prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [08] Inaccurate use of inequality operator
### Description
In the `getArtPieceById` function within the `VerbsToken` smart contract, the condition require`(verbId <= _currentVerbId, "Invalid piece ID")` should ideally use `<` instead of `<=`. This is because `_currentVerbId` is post-incremented in the `_mintTo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Excessively using Console.log
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Contracts are still including console.log statements which is pointless on deployment.
**Recommendation**
Remove console.log lines.
**Fixed**: Issue fixed in commit a72e06b | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Pool Name Length Constraint
### Description
## AddPool Functionality
`AddPool` initializes a new pool, and the `params.name` field represents the pool’s name and is one of the seeds that create the pool’s program derived address. If the length of `params.name` exceeds 32 bytes, it may result in collisions wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Add preconditions to important functions
### Description
Some functions could use more precondition checking. This helps prevent critical bugs coming from programming or user input handling errors. For example, [the function getAddress in line 20 of bitcoin.js of fundraiser-lib](https://github.com/cosmos/fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: User's LsETH might be locked due to out-of-gas error during recursive calls
### Description
Let `W0, W1, ... W7` represent the withdrawal events in the withdrawal stack. Let `R0, R1, R2` represent the users' redeem requests in the redeem queue.
Assume that Alice is the owner of `R1`. When Alice called the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Generate perfect code headers every time
### Description
**Description:**
I recommend using header for Solidity code layout and readability
https://github.com/transmissions11/headers
**[kirk-baird (judge) commented](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-Stealth-Project-findings/issues/40#issuecomment-140947... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Multiple use of block.timestamp, block.timestamp can be manipulated by miners with up to900ms.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
Use block.number instead of block.timestamp and calculate time based on mined blocks, 1
block is mined every 15 secs so 1 minute = 4 blocks and so on...
**Partner response for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero Check Validation in setMaxNegativePnlOnOpenP Function
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
The setMaxNegativePnlOnOpenP function in the PairInfos contract sets the maximum negative profit and loss percentage that can be incurred on opening a trade. However, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Confusing variable naming in fee manager contracts
### Description
The fee manager contracts use confusing variable names for fee percentage values.
In `MbpsFeeManager`, the variable `fee` represents a fee percentage in MBPS (milli basis points), not an actual fee amount. The comment even clarifies "Fee expres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `_sendToRecipient(...)` is unnecessary if the `receiver` is passed as the `receipient` of the swap parameter.
### Description
There are 2 instances of this
- https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-decent/blob/07ef78215e3d246d47a410651906287c6acec3ef/src/swappers/UniSwapper.sol#L130C13-L140C68
- https://github.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: ERC4626Cloned deposit and mint logic differ on first deposit
### Description
The `ERC4626Cloned` contract is an implementation of the ERC4626 used for vaults. The standard contains a `deposit` function to deposit a specific amount of the underlying asset, and a `mint` function that will calculate the amount n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Assembly Optimization in `mulDiv` Function
### Description
[Math.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-panoptic/blob/main/contracts/libraries/Math.sol#L197)
The `mulDiv` function can be optimized by using inline assembly for certain arithmetic operations.
### Original Code
### Optimized Code
Using ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consider Defining Commission Scaling Factor as a Constant
### Description
The [`commission_scaling_factor`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol#L51) is set as an `immutable` variable, but it is typically a constant value (e.g., `1e6`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Add constructor initializers
### Description
[L-01] Add constructor initializers
As per OpenZeppelin’s (OZ) recommendation, “The guidelines are now to make it impossible for anyone to run initialize on an implementation contract, by adding an empty constructor with the initializer modifier. So the implementati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Typos in Interfaces
### Description
Two typographical errors were found in the interfaces used by the project. While they may not be introduced by the team, they have been listed for the sake of completeness:
* In `IEarn.sol`:
```
// Amount of CORE the user recieves
...
// Amount of CORE the protocol rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `public` functions not called by the contract should be declared `external` instead
### Description
Contracts [are allowed](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#function-overriding) to override their parents' functions and change the visibility from `external` to `public` and can save gas by ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Front-Running in delegateBtc Function
### Description
The `delegateBtc` function, intended for users to delegate Bitcoin (BTC) to the Core blockchain, lacks mechanisms to prevent front-running attacks. This vulnerability arises from the function's design, which does not account for the potential for malicio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | true | ## High: Blacklisted implementation versions are accessible through migrations
### Description
The `VaultFactory` contract implements a blacklisting mechanism to prevent the use of vulnerable or deprecated contract versions. However, the blacklisting check is only applied when creating new vaults through the create fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: `updateProjectHash` does not check project address
### Description
_Submitted by MEP, also found by byndooa, Haipls, and minhquanym_
[Project.sol#L162](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-rigor/blob/5ab7ea84a1516cb726421ef690af5bc41029f88f/contracts/Project.sol#L162)
In Project.sol, function `updateProj... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing sanity checks for argumentData instruction
### Description
The `argumentData` instruction is missing sanity checks in certain cases. In most cases, `argumentData` is checked to ensure it does not contain any unexpected and unwanted bits, as is done in the `executeCrossModuleCall` function.
```solidity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Specifying a pragma version with the caret symbol (^) upfront which tells the compiler to use any version of solidity bigger than specified considered not a good practice. Since there could be major changes between versions that would make your code unstable. The latest known versions with bugs are 0.8.8
### D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Slightly imprecise tax calculation
### Description
The tax amount is calculated as `amount * DENOM / DENOM + tax_rate` instead of `amount * tax_rate / DENOM`, which means the tax percentage isn’t as precise (less tax is actually charged).
We see this in the test case:
```rust
// normal tax
assert_eq!(
dedu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Ineffective whitelisting in `OmoRouter` contract functions
### Description
- The `OmoRouter.deposit()` function restricts depositing in the vault to whitelisted users only, where these users are whitelisted by the router owner, however, the `receiver` address is not subjected to the same whitelist check, **all... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: Wrong parameter order leads to unusable function
### Description
DSClock allows for scheduling and executing actions. Due to an incorrect parameter order, the `wire` function, which schedules an action, cannot be executed.
The function `wire(target, value, data)` (located at clock.sol#L89-L98) is meant to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Unsafe Role Removal
### Description
I n `acl::remove_role`, utilizing the subtraction operation for role removal may produce unexpected results. The current implementation fails to check if the role to be removed is set, allowing attempts to remove an unset role, which may result in other roles being added ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Prevent Partial Deployment of Wrapped Assets
### Description
## Handling Non-Native Tokens with Wormhole’s Token Bridge
In order to handle non-native tokens (i.e. tokens that belong to other chains), Wormhole’s token bridge deploys a “wrapped coin” which acts as a proxy for the remote coin.
## Wrapped Asset ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Possible lock ups with SafeMath multiplication Acknowledged
### Description
In some cases using SafeMath can lead to a situation where a contract is locked up due to an unavoidable overflow.
It is theoretically possible that both the `internalSubmitVote()` and `internalCancelVote()` functions could become u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Potential Out-of-Gas Error when Adding a Market
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> It will go out of gas only when there are a large number of markets but currently, we only have around 30 markets in the core pool. So, this error will not occ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Rate limits are not applied
### Description
The `_inflow()` function is designed to reduce the `amountInFlight` by the `_amount` passed to it (`inflowAmount`), with a lower bound of zero:
However, let's imagine the following two scenarios:
- `RateLimiter.RateLimitConfig(1337, 1000, 100);`
**Scenario 1**
-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Could use delete keyword
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The removeWalletListFromVesting() function of ERC20Vesting is intended to remove the user's vestings by setting each element of _vestingToUser[vestingId] to the default value.
However, it could use the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Use of `shrink()` and `expand()`
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Generally we manage inputs and event outputs in uin256 and internally use uin64, so its an expected behaviour. Added natspec comments.
**File(s) affected:**`SSV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Missing Funds Validation
### Description
## Manager Contract Vulnerability
The manager contract fails to validate the provision of ether. An adversary may exploit this to deplete ether. When creating orders, users must pay execution fees, which cover Pyth price feed update fees. However, the protocol fails t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity compiler optimizations can be problematic
### Description
Opyn has enabled optional compiler optimizations in Solidity. There have been several bugs with security implications related to optimizations. Moreover, optimizations are actively being developed. Solidity compiler optimizations are disabled b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Calculation Of minterCollateral
### Description
Following discussions with the development team, it was established that the calculation of `minterCollateral` within the function `_mint()` is incorrect. This will in turn produce incorrect calculations of trading fees and of the permitted collateral ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.4 to get `bytes.concat()` instead of `abi.encodePacked(,)`
Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.12 to get `string.concat()` instead of `abi.encodePacked(,)`
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | true | ## High: Wrong calculation of supply/debt balance of a position, disrupting core system functionalities
### Description
There is an error in the calculation of the supply/debt balance of a position, impacting a wide range of operations across the system, including core lending features.
### Impact
Since these functio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misleading Function Name
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> To maintain the backward compatibility. Maybe third parties are calling the public view rewardTokenAmountsPerBlock, so we want to maintain it in the contract
**File(s) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Arithmetic operations
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The SafeMath library is used for arithmetic operations in this contract. However, as of Solidity version 0.8 and later, SafeMath is no longer required for preventing arithmetic overflow/underflow issues. S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Priviliges setOperatorAddresses Acknowledged
### Description
The function `setOperatorAddresses` instead of allowing the **Operator** to update its own, as well as the **Fee Recipient** address, incorrectly provides the privileges to the Fee Recipient. As a result, the Fee Recipient can modify the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `public` functions not called by the contract should be declared `external` instead
### Description
Contracts [are allowed](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#function-overriding) to override their parents' functions and change the visibility from `external` to `public`.
*There are 10 inst... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: No Cap on Oracle Price Feed Timeout
### Description
**Update**
Acknowledged. The client's response: "We acknowledged the issue and deciced to fix in the next version."
**File(s) affected:**`LevelOracle.sol`
**Description:** The `configToken()` function takes in a `chainlinkTimeout` value that is later used t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Owner of a cancelled Sablier stream will be elegible for a full amount reward claim, due to a revert in `FjordStaking::onStreamCanceled(...)`
### Description
The `Fjord` protocol team allows for users to stake their Sablier streams and make additional gains on their Sablier NFTs. However, whenever a Sablier... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Application does not exclude keychain items from iCloud and iTunes backups
### Description
The Uniswap mobile wallet does not prohibit its keychain items from being saved to an iTunes backup or uploaded to iCloud. Both Apple, Inc. and any attacker with access to a user’s iTunes or iCloud backup will have acce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Predictable Calls to `payFunding()` Reduce the Effectiveness of Price Alignments
### Description
**Update**
Positions can no longer be opened or closed in a block after `payFunding()` is called.
**File(s) affected:**`ClearingHouse.sol`
**Description:**`ClearingHouse.payFunding()` triggers the price alignment... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: ControllerFactory.set_admin() does not have two-step ownership transferring
### Description
Admin can transfer ownership to anyone, even if it is a wrong address or zero-value address.
- https://github.com/curvefi/curve-stablecoin/blob/0d9265cc2dbd221b0f27f880fac1c590e1f12d28/contracts/ControllerFactory.vy#L2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Floating pragma
### Description
Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested with thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using, for example, an outdated compiler version that might introduce bugs that af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | true | ## Low: Vulnerability to withdrawal of stuck funds in certain contracts
### Description
There is a vulnerability in the router, bridge, and synthesis contracts that allows for the withdrawal of stuck funds using specifically crafted parameters.
**Router**
For example, a malicious actor could withdraw Ether from the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: We can save an entire SLOAD (2100 Gas) by short circuiting the operations
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-ethena/blob/ee67d9b542642c9757a6b826c82d0cae60256509/contracts/EthenaMinting.sol#L413-L433
The if statement has two checks `!_supportedAssets.contains(asset)` and `asset == NATIVE_T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Consider Validating the `authority` of the `taker_src_ata` Account
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> While the validation you suggest could help prevent resolver mistakes when filling orders, we prefer not to add it. This would ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: An incorrect expression inside `require` leads to a revert
### Description
There is a `closeDistribution` function - https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/claiming/FantiumClaimingV1.sol#L624. It is used by the protocol manager to close a distribut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Suggested Next Steps
### Description
**Executive Summary**
During the review I went through all of the code at least 2 times
I did give a lot less priority to view functions (HintHelpers | MultiTrovegetter) and have not done a thorough additional pass on SortedTroves
I spent the vast majority of my time rea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent behavior for canary claims in the `claimer`
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Whenever a `claimer` claims prizes they compute fees per `claim` without considering canary claims.
[src/Claimer.sol#L76](https://github.com/GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-claimer/blob/57a381aef690a27c9198f4340747155a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol can be repeatedly gas griefed in `AutoRange` external call
### Description
Revert controlled `AutoRange` bot can be gas griefed and `execute()` reverted by malicious `onERC721Received` implementation
### Vulnerability Details
The initiator of a transaction pays the transaction gas; in the case of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: MagicSpend.withdraw() calls are exposed to frontrun attacks
### Description
The protocol supports the `magicSpend.withdraw()` permission call.
```solidity
} else if (selector == MagicSpend.withdraw.selector) {
// check call target is MagicSpend
if (call.target != magicSpend) revert CallErrors.TargetNotAll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Vault Fees Can Total To More Than `1e18`
### Description
Currently in `Vault.sol` there are four different fee types:
1. Deposit
2. Withdrawal
3. Management
4. Performance
There is a proper check to make sure that individually none of them are `>= 1e18`. However, they can total to more than `1e18` and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: UniProxy.depositSwap - Tokens are not approved before calling Router.exactInput ✓ Fixed
### Description
the call to `Router.exactInput`requires the sender to pre-approve the tokens. We could not find any reference for that, thus we assume that a call to `UniProxy.depositSwap` will always revert.
### Recommen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Improper implementation of `arbitraryCall()` allows protocol gov to steal funds from users' wallets
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by Jujic and hack3r-0m_
When an incentiveToken is claimed after `endStream`, `incentives[who]` will be `0` for that `incentiveToken`.
If the protocol gov is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Same value is calculated in every loop iteration
### Description
Value of `decWant` is persistent during each iteration of loops at https://github.com/tonkers-kuma/strategy-ssb/blob/e49d07a64ea0eb4f5a199c2bf9ea4c8aee2b313f/contracts/Strategy.sol#L276 and at https://github.com/tonkers-kuma/strategy-ssb/blob/e49... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Duplicated newProposalId calculation
### Description
In lines [187](https://github.com/AudiusProject/audius-protocol/blob/6f3b31562b9d4c43cef91af0a011986a2580fba2/eth-contracts/contracts/Governance.sol#L187) and [213](https://github.com/AudiusProject/audius-protocol/blob/6f3b31562b9d4c43cef91af0a011986a2580fba... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `fulfillQuery()` `gasUsed` calculation misses L1 rollup fee
### Description
The `gasUsed` of `fulfillQuery` is designed to always consume the full execution gas.
The issue here is that the gas paid by the user is always equal to the execution gas fee, but when ZKPay is used on Ethereum L2, the L1 data fee pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Stealing ETH using reentrancy in minting pass
### Description
**Severity:** Critical
**Path:** BabylonCore.sol:participate (L89-114)
**Description:** In `BabylonCore.sol:participate` a user can buy tickets, which are minting pass NFTs and minted to the user. The minting pass contracts uses `_safeMint`, whic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Cross Chain | true | true | ### Relevant GitHub Links
<a data-meta="codehawks-github-link" href="https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-12-stake-link/blob/main/contracts/core/sdlPool/SDLPoolPrimary.sol#L172-L199">https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-12-stake-link/blob/main/contracts/core/sdlPool/SDLPoolPrimary.sol#L172-L199</a>
<a data-meta="codehawks-github-... | Codehawks | 5 | stake.link |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Whitelist Modifiers Check msg.sender Rather Than User
### Description
The [`onlyWhitelistedLender`](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/IonPool.sol#L104-L108) and [`onlyWhitelistedBorrowers`](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e2825... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Arbitrary l2Logs length can lead to unprovable blocks and log inclusion
### Description
In the `ExecutorFacet` contract, the [layer 2 logs are processed](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-2-dev/blob/534dc37c7b86753803a31b836f78896d18372e7e/contracts/ethereum/contracts/zksync/facets/Executor.sol#L83) as ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Duplicating sanity check
### Description
Sanity check `maxSlippage != 0` at https://github.com/yearn/hardhat-monorepo/blob/ecc0b5147992b34c315e08af170ceb4a5fe071ee/packages/yswaps/contracts/TradeFactory/TradeFactoryExecutor.sol#L81 duplicates sanity check at https://github.com/yearn/hardhat-monorepo/blob/ecc0b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: | Cannot Withdraw Max Amount
### Description
**Description**
In the `withdraw` function the `require` statement specifies a value `<` the contract balance, meanwhile it may be intended to remove a value equal to the contract balance.
**Recommendation**
Confirm whether or not the exact contract balance shoul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Outdated Prices May Cause Incorrect Swap Outputs or Lp Token Calculations
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We've made the decision not to stop pools when the oracle data is outdated because in case of serious oracle outage u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: Update to funding rate parameters retrospectively impacts accrued funding rates
### Description
On centralized perpetuals protocols funding rates are typically settled every 8 hours however on Zaros they "accrue" and are settled when the trader interacts with their position. The protocol owner also has the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Invalidated Token Symbol Leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability
### Description
**Severity** - Medium
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
The FlashDuels contract allows users to create duels and specify token symbols, particularly in functions like createCryptoDuel. If the contract does no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: `AMM.exchange()` has no deadline
### Description
The `AMM.exchange()` and `AMM.exchange_dy()` functions have slippage checks for output tokens; however, they do not have a deadline check for the transaction:
```
def exchange(i, j, in_amount, min_amount, _for)
...
def exchange_dy(i, j, out_amount, max_amount, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Relayer Will Not Receive Any Fee If `execute` Reverts
### Description
_Submitted by xiaoming90_
Connext relies on the relayer to trigger the `BridgeFacet.execute` function on the destination domain to initiate the token transfer and calldata execution processes. Relayers pay for the gas cost to trigger the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Genesis Value Balance Incorrectly Updated
### Description
**Update**
Fixed by setting the balance of the reserve fund after calling `_updateTotalSupplies()`. Addressed in: `7df1b02e127463a21b479985ddea0b1efa1bbd08`.
**File(s) affected:**`GenesisValueVault.sol`
**Description:** In `GenesisValueVault._updateBa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unvalidated user input in the `_getAddLiquidityOneCoinCallData` function
### Description
The `_getAddLiquidityOneCoinCallData` function utilizes variable `i`, which is an arbitrary value passed by the user, without any validation from the `add_liquidity_one_coin` function. If this value is outside the valid ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: The first disputer might lose funds although his dispute is valid
### Description
Users can dispute the current tree using `disputeTree()` and the governor refunds the dispute funds if the dispute is valid in `resolveDispute()`.
But `disputeTree()` can be called again by another disputer although there is a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Server lacks OCSP stapling
### Description
The affected servers do not return its SSL certificate’s revocation status via **OCSP Stapling**. This feature provides clients with the ability to detect whether the server’s SSL certificate has been revoked. Apple recommends that OCSP Stapling should be implement... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Factory::create() is vulnerable to reorg attacks
### Description
Take a look at
We can see that this function uses the `create()` logic and depends on the `tx.origin`, now Blast is suspicious of a reorg attack and protocol would be deployed on here.
Where as one can assume that the tx.origin should be d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Use Ownable instead of an immutable beneficiary in vesting.sol
### Description
**Severity** : Medium
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
In the current implementation of the VestingWallet, the beneficiary is set at contract deployment and cannot be altered. This design choice limits the ability to t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Missing cds deposit amount in swapCollateralForUSDT
### Description
swapCollateralForUSDT() will help to convert the remaining Ether to USDT. This part of upside collateral will be taken as the cds owner's profit. But we miss update the cds deposit amount. This will cause that cds owners fail to withdraw.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: USAGE OF DOTENV TO STORE SECRETS
### Description
During the assessment, a risk has been identified to the security of the bridge, where in the bridge repository where sensitive information, such as blockchain bridge secrets, are stored in a `.env` file. While using environment variables is generally a good ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Undistributed rewards are not rolled over when additional rewards are announced in an epoch
### Description
`CLGauge._notifyRewardAmount()` allows notifying rewards multiple times in an epoch. However, undistributed rewards are not rolled over during additional reward notifications:
1. When notifying rewards... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Missing NatSpec `@dev` from modifier declaration
### Description
Some modifiers have an incomplete NatSpec: add a `@dev` notation to describe the modifier to improve the code documentation.
*There is 1 instance of this issue.*
[[169](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-04-panoptic/blob/6908144756ef0cce2ede6d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Implementing `renounceOwnership()` is dangerous
### Description
`OfframpRegistry.sol` inherits `Ownable2Step`, and renouncing ownership via `renounceOwnership()` is possible since the function is not overridden. Leaving the contract without an owner would prevent offramps from being added/removed, as well as s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing event for important state changes
### Description
The following calls doesn't emit any events:
* [`LandFactory::updateLockAmount`](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/polkamarkets-js/blob/24f1394be94d27433d2e3a7370442126e1c1e5ba/contracts/LandFactory.sol#L205-L210)
* [`PredictionMarketV3_4::withdraw`](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Remove unnecessary imports and inheritance
### Description
Remove unnecessary imports and inheritance:
* `BurnStateManager` should only import and inherit from `Initializable` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Comment required
### Description
It's not intuitive what is happening here
- https://github.com/nucypher/nucypher/blob/main/nucypher/blockchain/eth/sol/source/contracts/staking_contracts/PoolingStakingContractV2.sol#L116
- https://github.com/nucypher/nucypher/blob/main/nucypher/blockchain/eth/sol/source/contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Bridge with Axelar can be stolen with malicious external call
### Description
The Executor contract allows users to build an arbitrary payload external call to any address except `address(erc20Proxy)`. `erc20Proxy` is not the only dangerous address to call. By building a malicious external call to the Axelar ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Possible DoS Attack on Swapping via Permit2
### Description
The [`SwapProxy` contract](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/b84dbfae35030e0f2caa5509b632c10106a32330/contracts/SpokePoolPeriphery.sol#L26) contains the [`performSwap` function](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/blob/b84d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Controller does not raise an error when there’s insufficient liquidity
### Description
## Handle
jonah1005
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
When a user tries to withdraw the token from the vault, the vault would withdraw the token from the controller if there's insufficient liquidity in the vault. Howev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Unused return value can be removed
### Description
**Description:** The `IRedeemableLegacy::autoRedemption` function signature is as follows:
Within `SmartVaultV4Legact::autoRedemption`, the `_amountOut` return value is bubbled-up by `SmartVaultManagerV6::vaultAutoRedemption`:
However, it is never actually... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: OPEN TO-DOS
### Description
Open To-dos can point to architecture or programming issues that still need to be resolved. Often these kinds of comments indicate areas of complexity or confusion for developers. This provides value and insight to an attacker who aims to cause damage to the protocol.
Code Location... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [02] Tax rate updates bypass `Timestamp` refresh, distorting Schnibble calculations for invalid plots
### Description
The `updateTaxRate` function fails to update the `lastUpdated` timestamp when changing a landlord's tax rate. This can lead to incorrect Schnibble calculations in the `_farmPlots` function. The... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: 3 `OfferStatus` are never used, and code seems to have contradicting intentions
### Description
## Summary 📌
There are several issues and inconsistenies that arise from the way the protocol uses the `OfferStatus` enum.
Due to lack of answers from devs, incomplete documentation that contradicts the code some... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Duplicate assignments
### Description
There are duplicate lines:
* https://github.com/metaxu-art/fantium-smart-contracts/blob/cb2d97bc30c40321991fe5ab8fc798babba1610f/contracts/FantiumNFTV1.sol#L281
* https://github.com/metaxu-art/fantium-smart-contracts/blob/cb2d97bc30c40321991fe5ab8fc798babba1610f/contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: 0x exchange wrapper cannot increase approval for relay fees
### Description
The `ZeroExExchangeWrapper` transfers the `_zeroExToken` balance in the event of 0x exchange order relay fees. However, there is no method to later increase this approval, resulting in a finite amount of transfers which could eventu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [08] Fallback oracles should be implemented in the `CDPVault`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-loopfi/blob/57871f64bdea450c1f04c9a53dc1a78223719164/src/CDPVault.sol#L52-L53
Now whenever any pricing logic is to be implemented, [this function](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-loopfi/b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Bound Checking in `Factory.add_market()`
### Description
In `Factory.vy:add_market()`:
```python
i: uint256 = self.market_count
if i
### Recommendation
We recommend checking `self.market_count < MAX_MARKETS`.
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-contracts-audit/tree/29e6798eb85074253145c4688acfa540f37a220f/), the event parameters are not documented.
Consider thoroughly documenting all events and their parameters. When writing docstrings, consider follo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing vault registration check enables duplicate vault registrations
### Description
The `PositionManager.registerVault()` function does not verify if a vault is already registered before adding it to the `vaults` mapping. This allows the same vault address to be registered multiple times with potentially di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Basis Point Fee Misleading
### Description
**Update**
The Fabric team fixed the issue in commit `f1d9552` by implementing our recommendation and calculating the `feeAllocation` using the following formula:
**Description:** The way the yield fee is calculated is by increasing the total contribution by add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: zBanc - DynamicLiquidTokenConverter frontrunner can grief owner when calling reduceWeight Acknowledged
### Description
The owner of the converter is allowed to reduce the converters weights once the marketcap surpasses a configured threshhold. The thresshold is configured on first deployment. The marketcap... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.