instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
90
5.47k
output
stringlengths
16
15.4k
__index_level_0__
int64
165k
175k
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool NaClProcessHost::StartNaClExecution() { NaClBrowser* nacl_browser = NaClBrowser::GetInstance(); nacl::NaClStartParams params; params.validation_cache_enabled = nacl_browser->ValidationCacheIsEnabled(); params.validation_cache_key = nacl_browser->GetValidationCacheKey(); params.version = chrome::Ve...
bool NaClProcessHost::StartNaClExecution() { NaClBrowser* nacl_browser = NaClBrowser::GetInstance(); nacl::NaClStartParams params; params.validation_cache_enabled = nacl_browser->ValidationCacheIsEnabled(); params.validation_cache_key = nacl_browser->GetValidationCacheKey(); params.version = chrome::VersionI...
170,729
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static char *escape_pathname(const char *inp) { const unsigned char *s; char *escaped, *d; if (!inp) { return NULL; } escaped = malloc (4 * strlen(inp) + 1); if (!escaped) { perror("malloc"); return NULL; } for (d = escaped, s = (const unsigned char *)inp; *s; s...
static char *escape_pathname(const char *inp) { const unsigned char *s; char *escaped, *d; if (!inp) { return NULL; } escaped = malloc (4 * strlen(inp) + 1); if (!escaped) { perror("malloc"); return NULL; } for (d = escaped, s = (const unsigned char *)inp; *s; s++) { ...
169,757
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void LocalFileSystem::fileSystemNotAvailable( PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<ExecutionContext> context, PassRefPtr<CallbackWrapper> callbacks) { context->postTask(createCrossThreadTask(&reportFailure, callbacks->release(), FileError::ABORT_ERR)); } Commit Message: Oilpan: Ship Oilpan for SyncCallbackHel...
void LocalFileSystem::fileSystemNotAvailable( PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<ExecutionContext> context, CallbackWrapper* callbacks) { context->postTask(createCrossThreadTask(&reportFailure, callbacks->release(), FileError::ABORT_ERR)); }
171,428
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool Track::VetEntry(const BlockEntry* pBlockEntry) const { assert(pBlockEntry); const Block* const pBlock = pBlockEntry->GetBlock(); assert(pBlock); assert(pBlock->GetTrackNumber() == m_info.number); if (!pBlock || pBlock->GetTrackNumber() != m_info.number) return false; retur...
bool Track::VetEntry(const BlockEntry* pBlockEntry) const bool Track::VetEntry(const BlockEntry* pBlockEntry) const { assert(pBlockEntry); const Block* const pBlock = pBlockEntry->GetBlock(); assert(pBlock); assert(pBlock->GetTrackNumber() == m_info.number); if (!pBlock || pBlock->GetTrackNumber() != m_info.n...
174,451
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void fe_netjoin_init(void) { settings_add_bool("misc", "hide_netsplit_quits", TRUE); settings_add_int("misc", "netjoin_max_nicks", 10); join_tag = -1; printing_joins = FALSE; read_settings(); signal_add("setup changed", (SIGNAL_FUNC) read_settings); } Commit Message: Merge branch 'netjoin-timeout'...
void fe_netjoin_init(void) { settings_add_bool("misc", "hide_netsplit_quits", TRUE); settings_add_int("misc", "netjoin_max_nicks", 10); join_tag = -1; printing_joins = FALSE; read_settings(); signal_add("setup changed", (SIGNAL_FUNC) read_settings); signal_add("server disconnected", (SIGNAL_FUNC) sig_ser...
168,291
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static uint64_t pci_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) { AcpiPciHpState *s = opaque; uint32_t val = 0; int bsel = s->hotplug_select; if (bsel < 0 || bsel > ACPI_PCIHP_MAX_HOTPLUG_BUS) { return 0; } switch (addr) { case PCI_UP_BASE: val = s->acpi_pc...
static uint64_t pci_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) { AcpiPciHpState *s = opaque; uint32_t val = 0; int bsel = s->hotplug_select; if (bsel < 0 || bsel >= ACPI_PCIHP_MAX_HOTPLUG_BUS) { return 0; } switch (addr) { case PCI_UP_BASE: val = s->acpi_pcihp_p...
165,019
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OmniboxPopupViewGtk::~OmniboxPopupViewGtk() { model_.reset(); g_object_unref(layout_); gtk_widget_destroy(window_); for (ImageMap::iterator it = images_.begin(); it != images_.end(); ++it) delete it->second; } Commit Message: GTK: Stop listening to gtk signals in the omnibox before destroying the m...
OmniboxPopupViewGtk::~OmniboxPopupViewGtk() { // Stop listening to our signals before we destroy the model. I suspect that // we can race window destruction, otherwise. signal_registrar_.reset(); model_.reset(); g_object_unref(layout_); gtk_widget_destroy(window_); for (ImageMap::iterator it = images_....
171,049
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool IDNSpoofChecker::SafeToDisplayAsUnicode(base::StringPiece16 label, bool is_tld_ascii) { UErrorCode status = U_ZERO_ERROR; int32_t result = uspoof_check(checker_, label.data(), base::checked_cast<int32_t>(label.size()), NULL, &status); ...
bool IDNSpoofChecker::SafeToDisplayAsUnicode(base::StringPiece16 label, bool is_tld_ascii) { UErrorCode status = U_ZERO_ERROR; int32_t result = uspoof_check(checker_, label.data(), base::checked_cast<int32_t>(label.size()), NULL, &status); if (...
172,363
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppCacheUpdateJob::StartUpdate(AppCacheHost* host, const GURL& new_master_resource) { DCHECK(group_->update_job() == this); DCHECK(!group_->is_obsolete()); bool is_new_pending_master_entry = false; if (!new_master_resource.is_empty()) { DCHECK(new_master_resou...
void AppCacheUpdateJob::StartUpdate(AppCacheHost* host, const GURL& new_master_resource) { DCHECK(group_->update_job() == this); DCHECK(!group_->is_obsolete()); bool is_new_pending_master_entry = false; if (!new_master_resource.is_empty()) { DCHECK(new_master_resource ==...
171,733
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: set_umask(const char *optarg) { long umask_long; mode_t umask_val; char *endptr; umask_long = strtoll(optarg, &endptr, 0); if (*endptr || umask_long < 0 || umask_long & ~0777L) { fprintf(stderr, "Invalid --umask option %s", optarg); return; } umask_val = umask_long & 0777; umask(umask_val); ...
set_umask(const char *optarg) { long umask_long; mode_t umask_val; char *endptr; umask_long = strtoll(optarg, &endptr, 0); if (*endptr || umask_long < 0 || umask_long & ~0777L) { fprintf(stderr, "Invalid --umask option %s", optarg); return 0; } umask_val = umask_long & 0777; umask(umask_val); uma...
170,158
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ConnectIBusSignals() { if (!ibus_) { return; } g_signal_connect_after(ibus_, "connected", G_CALLBACK(IBusBusConnectedCallback), this); g_signal_connect(ibus_, "disconnected", ...
void ConnectIBusSignals() { if (!ibus_) { return; } g_signal_connect_after(ibus_, "connected", G_CALLBACK(IBusBusConnectedThunk), this); g_signal_connect(ibus_, "disconnected", ...
170,529
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: RenderThread::~RenderThread() { FOR_EACH_OBSERVER( RenderProcessObserver, observers_, OnRenderProcessShutdown()); if (web_database_observer_impl_.get()) web_database_observer_impl_->WaitForAllDatabasesToClose(); RemoveFilter(audio_input_message_filter_.get()); audio_input_message_filter_ =...
RenderThread::~RenderThread() { FOR_EACH_OBSERVER( RenderProcessObserver, observers_, OnRenderProcessShutdown()); if (web_database_observer_impl_.get()) web_database_observer_impl_->WaitForAllDatabasesToClose(); RemoveFilter(devtools_agent_message_filter_.get()); devtools_agent_message_filter_ = N...
170,327
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(bprm->file); umode_t mode = inode->i_mode; int retval; /* clear any previous set[ug]id data from a previous binary */ bprm->cred->euid = current_euid(); bprm->cred->egid = current_egid(); if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt...
int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { int retval; bprm_fill_uid(bprm); /* fill in binprm security blob */ retval = security_bprm_set_creds(bprm); if (retval) return retval; bprm->cred_prepared = 1; memset(bprm->buf, 0, BINPRM_BUF_SIZE); return kernel_read(bprm->file, 0, bprm->buf, BINPRM_B...
166,625
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: PluginChannel::~PluginChannel() { if (renderer_handle_) base::CloseProcessHandle(renderer_handle_); MessageLoop::current()->PostDelayedTask( FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&PluginReleaseCallback), base::TimeDelta::FromMinutes(kPluginReleaseTimeMinutes)); } Commit Message: Convert plugin and ...
PluginChannel::~PluginChannel() { MessageLoop::current()->PostDelayedTask( FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&PluginReleaseCallback), base::TimeDelta::FromMinutes(kPluginReleaseTimeMinutes)); }
170,951
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: DWORD WtsSessionProcessDelegate::GetExitCode() { if (!core_) return CONTROL_C_EXIT; return core_->GetExitCode(); } Commit Message: Validate and report peer's PID to WorkerProcessIpcDelegate so it will be able to duplicate handles to and from the worker process. As a side effect WorkerProcessLauncher:...
DWORD WtsSessionProcessDelegate::GetExitCode() { DWORD WtsSessionProcessDelegate::GetProcessId() const { if (core_) return 0; return core_->GetProcessId(); } bool WtsSessionProcessDelegate::IsPermanentError(int failure_count) const { if (core_) return false; return core_->IsPermanentError(failure_co...
171,557
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { ++vcpu->stat.insn_emulation_fail; trace_kvm_emulate_insn_failed(vcpu); vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR; vcpu->run->internal.suberror = KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION; vcpu->run->internal.ndata = 0; kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_...
static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int r = EMULATE_DONE; ++vcpu->stat.insn_emulation_fail; trace_kvm_emulate_insn_failed(vcpu); if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu)) { vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR; vcpu->run->internal.suberror = KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION; vcpu->run->i...
166,558
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void EnterpriseEnrollmentScreen::OnPolicyStateChanged( policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::PolicySubsystemState state, policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::ErrorDetails error_details) { if (is_showing_) { switch (state) { case policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::UNENROLLED: return; case policy::Cl...
void EnterpriseEnrollmentScreen::OnPolicyStateChanged( policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::PolicySubsystemState state, policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::ErrorDetails error_details) { if (is_showing_) { switch (state) { case policy::CloudPolicySubsystem::UNENROLLED: return; case policy::CloudPol...
170,277
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static authz_status lua_authz_check(request_rec *r, const char *require_line, const void *parsed_require_line) { apr_pool_t *pool; ap_lua_vm_spec *spec; lua_State *L; ap_lua_server_cfg *server_cfg = ap_get_module_config(r->server->module_config, ...
static authz_status lua_authz_check(request_rec *r, const char *require_line, const void *parsed_require_line) { apr_pool_t *pool; ap_lua_vm_spec *spec; lua_State *L; ap_lua_server_cfg *server_cfg = ap_get_module_config(r->server->module_config, ...
166,250
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int SoundPool::load(const char* path, int priority __unused) { ALOGV("load: path=%s, priority=%d", path, priority); Mutex::Autolock lock(&mLock); sp<Sample> sample = new Sample(++mNextSampleID, path); mSamples.add(sample->sampleID(), sample); doLoad(sample); return sample->sampleID(); ...
int SoundPool::load(const char* path, int priority __unused) { ALOGV("load: path=%s, priority=%d", path, priority); int sampleID; { Mutex::Autolock lock(&mLock); sampleID = ++mNextSampleID; sp<Sample> sample = new Sample(sampleID, path); mSamples.add(sampleID, sample); ...
173,961
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long Track::GetType() const { return m_info.type; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The diff is so huge beca...
long Track::GetType() const
174,375
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox(MailboxSyncMode mode, GLenum filter) { if (!texture_holder_->IsMailboxTextureHolder()) { TRACE_EVENT0("blink", "AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox"); if (!original_skia_image_) { Retain...
void AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox(MailboxSyncMode mode, GLenum filter) { DCHECK_CALLED_ON_VALID_THREAD(thread_checker_); if (!texture_holder_->IsMailboxTextureHolder()) { TRACE_EVENT0("blink", "AcceleratedStaticBitmapImage::EnsureMailbox"); ...
172,595
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BaseMultipleFieldsDateAndTimeInputType::didBlurFromControl() { RefPtr<HTMLInputElement> protector(element()); element()->setFocus(false); } Commit Message: Fix reentrance of BaseMultipleFieldsDateAndTimeInputType::destroyShadowSubtree. destroyShadowSubtree could dispatch 'blur' event unexpect...
void BaseMultipleFieldsDateAndTimeInputType::didBlurFromControl() { if (containsFocusedShadowElement()) return; RefPtr<HTMLInputElement> protector(element()); element()->setFocus(false); }
171,211
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: BackendImpl::BackendImpl( const base::FilePath& path, scoped_refptr<BackendCleanupTracker> cleanup_tracker, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& cache_thread, net::NetLog* net_log) : cleanup_tracker_(std::move(cleanup_tracker)), background_queue_(this, FallbackToInternalIfN...
BackendImpl::BackendImpl( const base::FilePath& path, scoped_refptr<BackendCleanupTracker> cleanup_tracker, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& cache_thread, net::NetLog* net_log) : cleanup_tracker_(std::move(cleanup_tracker)), background_queue_(this, FallbackToInternalIfNull(ca...
172,696
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static RFlagsAtOffset* r_flag_get_nearest_list(RFlag *f, ut64 off, int dir) { RFlagsAtOffset *flags = NULL; RFlagsAtOffset key; key.off = off; if (dir >= 0) { flags = r_skiplist_get_geq (f->by_off, &key); } else { flags = r_skiplist_get_leq (f->by_off, &key); } if (dir == 0 && flags && flags->off !...
static RFlagsAtOffset* r_flag_get_nearest_list(RFlag *f, ut64 off, int dir) { static RFlagsAtOffset* r_flag_get_nearest_list(RFlag *f, ut64 off, int dir) { RFlagsAtOffset *flags = NULL; RFlagsAtOffset key; key.off = off; if (dir >= 0) { flags = r_skiplist_get_geq (f->by_off, &key); } else { flags = r_skipl...
167,723
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static struct svc_serv *nfs_callback_create_svc(int minorversion) { struct nfs_callback_data *cb_info = &nfs_callback_info[minorversion]; struct svc_serv *serv; struct svc_serv_ops *sv_ops; /* * Check whether we're already up and running. */ if (cb_info->serv) { /* * Note: increase service usage, b...
static struct svc_serv *nfs_callback_create_svc(int minorversion) { struct nfs_callback_data *cb_info = &nfs_callback_info[minorversion]; struct svc_serv *serv; struct svc_serv_ops *sv_ops; /* * Check whether we're already up and running. */ if (cb_info->serv) { /* * Note: increase service usage, because...
168,139
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ide_dma_cb(void *opaque, int ret) { IDEState *s = opaque; int n; int64_t sector_num; bool stay_active = false; if (ret == -ECANCELED) { return; } if (ret < 0) { int op = IDE_RETRY_DMA; if (s->dma_cmd == IDE_DMA_READ) op |= IDE_RETRY_READ; ...
void ide_dma_cb(void *opaque, int ret) { IDEState *s = opaque; int n; int64_t sector_num; bool stay_active = false; if (ret == -ECANCELED) { return; } if (ret < 0) { int op = IDE_RETRY_DMA; if (s->dma_cmd == IDE_DMA_READ) op |= IDE_RETRY_READ; el...
164,839
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: uint32 ResourceTracker::GetLiveObjectsForInstance( PP_Instance instance) const { InstanceMap::const_iterator found = instance_map_.find(instance); if (found == instance_map_.end()) return 0; return static_cast<uint32>(found->second->resources.size() + found->second->...
uint32 ResourceTracker::GetLiveObjectsForInstance( PP_Instance instance) const { InstanceMap::const_iterator found = instance_map_.find(instance); if (found == instance_map_.end()) return 0; return static_cast<uint32>(found->second->ref_resources.size() + found->second->ob...
170,418
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static M_bool M_fs_check_overwrite_allowed(const char *p1, const char *p2, M_uint32 mode) { M_fs_info_t *info = NULL; char *pold = NULL; char *pnew = NULL; M_fs_type_t type; M_bool ret = M_TRUE; if (mode & M_FS_FILE_MODE_OVERWRITE) return M_TRUE; /* If we're not overwritin...
static M_bool M_fs_check_overwrite_allowed(const char *p1, const char *p2, M_uint32 mode) { M_fs_info_t *info = NULL; char *pold = NULL; char *pnew = NULL; M_fs_type_t type; M_bool ret = M_TRUE; if (mode & M_FS_FILE_MODE_OVERWRITE) return M_TRUE; /* If we're not overwriting we n...
169,140
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void si_conn_send(struct connection *conn) { struct stream_interface *si = conn->owner; struct channel *chn = si->ob; int ret; if (chn->pipe && conn->xprt->snd_pipe) { ret = conn->xprt->snd_pipe(conn, chn->pipe); if (ret > 0) chn->flags |= ...
static void si_conn_send(struct connection *conn) { struct stream_interface *si = conn->owner; struct channel *chn = si->ob; int ret; if (chn->pipe && conn->xprt->snd_pipe) { ret = conn->xprt->snd_pipe(conn, chn->pipe); if (ret > 0) chn->flags |= CF_WRI...
164,991
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool NuMediaExtractor::getTotalBitrate(int64_t *bitrate) const { if (mTotalBitrate >= 0) { *bitrate = mTotalBitrate; return true; } off64_t size; if (mDurationUs >= 0 && mDataSource->getSize(&size) == OK) { *bitrate = size * 8000000ll / mDurationUs; // in bits/sec return tru...
bool NuMediaExtractor::getTotalBitrate(int64_t *bitrate) const { if (mTotalBitrate >= 0) { *bitrate = mTotalBitrate; return true; } off64_t size; if (mDurationUs > 0 && mDataSource->getSize(&size) == OK) { *bitrate = size * 8000000ll / mDurationUs; // in bits/sec return true; ...
174,003
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void UnloadController::TabDetachedImpl(TabContents* contents) { if (is_attempting_to_close_browser_) ClearUnloadState(contents->web_contents(), false); registrar_.Remove( this, content::NOTIFICATION_WEB_CONTENTS_DISCONNECTED, content::Source<content::WebContents>(contents->web_contents(...
void UnloadController::TabDetachedImpl(TabContents* contents) { void UnloadController::TabDetachedImpl(content::WebContents* contents) { if (is_attempting_to_close_browser_) ClearUnloadState(contents, false); registrar_.Remove(this, content::NOTIFICATION_WEB_CONTENTS_DISCONNECTED, ...
171,520
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: tar_directory_for_file (GsfInfileTar *dir, const char *name, gboolean last) { const char *s = name; while (1) { const char *s0 = s; char *dirname; /* Find a directory component, if any. */ while (1) { if (*s == 0) { if (last && s != s0) break; else return dir; } /* This is ...
tar_directory_for_file (GsfInfileTar *dir, const char *name, gboolean last) { const char *s = name; while (1) { const char *s0 = s; char *dirname; /* Find a directory component, if any. */ while (1) { if (*s == 0) { if (last && s != s0) break; else return dir; } /* This is delibe...
166,843
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: struct lib_t* MACH0_(get_libs)(struct MACH0_(obj_t)* bin) { struct lib_t *libs; int i; if (!bin->nlibs) return NULL; if (!(libs = calloc ((bin->nlibs + 1), sizeof(struct lib_t)))) return NULL; for (i = 0; i < bin->nlibs; i++) { strncpy (libs[i].name, bin->libs[i], R_BIN_MACH0_STRING_LENGTH); ...
struct lib_t* MACH0_(get_libs)(struct MACH0_(obj_t)* bin) { struct lib_t *libs; int i; if (!bin->nlibs) { return NULL; } if (!(libs = calloc ((bin->nlibs + 1), sizeof(struct lib_t)))) { return NULL; } for (i = 0; i < bin->nlibs; i++) { strncpy (libs[i].name, bin->libs[i], R_BIN_MACH0_STRING_LENGTH...
168,234
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ReportPreconnectAccuracy( const PreconnectStats& stats, const std::map<GURL, OriginRequestSummary>& requests) { if (stats.requests_stats.empty()) return; int preresolve_hits_count = 0; int preresolve_misses_count = 0; int preconnect_hits_count = 0; int preconnect_misses_count = 0;...
void ReportPreconnectAccuracy( const PreconnectStats& stats, const std::map<url::Origin, OriginRequestSummary>& requests) { if (stats.requests_stats.empty()) return; int preresolve_hits_count = 0; int preresolve_misses_count = 0; int preconnect_hits_count = 0; int preconnect_misses_count = 0...
172,372
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct mg_context *ctx; base::AtExitManager exit; base::WaitableEvent shutdown_event(false, false); CommandLine::Init(argc, argv); CommandLine* cmd_line = CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess(); #if defined(OS_POSIX) signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); #endif srand((unsigned int)...
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct mg_context *ctx; base::AtExitManager exit; base::WaitableEvent shutdown_event(false, false); CommandLine::Init(argc, argv); CommandLine* cmd_line = CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess(); #if defined(OS_POSIX) signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); #endif srand((unsigned int)time(N...
170,462
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ShellSurface::CreateShellSurfaceWidget(ui::WindowShowState show_state) { DCHECK(enabled()); DCHECK(!widget_); views::Widget::InitParams params; params.type = views::Widget::InitParams::TYPE_WINDOW; params.ownership = views::Widget::InitParams::NATIVE_WIDGET_OWNS_WIDGET; params.delegate = this; ...
void ShellSurface::CreateShellSurfaceWidget(ui::WindowShowState show_state) { DCHECK(enabled()); DCHECK(!widget_); views::Widget::InitParams params; params.type = views::Widget::InitParams::TYPE_WINDOW; params.ownership = views::Widget::InitParams::NATIVE_WIDGET_OWNS_WIDGET; params.delegate = this; param...
171,638
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct vm_area_struct *prev; int error; address &= PAGE_MASK; error = security_mmap_addr(address); if (error) return error; /* Enforce stack_guard_gap */ prev = vma->vm_prev; /*...
int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct vm_area_struct *prev; int error = 0; address &= PAGE_MASK; if (address < mmap_min_addr) return -EPERM; /* Enforce stack_guard_gap */ prev = vma->vm_prev; /* Check that both stac...
169,722
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void WT_NoiseGenerator (S_WT_VOICE *pWTVoice, S_WT_INT_FRAME *pWTIntFrame) { EAS_PCM *pOutputBuffer; EAS_I32 phaseInc; EAS_I32 tmp0; EAS_I32 tmp1; EAS_I32 nInterpolatedSample; EAS_I32 numSamples; /* initialize some local variables */ numSamples = pWTIntFrame->numSamples; ...
void WT_NoiseGenerator (S_WT_VOICE *pWTVoice, S_WT_INT_FRAME *pWTIntFrame) { EAS_PCM *pOutputBuffer; EAS_I32 phaseInc; EAS_I32 tmp0; EAS_I32 tmp1; EAS_I32 nInterpolatedSample; EAS_I32 numSamples; /* initialize some local variables */ numSamples = pWTIntFrame->numSamples; if (n...
173,920
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AppListController::Init(Profile* initial_profile) { if (win8::IsSingleWindowMetroMode()) return; PrefService* prefs = g_browser_process->local_state(); if (prefs->HasPrefPath(prefs::kRestartWithAppList) && prefs->GetBoolean(prefs::kRestartWithAppList)) { prefs->SetBoolean(prefs::kRestart...
void AppListController::Init(Profile* initial_profile) { if (win8::IsSingleWindowMetroMode()) return; PrefService* prefs = g_browser_process->local_state(); if (prefs->HasPrefPath(prefs::kRestartWithAppList) && prefs->GetBoolean(prefs::kRestartWithAppList)) { prefs->SetBoolean(prefs::kRestartWithAp...
171,337
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int hashtable_set(hashtable_t *hashtable, const char *key, size_t serial, json_t *value) { pair_t *pair; bucket_t *bucket; size_t hash, index; /* rehash if the load ratio exceeds 1 */ if(hashtable->size >= num_buckets(hashtable)) if(hashtable_do...
int hashtable_set(hashtable_t *hashtable, const char *key, size_t serial, json_t *value) { pair_t *pair; bucket_t *bucket; size_t hash, index; /* rehash if the load ratio exceeds 1 */ if(hashtable->size >= hashsize(hashtable->order)) if(hashtable_do_r...
166,533
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: unsigned char *base64decode(const char *buf, size_t *size) { if (!buf || !size) return NULL; size_t len = (*size > 0) ? *size : strlen(buf); if (len <= 0) return NULL; unsigned char *outbuf = (unsigned char*)malloc((len/4)*3+3); const char *ptr = buf; int p = 0; size_t l = 0; do { ptr += strspn...
unsigned char *base64decode(const char *buf, size_t *size) { if (!buf || !size) return NULL; size_t len = (*size > 0) ? *size : strlen(buf); if (len <= 0) return NULL; unsigned char *outbuf = (unsigned char*)malloc((len/4)*3+3); const char *ptr = buf; int p = 0; int wv, w1, w2, w3, w4; int tmpval[4]; int...
168,416
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PrintWebViewHelper::OnPrintForPrintPreview( const base::DictionaryValue& job_settings) { if (prep_frame_view_) return; if (!render_view()->GetWebView()) return; blink::WebFrame* main_frame = render_view()->GetWebView()->mainFrame(); if (!main_frame) return; blink::WebDocument ...
void PrintWebViewHelper::OnPrintForPrintPreview( const base::DictionaryValue& job_settings) { CHECK_LE(ipc_nesting_level_, 1); if (prep_frame_view_) return; if (!render_view()->GetWebView()) return; blink::WebFrame* main_frame = render_view()->GetWebView()->mainFrame(); if (!main_frame) r...
171,873
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const SystemProfileProto& MetricsLog::RecordEnvironment( DelegatingProvider* delegating_provider) { DCHECK(!has_environment_); has_environment_ = true; SystemProfileProto* system_profile = uma_proto()->mutable_system_profile(); WriteMetricsEnableDefault(client_->GetMetricsReportingDefaultState(), ...
const SystemProfileProto& MetricsLog::RecordEnvironment( DelegatingProvider* delegating_provider) { DCHECK(!has_environment_); has_environment_ = true; SystemProfileProto* system_profile = uma_proto()->mutable_system_profile(); WriteMetricsEnableDefault(client_->GetMetricsReportingDefaultState(), ...
172,072
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: huff_get_next_word(Jbig2HuffmanState *hs, int offset) { uint32_t word = 0; Jbig2WordStream *ws = hs->ws; if ((ws->get_next_word(ws, offset, &word)) && ((hs->offset_limit == 0) || (offset < hs->offset_limit))) hs->offset_limit = offset; return word; } Commit Message: CWE ID: CWE-119
huff_get_next_word(Jbig2HuffmanState *hs, int offset) huff_get_next_word(Jbig2HuffmanState *hs, uint32_t offset) { uint32_t word = 0; Jbig2WordStream *ws = hs->ws; if ((ws->get_next_word(ws, offset, &word)) && ((hs->offset_limit == 0) || (offset < hs->offset_limit))) hs->offset_limit = offset; ...
165,488
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void red_channel_pipes_add_type(RedChannel *channel, int pipe_item_type) { RingItem *link; RING_FOREACH(link, &channel->clients) { red_channel_client_pipe_add_type( SPICE_CONTAINEROF(link, RedChannelClient, channel_link), pipe_item_type); } } Commit Message: CW...
void red_channel_pipes_add_type(RedChannel *channel, int pipe_item_type) { RingItem *link, *next; RING_FOREACH_SAFE(link, next, &channel->clients) { red_channel_client_pipe_add_type( SPICE_CONTAINEROF(link, RedChannelClient, channel_link), pipe_item_type); } }
164,664
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void AddInputMethodNames(const GList* engines, InputMethodDescriptors* out) { DCHECK(out); for (; engines; engines = g_list_next(engines)) { IBusEngineDesc* engine_desc = IBUS_ENGINE_DESC(engines->data); const gchar* name = ibus_engine_desc_get_name(engine_desc); const gchar* longname = ibus_engin...
void AddInputMethodNames(const GList* engines, InputMethodDescriptors* out) { DCHECK(out); for (; engines; engines = g_list_next(engines)) { IBusEngineDesc* engine_desc = IBUS_ENGINE_DESC(engines->data); const gchar* name = ibus_engine_desc_get_name(engine_desc); const gchar* longname = ibus_engine_desc...
170,517
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void sum_init(int csum_type, int seed) { char s[4]; if (csum_type < 0) csum_type = parse_csum_name(NULL, 0); cursum_type = csum_type; switch (csum_type) { case CSUM_MD5: md5_begin(&md); break; case CSUM_MD4: mdfour_begin(&md); sumresidue = 0; break; case CSUM_MD4_OLD: br...
void sum_init(int csum_type, int seed) { char s[4]; if (csum_type < 0) csum_type = parse_csum_name(NULL, 0); cursum_type = csum_type; switch (csum_type) { case CSUM_MD5: md5_begin(&md); break; case CSUM_MD4: mdfour_begin(&md); sumresidue = 0; break; case CSUM_MD4_OLD: break; ...
164,646
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void GM2TabStyle::PaintTabBackground(gfx::Canvas* canvas, bool active, int fill_id, int y_inset, const SkPath* clip) const { DCHECK(!y_inset || fill_id); c...
void GM2TabStyle::PaintTabBackground(gfx::Canvas* canvas, TabState active_state, int fill_id, int y_inset, const SkPath* clip) const { DCHECK(!y_inset || fill_id); ...
172,525
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChangeCurrentInputMethod(const InputMethodDescriptor& new_input_method) { if (current_input_method_.id != new_input_method.id) { previous_input_method_ = current_input_method_; current_input_method_ = new_input_method; if (!input_method::SetCurrentKeyboardLayoutByName( ...
void ChangeCurrentInputMethod(const InputMethodDescriptor& new_input_method) { void ChangeCurrentInputMethod(const input_method::InputMethodDescriptor& new_input_method) { if (current_input_method_.id != new_input_method.id) { previous_input_method_ = current_input_method...
170,478
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int mp_get_count(struct sb_uart_state *state, struct serial_icounter_struct *icnt) { struct serial_icounter_struct icount; struct sb_uart_icount cnow; struct sb_uart_port *port = state->port; spin_lock_irq(&port->lock); memcpy(&cnow, &port->icount, sizeof(struct sb_uart_icount)); spin_unlock_ir...
static int mp_get_count(struct sb_uart_state *state, struct serial_icounter_struct *icnt) { struct serial_icounter_struct icount = {}; struct sb_uart_icount cnow; struct sb_uart_port *port = state->port; spin_lock_irq(&port->lock); memcpy(&cnow, &port->icount, sizeof(struct sb_uart_icount)); spin_unlock_irq...
165,961
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void RunMemCheck() { ACMRandom rnd(ACMRandom::DeterministicSeed()); const int count_test_block = 1000; DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, input_block, kNumCoeffs); DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, input_extreme_block, kNumCoeffs); DECLARE_ALIGNED_ARRAY(16, int16_t, output_ref_block, kNu...
void RunMemCheck() { ACMRandom rnd(ACMRandom::DeterministicSeed()); const int count_test_block = 1000; DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, int16_t, input_extreme_block[kNumCoeffs]); DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, tran_low_t, output_ref_block[kNumCoeffs]); DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, tran_low_t, output_block[kNumCoeffs]); ...
174,526
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: nfsd4_encode_layoutget(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, __be32 nfserr, struct nfsd4_layoutget *lgp) { struct xdr_stream *xdr = &resp->xdr; const struct nfsd4_layout_ops *ops = nfsd4_layout_ops[lgp->lg_layout_type]; __be32 *p; dprintk("%s: err %d\n", __func__, nfserr); if (nfserr) goto out; nfse...
nfsd4_encode_layoutget(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, __be32 nfserr, struct nfsd4_layoutget *lgp) { struct xdr_stream *xdr = &resp->xdr; const struct nfsd4_layout_ops *ops; __be32 *p; dprintk("%s: err %d\n", __func__, nfserr); if (nfserr) goto out; nfserr = nfserr_resource; p = xdr_reserve_space(xdr...
168,149
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: s_aes_process(stream_state * ss, stream_cursor_read * pr, stream_cursor_write * pw, bool last) { stream_aes_state *const state = (stream_aes_state *) ss; const unsigned char *limit; const long in_size = pr->limit - pr->ptr; const long out_size = pw->limit - pw->ptr; unsigned ...
s_aes_process(stream_state * ss, stream_cursor_read * pr, stream_cursor_write * pw, bool last) { stream_aes_state *const state = (stream_aes_state *) ss; const unsigned char *limit; const long in_size = pr->limit - pr->ptr; const long out_size = pw->limit - pw->ptr; unsigned char t...
164,703
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static double ipow( double n, int exp ) { double r; if ( exp < 0 ) return 1.0 / ipow( n, -exp ); r = 1; while ( exp > 0 ) { if ( exp & 1 ) r *= n; exp >>= 1; n *= n; } return r; } Commit Message: Fix a buffer overflow / heap corruption issue that could occur if a malformed JSON string was pa...
static double ipow( double n, int exp ) /* Parse the input text to generate a number, and populate the result into item. */ static const char *parse_number(cJSON *item,const char *num) { double n=0,sign=1,scale=0;int subscale=0,signsubscale=1; if (*num=='-') sign=-1,num++; /* Has sign? */ if (*num=='0') num++; ...
167,300
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void svc_rdma_send_error(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp, int status) { struct ib_send_wr err_wr; struct page *p; struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *ctxt; enum rpcrdma_errcode err; __be32 *va; int length; int ret; ret = svc_rdma_repost_recv(xprt, GFP_KERNEL); if (ret) return; p = alloc_...
void svc_rdma_send_error(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp,
168,174
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ut64 MACH0_(get_baddr)(struct MACH0_(obj_t)* bin) { int i; if (bin->hdr.filetype != MH_EXECUTE && bin->hdr.filetype != MH_DYLINKER) return 0; for (i = 0; i < bin->nsegs; ++i) if (bin->segs[i].fileoff == 0 && bin->segs[i].filesize != 0) return bin->segs[i].vmaddr; return 0; } Commit Message: Fi...
ut64 MACH0_(get_baddr)(struct MACH0_(obj_t)* bin) { int i; if (bin->hdr.filetype != MH_EXECUTE && bin->hdr.filetype != MH_DYLINKER) { return 0; } for (i = 0; i < bin->nsegs; ++i) { if (bin->segs[i].fileoff == 0 && bin->segs[i].filesize != 0) { return bin->segs[i].vmaddr; } } return 0; }
168,232
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: dhcpv6_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *cp, u_int length, int indent) { u_int i, t; const u_char *tlv, *value; uint16_t type, optlen; i = 0; while (i < length) { tlv = cp + i; type = EXTRACT_16BITS(tlv); optlen = EXTRACT_16BITS(tlv + 2); ...
dhcpv6_print(netdissect_options *ndo, const u_char *cp, u_int length, int indent) { u_int i, t; const u_char *tlv, *value; uint16_t type, optlen; i = 0; while (i < length) { if (i + 4 > length) return -1; tlv = cp + i; type = EXTRACT_16BITS(tlv)...
167,833
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlDocPtr soap_xmlParseMemory(const void *buf, size_t buf_size) { xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt = NULL; xmlDocPtr ret; /* xmlInitParser(); */ */ ctxt = xmlCreateMemoryParserCtxt(buf, buf_size); if (ctxt) { ctxt->sax->ignorableWhitespace = soap_ignorableWhitespace; ctxt...
xmlDocPtr soap_xmlParseMemory(const void *buf, size_t buf_size) { xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt = NULL; xmlDocPtr ret; /* xmlInitParser(); */ */ ctxt = xmlCreateMemoryParserCtxt(buf, buf_size); if (ctxt) { ctxt->options -= XML_PARSE_DTDLOAD; ctxt->sax->ignorableWhitespace = s...
164,728
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: xmlParseNameAndCompare(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlChar const *other) { register const xmlChar *cmp = other; register const xmlChar *in; const xmlChar *ret; GROW; in = ctxt->input->cur; while (*in != 0 && *in == *cmp) { ++in; ++cmp; ctxt->input->col++; } if (*cmp == 0 && (...
xmlParseNameAndCompare(xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlChar const *other) { register const xmlChar *cmp = other; register const xmlChar *in; const xmlChar *ret; GROW; if (ctxt->instate == XML_PARSER_EOF) return(NULL); in = ctxt->input->cur; while (*in != 0 && *in == *cmp) { ++in; ...
171,296
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: int BlobURLRequestJob::ComputeBytesToRead() const { int64 current_item_remaining_bytes = item_length_list_[current_item_index_] - current_item_offset_; int64 remaining_bytes = std::min(current_item_remaining_bytes, remaining_bytes_); return static_cast<int>(std::min...
int BlobURLRequestJob::ComputeBytesToRead() const { int64 current_item_length = item_length_list_[current_item_index_]; int64 item_remaining = current_item_length - current_item_offset_; int64 buf_remaining = read_buf_->BytesRemaining(); int64 max_remaining = std::numeric_limits<int>::max(); int64 min = st...
171,397
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: virtual void Predict(MB_PREDICTION_MODE mode) { mbptr_->mode_info_context->mbmi.mode = mode; REGISTER_STATE_CHECK(pred_fn_(mbptr_, data_ptr_[0] - kStride, data_ptr_[0] - 1, kStride, data_ptr_[0], kStr...
virtual void Predict(MB_PREDICTION_MODE mode) { mbptr_->mode_info_context->mbmi.mode = mode; ASM_REGISTER_STATE_CHECK(pred_fn_(mbptr_, data_ptr_[0] - kStride, data_ptr_[0] - 1, kStride, data_ptr...
174,566
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void SpdyWriteQueue::Clear() { CHECK(!removing_writes_); removing_writes_ = true; for (int i = MINIMUM_PRIORITY; i <= MAXIMUM_PRIORITY; ++i) { for (std::deque<PendingWrite>::iterator it = queue_[i].begin(); it != queue_[i].end(); ++it) { delete it->frame_producer; } queue_...
void SpdyWriteQueue::Clear() { CHECK(!removing_writes_); removing_writes_ = true; std::vector<SpdyBufferProducer*> erased_buffer_producers; for (int i = MINIMUM_PRIORITY; i <= MAXIMUM_PRIORITY; ++i) { for (std::deque<PendingWrite>::iterator it = queue_[i].begin(); it != queue_[i].end(); ++it...
171,673
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ResourceHostMsg_Request CreateXHRRequestWithOrigin(const char* origin) { ResourceHostMsg_Request request; request.method = "GET"; request.url = GURL("http://bar.com/simple_page.html"); request.first_party_for_cookies = GURL(origin); request.referrer_policy = blink::WebReferrerPolicyDefault; request...
ResourceHostMsg_Request CreateXHRRequestWithOrigin(const char* origin) { ResourceHostMsg_Request CreateXHRRequest(const char* url) { ResourceHostMsg_Request request; request.method = "GET"; request.url = GURL(url); request.referrer_policy = blink::WebReferrerPolicyDefault; request.load_flags = 0; reque...
172,272
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::AuthorizeService( const dbus::ObjectPath& device_path, const std::string& uuid, const ConfirmationCallback& callback) { callback.Run(CANCELLED); } Commit Message: Refactor to support default Bluetooth pairing delegate In order to support a default pairing delegate we ...
void BluetoothDeviceChromeOS::AuthorizeService(
171,216
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: CreateDataReductionProxyChromeIOData( Profile* profile, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& io_task_runner, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& ui_task_runner) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(content::BrowserThread::UI); DCHECK(profile); DCHECK(profile->GetPrefs()); dat...
CreateDataReductionProxyChromeIOData( Profile* profile, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& io_task_runner, const scoped_refptr<base::SingleThreadTaskRunner>& ui_task_runner) { DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(content::BrowserThread::UI); DCHECK(profile); DCHECK(profile->GetPrefs()); bool enab...
172,549
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool AXNodeObject::isModal() const { if (roleValue() != DialogRole && roleValue() != AlertDialogRole) return false; if (hasAttribute(aria_modalAttr)) { const AtomicString& modal = getAttribute(aria_modalAttr); if (equalIgnoringCase(modal, "true")) return true; if (equalIgnoringCase(...
bool AXNodeObject::isModal() const { if (roleValue() != DialogRole && roleValue() != AlertDialogRole) return false; if (hasAttribute(aria_modalAttr)) { const AtomicString& modal = getAttribute(aria_modalAttr); if (equalIgnoringASCIICase(modal, "true")) return true; if (equalIgnoringASCIIC...
171,916
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: SSH_PACKET_CALLBACK(ssh_packet_kexdh_init){ int rc; (void)type; (void)user; SSH_LOG(SSH_LOG_PACKET,"Received SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT"); if(session->dh_handshake_state != DH_STATE_INIT){ SSH_LOG(SSH_LOG_RARE,"Invalid state for SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT"); goto error; } switch(session->next_crypto->k...
SSH_PACKET_CALLBACK(ssh_packet_kexdh_init){ int rc = SSH_ERROR; (void)type; (void)user; SSH_LOG(SSH_LOG_PACKET,"Received SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT"); if(session->dh_handshake_state != DH_STATE_INIT){ SSH_LOG(SSH_LOG_RARE,"Invalid state for SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT"); goto error; } switch(session->next_cry...
165,325
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: RenderWidgetHostViewAura::RenderWidgetHostViewAura(RenderWidgetHost* host) : host_(RenderWidgetHostImpl::From(host)), ALLOW_THIS_IN_INITIALIZER_LIST(window_(new aura::Window(this))), in_shutdown_(false), is_fullscreen_(false), popup_parent_host_view_(NULL), popup_child_host_view_...
RenderWidgetHostViewAura::RenderWidgetHostViewAura(RenderWidgetHost* host) : host_(RenderWidgetHostImpl::From(host)), ALLOW_THIS_IN_INITIALIZER_LIST(window_(new aura::Window(this))), in_shutdown_(false), is_fullscreen_(false), popup_parent_host_view_(NULL), popup_child_host_view_(NULL)...
171,383
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: ext2_xattr_delete_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; struct mb_cache_entry *ce; down_write(&EXT2_I(inode)->xattr_sem); if (!EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl) goto cleanup; bh = sb_bread(inode->i_sb, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl); if (!bh) { ext2_error(inode->i_sb, "ext2_xattr_delet...
ext2_xattr_delete_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; down_write(&EXT2_I(inode)->xattr_sem); if (!EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl) goto cleanup; bh = sb_bread(inode->i_sb, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl); if (!bh) { ext2_error(inode->i_sb, "ext2_xattr_delete_inode", "inode %ld: block %d ...
169,979
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void OnDidAddMessageToConsole(int32_t, const base::string16& message, int32_t, const base::string16&) { callback_.Run(message); } Commit Message: Convert FrameHostMsg_DidAddMessageToConsole to Mojo. Note: Sin...
void OnDidAddMessageToConsole(int32_t,
172,490
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void CreatePersistentHistogramAllocator() { GlobalHistogramAllocator::GetCreateHistogramResultHistogram(); GlobalHistogramAllocator::CreateWithLocalMemory( kAllocatorMemorySize, 0, "HistogramAllocatorTest"); allocator_ = GlobalHistogramAllocator::Get()->memory_allocator(); } Commit Me...
void CreatePersistentHistogramAllocator() { GlobalHistogramAllocator::CreateWithLocalMemory( kAllocatorMemorySize, 0, "HistogramAllocatorTest"); allocator_ = GlobalHistogramAllocator::Get()->memory_allocator(); }
172,130
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int l2tp_ip6_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int *uaddr_len, int peer) { struct sockaddr_l2tpip6 *lsa = (struct sockaddr_l2tpip6 *)uaddr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk); struct l2tp_ip6_sock *lsk = l2tp_ip6_sk(sk); lsa->l2tp_family = AF_I...
static int l2tp_ip6_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int *uaddr_len, int peer) { struct sockaddr_l2tpip6 *lsa = (struct sockaddr_l2tpip6 *)uaddr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk); struct l2tp_ip6_sock *lsk = l2tp_ip6_sk(sk); lsa->l2tp_family = AF_INET6; ...
166,183
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: const char* Chapters::Display::GetCountry() const { return m_country; } Commit Message: libwebm: Pull from upstream Rolling mkvparser from upstream. Primarily for fixing a bug on parsing failures with certain Opus WebM files. Upstream commit hash of this pull: 574045edd4ecbeb802ee3f1d214b5510269852ae The ...
const char* Chapters::Display::GetCountry() const
174,300
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void ChromeMockRenderThread::OnDidPrintPage( const PrintHostMsg_DidPrintPage_Params& params) { if (printer_.get()) printer_->PrintPage(params); } Commit Message: Print preview: Use an ID instead of memory pointer string in WebUI. BUG=144051 Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/108700...
void ChromeMockRenderThread::OnDidPrintPage( const PrintHostMsg_DidPrintPage_Params& params) { printer_->PrintPage(params); }
170,850
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void PepperRendererConnection::OnMsgDidCreateInProcessInstance( PP_Instance instance, const PepperRendererInstanceData& instance_data) { PepperRendererInstanceData data = instance_data; data.render_process_id = render_process_id_; in_process_host_->AddInstance(instance, data); } Commit Messag...
void PepperRendererConnection::OnMsgDidCreateInProcessInstance( PP_Instance instance, const PepperRendererInstanceData& instance_data) { PepperRendererInstanceData data = instance_data; // It's important that we supply the render process ID ourselves since the // message may be coming from a compromise...
172,311
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Segment::PreloadCluster(Cluster* pCluster, ptrdiff_t idx) { assert(pCluster); assert(pCluster->m_index < 0); assert(idx >= m_clusterCount); const long count = m_clusterCount + m_clusterPreloadCount; long& size = m_clusterSize; assert(size >= count); if (count >= size) { ...
void Segment::PreloadCluster(Cluster* pCluster, ptrdiff_t idx) if (m_clusterPreloadCount > 0) { assert(m_clusters); Cluster** const p = m_clusters + m_clusterCount; assert(*p); assert((*p)->m_index < 0); Cluster** q = p + m_clusterPreloadCount; assert(q < (m_clusters + size)); for ...
174,431
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool AffiliationFetcher::ParseResponse( AffiliationFetcherDelegate::Result* result) const { std::string serialized_response; if (!fetcher_->GetResponseAsString(&serialized_response)) { NOTREACHED(); } affiliation_pb::LookupAffiliationResponse response; if (!response.ParseFromString(serialized_...
bool AffiliationFetcher::ParseResponse( AffiliationFetcherDelegate::Result* result) const { std::string serialized_response; if (!fetcher_->GetResponseAsString(&serialized_response)) { NOTREACHED(); } affiliation_pb::LookupAffiliationResponse response; if (!response.ParseFromString(serialized_respon...
171,143
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Blob::Blob(PassOwnPtr<BlobData> blobData, long long size) : m_type(blobData->contentType()) , m_size(size) { ASSERT(blobData); ScriptWrappable::init(this); m_internalURL = BlobURL::createInternalURL(); ThreadableBlobRegistry::registerBlobURL(m_internalURL, blobData); } Commit Message...
Blob::Blob(PassOwnPtr<BlobData> blobData, long long size) : m_type(blobData->contentType()) , m_size(size) { ASSERT(blobData); ScriptWrappable::init(this); m_internalURL = BlobURL::createInternalURL(); BlobRegistry::registerBlobURL(m_internalURL, blobData); }
170,675
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static int rock_continue(struct rock_state *rs) { int ret = 1; int blocksize = 1 << rs->inode->i_blkbits; const int min_de_size = offsetof(struct rock_ridge, u); kfree(rs->buffer); rs->buffer = NULL; if ((unsigned)rs->cont_offset > blocksize - min_de_size || (unsigned)rs->cont_size > blocksize || ...
static int rock_continue(struct rock_state *rs) { int ret = 1; int blocksize = 1 << rs->inode->i_blkbits; const int min_de_size = offsetof(struct rock_ridge, u); kfree(rs->buffer); rs->buffer = NULL; if ((unsigned)rs->cont_offset > blocksize - min_de_size || (unsigned)rs->cont_size > blocksize || (uns...
166,236
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: std::string GetUploadData(const std::string& brand) { DCHECK(!brand.empty()); std::string data(kPostXml); const std::string placeholder("__BRANDCODE_PLACEHOLDER__"); size_t placeholder_pos = data.find(placeholder); DCHECK(placeholder_pos != std::string::npos); data.replace(placeholder_pos, placehold...
std::string GetUploadData(const std::string& brand) { std::string app_id(kDefaultAppID); #if defined(OS_WIN) app_id = install_static::UTF16ToUTF8(install_static::GetAppGuid()); #endif // defined(OS_WIN) DCHECK(!brand.empty()); return base::StringPrintf(kPostXml, app_id.c_str(), brand.c_str()); }
172,278
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: long long mkvparser::UnserializeUInt(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { assert(pReader); assert(pos >= 0); if ((size <= 0) || (size > 8)) return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; long long result = 0; for (long long i = 0; i < size; ++i) { unsigned c...
long long mkvparser::UnserializeUInt(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long UnserializeUInt(IMkvReader* pReader, long long pos, long long size) { if (!pReader || pos < 0 || (size <= 0) || (size > 8)) return E_FILE_FORMAT_INVALID; long long result = 0; for (long long i = 0; i < size; ++i) { unsigne...
173,868
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: build_config(char *prefix, struct server *server) { char *path = NULL; int path_size = strlen(prefix) + strlen(server->port) + 20; path = ss_malloc(path_size); snprintf(path, path_size, "%s/.shadowsocks_%s.conf", prefix, server->port); FILE *f = fopen(path, "w+"); if (f == NULL) { ...
build_config(char *prefix, struct server *server) build_config(char *prefix, struct manager_ctx *manager, struct server *server) { char *path = NULL; int path_size = strlen(prefix) + strlen(server->port) + 20; path = ss_malloc(path_size); snprintf(path, path_size, "%s/.shadowsocks_%s.conf", prefi...
167,713
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: test_standard(png_modifier* PNG_CONST pm, png_byte PNG_CONST colour_type, int bdlo, int PNG_CONST bdhi) { for (; bdlo <= bdhi; ++bdlo) { int interlace_type; for (interlace_type = PNG_INTERLACE_NONE; interlace_type < INTERLACE_LAST; ++interlace_type) { standard_test(&p...
test_standard(png_modifier* PNG_CONST pm, png_byte PNG_CONST colour_type, test_standard(png_modifier* const pm, png_byte const colour_type, int bdlo, int const bdhi) { for (; bdlo <= bdhi; ++bdlo) { int interlace_type; for (interlace_type = PNG_INTERLACE_NONE; interlace_type < INTERLACE_LAS...
173,710
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void Editor::Transpose() { if (!CanEdit()) //// TODO(yosin): We should move |Transpose()| into |ExecuteTranspose()| in //// "EditorCommand.cpp" return; GetFrame().GetDocument()->UpdateStyleAndLayoutIgnorePendingStylesheets(); const EphemeralRange& range = ComputeRangeForTranspose(GetFrame()); if...
void Editor::Transpose() { //// TODO(yosin): We should move |Transpose()| into |ExecuteTranspose()| in //// "EditorCommand.cpp" void Transpose(LocalFrame& frame) { Editor& editor = frame.GetEditor(); if (!editor.CanEdit()) return; Document* const document = frame.GetDocument(); document->UpdateStyleAndL...
172,011
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: V4L2JpegEncodeAccelerator::JobRecord::JobRecord( scoped_refptr<VideoFrame> input_frame, scoped_refptr<VideoFrame> output_frame, int quality, int32_t task_id, BitstreamBuffer* exif_buffer) : input_frame(input_frame), output_frame(output_frame), quality(quality), task_id...
V4L2JpegEncodeAccelerator::JobRecord::JobRecord( scoped_refptr<VideoFrame> input_frame, scoped_refptr<VideoFrame> output_frame, int quality, int32_t task_id, BitstreamBuffer* exif_buffer) : input_frame(input_frame), output_frame(output_frame), quality(quality), task_id(task_...
172,318
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: image_transform_png_set_expand_16_add(image_transform *this, PNG_CONST image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { UNUSED(colour_type) this->next = *that; *that = this; /* expand_16 does something unless the bit depth is already 16. */ return bit_depth < 16; } Commit Mess...
image_transform_png_set_expand_16_add(image_transform *this, const image_transform **that, png_byte colour_type, png_byte bit_depth) { UNUSED(colour_type) this->next = *that; *that = this; /* expand_16 does something unless the bit depth is already 16. */ return bit_depth < 16; }
173,626
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: process_add_smartcard_key(SocketEntry *e) { char *provider = NULL, *pin; int r, i, version, count = 0, success = 0, confirm = 0; u_int seconds; time_t death = 0; u_char type; struct sshkey **keys = NULL, *k; Identity *id; Idtab *tab; if ((r = sshbuf_get_cstring(e->request, &provider, NULL)) != 0 ||...
process_add_smartcard_key(SocketEntry *e) { char *provider = NULL, *pin, canonical_provider[PATH_MAX]; int r, i, version, count = 0, success = 0, confirm = 0; u_int seconds; time_t death = 0; u_char type; struct sshkey **keys = NULL, *k; Identity *id; Idtab *tab; if ((r = sshbuf_get_cstring(e->request, &...
168,664
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static ssize_t snd_timer_user_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *offset) { struct snd_timer_user *tu; long result = 0, unit; int qhead; int err = 0; tu = file->private_data; unit = tu->tread ? sizeof(struct snd_timer_tread) : sizeof(struct snd_timer_read); spin_l...
static ssize_t snd_timer_user_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *offset) { struct snd_timer_user *tu; long result = 0, unit; int qhead; int err = 0; tu = file->private_data; unit = tu->tread ? sizeof(struct snd_timer_tread) : sizeof(struct snd_timer_read); mutex_lock(&t...
170,008
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: unix_client_connect(hsm_com_client_hdl_t *hdl) { int fd, len; struct sockaddr_un unix_addr; if ((fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) { return HSM_COM_ERROR; } memset(&unix_addr,0,sizeof(unix_addr)); unix_addr.sun_family = AF_UNIX; if(strlen(hdl->c_path) >= sizeof(unix_addr.sun_p...
unix_client_connect(hsm_com_client_hdl_t *hdl) { int fd, len; struct sockaddr_un unix_addr; hsm_com_errno_t res = HSM_COM_OK; if ((fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) { return HSM_COM_ERROR; } memset(&unix_addr,0,sizeof(unix_addr)); unix_addr.sun_family = AF_UNIX; if(strlen(hdl->c_p...
170,128
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: NetworkThrottleManagerImpl::NetworkThrottleManagerImpl() : lifetime_median_estimate_(PercentileEstimator::kMedianPercentile, kInitialMedianInMs), outstanding_recomputation_timer_( base::MakeUnique<base::Timer>(false /* retain_user_task */, ...
NetworkThrottleManagerImpl::NetworkThrottleManagerImpl() : lifetime_median_estimate_(PercentileEstimator::kMedianPercentile, kInitialMedianInMs), outstanding_recomputation_timer_( std::make_unique<base::Timer>(false /* retain_user_task */, ...
173,266
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void locationWithPerWorldBindingsAttributeSetterForMainWorld(v8::Local<v8::Value> jsValue, const v8::PropertyCallbackInfo<void>& info) { TestObjectPython* proxyImp = V8TestObjectPython::toNative(info.Holder()); TestNode* imp = WTF::getPtr(proxyImp->locationWithPerWorldBindings()); if (!imp)...
static void locationWithPerWorldBindingsAttributeSetterForMainWorld(v8::Local<v8::Value> jsValue, const v8::PropertyCallbackInfo<void>& info) { TestObjectPython* proxyImp = V8TestObjectPython::toNative(info.Holder()); RefPtr<TestNode> imp = WTF::getPtr(proxyImp->locationWithPerWorldBindings()); if (!imp...
171,690
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: OMXNodeInstance::OMXNodeInstance( OMX *owner, const sp<IOMXObserver> &observer, const char *name) : mOwner(owner), mNodeID(0), mHandle(NULL), mObserver(observer), mDying(false), mBufferIDCount(0) { mName = ADebug::GetDebugName(name); DEBUG = ADebug::GetDebugLe...
OMXNodeInstance::OMXNodeInstance( OMX *owner, const sp<IOMXObserver> &observer, const char *name) : mOwner(owner), mNodeID(0), mHandle(NULL), mObserver(observer), mDying(false), mSailed(false), mQueriedProhibitedExtensions(false), mBufferIDCount(0) { mName =...
174,129
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: bool SVGFEColorMatrixElement::setFilterEffectAttribute(FilterEffect* effect, const QualifiedName& attrName) { FEColorMatrix* colorMatrix = static_cast<FEColorMatrix*>(effect); if (attrName == SVGNames::typeAttr) return colorMatrix->setType(m_type->currentValue()->enumValue()); if (attrName ...
bool SVGFEColorMatrixElement::setFilterEffectAttribute(FilterEffect* effect, const QualifiedName& attrName) { FEColorMatrix* colorMatrix = static_cast<FEColorMatrix*>(effect); if (attrName == SVGNames::typeAttr) return colorMatrix->setType(m_type->currentValue()->enumValue()); if (attrName == SVG...
171,979
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net, struct user_namespace *user_ns) { /* Must be called with pernet_ops_rwsem held */ const struct pernet_operations *ops, *saved_ops; int error = 0; LIST_HEAD(net_exit_list); refcount_set(&net->count, 1); refcount_set(&net->passive, 1); net->dev_base_seq =...
static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net, struct user_namespace *user_ns) { /* Must be called with pernet_ops_rwsem held */ const struct pernet_operations *ops, *saved_ops; int error = 0; LIST_HEAD(net_exit_list); refcount_set(&net->count, 1); refcount_set(&net->passive, 1); get_random_bytes(&net->has...
169,715
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: virtual void FramePktHook(const vpx_codec_cx_pkt_t *pkt) { if (pkt->data.frame.flags & VPX_FRAME_IS_KEY) { } } Commit Message: Merge Conflict Fix CL to lmp-mr1-release for ag/849478 DO NOT MERGE - libvpx: Pull from upstream Current HEAD: 7105df53d7dc13d5e575bc8df714ec8d1da36b06 BUG=23452792 Chang...
virtual void FramePktHook(const vpx_codec_cx_pkt_t *pkt) {
174,502
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: static void copyStereo8( short *dst, const int *const *src, unsigned nSamples, unsigned /* nChannels */) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < nSamples; ++i) { *dst++ = src[0][i] << 8; *dst++ = src[1][i] << 8; } } Commit Message: FLACExtractor: copy protect mWriteBuffer Bu...
static void copyStereo8( short *dst, const int * src[FLACParser::kMaxChannels], unsigned nSamples, unsigned /* nChannels */) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < nSamples; ++i) { *dst++ = src[0][i] << 8; *dst++ = src[1][i] << 8; } }
174,023
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void DownloadRequestLimiter::TabDownloadState::DidStartNavigation( content::NavigationHandle* navigation_handle) { if (!navigation_handle->IsInMainFrame()) return; download_seen_ = false; ui_status_ = DOWNLOAD_UI_DEFAULT; if (navigation_handle->IsRendererInitiated() && (status_ == PROMP...
void DownloadRequestLimiter::TabDownloadState::DidStartNavigation( content::NavigationHandle* navigation_handle) { if (!navigation_handle->IsInMainFrame()) return; download_seen_ = false; ui_status_ = DOWNLOAD_UI_DEFAULT; if (status_ == PROMPT_BEFORE_DOWNLOAD || status_ == DOWNLOADS_NOT_ALLOWED) { ...
173,189
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: void NetworkHandler::GetResponseBodyForInterception( const String& interception_id, std::unique_ptr<GetResponseBodyForInterceptionCallback> callback) { DevToolsInterceptorController* interceptor = DevToolsInterceptorController::FromBrowserContext( process_->GetBrowserContext()); if...
void NetworkHandler::GetResponseBodyForInterception( const String& interception_id, std::unique_ptr<GetResponseBodyForInterceptionCallback> callback) { DevToolsInterceptorController* interceptor = DevToolsInterceptorController::FromBrowserContext(browser_context_); if (!interceptor) { callbac...
172,758
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: Response StorageHandler::UntrackIndexedDBForOrigin(const std::string& origin) { if (!process_) return Response::InternalError(); GURL origin_url(origin); if (!origin_url.is_valid()) return Response::InvalidParams(origin + " is not a valid URL"); GetIndexedDBObserver()->TaskRunner()->PostTask...
Response StorageHandler::UntrackIndexedDBForOrigin(const std::string& origin) { if (!storage_partition_) return Response::InternalError(); GURL origin_url(origin); if (!origin_url.is_valid()) return Response::InvalidParams(origin + " is not a valid URL"); GetIndexedDBObserver()->TaskRunner()->Post...
172,779
Analyze the following vulnerable code snippet, the commit message, and the CWE ID. Determine the impact category of this vulnerability. Respond with the corrected function only. Remember, I want response with just the fixed code only, No explanation.
Code: MockRenderProcess::MockRenderProcess() : transport_dib_next_sequence_number_(0) { } Commit Message: Allow browser to handle all WebUI navigations. BUG=113496 TEST="Google Dashboard" link in Sync settings loads in new process. Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/9663045 git-svn-id: svn://svn.chro...
MockRenderProcess::MockRenderProcess() : transport_dib_next_sequence_number_(0), enabled_bindings_(0) { }
171,020