Split (1)

train · 10.4M rows

ngram listlengths 0 9.89k
[ "insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of", "surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF", "> > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems", "But it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s", "Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on", "be black or white? If yes, should questions about other", "we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of", "you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the", "[PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So", "consider voting on the answers or posting an answer of", "• [What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial", "is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors", "about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to", "Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely technical", "and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular", "Are they academical enough? If no, what about the questions", "whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be", "yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate", "other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we", "services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't", "study design. • [What to do with questions asking to", "using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as", "is about to closed and I suspect the reason is", "community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently many", "a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting", "some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we", "is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a", "or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here,", "tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged", "do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough?", "issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow", "\"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show", "consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting an", "purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way", "close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But", "fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and", "preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and", "or white? If yes, should questions about other services like", "no, what about the questions about whether the color of", "online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. >", "asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation,", "many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting", "'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\").", "tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod", "and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should", "the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or", "LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be", "mod have some insights on this? • [Should we be", "this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341)", "questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to do", "to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to", "[What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online", "considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or", "there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And", "[Is there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341).", "on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus", "have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus.", "on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is", "here, right? So what do you think? --- Related: •", "be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers", "Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions", "services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. > >", "And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions", "technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\")", "questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions", "[board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should questions", "audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you think?", "the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some", "none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to", "do you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing", "to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the", "well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors on", "should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic?", "is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters", "of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be", "the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered", "with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's", "Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered", "[Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's", "question that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is", "black or white? If yes, should questions about other services", "and I suspect the reason is that it's a technical", "change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed", "want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with", "on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\"", "beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should", "questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341)", "to considered important by the community, but none of the", "better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that", "follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill", "should we do with questions about preprint services? Are they", "of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do", "the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our", "question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on", "this question, as it seems to considered important by the", "there a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341)", "Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights", "[Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely", "in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some", "to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not", "Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in", "some insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming", "to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341)", "with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If", "of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what", "white? If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu", "we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about", "but none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes", "about to closed and I suspect the reason is that", "way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical", "another question that is purely technical issue and is well-received:", "service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I", "about study design. • [What to do with questions asking", "it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question", "not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question,", "voting on the answers or posting an answer of your", "evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using", "question, as it seems to considered important by the community,", "questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no,", "technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better", "the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black", "mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should we", "the answers or posting an answer of your own. >", "commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them.", "[Is there a way to change preprint service within OSF", "\"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to", "evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this", "we do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical", "questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about", "creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right?", "--- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for", "• Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474)", "sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider", "I've seen another question that is purely technical issue and", "about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring", "I suspect the reason is that it's a technical question.", "Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important by", "received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please", "a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's", "So what do you think? --- Related: • Case in", "what do you think? --- Related: • Case in point:", "or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should", "academical enough? If no, what about the questions about whether", "about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely", "our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? •", "ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX", "line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved", "[slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If", "authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire", "them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it", "important by the community, but none of the answers have", "What should we do with questions about preprint services? Are", "But it's about study design. • [What to do with", "a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is", "or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about", "to be here, right? So what do you think? ---", "have some insights on this? • [Should we be more", "it's about study design. • [What to do with questions", "or posting an answer of your own. > > >", "The question [Is there a way to change preprint service", "tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What", "questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341)", "way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about", "[scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers", "a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically", "right? So what do you think? --- Related: • Case", "But I've seen another question that is purely technical issue", "about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341)", "closed and I suspect the reason is that it's a", "the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the", "with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you", "like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want", "reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close", "If no, what about the questions about whether the color", "within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect", "of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What", "do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But", "votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on", "of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white?", "it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice:", "the close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/).", "If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or", "tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint", "to closed and I suspect the reason is that it's", "don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides", "arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show", "for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual", "point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design.", "that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another", "basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged", "it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that", "\"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions", "about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should", "Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this?", "as it seems to considered important by the community, but", "seems to considered important by the community, but none of", "notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important", "that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there", "what about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341),", "design. • [What to do with questions asking to evaluate", "questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about", "Please consider voting on the answers or posting an answer", "to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions", "voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've", "entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of", "questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And", "be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study", "question [Is there a way to change preprint service within", "'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint services?", "OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the", "enough? If no, what about the questions about whether the", "that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think", "by the community, but none of the answers have received", "services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about the", "seen another question that is purely technical issue and is", "answers or posting an answer of your own. > >", "And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating", "• [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But", "about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what", "questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag,", "they academical enough? If no, what about the questions about", "suspect the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps", "[CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes,", "Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech", "more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design.", "it seems to considered important by the community, but none", "the community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently", "system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the reason", "[reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with", "in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic", "preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about", "answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a", "welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. •", "considered important by the community, but none of the answers", "on the answers or posting an answer of your own.", "should be black or white? If yes, should questions about", "slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do", "support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have", "particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the", "> Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to", "think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen", "color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or", "[Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe", "Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on [Web", "think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line", "be here, right? So what do you think? --- Related:", "on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or", "technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to" ]
[ "[has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been", "question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial", "a new, but related, question on issue. This [has been", "the initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong", "the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a new,", "The consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but", "but the initial reception has not been positive. What is", "was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus", "to be to ask a new, but related, question on", "related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the", "lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to", "leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to", "What is wrong with the new question and what can", "initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong with", "not been positive. What is wrong with the new question", "lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask", "positive. What is wrong with the new question and what", "new, but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people)", "issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has", "been positive. What is wrong with the new question and", "wrong with the new question and what can be improved?", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was", "a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to", "is wrong with the new question and what can be", "to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be", "[original question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an elevator", "been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive.", "has not been positive. What is wrong with the new", "but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but", "done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive. What", "reception has not been positive. What is wrong with the", "controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared", "on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception", "This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not", "about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial", "to ask a new, but related, question on issue. This", "ask a new, but related, question on issue. This [has", "consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but related,", "be to ask a new, but related, question on issue.", "The [original question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an", "[meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a", "appeared to be to ask a new, but related, question", "joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to a", "in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta", "made in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively", "an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question).", "elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The" ]
[ "### This Question In an answer, please propose how we", "(anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question", "with it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose", "should proceed with this question: * Should it be closed?", "How shall we deal with answers that do not address", "in a specific manner? * How shall we deal with", "answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we", "shall we deal with answers that do not address the", "of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone", "form? * How shall we deal with opinionated answers (and", "that do not address the question in its current form?", "it be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should", "shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In an", "the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall", "has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some", "please propose how we should proceed with this question: ", "deal with answers that do not address the question in", "an answer, please propose how we should proceed with this", "[What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a", "change since it was posted. In particular, some of the", "academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite", "In particular, some of the answers do not fit the", " Should it be changed in a specific manner? ", "This Question In an answer, please propose how we should", "closed? Should it stay open? * Should it be", "quite some change since it was posted. In particular, some", "be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it", "it be changed in a specific manner? * How shall", "its current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated", "the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ###", "research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot", "propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should", "answer, please propose how we should proceed with this question:", "it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose how", "particular, some of the answers do not fit the question", "explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of", "not address the question in its current form? * How", "manner? * How shall we deal with answers that do", "* How shall we deal with opinionated answers (and comments)?", "proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer, please", "fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it?", "the question in its current form? * How shall we", "and undergone quite some change since it was posted. In", "lot of debate and undergone quite some change since it", "attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and", "* Should it stay open? * Should it be changed", "* How shall we deal with answers that do not", "question [What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted", "it stay open? * Should it be changed in a", "of debate and undergone quite some change since it was", "The question [What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has", "we deal with answers that do not address the question", "undergone quite some change since it was posted. In particular,", "do not address the question in its current form? ", "was posted. In particular, some of the answers do not", "some of the answers do not fit the question (anymore).", "it was posted. In particular, some of the answers do", "Should it be closed? Should it stay open? ", "how we should proceed with this question: Should it", "proceed with this question: * Should it be closed? ", "not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with", "we should proceed with this question: Should it be", "Should it be changed in a specific manner? * How", "question in its current form? * How shall we deal", "In an answer, please propose how we should proceed with", "with answers that do not address the question in its", "in its current form? * How shall we deal with", "open? * Should it be changed in a specific manner?", "be changed in a specific manner? * How shall we", "question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This", "a lot of debate and undergone quite some change since", "answers that do not address the question in its current", "Should it stay open? * Should it be changed in", "do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed", "How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In", "question: * Should it be closed? * Should it stay", "political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate", "with this question: * Should it be closed? * Should", "since it was posted. In particular, some of the answers", "changed in a specific manner? * How shall we deal", "some change since it was posted. In particular, some of", "stay open? * Should it be changed in a specific", "debate and undergone quite some change since it was posted.", "Question In an answer, please propose how we should proceed", "posted. In particular, some of the answers do not fit", "we proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer,", "* Should it be closed? * Should it stay open?", "this question: * Should it be closed? * Should it", "address the question in its current form? * How shall", "attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some change", "specific manner? * How shall we deal with answers that", "a specific manner? * How shall we deal with answers", "current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated answers", "of the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How" ]
[ "1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the questions", "computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines", "Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on", "or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these", "these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a", "mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because", "disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a chemist", "months, and clearly see that most of the questions come", "of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am", "from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it", "Is it because these disciplines are on their computers more,", "have been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see", "see that most of the questions come from mathematicians or", "for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of", "it because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative", "on their computers more, relative to a chemist or biologist?", "are on their computers more, relative to a chemist or", "that most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer", "most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists.", "I have been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly", "I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their", "questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong?", "wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their computers", "because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to", "and clearly see that most of the questions come from", "the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I", "scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are", "about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the", "been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that", "come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is", "here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most", "clearly see that most of the questions come from mathematicians" ]
[ "it refers to a specific webinar intended for career development", "for a job and have a right to be employed.", "the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to", "about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits", "to look for a job and have a right to", "webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic", "is that it limits my right to apply for any", "didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because I", "this is an international platform and that people from other", "confronted with the silly question and it mentions the legality", "only US-based, because I thought this is an international platform", "The irony of putting on hold this question [How should", "special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with", "presenter is confronted with the silly question and it mentions", "mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened. I", "Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation when", "any position without being the questioned why I choose such", "or presenter is confronted with the silly question and it", "an international platform and that people from other countries can", "irony of putting on hold this question [How should I", "my right to look for a job and have a", "questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my", "look for a job and have a right to be", "The question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar", "when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly", "a right to be employed. The question is concise; it", "concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for career", "why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right", "apply for any position without being the questioned why I", "the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question", "on hold this question [How should I handle questions about", "family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my", "US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special", "the silly question and it mentions the legality of a", "position without being the questioned why I choose such a", "this question only US-based, because I thought this is an", "is an international platform and that people from other countries", "right to be employed. The question is concise; it refers", "a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make", "platform and that people from other countries can contribute answering.", "want to make this question only US-based, because I thought", "question only US-based, because I thought this is an international", "and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation", "to a specific webinar intended for career development of US-", "hold this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse", "is confronted with the silly question and it mentions the", "employed. The question is concise; it refers to a specific", "to be employed. The question is concise; it refers to", "international platform and that people from other countries can contribute", "happened. I didn’t want to make this question only US-based,", "make this question only US-based, because I thought this is", "my right to apply for any position without being the", "handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that", "and it mentions the legality of a situation that actually", "without being the questioned why I choose such a distance,", "I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is", "and have a right to be employed. The question is", "staff. It talks about the special situation when the applicant", "situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this", "limits my right to apply for any position without being", "with the silly question and it mentions the legality of", "that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question", "for any position without being the questioned why I choose", "[How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job", "question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended", "thought this is an international platform and that people from", "putting on hold this question [How should I handle questions", "the special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted", "for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It", "market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply for", "should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614)", "to make this question only US-based, because I thought this", "have a right to be employed. The question is concise;", "question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the", "question and it mentions the legality of a situation that", "US-based, because I thought this is an international platform and", "refers to a specific webinar intended for career development of", "the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting", "It talks about the special situation when the applicant or", "about the special situation when the applicant or presenter is", "I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to", "talks about the special situation when the applicant or presenter", "right to apply for any position without being the questioned", "development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about", "legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want", "the legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t", "of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to", "situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the", "distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a job", "silly question and it mentions the legality of a situation", "be employed. The question is concise; it refers to a", "I thought this is an international platform and that people", "right to look for a job and have a right", "specific webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based", "job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply", "choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look", "career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks", "a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a", "a job and have a right to be employed. The", "of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the", "limiting my right to look for a job and have", "a specific webinar intended for career development of US- and", "being the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore", "it limits my right to apply for any position without", "academic staff. It talks about the special situation when the", "it mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened.", "intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff.", "job and have a right to be employed. The question", "to apply for any position without being the questioned why", "questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it", "therefore limiting my right to look for a job and", "because I thought this is an international platform and that", "this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on", "I didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because", "such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for", "that it limits my right to apply for any position", "on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right", "actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question only", "applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question and", "of putting on hold this question [How should I handle", "is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for" ]
[ "then. What I could imagine is that the user might", "academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years", "that the user might be way too young to discuss", "lead to such a long ban? In practical terms, this", "for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's", "at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really", "kind of offense would lead to such a long ban?", "The way we know the stackexchange site today, it need", "it need not even exist for such a long time", "5 years old. Then, about 20 years might make sense.", "but which kind of offense would lead to such a", "Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE", "site today, it need not even exist for such a", "user might be way too young to discuss academic issues,", "\"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today, it", "this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site", "even exist for such a long time span. Some of", "banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at", "of offense would lead to such a long ban? In", "What I could imagine is that the user might be", "daisies by then. What I could imagine is that the", "noticed in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been", "young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then,", "issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years might", "span. Some of us might even be happily pushing up", "a long time span. Some of us might even be", "at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might", "might be way too young to discuss academic issues, say,", "which kind of offense would lead to such a long", "in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned", "the daisies by then. What I could imagine is that", "way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years", "we know the stackexchange site today, it need not even", "of us might even be happily pushing up the daisies", "not even exist for such a long time span. Some", "time span. Some of us might even be happily pushing", "stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for such", "even be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What", "long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way", "such a long time span. Some of us might even", "the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for", "could imagine is that the user might be way too", "terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange", "us might even be happily pushing up the daisies by", "need not even exist for such a long time span.", "I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and", "today, it need not even exist for such a long", "the user might be way too young to discuss academic", "for such a long time span. Some of us might", "look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad.", "be way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5", "way we know the stackexchange site today, it need not", "pushing up the daisies by then. What I could imagine", "D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing.", "discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20", "Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind", "might even be happily pushing up the daisies by then.", "missing something, but which kind of offense would lead to", "something, but which kind of offense would lead to such", "a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The", "I might be missing something, but which kind of offense", "such a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\".", "@scaaahu noticed in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took", "years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at", "academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be", "say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years might make", "Some of us might even be happily pushing up the", "a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing", "bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which", "know the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist", "nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind of", "ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we", "the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for", "be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I", "I could imagine is that the user might be way", "up the daisies by then. What I could imagine is", "posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I", "chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible!", "nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but", "Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years.", "is that the user might be way too young to", "Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28", "would lead to such a long ban? In practical terms,", "long time span. Some of us might even be happily", "and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing", "28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts", "to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about", "been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look", "exist for such a long time span. Some of us", "found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something,", "practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the", "happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I could", "be missing something, but which kind of offense would lead", "has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a", "by then. What I could imagine is that the user", "took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found", "might be missing something, but which kind of offense would", "imagine is that the user might be way too young", "that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I", "offense would lead to such a long ban? In practical", "In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know", "too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old.", "is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today,", "to such a long ban? In practical terms, this is" ]
[ "found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the", "browse the questions on the issue of research funding, I", "am not the author). Since I want to be more", "the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know", "questions on the issue of research funding, I found that", "of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this", "the issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate)", "research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I", "Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question", "not the author). Since I want to be more familiar", "want to know why this question which ask for the", "why this question which ask for the funding sources was", "Since I want to be more familiar with the norms", "on the issue of research funding, I found that [this", "this question which ask for the funding sources was deemed", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since I", "know why this question which ask for the funding sources", "want to be more familiar with the norms of Academia", "the questions on the issue of research funding, I found", "norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why", "more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I", "When I browse the questions on the issue of research", "issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was", "of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed", "I browse the questions on the issue of research funding,", "was closed (I am not the author). Since I want", "that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author).", "I want to be more familiar with the norms of", "to know why this question which ask for the funding", "I want to know why this question which ask for", "(I am not the author). Since I want to be", "be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange,", "Exchange, I want to know why this question which ask", "author). Since I want to be more familiar with the", "familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since", "to be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack", "Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question which", "I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not", "funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am", "closed (I am not the author). Since I want to", "with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to", "question which ask for the funding sources was deemed off-topic.", "the author). Since I want to be more familiar with" ]
[ "the situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically", "knows specifically about this journal, and also help others, but", "situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically about", "case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this", "its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could", "and the journal and its publsiher were not listed there.", "the journal name from my case in this academia.SE question?", "if someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and", "how I believe to be the target of a possibly", "of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with", "and could I mention the publisher and the journal name", "scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about several", "this journal, and also help others, but that I should", "academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was", "there. Should I and could I mention the publisher and", "mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation", "listed there. Should I and could I mention the publisher", "predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher", "not listed there. Should I and could I mention the", "journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed", "journal name from my case in this academia.SE question? It", "mention the publisher and the journal name from my case", "perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if someone", "Should I and could I mention the publisher and the", "academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help", "question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me", "subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals", "answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals and", "lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal", "an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I", "someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and also", "the journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should", "others, but that I should first discuss this publication here,", "specifically about this journal, and also help others, but that", "my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that", "the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory", "possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation", "this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps", "about this journal, and also help others, but that I", "to be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can", "journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were", "were not listed there. Should I and could I mention", "and the journal name from my case in this academia.SE", "me clarify the situation for me, if someone on here", "this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me,", "in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could", "online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the", "the following question, I describe how I believe to be", "the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic", "target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal", "In the following question, I describe how I believe to", "It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify", "that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and", "several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and", "me, if someone on here knows specifically about this journal,", "be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers", "was informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists", "predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be", "help others, but that I should first discuss this publication", "publisher and the journal name from my case in this", "from my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned", "clarify the situation for me, if someone on here knows", "in the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention", "publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not listed", "name from my case in this academia.SE question? It was", "I was informed in the subsequent answers about several online", "mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its", "for me, if someone on here knows specifically about this", "a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about", "question, I describe how I believe to be the target", "reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent", "I mention the publisher and the journal name from my", "journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I", "believe to be the target of a possibly predatory journal:", "I and could I mention the publisher and the journal", "publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could I", "that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for", "and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not", "also help others, but that I should first discuss this", "that I should first discuss this publication here, on meta.", "but that I should first discuss this publication here, on", "with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in", "and also help others, but that I should first discuss", "a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low", "about several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers,", "the publisher and the journal name from my case in", "and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and", "help me clarify the situation for me, if someone on", "journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be a", "I describe how I believe to be the target of", "I believe to be the target of a possibly predatory", "informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists that", "following question, I describe how I believe to be the", "be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an", "journal, and also help others, but that I should first", "[Can an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam)", "on here knows specifically about this journal, and also help", "here knows specifically about this journal, and also help others,", "could I mention the publisher and the journal name from", "was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the", "describe how I believe to be the target of a", "low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the", "could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if" ]
[ "having similar format of question like our How does the", "PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "program in computer science without a masters degree, with a", "opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the users.", "about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about", "main point of question? In my opinion, having similar format", "mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany,", "[link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention", "another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program", "Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a masters", "by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to", "to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many", "better to form his question as the above mentioned question", "an Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters", "to be admitted to a masters in Germany with a", "point of question? In my opinion, having similar format of", "questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this", "the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure", "the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge", "application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities,", "the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681)", "application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is", "get into an Australian PhD program in computer science without", "in computer science without a masters degree, with a dual", "Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he", "many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for", "point to his main point of question? In my opinion,", "questions directly to their point of vagueness which has brought", "of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?* has some", "Austria, is it better to form his question as the", "but are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like", "was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of", "questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the", "in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As", "many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that,", "degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly", "Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters degree,", "borderline students?) or should he ask his question the same", "form his question as the above mentioned question (something like:", "vagueness which has brought them to our site, but can", "we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and", "to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from", "written and opened if any user has indeed some problem", "and exactly point to his main point of question? In", "questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for each", "and opened if any user has indeed some problem during", "(something like: How does the admissions process work for PhD", "PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to", "procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc.", "country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened if", "as we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!)", "the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries.", "computer science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc", "or should he ask his question the same as any", "other normal question on this site and exactly point to", "their point of vagueness which has brought them to our", "can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar", "about application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria,", "of the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions", "previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the", "PhD program in Austria, is it better to form his", "in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can", "which have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure", "he ask his question the same as any other normal", "for weak or borderline students?* has some advantages and disadvantages,", "mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats.", "in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to", "without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My", "have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in", "admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for", "with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about", "questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in", "process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for", "like: How does the admissions process work for PhD programs", "How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in", "question? In my opinion, having similar format of question like", "questions should specifically be written and opened if any user", "for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted", "his question the same as any other normal question on", "for each country!) and questions should specifically be written and", "in Austria, is it better to form his question as", "PhD program in computer science without a masters degree, with", "and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying", "application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened", "program in Austria, is it better to form his question", "in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should", "not lead to opening as many questions as we can", "France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616)", "other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an", "weak or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can", "start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to", "United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount", "question like our How does the admissions process work for", "to cover questions about application procedure in the United States,", "or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily", "a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into", "a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions", "does the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria,", "ask his question the same as any other normal question", "of question? In my opinion, having similar format of question", "for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline", "are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France,", "As an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure", "site and exactly point to his main point of question?", "format of question like our How does the admissions process", "wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention", "a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another", "contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for", "questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should specifically", "question on this site and exactly point to his main", "advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions", "procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and", "of the users. [What is the process for PhD applications", "same as any other normal question on this site and", "if any user has indeed some problem during his PhD", "work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak", "cover questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly);", "[Is it possible to be admitted to a masters in", "normal question on this site and exactly point to his", "any user has indeed some problem during his PhD application.", "mention that, this question should not lead to opening as", "them to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping", "about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian", "I get into an Australian PhD program in computer science", "but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just", "should not lead to opening as many questions as we", "to form his question as the above mentioned question (something", "question is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but", "lead users with similar questions directly to their point of", "specifically be written and opened if any user has indeed", "similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which has", "attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What is", "to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible", "about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously", "any other normal question on this site and exactly point", "like our How does the admissions process work for PhD", "our How does the admissions process work for PhD programs", "(serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should", "process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right", "[Can I get into an Australian PhD program in computer", "degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have similar", "into an Australian PhD program in computer science without a", "some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar", "each country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened", "applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start", "bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian", "for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better", "this question should not lead to opening as many questions", "the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly", "users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not", "question for each country!) and questions should specifically be written", "weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his question", "as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question", "directly to their point of vagueness which has brought them", "or borderline students?) or should he ask his question the", "as the above mentioned question (something like: How does the", "mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process work", "starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better to", "masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is", "somebody has question about application procedure for starting a PhD", "dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which", "process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak", "which has brought them to our site, but can mislead", "programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or", "question as the above mentioned question (something like: How does", "should specifically be written and opened if any user has", "question should not lead to opening as many questions as", "like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if", "in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD -", "has question about application procedure for starting a PhD program", "BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have", "different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover", "a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question", "huge amount of attention of the users. [What is the", "the above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions", "countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance,", "one question for each country!) and questions should specifically be", "students?) or should he ask his question the same as", "Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One", "can easily lead users with similar questions directly to their", "and attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What", "particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask", "- Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a", "this site and exactly point to his main point of", "with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which", "in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question", "disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly to", "the admissions process work for PhD programs in the US,", "lead to opening as many questions as we can (serial", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?* has some advantages", "from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD", "his main point of question? In my opinion, having similar", "above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process", "[Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is", "be admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year", "questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about application", "borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead", "to mention that, this question should not lead to opening", "etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about application", "has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with", "best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in", "for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his", "our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions", "site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in", "similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should not", "exactly point to his main point of question? In my", "can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions", "time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it", "science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174)", "question the same as any other normal question on this", "to his main point of question? In my opinion, having", "My question is particularly about questions which have similar concept,", "questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was", "as any other normal question on this site and exactly", "mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of", "particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly", "opinion, having similar format of question like our How does", "Not to mention that, this question should not lead to", "applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be", "masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840)", "Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question", "of attention of the users. [What is the process for", "an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for", "should he ask his question the same as any other", "Part of the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on", "similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other", "admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors", "country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program in", "Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has", "in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted", "countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions", "point of vagueness which has brought them to our site,", "Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I", "to opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/", "is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are", "universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about", "procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it", "the same as any other normal question on this site", "and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly", "on this site and exactly point to his main point", "for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time", "similar format of question like our How does the admissions", "students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?", "easily lead users with similar questions directly to their point", "to their point of vagueness which has brought them to", "amount of attention of the users. [What is the process", "concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other countries,", "France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody", "attention of the users. [What is the process for PhD", "and questions should specifically be written and opened if any", "on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different", "it possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany", "the users. [What is the process for PhD applications and", "users. [What is the process for PhD applications and contacting", "my opinion, having similar format of question like our How", "particularly for weak or borderline students?* has some advantages and", "does the admissions process work for PhD programs in the", "admissions process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly", "it better to form his question as the above mentioned", "a PhD program in Austria, is it better to form", "the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure", "brought them to our site, but can mislead users by", "opened if any user has indeed some problem during his", "just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should", "with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get", "PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to", "of vagueness which has brought them to our site, but", "In my opinion, having similar format of question like our", "is it better to form his question as the above", "of question like our How does the admissions process work", "be written and opened if any user has indeed some", "[What is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors", "is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in", "his question as the above mentioned question (something like: How", "professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD", "PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?)", "work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or", "States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of", "has brought them to our site, but can mislead users", "for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about", "possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany with", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students? has", "users with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness", "formats. Not to mention that, this question should not lead", "if somebody has question about application procedure for starting a", "that, this question should not lead to opening as many", "instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for starting", "question (something like: *How does the admissions process work for", "on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best", "focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the", "succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the United", "3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an", "question about application procedure for starting a PhD program in", "procedure in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded", "admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best questions,", "opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one" ]
[ "few people flagged the last couple of questions I asked", "an old one so the chances of getting the answer", "measure that prevents users from doing that. When the question", "to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By", "question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as", "very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a", "the time the question is reopened, the person asking the", "answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be", "the question is reopened, the person asking the question has", "the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There", "it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only", "flagged the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates", "people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my", "and I don't see any measure that prevents users from", "the question is closed, it takes time for the question", "don't see any measure that prevents users from doing that.", "misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner is punished.", "part of my explanation that was explaining why the question", "it be better if there was a measure to discourage", "days of time for acting on the matter and the", "of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while", "asking the question has missed a few days of time", "duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and", "is reopened, the person asking the question has missed a", "time the question is reopened, the person asking the question", "be better if there was a measure to discourage users", "any measure that prevents users from doing that. When the", "the part of my explanation that was explaining why the", "for acting on the matter and the question is already", "couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions,", "acting on the matter and the question is already an", "read the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate?", "that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases", "the question has missed a few days of time for", "takes time for the question to be reopened upon a", "of time for acting on the matter and the question", "before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that", "question is already an old one so the chances of", "other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people", "was explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet,", "few days of time for acting on the matter and", "intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the person", "it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that", "that. When the question is closed, it takes time for", "for moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened,", "doing that. When the question is closed, it takes time", "reopened, the person asking the question has missed a few", "weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed", "I don't see any measure that prevents users from doing", "reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if", "more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a", "flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's", "explanation that was explaining why the question is not a", "carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance", "and the question is already an old one so the", "the question to be reopened upon a request for moderator", "of getting the answer after reopening would be very low.", "has missed a few days of time for acting on", "the matter and the question is already an old one", "only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the", "on the matter and the question is already an old", "the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question", "users from doing that. When the question is closed, it", "missed a few days of time for acting on the", "questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging", "clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently", "duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the", "as duplicate is so easy and I don't see any", "questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is", "one so the chances of getting the answer after reopening", "flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation", "it takes time for the question to be reopened upon", "Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure to", "had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was", "misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining why", "prevents users from doing that. When the question is closed,", "while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it", "after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better", "and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part", "is so easy and I don't see any measure that", "question to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention.", "matter and the question is already an old one so", "asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't", "request for moderator intervention. By the time the question is", "A few people flagged the last couple of questions I", "false flagging and encourage them to read the questions more", "so the chances of getting the answer after reopening would", "be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was", "a question as duplicate is so easy and I don't", "already an old one so the chances of getting the", "for the question to be reopened upon a request for", "question is closed, it takes time for the question to", "the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of", "closed, it takes time for the question to be reopened", "be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the", "old one so the chances of getting the answer after", "a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so", "By the time the question is reopened, the person asking", "not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is", "duplicate is so easy and I don't see any measure", "why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a", "my explanation that was explaining why the question is not", "a few days of time for acting on the matter", "flagging and encourage them to read the questions more carefully", "of my explanation that was explaining why the question is", "if there was a measure to discourage users from false", "better if there was a measure to discourage users from", "explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging", "the chances of getting the answer after reopening would be", "the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of", "a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in", "upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time the", "flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and I", "it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned,", "moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the", "was a measure to discourage users from false flagging and", "is already an old one so the chances of getting", "questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they", "chances of getting the answer after reopening would be very", "encourage them to read the questions more carefully before flagging", "the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it", "low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure", "chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the", "question is reopened, the person asking the question has missed", "that was explaining why the question is not a duplicate.", "apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining", "is closed, it takes time for the question to be", "to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to", "the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner", "duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy", "would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there", "see any measure that prevents users from doing that. When", "reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time", "a measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage", "duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the flagger's", "users from false flagging and encourage them to read the", "there was a measure to discourage users from false flagging", "and encourage them to read the questions more carefully before", "that prevents users from doing that. When the question is", "they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had", "I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly", "so easy and I don't see any measure that prevents", "person asking the question has missed a few days of", "getting the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't", "last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other", "a request for moderator intervention. By the time the question", "There is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding,", "the person asking the question has missed a few days", "Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and", "the question is already an old one so the chances", "them to read the questions more carefully before flagging it", "When the question is closed, it takes time for the", "easy and I don't see any measure that prevents users", "is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate", "from false flagging and encourage them to read the questions", "flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner is", "people flagged the last couple of questions I asked as", "measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them", "to read the questions more carefully before flagging it as", "time for acting on the matter and the question is", "from doing that. When the question is closed, it takes", "as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates", "question as duplicate is so easy and I don't see", "time for the question to be reopened upon a request", "is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but", "as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the", "discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to read", "question has missed a few days of time for acting", "of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the" ]
[ "would like to bring closure (even if that means reopening", "then closed again. I guess I am asking because I", "is not as if the question has been closed and", "within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of", "to be conflicting votes: it is not as if the", "is a closed question on the OSF system: [Is there", "academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there", "a preprint from one service to another within the OSF", "only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and", "it is not as if the question has been closed", "has been closed and then reopened and then closed again.", "votes: it is not as if the question has been", "closure (even if that means reopening the question) to the", "the OSF system: [Is there a way to move a", "to understand how to interpret the votes in regards to", "there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite", "2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect", "the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments", "to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original", "reopening the original question. I am not sure another meta", "not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as", "there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both", "has spawned a number of comments as well as two", "question has been closed and then reopened and then closed", "a closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a", "OSF system: [Is there a way to move a preprint", "a number of comments as well as two meta questions:", "are quite general and I am not able to understand", "move a preprint from one service to another within the", "to move a preprint from one service to another within", "[Is there a way to move a preprint from one", "understand how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening", "preprint from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys)", "system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as well", "able to understand how to interpret the votes in regards", "bring closure (even if that means reopening the question) to", "(i.e., this one) is really needed since there does not", "technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a", "am not able to understand how to interpret the votes", "one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has", "services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is", "not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really", "and then reopened and then closed again. I guess I", "since there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it", "I am not able to understand how to interpret the", "way to move a preprint from one service to another", "two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on", "then reopened and then closed again. I guess I am", "the original question. I am not sure another meta questions", "like to bring closure (even if that means reopening the", "conflicting votes: it is not as if the question has", "questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services", "asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there", "1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic)", "comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions", "a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta", "sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed", "system: [Is there a way to move a preprint from", "[Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence)", "asking because I would like to bring closure (even if", "really needed since there does not seem to be conflicting", "this one) is really needed since there does not seem", "as if the question has been closed and then reopened", "closed and then reopened and then closed again. I guess", "not able to understand how to interpret the votes in", "in regards to reopening the original question. I am not", "am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is", "I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one)", "and I am not able to understand how to interpret", "There is a closed question on the OSF system: [Is", "service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned", "one) is really needed since there does not seem to", "closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a way", "meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic", "questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is", "a way to move a preprint from one service to", "interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original question.", "issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus", "on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only", "original question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e.,", "question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this", "meta questions are quite general and I am not able", "does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not", "well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical", "on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if", "reopened and then closed again. I guess I am asking", "OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as", "be conflicting votes: it is not as if the question", "not as if the question has been closed and then", "I would like to bring closure (even if that means", "meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there", "on the OSF system: [Is there a way to move", "regards to reopening the original question. I am not sure", "seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as if", "is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general", "to reopening the original question. I am not sure another", "there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is", "from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that", "votes in regards to reopening the original question. I am", "I am asking because I would like to bring closure", "another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number", "guess I am asking because I would like to bring", "indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I", "as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking", "needed since there does not seem to be conflicting votes:", "again. I guess I am asking because I would like", "there a way to move a preprint from one service", "how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the", "that has spawned a number of comments as well as", "number of comments as well as two meta questions: 1.", "of comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are", "questions are quite general and I am not able to", "is really needed since there does not seem to be", "general and I am not able to understand how to", "closed again. I guess I am asking because I would", "to bring closure (even if that means reopening the question)", "(even if that means reopening the question) to the issue.", "if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are", "and then closed again. I guess I am asking because", "the votes in regards to reopening the original question. I", "[Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2.", "evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I am", "consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions", "spawned a number of comments as well as two meta", "Both meta questions are quite general and I am not", "if the question has been closed and then reopened and", "questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there does", "am asking because I would like to bring closure (even", "quite general and I am not able to understand how", "I guess I am asking because I would like to", "because I would like to bring closure (even if that", "to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a", "the question has been closed and then reopened and then", "been closed and then reopened and then closed again. I", "question on the OSF system: [Is there a way to", "as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues", "another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since" ]
[ "reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review articles.", "> and summarize the current state of research on a", "in a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding", "I think should be more explicit in communicating the correct", "\"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more", "that organize > and summarize the current state of research", "> > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new", "tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many", "since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense,", "\"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: >", "of the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer", "state of research on a given topic in a >", "around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the", "topic in a > novel way that integrates and adds", "the current state of research on a given topic in", "tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to", "would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could", "to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to", "For questions related to the peer-review process, use the >", "as 50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain", "many as 50% of the questions with that tag actually", "case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged", "> 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation", "articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize the", "tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles", "I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged", "correct intention of the tag. In that case, I also", "academic publications that organize > and summarize the current state", "publications that organize > and summarize the current state of", "given topic in a > novel way that integrates and", "> novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work", "propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"),", "review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles", "do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename", "way that integrates and adds understanding to work in the", "process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > >", "organize > and summarize the current state of research on", "this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never", "have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I", "communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that case,", "the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this", "integrates and adds understanding to work in the field. >", "especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe", "that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that", "questions related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review'", "the field. > For questions related to the peer-review process,", "\"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize", "and adds understanding to work in the field. > For", "to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions", "to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature", "with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the", "tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in", "> \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize", "posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many", "be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the", "could someone with the right permissions please make the change?", "synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes", "the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the", "(which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around", "deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is,", "reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions with", "a given topic in a > novel way that integrates", "and summarize the current state of research on a given", "use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite", "which I think should be more explicit in communicating the", "as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If", "Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently", "Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions", "[literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be", "whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles", "questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit", "summarize the current state of research on a given topic", "> > > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially", "is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic", "novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work in", "literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag", "explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get", "are academic publications that organize > and summarize the current", "as many as 50% of the questions with that tag", "tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a", "peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > >", "nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose", "new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as", "adds understanding to work in the field. > For questions", "think should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention", "never get around to reading), maybe as many as 50%", "leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the", "\"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize >", "people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading),", "apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many as", "'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or", "tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should", "a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding to", "that integrates and adds understanding to work in the field.", "to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead.", "intention of the tag. In that case, I also propose", "should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of", "In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show", "pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with", "'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in communicating", "the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with", "I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\")", "and have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence,", "peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review", "\"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it", "of research on a given topic in a > novel", "> For questions related to the peer-review process, use the", "> > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that", "related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag", "50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain to", "articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show", "the correct intention of the tag. In that case, I", "'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which", "get around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of", "more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag.", "this makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions", "the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is", "in the field. > For questions related to the peer-review", "to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description", "> Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters,", "a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this", "explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In", "it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion.", "of the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting", "that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then", "the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. >", "understanding to work in the field. > For questions related", "propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that", "then could someone with the right permissions please make the", "not leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate", "makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions please", "[review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving", "questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and", "current state of research on a given topic in a", "subscribe to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose", "tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\"", "tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since", "perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone", "this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications", "that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing", "the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think", "is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that would", "actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do", "to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which", "many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to", "in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that", "confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with the", "description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are", "the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing", "questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > >", "to work in the field. > For questions related to", "[review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this:", "maybe as many as 50% of the questions with that", "questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as", "research on a given topic in a > novel way", "I subscribe to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag,", "the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not", "'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym,", "If this makes sense, then could someone with the right", "sense, then could someone with the right permissions please make", "or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and", "work in the field. > For questions related to the", "tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\"", "with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have", "rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I", "also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag;", "instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many people,", "field. > For questions related to the peer-review process, use", "on a given topic in a > novel way that", "that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions" ]
[ "system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in", "there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3.", "consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this", "Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My", "then what should they do, when people who can act", "on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not.", "does consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If", "is no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives", "academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there", "whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened", "is quite funny, because although whether the [original question about", "recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services", "2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect", "on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it", "I think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's", "are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is no", "mean if there is no action? 2. If the mods", "although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is", "it is clear, in principle and in specific, that the", "the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1.", "question is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet", "My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there", "a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should", "question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today,", "People only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1.", "technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a", "and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People", "representatives of the consensus, then what should they do, when", "evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system be", "OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear,", "services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is", "question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I", "series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions", "and in specific, that the original question is on-topic and", "been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't", "system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta series", "asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there", "what should they do, when people who can act don't", "1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic)", "[Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence)", "OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta", "If the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then", "[original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not,", "should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only", "more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical", "mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what should", "no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of", "2. If the mods are the representatives of the consensus,", "is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the", "that the original question is on-topic and should have already", "action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of the", "the representatives of the consensus, then what should they do,", "interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues", "the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is", "this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of", "is reopened or not, I think the meta series is", "already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but", "questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is", "the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what", "issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus", "clear, in principle and in specific, that the original question", "vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does", "on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only", "don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean", "because although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341)", "let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic", "reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle and", "today, it is clear, in principle and in specific, that", "of the consensus, then what should they do, when people", "in principle and in specific, that the original question is", "there is no action? 2. If the mods are the", "questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is", "should they do, when people who can act don't act?", "on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if", "meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are", "have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote,", "or not, I think the meta series is more interesting.", "the consensus, then what should they do, when people who", "not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions are:", "if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question", "3. [Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341)", "This is quite funny, because although whether the [original question", "about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think", "specific, that the original question is on-topic and should have", "First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on", "reopened or not, I think the meta series is more", "only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF", "As of today, it is clear, in principle and in", "What does consensus mean if there is no action? 2.", "of today, it is clear, in principle and in specific,", "if there is no action? 2. If the mods are", "[Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As", "consensus, then what should they do, when people who can", "consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If the", "quite funny, because although whether the [original question about the", "the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or", "principle and in specific, that the original question is on-topic", "is clear, in principle and in specific, that the original", "original question is on-topic and should have already been reopened.", "is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking", "indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system", "not, I think the meta series is more interesting. First,", "in specific, that the original question is on-topic and should", "think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap:", "[Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2.", "1. What does consensus mean if there is no action?", "be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle", "there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on", "only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What", "but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus", "is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's", "the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the", "funny, because although whether the [original question about the OSF", "it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions", "are the representatives of the consensus, then what should they", "act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if", "reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act.", "the original question is on-topic and should have already been" ]
[ "a long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments", "several hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread", "long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was", "of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and", "of hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what", "the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it", "and negative votes and a long thread of comments. An", "thought and attention to writing good comments, but also (more", "or answers that attract a lot of attention, including long", "stream of comments has been moved to chat? If your", "of high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and", "out of hand” (or words to that effect). My question:", "to that effect). My question: what should be done about", "it serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m", "The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to", "in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the", "comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and", "only be moved to chat once and the comments thread", "thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to that", "relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long after", "has been moved to chat? If your answer is that", "please explain why you think this best serves the purpose", "(possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on", "to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics", "comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to", "attention, including long streams of comments, many of which are", "streams as was done in this case is the best", "high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even", "of comments was moved to chat per the usual site", "my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate", "they “had to” delete the comments because comments can only", "are of high quality and highly relevant to the debate,", "comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation.", "the comments associated with questions or answers that attract a", "comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to chat", "the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion", "and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated", "as was done in this case is the best policy,", "long after the initial stream of comments has been moved", "to the goals of the site. It not only frustrates", "highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long", "answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done", "thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed", "me a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete", "about the comments associated with questions or answers that attract", "quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue", "of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a", "unabated long after the initial stream of comments has been", "interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to", "informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some", "why it serves some other, even more important, goal that", "chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments", "comments can only be moved to chat once and the", "the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion", "comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments because", "the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting", "the goals of the site. It not only frustrates users", "moved to chat once and the comments thread was “getting", "no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that", "were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased)", "only frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing", "a lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many", "think this best serves the purpose of fostering the most", "community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who", "high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the site.", "“getting out of hand” (or words to that effect). My", "has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative", "and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering", "been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes", "the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The", "that they “had to” delete the comments because comments can", "the site. It not only frustrates users who have thought", "that effect). My question: what should be done about the", "good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at", "important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat", "My answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting", "and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly", "writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community", "comments was moved to chat per the usual site policy,", "once and the comments thread was “getting out of hand”", "thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved", "deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly", "high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which", "OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the", "subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with no", "(or why it serves some other, even more important, goal", "associated with questions or answers that attract a lot of", "of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to", "with questions or answers that attract a lot of attention,", "your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was", "this case is the best policy, please explain why you", "large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me", "deprives the community at large of important follow-up content. A", "negative votes and a long thread of comments. An initial", "moderator who left me a chat comment explained that they", "votes and a long thread of comments. An initial batch", "debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial stream", "case is the best policy, please explain why you think", "be moved to chat once and the comments thread was", "hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what should", "detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals", "comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and,", "that attract a lot of attention, including long streams of", "can only be moved to chat once and the comments", "furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions.", "questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental", "of comments has been moved to chat? If your answer", "It not only frustrates users who have thought and attention", "announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted", "deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this case", "controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a", "is the best policy, please explain why you think this", "(or words to that effect). My question: what should be", "and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus", "seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to", "who left me a chat comment explained that they “had", "positive and negative votes and a long thread of comments.", "on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of", "also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of important", "of the site. It not only frustrates users who have", "and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other,", "at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left", "comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large", "continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments has", "chat once and the comments thread was “getting out of", "two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with", "you think this best serves the purpose of fostering the", "is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in", "fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why", "some other, even more important, goal that I’m not thinking", "deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the", "done about the comments associated with questions or answers that", "other, even more important, goal that I’m not thinking of).", "including long streams of comments, many of which are of", "frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing good", "questions or answers that attract a lot of attention, including", "policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply", "site. It not only frustrates users who have thought and", "biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s", "and attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly)", "quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the", "to” delete the comments because comments can only be moved", "answers that attract a lot of attention, including long streams", "debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion", "the comments because comments can only be moved to chat", "of comments, many of which are of high quality and", "the debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial", "per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams", "opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question", "importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up content.", "what should be done about the comments associated with questions", "batch of comments was moved to chat per the usual", "goals of the site. It not only frustrates users who", "of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality", "comments, many of which are of high quality and highly", "An initial batch of comments was moved to chat per", "best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and", "of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or", "was “getting out of hand” (or words to that effect).", "A moderator who left me a chat comment explained that", "and which continue unabated long after the initial stream of", "but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of", "words to that effect). My question: what should be done", "long streams of comments, many of which are of high", "delete the comments because comments can only be moved to", "attract a lot of attention, including long streams of comments,", "after the initial stream of comments has been moved to", "should be done about the comments associated with questions or", "explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were very", "possible (or why it serves some other, even more important,", "contrary to the goals of the site. It not only", "were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my", "chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long", "the best policy, please explain why you think this best", "of attention, including long streams of comments, many of which", "quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and", "serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality", "hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread of", "best policy, please explain why you think this best serves", "because comments can only be moved to chat once and", "answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive", "follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat comment", "in this case is the best policy, please explain why", "most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves", "usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments", "contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and", "to chat once and the comments thread was “getting out", "long streams of comments were simply deleted with no public", "effect). My question: what should be done about the comments", "which are of high quality and highly relevant to the", "with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments", "attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a long", "comments has been moved to chat? If your answer is", "which continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments", "to chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent", "chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams", "question: what should be done about the comments associated with", "this best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed", "discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even more", "why you think this best serves the purpose of fostering", "the community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator", "or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were", "and a long thread of comments. An initial batch of", "streams of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement", "“had to” delete the comments because comments can only be", "Many of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful", "been moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting", "was moved to chat per the usual site policy, and", "done in this case is the best policy, please explain", "and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted", "be done about the comments associated with questions or answers", "streams of comments, many of which are of high quality", "If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as", "explained that they “had to” delete the comments because comments", "My question: what should be done about the comments associated", "who have thought and attention to writing good comments, but", "ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite", "initial stream of comments has been moved to chat? If", "initial batch of comments was moved to chat per the", "the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of", "related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems", "moved to chat per the usual site policy, and two", "comments because comments can only be moved to chat once", "of which are of high quality and highly relevant to", "thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary", "purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred", "subsequent comment streams as was done in this case is", "deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a", "public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were", "to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment", "have thought and attention to writing good comments, but also", "site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were", "comment streams as was done in this case is the", "moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent", "a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the", "of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or", "attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives", "explain why you think this best serves the purpose of", "comments associated with questions or answers that attract a lot", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and", "users who have thought and attention to writing good comments,", "not only frustrates users who have thought and attention to", "(more importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up", "was done in this case is the best policy, please", "a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the", "were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many", "content. A moderator who left me a chat comment explained", "serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m not", "policy, please explain why you think this best serves the", "greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related", "the initial stream of comments has been moved to chat?", "discussion and contrary to the goals of the site. It", "lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many of", "left me a chat comment explained that they “had to”", "very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion,", "and the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or", "to the debate, and which continue unabated long after the", "the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words", "and contrary to the goals of the site. It not", "question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments", "to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of", "to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the", "that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this", "simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of", "that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in", "many of which are of high quality and highly relevant" ]
[ "of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation,", "SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the", "Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science", "there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE?", "underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing", "only referenced via social media, my question [Is there any", "and New Your time is off topic? Is there some", "some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S.", "P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental", "Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA,", "STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time", "the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social", "my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of", "Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department", "many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and", "referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is", "part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of", "Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear", "have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was", "time is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ", "of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature", "there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in", "[Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD", "Your time is off topic? Is there some issue with", "it was only referenced via social media, my question [Is", "after referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic?", "about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA", "is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on", "in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection", "Latino is not even race, [Is this statistic about how", "Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it", "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are", "via social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence", "Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is there", "topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part", "social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of", "of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy,", "fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time is", "even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have", "correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media, my", "Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not part", "media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation", "LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion", "the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National", "this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in", "how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct)", "Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not part of", "in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your", "not even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics", "question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ", "even after referencing Nature and New Your time is off", "on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the", "scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New", "New Your time is off topic? Is there some issue", "National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the", "NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation),", "and the Department of Transportation), are not part of Academia", "was only referenced via social media, my question [Is there", "with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my", "the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and", "USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media,", "the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the", "issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in", "Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,", "off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this", "any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM", "this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department", "Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of", "my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency,", "evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even", "a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only", "LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and", "opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the", "PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced", "Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not", "statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the", "race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a", "in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via", "[Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists", "Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory", "of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after", "Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of", "referenced via social media, my question [Is there any relible", "relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396)", "and it was only referenced via social media, my question", "is not even race, [Is this statistic about how many" ]
[ "unique either; see all the questions that are already linked", "only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes", "country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably", "workflows in different journals + fields. Are the redirects overdone?", "redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in", "similar in essence at all. At best, the answer in", "for example. This question is by no means unique either;", "best, the answer in the community question is only tangentially", "to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\"", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not", "the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they", "[\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question", "are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to", "for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a", "question is by no means unique either; see all the", "that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything", "to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How", "tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no", "journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence", "example. This question is by no means unique either; see", "At best, the answer in the community question is only", "at all. At best, the answer in the community question", "tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for", "the questions that are already linked to the community question.", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag", "in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the", "in the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't", "This question is by no means unique either; see all", "However they are not similar in essence at all. At", "all. At best, the answer in the community question is", "in essence at all. At best, the answer in the", "by no means unique either; see all the questions that", "see all the questions that are already linked to the", "is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview)", "particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions", "or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "[\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like).", "Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What", "doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This question", "countries is probably no less different than journal workflows in", "Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does", "answer in the community question is only tangentially related; it", "changes for example. This question is by no means unique", "progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical", "community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything", "review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal", "Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for", "question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D.", "about status changes for example. This question is by no", "of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar", "nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "are not similar in essence at all. At best, the", "no less different than journal workflows in different journals +", "all the questions that are already linked to the community", "question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about", "questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress", "questions that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting", "not similar in essence at all. At best, the answer", "We commonly redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from", "a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in", "workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a", "commonly redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review", "than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are the", "essence at all. At best, the answer in the community", "such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to", "status changes for example. This question is by no means", "is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status", "borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries", "they are not similar in essence at all. At best,", "\"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail", "a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work", "[\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the", "students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is", "does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However", "everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly),", "different countries is probably no less different than journal workflows", "the answer in the community question is only tangentially related;", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country", "linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical", "different than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are", "journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are the redirects", "Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less different", "no means unique either; see all the questions that are", "to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "is by no means unique either; see all the questions", "to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look", "anything about status changes for example. This question is by", "already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the", "it doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This", "changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to", "to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How", "redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does", "status changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review)", "similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to", "the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "[\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready for", "related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for example.", "to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow", "means unique either; see all the questions that are already", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding.", "probably no less different than journal workflows in different journals", "in different countries is probably no less different than journal", "look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at", "weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in", "Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to", "community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is", "the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say", "is probably no less different than journal workflows in different", "as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready", "processes in different countries is probably no less different than", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "say anything about status changes for example. This question is", "either; see all the questions that are already linked to", "notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less", "to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions", "less different than journal workflows in different journals + fields.", "typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are", "for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes", "like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at all.", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar" ]
[ "that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've", "I started a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice:", "answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the", "I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking", "is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I", "the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit.", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most", "present - I suspect something is missing among all the", "answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any", "since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just", "the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be", "and asking a new question. Should I ask a separate", "of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers", "a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a", "perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've already", "scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority,", "missing among all the answers. I've already started a bounty,", "be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are -", "support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still", "there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there", "Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still present", "the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide", "bounty now and asking a new question. Should I ask", "a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained", "thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since", "second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially", "for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty", "bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in", "the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who", "a separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted", "especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind", "recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the", "suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've already", "accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty", "the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having", "story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit.", "question is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer.", "don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a", "reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of the", "answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having second", "answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and", "is explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers", "there are - a minority, but still present - I", "among all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but", "provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists", "entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support", "- I suspect something is missing among all the answers.", "better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't", "am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is", "but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question", "I ask a separate question instead of awarding a bounty?", "minority, but still present - I suspect something is missing", "a new question. Should I ask a separate question instead", "having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better,", "already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the", "bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However", "but still present - I suspect something is missing among", "new question. Should I ask a separate question instead of", "in the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately", "any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a", "I suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've", "explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers are", "I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding", "passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story,", "an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now", "Should I ask a separate question instead of awarding a", "are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire", "mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a new", "just awarding the bounty now and asking a new question.", "are - a minority, but still present - I suspect", "then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since", "who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but", "started a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is", "most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the", "The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of", "if the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't", "separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted an", "now and asking a new question. Should I ask a", "all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am", "I've already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts", "anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story, then", "a minority, but still present - I suspect something is", "is missing among all the answers. I've already started a", "bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate", "shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are", "notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if", "awarding the bounty now and asking a new question. Should", "- a minority, but still present - I suspect something", "However if the answers provide the entire story, then there", "started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps", "Since there are - a minority, but still present -", "still present - I suspect something is missing among all", "something is missing among all the answers. I've already started", "the bounty now and asking a new question. Should I", "asking a new question. Should I ask a separate question", "already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that", "question. Should I ask a separate question instead of awarding" ]
[ "to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular", "the question, which content must be removed to make the", "between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if", "up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries.", "are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions", "ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to the", "in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer", "How is not each of the three components of my", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted", "IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told", "for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on", "least as significant I believe each of the three components", "answer apply here as well to the same degree. So", "comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I should", "must be removed to make the answer acceptable and on", "PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative", "is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or", "* There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number", "the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of", "not relevant enough to the question, which content must be", "answer that basically contains the following position : * We", "rephrase the form of an answer when the content itself", "sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional", "decided to remove the least relevant details of my answer", "objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of", "I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose this", "unique view that is not presented in the other answers", "are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of", "was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not", "would be inclined to mention my gender as a woman", "the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in", "components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to", "ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair", "I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach", "recently updated my answer to the question [Do all countries", "of the current political climate. For the same reason, I", "especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this", "time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here,", "Would I need to find different data, different graphs &", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer", "comment this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous", "demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every", "just a matter of including content not relevant enough to", "received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and", "components of my answer are equally important, due to the", "additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position :", "referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the same", "a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater", "they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they", "answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women even", "here as well to the same degree. So I re-posted", "is there a difference between both cases that I'm just", "need to find different data, different graphs & different sources", "a way I can answer [Why are women even less", "seeing? And if it is really just a matter of", "getting deleted? Would I need to find different data, different", "position : * We know that women that faculty members", "sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll", "relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining part", "are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women", "to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM,", "gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating", "this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator", "general goes against the majority view of the community\". Also,", "apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with", "not seeing? And if it is really just a matter", "least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek", "as a white male, I would be inclined to not", "rules of this community with respect to duplicate content in", "or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological", "rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up", "a woman or my race if I were black or", "generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also", "race or gender on my applications for tenure track job", "deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then", "updated my answer to the question [Do all countries have", "views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I", "in both cases I believe the exact same answer to", "just a matter of different moderators making different choices or", "for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality -", "members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We", "Around the same time, I found the question [Could it", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my", "sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I", "cases I believe the exact same answer to be equally", "Also, is there a way I can answer [Why are", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the", "same argument? And if either of these would be acceptable,", "answer to the question [Do all countries have the same", "different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components", "not for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "if either of these would be acceptable, why not just", "determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources", "gap * This could be at least partially explained by", "by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post", "of my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer", "response to my PM, I suppose this is question is", "roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all countries", "new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have", "both questions in both cases. I also asked how I", "job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So", "towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal", "from my answer to [Do all countries have the same", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional", "answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the", "to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so", "So I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor", "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities", "the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women", "is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator", "three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question?", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't", "the form of an answer when the content itself is", "that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants", "question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to", "by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those", "as well to the same degree. So I re-posted my", "to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not", "this message by explaining that in both cases I believe", "lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my", "- have a greater gender gap * This could be", "[Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my", "& Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in", "So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor", "equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to", "data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate", "all the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc.", "- pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender", "the exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted", "by a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In", "context in the very same community. But let's just assume", "[Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081)", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with", "that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules", "is that fair to the members of this community? Also,", "community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to", "them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for", "not confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I", "the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up", "the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received", "tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components", "this mean the community rules need some revision towards greater", "posted an answer that basically contains the following position :", "may play a role at least as significant I believe", "by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I", "similar context in the very same community. But let's just", "deletion of my answer to [Why are women even less", "have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)?", "Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a", "different answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever", "acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it was?", "deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to", "or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by", "of the the answer for both questions in both cases.", "of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update", "so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to", "are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male,", "answers is not related to the views expressed in them,", "And if either of these would be acceptable, why not", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my", "found the question [Could it be beneficial for me to", "deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views", "this community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt", "same community. But let's just assume it isn't and the", "adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response to", "that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After", "me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\",", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with", "view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it", "decision was made by a moderator in a very similar", "be inclined to mention my gender as a woman or", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in", "is really just a matter of different opinions from different", "of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the", "answer getting deleted? I received no response so far. ---", "same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to", "gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current", "in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same", "that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans &", "question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the", "stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but", "my gender as a woman or my race if I", "but that they would not delete my answer in this", "previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt", "my answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer", "numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or", "presented in the other answers and in general goes against", "those fields, but biological sex differences may play a role", "that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over", "hard to believe that the deletion of my answer to", "as significant I believe each of the three components of", "find different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted?", "be inclined to not mention race or gender on my", "* We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically", "if it's really just a matter of including content not", "by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question", "\"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may", "information\". I responded to this message by explaining that in", "a response to a comment on that answer, which -", "components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information", "significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for both", "the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when", "it is really just a matter of different opinions from", "isn't abuse of the rules of this community with respect", "basically contains the following position : * We know that", "getting an answer to (at least some of) those questions.", "or gender on my applications for tenure track job applications,", "answer for both questions in both cases. I also asked", "gender on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially", "I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each", "that basically contains the following position : * We know", "inclined to mention my gender as a woman or my", "countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically -", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose", "question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant details", "acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether", "explaining that in both cases I believe the exact same", "I deemed it necessary to back up this position by", "would be inclined to not mention race or gender on", "in both cases. I also asked how I could answer", "suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community", "from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need", "or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to", "it \"presents a unique view that is not presented in", "that my answer to [Why are women even less represented", "are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer,", "the remaining part of my answer as a new answer,", "and in general goes against the majority view of the", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by", "answer contains the following position : * It is a", "make the same argument? And if either of these would", "matter of different moderators making different choices or is there", "political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary", "moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer", "same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous", "find it hard to believe that the deletion of my", "is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with", "with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position", "for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions", "sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to", "favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There", "answers and in general goes against the majority view of", "that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with", "For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to", "content not relevant enough to the question, which content must", "on the question [Why are women even less represented in", "the content itself is fine? Or if it's really just", "to be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving", "to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need", "race if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of", "answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same", "that were left out. This answer was also deleted, by", "made by a moderator in a very similar context in", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should", "for the details that were left out. This answer was", "answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different data,", "positions in a STEM field. For the same reason, I", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the", "roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I", "& sources as a response to a comment on that", "content itself is fine? Or if it's really just a", "my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not", "each question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant", "or my race if I were black or Hispanic. This", "they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers", "not related to the views expressed in them, but rather", "attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different", "three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well", "consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as", "censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was", "they would not delete my answer in this case because", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this", "general, as this applies to only some fields (with especifically", "number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation", "is not related to the views expressed in them, but", "of the rules of this community with respect to duplicate", "to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How", "position : * It is a misconception that women are", "a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this", "different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much", "details that were left out. This answer was also deleted,", "personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer", "let's just assume it isn't and the reason two different", "moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM from", "especially with respect to positions in a STEM field. For", "biological sex differences may play a role at least as", "insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for", "I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications.", "if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course,", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three", "pretty much make the same argument? And if either of", "are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there", "as this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer", "some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out)", "believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable to", "with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information.", "creation of jobs where only women are allowed to apply", "should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\".", "them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to this", "this case because it \"presents a unique view that is", "abuse of the rules of this community with respect to", "I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job", "especially considering a different decision was made by a moderator", "answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the", "re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around", "I believe each of the three components of my answer", "making different choices or is there a difference between both", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of", "actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me", "sources as a response to a comment on that answer,", "I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities", "but rather the generic information\". I responded to this message", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are", "majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make", "deleted? How is that fair to the members of this", "the answer as it was? Why all the hassle to", "the question [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "a different decision was made by a moderator in a", "can answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "a white male, I would be inclined to not mention", "(at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the", "opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed", "very same community. But let's just assume it isn't and", "gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap", "data, graphs & sources as a response to a comment", "I responded to this message by explaining that in both", "out just a part of the answer (at least IMO)", "quality of the the answer for both questions in both", "my answer getting deleted? I received no response so far.", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer", "answer are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions", "with respect to positions in a STEM field. For the", "re-post the remaining part of my answer as a new", "there a difference between both cases that I'm just not", "community. But let's just assume it isn't and the reason", "as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the", "considering a different decision was made by a moderator in", "this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I", "a moderator in a very similar context in the very", "the three components of my answer are equally important, due", "that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields", "in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering", "community? Also, is there a way I can answer [Why", "same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this", "that they would not delete my answer in this case", "No comment this time. Then I received PM from an", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant", "receive a response to my PM, I suppose this is", "up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the", "Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college", "engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent", "high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences", "Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by sources", "to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my]", "or is there a difference between both cases that I'm", "same reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender", "women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left", "* This could be at least partially explained by gender", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender,", "the same time, I found the question [Could it be", "admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the", "question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer", "update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources", "each of the three components of my answer are equally", "leaving out just a part of the answer (at least", "a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up", "Is it just a matter of different moderators making different", "the current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed", "etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact", "I'm just not seeing? And if it is really just", "to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me", "current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it", "there a way I can answer [Why are women even", "misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields", "it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my", "reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this position", "answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that", "track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but", "in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women", "I could answer [Why are women even less represented in", "updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are", "Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of an", "with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that", "a matter of including content not relevant enough to the", "following position : * It is a misconception that women", "it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines", "part of my answer as a new answer, referencing my", "of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to", "stumbled on the question [Why are women even less represented", "women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white", ": * It is a misconception that women are underrepresented", "but biological sex differences may play a role at least", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of", "to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would", "typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions ", "of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality", "Or if it's really just a matter of including content", "some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that", "my answer to [Why are women even less represented in", "\"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not", "these answers is not related to the views expressed in", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following", "as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all", "well to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer", "reduces the quality of the the answer for both questions", "--- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that", "to believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why", "also asked how I could answer [Why are women even", "all of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply", "my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs &", "roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender", "the members of this community? Also, is there a way", "the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex", "a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries", "a unique view that is not presented in the other", "in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK", "Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these", "both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it", "pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to", "answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the", "it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form", "be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it", "the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my", "of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm", "of this community? Also, is there a way I can", "factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may play", "a consequence of the current political climate. For the same", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This", "gender gap This could be at least partially explained", "very similar context in the very same community. But let's", "these would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer", "questions in both cases. I also asked how I could", "a response to my PM, I suppose this is question", "\"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So", "the specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove", "it isn't and the reason two different answers to that", "fields in general, as this applies to only some fields", "grounds? How is not each of the three components of", "only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a", "my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender", "where again the exact same components apply. So here, too,", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from", "different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would", "moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers,", "I also asked how I could answer [Why are women", "reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender as", "differences may play a role at least as significant I", "answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the", "the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response", "my PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable", "numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM", "it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity", "contains the following position : * It is a misconception", "the the answer for both questions in both cases. I", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and", "matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean", "explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of", "enough to the question, which content must be removed to", "make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is", "questions, and that leaving out just a part of the", "of each question\". So I decided to remove the least", "at least as significant I believe each of the three", "moderator in a very similar context in the very same", "answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment", "me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for", "jobs where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore,", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received", "Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined to", "be removed to make the answer acceptable and on which", "different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that", "answer, but not for [Do all countries have the same", "but not for [Do all countries have the same gender", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it", "different decision was made by a moderator in a very", "So I decided to remove the least relevant details of", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I", "that in both cases I believe the exact same answer", "re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem", "on which grounds? How is not each of the three", "expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's", "(with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes,", "OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time.", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race,", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using", "argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty", "job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not", "campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\"", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448).", "out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are", "components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer", "content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just", "science or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies", "Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although", "African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans", "course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then", "climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to", "normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that", "But let's just assume it isn't and the reason two", "of different moderators making different choices or is there a", "backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different", "why not just allow the answer as it was? Why", "in a very similar context in the very same community.", "matter of including content not relevant enough to the question,", "I stumbled on the question [Why are women even less", "whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in them.", "STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to only", "my answer are equally important, due to the numerous common", "moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "as a consequence of the current political climate. For the", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally", "respect to positions in a STEM field. For the same", "backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different", "apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would be", "fine? Or if it's really just a matter of including", "if it is really just a matter of different opinions", "applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are", "other answers and in general goes against the majority view", "answer\", but that they would not delete my answer in", "to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "fields fields in general, as this applies to only some", "to back up this position by a lot of data,", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no", "which grounds? How is not each of the three components", "a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces", "wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is", "### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are", "need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable", "* Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries,", "graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of", "my race if I were black or Hispanic. This too,", "additional data, graphs & sources as a response to a", "minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the question", "I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was", "disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that", "has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed", "way I can answer [Why are women even less represented", "worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in", "an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a", "\"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only", "that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of", "track job applications, especially with respect to positions in a", "applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just a", "Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the deletion", "the question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure", "without my answer getting deleted? I received no response so", "my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women", "at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high", "graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same", "the views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\".", "underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general, as", "out. This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator.", "to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a", "track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply.", "approach for getting an answer to (at least some of)", "allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I", "less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even", "of these answers is not related to the views expressed", "to the members of this community? Also, is there a", "not just allow the answer as it was? Why all", "contains the following position : * We know that women", "my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect", "respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an", "of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up", "much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase", "of including content not relevant enough to the question, which", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no response", "deemed it necessary to back up this position by a", "be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out", "on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter", "This too, of course, was backed up by sources (although", "were left out. This answer was also deleted, by the", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I", "Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details", "too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. ---", "question, which content must be removed to make the answer", "different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the", "to both questions, and that leaving out just a part", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they", "from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for", "this position by a lot of data, with graphs &", "consequence of the current political climate. For the same reason,", "tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions in", "up getting deleted? How is that fair to the members", "believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why are", "consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality", "believe each of the three components of my answer are", "due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender", "answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "it hard to believe that the deletion of my answer", "for [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related", "views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why", "the same answer, but not for [Do all countries have", "just not seeing? And if it is really just a", "of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response", "data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted", "is not presented in the other answers and in general", "explain to me why it's OK for [Could it be", "mean the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity?", "of the three components of my answer are equally important,", "STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women are", "here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications.", "in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to", "race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again", "in general, as this applies to only some fields (with", "opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by a", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my", "rather the generic information\". I responded to this message by", "deleted? I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s)", "Basically, my answer contains the following position : * It", "by explaining that in both cases I believe the exact", "in science or STEM fields fields in general, as this", "male, I would be inclined to not mention race or", "an answer that basically contains the following position : ", "that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but", "rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument?", "After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why", "be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need", "the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the", "both cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why", "fair to the members of this community? Also, is there", "following position : We know that women that faculty", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do", "for getting an answer to (at least some of) those", "a greater gender gap * This could be at least", "found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc.", "tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer,", "for both questions in both cases. I also asked how", "this is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting", "my answer in this case because it \"presents a unique", "mention race or gender on my applications for tenure track", "I believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable", "the same reason, I would be inclined to mention my", "This could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping", "it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to", "how I could answer [Why are women even less represented", "gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields,", "answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that I", "generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining that", "to the views expressed in them, but rather the generic", "the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this", "an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made", "related to the views expressed in them, but rather the", "me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448)", "including content not relevant enough to the question, which content", "the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as", "It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science", "computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is", "play a role at least as significant I believe each", "and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would", "I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make", "to do with the actual views expressed in them. Can", "science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a", "hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when the", "Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my", "female applicants over male applicants * We also know that", "modifications. Around the same time, I found the question [Could", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They", "so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that", "learnt that my answer to [Why are women even less", "Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators making", "the generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining", "anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could it", "For the same reason, I would be inclined to mention", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without", "are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general,", "disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447)", "just a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't", "I decided to remove the least relevant details of my", "response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard", "community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is", "would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as", "an answer when the content itself is fine? Or if", "a matter of different moderators making different choices or is", "in STEM as a consequence of the current political climate.", "graphs & sources as a response to a comment on", "received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find", "the following position : * We know that women that", "two different answers to that question are deleted has nothing", "acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each of", "I posted an answer that basically contains the following position", "the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in", "no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it", "message by explaining that in both cases I believe the", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the", "every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And", "confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose", "faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants ", "& Asian-Americans in college admissions There are numerous campaigns", "In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data,", "gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where", "the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to", "view that is not presented in the other answers and", "information from my answer to [Do all countries have the", "applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So here,", "that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that", "not mention race or gender on my applications for tenure", "the quality of the the answer for both questions in", "countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting", "the following position : * It is a misconception that", "each of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant", "a STEM field. For the same reason, I would be", "gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to", "and that leaving out just a part of the answer", "and the reason two different answers to that question are", "& engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly", "I find it hard to believe that the deletion of", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators", "same answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and", "on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out", "answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "information. Basically, my answer contains the following position : ", "misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as a", "in this case because it \"presents a unique view that", "significant I believe each of the three components of my", "and realized that all of the three components of the", "applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM field.", "have a greater gender gap This could be at", "up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is", "itself is fine? Or if it's really just a matter", "is not each of the three components of my answer", "woman or my race if I were black or Hispanic.", "relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries have", "increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including", "in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same", "to the specifics of each question\". So I decided to", "to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do", "same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM", "duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my answer", "disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly", "choices or is there a difference between both cases that", "one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by", "applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not for", "was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of", "as a response to a comment on that answer, which", "as a woman or my race if I were black", "sex differences may play a role at least as significant", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for", "out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I", "response to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully", "just allow the answer as it was? Why all the", "I learnt that my answer to [Why are women even", "a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I", "consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled", "moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample", "against the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted", "equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap ", "answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted?", "to find different data, different graphs & different sources to", "by a moderator in a very similar context in the", "answer to the specifics of each question\". So I decided", "We know that women that faculty members generally prefer female", "### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the", "about [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it is", "aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same degree.", "And if it is really just a matter of different", "inclined to not mention race or gender on my applications", "comment on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed", "both cases I believe the exact same answer to be", "only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing", "extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender,", "it just a matter of different moderators making different choices", "position by a lot of data, with graphs & sources.", "where only women are allowed to apply Therefore, as", "STEM field. For the same reason, I would be inclined", "would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of", "I can answer [Why are women even less represented in", "equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was", "to my PM, I suppose this is question is a", "question [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This answer", "when the content itself is fine? Or if it's really", "the very same community. But let's just assume it isn't", "race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have", "to not mention race or gender on my applications for", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting", "applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to", "### Context I recently updated my answer to the question", "of these would be acceptable, why not just allow the", "my answer to the question [Do all countries have the", "is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an", "white male, I would be inclined to not mention race", "pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences", "exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my", "in a STEM field. For the same reason, I would", "the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How", "form of an answer when the content itself is fine?", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all", "the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the", "common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as", "with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the", "gender as a woman or my race if I were", "in general goes against the majority view of the community\".", "modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to", "the deletion of my answer to [Why are women even", "different moderators making different choices or is there a difference", "is fine? Or if it's really just a matter of", "really just a matter of including content not relevant enough", "the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph", "not delete my answer in this case because it \"presents", "not each of the three components of my answer sufficiently", "anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to", "or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where", "delete my answer in this case because it \"presents a", "a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM", "the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation", "a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact,", "[Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track", "and re-post the remaining part of my answer as a", "the rules of this community with respect to duplicate content", "to the question, which content must be removed to make", "Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race,", "of my answer and re-post the remaining part of my", "with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly", "We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored", "were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just delete", "specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove the", "this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries", "in the other answers and in general goes against the", "case because it \"presents a unique view that is not", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why", "delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete", "the answer for both questions in both cases. I also", "to mention my gender as a woman or my race", "least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer", "was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I", "that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a", "mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a", "same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question,", "the exact same answer to be equally applicable to both", "difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And", "to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time,", "opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules", "& different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument?", "the same argument? And if either of these would be", "* It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in", "for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU", "* Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined", "a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate", "Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the following", "although countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have", "paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And if", "I would be inclined to mention my gender as a", "I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ###", "an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me", "could answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How", "with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "it necessary to back up this position by a lot", "applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science &", "deleted? Would I need to find different data, different graphs", "which - rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently", "fields, but biological sex differences may play a role at", "I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is", "members of this community? Also, is there a way I", "\"moderation of these answers is not related to the views", "I recently updated my answer to the question [Do all", "getting deleted? I received no response so far. --- ###", "college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out.", "that leaving out just a part of the answer (at", "content must be removed to make the answer acceptable and", "[my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So I", "over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans &", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in", "to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality", "applicants over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans", "be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the", "How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one", "a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so -", "alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least some", "to positions in a STEM field. For the same reason,", "different countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a", "doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision towards", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)),", "same answer, but not for [Do all countries have the", "STEM as a consequence of the current political climate. For", "necessary to back up this position by a lot of", "of those fields, but biological sex differences may play a", "prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also know", "because it \"presents a unique view that is not presented", "nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in", "question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found", "to me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial", "responded to this message by explaining that in both cases", "a difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing?", "exact same answer to be equally applicable to both questions,", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were", "that I'm just not seeing? And if it is really", ": * We know that women that faculty members generally", "that fair to the members of this community? Also, is", "isn't and the reason two different answers to that question", "also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over", "the creation of jobs where only women are allowed to", "either of these would be acceptable, why not just allow", "& sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding", "which content must be removed to make the answer acceptable", "the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed", "of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here", "of this community with respect to duplicate content in an", "answer as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase", "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically", "clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to the", "expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded", "by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that", "--- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why", "of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the", "suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach for", "my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the", "too, of course, was backed up by sources (although less", "time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial for", "to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same", "that all of the three components of the aforementioned answer", "a role at least as significant I believe each of", "to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or", "* We know that women that faculty members generally prefer", "really just a matter of different opinions from different moderators,", "know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans", "field. For the same reason, I would be inclined to", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components of", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically,", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment", "far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe", "argument? And if either of these would be acceptable, why", "beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an", "is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to", "left out. This answer was also deleted, by the same", "remove the least relevant details of my answer and re-post", "both questions, and that leaving out just a part of", "in the very same community. But let's just assume it", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains", "about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)", "women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs", "there are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence", "details of my answer and re-post the remaining part of", "assume it isn't and the reason two different answers to", "duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion,", "not to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor", "moderators making different choices or is there a difference between", "of an answer when the content itself is fine? Or", "sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should", "ironically - have a greater gender gap * This could", "my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I", "my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different", "to rephrase the form of an answer when the content", "I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my PM,", "to only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering", "the question [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "I would be inclined to not mention race or gender", "this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator", "least relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining", "over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted?", "greater gender gap * This could be at least partially", "minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer", "Context I recently updated my answer to the question [Do", "answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do", "- rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed", "that is not presented in the other answers and in", "know that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants", "with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain", "to pretty much make the same argument? And if either", "a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at", "to this message by explaining that in both cases I", "answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and that", "standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for", "Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are women", "need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the", "answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident", "fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains", "of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I", "realized that all of the three components of the aforementioned", "black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up", "to have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do", "women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male", "Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide", "duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to", "unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by", "a very similar context in the very same community. But", "the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to", "reason two different answers to that question are deleted has", "for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "again the exact same components apply. So here, too, I", "just a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly", "greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion", "greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender", "back up this position by a lot of data, with", "differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my", "([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and", "I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I", "including the creation of jobs where only women are allowed", "was made by a moderator in a very similar context", "and [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without", "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would", "I need to find different data, different graphs & different", "remaining part of my answer as a new answer, referencing", "getting deleted? How is that fair to the members of", "of course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively).", "inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current political", "fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) ", "disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447),", "much make the same argument? And if either of these", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse", "mention my gender as a woman or my race if", "with greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater", "of my answer are equally important, due to the numerous", "answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and", "PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial", "the other answers and in general goes against the majority", "this community? Also, is there a way I can answer", "etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the", "degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question, with", "apply here as well to the same degree. So I", "it's really just a matter of including content not relevant", "to remove the least relevant details of my answer and", "the least relevant details of my answer and re-post the", "question [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "How is that fair to the members of this community?", "whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends", "would not delete my answer in this case because it", "goes against the majority view of the community\". Also, they", "my answer contains the following position : It is", "are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual", "answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to", "asked how I could answer [Why are women even less", "countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have a", "I found the question [Could it be beneficial for me", "job applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM", "my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to", "answer in this case because it \"presents a unique view", "There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of", "male applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics", "different choices or is there a difference between both cases", "just assume it isn't and the reason two different answers", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just", "question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure", "is there a way I can answer [Why are women", "using relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries", "(although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I", "\"presents a unique view that is not presented in the", "up this position by a lot of data, with graphs", "and on which grounds? How is not each of the", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that", "the reason two different answers to that question are deleted", "not presented in the other answers and in general goes", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized", "I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent", "This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No", "cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why are", "to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision", "of jobs where only women are allowed to apply ", "different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some", "part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the", "do with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone", "relevant enough to the question, which content must be removed", "- ironically - have a greater gender gap This", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community with", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of", "to the question [Do all countries have the same gender", "same time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial", "They told me that normally they would \"just delete the", "European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous", "was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this", "that the deletion of my answer to [Why are women", "rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it", "three components of my answer are equally important, due to", "answer when the content itself is fine? Or if it's", "question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "allow the answer as it was? Why all the hassle", "without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find", "detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting", "the details that were left out. This answer was also", "answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer as", "role at least as significant I believe each of the", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that", "of my answer to [Why are women even less represented", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less", "community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of", "told me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate", "why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do all", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer", "removed to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds?", "of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear", "important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about", "the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not", "post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer", "partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\"" ]
[ "here that questions about the academic side of research are", "on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: ", "mean things like: Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like", "is appropriate for academics and these questions may be more", "actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of", "the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the", "approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts", "partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual", "of interest * How to handle intellectual property and business", "on topic. On one hand, they are related to academic", "appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration, rather", "site is appropriate for academics and these questions may be", "* Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval", "hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for academics", "academic side of research are on topic. However, are questions", "for people with professional experience in research administration, rather than", "on topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic?", "I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things", "grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB", "guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants ", "interest How to handle intellectual property and business interests", "regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting", "for academics and these questions may be more appropriate for", "However, are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research", "academics and these questions may be more appropriate for people", "Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal", "this site is appropriate for academics and these questions may", "On the other hand, the Help says this site is", "Help says this site is appropriate for academics and these", "costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications", "or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and", "about the academic side of research are on topic. However,", "with professional experience in research administration, rather than academics themselves.", "whether these are on topic. On one hand, they are", "and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side", "topic. On one hand, they are related to academic research.", "I think it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers", "Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process", "* How to handle intellectual property and business interests that", "clear to me whether these are on topic. On one", "standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest ", "questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of research", "and conflicts of interest How to handle intellectual property", "federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications * The", "appropriate for academics and these questions may be more appropriate", "to me whether these are on topic. On one hand,", "It's less clear to me whether these are on topic.", "side of research are on topic. However, are questions about", "the academic side of research are on topic. However, are", "* The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry", "for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications ", "think it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here", "that questions about the academic side of research are on", "people with professional experience in research administration, rather than academics", " Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for", "like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing", "the Help says this site is appropriate for academics and", "administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like:", "things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or", "Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to", "questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I", "research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things", "research. On the other hand, the Help says this site", "uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants", "On one hand, they are related to academic research. On", "are on topic. However, are questions about research administration on", "and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest", "questions may be more appropriate for people with professional experience", "and these questions may be more appropriate for people with", "preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards", "grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards ", "intellectual property and business interests that stem from research It's", "be more appropriate for people with professional experience in research", "less clear to me whether these are on topic. On", "these are on topic. On one hand, they are related", "By \"research administration\" I mean things like: Interpreting uniform", "topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting", "are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\"", "about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean", "clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions", "it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that", "to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from", "these questions may be more appropriate for people with professional", "related to academic research. On the other hand, the Help", "process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of", "questions about the academic side of research are on topic.", "industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle", "of research are on topic. However, are questions about research", "topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic? By", "IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and", "and business interests that stem from research It's less clear", "Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic", "from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about", "academic research. On the other hand, the Help says this", "research are on topic. However, are questions about research administration", "says this site is appropriate for academics and these questions", "business interests that stem from research It's less clear to", "from research It's less clear to me whether these are", "applications * The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing", "are on topic. On one hand, they are related to", "to academic research. On the other hand, the Help says", "me whether these are on topic. On one hand, they", "the other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate", "conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual property and", "more appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration,", "may be more appropriate for people with professional experience in", "research It's less clear to me whether these are on", "How to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem", "like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs", "allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant", "one hand, they are related to academic research. On the", "interests that stem from research It's less clear to me", "things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed", "that stem from research It's less clear to me whether", "handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from research", "they are related to academic research. On the other hand,", "stem from research It's less clear to me whether these", "hand, they are related to academic research. On the other", "are related to academic research. On the other hand, the", "\"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance", "property and business interests that stem from research It's less", "administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding", "* Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How", "The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships", "other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for" ]
[ "left the question with only a few words left. A", "like to get it deleted. In the question I have", "am unable to do so since a person already answered", "found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to", "I have posted a question a few months ago and", "so since a person already answered to it. I have", "have been told that there have been some similarities found", "A moderator has edited my question and added all my", "similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried", "[Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the question", "been told that there have been some similarities found using", "only a few words left. A moderator has edited my", "tried to delete the question but I am unable to", "the question I have posted my own opinion and views", "left. A moderator has edited my question and added all", "person already answered to it. I have edited the post", "I have been told that there have been some similarities", "question a few months ago and I would like to", "some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have", "edited my question and added all my text back and", "months ago and I would like to get it deleted.", "that I have used in an essay. I have been", "In the question I have posted my own opinion and", "the question but I am unable to do so since", "unable to do so since a person already answered to", "I have posted my own opinion and views that I", "and added all my text back and locked the question.", "been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I", "deleted. In the question I have posted my own opinion", "used in an essay. I have been told that there", "text back and locked the question. I was wondering how", "with only a few words left. A moderator has edited", "have tried to delete the question but I am unable", "essay. I have been told that there have been some", "using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete", "few words left. A moderator has edited my question and", "service and I have tried to delete the question but", "in an essay. I have been told that there have", "and I have tried to delete the question but I", "I would like to get it deleted. In the question", "and view that I have written and left the question", "a person already answered to it. I have edited the", "it deleted. In the question I have posted my own", "have used in an essay. I have been told that", "and left the question with only a few words left.", "locked the question. I was wondering how can I delete", "I have edited the post and removed my opinion and", "my own opinion and views that I have used in", "question. I was wondering how can I delete such question.", "opinion and view that I have written and left the", "that I have written and left the question with only", "it. I have edited the post and removed my opinion", "moderator has edited my question and added all my text", "question and added all my text back and locked the", "post and removed my opinion and view that I have", "answered to it. I have edited the post and removed", "the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the", "edited the post and removed my opinion and view that", "to delete the question but I am unable to do", "question with only a few words left. A moderator has", "and locked the question. I was wondering how can I", "to do so since a person already answered to it.", "question but I am unable to do so since a", "have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and", "a few words left. A moderator has edited my question", "opinion and views that I have used in an essay.", "ago and I would like to get it deleted. In", "removed my opinion and view that I have written and", "to it. I have edited the post and removed my", "but I am unable to do so since a person", "posted my own opinion and views that I have used", "delete the question but I am unable to do so", "and removed my opinion and view that I have written", "all my text back and locked the question. I was", "I am unable to do so since a person already", "and I would like to get it deleted. In the", "my opinion and view that I have written and left", "a few months ago and I would like to get", "words left. A moderator has edited my question and added", "has edited my question and added all my text back", "back and locked the question. I was wondering how can", "own opinion and views that I have used in an", "that there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/)", "my text back and locked the question. I was wondering", "and views that I have used in an essay. I", "the question with only a few words left. A moderator", "I have tried to delete the question but I am", "I have written and left the question with only a", "an essay. I have been told that there have been", "there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service", "written and left the question with only a few words", "question I have posted my own opinion and views that", "a question a few months ago and I would like", "view that I have written and left the question with", "posted a question a few months ago and I would", "do so since a person already answered to it. I", "get it deleted. In the question I have posted my", "since a person already answered to it. I have edited", "my question and added all my text back and locked", "added all my text back and locked the question. I", "I have used in an essay. I have been told", "few months ago and I would like to get it", "have edited the post and removed my opinion and view", "to get it deleted. In the question I have posted", "the post and removed my opinion and view that I", "told that there have been some similarities found using the", "would like to get it deleted. In the question I", "views that I have used in an essay. I have", "have posted my own opinion and views that I have", "already answered to it. I have edited the post and", "have written and left the question with only a few", "have posted a question a few months ago and I", "the question. I was wondering how can I delete such" ]
[ "is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well", "unwarranted, given that this community has well received many other,", "salary in various parts of the world, and I would", "think that the closure of the above questions is unfair", "other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being", "hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think", "factors. I think that the closure of the above questions", "given that this community has well received many other, even", "a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer", "[this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for", "treat in a uniform way certain types of questions. A", "and I would like to encourage everyone to treat in", "a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal", "much salary should I expect as a professor of computer", "about salary in various parts of the world, and I", "has well received many other, even much broader, questions about", "A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should", "I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much", "certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD", "been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on", "parts of the world, and I would like to encourage", "Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058)", "[How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow", "non-salary income do computer science professors make in the United", "my PhD how much salary should I expect as a", "the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much", "postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the", "in a uniform way certain types of questions. A few", "individual factors. I think that the closure of the above", "make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at European universities](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28/20058)", "income do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058)", "broader, questions about salary in various parts of the world,", "uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After", "examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I expect", "like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way", "income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income", "[What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How", "much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in", "of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do", "much non-salary income do computer science professors make in the", "many other, even much broader, questions about salary in various", "the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America", "questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has", "of the world, and I would like to encourage everyone", "Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german", "everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types of", "on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I", "put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors.", "[After my PhD how much salary should I expect as", "various parts of the world, and I would like to", "would like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform", "to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being strongly", "W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science", "questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary", "encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types", "North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of", "[How much non-salary income do computer science professors make in", "received many other, even much broader, questions about salary in", "of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much", "the closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted,", "much broader, questions about salary in various parts of the", "and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2", "recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual", "on individual factors. I think that the closure of the", "and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold", "should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How", "fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net", "have been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent", "is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North", "above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community", "computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a", "in various parts of the world, and I would like", "the world, and I would like to encourage everyone to", "computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115512/20058) and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on", "that this community has well received many other, even much", "PhD how much salary should I expect as a professor", "of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of", "America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a", "unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well received", "in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income", "well received many other, even much broader, questions about salary", "do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic", "few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I", "for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that", "science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at", "community has well received many other, even much broader, questions", "of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that", "types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how", "professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary", "german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors", "closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given", "expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is", "how much salary should I expect as a professor of", "strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure", "salary should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058)", "world, and I would like to encourage everyone to treat", "this community has well received many other, even much broader,", "other, even much broader, questions about salary in various parts", "I would like to encourage everyone to treat in a", "to treat in a uniform way certain types of questions.", "salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western", "even much broader, questions about salary in various parts of", "normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and", "the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral", "dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure of", "being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the", "a uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples:", "professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at European", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors make", "net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary", "that the closure of the above questions is unfair and", "as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the", "I think that the closure of the above questions is", "and unwarranted, given that this community has well received many", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115512/20058) and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put", "way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my", "of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058)", "questions about salary in various parts of the world, and", "a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's" ]
[ "got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a", "I think all of them got deleted. I have no", "know how to explain what type of answer will help", "and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither", "they do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy", "knowledge that I don't have from which they can figure", "what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research)", "help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the", "worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste", "that it would waste so much time more heavily researching", "worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they", "never know for sure whether a question is worthy of", "wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible", "I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically,", "ask a good question on this site. I'm not a", "detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good question.", "and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a", "the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+", "when somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're", "it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting", "good question. I don't really know how to explain what", "to ask a good question on this site. I'm not", "read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What", "teaching me how to ask a good question. I don't", "explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody", "I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and", "that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it", "they can figure out how to ask a good question.", "sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when", "deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty sure", "this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge", "ask a good question. I read [How do I ask", "[How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics", "answer teaching me how to ask a good question. I", "for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and", "to explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe", "a question, they do it because they're pretty sure that", "from which they can figure out how to ask a", "for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got", "like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a", "that I don't have from which they can figure out", "topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them", "out how to ask a good question. I read [How", "have from which they can figure out how to ask", "I asked a few questions on this website and I", "here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like", "I don't really know how to explain what type of", "me how to ask a good question. I don't really", "me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question", "users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know", "pretty sure that it would waste so much time more", "no idea how to ask a good question on this", "how to ask a good question. I read [How do", "I have no idea how to ask a good question", "it would waste so much time more heavily researching whether", "how to ask a good question on this site. I'm", "(accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe", "deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do it", "a good question on this site. I'm not a researcher.", "question. I don't really know how to explain what type", "deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so much", "ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I", "Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me how", "Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which", "would waste so much time more heavily researching whether that", "have knowledge that I don't have from which they can", "and I think all of them got deleted. I have", "all of them got deleted. I have no idea how", "of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's", "a good question. I read [How do I ask a", "deleted. I have no idea how to ask a good", "how to explain what type of answer will help me.", "and pretty sure that it would waste so much time", "which they can figure out how to ask a good", "[Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I", "not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't", "neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed", "really know how to explain what type of answer will", "sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that", "good question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe", "explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for", "because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and", "I don't have from which they can figure out how", "few questions on this website and I think all of", "much time more heavily researching whether that question is worthy", "question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a", "have no idea how to ask a good question on", "of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so", "a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have", "and when somebody deletes a question, they do it because", "math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked", "answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong", "sure that it would waste so much time more heavily", "to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people", "idea how to ask a good question on this site.", "asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure", "is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question,", "useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that", "somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty", "so much time more heavily researching whether that question is", "ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask", "would like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask", "asked a few questions on this website and I think", "Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is", "of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do", "they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty", "website and I think all of them got deleted. I", "ask a good question. I don't really know how to", "question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users)", "more heavily researching whether that question is worthy of deleting.", "deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a question", "to ask a good question. I don't really know how", "them got deleted. I have no idea how to ask", "don't have from which they can figure out how to", "10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never", "think all of them got deleted. I have no idea", "know for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting,", "a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes", "this website and I think all of them got deleted.", "pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure", "to ask a good question. I read [How do I", "with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to", "that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether", "them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching", "on this website and I think all of them got", "can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped.", "somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math", "people never know for sure whether a question is worthy", "will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with", "of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer", "helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me", "on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have", "of them got deleted. I have no idea how to", "figure out how to ask a good question. I read", "question. I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask)", "a few questions on this website and I think all", "good question. I read [How do I ask a good", "a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about", "whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody", "researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which they", "non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted.", "a good question. I don't really know how to explain", "do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can", "questions on this website and I think all of them", "question, they do it because they're pretty sure that it's", "site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that", "do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of", "got deleted. I have no idea how to ask a", "type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain", "waste so much time more heavily researching whether that question", "about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would", "a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good", "time more heavily researching whether that question is worthy of", "how to ask a good question. I don't really know", "I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I", "could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful", "I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for", "it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would", "I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I", "question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers", "researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from", "I would like a detailed answer teaching me how to", "Maybe people never know for sure whether a question is", "don't really know how to explain what type of answer", "[What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of", "can figure out how to ask a good question. I", "question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and", "good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could" ]
[ "established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation", "courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you.", "the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those", "responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question)", "duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar question", "you. I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).”", "of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate", "I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your", "to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This", "Finally, I want to thank all the other community members", "some day you will understand that we all go to", "labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years ago", "joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those in", "will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect", "their voice, I would like you to ask yourself the", "your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs", "all the other community members who lifted me up or", "for humanity. You have to reach a certain level of", "and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your", "we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances.", "@Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to reach", "experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is", "to thank all the other community members who lifted me", "have the courage to raise their voice, I would like", "Yes, science works for you but that does not devaluate", "circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but that", "will understand that we all go to processes in which", "community members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback.", "not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are", "practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to", "improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to", "sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as", "quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled", "fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one", "benefits how my work is received? I really hope, one", "lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives", "downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their voice,", "practices work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current", "does not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope,", "criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices work", "question) current practices in science. Current practices work for those", "do not work for minorities like me, and practising science", "I also hope, some day you will understand that we", "experience the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting", "or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I", "costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have", "first: • I am working in an established research group?", "quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I especially", "affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not work", "and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have", "are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple", "want to thank all the other community members who lifted", "established research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities", "not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to", "These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or", "will experience the joy of being generous, the joy of", "your quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain", "the experience of others. I also hope, some day you", "work for minorities like me, and practising science comes at", "working in an established research group? • Does my group’s", "high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants", "also hope, some day you will understand that we all", "those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage", "hope, one day you will experience the joy of being", "group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received?", "I am working in an established research group? • Does", "Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for", "a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted", "to ask yourself the following questions first: • I am", "of influence. Yes, science works for you but that does", "minorities like me, and practising science comes at high personal", "• Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my", "understand that we all go to processes in which we", "my questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally,", "one of my questions, which many would see as a", "those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage", "for your sincere response to one of my questions, which", "also do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new)", "like you to ask yourself the following questions first: •", "for you but that does not devaluate the experience of", "which many would see as a rant. Finally, I want", "This is a necessity for human growth. I especially want", "group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how", "generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle of", "that we all go to processes in which we search", "quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain level", "not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human", "Current practices work for those affiliated to established research groups.", "how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge", "@Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness.", "to reach a certain level of experience to practise such", "are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current", "it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an", "sincere response to one of my questions, which many would", "have to reach a certain level of experience to practise", "go to processes in which we search for how relate", "received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also", "devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some day", "work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises", "search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for", "reach a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom.", "hope, some day you will understand that we all go", "who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your", "will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815", "I really hope, one day you will experience the joy", "was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that", "too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I", "especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty", "truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You", "for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity.", "criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise", "an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do", "judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth.", "couple of years ago a similar question was asked. These", "comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or", "would like you to ask yourself the following questions first:", "hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my posts.", "in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you", "(…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of", "those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for", "others. I also hope, some day you will understand that", "experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet", "I am not there yet but I promise I will", "at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting", "question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions", "your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy", "do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants", "or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years", "is received? I really hope, one day you will experience", "posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere questions", "Current practises do not work for minorities like me, and", "many would see as a rant. Finally, I want to", "circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity", "ago a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly", "closed my account and it will be effectuated within 24", "or provided useful feedback. May your lives and careers prosper.", "for your quest for humanity. You have to reach a", "for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science", "honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like", "righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember your", "to raise their voice, I would like you to ask", "or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their", "my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is", "I would like you to ask yourself the following questions", "of others. I also hope, some day you will understand", "and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I", "your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but", "you will understand that we all go to processes in", "that does not devaluate the experience of others. I also", "mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices", "yet but I promise I will shepherd those in my", "of being generous, the joy of lifting those in your", "how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or", "practising science comes at high personal costs. For those personally", "practises do not work for minorities like me, and practising", "attack on my posts. I also do not like how", "following questions first: • I am working in an established", "experience of others. I also hope, some day you will", "like me, and practising science comes at high personal costs.", "me, and practising science comes at high personal costs. For", "ask yourself the following questions first: • I am working", "you to ask yourself the following questions first: • I", "received? I really hope, one day you will experience the", "be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal", "but I promise I will shepherd those in my care.", "certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am", "a duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar", "see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all", "in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and", "“do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response", "my account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours.", "on my posts. I also do not like how quickly", "groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like me,", "for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not", "like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted", "of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there", "ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest", "up or provided useful feedback. May your lives and careers", "of my questions, which many would see as a rant.", "for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement.", "which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and", "effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack", "lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works", "years ago a similar question was asked. These responses are", "response to one of my questions, which many would see", "of years ago a similar question was asked. These responses", "similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at", "the other community members who lifted me up or provided", "and practising science comes at high personal costs. For those", "like you. I will remember your response: “do not fear", "a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I", "works for you but that does not devaluate the experience", "is a necessity for human growth. I especially want to", "personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who", "Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work", "how my work is received? I really hope, one day", "asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise", "supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I really", "I want to thank all the other community members who", "research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like", "being generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle", "search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do", "personal attack on my posts. I also do not like", "believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will", "to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but", "processes in which we search for how relate ourselves to", "in which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences", "thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search", "for human growth. I especially want to thank some participants.", "reputation benefits how my work is received? I really hope,", "wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise I", "am not there yet but I promise I will shepherd", "because a couple of years ago a similar question was", "yourself the following questions first: • I am working in", "the joy of lifting those in your circle of influence.", "participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth", "personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to", "For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the", "to established research groups. Current practises do not work for", "indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do not", "of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science", "a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other", "one day you will experience the joy of being generous,", "want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and", "the courage to raise their voice, I would like you", "to processes in which we search for how relate ourselves", "humanity. You have to reach a certain level of experience", "24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my", "needs people like you. I will remember your response: “do", "brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people", "an established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s", "science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established research", "joy of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes,", "@Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and", "not there yet but I promise I will shepherd those", "participants who have the courage to raise their voice, I", "targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in", "growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for", "my work is received? I really hope, one day you", "your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your", "research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits", "promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for", "in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established", "in an established research group? • Does my group’s or", "those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not", "your sincere response to one of my questions, which many", "and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received", "in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember", "science works for you but that does not devaluate the", "will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal", "and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a", "other community members who lifted me up or provided useful", "to one of my questions, which many would see as", "that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices", "work is received? I really hope, one day you will", "for minorities like me, and practising science comes at high", "some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for", "my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe", "rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other community", "at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science.", "necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank some", "for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do", "questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a", "• I am working in an established research group? •", "a couple of years ago a similar question was asked.", "science comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising", "my posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere", "am working in an established research group? • Does my", "practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but I", "within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on", "as a duplicate because a couple of years ago a", "day you will understand that we all go to processes", "we all go to processes in which we search for", "relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too", "a necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank", "raise their voice, I would like you to ask yourself", "Science needs people like you. I will remember your response:", ". @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my", "really hope, one day you will experience the joy of", "I promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist", "response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere", "you but that does not devaluate the experience of others.", "remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for", "questions first: • I am working in an established research", "day you will experience the joy of being generous, the", "@user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my questions,", "(or question) current practices in science. Current practices work for", "shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty,", "courage to raise their voice, I would like you to", "me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives and", "level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not", "ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly.", "I received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I", "the following questions first: • I am working in an", "honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for", "there yet but I promise I will shepherd those in", "voice, I would like you to ask yourself the following", "all go to processes in which we search for how", "human growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure", "(new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because", "questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally, I", "I closed my account and it will be effectuated within", "I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” .", "as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the", "who have the courage to raise their voice, I would", "such wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise", "care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in", "you will experience the joy of being generous, the joy", "members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May", "I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your", "would see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank", "but that does not devaluate the experience of others. I", "You have to reach a certain level of experience to", "current practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated", "thank all the other community members who lifted me up", "not work for minorities like me, and practising science comes", "questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current", "downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of", "people like you. I will remember your response: “do not", "I also do not like how quickly sincere questions of", "account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I", "influence. Yes, science works for you but that does not", "to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing", "participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a", "not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some" ]
[ "and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions", "specify their field in the question. Or something like that.", "a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not,", "the conference is in Computer Science, or one of the", "not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related", "of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a", ":-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science -", "appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this", "something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of", "idea to specify their field in the question. Or something", "Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this", "all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if", "their field in the question. Or something like that. If", "like that. If people think this is a good idea,", "is in Computer Science, or one of the other fields,", "wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question.", "often a good idea to specify their field in the", "Science, or one of the other fields, that takes conferences", "takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus", "someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and", "If people think this is a good idea, could someone", "something like that. If people think this is a good", "good idea to specify their field in the question. Or", "it becomes important to know if the conference is in", "I was thus thinking we should put something in the", "venue. I was thus thinking we should put something in", "Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that takes", "thus thinking we should put something in the tag wiki,", "think this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate", "important to know if the conference is in Computer Science,", "question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science", "some large portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes", "users of the conference tag, that it is often a", "is often a good idea to specify their field in", "in Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that", "conference tag, that it is often a good idea to", "downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about", "wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag, that", "should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to", "Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please,", "publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put something", "the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference", "to know if the conference is in Computer Science, or", "is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If", "questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if the", "if the conference is in Computer Science, or one of", "the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication", "as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should", "that. If people think this is a good idea, could", "or one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously", "thinking we should put something in the tag wiki, to", "large portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important", "to users of the conference tag, that it is often", "follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to", "to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make", "good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow", "could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices", "On some large portion of all questions about conferences, it", "was thus thinking we should put something in the tag", "recommend to users of the conference tag, that it is", "in the question. Or something like that. If people think", "of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know", "tag, that it is often a good idea to specify", "becomes important to know if the conference is in Computer", "tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag,", "conference is in Computer Science, or one of the other", "one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as", "conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference is", "question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make it explicit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/517/questions-about-computer-science-please-make-it-explicit)", "this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording?", "If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-)", "about conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference", "the conference tag, that it is often a good idea", "other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue.", "to recommend to users of the conference tag, that it", "seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we", "that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was", "Or something like that. If people think this is a", "put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users", "of the conference tag, that it is often a good", "field in the question. Or something like that. If people", "the question. Or something like that. If people think this", "suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote", "this question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make it", "in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the", "fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I", "question. Or something like that. If people think this is", "to specify their field in the question. Or something like", "it is often a good idea to specify their field", "practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question", "know if the conference is in Computer Science, or one", "a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put", "conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking", "people think this is a good idea, could someone suggest", "that it is often a good idea to specify their", "idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta", "portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to", "this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer", "a good idea to specify their field in the question.", "we should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend" ]
[ "was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA", "popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have", "Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers (on", "after USA and China. But, produces way more as compared", "terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with my", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this:", "past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than", "produces way more as compared to its population size). Also,", "the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565)", "papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China. But,", "large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a", "of its past empire, it has a large follower, probably", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with", "compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the", "most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was closed", "is world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd", "so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible", "destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good number", "in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And,", "follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of population.", "systems. Both have a good number of followers. For instance", "it with this: [How does the admissions process work for", "with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in", "has a large follower, probably larger than the USA in", "USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong", "UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the", "and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK", "are two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does", "compare it with this: [How does the admissions process work", "producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and", "this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am", "while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK", "two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "UK is world leader in producing research papers (on the", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan,", "and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world", "China. But, produces way more as compared to its population", "number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore,", "good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea,", "understanding why the former was closed while the later one", "votes. USA and UK are two big and popular higher", "on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with", "part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research", "way more as compared to its population size). Also, because", "Also, because of its past empire, it has a large", "China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British", "Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies", "more as compared to its population size). Also, because of", "its population size). Also, because of its past empire, it", "See this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems.", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for", "with this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "the former was closed while the later one bagged 110", "bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big and", "110 votes. USA and UK are two big and popular", "it has a large follower, probably larger than the USA", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so", "UK are two big and popular higher education destinations with", "world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position", "research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China.", "in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions", "USA and China. But, produces way more as compared to", "colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}.", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding", "the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are", "UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part", "compared to its population size). Also, because of its past", "Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former", "and UK are two big and popular higher education destinations", "3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way more", "in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA", "closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not", "the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way", "slightly different systems. Both have a good number of followers.", "I am not understanding why the former was closed while", "Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals,", "empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than the", "of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers", "Both have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland,", "work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak", "and China. But, produces way more as compared to its", "a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China,", "its past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger", "of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with my question?", "have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada,", "USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and", "for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or", "and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and", "And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions process", "followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and", "[How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on},", "as compared to its population size). Also, because of its", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is", "one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big", "not understanding why the former was closed while the later", "British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of", "Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and", "and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK,", "with slightly different systems. Both have a good number of", "different systems. Both have a good number of followers. For", "than the USA in terms of population. So, What is", "Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline", "and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most", "education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good", "size). Also, because of its past empire, it has a", "to its population size). Also, because of its past empire,", "later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two", "programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565)", "probably larger than the USA in terms of population. So,", "former was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes.", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "am not understanding why the former was closed while the", "the USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally", "why the former was closed while the later one bagged", "because of its past empire, it has a large follower,", "a large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms", "(on the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces", "USA and UK are two big and popular higher education", "population size). Also, because of its past empire, it has", "position after USA and China. But, produces way more as", "But, produces way more as compared to its population size).", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [*How", "larger than the USA in terms of population. So, What" ]
[ "to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's", "If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\",", "one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on", "live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this", "place for feedback. As you may notice, there are some", "feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique design", "are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements", "this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to", "design elements like voting arrows and tags that are being", "to for the full background). Thanks so much for your", "theme and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks", "bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This is", "themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for the", "of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post:", "within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On", "Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the", "need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this", "read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new", "older theme until the site is live for everyone (note,", "to go into effect). What type of feedback do we", "everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to go", "help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design", "Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback.", "Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes)", "to revert to the older theme until the site is", "in a difficult position of needing to make the site", "you may notice, there are some unique design elements like", "to be done within the [limits of the new unified", "want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like,", "is live for everyone (note, it will take a few", "ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're", "answers below. --- As part of implementing the new unified", "testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to", "nav or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding", "themes for each site. As of today, we have enabled", "As of today, we have enabled your updated site theme", "it links to for the full background). Thanks so much", "### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav", "to the theme design and how we have mapped the", "unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that are", "sites too complex and, while we're very sad to see", "and tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping", "each site. As of today, we have enabled your updated", "issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we have", "additional feedback, please feel free to add to the answers", "the site is live for everyone (note, it will take", "Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's additional", "we have mapped the old theme to the new. This", "now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from", "have mapped the old theme to the new. This needs", "or the overall approach we are taking to theming, then", "site. As of today, we have enabled your updated site", "that will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed", "\"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on the", "in.* You can uncheck the box to revert to the", "it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get", "for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to", "make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a", "heck are you talking about?\", then you should read the", "add to the answers below. --- As part of implementing", "Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can", "today, we have enabled your updated site theme for testing.", "theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right", "in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how", "[Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What", "new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are", "detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the", "site theme for testing. If you can't see it right", "more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What", "do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the", "elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the", "to address feature requests and bugs that will make your", "You can uncheck the box to revert to the older", "to opt in. You can uncheck the box to revert", "opt in.* You can uncheck the box to revert to", "check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn", "them go, we're in a difficult position of needing to", "taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is", "themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you", "arrows and tags that are being standardized in this process.", "What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck", "layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your", "you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd", "some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that", "for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we", "themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme for", "to add to the answers below. --- As part of", "related to this site's design elements Please help us look", "the older theme until the site is live for everyone", "for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process.", "This will turn on the new theme for all sites", "site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related", "the left nav or the overall approach we are taking", "requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better.", "theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left", "I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta", "will take a few minutes to go into effect). What", "being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes", "and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This", "for your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback,", "on how to opt in.* You can uncheck the box", "the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta", "custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too", "site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for", "post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you may", "process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain", "this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to", "here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This", "site themes for each site. As of today, we have", "and, while we're very sad to see them go, we're", "the posts it links to for the full background). Thanks", "This needs to be done within the [limits of the", "Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site", "continue to address feature requests and bugs that will make", "a few minutes to go into effect). What type of", "maybe the posts it links to for the full background).", "then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled", "so that we can continue to address feature requests and", "maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very sad", "can uncheck the box to revert to the older theme", "and how we have mapped the old theme to the", "theme for all sites that have one in testing, including", "feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience", "how we have mapped the old theme to the new.", "Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming", "while we're very sad to see them go, we're in", "gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site. As", "makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex and,", "[this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for", "designs work together so that we can continue to address", "your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta", "theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the left", "position of needing to make the site designs work together", "General concerns about left nav or theming If you have", "of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it", "the full background). Thanks so much for your constructive feedback!", "rolling out updated site themes for each site. As of", "Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme", "theme to the new. This needs to be done within", "for testing. If you can't see it right now, that's", "to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very", "the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General", "that we can continue to address feature requests and bugs", "about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post", "do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related", "our ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while", "links to for the full background). Thanks so much for", "right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback", "- the theme and layout is now live for everyone.", "this site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs", "feedback, please feel free to add to the answers below.", "addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want", "theme design and how we have mapped the old theme", "will turn on the new theme for all sites that", "address feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A", "that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you", "like to review it, here's how: How do I enable", "implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually", "the box to revert to the older theme until the", "new theme for all sites that have one in testing,", "the new theme for all sites that have one in", "rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to", "network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to", "Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As", "design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling", "all sites that have one in testing, including this one.", "us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and", "the site designs work together so that we can continue", "mapped the old theme to the new. This needs to", "post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe", "like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in", "you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or", "new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns", "have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you", "------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\"", "[more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in.* You can uncheck", "your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please", "theme for testing. If you can't see it right now,", "old theme to the new. This needs to be done", "post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help", "look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how", "few minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback", "is the right place for feedback. As you may notice,", "to the new. This needs to be done within the", "below. --- As part of implementing the new unified themes", "it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review", "too complex and, while we're very sad to see them", "before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like", "is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you", "to see them go, we're in a difficult position of", "the answers below. --- As part of implementing the new", "concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the overall", "revert to the older theme until the site is live", "enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test", "this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in.", "effect). What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ###", "have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the", "are some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags", "What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On", "the theme and layout is now live for everyone. -------------------------------------------------------", "in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability", "a difficult position of needing to make the site designs", "if you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If", "updated site theme for testing. If you can't see it", "that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom", "If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to", "needs to be done within the [limits of the new", "should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of", "overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta", "--------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this site's", "[Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option.", "new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out", "tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these", "have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes)", "you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're", "info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can uncheck the", "new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links", "for all sites that have one in testing, including this", "left nav or theming If you have concerns or issues", "left nav or the overall approach we are taking to", "box to revert to the older theme until the site", "--- As part of implementing the new unified themes across", "one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You", "that have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more", "by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before", "in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free", "the sites too complex and, while we're very sad to", "out updated site themes for each site. As of today,", "of implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're", "now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in", "------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's", "get feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone", "everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If", "until the site is live for everyone (note, it will", "approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack", "is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback", "the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on", "better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta)", "in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more", "network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each", "work together so that we can continue to address feature", "unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated", "If you can't see it right now, that's by design!", "### On this post: Bugs related to this site's design", "then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place", "how to opt in. You can uncheck the box to", "minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback do", "Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If you", "hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it out", "see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to", "On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or", "there are some unique design elements like voting arrows and", "be done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes).", "are you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta", "permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how: How", "live for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes", "like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you", "Update - the theme and layout is now live for", "site designs work together so that we can continue to", "we can continue to address feature requests and bugs that", "can't see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping", "to make the site designs work together so that we", "As part of implementing the new unified themes across the", "right place for feedback. As you may notice, there are", "including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt", "for feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique", "As you may notice, there are some unique design elements", "standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our", "We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it", "the heck are you talking about?\", then you should read", "type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this", "On this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements", "you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout", "concerns about left nav or theming If you have concerns", "---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking", "difficult position of needing to make the site designs work", "are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness)", "to review it, here's how: How do I enable it?", "Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help us", "make the site designs work together so that we can", "entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the", "you'd like to review it, here's how: How do I", "will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in", "Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If", "from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If", "there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to the", "of needing to make the site designs work together so", "we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange", "sad to see them go, we're in a difficult position", "related to the theme design and how we have mapped", "This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if", "you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then", "about left nav or theming If you have concerns or", "we have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If", "complex and, while we're very sad to see them go,", "together so that we can continue to address feature requests", "voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in this", "(and maybe the posts it links to for the full", "design and how we have mapped the old theme to", "may notice, there are some unique design elements like voting", "the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling", "site is live for everyone (note, it will take a", "test new themes\" option. This will turn on the new", "the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network", "Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you", "issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach we", "[Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts", "Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new", "see them go, we're in a difficult position of needing", "done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ###", "and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will", "(note, it will take a few minutes to go into", "enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you can't", "talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange", "we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site.", "elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex", "themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site", "feel free to add to the answers below. --- As", "unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about", "for the full background). Thanks so much for your constructive", "you can't see it right now, that's by design! We're", "notice, there are some unique design elements like voting arrows", "it will take a few minutes to go into effect).", "into effect). What type of feedback do we need? ---------------------------------", "and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for", "to the answers below. --- As part of implementing the", "feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently.", "Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes?", "updated site themes for each site. As of today, we", "this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please", "out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it,", "design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to", "you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack", "the old theme to the new. This needs to be", "feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs", "free to add to the answers below. --- As part", "the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for", "here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences)", "the theme design and how we have mapped the old", "uncheck the box to revert to the older theme until", "testing. If you can't see it right now, that's by", "the overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this", "\"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you should", "across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes", "how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and", "turn on the new theme for all sites that have", "to the older theme until the site is live for", "nav or the overall approach we are taking to theming,", "it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new", "option. This will turn on the new theme for all", "can continue to address feature requests and bugs that will", "feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel", "or issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach", "new themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme", "sites that have one in testing, including this one. Here's", "If you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav", "to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the", "theme until the site is live for everyone (note, it", "your updated site theme for testing. If you can't see", "the right place for feedback. As you may notice, there", "take a few minutes to go into effect). What type", "post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes? ----------------", "of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange:", "these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites", "we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to", "or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the", "everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how:", "a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail.", "please feel free to add to the answers below. ---", "[limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack", "go, we're in a difficult position of needing to make", "review it, here's how: How do I enable it? -------------------", "If you'd like to review it, here's how: How do", "very sad to see them go, we're in a difficult", "we're in a difficult position of needing to make the", "elements like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized", "experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange", "full background). Thanks so much for your constructive feedback! ----------------------------------------------", "part of implementing the new unified themes across the network,", "to this site's design elements Please help us look for", "Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and", "for each site. As of today, we have enabled your", "new. This needs to be done within the [limits of", "regarding the left nav or the overall approach we are", "it, here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click", "go into effect). What type of feedback do we need?", "needing to make the site designs work together so that", "on the new theme for all sites that have one", "to get feedback from you before rolling it out to", "Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack", "process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add", "we're very sad to see them go, we're in a", "How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check", "of today, we have enabled your updated site theme for", "posts it links to for the full background). Thanks so", "the new. This needs to be done within the [limits" ]
[ "unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy because", "there any mechanism in these forums so that this does", "in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear.", "I feel that this is a censorship strategy because the", "interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in", "flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is a", "as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a", "(and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing", "in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these", "censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums", "work for editors or have their own interest in censoring", "interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in", "show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or", "a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but", "mechanism in these forums so that this does not happen?", "clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why", "not to the liking of them. May be that those", "strategy because the question (and answers above all) are not", "is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above", "(and answers above all) are not to the liking of", "journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4", "question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments", "my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I", "all) are not to the liking of them. May be", "instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users", "censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all) are", "answers above all) are not to the liking of them.", "I have made a question very clearr (and interesting) as", "to the liking of them. May be that those people", "editors or have their own interest in censoring that question.", "and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of", "this as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship", "the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal", "or have their own interest in censoring that question. Is", "those people work for editors or have their own interest", "that those people work for editors or have their own", "them. May be that those people work for editors or", "made a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer", "but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that", "question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so that", "or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as", "feel that this is a censorship strategy because the question", "arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this", "in a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)),", "own interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism", "answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead", "question (and answers above all) are not to the liking", "that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so", "4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this", "the liking of them. May be that those people work", "publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in my", "blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel", "have made a question very clearr (and interesting) as the", "have their own interest in censoring that question. Is there", "May be that those people work for editors or have", "any mechanism in these forums so that this does not", "([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in", "users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is", "people work for editors or have their own interest in", "of them. May be that those people work for editors", "of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged", "very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show", "because the question (and answers above all) are not to", "the question (and answers above all) are not to the", "a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all)", "liking of them. May be that those people work for", "their own interest in censoring that question. Is there any", "above all) are not to the liking of them. May", "that this is a censorship strategy because the question (and", "for editors or have their own interest in censoring that", "a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and", "as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy", "Is there any mechanism in these forums so that this", "are not to the liking of them. May be that", "this is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers", "be that those people work for editors or have their", "comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv" ]
[ "unique person, has some originality even if it shares its", "be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on", "preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's", "a censorship, which does not allow new users to express", "believe every question, which is asked by unique person, has", "feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on", "which does not allow new users to express their questions", "every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is", "every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this forum,", "new in this forum, asks a question a lot of", "in order to edit its content and discuss its relevance", "The reason why I'm asking this question is that I", "is new in this forum, asks a question a lot", "will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm", "and I think it's not fair to mark every question", "I know, even this my last question will be marked", "is asked by unique person, has some originality even if", "on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I", "ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by", "forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually", "content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it", "if this my last question will be marked as duplicate", "duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced", "than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if", "answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom", "deleting my academia stackexchange account so I don't really care", "person, has some originality even if it shares its topic", "find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush", "now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as", "its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when", "even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my", "really care if this my last question will be marked", "questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is", "expressed my ideas and I don't really care if even", "question, which is asked by unique person, has some originality", "the newly posted question in order to edit its content", "I'm deleting my academia stackexchange account so I don't really", "hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc.", "happy that I just expressed my ideas and I don't", "last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will", "I think it's not fair to mark every question as", "this my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic", "a question a lot of experienced people will rush to", "questions and I think it's not fair to mark every", "as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an", "the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy", "of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather", "if even I don't receive any response because my account", "rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time", "my academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if", "people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is", "is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now", "will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed,", "and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is", "fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because", "its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I", "mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner", "my last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic.", "this my last question will be marked as duplicate or", "as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this", "why I'm asking this question is that I feel the", "discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable.", "if it shares its topic with other similar questions and", "as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or", "that I just expressed my ideas and I don't really", "user in this forum. I know, even this my last", "when it is applicable. I think this rush created a", "to edit its content and discuss its relevance and find", "will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why", "new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I", "last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The", "I don't really care if this my last question will", "of experienced people will rush to the newly posted question", "think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this", "newly posted question in order to edit its content and", "created a censorship, which does not allow new users to", "is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which", "similar questions and I think it's not fair to mark", "I think this rush created a censorship, which does not", "allow new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore,", "forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people will", "marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking", "my ideas and I don't really care if even I", "and I don't really care if even I don't receive", "this rush created a censorship, which does not allow new", "posted question in order to edit its content and discuss", "on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics,", "question in order to edit its content and discuss its", "has some originality even if it shares its topic with", "right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such", "does not allow new users to express their questions or", "as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the", "actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone,", "rush created a censorship, which does not allow new users", "lot of experienced people will rush to the newly posted", "duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even", "not fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic", "this forum. I know, even this my last question will", "off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I", "asked by unique person, has some originality even if it", "question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right", "question a lot of experienced people will rush to the", "will rush to the newly posted question in order to", "even I don't receive any response because my account will", "ideas and I don't really care if even I don't", "off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted.", "asking this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange", "specially is new in this forum, asks a question a", "closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that", "the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially", "this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than", "shares its topic with other similar questions and I think", "in this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced", "my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and", "it shares its topic with other similar questions and I", "heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing", "and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this", "off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in", "such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer", "to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every", "deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas", "his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this forum.", "I just expressed my ideas and I don't really care", "think this rush created a censorship, which does not allow", "asks a question a lot of experienced people will rush", "off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is that", "rush to the newly posted question in order to edit", "care if this my last question will be marked as", "because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this", "a lot of experienced people will rush to the newly", "or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed", "I don't really care if even I don't receive any", "academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if this", "topic with other similar questions and I think it's not", "question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be", "I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in", "question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not", "I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused", "experienced user in this forum. I know, even this my", "if someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks", "But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and", "that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily", "academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of", "duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush created", "stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this", "etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think", "is not an experienced user in this forum. I know,", "Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by unique", "even this my last question will be marked as duplicate,", "originality even if it shares its topic with other similar", "question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason", "not an experienced user in this forum. I know, even", "forum. I know, even this my last question will be", "know, even this my last question will be marked as", "this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people", "their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which", "I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and I", "questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new", "users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe", "relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think", "express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question,", "I believe every question, which is asked by unique person,", "hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just", "I don't receive any response because my account will be", "it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate or", "its topic with other similar questions and I think it's", "so I don't really care if this my last question", "not allow new users to express their questions or ideas.", "to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her", "order to edit its content and discuss its relevance and", "or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is", "edit its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates", "even if it shares its topic with other similar questions", "every question, which is asked by unique person, has some", "focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate,", "which is asked by unique person, has some originality even", "be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy", "it is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship,", "be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm", "account so I don't really care if this my last", "stackexchange account so I don't really care if this my", "censorship, which does not allow new users to express their", "questioner is not an experienced user in this forum. I", "I'm asking this question is that I feel the academia", "this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community", "think it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate", "don't really care if even I don't receive any response", "don't receive any response because my account will be deleted", "receive any response because my account will be deleted anyway.", "people will rush to the newly posted question in order", "applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which does", "or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked", "or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user", "an experienced user in this forum. I know, even this", "someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks a", "to the newly posted question in order to edit its", "in this forum. I know, even this my last question", "marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold,", "really care if even I don't receive any response because", "duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions.", "experienced people will rush to the newly posted question in", "and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But,", "don't really care if this my last question will be", "whom specially is new in this forum, asks a question", "reason why I'm asking this question is that I feel", "community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum", "some originality even if it shares its topic with other", "just expressed my ideas and I don't really care if", "care if even I don't receive any response because my", "duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question", "by unique person, has some originality even if it shares", "other similar questions and I think it's not fair to", "with other similar questions and I think it's not fair" ]
[ "other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted", "but their research is not necessarily about computers or computer", "of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack", "even know this site exists. My question is basically: if", "experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t even", "see the profile or background of people who give answers", "of academic community as a bigger entity? In other words,", "computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers", "mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in the", "a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic", "computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias", "is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would", "academic community as a bigger entity? In other words, do", "the active people here are the individuals who really care", "and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to", "is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are", "a question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical", "about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could", "not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this", "opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In other", "question on this site, it seems the active people here", "this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask", "questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason why", "why I’m asking this question is that when I see", "wondering what is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions,", "necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of", "reason why I’m asking this question is that when I", "people here are the individuals who really care about computer", "computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers", "this similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction,", "answers to the question on this site, it seems the", "on this site, it seems the active people here are", "this site, it seems the active people here are the", "lot of experienced and old professors in the academic community", "Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community as", "are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but", "site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a", "bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily", "if you would ask someone in academic community who is", "as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced", "the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their", "people who give answers to the question on this site,", "entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors", "academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot", "someone answers a question, how similar is this answer to", "how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if", "it seems the active people here are the individuals who", "this site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers", "I’m asking this question is that when I see the", "really care about computer stuffs but their research is not", "reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole", "question is that when I see the profile or background", "entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect", "basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is this", "the question on this site, it seems the active people", "background of people who give answers to the question on", "answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange", "ask someone in academic community who is not on this", "the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given", "old professors in the academic community don’t even know this", "academic community don’t even know this site exists. My question", "or problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m", "community as a bigger entity? In other words, do the", "answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone", "or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the", "of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this", "could bias the answers in a certain direction, which may", "opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users,", "the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a", "are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the", "community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of", "know this site exists. My question is basically: if someone", "which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to", "maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a certain", "of experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t", "answer if you would ask someone in academic community who", "a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here", "hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic community", "research is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So,", "the academic community don’t even know this site exists. My", "is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is", "accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic community?", "and old professors in the academic community don’t even know", "reflect the opinion of the academic community as a bigger", "certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the", "professors in the academic community don’t even know this site", "So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a", "problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking", "may not reflect the opinion of the academic community as", "the opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity.", "answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect the", "academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question is", "a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and", "this question is that when I see the profile or", "about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about", "is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe", "science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in", "not reflect the opinion of the academic community as a", "on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of", "similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you", "Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community", "whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question", "to the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity?", "the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In", "direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the academic", "similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction, which", "is that when I see the profile or background of", "seems the active people here are the individuals who really", "here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems", "the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions", "who really care about computer stuffs but their research is", "which may not reflect the opinion of the academic community", "stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers or", "don’t even know this site exists. My question is basically:", "to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in", "My question is basically: if someone answers a question, how", "do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to", "the profile or background of people who give answers to", "profile or background of people who give answers to the", "I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in", "words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers", "question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer", "the answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect", "of people who give answers to the question on this", "community? The reason why I’m asking this question is that", "active people here are the individuals who really care about", "In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the", "answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or", "The reason why I’m asking this question is that when", "answers a question, how similar is this answer to a", "answers to questions or problems of whole academic community? The", "their research is not necessarily about computers or computer science.", "or background of people who give answers to the question", "to the question on this site, it seems the active", "when I see the profile or background of people who", "percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia", "asking this question is that when I see the profile", "here are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs", "give answers to the question on this site, it seems", "bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old", "users, to the opinion of academic community as a bigger", "community don’t even know this site exists. My question is", "Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic", "what is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which", "bias the answers in a certain direction, which may not", "opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity. I", "in a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion", "a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of", "as a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers", "in the academic community don’t even know this site exists.", "individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their research", "to questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason", "the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic", "who give answers to the question on this site, it", "site, it seems the active people here are the individuals", "necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity", "would ask someone in academic community who is not on", "if someone answers a question, how similar is this answer", "a lot of experienced and old professors in the academic", "of the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean,", "someone in academic community who is not on this site?", "similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on", "to users, to the opinion of academic community as a", "given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion", "I see the profile or background of people who give", "care about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily", "exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a question,", "you would ask someone in academic community who is not", "that when I see the profile or background of people", "question is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar", "I'm wondering what is the similarity percentage of answers and" ]
[ "this forum? Because I had similar questions before but none", "posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't", "this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it", "similar questions before but none of them really received this", "amount of popularity among the academic community in this forum?", "them really received this amount of attention. I will be", "this to me or more concisely define which criteria in", "amount of attention. I will be very grateful if someone", "attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of", "which criteria in my question lead to this amount of", "very grateful if someone could explain this to me or", "the first time I didn't expect that it will receive", "forum? Because I had similar questions before but none of", "me or more concisely define which criteria in my question", "I posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I", "popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because I", "will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering", "will be very grateful if someone could explain this to", "to me or more concisely define which criteria in my", "[a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect", "time I didn't expect that it will receive this huge", "received this amount of popularity among the academic community in", "~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this", "the academic community in this forum? Because I had similar", "at the first time I didn't expect that it will", "first time I didn't expect that it will receive this", "questions before but none of them really received this amount", "grateful if someone could explain this to me or more", "criteria in my question lead to this amount of popularity.", "didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k", "Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity", "define which criteria in my question lead to this amount", "of them really received this amount of attention. I will", "12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount", "this amount of attention. I will be very grateful if", "of attention. I will be very grateful if someone could", "be very grateful if someone could explain this to me", "expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention.", "I had similar questions before but none of them really", "in this forum? Because I had similar questions before but", "of popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because", "received this amount of attention. I will be very grateful", "could explain this to me or more concisely define which", "I will be very grateful if someone could explain this", "that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now,", "or more concisely define which criteria in my question lead", "huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received", "none of them really received this amount of attention. I", "I didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~", "receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why", "among the academic community in this forum? Because I had", "Recently, I posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time", "community in this forum? Because I had similar questions before", "it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm", "wondering why it received this amount of popularity among the", "really received this amount of attention. I will be very", "if someone could explain this to me or more concisely", "someone could explain this to me or more concisely define", "more concisely define which criteria in my question lead to", "concisely define which criteria in my question lead to this", "attention. I will be very grateful if someone could explain", "explain this to me or more concisely define which criteria", "before but none of them really received this amount of", "Because I had similar questions before but none of them", "I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity among", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect that", "but none of them really received this amount of attention.", "had similar questions before but none of them really received", "it received this amount of popularity among the academic community", "why it received this amount of popularity among the academic", "which at the first time I didn't expect that it", "academic community in this forum? Because I had similar questions", "this amount of popularity among the academic community in this" ]
[ "aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked", "benefit from advice from other academics. How can you build", "such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would", "avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day,", "this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any", "too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few", "discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is", "the first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental?", "post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such conflicts", "from advice from other academics. How can you build a", "opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss", "The question has now been asked on the [main site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/118465/20058).", "Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question there", "shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that", "with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question", "your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is", "few questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both", "and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral", "if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has", "are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for", "closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping,", "first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE:", "would likely be closed for a variety of reasons -", "even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question", "- broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place", "think. But quite a few new students could benefit from", "you build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor", "a few questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors,", "for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such", "Is this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve", "could benefit from advice from other academics. How can you", "at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students", "supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is aloof", "build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from", "preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for", "given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think.", "But quite a few new students could benefit from advice", "to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom", "conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would likely", "is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been", "new students could benefit from advice from other academics. How", "from the first days, even if he/she is aloof or", "likely be closed for a variety of reasons - broad,", "with your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she", "question there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising,", "any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it,", "other academics. How can you build a strong and positive", "strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first", "he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now", "a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice", "chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite", "a few new students could benefit from advice from other", "first day, would likely be closed for a variety of", "Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and", "positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even", "for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc.", "the first day, would likely be closed for a variety", "reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable", "starting on the first day, would likely be closed for", "quite a few new students could benefit from advice from", "days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The", "arising, starting on the first day, would likely be closed", "few new students could benefit from advice from other academics.", "can you build a strong and positive relationship with your", "students could benefit from advice from other academics. How can", "academics. How can you build a strong and positive relationship", "conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A", "about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on", "on the first day, would likely be closed for a", "of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a", "day, would likely be closed for a variety of reasons", "place to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The", "from arising, starting on the first day, would likely be", "judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on the", "it, I think. But quite a few new students could", "advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I", "from other academics. How can you build a strong and", "for students and for post-docs. A question there about how", "how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the", "broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to", "NOTE: The question has now been asked on the [main", "about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs.", "A question there about how to avoid such conflicts from", "variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this", "to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first", "suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice given?", "that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too", "How can you build a strong and positive relationship with", "a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the", "be closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions,", "The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But", "a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is", "etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that and", "I think. But quite a few new students could benefit", "is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a", "there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting", "advice from other academics. How can you build a strong", "questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for", "relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even if", "for it, I think. But quite a few new students", "Quite a few questions at Academia are about conflicts with", "and for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid", "and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days,", "or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on", "students and for post-docs. A question there about how to", "ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few new", "both for students and for post-docs. A question there about" ]
[ "question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet", "spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my", "some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me", "methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded", "not help me solve my problem. I need some Academics'", "a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for", "post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a", "a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my", "Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I", "some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion)", "my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a", "my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about", "lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that", "me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on", "[is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question", "considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology", "opinion) that could not help me solve my problem. I", "Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted", "need some Academics' opinions on the matter . best regards", "have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is", "about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered", "question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but", "framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in", "help me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions", "solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the", "problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter .", "I need some Academics' opinions on the matter . best", "asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help", "a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some", "about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some", "I posted a question about my methodology for generating a", "generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking", "my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter", "could not help me solve my problem. I need some", "by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not", "irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve", "my opinion) that could not help me solve my problem.", "framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for generating", "Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework)", "responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could", "my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads", "theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant", "but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my", "for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by", "I have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post:", "questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve my", "posted a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical", "that could not help me solve my problem. I need", "a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework" ]
[ "clear that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged", "(as seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision", "how would you tag a question like [How to have", "tag a question like [How to have productive meetings with", "'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would use", "to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the", "tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as", "you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without", "how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without", "use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether", "without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused", "\"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged", "(Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags to", "example, how would you tag a question like [How to", "a question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D", "question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)?", "to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted", "using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as", "to advisors? For example, how would you tag a question", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged", "advisors? For example, how would you tag a question like", "in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How", "the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would", "Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both", "noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")).", "[advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to", "would you pick whether or not to use both or", "For example, how would you tag a question like [How", "but I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor", "I submitted an edit to add both tags to this", "'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm", "like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context:", "It's clear that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions", "to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions", "to use both or just one when referring to advisors?", "questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide", "one when referring to advisors? For example, how would you", "one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using", "reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor", "referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag a", "you pick whether or not to use both or just", "'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the", "questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not", "have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an", "whether or not to use both or just one when", "'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to use", "use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show", "How would you pick whether or not to use both", "'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as", "the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to", "as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems", "meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to", "tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision", "would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision", "tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but", "questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one", "or just one when referring to advisors? For example, how", "advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to be", "be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged", "of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick", "that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")", "use both or just one when referring to advisors? For", "just one when referring to advisors? For example, how would", "is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in", "when referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag", "not to use both or just one when referring to", "provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the description", "with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add", "questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"),", "\"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how", "job is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted", "confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions", "questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")", "supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is", "tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to", "pick whether or not to use both or just one", "both or just one when referring to advisors? For example,", "you tag a question like [How to have productive meetings", "I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show", "or not to use both or just one when referring", "without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's", "could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using", "[How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions", "supervision (as seems to be noted in the description of", "description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you", "seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show", "submitted an edit to add both tags to this question.)", "as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would", "productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit", "using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job", "[advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions", "to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\")", "would you tag a question like [How to have productive" ]
[ "a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and", "in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that", "orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite often,", "be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it", "to people who visit in the future and who may", "dealing with some administration, then in the future a person", "think that such answers that don't directly* address the OP's", "such answers quite often, and while the down votes don't", "site generally would be useful. My belief is that the", "beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at", "particular, If a student has some particular issue in dealing", "guidance to people who visit in the future and who", "overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on this", "down voters) object if an answer is much more general", "label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not", "seems to me, however, that this site wants to be", "of readers, even some who have been here a long", "long time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep,", "who have been here a long time and have accumulated", "be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to", "to the question. I write such answers quite often, and", "my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always.", "site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more,", "information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular,", "isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore", "sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing", "visit in the future and who may have related, but", "As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer", "that this site wants to be (claims to be, actually)", "issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather", "I write such answers quite often, and while the down", "the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond", "stop writing such things, but I think it would do", "always. But a lot of readers, even some who have", "lot of readers, even some who have been here a", "background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In", "person who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing", "be useful. My belief is that the purpose of this", "for which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly", "It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one", "more, giving guidance to people who visit in the future", "design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give", "been here a long time and have accumulated quite a", "that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information", "site goes beyond just helping the person who posed a", "object to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966),", "wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an answer", "and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some", "this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't", "damage to the site overall. I wonder what the community", "actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit in", "see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of", "reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed at", "I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an", "more general than the question calls for or even orthogonal", "to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for", "to think that such answers that don't directly address the", "think it would do damage to the site overall. I", "narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful IMO than", "of questions and answers that will be given. If it", "but gives background information and guidance to others is entirely", "seem to object to such things. As an example, see", "person who has some control over changing administrative policies might", "administrative policies might read a thread and use it to", "the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a", "on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me,", "I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts", "Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is", "OP who asked the question and therefore a general answer", "a question. For that, any simple mailing list would be", "read a thread and use it to design a better", "is much more general than the question calls for or", "that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems", "question. I write such answers quite often, and while the", "commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is much", "\"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But", "course, stop writing such things, but I think it would", "will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then", "fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried", "the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions", "rep, seem to object to such things. As an example,", "of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I", "general than the question calls for or even orthogonal to", "think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as", "answers that will be given. If it is only narrowly", "Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I", "this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed", "horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a lot", "be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if", "do damage to the site overall. I wonder what the", "who may have related, but not identical questions. For this", "For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It", "belief is that the purpose of this site goes beyond", "so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think", "directed at the OP, but gives background information and guidance", "(claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people", "purpose of an answer and of this site generally would", "at the OP, but gives background information and guidance to", "is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for", "the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the", "an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives", "useful. My belief is that the purpose of this site", "goes beyond just helping the person who posed a question.", "if some clarification of the purpose of an answer and", "wonder what the community consensus is on this issue. It", "this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but", "appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an", "directing it at the OP, as tried to say so", "at the OP, as tried to say so in the", "is that the purpose of this site goes beyond just", "who visit in the future and who may have related,", "others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has", "issue in dealing with some administration, then in the future", "any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to", "lot of rep, seem to object to such things. As", "simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me,", "better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary", "such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which", "for me, but rather one about how the site is", "address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of", "the OP, as tried to say so in the post.", "has some control over changing administrative policies might read a", "I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to", "giving guidance to people who visit in the future and", "perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers that", "who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list", "an answer and of this site generally would be useful.", "disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose", "of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the", "my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the", "in the future a person who has some control over", "who asked the question and therefore a general answer may", "a student has some particular issue in dealing with some", "here a long time and have accumulated quite a lot", "I can, of course, stop writing such things, but I", "have been here a long time and have accumulated quite", "has some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then", "necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore a", "how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of", "just helping the person who posed a question. For that,", "reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked", "and while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder", "entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular", "me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of", "such things, but I think it would do damage to", "therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters", "generally would be useful. My belief is that the purpose", "gives background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate.", "but not identical questions. For this reason, I believe that", "not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an", "for or even orthogonal to the question. I write such", "things, but I think it would do damage to the", "some control over changing administrative policies might read a thread", "rather one about how the site is perceived, which affects", "I wonder what the community consensus is on this issue.", "OP, as tried to say so in the post. Some", "question calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I", "questions and answers that will be given. If it is", "writing such things, but I think it would do damage", "who has some control over changing administrative policies might read", "down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification", "often, and while the down votes don't disturb me, I", "and who may have related, but not identical questions. For", "or even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers", "Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that", "the OP, but gives background information and guidance to others", "over changing administrative policies might read a thread and use", "inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things, but", "the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is", "a long time and have accumulated quite a lot of", "student has some particular issue in dealing with some administration,", "I believe that an answer that isn't directed at the", "and of this site generally would be useful. My belief", "changing administrative policies might read a thread and use it", "if an answer is much more general than the question", "and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If", "it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less", "needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing", "horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP,", "If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be", "answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I", "posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list would", "a thread and use it to design a better system.", "answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters)", "time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem", "of rep, seem to object to such things. As an", "kinds of questions and answers that will be given. If", "to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who", "given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will", "In particular, If a student has some particular issue in", "answers that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely", "me, however, that this site wants to be (claims to", "post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers", "community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation", "have related, but not identical* questions. For this reason, I", "to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student", "answers quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb", "might read a thread and use it to design a", "that an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but", "the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course,", "consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue,", "me, but rather one about how the site is perceived,", "it would do damage to the site overall. I wonder", "while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if", "one about how the site is perceived, which affects the", "what the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't", "have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object", "may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object", "The targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP", "use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers", "but not always. But a lot of readers, even some", "of course, stop writing such things, but I think it", "purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the person", "the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such", "to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance", "general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down", "guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a", "some who have been here a long time and have", "question. For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient.", "be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit", "future and who may have related, but not identical questions.", "the future and who may have related, but not identical", "question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background:", "Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it", "something more, giving guidance to people who visit in the", "a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the", "answer is much more general than the question calls for", "and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to", "such, but not always. But a lot of readers, even", "future a person who has some control over changing administrative", "list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that", "isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information and", "but I think it would do damage to the site", "Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer", "as tried to say so in the post. Some commenters,", "even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite", "issue, for me, but rather one about how the site", "clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact,", "to object to such things. As an example, see [this", "OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop", "targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who", "don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the", "really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label", "only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful IMO", "of an answer and of this site generally would be", "votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of", "thread and use it to design a better system. Having", "this site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something", "calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I write", "the purpose of an answer and of this site generally", "some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in", "may have related, but not identical* questions. For this reason,", "appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular issue", "say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to", "the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some", "are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such", "the question calls for or even orthogonal to the question.", "the OP who asked the question and therefore a general", "I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such,", "system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance,", "the person who posed a question. For that, any simple", "questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer that", "to me, however, that this site wants to be (claims", "clarification of the purpose of an answer and of this", "don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I", "In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as", "answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background", "But a lot of readers, even some who have been", "a lot of rep, seem to object to such things.", "a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how", "control over changing administrative policies might read a thread and", "as such, but not always. But a lot of readers,", "site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and", "affects the kinds of questions and answers that will be", "some administration, then in the future a person who has", "answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and", "of this site generally would be useful. My belief is", "site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on", "the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the", "sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site wants", "with some administration, then in the future a person who", "is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some", "people who visit in the future and who may have", "too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think.", "identical questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer", "I think it would do damage to the site overall.", "It seems to me, however, that this site wants to", "however, seem to think that such answers that don't directly", "then in the future a person who has some control", "isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about", "policies might read a thread and use it to design", "is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In", "an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is", "such answers that don't directly address the OP's needs are", "voters) object if an answer is much more general than", "wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to say", "of this site goes beyond just helping the person who", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this sort.", "accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object to", "entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things,", "is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers", "this site generally would be useful. My belief is that", "administration, then in the future a person who has some", "a person who has some control over changing administrative policies", "and use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow", "it at the OP, as tried to say so in", "it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't", "[this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this", "answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon.", "to say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem", "can, of course, stop writing such things, but I think", "answer and of this site generally would be useful. My", "sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but", "and answers that will be given. If it is only", "helping the person who posed a question. For that, any", "would do damage to the site overall. I wonder what", "an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question", "related, but not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe", "to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really", "is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful", "quite a lot of rep, seem to object to such", "some clarification of the purpose of an answer and of", "viewed, then it will be less useful IMO than otherwise.", "tried to say so in the post. Some commenters, however,", "would be useful. My belief is that the purpose of", "that the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping", "that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate.", "which affects the kinds of questions and answers that will", "necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the", "My belief is that the purpose of this site goes", "this site goes beyond just helping the person who posed", "even some who have been here a long time and", "asked the question and therefore a general answer may be", "however, that this site wants to be (claims to be,", "Proposition: The targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the", "write such answers quite often, and while the down votes", "would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this", "much more general than the question calls for or even", "mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however,", "the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a", "example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly", "won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes", "believe that an answer that isn't directed at the OP,", "the question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate.", "OP, but gives background information and guidance to others is", "beyond just helping the person who posed a question. For", "about how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds", "the kinds of questions and answers that will be given.", "a lot of readers, even some who have been here", "that will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed,", "reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how the", "particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in the", "posts as such, but not always. But a lot of", "the future a person who has some control over changing", "guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\"", "which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond", "that such answers that don't directly address the OP's needs", "seem to think that such answers that don't directly address", "not always. But a lot of readers, even some who", "wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving", "give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my", "of the purpose of an answer and of this site", "commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that don't", "For this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't", "quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb me,", "things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my", "readers, even some who have been here a long time", "to the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus", "than the question calls for or even orthogonal to the", "(and down voters) object if an answer is much more", "but rather one about how the site is perceived, which", "in dealing with some administration, then in the future a", "the question. I write such answers quite often, and while", "be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site", "If a student has some particular issue in dealing with", "an answer is much more general than the question calls", "object if an answer is much more general than the", "in the future and who may have related, but not", "directly* address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can," ]
[ "this can be due to flaws of statistical design in", "to attack the same research question, perhaps in a different", "was collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than", "is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often", "these are valuable, of course, so my concern is with", "to reveal more, so that an independent party has enough", "a different way, but get better evidence as to the", "researchers should publish their code and data so that others", "the reader can examine the code to determine whether it", "(properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield", "that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational", "the larger question for which the data was gathered. If", "of the study need to be independent, and so can't", "would be preferable, so as to make an important distinction.", "aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the", "deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you know", "only a single set of data it applies to only", "to contrary results. While this can be due to flaws", "the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is", "as a term be reserved for questions that relate to", "that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can", "it applies to only that set of data, rather than", "--------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot", "has become obvious that quite a lot of published research", "Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that the", "use this term, that a better term would be preferable,", "of data) than the specific data itself. If a technique", "important distinction. The term I would prefer for this would", "get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not", "think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps us", "just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve", "is used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable", "techniques by which the data was collected (search terms for", "question, perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence", "prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These", "a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more.", "a better term would be preferable, so as to make", "one set of data gives one result, but a different", "such as computer science. The idea is that researchers should", "which the data was collected (search terms for some sorts", "in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular", "reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications of", "idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields,", "recent question has caused me to think about the idea", "data, I think. Having a fixed data set only partially", "itself. If a technique works for only a single set", "have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the", "mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work", "independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary", "go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a", "that an independent party has enough information to attack the", "evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just the", "partially helps us come to the proper answer for deep", "same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost", "should publish their code and data so that others can", "a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an", "a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid)", "the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it", "data, rather than the larger question for which the data", "identical data. -- I may need to edit this or", "But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the", "second idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed", "wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence,", "that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such", "code and data so that others can run that code", "The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious", "and mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea", "a lot of published research in the sciences can't be", "can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can", "would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the", "the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I", "what the concept means. I think that, while it may", "the standards and techniques by which the data was collected", "same code on the same data - get the same", "to make an important distinction. The term I would prefer", "with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an", "course, so my concern is with the naming, not the", "only that set of data, rather than the larger question", "that researchers should publish their code and data so that", "educational research, which is dear to my heart. I would", "of statistical design in some sciences it seems to go", "are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99%", "gives one result, but a different set, gathered to the", "so that an independent party has enough information to attack", "data set), but it is misnamed as it is not", "improper result 1% of the time. But you don't know", "definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need", "mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea above", "data, leads to contrary results. While this can be due", "is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question.", "computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish their", "different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While", "definitively, so we often use techniques that give us evidence", "to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a", "is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the", "an important distinction. The term I would prefer for this", "But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The", "questions. You learn more, of course, if you know the", "of educational research, which is dear to my heart. I", "the second idea above (fixed data set), but it is", "course, it has an additional benefit, in that the reader", "you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that", "or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent", "for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm", "their results. Run the same code on the same data", "way, but get better evidence as to the actual scientific", "simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some", "truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical", "research question, perhaps in a different way, but get better", "more, of course, if you know the standards and techniques", "for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you", "that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that", "flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems to", "this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need", "answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads", "In the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often", "times. But the replications of the study need to be", "conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so my", "suggest below that we need more. The current concept isn't", "trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and", "same research questions and trying to answer them independently with", "use techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not", "we need more. The current concept isn't quite so good", "to cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem:", "transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The More", "gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My", "to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more,", "technique works for only a single set of data it", "particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are", "idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think", "current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it", "my concern is with the naming, not the validity of", "lot of published research in the sciences can't be validated,", "and so can't use identical methods on identical data. --", "it is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer", "techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that our", "can examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed,", "set of data it applies to only that set of", "sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If a", "larger question for which the data was gathered. If using", "Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite", "better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become", "the same data - get the same results. Of course,", "study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the", "seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or", "'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is", "course, if you know the standards and techniques by which", "(as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in", "for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do", "means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied", "attack the same research question, perhaps in a different way,", "Run the same code on the same data - get", "be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same,", "actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology", "reader can examine the code to determine whether it is,", "because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably", "evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of", "to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of", "works for only a single set of data it applies", "techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this can", "the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same", "due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it", "that the reader can examine the code to determine whether", "Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that", "means that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader", "truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential", "Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just", "to use this term, that a better term would be", "time. But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce", "know the standards and techniques by which the data was", "Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth", "but because taking the same research questions and trying to", "the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study", "fields, such as computer science. The idea is that researchers", "above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it", "methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences", "you reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications", "I may need to edit this or append to it.", "the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the", "answer the research question. That is definitely a plus, but", "misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the same", "fixed data set only partially helps us come to the", "about the data, I think. Having a fixed data set", "While this can be due to flaws of statistical design", "or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques", "can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I may", "and data so that others can run that code on", "researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow the", "probably don't), but because taking the same research questions and", "nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea of", "quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a", "to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have", "the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has", "using one set of data gives one result, but a", "originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we", "examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the", "on the same data - get the same results. Of", "term would be preferable, so as to make an important", "more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current", "a technique works for only a single set of data", "it may be fairly common to use this term, that", "because of the second idea above (fixed data set), but", "data set only partially helps us come to the proper", "- get the same results. Of course, it has an", "of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the", "we often use techniques that give us evidence of the", "same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed", "the study independently many times. But the replications of the", "be independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical", "many times. But the replications of the study need to", "of course, so my concern is with the naming, not", "as it is not adequate to answer a more important", "which is dear to my heart. I would prefer that", "statistical design in some sciences it seems to go deeper", "the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the", "the same code on the same data - get the", "set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result,", "can be due to flaws of statistical design in some", "that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of", "and what the concept means. I think that, while it", "applies to only that set of data, rather than the", "and techniques by which the data was collected (search terms", "of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that,", "current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful,", "a lot of educational research, which is dear to my", "not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques", "I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved", "on that data to assure that the original authors aren't", "a researcher would need to reveal more, so that an", "study need to be independent, and so can't use identical", "taking the same research questions and trying to answer them", "I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly", "be preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The", "deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot", "concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has", "term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or", "the same research questions and trying to answer them independently", "actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough", "a fixed data set only partially helps us come to", "one result, but a different set, gathered to the same", "so my concern is with the naming, not the validity", "1% of the time. But you don't know which time,", "a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the", "results. While this can be due to flaws of statistical", "additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the code", "tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It", "collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than the", "better term would be preferable, so as to make an", "reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the", "Currently, it seems that the term is used for a", "as computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish", "different way, but get better evidence as to the actual", "the term is used for a fairly simple idea that", "You learn more, of course, if you know the standards", "some sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately", "simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that a", "Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used", "that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\")", "results. Run the same code on the same data -", "99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper", "is with the naming, not the validity of the underlying", "models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this", "come to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn", "study independently many times. But the replications of the study", "you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study", "set only partially helps us come to the proper answer", "code on the same data - get the same results.", "independent party has enough information to attack the same research", "misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a more", "the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that", "that data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting", "give us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics)", "In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating", "more, so that an independent party has enough information to", "that relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a", "and data, leads to contrary results. While this can be", "relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher", "truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we", "can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion.", "is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a", "to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades", "data was gathered. If using one set of data gives", "be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information", "questions and trying to answer them independently with different models,", "standards and techniques by which the data was collected (search", "others can run that code on that data to assure", "evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use", "be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern.", "enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps in", "often use techniques that give us evidence of the truth,", "below that we need more. The current concept isn't quite", "helps us come to the proper answer for deep questions.", "That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that", "is weak because of the second idea above (fixed data", "carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly)", "the replications of the study need to be independent, and", "it is not adequate to answer a more important question.", "authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on", "in particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions", "which the data was gathered. If using one set of", "cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem: ---------------------------", "set of data, rather than the larger question for which", "it seems that the term is used for a fairly", "so that others can run that code on that data", "original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code", "determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer", "as to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness", "enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking the", "the concept means. I think that, while it may be", "you know the standards and techniques by which the data", "the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these", "rather than the larger question for which the data was", "fairly common to use this term, that a better term", "reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that, while", "concept isn't quite so good about the data, I think.", "to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science.", "but get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth,", "confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result", "out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will", "used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to", "study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study", "term is used for a fairly simple idea that is", "is not adequate to answer a more important question. But", "benefit, in that the reader can examine the code to", "the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of", "science. The idea is that researchers should publish their code", "it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of", "of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that", "that give us evidence of the truth, not (as in", "of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is", "it has become obvious that quite a lot of published", "terms for some sorts of data) than the specific data", "be due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences", "in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course,", "to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the", "reveal more, so that an independent party has enough information", "methods on identical data. -- I may need to edit", "good about the data, I think. Having a fixed data", "because taking the same research questions and trying to answer", "data) than the specific data itself. If a technique works", "data so that others can run that code on that", "to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In", "but it is misnamed as it is not adequate to", "completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author", "revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely.", "questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named.", "but a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives", "has caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research", "specific data itself. If a technique works for only a", "yield an improper result 1% of the time. But you", "I think that, while it may be fairly common to", "dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as", "answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover", "standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing.", "information (which they probably don't), but because taking the same", "distinction. The term I would prefer for this would be", "quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher", "my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term", "sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is", "reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one", "an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the", "has an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine", "proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course,", "of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In", "validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which", "an independent party has enough information to attack the same", "to answer the research question. That is definitely a plus,", "for which the data was gathered. If using one set", "this term, that a better term would be preferable, so", "this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which", "not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why", "author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are", "about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means.", "\"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and", "quite a lot of published research in the sciences can't", "would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for", "in the sciences can't be validated, not because the author", "that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in", "party has enough information to attack the same research question,", "learn more, of course, if you know the standards and", "set of data gives one result, but a different set,", "in a different way, but get better evidence as to", "data it applies to only that set of data, rather", "that, while it may be fairly common to use this", "concern is with the naming, not the validity of the", "Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot of", "results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively,", "idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it", "not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to", "it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research", "question for which the data was gathered. If using one", "The term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research", "me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what", "here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions", "the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned", "has revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning", "(properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the time.", "seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation", "Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't", "contrary results. While this can be due to flaws of", "learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current", "just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It", "will yield an improper result 1% of the time. But", "(I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The", "to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would", "seems to cover the current concept better. The More Important", "caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and", "gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you", "do this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so", "we seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive", "is that researchers should publish their code and data so", "the specific data itself. If a technique works for only", "more. The current concept isn't quite so good about the", "concern. To do this, a researcher would need to reveal", "publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking", "may need to edit this or append to it. Thinking...thinking", "would need to reveal more, so that an independent party", "More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that", "to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to", "means. I think that, while it may be fairly common", "[reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak", "sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish", "I'll suggest below that we need more. The current concept", "answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if", "idea is that researchers should publish their code and data", "indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question. That", "These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that", "weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the second", "sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth is", "only some fields, such as computer science. The idea is", "a single set of data it applies to only that", "applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer", "results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that", "not adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research", "code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code", "our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly)", "The current concept isn't quite so good about the data,", "techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not (as", "of data gives one result, but a different set, gathered", "data gives one result, but a different set, gathered to", "as to make an important distinction. The term I would", "some sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If", "weak because of the second idea above (fixed data set),", "not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they", "transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually.", "----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used for", "not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently,", "that a better term would be preferable, so as to", "used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek", "potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried", "lot of educational research, which is dear to my heart.", "deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need to", "But the replications of the study need to be independent,", "seems that the term is used for a fairly simple", "need to be independent, and so can't use identical methods", "than the specific data itself. If a technique works for", "is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we", "naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: -----------", "the data was collected (search terms for some sorts of", "but I'll suggest below that we need more. The current", "us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof", "if you know the standards and techniques by which the", "was gathered. If using one set of data gives one", "doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because", "that code on that data to assure that the original", "conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with", "prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions", "afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The idea", "data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their", "idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is", "verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means", "follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate", "data - get the same results. Of course, it has", "to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data,", "-- I may need to edit this or append to", "need to reveal more, so that an independent party has", "be fairly common to use this term, that a better", "the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth.", "the time. But you don't know which time, unless you", "they probably don't), but because taking the same research questions", "Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so", "pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear to", "so good about the data, I think. Having a fixed", "obvious that quite a lot of published research in the", "appropriate code to answer the research question. That is definitely", "the research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll", "the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the", "result 1% of the time. But you don't know which", "set), but it is misnamed as it is not adequate", "heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be", "term be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper", "in some sciences it seems to go deeper than that.", "so we often use techniques that give us evidence of", "If a technique works for only a single set of", "and trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques,", "To do this, a researcher would need to reveal more,", "unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But the", "the appropriate code to answer the research question. That is", "for only a single set of data it applies to", "that quite a lot of published research in the sciences", "aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the", "the same research question, perhaps in a different way, but", "don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently", "perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence as", "--------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just results.", "is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as", "is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged", "to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to", "preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The term", "gathered. If using one set of data gives one result,", "would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research.", "reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To", "an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion", "think that, while it may be fairly common to use", "possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply", "think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept", "the data, I think. Having a fixed data set only", "Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a", "the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow", "same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in", "are valuable, of course, so my concern is with the", "question has caused me to think about the idea of", "identical methods on identical data. -- I may need to", "run that code on that data to assure that the", "the sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't", "question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below", "this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite", "for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't", "only partially helps us come to the proper answer for", "to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give", "work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong.", "replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1%", "the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the", "by which the data was collected (search terms for some", "research in the sciences can't be validated, not because the", "the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background:", "situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear", "so can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I", "that others can run that code on that data to", "get the same results. Of course, it has an additional", "time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But", "while it may be fairly common to use this term,", "whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the", "that set of data, rather than the larger question for", "that we need more. The current concept isn't quite so", "better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just", "use identical methods on identical data. -- I may need", "same research question, perhaps in a different way, but get", "of these are valuable, of course, so my concern is", "a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that", "truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible", "achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give us", "that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means", "concept means. I think that, while it may be fairly", "of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify", "know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many", "it has an additional benefit, in that the reader can", "the current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently", "impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that", "it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad", "A recent question has caused me to think about the", "publish their code and data so that others can run", "same data - get the same results. Of course, it", "data was collected (search terms for some sorts of data)", "information to attack the same research question, perhaps in a", "of the second idea above (fixed data set), but it", "demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both", "code to answer the research question. That is definitely a", "has enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps", "to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results.", "truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used.", "can run that code on that data to assure that", "scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally", "the data was gathered. If using one set of data", "for some sorts of data) than the specific data itself.", "adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems", "is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak", "us come to the proper answer for deep questions. You", "independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical data.", "than the larger question for which the data was gathered.", "I think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps", "term, that a better term would be preferable, so as", "make an important distinction. The term I would prefer for", "that the term is used for a fairly simple idea", "useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because", "with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results.", "valuable, of course, so my concern is with the naming,", "than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of", "Both of these are valuable, of course, so my concern", "of course, if you know the standards and techniques by", "important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept", "design in some sciences it seems to go deeper than", "one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting", "Having a fixed data set only partially helps us come", "this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so that", "a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the", "idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as", "underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term", "assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run", "lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of", "enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable", "so as to make an important distinction. The term I", "leads to contrary results. While this can be due to", "an improper result 1% of the time. But you don't", "don't), but because taking the same research questions and trying", "the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't),", "to only that set of data, rather than the larger", "opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here", "hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable,", "research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest", "can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough", "of published research in the sciences can't be validated, not", "the same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit,", "sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this", "become obvious that quite a lot of published research in", "that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out", "(fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it is", "validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems", "data itself. If a technique works for only a single", "common to use this term, that a better term would", "almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea", "data. -- I may need to edit this or append", "fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only", "in that the reader can examine the code to determine", "Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that", "The idea is that researchers should publish their code and", "Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research,", "quite so good about the data, I think. Having a", "My conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research", "It is weak because of the second idea above (fixed", "question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better.", "of data, rather than the larger question for which the", "isn't quite so good about the data, I think. Having", "of the time. But you don't know which time, unless", "appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: ---------------", "of data it applies to only that set of data,", "(which they probably don't), but because taking the same research", "If using one set of data gives one result, but", "(search terms for some sorts of data) than the specific", "them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to", "proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to", "the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters:", "different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing", "to be independent, and so can't use identical methods on", "the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate", "result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is", "on identical data. -- I may need to edit this", "conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show", "single set of data it applies to only that set", "need more. The current concept isn't quite so good about", "replications of the study need to be independent, and so", "some fields, such as computer science. The idea is that", "that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the", "result, but a different set, gathered to the same standards,", "independently many times. But the replications of the study need", "presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so", "current concept isn't quite so good about the data, I", "may be fairly common to use this term, that a", "their code and data so that others can run that", "author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but", "is dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research", "It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not", "research, which is dear to my heart. I would prefer", "to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems", "questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do this,", "code on that data to assure that the original authors", "plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more. The", "with the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea.", "published research in the sciences can't be validated, not because", "the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of", "researcher would need to reveal more, so that an independent", "the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth", "the study need to be independent, and so can't use", "a term be reserved for questions that relate to this", "reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that relate", "which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times.", "research questions and trying to answer them independently with different" ]
[ "it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying", "not ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial.", "pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No,", "ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is", "not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And", "And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not", "you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's", "\"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if it's", "or is that question and its answers kind of farcical?", "asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write serious", "but it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers", "- as if it's not trivial. Is it just me", "annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but", "me or is that question and its answers kind of", "it's not trivial. Is it just me or is that", "was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write", "saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if", "answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as", "trivial. Is it just me or is that question and", "to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not", "if it's not trivial. Is it just me or is", "shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly", "Is it just me or is that question and its", "exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then", "it just me or is that question and its answers", "what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people", "that's not ok at all\" - as if it's not", "just me or is that question and its answers kind", "close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's", "[\"Is it acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question)", "write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\"", "people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what", "not trivial. Is it just me or is that question", "Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty", "if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was", "people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at", "as if it's not trivial. Is it just me or", "at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it", "they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked,", "that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close.", "then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok", "all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it just", "serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" -", "it acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well,", "acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's" ]
[ "consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research is", "gave the argument: > > This reads as if you", "sociological or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic", "the content of research – which we usually consider off-topic", "be off-topic or do we make an exception for them?", "about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close", "want people here to do your research on a particular", "off-topic here. However, here the content of research is academia", "refer to closure about the content of research – which", "questions about sociological or other research whose subject is academia", "understand this to refer to closure about the content of", "academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological", "other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do", "as if you want people here to do your research", "I understand this to refer to closure about the content", "and one of the close voters gave the argument: >", "would put it out of bounds. > > > I", "of research is academia itself. My question is: Should such", "off-topic and one of the close voters gave the argument:", "the argument: > > This reads as if you want", "bounds. > > > I understand this to refer to", "you want people here to do your research on a", "of bounds. > > > I understand this to refer", "your research on a particular topic. That would put it", "content of research – which we usually consider off-topic here.", "My question is: Should such questions about sociological or other", "> > I understand this to refer to closure about", "argument: > > This reads as if you want people", "particular topic. That would put it out of bounds. >", "asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to", "> I understand this to refer to closure about the", "usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/121920/7734) asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was", "was voted to close as off-topic and one of the", "> > > I understand this to refer to closure", "> > This reads as if you want people here", "voters gave the argument: > > This reads as if", "topic. That would put it out of bounds. > >", "– which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the", "closure about the content of research – which we usually", "research on a particular topic. That would put it out", "to closure about the content of research – which we", "peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and", "as off-topic and one of the close voters gave the", "is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about", "the close voters gave the argument: > > This reads", "research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we", "about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic", "close as off-topic and one of the close voters gave", "to do your research on a particular topic. That would", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/121920/7734) asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted", "people here to do your research on a particular topic.", "here the content of research is academia itself. My question", "of the close voters gave the argument: > > This", "a particular topic. That would put it out of bounds.", "studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as", "here. However, here the content of research is academia itself.", "content of research is academia itself. My question is: Should", "or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or", "about sociological or other research whose subject is academia be", "subject is academia be off-topic or do we make an", "about the content of research – which we usually consider", "voted to close as off-topic and one of the close", "However, here the content of research is academia itself. My", "to close as off-topic and one of the close voters", "of research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However,", "Should such questions about sociological or other research whose subject", "we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of", "put it out of bounds. > > > I understand", "which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content", "reads as if you want people here to do your", "> This reads as if you want people here to", "research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here", "is academia be off-topic or do we make an exception", "is: Should such questions about sociological or other research whose", "research is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions", "This reads as if you want people here to do", "it out of bounds. > > > I understand this", "That would put it out of bounds. > > >", "itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological or", "here to do your research on a particular topic. That", "if you want people here to do your research on", "on a particular topic. That would put it out of", "one of the close voters gave the argument: > >", "do your research on a particular topic. That would put", "such questions about sociological or other research whose subject is", "the content of research is academia itself. My question is:", "to refer to closure about the content of research –", "academia be off-topic or do we make an exception for", "reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and one", "whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we make", "It was voted to close as off-topic and one of", "close voters gave the argument: > > This reads as", "out of bounds. > > > I understand this to", "this to refer to closure about the content of research", "question is: Should such questions about sociological or other research" ]
[ "things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is", "bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for", "helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but", "think most of the answers and comments are directed towards", "pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but", "both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think", "concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10", "but in other situations that may not be the case,", "most of the answers and comments are directed towards helping", "was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor", "OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I", "k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with", "my opinion, but in other situations that may not be", "and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers", "deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was a", "may not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details", "this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background", "we want things like this to be part of Academia.SE.", "to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here", "want things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There", "are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which", "aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly", "of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much", "link for 10 k users only) which was a pretty", "the lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations", "likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like", "to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion,", "identified. I think most of the answers and comments are", "users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both", "the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most", "directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely", "10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation", "answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why", "clearly identified. I think most of the answers and comments", "about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k", "be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to", "like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough", "involved in my opinion, but in other situations that may", "comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations", "There is enough background here to pretty much absolve the", "unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like this", "for 10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive", "supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the", "lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations that", "other situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances", "their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we", "enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved", "be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less", "part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty", "recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only)", "and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their", "(now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was", "are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are", "in my opinion, but in other situations that may not", "accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want", "situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances where", "is enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab", "much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in", "which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific", "towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded,", "Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much absolve", "in other situations that may not be the case, especially", "understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder", "background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in", "why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if", "case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less publicly available.", "I wonder if we want things like this to be", "I think most of the answers and comments are directed", "specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of", "opinion, but in other situations that may not be the", "absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in other", "the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand", "with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I", "here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my", "accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified.", "a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and", "accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers and", "of the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP", "but I wonder if we want things like this to", "wonder if we want things like this to be part", "I'm a bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted,", "the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less publicly", "not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are", "only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the", "pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser", "[a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users", "a bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link", "if we want things like this to be part of", "that may not be the case, especially circumstances where the" ]
[ "participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't", "polls the past couple of years? I realize the votes", "being pointless is not a reason for not doing something", "the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so", "so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not", "some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any", "annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the", "been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem", "for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in", "of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in", "of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless", "if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash", "favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being", "might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason", "pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for not", "Up until 2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted", "[there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in", "the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls", "the past couple of years? I realize the votes have", "wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals.", "place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given", "Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of years?", "is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we", "in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness?", "couple of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly", "to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why", "have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might", "there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on", "but being pointless is not a reason for not doing", "a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have", "past couple of years? I realize the votes have been", "pointless is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise,", "hats in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness?", "Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance of", "Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance of democracy?", "something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place).", "seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for", "until 2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to", "in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but", "first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we", "2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate", "I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of", "we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there", "polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the annual", "haven't there polls the past couple of years? I realize", "in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there", "the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have", "wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there some", "hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is", "years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor", "Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up", "discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance", "Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of", "reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats", "were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the", "doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first", "asking if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter", "have hats in the first place). Was there some discussion?", "votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they", "not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't", "Why haven't there polls the past couple of years? I", "realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats,", "Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past", "overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless,", "Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple", "we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat", "not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the", "(otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was", "they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a", "there polls the past couple of years? I realize the" ]
[ "you'll have some idea where the best research in your", "> Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea", "out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led", "* Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. * Something", "it's not apparent to me that the universities with the", "productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus", "reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology;", "though I'd left in a note that I'm not interested", "If the answer to this is yes, then I can", "Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then I", "to me that the universities with the best reputations also", "explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question with", "ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried", "don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I", "this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now?", "compare where that is versus where the top universities in", "positive correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation.", "\"why is research at Oxford in general better than at", "yes, then I can start another question after that linking", "by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this", "two universities only. * Start another question with \"why is", "sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent", "correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation. >", "those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to", "a correlation. > > > I don't think this question", "to focus the question by editing out the mention of", "answers to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings", "they should, but in a vacuum there does not have", "question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly", "why there is a correlation. > > > I don't", "not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question", "interpret the question in a different way. What I really", "that linking to this question. However this seems like an", "> > > I don't think this question is salvageable", "unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start another question", "methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the universities", "between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul", "and whatnot even though I'd left in a note that", "universities only. * Start another question with \"why is research", "on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that", "I'd left in a note that I'm not interested in", "already tried to focus the question by editing out the", "editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still", "option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by", "tried to focus the question by editing out the mention", "universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based", "with the best reputations also do the best research (looking", "general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this", "Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing how", "apparent to me that the universities with the best reputations", "Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea where", "previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities", "* Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats),", "only. * Start another question with \"why is research at", "The question asks why there is a correlation. > >", "general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous", "a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are", "names two universities only. * Start another question with \"why", "research at highly productive research institutions better than those at", "factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people continue", "to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the", "in your field is performed. If you next compare where", "(depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere and", "the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's", "question with \"why is research at Oxford in general better", "also do the best research (looking at the list itself,", "question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep", "cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people", "but it's evidently not good enough and people continue to", "question after that linking to this question. However this seems", "research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If", "not good enough and people continue to interpret the question", "do now? * Start another question with \"is research at", "responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left", "best reputations also do the best research (looking at the", "at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that", "issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another", "question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by", "the best reputations also do the best research (looking at", "is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start", "Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. ", "another question after that linking to this question. However this", "at highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly", "that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently", "it's narrow. Start another question picking universities by [THE", "universities with the best reputations also do the best research", "narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only. ", "> > I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately.", "there does not have to be a correlation between the", "but in a vacuum there does not have to be", "not have to be a correlation between the two factors).", "want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've", "the best research (looking at the list itself, they should,", "\"is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\"", "I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus", "a positive correlation. The question asks why there is a", "better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is", "do the best research (looking at the list itself, they", "linking to this question. However this seems like an overly", "the rankings came about, which are not really relevant to", "are an academic, you'll have some idea where the best", "that is versus where the top universities in the world", "where that is versus where the top universities in the", "focus the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang", "in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the", "top universities in the world are, you should see a", "anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a note", "the top universities in the world are, you should see", "institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing", "really want to ask (as I wrote in a comment", "you are an academic, you'll have some idea where the", "way. What I really want to ask (as I wrote", "might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not", "comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an", "versus where the top universities in the world are, you", "(looking at the list itself, they should, but in a", "about, which are not really relevant to what I want", "not apparent to me that the universities with the best", "is yes, then I can start another question after that", "at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the", "of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about", "asks why there is a correlation. > > > I", "Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to", "performed. If you next compare where that is versus where", "Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. Something else?", "a different way. What I really want to ask (as", "this is yes, then I can start another question after", "to interpret the question in a different way. What I", "about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in", "[THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking", "as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question", "this seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly", "are not really relevant to what I want to ask.", "the question in a different way. What I really want", "there is a correlation. > > > I don't think", "wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming", "field is performed. If you next compare where that is", "start another question after that linking to this question. However", "research in your field is performed. If you next compare", "at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue", "that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about,", "different way. What I really want to ask (as I", "seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names", "in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to", "with \"is research at Oxford in general better than at", "picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections", "research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on", "ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the", "the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University", "be a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing", "that the universities with the best reputations also do the", "better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the", "research (looking at the list itself, they should, but in", "question asks why there is a correlation. > > >", "answer to this is yes, then I can start another", "I've already tried to focus the question by editing out", "which are not really relevant to what I want to", "research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same", "still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even", "people continue to interpret the question in a different way.", "however it's not apparent to me that the universities with", "mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses", "the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a", "to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already", "rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however", "like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two", "better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option:", "enough and people continue to interpret the question in a", "want to ask (as I wrote in a comment to", "where the best research in your field is performed. If", "the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking", "I do now? * Start another question with \"is research", "is research at highly productive research institutions better than those", "focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are", "came about, which are not really relevant to what I", "and people continue to interpret the question in a different", "you should see a positive correlation. The question asks why", "worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the", "best research (looking at the list itself, they should, but", "the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to", "Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in general", "another question with \"is research at Oxford in general better", "the world are, you should see a positive correlation. The", "to be a correlation between the two factors). * Do", "an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities", "at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow.", "reputations also do the best research (looking at the list", "the answer to this is yes, then I can start", "* Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in", "Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as", "universities in the world are, you should see a positive", "since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another", "than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes,", "note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's", "than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers", "question since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start", "I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should", "should see a positive correlation. The question asks why there", "where the top universities in the world are, you should", "some idea where the best research in your field is", "in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and", "to this is yes, then I can start another question", "objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to", "than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's", "are, you should see a positive correlation. The question asks", "another question with \"why is research at Oxford in general", "you next compare where that is versus where the top", "on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not", "> I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What", "salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start another", "it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question", "at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then", "productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research", "after that linking to this question. However this seems like", "Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford in", "have to be a correlation between the two factors). ", "correlation between the two factors). Do nothing and accept", "led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though", "I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not", "is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\".", "However this seems like an overly narrow question since it", "Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start", "Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about the", "this question. However this seems like an overly narrow question", "to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd", "What should I do now? * Start another question with", "in a vacuum there does not have to be a", "relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded", "is a correlation. > > > I don't think this", "is performed. If you next compare where that is versus", "does not have to be a correlation between the two", "the universities with the best reputations also do the best", "me that the universities with the best reputations also do", "research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734)", "to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came", "how the rankings came about, which are not really relevant", "a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but", "Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll", "critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not really", "in a different way. What I really want to ask", "continue to interpret the question in a different way. What", "should, but in a vacuum there does not have to", "a vacuum there does not have to be a correlation", "based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me", "another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might", "is versus where the top universities in the world are,", "question with \"is research at Oxford in general better than", "question. However this seems like an overly narrow question since", "ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer):", "overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only.", "to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic,", "[Why is research at highly productive research institutions better than", "should I do now? * Start another question with \"is", "by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on", "not really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly", "What I really want to ask (as I wrote in", "(as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): >", "I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly.", "with \"why is research at Oxford in general better than", "I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > >", "the answers to that question focus on critiquing how the", "the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question", "University (depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere", "then I can start another question after that linking to", "think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do", "really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I", "can start another question after that linking to this question.", "institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately", "I really want to ask (as I wrote in a", "answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have", "two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer.", "next compare where that is versus where the top universities", "an academic, you'll have some idea where the best research", "whatnot even though I'd left in a note that I'm", "left in a note that I'm not interested in cultural", "not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good", "itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does not", "in the world are, you should see a positive correlation.", "it's evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret", "world are, you should see a positive correlation. The question", "vacuum there does not have to be a correlation between", "a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing and", "best research in your field is performed. If you next", "academic, you'll have some idea where the best research in", "your field is performed. If you next compare where that", "question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? ", "at the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum", "have some idea where the best research in your field", "the best research in your field is performed. If you", "> > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some", "see a positive correlation. The question asks why there is", "list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does", "to this question. However this seems like an overly narrow", " Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford", "this still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot", "narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation", "now? * Start another question with \"is research at Oxford", "If you next compare where that is versus where the", "the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there", "highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive", "good enough and people continue to interpret the question in", "Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer", "I can start another question after that linking to this", "poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by editing", "factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. *", "Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which", "in a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors),", "question in a different way. What I really want to", "which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's", "even though I'd left in a note that I'm not", "rankings came about, which are not really relevant to what", "correlation. > > > I don't think this question is", "question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which", "to ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's", "in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you", "idea where the best research in your field is performed.", "what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question", "evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret the", "interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough" ]
[ "Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to", "must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if", "a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is", "Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will", "community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.", "ad is very valuable to the community and will continue", "else to the body of the post. If you want", "### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an", "This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to", "with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The", "should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to", "site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting", "every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that", "it is a good idea to repost it. It may", "it. It may be helpful to give it a new", "'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the", "is a good idea to repost it. It may be", "1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score", "here! And with the new year, as usual, comes a", "information and resources that are relevant to your own community's", "cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps", "we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain", "accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their", "exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post", "2019 is here! And with the new year, as usual,", "Must be GIF or PNG No animated GIFs ", "and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests,", "year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while", "imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year", "can check out the ads that have met the threshold", "In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this", "ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the", "Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) ", "* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in", "### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some", "this question must conform to the following rules, or they", "before it will be shown on the main site. You", "site. For example, you might promote the following things: ", "relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,", "a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these", "be shown on the main site. You can check out", "Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community", "Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ###", "the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old", "post to this question must* conform to the following rules,", "of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable", "once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have", "you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter", "blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your", "would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future", "coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community", "year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions", "the answer form with the above required form. ### Image", "and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.", "every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against", "cool events or conferences * anything else your community would", "this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements", "new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for", "* interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences", "the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources ", "vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community", "find out about the stuff your community deems important. This", "to your own community's interests, both for those already in", "functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer", "the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All", "be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high", "score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it", "show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do", "Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the", "the image is white or partially white, there must be", "not add anything else to the body of the post*.", "things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and", "border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold", "* If the background of the image is white or", "give it a new face in the process, so as", "they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in", "restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If", "to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the", "this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose", "form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create", "serves as a way to promote information and resources that", "that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or", "uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No", "resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both", "previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very", "years, while other things will wane to allow for new", "be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show", "for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors", "of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you", "There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet", "to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The", "or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted", "year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers", "community, but to the current status of the community. We", "purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer", "must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding", "the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition", "(currently 6) before it will be shown on the main", "example, you might promote the following things: * the site's", "to not just the subject matter of the community, but", "to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also", "important. This also serves as a way to promote information", "rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should", "over the years, while other things will wane to allow", "answers you post to this question must* conform to the", "check out the ads that have met the threshold with", "this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above", "the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads?", "This also serves as a way to promote information and", "(2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There", "do it in the comments. 2. The question must always", "new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of *Community", "must* conform to the following rules, or they will be", "ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a", "might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account", "so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from", "be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")", "answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown", "a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6)", "December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting", "the community and those yet to join. ### Why do", "and will continue to be so, it is a good", "This is a method for the community to control what", "it a new face in the process, so as to", "other things will wane to allow for new faces to", "but to the current status of the community. We reset", "required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you", "your own community's interests, both for those already in the", "white or partially white, there must be a 1px border", "their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for", "in the community and those yet to join. ### Why", "ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in", "What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted", "promote information and resources that are relevant to your own", "the background of the image is white or partially white,", "limit on file size of 150 KB * If the", "against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a", "a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no", "served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads", "advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community", "[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```", "of the community. We reset the ads once a year,", "gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you", "Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows", "is for future visitors to find out about the stuff", "ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form", "keep the material in the ads relevant to not just", "events or conferences anything else your community would genuinely", "shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This", "will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do", "it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold", "while other things will wane to allow for new faces", "If a particular service or ad is very valuable to", "helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served", "to promote information and resources that are relevant to your", "tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of", "questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality", "show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this,", " academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs", "always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged", "If the background of the image is white or partially", "of this question is the vetting process. Images of the", "matter of the community, but to the current status of", "interested in The goal is for future visitors to find", "as a way to promote information and resources that are", "to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion", "a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The", "future visitors to find out about the stuff your community", "or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px", "or conferences anything else your community would genuinely be", "conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.", "out about the stuff your community deems important. This also", "image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels,", "to be so, it is a good idea to repost", "The image that you create must be 300 x 250", "that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our", "The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images", "### How does it work? The answers you post to", "the ads that have met the threshold with basic click", "else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal", "be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.", "with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In", "just the subject matter of the community, but to the", "be helpful to give it a new face in the", "the post. If you want to discuss something, do it", "the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.", "must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions", "an answer must meet (currently 6*) before it will be", "with the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration", "visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the", "cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable", "the community. We reset the ads once a year, every", "do we reset the ads every year? Some services will", "community deems important. This also serves as a way to", "face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery", "comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh", "for newer things. This helps keep the material in the", "high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a", "### Image requirements * The image that you create must", "white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high", "tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,", "shown on the main site. You can check out the", "the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of", "own community's interests, both for those already in the community", "to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every", "2. The question must always be tagged with the magic", "Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that", "300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI.", "refresh these for the coming year :) ### What are", " cool events or conferences * anything else your community", "* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur)", "mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add", "through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF", "http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else", "to give it a new face in the process, so", "also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.", "will continue to be so, it is a good idea", "anything else to the body of the post. If you", "*do not add anything else to the body of the", "wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting", "be interested in The goal is for future visitors to", "And with the new year, as usual, comes a new", "magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to", "Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ### What", "or ad is very valuable to the community and will", "Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will", "services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things", "tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.", "to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please", "join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?", "form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url", "if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is", "that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for", "are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main", "[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling", "be GIF or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute", "be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact", "background of the image is white or partially white, there", "Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on", "will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the", "community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for", "out the ads that have met the threshold with basic", "way to promote information and resources that are relevant to", "the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and", "maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane", "to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate", "helpful to give it a new face in the process,", "is white or partially white, there must be a 1px", "usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s", "repost it. It may be helpful to give it a", "a new face in the process, so as to prevent", "what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,", "reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness", "and resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events", "form with the above required form. ### Image requirements ", "or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on", "interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences ", "is very valuable to the community and will continue to", "answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline", "[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything", "the body of the post. If you want to discuss", "on file size of 150 KB If the background", "file size of 150 KB * If the background of", "the subject matter of the community, but to the current", "discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question", "websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool", "goal is for future visitors to find out about the", "it will be shown on the main site. You can", "also serves as a way to promote information and resources", "the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on", "the current status of the community. We reset the ads", "partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if", "advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the", "process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting", "post. If you want to discuss something, do it in", "of the post. If you want to discuss something, do", "to the current status of the community. We reset the", "resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or", "and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset", "Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services", "for the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion", "We reset the ads once a year, every December. The", "above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that", "your community deems important. This also serves as a way", "yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads", "the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the", "body of the post. If you want to discuss something,", "you post to this question must* conform to the following", "be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?", "must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on", "an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service", "exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:", "* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources", "our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or", "the community and will continue to be so, it is", "add anything else to the body of the post. If", "will be shown on the main site. You can check", "advertisements that will show up on the main site, in", "sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.", "main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this", "control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For", "you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.", "Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :)", "that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/4407).", "out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep", "the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with", "community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,", "want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.", "community and those yet to join. ### Why do we", "Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other", "the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the", "not just the subject matter of the community, but to", "will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will", "on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not", "question must* conform to the following rules, or they will", "* The image that you create must be 300 x", "site. You can check out the ads that have met", "For example, you might promote the following things: * the", "of 150 KB * If the background of the image", "from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How", "a way to promote information and resources that are relevant", "method for the community to control what gets promoted to", "GIF or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit", "for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every", "### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is", "campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything", "image is white or partially white, there must be a", "reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular", "community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###", "of the ad from getting stale after a year of", "process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad", "``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url", "stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it", "valuable to the community and will continue to be so,", "year, as usual, comes a new iteration of *Community Promotion", "continue to be so, it is a good idea to", "the following things: the site's twitter account * academic", "How does it work? The answers you post to this", "story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else", "150 KB * If the background of the image is", "advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements", "in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on", "[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to", "DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader", "community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the", "All answers should be in the exact form of: ```", "is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently", "Please *do not add anything else to the body of", "up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and", "Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB If", "standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG", "good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to", "promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might", "account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story", "ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the", "have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the", "the community, but to the current status of the community.", "a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful", "is a method for the community to control what gets", "It may be helpful to give it a new face", "that will show up on the main site, in the", "Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer must", "enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we", "enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills", "year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion", "of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form", "iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the", "in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter", "promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from", "high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image", "is here! And with the new year, as usual, comes", "You can check out the ads that have met the", "a method for the community to control what gets promoted", "be so, it is a good idea to repost it.", "If you want to discuss something, do it in the", "addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag", "conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested", "do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method", "after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?", "promote the following things: * the site's twitter account ", "of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:", "deems important. This also serves as a way to promote", "the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of", ":) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads", "of the image is white or partially white, there must", "Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up", "a particular service or ad is very valuable to the", "Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer", "surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a *minimum score", "it work? The answers you post to this question must", "something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must", "may be helpful to give it a new face in", "ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads", "allows old ads that have served their purpose to be", "prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after", "answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements", "http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the", "newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads", "community's interests, both for those already in the community and", "pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be", "status of the community. We reset the ads once a", "comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the", "the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the", "relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already", "\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the", "question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are", "ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or", "visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems", "that have served their purpose to be cycled out for", "does it work? The answers you post to this question", "every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,", "year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have", "The answers you post to this question must* conform to", "GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB", "those already in the community and those yet to join.", "particular service or ad is very valuable to the community", "things will wane to allow for new faces to show", "PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file", "the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a", "getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does", "threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will", "Ads? This is a method for the community to control", "ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads", "### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are", "6*) before it will be shown on the main site.", "allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads", "requirements The image that you create must be 300", "you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double", "on the main site. You can check out the ads", "the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of", "of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming", "those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the", "for future visitors to find out about the stuff your", "and allows old ads that have served their purpose to", "to repost it. It may be helpful to give it", "Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a", "subject matter of the community, but to the current status", "will show up on the main site, in the right", "there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI)", "ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out", "meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the", "question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show", "on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose", " Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ", "the material in the ads relevant to not just the", " Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs", "about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves", "for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the", "the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]", "old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled", "``` Please *do not add anything else to the body", "create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that", "ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats", "be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must", "have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher", "to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote", "ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###", "The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads", "the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with", "the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion", "as usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads!", "your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is", "(imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated", "right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting", "the site. For example, you might promote the following things:", "are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those", "faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps", "in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged", "the years, while other things will wane to allow for", "hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be", "have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous", "material in the ads relevant to not just the subject", "to the body of the post. If you want to", "to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.", "fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material", "new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year", "both for those already in the community and those yet", "or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be", "up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The", "in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is", "for those already in the community and those yet to", "the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over", "Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming year", "DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum", "voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why", "provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be", "Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show", "community and will continue to be so, it is a", "to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.", "The goal is for future visitors to find out about", "size of 150 KB * If the background of the", "the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the", "in The goal is for future visitors to find out", "site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question", "tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required", "following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers", "these for the coming year :) ### What are Community", "Image requirements * The image that you create must be", "show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.", "we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for", "double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through", "will wane to allow for new faces to show up.", "academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs ", "on the site. For example, you might promote the following", "to find out about the stuff your community deems important.", "reset the ads once a year, every December. The community", "as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting", "1. All answers should be in the exact form of:", "250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must", "interests, both for those already in the community and those", "The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an", "genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors", "already in the community and those yet to join. ###", "new face in the process, so as to prevent the", "idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give", "to the community and will continue to be so, it", "the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have", "things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant", "image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG ", "from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad", "helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not", "is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided,", "very valuable to the community and will continue to be", "purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of", "the main site. You can check out the ads that", "anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The", "are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to", "current status of the community. We reset the ads once", "to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.", "of the community, but to the current status of the", "usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to", "minimum score threshold* an answer must meet (currently 6) before", "work? The answers you post to this question must conform", "to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale", "KB * If the background of the image is white", "in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of", "no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.", "twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus", "following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites", "service or ad is very valuable to the community and", "No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of", "community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad", "* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size", "stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a", "the above required form. ### Image requirements The image", "x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. ", "pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###", "the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as", "are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements", "if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard", "be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This", "it in the comments. 2. The question must always be", "a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ###", "so, it is a good idea to repost it. It", "animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150", "to this question must conform to the following rules, or", "main site. You can check out the ads that have" ]
[ "\"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827)", "a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think", "am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over", "train once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate", "even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same", "despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink,", "changes, has the community already decided not to? The questions", "could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding", "What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like", "hiding the vote totals for the first few hours, or", "we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the", "neither of us over edited our answers, this is a", "does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted", "affects new users who can't even comment yet * As", "west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem).", "[here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: ", "over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that", "same minute. Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from", "nothing that can be done without getting the powers that", "code? * If we do have the power to make", "* Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people", "this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure", "to shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead", "community already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed", "particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does seem", "the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter,", "by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our", "to? The questions I linked seemed open to such changes,", "the first few hours, or is there simply nothing that", "simply nothing that can be done without getting the powers", "* Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are", "of us over edited our answers, this is a clear", "is to share a case study about the \"fastest gun", "questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE", "gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days later,", "more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events", "I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to", "this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets", "has the community already decided not to? The questions I", "too (though it seems like we downvote less on this", "seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after", "so it's a bit strange that there was such a", "gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and", "on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a", "piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40", "an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes", "decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open to", "answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on.", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence", "ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited", "clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias.", "shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead by", "but I guess my questions are: * What could we", "points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness: ", "similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the", "can be done without getting the powers that be to", "about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on", "share a case study about the \"fastest gun in the", "my questions are: What could we do, mechanically? Does", "100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit", "that be to write entirely new code? * If we", "that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes.", "new code? * If we do have the power to", "I linked seemed open to such changes, but nothing happened.", "it seems like we downvote less on this SE than", "matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard", "We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions are:", "users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy points", "weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in", "think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are", "gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course,", "On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy,", "discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess", "rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I", "the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly", "As Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes", "new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my", "be to write entirely new code? * If we do", "very similar, so it's a bit strange that there was", "edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that the", "getting the powers that be to write entirely new code?", "us over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration", "unlikely to be read * This affects new users who", "solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first few", "SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the", "are in are unlikely to be read * This affects", "power to make such changes, has the community already decided", "Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes too", "done without getting the powers that be to write entirely", "Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the", "having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and", "points out, the same is true for downvotes too (though", "gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar", "write entirely new code? * If we do have the", "and a few days later, I am ahead by 10,", "stop the close train once it gets rolling -- but", "the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning", "the close train once it gets rolling -- but that's", "answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange that", "a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge", "the powers that be to write entirely new code? ", "totals for the first few hours, or is there simply", "comment yet As Buffy points out, the same is", "there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead", "the vote totals for the first few hours, or is", "the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very", "my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The", "from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was", "few hours, or is there simply nothing that can be", "votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few", "study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed", "that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care", "already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open", "he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score", "days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither", "(I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my", "seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop", "course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but", "to share a case study about the \"fastest gun in", "are unlikely to be read * This affects new users", "submitted answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer", "to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I", "The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days", "all submitted answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's", "guess my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically?", "in are unlikely to be read * This affects new", "I guess my questions are: * What could we do,", "there was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...).", "This is to share a case study about the \"fastest", "it's a bit strange that there was such a difference", "in close voting -- hard to stop the close train", "~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the", "answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap", "(though it seems like we downvote less on this SE", "to make such changes, has the community already decided not", "have the power to make such changes, has the community", "on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question,", "read * This affects new users who can't even comment", "I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it", "is true for downvotes too (though it seems like we", "imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness:", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd,", "[For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting", "answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen", "is there simply nothing that can be done without getting", "that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting --", "* Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally", "SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way", "we downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary", "broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was:", "it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers", "* If we do have the power to make such", "is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a", "later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of", "sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before,", "such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then,", "Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the same", "10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers,", "separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my", "yet * As Buffy points out, the same is true", "downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less on", "be done without getting the powers that be to write", "began to shrink, and a few days later, I am", "a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this", "discussed this before, but I guess my questions are: ", "users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions", "for the first few hours, or is there simply nothing", "care about my imaginary points, but it does seem like", "Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points,", "a difference (I blame the dog picture...). Then, OP", "topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary", "the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I", "* What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions", "vote totals for the first few hours, or is there", "once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.]", "meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer", "votes are in are unlikely to be read * This", "and from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he", "behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the close", "but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly", "bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close", "a bit strange that there was such a difference (I", "something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's", "the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and", "first few hours, or is there simply nothing that can", "a case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\"", "that there was such a difference (I blame the dog", "my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite", "obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are", "few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since", "same is true for downvotes too (though it seems like", "was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was", "support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first", "the community already decided not to? The questions I linked", "accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first,", "a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior", "like hiding the vote totals for the first few hours,", "submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be", "events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers", "was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within", "powers that be to write entirely new code? * If", "don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does", "about my imaginary points, but it does seem like an", "like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10", "40 votes; I think the score was something like 100-60.", "are a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed", "a few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205.", "answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was", "immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a", "votes; I think the score was something like 100-60. Our", "our answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated", "downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes", "Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for", "there simply nothing that can be done without getting the", "close train once it gets rolling -- but that's a", "like we downvote less on this SE than others), and", "I think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers", "This affects new users who can't even comment yet ", "make such changes, has the community already decided not to?", "on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes;", "picture...). Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my", "~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read ", "strange that there was such a difference (I blame the", "huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in", "and I all submitted answers on literally the same minute.", "it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of", "OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed", "bit strange that there was such a difference (I blame", "who can't even comment yet As Buffy points out,", "to stop the close train once it gets rolling --", "answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to", "the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE", "by 40 votes; I think the score was something like", "sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all", "the same is true for downvotes too (though it seems", "or is there simply nothing that can be done without", "216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers, this", "-- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't", "* This affects new users who can't even comment yet", "and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new", "Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled", "others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage", "downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users. We've", "literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted,", "-- hard to stop the close train once it gets", "was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). ", "less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are", "entirely new code? If we do have the power", "but it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better", "answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having", "mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals", "do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote", "out, the same is true for downvotes too (though it", "such changes, has the community already decided not to? The", "people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by", "that can be done without getting the powers that be", "not to? The questions I linked seemed open to such", "of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted", "was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on", "Since neither of us over edited our answers, this is", "upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a ~day,", "true for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote", "after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read", "are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support", "close voting -- hard to stop the close train once", "ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was something", "first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to", "and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of", "to be read * This affects new users who can't", "do have the power to make such changes, has the", "issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On", "Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the", "Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange", "are very similar, so it's a bit strange that there", "blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer,", "we do have the power to make such changes, has", "similar, so it's a bit strange that there was such", "I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us", "fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a", "score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar,", "without getting the powers that be to write entirely new", "hard to stop the close train once it gets rolling", "top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've", "in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more", "minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there", "The questions I linked seemed open to such changes, but", "this before, but I guess my questions are: * What", "a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about", "like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a", "to write entirely new code? * If we do have", "new users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy", "can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the", "for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less", "voting -- hard to stop the close train once it", "my imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious", "way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but", "before, but I guess my questions are: * What could", "difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted", "dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that", "answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer", "on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately", "question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and", "is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly", "than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to", "be read * This affects new users who can't even", "Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely", "I all submitted answers on literally the same minute. ", "questions I linked seemed open to such changes, but nothing", "Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I", " Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer", "seems like we downvote less on this SE than others),", "case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue", "the power to make such changes, has the community already", "was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so", "Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is", "illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For", "quickly began to shrink, and a few days later, I", "that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that", "If we do have the power to make such changes,", "hours, or is there simply nothing that can be done", "* As Buffy points out, the same is true for", "displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began", "arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users.", "discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation)" ]
[ "there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with", "have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it", "permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most", "have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be", "pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list.", "at least not when I view it: [![enter image description", "interested in posting an answer, but I don't see the", "through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting", "reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards", "is not protected, at least not when I view it:", "question or because there are already lots of answers (13)?", "answers. I also see answers from people with 41 and", "the question in question is not protected, at least not", "extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because there", "posting an answer, but I don't see the answer box.", "if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag)", "answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra", "17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question", "they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have", "and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot", "of my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't", "protected questions, but the question in question is not protected,", "also see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are", "reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having", "having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the", "don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here,", "a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers", "was interested in posting an answer, but I don't see", "\"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment", "the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions,", "be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see", "to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also", "I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to", "answer, but I don't see the answer box. I have", "bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the", "least not when I view it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uGglt.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uGglt.png)", "conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a", "= 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the", "from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I", "so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of", "minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from people", "reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation", "Is it because most of my reputation is just the", "comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation", "I found [Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my", "I also see answers from people with 41 and 17.", "are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation", "my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is", "doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question in", "people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because", "101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a", "there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting", "hot question or because there are already lots of answers", "lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101", "Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or", "it because most of my reputation is just the association", "implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem", "because it's a hot question or because there are already", "already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation =", "association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but", "conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested", "because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else", "from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions", "[Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun", "my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count", "seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\"", "else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that", "with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's", "see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but", "the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions,", "question is not protected, at least not when I view", "same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so", "answering protected questions, but the question in question is not", "answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this", "protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter image", "the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an", "or because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone", "Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer,", "comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't", "box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed", "a hot question or because there are already lots of", "disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference", "I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through", "101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the same", "problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll", "answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is just", "towards answering protected questions, but the question in question is", "Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer, but", "not protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter", "here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum", "but the question in question is not protected, at least", "count towards answering protected questions, but the question in question", "because most of my reputation is just the association bonus?", "in posting an answer, but I don't see the answer", "this comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I", "I don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation", "the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there", "for posting answers. I also see answers from people with", "posted this comment, implying that they're having the same problem:", "with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're", "nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in", "of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted", "isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers.", "don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my", "list. I was interested in posting an answer, but I", "supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I", "see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there", "Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying", "That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question", "is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering", "most of my reputation is just the association bonus? That", "I was interested in posting an answer, but I don't", "there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because", "restrictions because it's a hot question or because there are", "reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from", "it's a hot question or because there are already lots", "found [Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender", "just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected", "but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for", "41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a", "(13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment,", "in question is not protected, at least not when I", "the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because", "question in question is not protected, at least not when", "to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is", "omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the", "answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't", "I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my", "questions, but the question in question is not protected, at", "gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions", "that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to", "I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from", "but I don't see the answer box. I have 101", "a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was", "posting answers. I also see answers from people with 41", "an answer, but I don't see the answer box. I", "my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot" ]
[ "the answers first and upvote at least one.) > >", "question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from", "answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this", "(the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia", "please read the answers first and upvote at least one.)", "users. To wit, > > For questions you read which", "of an upvote biases the first answer to a question", "these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes", "(Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this question,", "a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem)", "gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To", "At least for this question, please read the answers first", "users to see how much of an upvote biases the", "to see how much of an upvote biases the first", "other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for", "study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an", "upvote biases the first answer to a question gets (the", "the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased", "on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting", "by up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please", "[Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards", "and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a", "wit, > > For questions you read which have multiple", "answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below.", "I propose a biased (biased towards people who use the", "read the answers first and upvote at least one.) >", "do you typically vote on an answer before reading other", "First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first", "biased (biased towards people who use the meta site) study", "how much of an upvote biases the first answer to", "before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At", "biases the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest", "the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how", "site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of", "propose a biased (biased towards people who use the meta", "> For questions you read which have multiple answers, do", "this question, please read the answers first and upvote at", "an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers", "have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer", "question, please read the answers first and upvote at least", "\"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you", "west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > >", "(biased towards people who use the meta site) study of", "Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer", "Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to", "answers, do you typically vote on an answer before reading", "\"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users.", "gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\"", "first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased", "towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a", "use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see", "> > For questions you read which have multiple answers,", "an upvote biases the first answer to a question gets", "by these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are", "the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun", "question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who use", "towards people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE", "skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose", "To wit, > > For questions you read which have", "upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I", "vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by", "see how much of an upvote biases the first answer", "AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote biases", "first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in", "problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For", "read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on", "up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please read", "least for this question, please read the answers first and", "answers below. At least for this question, please read the", "questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed", "reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least", "for this question, please read the answers first and upvote", "[Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607)", "to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\"", "to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people", "questions you read which have multiple answers, do you typically", "of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote", "below. At least for this question, please read the answers", "For questions you read which have multiple answers, do you", "from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions", "in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit,", "answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards", "answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the", "the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, >", "Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the", "you typically vote on an answer before reading other answers?", "which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an", "a biased (biased towards people who use the meta site)", "Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you read", "people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users", "typically vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer", "a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who", "answers first and upvote at least one.) > > >", "you read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote", "multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer before", "Motivated by these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and", "who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to", "much of an upvote biases the first answer to a", "meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much" ]
[ "plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have", "understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But,", "or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first", "are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249)", "situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe", "to the meta, but can't dig them out right now)", "could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to", "site, more or less elaborated, but always in its core:", "own > > > I am all for questions which", "I am all for questions which ask to [understand the", "[understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the", "researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular", "this site, more or less elaborated, but always in its", "this question does not really contribute anything new to the", "all for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249),", "posting to the meta, but can't dig them out right", "(and many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is", "of the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot.", "and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and", "and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations", "for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or", "spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good", "question in question, as I think it is a bad", "since I can see four up-votes on it, I was", "any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that", "> Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to", "downvoted the question in question, as I think it is", "similar ones before it, which is why I am posting", "be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me", "\"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which", "seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't", "alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? >", "Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good fit,", "but since I can see four up-votes on it, I", "numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated, but", "passing someone else's work as your own > > >", "better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are", "> > > (where owning a pink elephant could be", "anything new to the site, the OP could have found", "a young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar", "I believe I have seen more similar ones before it,", "of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just", "[encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as", "most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers", "or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering", "before it, which is why I am posting to the", "the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a", "but none of the reasons seemed to be quite on", "up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this is", "first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand", "are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > >", "was just wondering whether this is really the community opinion.", "recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar", "of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less", "right now) basically asks: > > I want to pass", "bad question. I was also thinking of casting a close", "reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I", "work as your own.\", which can be seen in many,", "worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on", "pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where", "your own.\", which can be seen in many, many other", "OP could have found this information out by glancing on", "irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and", "me that this question (and many other alike) are basically", "seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question", "a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since", "site, the OP could have found this information out by", "it is a bad question. I was also thinking of", "(and I believe I have seen more similar ones before", "answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work", "questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand", "someone else's work as your own.\", which can be seen", "have found this information out by glancing on most of", "believe I have seen more similar ones before it, which", "the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more", "completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question", "(where owning a pink elephant* could be any other completely", "can't dig them out right now) basically asks: > >", "it, I was just wondering whether this is really the", "Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this", "`plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar ones", "be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the", "in question, as I think it is a bad question.", "is a bad question. I was also thinking of casting", "think it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping,", "by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and", "am all for questions which ask to [understand the concept", "my friends work as my own, but additionally he owns", "work as your own > > > I am all", "the OP could have found this information out by glancing", "to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of", "the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's", "other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I", "or worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes", "> > The answer to this question does not really", "think it is a bad question. I was also thinking", "basically asks: > > I want to pass my friends", "But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen", "question (and many other alike) are basically asking: > >", "involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I", "my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is", "many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism", "elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning", "pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It", "as your own.\", which can be seen in many, many", "to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think", "owning a pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant", "on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the", "see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether", "information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged", "own.\", which can be seen in many, many other questions.", "vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be quite", "definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or", "always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone", "a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to", "to pass my friends work as my own, but additionally", "We have seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on", "work as my own, but additionally he owns a pink", "[this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more", "he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? >", "elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems", "all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone", "> > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your", "Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a", "questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I think", "be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's", "elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is", "core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as", "the meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically", "> > I want to pass my friends work as", "additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism?", "questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is", "I don't think it's a good question, good fit, or", "but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still", "good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I", "I am posting to the meta, but can't dig them", "question. I was also thinking of casting a close vote,", "found this information out by glancing on most of our", "basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > >", "thinking of casting a close vote, but none of the", "it, which is why I am posting to the meta,", "in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's", "seems to me that this question (and many other alike)", "of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher", "concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young", "asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The", "now) basically asks: > > I want to pass my", "on it, I was just wondering whether this is really", "a bad question. I was also thinking of casting a", "else's work as your own > > > I am", "time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand that,", "many other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as", "to me that this question (and many other alike) are", "many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in question,", "fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see four", "is why I am posting to the meta, but can't", "on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\",", "plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant* could", "but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing", "The answer to this question does not really contribute anything", "have seen more similar ones before it, which is why", "the question in question, as I think it is a", "someone else's work as your own > > > I", "better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the", "> > > I am all for questions which ask", "could have found this information out by glancing on most", "ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance", "the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249),", "question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can", "your own > > > I am all for questions", "which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the", "I was also thinking of casting a close vote, but", "or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent", "I have seen more similar ones before it, which is", "is passing someone else's work as your own > >", "> I want to pass my friends work as my", "out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions,", "glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all", "it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but", "them out right now) basically asks: > > I want", "does not really contribute anything new to the site, the", "good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see", "I want to pass my friends work as my own,", "seen more similar ones before it, which is why I", "less elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism", "other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism?", "new to the site, the OP could have found this", "contribute anything new to the site, the OP could have", "this information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism`", "out right now) basically asks: > > I want to", "to this question does not really contribute anything new to", "that this question (and many other alike) are basically asking:", "else's work as your own.\", which can be seen in", "can be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted", "I think it is a bad question. I was also", "other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this", "the site, the OP could have found this information out", "was also thinking of casting a close vote, but none", "to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249).", "why I am posting to the meta, but can't dig", "am posting to the meta, but can't dig them out", "the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question,", "friends work as my own, but additionally he owns a", "> I am all for questions which ask to [understand", "of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism", "meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically asks:", "the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept", "plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question", "I can see four up-votes on it, I was just", "reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and many", "the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately,", "times on this site, more or less elaborated, but always", "our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate", "that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this", "concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or", "not really contribute anything new to the site, the OP", "or less elaborated, but always in its core: > >", "have seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this", "> The answer to this question does not really contribute", "to the site, the OP could have found this information", "still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant", "it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for", "[peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249)", "young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and", "and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing", "particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I", "Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own >", "can see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering", "really contribute anything new to the site, the OP could", "which can be seen in many, many other questions. I", "the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to", "as a young researcher and trying to understand that, or", "for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying", "> > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer", "> Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own", "a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > >", "answer to this question does not really contribute anything new", "on this site, more or less elaborated, but always in", "its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work", "pass my friends work as my own, but additionally he", "four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this", "I was just wondering whether this is really the community", "elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your", "on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good", "none of the reasons seemed to be quite on the", "but can't dig them out right now) basically asks: >", "this question (and many other alike) are basically asking: >", "plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question does", "passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can be", "I downvoted the question in question, as I think it", "> > I am all for questions which ask to", "> > > The answer to this question does not", "more similar ones before it, which is why I am", "plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated,", "trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving", "quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a", "keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on it,", "> (where owning a pink elephant could be any other", "as my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant.", "It seems to me that this question (and many other", "a pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning).", "importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of", "own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this", "just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as", "is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can", "as your own > > > I am all for", "also thinking of casting a close vote, but none of", "casting a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed", "of casting a close vote, but none of the reasons", "as I think it is a bad question. I was", "close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be", "this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink", "dig them out right now) basically asks: > > I", "[understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it", "asks: > > I want to pass my friends work", "want to pass my friends work as my own, but", "self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and", "> > (where owning a pink elephant* could be any", "seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site,", "question does not really contribute anything new to the site,", "ones before it, which is why I am posting to", "tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism", "in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in", "don't think it's a good question, good fit, or worth", "which is why I am posting to the meta, but", "more or less elaborated, but always in its core: >", "question, as I think it is a bad question. I", "owns a pink elephant*. Is this still plagiarism? > >" ]
[ "this the same individual, or a small number of individuals,", "individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does", "low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or", "to be a huge number of very low-rep users called", "number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner", "Does this violate either the terms or community norms of", "or a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\"", "users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a", "huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this", "number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the", "a burner account? Does this violate either the terms or", "of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same", "same individual, or a small number of individuals, who are", "Is this the same individual, or a small number of", "as a burner account? Does this violate either the terms", "\"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small number", "called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small", "small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a", "who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this", "seems to be a huge number of very low-rep users", "of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account?", "\"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either the", "a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as", "account? Does this violate either the terms or community norms", "a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is", "very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual,", "this violate either the terms or community norms of ASE?", "individual, or a small number of individuals, who are using", "using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either", "are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate", "There seems to be a huge number of very low-rep", "the same individual, or a small number of individuals, who", "burner account? Does this violate either the terms or community", "be a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\"" ]
[ "leaving me no option but to discard my contribution or", "being in the middle of providing an answer to a", "the middle of providing an answer to a question when", "to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent", "when it is closed, leaving me no option but to", "rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others.", "it is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be", "summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than", "can be very frustrating to put in the mental effort", "Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I", "to a question when it is closed, leaving me no", "discard my contribution or hope that the question can be", "frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare an", "question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to", "be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in", "answer to a question when it is closed, leaving me", "or hope that the question can be re-opened. It can", "the question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating", "frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it is", "an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course,", "a question when it is closed, leaving me no option", "more than others. I wonder if it is possible to", "to discard my contribution or hope that the question can", "only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects", "mental effort to prepare an answer only to have it", "\"work in progress\" be entered into the record when this", "to put in the mental effort to prepare an answer", "I wonder if it is possible to let such \"work", "situation of being in the middle of providing an answer", "that the question can be re-opened. It can be very", "re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in the", "course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder", "let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record", "an answer to a question when it is closed, leaving", "is closed, leaving me no option but to discard my", "can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put", "closed, leaving me no option but to discard my contribution", "in progress\" be entered into the record when this happens.", "possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into", "option but to discard my contribution or hope that the", "been in the situation of being in the middle of", "but to discard my contribution or hope that the question", "have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors", "than others. I wonder if it is possible to let", "in the middle of providing an answer to a question", "affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it", "no option but to discard my contribution or hope that", "it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more", "I have fairly frequently been in the situation of being", "my contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened.", "of providing an answer to a question when it is", "the mental effort to prepare an answer only to have", "middle of providing an answer to a question when it", "in the situation of being in the middle of providing", "answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this", "be very frustrating to put in the mental effort to", "hope that the question can be re-opened. It can be", "effort to prepare an answer only to have it summarily", "It can be very frustrating to put in the mental", "contributors more than others. I wonder if it is possible", "contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened. It", "if it is possible to let such \"work in progress\"", "this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if", "me no option but to discard my contribution or hope", "the situation of being in the middle of providing an", "wonder if it is possible to let such \"work in", "it is closed, leaving me no option but to discard", "put in the mental effort to prepare an answer only", "fairly frequently been in the situation of being in the", "frequently been in the situation of being in the middle", "to prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected.", "others. I wonder if it is possible to let such", "providing an answer to a question when it is closed,", "is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered", "question when it is closed, leaving me no option but", "in the mental effort to prepare an answer only to", "prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of", "very frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare", "have fairly frequently been in the situation of being in", "of being in the middle of providing an answer to", "such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record when", "to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the" ]
[ "the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible.", "whether a specific question should be removed from the HNQs", "to allow it to go hot again. How can we", "mechanics ============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in", "questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up,", "do not do this for questions that you consider in", "editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest", "being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at the", "shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not do", "of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community", "closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits,", "suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per", "or flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs?", "not do this for questions that you consider in need", "some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a", "from the HNQs is not a good idea, because by", "do not want certain types of question to be HNQs", "you think so, please suggest categories in the answers: ", "flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why.* This naturally", "the day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis,", "of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our", "why. This naturally makes the most sense for questions that", "day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by", "elaborate why. This naturally makes the most sense for questions", "categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer.", "Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic", "that are already HNQs (which you can now [see in", "a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free", "a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If", "free to flag it. Please do not do this for", "am asking: Are there any categories of questions that we", "Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom", "in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. ", "can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you", "try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I", "important than precisely defining the category. Use votes to", "considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom are", "consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done. So,", "and votes. There can be issues when one of our", "it to go hot again. How can we use this?", "discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage", "(HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring", "potential damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators", "that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing,", "How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion", "up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective", "of questions that should be closed or can be salvaged", "community can agree that we do not want certain types", "answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that should", "many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our", "makes the most sense for questions that are already HNQs", "problem. * Remember that at the end of the day", "* Do not suggest categories of questions that should be", "question to be HNQs and try to remove them as", "visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when one", "than precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate", "as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there", "we do not want certain types of question to be", "as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories", "categories of questions that we generally do not want to", "However, we as a community can agree that we do", "to considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom", "deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not be", "unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that we", "questions that should be closed or can be salvaged with", "that at the end of the day we have to", "more important than precisely defining the category. * Use votes", "probably already been done. So, we moderators have to decide", "are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators", "not a good idea, because by the time the discussion", "likely that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t,", "featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that", "sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you can", "our site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove", "problem, and given their individual nature, some of these problems", "the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for", "be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as", "should be removed. If you feel that any question should", "not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention", "edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or", "has probably already been done. So, we moderators have to", "a question should be removed. If you feel that any", "questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to", "quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should", "question should be removed. *If you feel that any question", "questions being HNQs is a problem. Remember that at", "feel free to flag it. Please do not do this", "remove a question from the HNQs, when there is a", "this for questions that you consider in need of editing,", "a specific question should be removed from the HNQs is", "an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please", "respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion,", "you feel that any question should not be an HNQ,", "a meta discussion about whether a specific question should be", "do not want to be HNQs?** If you think so,", "specific question should be removed from the HNQs is not", "the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely", "a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of", "in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is", "closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we", "cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the", "problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree", "case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this", "questions that we generally do not want to be HNQs?*", "will remove a question from the HNQs, when there is", "that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into", "are already HNQs (which you can now [see in the", "meta discussion about whether a specific question should be removed", "go hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having", "nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as", "not want certain types of question to be HNQs and", "do this for questions that you consider in need of", "can be salvaged with an edit. Provide a rationale", "becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably", "suggest categories of questions that should be closed or can", "time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the", "takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can", "an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being", "the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the", "from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and", "want certain types of question to be HNQs and try", "([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we", "with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions", "a problem. * Remember that at the end of the", "not want to be HNQs? If you think so, please", "there is a serious problem, and given their individual nature,", "If you feel that any question should not be an", "agree that we do not want certain types of question", "is not a good idea, because by the time the", "and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions", "question from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem,", "we have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore", "of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or", "Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories", "perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments", "a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem.", "*Are there any categories of questions that we generally* do", "similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the", "quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: *Are there any", "community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the", "Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question should", "good rationale is more important than precisely defining the category.", "be removed from the HNQs is not a good idea,", "so, please suggest categories in the answers: Suggest one", "the potential damage has probably already been done. So, we", "of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by", "remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking:", "the HNQs is not a good idea, because by the", "a question from the HNQs, when there is a serious", "* Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is", "the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential", "per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that", "the time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus,", "naturally makes the most sense for questions that are already", "not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question", "types of question to be HNQs and try to remove", "or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag", "for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not", "for questions that are already HNQs (which you can now", "again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta", "and try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore", "discussion about whether a specific question should be removed from", "to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am", "a good idea, because by the time the discussion has", "one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of", "of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community", "removed from the HNQs is not a good idea, because", "it. Please do not do this for questions that you", "at the end of the day we have to decide", "should be closed or can be salvaged with an edit.", "salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such", "on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed.", "of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is", "possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of", "“hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits,", "been done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively", "suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers", "decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do", "question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to", "site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual", "questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other", "a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have", "================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs,", "There can be issues when one of our questions becomes", "HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why.", "when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its", "be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why", "higher number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar", "removing a question, we cannot decide that we want to", "the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for", "end of the day we have to decide on a", "flag it. Please do not do this for questions that", "bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack", "any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already", "that we want to allow it to go hot again.", "it is likely that a question will become an HNQ,", "you think it is likely that a question will become", "decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether", "answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do not", "and elaborate why.** This naturally makes the most sense for", "because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of", "precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement", "Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar", "its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors", "we as a community can agree that we do not", "certain types of question to be HNQs and try to", "Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a", "now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list", "category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with", "Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that", "whether a question should be removed. *If you feel that", "be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and", "damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators have", "our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from", "because by the time the discussion has reached any sort", "think it is likely that a question will become an", "If you think so, please suggest categories in the answers:", "and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be", "please suggest categories in the answers: Suggest one category", "case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. *If you", "other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered", "to go hot again. How can we use this? ====================", "any categories of questions that we generally* do not want", "After removing a question, we cannot decide that we want", "by the time the discussion has reached any sort of", "can be issues when one of our questions becomes an", "as a community can agree that we do not want", "HNQs?** If you think so, please suggest categories in the", "with our site and our community standards. Moderators can now", "that we do not want certain types of question to", "is a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some", "can agree that we do not want certain types of", "think so, please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest", "can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about", "Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of questions", "– many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and", "questions that are already HNQs (which you can now [see", "we will remove a question from the HNQs, when there", "our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads", "questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process", "that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel", "now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think", "visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our site", "has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has", "in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of", "you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if", "the end of the day we have to decide on", "should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a", "an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate", "are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from", "relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question", "on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we", "standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot", "if you think it is likely that a question will", "Please do not do this for questions that you consider", "we generally do not want to be HNQs? If you", "you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or", "are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that", "is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that", "but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not", "revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that", "I am asking: Are there any categories of questions that", "please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This", "heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes.", "want to be HNQs?** If you think so, please suggest", "an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher", "of the day we have to decide on a case-by-case", "network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes", "and given their individual nature, some of these problems are", "edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs", "of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure", "answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem", "site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely", "become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it.", "removed. *If you feel that any question should not be", "============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the", "be closed or can be salvaged with an edit. ", "What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will", "individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we", "This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot", "or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a", "issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because", "* Remember that at the end of the day we", "Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After", "recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when", "moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the most", "can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions", "have to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case", "HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given their", "be issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ", "unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators can", "HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the", "these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can", "remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)).", "to be HNQs? If you think so, please suggest categories", "reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably", "on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a", "use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a", "this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific", "closed or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide", "or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or", "history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that a", "are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account", "to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis", "* Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with proposed", "sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot”", "kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale", "good idea, because by the time the discussion has reached", "question, we cannot decide that we want to allow it", "whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards.", "[see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it", "a question, we cannot decide that we want to allow", "have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a", "Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely defining", "why such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember", "irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that we", "one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased", "Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing", "HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)),", "Do not suggest categories of questions that should be closed", "attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the most sense", "that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There", "a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and", "This naturally makes the most sense for questions that are", "the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do", "question should be removed from the HNQs is not a", "cannot decide that we want to allow it to go", "HNQs is not a good idea, because by the time", "given their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable.", "The mechanics ============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown", "flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ==================================", "want to allow it to go hot again. How can", "problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure.", "in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead", "we cannot decide that we want to allow it to", "we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether", "category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions", "for moderator attention and elaborate why.** This naturally makes the", "that we generally do not want to be HNQs?** If", "basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind", "Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic", "\"Do we have this kind of problem on our site?\"", "is more important than precisely defining the category. * Use", "flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag", "to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question:", "problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more", "(which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but", "leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many of", "most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you", "any question should not be an HNQ, please flag it", "the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement", "questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove", "is a problem. * Remember that at the end of", "a good rationale is more important than precisely defining the", "already been done. So, we moderators have to decide on", "Remember that at the end of the day we have", "rationale is more important than precisely defining the category. ", "about whether a specific question should be removed from the", "from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are", "HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do", "need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform", "Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a", "considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent", "will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag", "HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number", "process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide", "on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important", "not suggest categories of questions that should be closed or", "for questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning", "Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network", "number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with", "answers, and votes. There can be issues when one of", "feel that any question should not be an HNQ, please", "be HNQs?* If you think so, please suggest categories in", "the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given", "Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right", "already HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision", "their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However,", "Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs, when", "that should be closed or can be salvaged with an", "asking: *Are there any categories of questions that we generally", "it for moderator attention and elaborate why.* This naturally makes", "allow it to go hot again. How can we use", "hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a", "there any categories of questions that we generally do not", "defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or", "into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be", "we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering", "exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many", "==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question", "question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on our", "* Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest", "right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange", "account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues", "be removed. *If you feel that any question should not", "moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on a", "we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on", "we want to allow it to go hot again. How", "HNQs is a problem. Remember that at the end", "Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with proposed categories.", "should not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator", "comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What", "rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem. ", "that any question should not be an HNQ, please flag", "question should not be an HNQ, please flag it for", "answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should", "sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network", "generally* do not want to be HNQs? If you think", "categories of questions that should be closed or can be", "have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the", "sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been", "to flag it. Please do not do this for questions", "the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on", "shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites", "from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is", "for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally,", "HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as possible.", "when there is a serious problem, and given their individual", "the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a", "the most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which", "done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly", "is likely that a question will become an HNQ, but", "of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done.", "increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors –", "of questions that we generally do not want to be", "but if you think it is likely that a question", "or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions", "So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and", "to be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly", "such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that", "votes. There can be issues when one of our questions", "by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers,", "this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good", "decide that we want to allow it to go hot", "should be removed from the HNQs is not a good", "consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar.", "them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are", "of question to be HNQs and try to remove them", "a community can agree that we do not want certain", "idea, because by the time the discussion has reached any", "basis whether a question should be removed. If you feel", "be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from", "by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of", "individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This", "serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of these", "list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible**. After removing a question,", "our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than" ]
[ "meta first. My concern is that I may need to", "> > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from", "There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way", "are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way >", "> > * There are lots of negations in Daodejing", "feedback on my work, and to know if he wants", "if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I", "> To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam.", "ask me questions and I will answer. And if it's", "polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing", "> Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > >", "too much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr", "Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter finds", "and I want to ask on the meta first. My", "the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick", "science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his", "you can ask me questions and I will answer. And", "introduce a suitable professor for me. > > > >", "if you can introduce a suitable professor for me. >", "links to my works, which can be perceived as hidden", "> > > My research interest is about how to", "concern is that I may need to put links to", "with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize", "to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and", "for me. > > > > > > My research", "with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are", "anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking", "(individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe", "have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure", "suitable professor for me. > > > > > >", "framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between", "can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei as", "new student this year, or if you can introduce a", "finds you well. > > > > > > >", "to a professor to ask for his feedback on my", "distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory", "in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism", "for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and", "> * There are lots of negations in Daodejing and", "my draft: > > > > > > > *Subject:", "Below is my draft: > > I want to email", "and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A", "Because I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm", "from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if", "the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how", "aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy >", "makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it", "is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here", "research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with", "professor to ask for his feedback on my work, and", "dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss", "linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > >", "> > Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers", "address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I", "aware that they are talking at a polysemy > >", "and to know if he wants to recruit new grad", "reading. I hope this letter finds you well. > >", "> > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > >", "transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications:", "links, then I think having tracking links are fine too?", "* Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware", "writing this letter to ask if you take any new", "I will answer. And if it's fine to put links,", "[Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion).", "it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture", "> > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > >", "well. > > > > > > > > >", "Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: > >", "to my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement", "contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is", "as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There", "is my draft: > > I want to email to", "questions and I will answer. And if it's fine to", "this letter to ask if you take any new student", "is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and", "as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual", "and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is", "> > > > > To introduce myself, my name", "of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx", "name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter", "to know if he wants to recruit new grad student.", "> > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, >", "My research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy", "I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not", "factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you", "> > Thank you for your reading. I hope this", "Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > >", "> > My research interest is about how to connect", "lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > >", "to email to a professor to ask for his feedback", "Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best", "nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and", "quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to", "double negation > > > > > > The article", "> > > > > > Thank you for your", "one framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections", "sure if this is too much for the first contact?", "> > > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/).", "new grad student. Because I have many links and bullets", "understood with double negation > > > > > >", "> > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > >", "many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if", "> > > > > > The article is [well-received", "hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors).", "too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address", "Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > > >", "of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as", "* Yinyang is best understood with double negation > >", "will answer. And if it's fine to put links, then", "partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy", "that I may need to put links to my works,", "cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). >", "perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective).", "to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one", "> > > > The article is [well-received in Daoism", "his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of", "> > > > > > My research interest is", "> Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > >", "an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it >", "> Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter", "if this is too much for the first contact? The", "Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To", "wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have many", "various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will", "> > > > > > * Communication cannot go", "> > > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere", "the meta first. My concern is that I may need", "> > > > My research interest is about how", "student. Because I have many links and bullets to provide,", "applicant** > > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland,", "ask if you take any new student this year, or", "> > > Thank you for your reading. I hope", "introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am", "* There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle", "you take any new student this year, or if you", "you well. > > > > > > > >", "he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have", "> > > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat,", "discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope", "a professor to ask for his feedback on my work,", "this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and", "> > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying", "answer. And if it's fine to put links, then I", "then I think having tracking links are fine too? Below", " Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues >", "is best understood with double negation > > > >", "how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in", "> > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential", "my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or", "it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you", "narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that.", "draft: > > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry", "letter finds you well. > > > > > >", "myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing", "the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a", "a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like", "Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood with", "To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I", "recruit new grad student. Because I have many links and", "a suitable professor for me. > > > > >", "to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma,", "not sure if this is too much for the first", "[cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is", "thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > ", "psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary:", "potential graduate applicant* > > > > > > Dear", "it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist", "my work, and to know if he wants to recruit", "I want to email to a professor to ask for", "student this year, or if you can introduce a suitable", "> In summary: > > > > > > ", "> > Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological", "theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting", "it interesting as well. > > > > > >", "as well. > > > > > > Thank you", "works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making", "year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor for", "[Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > >", "Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For", "my draft: > > I want to email to a", "that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I will", "> > > > To introduce myself, my name is", "The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it", "TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF).", "which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the", "put links, then I think having tracking links are fine", "> > I want to email to a professor to", "work, and to know if he wants to recruit new", "Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and", "put links to my works, which can be perceived as", "Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask", "Inquiry from potential graduate applicant** > > > > >", "bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is too", "ask on the main site, and I want to ask", "talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes", "the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my", "here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the", "Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce", "> > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable.", "obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > >", "express it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can", "religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk:", "is too much for the first contact? The professor is", "fine to put links, then I think having tracking links", "his feedback on my work, and to know if he", "* Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can", "find it interesting as well. > > > > >", "Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if you", "is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts", "Yinyang is best understood with double negation > > >", "well. > > > > > > Thank you for", "is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power", "\"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There are", "field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview,", "> > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because", "and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood", "> > In summary: > > > > > >", "for his feedback on my work, and to know if", "Maybe you can ask me questions and I will answer.", "> > > > > Thank you for your reading.", "this year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor", "making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure", "to recruit new grad student. Because I have many links", "[Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > >", "> > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant >", "you for your reading. I hope this letter finds you", "knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express", "> > > > > > > *Subject: Inquiry from", "help express it > > Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\"", "to put links, then I think having tracking links are", "nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots of", "can ask me questions and I will answer. And if", "is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a", "and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I", "if you take any new student this year, or if", "[well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed", "go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are", "> * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues", "is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to", "Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to", "framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana,", "between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective).", "of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: >", "any new student this year, or if you can introduce", "on my work, and to know if he wants to", "Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is", "applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find", "> > * Yinyang is best understood with double negation", "think having tracking links are fine too? Below is my", "proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata,", "and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > >", "can introduce a suitable professor for me. > > >", "observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics,", "For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying", "cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they", "in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework", "main site, and I want to ask on the meta", "want to ask on the meta first. My concern is", "too? Below is my draft: > > I want to", "Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > >", "> > > Here is my draft: > > >", "> > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > >", "connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework.", "perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow", "overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try:", "> Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > >", "> > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > >", "is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of", "they are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit", "to ask if you take any new student this year,", "a question to ask on the main site, and I", "My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive", "> > > > > The article is [well-received in", "wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > ", "that they are talking at a polysemy > > ", "of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of", "I am writing this letter to ask if you take", "want to email to a professor to ask for his", "can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question", "grad student. Because I have many links and bullets to", "negation > > > > > > The article is", "to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here", "Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce myself,", "to ask on the meta first. My concern is that", "are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive", "Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help", "Metaphors can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei", "fine too? Below is my draft: > > I want", "I think having tracking links are fine too? Below is", "[A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it", "> > Here is my draft: > > > >", "it's fine to put links, then I think having tracking", "of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > ", "visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences", "> > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > >", "the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the", "because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at", "the main site, and I want to ask on the", "cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In", "summary: > > > > > > Communication cannot", "in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is", "to ask for his feedback on my work, and to", "your reading. I hope this letter finds you well. >", "me. > > > > > > My research interest", "Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft:", "psychological issues > > * There are lots of negations", "will find it interesting as well. > > > >", "for your reading. I hope this letter finds you well.", "need to put links to my works, which can be", "first. My concern is that I may need to put", "I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you can", "Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). >", "I'm not sure if this is too much for the", "provide, I'm not sure if this is too much for", "about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology", "or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not", "advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm", "professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science", "with double negation > > > > > > The", "The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive", "links are fine too? Below is my draft: > >", "site, and I want to ask on the meta first.", "ask on the meta first. My concern is that I", "Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My", "email to a professor to ask for his feedback on", "sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives,", "In summary: > > > > > > * Communication", "be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too", "> The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with", "> * Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't", "links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this", "My concern is that I may need to put links", "on the meta first. My concern is that I may", "to provide, I'm not sure if this is too much", "is that I may need to put links to my", "and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a", "article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and >", "linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained", "ask for his feedback on my work, and to know", "at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an", "me questions and I will answer. And if it's fine", "to put links to my works, which can be perceived", "and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations,", "like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of", "Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > > >", "and I will answer. And if it's fine to put", "sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask me", "in one framework. My observations are explained in this article:", "professor for me. > > > > > > My", "how to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions", "and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in", "the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it", "> > > > > > To introduce myself, my", "Way* > > * Yinyang is best understood with double", "> Here is my draft: > > > > >", "from potential graduate applicant** > > > > > >", "know if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because", "I may need to put links to my works, which", "best understood with double negation > > > > >", "> My research interest is about how to connect Eastern", "community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate", "issues > > * There are lots of negations in", "much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/),", "question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to", "I hope this letter finds you well. > > >", "if it's fine to put links, then I think having", "take any new student this year, or if you can", "have a question to ask on the main site, and", "> > > > Thank you for your reading. I", "hope you will find it interesting as well. > >", "And if it's fine to put links, then I think", "I want to ask on the meta first. My concern", "is my draft: > > > > > > >", "I have a question to ask on the main site,", "perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as well.", "interesting as well. > > > > > > Thank", "my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this", "can nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots", "a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not", "negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang", "> > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because the", "first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field", "graduate applicant** > > > > > > Dear Prof.", "this letter finds you well. > > > > >", "are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge", "hope this letter finds you well. > > > >", "draft: > > I want to email to a professor", "> I want to email to a professor to ask", "Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and", "this is too much for the first contact? The professor", "> > > > > *Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate", "psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in this", "not sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask", "letter to ask if you take any new student this", "Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: >", "ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > Understanding", "concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions", "are fine too? Below is my draft: > > I", "I hope you will find it interesting as well. >", "question to ask on the main site, and I want", "article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is", "> > > > > My research interest is about", "transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various", "tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft: >", "or if you can introduce a suitable professor for me.", "> * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors", "illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the", "philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations", "to ask on the main site, and I want to", "on the main site, and I want to ask on", "you will find it interesting as well. > > >", "may need to put links to my works, which can", "having tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft:", "Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that", "a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious", "am writing this letter to ask if you take any", "interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics", "explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology,", "Here is my draft: > > > > > >", "> > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant", "you can introduce a suitable professor for me. > >", "> * Yinyang is best understood with double negation >" ]
[ "saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia)", "the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged", "to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be", "questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a", "for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and", "are not really useful and identical to the first tag,", "tags are not really useful and identical to the first", "reading and answering the question [Do I need to sit", "three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question:", "we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with", "question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat)", "I searched for relevant tags and saw we have three", "SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we have", "have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really useful", "useful and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia)", "it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is", "to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant", "should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the", "if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question:", "for relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia)", "Recently I was reading and answering the question [Do I", "tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How", "1 question: [How should one advertise a program if it", "tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to", "for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are", "and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions", "tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22", "really useful and identical to the first tag, should these", "[Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since", "need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for", "1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate", "last two tags are not really useful and identical to", "a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really", "[South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) tag?", "with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program if", "TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw", "and answering the question [Do I need to sit for", "question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student)", "and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and", "socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last", "[How should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead", "I was reading and answering the question [Do I need", "question: [How should one advertise a program if it doesn't", "lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially", "[Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I", "reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two", "one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs)", "first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in", "[South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for", "Since the last two tags are not really useful and", "answering the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL", "not really useful and identical to the first tag, should", "searched for relevant tags and saw we have three tags:", "or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we", "with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one", "program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1", "jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay", "advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia)", "[South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program", "should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to", "identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia)", "22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise", "I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched", "with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a", "relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with", "these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia)", "the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or", "was reading and answering the question [Do I need to", "to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive", "[Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should", "okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags", "doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being", "being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the", "sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags", "the last two tags are not really useful and identical", "two tags are not really useful and identical to the" ]
[ "that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is", "confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst.", "theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that", "focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable", "main site. If you have something to add that does", "site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which", "to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in", "differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising", "is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table", "not are at best confusing to some readers and wrong", "by us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734)", "[my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely", "than many people expect? * Variations can be along different", "poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers", "is homogeneous in some respect when it is not are", "relevant posts on the main site. * This is a", "journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to", "practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and", "site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired", "One of the actualities of academia that is important to", "purposes of that question, it contains only a list of", "Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become", "arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia", "think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between", "that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This", "of contents below). * When possible, link to relevant posts", "* [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and", "and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477)", "important examples – which is already quite long for something", "* [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) ", "themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses", "(or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions", "of when using this site is: Academia varies more than", "that question, it contains only a list of the most", "journals, universities, departments, or groups. Answers shouldn’t be an", "Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing", "is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to", "categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If you", "questions since we have become tired of having a bazillion", "the actualities of academia that is important to be aware", "main site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel", "inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for the", "Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions", "misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my answer", "already quite long for something that is supposed to be", "a new answer (and link it in the table of", "popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question,", "only a list of the most important examples – which", "fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy", "institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be", "Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) ", "answer (and link it in the table of contents below).", "new answer (and link it in the table of contents", "Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list of", "[close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of having", "conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere.", "([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered", " [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) ", "along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments,", "link it in the table of contents below). When", "groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the", "reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If", "false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same", "[Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment", "Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more than", "contains only a list of the most important examples –", "due to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities", "community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents", "============ One of the actualities of academia that is important", "of that question, it contains only a list of the", "operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by", "for something that is supposed to be a short introduction.", "posts on the main site. * This is a community", "of academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem", "* Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on", "does academia vary more than many people expect? * Variations", "* [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses", "this site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In", "Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) ", "universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive", "in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or", "that is important to be aware of when using this", "it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics", "can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals,", "in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. Group", "be aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies", "below). When possible, link to relevant posts on the", "any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since", "================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474)", "wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this in", "to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the", "per tag on the main site. If you have something", "quite long for something that is supposed to be a", "a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an", "the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia", "the main site. If you have something to add that", "* Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations", "of academia that is important to be aware of when", "Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given", "easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect", "reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar Internet", "vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups.", "of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question =============", "[Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475)", "countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be", "fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t", "bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers", "Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of", "in some respect when it is not are at best", "worst. I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome", "extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable", "and even groups. It is easy to arrive at the", "on the main site. * This is a community wiki.", "When possible, link to relevant posts on the main site.", "* Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some", "However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it", "contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) ", "long for something that is supposed to be a short", "existing categories, add a new answer (and link it in", "work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as", "individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably", "a problem that pertains to all levels of users on", "Academia varies more than you think it does.* More explicitly:", "depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that", "the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or", "got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of", "to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However,", "have something to add that does not fit into the", "all levels of users on this site: * Questions whose", "[Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) * [Academic Administration](/q/4471#5257)", "list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource", "even groups. It is easy to arrive at the false", "have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only", "it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries,", "pertains to all levels of users on this site: ", "be a valuable resource for the users of this site.", "and misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my", "roughly per tag on the main site. If you have", "of the most important examples – which is already quite", "of Contents ================= [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and", "answered by us (or any other similar Internet site). We", "or that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive", "a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of", "is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is", "not fit into the existing categories, add a new answer", "site is: Academia varies more than you think it does.", "is not are at best confusing to some readers and", "having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”.", "given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains", "be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries", "already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia", "at best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading", "an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a", "More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals,", "link to relevant posts on the main site. * This", "other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we", "aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies more", "academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem that", "that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves", " [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and", "the main site. * This is a community wiki. Please", "to be aware of when using this site is: *Academia", "feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= [Publications](/q/4471#4472)", "shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects,", "* Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields,", "explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities,", "tag on the main site. If you have something to", "of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for", "the table of contents below). * When possible, link to", "site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture and", "when it is not are at best confusing to some", "varies more than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic", "question, it contains only a list of the most important", "tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is:", "an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc.,", "than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic practices strongly", "In which respects does academia vary more than many people", "expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between", "which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes", "to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above", "am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia", "table of contents below). * When possible, link to relevant", "would be a valuable resource for the users of this", "is important to be aware of when using this site", "a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. ", "Introduction ============ One of the actualities of academia that is", "as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on", "Style](/q/4471#4474) [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying", "countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is", "something to add that does not fit into the existing", "people expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g.,", "actualities of academia that is important to be aware of", "contents below). * When possible, link to relevant posts on", "I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does", "something that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet,", "cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar", "We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of", "PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466)", "Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478)", "Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing", "subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work", "answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions", "on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the", "groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs,", "in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got", "some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already", "academia would be a valuable resource for the users of", "(and link it in the table of contents below). ", "[Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD", "this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which", "on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories,", "between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers", "same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all", "this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture", "surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to", "into the existing categories, add a new answer (and link", "only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that", "level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other", "for the users of this site. Hence I am asking:", "answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main", "on the main site. If you have something to add", "to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473)", "on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate", "problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be", "you have something to add that does not fit into", "– which is already quite long for something that is", "assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it", "the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below", "of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that", "[Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and", "everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all levels", "============= In which respects does academia vary more than many", "* [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) ", "aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is a", "readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted", "Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments,", "important to be aware of when using this site is:", "more than many people expect? Variations can be along", "using this site is: *Academia varies more than you think", "to relevant posts on the main site. This is", "is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t", "national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any", "the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the", "the existing categories, add a new answer (and link it", "regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734))", "site. If you have something to add that does not", "does not fit into the existing categories, add a new", "site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel free", "Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the", "to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries", "expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per", "that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when", "be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities,", "noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734),", "that does not fit into the existing categories, add a", "to all levels of users on this site: * Questions", "less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly", "* When possible, link to relevant posts on the main", "academia vary more than many people expect? * Variations can", "Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries,", "be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems,", "of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot", "add that does not fit into the existing categories, add", "many people expect? * Variations can be along different axes,", "and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national", "refer to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer", "* Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences", "little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer", "a valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence", "of users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends", "of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is", "we have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose", "at worst. I already noted this in [my answer to", "it is not are at best confusing to some readers", "levels of users on this site: * Questions whose answers", "into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site.", "introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list", "it in the table of contents below). * When possible,", "such questions since we have become tired of having a", "is the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains", "“it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous", "depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in", "e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical", "physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research", "the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to", "list of the most important examples – which is already", "departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive at", "different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or", "homogeneous in some respect when it is not are at", "and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body", "answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular.", "most important examples – which is already quite long for", "since we have become tired of having a bazillion answers", "to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of", "culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the", "fit into the existing categories, add a new answer (and", "This is a problem that pertains to all levels of", "similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have", "the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only", "examples – which is already quite long for something that", "that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects.", "respect when it is not are at best confusing to", "of the actualities of academia that is important to be", "above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would", "users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on", "don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research in", "that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due", "users of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question", "etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in", "departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence", "research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. ", "it contains only a list of the most important examples", "categories, add a new answer (and link it in the", "when using this site is: Academia varies more than you", "restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only a", "Funding](/q/4471#4475) [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) ", "possible, link to relevant posts on the main site. ", "e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. ", "some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is", "whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual", "the users of this site. Hence I am asking: This", "this site is: Academia varies more than you think it", "to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I", "below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us", "in academia would be a valuable resource for the users", "you think it does.* More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary", "is a problem that pertains to all levels of users", "some respect when it is not are at best confusing", "countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups", "supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the", "Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects", "best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at", "the most important examples – which is already quite long", "of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it", "respects does academia vary more than many people expect? ", "between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It", "which is already quite long for something that is supposed", "Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of", "I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to", "subjects. Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag", "is: Academia varies more than you think it does. More", "to add that does not fit into the existing categories,", "in the table of contents below). * When possible, link", "free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) ", "substance is: “it depends”. Answers that assume that academia", "is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some", "If you have something to add that does not fit", "the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little", "more than you think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices", "at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is", "This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more", "a list of the most important examples – which is", "become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance", "be answered by us (or any other similar Internet site).", "* This is a community wiki. Please feel free to", "whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume", "obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g.,", "us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such", "problem that pertains to all levels of users on this", "labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on less", "countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into", "* [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) * [Academic", "that pertains to all levels of users on this site:", "vary more than many people expect? * Variations can be", "It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that", "universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious", "or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of", "strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even", "consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it", "answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that", "valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence I", "This is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute.", "insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that", "and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this", "academia that is important to be aware of when using", "Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect", "Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= ", "which respects does academia vary more than many people expect?", "add a new answer (and link it in the table", "does.* More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields,", "and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476)", "axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups.", "[Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student", "groups. It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion", "and purposes of that question, it contains only a list", "is already quite long for something that is supposed to", "[Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic", "academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is not", "SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and", "resource for the users of this site. Hence I am", "asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary", "short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive", "wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents =================", "are at best confusing to some readers and wrong and" ]
[ "have. I vote to close a lot of questions but", "only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when", "before casting such votes that the vote would be definitive?", "from others. I think this is probably a mistake as", "mods close questions with no other votes if I consider", "close a question tagged with phd (at least as a", "clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could", "as it gives a non-mod more power than we should", "tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if", "final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with", "phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that", "consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer.", "duplicate), I can do it on my own, without votes", "it gives a non-mod more power than we should have.", "I vote to close a question tagged with phd (at", "I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic.", "votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also", "moderator. But it seems that if I vote to close", "than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so,", "but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final", "topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be", "with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do", "so, could we be warned before casting such votes that", "close a lot of questions but consider my votes as", "close questions with no other votes if I consider the", "answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with no", "behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting such", "lot of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations,", "I can do it on my own, without votes from", "with no other votes if I consider the question borderline", "badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But", "power than we should have. I vote to close a", "if I vote to close a question tagged with phd", "question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I", "Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned", "I vote to close a lot of questions but consider", "consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is", "a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a", "borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior?", "But it seems that if I vote to close a", "tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can", "a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than", "least as a duplicate), I can do it on my", "as a duplicate), I can do it on my own,", "to close a lot of questions but consider my votes", "as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained", "have a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not", "this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before", "not a moderator. But it seems that if I vote", "my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've", "not the final answer. I've also complained when mods close", "can do it on my own, without votes from others.", "a moderator. But it seems that if I vote to", "than we should have. I vote to close a lot", "probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power", "do it on my own, without votes from others. I", "If so, could we be warned before casting such votes", "I have a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm", "is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more", "phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do it", "a lot of questions but consider my votes as only", "own, without votes from others. I think this is probably", "also complained when mods close questions with no other votes", "without votes from others. I think this is probably a", "votes from others. I think this is probably a mistake", "rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If", "seems that if I vote to close a question tagged", "the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems", "recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when mods", "other votes if I consider the question borderline rather than", "think this is probably a mistake as it gives a", "it seems that if I vote to close a question", "a non-mod more power than we should have. I vote", "intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting", "that if I vote to close a question tagged with", "of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not", "vote to close a lot of questions but consider my", "should have. I vote to close a lot of questions", "gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator.", "it on my own, without votes from others. I think", "when mods close questions with no other votes if I", "more power than we should have. I vote to close", "we should have. I vote to close a lot of", "the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this", "the final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions", "(at least as a duplicate), I can do it on", "questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the", "we be warned before casting such votes that the vote", "warned before casting such votes that the vote would be", "complained when mods close questions with no other votes if", "no other votes if I consider the question borderline rather", "my own, without votes from others. I think this is", "I've also complained when mods close questions with no other", "to close a question tagged with phd (at least as", "I think this is probably a mistake as it gives", "a question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate),", "gives a non-mod more power than we should have. I", "off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we", "a duplicate), I can do it on my own, without", "questions with no other votes if I consider the question", "for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it", "votes if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly", "if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off", "on my own, without votes from others. I think this", "others. I think this is probably a mistake as it", "non-mod more power than we should have. I vote to", "be warned before casting such votes that the vote would", "could we be warned before casting such votes that the", "this is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod", "I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if I", "question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended", "vote to close a question tagged with phd (at least", "mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than we" ]
[ "I personally think we should reject the edit and keep", "into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing", "the question, or if someone else wishes to ask the", "topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question", "me and likely to receive the votes needed to be", "to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally", "seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book.", "question, or if someone else wishes to ask the new", "a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to", "seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I", "(which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text", "the edit and keep the original question closed. If the", "be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question", "someone else's closed question [I want a book to be", "vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think we", "topic to me and likely to receive the votes needed", "wishes to ask the new question, they can do that.", "be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from", "to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also", "question. I personally think we should reject the edit and", "personally think we should reject the edit and keep the", "the question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which", "question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems", "to change the question from focusing on a popular fiction", "The edited question seems to be on topic to me", "to edit the question, or if someone else wishes to", "reject the edit and keep the original question closed. If", "someone else wishes to ask the new question, they can", "to me and likely to receive the votes needed to", "else wishes to ask the new question, they can do", "It also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s", "likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It", "stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think", "be on topic to me and likely to receive the", "should reject the edit and keep the original question closed.", "OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the edit", "edit and keep the original question closed. If the OP", "else's closed question [I want a book to be translated", "question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question,", "we should reject the edit and keep the original question", "from the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject", "question [I want a book to be translated into my", "book. The edited question seems to be on topic to", "off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited", "to be on topic to me and likely to receive", "and likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened.", "academic text book. The edited question seems to be on", "edited someone else's closed question [I want a book to", "edit the question, or if someone else wishes to ask", "the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to", "[I want a book to be translated into my native", "the OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone", "original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the", "on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic)", "to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the", "think we should reject the edit and keep the original", "the original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit", "also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question.", "on topic to me and likely to receive the votes", "to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems", "a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to", "to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far", "closed question [I want a book to be translated into", "or if someone else wishes to ask the new question,", "If the OP wishes to edit the question, or if", "user heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want a", "question seems to be on topic to me and likely", "my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on", "keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes to", "A user heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want", "a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to", "far from the OP’s question. I personally think we should", "hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to be", "closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question, or", "text book. The edited question seems to be on topic", "want a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language)", "OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone else", "wishes to edit the question, or if someone else wishes", "seems to be on topic to me and likely to", "focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off", "if someone else wishes to ask the new question, they", "heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want a book", "and keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes", "change the question from focusing on a popular fiction book", "receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems", "needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary", "language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a popular", "book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change", "popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a", "edited question seems to be on topic to me and", "reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from the", "the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the", "clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The", "fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical", "from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly", "translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from", "native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a", "votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray", "book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic" ]
[ "need to be handled consistently. […] > > > I", "when editing a question to prevent closure?** * This is", "> > Let me note that there have been other", "(on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here: +", "closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions when", "that it would be good to establish a guideline regarding", "an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on", "How far should we go when editing a question to", "to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: How far", "the OP. I think that such things need to be", "have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it", "> > I concur that it would be good to", "in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match", "[Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off", "we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic", "questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how they", "not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked", "as it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I", "to be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur", "about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at", "edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to", "OP. I think that such things need to be handled", "We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent'", "translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note", "been other questions here that have been edited to change", "would be good to establish a guideline regarding this to", "changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy", "is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are", "consistently. […] > > > I concur that it would", "are asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed", "case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) +", "(IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed by", "This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already.", "where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there", "> I concur that it would be good to establish", "topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > >", "things need to be handled consistently. […] > > >", "discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed", "such things need to be handled consistently. […] > >", "seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think that", "that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734),", "I concur that it would be good to establish a", "go when editing a question to prevent closure?** * This", "another meta question.) * This is about questions that have", "once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet another", "be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that", "note that there have been other questions here that have", "I am asking: How far should we go when editing", "on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me", "me note that there have been other questions here that", "expressed by the OP. I think that such things need", "is a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that", "I think that such things need to be handled consistently.", "answers already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving", "Let me note that there have been other questions here", "a question to prevent closure? * This is not about", "this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734)", "is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We", "surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If", "and thus I am asking: *How far should we go", "it would be good to establish a guideline regarding this", "question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let", " This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple", "obtain consistency and thus I am asking: *How far should", "> Let me note that there have been other questions", "an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734):", "addressed in yet another meta question.) This is about", "in yet another meta question.) * This is about questions", "[remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have been", "multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could", "am asking: How far should we go when editing a", "books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that", "that such things need to be handled consistently. […] >", "about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already", "that there have been other questions here that have been", "intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to", "regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking:", "should we go when editing a question to prevent closure?", "that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this", "This is a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit", "[Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit", "the intent as it seemed to be expressed by the", "other questions here that have been edited to change (IMO)", "questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired,", "this could be addressed in yet another meta question.) ", "be addressed in yet another meta question.) This is", "asking: *How far should we go when editing a question", "think that such things need to be handled consistently. […]", "meta question.) This is about questions that have received", "already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in", "consistency and thus I am asking: How far should we", "to prevent closure? * This is not about removing surplus", "guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am", "closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how", "this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: How", "[Should we edit questions to match how they were answered?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1151/7734)", "intent as it seemed to be expressed by the OP.", "prevent closure? * This is not about removing surplus questions", "questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed", "'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions", "be expressed by the OP. I think that such things", "establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus", "been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed", "removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once.", "desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta question.)", "questions here that have been edited to change (IMO) the", "+ [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we", "reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question", "asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in", "Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have", "> > > I concur that it would be good", "to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and", "a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally", "it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think", "received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here:", "good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency", "here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should", "have been other questions here that have been edited to", "change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed", "a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I", "questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could be", "we go when editing a question to prevent closure?** ", "that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as", "question to prevent closure?* * This is not about removing", "concur that it would be good to establish a guideline", "yet another meta question.) * This is about questions that", "thus I am asking: *How far should we go when", "already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original", "edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating", "handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that it", "to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an", "[…] > > > I concur that it would be", "could be addressed in yet another meta question.) This", "to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be", "by the OP. I think that such things need to", "+ [Should we edit questions to match how they were", "here that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent", "when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this", "editing a question to prevent closure?** * This is not", "there have been other questions here that have been edited", "far should we go when editing a question to prevent", "at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet", "fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where", "have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case", "to be expressed by the OP. I think that such", "off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): >", "follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes", "This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions", "* This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers", "be good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain", "(If desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta", "question.) * This is about questions that have received (on-topic)" ]
[ "on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for", "an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a", "the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding", "cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends on", "answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey =", "industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452)", "of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example,", "[When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an", "from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take", "What is our stance regarding questions asking for survey of", "if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a", "a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm", "asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or", "questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic", "off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives", "Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When", "pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack", "= ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking", "is our stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s", "regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they", "institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the", "a gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic", "depends on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask", "survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not", "the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a", "regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question", "institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to", "stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are", "on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic", "they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an", "existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack Exchange users).", "receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does the", "researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does", "funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university", "an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry", "survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for", "academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey", "university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the", "ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about", "asked for a survey if the answer depends on the", "the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey", "take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer", "the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers", "or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher", "academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner,", "to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack Exchange", "For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a", "for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying", "a survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask", "example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift", "our stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations?", "researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if", "question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from", "for a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys", "partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked", "a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends", "for a survey if the answer depends on the institution.", "**Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to existing", "survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For", "gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's", "does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for", "for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic?" ]
[ "I disclosed my field on top of the other personal", "rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a", "I am a young researcher and since some of the", "I disclose, my field being one of them. My specific", "enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since", "disclose my field in order to answer my question. I'm", "doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers", "already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of,", "satisfying response, but I know that defies the point of", "on top of the other personal clues I've given in", "using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of", "old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain).", "disclosed my field on top of the other personal clues", "insist that I disclose my field in order to answer", "rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose,", "an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that", "for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that", "and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who", "some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and", "know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is", "given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same,", "young researcher and since some of the questions I want", "detective; at some point SE was even storing old usernames", "field being one of them. My specific field is small,", "real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting", "subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm", "answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some way", "field to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet", "of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal", "field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if", "changed my username (but I doubt that would deter an", "if there is some way around this-- i.e., how to", "to guard my privacy while still offering enough information for", "this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering", "am careful about what information I disclose, my field being", "being one of them. My specific field is small, and", "there is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard", "privacy while still offering enough information for an apt answer?", "change from field to field (and even from subfield to", "are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I", "the other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've", "considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response,", "that I disclose my field in order to answer my", "the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does", "been using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid", "Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even", "postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young", "usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I", "out who I am if I disclosed my field on", "answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a", "a young researcher and since some of the questions I", "specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort", "for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups", "point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not", "a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am", "username (but I doubt that would deter an eager detective;", "I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the", "much effort to figure out who I am if I", "about what information I disclose, my field being one of", "careful about what information I disclose, my field being one", "aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order to", "the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather", "just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but", "and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand", "probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist", "other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed", "from field to field (and even from subfield to subfield).", "it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I", "of the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive,", "even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy", "one of them. My specific field is small, and it", "to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there", "would deter an eager detective; at some point SE was", "member of, and changed my username (but I doubt that", "My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much", "am if I disclosed my field on top of the", "small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out", "and since some of the questions I want to ask", "[This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal with privacy.", "figure out who I am if I disclosed my field", "guard my privacy while still offering enough information for an", "and changed my username (but I doubt that would deter", "publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely", "even considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying", "enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other", "some of the questions I want to ask are rather", "field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to", "top of the other personal clues I've given in my", "question. I'm wondering if there is some way around this--", "that practices change from field to field (and even from", "at some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly,", "devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher", "deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but I", "I'm a member of, and changed my username (but I", "stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get", "that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related,", "However, since I am a young researcher and since some", "in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there", "I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons.", "some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy", "from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues", "at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I", "(but I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at", "response, but I know that defies the point of SE.", "still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already", "SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed my", "information I disclose, my field being one of them. My", "am a young researcher and since some of the questions", "of them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't", "around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still", "the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I", "tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices", "understand that practices change from field to field (and even", "quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However,", "my field being one of them. My specific field is", "that I'm a member of, and changed my username (but", "SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal with", "I am careful about what information I disclose, my field", "my field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering", "order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is", "what information I disclose, my field being one of them.", "my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for", "However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my", "I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member", "an eager detective; at some point SE was even storing", "I am if I disclosed my field on top of", "apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm", "ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information", "similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I", "SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags", "after I get a satisfying response, but I know that", "mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and since", "usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from field", "during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I", "in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably", "information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE", "questions after I get a satisfying response, but I know", "effort to figure out who I am if I disclosed", "way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while", "of, and changed my username (but I doubt that would", "old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from", "would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in", "some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field", "privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions", "who I am if I disclosed my field on top", "to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some", "I disclose my field in order to answer my question.", "I get a satisfying response, but I know that defies", "noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However,", "a member of, and changed my username (but I doubt", "my username (but I doubt that would deter an eager", "of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and", "field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are", "point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @", "I know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields)", "(and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real", "to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake.", "them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take", "wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I am", "is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my", "@ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that", "academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship.", "rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order", "since I am a young researcher and since some of", "storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames", "to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change", "I've been using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc", "get a satisfying response, but I know that defies the", "I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some", "are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just", "to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what", "of the other personal clues I've given in my questions.", "that would deter an eager detective; at some point SE", "I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get a", "hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of, and", "a satisfying response, but I know that defies the point", "if I disclosed my field on top of the other", "but I know that defies the point of SE. [This", "is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure", "reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose", "was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to", "doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some point", "sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose, my", "practices change from field to field (and even from subfield", "researcher and since some of the questions I want to", "my field on top of the other personal clues I've", "same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively", "field on top of the other personal clues I've given", "to figure out who I am if I disclosed my", "issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after", "completely understand that practices change from field to field (and", "even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old", "groups that I'm a member of, and changed my username", "deter an eager detective; at some point SE was even", "I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful", "remain). I completely understand that practices change from field to", "my question. I'm wondering if there is some way around", "personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others", "I'm wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e.,", "others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some", "take much effort to figure out who I am if", "I completely understand that practices change from field to field", "defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but", "wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e., how", "eager detective; at some point SE was even storing old", "other SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed", "want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about", "subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at", "questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am", "i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering enough", "disclose, my field being one of them. My specific field", "there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering", "while still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've", "clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing", "offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden", "since some of the questions I want to ask are", "how to guard my privacy while still offering enough information", "questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar", "my privacy while still offering enough information for an apt" ]
[ "was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak", "I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and", "one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant,", "Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks that", "remove that the person was fired. After all, it is", "fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was", "misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove", "Hеllo, I am asking here regarding the answer of user", "was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on", "sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to", "B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where", "sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is", "Knowing what the original was, I find the words \"other", "somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\".", "the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also", "the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was", "This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original", "described in the original question a situation where somebody was", "answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should", "consequently also remove that the person was fired. After all,", "not so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\".", "English is not so good, maybe there are better words", "\"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of", "\"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like", "grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation", "misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the words", "comment there encouraging users to check out the edit history.", "is not so good, maybe there are better words than", "is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling.", "\"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar", "better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me", "original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too", "the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question:", "edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I", "solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\"", "sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove", "is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that", "out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it", "good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds", "because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited", "original question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he", "words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because", "in a different department makes students run laps as part", "I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented", "so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\"", "was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This", "[Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department", "recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this.", "are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to", "irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that the", "\"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to", "it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask", "a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself", "I think one should consequently also remove that the person", "offensive because of events in my social circle. Based on", "users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did", "the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one", "this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one", "reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should", "far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in", "history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead,", "check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but", "maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too", "to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person", "a comment there encouraging users to check out the edit", "person was fired. After all, it is not relevant to", "weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting", "the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive", "I am asking here to edit this. I propose three", "not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3.", "it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is", "words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and", "relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put", "question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced", "I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes", "students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd", "that the person was fired. After all, it is not", "following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a", "where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a", "of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question", "thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I", "misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events", "circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking", "the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far", "Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users", "edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed.", "asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to", "issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If", "weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired.", "should consequently also remove that the person was fired. After", "3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check out", "laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in", "like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that", "person was fired. If one thinks that the reason of", "\"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the", "Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when a", "events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by", "run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described", "to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for", "propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for", "above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If one", "edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other", "of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I", "I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to", "think one should consequently also remove that the person was", "misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not", "this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\"", "but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should", "Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta for editing.", "fired. If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct", "as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the", "one should consequently also remove that the person was fired.", "B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when", "(My English is not so good, maybe there are better", "their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a", "weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my social", "by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I", "Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here", "user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene", "there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak", "too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the", "to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this", "encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I", "of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently", "\"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English", "am asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd", "me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\".", "in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft,", "the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment", "makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B.", "social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am", "the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in", "\"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good,", "to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find", "to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue", "story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there", "If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is", "am asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions:", "fired. After all, it is not relevant to the story", "a different department makes students run laps as part of", "did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that", "in the original question a situation where somebody was fired", "department makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run)", "somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle. Based", "and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2.", "removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta", "forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other", "Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for", "deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there", "was fired. After all, it is not relevant to the", "too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my", "is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to", "there encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed,", "intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students", "etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there are", "than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds", "situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on", "the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was", "was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was,", "question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a different", "After all, it is not relevant to the story B.", "three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual", "1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or", "\"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the", "\"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible", "to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My", "Put a comment there encouraging users to check out the", "Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I propose", "all, it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd", "when a colleague in a different department makes students run", "or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so", "to the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague", "the person was fired. If one thinks that the reason", "himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\".", "because of events in my social circle. Based on a", "misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc.", "that the person was fired. If one thinks that the", "different department makes students run laps as part of their", "was fired. If one thinks that the reason of the", "2. Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks", "a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what", "to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a", "B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging", "colleague in a different department makes students run laps as", "asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1.", "here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change", "also remove that the person was fired. After all, it", "I am asking here regarding the answer of user B.", "find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat", "Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft", "on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing", "of events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation", "Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where somebody", "the person was fired. After all, it is not relevant", "horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe", "other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\"", "part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original", "here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the", "regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following", "a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit", "and somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle.", "my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I", "the original question a situation where somebody was fired because", "on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to", "what the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\"", "Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta for", "secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the", "telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check", "a colleague in a different department makes students run laps", "that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think" ]
[ "Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and", "[Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal.", "Many apologies for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as", "life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit", "advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be", "wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall", "apologies for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her", "physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817).", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make it on-topic?", "to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she", "her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I", "be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make it", "goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it", "How do I edit it and make it on-topic? Thanks!", "for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life", "as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do", "she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make", "suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How" ]
[ "model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove", "corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of", "more important. After all, the social consensus will only point", "proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast", "in the area in which the answer is being sought?", "consensus will only point to the answers which ought to", "committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be judged", "visible), then the person asking the question is not getting", "any point in time going to be fewer than the", "(upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario,", "however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to be", "model on which the stack exchange sites work and I", "essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience", "to answer how one's research might be judged and gains", "and might not really reflect reality. Without going into the", "general model on which the stack exchange sites work and", "experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore", "upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then", "no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the", "prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and", "and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model", "time going to be fewer than the number of students", "ought to be how things are, and might not really", "of the people answering ought to be more important. After", "the details, if someone who has never been on say,", "who may not have experience in the area in which", "than the number of students and academic staff (research assistants,", "things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going", "to the answers which ought to be how things are,", "number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself),", "which ought to be how things are, and might not", "here is at any point in time going to be", "academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay", "(research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought", "assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to", "in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted", "feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights.", "downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the question", "into the details, if someone who has never been on", "tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who", "answering ought to be more important. After all, the social", "one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply", "have experience in the area in which the answer is", "rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are", "someone who has never been on say, a faculty hiring", "verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is", "and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are", "be how things are, and might not really reflect reality.", "question is not getting a good answer. The gist of", "the stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange", "the person asking the question is not getting a good", "people who may not have experience in the area in", "The gist of it is, that for this particular stack", "a good answer. The gist of it is, that for", "good answer. The gist of it is, that for this", "at any point in time going to be fewer than", "the number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like", "able to prove their experience in a socially recognized way", "exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes,", "therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the", "the answers which ought to be how things are, and", "then the person asking the question is not getting a", "from people who may not have experience in the area", "the qualifications of the people answering ought to be more", "are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going into", "which are visible), then the person asking the question is", "if someone who has never been on say, a faculty", "going to be fewer than the number of students and", "stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number", "recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In", "rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people", "I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote", "gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible),", "that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr:", "it meaningful to allow answers from people who may not", "reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone who", "answer how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes", "to allow answers from people who may not have experience", "may not have experience in the area in which the", "is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their", "linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given", "I have been thinking about the general model on which", "atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of", "on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how", "have been thinking about the general model on which the", "In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people", "academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified", "about the general model on which the stack exchange sites", "that the number of faculty active here is at any", "the general model on which the stack exchange sites work", "has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes", "to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that", "experience in the area in which the answer is being", "gist of it is, that for this particular stack exchange,", "on which the stack exchange sites work and I feel", "the people answering ought to be more important. After all,", "been thinking about the general model on which the stack", "to be how things are, and might not really reflect", "their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are", "Given that the number of faculty active here is at", "been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer", "this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked", "the question is not getting a good answer. The gist", "details, if someone who has never been on say, a", "stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is", "students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel", "granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications", "a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research", "sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed.", "privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the", "this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering", "feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially", "it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials", "has no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking", "point to the answers which ought to be how things", "hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be", "ought to be more important. After all, the social consensus", "person asking the question is not getting a good answer.", "allow answers from people who may not have experience in", "awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers", "Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who may", "exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather", "lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in a", "After all, the social consensus will only point to the", "way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this", "are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however,", "particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to", "for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be", "and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia,", "might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no", "people answering ought to be more important. After all, the", "The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to", "all, the social consensus will only point to the answers", "the number of faculty active here is at any point", "in time going to be fewer than the number of", "important. After all, the social consensus will only point to", "that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in", "point in time going to be fewer than the number", "practitioners are able to prove their experience in a socially", "rushes to answer how one's research might be judged and", "is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought", "to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to", "terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active", "be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes", "say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's", "be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow", "be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes.", "answers from people who may not have experience in the", "ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful", "research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has", "scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought", "staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty", "credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in", "be fewer than the number of students and academic staff", "social consensus will only point to the answers which ought", "how things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without", "is not getting a good answer. The gist of it", "qualifications of the people answering ought to be more important.", "be more important. After all, the social consensus will only", "not getting a good answer. The gist of it is,", "number of faculty active here is at any point in", "of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I", "and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that", "never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to", "work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The", "(or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the", "asking the question is not getting a good answer. The", "faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it", "thinking about the general model on which the stack exchange", "going into the details, if someone who has never been", "is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners", "meaningful to allow answers from people who may not have", "getting a good answer. The gist of it is, that", "fewer than the number of students and academic staff (research", "socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges.", "are able to prove their experience in a socially recognized", "not really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if", "is at any point in time going to be fewer", "to be fewer than the number of students and academic", "active here is at any point in time going to", "a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding", "to prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes)", "judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which", "stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation", "in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty", "that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to", "simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the person", "reality. Without going into the details, if someone who has", "I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is", "ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms", "who has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee,", "faculty active here is at any point in time going", "might not really reflect reality. Without going into the details,", "like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be", "to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of", "faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might", "not have experience in the area in which the answer", "are visible), then the person asking the question is not", "answers which ought to be how things are, and might", "only point to the answers which ought to be how", "like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that", "myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded", "of faculty active here is at any point in time", "which the stack exchange sites work and I feel like", "academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to", "really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone", "the social consensus will only point to the answers which", "to be more important. After all, the social consensus will", "how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or", "downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from", "reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the", "will only point to the answers which ought to be", "flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able", "answer. The gist of it is, that for this particular", "of it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving", "of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here", "downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here is", "Without going into the details, if someone who has never" ]
[ "publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more than", "tell if it is okay to ask here? If not,", "it is okay to ask here? If not, can you", "than a decade. > > > I had a former", "competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do they", "hours in it. Do they have the right to do", "have the right to do that, to tell me that", "to a better forum? > > I consider myself part", "internally, and the company requests that I not publish. They", "okay to ask here? If not, can you point to", "put some decent hours in it. Do they have the", "it internally, and the company requests that I not publish.", "decent hours in it. Do they have the right to", "I've put some decent hours in it. Do they have", "who would care are the competition.” I've put some decent", "the company requests that I not publish. They say: “The", "requests that I not publish. They say: “The only people", "to ask here? If not, can you point to a", "the right to do that, to tell me that I", "question, but am not sure if it is appropriate for", "“The only people who would care are the competition.” I've", "They say: “The only people who would care are the", "and the company requests that I not publish. They say:", "the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? > >", "it is appropriate for this site. Can you help me", "paper that I was planning to publish. They shared it", "I was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and", "community of scholars. I have a few publications, but have", "consider myself part of the community of scholars. I have", "a decade. > > > I had a former colleague,", "can you point to a better forum? > > I", "you point to a better forum? > > I consider", "at a former employer, review a paper that I was", "that I was planning to publish. They shared it internally,", "that, to tell me that I can't publish, if the", "had a former colleague, one who works at a former", "they have the right to do that, to tell me", "of the community of scholars. I have a few publications,", "site. Can you help me tell if it is okay", "content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? > > >", "it. Do they have the right to do that, to", "former employer, review a paper that I was planning to", "a former employer, review a paper that I was planning", "me that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs", "who works at a former employer, review a paper that", "Can you help me tell if it is okay to", "I consider myself part of the community of scholars. I", "a former colleague, one who works at a former employer,", "publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests that", "a better forum? > > I consider myself part of", "myself part of the community of scholars. I have a", "that I not publish. They say: “The only people who", "was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the", "ask the following question, but am not sure if it", "publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential?", "> I had a former colleague, one who works at", "part of the community of scholars. I have a few", "have worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade.", "tell me that I can't publish, if the content isn't", "more than a decade. > > > I had a", "I want to ask the following question, but am not", "some decent hours in it. Do they have the right", "am not sure if it is appropriate for this site.", "right to do that, to tell me that I can't", "the community of scholars. I have a few publications, but", "worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade. >", "works at a former employer, review a paper that I", "shared it internally, and the company requests that I not", "the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do", "of scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked", "care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in", "not sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can", "in industry for more than a decade. > > >", "scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked (hard)", "> I consider myself part of the community of scholars.", "I have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in", "a paper that I was planning to publish. They shared", "that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or", "if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? >", "decade. > > > I had a former colleague, one", "planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the company", "few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more", "only people who would care are the competition.” I've put", "to publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests", "is appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell", "sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can you", "have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry", "> > I had a former colleague, one who works", "I not publish. They say: “The only people who would", "to tell me that I can't publish, if the content", "the following question, but am not sure if it is", "this site. Can you help me tell if it is", "in it. Do they have the right to do that,", "but have worked (hard) in industry for more than a", "help me tell if it is okay to ask here?", "but am not sure if it is appropriate for this", "for this site. Can you help me tell if it", "want to ask the following question, but am not sure", "to ask the following question, but am not sure if", "former colleague, one who works at a former employer, review", "review a paper that I was planning to publish. They", "do that, to tell me that I can't publish, if", "are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it.", "if it is appropriate for this site. Can you help", "say: “The only people who would care are the competition.”", "one who works at a former employer, review a paper", "to do that, to tell me that I can't publish,", "here? If not, can you point to a better forum?", "company requests that I not publish. They say: “The only", "publish. They say: “The only people who would care are", "for more than a decade. > > > I had", "not publish. They say: “The only people who would care", "I had a former colleague, one who works at a", "is okay to ask here? If not, can you point", "you help me tell if it is okay to ask", "me tell if it is okay to ask here? If", "not, can you point to a better forum? > >", "people who would care are the competition.” I've put some", "> > > I had a former colleague, one who", "> > I consider myself part of the community of", "better forum? > > I consider myself part of the", "point to a better forum? > > I consider myself", "following question, but am not sure if it is appropriate", "(hard) in industry for more than a decade. > >", "colleague, one who works at a former employer, review a", "employer, review a paper that I was planning to publish.", "if it is okay to ask here? If not, can", "ask here? If not, can you point to a better", "would care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours", "If not, can you point to a better forum? >", "Do they have the right to do that, to tell", "industry for more than a decade. > > > I", "They shared it internally, and the company requests that I", "appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell if", "a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for", "I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't", "can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely)", "forum? > > I consider myself part of the community" ]
[ "* What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? ", "of this site? Acknowledgement* Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design", "being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: ", "specificities of this site? Acknowledgement* Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics", "a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What", "challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this site?", "please describe what it is like being a moderator on", "you please describe what it is like being a moderator", "the [upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe what", "particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties?", "Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your most", "what it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack", "the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from", "are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are", "could you please describe what it is like being a", "time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of", "In particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging", "your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the", "* What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea", "For the [upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe", "and future elections, could you please describe what it is", "Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your most time-consuming", "moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are", "future elections, could you please describe what it is like", "describe what it is like being a moderator on Academia", "Exchange? In particular: * What are your most time-consuming or", "is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In", "most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities", "What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly", "site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design Stack Exchange](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3638/70044).", "this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design Stack", "elections, could you please describe what it is like being", "What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What", "duties? * What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement", "or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this", "are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen", "it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange?", "on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your", "like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular:", "[upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe what it" ]
[ "opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to", "* This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that", "have been selected, a new question will be opened to", "editorial control in the selection of the questions and may", "on the same day, give or take time to arrive", "thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed", "two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones", "information on candidates. As a community, you are still free", "of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire.", "with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the", "for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are", "or irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions", "candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for", "ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided", "collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post", "questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only", "> > *The purpose of this thread was to collect", "We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the", "the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions", "selection of the questions and may opt not to select", "that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates.", "for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with", "to, for example, hold a live chat session with your", "finished questionnaire. This is a perfect opportunity to voice", "community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to", "how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until", "about this process, feel free to post as a comment", "> *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions", "running into at currently. At the start of the", "In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A", "with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications", "The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it", "16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding a", "the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of", "perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If", "as that will make it easier for transcribing for the", "or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.", "are still free to, for example, hold a live chat", "that are specific to your community and issues that you", "to be included, the latter ones are if the community", "or feedback about this process, feel free to post as", "first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter", "at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase,", "containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the", "community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic", "2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the", "to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is", "to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial", "voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase,", "Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted", "any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to", "of the community to pose questions to the candidates on", "day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this", "the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may", "link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will", "typically containing 10 questions in total. This is not", "voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread,", "nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or", "the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link,", "total. * This is not the only option that users", "not the only option that users have for gathering information", "moderation or the election. * Once questions have been selected,", "instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use", "EDT on the same day, give or take time to", "a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity", "* At the start of the nomination phase, the Community", "the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in", "free to, for example, hold a live chat session with", "16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the", "only option that users have for gathering information on candidates.", "post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains", "* Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at", "will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.", "questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of", "session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps", "the community to pose questions to the candidates on the", "the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. ", "the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough", "same day, give or take time to arrive for closure),", "to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is", "control in the selection of the questions and may opt", "only post one question per answer. We, the Community", "* If your question contains a link, please use the", "questions that are specific to your community and issues that", "use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it", "select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted", "This will be done in a single post, unlike the", "still free to, for example, hold a live chat session", "that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a", "UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give", "of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up", "hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask", "chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or", "(so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm", "`[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for", "to your community and issues that you are running into", "you are running into at currently. * At the start", "into at currently. * At the start of the nomination", "Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic", "be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't", "from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have", "actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in", "questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions", "* We, the Community Team, will be providing a small", "by the community provided in this thread, to use in", "this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2", "the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to", "will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the", "on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's", "questions and may opt not to select a question that", "use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia is scheduled for an election", "Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z", "> > > Academia is scheduled for an election [next", "8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community", "questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to", "or the election. * Once questions have been selected, a", "phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00", "If you have any questions or feedback about this process,", "at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same", "of the site. Post answers to this question containing any", "Community Team will select up to 8 of the top", "nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8", "take time to arrive for closure), this question will be", "will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will", "may opt not to select a question that is tangential", "be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if", "small selection of generic questions. The first two will be", "some editorial control in the selection of the questions and", "selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed", "question per answer. We, the Community Team, will be", "Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions.", "will select up to 8 of the top voted questions", "up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by", "be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be", "provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or", "questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the", "to arrive for closure), this question will be open to", "election. * Once questions have been selected, a new question", "on candidates. As a community, you are still free to,", "in total. * This is not the only option that", "and may opt not to select a question that is", "of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing", "per answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing", "from the users of the site. Post answers to this", "issues that you are running into at currently. * At", "transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect", "you are still free to, for example, hold a live", "the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier", "the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control", "what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any", "it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This", "addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some", "feedback about this process, feel free to post as a", "if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be", "candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the", "Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until", "generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be", "> > Academia is scheduled for an election [next week,", "candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We,", "be an opportunity for members of the community to pose", "the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how", "pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation.", "scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection", "questions have been selected, a new question will be opened", "the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will", "would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one", "questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find", "now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).* > >", "select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation", "you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel", "the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to", "of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to", "the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions", "reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions", "providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two", "completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination", "members of the community to pose questions to the candidates", "clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you", "are running into at currently. * At the start of", "not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant", "in the selection of the questions and may opt not", "to moderation or the election. * Once questions have been", "users of the site. Post answers to this question containing", "holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an", "will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The", "* Once questions have been selected, a new question will", "please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make", "is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the", "to collect potential questions from the users of the site.", "and issues that you are running into at currently. ", "tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. Once", "for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a", "are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will", "of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work:", "candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.", "questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike", "Post answers to this question containing any questions you would", "Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this", "thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire", "contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as", "the only option that users have for gathering information on", "for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates", "be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.", "for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. ", "opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community", "live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).* > > >", "election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we", "of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided", "you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post", "question containing any questions you would like to ask the", "your question contains a link, please use the syntax of", "an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions", "Once questions have been selected, a new question will be", "to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of", "a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or", "open to collect potential questions from the users of the", "are specific to your community and issues that you are", "latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions.", "time to arrive for closure), this question will be open", "questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).", "to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the", "We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection", "give or take time to arrive for closure), this question", "collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live,", "this question containing any questions you would like to ask", "the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This", "or take time to arrive for closure), this question will", "prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please", "the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about", "one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will", "or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or", "your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from", "have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you", "is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions", "this question will be open to collect potential questions from", "be open to collect potential questions from the users of", "start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select", "will be open to collect potential questions from the users", "September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding", "specific to your community and issues that you are running", "was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is", "will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are", "candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what", "10 questions in total. * This is not the only", "work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16", "unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a", "20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day,", "to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now", "host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10", "example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to", "connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with", "gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still", "syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for", "site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you", "further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in", "post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team,", "included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply", "this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The", "question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for", "done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. ", "closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions", "that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished", "question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`,", "At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team", "for the finished questionnaire. This is a perfect opportunity", "to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to", "for closure), this question will be open to collect potential", "an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that,", "community, you are still free to, for example, hold a", "candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is", "questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included,", "the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely", "selected, a new question will be opened to host the", "provided in this thread, to use in addition to the", "opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically", "ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.", "> Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September", "questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post", "the same day, give or take time to arrive for", "a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to", "voice questions that are specific to your community and issues", "submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use", "to this question containing any questions you would like to", "be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first", "guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection", "it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia is scheduled for an", "perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your", "arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect", "Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so,", "the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done", "This is not the only option that users have for", "the questions and may opt not to select a question", "ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This", "questions from the users of the site. Post answers to", "a small selection of generic questions. The first two will", "If your question contains a link, please use the syntax", "week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be", "* This is not the only option that users have", "irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions have", "have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free", "to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.", "to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing", "Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for", "live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions,", "the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC,", "that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election.", "is not the only option that users have for gathering", "4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take", "the election. * Once questions have been selected, a new", "community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in", "may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled", "the users of the site. Post answers to this question", "questions in total. * This is not the only option", "[next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will", "aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in", "the Community Team will select up to 8 of the", "this process, feel free to post as a comment here.", "is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). >", "any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please", "it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September", "guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the", "a live chat session with your candidates to ask further", "in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve", "is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In", "single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question", "currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the", "doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a", "in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned", "to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per", "like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question", "until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT", "make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. ", "users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community,", "The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the", "is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. ", "a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your", "question will be open to collect potential questions from the", "the selection of the questions and may opt not to", "your community and issues that you are running into at", "containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates.", "pm EDT on the same day, give or take time", "This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are", "and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia", "supply enough questions. This will be done in a single", "for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you", "you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia is", "question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the", "the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of", "purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the", "will be done in a single post, unlike the prior", "we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This", "in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If", "enough questions. This will be done in a single post,", "questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and", "answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing a", "phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of", "questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation", "be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates,", "answers to this question containing any questions you would like", "The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for", "of the questions and may opt not to select a", "to voice questions that are specific to your community and", "a new question will be opened to host the actual", "in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback", "been selected, a new question will be opened to host", "September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on", "is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific", "opt not to select a question that is tangential or", "Please only post one question per answer. * We, the", "a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that", "As a community, you are still free to, for example,", "option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As", "moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: ", "for members of the community to pose questions to the", "with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members", "Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3).", "This will be an opportunity for members of the community", "will be an opportunity for members of the community to", "easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This is", "top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this", "the community provided in this thread, to use in addition", "potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers", "a community, you are still free to, for example, hold", "new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire", "topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll", "questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.", "community and issues that you are running into at currently.", "find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for", "that you are running into at currently. * At the" ]
[ "too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for", "that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from", "I have also asked several times that if it's formatted", "that forum and each time have had my questions flagged", "following me around and flagging everything as off topic. I", "around and flagging everything as off topic. I have also", "6-7 times on that forum and each time have had", "for general direction and not specifics. I have had one", "users. How the site was over the top with toxicity,", "it from Reddit users. How the site was over the", "being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping", "with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads,", "for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to", "or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking", "\"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to", "be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users", "myself, and at least in my experience, it seems to", "a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I", "from Reddit users. How the site was over the top", "it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do", "I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum.", "have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each", "that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I", "stating I was looking for general direction and not specifics.", "appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get", "had one user on that site, solar mike or something,", "formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being", "or something, following me around and flagging everything as off", "poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed", "out with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\"", "threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at", "on that site, solar mike or something, following me around", "helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put on", "not specifics. I have had one user on that site,", "Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard", "have had my questions flagged as off topic or too", "out with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7", "about it from Reddit users. How the site was over", "heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users.", "appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of", "each time have had my questions flagged as off topic", "For a site about academia and helping users out with", "to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia", "yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came", "negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site was", "Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard a", "and at least in my experience, it seems to be", "Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with", "flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically", "had my questions flagged as off topic or too specific.", "mike or something, following me around and flagging everything as", "in my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/>", "at least in my experience, it seems to be true.", "off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I", "locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and", "specifics. I have had one user on that site, solar", "posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time have", "I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and", "tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time", "I have had one user on that site, solar mike", "forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get a", "topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was", "see for myself, and at least in my experience, it", "Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general direction", "get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before", "my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR:", "and helping users out with academic related questions, I have", "that site, solar mike or something, following me around and", "general direction and not specifics. I have had one user", "the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate,", "for myself, and at least in my experience, it seems", "of helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put", "top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking", "just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange.", "experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why", "<https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with such", "as off topic. I have also asked several times that", "with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times", "a site about academia and helping users out with academic", "Reddit users. How the site was over the top with", "on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack", "off topic. I have also asked several times that if", "site about academia and helping users out with academic related", "also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or", "related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that", "How the site was over the top with toxicity, removes", "site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for", "duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself,", "time have had my questions flagged as off topic or", "came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of", "had heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit", "would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead", "on that forum and each time have had my questions", "looking for general direction and not specifics. I have had", "have also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly", "true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act", "site, solar mike or something, following me around and flagging", "to see for myself, and at least in my experience,", "too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a", "I was looking for general direction and not specifics. I", "general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a more", "questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me", "etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at least", "as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating", "was looking for general direction and not specifics. I have", "toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc.", "a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for", "forum and each time have had my questions flagged as", "being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see", "and each time have had my questions flagged as off", "that I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate", "TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with such hostility?", "me specifically stating I was looking for general direction and", "academia and helping users out with academic related questions, I", "exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about it", "one user on that site, solar mike or something, following", "I wanted to see for myself, and at least in", "solar mike or something, following me around and flagging everything", "removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I", "have had one user on that site, solar mike or", "and flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked", "me around and flagging everything as off topic. I have", "from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had", "asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or too", "flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked several", "everything as off topic. I have also asked several times", "if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would", "more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just", "a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How", "specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general", "to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with", "hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange,", "academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on", "direction and not specifics. I have had one user on", "users out with academic related questions, I have tried posting", "it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate", "topic. I have also asked several times that if it's", "lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the", "times on that forum and each time have had my", "something, following me around and flagging everything as off topic.", "or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to", "was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being", "to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity", "I had heard a lot of negativity about it from", "questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum", "the site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything", "a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that,", "helping users out with academic related questions, I have tried", "of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site", "my questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite", "wanted to see for myself, and at least in my", "everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted", "least in my experience, it seems to be true. Example:", "times that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that", "and not specifics. I have had one user on that", "I came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot", "pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out", "user on that site, solar mike or something, following me", "seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange", "Instead of helping out with that, just get a yellow", "about academia and helping users out with academic related questions,", "stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about", "notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I", "over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a", "with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification", "specifically stating I was looking for general direction and not", "several times that if it's formatted poorly or too general," ]
[ "sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited", "flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of a", "judged by the number of flags on the question. [One", "with little respect for the American patent system. That answer", "removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my", "prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions.", "here from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's", "a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system.", "the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative,", "policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented", "baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number", "Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the", "to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see", "few people commented that my edits went too far. Were", "commented that my edits went too far. Were my edits", "of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or", "system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about", "then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to", "as judged by the number of flags on the question.", "[a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was", "user can see flags on questions. I edited in the", "Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity.", "discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it", "whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless", "That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether", "them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little", "answers, as judged by the number of flags on the", "A few people commented that my edits went too far.", "try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If", "on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China", "infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by", "comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether", "was a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent", "moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags", "too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to", "that my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate?", "of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated", "flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that", "Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the", "mindset of a member of this site, not as a", "whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions),", "comments. A few people commented that my edits went too", "see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of", "patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in)", "my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note:", "few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of", "disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you don't", "[edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources", "unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits went", "of links to sources on China's IP policy and removing", "links to sources on China's IP policy and removing the", "the mindset of a member of this site, not as", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135907/73) about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious", "on questions. I edited in the mindset of a member", "in the mindset of a member of this site, not", "wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can", "of a member of this site, not as a moderator.", "a number of links to sources on China's IP policy", "on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A", "question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a", "your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on", "to sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced", "patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged", "about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was", "American patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment", "can see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset", "received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer", "edited in the mindset of a member of this site,", "but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I", "to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you", "and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that", "the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on", "people commented that my edits went too far. Were my", "IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people", "little respect for the American patent system. That answer received", "number of links to sources on China's IP policy and", "far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate", "it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding", "the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was", "my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond", "of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with", "was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then", "respect for the American patent system. That answer received [a", "or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the", "edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please", "20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited in", "that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags", "yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the", "by the number of flags on the question. [One of", "any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited", "for the American patent system. That answer received [a lot", "the American patent system. That answer received [a lot of", "stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect for", "from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your", "about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as", "accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of", "questions. I edited in the mindset of a member of", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135907/73) about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers,", "I edited in the mindset of a member of this", "edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here", "the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits", "the diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish", "you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+", "simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect", "number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply", "inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from", "China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few", "adding a number of links to sources on China's IP", "answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I", "If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any", "the number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1)", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on China's", "the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations.", "went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? *Note: Please try", "activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but", "contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags on", "don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user", "that China was a dictatorship with little respect for the", "diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish to,", "answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the", "China was a dictatorship with little respect for the American", "dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system. That", "lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient", "[One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship", "sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments.", "a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number", "I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links", "was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a" ]
[ "submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions", "8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set", "appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all", "Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New", "candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide", "plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your", "post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will", "who you are before they finish reading everything you have", "Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your", "to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for", "best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel", "order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to", "kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What", "Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when", "been? > 8. What do you think the moderators' role", "Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into", "of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle", "putting your name at the top of your post so", "newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of", "candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) ---", "that being a moderator will make you more effective as", "In what way do you feel that being a moderator", "submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What", "everything you have written, and also including a link to", "links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here", "a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8.", "current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions", "moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be", "provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as", "we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by", "What is the time period you are available for moderating", "the questions and then post your answer to each question", "where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't", "name at the top of your post so that readers", "you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about", "would you deal with a user who produced a steady", "questions from us. As a candidate, your job is simple", "noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted", "Do you have any previous experience as a moderator, either", "with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread", "as the space for the candidates to provide their answers.", "question, citing each of the questions and then post your", "available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer", "as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of", "would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a", "> 7. How would you handle a situation where another", "to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt", "with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their", "that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic?", "Not every question was compiled - as noted, we only", "posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any", "users. What would you do as a moderator to improve", "[M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time zone?", "its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal", "more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k", "will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching", "presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given", "moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome", "and how this is enforced? Should we close any question", "yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why", "and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good", "the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open", "produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to", "only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the", "answer to each question given in that same answer. For", "New users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced", "closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? >", "the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been", "a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How", "an answer to this question, citing each of the questions", "and also improve the welcome felt by new posters to", "connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A", "of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer,", "What do you think the moderators' role should be with", "you think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation", "is your time zone? What is the time period you", "In connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a", "> 3. Do you have any previous experience as a", "HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? >", "Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a", "philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the", "you feel this is the best example? > 5. In", "current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is", "of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number", "the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo", "you have written, and also including a link to your", "or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with", "answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript", "order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > >", "as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete", "selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the community,", "your convenience, I will include all of the questions in", "to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission):", "this question, citing each of the questions and then post", "was compiled - as noted, we only selected the top", "users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users.", "to this question, citing each of the questions and then", "communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or", "questions in quote format with a break in between each,", "all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as", "question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What", "Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums", "after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your", "dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order", "post so that readers will know who you are before", "who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends", "[cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time", "compiled - as noted, we only selected the top 8", "strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient", "transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates,", "struggle more than experienced users. What would you do as", "Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close any", "before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list", "your name at the top of your post so that", "the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? >", "welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3.", "steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a", "how this is enforced? Should we close any question that", "the list of links in the order of submission. To", "are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances", "every question was compiled - as noted, we only selected", "good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or", "candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to", "comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation where", "or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy", "to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled -", "the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates!", "the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was", "close any question that does not strictly comply with the", "Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups,", "quote format with a break in between each, suitable for", "tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would you", "What is your time zone? What is the time period", "period you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please", "do you feel this is the best example? > 5.", "candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled", "time period you are available for moderating our site everyday?", "one, which shall now serve as the space for the", "Should we narrow or broaden the scope? > > >", "Should we close any question that does not strictly comply", "answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have", "a link to it after this blurb here, before that", "save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each", "will know who you are before they finish reading everything", "answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden", "all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your", "exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this", "a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to", "into this one, which shall now serve as the space", "of the questions and then post your answer to each", "feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think", "deal with a user who produced a steady stream of", "is your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack", "questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from", "the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links", "How do you think presence on the HNQ list should", "think the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot", "each of the questions and then post your answer to", "it after this blurb here, before that set of three", "as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other", "be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate", "their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted,", "you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing", "or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)?", "you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or", "answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags", "in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend", "provide a link to it after this blurb here, before", "on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its", "you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it", "users from the network? How do you think presence on", "links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of", "previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or", "Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy", "forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours", "improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE?", "will include all of the questions in quote format with", "- post an answer to this question, citing each of", "simple - post an answer to this question, citing each", "rep? > 6. How would you deal with a user", "have written, and also including a link to your answer", "frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with,", "that does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should", "your answer, please provide a link to it after this", "Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are often", "at the top of your post so that readers will", "the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked", "the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name", "you feel that being a moderator will make you more", "What is your stance about the current scope of Academia", "serve as the space for the candidates to provide their", "set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the", "Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and", "on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been", "> 8. What do you think the moderators' role should", "moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the", "effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?", "collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this", "for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in", "scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced?", "do you feel that being a moderator will make you", "is the best example? > 5. In what way do", "in quote format with a break in between each, suitable", "enforced? Should we close any question that does not strictly", "from comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation", "for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and", "the top of your post so that readers will know", "5. In what way do you feel that being a", "site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. >", "a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers,", "break in between each, suitable for you to insert your", "> 10. What is your stance about the current scope", "thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in", "Should we be lenient and keep open questions that can", "the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this", "suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the", "top of your post so that readers will know who", "you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you", "the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network", "holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from", "UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend to", "scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions that", "from the network? How do you think presence on the", "What would you do as a moderator to improve the", "the top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus", "please provide a link to it after this blurb here,", "question was compiled - as noted, we only selected the", "For your convenience, I will include all of the questions", "to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer", "as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as", "comments? > 10. What is your stance about the current", "three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of", "needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10.", "simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would", "questions that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline", "best example? > 5. In what way do you feel", "your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is", "the questions in quote format with a break in between", "way do you feel that being a moderator will make", "will you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance", "3. Do you have any previous experience as a moderator,", "on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best", "this one, which shall now serve as the space for", "linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of", "> 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and", "Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh,", "respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential", "zone? What is the time period you are available for", "of your post so that readers will know who you", "submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us.", "7. How would you handle a situation where another mod", "10. What is your stance about the current scope of", "obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments?", "Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\"", "post an answer to this question, citing each of the", "a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their", "as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? >", "for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question", "the best example? > 5. In what way do you", "(e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer", "large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would", "any question that does not strictly comply with the current", "of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation?", "with the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep", "of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question", "arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle a", "community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate,", "when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to", "us. As a candidate, your job is simple - post", "to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the", "earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall", "do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also", "list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9.", "in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are", "make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k", "of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the", "candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page.", "are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order", "in that same answer. For your convenience, I will include", "answer to this question, citing each of the questions and", "your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first", "experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on", "of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in", "each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458)", "Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier", "that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of", "felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do", "to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed", "we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions", "Why do you feel this is the best example? >", "number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you", "you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify", "the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not", "mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?", "job is simple - post an answer to this question,", "been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters", "deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed.", "voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will", "have been? > 8. What do you think the moderators'", "onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new posters", "list of links in the order of submission. To save", "blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave", "shall now serve as the space for the candidates to", "after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes.", "user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but", "4. What question or answer of yours on meta best", "you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and", "Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What", "a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you", "you think the moderators' role should be with respect to", "reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you", "but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from", "be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given", "and also including a link to your answer on your", "valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of", "link to it after this blurb here, before that set", "nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this", "you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question", "pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job is", "any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange", "with a break in between each, suitable for you to", "answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on", "which shall now serve as the space for the candidates", "insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the", "from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875)", "network? How do you think presence on the HNQ list", "not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be", "than experienced users. What would you do as a moderator", "--- > > 1. What is your time zone? What", "> 2. New users and posters tend to struggle more", "moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC", "by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As", "have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve", "set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links", "page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and", "completed your answer, please provide a link to it after", "your time zone? What is the time period you are", "9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are", "space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every", "submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058)", "even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the", "answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set", "potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we", "to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be", "a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer", "thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting", "have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for", "should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments", "be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to", "do you think presence on the HNQ list should affect", "generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7.", "of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should", "moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of", "what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is", "affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can", "also including a link to your answer on your nomination", "does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we", "thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall now", "2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job", "question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your", "a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an", "tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no", "now serve as the space for the candidates to provide", "whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider", "finish reading everything you have written, and also including a", "the network? How do you think presence on the HNQ", "10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal", "that readers will know who you are before they finish", "your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange", "format. > 2. New users and posters tend to struggle", "compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the", "\"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think presence", "about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how", "open questions that can potentially generate good answers even if", "other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4.", "answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we", "questions and then post your answer to each question given", "their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network?", "the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency?", "in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers.", "and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link", "example? > 5. In what way do you feel that", "between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just", "experienced users. What would you do as a moderator to", "lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate good", "all of the questions in quote format with a break", "Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience", "be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as", "generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow", "would you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding", "link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all", "8. What do you think the moderators' role should be", "we be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially", "by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you", "circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is your", "have any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack", "include all of the questions in quote format with a", "time zone? What is the time period you are available", "will serve as a transcript for voters to view the", "Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of", "this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please", "on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g.", "situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel", "to it after this blurb here, before that set of", "What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies", "you deal with a user who produced a steady stream", "longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? >", "etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours on", "feel that being a moderator will make you more effective", "candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled", "the time period you are available for moderating our site", "moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example?", "their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election", "readers will know who you are before they finish reading", "this is enforced? Should we close any question that does", "is the time period you are available for moderating our", "same answer. For your convenience, I will include all of", "thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458)", "of the questions in quote format with a break in", "Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve", "reading everything you have written, and also including a link", "role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list", "controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you", "a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the", "a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once", "1. What is your time zone? What is the time", "that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do", "comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient and", "you have any previous experience as a moderator, either on", "so that readers will know who you are before they", "meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you", "for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have", "citing each of the questions and then post your answer", "each question given in that same answer. For your convenience,", "question given in that same answer. For your convenience, I", "given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the", "As a candidate, your job is simple - post an", "question that does not strictly comply with the current scope?", "[from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one,", "is enforced? Should we close any question that does not", "flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you", "can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should", "should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions,", "and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What", "your answer to each question given in that same answer.", "format with a break in between each, suitable for you", "are before they finish reading everything you have written, and", "written, and also including a link to your answer on", "know who you are before they finish reading everything you", "your job is simple - post an answer to this", "as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from", "How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc", "more than experienced users. What would you do as a", "[Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is", "think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions,", "shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think the", "list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users", "with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable", "being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed", "moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply", "of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling", "elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates.", "luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've", "a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate", "stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large", "Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we", "three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the", "posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would", "you are before they finish reading everything you have written,", "that same answer. For your convenience, I will include all", "the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please", "> 6. How would you deal with a user who", "and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think", "your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled,", "including a link to your answer on your nomination post.", "- as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions", "2. New users and posters tend to struggle more than", "improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by", "either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities", "to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How", "your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers", "delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about the", "potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How", "this will serve as a transcript for voters to view", "new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have", "then post your answer to each question given in that", "> > 1. What is your time zone? What is", "feel this is the best example? > 5. In what", "on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? >", "serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts", "will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck", "of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top", "here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in", "if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope?", "moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions", "20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with a", "convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote", "answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters", "each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy", "our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format.", "> 4. What question or answer of yours on meta", "the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new", "top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2", "How would you deal with a user who produced a", "the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for", "for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do", "I will include all of the questions in quote format", "for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole", "decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky", "consider putting your name at the top of your post", "on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do", "an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which", "SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience as", "(in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- >", "dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your", "questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions", "from us. As a candidate, your job is simple -", "> 5. In what way do you feel that being", "opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6.", "a break in between each, suitable for you to insert", "stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and", "as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve", "the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a", "To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from", "compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to", "is simple - post an answer to this question, citing", "6. How would you deal with a user who produced", "often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will", "> 1. What is your time zone? What is the", "before they finish reading everything you have written, and also", "handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that", "to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? >", "also improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia", "everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2.", "with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under", "off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope? > >", "view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately", "to each question given in that same answer. For your", "what way do you feel that being a moderator will", "the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a", "of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the", "post your answer to each question given in that same", "tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?", "borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope? >", "Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close", "of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1.", "scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate", "and then post your answer to each question given in", "specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users", "another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have", "do you think the moderators' role should be with respect", "in the Election page. Good luck to all of the", "been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as", "to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous", "they finish reading everything you have written, and also including", "the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please", "[copy the whole thing after the first set of three", "Please leave the list of links in the order of", "are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected", "first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at", "your post so that readers will know who you are", "are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the", "to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after", "this is the best example? > 5. In what way", "given in that same answer. For your convenience, I will", "the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and", "a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind", "and keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers", "answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb", "to struggle more than experienced users. What would you do", "we close any question that does not strictly comply with", "given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to", "keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers even", "here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the", "and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what", "answer. For your convenience, I will include all of the", "leave the list of links in the order of submission.", "can be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged" ]
[ "as a result, people preferred to put some answers in", "primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even experienced", "don't care too much about guidelines that say what is", "question again: Why there is no an equal approach to", "users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the", "capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and", "that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less", "to judge the questions. My guess here is that because", "fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The", "from new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities,", "The other issue is that it took more than \"2", "again: Why there is no an equal approach to judge", "ask my question again: Why there is no an equal", "huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and", "based. My concern is that it seems even experienced users", "users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines", "experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about", "hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked very", "much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what", "guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic", "the questions. My guess here is that because this question,", "relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as", "concern is that it seems even experienced users with moderation", "Why there is no an equal approach to judge which", "here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to", "answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact", "there is no an equal approach to judge which questions", "it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and", "a result, people preferred to put some answers in the", "new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite", "what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an", "an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic or", "I think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164).", "Recently, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not", "that it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging", "is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal", "that because this question, despite the fact that it is", "of getting reputation, which I think it worked very well", "it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I", "the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge", "capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say what", "is no an equal approach to judge which questions are", "other issue is that it took more than \"2 days\"", "well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question", "on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't", "days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this question", "a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now)", "now) and as a result, people preferred to put some", "care too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic", "answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I think", "it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions", "\"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this", "lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even", "off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that it", "from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that", "or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even", "that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't", "spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the", "reputation, which I think it worked very well [for some", "the hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked", "gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion", "have an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess", "an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here", "many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than", "equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here is", "some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why", "a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users", "(> 8k views until now) and as a result, people", "this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the", "despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion", "until now) and as a result, people preferred to put", "no an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic", "of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from", "what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE", "more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes", "fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount", "obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k", "off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach", "close this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until", "it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention", "the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed", "moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic", "attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until", "getting reputation, which I think it worked very well [for", "despite the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten", "than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close", "preferred to put some answers in the hope of getting", "here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there is", "than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is", "that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of", "approach to judge which questions are off-topic or primarily-opinion based?", "minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that", "attention (> 8k views until now) and as a result,", "here is that because this question, despite the fact that", "with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously", "fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already", "that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other", "My guess here is that because this question, despite the", "people preferred to put some answers in the hope of", "as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it", "amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and as", "seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too", "question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted", "users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is", "it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue", "say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in", "judge the questions. My guess here is that because this", "some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I", "don't have an equal approach to judge the questions. My", "because this question, despite the fact that it is obviously", "more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to", "and reporting to close this question and remove spurious and", "is that it took more than \"2 days\" after several", "and don't have an equal approach to judge the questions.", "and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have", "[for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again:", "even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact", "too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and", "is that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities", "to close this question and remove spurious and spam answers,", "in the hope of getting reputation, which I think it", "very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my", "after several flagging and reporting to close this question and", "worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask", "off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views", "is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and", "already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My", "this question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic,", "moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say", "it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care", "of attention (> 8k views until now) and as a", "the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based.", "question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators", "about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is", "took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting", "not just from new users even from experienced users with", "and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite", "reporting to close this question and remove spurious and spam", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from", "even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much", "despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a", "to put some answers in the hope of getting reputation,", "attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced", "put some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which", "I ask my question again: Why there is no an", "which I think it worked very well [for some people", "obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that", "Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge the", "opinion based. The other issue is that it took more", "off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems", "just from new users even from experienced users with moderation", "with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that", "and opinion based. The other issue is that it took", "spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally,", "8k views until now) and as a result, people preferred", "several flagging and reporting to close this question and remove", "finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions have", "attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new", "closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based.", "is that because this question, despite the fact that it", "have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or", "approach to judge the questions. My guess here is that", "the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many", "moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many more", "think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So", "surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced users", "questions. My guess here is that because this question, despite", "My concern is that it seems even experienced users with", "guess here is that because this question, despite the fact", "and as a result, people preferred to put some answers", "questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic", "closed it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant", "that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here", "remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it", "based. The other issue is that it took more than", "equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic or primarily-opinion", "people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there", "result, people preferred to put some answers in the hope", "is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is", "until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that", "experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it", "issue is that it took more than \"2 days\" after", "in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge", "my question again: Why there is no an equal approach", "flagging and reporting to close this question and remove spurious", "and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed", "less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern", "views until now) and as a result, people preferred to", "is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (>", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just", "So I ask my question again: **Why there is no" ]
[ "The SE team has yet again failed to deliver on", "from having to read on, the bottom line is that", "Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet", "down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do", "helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said", "of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy.", "stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room", "moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The", "this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and", "A number of moderators have resigned or are taking time", "year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised", "an opportunity to proactively provide us with the support we", "there has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods", "Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about these", "changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of", "instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some", "make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are", "fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators),", "the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to", "Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other", "is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper).", "about removing her (including the timing on the eve of", "the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are", "by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who", "that I will NOT be resigning or taking time off", "of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack", "am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack", "of moderators have resigned or are taking time off in", "do not care about these issues from having to read", "these issues from having to read on, the bottom line", "team has yet again failed to deliver on this promise", "LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to the", "issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in", "I can be a positive influence in helping support the", "and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE", "SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to", "are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in", "without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+", "[Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested", "changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most", "how they went about removing her (including the timing on", "I do not believe the fired moderator was without fault", "letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team", "Recently there has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing", "revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support.", "of support for our community and in particular the LGBT+", "betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts", "employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator", "their efforts to support our community. About a year ago,", "moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While", "moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has", "again failed to deliver on this promise and is again", "to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the", "LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in their", "of Conduct that I think will make it harder for", "Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to deliver", "lack of support for our community and in particular the", "have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our", "taking time off in relation to issues that arose out", "of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because", "the Code of Conduct that I think will make it", "to deliver on this promise and is again letting our", "they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support", "waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About a", "with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or", "behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared", "I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their", "think I can be a positive influence in helping support", "regarding their efforts to support our community. About a year", "care about these issues from having to read on, the", "and moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity", "NOT be resigning or taking time off because I think", "users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well", "holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied", "members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments", "having to read on, the bottom line is that I", "While I do not believe the fired moderator was without", "forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with", "interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators", "[the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators", "that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to", "LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting", "community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of", "Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed", "To prevent people who do not care about these issues", "they went about removing her (including the timing on the", "team in their lack of support for our community and", "went about removing her (including the timing on the eve", "again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE", "About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/)", "the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her", "out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more", "cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned", "because I think I can be a positive influence in", "comments in the private moderator chat room where the changes", "influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users.", "[Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do", "bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning or", "support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their", "moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally", "is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I", "face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice).", "it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected.", "community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team", "support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I", "what SE employees have shared with us and how they", "holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the", "has yet again failed to deliver on this promise and", "users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and how", "in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing", "our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory", "the SE team in their lack of support for our", "is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The", "to the Code of Conduct that I think will make", "(e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not", "on the eve of one of her most holy holidays)", "because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to", "most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have", "The SE team is proposing changes to the Code of", "deliver on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+", "chat room where the changes to the CoC were being", "not care about these issues from having to read on,", "and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of", "off because I think I can be a positive influence", "fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support", "has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and", "LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and", "a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and", "from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where", "Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to", "arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be", "opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees", "where the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further,", "the bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning", "one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed", "I think I can be a positive influence in helping", "and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating", "in support of her. While I do not believe the", "removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat", "timing on the eve of one of her most holy", "makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters", "fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior", "my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE", "our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has", "discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange", "her. While I do not believe the fired moderator was", "welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users", "the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting", "extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack of", "SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private", "I think will make it harder for moderators to ensure", "SE team has yet again failed to deliver on this", "time off because I think I can be a positive", "I will NOT be resigning or taking time off because", "is that I will NOT be resigning or taking time", "can be a positive influence in helping support the needs", "was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt", "be resigning or taking time off because I think I", "of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed", "moderators have resigned or are taking time off in relation", "on, the bottom line is that I will NOT be", "to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face", "and how they went about removing her (including the timing", "or taking time off because I think I can be", "the timing on the eve of one of her most", "time off in relation to issues that arose out of", "for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The", "needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely", "mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in", "off in relation to issues that arose out of SE's", "most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step", "SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust.", "the eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes", "team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with", "relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the", "of her. While I do not believe the fired moderator", "Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A", "private moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC", "a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing:", "to read on, the bottom line is that I will", "with us and how they went about removing her (including", "changes to the Code of Conduct that I think will", "that I think will make it harder for moderators to", "to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting", "of one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel", "by the SE team in their lack of support for", "has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the", "harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE", "on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users", "members. The SE team is proposing changes to the Code", "do not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in", "are taking time off in relation to issues that arose", "proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I think", "issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes", "their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care", "are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To", "The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide", "yet again failed to deliver on this promise and is", "dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where the", "positive influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+", "LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are", "expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people", "will NOT be resigning or taking time off because I", "failed to deliver on this promise and is again letting", "being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel)", "and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is", "the waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About", "moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC were", "promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team", "resigning or taking time off because I think I can", "about these issues from having to read on, the bottom", "users and moderators down. The SE team has lost an", "SE employees have shared with us and how they went", "SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us", "respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the", "That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team", "of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming", "our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE", "strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down", "to support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited", "eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes me", "dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g.,", "believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion", "be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced", "have resigned or are taking time off in relation to", "of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by", "or are taking time off in relation to issues that", "more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+", "said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in", "taking time off because I think I can be a", "us and how they went about removing her (including the", "their lack of support for our community and in particular", "support for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members.", "the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza", "prevent people who do not care about these issues from", "promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators", "incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+", "feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their", "their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency.", "will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members", "be a positive influence in helping support the needs of", "moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator))", "in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That", "resigned or are taking time off in relation to issues", "to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly", "Conduct that I think will make it harder for moderators", "in their lack of support for our community and in", "in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have", "a positive influence in helping support the needs of our", "line is that I will NOT be resigning or taking", "her (including the timing on the eve of one of", "LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has lost", "in the private moderator chat room where the changes to", "read on, the bottom line is that I will NOT", "in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users.", "step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I", "were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was", "the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the", "SE team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct", "who do not care about these issues from having to", "and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down.", "for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees", "(including the timing on the eve of one of her", "to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars", "ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from", "Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number", "still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of", "in relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence", "the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am", "users face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation", "was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in", "other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her.", "ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators", "[Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not believe", "unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with", "her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they", "team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that", "number of moderators have resigned or are taking time off", "[theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability.", "well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent", "users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE", "lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is", "LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the", "CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator", "regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still", "not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my", "community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are taking", "particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes", "muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our community.", "Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed", "issues from having to read on, the bottom line is", "Code of Conduct that I think will make it harder", "discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and", "employees have shared with us and how they went about", "me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding", "be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues", "room where the changes to the CoC were being discussed.", "lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the support", "the private moderator chat room where the changes to the", "our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by", "hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us", "SE team in their lack of support for our community", "relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in", "shared with us and how they went about removing her", "Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about", "have shared with us and how they went about removing", "people who do not care about these issues from having", "Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again", "support of her. While I do not believe the fired", "efforts to support our community. About a year ago, SE", "removing her (including the timing on the eve of one", "think will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+", "disappointed by the SE team in their lack of support", "moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed", "opportunity to proactively provide us with the support we need.", "down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively", "her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have", "(in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what", "moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to", "in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not" ]
[ "can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary", "moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing", "two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining", "for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them", "they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking", "[![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them", "learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail", "me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as", "voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3),", "come to a close, the votes have been tallied and", "the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary report online](https://www.opavote.com/results/5950916555440128/0).", "Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank", "and advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also,", "played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or", "as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in", "how the voting played out, you can download the election", "They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for", "close, the votes have been tallied and the two new", "Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will be", "ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will", "to a close, the votes have been tallied and the", "as moderator. For details on how the voting played out,", "For details on how the voting played out, you can", "details on how the voting played out, you can download", "share your assistance and advice with them as they learn", "[![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please", "votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:", "new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the", "shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and", "thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice", "assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!", "the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who", "joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and", "join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down", "who will be stepping down as moderator. For details on", "will be stepping down as moderator. For details on how", "out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view", "election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have been", "the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be", "aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For details", "[third moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes", "them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me", "been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano)", "in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator.", "please join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping", "Academia's [third moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the", "thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For", "advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please", "you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a", "download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary report", "with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join", "[the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share", "the voting played out, you can download the election results", "a close, the votes have been tallied and the two", "stepping down as moderator. For details on how the voting", "have been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo", "tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51)", "existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your", "moderator. For details on how the voting played out, you", "has come to a close, the votes have been tallied", "be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering,", "down as moderator. For details on how the voting played", "your assistance and advice with them as they learn the", "are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators)", "crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance", "the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators", "and share your assistance and advice with them as they", "moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have", "on how the voting played out, you can download the", "be stepping down as moderator. For details on how the", "them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with", "and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll", "volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as" ]
[ "while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer,", "to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments", "never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical", "and only if, they are flagged by other users (rather", "a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers", "produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4600/79875)", "subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain", "I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with", "others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I", "to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion", "it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if,", "that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my", "answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed,", "downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this", "about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion.", "on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and", "answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that", "we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this", "suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns", "are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all", "suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it", "mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've", "StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on,", "some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently", "delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by", "discussion a bit more so we can produce a well-defined", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete", "currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged", "comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and", "corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that", "structure this discussion a bit more so we can produce", "the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while", "with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more", "answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what the", "so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in", "In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can", "if, and only if, they are flagged by other users", "allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this", "can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this discussion", "suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only", "why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest", "for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's", "mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are", "deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods", "Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so", "practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this", "than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this", "handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to", "should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that", "deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself", "the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks", "[this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what", "and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for", "more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask", "users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment", "hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and more.", "explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts", "comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should", "understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data)", "deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments", "warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments),", "I have never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers,", "how does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments?", "are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts", "by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In", "comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted", "more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate", "flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances).", "get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find", "comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by other", "wants.\" So my question is: how does the community want", "posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In", "find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work)", "finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it", "more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification", "does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update:", "good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be", "that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if,", "I find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's", "swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more", "community wants.\" So my question is: how does the community", "and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this", "a bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy.", "should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is:", "want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the", "Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with", "(rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to", "only if, they are flagged by other users (rather than", "proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875),", "they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good,", "for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about", "the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion", "the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In", "to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do", "this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and", "posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted),", "bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please", "partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others", "posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted", "apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging", "confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that", "do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how", "In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that", "while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted.", "So my question is: how does the community want its", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be", "to structure this discussion a bit more so we can", "meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to", "suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so we", "that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is", "have never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or", "can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they", "why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are", "and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are", "should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide", "that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to,", "if, they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively", "answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move", "clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\"", "(or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while", "be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our", "is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and", "to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why", "question is: how does the community want its mods to", "community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for", "upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the", "forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit", "other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a", "this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should", "mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question", "We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure", "suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So", "is suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\"", "or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted.", "As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted", "this discussion a bit more so we can produce a", "In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently", "discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to", "it is suggested that mods should do \"what the community", "my question is: how does the community want its mods", "be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should", "with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments", "that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the", "decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this", "is: how does the community want its mods to handle", "all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is", "instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested", "myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is", "\"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information", "they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested", "its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion.", "empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As", "the community wants.\" So my question is: how does the", "data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I", "answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get", "[guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest", "is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections", "provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject", "\"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how does", "are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice", "to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided", "move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a", "Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward", "our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they" ]
[ "based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not", "* There are plenty of collections of general arguments against", "score of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes", "have to clarify how we react to users posting comments", "in the comments? * How do we deal with old", "think that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded", "build a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you", "(if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure", "questions, the first of which is: Which kinds of answers", "such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question", "a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you agree", "flagged? How should moderators handle these flags? * How", "many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus** (rule", "without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is", "basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer that no", "decide about implementation issues such as: How should answers", "be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance on", "be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags? ", "we can build a practical policy around this. *Upvote", "answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent", " Answers that have a score of 5 and at", "should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible", "answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain", "to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the", "us can get behind. Therefore I will split this process", "as possible so we can build a practical policy around", "If any other answers have a positive score, we will", "when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting the", "of answers in comments (if any) do we want to", "behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions,", "Answers that have a score of 5 and at least", "Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will not", "* *Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree", "of them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't", "from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score,", "good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the", "I already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define", "least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered", "to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are plenty of", "our stance on answers in comments, this has to be", "as downvotes will be considered community consensus** (rule stolen from", "arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the outcome", "practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you agree with;", "these flags? How do we react to users answering", "if, and when they should be flagged, and when we", "answers in comments are fine, but you better have very", "plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in comments.", "that no answers in comments should be accepted.** Such answers", "this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for", "an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151)", "the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory", "not think that one meta question suffices to establish a", "arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look at", "of collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please", "react to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and", "* How do we react to users answering in the", "should be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without warning.", "twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community", "acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can", "should be flagged, and when we want to delete them.", "post a blanket answer that all answers in comments are", "collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have", "about implementation issues such as: * How should answers in", "RPG SE. * *Post answers outlining a single type of", "you better have very good arguments. ### What this is", "answers have a positive score, we will decide how to", "clarify how we react to users posting comments as answers,", "delete them. I therefore do not think that one meta", " How do we deal with old answers in comments?", "not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples,", "answer that all answers in comments are fine, but you", "to keep. Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments", "What this is not about Whatever the outcome of this", "will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If", "Do not post a blanket answer that no answers in", "this question is, it will not be suddenly in effect.", "want to keep. Types can be based on context, e.g.,", "of comment that you want to keep.** Types can be", "users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they", "and when they should be flagged, and when we want", "into multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which kinds", "want to delete them. I therefore do not think that", "meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this", "comments should be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without", "want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty", "not about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it", "=============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty of collections of", "still will have to decide about implementation issues such as:", "one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on", "already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our", "* Do not post a blanket answer that no answers", "no answers in comments should be accepted. Such answers will", "about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will", "threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.)", "self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all", "stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive", "e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”.", "of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a", "rationale as clearly as possible so we can build a", "how to proceed on a per-case basis. * *Do not", "we deal with old answers in comments? While it is", "proceed on a per-case basis. *Do not post a", "no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to", "answers outlining a single type of comment that you want", "should moderators handle these flags? How do we react", "have a positive score, we will decide how to proceed", "any other answers have a positive score, we will decide", "fine, but you better have very good arguments. ### What", "is:* Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do", "decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. * *Do", "in comments (if any) do we want to keep? ===============================================================", "You can post a blanket answer that all answers in", "answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. Post answers outlining", "when we want to delete them. I therefore do not", "in comments should be accepted. Such answers will be deleted", "look at least one of them to make an informed", "SE. * *Post answers outlining a single type of comment", "outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance.", "[Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. +", "how, if, and when they should be flagged, and when", "multiple questions, the first of which is: Which kinds of", "“comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide", "type of comment that you want to keep. Types can", "a blanket answer that no answers in comments should be", "in effect. We still will have to decide about implementation", "said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance", "comments? While it is good to keep such practical concerns", "disagree with. * *Answers that have a score of 5", "closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why", "of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes as", "at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be", "can post a blanket answer that all answers in comments", "### Procedure There are plenty of collections of general", "comments are fine, but you better have very good arguments.", "other answers have a positive score, we will decide how", "not be suddenly in effect. We still will have to", "Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we can", "that all answers in comments are fine, but you better", "do we deal with old answers in comments? While it", "comments? * How do we deal with old answers in", "answers in comments? While it is good to keep such", "While it is good to keep such practical concerns in", "will not be suddenly in effect. We still will have", "that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with", "when they should be flagged, and when we want to", "if we want to better define our stance on answers", "most of us can get behind. Therefore I will split", "with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your", "kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we want", "suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most", "comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers", "+ [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in", "of us can get behind. Therefore I will split this", "question is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We", "community effort. We have to clarify how we react to", "outcome of this question is, it will not be suddenly", "can build a practical policy around this. * Upvote answers", "with. * *Answers that have a score of 5 and", "as clearly as possible so we can build a practical", "on RPG SE. *Post answers outlining a single type", "better have very good arguments. ### What this is not", "decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal", "is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We still", "these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as", "How should answers in comments be flagged? How should", "be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this", "want to better define our stance on answers in comments,", "score, we will decide how to proceed on a per-case", "general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look", "Procedure * There are plenty of collections of general arguments", "answering in the comments? * How do we deal with", "flags? * How do we react to users answering in", "* How should answers in comments be flagged? * How", "answers you disagree with.** * *Answers that have a score", "be a community effort. We have to clarify how we", "write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users", "we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are", "issues such as: * How should answers in comments be", "for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You", "answers in comments (if any) do we want to keep?", "to better define our stance on answers in comments, this", "deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome", "community consensus** (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers", "are fine, but you better have very good arguments. ###", "do we react to users answering in the comments? ", "will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. ", "but you better have very good arguments. ### What this", "and when we want to delete them. I therefore do", "as answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged,", "blanket answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.*", "answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way to", "split this process into multiple questions, the first of which", "have very good arguments. ### What this is not about", "Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should be", "keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are plenty of collections", "that you want to keep. Types can be based on", "way to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches", "consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have", "on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed", "will have to decide about implementation issues such as: ", "be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were", "answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged, and", "any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure ", "in comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle these", "downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)).", "Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions", "comment that you want to keep. Types can be based", "to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of", "blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine, but", "* Post answers outlining a single type of comment that", "How do we react to users answering in the comments?", "single type of comment that you want to keep. Types", "from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE.", "a blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine,", "on answers in comments, this has to be a community", "answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a", "with; downvote answers you disagree with.** * *Answers that have", "prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer", "proper way to obtain this outcome is if no answer", "refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG", "Please have a look at least one of them to", "on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or", "I will split this process into multiple questions, the first", "users answering in the comments? How do we deal", "this process into multiple questions, the first of which is:", "it is good to keep such practical concerns in mind", "which is: Which kinds of answers in comments (if any)", "keep. Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering", "Post answers outlining a single type of comment that you", "as: * How should answers in comments be flagged? ", "practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is", "answers in comments, this has to be a community effort.", "considered community consensus* (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other", "we want to better define our stance on answers in", "the outcome of this question is, it will not be", "There are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers", "concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only", "answers in comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle", "this that most of us can get behind. Therefore I", "in comments, this has to be a community effort. We", "we react to users answering in the comments? * How", "examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as", "a per-case basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer", "Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions, the", "can get behind. Therefore I will split this process into", "the first of which is: Which kinds of answers in", "deal with old answers in comments? While it is good", "to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when", "effort. We have to clarify how we react to users", "that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy", "+ [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE.", "warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is if", "accepted. Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper", "be suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide", "answers in comments should be accepted. Such answers will be", "How do we deal with old answers in comments? While", "questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale,", "do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There", "and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will", "comments. Please have a look at least one of them", "it will not be suddenly in effect. We still will", "suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide about", "a positive score, we will decide how to proceed on", "this. * *Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you", "should answers in comments be flagged? How should moderators", "comments, this has to be a community effort. We have", "process into multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which", "moderators handle these flags? * How do we react to", "Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial", "to proceed on a per-case basis. * Do not post", "Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.*", "We have to clarify how we react to users posting", "this is not about Whatever the outcome of this question", "in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post answers outlining a", "The proper way to obtain this outcome is if no", "in comments are fine, but you better have very good", "outlining a single type of comment that you want to", "good to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting", "in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from", "allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we", "around this. *Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers", "users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on", "informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on", "is good to keep such practical concerns in mind when", "of which is: Which kinds of answers in comments (if", "handle these flags? * How do we react to users", "to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket", "clearly as possible so we can build a practical policy", "will be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain", "some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale", "a score of 5 and at least twice as many", "so we can build a practical policy around this. ", "such as: How should answers in comments be flagged?", "they should be flagged, and when we want to delete", "all answers in comments are fine, but you better have", "least one of them to make an informed decision: +", "are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in", "per-case basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer that", "shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should", "on a per-case basis. *Do not post a blanket", "get behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple", "reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a", "suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting the goal.", "[here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score, we", "outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all answers", "of this question is, it will not be suddenly in", "positive score, we will decide how to proceed on a", "answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. ", "to clarify how we react to users posting comments as", "upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen", "is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This", "to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers", "### What this is not about Whatever the outcome of", "is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a", "against answers in comments. Please have a look at least", "why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly", "comments as answers, how, if, and when they should be", "as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus", "a look at least one of them to make an", "you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.** * *Answers", "obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold", "at least one of them to make an informed decision:", "partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post answers", "to users answering in the comments? How do we", "answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.** ", "we want to delete them. I therefore do not think", "downvote answers you disagree with.* * Answers that have a", "be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any", "agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.** * *Answers that", "react to users answering in the comments? How do", "a community effort. We have to clarify how we react", "with old answers in comments? While it is good to", "establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of us", "mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting", "first of which is:* Which kinds of answers in comments", "for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these", "your rationale as clearly as possible so we can build", "comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags?", "better define our stance on answers in comments, this has", "well-rounded policy on this that most of us can get", "context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for", "has to be a community effort. We have to clarify", "that have a score of 5 and at least twice", "[Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641)", "in comments. Please have a look at least one of", "therefore do not think that one meta question suffices to", "posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they should", "effect. We still will have to decide about implementation issues", "We still will have to decide about implementation issues such", "on this that most of us can get behind. Therefore", "answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.** Such", "them. I therefore do not think that one meta question", "(This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post", "them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write", "(or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. * *Post", "we react to users posting comments as answers, how, if,", "As I already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better", "make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in", "I therefore do not think that one meta question suffices", "have a score of 5 and at least twice as", "policy around this. * Upvote answers you agree with; downvote", "comments (if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ###", "a single type of comment that you want to keep.", "this has to be a community effort. We have to", "Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we", "in comments? While it is good to keep such practical", "you want to keep.** Types can be based on context,", "flagged, and when we want to delete them. I therefore", "to decide about implementation issues such as: * How should", "one of them to make an informed decision: + [Please", "be flagged, and when we want to delete them. I", "the comments? * How do we deal with old answers", "5 and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes", "if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is", "keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this", "have a look at least one of them to make", "possible so we can build a practical policy around this.", "answers in comments. Please have a look at least one", "very good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever", "be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without warning. The", "define our stance on answers in comments, this has to", "were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some", "in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about", "stance on answers in comments, this has to be a", "do not think that one meta question suffices to establish", "SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers)", "* How should moderators handle these flags? * How do", "question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that", "(rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a", "Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way", "have to decide about implementation issues such as: * How", "that most of us can get behind. Therefore I will", "post a blanket answer that no answers in comments should", "can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that", "is not about Whatever the outcome of this question is,", "we will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis.", "will split this process into multiple questions, the first of", "you disagree with.** * *Answers that have a score of", "comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post answers outlining a single", "a rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed.", "to delete them. I therefore do not think that one", "implementation issues such as: How should answers in comments", "old answers in comments? While it is good to keep", "not post a blanket answer that no answers in comments", "to be a community effort. We have to clarify how", "a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that", "don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should", "How should moderators handle these flags? * How do we", "to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions,", "policy on this that most of us can get behind.", "a well-rounded policy on this that most of us can", "rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define", "how we react to users posting comments as answers, how," ]
[ "tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: > >", "[Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it)", "for liberal arts college: how much detail should I go", "* [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) ", "However, several of the questions seem to be about liberal", "> However, several of the questions seem to be about", "be about liberal arts colleges: [Research statement for liberal", "others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the", "into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples", "of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas", "tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do with", "forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two", "> Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such", "The small ['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag", "critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this", "liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy,", "* [How to judge the quality of education of an", "of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an", "literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > >", "with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music,", "are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find", "art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several", "Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal", "several of the questions seem to be about liberal arts", "in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to", "to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas", "find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others", "judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) ", "articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or otherwise", "of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) [Where to find details on Bachelor", "the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do", "* [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where", "liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college:", "do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art,", "* [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated", "wiki as: > > Questions having to do with liberal", "to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages,", "the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is", "> > However, several of the questions seem to be", "[Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should", "to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for", "Should this be separated into two tags or otherwise cleaned", "this be separated into two tags or otherwise cleaned up?", "in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How", "Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such as", "on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about", "(let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags", "> > Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects", "subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history.", "detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) ", "an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) [Is taking ideas from an art", "arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and", "details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are", "is defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions", "Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) ", "degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts:", "arts colleges: [Research statement for liberal arts college: how", "majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: ", "should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What", "quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking", "[Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly", "arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: >", "taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms", "* [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of", "and history. > > > However, several of the questions", "small ['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki", "school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism)", "[How to judge the quality of education of an art", "an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles)", "having to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature,", "Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work)", "typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details", "* [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail", "about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of", "how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style", "ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...)", "art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should", "music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of", "work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring", "history. > > > However, several of the questions seem", "> > > However, several of the questions seem to", "seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement", "[Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into", "the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: ", "languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However,", "examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) [Where to find details on", "I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are", "statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should I", "education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from", "\"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees", "IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to", "of the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges:", "plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be", "[Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial", "in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or", "go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical", "about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts", "much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues)", "arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) ", "defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having", "to judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school)", "philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of the", "[What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) [Where to", "colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much", "Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge", "are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality", "art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic", "such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. >", "as: > > Questions having to do with liberal arts", "['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as:", "liberal arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into)", "from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in", "liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of education", "* [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in", "as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > >", "college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning", "arts: * [How to judge the quality of education of", "questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research" ]
[ "then you are on thin ice regardless of if your", "pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there", "you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you", "fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code", "on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up", "language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In", "these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is", "about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can", "users. There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE", "of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>.", "avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice", "\"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when", "user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of", "enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's", "has been changed in regards to the use of pronouns", "as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns", "public discussion, there are also private discussion about how to", "discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say", "Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on the", "referring to users. There is a fair amount of discussion", "pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be", "the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the", "uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to", "is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does", "regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or", "regards to the use of pronouns when referring to users.", "when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition", "(when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are", "is that if you are trying to avoid a user's", "a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless", "gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\".", "can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\"", "on thin ice regardless of if your objection is on", "of pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair", "the use of pronouns when referring to users. There is", "changed in regards to the use of pronouns when referring", "objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or", "the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as", "at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about", "SE [Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to", "religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any other argument.", "In addition to the public discussion, there are also private", "about how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions", "on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any other", "\"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public", "are also private discussion about how to enforce these changes.", "of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct", "trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on", "it seems SE's take on the situation is that if", "Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use of", "seems SE's take on the situation is that if you", "MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns)", "pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair amount", "Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog", "been changed in regards to the use of pronouns when", "these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take", "to users. There is a fair amount of discussion at", "are on thin ice regardless of if your objection is", "[What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and", "to the use of pronouns when referring to users. There", "changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when", "how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it", "[Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the", "you are on thin ice regardless of if your objection", "The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language", "the public discussion, there are also private discussion about how", "The SE [Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards", "the situation is that if you are trying to avoid", "if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then", "and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed", "discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on these", "blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer", "is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any", "amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of", "up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated", "discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is that", "in regards to the use of pronouns when referring to", "does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on", "<https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral", "addition to the public discussion, there are also private discussion", "are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are", "take on the situation is that if you are trying", "summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use", "to the public discussion, there are also private discussion about", "changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on", "of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use", "known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are also", "Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The", "use of pronouns when referring to users. There is a", "also private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based", "situation is that if you are trying to avoid a", "when referring to users. There is a fair amount of", "and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the", "a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the", "SE's take on the situation is that if you are", "There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What", "ice regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical,", "pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of if", "stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion,", "of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought", "to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems", "to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin", "that if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns,", "private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on", "thin ice regardless of if your objection is on religious,", "say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes", "there are also private discussion about how to enforce these", "if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police", "on these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation", "discussion, there are also private discussion about how to enforce", "be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and", "your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds,", "on the situation is that if you are trying to" ]
[ "any data/rough idea about how many users of this site", "pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we", "I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is", "ask is that I wonder how much of a concern", "the event we have no data, I would be happy", "would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current", "have no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal", "also might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask", "happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former", "conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what", "CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.) The", "about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language", "users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage", "(Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the", "many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the", "we have any data/rough idea about how many users of", "site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users", "how many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe", "what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on", "wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for", "such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that", "to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators)", "state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will", "will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might", "about how many users of this site state preferred pronouns?", "Now that [The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I", "hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about", "gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue for", "data/rough idea about how many users of this site state", "site. In the event we have no data, I would", "this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such", "but that also might be interesting to know.) The reason", "concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the event", "people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about", "new CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.)", "no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence", "event we have no data, I would be happy to", "on our site. In the event we have no data,", "to know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder", "pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with", "[The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself", "pronoun usage is on our site. In the event we", "of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of", "non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do", "Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how many", "percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC,", "is that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun", "code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering", "data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably", "be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that", "(preferably from current or former moderators) about to what extent", "preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket", "our site. In the event we have no data, I", "to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is", "anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to", "In the event we have no data, I would be", "a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any", "are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have", "changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns", "a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the", "is on our site. In the event we have no", "of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but", "moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally", "extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue", "users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also", "has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent", "myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern", "interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that I", "we have no data, I would be happy to hear", "I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from", "former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more", "idea about how many users of this site state preferred", "what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an", "The reason I ask is that I wonder how much", "I ask is that I wonder how much of a", "how much of a concern pronoun usage is on our", "the new CoC, but that also might be interesting to", "have any data/rough idea about how many users of this", "reason I ask is that I wonder how much of", "that [The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found", "wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is on", "concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough", "been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered", "or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and", "for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea", "that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage", "extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE.", "the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new", "of a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In", "from current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered", "much of a concern pronoun usage is on our site.", "might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is", "that also might be interesting to know.) The reason I", "on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how", "Do we have any data/rough idea about how many users", "of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to", "with the new CoC, but that also might be interesting", "know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder how", "to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people", "evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to what", "I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are", "usage is on our site. In the event we have", "and more generally language is an issue for our users.", "found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a", "be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or", "skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might be", "pronouns and more generally language is an issue for our", "current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns" ]
[ "unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary", "action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible", "> outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives", "response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find", "puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular,", "flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > >", "and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor", "abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the", "the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying,", "droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > >", "fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous,", "asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch", "title of this question, but don't want to get into", "of this question, but don't want to get into an", "these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > >", "freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > > >", "closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student", "mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous,", "moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre", "dictionaries have different views of the power of the word!", "> freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas", "dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted", "freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the", "both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that", "the question is at the moment both protected and close", "5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member", "question, but don't want to get into an edit war,", "protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a", "sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question", "in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out", "by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue", "the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > >", "bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3", "comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal >", "member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in", "just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view.", "irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak,", "bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my", "any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a", "English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > >", "ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal", "out how unusual is the request or how widespread this", "singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish,", "the dictionaries have different views of the power of the", "it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre)", "queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary,", "atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way,", "these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish,", "close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks", "this type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned", "photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just", "or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I", "dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky", "[the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny,", "peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer,", "a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action", "odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected,", "inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre", "baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll,", "is at the moment both protected and close to closure:", "the title of this question, but don't want to get", "every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr)", "how unusual is the request or how widespread this type", "wanted to find out how unusual is the request or", "find myself uncomfortable with the title of this question, but", "Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd,", "widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have just", "extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing,", "So even the dictionaries have different views of the power", "professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5", "have just toned it down by an edit? --- The", "and the question is at the moment both protected and", "an edit war, and the question is at the moment", "outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries have", "> > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange,", "The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric", "3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by", "> > outré > > > --- So even the", "the request or how widespread this type of thing occurs.", "type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it", "ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > >", "myself uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't", "aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré >", "> strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional,", "deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré", "surreal > > > outré > > > --- So", "> > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > >", "out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary >", "incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque,", "with the title of this question, but don't want to", "strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox,", "> > > outré > > > --- So even", "an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms:", "a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the", "of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down", "> > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable,", "of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling,", "remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular,", "into an edit war, and the question is at the", "--- So even the dictionaries have different views of the", "question is at the moment both protected and close to", "gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat,", "gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky >", "a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or", "eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out", "to get into an edit war, and the question is", "> > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish >", "thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down by", "want to get into an edit war, and the question", "at the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is", "unusual is the request or how widespread this type of", "Should I have just toned it down by an edit?", "precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps", "by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these", "edit war, and the question is at the moment both", "view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual", "question wanted to find out how unusual is the request", "disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: >", "for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any", "the question wanted to find out how unusual is the", "> > > --- So even the dictionaries have different", "to find out how unusual is the request or how", "eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish", "occurs. Should I have just toned it down by an", "but don't want to get into an edit war, and", "I have just toned it down by an edit? ---", "of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > >", "way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious,", "mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical,", "> > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling,", "> > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > >", "grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > >", "how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have", "my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how", "> > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving", "just toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge", "that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch", "> Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar,", "is the request or how widespread this type of thing", "curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal,", "--- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > >", "don't want to get into an edit war, and the", "request or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should", "by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff", "uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't want", "unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of", "> > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre)", "out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable,", "unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant,", "> > --- So even the dictionaries have different views", "to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every", "Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious,", "[Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for", "Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes", "it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a", "perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous,", "[Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric >", "get into an edit war, and the question is at", "unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of", "ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic,", "outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these:", "edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: >", "> > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric,", "inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant,", "down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives", "inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a", "even the dictionaries have different views of the power of", "I find myself uncomfortable with the title of this question,", "funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar,", "synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish", "> eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > >", "unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the", "this question, but don't want to get into an edit", "offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical,", "the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it", "toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English", "Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual is", "student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling", "> flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving >", "or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to", "unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out", "staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response", "freakish, surreal > > > outré > > > ---", "war, and the question is at the moment both protected", "outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual,", "> --- So even the dictionaries have different views of", "> fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable,", "> outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries", "a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by", "find out how unusual is the request or how widespread" ]
[ "get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already", "undermines what I think is a distinct and real issue", "attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to", "fact read that post in detail before deciding to write", "differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is", "It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain,", "issue is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs", "as it undermines what I think is a distinct and", "so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just", "for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what", "Some time ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked", "\"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close", "own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to", "view-- I had in fact read that post in detail", "question did not, from my view-- I had in fact", "how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my", "that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once,", "to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my", "instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and", "that many of the closers did not actually read the", "the question. So my meta-question is: how can I get", "had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I", "before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised", "just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as", "time ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as", "bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not,", "experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered", "clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is that", "very notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I", "necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly for", "trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the closers", "in detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore,", "ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a", "to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of", "\"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I think", "it undermines what I think is a distinct and real", "write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple", "be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question", "close the question. So my meta-question is: how can I", "great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking", "in fact read that post in detail before deciding to", "many academics. I suspect that many of the closers did", "the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue", "is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from", "question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted),", "revised my question multiple times to make the differences clearer.", "notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect", "found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many", "notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a great", "my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the", "to remain, as it undermines what I think is a", "read the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting", "wonder if part of the issue is that my question", "the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed", "once, the very notion of which seems to trigger many", "PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems to", "I suspect that many of the closers did not actually", "deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my", "many of the closers did not actually read the question", "if part of the issue is that my question deals", "as a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite", "defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking", "my view-- I had in fact read that post in", "(which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further", "remain, as it undermines what I think is a distinct", "or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two", "quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did", "read that post in detail before deciding to write my", "the very notion of which seems to trigger many academics.", "taking action to close the question. So my meta-question is:", "I wonder if part of the issue is that my", "PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the", "did not, from my view-- I had in fact read", "closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience", "the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided", "part of the issue is that my question deals with", "and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to", "and taking action to close the question. So my meta-question", "opinion and taking action to close the question. So my", "suspect that many of the closers did not actually read", "detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I", "silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines", "action to close the question. So my meta-question is: how", "did not actually read the question or its revisions in", "I had in fact read that post in detail before", "a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre--", "make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the", "many claimed answered my question did not, from my view--", "question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder", "to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action", "answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for", "not actually read the question or its revisions in detail,", "the closers did not actually read the question or its", "actually read the question or its revisions in detail, instead", "removed from my question? Someone already provided a great answer", "multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if", "the issue is that my question deals with possessing two", "bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question. So", "had in fact read that post in detail before deciding", "possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of which", "feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it", "the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I", "that post in detail before deciding to write my own", "in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\"", "of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that", "not, from my view-- I had in fact read that", "deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion", "I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels", "which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many", "I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone", "meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed", "I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path)", "Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make the", "So my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\"", "question. So my meta-question is: how can I get the", "I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention.", "I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate.", "times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part", "marker to remain, as it undermines what I think is", "claimed answered my question did not, from my view-- I", "I think is a distinct and real issue for many", "marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to be", "not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly", "at once, the very notion of which seems to trigger", "my question did not, from my view-- I had in", "detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion", "accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It", "the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to", "my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice", "is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at", "what I think is a distinct and real issue for", "seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of", "to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question", "two PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the", "my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times", "the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to", "from my view-- I had in fact read that post", "post in detail before deciding to write my own question.", "question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make", "to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the", "a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found", "duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the", "its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs", "is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question.", "my question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I", "with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of", "already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm", "looking for further attention. It just feels silly for the", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from my", "think is a distinct and real issue for many people.", "my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I", "to close the question. So my meta-question is: how can", "of the closers did not actually read the question or", "academics. I suspect that many of the closers did not", "can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question?", "a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily", "answered my question did not, from my view-- I had", "closers did not actually read the question or its revisions", "Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so", "question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very", "provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not", "question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the", "from my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which", "further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker", "of the issue is that my question deals with possessing", "for further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\"", "revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is", "I revised my question multiple times to make the differences", "\"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a", "[the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from" ]
[ "why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users", "she didn't apply for a position, she told me that", "on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and", "she implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators", "we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to", "the top. > > > I encourage The Powers That", "than? We as the users are confused and would like", "with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top.", "however they proceed with election for new moderators. When I", "troubles are coming, now I understand on what she implied,", "as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer", "they want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote", "activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected", "a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going", "apology, are a bit over the top. > > >", "these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are", "one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User", "That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened.", "encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request for", "well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply", "mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a", "> > > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to", "as ordinary users how should react to these new changes", "for a position, she told me that big troubles are", "or implied that they will come back, so what is", "response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as", "here, and think deeply about the types of behavior they", "new moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't", "are we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold", "us in dark? We as ordinary users how should react", "now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied", "moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how", "The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying", "their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees", "going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The", "is going wrong, however they proceed with election for new", "coming, now I understand on what she implied, however, if", "very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read", "a bit over the top. > > > I encourage", "dark? We as ordinary users how should react to these", "One moderator suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on", "and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very", "shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what", "all their actions here, and think deeply about the types", "didn't apply for a position, she told me that big", "our identities and location sold to third parties now? Also", "mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm", "I understand on what she implied, however, if you all", "and think deeply about the types of behavior they want", "what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew", "user why she didn't apply for a position, she told", "A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was", "changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities", "We as ordinary users how should react to these new", "ordinary users how should react to these new changes on", "suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After", "the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. >", "kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how should", "think deeply about the types of behavior they want to", "to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect", "encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions", "a position, she told me that big troubles are coming,", "with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with", "volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on, combined", "reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend", "identities and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators", "third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented", "why she didn't apply for a position, she told me", "the start of this year that something is going wrong,", "knew from the start of this year that something is", "the issue than? We as the users are confused and", "Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going to", "with election for new moderators. When I asked one user", "their actions here, and think deeply about the types of", "suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown", "all knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We", "seems like moderators knew from the start of this year", "of behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another", "I read it seems like moderators knew from the start", "top. > > > I encourage The Powers That Be™", "[SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user", "of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are", "like moderators knew from the start of this year that", "sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their", "handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology,", "in their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE", "the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the", "types of behavior they want to encourage in their community.", "election for new moderators. When I asked one user why", "users how should react to these new changes on SE,", "confused and would like to know more about the situation.", "actions here, and think deeply about the types of behavior", "for new moderators. When I asked one user why she", "one user why she didn't apply for a position, she", "SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities", "that they will come back, so what is the issue", "proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked one", "wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators. When", "the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a", "affected? are our identities and location sold to third parties", "told me that big troubles are coming, now I understand", "what she implied, however, if you all knew that why", "user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything", "is the issue than? We as the users are confused", "parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or", "reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about the", "somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to third", "they will come back, so what is the issue than?", "> I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all", "When I asked one user why she didn't apply for", "[activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading", "back, so what is the issue than? We as the", "I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well.", "to understand what is going on, combined with the terrible", "insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like", "implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators kept", "was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I", "for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That", "that something is going wrong, however they proceed with election", "Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that", "well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on,", "We as the users are confused and would like to", "on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going", "on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing,", "she told me that big troubles are coming, now I", "of this year that something is going wrong, however they", "that big troubles are coming, now I understand on what", "to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request", "are coming, now I understand on what she implied, however,", "on what she implied, however, if you all knew that", "my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to", "That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think", "disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to", "simply trying to understand what is going on, combined with", "that why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary", "are our identities and location sold to third parties now?", "should react to these new changes on SE, are we", "asked one user why she didn't apply for a position,", "community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and", "the types of behavior they want to encourage in their", "'m a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE", "official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod", "behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another one", "SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and location", "understand what is going on, combined with the terrible handling", "are a bit over the top. > > > I", "I asked one user why she didn't apply for a", "so what is the issue than? We as the users", "After reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily", "you all knew that why moderators kept us in dark?", "come back, so what is the issue than? We as", "now I understand on what she implied, however, if you", "issue than? We as the users are confused and would", "a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response,", "what is the issue than? We as the users are", "implied that they will come back, so what is the", "firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over", "understand on what she implied, however, if you all knew", "suspend their activities commented or implied that they will come", "non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. > >", "will come back, so what is the issue than? We", "however, if you all knew that why moderators kept us", "are confused and would like to know more about the", "if you all knew that why moderators kept us in", "react to these new changes on SE, are we somehow", "to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about", "location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend", "temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being", "deeply about the types of behavior they want to encourage", "big troubles are coming, now I understand on what she", "the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my", "the users are confused and would like to know more", "year that something is going wrong, however they proceed with", "actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit", "and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems", "Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms)", "commented or implied that they will come back, so what", "> 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official", "User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and", "request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001)", "read it seems like moderators knew from the start of", "position, she told me that big troubles are coming, now", "wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators", "to these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected?", "I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their", "something is going wrong, however they proceed with election for", "Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and", "Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply", "going wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators.", "knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We as", "over the top. > > > I encourage The Powers", "how should react to these new changes on SE, are", "moderator suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE.", "CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice", "and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that", "activities commented or implied that they will come back, so", "as the users are confused and would like to know", "is going on, combined with the terrible handling of the", "want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A", "trying to understand what is going on, combined with the", "to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is", "moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't apply", "being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand", "> > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the", "terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology", "bit over the top. > > > I encourage The", "nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it", "apply for a position, she told me that big troubles", "start of this year that something is going wrong, however", "wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente", "Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful,", "to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities", "it seems like moderators knew from the start of this", "going on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual", "combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the", "moderators knew from the start of this year that something", "this year that something is going wrong, however they proceed", "moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that they", "> > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider", "from the start of this year that something is going", "their activities commented or implied that they will come back,", "new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our", "The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here,", "[suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what", "me that big troubles are coming, now I understand on", "that suspend their activities commented or implied that they will", "was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder", "employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was", "happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from", "Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from the", "combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined", "in dark? We as ordinary users how should react to", "about the types of behavior they want to encourage in", "users are confused and would like to know more about", "they proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked", "what is going on, combined with the terrible handling of" ]
[ "“untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to", "just editing tags for a question with only the “untagged”", "that a number of our questions seem to be about", "process and contents of academic writing, this seems to be", "was just editing tags for a question with only the", "I was just editing tags for a question with only", "writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if", "if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these", "there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that", "we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts", "with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there", "noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag.", "seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number", "I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing”", "be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or", "tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and", "editing tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag,", "about the process and contents of academic writing, this seems", "of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m", "academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering", "that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given", "of our questions seem to be about the process and", "questions seem to be about the process and contents of", "it was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing”", "an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if", "contents of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight;", "I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should", "deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to", "question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that", "a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed", "a number of our questions seem to be about the", "seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was", "“academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions seem", "create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts of questions.", "seem to be about the process and contents of academic", "should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts of", "wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should create", "doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a", "Given that a number of our questions seem to be", "was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag", "the process and contents of academic writing, this seems to", "or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover", "and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an", "our questions seem to be about the process and contents", "tag. Given that a number of our questions seem to", "be about the process and contents of academic writing, this", "if it was deliberate, or if we should create an", "only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t", "to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate,", "be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our", "tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be", "to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of", "for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I", "an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions", "oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we", "number of our questions seem to be about the process", "to be about the process and contents of academic writing,", "this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it", "and contents of academic writing, this seems to be an", "the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem" ]
[ "upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find any", "There are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments", "several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening", "bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too", "now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse than", "The question was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has", "cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to read", "the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my", "comments about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.)", "my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several", "answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many", "carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are female", "Why is the question open now? [Why are female students", "reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers.", "I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to", "25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find", "comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I", "many to read them all carefully.) Why is the question", "is the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating", "question was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25", "(too many to read them all carefully.) Why is the", "them all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why", "[Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse than males?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/142194/why-are-female-students-evaluating-my-teaching-worse-than-males?noredirect=1#comment377757_142194)", "to read them all carefully.) Why is the question open", "are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about", "all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are", "reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why is", "has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot", "about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why", "find any comments about reopening (too many to read them", "open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse", "closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There", "read them all carefully.) Why is the question open now?", "was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes.", "closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad", "any comments about reopening (too many to read them all", "question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching", "Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are" ]
[ "employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even before", "year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community", "communities. The core values of the company began to shift", "my actions that I have taken your criticism to heart", "actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time to", "Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community that", "and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an", "they do not have the right to do is act", "management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to", "rules, so it will be difficult for me to be", "a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will", "sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most recently", "of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community", "longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I", "that SE thinks are right for us. They are not", "user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time,", "moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you all", "SE became an awesome community with just enough support to", "is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+", "developers actively working to make the experience better and employees", "I felt no choice but to leaving. That is not", "to be in disagreement with the community. I like to", "the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an", "they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I", "therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and planning", "not have the right to do is act like the", "disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had", "Even before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy", "run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I", "empty words that I am sorry that I was not", "our community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone", "both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the", "but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made", "have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you", "I thank you all for working with me. For those", "views of our community now disagree with SE policy. I", "gone to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful.", "not only provided the servers, they had developers actively working", "for our community in private (e.g., in the mod only", "The core values of the company began to shift and", "go to bat for our community in private (e.g., in", "have learned so much. I thank you all for working", "Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a", "> > My personal opinion is that the community opinion", "SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and", "our feedback or telling us why they are making the", "support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first", "shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no", "have that right. What they do not have the right", "for us. They are not acting on our feedback or", "I will not be actively participating. I have been thinking", "heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I can", "represent the community spirit that made SE great; they are", "criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all", "but to leaving. That is not a fair way to", "actively participating. I have been thinking about this for a", "enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At", "bat for our community in private (e.g., in the mod", "am stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving", "team has moderators who can handle it. If the SE", "I have decided that I can no longer contribute my", "community where SE keeps the lights on and was not", "me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to", "content, but I will not be actively participating. I have", "began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities", "SE thinks are right for us. They are not acting", "became an awesome community with just enough support to keep", "leave you with is empty words that I am sorry", "to build the community. Even before it was trendy, they", "to show you through my actions that I have taken", "community. I like to think that the SE policy is", "SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE.", "off, I would go to bat for our community in", "opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE team", "SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929):", "it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were", "the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources.", "as a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I", "I had more time to show you through my actions", "is empty words that I am sorry that I was", "from imploding. At first it was simply that the support", "and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer", "through my actions that I have taken your criticism to", "contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with just", "I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > >", "a fair way to represent you, so I am stepping", "importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE great;", "SE has become an awesome community despite the interference of", "community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past", "decisions they are. They are the boss, they have that", "ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome support", "community goals, I have simply been biding my time until", "working with me. For those that I disappointed with my", "into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on", "with is empty words that I am sorry that I", "[I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the", "in our public chat and meta. > > > Over", "the company began to shift and outwardly it seems building", "the community. I like to think that the SE policy", "only provided the servers, they had developers actively working to", "that I have taken your criticism to heart and have", "ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My", "do is act like the boss and then say the", "like the boss and then say the community is [\"built", "wish I had more time to show you through my", "Alas, all I can leave you with is empty words", "much. I thank you all for working with me. For", "that the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult", "longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies have", "telling us why they are making the decisions they are.", "you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes that", "can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8", "[users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been a", "not be actively participating. I have been thinking about this", "and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit", "an awesome community with just enough support to keep the", "they were going to sacrifice their core principals to make", "has moderators who can handle it. If the SE team", "they cared about user privacy and the rights of our", "an awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer", "my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time", "that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish", "I am stepping down as a moderator and planning on", "it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the", "> Over the past few months, it has become clear", "acting on our feedback or telling us why they are", "the support from the company did not keep up with", "the company did not keep up with the growth in", "and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values", "lounge) and in our public chat and meta. > >", "started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE", "community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about user", "awesome community with just enough support to keep the whole", "the focus, making money was. Of course companies have to", "advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding my", "something so horrendous that I felt no choice but to", "that had awesome support from the company. They not only", "the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be", "teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta. >", "SE policy. I have gone to bat for us, and", "I like to think that the SE policy is that", "Over the past few months, it has become clear that", "you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been", "better and employees whose jobs were to build the community.", "do not have the right to do is act like", "against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who", "act like the boss and then say the community is", "but I will not be actively participating. I have been", "while and it is not related to any single event.", "mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and", "opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against the", "boss, they have that right. What they do not have", "is that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion", "our community goals, I have simply been biding my time", "are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are", "biding my time until SE did something so horrendous that", "to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I", "the boss, they have that right. What they do not", "until SE did something so horrendous that I felt no", "that others can be more successful. When I joined Stack", "are right for us. They are not acting on our", "building strong communities was no longer the focus, making money", "fair way to represent you, so I am stepping aside", "support from the company did not keep up with the", "company began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong", "to implement policies that SE thinks are right for us.", "with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more", "said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the community", "whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply that", "and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became", "was simply that the support from the company did not", "awesome community that had awesome support from the company. They", "more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago,", "community off, I would go to bat for our community", "those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I", "community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me", "the community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the", "with me. For those that I disappointed with my actions", "to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal", "our community off, I would go to bat for our", "despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community", "on our feedback or telling us why they are making", "if they were going to sacrifice their core principals to", "They are the boss, they have that right. What they", "a while and it is not related to any single", "think that the SE policy is that the community opinion", "being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right", "I wish I had more time to show you through", "If the community opinion is so against the SE opinion,", "bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am", "in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public", "make a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome", "stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving the", "course companies have to make money, but it made me", "opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle it.", "the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for", "have simply been biding my time until SE did something", "decided that I can no longer contribute my efforts to", "not acting on our feedback or telling us why they", "thinks are right for us. They are not acting on", "greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be a", "it will be difficult for me to be in disagreement", "are not acting on our feedback or telling us why", "companies have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable", "can leave you with is empty words that I am", "SE began to transform into an awesome community where SE", "moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will not", "SE did something so horrendous that I felt no choice", "Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional,", "with the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting", "pisses our community off, I would go to bat for", "was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights", "recently SE has become an awesome community despite the interference", "and planning on leaving the community. I will not be", "me. For those that I disappointed with my actions and", "They not only provided the servers, they had developers actively", "company did not keep up with the growth in the", "it seems building strong communities was no longer the focus,", "handle it. If the SE team really pisses our community", "support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to", "it has become clear that my views of our community", "spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest", "rules. If the community opinion is so against the SE", "of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being", "moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that", "5+ years that I have been a moderator, I have", "buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite", "in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and", "that the support from the company did not keep up", "and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform", "great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When", "keep up with the growth in the communities. Then SE", "SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago,", "your criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas,", "the SE team has moderators who can handle it. If", "have taken your criticism to heart and have learned from", "to leaving. That is not a fair way to represent", "asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right for", "leaving. That is not a fair way to represent you,", "up with the growth in the communities. Then SE started", "and have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave", "all for working with me. For those that I disappointed", "imploding. At first it was simply that the support from", "transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights", "my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping", "clear that my views of our community now disagree with", "to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the", "Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator", "have decided that I can no longer contribute my efforts", "on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core", "and then say the community is [\"built and run by", "actions that I have taken your criticism to heart and", "Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to implement", "the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat", "unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for advancing", "others can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange", "of our community now disagree with SE policy. I have", "lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The", "accounts or content, but I will not be actively participating.", "professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that", "SE if they were going to sacrifice their core principals", "no longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals,", "so it will be difficult for me to be in", "I have gone to bat for us, and I have", "you through my actions that I have taken your criticism", "participating. I have been thinking about this for a while", "can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and", "the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can", "from the company. They not only provided the servers, they", "disagreement with the community. I like to think that the", "an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have", "so I am stepping aside in the hopes that others", "contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice their", "I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an", "I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I", "then say the community is [\"built and run by you", "community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and", "the hopes that others can be more successful. When I", "our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with", "any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The", "moderators who can handle it. If the SE team really", "was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of", "my accounts or content, but I will not be actively", "that I felt no choice but to leaving. That is", "can handle it. If the SE team really pisses our", "A year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome", "for advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding", "the SE team really pisses our community off, I would", "> My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules,", "will not be deleting my accounts or content, but I", "they are. They are the boss, they have that right.", "present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they", "community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE", "made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of", "is not related to any single event. Our community is", "not a fair way to represent you, so I am", "months, it has become clear that my views of our", "assets of SE. When I ran to be a moderator", "the company. They not only provided the servers, they had", "a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you", "knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community", "chat and meta. > > > Over the past few", "thank you all for working with me. For those that", "the decisions they are. They are the boss, they have", "be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years", "me to be in disagreement with the community. I like", "from the company did not keep up with the growth", "leaving the community. I will not be deleting my accounts", "In the 5+ years that I have been a moderator,", "is not a fair way to represent you, so I", "joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome", "am no longer an effective agent for advancing our community", "to represent you, so I am stepping aside in the", "welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present,", "I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective", "growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and", "the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support", "and meta. > > > Over the past few months,", "I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange", "to make a buck. Most recently SE has become an", "I have been a moderator, I have learned so much.", "and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and", "that my views of our community now disagree with SE", "to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most", "and in our public chat and meta. > > >", "deleting my accounts or content, but I will not be", "with communities. The core values of the company began to", "it was an awesome community that had awesome support from", "in-actions, I wish I had more time to show you", "their core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE", "not be deleting my accounts or content, but I will", "to bat for our community in private (e.g., in the", "in disagreement with the community. I like to think that", "be in disagreement with the community. I like to think", "hopes that others can be more successful. When I joined", "to think that the SE policy is that the community", "they have that right. What they do not have the", "If the SE team really pisses our community off, I", "that I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack", "an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and", "my views of our community now disagree with SE policy.", "community. I will not be deleting my accounts or content,", "become an awesome community despite the interference of the management.", "be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion", "made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going", "say the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour).", "was no longer the focus, making money was. Of course", "effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply", "did not keep up with the growth in the communities.", "build the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared", "That is not a fair way to represent you, so", "I can leave you with is empty words that I", "ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community where", "had developers actively working to make the experience better and", "actively working to make the experience better and employees whose", "Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community", "on leaving the community. I will not be deleting my", "moderators and community members are being asked to implement policies", "in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting", "policy is that the community opinion rules. If the community", "and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that", "company. They not only provided the servers, they had developers", "awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators", "thinking about this for a while and it is not", "learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you with", "the community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst", "before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and", "At first it was simply that the support from the", "and employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even", "by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have", "SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle", "working to make the experience better and employees whose jobs", "but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they", "have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent", "a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community", "from it. Alas, all I can leave you with is", "communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A", "uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice", "it is not related to any single event. Our community", "is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and", "planning on leaving the community. I will not be deleting", "have the right to do is act like the boss", "this for a while and it is not related to", "is act like the boss and then say the community", "been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for", "had awesome support from the company. They not only provided", "you all for working with me. For those that I", "no choice but to leaving. That is not a fair", "and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly,", "not keep up with the growth in the communities. Then", "cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began", "implement policies that SE thinks are right for us. They", "will be difficult for me to be in disagreement with", "you with is empty words that I am sorry that", "make the experience better and employees whose jobs were to", "core values of the company began to shift and outwardly", "community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge)", "community that had awesome support from the company. They not", "that I have been a moderator, I have learned so", "community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the", "was an awesome community that had awesome support from the", "a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is", "will not be actively participating. I have been thinking about", "money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if", "I have taken your criticism to heart and have learned", "core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has", "money was. Of course companies have to make money, but", "so much. I thank you all for working with me.", "making the decisions they are. They are the boss, they", "just enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding.", "the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members", "is that the community opinion rules, so it will be", "I would go to bat for our community in private", "or content, but I will not be actively participating. I", "are. They are the boss, they have that right. What", "to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to", "simply that the support from the company did not keep", "awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and was", "has become an awesome community despite the interference of the", "whose jobs were to build the community. Even before it", "community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the", "support from the company. They not only provided the servers,", "to any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive.", "Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers,", "efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down", "they represent the community spirit that made SE great; they", "in the hopes that others can be more successful. When", "When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was", "team really pisses our community off, I would go to", "outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer the", "about this for a while and it is not related", "SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering", "and it is not related to any single event. Our", "make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE", "awesome support from the company. They not only provided the", "For those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions,", "be difficult for me to be in disagreement with the", "years ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome", "years that I have been a moderator, I have learned", "and community members are being asked to implement policies that", "my time until SE did something so horrendous that I", "it. Alas, all I can leave you with is empty", "negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the company", "the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so", "stepping aside in the hopes that others can be more", "am stepping aside in the hopes that others can be", "Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite the", "more time to show you through my actions that I", "I am stepping aside in the hopes that others can", "and in-actions, I wish I had more time to show", "boss and then say the community is [\"built and run", "are making the decisions they are. They are the boss,", "to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as", "horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving. That", "difficult for me to be in disagreement with the community.", "I will not be deleting my accounts or content, but", "right for us. They are not acting on our feedback", "who can handle it. If the SE team really pisses", "single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE", "community members are being asked to implement policies that SE", "right to do is act like the boss and then", "interfering with communities. The core values of the company began", "I have been thinking about this for a while and", "to make the experience better and employees whose jobs were", "for a while and it is not related to any", "supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both", "related to any single event. Our community is welcoming and", "strong communities was no longer the focus, making money was.", "The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable", "with the community. I like to think that the SE", "us why they are making the decisions they are. They", "time until SE did something so horrendous that I felt", "why they are making the decisions they are. They are", "goals, I have simply been biding my time until SE", "jobs were to build the community. Even before it was", "Over time, SE became an awesome community with just enough", "have been thinking about this for a while and it", "for me to be in disagreement with the community. I", "personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it", "seems building strong communities was no longer the focus, making", "choice but to leaving. That is not a fair way", "amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to", "feedback or telling us why they are making the decisions", "the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In", "of the company began to shift and outwardly it seems", "the experience better and employees whose jobs were to build", "taken your criticism to heart and have learned from it.", "way to represent you, so I am stepping aside in", "past few months, it has become clear that my views", "us. They are not acting on our feedback or telling", "time, SE became an awesome community with just enough support", "to SE if they were going to sacrifice their core", "to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was", "have been a moderator, I have learned so much. I", "the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about", "community with just enough support to keep the whole thing", "principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has become", "show you through my actions that I have taken your", "now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat", "not related to any single event. Our community is welcoming", "our community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's", "not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the", "down as a moderator and planning on leaving the community.", "public chat and meta. > > > Over the past", "had more time to show you through my actions that", "were to build the community. Even before it was trendy,", "past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more", "opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me to", "have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing", "an awesome community that had awesome support from the company.", "SE team really pisses our community off, I would go", "with SE policy. I have gone to bat for us,", "contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am", "the lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities.", "interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are", "is so against the SE opinion, the SE team has", "trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights of", "that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets", "thing from imploding. At first it was simply that the", "been a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank", "they are making the decisions they are. They are the", "represent you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes", "all I can leave you with is empty words that", "opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it will", "that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is", "(e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our", "only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta.", "disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat for", "They are not acting on our feedback or telling us", "learned so much. I thank you all for working with", "the 5+ years that I have been a moderator, I", "agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply been", "the right to do is act like the boss and", "privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE", "resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into an", "been biding my time until SE did something so horrendous", "I have learned so much. I thank you all for", "Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but", "been thinking about this for a while and it is", "the community. I will not be deleting my accounts or", "that the SE policy is that the community opinion rules.", "the whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply", "simply been biding my time until SE did something so", "they had developers actively working to make the experience better", "making money was. Of course companies have to make money,", "was. Of course companies have to make money, but it", "us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer", "meta. > > > Over the past few months, it", "the past few months, it has become clear that my", "the SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If", "cared about user privacy and the rights of our contributions.", "diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into", "longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I", "felt no choice but to leaving. That is not a", "communities was no longer the focus, making money was. Of", "community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against", "policy. I have gone to bat for us, and I", "SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If the", "I am no longer an effective agent for advancing our", "[\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years", "> > Over the past few months, it has become", "for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no", "private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in", "Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year", "right. What they do not have the right to do", "for working with me. For those that I disappointed with", "has become clear that my views of our community now", "the servers, they had developers actively working to make the", "When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): >", "really pisses our community off, I would go to bat", "become clear that my views of our community now disagree", "did something so horrendous that I felt no choice but", "began to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps", "experience better and employees whose jobs were to build the", "going to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck.", "My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so", "event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community", "What they do not have the right to do is", "community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to", "with just enough support to keep the whole thing from", "values of the company began to shift and outwardly it", "the boss and then say the community is [\"built and", "are the boss, they have that right. What they do", "words that I am sorry that I was not better.", "about user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over", "policies that SE thinks are right for us. They are", "it. If the SE team really pisses our community off,", "it was simply that the support from the company did", "few months, it has become clear that my views of", "SE team has moderators who can handle it. If the", "aside in the hopes that others can be more successful.", "like to think that the SE policy is that the", "I have simply been biding my time until SE did", "8 years ago, it was an awesome community that had", "provided the servers, they had developers actively working to make", "are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent", "of SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I", "Of course companies have to make money, but it made", "or telling us why they are making the decisions they", "our public chat and meta. > > > Over the", "servers, they had developers actively working to make the experience", "are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran", "were going to sacrifice their core principals to make a", "to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I", "successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it", "so horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving.", "to do is act like the boss and then say", "to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it", "that right. What they do not have the right to", "no longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies", "> > > Over the past few months, it has", "would go to bat for our community in private (e.g.,", "time to show you through my actions that I have", "and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are", "more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE", "the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked", "where SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively", "rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome", "keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it was", "focus, making money was. Of course companies have to make", "no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore", "be deleting my accounts or content, but I will not", "so against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators", "be actively participating. I have been thinking about this for", "have gone to bat for us, and I have been", "keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering with", "members are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks", "first it was simply that the support from the company" ]
[ "deal with this particular. It's already had a few flags", "answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both", "accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with", "correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community", "with this particular. It's already had a few flags raised", "this particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive,", "flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own", "rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how", "as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate.", "answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an answer below.", "non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the", "question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but", "to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted", "both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious", "(rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in", "out as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite", "had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll", "also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to", "particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and", "[one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically", "a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as", "if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's", "answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a", "few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my", "question [How to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73)", "diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers,", "few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being", "I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this", "curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular.", "interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73)", "already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer).", "has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands", "a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post", "in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct", "to deal with this particular. It's already had a few", "an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an answer", "but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather", "community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had", "raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts", "during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one", "not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an", "quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal", "the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few", "faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in", "being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm", "The question [How to answer the diversity question during faculty", "It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an", "wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had a", "particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not", "attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out", "[How to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has", "the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already", "and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes", "stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and also" ]
[ "\"What research have you done?\" type of close reason on", "be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent", "a link to a meta Q&A that explains the level", "book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the", "to be able to flag these for closing for lack", "have a \"What research have you done?\" type of close", "the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits", "a meta Q&A that explains the level of research expected?", "its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of", "are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to", "* [How do I cite an article with no page", "consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site", "tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations", "I would love to be able to flag these for", "closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this", "[research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our", "be able to flag these for closing for lack of", "which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show", "have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with", "> > > Would it be useful to have a", "Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using", "Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available", "publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) ", "[English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered", "(APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag", "Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) [How do I cite", "for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close", "our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be", "> Would it be useful to have a \"What research", "to a meta Q&A that explains the level of research", "only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to", "tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can", "of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a", "if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better.", "page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of", "[In APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly", "> > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider", "with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA,", "to have a \"What research have you done?\" type of", "suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can", "questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions", "year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How", "can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > >", "page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I", "the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which", "style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with", "to flag these for closing for lack of research, but", "* [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do", "Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following", "Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from", "reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with no", "no research effort and can be answered by consulting the", "format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In", "with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text", "format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors,", "answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples:", "show little or no research effort and can be answered", "no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873)", "research effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate", "authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA", "by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: ", "of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873)", "type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to", " [In APA, how would one cite the same source", "a \"What research have you done?\" type of close reason", "[commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be", "(APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the same", "on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that", "off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to have", "these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't", "from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one", "reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A", "flag these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE", "numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would", "your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions", "be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > >", "recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same", "following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve", "include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question", "Many of the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some", "[citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are", "English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please include", "article with no page numbers and only a DOI number", "and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style", "site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573)", "\"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously", "DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able", "of the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of", "would love to be able to flag these for closing", "I cite an article with no page numbers and only", "to format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its", "same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to", "the following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039)", "its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873)", "effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style", "> > Would it be useful to have a \"What", "reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or", "doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following close", "questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged", "citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication", "Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic.", "APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article", "some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged", "format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag these", "in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its", "the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How", "using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it", "research have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE,", "[How do I cite an article with no page numbers", "consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography", "tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no", "little or no research effort and can be answered by", "done, or consider if your question suits our [English Language", "[citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research", "style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple", "guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations", "[Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) ", "differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) [How to format the in-text citation", "with no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA", "has the following close reason: > > Please include the", "* [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873)", "close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done,", "Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your", "* [How to format the in-text citation of a Book's", "the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format", "would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page", "how would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing", "appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with", "[Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I", "'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can be", "can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some", "are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little", "be useful to have a \"What research have you done?\"", "useful to have a \"What research have you done?\" type", "able to flag these for closing for lack of research,", "numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of a", "a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) ", "of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"),", "title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) [Sorting Title", "cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) ", "question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that", "references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful", "it be useful to have a \"What research have you", "close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta", "source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) [How to format", "reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please", "or no research effort and can be answered by consulting", "with a link to a meta Q&A that explains the", "APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly with", "> Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if", "that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. >", "or consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/)", "Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that explains", "\"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort", "close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > >", "cite an article with no page numbers and only a", "of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE", "but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the", "link to a meta Q&A that explains the level of", "citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would", "you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our [English", "erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or", "same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite", "an article with no page numbers and only a DOI", "and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love", "done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link", "of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an", "number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to", "for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have", "love to be able to flag these for closing for", "repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the", "you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a", "a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be", "and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide.", "multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how", "this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: >", "have this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason:", "Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting", "answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would", "do I cite an article with no page numbers and", "'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show", "Would it be useful to have a \"What research have", "better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are", "lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason.", "questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and", "[How to format the in-text citation of a Book's title,", "the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and", "examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book?", "one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873)", "research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has" ]
[ "least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve", "I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange", "serve as an exchange of sorts, if no one objects.", "I don't know how much help I can be, but", "can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if no", "suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have to", "a situation where they have to entirely change their teaching", "collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as", "whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an", "situation where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset", "[chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a", "teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post resources,", "but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly", "weeks can post resources, or at the very least, collectively", "the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can", "much help I can be, but I've created a [chat", "have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next", "to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few", "know how much help I can be, but I've created", "a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in", "meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if", "can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people", "how much help I can be, but I've created a", "find themselves in a situation where they have to entirely", "room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation", "resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose", "in a situation where they have to entirely change their", "help I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat)", "can post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine.", "be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who", "change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can", "themselves in a situation where they have to entirely change", "at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread", "their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post", "don't know how much help I can be, but I've", "they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the", "I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find", "where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where", "the next few weeks can post resources, or at the", "this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts,", "very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also", "suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of", "created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves", "toolset in the next few weeks can post resources, or", "next few weeks can post resources, or at the very", "in the next few weeks can post resources, or at", "few weeks can post resources, or at the very least,", "where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in", "who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have", "I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where", "or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this", "also serve as an exchange of sorts, if no one", "people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they", "post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I", "entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks" ]
[ "presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other has", "in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But", "interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services)", "as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that", "from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of", "links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online", "teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are", "very slow to earn closure votes, with the still open", "at the same time, the language on commercial software seems", "a lot of the people who spend time in the", "count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing?", "of software that can be used to teach remotely, in", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from", "specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And", "in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: ", "days, which suggests a lot of the people who spend", "remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three:", "to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”,", "as its own question. What questions should be closed as", "a close vote. These have been very slow to earn", "this as an answer to the meta thread on faculty", "should be closed as “shopping”?* * Here’s the [meta thread", "[Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream", "that the documentation links to. The points of interest contain", "from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we", "to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the", "And then we have current posts where people are asking", "not off scope for another reason)? If not, does it", "sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests a", "slow to earn closure votes, with the still open one", "the corona virus, but it was suggested that it might", "earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting at", "them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language", "2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people are", "which suggests a lot of the people who spend time", "Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if not", "be used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus", "suggested that it might make sense as its own question.", "* And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current", "as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on", "can be used to teach remotely, in light of the", "to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations)", "to earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting", "a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing", "have current posts where people are asking for lists of", "vote. These have been very slow to earn closure votes,", "thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points", "Two of these are closed, and the other has a", "[another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where", "from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people", "where people are asking for lists of software that can", "two related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when", "interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts", "test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to", "the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at", "three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a programming", "spend time in the review queues don’t see them as", "open one sitting at one vote for several days, which", "programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools)", "as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2.", "of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another", "[discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then", "of questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If", "are asking for lists of software that can be used", "votes, with the still open one sitting at one vote", "to me, when I read our official documentation, that these", "on faculty support during the corona virus, but it was", "of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a", "are closed, and the other has a close vote. These", "on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited)", "question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s", "* Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation", "queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same", "the gist of this as an answer to the meta", "practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software", "faculty support during the corona virus, but it was suggested", "The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking", "directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It", "* [Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab", "big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two", "shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should", "meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but", "was suggested that it might make sense as its own", "another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these", "service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s", "then we have current posts where people are asking for", "read our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions.", "these are closed, and the other has a close vote.", "commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically.", "for another reason)? If not, does it require a change", "closure votes, with the still open one sitting at one", "other has a close vote. These have been very slow", "older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And", "points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to", "it require a change to the language in the rules?", "posted the gist of this as an answer to the", "own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? ", "one sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests", "to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. Here’s an older", "people who spend time in the review queues don’t see", "on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two", "here: 1. It seems to me, when I read our", "It seems to me, when I read our official documentation,", "scope for another reason)? If not, does it require a", "Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be", "make sense as its own question. *What questions should be", "[Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical)", "questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If not,", "the corona-virus closures. Here are three: [Creating a secure", "remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these", "that these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation", "there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing", "corona virus, but it was suggested that it might make", "closed, and the other has a close vote. These have", "* Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another", "[Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and", "time, the language on commercial software seems to directly relate.", "vote for several days, which suggests a lot of the", "missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions", "for lists of software that can be used to teach", "closed as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping)", "answer to the meta thread on faculty support during the", "but it was suggested that it might make sense as", "these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m", "it might make sense as its own question. *What questions", "same time, the language on commercial software seems to directly", "used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures.", "a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) ", "virus, but it was suggested that it might make sense", "several days, which suggests a lot of the people who", "and the other has a close vote. These have been", "proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of", "another reason)? If not, does it require a change to", "don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time,", "commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two related", "relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It seems", "questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I read", "its own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”?", "Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links", "at one vote for several days, which suggests a lot", "1. It seems to me, when I read our official", "for several days, which suggests a lot of the people", "the same time, the language on commercial software seems to", "an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions)", "with the still open one sitting at one vote for", "seems to directly relate. There are two related questions here:", "seems to me, when I read our official documentation, that", "to directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1.", "current posts where people are asking for lists of software", "reason)? If not, does it require a change to the", "tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are", "Here are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for", "it was suggested that it might make sense as its", "documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there another", "off scope for another reason)? If not, does it require", "the meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus,", "sense as its own question. *What questions should be closed", "online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. ", "been very slow to earn closure votes, with the still", "the other has a close vote. These have been very", "be closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope", "corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test", "we be closing these sorts of questions (if not off", "gist of this as an answer to the meta thread", "(if not off scope for another reason)? If not, does", "are two related questions here: 1. It seems to me,", "review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the", "these sorts of questions (if not off scope for another", "that can be used to teach remotely, in light of", "who spend time in the review queues don’t see them", "one vote for several days, which suggests a lot of", "might make sense as its own question. *What questions should", "“a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that", "to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here", "documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial", "questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we", "does it require a change to the language in the", "to the meta thread on faculty support during the corona", "software seems to directly relate. There are two related questions", "of these are closed, and the other has a close", "I read our official documentation, that these count as shopping", "If not, does it require a change to the language", "light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: [Creating", "But at the same time, the language on commercial software", "me, when I read our official documentation, that these count", "not, does it require a change to the language in", "the documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a", "closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test environment", "during the corona virus, but it was suggested that it", "as an answer to the meta thread on faculty support", "we have current posts where people are asking for lists", "There are two related questions here: 1. It seems to", "people are asking for lists of software that can be", "language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are", "[meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The", "Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from", "lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) ", " [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to", "be closed as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from", "2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of interest", "secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives", "of the people who spend time in the review queues", "the people who spend time in the review queues don’t", "see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the", "for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary", "closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on commercial", "* [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed,", "has a close vote. These have been very slow to", "have been very slow to earn closure votes, with the", "I posted the gist of this as an answer to", "the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to.", "contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on", "that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) ", "These have been very slow to earn closure votes, with", "still open one sitting at one vote for several days,", "lot of the people who spend time in the review", "the still open one sitting at one vote for several", "sorts of questions (if not off scope for another reason)?", "environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) [Alternatives to big-name", "2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if", "that it might make sense as its own question. What", "questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s the [meta", "support during the corona virus, but it was suggested that", "our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is", "closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope for", "2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have", "“shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the", "the language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There", "related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I", "of this as an answer to the meta thread on", "close vote. These have been very slow to earn closure", "[linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an", "lists of software that can be used to teach remotely,", "suggests a lot of the people who spend time in", "software that can be used to teach remotely, in light", "asking for lists of software that can be used to", "I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of", "official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there", "thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but it", "an answer to the meta thread on faculty support during", "are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a", "when I read our official documentation, that these count as", "live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other", "another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion", "time in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy.", "posts where people are asking for lists of software that", "What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s the", "And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts" ]
[ "can propose other things we can do as a community", "fields or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g.,", "high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions", "help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag", "crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions", "you are here because of this, here is a brief", "you can provide better or complementary answers to some of", "[covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the", "is a brief introduction to our site and resources that", "* [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you", "academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online,", "Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions", "the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. ", "\"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona", "not suited for our site: Scientific questions on immunology", "### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by", "also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general", "speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further", "and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are", "for more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly", "a brief introduction to our site and resources that may", "light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more", "about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show", "where you may find informal help. However, to talk there,", "on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/)", "resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We", "exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted,", "We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for", "for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions", "here but isn’t, please add it. You can also link", "We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our", "in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences", "first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular", "point. If you can provide better or complementary answers to", "general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to", "about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). ", "talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat).", "sites or the Internet in general, but please mark them", "[conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a", "and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If", "a question that is not covered by this, please [ask", "Be aware that the following questions are not suited for", "this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is", "here because of this, here is a brief introduction to", "focused and clearly states which information you need. Be aware", "you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19", "Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose", "[are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get", "they point. If you can provide better or complementary answers", "\"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as", "be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can", "the following questions are not suited for our site: ", "brief introduction to our site and resources that may help", "[Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General travelling questions can be", "find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20", "please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of relevant", "states which information you need. Be aware that the following", "Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly states", "may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need", "* [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question", "tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but", "by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find", "exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you", "a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where", "teaching in those fields or that are about teaching outside", "questions that are specific to teaching in those fields or", "with questions that are specific to teaching in those fields", "Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only be", "or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at", "### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat)", "where they point. If you can provide better or complementary", "[Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific", "crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are", "* [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683)", "FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will be", "in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for", "referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can also", "chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to talk", "questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose other", "If you have a question that is not covered by", "be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling", "upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development of", "asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions", "### New questions If you have a question that is", "need. Be aware that the following questions are not suited", "If you can provide better or complementary answers to some", "outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406)", "of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information.", "be answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated", "the Internet in general, but please mark them by stating", "by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682)", "here as well. We maintain collections of questions and external", "impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved", "introduction to our site and resources that may help you.", "Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on", "* [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have", "of questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote", "that the following questions are not suited for our site:", "crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t", "be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see", "information you need. Be aware that the following questions are", "some of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome.", "you need. Be aware that the following questions are not", "of individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions", "[other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question that", "need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If", "teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel", "the further development of the crisis [are not suited for", "question is focused and clearly states which information you need.", "by stating where they point. If you can provide better", "you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also", "find any question that should be referenced here but isn’t,", "epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). ", "provide better or complementary answers to some of the relevant", "may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the", "please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused", "or the Internet in general, but please mark them by", "and may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis.", "in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If", "[our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However,", "[chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you", "[you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute", "propose other things we can do as a community [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4673/7734).", "that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high", "You can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange", "is focused and clearly states which information you need. Be", "[Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/)", "Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and", "You can propose other things we can do as a", "of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the", "by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question", "here is a brief introduction to our site and resources", "at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual", "[Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with", "are specific to teaching in those fields or that are", "will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and", "restricted, etc. If you are here because of this, here", "on the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered", "whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming", "can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of", "20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you", "may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please", "may help you with questions that are specific to teaching", "The current COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching", "information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based on", "and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help.", "welcome. You can propose other things we can do as", "please mark them by stating where they point. If you", "answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for", "site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in", "the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions", "covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your", "which information you need. Be aware that the following questions", "maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic:", "should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You", "help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on", "that are specific to teaching in those fields or that", "following questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific", "of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You", "lists of relevant questions. If you find any question that", "it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly", "the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you", "question that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/).", "informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation", "complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this is", "questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\")", "of relevant questions. If you find any question that should", "also very welcome. You can propose other things we can", "questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching,", "and the further development of the crisis [are not suited", "apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions and", "is restricted, etc. If you are here because of this,", "that your question is focused and clearly states which information", "specific to teaching in those fields or that are about", "political and administrative decisions and the further development of the", "Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged", "you have a question that is not covered by this,", "good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom", "crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\")", "you with questions that are specific to teaching in those", "you find any question that should be referenced here but", "decisions and the further development of the crisis [are not", "We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by", "resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681)", "and similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections", "online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find", "about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development", "not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that", "that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it.", "stating where they point. If you can provide better or", "ensure that your question is focused and clearly states which", "them by stating where they point. If you can provide", "collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic: ", "### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show", "questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well.", "mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions", "in general, but please mark them by stating where they", "the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by", "are not suited for our site: Scientific questions on", "that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have", "is also very welcome. You can propose other things we", "anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online", "any question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please", "ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled,", "on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science", "Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked", "COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams", "travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because of", "for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may", "outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on", "[online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here", "conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are", "(e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of", "based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and", "teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions", "can provide better or complementary answers to some of the", "are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here", "the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific", "more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based", "cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because", "questions. If you find any question that should be referenced", "better or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions,", "schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can", "clearly states which information you need. Be aware that the", "have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions", "to our site and resources that may help you. ###", "questions If you have a question that is not covered", "answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political", "relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet", "are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools).", "on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can", "administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis [are", "and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is", "answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in", "General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/).", "tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about", "'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older", "the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute,", "but isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant", "or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked on", "by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light", "and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning,", "New questions If you have a question that is not", "older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar", "have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower)", "suited for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and", "question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add", "also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or", "those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of", "of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and", "help you with questions that are specific to teaching in", "aware that the following questions are not suited for our", "regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by those", "the lists of relevant questions. If you find any question", "[this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will", "not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good", "are here because of this, here is a brief introduction", "other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but", "immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or", "contribute*, in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions.", "only be answered by those institutions and may be quickly", "quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this", "If you find any question that should be referenced here", "learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal", "isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant resources", "are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc.", "resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in", "can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). [Math Educators", "for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology", "particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you", "Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating", "topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) ", "questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical", "[Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/)", "development of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask)", "and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/).", "our site and resources that may help you. ### Finding", "be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative", "this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ###", "suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers", "external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and", "those fields or that are about teaching outside of academia", "site and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing", "institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of the", "mark them by stating where they point. If you can", "see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers", "individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions and", "questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about", "Internet in general, but please mark them by stating where", "it. You can also link relevant resources on other Stack", "please add it. You can also link relevant resources on", "or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this", "and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions", "tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We", "because of this, here is a brief introduction to our", "on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general,", "our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can", "teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New", "on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, *please", "Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please mark", "can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General", "but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and", "online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you", "similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections of", "[Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help", "* Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only", "specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning", "questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific questions", "Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific to", "your question is focused and clearly states which information you", "be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/)", "[remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ###", "If you are here because of this, here is a", "may apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions", "for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere).", "to teaching in those fields or that are about teaching", "academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations", "relevant questions. If you find any question that should be", "that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please", "* Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked", "won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have", "current COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and", "add it. You can also link relevant resources on other", "you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists", "questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may", "link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the", "well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted", "SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that", "have a question that is not covered by this, please", "general, but please mark them by stating where they point.", "relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose", "this, here is a brief introduction to our site and", "or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may", "you may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you", "questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis,", "'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We maintain", "site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be", "questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math", "travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). ", "as well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources", "Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please", "curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find any", "can only be answered by those institutions and may be", "site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom", "is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure", "in those fields or that are about teaching outside of", "about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply", "get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a", "and administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis", "Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions", "can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites", "(and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We", "moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If", "[ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and", "Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about", "to some of the relevant questions, this is also very", " Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation", "However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the", "* General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or", "to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site", "reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can,", "institutions can only be answered by those institutions and may", "but please mark them by stating where they point. If", "asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and", "several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are", "If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the", "very welcome. You can propose other things we can do", "sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) ", "etc. If you are here because of this, here is", "further development of the crisis [are not suited for this", "and clearly states which information you need. Be aware that", "of this, here is a brief introduction to our site", "learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions", "the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can", "on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the", "this is also very welcome. You can propose other things", "existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged", "there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ###", "answers to some of the relevant questions, this is also" ]
[ "be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading the", "to the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover", "apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of calling", "Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it was", "indicate the first reason is wrong - it was a", "very short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes.", "answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator", "answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to", "high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless.", "user posted a very short answer. The answer had a", "a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving", "the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier", "has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes", "moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack", "it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is", "completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to", "would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for", "answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\"", "low reputation user posted a very short answer. The answer", "quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was", "short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A", "reason is wrong - it was a high quality answer.", "mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong", "the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong -", "should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading", "the first reason is wrong - it was a high", "The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like", "no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate", "to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of", "it was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking", "reputation user posted a very short answer. The answer had", "answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by", "like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the", "earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks", "by vote. (question edited, I was reading the wrong policy)", "nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting", "lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the", "Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question", "moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds", "giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the", "I would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer", "deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing", "the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it", "the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever", "that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and", "\"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote.", "was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was", "a very short answer. The answer had a net 13", "the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal", "for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters", "accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the", "is wrong - it was a high quality answer. The", "13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason", "\"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has", "wrong - it was a high quality answer. The accusation", "mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to", "the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided", "answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would", "had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer", "baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to the", "attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality", "of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator", "asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it", "personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer", "decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading the wrong", "Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason", "upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that", "of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited,", "posted a very short answer. The answer had a net", "of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should", "A low reputation user posted a very short answer. The", "A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It", "The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted", "answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the", "answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the", "the answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer", "to the answerer for the personal attack of calling the", "the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of", "value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first", "and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\"", "net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the", "answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I", "- it was a high quality answer. The accusation of", "a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely", "was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize", "whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting value.", "reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers", "adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no", "first reason is wrong - it was a high quality", "calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be", "quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I" ]
[ "asks advice from people who had similar experience during their", "people who have the same issues. The most voted question", "thing in academic life is closed due to the reason", "it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I", "this site is [How should I deal with discouragement as", "very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it", "advice from people who had similar experience during their academic", "at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar", "relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who have", "considers a very common, and very important thing in academic", "question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for", "the answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless,", "that his question is highly relevant to academia, and very", "issues. The most voted question in this site is [How", "question in this site is [How should I deal with", "academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had", "believe that his question is highly relevant to academia, and", "entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from", "academia, and very beneficial for people who have the same", "[How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student).", "academic life is closed due to the reason being off-topic?", "have the same issues. The most voted question in this", "Why is a question which considers a very common, and", "during their academic career. I believe that his question is", "very beneficial for people who have the same issues. The", "Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question and", "I believe that his question is highly relevant to academia,", "experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among", "a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that", "be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question", "should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred", "question entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice", "[This](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147940/leaving-academia-at-39/1) question entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks", "I believe that it is a valuable question and should", "people who had similar experience during their academic career. I", "deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is", "not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a", "which considers a very common, and very important thing in", "a valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence", "answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it", "with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely", "on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very", "believe that it is a valuable question and should not", "their academic career. I believe that his question is highly", "is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers", "had similar experience during their academic career. I believe that", "is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal", "I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question", "a very common, and very important thing in academic life", "that it is a valuable question and should not be", "very important thing in academic life is closed due to", "Hence my point; Why is a question which considers a", "\"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who", "academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question", "open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience, but", "personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem", "but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics.", "nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore,", "and very beneficial for people who have the same issues.", "ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which considers", "academic career. I believe that his question is highly relevant", "a question which considers a very common, and very important", "and should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why", "purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common", "from people who had similar experience during their academic career.", "is a question which considers a very common, and very", "closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which", "his question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial", "career. I believe that his question is highly relevant to", "basically asks advice from people who had similar experience during", "is [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate", "and very important thing in academic life is closed due", "site is [How should I deal with discouragement as a", "based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a", "is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people", "valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence my", "question and should not be closed ever. Hence my point;", "most voted question in this site is [How should I", "is a valuable question and should not be closed ever.", "should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is", "discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended,", "question which considers a very common, and very important thing", "point; Why is a question which considers a very common,", "common, and very important thing in academic life is closed", "who have the same issues. The most voted question in", "beneficial for people who have the same issues. The most", "among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable", "for people who have the same issues. The most voted", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is", "problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a", "my point; Why is a question which considers a very", "important thing in academic life is closed due to the", "as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people", "the same issues. The most voted question in this site", "as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the", "common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer", "Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on", "same issues. The most voted question in this site is", "absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience,", "voted question in this site is [How should I deal", "similar experience during their academic career. I believe that his", "very common, and very important thing in academic life is", "The most voted question in this site is [How should", "in academic life is closed due to the reason *being", "it is a valuable question and should not be closed", "to academia, and very beneficial for people who have the", "considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe", "highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who", "in this site is [How should I deal with discouragement", "experience during their academic career. I believe that his question", "who had similar experience during their academic career. I believe", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based", "question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely", "39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar experience" ]
[ "sense. It's hard to ask a good question when you", "help? I think it's pretty clear this site is not", "health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or", "say they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting", "of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health", "direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty", "these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's", "are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to", "not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes", "imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed", "there a way we can direct these askers to appropriate", "hard to ask a good question when you are distressed.", "questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety.", "describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common", "makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question when", "anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply", "very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they", "lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these", "problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious", "their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always,", "they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their", "Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and", "is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but", "it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often,", "way we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I", "clear this site is not the help these askers need.", "closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask", "askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it", "and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it.", "or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some", "we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think", "good question when you are distressed. Is there a way", "common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are", "I think it's pretty clear this site is not the", "from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These", "explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it is", "appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site is", "depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others", "these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear", "It's hard to ask a good question when you are", "Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions", "pretty clear this site is not the help these askers", "a way we can direct these askers to appropriate help?", "anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some askers", "are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say", "or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only", "it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed as", "regularly get questions from people who describe symptoms of depression", "to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site", "We regularly get questions from people who describe symptoms of", "ask a good question when you are distressed. Is there", "questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard", "get questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or", "distressed. Is there a way we can direct these askers", "symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental", "Is there a way we can direct these askers to", "always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense.", "This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question", "but not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This", "think it's pretty clear this site is not the help", "as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a", "are distressed. Is there a way we can direct these", "depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems.", "only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are", "a good question when you are distressed. Is there a", "question when you are distressed. Is there a way we", "can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's", "you are distressed. Is there a way we can direct", "mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed", "are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives.", "people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are", "askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this", "when you are distressed. Is there a way we can", "to ask a good question when you are distressed. Is", "it's pretty clear this site is not the help these", "Often, but not always, these questions are closed as unclear.", "unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good", "These are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly", "who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very", "disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not" ]
[ "to the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately reopen", "do focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal", "which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including", "votes cast outside the queue. While this question is on", "to this question (including one by me) do focus on", "this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot", "site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push", "one by me) do focus on this factual correctness and", "mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one by", "this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question", "arguably less subjective than many on this site. I therefore", "anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity", "question is on a series of claims, which would make", "this question (including one by me) do focus on this", "reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen", "claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for", "for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to", "was only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While", "for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually", "While there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider", "is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a", "and most of its answers are arguably less subjective than", "would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it", "primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the", "this statement on doing a PhD in Germany as a", "are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I", "case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most", "subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its answers", "correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there", "and was only closed from votes cast outside the queue.", "closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this question", "in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed", "cast outside the queue. While this question is on a", "such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some", "mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed", "be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open", "and it the question and most of its answers are", "it the question and most of its answers are arguably", "I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this", "being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in", "series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it", "outside the queue. While this question is on a series", "this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic.", "a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and", "the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was", "three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes", "leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast", "closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975),", "foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based.", "open* votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside", "push this question to the reopen queue, because my vote", "from votes cast outside the queue. While this question is", "than many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen", "subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of [good", "subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose to", "less subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose", "the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately reopen it.)", "question (including one by me) do focus on this factual", "statement on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner", "It actually failed to be closed in the close queue,", "only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this", "question to the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately", "[receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from", "as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being", "a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily", "some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of", "queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed", "actually failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving", "asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers", "objective. Most answers to this question (including one by me)", "of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of", "answers are arguably less subjective than many on this site.", "focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims", "to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave", "therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question", "would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness,", "of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks", "propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to", "on a series of claims, which would make an opinionated", "on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I", "consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the", "Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for", "there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this", "their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this", "to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the", "left, I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/)", "factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While", "this question is on a series of claims, which would", "[Is this statement on doing a PhD in Germany as", "votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside the", "me) do focus on this factual correctness and why such", "doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for", "the question and most of its answers are arguably less", "on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate", "why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still", "of its answers are arguably less subjective than many on", "it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen queue,", "problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I would", "opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the close", "answers to this question (including one by me) do focus", "cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because my", "an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is", "is on a series of claims, which would make an", "was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to", "[good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its", "question and most of its answers are arguably less subjective", "answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective.", "failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three", "a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734)", "I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and", "which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their", "opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly", "on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are", "most of its answers are arguably less subjective than many", "its answers are arguably less subjective than many on this", "still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case", "make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which", "many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it.", "the queue. While this question is on a series of", "a series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer,", "claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left,", "(I cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because", "correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question", "While this question is on a series of claims, which", "PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was", "close queue, [receiving three leave open* votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only", "by me) do focus on this factual correctness and why", "are arguably less subjective than many on this site. I", "for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed", "queue. While this question is on a series of claims,", "Most answers to this question (including one by me) do", "accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It", "is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one", "in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and", "and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is", "it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most", "(including one by me) do focus on this factual correctness", "closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be", "this question to the reopen queue, because my vote would" ]
[ "see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since", "respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us", "the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar.", "the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp", "first myself. I therefore considered it better to have you", "accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather", "comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues", "should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since", "without seeing the result in action; I got a few", "questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did", "close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? ===============================", "Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any", "changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the", "to different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers,", "example, this is what the author of a question closed", "which text goes where without seeing the result in action;", "little risk of the result being accidentally worse than the", "For example, this is what the author of a question", "will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great", "* One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers", "Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create", "or guide the asker. For example, this is what the", "shown in the two following cases.) * One text to", "with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not", "guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked", "question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. ", "of the result being accidentally worse than the status quo.", "we can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons", "voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be used.", "Since there is more room and the texts are more", "the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also", "of our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please", "occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and", "goes where without seeing the result in action; I got", "the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for", "notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do not", "[close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the", "surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room", "all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and", "have more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming.", "brief text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing", "predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier?", "necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each", "similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will", "moderators to make use of this system. The new close", "any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate", "guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the", "complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions", "scope of this community will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I", "earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises;", "active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions", "the author of a question closed as not within the", "gets shown in the two following cases.) One text", "for each of our custom close reasons containing all the", "not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there", "close reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs", "============= I worked together with the other moderators to make", "for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened =============", "The new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect", "of this system. The new close reasons went active just", "similar. * One text to guide users with the [close", "suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one", "informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason", "tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences:", "close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should", "a single text that works on all occasions anymore and", "text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to", "question closed as not within the scope of this community", "this is great since we do not have to have", "the author of a question with improving it, getting help", "that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question.", "improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise,", "now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different", "also gets shown in the two following cases.) * One", "policy. Since there is more room and the texts are", "reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown", "improve the question or guide the asker. For example, this", "a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered", "in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question =============", "reason should be used. * One brief text that describes", "reviewers when the close reason should be used. * One", "is little risk of the result being accidentally worse than", "to grasp which text goes where without seeing the result", "I think this is great since we do not have", "help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users", "with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One", "other moderators to make use of this system. The new", "texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One", "reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and the", "targetted, there is little risk of the result being accidentally", "reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The", "the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This", "========== With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can", "two following cases.) * One text to guide the author", "containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements", "following cases.) * One text to guide the author of", "use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex", "result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it", "question or guide the asker. For example, this is what", "I therefore considered it better to have you review the", "for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text", "question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of our", "it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where", "a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar.", "considered it better to have you review the result in", "text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the", "ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain", "flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be", "not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not", "more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the", "at first myself. I therefore considered it better to have", "have you review the result in place, and suggest changes", "where without seeing the result in action; I got a", "wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better to", "is what the author of a question closed as not", "Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes", "I worked together with the other moderators to make use", "in the two following cases.) One text to guide", "changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer", "to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason.", "improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text", "since we do not have to have a single text", "question. (It also gets shown in the two following cases.)", "(It also gets shown in the two following cases.) ", "how to improve the question or guide the asker. For", "text to guide the author of a question with improving", "asker. For example, this is what the author of a", "to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in", "and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I", "a question closed as not within the scope of this", "works on all occasions anymore and have more room for", "the texts are more targetted, there is little risk of", "the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: ", "of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or", "worked together with the other moderators to make use of", " One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions)", "apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close", "each of our custom close reasons containing all the texts.", "system. The new close reasons went active just now. The", "or similar. * One text to guide users with the", "this is what the author of a question closed as", "us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any", "One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how", "great since we do not have to have a single", "close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do", "it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to", "old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why", "that works on all occasions anymore and have more room", "new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing", "more room and the texts are more targetted, there is", "to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or", "close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to", "therefore considered it better to have you review the result", "One brief text that describes the close reason to everybody", "what the author of a question closed as not within", "============= I’ll post one answer for each of our custom", "and reviewers when the close reason should be used. ", "there is more room and the texts are more targetted,", "text that works on all occasions anymore and have more", "text goes where without seeing the result in action; I", "we do not have to have a single text that", "This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of", "getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide", "the result in action; I got a few things wrong", "everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the", "in action; I got a few things wrong at first", "changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective", "guide the asker. For example, this is what the author", "reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest", "all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance", "cases.) * One text to guide the author of a", "audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and", "happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators to", "with the other moderators to make use of this system.", "closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you", "are more targetted, there is little risk of the result", "not within the scope of this community will see: [![example", "=============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises; they", "suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements", "privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the asker.", "make use of this system. The new close reasons went", "being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with", "the two following cases.) * One text to guide the", "of a question closed as not within the scope of", "worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult", "myself. I therefore considered it better to have you review", "do not have to have a single text that works", "our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use", "custom close reasons to different audiences: One text that", "close reason should be used. * One brief text that", "the result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also,", "close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets", "reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to", "texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should", "custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments", "[![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we", "got a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore", "things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better", "rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing", "The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the", "retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor", "be used. * One brief text that describes the close", "of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think", "different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers, voters,", "author of a question closed as not within the scope", "is great since we do not have to have a", "community will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is", "when the close reason should be used. * One brief", "closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom", "there is little risk of the result being accidentally worse", "contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is", "close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply", "just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed", "within the scope of this community* will see: [![example close", "the asker. For example, this is what the author of", "can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to", "system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom close", "guide the author of a question with improving it, getting", "users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question", "single text that works on all occasions anymore and have", "I got a few things wrong at first myself. I", "and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post", "elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users with", "text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the", "review the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary.", "the close reason should be used. * One brief text", "to guide the author of a question with improving it,", "seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the two", "than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to", "as not within the scope of this community will see:", "Background ========== With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we", "place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll", "the other moderators to make use of this system. The", "that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close", "The new close reasons went active just now. The changes", "to make use of this system. The new close reasons", "it better to have you review the result in place,", "any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more", "they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and", "reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs close", "you review the result in place, and suggest changes if", "* One brief text that describes the close reason to", "this system. The new close reasons went active just now.", "went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old", "you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should", "more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What", "describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It", "author of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere,", "What happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators", "tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I", "Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new", "to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve", "used. * One brief text that describes the close reason", "result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question", "being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is", "With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now", "status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which", "[recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor", "post one answer for each of our custom close reasons", "this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this", "to improve the question or guide the asker. For example,", "room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened", "use of this system. The new close reasons went active", "and the texts are more targetted, there is little risk", "with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or", "the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask", "One text to guide the author of a question with", "more targetted, there is little risk of the result being", "and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together", "now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with", "grasp which text goes where without seeing the result in", "better to have you review the result in place, and", "should be used. * One brief text that describes the", "room and the texts are more targetted, there is little", "the question. (It also gets shown in the two following", "quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text", "on all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored", "I’ll post one answer for each of our custom close", "to have a single text that works on all occasions", "few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it", "have to have a single text that works on all", "the scope of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)", "to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts", "existing policy. Since there is more room and the texts", "not have to have a single text that works on", "is more room and the texts are more targetted, there", "texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy.", "closed as not within the scope of this community will", "difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing the", "is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without", "or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions as needed.", "texts are more targetted, there is little risk of the", "anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and being", "result in action; I got a few things wrong at", "the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide", "risk of the result being accidentally worse than the status", "have a single text that works on all occasions anymore", "together with the other moderators to make use of this", "think this is great since we do not have to", "to have you review the result in place, and suggest", "one answer for each of our custom close reasons containing", "* One text to guide the author of a question", "did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts", "action; I got a few things wrong at first myself.", "new close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively", "answer for each of our custom close reasons containing all", "One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when", "welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the other", "and have more room for tailored guidance and being more", "the question or guide the asker. For example, this is", "seeing the result in action; I got a few things", "issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions as", "if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for" ]
[ "into a bad habit. A few questions get asked that", "say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really", "asked that don't require much thought or analysis to answer.", "would like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal", "such things. The alternative might be to just ignore the", "some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've", "or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but", "ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied", "future reader. Not all are like that. And many of", "real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of", "and would like advice on the validity. A one sentence", "OP needs some help but the question is anything but", "on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such", "one may be a the limit of where a real", "it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't", "for such things. The alternative might be to just ignore", "few of these in comments lately and would like advice", "A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like", "fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get asked", "to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it", "new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to", "given. Some of the questions of this kind are personal", "really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many of these.", "all are like that. And many of these sorts of", "needs some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering.", "I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may be", "have fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get", "\"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but the", "are like that. And many of these sorts of questions", "\"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to answer", "analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\"", "alternative might be to just ignore the question or close", "question, though this one may be a the limit of", "seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming that", "may have little value for a future reader. Not all", "be given. Some of the questions of this kind are", "value for a future reader. Not all are like that.", "of this kind are personal and may have little value", "advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help", "Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed", "an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may", "answer in comments for such things. The alternative might be", "have little value for a future reader. Not all are", "many of these sorts of questions seem to be coming", "of questions seem to be coming from new users. So,", "unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a", "journal\". The OP needs some help but the question is", "like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question,", "the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions", "be to just ignore the question or close it, leaving", "to be coming from new users. So, assuming that there", "these in comments lately and would like advice on the", "questions seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming", "of these in comments lately and would like advice on", "just ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP", "a future reader. Not all are like that. And many", "overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though", "of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of", "comments for such things. The alternative might be to just", "to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or", "much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is", "in comments for such things. The alternative might be to", "and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really", "sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here", "from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much", "get asked that don't require much thought or analysis to", "a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be", "few questions get asked that don't require much thought or", "is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP", "is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one", "such a question, though this one may be a the", "a question, though this one may be a the limit", "a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many of", "this one may be a the limit of where a", "but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these", "\"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of this", "though this one may be a the limit of where", "like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\"", "but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\"", "that. And many of these sorts of questions seem to", "I may have fallen into a bad habit. A few", "of these sorts of questions seem to be coming from", "there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason", "might be to just ignore the question or close it,", "little value for a future reader. Not all are like", "leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem", "The alternative might be to just ignore the question or", "these sorts of questions seem to be coming from new", "questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such", "question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a", "answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact", "a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions", "that don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often", "the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\".", "the questions of this kind are personal and may have", "be a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could", "that journal\". The OP needs some help but the question", "limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some", "a few of these in comments lately and would like", "\"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is", "it really fine to answer in comments for such things.", "thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask", "OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be", "quite a few of these in comments lately and would", "be coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't", "fine to answer in comments for such things. The alternative", "So, assuming that there isn't really much to say and", "question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy.", "your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some", "that there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\"", "such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of", "of the questions of this kind are personal and may", "where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the", "like that. And many of these sorts of questions seem", "require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer", "personal and may have little value for a future reader.", "assuming that there isn't really much to say and the", "this kind are personal and may have little value for", "validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems", "lately and would like advice on the validity. A one", "really much to say and the \"answer\" is very short,", "Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that", "or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your", "seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a", "the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to", "users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to say", "the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given.", "be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many", "are personal and may have little value for a future", "may be a the limit of where a real \"answer\"", "kind are personal and may have little value for a", "coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really", "habit. A few questions get asked that don't require much", "for a future reader. Not all are like that. And", "earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in", "a bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't", "Some of the questions of this kind are personal and", "Not all are like that. And many of these sorts", "to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for", "The OP needs some help but the question is anything", "close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there", "is very short, is it really fine to answer in", "seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\"", "the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite", "and may have little value for a future reader. Not", "could be given. Some of the questions of this kind", "sorts of questions seem to be coming from new users.", "the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and", "reader. Not all are like that. And many of these", "don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the", "questions get asked that don't require much thought or analysis", "of such a question, though this one may be a", "to answer in comments for such things. The alternative might", "[Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this", "advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to", "or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover,", "doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to", "things. The alternative might be to just ignore the question", "answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an", "short, is it really fine to answer in comments for", "in comments lately and would like advice on the validity.", "one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill.", "and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine", "isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is very", "help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been", "much to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is", "is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few", "anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of", "there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is", "really fine to answer in comments for such things. The", "very short, is it really fine to answer in comments", "\"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs", "is it really fine to answer in comments for such", "needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate", "may have fallen into a bad habit. A few questions", "comments lately and would like advice on the validity. A", "answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The", "\"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately and", "the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to", "to just ignore the question or close it, leaving the", "And many of these sorts of questions seem to be", "A few questions get asked that don't require much thought", "been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately", "bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't require", "questions of this kind are personal and may have little", "to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368)" ]
[ "will the system notice two a day across several days?", "the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice", "that is slow? If the system will not, then how", "will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as", "across several days? I know that the system will revoke", "how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t", "it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the", "spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the system needs", "days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes of", "not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that", "do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be", "up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will", "several days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes", "system notice two a day across several days? I know", "that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the", "say ten in a row as that is easily spotted", "but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow?", "answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed", "slow? If the system will not, then how do I", "downvoting that is slow? If the system will not, then", "mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system", "So I have noticed that two of my answers get", "is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting", "downvoting, but will the system notice two a day across", "I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted", "that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in", "of my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen", "have seen other posts that mention the system notices serial", "that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will", "and can’t be changed will suggest the system needs changing.", "ten in a row as that is easily spotted but", "have noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each", "serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a day", "downvotes of say ten in a row as that is", "my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other", "a row as that is easily spotted but will it", "the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a", "that two of my answers get downvoted each day. I", "system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row", "easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that", "pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system", "answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts", "downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that mention", "posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will", "system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an", "noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each day.", "will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If", "will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer", "two of my answers get downvoted each day. I have", "I have seen other posts that mention the system notices", "If the system will not, then how do I proceed?", "row as that is easily spotted but will it pick", "I have noticed that two of my answers get downvoted", "day across several days? I know that the system will", "is slow? If the system will not, then how do", "two a day across several days? I know that the", "revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as that", "other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but", "each day. I have seen other posts that mention the", "know that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten", "day. I have seen other posts that mention the system", "a day across several days? I know that the system", "seen other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting,", "then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it", "but will the system notice two a day across several", "spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is", "insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will not,", "that is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious", "notice two a day across several days? I know that", "notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a", "Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t", "in a row as that is easily spotted but will", "as that is easily spotted but will it pick up", "of say ten in a row as that is easily", "I know that the system will revoke downvotes of say", "proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and", "won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the", "get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that", "the system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting", "the system notice two a day across several days? I", "be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the system", "an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be", "system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two", "it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest" ]
[ "answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th comment,", "of his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub", "I have not seen evidence that this is the case;", "illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and", "opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading from", "one. I admit I have not made any sort of", "I / can I do, seeing how I believe readers", "in the world). The second claim is a factual one.", "service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most", "most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction,", "factual one. I admit I have not made any sort", "of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that", "lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually in", "itself - other than the claims of illegality - is", "[A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > >", "or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other than", "is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not", "15th comment, while the answer itself - other than the", "(as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions.", "> > > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\";", "sort of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence", "admit I have not made any sort of legal survey,", "the answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th", "have not seen evidence that this is the case; and", "places in the world). The second claim is a factual", "limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth", "research is likely legal in most places in the world).", "while the answer itself - other than the claims of", "- other than the claims of illegality - is useful,", "jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the", "accepted answer to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319)", "comment, while the answer itself - other than the claims", "the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has", "claim is a factual one. I admit I have not", "the claims of illegality - is useful, and is the", "Now, I can comment on the answer, but it would", "answer. What should I / can I do, seeing how", "I do, seeing how I believe readers are being misinformed?", "his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited", "the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at", "at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and", "case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence", "[debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that", "illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to uploading", "should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested", "ruled on, and they are usually in favor of the", "@Allure knows this not to be the case, since we've", "and they are usually in favor of the copyright holder).", "knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth -", "on the answer, but it would be the 10th or", "the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of", "I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on", "this is the case; and given the other dispute, I", "@Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking", "survey, but I have not seen evidence that this is", "jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit", "in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your", "to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is", "second claim is a factual one. I admit I have", "illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e.", "is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled", "can comment on the answer, but it would be the", "thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use", "uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not", "not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before.", "holder). > > > The first claim is qualified with", "least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not", "stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already", "it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in", "marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim", "is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the", "but I have not seen evidence that this is the", "on, and they are usually in favor of the copyright", "for the purposes of research is likely legal in most", "of the copyright holder). > > > The first claim", "the accepted answer. What should I / can I do,", "that this is the case; and given the other dispute,", "be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should,", "Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely", "Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as", "evidence that this is the case; and given the other", "this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it", "probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to", "that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub.", "lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are", "has been ruled on, and they are usually in favor", "to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states", "claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this", "from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal", "answer itself - other than the claims of illegality -", "the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself -", "Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal in", "likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to", "illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer. What", "If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend", "it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the", "10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other", "have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally;", "not made any sort of legal survey, but I have", "the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in", "they are usually in favor of the copyright holder). >", "papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend", "- is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should", "opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If", "is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes", "should I / can I do, seeing how I believe", "in favor of the copyright holder). > > > The", "purposes of research is likely legal in most places in", "accepted answer. What should I / can I do, seeing", "free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your", "the world). The second claim is a factual one. I", "> The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but -", "can I do, seeing how I believe readers are being", "seen evidence that this is the case; and given the", "and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists.", "is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I", "contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite", "the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such", "usually in favor of the copyright holder). > > >", "He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is", "is a factual one. I admit I have not made", "doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the", "given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now,", "are usually in favor of the copyright holder). > >", "truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research", "in most places in the world). The second claim is", "friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal,", "any sort of legal survey, but I have not seen", "of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the", "is the accepted answer. What should I / can I", "In accepted answer to this question: [A free papers search", "to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto", "mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to", "of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer.", "his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for", "most places in the world). The second claim is a", "is likely legal in most places in the world). The", "the opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading", "to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's", "> > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but", "> Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's", "legal in most places in the world). The second claim", "including to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff", "states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of", "evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but", "the answer itself - other than the claims of illegality", "before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim", "likely legal in most places in the world). The second", "legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that this", "we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned", "The second claim is a factual one. I admit I", "(and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of", "in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit", "world). The second claim is a factual one. I admit", "not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his", "and is the accepted answer. What should I / can", "copyright holder). > > > The first claim is qualified", "a factual one. I admit I have not made any", "with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be", "> > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning:", "already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality", "useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I /", "to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He", "it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is", "favor of the copyright holder). > > > The first", "but - @Allure knows this not to be the case,", "be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself", "/ can I do, seeing how I believe readers are", "- downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is", "have not made any sort of legal survey, but I", "since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have", "knows this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319)", "case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least,", "my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the", "the purposes of research is likely legal in most places", "exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but it", "engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably", "other than the claims of illegality - is useful, and", "answer to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure", "made any sort of legal survey, but I have not", "this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that:", "search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is", "it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed", "not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards", "not seen evidence that this is the case; and given", "it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his", "the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I", "I can comment on the answer, but it would be", "use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it),", "claims of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted", "Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service", "other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can", "onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal", "than the claims of illegality - is useful, and is", "qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to", "- @Allure knows this not to be the case, since", "comment on the answer, but it would be the 10th", "What should I / can I do, seeing how I", "\"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be the", "but it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while", "after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually", "question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: >", "the copyright holder). > > > The first claim is", "The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure", "claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge,", "trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been", "claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the", "that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my", "such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer,", "I admit I have not made any sort of legal", "I have not made any sort of legal survey, but", "towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on,", "your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after", "of research is likely legal in most places in the", "been ruled on, and they are usually in favor of", "dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment", "is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including", "(i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they", "first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows", "would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer", "is the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt", "downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely" ]
[ "much not opinion based. --- I asked the question over", "whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the", "phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely", "my question very well, and clear. 2. This is a", "too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I", "I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I", "close, and was closed by one of the moderators? Has", "be at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions", "best question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice,", "the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I", "address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) ", "to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) [How to avoid and address", "close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in", "intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the authors", "any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer", "any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are", "15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also be", "3. It should be clearly stated that why are the", "list with no best answer. > 2. The next best", "claimed that there should be at least one clear reason", "link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and", "do not approve the motivation of the authors who published", "their opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I", "got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What", "Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well, and", "that I cannot ask a question of which answers can", "sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > > So,", "to close, and was closed by one of the moderators?", "written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation", "was it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper", "I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that", "voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are", "there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) ", "taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all", "gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) [What am I being", "is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until", "are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is", "their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some", "were retracted with the same official reason: > > because", "the reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing", "are the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are", "have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have", "the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their", "diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid", "answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons that", "I do not approve the motivation of the authors who", "question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were", "in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics", "I am not racist, and I am fully aware that", "Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval of", "the same official reason: > > because of the sources", "reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are not", "example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in", "Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as a", "procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How", "a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into", "to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion", "the data section when data is reused from a previous", "previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly", "fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of", "out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the", "comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my question", "them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3.", "one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place", "comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because: >", "a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there", "publications that were retracted with the same official reason: >", "question. As for (3), I am willing to give examples", "paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data because", "[Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing", "one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken.", "question can be one example, or many examples. There is", "* [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of", "[How to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole)", "from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation", "Taken literally, it asks for a > list with no", "[Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by the", "looked up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately", "to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in", "by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a", "Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot even", "Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by", "follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications", "questions** in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement", "(see above). My question: Why was my question voted to", "become a place where we cannot even ask questions due", "curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3.", "of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter.", "encouraged me to check some questions that are answered by", "simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are", "(as in the official notice), then the papers those are", "a question of which answers can be many. 4. None", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment", "closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally,", "[Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar", "that were retracted by the publisher due to the reader", "outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun", "reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD", "believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum", "are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed", "they provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1.", "to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not", "ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not", "scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due to", "What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not", "reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up", "> I am closing this question because: > > >", "based. --- I asked the question over a simple debate", "by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be", "questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when I", "questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question", "[How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student)", "the sources used are not credible (as in the official", "reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing are", "the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I", "not really a reason to close a question. Also, (2)", "not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very", "accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read", "plain wrong, because in the very same link I have", "to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None", "this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction", "good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons", "> > > So, I looked up some questions. Those", "data because the data they provide were already published many", "or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the", "are based on those resources, in which 15 of them", "> > So, I looked up some questions. Those are", "or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me", "examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of", "Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully aware", "for (3), I am willing to give examples from the", "other publications that were retracted with the same official reason:", "(postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when data", "many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question", "of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I", "credible, and how was it determined after eight whole years.", "place where we cannot even ask questions due to current", "harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without", "answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and", "editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible (as", "2. If the sources used are not credible (as in", "states that I cannot ask a question of which answers", "same link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article),", "Academia SE become a place where we cannot even ask", "on the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing", "people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to", "already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed", "being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the", "retracted with the same official reason: > > because of", "researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and", "I am closing this question because: > > > 1.", "I am willing to give examples from the top questions", "falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet", "we cannot even ask questions due to current political situations?", "what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment", "said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications", "any solid reason, I claimed that there should be at", "that took the approval of the same reviewers and editors.", "on the answers to avoid being overrun with > people", "> So, I looked up some questions. Those are the", "the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am", "should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation", "and how was it determined after eight whole years. Because", "is very much not opinion based. --- I asked the", "retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why are", "> 1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list", "a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation", "is not clear what this is. > 3. Even then,", "opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions", "of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any", "I firmly believe that my question is very much not", "after eight whole years. Because the paper in question is", "> > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a >", "on those resources, in which 15 of them are published", "one cannot claim it was falsified data because the data", "posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written", "section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) ", "claimed that there are many papers retracted without any solid", "I have formed my question very well, and clear. 2.", "am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) [How to write", "it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in", "identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which", "very same link I have posted, there is [official retraction", "Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria on", "to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student)", "immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the search", "credible (as in the official notice), then the papers those", "until the retraction notice is > published, it is not", "* [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals)", "journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues with", "into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the", "> 2. The next best question is whether this is", "my question voted to close, and was closed by one", "voted to close, and was closed by one of the", "* [What are some good ways to keep students coming", "legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines", "the article, and critical comments from readers. > > >", "very much not opinion based. --- I asked the question", "* [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too", "the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question:", "I typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are", "there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are", "a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion:", "(3), I am willing to give examples from the *top", "in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted", "the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) [How to avoid", "not approve the motivation of the authors who published this", "dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should", "because of the sources cited within the article, and critical", "stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above).", "clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the question", "opinion based. --- I asked the question over a simple", "question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it", "* [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by", "the very same link I have posted, there is [official", "written that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I", "colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted without", "genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that were", "falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to", "claim it was falsified data because the data they provide", "* [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs)", "same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are", "determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in question", "in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services", "people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > >", "[Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that", "the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot", "* [How to write the data section when data is", "Those are the ones I immediately found when I typed", "very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question,", "3. The answer to my question can be one example,", "on the matter. 3. The answer to my question can", "really a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is", "question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed", "be many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated", "should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated", "paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section", "[How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a", "where we cannot even ask questions due to current political", "over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that", "what this is. > 3. Even then, the question >", "[How to write the data section when data is reused", "by the users who voted to close my question for", "rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he", "are answered by the users who voted to close my", "keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing", "or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my", "answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their", "ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for", "1. I have formed my question very well, and clear.", "a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that", "Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very same", "wrong, because in the very same link I have posted,", "Why was my question voted to close, and was closed", "without any solid reason, I claimed that there should be", "[Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) ", "discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) [How to avoid procrastination", "as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My", "are the resources not credible, and how was it determined", "laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following", "the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does", "am not racist, and I am fully aware that this", "to my question can be one example, or many examples.", "many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules", "best answer. > 2. The next best question is whether", "by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I", "2. This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity,", "eight whole years. Because the paper in question is a", "users who voted to close my question for opinion-based: ", "not* opinion based. --- I asked the question over a", "well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated", "by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling", "formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This is", "> > I am closing this question because: > >", "with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling", "the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the", "there should be at least one clear reason or the", "at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should", "> 3. Even then, the question > must outline clear", "answer. > 2. The next best question is whether this", "> must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid", "of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a", "clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with", "should be at least one clear reason or the follow-up", "of the authors who published this study. With this said,", "ask a question of which answers can be many. 4.", "clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By", "published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether", "in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as", "and I have written that verbatim in the question. As", "work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded", "the users who voted to close my question for opinion-based:", "cannot ask a question of which answers can be many.", "reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above", "that were retracted with the same official reason: > >", "If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe", "criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with >", "years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very", "trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any", "due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist,", "the sources cited within the article, and critical comments from", "resources not credible, and how was it determined after eight", "Because the paper in question is a survey paper, and", "with the same official reason: > > because of the", "answer to my question can be one example, or many", "authors who published this study. With this said, I genuinely", "> [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am", "accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published,", "willing to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE:", "absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which", "reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am", "I cannot ask a question of which answers can be", "old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a", "the data they provide were already published many years ago.", "were retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the)", "my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted", "based on those resources, in which 15 of them are", "is. > 3. Even then, the question > must outline", "write the data section when data is reused from a", "retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the", "it asks for a > list with no best answer.", "the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used", "paper in question is a survey paper, and one cannot", "of the reasons that were stated as the reasons for", "* [I got the following comment from a reputed math", "then the papers those are based on those resources, in", "with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers", "many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated as", "paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve", "* [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate", "The answer to my question can be one example, or", "I asked the question over a simple debate with my", "there are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I", "many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that", "for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was", "is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim", "my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of", "data they provide were already published many years ago. Facts:", "being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data", "published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my", "without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions", "there\" in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy", "PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what", "am fully aware that this paper was written with crooked", "next best question is whether this is > commonly accepted", "This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without", "papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those", "[Are there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud)", "the official notice), then the papers those are based on", "closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my", "> published, it is not clear what this is. >", "comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the", "to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is", "that my question is very much not opinion based. ---", "question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research", "grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255)", "it was falsified data because the data they provide were", "question must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid", "publications that took the approval of the same reviewers and", "plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services or", "which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also", "also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that", "are not credible (as in the official notice), then the", "some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when", "give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How", "unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558)", "a > list with no best answer. > 2. The", "the authors who published this study. With this said, I", "I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took", "racist, and I am fully aware that this paper was", "in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should", "opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I looked", "one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction", "question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very", "lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old", "sources used are not credible (as in the official notice),", "in the very same link I have posted, there is", "question > must outline clear criteria on the answers to", "of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline", "follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean:", "official notice), then the papers those are based on those", "that there are many papers retracted without any solid reason,", "this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it", "data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe", "motivation of the authors who published this study. With this", "or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions", "restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that", "[What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to", "approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the", "(2) is plain wrong, because in the very same link", "question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks", "None of the reasons that were stated as the reasons", "this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there", "1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list with", "when I typed \"are there\" in the search box: ", "box: [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access", "then, the question > must outline clear criteria on the", "By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the", "stated that why are the resources not credible, and how", "publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not", "years. Because the paper in question is a survey paper,", "4. None of the reasons that were stated as the", "with no best answer. > 2. The next best question", "services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells", "as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during", "retraction. > > > So, I looked up some questions.", "graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) ", "for a > list with no best answer. > 2.", " [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How", "and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really", "there are any other publications that were retracted with the", "have formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This", "and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out", "the matter. 3. The answer to my question can be", "[Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) ", "students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line", "for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the", "was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I", "stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on", "believe that my question is very much not opinion based.", "are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621)", "the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because:", "open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal", "I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How", "None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must", "If the sources used are not credible (as in the", "Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly", "no best answer. > 2. The next best question is", "with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid", "bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid", "the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\"", "of all the publications that took the approval of the", "fully aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions.", "any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID", "comments encouraged me to check some questions that are answered", "not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How", "the publications that took the approval of the same reviewers", "and was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia", "because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for", "clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out of", "those resources, in which 15 of them are published by", "My question: Why was my question voted to close, and", "* [How to avoid and address a lack of gender", "and editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible", "question of which answers can be many. 4. None of", "3. Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria", "proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) ", "and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated", "and one cannot claim it was falsified data because the", "> people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > >", "should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) ", "verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am willing", "math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions", "was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE", "* [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam", "cited within the article, and critical comments from readers. >", "does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based,", "I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the", "data section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446)", "deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to", "of them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted.", "study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are", "releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to", "do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a reputed", "guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any", "* [How to read papers without falling into a rabbit", "my question is very much not opinion based. --- I", "directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that", "--- I asked the question over a simple debate with", "should be clearly stated that why are the resources not", "approve the motivation of the authors who published this study.", "up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found", "overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged", "coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers", "that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do", "axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification", "[Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342)", "matter. 3. The answer to my question can be one", "Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that are", "with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me", "to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and", "the question. As for (3), I am willing to give", "the resources not credible, and how was it determined after", "there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are", "resources, in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier,", "wondered whether there are any other publications that were retracted", "any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there", "[I got the following comment from a reputed math journal.", "journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are", "without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The", "that there should be at least one clear reason or", "The next best question is whether this is > commonly", "aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I", "solid reason, I claimed that there should be at least", "hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question", "official reason: > > because of the sources cited within", "are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question", "in question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim", "survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data", "of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused", "tells me that (1) is not really a reason to", "the retraction notice is > published, it is not clear", "in the question. As for (3), I am willing to", "the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question", "site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question of", "are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It", "that were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate", "from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If", "a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the", "sources cited within the article, and critical comments from readers.", "meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on", "for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) ", "a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) [What", "reason, I claimed that there should be at least one", "> > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I", "close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good", "a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified", "actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that", "question is very much not opinion based. --- I asked", "sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check", "to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some", "the question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They", "article, and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft)", "> > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > >", "that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am", "avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in grant", "have written that verbatim in the question. As for (3),", "digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar)", "opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep students", "announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the question.", "critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in", "were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have", "They claimed that there are many papers retracted without any", "stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this", "> list with no best answer. > 2. The next", "comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully", "the retraction. > > > So, I looked up some", "why are the resources not credible, and how was it", "moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot", "can be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely", "took the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2.", "Which tells me that (1) is not really a reason", "in the official notice), then the papers those are based", "of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where", "to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to", "to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: ", "Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) [Are there any examples", "exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack", "I claimed that there should be at least one clear", "top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with", "from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829):", "[in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question", "criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with people", "[How to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity", "mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly", "search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open", "least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be", "not credible (as in the official notice), then the papers", "ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really a", "accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question voted", "is > published, it is not clear what this is.", "within the article, and critical comments from readers. > >", "however, until the retraction notice is > published, it is", "asks for a > list with no best answer. >", "genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or", "are any other publications that were retracted with the same", "readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): >", "when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I", "because the data they provide were already published many years", "not clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the", "I looked up some questions. Those are the ones I", "it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I", "asked the question over a simple debate with my colleagues.", "can be many. 4. None of the reasons that were", "question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however,", "for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep", "commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is >", "retraction notice is > published, it is not clear what", "the answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing", "the papers those are based on those resources, in which", "my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude):", "my question can be one example, or many examples. There", "were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see", "> > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a", "[How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into a", "from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I", "the paper in question is a survey paper, and one", "examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should", "I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the", "some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) ", "following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it", "no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states", "above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my", "any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) [Are there", "SE become a place where we cannot even ask questions", "firmly believe that my question is very much not opinion", "avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) ", "be clearly stated that why are the resources not credible,", "to check some questions that are answered by the users", "was falsified data because the data they provide were already", "asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers", "which answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons", "answered by the users who voted to close my question", " [Are there any examples of legal issues with academic", "the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that", "(1) is not really a reason to close a question.", "to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because", "comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564)", "there any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher", "not racist, and I am fully aware that this paper", "I am fully aware that this paper was written with", "typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there", "was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the", "is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "of which answers can be many. 4. None of the", "labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital", "must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being", "being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How", "those are based on those resources, in which 15 of", "and I am fully aware that this paper was written", "because in the very same link I have posted, there", "retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer:", "[I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low", "ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well,", "be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no", "\"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there any", "not credible, and how was it determined after eight whole", "am willing to give examples from the top questions in", "falsified data because the data they provide were already published", "ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in", "questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack of", "in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for?", "the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal", "There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the", "clearly stated that why are the resources not credible, and", "I asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific", "is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was", "my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways", "reason: > > because of the sources cited within the", "> > because of the sources cited within the article,", "overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction.", "“[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers to", "being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments", "to write the data section when data is reused from", "is not really a reason to close a question. Also,", "actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1.", "opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very much", "access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues", "this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not", "provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to", "academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes", "the question > must outline clear criteria on the answers", "practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published, it", "mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the", "to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd)", "retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there should", "notice is > published, it is not clear what this", "there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that", "published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should", "It should be clearly stated that why are the resources", "on the retraction. > > > So, I looked up", "check some questions that are answered by the users who", "above). My question: Why was my question voted to close,", "any other publications that were retracted with the same official", "question: Why was my question voted to close, and was", "question very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine", "papers that were retracted by the publisher due to the", "cannot claim it was falsified data because the data they", "[What are some good ways to keep students coming to", "the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If", "used are not credible (as in the official notice), then", "provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I", "there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to", "some questions that are answered by the users who voted", "papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there", "and address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503)", "As for (3), I am willing to give examples from", "the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based", "criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers", "any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase", "avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause)", "of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources", "a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the", "the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we", "lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am", "questions that are answered by the users who voted to", "this is. > 3. Even then, the question > must", "question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to", "whether there are any other publications that were retracted with", "should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from", "question voted to close, and was closed by one of", "which states that I cannot ask a question of which", "questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria", "> because of the sources cited within the article, and", "avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on", "those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear", "me that (1) is not really a reason to close", "* [Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories,", "read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of", "a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain", "who voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What", "am closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken", "issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for", "notice), then the papers those are based on those resources,", "is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice", "similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1)", "of the sources cited within the article, and critical comments", "published, it is not clear what this is. > 3.", "same official reason: > > because of the sources cited", "me to check some questions that are answered by the", "low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got", "[official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in", "a place where we cannot even ask questions due to", "this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other", "I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a", "in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I", "was my question voted to close, and was closed by", "literally, it asks for a > list with no best", "1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval", "> commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is", "the motivation of the authors who published this study. With", "papers those are based on those resources, in which 15", "So, I looked up some questions. Those are the ones", "whole years. Because the paper in question is a survey", "reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why", "a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was", "be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of", "research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being", "debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many", "all the publications that took the approval of the same", "Yesterday, I asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any", "who published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered", "that are answered by the users who voted to close", "closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become", "I have written that verbatim in the question. As for", "with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction. >", "is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my", "that (1) is not really a reason to close a", "is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any", "With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any", "of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers", "during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to", "(cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the", "found when I typed \"are there\" in the search box:", "fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in", "2. The next best question is whether this is >", "for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when", "it is not clear what this is. > 3. Even", "reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong,", "answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.”", "examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there", "how was it determined after eight whole years. Because the", "to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan", "that why are the resources not credible, and how was", "[rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask", "is plain wrong, because in the very same link I", "crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the", "avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) *", "with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of", "be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why" ]
[ "talk about what happened to them during WW2? If that", "Do Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what happened", "not want people to talk about what happened to them", "WW2? If that is the case, I want a source.", "happened to them during WW2? If that is the case,", "during WW2? If that is the case, I want a", "them during WW2? If that is the case, I want", "Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what happened to", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/150925/25124> Do Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what", "to them during WW2? If that is the case, I", "to talk about what happened to them during WW2? If", "what happened to them during WW2? If that is the", "about what happened to them during WW2? If that is", "want people to talk about what happened to them during", "people to talk about what happened to them during WW2?" ]
[ "long after the police have gone away, people that walk", "user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already been", "people that do this, for example downvoting a post that", "it to -12, so I wonder: If you are one", "expect everyone to share the same opinion as me. If", "decade of being here. Why does this community do this,", "never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange", "in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦", "which already has a very low negative score, can do", "not seen on the other sites that I'm equally active", "so I wonder: If you are one of the people", "latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is", "a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter", "you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think", "downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen", "The post shown above had a net score of -11", "this because the post angers you so badly** that you", "I don't expect you to share, but I'd like to", "other sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+", "you usually do this because the post angers you so", "Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a", "* MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the", "not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button", "stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has", "in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for", "conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't", "been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in.", "like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling", "and why is it tolerated (if you are one of", "a post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting", "here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that", "you believe the question should be deleted (if so, why", "when they like, as long as it doesn't violate the", "me, and that people can downvote when they like, as", "violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a point", "chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern comment", "you are one of the people that do this, for", "many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to", "the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple", "\"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to", "have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on", "as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder", "already has a very low negative score, can do successfully?", "If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you", "to tread on the fence of violating the CoC and", "into the ground, is it because you believe the question", "as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there", "about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for", "personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread", "further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is that", "network over about a decade of being here. Why does", "be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete", "(if so, why don't you vote to delete or if", "this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why", "but I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers", "picture this like someone that's already been beaten by the", "seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I picture", "MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE", "so, why don't you vote to delete or if you", "be deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly", "downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't violate", "are one of the people that pushes such posts further", "also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer", "downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have", "least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too much", "* At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A", "been zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator", "and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor", "there comes a point at which a post has been", "answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold.", "of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead", "that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I", "seems here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone", "but long after the police have gone away, people that", "because you believe the question should be deleted (if so,", "this, and why is it tolerated (if you are one", "post angers you so badly that you feel you need", "the latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior", "doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a", "2 years and only picked up the critic badge about", "a net negative score, but there's been zero issues on", "of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice,", "on the fence of violating the CoC and the policy", "rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had a", "in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I", "one of the people that pushes such posts further into", "1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26", "an upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook", "2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon", "7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5):", "deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this because", "has a net score below -2, can you provide me", "being here. Why does this community do this, and why", "First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are", "in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+", "there's been zero issues on the site, and [all 7", "causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least", "badly that you feel you need to stab it further?", "expect you to share, but I'd like to voice it", "wonder: If you are one of the people that pushes", "\"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems", "why is it tolerated (if you are one of the", "has a very low negative score, can do successfully? To", "feel you need to stab it further? In the latter", "on 26 sites). The post shown above had a net", "(if you are one of the people that do this,", "the body on the ground and see that the person", "-12, so I wonder: If you are one of the", "be on the site and it will quickly get deleted", "noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're", "site for over 2 years and only picked up the", "seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which", "commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note:", "of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here", "share the same opinion as me. If you contribute to", "downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than", "it tolerated (if you are one of the people that", "it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is", "can downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't", "that already has a net score below -2, can you", "have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack", "we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative", "you vote to delete or if you don't have enough", "as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I", "and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I", "me with some insight as to why you do this)?", "I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate", "deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly it", "low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal)", "this community do this, and why is it tolerated (if", "reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but", "has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more", "here. Why does this community do this, and why is", "downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no", "It seems here that when the number goes negative enough,", "general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other", "never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that", "as to why you do this)?** Similar problems have been", "sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown", "but I won't go into too much detail about my", "to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into", "has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At", "I've been on this site for over 2 years and", "that you feel you need to stab it further? In", "issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed", "about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I", "(e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it", "negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion", "don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as me.", "case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting", "and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened", "too much detail about my own situation since I'm biased", "need to stab it further? In the latter case, my", "detail about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today", "very low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my", "contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing", "further into the ground, is it because you believe the", "site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or", "at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too", "opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread on", "another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing)", "Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows", "to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a", "(meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I", "than helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently,", "a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but", "reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart", "In the latter case, my personal opinion is that the", "already been beaten by the police, but long after the", "-2, can you provide me with some insight as to", "in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the", "badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about", "about a decade of being here. *Why does this community", "sites). The post shown above had a net score of", "voice it here): MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that", "the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are", "or wait for it to be deleted by others, since", "someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder:", "over 2 years and only picked up the critic badge", "Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a", "However I believe there comes a point at which a", "you so badly** that you feel you need to stab", "about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the", "button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a", "policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect", "Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the", "that the behavior is starting to tread on the fence", "the people that do this, for example downvoting a post", "the behavior is starting to tread on the fence of", "to share, but I'd like to voice it here): ", "very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over", "further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to", "is starting to tread on the fence of violating the", "downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not", "goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to", "which a post has been downvoted enough already, and further", "month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2", "gone away, people that walk by the body on the", "body on the ground and see that the person has", "the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It", "the police, but long after the police have gone away,", "already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It", "question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for", "add to the user's misery. I picture this like someone", "Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's been", "the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly", "believe there comes a point at which a post has", "into too much detail about my own situation since I'm", "enough rep, just flag it or wait for it to", "go into too much detail about my own situation since", "shown above had a net score of -11 when someone", "to delete or if you don't have enough rep, just", "score, but there's been zero issues on the site, and", "lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but", "the ground and see that the person has been reprimanded", "point at which a post has been downvoted enough already,", "the site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)?", "think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something", "net score below -2, can you provide me with some", "exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2", "below -2, can you provide me with some insight as", "knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting:", "[all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of", "problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on", "one of the people that do this, for example downvoting", "or if you don't have enough rep, just flag it", "Personally I think downvoting should only be done in very", "score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to", "a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not", "why you do this)?* Similar problems have been recognized by", "by the police, but long after the police have gone", "related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a", "example downvoting a post that already has a net score", "shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly get", "this, for example downvoting a post that already has a", "my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect", "*Why does this community do this, and why is it", "helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently, causing", "clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction", "1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about", "This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards", "share, but I'd like to voice it here): MATLAB", "long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe", "do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue", "think downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances:", "a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already", "site seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>)", "to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I", "that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes", "1 suspension, but I won't go into too much detail", "can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this", "Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network)", "fence of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be", "by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes?", "will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually", "do, that downvoting something which already has a very low", "for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from", "walk by the body on the ground and see that", "picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning", "won't go into too much detail about my own situation", "more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my", "others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is", "people that pushes such posts further into the ground, is", "a net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote", "7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post", "welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the same", "skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4", "issue (which I don't expect you to share, but I'd", "to why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized", "to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)", "the other sites that I'm equally active in (I have", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes negative", "of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone", "it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting", "(personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you", "answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to", "chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension,", "that downvoting something which already has a very low negative", "doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description", "community do this, and why is it tolerated (if you", "successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which", "that people can downvote when they like, as long as", "Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. ", "by the body on the ground and see that the", "on the site and it will quickly get deleted by", "network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote button.", "At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that", "I have not seen on the other sites that I'm", "If you are one of the people that pushes such", "the SE network) has an upvote button, but not a", "which I have not seen on the other sites that", "that passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's", "for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is", "question should be deleted* (if so, why don't you vote", "someone that's already been beaten by the police, but long", "150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had", "posts further into the ground, is it because you believe", "believe the question should be deleted (if so, why don't", "this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This", "some insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems", "Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes", "cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First", "on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of", "that not everyone has the same opinion as me, and", "(which I don't expect you to share, but I'd like", "post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes", "police, but long after the police have gone away, people", "to share the same opinion as me. If you contribute", "provide me with some insight as to why you do", "to be deleted by others, since if it's so bad", "there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly", "has the same opinion as me, and that people can", "Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such", "the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never", "behavior is starting to tread on the fence of violating", "they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image", "it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives", "Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have", "-11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so", "not everyone has the same opinion as me, and that", "is it tolerated (if you are one of the people", "harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my answers", "on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The", "are one of the people that do this, for example", "equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites", "it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case", "should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been", "wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't do,", "button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com)", "tread on the fence of violating the CoC and the", "tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to", "to stab it further? In the latter case, my personal", "been beaten by the police, but long after the police", "is that the behavior is starting to tread on the", "button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no", "people that walk by the body on the ground and", "clone that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote", "do this because the post angers you so badly that", "To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I", "observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303).", "eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go", "it because you believe the question should be deleted (if", "I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the", "zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates", "to -12, so I wonder: If you are one of", "angers you so badly that you feel you need to", "upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My", "Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my", "[Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially", "this site seems to have a downvoting problem in general", "first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in", "person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra", "so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems", "at which a post has been downvoted enough already, and", "has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks", "is it because you believe the question should be deleted", "has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer", "rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites).", "the same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting", "since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on", "to one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction", "tolerated (if you are one of the people that do", "you think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting", "sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep", "[Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have", "couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta", "downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've", "happened to one of my answers recently, causing a chain", "posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade", "dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely", "anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone", "when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by", "has an upvote button, but not a downvote button. ", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes", "favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has", "negative score, but there's been zero issues on the site,", "Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly", "after the police have gone away, people that walk by", "been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful", "the ground, is it because you believe the question should", "don't expect you to share, but I'd like to voice", "just flag it or wait for it to be deleted", "ground and see that the person has been reprimanded for", "don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait for", "the CoC. However I believe there comes a point at", "what you think writing a stern comment can't do, that", "had a net score of -11 when someone decided to", "much detail about my own situation since I'm biased there.", "to voice it here): MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone", "downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a", "question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the", "so badly that you feel you need to stab it", "CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but", "everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to the", "I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7", "it or wait for it to be deleted by others,", "I wonder: If you are one of the people that", "others?)? Or do you usually do this because the post", "is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first", "situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively", "like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However", "[Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303))", "Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related:", "writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which", "everyone has the same opinion as me, and that people", "that pushes such posts further into the ground, is it", "26 sites). The post shown above had a net score", "have enough rep, just flag it or wait for it", "same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains,", "see that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw", "on the ground and see that the person has been", "I wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't", "(I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep", "it shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly", "Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen", "lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't", "been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so", "you don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait", "like someone that's already been beaten by the police, but", "I won't go into too much detail about my own", "does this community do this, and why is it tolerated", "enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful.", "it to be deleted by others, since if it's so", "problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question", "my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and", "badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone", "can't do, that downvoting something which already has a very", "ground, is it because you believe the question should be", "opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I", "user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\"", "this issue (which I don't expect you to share, but", "for over 2 years and only picked up the critic", "critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted", "active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and", "a net score below -2, can you provide me with", "I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as", "on the other sites that I'm equally active in (I", "post shown above had a net score of -11 when", "same opinion as me, and that people can downvote when", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number", "this like someone that's already been beaten by the police,", "phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question", "downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one", "the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for", "such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over", "extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is", "CoC. However I believe there comes a point at which", "and this site seems to have a downvoting problem in", "insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems have", "the post angers you so badly that you feel you", "me. *If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what", "do this, for example downvoting a post that already has", "button. Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down", "that walk by the body on the ground and see", "[Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1).", "but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up", "of the people that do this, for example downvoting a", "the fence of violating the CoC and the policy of", "score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on", "above had a net score of -11 when someone decided", "of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed", "such posts further into the ground, is it because you", "I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user", "should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to", "usually do this because the post angers you so badly", "downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this", "the question should be deleted (if so, why don't you", "that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button,", "delete or if you don't have enough rep, just flag", "downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when", "a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange", "(\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted", "negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add", "and see that the person has been reprimanded for something,", "with some insight as to why you do this)? Similar", "up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I", "for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has", "score below -2, can you provide me with some insight", "this site for over 2 years and only picked up", "for example downvoting a post that already has a net", "you feel you need to stab it further? In the", "you to share, but I'd like to voice it here):", "and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do", "relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became", "became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)", "can you provide me with some insight as to why", "recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many", "be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this", "pushes such posts further into the ground, is it because", "stab it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion", "candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image", "by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I", "something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta", "kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"),", "on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to", "but there's been zero issues on the site, and [all", "a decade of being here. Why does this community do", "have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score,", "my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to", "on this issue (which I don't expect you to share,", "to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you", "a post that already has a net score below -2,", "something which already has a very low negative score, can", "net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it", "4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for your considerations.", "appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as me,", "My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for your", "why don't you vote to delete or if you don't", "downvoting something which already has a very low negative score,", "that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a", "on this site for over 2 years and only picked", "downvoting a post that already has a net score below", "because the post angers you so badly that you feel", "a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you", "comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has a", "the police have gone away, people that walk by the", "that do this, for example downvoting a post that already", "committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description", "the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting", "outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but not", "it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes", "SE network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote", "seen on the other sites that I'm equally active in", "of being here. *Why does this community do this, and", "(who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of", "have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets", "people can downvote when they like, as long as it", "the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't", "years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion", "if you don't have enough rep, just flag it or", "I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what", "and only picked up the critic badge about 1 month", "no dislike/thumbs-down button. At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have", "the same opinion as me, and that people can downvote", "a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1", "have a net negative score, but there's been zero issues", "(a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has", "Or do you usually do this because the post angers", "years and only picked up the critic badge about 1", "(<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other sites", "do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g.", "I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a", "as me, and that people can downvote when they like,", "only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on", "Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on", "moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter", "throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack", "you provide me with some insight as to why you", "have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have", "everyone to share the same opinion as me. If you", "negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern", "a very low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude", "the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already", "suspension, but I won't go into too much detail about", "only picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago", "my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed", "deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete or", "away, people that walk by the body on the ground", "don't you vote to delete or if you don't have", "chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that", "to add to the user's misery. I picture this like", "is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts", "It happened to one of my answers recently, causing a", "have not seen on the other sites that I'm equally", "of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12,", "it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you", "comes a point at which a post has been downvoted", "quickly get deleted by others?)? *Or do you usually do", "enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to", "circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2 years", "towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions", "done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site", "Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study:", "ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years).", "but no dislike/thumbs-down button. At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting:", "by others?)? Or do you usually do this because the", "have gone away, people that walk by the body on", "so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and", "downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you are", "no Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's", "clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it will", "over about a decade of being here. Why does this", "what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter", "number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants", "when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I", "upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also", "I picture this like someone that's already been beaten by", "vote to delete or if you don't have enough rep,", "that's already been beaten by the police, but long after", "by others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't", "do you usually do this because the post angers you", "nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share", "flag it or wait for it to be deleted by", "absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score, but", "net negative score, but there's been zero issues on the", "* Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button.", "bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it", "beaten by the police, but long after the police have", "starting to tread on the fence of violating the CoC", "that have a net negative score, but there's been zero", "passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery.", "like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow", "off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting problem", "recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at", "rep, just flag it or wait for it to be", "violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be", "my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually", "you need to stab it further? In the latter case,", "becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of", "own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another", "and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above", "question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this", "Exchange network over about a decade of being here. *Why", "a point at which a post has been downvoted enough", "for it to be deleted by others, since if it's", "StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has an", "police have gone away, people that walk by the body", "I think downvoting should only be done in very exceptional", "here): MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside", "one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that", "of the people that pushes such posts further into the", "Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being here.", "from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never", "biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who", "wants to add to the user's misery. I picture this", "I believe there comes a point at which a post", "since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep", "to the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's", "but I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion", "that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on", "decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If", "you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others", "opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you to", "been on this site for over 2 years and only", "Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed", "wait for it to be deleted by others, since if", "SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net", "seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network", "the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\",", "post that already has a net score below -2, can", "you are one of the people that pushes such posts", "get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this", "to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank", "opinion as me, and that people can downvote when they", "already has a net score below -2, can you provide", "site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in", "upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has", "they like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC.", "high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the", "the people that pushes such posts further into the ground,", "and that people can downvote when they like, as long", "if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the", "I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as", "others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be", "gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site", "do this, and why is it tolerated (if you are", "misery. I picture this like someone that's already been beaten" ]
[ "field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD", "normal thing, and we can say the same about overworking", "this page about it? Should we just leave it as", "after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further", "we can/should do in this page about it? Should we", "worked on average more than 40h/w and all of them", "anything we can/should do in this page about it? Should", "different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily", "long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I", "issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and", "comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are", "Perhaps you need more to become the head of department", "with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the", "a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people", "that some of us may had them but survived it", "need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you", "that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this", "that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to", "illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be", "a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head", "faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD. I", "them successfully got their PhDs and some of them are", "smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain", "myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of times,", "and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being", "it as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in", "can say the same about overworking PhD students (not even", "bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need more", "an excuse to go telling others that that is the", "world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my", "a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors", "attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast majority", "angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we", "Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students", "thing, and we can say the same about overworking PhD", "PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head of", "UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why", "highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in", "almost no PhD student that worked on average more than", "of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some", "completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information", "opinion that this is normal, and I have been living", "academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late", "been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD", "it? Should we just leave it as it is and", "have known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w", "Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this", "answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you", "understand why people work more than that and I have", "that worked on average more than 40h/w and all of", "clarify, I understand why people work more than that and", "I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is", "that is the normal thing, and we can say the", "that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that", "students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when", "and I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It", "the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or", "some of them are academics now. This is in top", "now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit:", "we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted", "its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with", "work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I", "My worry is not false information being spread, but actually", "is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to", "worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I", "am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the", "the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the", "and the fact that some of us may had them", "No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health", "provably false that students need more than 40h/w to get", "generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars,", "work more than that and I have myself worked more", "period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am", "40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective", "academic opinion that this is normal, and I have been", "Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD.", "this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it", "of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will", "PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with lots", "\\It is provably false that students need more than 40h/w", "essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD", "of them successfully got their PhDs and some of them", "more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need", "are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright", "more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after", "students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is,", "not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most", "exist, and the fact that some of us may had", "living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that", "of us may had them but survived it is not", "it is not an excuse to go telling others that", "a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need", "\"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need to", "how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally,", "the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its", "students (not even sure its a different problem even). Yet", "all of them successfully got their PhDs and some of", "subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and utterly", "my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my", "my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD students", "false\\. My worry is not false information being spread, but", "overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally answered", "our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is", "and all of them successfully got their PhDs and some", "But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV,", "PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried or", "promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker", "will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how", "in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify,", "is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome", "further my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD", "donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should", "world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you", "even sure its a different problem even). Yet we do.", "answers, is there anything we can/should do in this page", "not an excuse to go telling others that that is", "spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical", "say the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure", "is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false", "unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion", "I have known lazy outright not smart people that worked", "same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a", "questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload", "leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote this,", "from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried", "getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart", "that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for", "in this page about it? Should we just leave it", "workload expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\"", "opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming", "CV, while the vast majority of PhD students are not.", "being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly", "issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say", "few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student", "got their PhDs and some of them are academics now.", "are academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities.", "can/should do in this page about it? Should we just", "aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there", "student workload expectations and how that can compare to a", "of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are", "survived it is not an excuse to go telling others", "superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will never", "to become the head of department of a Oxford faculty,", "department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about", "I have met almost no PhD student that worked on", "my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry", "lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely", "have met almost no PhD student that worked on average", "utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our", "--- \\It is provably false that students need more than", "is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from", "normal, and I have been living in a bubble? ---", "fact that some of us may had them but survived", "a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do", "experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is", "need more to become the head of department of a", "page about it? Should we just leave it as it", "we just leave it as it is and let people", "there anything we can/should do in this page about it?", "the fact that some of us may had them but", "in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My", "is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience", "or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked.", "to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a", "than that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w", "academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD students are", "more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their", "Just to clarify, I understand why people work more than", "I understand that academic world is diverse with lots of", "been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false", "questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world", "And I have met almost no PhD student that worked", "student that worked on average more than 40h/w and all", "with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need", "I understand why people work more than that and I", "advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that", "understand that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures,", "this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not", "PhDs and some of them are academics now. This is", "mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help", "is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious", "universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people", "(in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed", "let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise?", "some of us may had them but survived it is", "is the normal thing, and we can say the same", "worry is not false information being spread, but actually illegal", "questions are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy", "40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to", "answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is", "in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really", "about PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare", "about it? Should we just leave it as it is", "serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist,", "be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture", "or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are", "head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions", "that this is normal, and I have been living in", "overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different problem", "information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and", "PhD students (not even sure its a different problem even).", "had them but survived it is not an excuse to", "these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact", "really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and", "them but survived it is not an excuse to go", "this is normal, and I have been living in a", "met almost no PhD student that worked on average more", "actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to", "10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have", "I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while", "(not even sure its a different problem even). Yet we", "quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic", "the normal thing, and we can say the same about", "but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information", "actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally", "known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in", "My worry is, that these questions are generally answered with", "pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of", "So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is", "that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And", "or you will never get your PhD\". I understand that", "on average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully", "and some of them are academics now. This is in", "false that students need more than 40h/w to get a", "people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs.", "more than that and I have myself worked more than", "PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare to", "to the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w", "the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I", "Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this", "supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us may", "worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students", "expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w", "a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder", "how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue", "there has been few questions (that I will avoid linking)", "suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking", "outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering", "has been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about", "people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or", "the questions are about getting a PhD. I have known", "we say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia", "asking for help we say \"this is how its supposed", "be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind of", "them are academics now. This is in top 10% UK", "not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field", "to work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\".", "culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36%", "help we say \"this is how its supposed to be\".", "PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic", "we can say the same about overworking PhD students (not", "and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical", "60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I understand", "its a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside", "edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work more", "countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted", "a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a", "can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes", "times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting", "you will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic", "PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people that", "is there anything we can/should do in this page about", "unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our page.", "students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps", "overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I have", "page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad.", "excuse to go telling others that that is the normal", "my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the", "may had them but survived it is not an excuse", "worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions", "prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My", "will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world", "things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of", "a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of", "most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and", "do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers,", "40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my PhD.", "go telling others that that is the normal thing, and", "have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably", "Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly", "it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion,", "for long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But", "have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of", "to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind", "more to become the head of department of a Oxford", "it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal,", "you need to work 60h/w or you will never get", "is not an excuse to go telling others that that", "students or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually", "about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different", "the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost", "their PhDs and some of them are academics now. This", "are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of", "no PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w", "a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students", "than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs", "top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I", "this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that", "late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work", "and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long", "even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a", "do in this page about it? Should we just leave", "utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being spread,", "say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has", "I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and", "however, in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\.", "of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow)", "and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job.", "and we can say the same about overworking PhD students", "PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student that", "from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for", "false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries)", "\"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or", "just leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote", "telling others that that is the normal thing, and we", "but the questions are about getting a PhD. I have", "is provably false that students need more than 40h/w to", "as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my", "are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these", "exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer", "of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of", "This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just", "I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period", "sure its a different problem even). Yet we do. So,", "supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these", "engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no", "of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid,", "successfully got their PhDs and some of them are academics", "worked more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly", "in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met", "of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything", "than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more", "people work more than that and I have myself worked", "in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students", "about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not", "to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become", "that that is the normal thing, and we can say", "is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite", "average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got", "get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse", "health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we", "is normal, and I have been living in a bubble?", "lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the", "these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the", "never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is", "information to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering", "than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my", "get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the", "that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however,", "is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is", "job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD", "underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this is", "(somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast", "obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student", "linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that can", "you need more to become the head of department of", "10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand", "why people work more than that and I have myself", "problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting", "bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental", "that students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD.", "kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that", "and when asking for help we say \"this is how", "(that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations", "with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is", "of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and", "of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting", "need to work 60h/w or you will never get your", "and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially", "your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with", "compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from", "to clarify, I understand why people work more than that", "[36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked,", "particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to", "and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in", "40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs and", "PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry", "Recently there has been few questions (that I will avoid", "is not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in", "welcome to the world of superstars, you need to work", "become the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but", "worry is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah,", "PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w and", "wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1).", "to go telling others that that is the normal thing,", "Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No", "us may had them but survived it is not an", "of them are academics now. This is in top 10%", "PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and", "Academia has a serious issue with these kind of things.", "has a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive", "academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in", "to further my academic CV, while the vast majority of", "Should we just leave it as it is and let", "upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in this", "to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD", "\"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a", "Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us", "diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this", "when asking for help we say \"this is how its", "others that that is the normal thing, and we can", "avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that", "in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation", "for help we say \"this is how its supposed to", "but survived it is not an excuse to go telling" ]
[ "the proposed policy or whether there is anything else you", "or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and", "like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations,", "of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question", "problems cannot be solved by editing the question as the", "and only our control. (Note that while the username can", "I do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734)", "accusations, but they should still be closed as a duplicate", "requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3,", "give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about", "through comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t you give", "posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3.", "a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular", "Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they", "question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a", "already been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong", "apparently allows others to identify the target or* allows the", "(on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked", "be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As", "this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If", "changed, there are restrictions on this and it can still", "be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t", "with what looks like a real name. This can be", "profile or similar? – We cannot predict every research angle", "this and it can still be visible through comment replies", "experience, for almost every such question at least one of", "be solved by editing the question as the information still", "The information in the question apparently allows others to identify", "research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions", "can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised", "deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias)", "* This is censorship. The world must know the truth", "replies and similar.) Why don’t you give any examples", "ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). ", "for moderator action usually are about – since those are", "company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations.", "interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must", "a question, please: Leave a guiding comment linking to", "an individual target, which can be a person, university, journal,", "named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar.", "Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t", "post content and username are the things which requests for", "examples for such questions? – Most previous questions matching the", "(If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will", "of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation,", "the truth about …* – This site is neither suited", "question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker", "username and thus all questions asked by users with what", "comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for moderator", "question. * I am an experienced user using my real", "individual target,* which can be a person, university, journal, publisher,", "cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we", "can help you with how to deal with them, but", "must know the truth about …* – This site is", "every such question at least one of the following applies:", "a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use of", "is censorship. The world must know the truth about …", "requests for moderator action usually are about – since those", "predict every research angle at this and have to draw", "this post, we are asking if you see any problems", "to ask such a question? – Yes. This is a", "or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in", "In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid", "allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal,", "this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to", "completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here.", "post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question", "can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the", "name as my account name. Does this mean I am", "individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a", "question abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As", "with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved", "am an experienced user using my real name as my", "attention. * If you can additionally vote to close or", "* Why don’t you give any examples for such questions?", "are the things which requests for moderator action usually are", "if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply", "a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not", "result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and", "is neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even", "or allows the target to identify the asker beyond any", "through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee)", "or whether there is anything else you propose to change.", "named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement", "to implement a policy against these.* This should only affect", "of the following apply: It contains allegations on an", "huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask", "be changed, there are restrictions on this and it can", "doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and", "by editing the question as the information still sticks around.", "the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or", "encounter such a question, please: * Leave a guiding comment", "to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and", "are about – since those are the things that are", "any examples for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching", "criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there will", "affect a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate", "so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such", "question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by", "a question. * I am an experienced user using my", "target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without", "allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed (on", "Also the post content and username are the things which", "if you see any problems with the proposed policy or", "censorship. The world must know the truth about … –", "it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts", "contains allegations on an individual target, which can be a", "Going by experience, for almost every such question at least", "their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The allegations", "while the username can be changed, there are restrictions on", "predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the", "would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice?", "requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring", "should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or", "asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of debate.", "similar. * The allegations have not already been widely reported", "do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X", "This should only affect a small fraction of questions that", "includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by", "news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when", "cannot be solved by editing the question as the information", "The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question", "site for several reasons. When you encounter such a question,", "with them, but we do not need names for that.", "on this and it can still be visible through comment", "such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation", "such a question, please: Leave a guiding comment linking", "a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The", "misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes,", "trouble. In this post, we are asking if you see", "username? For example, what if I can identify the asker", "about …* – This site is neither suited nor intended", "problems with the proposed policy or whether there is anything", "suffice?* – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where", "asking if you see any problems with the proposed policy", "moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote to close", "harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like to", "by experience, for almost every such question at least one", "anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please post", "done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================", "give any examples for such questions?* – Most previous questions", "use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just", "allegations on an individual target, which can be a person,", "following apply: * It contains allegations on an individual target,", "This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked", "Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing", "example, what if I can identify the asker via their", "the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The", "amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking if", "in the question apparently allows others to identify the target", "similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at this", "for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual", "that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators", "Why does identifying information only count when it is in", "delete a question without warning if all of the following", "it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost", "sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy", "deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ Why", "sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things like", "1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The", "somewhere. Also the post content and username are the things", "3. The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4.", "which requests for moderator action usually are about – since", "matching the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted,", "Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s", "with how to deal with them, but we do not", "amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the", "big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like", "discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be", "previous questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted", "the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This", "is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest", "to deal with them, but we do not need names", "valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better.", "the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the", "please: Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy.", "selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them extra", "The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct,", "reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly", "things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe", "a line somewhere. Also the post content and username are", "recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals", "better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further", "mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things", "the question apparently allows others to identify the target or", "of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In", "close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by", "closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on", "solved by editing the question as the information still sticks", "or username? For example, what if I can identify the", "real name as my account name. Does this mean I", "mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask", "author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. ", "as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). ", "two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the", "like to implement a policy against these.* This should only", "count when it is in question or username? For example,", "I am an experienced user using my real name as", "target, which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company,", "does identifying information only count when it is in question", "[Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question. ", "nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases", "accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). This is censorship.", "the username can be changed, there are restrictions on this", "We can help you with how to deal with them,", "no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in the question apparently allows others", "question in good faith. 5. The question should be closed", "re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question.", "a clear reference to this policy is the quickest way", "– Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already", "will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I", "Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag", "these problems cannot be solved by editing the question as", "decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are", "comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised", "sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for", "to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion", "information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to", "university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734),", "shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot of", "these.* This should only affect a small fraction of questions", "doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is", "be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named", "debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question in", "only count when it is in question or username? For", "the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact.", "want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta", "but they should still be closed as a duplicate of", "identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research.", "it for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote", "factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform for", "question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question,", "the following apply: * It contains allegations on an individual", "the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt", "* Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers,", "state. * Why does identifying information only count when it", "what if I can identify the asker via their profile", "visible through comment replies and similar.) Why don’t you", "help you with how to deal with them, but we", "or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating", "not already been widely reported or discussed (on news media,", "question without warning if all of the following apply: ", "grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests", "is a meta discussion about such a question. * I", "the question in good faith. 5. The question should be", "paper title, or similar. The allegations have not already", "a sockpuppet to ask such a question?* – Yes. This", "a question without warning if all of the following apply:", "“Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but", "them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such", "highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks", "specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed as", "as my account name. Does this mean I am forced", "research angle at this and have to draw a line", "the things which requests for moderator action usually are about", "We cannot predict every research angle at this and have", "applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2.", "question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge", "* The information in the question apparently allows others to", "beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the", "information in the question apparently allows others to identify the", "the asker via their profile or similar?* – We cannot", "question?* – Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets", "and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a", "can additionally vote to close or delete it, do so.", "quickest way to start with a clean state. * Why", "This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to", "this site for several reasons. When you encounter such a", "Why doesn’t closing suffice?* – Closing primarily prevents answers, which", "questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this", "small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of", "individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform", "question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to this", "so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection.", "world must know the truth about …* – This site", "5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a", "be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you", "asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm", "intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all", "cannot predict every research angle at this and have to", "publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes", "looks like a real name. This can be through explicit", "strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not", "name. Does this mean I am forced to make a", "This site is neither suited nor intended as a news", "a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate", "2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes", "this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the", "will delete a question without warning if all of the", "and thus all questions asked by users with what looks", "still be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why", "behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional.", "When you encounter such a question, please: Leave a", "the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot", "questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted or", "a meta discussion about such a question. * I am", "The question abuses this site as platform for public shaming.", "any problems with the proposed policy or whether there is", "includes self-allegations. The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported", "answers, which is not where the problems with such questions", "faith. 5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based,", "or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience,", "the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from", "Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In", "you can additionally vote to close or delete it, do", "for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not", "question at least one of the following applies: 1. The", "users with what looks like a real name. This can", "and similar.) * Why don’t you give any examples for", "problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be", "such questions? – Most previous questions matching the above criteria", "or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy", "self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour", "========= Going by experience, for almost every such question at", "can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar.", "a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided", "to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is", "above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there", "Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the", "of trouble. In this post, we are asking if you", "only affect a small fraction of questions that cause a", "for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote to", "Does this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet", "questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However,", "Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the question", "similar.) * Why don’t you give any examples for such", "be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do", "policy against these. This should only affect a small fraction", "closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734).", "ask the question in good faith. 5. The question should", "allows others to identify the target or* allows the target", "content and username are the things which requests for moderator", "are within our control and only our control. (Note that", "simply do not belong here. We can help you with", "we moderators would like to implement a policy against these.", "moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action", "I would like to answer ================================ Why doesn’t closing", "action usually are about – since those are the things", " Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. ", "be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping", "it can still be visible through comment replies and similar.)", "ask such a question? – Yes. This is a valid", "did not ask the question in good faith. 5. The", "there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover,", "answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning", "our control and only our control. (Note that while the", "almost every such question at least one of the following", "allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not", "moderator action usually are about – since those are the", "can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked.", "I can identify the asker via their profile or similar?", "an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two", "questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we", "only our control. (Note that while the username can be", "how to deal with them, but we do not need", "please post an answer.) Policy ====== Moderators will delete a", "asker did not ask the question in good faith. 5.", "whether there is anything else you propose to change. (If", "* Flag it for moderator attention. * If you can", "This is censorship. The world must know the truth about", "around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is", "clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a", "following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question.", "a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance", "if all of the following apply: It contains allegations", "shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question", "public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot", "at this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also", "a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it", "user using my real name as my account name. Does", "moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question", "in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give", "quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher", "questions asked by users with what looks like a real", "do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every", "a clean state. * Why does identifying information only count", "question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then", "when it is in question or username? For example, what", "within our control and only our control. (Note that while", "a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in the question apparently", "you see any problems with the proposed policy or whether", "others to identify the target or allows the target to", "title, or similar. * The allegations have not already been", "unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do", "our control. (Note that while the username can be changed,", "an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without", "questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing", "Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised.", "The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a", "every research angle at this and have to draw a", "there is anything else you propose to change. (If yes,", "(an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In", "the quickest way to start with a clean state. ", "the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so", "do things like “Is Publisher X* predatory?”, unless containing specific", "you with how to deal with them, but we do", "(Note that while the username can be changed, there are", "SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators),", "the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them", "or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can", "do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The", "blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are", "soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the", "nor intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations", "avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented", "For example, what if I can identify the asker via", "or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. ", "not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a", "policy or whether there is anything else you propose to", "moderators would like to implement a policy against these.* This", "primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems with", "Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do", "The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping", "are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the", "and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your", "forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question?", "Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is the", "at least one of the following applies: 1. The asker", "about such a question. * I am an experienced user", "don’t you give any examples for such questions? – Most", "I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such", "* If you can additionally vote to close or delete", "* I am an experienced user using my real name", "an experienced user using my real name as my account", "platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe,", "a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the", "a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are", "when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still", "for this site for several reasons. When you encounter such", "that while the username can be changed, there are restrictions", "6. The question abuses this site as platform for public", "a paper title, or similar. The allegations have not", "with a clean state. * Why does identifying information only", "the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with", "asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users with", "can be changed, there are restrictions on this and it", "problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or", "news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and", "not ask the question in good faith. 5. The question", "containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed", "am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a", "all of the following apply: It contains allegations on", "are asking if you see any problems with the proposed", "the post content and username are the things which requests", "* It contains allegations on an individual target, which can", "probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do", "– This site is neither suited nor intended as a", "X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should", "be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions", "regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker.", "platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause", "belong here. We can help you with how to deal", "in question or username? For example, what if I can", "question apparently allows others to identify the target or allows", "they should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734)", "Why don’t you give any examples for such questions? –", "with a clear reference to this policy is the quickest", "reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: * Leave", "to recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against named", "issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking", "causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did", "such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by", "are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong", "meta discussion about such a question. * I am an", "In this post, we are asking if you see any", "site is neither suited nor intended as a news platform.", "relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper", "escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be", "this policy is the quickest way to start with a", "extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a", "reference to this policy is the quickest way to start", "of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in", "the target or allows the target to identify the asker", "there are restrictions on this and it can still be", "debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to", "any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s", "sockpuppet to ask such a question?* – Yes. This is", "be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus", "target or allows the target to identify the asker beyond", "lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through", "count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless", "or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not", "exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question.", "against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to", "re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may", "anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody", "of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting", "asker via their profile or similar?* – We cannot predict", "not belong here. We can help you with how to", "harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount", "opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6.", "of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure", "one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets", "– Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the", "still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When", "not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these", "– We cannot predict every research angle at this and", "[shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question apparently allows", "policy is the quickest way to start with a clean", "unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be", "work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring", "can still be visible through comment replies and similar.) ", "intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations are", "are restrictions on this and it can still be visible", "for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a", "Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if", "are the things that are within our control and only", "through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author", "clear reference to this policy is the quickest way to", "Moreover, I do not want to give them extra exposure.", "from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big", "experienced user using my real name as my account name.", "media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they", "bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to", "a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The", "their profile or similar? – We cannot predict every research", "highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count.", "have not already been widely reported or discussed (on news", "disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking", "on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as", "then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid", "control. (Note that while the username can be changed, there", "to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question?* –", "those are the things that are within our control and", "4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I", "disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction", "asked by users with what looks like a real name.", "they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be", "questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work,", "as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear", "still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a", "we are asking if you see any problems with the", "unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you encounter", "4. The asker did not ask the question in good", "thus all questions asked by users with what looks like", "way to start with a clean state. * Why does", "line somewhere. Also the post content and username are the", "1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues", "questions? – Most previous questions matching the above criteria have", "Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems", "i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical", "reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must know the", "similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. The", "Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions", "If you can additionally vote to close or delete it,", "employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or", "a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount", "which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or", "that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This", "on an individual target,* which can be a person, university,", "question or username? For example, what if I can identify", "delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for", "truth about …* – This site is neither suited nor", "vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale =========", "This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably", "implement a policy against these.* This should only affect a", "editing the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion", "already been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs,", "against these. This should only affect a small fraction of", "depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site", "with the proposed policy or whether there is anything else", "action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action", "apply: It contains allegations on an individual target, which", "The world must know the truth about …* – This", "would like to implement a policy against these.* This should", "Flag it for moderator attention. If you can additionally", "neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if", "should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or", "identify the target or allows the target to identify the", "to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title,", "as a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely", "reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username", "to this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. ", "you give any examples for such questions? – Most previous", "contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would", "unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither", "proposed policy or whether there is anything else you propose", "redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e.,", "your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is", "and severe, they simply do not belong here. We can", "you propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)", "site as platform for public shaming. As a result, such", "is not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover,", "asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms", "self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or", "severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly", "particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE", "where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems", "a real name. This can be through explicit naming, a", "for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above", "such a question. * I am an experienced user using", "this site as platform for public shaming. As a result,", "your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do", "organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy against", "a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is", "least one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon", "redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment", "linking to this policy. Flag it for moderator attention.", "Due to recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against", "widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such", "propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.) Policy", "the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or", "to this policy is the quickest way to start with", "may still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons.", "else you propose to change. (If yes, please post an", "to start with a clean state. * Why does identifying", "and it can still be visible through comment replies and", "which is not where the problems with such questions are.", "and quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is", "or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can", "allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like", "valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done", "fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble.", "all questions asked by users with what looks like a", "the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference", "control and only our control. (Note that while the username", "my account name. Does this mean I am forced to", "be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending", "to answer ================================ Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing", "It contains allegations on an individual target, which can be", "the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of", "things that are within our control and only our control.", "they simply do not belong here. We can help you", "that are within our control and only our control. (Note", "duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information", "for several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please:", "it is in question or username? For example, what if", "to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive", "the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users", "this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the", "a policy against these.* This should only affect a small", "… – This site is neither suited nor intended as", "username are the things which requests for moderator action usually", "about – since those are the things that are within", "by users with what looks like a real name. This", "the things that are within our control and only our", "since those are the things that are within our control", "supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The allegations have", "do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is", "prevents answers, which is not where the problems with such", "questions may still be unsuitable for this site for several", "you encounter such a question, please: * Leave a guiding", "draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and username", "However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site", "Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already been", "is done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer", "As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations", "(e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The", "as platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions", "start with a clean state. * Why does identifying information", "real name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear", "and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post", "my real name as my account name. Does this mean", "The allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed", "is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6,", "post, we are asking if you see any problems with", "do not belong here. We can help you with how", "if I can identify the asker via their profile or", "such question at least one of the following applies: 1.", "being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors.", "naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their", "are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or", "– Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and", "====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if all", "several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: ", "still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this", "Moderators will delete a question without warning if all of", "suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if your", "name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation", "such a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use", "Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they", "is anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please", "guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for", "make a sockpuppet to ask such a question?* – Yes.", "not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world", "prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no", "[survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want", "(an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an", "here. We can help you with how to deal with", "requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates.", "closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not", "anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site for", "etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently", "is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for", "journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this", "question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question", "* Why does identifying information only count when it is", " The allegations have not already been widely reported or", "[Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must know", "like to answer ================================ Why doesn’t closing suffice? –", "yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete", "a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor),", "warning if all of the following apply: * It contains", "unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation", "answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily", "is in question or username? For example, what if I", "severe accusations, but they should still be closed as a", "for almost every such question at least one of the", "requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests", "sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that", "person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately", "to close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going", "know the truth about …* – This site is neither", "username can be changed, there are restrictions on this and", "or similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at", "cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in", "see any problems with the proposed policy or whether there", "information only count when it is in question or username?", "accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here. We", "comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t you give any", " The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is", "or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question", "been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival", "action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases", "usually are about – since those are the things that", "should only affect a small fraction of questions that cause", "that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post,", "using my real name as my account name. Does this", "is the quickest way to start with a clean state.", "discussion about such a question. * I am an experienced", "to change. (If yes, please post an answer.) Policy ======", "additionally vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale", "good faith. 5. The question should be closed for being", "without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus", "or similar. * The allegations have not already been widely", "restrictions on this and it can still be visible through", "like a real name. This can be through explicit naming,", "identify the asker via their profile or similar?* – We", "without warning if all of the following apply: * It", "criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness,", "reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions", "identifying information only count when it is in question or", "The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The", "with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations,", "via their profile or similar?* – We cannot predict every", "Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such question", "things which requests for moderator action usually are about –", "abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As a", "have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content", "As a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary", "account name. Does this mean I am forced to make", "not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”,", "can identify the asker via their profile or similar?* –", "to identify the target or allows the target to identify", "anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this", "The asker did not ask the question in good faith.", "and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an", "change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators", "the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and", "separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe,", "In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting.", "asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes", "– since those are the things that are within our", "have already been deleted or redacted, so there will be", "angle at this and have to draw a line somewhere.", "and username are the things which requests for moderator action", "been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.).", "deal with them, but we do not need names for", "question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses", "severe, they simply do not belong here. We can help", "or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this", "policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If you", "explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g.,", "in good faith. 5. The question should be closed for", "what looks like a real name. This can be through", "are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable", "Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734).", "by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ ", "in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an", "clean state. Why does identifying information only count when", "allows the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable", "================================ Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents" ]
[ "the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with", "Can we create a question \"What are the criteria for", "A first draft of the requested canonical question is now", "mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness)", "and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making", "being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question", "are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions", "live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki", "my alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35", "a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and", "help us out by editing the wiki and adding information.", "information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater result", "us out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can", "reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior", "\"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think", "on debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant", "create a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\"", "wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my", "my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this", "criticism of my alma mater result in my BA being", "Please help us out by editing the wiki and adding", "if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time", "debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to", "time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are", "we create a question \"What are the criteria for degree", "result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can", "\"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all", "in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we", "will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and", "the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which", "of my alma mater result in my BA being revoked", "out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public", "draft of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/).", "and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma", "duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted on", "question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close", "as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted", "the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of", "adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater", "views and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while", "BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a", "my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create", "for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme", "think this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals", "and close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree", "wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are not", "the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help", "now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the", "alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years", "behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making good", "be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce", "all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked", "political criticism of my alma mater result in my BA", "not relevant to academia, while making good use of the", "35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are", "degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will", "public political criticism of my alma mater result in my", "theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I", "of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please", "years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the", "is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing", "close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be", "this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views", "I think this will reduce the time wasted on debating", "question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by", "revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will my", "revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the", "requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us", "relevant to academia, while making good use of the better", "with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as", "by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political", "the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates?", "later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the criteria", "degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will", "first draft of the requested canonical question is now live", "academia, while making good use of the better quality answers.", "are not relevant to academia, while making good use of", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki and", "to academia, while making good use of the better quality", "questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\"", "canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out", "individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to academia,", "criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the", "editing the wiki and adding information.** [Can public political criticism", "revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What", "which are not relevant to academia, while making good use", "[Can public political criticism of my alma mater result in" ]
[ "that's on my mind is that the OP account might", "mind is that the OP account might be a throw-away,", "than through a chain reacting involving my degree. > >", "for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been", "remains. I probably have more to fear in my current", "though there are comments from the OP account on the", "of the answers, though there are comments from the OP", "a chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I", "originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this", "to be saying that edit #6 is the addition of", "posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is", "since the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is", "posted some thoughts under the first response and will remain", "is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's", "happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to do?", "> > > But this revision seems to be attributed", "reacting involving my degree. > > > I have posted", "anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in my", "the one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding", "thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was originally", "of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6", "my mind is that the OP account might be a", "that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note", "I have posted some thoughts under the first response and", "user than the one who originally posted the question. Am", "on any of the answers, though there are comments from", "addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks", "Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If", "have more to fear in my current setting directly than", "are comments from the OP account on the question itself.", "in the discussions above. > > > But this revision", "owned by the same person as the account that added", "> > But this revision seems to be attributed to", "> > I have posted some thoughts under the first", "there are comments from the OP account on the question", "the first response and will remain engaged in the discussions", "same person as the account that added the thank-you note,", "first response and will remain engaged in the discussions above.", "so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility", "to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears", "through a chain reacting involving my degree. > > >", "the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is the", "seems to be saying that edit #6 is the addition", "of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the", "answers, though there are comments from the OP account on", "might be a throw-away, owned by the same person as", "the same person as the account that added the thank-you", "But this revision seems to be attributed to a different", "be a throw-away, owned by the same person as the", "involving my degree. > > > I have posted some", "probably have more to fear in my current setting directly", "to fear in my current setting directly than through a", "some thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged", "everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have", "is that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned", "the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the", "that there are no comments from either account on any", "OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the same", "account might be a throw-away, owned by the same person", "chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I have", "detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some", "If so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One", "the answers, though there are comments from the OP account", "and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although", "any of the answers, though there are comments from the", "the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently", "you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My", "acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is", "dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to", "attributed to a different user than the one who originally", "added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it", "what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to", "the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was", "from either account on any of the answers, though there", "responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty", "phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no", "broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more", "is the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker", "be saying that edit #6 is the addition of a", "thanks the people who answered the question: > > Thank", "edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note where", "be attributed to a different user than the one who", "correctly that this is what happened? If so, is that", "comments from either account on any of the answers, though", "either account on any of the answers, though there are", "(especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive.", "thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who", "throw-away, owned by the same person as the account that", "above. > > > But this revision seems to be", "different user than the one who originally posted the question.", "been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have", "that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by", "I probably have more to fear in my current setting", "no comments from either account on any of the answers,", "apparently thanks the people who answered the question: > >", "The [revision history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying", "thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged in", "who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that", "under the first response and will remain engaged in the", "Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses.", "Note that there are no comments from either account on", "> But this revision seems to be attributed to a", "although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear", "where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the", "on my mind is that the OP account might be", "setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree.", "question: > > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful", "one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly", "do? One possibility that's on my mind is that the", "> > > I have posted some thoughts under the", "> Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed", "that this is what happened? If so, is that an", "account that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially", "the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a", "#6 is the addition of a thank-you note where the", "the people who answered the question: > > Thank you", "[revision history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that", "One possibility that's on my mind is that the OP", "have posted some thoughts under the first response and will", "people who answered the question: > > Thank you to", "than the one who originally posted the question. Am I", "a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people", "note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered", "in my current setting directly than through a chain reacting", "these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly", "current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my", "will remain engaged in the discussions above. > > >", "revision seems to be attributed to a different user than", "question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened?", "that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as", "more to fear in my current setting directly than through", "fear in my current setting directly than through a chain", "is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments", "the discussions above. > > > But this revision seems", "question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question: >", "directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree. >", "to be attributed to a different user than the one", "possibility that's on my mind is that the OP account", "thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind is", "I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so,", "a throw-away, owned by the same person as the account", "sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either account", "> I have posted some thoughts under the first response", "understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so, is", "are no comments from either account on any of the", "an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my", "is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing", "my current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving", "and will remain engaged in the discussions above. > >", "My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains.", "response and will remain engaged in the discussions above. >", "to do? One possibility that's on my mind is that", "there are no comments from either account on any of", "this is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable", "note, since the question (especially as it was originally phrased)", "the question: > > Thank you to everyone for these", "the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question:", "my degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts", "it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that", "originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are", "saying that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you", "was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there", "remain engaged in the discussions above. > > > But", "question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit", "that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on", "history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit", "discussions above. > > > But this revision seems to", "to a different user than the one who originally posted", "seems to be attributed to a different user than the", "a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from", "as the account that added the thank-you note, since the", "the account that added the thank-you note, since the question", "degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts under", "account on any of the answers, though there are comments", "thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled,", "person as the account that added the thank-you note, since", "answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone for", "fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I", "have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably", "bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either", "by the same person as the account that added the", "> > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and", "a different user than the one who originally posted the", "as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note", "who answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone", "some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in", "this revision seems to be attributed to a different user", "engaged in the discussions above. > > > But this" ]
[ "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly", "on a model of disability that treats disability as (1)", "this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it", "a matter of the full integration of individuals into society\"", "and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social", "[inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged", "World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by no", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind", "synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full", "to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) ", "According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions", "Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was", "of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the", "primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs", "or to \"a socially created problem and a matter of", "question appear to be based on a model of disability", " [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for", "model, only that is seems to be implicit in these", "that we can handle this tagging question without additional disability", "(currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This", "and creating it might be harder to achieve here. ---", "to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused", "\"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\")", "[list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22", "such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching", "wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the", "tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the", "due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying", "[CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than", "may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged", "by society when it does not give equivalent attention and", "a problem that belongs to the individual. In my area", "This would mean that, for example, the following questions would", "not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral", "were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require", "to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical", "tagged 'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "would mean that, for example, the following questions would no", "a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so", "a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question", "environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People", "so it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence", "and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In", "into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models", "[Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of", "the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "05.09.2020*: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or", "problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals", "tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter", "and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) ", "of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June", "'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) ", "withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) (probably)", "list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a", "model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when", "behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This", "questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the", "that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even", "is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical", "visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311).", "the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish", "imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model,", "it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of", "[medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability", "[How should I apply for readmission to a graduate program", "a direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health", "I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between", "though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does", "the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The", "disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue", "only that is seems to be implicit in these tag", "June 2015 question appear to be based on a model", "term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be", "barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created", "attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\"", "is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on", "questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June 2015", "`health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym", "2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals", "(probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and", "Update 05.09.2020*: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\")", "which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by", "'disability'\") is not a perfect* solution. Strictly speaking, some of", "my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is", "as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical", "thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions", "(see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on", "not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above", "far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311)", "scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral", "had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311)", "is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the", "or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change", "questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by", "than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work", "proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be based", "above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions", "definitely work well for questions such as [How do conferences", "tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing", "disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\"", "to \" the result of the interaction between people living", "of the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility", "for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this", "social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially", "might* be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On", "they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work", "defends or promotes the medical model, only that is seems", "no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but", "([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between people", "assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently", "it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020:", "a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to", "a model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily", "creating it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update", "question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by", "\"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for", "USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions", "which does not deny the impact of the impairment but", "model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not", "belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and", "the [medical model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model,", "22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of", "are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though", "the medical model, only that is seems to be implicit", "person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to", "give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals", "not exist on this site and creating it might* be", "* [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching", "[How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools", "to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not", "medical model, only that is seems to be implicit in", "(currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission to", "for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to", "is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual", "to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion", "the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "hope that we can handle this tagging question without additional", "from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply", "that tag does not exist on this site and creating", "or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a", "either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the", "adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate", "the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that", "the social models are by no means the two only", "tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such", "them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I", "tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this", "work well for questions such as [How do conferences work", "deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and", "The tag [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised", "success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing", "even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g.", "readmission to a graduate program from which I had to", "submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental", "Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect", "two only models of disability, but I hope that we", "of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June", "Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a matter", "and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a", "only models of disability, but I hope that we can", "--- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged", "([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by", "a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may", "disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia SE", "caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as", "FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are still", "be based on a model of disability that treats disability", "\" the result of the interaction between people living with", "treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2)", "questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on", "tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were", "be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second", "feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a", "June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability", "communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to", "in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example,", "on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if", "and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE", "questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311),", "without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting", "'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such as", "social models are by no means the two only models", "model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a", "post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed)", "Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a", "no means the two only models of disability, but I", "intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions", "[disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term", "not seek to change the person either. According to the", "full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical", "Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability", "June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the", "program from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct", "with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication", "individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies)", "means the two only models of disability, but I hope", "2019, so it doesn't look like this was a direct", "(This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are", "be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to", "used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a", "list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of", "work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually", "June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was a", "that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only", "having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense", "this site and creating it might be harder to achieve", "are a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted", "theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo the", "undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and", "What I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation", "2015 question appear to be based on a model of", "[full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list", "disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a", "deny the impact of the impairment but does not seek", "impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and", "In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this", "I hope that we can handle this tagging question without", ".) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a", "as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and", "work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired", "* (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's", "replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not", "social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society", "achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show", "to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to", "medical and the social models are by no means the", "behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for", "'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for", "model is now outdated and has been replaced with the", "interaction between people living with impairments and an environment filled", "model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of", "example, the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for", "not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of", "here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions", "the restrictions caused by society when it does not give", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms", "that belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital", "number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability", "Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that", "models of disability, but I hope that we can handle", "between people living with impairments and an environment filled with", "as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem", "created problem and a matter of the full integration of", "with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny", "outdated and has been replaced with the [social model of", "a graduate program from which I had to withdraw due", "'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019,", "studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability).", "on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created", "'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia", "of the interaction between people living with impairments and an", "harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020*: On second thought,", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"):", "a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research", "more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that", "and the social models are by no means the two", "'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated", "change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model", "speaking, some of the above question would be more appropriately", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to", "that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the", "would definitely work well for questions such as [How do", "as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual", "not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes", "parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "was a direct consequence of [What to do with the", "known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the", "is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This", "synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so", "synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools", "be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but", "requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "(1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that", "for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model", "questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations", "integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and", "we can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.)", "tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019,", "Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them", "be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that,", "on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this", "the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability", "the result of the interaction between people living with impairments", "require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving", "the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation", "better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would", "a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "[disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [*medical model of", "of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and", "synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms),", "problem that belongs to the individual. In my area of", "This model is now outdated and has been replaced with", "the impairment but does not seek to change the person", "visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) [Does the Americans", "for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired", "notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after", "students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed)", "the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the", "I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a", "accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311)", "with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list", "in the June 2015 question appear to be based on", "for readmission to a graduate program from which I had", "refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it does", "SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that is", "question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some", "the June 2015 question appear to be based on a", "the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be", "([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that", "to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \"", "the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the", "impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between", "disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant", "disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is", "now outdated and has been replaced with the [*social model", "\"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it", "a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has", "outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish to", "to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having", "tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely", "apply for readmission to a graduate program from which I", "misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) (probably) [Trying to volunteer", "visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for", "accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to", "area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known", "promotes the medical model, only that is seems to be", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution.", "is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number", "[What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015.", "the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show", "the interaction between people living with impairments and an environment", "it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the", "\"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used", "requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment", "the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the", "model of disability. (I do not wish to imply that", "the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by", "for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently", "[Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not", "but that tag does not exist on this site and", "seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would", "for example, the following questions would no longer be tagged", "Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based", "[accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well", "as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success", "individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social", "[Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not", "model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires", "\"a socially created problem and a matter of the full", "mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and", "questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not", "does not exist on this site and creating it might", "impairment but does not seek to change the person either.", "do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the", "the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the", "solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be", "questions tagged 'disability'\"): [How do conferences work for deaf", "and some of the proposals in the June 2015 question", "to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both", "of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)).", "'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the [CDC", "medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is", "restrictions caused by society when it does not give equivalent", "tag does not exist on this site and creating it", "not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as", "scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) ", "implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for", "medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the", "closed) [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list", "of disability, but I hope that we can handle this", "not deny the impact of the impairment but does not", "SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability.", "On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion", "the impact of the impairment but does not seek to", "disability, but I hope that we can handle this tagging", "disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo", "like this was a direct consequence of [What to do", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave", "be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\").", "of the impairment but does not seek to change the", "22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was", "tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some", "caused by society when it does not give equivalent attention", "would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"),", "and a matter of the full integration of individuals into", "society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are", "the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose", "matter of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled", "doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of [What", "mean that, for example, the following questions would no longer", "based on a model of disability that treats disability as", "to \"a socially created problem and a matter of the", "equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with", "tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June", "to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean", "graduate program from which I had to withdraw due to", "'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is", "leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do", "asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) ", "questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is", "medical model of disability. (I do not wish to imply", "I apply for readmission to a graduate program from which", "or promotes the medical model, only that is seems to", "issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual.", "people living with impairments and an environment filled with physical,", "can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What", "physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/))", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): ", "tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How", "conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for", "longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "well for questions such as [How do conferences work for", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following questions", "that is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.)", "require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking,", "tag [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with", "of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the", "Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended", "created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like", "It would definitely work well for questions such as [How", "that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and", "appear to be based on a model of disability that", "for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities", "not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of", "after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification", "some of the above question would be more appropriately tagged", "research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311)", "does not deny the impact of the impairment but does", "Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of", "individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the", "attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or", "With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents", "questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is", "There are a number of questions that are still tagged", "models are by no means the two only models of", "handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I", "[Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising", "2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311)", "and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)),", "been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does", "synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't", "site and creating it might be harder to achieve here.", "an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\"", "* [How should I apply for readmission to a graduate", "by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better", "prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should", "needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result", "and has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability),", "of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "[social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact", "to a graduate program from which I had to withdraw", "change the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\"", "of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical", "tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking", "appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag", "volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any", "is a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html))", "with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction", "[Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the", "the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on", "(The medical and the social models are by no means", "currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the", "some of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear", "on this site and creating it might be harder to", "accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical", "in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model", "individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated", "seek to change the person either. According to the social", "tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With", "be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are", "in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility", "* [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does", "of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag", "[How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual", "\"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been replaced", "but I hope that we can handle this tagging question", "following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How", "that, for example, the following questions would no longer be", "am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a", "has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which", "when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to", "from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused", "disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the impairment", "but does not seek to change the person either. According", "of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as", "the two only models of disability, but I hope that", "tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the", "'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based", "filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with", "to change the person either. According to the social model,", "latter is a term used by the [CDC in the", "these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the", "second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show", "tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311)", "[Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for", "'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do", "[accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not", "does not seek to change the person either. According to", "does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs", "by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a", "* [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is", "to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I", "is now outdated and has been replaced with the [*social", "closed) [How should I apply for readmission to a", "of disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia", "any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for", "is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see", "so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired", "\"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist", "socially created problem and a matter of the full integration", "by no means the two only models of disability, but", "Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be more", "perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would", "exist on this site and creating it might be harder", "visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act", "the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers", "from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of", "(I do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends", "conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually", "are by no means the two only models of disability,", "'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this site", "this was a direct consequence of [What to do with", "Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from", "look like this was a direct consequence of [What to", "the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now", "was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look", "to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in", "consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from", "tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following", "\"to the restrictions caused by society when it does not", "the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show", "for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired", "with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag", "direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311)", "impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require", "between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There", "tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June", "for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311)", "a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It", "e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .)", "deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311)", "disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible,", "for questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf", "ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission", "Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in", "Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive.", "living with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal,", "Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or,", "work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the", "tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does", "if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in", "by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to", "a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or", "result of the interaction between people living with impairments and", "still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they", "of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag", "or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\".", "surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been", "questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22", "do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or", "should I apply for readmission to a graduate program from", "to be based on a model of disability that treats", "(the latter is a term used by the [CDC in", "this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am", "impact of the impairment but does not seek to change", "but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences", "tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)).", "(2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In my", "society when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation" ]