_governance#vote-casting) stores its cutoffs based on the total supply durin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | true | ## Medium: Validator and protocol fees can exceed 100 percent of rewards in `PolygonStrategy.sol`
### Description
The `setValidatorMEVRewardsPercentage` function in `PolygonStrategy.sol` allows setting the validator MEV rewards percentage up to 100% (10,000 basis points), but does not account for the total protocol fe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every `transfer()` or `transferFrom()`, E.g `Vader` token.
In the current implementation, `BasePoolV2.sol#mint()` assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer am... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Undetermined confirmation time for transactions
### Description
Electronic transactions of USD may be rolled back by a centralized agency at the request of the payer, at an arbitrary time after being executed (sometimes even months after). Compared to the average confirmation time in the order of minutes in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Centralization risk in Admin.adminCall() function
### Description
The `Admin` contract implements the function `adminCall()`:
```
function adminCall(address target, bytes calldata data) external payable onlyAdmin {
assembly {
calldatacopy(0, data.offset, data.length)
let result := call(gas(), target,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect earnings calculation in `removeValueSingle()` function causes partial user losses
### Description
Asset removal before invoking `trimBalance()` in `removeValueSingle()` function causes partial loss of user earnings, as the asset's `remove()` function uses outdated earnings per value variable to ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use the Same Solidity Version Across Contracts. ✓ Fixed
### Description
Most contracts use the same Solidity version with `pragma solidity ^0.8.17`. The only exception is the `StakingRewardsV2` contract which has `pragma solidity ^0.8`.
**contracts/lybra/miner/stakerewardV2pool.sol:L2**
```
pragma solidity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Unbounded array lengths could lead to out of gas errors
### Description
In our prior audit, we raised the issue of the Notional system potentially running out of gas within functions that iterated over arrays crucial to the system. We specifically cited the [‘portfolios’ array of assets](https://github.com/not... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | true | false | ## Low: Bonding Curve Can only Be Set Once
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The suggestion to enable changing the bonding curve is not feasible, as all logic in the contract related to the bonding curve assumes a pure mathematical func... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: instruction_params Account Remains Open After Execution
### Description
The `instruction_params` account used in the [`ExecuteRelayerRefundLeaf`](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/401e24ccca1b3af919dd521e58acd445297b65b6/programs/svm-spoke/src/instructions/bundle.rs#L22) instruction remains ope... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-09-nounsbuilder-judging/issues/249
## Found by
0x52, SilentDefendersOfDeFi, jerseyjoewalcott, nirohgo
## Summary
MerkleReserveMinter allows large number of tokens to be minted instantaneously which is incompatible with the current governance structure which relies on t... | Sherlock | 5 | Nouns Builder |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Cross-chain Replay in borrowAsset() & swapToBorrow()
### Description
**Description**
Cross-chain Replay: If an User borrows assets on Chain A, they could reuse the same signature (generated from the same data) on Chain B, assuming the signature is valid for the same borrow hash structure on both chains.
**R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Deviation from specifications
### Description
The [`StakingEscrow` contract](https://github.com/forta-protocol/forta-token/blob/92d7a7ddd6672a7530a4bfc532d0d697e7f12744/contracts/vesting/escrow/StakingEscrow.sol#L18) implements the functionality to allow users who have vested tokens in L1 to be able to interac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initial Liquidity Provider can trick the system
### Description
Since there is no cap on the amount which the initial depositor can deposit, an attacker can trick the system into bypassing admin fees for other users by selling liquidity at half admin fees. Consider the following scenario:
1. User A provides t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Loan can be impaired when the protocol is paused
### Description
The `impairLoan` function allows the `poolDelegate` or `governor` to impair a loan when the protocol is paused due to a missing `whenProtocolNotPaused` modifier. The role of this function is to mark the loan at risk of default by updating the loa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Calculating new rewards is susceptible to precision loss due to division before multiplication
### Description
Rewards may be lost (0) due to division before multiplication precision issues.
### Impact
Stakers may not receive rewards due to precision loss.
### Recommendation
Consider calculating the new r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary If condition in update() of Staking.sol
### Description
## Vulnerability Details
In line 65 https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-beedle/blob/main/src/Staking.sol#L65, there already exists a condition if `_balance > balance` so that `_diff` is always > 0. However, there is a condition below checks if `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity version
### Description
The contracts can be compiled with versions of the compiler as low as `0.4.11`. We recommend changing the Solidity version pragma to a more recent version (for example, `pragma solidity ^0.4.17`) to enforce the use of an up to date compiler.
***Update:** Fixed in [this](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Potential reentrancy in claimFees
### Description
The contract performs all transfers in the `_settlement` function and therefore `_settlement` can call back to the user for reentrant tokens. To avoid reentrancy issues, the `_preLock()` modifier implements a reentrancy check, but only if the called action is n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Ineligible accounts can mint synthetic breakage units via post-checkpoint outflows and
### Description
## Self-Transfers
**Severity:** Medium Risk
**Context:** (No context files were provided by the reviewer)
**Description:**
If an eligible user transfers STRX tokens after the checkpoint ends, they ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Wrong location of _approve()
### Description
The function `_mint()` performs an `_approve()`, which is unnecessary in this context as you are designed to receive the shares directly. Conversely, the `_requestRedeem()` function does not execute `_approve()`, but it is essential there since it needs to send the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Using single total native reserve variable for synth and non-synth reserves of `VaderPoolV2` can lead to losses for synth holders
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by certora_
Users that mint synths do provide native assets, increasing native reserve pool, but do not get any liquidity shares issu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous Treasury General Comments
### Description
This section details miscellaneous findings discovered by the testing team that do not have direct security implications: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Malicious user can frontrunning buyMemecoin funtion minting less tokens for the user
### Description
The `buyMemecoin` function can be frontrun by a malicious user, leaving only 1 wei of ETH to buy. The next user would be paying more gas fees to execute the finalization of the launch transaction than the va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: ETH deposited by the user may be stolen.
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-06-tokemak-judging/issues/1
## Found by
0x007, 0x3b, 0xComfyCat, 0xDjango, 0xJuda, 0xSurena, 0xbepresent, 0xdeadbeef, 0xmuxyz, 0xvj, Breeje, Flora, SaharDevep, TangYuanShen, VAD37, asui, berndartmueller,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/RewardsPool.sol#L229
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/RewardsPool.sol#L156
## Vulnerability details
## Impac... | Code4rena | 5 | GoGoPool |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Non-normalized amounts sent via Wormhole lead to failure to redeem incentives
### Description
Wormhole only supports sending tokens in 8 decimal precision. This is addressed in the code via the `getBridgingDecimals()` method, which is overridden in `WormholeDepositProcessorL1` to return 8. This is then pass... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Failed transfer may be overlooked due to lack of contract existence check
### Description
Because the pool fails to check that a contract exists, the pool may assume that failed transactions involving destructed tokens are successful.
`TransferHelper.safeTransfer` performs a transfer with a low-level call wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Remove `msgValue < computeTotalReward(msgValue` check from TokenEmitterRewards.sol contract
### Description
On Line 18, when passing msgValue as parameter to computeTotalReward(), we will always pass this check because computeTotalReward always returns 2.5% of the msgValue. Thus since msgValue can never be les... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: A malicious guardian can steal funds Won't Fix
### Description
A guardian is signing every message that should be submitted as a payment channel update.
A guardian’s two main things to verify are: `blockNumber` and the fact that the `sender` has enough funds.
There are two main attack vectors for the mal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use constant value
### Description
**Description**
totalTokensAmount can be set as constant. It will perform gas optimization and increase the
code style.
**Recommendation**:
Set totalTokensAmount as constant. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Users at `UNSTAKE_PERIOD` can assist other users in unstaking tokens.
### Description
_Submitted by cccz, also found by JC and gzeon_
Consider the following scenario:
Day 0: User A stakes 200 tokens and calls the cooldown function. At this time, user A's cooldown is Day 0.
Day 15: User B stakes 100 tokens,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `performUpkeep` could revert
### Description
When `performUpkeep` is called, it will withdraw a percentage of shares from the deposit vault and then deposit the withdrawn tokens into the deposit and target vaults accordingly.
```solidity
function _rebalance(uint256 rebalancePct) private {
require(rebal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Undelegations from pool cannot be paused
### Description
Accounts that are granted the `OPERATOR` or `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE` role are entitled to pause multiple features of the SonicStaking contract. According to the documentation, this should include, among others, undelegation of assets.
However, while the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Confusing Usage of Staker Index
### Description
The [`staker_deposit`](https://github.com/DigitalMOB2/refi-protocol/blob/dc842fd071f225c9d1ff9ad4677b986970125cf9/contracts/Controller.sol#L281), [`staker_pullUnderlying`](https://github.com/DigitalMOB2/refi-protocol/blob/dc842fd071f225c9d1ff9ad4677b986970125cf9/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Event Emission When Completing Queued Withdrawal As Shares
### Description
The `StrategyManager.addShares()` function does not validate whether the token input parameter corresponds to the strategy’s underlying token. This can result in an incorrect event emission.
When completing a queued withdrawa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: ERC20.approve Used Instead of Safe Approvals, Causing Pool Failures with Some ERC20s
### Description
The function [acceptFundsForAcceptBid](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-11-teller-finance-update/blob/main/teller-protocol-v2-audit-2024/packages/contracts/contracts/LenderCommitmentForwarder/extension... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: OCC_Modular::applyCombine will round APR down
### Description
`OCC_Modular::applyCombine` calculation of `APR` `APR = APR / notional` rounds in defavor of the protocol, and a user can game this feature to shave of a point of APR from one of his loans.
### Impact
Loss of funds for the borrowers of the proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Use of Boolean Literal as Conditional
### Description
Boolean literals in code have limited legitimate uses. Other uses (in complex expressions, as conditionals) indicate either an error or, most likely, the persistence of faulty code.
The boolean literal [`False`](https://github.com/DigitalMOB2/refi-protoco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Front-running fallback root update might lead to additional withdrawal
### Description
A front-running attack might allow an attacker to withdraw a deposit one additional time if the system is not updated before the fallback withdrawal period is reached. The fallback withdrawal mechanism allows users to withd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Reentrancy | true | true |
When a fighting round ends, winners for the current round get picked and allocated respective rewards. These rewards are fighter NFTs that can be claimed by such winners. When you claim your rewards for a round or several rounds, the `numRoundsClaimed` state variable which stores the number of rounds you've claimed fo... | Code4rena | 5 | AI Arena |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use a two-step `governance` role transfer pattern
### Description
The `VestFactory::setGovernance` uses a single-step access control transfer pattern. This means that if the current `governance` account calls `setGovernance` with an incorrect address, then this `governance` role will be lost forever along with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RateChange event and variable not related but have same name
### Description
In `MANACrowdsale` there is a [`RateChange`](https://github.com/decentraland/mana/blob/a13905356378cc0153dd3c2153c8ceae6400970d/contracts/MANACrowdsale.sol#L27) event and a state variable. Even though they have the same name, they rep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Risk of overborrowing by only using Price * Rate Feed
### Description
**Impact**
NOTE: I'm under the impression that the config for Quill is the following:
Meaning that all oracles use the ETH-USD feed instead of their Underlying * Rate Feed
This is in general a good price to protect against redemptions... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Recommendation: Remove optional arguments and clean unused code ✓ Addressed
### Description
Several locations in the codebase feature unused arguments, functions, return values, and more. There are two primary reasons to remove these artifacts from the codebase:
1. Mass exits are the primary safeguard agains... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary use of assembly
### Description
* The [`getMerkleRoot` function](https://github.com/ben-chain/contracts-v2/blob/a935e276f5620b40802b52721e3474232e458f72/contracts/optimistic-ethereum/libraries/utils/Lib_MerkleTree.sol#L23) of the `Lib_MerkleTree` library uses assembly to pack elements before hashin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Methods should be declared as externa
### Description
**Description**
In order to get gas saving and make code more secure next functions should be set as
external.
addPackage(uint256,uint8)
addLeaderAddress(address)
addELFTAddress(address)
addExchangeAddress(address)
debitStaking(address,uint256)
creditPayout... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: ``>=`` costs less gas than ``>``
### Description
The compiler uses opcodes GT and ISZERO for solidity code that uses >, but only requires LT for >=, which saves 3 gas
4 results - 2 files:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-timeswap/blob/main/packages/v2-library/src/Math.sol#L89
https://github.com/code-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | token | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-openq-judging/issues/266
## Found by
TrungOre, XKET, chainNue, 0xbepresent, unforgiven, yixxas, jkoppel, libratus, Robert, HonorLt, 0x52, ctf\_sec, Ruhum, ltyu, CodeFoxInc, seyni, cccz, 8olidity, holyhansss
## Summary
When closeCompetition is called for TieredPerce... | Sherlock | 5 | OpenQ |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `expirations` is set to 0 for non-unlocked tokens
### Description
`expirations` of the deposited LP tokens would be set to 0 for unlocked HoneyLocker:
This would create a potential footgun for users since they would be able to withdraw LPs using the `withdrawERC20()` function and pay fees for LP tokens when ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious user can create delegations that will spend unlimited amount of gas with `SpecificActionERC20TransferBatchEnforcer` caveat
### Description
**Description:** The `SpecificActionERC20TransferBatchEnforcer` first execution has no limit on the calldata size. This allows a malicious user to create deleg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: 13] Decimal precision oversight in cross-layer token transactions
### Description
**Severity:** High
**Path:** fuel-bridge/packages/solidity-contracts/contracts/messaging/gateway/FuelERC20Gateway/FuelERC20GatewayV4.sol, fuel-bridge/packages/fungible-token/bridge-fungible-token/src/main.sw
**Description:**
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users are getting back their `soc-loss-funds` while selling their market seat
### Description
**Description:** Inside `sell-market-seat` when [soc-loss-funds](https://github.com/deriverse/protocol-v1/blob/30b06d2da69e956c000120cdc15907b5f33088d7/src/program/processor/sell_market_seat.rs#L122) are negative, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | false | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
`SwapAdminFacet.sol#L109`
## Description
Once a Stable Swap is assigned to a key (the hash of the canonical id and domain for token), it cannot be updated nor deleted. A Swap can be hacked or an improved version may be released which will warrant updating the S... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Open Spread Loss Calculation Error
### Description
The `maxLossOfOpenOptions` variable prevents new RFQ option strategies from opening if previously opened strategies exceed potential max losses. However, this check is calculated on the assumption that the `strikeDiff` cannot change. If `strikeDiff` decreases ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Buy request executed by providing `request.owner`
### Description
When `buy` is executed, it first validates `isValidListing`, ensuring that `request.owner` has indeed signed the listing, and that listing.receiver has also signed the listing if the caller is not the `listing.receiver`.
```solidity
function... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Unoptimized Owner Lookup in approve Function
### Description
In the `approve` function of the VotingEscrow contract, the owner of a token is looked up using the `_ownerOf(_tokenId)` function call multiple times. This is inefficient because the owner is already retrieved and stored in the `owner` variable at th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: [23] Order of functions
### Description
The solidity [documentation](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.17/style-guide.html#order-of-functions) recommends the following order for functions:
- constructor
- receive function (if exists)
- fallback function (if exists)
- external
- public
- internal
- private... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Bundler May Drop UserOps if the `owner` of LightAccount Violates ERC-4337's Validation Requirements in `isValidSignature()`
### Description
**Update**
The client added a comment to the Light Account documentation explaining the limitations of owners that are contracts in the context of user operation validatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Oracle.removeMember could, in the same epoch, allow members to vote multiple times and other members to not vote at all
### Description
The current implementation of `removeMember` is introducing an exploit that allows an oracle member to vote multiple times in the same epoch, while preventing another oracle ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Front-Running | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-09-notional-judging/issues/82
## Found by
xiaoming90
## Summary
Malicious users can deny Notional Treasury from receiving fees when rewards are reinvested.
## Vulnerability Detail
The `claimRewardTokens` function will harvest the reward tokens from the Aura Pool, an... | Sherlock | 5 | Notional |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Fee On Transfer Tokens May Break Virtual Accounting When Withdrawing And Depositing
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In DeFi tokenized vaults allow users to deposit their tokens and earn yield on those tokens deposited. These instances of ERC7540 make use of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Application Fails with Generic Error Messages Making It Hard to Know What Went Wrong
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The Open Dollar application’s back end is composed completely of Solidity smart contracts. Calling functions ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: The OwnershipTransferred event should send the oldOwner
### Description
The OwnershipTransferred event has two arparameterguments to indicate who was the current owner and who is the new owner, however parameter one does not describe the case, the parameter is declared as user when the variable should be relat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Object credentials retrieval
### Description
## Security Considerations for zkApps
Using `mina_getState`, it is possible to retrieve all credentials without the user knowing which ones are going to be accessed by the zkApp.
## Proof of Concept
If a zkApp executes the following code, it will request all o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Double-Counted Submission At Cutoff
### Description
If the first submission is triggered at `firstSubmissionTriggerCutoff`, then the rewards for the period ending at `firstSubmissionTriggerCutoff` can be double-counted. The first submission can be triggered at `firstSubmissionTriggerCutoff` due to the equality... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Create 2 Hash Collision
### Description
**Impact**
Because of the fact that the system uses deterministic addresses, given the fact that keccak (a 32 bytes function) is truncated down to a uint160 (20 bytes), the likelihood that a clash is found is around 2^80
This makes brute-force mining a clash plausible,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Overpayment vulnerability in `registerL1`
### Description
**Description:** The `registerL1` function in the `L1Registry` contract does not handle excess Ether sent by users. If the `registerFee` is set to a nonzero value and a user sends more Ether than required, the contract keeps the entire amount instead of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: MISSING NATSPEC DOCUMENTATION
### Description
Solidity contracts can use a special form of comments to provide rich documentation for functions, return variables, and more. This special form is named the Ethereum Natural Language Specification Format (NatSpec).
### Recommendation
**PENDING**: Natspec document... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | cross-chain | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-optimism-judging/issues/235
## Found by
unforgiven
## Summary
Function `MigrateWithdrawal()` in migrate.go will turn a LegacyWithdrawal into a bedrock style Withdrawal. it should set a min gas limit value for the withdrawals. to calculate a gas limit contract overes... | Sherlock | 5 | Optimism |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Since attribute expiration is deprecated, remove as input parameters, don't write it to storage and put comment explaining this
### Description
**Description:** `RegistryService::setAttribute` sets a given `_expiry` field for each attribute at which point the attribute should expire.
However this is never che... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Liquidations Use Inaccurate rate Values
### Description
The [`liquidate` function](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/Liquidation.sol#L162) of the `Liquidation` contract does not accrue interest prior to liquidating a vault. Instead, interest is ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `CDPVault.liquidatePosition()` does not scale `takeCollateral` with `tokenScale`; therefore, it might send the wrong amount of collateral to the liquidator when `tokenScale ! = 1 ether`
### Description
First of all, in `CDPVault`, the amount of `collateral` maintained in each position is scaled using `token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Wrong Math | false | true | _Submitted by p4st13r4, also found by cmichel, GreyArt, hyh, jayjonah8, leastwood, pauliax, shenwilly, and WatchPug_
Any user that owns a vToken of a particular vault can lock the functionalities of `NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol` and `NFTXStakingZap.sol` for everyone.
Every operation performed by the marketplace, that deal... | Code4rena | 3 | NFTX |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Storage Overwrite in `recv_external()` Corrupts Plugin State
### Description
**Update**
The team addressed the issues in the following commits: `6afdbdeb7722fc01f8ecb3b9a33fe6e75a0ec69e`, `ef79ab0f1a1754149d4bc6f836b8bf50f81abea8`, `925319a5547311890384aead846d1fb5f8e331bd`, `c1f4f87a8699d69fbfb007b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [03] Missing UUID uniqueness validation in campaign deployment
### Description
The NudgeCampaignFactory does not validate the uniqueness of campaign UUIDs during deployment, potentially allowing multiple campaigns with the same identifier.
### Vulnerability Details
When deploying campaigns through `deployCam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing validation of the TOKEN_SALE constant
### Description
In the [`TokenSale`](https://github.com/OpenSTFoundation/SimpleTokenSale/blob/1a1e863441ba0149d7585203f5dbc6e800af00cf/contracts/TokenSale.sol#L128) contract, there is validation for most of the configuration constants which is a very good practice.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [12] Useless `max` pick
### Description
In [bootloader, line 1456](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-zksync/blob/1fb4649b612fac7b4ee613df6f6b7d921ddd6b0d/code/system-contracts/bootloader/bootloader.yul#L1456), it is being picked the maximum between the refund provided by the operator and the one calculated... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: `LenderPool`: Principal withdrawable is incorrectly calculated if start() is invoked with non-zero start fee
### Description
_Submitted by hickuphh3_
[LenderPool.sol#L594-L599](https://github.com/sublime-finance/sublime-v1/blob/46536a6d25df4264c1b217bd3232af30355dcb95/contracts/PooledCreditLine/LenderPool.so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Permanent `Fees` Loss if The Owner Forget to Executed `setFeeAddress()` Function
### Description
The `FEE_ADDRESS` address in `PANTHEON.sol` contract is used to store `4%` tax fees when the user calls `mint()` or `redeem()` functions. This `4%` fee is distributed as follows:
- `3%` will be used to incentiv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Event Emitting Due to the Lack of Duplicate Address Checks
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `6704de9f726d22100eadfaa85f75011318cd5e44`, `e379a966302482254b65664dfe552d0366b0ff69`. The client provided the following explanation:
> By preventing (non-zero) price... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Bio Protocol - `tokenURI` JSON injection
### Description
The Bio Protocol allows users to mint Bio NFTs that represent user's bio. Once NFT is minted anyone can trigger `tokenURI` to retrieve JSON data with the bio and generated svg image. Example JSON content (decoded from Base64):
{"name": "Bio #1", "d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constants should be used in place of magic numbers
### Description
**Description:** There are a number of instances in both `MembershipFactory` [[1](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119d0b515a/contracts/dao/MembershipFactory.sol#L60), [2](https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect or missing NatSpec comments
### Description
The following issues were identified in the NatSpec documentation:
**OracleUtils.SetPricesParams** struct**:**
* The `compactedOracleBlockNumbers` parameter is outdated and no longer exists.
* The `realtimeFeedTokens` and `realtimeFeedData` parameters... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Token approvals enabled during contract pause
### Description
The `SwapBridge` contract inherits from OpenZeppelins's `Pausable` contract and allows for control of function execution via the `whenNotPaused` modifier. However, the `approveMax()` function is not protected by this modifier. Consequently, token ap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: The doCall forwarding the callvalue is counterintuitive
### Description
The ALMProxy is a contract that stores assets and allows arbitrary, permissioned calls to it. It has implemented a few functions to facilitate this:
- **doCall(address target, bytes memory data)**: Performs a `.call` to a target with `msg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Uninitialized `last_block_number` Variable
### Description
The `last_block_number` variable is declared but not initialized in the constructor, defaulting to `0`. This could lead to undefined behaviour if accessed before being set. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Minimum Amount Check in `SmartVaultV3::mint`, `SmartVaultV3::burn`, and `SmartVaultV3::swap` Can Result in Loss of Fees
### Description
The absence of a minimum requirement check for `_amount` in `SmartVaultV3::mint`, `SmartVaultV3::burn`, and `SmartVaultV3::swap` allows a user to send a very small amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Fee Scaling in `spot_lp`
### Description
The fee calculation in the `spot_lp` instruction uses an incorrect decimal factor when converting `last_px` to a human-readable price when trying to determine how much money is needed to purchase the minimum quantity of an asset. The code divides `last_px` by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Potentially depositing at unfavorable rate since anyone can deposit the entire lenderPool to a known strategy at a pre-fixed time
### Description
_Submitted by kyliek_
[LenderPool.sol#L312](https://github.com/sublime-finance/sublime-v1/blob/46536a6d25df4264c1b217bd3232af30355dcb95/contracts/PooledCreditLin... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.