prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `PoolV3#repayCreditAccount()` use incorrect share converting function to calculate profit and loss
### Description
### Impact
Either the profit or the loss is calculated incorrectly, resulting in the treasury owns incorrect profit balance.
### Proof of Concept
Anyone can deposit `WETH` for `lpETH` by cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Intentional design choice
**File(s) affected:**`Vepoch.sol`
**Description:** Specific contracts have state variables, e.g., `owner`, which provide certain addres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Withdrawals can be frozen by creating null deposits
### Description
It won't be possible to withdraw any LP token after doing a deposit of $0$ liquidity, leading to withdrawals being effectively freezed.
### Proof of Concept
In [**liquidity_lockbox, function withdraw**](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-12... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Remove unused inherited contracts
### Description
In `GasZipPeriphery`, the following contracts are inherited but never used:
- `ILiFi`
- `SwapperV2`
- `ReentrancyGuard`
- `Validatable`
The `ReentrancyGuard` adds additional storage, increasing the contract deployment cost. Similarly, the logic in `Validatable... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Problematic approach to the handling precision errors
### Description
Many functions in the TickLogic contract contain obscure precision checks. These checks may protect against a subset of unexpected behavior but are problematic when considering the full range of inputs.
One such example is in the `RCLBorrow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | flash-loan | true | false | ## High: Multiple vote checkpoints per block will lead to incorrect vote accounting
### Description
_Submitted by berndartmueller, also found by 0x52, 0xSky, bin2chen, cccz, Chom, davidbrai, elprofesor, izhuer, m9800, PwnPatrol, and rvierdiiev_
Voting power for each NFT owner is persisted within timestamp-dependent c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: SafeGuard’s admin can assign the role of creator to any address
### Description
The `SafeGuard` contract defines the role of a [`CREATOR_ROLE`](https://github.com/withtally/safeguard/blob/b2c63a9dfc4090be13320d999e7c6c1d842625d3/contracts/SafeGuard.sol#L16) which, as the name suggests, is assigned to the creat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | true | ## High: Incorrect indexing for bid sorting algorithm
### Description
When an Atlas CallConfig specifies `exPostBids == true`, all `solverOps` are simulated on-chain to determine their theoretical bid amount. The `solverOps` are then sorted and executed in order until a `solverOp` succeeds. The sorting of the bids is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Room for improvement in contracts documentation
### Description
The Centre Token minting contracts are in general well documented, and the documentation adheres to the [NatSpec format](https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Ethereum-Natural-Specification-Format). There is, however, room for improvement. First, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | access-control | true | true | ## Critical: `SignatureValidator::setAllowlist` is unrestricted leading to free purchases of tokens
### Description
`SignatureValidator::setAllowlist` is unrestricted.
Since `SignatureValidator` inherited by `ReferralManager` and `TokenBank` this has downstream consequences.
For `TokenBank` in particular this means ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
**Partially Fixed** in `2c05d81`. The client did not add all the fixes, but provided the following explanation: Intended behaviour to be able to disable the filter registry and IMX functionality by setting it to the zero address. However, added check in `Vouc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: Prize locking mechanism inconsistency with weight proportions
### Description
In the SpinLottery contract, users pay for `spin`s based on the weight distribution of the rarities, which determines the cost of participation.
```solidity
function calculateSpinCost(uint256 _totalSlots, uint256 _prizeCount) pu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: `encodedData` argument of `hashStruct` is not calculated perfectly for EIP712 singed messages in `CultureIndex.sol`
### Description
Encoding of `encodedData` is not done correctly for the verification of EIP712 signed messages.
### Impact
`CultureIndex::_verifyVoteSignature()` is called by other functions... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Constant may be utilised.
### Description
**Description**
Contract uses “magic” number 1e18 as a definition of accuracy. Public constant may be
utilized for this purpose.
**Recommendation**:
Consider constant usage. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Comptroller rewards can be artificially inflated and drained by manipulating [totalStaked - totalFrozen] (or: wrong rewards calculation)
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo_
By adding a small of amount of staking to a normal user scenario, and not approving this small amount as a loan for anybody, a staker... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: guest uses invalid parameters
### Description
The `GENERATOR` and `NEG_GENERATOR` constants for the P256 curve are not valid. As we can see in the following snippet, the parameters are encoded in big endian to match the generator parameters of the curve (see neuromancer.sk reference on secp256r1).
```rust
im... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Cannot Revoke Permit of `MintBurnToken`
### Description
The `MintBurnToken` inherits from `ERC20Permit` which provides users with a gasless way to give other users a token approval by generating a permit signature.
However, this signature is valid until the `deadline` and cannot be revoked beforehand if desi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Auth admits Pyth update timestamps that are rejected by the engine
### Description
In `auth.rs`, Pyth updates are rejected if the new timestamp is less than the current timestamp. However, in `engine.rs`, updates are rejected when the new timestamp is not greater than the current timestamp. This inconsistency ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity version
### Description
Current code specifies version pragma `^0.4.8` or `^0.4.9`, depending on the file. We recommend changing the solidity version pragma to the latest version (`^0.4.18`) to enforce the use of an up to date compiler. The new compiler [includes several bugfixes](https://etherscan.io... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: [07] The first buyer could get front-runed after `autoApprove` get updated
### Description
If NFT is not `autoApprove`, in case the user calls the `execute.rs#setbidtobuy()` function then the owner updates the `autoApprove to true`. Any other user could call the `execute.rs#setbidtobuy()` function and buy it (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [04] Missing checks for `address(0x0)` when assigning values to `address` state variables
### Description
*There are 10 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-artgobblers/blob/d2087c5a8a6a4f1b9784520e7fe75afa3a9cbdbe/src/ArtGobblers.sol#L316
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Fortuna entropy seed does not bind provider identity
### Description
The Fortuna entropy provider service derives the base seed for individual hash chains by combining a master secret with a random nonce, the hash chain length, and the blockchain ID. The use of the blockchain ID prevents a provider from uninte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: The function `MathUtils.calculateLinearInterestFromBips()` is duplicated and can be deleted
### Description
The function `calculateLinearInterestFromBips()` is duplicated in `FeeMath.sol` and `MathUtils.sol`. Removing the duplicated `calculateLinearInterestFromBips()` function in `MathUtils.sol` and using the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Withdrawals.EncodeIndex() index out of range panic
### Description
`Withdrawals.EncodeIndex()` is vulnerable to index out of range panics if the method is called with an `i` value larger than the length of the withdrawals buffer. This function does not appear to be used at the moment but may be included in the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Fuse pools are not whitelisted
### Description
Rari Fuse is a permissionless framework for creating and running user-created open interest rate pools with customizable parameters. On the FusePoolZap contract, the correctness of the pool is not checked. Because Fuse is a permissionless framework, an attacker ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Griefing and DoS via Malicious Fallback in `refund()`
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The `refund()` function utilizes OpenZeppelin's `Address.sendValue` to return native tokens, which forwards all available gas to the recipient. A malicious user can participate with a negligible amount (e.g., 1 wei) and imple... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Checks missing for the derived contracts addresses in LpWrapper.constructor
### Description
In the `LpWrapper.constructor`, the following addresses are derived and stored:
- `positionManager = ammModule.positionManager();`
- `ammDepositWithdrawModule = ammDepositWithdrawModule_;`
Note that `ammDepositWithdraw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect rounding on incentive calculation in `_applyFeeOrIncentiveOnTotal()`
### Description
_Resolved_
The `_applyFeeOrIncentiveOnTotal()` applies fees or incentives to assets. When handling negative `feePpm` (incentives), it uses `_feeOnRaw()` which rounds up via `Math.Rounding.Ceil`.
This rounding dire... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: EXTERNAL FUNCTION CALLS WITHIN LOOP
### Description
External calls within a loop increase Gas usage or can lead to a denial of service attack. In the `Governance.sol` contract functions discovered there is a for loop on the `i` variable that iterates through the `weightSources.kapSources.length` and `weightSou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Potential hash collision in withdrawal request generation
### Description
The `_withdrawFunds` function in both `DepositETH` and `DepositUSD` contracts generates a withdrawal hash that could potentially collide if multiple withdrawal requests are made by the same user in the same block. The hash is generate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unclear if the gas pool account is controlled by someone
### Description
The special gas pool account is used to mint LUSD tokens and pay for the gas operations performed by users, but it is unclear if someone owns its private key. The Liquity protocol mints LUSD to compensate for the gas spent by users when t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Commented out code in several functions
### Description
[Several functions in the](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd320a258a9d7531d72d07a830fae58a/contracts/token/ERC865Token.sol#L49) [`ERC865Token`](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Batch creation will break if vestings are opened to recipients
### Description
The `andromeda-vesting` contract allows the owner to create vestings (batches) for freezing tokens. The planned update will enable the recipient to claim or delegate tokens instead of the owner. However, this change introduces a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | true | false | ## Low: `automationsToIndex` storage is not correctly reset when deleting automations
### Description
When deleting an automation, the logic pops the final element from the `_usedInAutomations` array but fails to correctly reset the `automationsToIndex` mapping storage. Regardless of whether the if statement executes,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: RootERC20Predicate is incompatible with nonstandard ERC-20 tokens
### Description
The `deposit` and `depositTo` functions of the `RootERC20Predicate` contract are incompatible with nonstandard ERC-20 tokens, such as tokens that take a fee on transfer. The `RootERC20Predicate` contract allows users to deposit a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | false | false | ## Low: Parameter constraints in `borgCore` work incorrectly in the case of `borgModes.blacklist`
### Description
According to the business logic, parameter constraints are not supported by `borgCore` in the case of `borgModes.blacklist`. But there are no restrictions on adding them. If they are added by mistake, `isM... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] `_remove_gauge_weight()` in GaugeController.sol should update points total
### Description
`points_total` does not immediately reflect the current value after the removal of gauge weight.
### Proof of Concept
It can be observed that inside ` _remove_gauge_weight()` function, it will only update `points_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Long lines are not suitable for the Solidity Style Guide
### Description
[Collateral.sol#L9](https://github.com/prepo-io/prepo-monorepo/blob/feat/2022-12-prepo/apps/smart-contracts/core/contracts/Collateral.sol#L9)
[Collateral.sol#L112](https://github.com/prepo-io/prepo-monorepo/blob/feat/2022-12-prepo/apps/s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: TRST-L-6 Liquidation token claiming event spam
### Description
**Description:**
Claiming liquidation tokens via the `LiquidationVault.claim()` function emits the Claimed event.
The function takes an array of **BatchClaimInfo**, each of which can contain multiple **ClaimInfos**;
claiming an amount specified i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: 7] Lack of Slippage Protection in UFarmPool Withdrawals and Deposits
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** contracts/main/contracts/pool/UFarmPool.sol::quexCallback()
**Description:** When depositing to or withdrawing from the `UFarmPool` contract, users must submit a request and wait for the `q... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Possible free tokens on Ledger
### Description
If someone sends `xcKSM` to Ledger: https://github.com/mixbytes/lido-dot-ksm/blob/76a10efa5f223c4c613f26794802b8fb9bb188e1/contracts/Ledger.sol#L282
### Recommendation
We recommend sendig excess in funds to treasury. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: MARKETING INFO IS NOT VALIDATED AT INSTANTIATION
### Description
If marketing info is not included at instantiation time, the `execute_update_marketing` and `execute_upload_logo` functions will always return an `Unauthorized` error message because `marketing` is **None**. The affected contracts are the followi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Quorum overflow in `CollectionShutdown` leads to complete drain of contract's funds
### Description
[CollectionShutdown.sol#150](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-08-flayer/blob/main/flayer/src/contracts/utils/CollectionShutdown.sol#L150) and [CollectionShutdown.sol#L247](https://github.com/sherlock-audi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Users are incentivised to invest right before the getEndLMTime to join the winning team
### Description
When investing, there are 3 types of rewards in the `LiquidityMining` contracts: for the top users, for the top teams, for the group leaders in the top teams. EVERY member from the top teams is getting a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [03] `SystemContract.sol` could have some minor refactor introducing a `modifier`
### Description
`SystemContract.sol` could have some minor refactor introducing a `modifier` as follow to aliviate and make the code cleaner, and use it on all the `external` functions and the contructor as they are all gated wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing validation for `max_staleness_allowed`
### Description
The `max_staleness_allowed` variable is assigned a value but is not considered in the price validation logic from the oracle account. This oversight allows the system to use outdated price data without any constraints, potentially leading to inaccu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: *Old.sol Contracts Do Not Match Current Version On Mainnet
### Description
Code and recorded versions of some of the *Old.sol contracts do not match those currently deployed on mainnet:
- **RocketDAOProtocolSettingsMinipoolOld.sol** - should be version = 2, as currently observed on mainnet - see [Block explor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Incompatible with Deflationary or Rebasing Tokens
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `36a99cbbea137761d3265a79e275164237848544`. The team now added support for deflationary tokens.
**File(s) affected:**`StakingERC20.sol`, `Escrow.sol`
**Description:** The contracts are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Uniswap oracle are very easy to manipulate on L2
### Description
The protocol aims to deploy on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. However, the cost of manipulating TWAP in L2 networks is very low, so the TWAP oracle should not be used on them. This is due to the short average block time on most L2 chains... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Redundant zero initialization
### Description
[G-01] Redundant zero initialization
Solidity does not recognize null as a value, so uint variables are initialized to zero. Setting a uint variable to zero is redundant and can waste gas.
There are several places where an int is initialized to zero, which looks li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: createBasket re-entrancy
### Description
_Submitted by pauliax_.
#### Impact
function `createBasket` in Factory should also be `nonReentrant` as it interacts with various tokens inside the loop and these tokens may contain callback hooks.
#### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Add `nonReentrant` modifier to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Discrepancy In Allowed Supply
### Description
## Discrepancy in `batch_mint` and `mint`
In `collectible.move`, `batch_mint` and `mint` contain a small discrepancy in the allowed supply. Specifically, `batch_mint` utilizes the `<` operator in the length assertion check, which results in a maximum supply of `ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: L08] Unnecessary require statement
### Description
###### Low
In the `withdrawFor` function of the `DepositCertificates` contract, there are four `require` statements that check if a withdraw can be executed.
The [second](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af455391af2bc30d13d761566d8c236... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Hooklet validation is recommended upon deploying new Bunni tokens
### Description
**Description:** Uniswap V4 performs some validation on the hook address to ensure that a valid contract has been provided:
Regarding the hooklet, it would be best practice to also validate the permissions for the `BEFORE_SWAP_F... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Failure to validate MPC output can lead to double spending attack
### Description
Currently, the MPC server does not check if the jointly computed secret value is between 0 and `k_max`. If this occurs, any user of the AZTEC system will be able to compute the secret value and create transactions with arbitrary... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consider using named mappings
### Description
During the audit, it was identified that **DisputeModule**, **IPAccountStorage, AccessController, LicensorApprovalChecker** and **IPGraphACL** contracts do not use named mappings, unlike the other contracts in the protocol.
The project is using Solidity versio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [18] Incorrect NATSPEC
### Description
`SafEth.adjustWeight()` contains an incorrect @notice.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry/blob/main/contracts/SafEth/SafEth.sol#L158 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `public` functions not called by the contract should be declared `external` instead
### Description
Contracts [are allowed](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#function-overriding) to override their parents' functions and change the visibility from `external` to `public`.
1. File: external... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Inconstant health factor inequality boundary checks
### Description
In other checks regarding healthy positions the inequality is not strict, but in this context a strict inequality is checked.
```solidity
require(
vars.healthFactor > /*...*/ PoolGenericLogic.HEALTH_FACTOR_LIQUIDATION_THRESHOLD,
Errors.VL... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Authenticated clients can cause an access violation in desktop wallet
### Description
An issue exists where an authenticated mobile device can cause an access violation in the Qt desktop wallet application. Upon being spammed with `sendTx` requests, followed by an abrupt disconnection, the Qt wallet applicatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Chain Reorganization Attack | false | true |
The `createClone` function deploys a clone contract using the create, where the address derivation depends only on the `PositionFactory` nonce.
Re-orgs can happen in all EVM chains. In ethereum, where currently Frankencoin is deployed, it is not "super common" but it still happens, being the last one less than a year... | Code4rena | 3 | Frankencoin |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | cross-chain | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-02-telcoin-platform-audit-update-judging/issues/26
## Found by
ZdravkoHr., bughuntoor, cawfree
## Summary
`PREDICATE_ADDRESS` in [`BridgeRelay.sol`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-02-telcoin-platform-audit-update/blob/21920190e0772afa18e7f856a036fea3ef5b9635/tel... | Sherlock | 5 | Telcoin Platform Audit Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of Upgradeability and Pausable Functionality
### Description
The issue is identified within the [`LOB`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol) contract.
There is an issue due to the lack of upgradeability and pausable function... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Renouncable Ownership
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Will update docs to warn about this topic.
**File(s) affected:**`SSVNetwork.sol`, `SSVNetworkViews.sol`
**Description:** If the owner renounces their ownership, all ownable contracts ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The improper usage of return statement:
### Description
**Description**
**Recommendation**:
The return statement can be safely removed. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cache `self.skew` in `PerpMarket::checkOpenInterestLimits` to avoid reading same value from storage twice
### Description
**Description:** Cache `self.skew` in `PerpMarket::checkOpenInterestLimits` to avoid reading the same value from storage twice:
This saves 1 storage read and 1 wrapping call to `sd59x18`.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Public functions not called within the contract can be made external to save gas
### Description
The `Operator.sol` contract currently defines the `addOperator()` and `removeOperator()` functions with `public` visibility, even though they are not called from within the smart contract, resulting in higher gas c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: USE OF FLOATING PRAGMA
### Description
It is advisable to avoid using floating pragmas in contracts that are not libraries.
While floating pragmas make sense in the context of libraries, allowing them to be included in multiple different versions of applications, they can pose a security risk in application i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Multiple unstake requests can cause denial of service because withdrawn balance is not adjusted after every unstake request is fulfilled
### Description
A `while` loop runs over a specific number of unstake requests, and in every iteration, it checks if an unstake request is fulfillable. If it is, the unsta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typo in a Comment
### Description
The following comment with a typographical error was found in the `SwapManager.sol` file:
```
/// this amount of USDT to the Curve Pool to get another LP, wthich we will stake again into the
```
The word `wthich` above should be spelled as `which` instead.
### Recommendatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [09] Eslint warning in a solidity file
### Description
The comment on `Comptroller.preBorrowHook()` seems to have been intended for a js/ts test file.
Consider removing it from the solidity source code or add a comment on why it needs to be there.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-venus/blob/main/contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Natspec
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The contract exhibits a lack of documentation, hindering its readability, maintainability, and auditability.
**Recommendation**:
Consider adding Natspec to the contracts. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper Code Structure
### Description
## Optimization of Gas Usage in the `getHealth` Function
To optimize gas usage, it is recommended to structure the code in the `getHealth` function in `Clearinghouse.sol` such that risks and penalties are applied only if spot/perp products exist in the health group. How... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: [Across] Blast_SpokePool May Fail on Attempt to Bridge Native Blast Tokens
### Description
The [`_bridgeTokensToHubPool`](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/95c4f923932d597d3e63449718bba5c674b084eb/contracts/Blast_SpokePool.sol#L127) function handles bridging tokens from the Blast spoke pool to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: `TickMath` and `FullMath` libraries are missing `unchecked`
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, as it will cause the swap to revert.
**Likelihood:** Medium, as it will occur when there is phantom overflow.
**Description**
Both `FullMath` and `TickMath` are missing `unchecked`, which causes ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Not mechanism to automatically cleanup locks that are already unlock-able on LockManagers
### Description
`InvestorLockManager` as well as `LockManager` contracts don't have a mechanism to automatically clean up unlock-able locks; it is only possible to remove locks via manual intervention using the function `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Mutable payload identifier is assigned outside of write lock
### Description
In `PrepareProposal()`, the `getOptimisticPayload()` method returns a pointer to the payload identifier. When we finally get the payload, we use the pointer to assign the identifier. The mutable payload has a lock and we are writing to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: (HAL-07) Outdated Solidity version
### Description
Several contracts utilize the older Solidity 0.6.x compiler version, which lacks the newest language features, improvements in error handling, and security enhancements introduced in later releases. Continuing to use a legacy compiler version may expose these ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Implement Secure Key Management System
### Description
The current implementation stores sensitive private keys as environment variables:
```
BitcoinPrivateKeys: util.EnvArray("BITCOIN_PRIVATE_KEYS"),
SolanaPrivateKeys: util.EnvArray("SOLANA_PRIVATE_KEYS"),
```
This approach poses security risks, as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: `AprPremium` calculation might be incorrect due to loss of precision
### Description
In OraclePoolOfferHandler.sol, `AprPremium` is calculated partially based on the ratio of total outstanding assets over total assets. This issue is the ratio is not scaled properly to BPS decimals before adding to `aprFacto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Slippage checks when adding liquidity are too strict
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
When adding liquidity through `UniswapHandler.addLiquidity`, the entire contract balances are used to add liquidity and the min amounts are set to 95% of these balances.
If the balances in this contract are unbalanc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Expiration Date for Protocol Support
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `c05dfbcb8844f6a5a8cc7a41e31445c5a6b040b8`. The client provided the following explanation: Add Limited Protocol and Loan Time Horizon Section to README. This finding has been addressed via documentati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Modifiers used once can be packed into the function
### Description
If a modifier is invoked only a single time within a contract, it may be more efficient and cleaner to integrate the modifier's logic directly into the function's body.
`- contracts/core/pools/cachePool/CachePool.sol`
```
modifier onlyIn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Retrieve and enforce token decimal precision
### Description
Retrieve and enforce token decimal precision using [`IERC20Metadata`](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol). For example:
1) `PledgeManager::initialize`
```diff
co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Lack of voter deduplication in sync\_trie\_hashes...
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
* Direct loss of funds
## Description
## Brief/Intro
A malicious node is able to send falsified trie hashes through `sync_trie_hashes` inte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Signatures on `TokenBank` and `AllowList` can be reused in perpetuity an infinite amount of times
### Description
**Description:** `TokenBank` allows buyers to purchase tokens by getting an off-chain signature, which specifies the token and the amount they are allowed to buy. When buying using a signature, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: MarketplaceUniversalRouterZap 's _sendETHResidue() doesn 't check for zero recipient, so residual ETH funds can be frozen
### Description
When the `to` address is zero, the function `_sendETHResidue()` will permanently freeze the corresponding funds.
```solidity
// Code Reference
MarketplaceUniversalRouterZa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Use `delegationsByContributor[contributor]` instead of `delegate` when minting party card
### Description
The `ÌnitialETHCrowdfund._contribute` function currently uses `delegate` as the delegate when minting a party card [Link](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-party/blob/440aafacb0f15d037594cebc85fd471729... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Interfaces instead of contracts
### Description
**Description**
Vesting.sol: DSAuthority, DSAuthEvents, ERC20Events, ERC20, ERC20Extended are defined as
contracts. Though they do not have functionality, so it is recommended to define them as
interfaces. Also, for ERC20 functionality, it is recommended to use ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Token defaults to decimals == 18 when decimals reverts
### Description
## Audit Report
## Severity: Low Risk
### Context
`Token.sol#L32`
When the asset contract obtained from `ProxyUtils.metadata` is a contract that does not implement the `decimals` function, the `staticcall` function will fail and return 1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Ambiguous/Misleading Return Data
### Description
The NATSPEC comment says that the getters return `address(0)` or `boolean false` if the key doesn’t exist in the contract. However, the functions don’t check for any such logic. As a result, for any disabled validator, the functions may still return existing val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Stricter Input Validation
### Description
## Recommendations for Input Validation Improvement
The following are recommendations to improve input validation for key functions:
1. **In `UERC20.sol`**, validate that the address inputs to the following functions are nonzero:
- `transfer`
- `transferFrom`
-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Typo in commentary
### Description
At line: https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-vaults/blob/054034304c7912d227d460feadc23177103de0b9/contracts/Vault.vy#L1270
```solidity
@return Amount of debt outstanding (iff totalDebt > debtLimit).
```
There is an extra ‘f’.
### Recommendation
We suggest removing the exc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misleading or Outdated Comments
### Description
Several comments in the `sUSDz.sol` file appear to be wrong or outdated:
1. `* @notice Add Yield(USDe) to this contract.`
2. `* @notice Total vested USDe in this contract.`
3. `* @notice Used to claim USDe after CD has finished.`
These comments reference to a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Reentrancy | true | true |
The reentrancy guard present in the `rageQuit()` function can be bypassed by host accounts, leading to reentrancy attack vectors and loss of funds.
The new `rageQuit()` function can be used by party members to exit their position and obtain their share of the tokens held by the party contract. In order to prevent fun... | Code4rena | 5 | PartyDAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of Slippage Checks in Trading
### Description
## Vulnerabilities in Trading Instructions
The lack of slippage checks in the `coin_trade` instruction presents a significant vulnerability, primarily because it exposes the trading process to risks associated with market volatility, rendering the trades v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Optimize away `nativeToken` variable in `TokenBridge::setDeployed`
### Description
Optimize away `nativeToken` variable in `TokenBridge::setDeployed` which is written to but never read, eg:
```solidity
function setDeployed(address[] calldata _nativeTokens) external onlyMessagingService onlyAuthorizedRemoteSe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: [09] Zero is an excessively permissive value for `OffchainSignatureValidator` default signing threshold
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-party/blob/b23c65d62a20921c709582b0b76b387f2bb9ebb5/contracts/signature-validators/OffChainSignatureValidator.sol#L72
When called to validate a signatur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Comment mismatch on future enhanced asset support in MagicSpend
### Description
MagicSpend.sol, initially documented to support only ETH withdrawals, inherently possesses a broader capability to manage multiple asset types, including ERC-20 tokens, through its versatile `_withdraw()` function.
https://github... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing validation for ERC-7540 asynchronous functionality interfaces
### Description
According to the EIP-7540 documentation, vaults can optionally implement asynchronous flows for deposits and redemptions. If a vault doesn’t implement asynchronous deposits, calls to `pendingDepositRequest` and `claimableDepo... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.