prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Malicious bidders can disincentivize users from bidding
### Description
Upon someone bidding, if there is a previous bidder, we refund him the amount that he bid using the function below:
```solidity
function _safeTransferETHWithFallback(address to, uint256 amount) internal {
if (!_safeTransferETH(to, amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] More sanity checks should be applied to `calculateScore()`
### Description
Low impact, since the chances of passing a valuse above type(int256).max is relatively slim.
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at `calculateScore()`:
Do note that the function is used to calculate a membership score given some a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Fee Calculation Regression Enables Arbitrage on Price Drifts
### Description
`TransferPoolFeeCalculatorV2` now charges only static protocol/LP fees plus a binary `Depeg` check. When both pools are marked `PriceDeviationStatus.Drift`, the calculator ignores any real price delta between them, so an attacker c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | integer-overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Redundant State Updates in `fill` Function Cause Issues
### Description
The `fill` function contains **redundant state updates** to `last_asset_tokens` and `last_crncy_tokens` that are already properly handled by `write_last_tokens`. This redundancy causes data loss, incorrect accumulation, and state incons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of integer types
### Description
The Drift Protocol codebase uses integer types inconsistently; data of similar kinds is represented using differently sized types or types with different signedness. Conversions from one integer type to another present an opportunity for the contracts to fail a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Mappings not used externally/internally can be marked private
### Description
The below mappings from the [MaxHeap.sol contract](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-12-revolutionprotocol/blob/d42cc62b873a1b2b44f57310f9d4bbfdd875e8d6/packages/revolution/src/MaxHeap.sol#L65) can be marked private since they're no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Problematic Whitelist Implementation
### Description
The [`AddressWhitelist` contract](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/managed-oracle/blob/fc03083eca91c880efa8918c6d9532af9362f00d/src/common/implementation/AddressWhitelist.sol) provides functionality for managing lists of approved addresses. It uses a mapping t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of Two-Step Ownership Transfer in `Credifi1155`
### Description
The `Credifi1155` contract inherits from `OwnableUpgradeable`, which allows the current owner to transfer ownership directly to a new address. However, `OwnableUpgradeable` does not include a confirmation step from the new owner.
To prevent ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Error Check
### Description
The error associated with a failed `MOD_EXP` precompile appears to have been [inadvertently removed](https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/blob/e2040836eb41a40df04a4a3648764b07a0fa12a2/backend/plonk/bn254/solidity.go#L1328).
Consider restoring the error.
***Update:** Resolv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: UTP account constraints
### Description
## Ownership Validation in UtpMangoActivate and UtpZoActivate Instructions
In the `UtpMangoActivate` and `UtpZoActivate` instructions, there are no constraints that check that the passed-in accounts are under ownership of respective protocols and that the data is empty.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: [Initia] The `get_price_by_metadata` Function Fails to Check Oracle Price Staleness
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `080e441`. Introduced staleness check in `get_price_by_metadata()`.
**File(s) affected:**`echelon_oracle/sources/oracle.move`
**Description:** The `echelon_oracle::oracle::get_price_by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Forget to check "Some manifolds contracts of ERC-2981 return (address(this), 0) when royalties are not defined" in 3rd priority - MarketFees.sol
### Description
_Submitted by KIntern_NA, also found by bin2chen and Lambda_
Wrong return of `cretorShares` and `creatorRecipients` can make real royalties pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Trading accounts can exceed the maximum number of allowed open positions.
### Description
Each trading account has a maximum limit on the number of open positions. For market orders, this limit is checked only during order creation (`OrderBranch.createMarketOrder()`), not during order settlement. As a result, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | false | ## Low: Concentrated liquidity tick logic is incorrect
### Description
`AutoRedemption::calculateUSDsToTargetPrice` performs the following concentrated liquidity tick calculations to determine the current tick range corresponding to a given price:
```solidity
int24 _spacing = pool.tickSpacing();
(uint160 _sqrtPriceX9... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Account can be opened for zero address
### Description
`onBehalfOf` can be equal to zero address:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditManager.sol#L180
### Recommendation
We recommend adding a check that `onBehalfOf` is n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Reduce the size of error messages (Long revert Strings)
### Description
Shortening revert strings to fit in 32 bytes will decrease deployment time gas and will decrease runtime gas when the revert condition is met.
Revert strings that are longer than 32 bytes require at least one additional mstore, along with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: The first lp provider can destroy the pool
### Description
_Submitted by jonah1005_
#### Impact
First lp provider received liquidity amount same as the nativeDeposit amount and decides the rate. If the first lp sets the pool's rate to an extreme value no one can deposit to the pool afterward. (please refe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | true | false | ## Gas: Using `private` rather than `public` for constants, saves gas
### Description
If needed, the value can be read from the verified contract source code
1. File: contracts/oracle/ScalingPriceOracle.sol (line [50](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-volt/blob/f1210bf3151095e4d371c9e9d7682d9031860bbd/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Wrapper Function
### Description
## Analysis of `stake_router.move`
In `stake_router.move`, the method `get_total_value_locked` simply wraps the `get_total_worth` function. This is unnecessary.
## Code Snippet
## Remediation
Remove the `get_total_value_locked` function.
## Patch
Resolved in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: First Tranche depositor can withdraw all the previously earned interest
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, because it only affects the initially earned interest of the tranche.
**Likelihood:** Medium, because the issue is only present if there's a larger gap between the time in which the tra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Using the same hash across games
### Description
If a hash is revealed in one game its params become public - `_number` and `_salt`. This hash must not be used in other games. Otherwise, there is a risk of exploiting a game (guaranteed wins leverage by max available amounts). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Verify the correct merkle tree is used
### Description
The `MultiMerkleDistributor.sol` contract does not verify that the merkle tree belongs to the right quest and period. If the wrong merkle tree is added, then the wrong rewards can be claimed.
**Note**: Set to medium risk because the likelihood of this ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Redundant status variable in `HanjiTrieFactory`
### Description
The issue has been identified within the [HanjiLOBFactory](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/70b15ec4d9e7578248141604503843716a67d875/src/HanjiLOBFactory.sol#L101) and [HanjiTrieFactory](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Unnecessary Cap Inflation and Unbounded Cap Growth
### Description
The `_setNewCap()` function in `PortalCCIP` unconditionally increases the token supply cap on every incoming cross-chain message, even when sufficient headroom already exists. This leads to unbounded cap growth that defeats the security purp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `_validatePositionList()` does not check for duplicate tokenIds, allowing attackers to bypass solvency checks
### Description
### Impact
The underlying issue is that `_validatePositionList()` does not check for duplicate tokenIds. Attackers can use this issue to bypass solvency checks, which leads to sever... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Griefing Users Can Cause Deposits to Fail on the Destination Chain Due to Lack of Minimum `_gaslimit` Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `ca194fd861d7406c934a01ed91b06205da2f067d`.
Additional fix in: `8e41143cf6839753b027569e24f70a88dffd2388`.
**File(s) af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: AUTHORIZE ACCOUNT CAN INCREASE MAX REWARD DELAY TO MAX INT VALUE
### Description
In the scope contract `FSMWrapper.sol`, `OSM.sol` and `DSM.sol`, it is observed that the `authorize` accounts can set max reward increase delay to a vast number, as `val` is a type of `uint256` a max value `2^256-1` could be suppl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Vulnerability In OpenZeppelin Library 4.3.2
### Description
The `BLSWallet.sol` contract imports the OpenZeppelin library at version 4.3.2 to make use of the initializer modifier. Version 4.3.2 of this library contained a bug relating to the initializer modifier. The vulnerability in the initializer modifier i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `RankedBattle._addResultPoints()` executes unnecessary lines of code in case of a tie
### Description
`RankedBattle._addResultPoints()` runs all of the below code in case of a tie; it's all setup for the win/lose code blocks, which make up the rest of the function. There's no more code that runs in case of a t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: routeToken function may fail for certain ERC20 tokens
### Description
The `routeToken` function can revert for ERC20 tokens that require the allowance to be set to 0 when calling the `approve` function, such as USDT.
The function has an optimization where it approves `amount + 1` to the gateway, which will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Ineffective minimum order size check for ASK limit orders can lead to Denial of Service
### Description
The minimum order size check for `ASK` orders during order creation is ineffective, allowing the creation of a large number of economically insignificant `ImmediateOrCancel` (IOC) orders. During the cron-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Messages with incorrectly ordered values are not rejected
### Description
The `handle_messages` function (figure 9.1) does not reject messages with incorrectly ordered values. This may allow messages from malfunctioning nodes to be processed. The severity of this issue is informational since MobileCoin is awar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [4]
### Description
Function `BytecodeCompressor.publishCompressedBytecode()` shouldn't be payable as it doesn't have any logic for transferred ETH. If users send eth by mistake their funds would be lost.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-zksync/blob/21d9a364a4a75adfa6f1e038232d8c0f39858a64/contracts/Byte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Owner of Portfolios can disable markets
### Description
By calling [`updateFutureCashGroup`](https://github.com/swapnet-protocol/swapnet-lite/blob/66ce8f3e529410a5272b7a57c8391fcb80a375fd/packages/contracts/contracts/Portfolios.sol#L129) with a [`numPeriods`](https://github.com/swapnet-protocol/swapnet-lite... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Funds can be stolen from the `FixedStrikeOptionTeller` contract by creating put option tokens without providing collateral
### Description
Due to a rounding error when calculating the `quoteAmount` in the `create` function of the `FixedStrikeOptionTeller` contract, it is possible to create (issue) option to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Use of saturating math
### Description
## Observations on Saturating Math Operations
It was noticed that the program uses saturating math operations at multiple instances. This is not sound as this could lead to incorrect token distributions if numeric bounds are reached.
## Example Code
An example of the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Liquidity provided when initializing a collection in Locker.sol will be stuck in Uniswap, with no way for the user to recover it
### Description
UniswapImplementation.sol does not offer a way to withdraw the initial liquidity provided from the pool, causing the total loss of funds for any user who initializes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Greedy Contract
### Description
**Update**
The `receive()` function has been removed from the aforementioned contracts.
**File(s) affected:**`depositers/GMXDeposter.sol`, `depositers/GMXExecutor.sol`, `credit/CreditUser.sol`, `credit/CreditCaller.sol`
**Description:** A greedy contract is a contract that can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Chainlink Oracle Data Feeds Lack Validation
### Description
Chainink oracle data feeds lack validation to ensure that the data is fresh and from a complete round. Oracle malfunctions may lead to large scale liquidation events or alternatively it may put the protocol at risk of insolvency.
### Recommendatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Incompatibility With Rebasing/Deflationary/Inflationary tokens
### Description
**Description:**
The protocol do not appear to support rebasing/deflationary/inflationary tokens whose balance changes during transfers or over time. The necessary checks include at least verifying the amount of tokens transfer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: `addGlobalToken()` `localAdress` could be overwritten
### Description
`CoreBranchRouter.addGlobalToken()` is used to set the local token of chains.
When `CoreBranchRouter.addGlobalToken(_dstChainId = ftm)`, it will execute follow step:
1. `[root]CoreRootRouter.\_addGlobalToken()`
- 1.1 check `isGlobalAdd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: [20] Rogue validators can spam `revertBlocks` and make the chain unusable
### Description
In [Executor, function `revertBlocks`](https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/f06a58360a2b8e7129f64413998767ac169d1efd/ethereum/contracts/zksync/facets/Executor.sol#L440C1-L456C6) there is no way to prevent a r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Error Information
### Description
## Error Handling in handle_add_tokens_on_sui
When `handle_add_tokens_on_sui` encounters a situation where the `chain_id` does not correspond to a Sui chain, it returns an error. However, this error message is incorrect as it mentions `handle_add_tokens_on_evm` inst... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of user-controlled limits for input amount in LiquidateBorrow
### Description
The `x/leverage` moduleβs `LiquidateBorrow` function computes the amount of funds that will be transferred from the module to the functionβs caller in a liquidation. The computation uses asset prices retrieved from an oracle.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unused funds are not returned and not counted in `GeVault`
### Description
Users can lose a portion of their deposited funds if some of their funds haven't been deposited to the underlying Uniswap pools. There's always a chance of such event since Uniswap pools take balanced token amounts when liquidity is ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initialization Performed Outside of Initialization Function
### Description
The [`updateMessenger` function](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/L2/predeploys/L2MessageQueue.sol#L47) in `L2MessageQueue` can only be called before any message is appen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Vote | false | true |
[VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L80](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/8f198624b97addbbe9602a451c908ea51bd3357c/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L80)<br>
In `delegate`, when a user delegates to a new tokenId, the tokenId is not removed from the current delegatee. Therefore, one user can easily ... | Code4rena | 5 | Golom |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Wrong implementation of `EIP712MetaTransaction`
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
1. `EIP712MetaTransaction` is a utils contract that intended to be inherited by concrete (actual) contracts, therefore. it's initializer function should not use the `initializer` modifier, instead, it should use `onlyIni... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Fee-on-Transfer tokens cause problems in multiple places
### Description
### Impact & Proof Of Concept
Certain tokens (e.g., STA or PAXG) charge a fee for transfers and others (e.g., USDT or USDC) may start doing so in the future. This is not correctly handled in multiple places and would lead to a loss of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Misbehaving nodes are not reported or punished by the consensus layer
### Description
The consensus protocol implemented by DFINITY assumes that at most \( \frac{N - 1}{3} \) nodes are Byzantine, where \( N \) is the size of the committee. (To be able to aggregate threshold signature shares for new CUPs, a com... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: User can bypass `MAX_EXPIRATION` when extend expiration
### Description
### Finding Description and Impact
In the `extend_expiration` function, the validation for the duration is incorrect, allowing the user to bypass `MAX_EXPIRATION`:
The issue arises because the code subtracts `new_expiration_date - expi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: `Vault.redeem` function does not use `syncFeeCheckpoint` modifier
### Description
### Impact
The following `Vault.redeem` function does not use the `syncFeeCheckpoint` modifier, which is unlike the `Vault.withdraw` function below. Because of this, after calling the `Vault.redeem` function, `highWaterMark` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Constructor in `VoltBurn.sol` Does Not Check For Zero Address
### Description
In the constructor of `VoltBurn.sol`, there is no check for zero address.
```solidity
constructor(address _dragonX, address _volt, SwapActionParams memory _s) SwapActions(_s) {
dragonX = ERC20Burnable(_dragonX);
//code
}
```
Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Extra getter function.
### Description
**Description**
LockToken.sol: the walletTokenBalance mapping has a public visibility, so there is no need in the function getTokenBalanceByAddress().
**Recommendation**
Remove the extra getter.
**Re-audit comment**
Resolved | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [Nβ02] `override` function arguments that are unused should have the variable name removed or commented out to avoid compiler warnings
### Description
*There are 5 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Fee auction allows buying zero assets, leading to front-running attacks
### Description
The FeeAuction contractβs buy function allows users to purchase a basket of assets at a given price. However, there is no way for users to specify which auction their buy transaction should be applied to, leading to a race... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | false | false | ## Gas: Use named return variables to eliminate redundant local variables and `return` statements
### Description
**Description:** Use named return variables to eliminate redundant local variables and `return` statements:
Same idea can be applied to `_collateralBalanceOfAave`, `_getDebtBalanceOfAave`.
**Rocko:** Fi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Utilize SafeERC20.safeTransferFrom() when interacting with 3rd-party tokens
### Description
It is best practice to utilize the "safe" variant of functions when interacting with unknown/untrusted/3rd Party ERC20 token implementations. This is particularly important with regards to the `safeTransferFrom()` varia... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Initialization of minBoost in BaseGauge Constructor Breaks Core Contract Functionality
### Description
In theΒ [`BaseGauge`](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2025-02-raac/blob/main/contracts/core/governance/gauges/BaseGauge.sol#L26C19-L26C29)Β contract, theΒ [`boostState.minBoost`](https://github.com/Cyfrin/20... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: `battleElo` is at risk of underflow revert, which may DOS voting
### Description
In EloCalculator.sol, the `battleElo()` function calculates a new maturity score based on a series of battle results:
When calculating results of a series of battle, battleElo will subtract `currentRating` by the difference i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `migrateToken` in MarinateV2.sol allows admin to withdraw funds, potentially concerning community.
### Description
**Description**
MarinateV2.sol - migrate Token(), Too much for admin, might be lured into it if $s/he$ is a single wallet having this kind of control. Also, the community might be concerned ov... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Large approvals may not work with some `ERC20` tokens
### Description
Not all `IERC20` implementations are totally compliant, and some (e.g `UNI`, `COMP`) may fail if the valued passed to `approve` is larger than `uint96`. If the approval amount is `type(uint256).max`, which may cause issues with systems that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent minted and deposited LP tokens amount
### Description
Function `deposit` in `Booster` defined at https://github.com/convex-eth/platform/blob/754d9e700693246275b613e895b4044b63ce9ed5/contracts/contracts/Booster.sol#L275 allows to deposit curve pools LP token and mint wrapped convex tokens with 1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: When a smart contract calls `CrossChainRelayerArbitrum.processCalls`, excess submission fees may be lost
### Description
When the user calls CrossChainRelayerArbitrum.processCalls, ETH is sent as the submission fee.
According to the documentation :
Credit-Back Address: Address to which all excess gas i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: The maintainer of the MiniGovernance can block the changeMaintainer function
### Description
Every entity with an ID has a controller and a maintainer. The controller tends to have more control, and the maintainer is mostly used for operational purposes. So the controller should be able to change the mainta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Consider using a staking rewards distributor to efficiently space out staking rewards, further deterring just-in-time attacks
### Description
Consider using a [staking rewards distributor](https://github.com/ethena-labs/bbp-public-assets/blob/main/contracts/contracts/StakingRewardsDistributor.sol) to efficient... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Pending interests not processed when updating treasury weight
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact**: Medium, Can lead to loss of yield for the treasury or pool participants
**Likelihood**: Medium, loss only happens between the weight update and next deposit/withdrawal
**Description**
The function `set... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Minipool preDeposit Submits Entire Contract Balance
### Description
When submitting an initial deposit to the beacon chain, the entirety of the Minipool contractβs balance is sent. In some circumstances, this may not equal the `preLaunchValue` passed to `preDeposit()`.
In order to verify that the node operato... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Redundant BurnOnRedeem event
### Description
The [`burnOnRedeemInternal` function](https://gitlab.com/aave-tech/dlp/contracts/blob/1f8e5e65a99a887a5a13ad9af6486ebf93f57d02/contracts/tokenization/AToken.sol#L165) of the `AToken` contract emits a `BurnOnRedeem` event that logs the account and the number of token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Factory 's 18 decimal requirement breaks core functionality by blocking intended BTC-based collateral tokens
### Description
## Finding Description
## Context
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
## Issue
In the Factory contract's `deployNewInstance` function, there is a strict requirement tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Potential DOS in Contract Inheriting `UUPSUpgradeable.sol`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-non-fungible/blob/main/scripts/deploy.ts#L18
The scripts/ folder outlines a number of deployment scripts used by the team. Some of the contracts deployed utilise the ERC1967 upgradeable proxy stan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: DoS in Redemption Due to Unchecked Asset Support in Subvaults
### Description
In Mellow Flexible Vaults, the `getLiquidAssets()` logic aggregates token balances from all subvaults without checking whether a given asset is supported by each subvault. Since subvaults are expected to restrict supported assets ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [FIXED] Disable initializers in upgradable contracts
### Description
The contract `FathomProxyWalletOwnerUpgradeable` and the contract `ProxyWalletRegistry` are upgradable, inheriting from the `Initializable` contract. However, the current implementation is missing the `_disableInitializers` function call in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Empty methods should be thoroughly documented
### Description
The function `redeemParams` variable has no code implementation.
It is both lacking any NatSpec and any internal comments to indicate its purpose.
### Instances (1)
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-juicebox/blob/main/juice-buyback/contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: ERC5095.mint function calculates slippage incorrectly
### Description
ERC5095.mint function calculates slippage incorrectly. This leads to lost of funds for user.
### Impact
Lost of users funds.
### Recommendation
Use this.
```solidity
uint128 returned = IMarketPlace(marketplace).sellUnderlying(
underly... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused variable
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: Token.sol
**Description**
The contract declares the destinationEIds variable but the variable is not used in the contract.
**Recommendation**:
Remove the unused variable. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Prevent accidental ownership and admin renouncement
### Description
The inherited `renounceOwnership()` and allow the last authority to remove themselves, potentially leaving the contract permanently ownerless or adminβless, blocking critical functions.
Consider override `renounceOwnership()` in `TokenAirdrop... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Gauge period cannot be updated
### Description
Gauge period cannot be updated.
### Impact
Each gauge period has a emission cap which determines the max reward amount can be distributed to the gauge, because gauage period cannot be updated, the reward distributed to a gauge is limited by the emission cap, and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Bounties can be broken by funding them with malicious ERC20 tokens
### Description
Any malicious user can fund a bounty contract with a malicious ERC20 contract and prevent winners from withdrawing their rewards.
### Impact
Bricking of bounty and lock up of funds until expiry timestamp
### Recommendation
Us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Emit events in setter functions.
### Description
**Description**
OwnerProxy_V1.sol: setMultisigAlpha(), setMultisigBeta(), setTeamKey().
Such setter function should emit an event for saving storage changes history.
**Recommendation**:
Emit event in setter function. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Concurrent RPC requests disrupt execution due to broadcast channel misuse
### Description
When an RPC request is received by the lightning node, it is forwarded to a plugin thread which creates a notification sent to the EVM channel through the broadcast channel. A response notification is sent through the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lacking Address Checks
### Description
Across the repository, addresses are commonly [saved into storage](https://github.com/ThenafiBNB/THENA-Contracts/blob/2bb84cf6bb429e9bac8ac8464f4546da855ef4ca/contracts/VoterV3.sol#L32-L41) to be used later. When saving addresses, it is best practice to add basic checks t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing check for `_feeBasisPoints > 0` in `PolygonStrategy::addFee`
### Description
**Description:** `PolygonStrategy::addFee` does not check if `_feeBasisPoints > 0` when adding a new fee element to the `fees` array. This is inconsistent with the `PolygonStrategy::updateFee` logic where `_feeBasisPoints = 0`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: AMM Cannot Be initialize() Except By Governance
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-hubble/blob/main/contracts/AMM.sol#L93-L108
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-hubble/blob/main/contracts/AMM.sol#L730-L734
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-hubble/blob/main/contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect order of modifiers: nonReentrant should precede all other modifiers
### Description
To mitigate the risk of reentrancy attacks, a modifier named `nonReentrant` is commonly used. This modifier acts as a lock, ensuring that a function cannot be called recursively while it is still in execution. A typic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: veto() doesn't undo all actions of endorse()
### Description
An update of `endorsements[]` has immediate effect on most operations; however, not for the effects of `setEndorsedOperator()`.
### Recommendation
Develop an approach to retrieve all the vaults for which `setEndorsedOperator()` has been executed and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol doesn't completely protect itself from `LTV = 0` tokens
### Description
The AaveLeverageStrategyExtension does not completely protect against tokens with a Loan-to-Value (LTV) of 0. Tokens with an LTV of 0 in Aave V3 pose significant risks, as they cannot be used as collateral to borrow upon a brea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Collateral can be deposited in a reserve where usage as collateral is disabled
### Description
The [`deposit` function](https://gitlab.com/aave-tech/dlp/contracts/blob/1f8e5e65a99a887a5a13ad9af6486ebf93f57d02/contracts/lendingpool/LendingPool.sol#L90) of the `LendingPool` contract allows users to deposit asset... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [G-01]
### Description
Function transfer in NestedReserve is never used and can only be called by the factory (onlyFactory), so consider removing it because I think the factory uses a withdraw function from the Reserve.
Currently never used:
You can remove it to save some gas, or leave it if it was intended... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Attacker can freeze users first rewards
### Description
The `andromeda-validator-staking` contract has a vulnerability related to the staking rewards withdrawal process. If the withdrawal address is not set correctly, rewards can be unintentionally distributed to the contract itself, causing them to become ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RateLimited - Contract starts with a full buffer at deployment
### Description
A contract that inherits from `RateLimited` starts out with a full buffer when it is deployed.
**code/contracts/utils/RateLimited.sol:L35**
```
\_bufferStored = \_bufferCap;
```
That means the full `bufferCap` is immediately av... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Functions `topUpDistributionEvent()` and `addDistributionAmount()` have duplicated functionality.
### Description
Functions `topUpDistributionEvent()` and `addDistributionAmount()` have duplicated functionality.
### Recommendation
We recommend taking out the logic to one function. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Burning Game NFTs will increase the balance of the `address(0)`
### Description
The GameNFT contract is the base abstract contract for NFTs in the game, and the overridden `_update` function handles the Soulbound NFT logic.
However, when burning the NFT, the `_incrementAmount` call will unexpectedly increase... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `stakerewardV2pool.withdraw()` should check the user's boost lock status.
### Description
Users can withdraw their staking token immediately after charging more rewards using boost.
### Proof of Concept
`withdraw()` should prevent withdrawals during the boost lock, but there is no such logic.
The below s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Lack of incentives to liquidate unprofitable strategy accounts
### Description
The `_getPremiums`function in the **StrategyBank** contract calculates the executor premiums for the liquidators. In case the `collateral`is 0 (e.g.: after adjusting the value for the loan payment), the `executorPremium` will be 0 a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Simplify check in removeApprover()
### Description
The function `removeApprover()` has a check that ensures the `approverCount` won't go below the threshold. This logic is slightly difficult to read and can be simplified.
```solidity
function removeApprover(...) ... {
...
require(orgs[msg.sender].approver... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: [61] Consider adding formal verification proofs
### Description
Formal verification is the act of proving or disproving the correctness of intended algorithms underlying a system with respect to a certain formal specification/property/invariant, using formal methods of mathematics.
Some tools that are current... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Unused nonce Field in `ExecutePreApprovedTransaction` struct
### Description
**Description:** The `ExecutePreApprovedTransaction` struct contains a nonce field that is never used or validated:
In `SecuritizeOnRamp::executePreApprovedTransaction`, the `txData.nonce` value passed by the caller is completely ig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use a more recent version of Solidity
### Description
Use a Solidity version of at least 0.8.13 to get the ability to use `using for` with a list of free functions.
*There are 6 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/debtdao/Line-of-Credit/blob/e8aa08b44f6132a5ed901f8daa231700c5afeb3a/contracts/modules... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
Documentation has been added detailing the roles and privileges.
**File(s) affected:**`ClayManager.sol`, `UserProxy.sol`
**Description:** Certain contracts have state variables, e.g. `TIMELOCK_UPGRADES_ROLE`, which provide certain addresses with privi... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.