text
stringlengths
1
2.97k
In-Reply-To: <DA25159AE3245C4F9094656F663E84D20906AB5ADF@USFMAIL2.forest.usf.edu>
References: <DA25159AE3245C4F9094656F663E84D20906AB5ADF@USFMAIL2.forest.usf.edu>
Message-ID: <4C697B0A.7060209@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Richard Everly,
A couple of decades ago I did a fair amount of work with
sapphire substrates, bonding these to glass for optical
windows in the DUV. For glass work I had to make sure the
sapphire face was cut on the correct axis to assure both x
and y directions had the same COE.
You should have no issues with chemical attack. There are no
known liquid etchants for sapphire at standard process bath
temps.
Si processing temps do not exceed the melting point of
sapphire susbstrates. These substrates can be run to 1250 C
without issue.
Assuming a reasonably thin wafer (~ 1mm) standard handling
will not represent a thermal shock issue.
Bob Hamilton
Robert Hamilton
University of California at Berkeley
Nanolab Equipment Engineering Manager
Rm406 Cory Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-1770
510-642-2716
510-642-2916 (Fax)
510-325-7557 (Cell)
bob at silicon2.eecs.berkeley.edu
On 8/16/2010 10:37 AM, Everly, Richard wrote:
> I have researcher that wants to grow a thermal oxide on 6000Ang epi layer on sapphire substrate. I have no experience with this material and the documentation seems to be scarce. I don't want to burn up the substrate by doing something foolish as they very expensive. any help would be greatly appreciated!
>
> 1. is this material process compatible with standard silicon processes, can I use the same tube as I do my regular dry oxidation and not worry about contamination.
>
> 2. What heat-up and cool-down rates should I use, and are there any temp limits I need to be aware of? I've read that thermal expansion can be a problem.
>
> 3. Can I use the RCA clean process? I'm worried about the SC1 solution attacking the Sapphire.
>
>
> Richard Everly
> Cleanroom Engineer
> Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC)
> University of South Florida
> NREC, ENB118
> 4202 E. Fowler Ave.
> Tampa, FL 33620
>
> Office: 813-974-5365
> Fax: 813-974-3610
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
From D.Lloyd at lboro.ac.uk Mon Aug 16 16:52:42 2010
From: D.Lloyd at lboro.ac.uk (Daniel Lloyd)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:52:42 +0100
Subject: [labnetwork] Thermal conductivity in plasma chamber
In-Reply-To: <4C697B0A.7060209@eecs.berkeley.edu>
References: <DA25159AE3245C4F9094656F663E84D20906AB5ADF@USFMAIL2.forest.usf.edu>
<4C697B0A.7060209@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <64991842D0A7F147A88769E6A143A9F2038C9FACBC@STAFFMBX-1.lunet.lboro.ac.uk>
Hi all,
I currently use a vacuum grease to promote thermal conductivity in a RIE chamber but unfortunately it seems to react badly with fused silica (SiO2). This results in a dirty film being left on the surface of the substrate which is very hard (verging on impossible) to remove). Can anyone suggest a replacement which won't...
Thanks,
Daniel
From bob at eecs.berkeley.edu Tue Aug 17 12:02:00 2010
From: bob at eecs.berkeley.edu (Bob Hamilton)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:02:00 -0700
Subject: [labnetwork] Thermal conductivity in plasma chamber
In-Reply-To: <64991842D0A7F147A88769E6A143A9F2038C9FACBC@STAFFMBX-1.lunet.lboro.ac.uk>
References: <DA25159AE3245C4F9094656F663E84D20906AB5ADF@USFMAIL2.forest.usf.edu>
<4C697B0A.7060209@eecs.berkeley.edu>
<64991842D0A7F147A88769E6A143A9F2038C9FACBC@STAFFMBX-1.lunet.lboro.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4C6AB278.6050601@eecs.berkeley.edu>
The Microlab has been using thermal grease, CGR7016,
Cool-Grease 7016, 50gram jar available from:
http://www.aitechnology.com/store/
This grease is used in an STS/Bosch Si etch process. I have
no information to offer about its interactions with SiO2.
We also make our own thermal paste from Santovac V
(polyphenol ether) and aluminum powder for use in our
ionmill. Santovac V has an exceptionally low vapor pressure
and is soluble in acetone, post-milling (perhaps boron
ntirde would be a better additive than aluminum)? Also, a
thin film of Santovac may be enough without a filler.
http://www.2spi.com/catalog/vac/santovac-5-vacuum-grease.shtml
Bob Hamilton
Robert Hamilton
University of California at Berkeley
Nanolab Equipment Engineering Manager
Rm406 Cory Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-1770
510-642-2716
510-642-2916 (Fax)
510-325-7557 (Cell)
bob at silicon2.eecs.berkeley.edu
On 8/16/2010 1:52 PM, Daniel Lloyd wrote:
> Hi all,
>