context
stringlengths
545
71.9k
questionsrc
stringlengths
16
10.2k
question
stringlengths
11
563
we 've already seen scenarios where we start with a differential equation and then we generate a slope field that describes the solutions to the differential equation and then we use that to visualize those solutions . what i want to do in this video is do an exercise that takes us the other way , start with a slope f...
when x is equal to one and y is equal to one , our slope is n't negative one . our slope here looks positive . so we can rule this one out .
can the slope of a function be defined where the function does not exist ?
we 've already seen scenarios where we start with a differential equation and then we generate a slope field that describes the solutions to the differential equation and then we use that to visualize those solutions . what i want to do in this video is do an exercise that takes us the other way , start with a slope f...
and you can also see what is happening here . when dy/dx is equal to x plus y , you would expect that as x increases for a given y your slope would increase and as y increases for a given x your slope increases . and we see that .
for example the slope of f ( x ) = x^2 at x = 1 and y = 5 and what does this value mean in relation to the function ?
( bouncy piano music ) > > a few hundred yards after sant'andrea al quirinale , we 've come to another busy intersection in rome , and this is the church of san carlo , st. charles . known as san carlino , little st. charles because it 's a small church . alle quattro san fontane the church of st. charles of the four f...
this is the early christian fascination , we could say even the byzantine one at that point , with inter-connecting shapes that then resolve because they all fit together . > > this reminds me of renaissance architecture in its appeal to the intellect . you have to sit and think and pay attention visually .
how did baroque architecture emerge ?
( bouncy piano music ) > > a few hundred yards after sant'andrea al quirinale , we 've come to another busy intersection in rome , and this is the church of san carlo , st. charles . known as san carlino , little st. charles because it 's a small church . alle quattro san fontane the church of st. charles of the four f...
this is the early christian fascination , we could say even the byzantine one at that point , with inter-connecting shapes that then resolve because they all fit together . > > this reminds me of renaissance architecture in its appeal to the intellect . you have to sit and think and pay attention visually .
is it possible that the extensive use of the curve in baroque architecture is related to the discovery of calculus ?
( bouncy piano music ) > > a few hundred yards after sant'andrea al quirinale , we 've come to another busy intersection in rome , and this is the church of san carlo , st. charles . known as san carlino , little st. charles because it 's a small church . alle quattro san fontane the church of st. charles of the four f...
known as san carlino , little st. charles because it 's a small church . alle quattro san fontane the church of st. charles of the four fountains because we have at this intersection four fountains . like bernini 's st. andrews church , sant'andrea al quirinale , this has a very limited space and the great architect , ...
what materials were used to build san carlo alle quattro fontane ?
( bouncy piano music ) > > a few hundred yards after sant'andrea al quirinale , we 've come to another busy intersection in rome , and this is the church of san carlo , st. charles . known as san carlino , little st. charles because it 's a small church . alle quattro san fontane the church of st. charles of the four f...
> > yes , i think that 's the key word for one of them anyway , for borromini . mathematics perhaps before everything , the pure science of mathematics , but then undulation , curving and in particular , a balance between convex and concave and this is a well-known feature of his architecture . this is a very pure exam...
is n't concave and convex for reflections ?
triangle abc undergoes a translation , and we 're using the notation capital t for it , and then we see what the translation has to be . we 're gon na move , it 's kind of small , i hope you can see it on your video screen . we 're gon na move positive eight . every point here is gon na move positive eight in the x di...
its x coordinate is going to increase by eight , or the corresponding point in the image , its x coordinate , is going to increase by eight , and the corresponding point in the image 's y coordinate is going to decrease by one , so let 's do that . and i 'll focus on the vertices , whoops , let me drag that to the tras...
why ca n't i put than a fourth dot on the pratice ?
triangle abc undergoes a translation , and we 're using the notation capital t for it , and then we see what the translation has to be . we 're gon na move , it 's kind of small , i hope you can see it on your video screen . we 're gon na move positive eight . every point here is gon na move positive eight in the x di...
triangle abc undergoes a translation , and we 're using the notation capital t for it , and then we see what the translation has to be . we 're gon na move , it 's kind of small , i hope you can see it on your video screen .
how do you rotate around a center of origin if there is no center of rotation ?
triangle abc undergoes a translation , and we 're using the notation capital t for it , and then we see what the translation has to be . we 're gon na move , it 's kind of small , i hope you can see it on your video screen . we 're gon na move positive eight . every point here is gon na move positive eight in the x di...
now , let 's do it with point a . so point a 's x coordinate is negative one . if you add eight to it , it 's going to be positive seven , and its current y coordinate is two .
what happens when the x axis is 0 ?
so here we have our vascular man and he 's got blood vessels that supply every part of the body . he 's got blood vessels supplying the heart , blood vessels supplying the lungs , some supplying the kidney , the liver , the intestines , the skin , the nerves , really all over the place . so here 's a blood vessel i 'm...
it 's kind of like when you take a water balloon and squeeze it on one area , all the water bulges to one side of the wall . the bulging and weakening of the blood vessel walls are known as aneurysms . the most fear complication from aneurysms is rupture , leading to blood spilling out of the blood vessels . last of al...
should n't the blood pressure increase , due to the increase of resistance , caused by the the decraese of blood vessel diameter ?
so here we have our vascular man and he 's got blood vessels that supply every part of the body . he 's got blood vessels supplying the heart , blood vessels supplying the lungs , some supplying the kidney , the liver , the intestines , the skin , the nerves , really all over the place . so here 's a blood vessel i 'm...
this damage is precisely what happens in the disease known as vasculitis . vasculitis is damage of blood vessels and inflammation of blood vessels . itis means inflammation and vascul means vasculature or blood vessels .
does inflamation of the blood vessels also include atherosclerosis ?
so here we have our vascular man and he 's got blood vessels that supply every part of the body . he 's got blood vessels supplying the heart , blood vessels supplying the lungs , some supplying the kidney , the liver , the intestines , the skin , the nerves , really all over the place . so here 's a blood vessel i 'm...
the different types of vessels that are affected usually depends on the size of those blood vessels and so vasculitis has been classified into three different categories . large vessel vasculitis , medium vessel vasculitis and small vessel vasculitis . here i 'll draw a blood vessel to show a little bit about what 's g...
would you see symptoms of hypovolemic shock with venous vasculitis ( in other words , inflammation of the veins ) ?
so here we have our vascular man and he 's got blood vessels that supply every part of the body . he 's got blood vessels supplying the heart , blood vessels supplying the lungs , some supplying the kidney , the liver , the intestines , the skin , the nerves , really all over the place . so here 's a blood vessel i 'm...
essentially this damage is caused by the immune system . white blood cells mistakenly release small molecules that can damage the blood vessels . essentially the immune system makes a mistake and thinks that blood vessels are foreign .
why would the blood pressure reduce when the resistance increases ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
i have a place to take a shower , that allows me to go get a job and i can now create value for society as a whole , instead of being on the corner and begging for money from people . i would argue that this is also an investment . why is it ?
so would renting then be considered an investment ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
and i 'd be surprised if someone else , truly , is willing to pay more than $ 100,000 unless they 're being , in some way , irrational or they can finance this because it 's part of the mortgage . anyway , this is , i think , just the big picture : investment adds value to society . a simple house adds value to society...
think about it : when you buy a stock from another person , are you generating wealth for society ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
anyway , this is , i think , just the big picture : investment adds value to society . a simple house adds value to society . consumption is something where people might call it an investment because it 's kind of speculation .
how bout if you rent the house to other people , will the hardwood floors and granite create value then ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
well , i think we 'd all agree that this is an investment . and why is it an investment ? because i 'm taking this $ 100,000 and i 'm putting it to some use that is creating , hopefully , more value than my original $ 100,000 .
all fall under the term 'investment ' ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
well , i think we 'd all agree that this is an investment . and why is it an investment ? because i 'm taking this $ 100,000 and i 'm putting it to some use that is creating , hopefully , more value than my original $ 100,000 .
by consuming the granite , floors , room addition etc does that not produce `` investment '' for the businesses that provided these consumables thereby contributing to the overall economic good of the economy ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
no , it 's just , if anything , providing more things for you to have to take care of , that you 're not going to be able to focus as much on your work . or more energy is going to have to be extended to maintain this type of place , to heat and cool a 2,000 square foot house . so if anything , by actually pouring the ...
how should we classify purchasing energy saving appliances or solar panels ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
maybe i 'm providing some other -- maybe i 'm a farmer now . whatever , i 'm providing some source of value . and maybe my kids -- if they never got an education , they would have maybe added $ 10,000 of value per year to people and now they can add $ 20,000 of value . so that difference would also be some of the retur...
is n't one way to define value what other people would be willing or able to buy ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
and because i 'm homeless , i do n't have a place to go and eat dinner and rest and relax . because i do n't have that , i ca n't get a job and i ca n't become a productive member of society . so maybe , i 'm going to use this $ 100,000 to buy a simple house that meets all of my needs .
i do n't disagree , but under these assumptions , is food an investment ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
anyway , this is , i think , just the big picture : investment adds value to society . a simple house adds value to society . consumption is something where people might call it an investment because it 's kind of speculation .
what value do the bankers create by making `` investments '' ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
it 's that security and it 's also the return that probably my kids are going to be able to now contribute to society . maybe if they grew up homeless , they would have never been able to contribute . and now that they have a roof over their head , and are able to go to school , et cetera , they are going to be able to...
would n't buying the granite contribute to labor demand for granite installing , thus fueling the economy ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
anyway , this is , i think , just the big picture : investment adds value to society . a simple house adds value to society . consumption is something where people might call it an investment because it 's kind of speculation .
could we not argue that live in a nicer house is as necessary as having a house ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
but anyway , that 's not the topic of discussion . we 're just trying to get at a mental framework on what consumption is versus investment . so i think we all agree that if i were to build a factory that this is -- let 's say i 'll do everything in green as investment .
for a government , is creating and maintaining a national park ( like carlsbad caverns or the grand canyon ) an investment or consumption ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
well , i think we 'd all agree that this is an investment . and why is it an investment ? because i 'm taking this $ 100,000 and i 'm putting it to some use that is creating , hopefully , more value than my original $ 100,000 .
is buying a glove an investment ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
anyway , this is , i think , just the big picture : investment adds value to society . a simple house adds value to society . consumption is something where people might call it an investment because it 's kind of speculation .
is it unreasonable to suggest that a nicer house has more potential to appreciate in value and act as a better hedge against inflation ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
and because i 'm homeless , i do n't have a place to go and eat dinner and rest and relax . because i do n't have that , i ca n't get a job and i ca n't become a productive member of society . so maybe , i 'm going to use this $ 100,000 to buy a simple house that meets all of my needs .
could n't we have just as easily asked , or stated , are n't the so called investments made by corporations just methods of increasing executive compensation , with no intrinsic value to anyone else ?
i 've been wanting to make a video on a couple of terms that people have really thrown around for a while now . and i think it really hits the core of some of the issues we 're dealing with now with the credit debacle but it 's kind of at a deeper level . so the things i want to go over are the ideas of savings , consu...
i have a place to take a shower , that allows me to go get a job and i can now create value for society as a whole , instead of being on the corner and begging for money from people . i would argue that this is also an investment . why is it ?
about the granite - if it appreciates over time , would n't it be seen as an investment ?
so you may have heard of tourette 's or tourette syndrome before , and it 's possible that when you think about tourette 's , you might picture what 's been kinda popularized in tv shows and movies , which is that people with tourette 's have these kind of verbal outbursts . and while this is possible in someone with ...
so you may have heard of tourette 's or tourette syndrome before , and it 's possible that when you think about tourette 's , you might picture what 's been kinda popularized in tv shows and movies , which is that people with tourette 's have these kind of verbal outbursts . and while this is possible in someone with ...
is there a positive correlation between someone with tourette 's and autism ?
so you may have heard of tourette 's or tourette syndrome before , and it 's possible that when you think about tourette 's , you might picture what 's been kinda popularized in tv shows and movies , which is that people with tourette 's have these kind of verbal outbursts . and while this is possible in someone with ...
and it turns out that quite a few kids with tourette 's also have other disorders that co-occur with their tourette 's . disorders like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , or also known as adhd , and obsessive compulsive disorder , also known as ocd . so for kids with tourette 's that also have one of these othe...
like cipa aka congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis ( which is a disorder that makes you feel no pain } ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
statin 's reduce your blood cholesterol level . and so they decrease progression of atherosclerotic buildup in your coronary arteries . remember plaques are filled with cholesterol , so you 'd probably be given a statin to take indefinitely . finally , you might be given an ace inhibitor .
would it make sense to take statins just as a preventive measure to slow down the buildup of plaques ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
so all this stuff will happen in the hospital right away . then the patient will be put on medications at the hospital that they 'll then have to continue for the rest of their life . and the reason for this is because taking these medications for the rest of their lives , this has been shown in clinical trials to redu...
what order would you put these interventions in when caring for an mi patient ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
they might be given supplemental oxygen , if it turned out that they were n't carrying enough oxygen in their blood stream . and they might be given morphine and that 's to reduce the amount of chest pain that they 're feeling . and to also reduce the amount of anxiety that they might be feeling .
how often do doctors use morphine ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
then the patient will be put on medications at the hospital that they 'll then have to continue for the rest of their life . and the reason for this is because taking these medications for the rest of their lives , this has been shown in clinical trials to reduce mortality , so that 's the rate of death attributed to h...
do people who have n't had a heart attack , take the medications listed in the video to help prevent a mi ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
and hopefully by doing that , by reducing their anxiety they 'd reduce their heart rate and even further reduce the amount of oxygen that their heart needed . really importantly , they 'd be given aspirin too . and the aspirin would reduce the development of the clot that might be causing their symptoms , that might be...
what dose of aspirin should be administered and when ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
they would be under continuous ecg monitoring for arrhythmias , or abnormal heart rhythms . remember the ecg would also give a really good idea of what type of heart attack they might have had . they 'd be made to lie down in bed to prevent their heart from working to hard .
when someone 's having heart attack , is it ok to give him 300 mg right away at home ( in non retard form ) ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
thrombo refers to the blood clot and lysis refers to break down . this is actually what 's being referred to when you hear of clot busters . unfortunately , no relation to ghostbusters .
how are clot-busters actually working and why are they only effective on `` stemi-clots '' ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
and that actually really reduces the tissue damage that the heart would experience . again , just to reiterate this is only for patients with stemi 's , not unstable angina or n stemi 's . and that 's because the type of clots that are being busted up with clot busters , they 're only found in stemi 's and not in n ste...
what 's the difference between `` stemi-clots '' and `` nstemi-clots '' /unstable-angina-clots ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
and allowing blood to flow back into that area that was deprived of blood . so getting rid of that clot and allowing blood back into that part of the heart is called reperfusion . and that 's the next goal .
what is the `` heart shaped medicine '' called , ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
if a patient comes in and the ecg trace has determined that they have a stemi , an st elevation myocardial infarct and they presented to the hospital within about two hours of the onset of their symptoms . they might be given a medication to break down their clot , in a process called thrombolysis , or thrombolysis . t...
i thought that angioplasty had replaced thrombolysis ... ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
so there are some treatment aspects that are common to all of the types of acute coronary syndromes . but there 's some really important differences in the approach to patients who present with a stemi , or an st elevation myocardial infarct ; compared to unstable angina and n stemi , non-st elevation myocardial infarc...
as a dentist should i operate on someone who has a history of myocardial infarct ?
the main idea in treating myocardial infarcts is to limit the damage that happens to your heart , and to minimize complications that might crop up . the treatment has to address the clot that caused the myocardial infarct in the first place . and it has to restore the balance between the myocardial oxygen supply and d...
well , there 's drugs that try to restore that oxygen supply and demand balance . so drugs like beta blockers , beta blockers work by making the heart beat slower , so fewer beats per minute . and it also makes the heart beat with a reduced force .
would it be beneficial for a patient to take calcium channel blockers ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length .
can someone explain to me what a rhombus is ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
so what if the quadrilateral only indicated one pair of parallel sides and one pair of congruent sides ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
let 's say that we have some type of a quadrilateral , and we know that the opposite sides are congruent . can we prove to ourselves that this is a parallelogram ? well , it 's kind of the same proof in reverse .
( additional information is missing ) is it possible to find out wether or not the quadrilateral is a parallelogram or not ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc .
is n't the second theorem just a converse of the first theorem ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so we get dc is going to be equal to ba . and that 's because they are corresponding sides of congruent triangles . so this is going to be equal to that .
how do you identify the corresponding parts and then label ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
we 've split this quadrilateral into two triangles , triangle acb and triangle dbc . and notice , all three sides of these two triangles are equal to each other . so we know by side-side-side that they are congruent .
is there any difference between the two symbols if we use them to indicate that the measures are equal , like in this case ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
is aaa and aas is appropraite property for prooving that the triangles are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc . now , you could also view this diagonal , db -- you could view it as a transversal of these two parallel lines , of the other pair of parallel lines , ad and bc .
how can we say that angle abd=bdc in the first instance ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so i 'll draw it like that . obviously , because it 's the same line . and then we have something interesting .
2 , why does sal put a line through the parallelogram ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and if you look at it that way , then you immediately see that angle dbc right over here is going to be congruent to angle adb for the exact same reason . they are alternate interior angles of a transversal intersecting these two parallel lines . so i could write this .
since alternate interior angles are used to find if the lines are parallel , can i still use the converse ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
how would you prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram if the opposite sides are congruent and you did n't know that they were parallel ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
let 's say that we have some type of a quadrilateral , and we know that the opposite sides are congruent . can we prove to ourselves that this is a parallelogram ? well , it 's kind of the same proof in reverse .
in a parallelogram , is there an axis of symmetry ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
does cpctc ( corresponding parts of conguent triangles are congruent ) include angles or can it only prove sides ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and by that exact same logic , ad corresponds to cb . ad is equal to cb . and for the exact same reason -- corresponding sides of congruent triangles .
what does the equal sign with the ~ mark on top mean ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
that 's that angle right there -- is going to be congruent to angle bdc , because they are alternate interior angles . you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc .
is there a reason why the first quadrilateral has arrows and the second one has little lines ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
we also know that angle -- let me get this right . angle acb is congruent to angle dbc . and we know that by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles .
wait , is there a angle-angle-angle theorem or postulate of congruency that can prove triangles congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
what would be the theorem for the opposite angles being congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so this is parallel to that . so we know that ac is parallel to bd by alternate interior angles . and we 're done .
how do you know that the angles are alternate in the second diagram before knowing that they are parrallel ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
that 's the hardest part . draw it . that 's pretty good .
is there a reason ( in a 2 column proof ) for being able to draw a transversal in a parallelogram that would spilt the parallelogram into two triangles ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
let 's say that we have some type of a quadrilateral , and we know that the opposite sides are congruent . can we prove to ourselves that this is a parallelogram ? well , it 's kind of the same proof in reverse .
i want to ask that why is square a parallelogram ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so what we 've done is -- it 's interesting . we 've shown if you have a parallelogram , opposite sides have the same length . and if opposite sides have the same length , then you have a parallelogram . and so we 've actually proven it in both directions .
i ask myself this constantly because i do n't see it anywhere , if you are trying to prove a quadrilateral is a parallelogram given that opposite sides are parallel , does that means it 's a parallelogram ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and if you look at it that way , then you immediately see that angle dbc right over here is going to be congruent to angle adb for the exact same reason . they are alternate interior angles of a transversal intersecting these two parallel lines . so i could write this .
when do you know when to have one transversal or two transversals ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
how would you show that if a quadrilateral has opposite angles congruent , the quadrilateral is a parallelogram ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so what we 've done is -- it 's interesting . we 've shown if you have a parallelogram , opposite sides have the same length . and if opposite sides have the same length , then you have a parallelogram . and so we 've actually proven it in both directions .
how do you find the exterior length and width of a polygon ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so we get dc is going to be equal to ba . and that 's because they are corresponding sides of congruent triangles . so this is going to be equal to that .
what is the relationship between corresponding sides of a rhombus ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
my question is , when speaking of the congruence of angles , is it necessary to specify the vertices of the two angles in an order that reflects their location in the corresponding triangles of which they are a part ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
that 's that angle right there -- is going to be congruent to angle bdc , because they are alternate interior angles . you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc .
i noticed 4 that lines a , b and c in the first parallelogram are connected to d and in the second parallelogram a , b and d are connected to c. dose this mean there from the same point or dose the lines connecting them make it impossible ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
now , we can use that exact same logic . we also know that angle -- let me get this right . angle acb is congruent to angle dbc .
do you know what these proofs stand for ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc . now , you could also view this diagonal , db -- you could view it as a transversal of these two parallel lines , of the other pair of parallel lines , ad and bc .
by which axiom is abd and bdc equal ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
what is the definition of congruent angles ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc . now , you could also view this diagonal , db -- you could view it as a transversal of these two parallel lines , of the other pair of parallel lines , ad and bc .
how is angle < abd congruent to < bdc ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
can two angles be congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length .
what 's the total number of diagonals in a 35-sided polygon ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
that 's that angle right there -- is going to be congruent to angle bdc , because they are alternate interior angles . you have a transversal -- parallel lines . so we know that angle abd is going to be congruent to angle bdc .
so if we were to draw a diagonal in a given diagram and our reason would be it is a transversal of parallel lines , that would be fine ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
can anybody think of a counterexample to disprove that a figure is a parallelogram only if opposite sides are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so we know that ab is parallel to cd by alternate interior angles of a transversal intersecting parallel lines . now , we can use that exact same logic . we also know that angle -- let me get this right .
what is use of asa congruency ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
what seems to be true about the lengths of the opposite sides of the parallelograms ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so this must be parallel to that . so we know that ab is parallel to cd by alternate interior angles of a transversal intersecting parallel lines . now , we can use that exact same logic .
how would you prove parallel if the angles are given but not the sides ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
could you not use cpctc or corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
is corresponding angle of congruent triangles the same thing as corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
well , what does that do for us ? well , if two triangles are congruent , then all of the corresponding features of the two triangles are going to be congruent . in particular , side dc on this bottom triangle corresponds to side ba on that top triangle .
what is the theorem for the two triangles ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
angles congurence theorem and say the triangles are congruent by asa like in the first proof ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
if sal meant opposite sides of a parallelogram then its already implied that the opposite sides are parallel , or is he referring to two pairs of opposite sides that are only congruent to their opposite side ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
would n't ou be able to say `` congruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent '' ( cpctc/cpct ) instead of corresponding sides of congruent triangles are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
and then we 're done . we 've proven that opposite sides are congruent . now let 's go the other way .
for the first question would n't the proof prove the theorem that states opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
you can say abc is going to be congruent to dcb . and you could say , by corresponding angles congruent of congruent triangles . i 'm just using some shorthand here to save some time .
for the second question , would n't the proof prove the theorem that states if both pairs of opposite angles of a quadrilateral are congruent then the quadrilateral is a parallelogram ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
so i 'll draw it like that . obviously , because it 's the same line . and then we have something interesting .
why is the line sloppy ?
what we 're going to prove in this video is a couple of fairly straightforward parallelogram-related proofs . and this first one , we 're going to say , hey , if we have this parallelogram abcd , let 's prove that the opposite sides have the same length . so prove that ab is equal to dc and that ad is equal to bc . so ...
let 's say that we have some type of a quadrilateral , and we know that the opposite sides are congruent . can we prove to ourselves that this is a parallelogram ? well , it 's kind of the same proof in reverse .
why is it that a parallelogram is always congruent but then how can you tell the difference between a parallelogram and a rhombus ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
and if you 're wondering where the word aboriginal comes from , you might recognize some parts of it . original -- you know what that means . the first things . the things that were there from the beginning .
do we know how the aboriginals first got to australia ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
it almost looks like park space . and then they would let their sheep graze there . and they were surprised -- because they had driven out the original inhabitants .
i wonder why people would kill giant animals if they 're such a wonder today ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
so they have controlled burns . controlled fires . those controlled fires helped promote grassland .
what do modern forest rangers do controlled fires for ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
so they have controlled burns . controlled fires . those controlled fires helped promote grassland .
and why would people set fires on their lands ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
so they have controlled burns . controlled fires . those controlled fires helped promote grassland .
how were the fires controlled ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
it involves using fire , which is really a form of technology -- or it can be a form of technology -- using fire to make the environment more suitable for human activity . and so what the original australians did -- the indigenous australians , or sometimes referred to as the aboriginal australians . and if you 're won...
how did we come to know that the aboriginal australians used scientific ways before starting a forest fire ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
so it becomes more suitable for things that humans might want to eat , or get milk from , or whatever . and this type of farming is called firestick farming . and i think you can already imagine what it might involve .
there were no cameras when the aboriginal australians did firestick farming , so how did sal get that picture ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
and there 's fossils of the giant wombat around 40,000 , 50,000 years ago . but they disappeared with humans showing up . and there 's multiple ways that you can think about why they disappeared .
what other kinds of species died out because humans came ?
farming , as we now associate the word , has been around for about 7,000 to 10,000 years . and when we think of farming , we imagine a farmer planting seeds , and later harvesting the crops . or maybe having cattle that they can allow to graze , and then using that cattle for either meat , or milk , or wool . but there...
original -- you know what that means . the first things . the things that were there from the beginning .
were the europeans the first group to introduce sheep to australia ?