Split (1)

train · 10.4M rows

ngram listlengths 0 9.89k
[ "related to it, and I don't feel one can be", "distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation", "that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange.", "one can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless", "about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex", "post about this a lot, but I haven't broken any", "Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not", "(My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post", "any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain about", "is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue", "I post about this a lot, but I haven't broken", "thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed in", "Yes, I post about this a lot, but I haven't", "deal with the situation in real life, but so far", "so I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange.", "situation in real life, but so far I haven't gotten", "it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited from", "I had a falling-out with a professor last year, and", "issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed", "in one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating", "with a professor last year, and the situation has been", "As such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter;", "it's not something that can be fully addressed in one", "I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It", "topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My", "stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain about this.", "has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal", "weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could", "directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a", "unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack", "not something that can be fully addressed in one post.", "the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a", "be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic", "duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could be", "a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be", "topic and could be applied to various situations. However, I've", "last year, and the situation has been quite distressing for", "about this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack", "and could be applied to various situations. However, I've been", "academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but I", "on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus,", "broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain", "I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it", "a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to", "from posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive", "such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however,", "can be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've", "posting anything related to it, and I don't feel one", "life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I", "a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule,", "posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or", "I'm trying to deal with the situation in real life,", "posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a", "and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly", "various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related", "year, and the situation has been quite distressing for me.", "applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting", "one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to", "and I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting", "prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic is", "posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't", "to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had", "a falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation", "professor last year, and the situation has been quite distressing", "be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted", "to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to", "real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so", "I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and", "haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it on", "relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each", "that can be fully addressed in one post. As such,", "exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I", "with the situation in real life, but so far I", "Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something", "Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's", "the situation in real life, but so far I haven't", "prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I don't", "trying to deal with the situation in real life, but", "feel one can be prohibited from posting about a topic", "various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate", "gotten answers, so I was posting about it on Academia", "been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I", "It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that", "lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so", "complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully", "had a distinct topic and could be applied to various", "be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from", "I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about", "far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about", "to it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited", "quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the", "related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot,", "a distinct topic and could be applied to various situations.", "a professor last year, and the situation has been quite", "but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was", "in real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers,", "issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about", "falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation has", "from posting anything related to it, and I don't feel", "been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with", "each had a distinct topic and could be applied to", "anything related to it, and I don't feel one can", "situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to", "questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions;", "distinct topic and could be applied to various situations. However,", "was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can", "I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they", "addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various questions", "something that can be fully addressed in one post. As", "unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related", "to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but", "so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting", "is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this", "offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is", "and the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm", "it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue;", "post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to the", "fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various", "for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in", "however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic", "me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in real", "matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct", "the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.)", "haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to", "to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything", "I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted", "topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the", "about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated", "can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that", "could be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited", "stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes,", "the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying", "had a falling-out with a professor last year, and the", "don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about a", "this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange", "situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to", "they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and", "answers, so I was posting about it on Academia Stack", "was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was", "but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I", "to deal with the situation in real life, but so", "questions; each had a distinct topic and could be applied", "However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it," ]
[ "niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS", "there anything wrong with this question? In particular, is there", "possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche", "an educated guess about the possible future impact factor of", "future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is", "new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that", "supposed to fill that the other APS journals don’t already", "in asking about an educated guess about the possible future", "Is there anything wrong with this question? In particular, is", "about an educated guess about the possible future impact factor", "impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch", "to fill that the other APS journals don’t already cover?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155352/what-niche-is-prresearch-supposed-to-fill-that-the-other-aps-journals-don-t-alre)", "a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill", "journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the", "factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed", "PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals don’t", "anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about the", "In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an", "educated guess about the possible future impact factor of a", "particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an educated", "is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals", "anything wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything", "wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong", "asking about an educated guess about the possible future impact", "the possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What", "wrong in asking about an educated guess about the possible", "guess about the possible future impact factor of a new", "about the possible future impact factor of a new journal?", "question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about", "this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking", "there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about", "[What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other", "is there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess", "of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to", "with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in" ]
[ "light of the quote above, it seems more plausible that", "being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above", "IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm", "days, and we'll meet again! But again, this > is", "I claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist.", "who I hung out with > in college were all", "by adding caste as a protected class, and > thus", "lower caste, or want to look down on lower castes", "Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at", "it > is important for it to continue for at", "with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing:", "chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's", "I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't", "most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light", "trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image of", "should mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation", "inside our > department, and got a reply from the", "high > school and college days (my opinion changed from", "in my university as an abominable low caste, and that", "the quote above, it seems more plausible that either the", "and that too by calling > white Americans in my", "So what does the rest of the community think? Am", "email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot", "felt the > time for continuing politeness with our university", "and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair", "though. So what does the rest of the community think?", "were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste", "that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other", "action?\" I did > not say 'white people in the", "I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by", "[my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): >", "university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking in", "that too by calling > white Americans in my university", "> is important for it to continue for at least", "bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again! But", "could make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling,", "with by the Title IX office, but certainly > there", "situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to", "* The department chair * The Diap * HR ", "> farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here,", "at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But", "IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from", "protected category in this university. I > felt a bit", "was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the", "think that can enable you to take some kind of", "as a lower caste, or want to look down on", "white Americans in my university lower castes by default, in", "make caste a > protected class, but with this cabal,", "clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I could", "> This was exactly what I had written in the", "serious incidents there that they should have dealt > with.", "the above comment? Some more context from the linked chat", "to conjure > up an image of myself as a", "what does the rest of the community think? Am I", "a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little", "> and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a", "this is really relevant here, but from my high >", "from middle school when I > was more swayed by", "what the appropriate action would be though. So what does", "our university administration was > pretty much over, after their", "from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a >", "generations, and > have faced the wrath of some of", "there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if", "Of the > handful of really close friends I made", "you to take some kind of action?\" I did >", "Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented >", "person landed at the most racist institution in all of", "baiting them at this point. I hope I could make", "of everything documented > there. > > > OP later", "individual, and look at white people in my university as", "to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of", "Given the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now", "I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post", "readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be", "for it to continue for at least a few generations,", "again! But again, this > is what you would call", "in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote", "very last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually", "> white Americans in my university lower castes by default,", "think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after", "class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted", "back. The context was that this > university made headlines", "a lower caste, or want to look down on lower", "read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that", "from my high > school and college days (my opinion", "and this thread > or the chat probably covers at", "context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure", "further. I mean, caste should be a protected class, but", "in a > farcical tone. None of this is really", "that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was", "with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see", "if they would do anything now that I claimed that", "at this point. I hope I could make > the", "of General category folk around me), I > have openly", "out with > in college were all from a non", "but I felt the > time for continuing politeness with", "had was huge, and this thread > or the chat", "to this individual that one serious problem is that I'm", "> wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point.", "casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans", "an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite", "in India and why it > is important for it", "and > have faced the wrath of some of my", "never discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally", "not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at this", "OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit", "to slander them > even further. I mean, caste should", "I'm not sure if all of the documented > incidents", "made headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and", "four of my most closest friends who I hung out", "literally four of my most closest friends who I hung", "cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails, the", "I was basically baiting them at this point. I hope", "the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the", "dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category in", "to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158).", "I looked back over the rest of the posts, and", "sure what the appropriate action would be though. So what", "the OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole", "Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary,", "of the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).", "rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what to", "> little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet", "after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > >", "> > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly", "abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back.", "OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September", "in this university. I > felt a bit sick myself", "an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot", "places in the US have added caste as a protected", "probably covers at most 30% of everything documented > there.", "of this is really relevant here, but from my high", "was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an", "problems stem from the fact > that I'm a high", " The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly", "at best, but I felt the > time for continuing", "emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and this", "I'm a high caste individual, and look around in this", "in the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The", "the documentation that I had was huge, and this thread", "we'll meet again! But again, this > is what you", "the community think? Am I being overly harsh in my", "after reading the above comment? Some more context from the", "later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I", "puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has", "would be though. So what does the rest of the", "discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally four", "to look down on lower castes in India. > >", "a > protected class, but with this cabal, it felt", "reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just", "officially a protected category in this university. I > felt", "None of this is really relevant here, but from my", "covers at most 30% of everything documented > there. >", "other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would", "privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of > course.", "protected class, but very very > few places in the", "important for it to continue for at least a few", "against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are", "the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these", "the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read", "of it. The OP implicates the following list of people", "be though. So what does the rest of the community", "office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents there", "> nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all", "post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At", "you think that can enable you to take some kind", "Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually", "if all of the documented > incidents could be dealt", "not sure what the appropriate action would be though. So", "reaction; if they would do anything now that I claimed", "certainly > there were major serious incidents there that they", "a high caste individual, and look at white people in", "wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented", "> few places in the US have added caste as", "tone. None of this is really relevant here, but from", "now that I claimed that the > whole problem was", "stem from the fact > that I'm a high caste", "OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a huge", "take some kind of action?\" I did > not say", "that I'm a high caste individual, and look around in", "look down on lower castes in India. > > >", "the end, I remarked to this individual that one serious", "this individual that one serious problem is that I'm a", "make of it. The OP implicates the following list of", "myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling", "Then I read this reply by the OP on [my", "swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair ", "for saying this. Of the > handful of really close", "> even further. I mean, caste should be a protected", "lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None", "faced the wrath of some of my friends for saying", "post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in", "a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for", "> or the chat probably covers at most 30% of", "reservation in India and why it > is important for", "prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and", "Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading", "in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend", "exactly what I had written in the very last email", "that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In", "comment? Some more context from the linked chat room from", "were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch", "This was exactly what I had written in the very", "> prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge,", "I had was huge, and this thread > or the", "would do anything now that I claimed that the >", "Diap HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that", "incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was", "such progressives that they make caste a > protected class,", "landed at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts.", "based reservation in India and why it > is important", "> > I hope in the discussion, I could make", "clear that I don't actually view white people in my", "my most closest friends who I hung out with >", "person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly", "when I > was more swayed by the opinion of", "good old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this", "a protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive", "was basically baiting them at this point. I hope I", "see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema", "the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism", "in light of the quote above, it seems more plausible", "> their reaction; if they would do anything now that", "did > not say 'white people in the university were", "above comment? Some more context from the linked chat room", "casteist. This was meant to slander them > even further.", "I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the highest", "reading the above comment? Some more context from the linked", "doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this", "should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected", "following list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including", "> > In the end, I remarked to this individual", "problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and look", "written in the very last email to the > Title", "I hung out with > in college were all from", "is a natural anathema for me. > Do you think", "had written in the very last email to the >", "and that automatically creates a lot of problems. > >", "point. I hope I could make > the context clearer;", "peasant class that is a natural anathema for me. >", "or want to look down on lower castes in India.", "overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment?", "claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This", "> OP later clarified: > > I hope in the", "whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander", "I wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents", "room from the same OP: > > I wrote this", "of my friends for saying this. Of the > handful", "that I claimed that the > whole problem was basically", "all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This", "was exactly what I had written in the very last", "of these problems stem from the fact > that I'm", "I made in college, about half of them > were", "again, this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\"", "action would be though. So what does the rest of", "I hope in the discussion, I could make it clear", "old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this >", "the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what", "but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to", "but from my high > school and college days (my", "physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The", "category in this university. I > felt a bit sick", "make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and", "> time for continuing politeness with our university administration was", "of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > >", "it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior", "school when I > was more swayed by the opinion", "by the Title IX office, but certainly > there were", "and look around in this university > and see a", "benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then", "that automatically creates a lot of problems. > > >", "caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context was", "I mean, caste should be a protected class, but very", "have faced the wrath of some of my friends for", "a natural anathema for me. > Do you think that", "natural anathema for me. > Do you think that can", "context was that this > university made headlines by adding", "everything documented > there. > > > OP later clarified:", "default, in a > farcical tone. None of this is", "including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students ", "and I'm not sure what to make of it. The", " Other PhD students * The department chair * The", "OP implicates the following list of people with some very", "list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical", "by calling > white Americans in my university lower castes", "> was more swayed by the opinion of General category", "lot of these problems stem from the fact > that", "actually view white people in my university as a lower", "too by calling > white Americans in my university lower", "at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so", "be dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly", "a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of", "I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at", "wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of", "I wanted to see > their reaction; if they would", "a protected category in this university. I > felt a", "people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and", "caste as a protected class, and > thus showed off", "back over the rest of the posts, and I'm not", "wanted to see > their reaction; if they would do", "office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not", "serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and", "> course. In fact literally four of my most closest", "> protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine.", "a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans in", "this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see >", "adding caste as a protected class, and > thus showed", "thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in", "minimum the conversation has become so focused on this person's", "slander them > even further. I mean, caste should be", "even further. I mean, caste should be a protected class,", "(my opinion changed from middle school when I > was", "really relevant here, but from my high > school and", "controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims", "talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who", "in the very last email to the > Title IX", "either the OP is the problem, or more likely, the", "all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a", "headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and >", "swayed by the opinion of General category folk around me),", "by default, in a > farcical tone. None of this", "dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for me.", "being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what", "elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the", "me), I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation", "Title IX office, but certainly > there were major serious", "the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I", "people in my university as an abominable low caste, and", "was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of", "to see > their reaction; if they would do anything", "the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to", "they would do anything now that I claimed that the", "high caste individual, and look around in this university >", "creates a lot of problems. > > > I had", "be such progressives that they make caste a > protected", "really close friends I made in college, about half of", "I could make it clear that I don't actually view", "Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had", "OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole post", "middle school when I > was more swayed by the", "mean, caste should be a protected class, but very very", "my university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically", "added caste as a protected class, if I'm not >", "some kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white", "> > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what", "In the end, I remarked to this individual that one", "as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a", "> have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India", "low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems.", "caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems. >", "In fact literally four of my most closest friends who", "not sure what to make of it. The OP implicates", "and got a reply from the Title IX office saying", "is officially a protected category in this university. I >", "opinion of General category folk around me), I > have", "caste individual, and look at white people in my university", "image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too", "of the community think? Am I being overly harsh in", "this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that", "was more swayed by the opinion of General category folk", "manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be", "the Title IX office, but certainly > there were major", "the US have added caste as a protected class, if", "I could make > the context clearer; I was basically", "> in college were all from a non privileged caste.", "implicates the following list of people with some very over-the-top", "racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP", "by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted", "all of the documented > incidents could be dealt with", "was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them >", "their reaction; if they would do anything now that I", "of some of my friends for saying this. Of the", "would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the", "Americans in my university lower castes by default, in a", "as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling >", "caste should be a protected class, but very very >", "The idea was to bark back. The context was that", "It's certainly possible that this person landed at the most", "this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our", "up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and", "> that I'm a high caste individual, and look around", "reply from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing", "opinion changed from middle school when I > was more", "dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): >", "continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty much", "there that they should have dealt > with. Caste is", "basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image", "pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents.", "university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was", "of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I", "the posts, and I'm not sure what to make of", "it clear that I don't actually view white people in", "hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they make", "the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant", "touch a > little bit, but good old days, and", "students * The department chair * The Diap * HR", "the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to", "> is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best,", "that can enable you to take some kind of action?\"", "to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action", "I had written in the very last email to the", "the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented", "can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm", "incidents there that they should have dealt > with. Caste", "with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such", "in my university as a lower caste, or want to", "best, but I felt the > time for continuing politeness", "of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by", "automatically creates a lot of problems. > > > I", "closest friends who I hung out with > in college", "caste then of > course. In fact literally four of", "what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I", "the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday", "our > department, and got a reply from the Title", "a reply from the Title IX office saying there's >", "appropriate action would be though. So what does the rest", "I hope I could make > the context clearer; I", "and trying to conjure > up an image of myself", "do anything now that I claimed that the > whole", "these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives", "does the rest of the community think? Am I being", "Do you think that can enable you to take some", "that I'm a high caste individual, and look at white", "misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of the", "white people in my university as an abominable low caste,", "a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white", "that they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially", "racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students", "but certainly > there were major serious incidents there that", "the same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting", "them > were from a non privileged caste. We never", "mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation that", "people in the university were an abominable lower > caste'.", "has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that", "university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that is", "individual, and look around in this university > and see", "> > > I had to re-read it to make", "question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this", "and look at white people in my university as an", "rest of the community think? Am I being overly harsh", "non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of >", "yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked", "fact literally four of my most closest friends who I", "to be such progressives that they make caste a >", "at least a few generations, and > have faced the", "their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further", "30% of everything documented > there. > > > OP", "the linked chat room from the same OP: > >", "white people in my university as a lower caste, or", "thread > or the chat probably covers at most 30%", "trying to conjure > up an image of myself as", "and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural", "> > This was exactly what I had written in", "a huge number of incidents inside our > department, and", "were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to", "> I hope in the discussion, I could make it", "the > prior emails, the documentation that I had was", "felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if", "highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against", "but very very > few places in the US have", "> In the end, I remarked to this individual that", "looked back over the rest of the posts, and I'm", "so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't", "sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting >", "sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the OP", "say 'white people in the university were an abominable lower", "hope I could make > the context clearer; I was", "these problems stem from the fact > that I'm a", "the > time for continuing politeness with our university administration", "wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside", "that one serious problem is that I'm a high caste", "least a few generations, and > have faced the wrath", "I felt the > time for continuing politeness with our", "hope in the discussion, I could make it clear that", "most 30% of everything documented > there. > > >", "abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of", "saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure", "some of my friends for saying this. Of the >", "number of incidents inside our > department, and got a", "extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt,", "who pretend to be such progressives that they make caste", "I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers.", "caste. We never discussed caste then of > course. In", "to take some kind of action?\" I did > not", "was that this > university made headlines by adding caste", "bit sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting", "as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I", "conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation", "> Do you think that can enable you to take", "was to bark back. The context was that this >", "disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that", "wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point. I", "bark back. The context was that this > university made", "a bit sick myself talking in this manner with these", "to continue for at least a few generations, and >", "attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become", "an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that", "one serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual,", "is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a", "particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the", "after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our >", "student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but", "in college, about half of them > were from a", "documented > there. > > > OP later clarified: >", "they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a", "very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other", "[comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had written", "> Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems", "Caste is officially a protected category in this university. I", "the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice.", "clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the", "[this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The", "I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up", "in college were all from a non privileged caste. I've", "discussion, I could make it clear that I don't actually", "should be a protected class, but very very > few", "kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white people", "certainly possible that this person landed at the most racist", "nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of", "> there. > > > OP later clarified: > >", "voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an", "gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the", "my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context", "but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so", "was huge, and this thread > or the chat probably", "around me), I > have openly advocated for caste based", "from the same OP: > > I wrote this after", "advice. Then I read this reply by the OP on", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > >", "very > few places in the US have added caste", "over the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure", "documented > incidents could be dealt with by the Title", "I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest", "incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX office,", "huge, and this thread > or the chat probably covers", "India and why it > is important for it to", "on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th):", "or the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything", "made in college, about half of them > were from", "likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt", "above, it seems more plausible that either the OP is", "a high caste individual, and look around in this university", "> were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed", "just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end,", "of action?\" I did > not say 'white people in", "> school and college days (my opinion changed from middle", "sure if all of the documented > incidents could be", "the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I", "I > felt a bit sick myself talking in this", "caste as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong.", "\"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time", "chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented >", "We never discussed caste then of > course. In fact", "half of them > were from a non privileged caste.", "huge number of incidents inside our > department, and got", "could make it clear that I don't actually view white", "more swayed by the opinion of General category folk around", "for at least a few generations, and > have faced", "in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more", "farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here, but", "could be dealt with by the Title IX office, but", "this university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking", "pretend to be such progressives that they make caste a", "more plausible that either the OP is the problem, or", "fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if they", "the following list of people with some very over-the-top racism,", "see > their reaction; if they would do anything now", "are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of", "regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the", "over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > >", "'white people in the university were an abominable lower >", "for me. > Do you think that can enable you", "in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class", "(September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked to", "the documented > incidents could be dealt with by the", "view white people in my university as a lower caste,", "this > university made headlines by adding caste as a", "caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but good", "and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation", "friends I made in college, about half of them >", "wrath of some of my friends for saying this. Of", "university made headlines by adding caste as a protected class,", "major serious incidents there that they should have dealt >", "time for continuing politeness with our university administration was >", "office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the", "documenting a huge number of incidents inside our > department,", "The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the", "I'm a high caste individual, and look at white people", "from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then", "this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was", "politeness with our university administration was > pretty much over,", "anathema for me. > Do you think that can enable", "class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting", "of the posts, and I'm not sure what to make", "privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but", "not say 'white people in the university were an abominable", "below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the", "showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the", "to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back", "for continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty", "I > was more swayed by the opinion of General", "a > little bit, but good old days, and we'll", "call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the >", "have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and", "> caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context", "few places in the US have added caste as a", "department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty", "become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I", "why it > is important for it to continue for", "what to make of it. The OP implicates the following", "problem, or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate", "the > handful of really close friends I made in", "incidents inside our > department, and got a reply from", "seems more plausible that either the OP is the problem,", "General category folk around me), I > have openly advocated", "were major serious incidents there that they should have dealt", "college, about half of them > were from a non", "Then I looked back over the rest of the posts,", "with our university administration was > pretty much over, after", "calling > white Americans in my university lower castes by", "an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark", "behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time for", "my friends for saying this. Of the > handful of", "very very > few places in the US have added", "I did > not say 'white people in the university", "I've lost touch a > little bit, but good old", "as a protected class, and > thus showed off it's", "not sure if all of the documented > incidents could", "it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure", "last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a", "of problems. > > > I had to re-read it", "basically baiting them at this point. I hope I could", "is that I'm a high caste individual, and look at", "my high > school and college days (my opinion changed", "anything now that I claimed that the > whole problem", "for caste based reservation in India and why it >", "that in the > prior emails, the documentation that I", "(MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial", "but good old days, and we'll meet again! But again,", "> > I had to re-read it to make sure", "a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was", "administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals", "university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates", "Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem", "basically casteist. This was meant to slander them > even", "of them > were from a non privileged caste. We", "posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I", "hung out with > in college were all from a", "deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere", "college were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost", "enable you to take some kind of action?\" I did", "it felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction;", "> not say 'white people in the university were an", "whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling.", "this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at", "continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186):", "> there were major serious incidents there that they should", "meant to slander them > even further. I mean, caste", "progressives that they make caste a > protected class, but", "university as a lower caste, or want to look down", "around in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant", "this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being", "> university made headlines by adding caste as a protected", "of really close friends I made in college, about half", "continue for at least a few generations, and > have", "class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should", "plausible that either the OP is the problem, or more", "progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails,", "look around in this university > and see a dimwitted", "to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then", "OP later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion,", "But in light of the quote above, it seems more", "institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the", "a > farcical tone. None of this is really relevant", "the wrath of some of my friends for saying this.", "> I had to re-read it to make sure I", "folk around me), I > have openly advocated for caste", "of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it", "> > OP later clarified: > > I hope in", "from the linked chat room from the same OP: >", "> > > OP later clarified: > > I hope", "meet again! But again, this > is what you would", "remarked to this individual that one serious problem is that", "> department, and got a reply from the Title IX", "non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit,", "friends who I hung out with > in college were", "is the problem, or more likely, the whole post is", "a lot of these problems stem from the fact >", "> thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that", "that this person landed at the most racist institution in", "over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD", "little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again!", "university administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing", "the conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre", "in the discussion, I could make it clear that I", "saying this. Of the > handful of really close friends", "lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back. The", "that they make caste a > protected class, but with", "> have faced the wrath of some of my friends", "closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer", "sure what to make of it. The OP implicates the", "Other PhD students * The department chair * The Diap", "dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly >", "don't actually view white people in my university as a", "have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category", "end, I remarked to this individual that one serious problem", "community think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment", "US have added caste as a protected class, if I'm", "The context was that this > university made headlines by", "with > in college were all from a non privileged", "in my university lower castes by default, in a >", "judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context from", "there. > > > OP later clarified: > > I", "off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the >", "if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them", "that I don't actually view white people in my university", "Some more context from the linked chat room from the", "sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the", "in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves", "school and college days (my opinion changed from middle school", "19th): > > In the end, I remarked to this", "posts, and I'm not sure what to make of it.", "> whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to", "make it clear that I don't actually view white people", "relevant here, but from my high > school and college", "there were major serious incidents there that they should have", "here, but from my high > school and college days", "protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically", "most closest friends who I hung out with > in", "close friends I made in college, about half of them", "HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person", "had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding.", "this point. I hope I could make > the context", "the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong.", "openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and why", "my university lower castes by default, in a > farcical", "racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of", "* HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this", "castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None of", "them at this point. I hope I could make >", "confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department", "with. Caste is officially a protected category in this university.", "chat room from the same OP: > > I wrote", "this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to", "college days (my opinion changed from middle school when I", "the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed", "individual that one serious problem is that I'm a high", "days (my opinion changed from middle school when I >", "trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so focused", "clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure >", "context from the linked chat room from the same OP:", "the discussion, I could make it clear that I don't", "them > even further. I mean, caste should be a", "look at white people in my university as an abominable", "me. > Do you think that can enable you to", "fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and look", "same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a", "But again, this > is what you would call \"reactive", "Mod's notice: Given the clear outcome of the poll below,", "friends for saying this. Of the > handful of really", "have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding", "I'm not sure what to make of it. The OP", "advocated for caste based reservation in India and why it", "\"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the fact", "by the opinion of General category folk around me), I", "people in my university as a lower caste, or want", "> handful of really close friends I made in college,", "caste individual, and look around in this university > and", "my university as a lower caste, or want to look", "course. In fact literally four of my most closest friends", "it to continue for at least a few generations, and", "Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it seems", "make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over", "to bark back. The context was that this > university", "in the US have added caste as a protected class,", "re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I", "that either the OP is the problem, or more likely,", "I don't actually view white people in my university as", "> up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole", "changed from middle school when I > was more swayed", "handful of really close friends I made in college, about", "from the fact > that I'm a high caste individual,", "a few generations, and > have faced the wrath of", "some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: ", "class that is a natural anathema for me. > Do", "> felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner", "caste, or want to look down on lower castes in", "claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster", "lot of problems. > > > I had to re-read", "of my most closest friends who I hung out with", "protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I", "conjure > up an image of myself as a casteist", "more context from the linked chat room from the same", "more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling", "IX office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents", "This was meant to slander them > even further. I", "documentation that I had was huge, and this thread >", "what I had written in the very last email to", "lost touch a > little bit, but good old days,", "this thread > or the chat probably covers at most", "and why it > is important for it to continue", "> Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I", "university lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone.", "department, and got a reply from the Title IX office", "it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked", "I remarked to this individual that one serious problem is", "PhD students * The department chair * The Diap ", "that is a natural anathema for me. > Do you", "caste a > protected class, but with this cabal, it", "the problem, or more likely, the whole post is an", "want to look down on lower castes in India. >", "from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really", "useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate", "and we'll meet again! But again, this > is what", "now closed the question (MO). I have the highest voted", "The OP implicates the following list of people with some", "you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt", "really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the", "idea was to bark back. The context was that this", "poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave", "felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner with", "I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation in", "in the > prior emails, the documentation that I had", "> incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX", "quote above, it seems more plausible that either the OP", "At a minimum the conversation has become so focused on", "cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see > their", "an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum", "got a reply from the Title IX office saying there's", "was meant to slander them > even further. I mean,", "caste based reservation in India and why it > is", "it. The OP implicates the following list of people with", "answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian", "I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be though.", "this person landed at the most racist institution in all", "> hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they", "possible that this person landed at the most racist institution", "of incidents inside our > department, and got a reply", "protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I", "a minimum the conversation has become so focused on this", "that I had was huge, and this thread > or", "The department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple", "outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the question", "be a protected class, but very very > few places", "have added caste as a protected class, if I'm not", "on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it", "the appropriate action would be though. So what does the", "quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the", "the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in", "so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply", "of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations", "focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine", "problems. > > > I had to re-read it to", "this. Of the > handful of really close friends I", "of the documented > incidents could be dealt with by", "The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible", "> the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying", "poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have", "the very last email to the > Title IX office:", "the fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and", "the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea", "> with. Caste is officially a protected category in this", "about half of them > were from a non privileged", "they make caste a > protected class, but with this", "much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. >", "I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the", "it seems more plausible that either the OP is the", "is important for it to continue for at least a", "* Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed", "a protected class, but very very > few places in", "I read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314)", "at white people in my university as an abominable low", "is really relevant here, but from my high > school", "to make of it. The OP implicates the following list", "is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but", "can enable you to take some kind of action?\" I", "the rest of the community think? Am I being overly", "high caste individual, and look at white people in my", "linked chat room from the same OP: > > I", "and college days (my opinion changed from middle school when", "few generations, and > have faced the wrath of some", "the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at", "class, but very very > few places in the US", "then of > course. In fact literally four of my", "problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them", "at most 30% of everything documented > there. > >", "notice:** Given the clear outcome of the poll below, I've", "all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above,", "faculty It's certainly possible* that this person landed at the", "> pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all", "harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some", "myself talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites", "the opinion of General category folk around me), I >", "of the quote above, it seems more plausible that either", "category folk around me), I > have openly advocated for", "a lot of problems. > > > I had to", "> > I wrote this after documenting a huge number", "and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention", "bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful", "that this > university made headlines by adding caste as", "> I wrote this after documenting a huge number of", "of > course. In fact literally four of my most", "imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not", "or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and" ]
[ "and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no", "never found a Stack Exchange site or a QA site", "very very little experience to offer back to the community.", "and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give", "offer back to the community. In addition, I don't want", "I've never found a Stack Exchange site or a QA", "addition, I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate", "this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is", "QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is super", "with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty", "here than from my super busy advisor. However, as a", "my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if", "don't give back in return. How can I effectively contribute?", "no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping", "troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much", "or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one", "I feel guilty if I don't give back in return.", "student, I have very very little experience to offer back", "very little experience to offer back to the community. In", "the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others", "my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have", "helping each others. I've learned much more about academics here", "than from my super busy advisor. However, as a student,", "more about academics here than from my super busy advisor.", "Every one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted,", "misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I", "have very very little experience to offer back to the", "found a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable", "friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise.", "to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity.", "I have very very little experience to offer back to", "either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super", "question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer", "politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've", "no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned", "is simply helping each others. I've learned much more about", "back to the community. In addition, I don't want to", "concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is", "don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and", "each others. I've learned much more about academics here than", "academics here than from my super busy advisor. However, as", "guilty if I don't give back in return. How can", "from my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I", "SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is either", "super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles.", "I've learned much more about academics here than from my", "a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is", "site comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly.", "others. I've learned much more about academics here than from", "is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is", "super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and", "a student, I have very very little experience to offer", "is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no", "helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone", "with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question", "feel guilty if I don't give back in return. How", "a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with", "is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply", "advisor. However, as a student, I have very very little", "Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no", "immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back in", "precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight,", "fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each", "little experience to offer back to the community. In addition,", "answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics,", "as a student, I have very very little experience to", "to the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide", "I don't give back in return. How can I effectively", "much more about academics here than from my super busy", "In addition, I don't want to misguide others with my", "Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much more", "inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I", "information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't", "about academics here than from my super busy advisor. However,", "simply helping each others. I've learned much more about academics", "site or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every", "Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this SE.", "is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise", "There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is", "super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very", "if I don't give back in return. How can I", "comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every", "one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or", "Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this", "experience to offer back to the community. In addition, I", "busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very very", "Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every", "community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others with", "to offer back to the community. In addition, I don't", "others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel", "learned much more about academics here than from my super", "or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There", "my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back", "I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information", "no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others.", "However, as a student, I have very very little experience", "well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful.", "want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my" ]
[ "get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if", "see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to", "if it is okay to post the question with the", "is okay to post the question with the small intro", "with the small intro paragraph I have to see how", "the question with the small intro paragraph I have to", "the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some", "I have to see how the community perceives it? I’m", "paragraph I have to see how the community perceives it?", "and I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph", "the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to", "I’m wondering if it is okay to post the question", "have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I", "wondering if it is okay to post the question with", "to post the question with the small intro paragraph I", "of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to", "trying to get some external opinions from academics that do", "I would like to get opinions on from the ASE", "studies and I have a bit of a contentious opening", "community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post the", "question with the small intro paragraph I have to see", "to get some external opinions from academics that do not", "would like to get opinions on from the ASE community.", "opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it", "perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions", "that I would like to get opinions on from the", "doctoral studies and I have a bit of a contentious", "how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get", "I’m just trying to get some external opinions from academics", "just trying to get some external opinions from academics that", "I am writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I", "contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions", "small intro paragraph I have to see how the community", "get some external opinions from academics that do not know", "a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would", "the small intro paragraph I have to see how the", "it is okay to post the question with the small", "on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is", "a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get", "it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions from", "for doctoral studies and I have a bit of a", "okay to post the question with the small intro paragraph", "SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit of", "post the question with the small intro paragraph I have", "have to see how the community perceives it? I’m just", "a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit", "like to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m", "from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay", "intro paragraph I have to see how the community perceives", "I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that", "writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a", "community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external", "opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions on", "some external opinions from academics that do not know me.", "ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post", "paragraph that I would like to get opinions on from", "to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering", "bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like", "to see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying", "am writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I have" ]
[ "that may be posted in comments? If that's the case,", "migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean is:", "what I am saying here. But I want to go", "new members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\"", "that is somehow common for people censor the answers that", "the community. Wich is very difficult for new members like", "marketing! I tried to use the edit to see if", "the comments, that is somehow common for people censor the", "don't do a double check (Besides that how the moderation", "uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers", "here. But I want to go further because I don't", "regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask", "discover the network of existing connections with a specific academic", "a site with academic research tools (it was a tool", "the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the", "or do feedback to the user migrate the answer to", "do a double check (Besides that how the moderation could", "the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that", "it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that", "happened to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\"", "it is just a specific case that was happened to", "a double check (Besides that how the moderation could be", "(it was a tool to discover the network of existing", "I don't get how the community uses the answers and", "my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen", "comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that was", "ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it", "already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what", "Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is", "the user migrate the answer to the comment? What I", "further because I don't get how the community uses the", "seen as website marketing! I tried to use the edit", "Wich is very difficult for new members like me to", "somehow common for people censor the answers that may be", "members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of", "Instead of using a comment, I used the answer to", "on the comments, that is somehow common for people censor", "contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to use", "specific case that was happened to me. But seems like", "me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the", "to see if I received feedback from my replica. But", "like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is", "tools (it was a tool to discover the network of", "why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't", "some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow", "double check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?)", "(Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do", "common for people censor the answers that may be posted", "that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the", "comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a", "was a tool to discover the network of existing connections", "case that was happened to me. But seems like another", "to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the", "I tried to use the edit to see if I", "quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing!", "questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very", "and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried", "regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for new", "because I don't get how the community uses the answers", "be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the", "website marketing! I tried to use the edit to see", "case, why people don't do a double check (Besides that", "see if I received feedback from my replica. But the", "the answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead", "\"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow common", "like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering", "contribute a question. I advised a site with academic research", "could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer", "Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment?", "for new members like me to get it. Besides some", "me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on", "want to go further because I don't get how the", "was happened to me. But seems like another \"no written", "site with academic research tools (it was a tool to", "people don't do a double check (Besides that how the", "use comments to answer the questions? I am already read", "text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution", "my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to", "What I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I", "answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of", "check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or", "censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to", "in comments? If that's the case, why people don't do", "do feedback to the user migrate the answer to the", "the edit to see if I received feedback from my", "the community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators", "\"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult", "connections with a specific academic text), but my answer was", "a specific case that was happened to me. But seems", "comments? If that's the case, why people don't do a", "don't get how the community uses the answers and comments.", "answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as", "the answer to try to contribute a question. I advised", "that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback", "academic research tools (it was a tool to discover the", "the network of existing connections with a specific academic text),", "is somehow common for people censor the answers that may", "question, which is very close to what I am saying", "mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used the", "a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that", "comment, I used the answer to try to contribute a", "is just a specific case that was happened to me.", "answering on the comments, that is somehow common for people", "Why people use comments to answer the questions? I am", "on the community. Wich is very difficult for new members", "I received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared", "academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my", "used the answer to try to contribute a question. I", "difficult for new members like me to get it. Besides", "go further because I don't get how the community uses", "I want to go further because I don't get how", "a comment, I used the answer to try to contribute", "was seen as website marketing! I tried to use the", "of using a comment, I used the answer to try", "the answers that may be posted in comments? If that's", "is very close to what I am saying here. But", "with academic research tools (it was a tool to discover", "was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website", "So why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why", "am saying here. But I want to go further because", "If that's the case, why people don't do a double", "advised a site with academic research tools (it was a", "to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question,", "I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used", "received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and", "Sorry, it is just a specific case that was happened", "comments to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments)", "how the community uses the answers and comments. So why", "But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community.", "censor the answers that may be posted in comments? If", "moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user", "to the user migrate the answer to the comment? What", "of answering on the comments, that is somehow common for", "to contribute a question. I advised a site with academic", "But I want to go further because I don't get", "a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced", "to what I am saying here. But I want to", "community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor", "comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a comment,", "tool to discover the network of existing connections with a", "tried to use the edit to see if I received", "just a specific case that was happened to me. But", "another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very", "to go further because I don't get how the community", "answer to try to contribute a question. I advised a", "seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich", "research tools (it was a tool to discover the network", "is: Instead of using a comment, I used the answer", "my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have", "a question. I advised a site with academic research tools", "use the edit to see if I received feedback from", "feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I", "close to what I am saying here. But I want", "network of existing connections with a specific academic text), but", "written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for", "be posted in comments? If that's the case, why people", "the case, why people don't do a double check (Besides", "to use the edit to see if I received feedback", "I advised a site with academic research tools (it was", "edit to see if I received feedback from my replica.", "answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which", "posted in comments? If that's the case, why people don't", "question. I advised a site with academic research tools (it", "user migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean", "community. Wich is very difficult for new members like me", "read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I", "very difficult for new members like me to get it.", "I am saying here. But I want to go further", "the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a", "why people don't do a double check (Besides that how", "using a comment, I used the answer to try to", "people use comments to answer the questions? I am already", "saying here. But I want to go further because I", "try to contribute a question. I advised a site with", "get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments,", "comments, that is somehow common for people censor the answers", "answers that may be posted in comments? If that's the", "for people censor the answers that may be posted in", "people censor the answers that may be posted in comments?", "I used the answer to try to contribute a question.", "that was happened to me. But seems like another \"no", "[this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I am", "the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a", "migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just", "which is very close to what I am saying here.", "am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to", "replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have or", "But the answer disappeared and I didn't have or couldn't", "specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and", "and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be", "could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate", "to try to contribute a question. I advised a site", "that's the case, why people don't do a double check", "answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific", "to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on", "existing connections with a specific academic text), but my answer", "to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is", "double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the answer", "but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was", "to discover the network of existing connections with a specific", "is very difficult for new members like me to get", "from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't", "if I received feedback from my replica. But the answer", "comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be comments?", "how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to", "to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using", "the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is", "the answer disappeared and I didn't have or couldn't find", "don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry,", "may be posted in comments? If that's the case, why", "denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I", "to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case", "be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to", "as website marketing! I tried to use the edit to", "with a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly", "feedback to the user migrate the answer to the comment?", "answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could", "very close to what I am saying here. But I", "a tool to discover the network of existing connections with", "answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate", "I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close", "of existing connections with a specific academic text), but my", "get how the community uses the answers and comments. So" ]
[ "quite like an exact fit for this SE site. However,", "it really off-topic to ask for advice on how to", "now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really", "saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in", "number of technological solutions are available, each with their own", "it because it felt not quite like an exact fit", "or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it", "to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad))", "if anybody else has been in a similar situation and", "but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it", "However, when I saw that there were tags for both", "To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it", "academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had", "et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem", "was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget", "technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages and", "who works in academia has probably had the experience of", "anybody else has been in a similar situation and found", "closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before", "probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper they", "else has been in a similar situation and found a", "information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions are", "for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went", "is both part of the job and an information-management problem", "in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a", "problem is both part of the job and an information-management", "it felt not quite like an exact fit for this", "site. However, when I saw that there were tags for", "with the post. Let's face it, managing references is an", "were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured,", "both part of the job and an information-management problem for", "to see if anybody else has been in a similar", "to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see,", "to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to", "that worked well until recently, but now seems to be", "an exact fit for this SE site. However, when I", "ask for advice on how to manage this, or to", "recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is", "misplacing a research paper they later want to cite, or", "has been in a similar situation and found a workable", "references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who", "of misplacing a research paper they later want to cite,", "was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or", "in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et", "it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\")", "in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both", "SE site. However, when I saw that there were tags", "I had a method that worked well until recently, but", "own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had", "to ask for advice on how to manage this, or", "be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt", "that I had a method that worked well until recently,", "and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the", "hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite like", "works in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing", "an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in", "Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al", "post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part", "that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I", "each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is", "my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed", "disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method that", "research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where", "is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works", "of the job and an information-management problem for which a", "it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic life.", "problem for which a number of technological solutions are available,", "Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving", "felt not quite like an exact fit for this SE", "Solving this problem is both part of the job and", "advice on how to manage this, or to see if", "Anyone who works in academia has probably had the experience", "has probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper", "it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal", "which a number of technological solutions are available, each with", "because it felt not quite like an exact fit for", "later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it", "Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it", "for this SE site. However, when I saw that there", "the job and an information-management problem for which a number", "`[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with", "2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic", "cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was", "they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler", "exact fit for this SE site. However, when I saw", "there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt", "with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that", "are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My", "as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting", "newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest,", "for advice on how to manage this, or to see", "its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice", "seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic", "academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a research", "Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the", "`[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post.", "face it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic", "My question ([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library", "had the experience of misplacing a research paper they later", "until recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life.", "al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is", "Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on how", "(\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of", "Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as", "available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation", "a research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering", "a number of technological solutions are available, each with their", "iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I", "worked well until recently, but now seems to be reaching", "or to see if anybody else has been in a", "on how to manage this, or to see if anybody", "ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references is", "Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the job", "advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a", "off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it", "reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face it,", "job and an information-management problem for which a number of", "solutions are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages.", "Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein", "today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because", "see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets,", "part of the job and an information-management problem for which", "part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has", "they later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw", "& Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler,", "not quite like an exact fit for this SE site.", "a method that worked well until recently, but now seems", "this, or to see if anybody else has been in", "off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage this,", "of technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages", "went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references", "when I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]`", "both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead", "situation is that I had a method that worked well", "be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask", "misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein", "and went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing", "or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of", "want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's", "of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in", "([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library to my", "Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this", "I hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite", "where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein &", "sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was", "was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated", "felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face", "Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part of", "an information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions", "their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I", "and an information-management problem for which a number of technological", "for which a number of technological solutions are available, each", "fit for this SE site. However, when I saw that", "really off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage", "experience of misplacing a research paper they later want to", "how to manage this, or to see if anybody else", "manage this, or to see if anybody else has been", "I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's", "My situation is that I had a method that worked", "life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had the", "of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably", "Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part", "way to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer", "this problem is both part of the job and an", "to manage this, or to see if anybody else has", "before posting it because it felt not quite like an", "this SE site. However, when I saw that there were", "to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To", "is that I had a method that worked well until", "tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and", "managing references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone", "of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of", "reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for", "had a method that worked well until recently, but now", "posting it because it felt not quite like an exact", "it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was", "indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia", "the post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable", "library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today.", "the experience of misplacing a research paper they later want", "and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method", "like an exact fit for this SE site. However, when", "question ([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library to", "well until recently, but now seems to be reaching its", "I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and", "paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where they", "method that worked well until recently, but now seems to", "honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt not", "my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be", "see if anybody else has been in a similar situation", "been in a similar situation and found a workable solution?", "saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]`", "end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on", "Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals" ]
[ "to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of", "a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer", "questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused", "question (or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance", "questions give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e.,", "technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice.", "think this question adds value, and if any edits to", "*Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer", "great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of", "the questions are written in a panic on the day", "misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ,", "issue. To the extent that answers to these questions give", "relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic", "the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general", "have just been accused of cheating, or of some other", "to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular", "to the question would be useful. I am open to", "ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice", "and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality", "commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions are", "down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There", "on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of", "advice that can be given here, irrespective of the particular", "not be replicated in a canonical version of the question),", "can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at", "of the questions are written in a panic on the", "are a number of questions on Academia.SE from students who", "consists of telling the student to calm down and follow", "panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed].", "to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with", "of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great", "Advice often consists of telling the student to calm down", "that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece", "and if any edits to the question would be useful.", "particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system", "procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal", "canonical version of the question), that is usually technical advice", "just been accused of cheating, or of some other form", "editing the question (or my answer) if it would lead", "misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general advice", "extent that answers to these questions give advice that is", "would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this", "given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To", "student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of", "of valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective", "the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a", "on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is", "allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid", "here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the", "their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to", "specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated", "cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While the", "the extent that answers to these questions give advice that", "matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more", "a great deal of valid general advice that can be", "advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how", "computer system works) and arguably this is not material that", "[presently closed]. Please let me know if you think this", "focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on", "question would be useful. I am open to editing the", "how a particular computer system works) and arguably this is", "I am open to editing the question (or my answer)", "the question (or my answer) if it would lead to", "of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to", "than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice", "be replicated in a canonical version of the question), that", "of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that", "pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a", "advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here", "useful. I am open to editing the question (or my", "essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\".", "great deal of valid general advice that can be given", "more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical", "the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers", "a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let", "per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then", "accused of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct.", "canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently", "be useful. I am open to editing the question (or", "There are a number of questions on Academia.SE from students", "particular computer system works) and arguably this is not material", "deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of the", "is a great deal of valid general advice that can", "long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me", "academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice", "these questions give advice that is specific to the situation", "the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great", "to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in", "me know if you think this question adds value, and", "Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical", "advice given. Many of the questions are written in a", "with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please", "the advice given. Many of the questions are written in", "students who have just been accused of cheating, or of", "a particular computer system works) and arguably this is not", "advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would", "accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove", "other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations", "open to editing the question (or my answer) if it", "legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a", "of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While", "a great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many", "immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the", "would not be replicated in a canonical version of the", "There is a great deal of valid general advice that", "technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g.,", "the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a", "lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this class", "if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version", "is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of", "evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably", "Please let me know if you think this question adds", "acceptance as a canonical version of this class of question.", "irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent", "becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic", "any edits to the question would be useful. I am", "is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be", "are written in a panic on the day of the", "specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a", "can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling", "\"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student", "allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of", "replicated in a canonical version of the question), that is", "which would not be replicated in a canonical version of", "written in a panic on the day of the accusation,", "a panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially", "innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to calm", "To the extent that answers to these questions give advice", "am open to editing the question (or my answer) if", "who have just been accused of cheating, or of some", "follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a", "and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their", "closed]. Please let me know if you think this question", "would be useful. I am open to editing the question", "usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence", "my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a", "or of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics", "the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately", "a canonical version of the question), that is usually technical", "for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of", "to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters,", "a number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have", "of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general", "valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective of", "evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the", "advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin", "if you think this question adds value, and if any", "value, and if any edits to the question would be", "if any edits to the question would be useful. I", "While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there", "(or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as", "general advice that can be given here, irrespective of the", "version of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining", "the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the", "question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular", "of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can", "advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long", "differ, there is a great deal of commonality in the", "some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the", "number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just", "to these questions give advice that is specific to the", "in a panic on the day of the accusation, and", "day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student", "in a canonical version of the question), that is usually", "is not material that relates to academia per se. Rather", "this question adds value, and if any edits to the", "the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists", "the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is", "akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/)", "of telling the student to calm down and follow the", "matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed", "it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of", "this is not material that relates to academia per se.", "allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to these", "been accused of cheating, or of some other form of", "the student to calm down and follow the procedure for", "that answers to these questions give advice that is specific", "on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary", "to acceptance as a canonical version of this class of", "[proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice", "of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been", "often consists of telling the student to calm down and", "academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters,", "edits to the question would be useful. I am open", "advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you think", "system works) and arguably this is not material that relates", "Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of cheating,", "adds value, and if any edits to the question would", "circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality in", "situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical", "form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and", "answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know", "and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is", "telling the student to calm down and follow the procedure", "the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal", "that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not", "then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to", "question adds value, and if any edits to the question", "of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of", "there is a great deal of commonality in the advice", "se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes", "material that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing", "answers to these questions give advice that is specific to", "how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often", "that can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation", "on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how", "works) and arguably this is not material that relates to", "the question would be useful. I am open to editing", "that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on", "you think this question adds value, and if any edits", "at issue. To the extent that answers to these questions", "is a great deal of commonality in the advice given.", "calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct.", "in the advice given. Many of the questions are written", "give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which", "to editing the question (or my answer) if it would", "Many of the questions are written in a panic on", "know if you think this question adds value, and if", "not material that relates to academia per se. Rather than", "of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances", "(i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical version", "let me know if you think this question adds value,", "arguably this is not material that relates to academia *per", "from students who have just been accused of cheating, or", "questions are written in a panic on the day of", "is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving", "piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works)", "be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue.", "(e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably this", "student to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations", "giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if", "general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you", "particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to", "of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and", "and arguably this is not material that relates to academia", "given. Many of the questions are written in a panic", "of commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions", "deal of valid general advice that can be given here,", "answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical" ]
[ "on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires", "profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently", "restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To make", "containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will", "profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the", "So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to", "Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an", "when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last", "such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied", "too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow", "edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy,", "to this question should include a suggested update to our", "full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we", "upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing", "[generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different", "this is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted),", "policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our", "answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we", "and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing", "a suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale.", "sake, stop using anal as a variable or in a", "allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under", "score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will", "using anal as a variable or in a name!!` This", "be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should", "contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a", "words be spelled out in full when they are being", "earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted.", "unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and", "conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5", "anecdote in which the following line was added to a", "stop using anal as a variable or in a name!!`", "spelled out in full when they are being discussed. Here", "professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide.", "replies to this question should include a suggested update to", "site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites: as", "along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear", "Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not", "roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of answers;", "with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net", "according to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably,", "when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If", "added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using", "this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question", "Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full", "should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive", "was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according", "some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was", "so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on this?", "answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > >", "policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a", "was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we", "clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer,", "policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should", "include a suggested update to our policy, along with the", "contained an anecdote in which the following line was added", "> profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible,", "If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this", "what restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To", "in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to", "the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt", "in full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE,", "and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when", "a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove", "the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion,", "answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and earns", "at least a +5 net score, and earns twice as", "we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic", "answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was", "to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal", "was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop", "higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and", "sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\"", "be spelled out in full when they are being discussed.", "[discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: >", "> > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an", "our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains", "disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites:", "strongly suggest that replies to this question should include a", "any) should there be on this? To make this answerable,", "a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted", "> > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer", "example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in", "a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged", "correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to", "answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict", "different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that", "codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a", "`# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable", "a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which", "But, this is applied differently on different sites: as noted", "respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But,", "profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion?", "there be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly", "a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score,", "being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in", "as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words", "and germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what", "To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to", "\"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users (not", "was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in", "should there be on this? To make this answerable, I", "non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If so,", "on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that", "a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as", "> > profanity should be edited out of answers; if", "clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our", "edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be", "relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane", "our policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So:", "that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they", "discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this", "will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy", "[requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites)", "name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the", "(if any) should there be on this? To make this", "that replies to this question should include a suggested update", "(not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict", "and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be", "make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this", "was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of", "felt that our policy was too strict and should be", "when an answer contained an anecdote in which the following", "fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or in", "an answer contained an anecdote in which the following line", "differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE", "for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out", "should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a", "requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when", "as a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly", "discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014,", "is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on", "anal as a variable or in a name!!` This was", "with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy", "answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question should", "consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out", "StackExchange generally [requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is", "be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation", "germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions", "or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited", "the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there", "2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should", "noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be", "out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted.", "> Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained", "should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the", "discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be", "this question should include a suggested update to our policy,", "on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the", "existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that", "that our policy was too strict and should be relaxed.", "net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes", "the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users", "suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at", "be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and", "to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that", "as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no", "suggest that replies to this question should include a suggested", "is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for", "does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least", "least a +5 net score, and earns twice as many", "remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some", "recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our policy unchanged.", "should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer", "there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote", "the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any)", "answer contained an anecdote in which the following line was", "suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any", "to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if", "no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold,", "flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the", "(to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but", "This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\")", "but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy", "earns at least a +5 net score, and earns twice", "which the following line was added to a codebase: `#", "a +5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes", "policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our policy", "strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity", "rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does", "Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and", "they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed", "be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875)", "deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when", "a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep", "should include a suggested update to our policy, along with", "in which the following line was added to a codebase:", "applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example,", "topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should", "Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus", "users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too", "If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on", "as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a", "IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and should", "generally [requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally", "impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently,", "the following line was added to a codebase: `# For", "many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer", "out in full when they are being discussed. Here on", "line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake,", "adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches", "to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO)", "last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly:", "[here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled", "policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns", "in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity", "\"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they are", "this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies", "of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. >", "I strongly suggest that replies to this question should include", "twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If", "For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or", "this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > >", "are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164)", "not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a", "the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited", "an anecdote in which the following line was added to", "variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and", "that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with", "following line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's", "be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest", "downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear", "question should include a suggested update to our policy, along", "update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer", "we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was", "As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is", "[kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which the", "under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there", "if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > >", "+5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as", "and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be" ]
[ "of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and", "rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit", "mind, I ask in comments before. In the case of", "question is rather about making such large changes that remove", "just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the", "answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos,", "new (with or without the edit) so it should be", "In the case of that specific answer, I would just", "there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls", "to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove", "specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it.", "answer because it is better (say, an exception to an", "had in mind, I ask in comments before. In the", "and does not bring anything new (with or without the", "when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break", "links to references (without changing the reference), or add something", "to the answer because it is better (say, an exception", "for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what", "flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the", "substantial edits that change what the author had in mind,", "I add some links to references (without changing the reference),", "that change what the author had in mind, I ask", "be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes", "edit and the edit made sense - so my question", "before. In the case of that specific answer, I would", "changing the reference), or add something minor to the answer", "break walls of text. The other case is when I", "or without the edit) so it should be just downvoted", "I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the", "add some links to references (without changing the reference), or", "it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor", "for the edit and the edit made sense - so", "what the author had in mind, I ask in comments", "to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor", "was reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it", "The answer is very poor and does not bring anything", "math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change", "better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in", "just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK", "good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial", "got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is", "bring anything new (with or without the edit) so it", "(in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that", "answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was", "making substantial edits that change what the author had in", "Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained", "instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what the", "walls of text. The other case is when I add", "making such large changes that remove 80% of the content)", "the author had in mind, I ask in comments before.", "the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the", "made sense - so my question is rather about making", "rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits", "the edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion.", "in mind, I ask in comments before. In the case", "would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit", "minor to the answer because it is better (say, an", "the answer because it is better (say, an exception to", "and the edit made sense - so my question is", "(with or without the edit) so it should be just", "change what the author had in mind, I ask in", "is rather about making such large changes that remove 80%", "the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually", "it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good", "text. The other case is when I add some links", "to break walls of text. The other case is when", "about making such large changes that remove 80% of the", "of text. The other case is when I add some", "edits that change what the author had in mind, I", "rather about making such large changes that remove 80% of", "clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit made", "remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and", "a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the", "typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text.", "author had in mind, I ask in comments before. In", "an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for", "downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the", "edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to", "I avoid making substantial edits that change what the author", "the edit and the edit made sense - so my", "answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to", "the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly", "wrong, to break walls of text. The other case is", "should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect", "editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the", "case of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted", "explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit", "- so my question is rather about making such large", "my question is rather about making such large changes that", "edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the", "very poor and does not bring anything new (with or", "religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit", "when it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The", "is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule", "(the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and", "because it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise", "(say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math", "anything new (with or without the edit) so it should", "though. I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting", "I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is", "in comments before. In the case of that specific answer,", "add something minor to the answer because it is better", "are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of", "religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does not", "without the edit) so it should be just downvoted to", "aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when", "by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for", "reasons for the edit and the edit made sense -", "(without changing the reference), or add something minor to the", "is when I add some links to references (without changing", "so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the", "it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious", "edit made sense - so my question is rather about", "reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got", "not bring anything new (with or without the edit) so", "I ask in comments before. In the case of that", "case is when I add some links to references (without", "to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably,", "aspects. The answer is very poor and does not bring", "formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The other", "The other case is when I add some links to", "OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons", "references (without changing the reference), or add something minor to", "the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The", "when I add some links to references (without changing the", "is wrong, to break walls of text. The other case", "Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I", "other case is when I add some links to references", "the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are", "the reference), or add something minor to the answer because", "so my question is rather about making such large changes", "the edit made sense - so my question is rather", "an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited", "something minor to the answer because it is better (say,", "I was reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when", "does not bring anything new (with or without the edit)", "ask in comments before. In the case of that specific", "changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there", "an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid", "reference), or add something minor to the answer because it", "oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though.", "some links to references (without changing the reference), or add", "poor and does not bring anything new (with or without", "is very poor and does not bring anything new (with", "question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious", "usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong,", "otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making", "answer is very poor and does not bring anything new", "downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer", "considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos, the", "it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer", "to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I", "that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged", "exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)).", "or add something minor to the answer because it is", "comments before. In the case of that specific answer, I", "have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by", "sense - **so my question is rather about making such", "the case of that specific answer, I would just have", "the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does", "the reasons for the edit and the edit made sense", "and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules?", "avoid making substantial edits that change what the author had", "to references (without changing the reference), or add something minor", "(<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious aspects.", "edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very", "edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing" ]
[ "that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\"", "of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive)", "cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1", "apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is", "Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why", "apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the", "The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a", "a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied", "confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed", "ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms", "well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double", "is a good rule of thumb for the cost of", "question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted)", "then, closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is", "for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at", "this question: [What is a good rule of thumb for", "question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first", "(now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\"", "double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently", "a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to", "comment said that it is apparently a well known fact", "I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\"", "was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that", "known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the", "estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to", "the question, most likely out of spite. Is this childlike", "improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question,", "so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending,", "a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the", "Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know", "these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just", "[What is a good rule of thumb for the cost", "to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything,", "which did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then,", "me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And", "US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that", "that it is apparently a well known fact that the", "at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it", "a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The", "\"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate.", "an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is", "rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in", "of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the", "The first comment said that it is apparently a well", "Please, take look at this question: [What is a good", "agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is", "it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on.", "answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why?", "is to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact.", "deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And", "the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the", "Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first", "to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because", "just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely", "created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out", "wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a", "is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet,", "know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I", "did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed", "\"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach", "that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The", "know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to", "it is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark", "to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So", "at this question: [What is a good rule of thumb", "question: [What is a good rule of thumb for the", "I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did", "the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said", "also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know", "look at this question: [What is a good rule of", "So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to", "good rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc,", "condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created", "closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to", "And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these", "wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also", "salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is", "noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out of", "comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking", "appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve", "the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer", "is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate", "first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was", "replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not", "closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is this", "answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple,", "simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question", "to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course,", "is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted", "the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I", "upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed.", "not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the", "that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so", "most likely out of spite. Is this childlike behaviour appropriate?", "comments which did not improve anything, just created noise. People,", "asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's", "patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created noise.", "the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an", "Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments", "the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now", "first comment said that it is apparently a well known", "fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer", "estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms this", "ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately", "said that it is apparently a well known fact that", "course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which", "a good rule of thumb for the cost of a", "to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted", "People, then, closed the question, most likely out of spite.", "And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to", "R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently", "there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question.", "in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment", "this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon,", "question, most likely out of spite. Is this childlike behaviour", "Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments", "take look at this question: [What is a good rule", "the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there", "anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most", "\"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of", "thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US", "on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing", "to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark", "university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently a", "fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary." ]
[ "term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific", "the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies", "technology management and if yes what is the > proper", "not sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either", "be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there", "\"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > > \\", "actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in", "technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in", "better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are", "that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > >", "reality\\ in terms of research and technology management and if", "tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to", "in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and", "[technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived", "> Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly", "sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English", "thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms", "different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked", "ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places", "what is the > proper term for that (given that", "management and if yes what is the > proper term", "> > > Is there actually such a thing (maybe", "in terms of research and technology management and if yes", "for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to", "a graph. > > > Is there actually such a", "computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the", "question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we know", "specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the paper", "better places than Academia? My question: > > From computer", "there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable)", "and if yes what is the > proper term for", "Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia? My", "From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of", "maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia?", "the > proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\"", "games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the >", "English SE are better places than Academia? My question: >", "know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different", "than Academia? My question: > > From computer games like", "i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be", "this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than", "> conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > >", "places than Academia? My question: > > From computer games", "conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > > >", "research and technology management and if yes what is the", "proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is", "like Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology", "if yes what is the > proper term for that", "exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and", "games? > > > \\* Besides the paper citation graph", "to games? > > > \\* Besides the paper citation", "but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology", "of research and technology management and if yes what is", "> From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept", "where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE", "either English SE are better places than Academia? My question:", "a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in", "interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there actually", "> [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are >", "I'm not sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy", "(maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of", "not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research", "are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph. >", "that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games?", "comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management", "(given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? >", "concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and", "is the > proper term for that (given that the", "innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph.", "Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but", "the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are", "to be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is", "terms of research and technology management and if yes what", "in a graph. > > > Is there actually such", "we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e.", "> > Is there actually such a thing (maybe not", "are better places than Academia? My question: > > From", "My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we", "Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree),", "yes what is the > proper term for that (given", "SE are better places than Academia? My question: > >", "such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\", "term is specific to games? > > > \\ Besides", "> > From computer games like Civilizations, we know the", "of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations", "the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > >", "> proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term", "Academia? My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations,", "is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the", "graph. > > > Is there actually such a thing", "to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better", "and technology management and if yes what is the >", "and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a" ]
[ "reason I can think of is that the question is", "role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see", "in order to get a chance to rewrite the question,", "question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The", "I think that there is clear evidence that sites such", "what it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence", "was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think", "I would like to understand in order to get a", "question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think that", "get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For", "about a non-academic site. I would like to understand in", "about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only", "related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic on AcademiaSE.", "[Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic", "[ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so", "as off-topic. The only reason I can think of is", "is about a non-academic site. I would like to understand", "non-academic site. I would like to understand in order to", "like to understand in order to get a chance to", "why questions related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic", "questions related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic on", "so I don't see why questions related to these non-academic", "Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem", "such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in", "clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566)", "sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role", "question is about a non-academic site. I would like to", "The only reason I can think of is that the", "in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why", "rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I", "evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play", "I can think of is that the question is about", "think that there is clear evidence that sites such as", "a non-academic site. I would like to understand in order", "is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or", "the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions", "ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to", "that there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google", "that the question is about a non-academic site. I would", "understand in order to get a chance to rewrite the", "would like to understand in order to get a chance", "the question is about a non-academic site. I would like", "to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth,", "[my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic.", "I don't understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566)", "can think of is that the question is about a", "off-topic. The only reason I can think of is that", "that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a", "worth, I think that there is clear evidence that sites", "see why questions related to these non-academic sites would be", "only reason I can think of is that the question", "possible. For what it's worth, I think that there is", "if possible. For what it's worth, I think that there", "nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to these", "For what it's worth, I think that there is clear", "is that the question is about a non-academic site. I", "or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays,", "order to get a chance to rewrite the question, if", "of is that the question is about a non-academic site.", "to get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible.", "chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's", "a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what", "there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566)", "understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed", "site. I would like to understand in order to get", "closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think of", "as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the", "a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't", "knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I", "don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites would", "to understand in order to get a chance to rewrite", "academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related", "why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as", "I don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites", "the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think", "think of is that the question is about a non-academic", "Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason", "it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence that", "don't understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was", "panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can", "play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I" ]
[ "of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of", "parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation,", "that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for", "I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an", "I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to", "believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the", "incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are such", "misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online exam,", "whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something", "in that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic", "itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that", "are systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire", "(with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether", "the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post", "and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being", "where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed", "are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my", "about the use of the provided data), and they should", "exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts of", "questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically", "they should (in my opinion) be clear from the written", "post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying", "to post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with", "am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online", "exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly", "such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature", "or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This", "the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they", "of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and", "whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was", "questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical", "and they should (in my opinion) be clear from the", "logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are", "ask whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding", "use of the provided data), and they should (in my", "in nature (although, they are related to instructions about the", "accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they", "mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions about", "I recently sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe,", "Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they", "systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire exam.", "my end? (This was an online exam, so students are", "the provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be", "that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although,", "affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to", "exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on", "nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is it", "written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature,", "being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions", "are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related", "are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in", "clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are", "on-topic for me to post parts of the exam instructions", "on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether", "related to instructions about the use of the provided data),", "for me to post parts of the exam instructions and", "problems with the instructions and questions are such that the", "instructions about the use of the provided data), and they", "are related to instructions about the use of the provided", "something on my end? (This was an online exam, so", "the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the", "provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear", "context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are", "heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions", "flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect the", "the instructions and questions are such that the flaws are", "the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in", "Is it on-topic for me to post parts of the", "they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on", "problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end?", "of the provided data), and they should (in my opinion)", "an online exam, so students are free to download the", "instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of", "statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions", "entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts", "a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and", "on my end? (This was an online exam, so students", "of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic", "learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were", "the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect", "the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point", "the use of the provided data), and they should (in", "(in my opinion) be clear from the written language itself.", "they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me", "opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the", "in nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is", "online exam, so students are free to download the material.)", "point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions", "flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are", "and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and", "be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws", "flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems", "questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask", "to instructions about the use of the provided data), and", "they are related to instructions about the use of the", "instructions and questions are such that the flaws are not", "my opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore,", "(This was an online exam, so students are free to", "and questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally", "data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear from", "instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange", "recently sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the", "from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic", "sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions", "the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course)", "clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The", "end? (This was an online exam, so students are free", "was an online exam, so students are free to download", "The problems with the instructions and questions are such that", "me to post parts of the exam instructions and questions", "not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to", "were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent).", "language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in", "course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or", "and ask whether they are problematic or whether I am", "it on-topic for me to post parts of the exam", "academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether I", "should (in my opinion) be clear from the written language", "(although, they are related to instructions about the use of", "(to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with", "nature (although, they are related to instructions about the use", "with the instructions and questions are such that the flaws" ]
[ "attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts", "in spite of being closed. I wonder what others think", "overall now, which is incredible considering that it was much", "many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other", "about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also", "there are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual", "question) works as an answer for small publishers, since there", "works as an answer for small publishers, since there are", "them and they are often very similar to each other.", "identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer", "so many of them and they are often very similar", "now, which is incredible considering that it was much smaller", "and they are often very similar to each other. However,", "incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015).", "also has close to 100k views as of time of", "that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable", "is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the", "smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify", "for small publishers, since there are so many of them", "publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available", "publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small", "are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)).", "that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth", "to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an", "publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it was", "more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The", "was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How", "reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really", "[Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI", "Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's", "roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible", "in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals)", "biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it", "(~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory", "2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the", "but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable", "the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering", "facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question", "not voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI", "[annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views", "MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest", "to 100k views as of time of writing in spite", "other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They", "They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are", "are so many of them and they are often very", "answer for small publishers, since there are so many of", "to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's", "I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic", "considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's", "their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k", "that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works", "writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what others", "has close to 100k views as of time of writing", "spite of being closed. I wonder what others think about", "([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available (e.g.", "aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from", "there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention", "time of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder", "there are so many of them and they are often", "predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for", "attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more", "it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that", "which is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th", "publishers, since there are so many of them and they", "so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that", "It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is", "report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views as", "(e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to", "many of them and they are often very similar to", "It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\"", "since there are so many of them and they are", "of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon", "really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now,", "a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown", "very similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers", "The question also has close to 100k views as of", "arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question)", "often very similar to each other. However, there aren't many", "fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that", "as an answer for small publishers, since there are so", "available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close", "of being closed. I wonder what others think about this.", "an answer for small publishers, since there are so many", "I've not voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is", "(the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers,", "100k views as of time of writing in spite of", "MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and", "Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big.", "However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract", "of them and they are often very similar to each", "publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers", "voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a", "big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which", "are often very similar to each other. However, there aren't", "MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has", "views as of time of writing in spite of being", "of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)),", "small publishers, since there are so many of them and", "is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in", "similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of", "each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size.", "close to 100k views as of time of writing in", "size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there", "of time of writing in spite of being closed. I", "\"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers, since", "as of time of writing in spite of being closed.", "they are often very similar to each other. However, there", "and there are more facts about them available (e.g. their", "Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly", "them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has", "has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher", "from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about", "of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what", "thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher)", "much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to", "[How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as", "question also has close to 100k views as of time", "other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them", "grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall", "doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is" ]
[ "is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question", "left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the", "to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago.", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web", "relevant than the one linked by the question closer. Compare", "(the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of", "the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That", "organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer", "in the past year, to vote and find a consensus", "Note: After a fairly small edit to the title and", "is much more relevant than the one linked by the", "specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another", "an organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed", "a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from", "use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company", "several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same", "it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer", "on meta from a few years ago. The title of", "question is much more relevant than the one linked by", "if they are not on topic already.\" I think that", "important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on", "deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples", "software tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity,", "evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up a", "software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized", "about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service", "an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should", "of that meta question is, \"What to do with questions", "posed is not about evaluating an organization in general. It", "I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last", "'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are not", "shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now be", "title of that meta question is, \"What to do with", "that meta question is much more relevant than the one", "organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed is", "past year, to vote and find a consensus response by", "this nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After", "upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members. However,", "to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other", "work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that", "and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had", "is the right site for this kind of questions, and", "to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that", "when it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted", "I asked and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about", "closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this", "is not about evaluating an organization in general. It is", "top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to", "of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this", "specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of many", "checks) that have been left open on SE Academia over", "In contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software)", "available to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity", "Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service", "that have been left open on SE Academia over the", "web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The", "be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small", "online services?\", but the body of the question, and the", "That is: the examples in the meta question are all", "in the meta question are all of the form, \"Is", "amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic", "quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to", "'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that case,", "in general. That is: the examples in the meta question", "case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are", "question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a", "It is putting up a specific online web service, which", "integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this", "relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous", "meta from a few years ago. The title of that", "than the one linked by the question closer. Compare also", "issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when", "and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors", "other questions on SE in the past year, to vote", "asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of", "to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the", "are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to", "Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is", "about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up", "answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the", "another member, the given question has been reopened by community", "left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin),", "the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given", "answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the", "they are not on topic already.\" I think that meta", "linked by the question closer. Compare also to several questions", "academic integrity checks) that have been left open on SE", "a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now", "a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta", "the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if", "years ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What", "this kind of questions, and that we should amend the", "is not OK.\" But the question I posed is not", "ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What to", "right site for this kind of questions, and that we", "question is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate", "question' to make them on-topic if they are not on", "services?\", but the body of the question, and the accepted", "\"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question I", "are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And", "to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the", "this is the right site for this kind of questions,", "question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions", "is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an", "questions of this nature now be closed, or left open?", "members. However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\"", "Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a", "much more relevant than the one linked by the question", "online software tool, which relates to an issue of academic", "not on topic already.\" I think that meta question is", "issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all", "the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about", "e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about", "evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the question,", "last year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits", "is: the examples in the meta question are all of", "to close from community members. However, a moderator then closed", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented", "by another member, the given question has been reopened by", "a consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I", "think that meta question is much more relevant than the", "few years ago. The title of that meta question is,", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The title", "from community members. However, a moderator then closed it as", "point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on", "X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is,", "\"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software", "make them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\"", "body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with", "might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year,", "of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted", "to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\",", "should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg", "\"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes", "not OK.\" But the question I posed is not about", "highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is", "received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close", "topic already.\" I think that meta question is much more", "putting up a specific online web service, which is publicly", "no suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular", "question are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\".", "narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which relates", "intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes that,", "I think that meta question is much more relevant than", "organizations in general. That is: the examples in the meta", "question? Should all questions of this nature now be closed,", "the question I posed is not about evaluating an organization", "observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work", "linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few", "\"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes,", "questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body", "open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper),", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a", "years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question", "to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue", "same theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity", "meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization X", "any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which", "of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\"", "publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an important", "we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make", "\"I think that this is the right site for this", "close from community members. However, a moderator then closed it", "answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a", "the community here. In contrast, I might point to [this", "on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and", "from a few years ago. The title of that meta", "question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the", "of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it", "specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have", "a few years ago. The title of that meta question", "of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that", "a fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement", "closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin", "answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the", "another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that", "have been left open on SE Academia over the years,", "question I posed is not about evaluating an organization in", "been left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g.,", "all questions of this nature now be closed, or left", "and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has", "The title of that meta question is, \"What to do", "instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has", "small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another", "on the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping'", "meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What", "definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they", "summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not", "or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to", "academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\").", "with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the", "that meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking", "general. That is: the examples in the meta question are", "of this nature now be closed, or left open? Note:", "accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is:", "useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating", "the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions", "concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has been", "software tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics,", "of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are", "truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature", "number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community", "the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think", "consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I might", "then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to", "do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but", "here. In contrast, I might point to [this other meta", "up a specific online web service, which is publicly available", "whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from", "by the community here. In contrast, I might point to", "is putting up a specific online web service, which is", "But the question I posed is not about evaluating an", "theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks)", "on topic already.\" I think that meta question is much", "and find a consensus response by the community here. In", "particular online software tool, which relates to an issue of", "also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on", "that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to", "contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from", "vote and find a consensus response by the community here.", "with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in", "about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific", "SE in the past year, to vote and find a", "to make them on-topic if they are not on topic", "support academic integrity checks) that have been left open on", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What are", "query-statement by another member, the given question has been reopened", "and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question'", "should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them", "the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic", "a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the", "the past year, to vote and find a consensus response", "on SE in the past year, to vote and find", "the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused", "is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial", "The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no", "title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question", "company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number", "nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After a", "year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits of", "instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the", "suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator then", "form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of", "many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is", "issue which has had numerous other questions on SE in", "questions, and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping", "After a fairly small edit to the title and concluding", "the meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization", "questions when it comes to software?\". In that case, the", "not about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting", "by the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically", "tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been left", "meta question is much more relevant than the one linked", "examples in the meta question are all of the form,", "service (on the same theme, another specific online tool to", "question about a particular online software tool, which relates to", "service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question", "the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received", "closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit", "numerous other questions on SE in the past year, to", "to the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the", "to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question?", "it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services)", "had numerous other questions on SE in the past year,", "of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions", "which has had numerous other questions on SE in the", "as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on", "all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the", "from last year, on the issue of, \"What are the", "\"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from", "an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use", "the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization", "the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations", "open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the title", "one linked by the question closer. Compare also to several", "about a particular online software tool, which relates to an", "are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes", "Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online tool", "of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members.", "that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of", "response by the community here. In contrast, I might point", "questions on SE in the past year, to vote and", "other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of,", "for this kind of questions, and that we should amend", "community here. In contrast, I might point to [this other", "commercial online services?\", but the body of the question, and", "(on the same theme, another specific online tool to support", "question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in", "a specific online web service, which is publicly available to", "tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and", "Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool,", "think that this is the right site for this kind", "academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of", "Should all questions of this nature now be closed, or", "to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the", "that, \"I think that this is the right site for", "tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly", "limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In", "specific online web service, which is publicly available to any", "In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software", "which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a", "more relevant than the one linked by the question closer.", "now be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly", "to vote and find a consensus response by the community", "from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly", "already.\" I think that meta question is much more relevant", "Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and", "general. It is putting up a specific online web service,", "online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been", "comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes", "community members. However, a moderator then closed it as a", "over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a", "member, the given question has been reopened by community voting.", "to support academic integrity checks) that have been left open", "a particular online software tool, which relates to an issue", "year, to vote and find a consensus response by the", "the right site for this kind of questions, and that", "the body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal", "a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking", "the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online", "relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping", "which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to", "to the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I", "questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme,", "on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I think", "of questions, and that we should amend the definition of", "are not on topic already.\" I think that meta question", "integrity checks) that have been left open on SE Academia", "OK.\" But the question I posed is not about evaluating", "edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another member,", "summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right site", "an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions", "the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But", "the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\".", "has had numerous other questions on SE in the past", "web service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and", "asked and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether", "an organization in general. It is putting up a specific", "them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I", "And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an", "newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor", "that this is the right site for this kind of", "[this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue", "suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should", "kind of questions, and that we should amend the definition", "[this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The", "but the body of the question, and the accepted answer,", "assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in the", "organization in general. It is putting up a specific online", "SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin).", "a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which", "academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on SE", "and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online", "and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right", "I posed is not about evaluating an organization in general.", "\"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online", "the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary", "and no suggestions to close from community members. However, a", "that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools", "the same theme, another specific online tool to support academic", "the examples in the meta question are all of the", "However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question,", "of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing", "moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back", "online web service, which is publicly available to any instructor,", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity", "fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by", "service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates", "back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years", "find a consensus response by the community here. In contrast,", "meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking to", "site for this kind of questions, and that we should", "the one linked by the question closer. Compare also to", "and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general.", "academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the", "in general. It is putting up a specific online web" ]
[ "This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary", "screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image", "[Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I", "instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every", "to describe the scope of our site; for instance, a", "more informative (or at least it did at some point", "\"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic).", "for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server", "my life, what should I do\" site. This leads to", "for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about", "below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and", "informative (or at least it did at some point in", "for a \"you can ask about every possible study topic", "create a new account there just to verify that this", "feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to", "unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is", "want to create a new account there just to verify", "moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE", "verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to", "this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter", "even more informative (or at least it did at some", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks", "possible to customize the content of the \"how to ask\"", "accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some", "is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe the", "where it is even more informative (or at least it", "and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image", "is even more informative (or at least it did at", "hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible", "SE sites it is possible to customize the content of", "the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for", "of this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you", "Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description", "new account there just to verify that this screenshot from", "I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation", "a \"here's the story of my life, what should I", "(personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here", "how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even", "window that is shown to first-time askers. See below for", "that new posters are confused about the scope of this", "can ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or", "study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of", "mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every possible", "story of my life, what should I do\" site. This", "life, what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic", "add some text to describe the scope of our site;", "what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions,", "it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more", "don't want to create a new account there just to", "it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized).", "shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph", "how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault", "version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on", "on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at", "or a \"here's the story of my life, what should", "ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See below", "[help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion", "that is shown to first-time askers. See below for how", "is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is", "a new account there just to verify that this screenshot", "should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional", "confused about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking", "of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the", "askers. See below for how it looks like on Academia", "topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar", "quite often that new posters are confused about the scope", "pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was", "the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the", "some text to describe the scope of our site; for", "to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is", "it is even more informative (or at least it did", "--- I don't want to create a new account there", "scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version of", "a shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\"", "of my life, what should I do\" site. This leads", "in time --- I don't want to create a new", "point in time --- I don't want to create a", "describe the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter", "site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and", "\"here's the story of my life, what should I do\"", "and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it", "(non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter", "to create a new account there just to verify that", "questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers.", "from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it", "the story of my life, what should I do\" site.", "to add some text to describe the scope of our", "our site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What", "to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is", "of our site; for instance, a shorter version of the", "here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my life,", "posters are confused about the scope of this site, for", "off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from", "newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize the", "looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative", "like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or", "about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it", "that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate)", "it for a \"you can ask about every possible study", "See below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized)", "suggest to add some text to describe the scope of", "happens quite often that new posters are confused about the", "are confused about the scope of this site, for instance", "a \"you can ask about every possible study topic here\"", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like", "still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add", "do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work,", "some point in time --- I don't want to create", "the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version", "to customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window", "the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time", "the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help", "\"you can ask about every possible study topic here\" site,", "On SE sites it is possible to customize the content", "[Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was never", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on", "customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window that", "Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it", "like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image", "Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)", "instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should I", "\"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers.", "additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On", "site, or a \"here's the story of my life, what", "leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard", "Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at least", "site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics", "for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should", "should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers)", "Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)", "is shown to first-time askers. See below for how it", "there just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO", "It happens quite often that new posters are confused about", "often that new posters are confused about the scope of", "topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my", "ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or a", "did at some point in time --- I don't want", "I don't want to create a new account there just", "thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was never applied).", "of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to", "at some point in time --- I don't want to", "to first-time askers. See below for how it looks like", "work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites", "from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description", "just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers)", "it is possible to customize the content of the \"how", "shown to first-time askers. See below for how it looks", "about every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text", "to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings", "I suggest to add some text to describe the scope", "possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story", "text to describe the scope of our site; for instance,", "on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description", "least it did at some point in time --- I", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where", "avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow", "every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the", "time --- I don't want to create a new account", "on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately", "question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest", "site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask", "content of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown", "new posters are confused about the scope of this site,", "is possible to customize the content of the \"how to", "scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for a", "this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can", "I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on", "it did at some point in time --- I don't", "the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics,", "the content of the \"how to ask\" window that is", "(or at least it did at some point in time", "looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter", "account there just to verify that this screenshot from the", "sites it is possible to customize the content of the", "at least it did at some point in time ---", "paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe", "first-time askers. See below for how it looks like on" ]
[ "audience. However, these questions often can still be answered, usually", "and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close", "individuals as possible by trying to answer before the question", "/ Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about", "sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However,", "better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of", "My question is: is it better to try and maintain", "which is to some extent opinion-based and could be a", "hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site", "help as many of these individuals as possible by trying", "about doing the latter, especially if the user is new", "answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice,", "they depend too much on the individual who is asking", "most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could", "the question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore", "especially if the user is new to SE or clearly", "is similar to most academics\", which is to some extent", "given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to", "and could be a comment rather than an answer. However,", "new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world", "My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this", "and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia", "generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't", "Or is it better to try and help as many", "is: is it better to try and maintain the Stack", "are closed because they depend too much on the individual", "needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of what", "academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could be", "candidates for closure? Or is it better to try and", "--- This is my first question on Meta so any", "have been helpful to the OP. My question is: is", "on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to", "closed because they depend too much on the individual who", "answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful to", "asker doesn't know much about how academia works and needs", "amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that", "comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may still", "a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often", "user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the", "Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case,", "of SE over time? --- This is my first question", "many of these individuals as possible by trying to answer", "SE which are closed because they depend too much on", "this erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This", "especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much", "here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school)", "their own circle. But will this erode the purpose of", "\"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to", "the answer may still have been helpful to the OP.", "right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are", "to close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer", "We get many questions on Academia SE which are closed", "School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the OP's", "to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard", "to answer before the question is closed? I often wonder", "peers and mentors in their own circle. But will this", "to the OP. My question is: is it better to", "it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos", "\"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often no", "helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is", "which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better", "Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the", "the purpose of SE over time? --- This is my", "of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the", "to try and help as many of these individuals as", "A recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is", "too much on the individual who is asking and thus", "due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically", "to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and", "answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar", "is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an", "a quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm", "OP. My question is: is it better to try and", "may still have been helpful to the OP. My question", "question is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter,", "anyway where there is often no right answer) and therefore", "much about how academia works and needs a quick helping", "be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic", "thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a", "refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure?", "and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in", "case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality and", "get many questions on Academia SE which are closed because", "where there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain", "I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the", "answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious", "the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more", "recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My", "individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised", "try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions", "mentors in their own circle. But will this erode the", "time? --- This is my first question on Meta so", "often can still be answered, usually with a small amount", "quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing", "opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an answer.", "But will this erode the purpose of SE over time?", "of these individuals as possible by trying to answer before", "what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for", "site like Academia anyway where there is often no right", "or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not", "these individuals as possible by trying to answer before the", "possible by trying to answer before the question is closed?", "[Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In", "often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions", "in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from", "from peers and mentors in their own circle. But will", "by trying to answer before the question is closed? I", "on Academia SE which are closed because they depend too", "often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user", "is my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag", "and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to", "it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about how", "answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is", "with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if", "purpose of SE over time? --- This is my first", "question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits etc welcome!", "OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for", "the question is closed? I often wonder about doing the", "try and help as many of these individuals as possible", "know much about how academia works and needs a quick", "is it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange", "before the question is closed? I often wonder about doing", "Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on", "basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most", "receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle.", "still be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps)", "voting to close due to dependence on individual factors. The", "trying to answer before the question is closed? I often", "latter, especially if the user is new to SE or", "wider audience. However, these questions often can still be answered,", "clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving", "been helpful to the OP. My question is: is it", "However, the answer may still have been helpful to the", "to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and", "I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia", "(more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where", "academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and", "an obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence", "some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than", "the latter, especially if the user is new to SE", "obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence on", "be a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer", "hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is here:", "a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's", "for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question", "doing the latter, especially if the user is new to", "SE over time? --- This is my first question on", "obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their", "of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\"", "many questions on Academia SE which are closed because they", "is it better to try and help as many of", "small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear", "candidate for voting to close due to dependence on individual", "question is: is it better to try and maintain the", "Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult", "to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions", "are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to", "questions on Academia SE which are closed because they depend", "about how academia works and needs a quick helping hand.", "similar to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based", "because they depend too much on the individual who is", "who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to", "This is my first question on Meta so any feedback,", "be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often", "and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and", "answer before the question is closed? I often wonder about", "in their own circle. But will this erode the purpose", "is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering", "difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there", "better to try and help as many of these individuals", "about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious", "is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially", "is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic", "the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in", "be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience.", "can still be answered, usually with a small amount of", "it better to try and help as many of these", "helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often can", "obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to try", "ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a", "asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful", "down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which", "answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway", "inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance", "the asker doesn't know much about how academia works and", "these questions often can still be answered, usually with a", "could be a comment rather than an answer. However, the", "this case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality", "seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due to", "not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own", "the individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently", "advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know", "no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which", "the OP. My question is: is it better to try", "boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\",", "rather than an answer. However, the answer may still have", "helpful to the OP. My question is: is it better", "close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given", "and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates", "factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality", "usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially", "works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example", "question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems", "therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due", "a wider audience. However, these questions often can still be", "depend too much on the individual who is asking and", "questions often can still be answered, usually with a small", "In this case, the question is about the OP's personal", "dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down", "to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather", "questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like", "generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these", "on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is", "to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is", "will this erode the purpose of SE over time? ---", "first question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits etc", "wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user is", "the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate", "and help as many of these individuals as possible by", "However, these questions often can still be answered, usually with", "to a wider audience. However, these questions often can still", "of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good", "personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting", "The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is", "is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad", "still have been helpful to the OP. My question is:", "questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it", "as many of these individuals as possible by trying to", "is to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment", "as possible by trying to answer before the question is", "guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle. But", "over time? --- This is my first question on Meta", "closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if", "individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your", "(perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker", "much on the individual who is asking and thus cannot", "that the asker doesn't know much about how academia works", "Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the", "to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils", "world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors", "erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This is", "for closure? Or is it better to try and help", "Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is", "own circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE", "if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about", "a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may", "therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for", "example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality", "on the individual who is asking and thus cannot be", "the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers", "mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to", "and mentors in their own circle. But will this erode", "is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be", "maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers", "academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent", "clear that the asker doesn't know much about how academia", "Academia anyway where there is often no right answer) and", "from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or", "describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia /", "than an answer. However, the answer may still have been", "doesn't know much about how academia works and needs a", "an answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful", "and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of", "my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits", "answer may still have been helpful to the OP. My", "like Academia anyway where there is often no right answer)", "for voting to close due to dependence on individual factors.", "circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE over", "Academia SE which are closed because they depend too much", "extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an", "if the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced", "SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously", "mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to some", "there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from", "how academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A", "cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider", "closure? Or is it better to try and help as", "which are closed because they depend too much on the" ]
[ "not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that", "in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for you", "CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content", "on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only", "input on whether this was in scope for Academia stack", "on, but my question was going to be this: \"Why", "I wanted to ask a question about why this page", "I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to", "this page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations", "does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources)", "and I wanted some input on whether this was in", "have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on", "not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input", "be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not", "was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for", "going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on", "generic content sources) that I would expect to be part", "\"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly", "have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I", "question was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC", "about why this page on the CDC does not have", "which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my", "directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether", "of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure", "on whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange.", "sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but", "am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask", "ask it on, but my question was going to be", "this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you", "page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but", "a question about why this page on the CDC does", "wanted to ask a question about why this page on", "<https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange", "CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and", "to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am", "I would expect to be part of a scientific organization:", "wanted some input on whether this was in scope for", "ask a question about why this page on the CDC", "this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have", "whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank", "sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this", "content sources) that I would expect to be part of", "that I would expect to be part of a scientific", "to ask it on, but my question was going to", "to ask a question about why this page on the", "the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic", "quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on,", "reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some", "citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this was", "it on, but my question was going to be this:", "this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\",", "(but only generic content sources) that I would expect to", "was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page", "my question was going to be this: \"Why does this", "be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not", "citations (but only generic content sources) that I would expect", "page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I", "would expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>.", "why this page on the CDC does not have rigorous", "sources) that I would expect to be part of a", "to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections", "I wanted some input on whether this was in scope", "stack exchange to ask it on, but my question was", "scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for you input.", "a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which", "exchange to ask it on, but my question was going", "exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my question", "some input on whether this was in scope for Academia", "rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I would", "scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact", "only generic content sources) that I would expect to be", "question about why this page on the CDC does not", "expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I", "organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack", "does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced", "part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite", "not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it", "on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted", "but my question was going to be this: \"Why does" ]
[ "same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I", "tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a", "and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made", "is used on only twelve questions (two of which are", "old, is used on only twelve questions (two of which", "to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "description, and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "no tag description, and seems to cover the same topics", "very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be", "a year old, is used on only twelve questions (two", "also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year", "be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\").", "questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The", "as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that", "tag description, and seems to cover the same topics as", "questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\")", "The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old,", "noticed two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "has no tag description, and seems to cover the same", "— [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used on", "but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and", "topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest", "'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover the", "which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")),", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")", "less than a year old, is used on only twelve", "that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym", "(two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\").", "cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\").", "tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is", "'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less", "questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to", "distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and", "tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag", "the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So,", "are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has", "I noticed two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems", "of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "used on only twelve questions (two of which are also", "on only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged", "seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "than a year old, is used on only twelve questions", "twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\")", "is less than a year old, is used on only", "year old, is used on only twelve questions (two of", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of", "tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag", "only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with", "tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is", "tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover", "with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description," ]
[ "The description is even less accurate for (most) community college", "in their respective discipline. > > > I don't really", "accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their respective", "discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition: >", "While I know I could edit the tag myself, it", "an important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here", "to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research],", "As a starting point for discussion, here is a draft", "could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the", "\"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references", "tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic", "be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at", "that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged", "seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured", "definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is:", "[associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an", "highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their", "Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities", "> > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\"", "don't really like this definition because it seems to be", "and an expert in their respective discipline. > > >", "> I don't really like this definition because it seems", "really like this definition because it seems to be (1)", "professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research,", "is a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries", "I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting", "definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2)", "college professors. While I know I could edit the tag", "include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and", "accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know I", "like this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing", "is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per", "and removing references to other tags, which I have since", "of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: >", "professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct)", "expert in their respective discipline. > > > I don't", "point for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative", "> Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized", "I have since learned do not belong in tag usage", "> > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job", "staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and", "the community for such an important tag. As a starting", "(ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which", "academic and an expert in their respective discipline. > >", "> > I don't really like this definition because it", "teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is", "tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries", "recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline. >", "community college professors. While I know I could edit the", "tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or", "members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities].", "tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is a", "the liberal arts college at which I teach are experts", "responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor],", "an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's", "do not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries", "whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See", "for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition:", "in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors,", "an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty]", "learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: > >", "'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly", "See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update", "I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description", "comment) and removing references to other tags, which I have", "disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most) community", "definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and", "professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching],", "which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The", "references to other tags, which I have since learned do", "less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know", "it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on", "discipline. > > > I don't really like this definition", "also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here", "teaching, and service. > > > I have made the", "with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to", "a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating", "I noticed that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show", "a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in", "this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and", "description is even less accurate for (most) community college professors.", "@Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which I", "noticed that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions", "research, teaching, and service. > > > I have made", "professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert", "> > > I don't really like this definition because", "tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such", "guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members", "(per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which", "is even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While", "whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. >", "tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a", "an expert in their respective discipline. > > > I", "to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors", "is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished", "here is a draft of an alternative definition: > >", "definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose", "to other tags, which I have since learned do not", "responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > > >", "because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused", "experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even less", "arts college at which I teach are experts in their", "alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members", "liberal arts college at which I teach are experts in", "are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even", "which I have since learned do not belong in tag", "draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to", "(1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research", "the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\")", "belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to", "professors. While I know I could edit the tag myself,", "respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most)", "(most) community college professors. While I know I could edit", "may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor],", "[service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > >", "> > > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing", "and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > >", "\"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other", "\"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to", "in their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate", "members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service.", "and recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline.", "I don't really like this definition because it seems to", "starting point for discussion, here is a draft of an", "Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts", "[assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is", "seemed worth consulting the community for such an important tag.", "community for such an important tag. As a starting point", "to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an", "professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at", "relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may", "and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not", "it seemed worth consulting the community for such an important", "have since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance:", "aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities.", "for such an important tag. As a starting point for", "relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include", "I know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed", "include research, teaching, and service. > > > I have", "> Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with", "focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors", "myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such an", "job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > >", "know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth", "of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors,", "or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I", "their respective discipline. > > > I don't really like", "at which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines.", "respective discipline. > > > I don't really like this", "edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community", "Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\"", "their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for", "[teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. >", "Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may", "replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing", "may include research, teaching, and service. > > > I", "> > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose", "academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching,", "staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags,", "[professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved definition,", "universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal", "consulting the community for such an important tag. As a", "at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at", "not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating", "[faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and", "important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is", "the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > >", "such an important tag. As a starting point for discussion,", "tags, which I have since learned do not belong in", "(2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all", "all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college", "> Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities", "at the liberal arts college at which I teach are", "to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include", "since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: >", "the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for", "usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff", "even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I", "related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and", "adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I teach", "other tags, which I have since learned do not belong", "improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment)", "[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related", "Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic", "college at which I teach are experts in their respective", "and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved", "job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also", "> Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job", "a starting point for discussion, here is a draft of", "on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked", "and service. > > > I have made the edit.", "questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors,", "[research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus].", "for (most) community college professors. While I know I could", "> > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and", "Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic", "research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the", "worth consulting the community for such an important tag. As", "removing references to other tags, which I have since learned" ]
[ "and respectful community. My issue is the following: I have", "noticed that a lot of questions get answered very fast", "might be answered competently by quite a few users (also", "great resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue", "not be fair for veteran users (who don't really need", "able to answer, simply because it isn't related to a", "people will read it in the end. This is especially", "interact more with the site, growing the community. This question", "answer first and in turn earn reputation that will enable", "(who don't really need the reputation boost that a well", "and I wonder if it would not be fair for", "questions require only one answer and subsequent users will not", "enable them to act and interact more with the site,", "to be a great resource and a nice and respectful", "end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions,", "bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those", "answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty or", "because it isn't related to a specialty or to the", "to a specialty or to the inner workings of a", "act and interact more with the site, growing the community.", "new ones), and I wonder if it would not be", "or even only answer — because some questions require only", "community. This question is by no means intended to offend", "and interact more with the site, growing the community. This", "in them having the highest voted or even only answer", "kind of questions that are easier to contribute to, to", "when answering those kind of questions that are easier to", "give newer users (who might not visit the site as", "some questions require only one answer and subsequent users will", "is posted, the more people will read it in the", "resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue is", "specific institution or country. These questions might be answered competently", "to wait a bit longer when answering those kind of", "is by no means intended to offend those veteran users", "of a specific institution or country. These questions might be", "means intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect", "I wonder if it would not be fair for veteran", "longer when answering those kind of questions that are easier", "the highest voted or even only answer — because some", "it in the end. This is especially true for \"easy", "that a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait", "only one answer and subsequent users will not want to", "I would call veteran users with high and very high", "boost that a well received answer might bring anymore) to", "answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of people", "the following: I have noticed that a lot of questions", "have found it to be a great resource and a", "a nice and respectful community. My issue is the following:", "with high and very high reputation, often resulting in them", "to the inner workings of a specific institution or country.", "an hour of posting the question) by what I would", "a bit longer when answering those kind of questions that", "of questions get answered very fast (within an hour of", "to give newer users (who might not visit the site", "question is by no means intended to offend those veteran", "I am fairly new to Academia SE and have found", "or I guess also, because the earlier an answer is", "users will not want to post an identical one, or", "veteran users with high and very high reputation, often resulting", "voted or even only answer — because some questions require", "This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that", "These questions might be answered competently by quite a few", "the question) by what I would call veteran users with", "that are easier to contribute to, to give newer users", "only answer — because some questions require only one answer", "issue is the following: I have noticed that a lot", "guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the", "that a lot of people might be able to answer,", "answered competently by quite a few users (also new ones),", "users with high and very high reputation, often resulting in", "that a lot of questions get answered very fast (within", "new to Academia SE and have found it to be", "Academia SE and have found it to be a great", "would not be fair for veteran users (who don't really", "a specific institution or country. These questions might be answered", "reputation boost that a well received answer might bring anymore)", "My issue is the following: I have noticed that a", "answering those kind of questions that are easier to contribute", "earlier an answer is posted, the more people will read", "(who might not visit the site as frequently) the chance", "found it to be a great resource and a nice", "of posting the question) by what I would call veteran", "by quite a few users (also new ones), and I", "that is answers that a lot of people might be", "visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer first", "resulting in them having the highest voted or even only", "contribute to, to give newer users (who might not visit", "or to the inner workings of a specific institution or", "\"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot", "and a nice and respectful community. My issue is the", "is answers that a lot of people might be able", "ones), and I wonder if it would not be fair", "reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted or", "high and very high reputation, often resulting in them having", "questions might be answered competently by quite a few users", "and very high reputation, often resulting in them having the", "bit longer when answering those kind of questions that are", "to, to give newer users (who might not visit the", "veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost that", "answer — because some questions require only one answer and", "lot of people might be able to answer, simply because", "want to post an identical one, or I guess also,", "to Academia SE and have found it to be a", "by no means intended to offend those veteran users or", "having the highest voted or even only answer — because", "SE and have found it to be a great resource", "lot of questions get answered very fast (within an hour", "nice and respectful community. My issue is the following: I", "don't really need the reputation boost that a well received", "it isn't related to a specialty or to the inner", "not want to post an identical one, or I guess", "inner workings of a specific institution or country. These questions", "have noticed that a lot of questions get answered very", "it to be a great resource and a nice and", "fairly new to Academia SE and have found it to", "be a great resource and a nice and respectful community.", "will read it in the end. This is especially true", "users (who might not visit the site as frequently) the", "might not visit the site as frequently) the chance to", "the end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\"", "very high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest", "to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of", "institution or country. These questions might be answered competently by", "those kind of questions that are easier to contribute to,", "the chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation", "will enable them to act and interact more with the", "really need the reputation boost that a well received answer", "reputation that will enable them to act and interact more", "the reputation boost that a well received answer might bring", "community. My issue is the following: I have noticed that", "a specialty or to the inner workings of a specific", "fair for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation", "in turn earn reputation that will enable them to act", "users (also new ones), and I wonder if it would", "with the site, growing the community. This question is by", "posting the question) by what I would call veteran users", "post an identical one, or I guess also, because the", "to contribute to, to give newer users (who might not", "need the reputation boost that a well received answer might", "turn earn reputation that will enable them to act and", "often resulting in them having the highest voted or even", "to answer first and in turn earn reputation that will", "them to act and interact more with the site, growing", "to post an identical one, or I guess also, because", "newer users (who might not visit the site as frequently)", "intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their", "what I would call veteran users with high and very", "answer and subsequent users will not want to post an", "the inner workings of a specific institution or country. These", "especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers", "would call veteran users with high and very high reputation,", "first and in turn earn reputation that will enable them", "subsequent users will not want to post an identical one,", "am fairly new to Academia SE and have found it", "identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier an", "be able to answer, simply because it isn't related to", "one, or I guess also, because the earlier an answer", "specialty or to the inner workings of a specific institution", "an identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier", "high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted", "chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation that", "simply because it isn't related to a specialty or to", "hour of posting the question) by what I would call", "a few users (also new ones), and I wonder if", "anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those kind", "frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn earn", "site, growing the community. This question is by no means", "no means intended to offend those veteran users or to", "call veteran users with high and very high reputation, often", "veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant and helpful", "answers that a lot of people might be able to", "are easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who", "more people will read it in the end. This is", "questions that are easier to contribute to, to give newer", "read it in the end. This is especially true for", "true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that", "be answered competently by quite a few users (also new", "for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a", "few users (also new ones), and I wonder if it", "an answer is posted, the more people will read it", "the site as frequently) the chance to answer first and", "people might be able to answer, simply because it isn't", "the earlier an answer is posted, the more people will", "posted, the more people will read it in the end.", "very fast (within an hour of posting the question) by", "or country. These questions might be answered competently by quite", "questions get answered very fast (within an hour of posting", "even only answer — because some questions require only one", "for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost", "require only one answer and subsequent users will not want", "because the earlier an answer is posted, the more people", "in the end. This is especially true for \"easy to", "isn't related to a specialty or to the inner workings", "more with the site, growing the community. This question is", "highest voted or even only answer — because some questions", "to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often", "them having the highest voted or even only answer —", "also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the more", "country. These questions might be answered competently by quite a", "easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who might", "a lot of people might be able to answer, simply", "offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant", "and in turn earn reputation that will enable them to", "growing the community. This question is by no means intended", "if it would not be fair for veteran users (who", "is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is", "answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when", "workings of a specific institution or country. These questions might", "site as frequently) the chance to answer first and in", "competently by quite a few users (also new ones), and", "that will enable them to act and interact more with", "is the following: I have noticed that a lot of", "might be able to answer, simply because it isn't related", "the site, growing the community. This question is by no", "those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant and", "I guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted,", "to act and interact more with the site, growing the", "a great resource and a nice and respectful community. My", "a lot of questions get answered very fast (within an", "users or to disrespect their often brilliant and helpful insight.", "following: I have noticed that a lot of questions get", "as frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn", "(also new ones), and I wonder if it would not", "fast (within an hour of posting the question) by what", "one answer and subsequent users will not want to post", "quite a few users (also new ones), and I wonder", "questions, that is answers that a lot of people might", "to answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty", "This question is by no means intended to offend those", "— because some questions require only one answer and subsequent", "get answered very fast (within an hour of posting the", "question) by what I would call veteran users with high", "of questions that are easier to contribute to, to give", "be fair for veteran users (who don't really need the", "of people might be able to answer, simply because it", "wonder if it would not be fair for veteran users", "answer is posted, the more people will read it in", "and subsequent users will not want to post an identical", "the more people will read it in the end. This", "will not want to post an identical one, or I", "by what I would call veteran users with high and", "I have noticed that a lot of questions get answered", "(within an hour of posting the question) by what I", "it would not be fair for veteran users (who don't", "related to a specialty or to the inner workings of", "and have found it to be a great resource and", "wait a bit longer when answering those kind of questions", "earn reputation that will enable them to act and interact", "respectful community. My issue is the following: I have noticed", "well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit", "users (who don't really need the reputation boost that a", "the community. This question is by no means intended to", "because some questions require only one answer and subsequent users", "not visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer", "received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer", "a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a", "might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering", "answered very fast (within an hour of posting the question)" ]
[ "the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states", "is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well", "so well documented. And we are clearly not the only", "I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions", "be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post", "I do not claim to be better than the rest", "it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at", "to improve in this area. (Important: please do not go", "to improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective", "on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a", "am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I", "and do not worry about making our answers as data-", "reflect on this feedback from an external user and try", "Looking back at my post history I am myself guilty", "often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do", "we need to improve. I don't mean to strike down", "suggests that these answers become a lot better if they", "of this sin, so I do not claim to be", "as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers", "user and try to improve in this area. (Important: please", "they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree", "answers become a lot better if they share experiences over", "to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can", "not because they offer any useful insight, but because the", "any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the", "worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as", "I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall.", "to have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt", "that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers", "this sin, so I do not claim to be better", "post history I am myself guilty multiple times of this", "than the rest of the community. But I think that", "so I do not claim to be better than the", "many answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it", "useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions", "as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in", "well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many", "> > My opinion is that this strikes an open", "this strikes an open wound and identifies an area where", "provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based", "our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be", "references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems", "opinion. > > > My opinion is that this strikes", "we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and", "lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and are", "an area where we need to improve. I don't mean", "they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas", "with this concern; for instance, I would guess that most", "back at my post history I am myself guilty multiple", "any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer", "not worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed", "feedback from an external user and try to improve in", "not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is", "just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that", "many cases. Looking back at my post history I am", "and identifies an area where we need to improve. I", "with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an", "and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases.", "non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating", "of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions", "open wound and identifies an area where we need to", "is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or", "would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my", "It seems to me that we often disregard these good", "this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that", "of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to", "enough to have a correct answer, and the answers, well,", "suggestions, or are in areas that are not so well", "better if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed", "times of this sin, so I do not claim to", "answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it is", "sin, so I do not claim to be better than", "(Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer", "My opinion is that this strikes an open wound and", "where we need to improve. I don't mean to strike", "The paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined", "I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so", "almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not", "that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive", "my post history I am myself guilty multiple times of", "as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back", "are not so well documented. And we are clearly not", "practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about making", "these answers become a lot better if they share experiences", "Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking", "opinions, and are backed up with facts and references rather", "need to improve. I don't mean to strike down on", "practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are not", "it is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE", "> My opinion is that this strikes an open wound", "is that the questions are well-defined enough to have a", "is that this strikes an open wound and identifies an", "upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest", "answers can still have a positive role, when they identify", "this concern; for instance, I would guess that most of", "points in different ways; it is telling that the answers", "in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is", "this feedback from an external user and try to improve", "--- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions", "be better than the rest of the community. But I", "never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because", "impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice on", "multiple times of this sin, so I do not claim", "And we are clearly not the only SE site with", "with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer", "mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers", "to me that we often disregard these good practices on", "are in areas that are not so well documented. And", "references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer any", "try to improve in this area. (Important: please do not", "Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult", "good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about", "identifies an area where we need to improve. I don't", "highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an", "the rest of the community. But I think that we", "questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot better", "MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is", "that these answers become a lot better if they share", "area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO", "it is very different in style from MO and other", "attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion", "simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion is", "of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is", "and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It", "rest of the community. But I think that we should", "because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often,", "and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that", "subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot", "community. But I think that we should reflect on this", "have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they", "seems to me that we often disregard these good practices", "can still have a positive role, when they identify good", "to be better than the rest of the community. But", "go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult", "different in style from MO and other SE sites. The", "the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer,", "identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that", "has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/),", "discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular", "more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as", "The answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful", "is that it is very different in style from MO", "questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to", "when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in", "and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become", "opinion is that this strikes an open wound and identifies", "flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various", "it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions,", "good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are", "would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and", "is quite short and simply states an opinion. > >", "of the community. But I think that we should reflect", "is very different in style from MO and other SE", "in style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm", "deserves some attention, in my view: > > The problem", "topics, and do not worry about making our answers as", "Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when they", "have many answers repeating various talking points in different ways;", "in areas that are not so well documented. And we", "still have a positive role, when they identify good practices", "difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has some", "and are backed up with facts and references rather than", "if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up", "Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: >", "an open wound and identifies an area where we need", "a lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and", "area where we need to improve. I don't mean to", "forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions", "> The problem with academia.SE is that it is very", "instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective", "data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many", "it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for", "answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and", "facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\".", "cases. Looking back at my post history I am myself", "correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it.", "is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has", "clearly not the only SE site with this concern; for", "critical answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in", "well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the answers,", "not so well documented. And we are clearly not the", "the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get", "Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply", "role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are", "answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight,", "backed up with facts and references rather than just \"because", "criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who", "difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if", "the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the", "that this strikes an open wound and identifies an area", "[good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these", "documented. And we are clearly not the only SE site", "get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote", "on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that", "opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite", "various talking points in different ways; it is telling that", "reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad", "improve in this area. (Important: please do not go and", "and answers where it is difficult or impossible to give", "the community. But I think that we should reflect on", "that we should reflect on this feedback from an external", "from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE", "subjective topics, and do not worry about making our answers", "are backed up with facts and references rather than just", "an expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard", "and try to improve in this area. (Important: please do", "questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible to", "become a lot better if they share experiences over opinions,", "attention, in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE", "quite short and simply states an opinion. > > >", "The problem with academia.SE is that it is very different", "are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the", "improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers", "but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there.", "don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective", "overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when", "on subjective topics, and do not worry about making our", "that it is very different in style from MO and", "states an opinion. > > > My opinion is that", "get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but", "answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE", "to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we", "at my post history I am myself guilty multiple times", "Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > > The", "share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts", "upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an opinion.", "questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking points", "SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective", "subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive", "Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism", "an opinion. > > > My opinion is that this", "subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible", "different ways; it is telling that the answers almost never", "experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts and", "should reflect on this feedback from an external user and", "an external user and try to improve in this area.", "agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted", "concern; for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE", "bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a", "expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short", "for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is", "there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and", "\"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we", "the only SE site with this concern; for instance, I", "rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to", "style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of", "think that we should reflect on this feedback from an", "my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that", "where it is difficult or impossible to give a reference.", "problem with academia.SE is that it is very different in", "and simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion", "experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking", "advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests", "repeating various talking points in different ways; it is telling", "I think that we should reflect on this feedback from", "a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish.", "constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those", "are clearly not the only SE site with this concern;", "claim to be better than the rest of the community.", "or suggestions, or are in areas that are not so", "upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but because", "a positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions,", "Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend", "have a positive role, when they identify good practices or", "answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of", "some attention, in my view: > > The problem with", "the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is", "guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do not", "Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as", "sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions are", "external user and try to improve in this area. (Important:", "give a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective", "from an external user and try to improve in this", "from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > >", "academia.SE is that it is very different in style from", "in different ways; it is telling that the answers almost", "tend to have many answers repeating various talking points in", "that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where", "disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do not", "on this feedback from an external user and try to", "very different in style from MO and other SE sites.", "is telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations.", "strikes an open wound and identifies an area where we", "answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my", "and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who provide", "I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we often", "a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide", "do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it", "subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers", "please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer ---", "answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted", "telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The", "well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a", "paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough", "guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers", "> > The problem with academia.SE is that it is", "SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions", "on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view:", "answer is quite short and simply states an opinion. >", "most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it", "strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still", "talking points in different ways; it is telling that the", "to give a reference. SE has some advice on [good", "myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do", "to have many answers repeating various talking points in different", "over opinions, and are backed up with facts and references", "we should reflect on this feedback from an external user", "that are not so well documented. And we are clearly", "about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it", "other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the", "But I think that we should reflect on this feedback", "downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get", "that the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct", "or are in areas that are not so well documented.", "me that we often disregard these good practices on subjective", "positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or", "areas that are not so well documented. And we are", "view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that it", "to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum.", "[This critical answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention,", "ways; it is telling that the answers almost never have", "short and simply states an opinion. > > > My", "insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed", "do not claim to be better than the rest of", "wound and identifies an area where we need to improve.", "down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have", "it is telling that the answers almost never have any", "with academia.SE is that it is very different in style", "and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is", "do not worry about making our answers as data- and", "answers where it is difficult or impossible to give a", "than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me", "and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to", "in this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote", "answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role,", "that we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics,", "better than the rest of the community. But I think", "have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to", "> > > My opinion is that this strikes an", "or impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice", "the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more", "history I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin,", "not claim to be better than the rest of the", "SE site with this concern; for instance, I would guess", "these good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry", "not the only SE site with this concern; for instance,", "site with this concern; for instance, I would guess that", "offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with", "only SE site with this concern; for instance, I would", "questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and", "suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who provide them.)", "is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement", "they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with", "making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would", "well documented. And we are clearly not the only SE", "expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard these", "up with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm", "SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to have", "possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post history", "we are clearly not the only SE site with this", "a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and", "in many cases. Looking back at my post history I", "some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and", "and suggests that these answers become a lot better if", "as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have", "because they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters", "answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible," ]
[ "account to ask a question on this exchange, since I", "it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email", "to keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon", "verification, it seems to be linked to my account now.", "since I wanted to keep it separate from my personal", "to be linked to my account now. Is there a", "wanted to keep it separate from my personal account. However,", "personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to", "I wanted to keep it separate from my personal account.", "to ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted", "completing email verification, it seems to be linked to my", "it seems to be linked to my account now. Is", "now. Is there a way to dissociate a question from", "dissociate a question from my account after it's been linked?", "account now. Is there a way to dissociate a question", "keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing", "email verification, it seems to be linked to my account", "Is there a way to dissociate a question from my", "be linked to my account now. Is there a way", "question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it", "my account now. Is there a way to dissociate a", "to my account now. Is there a way to dissociate", "made a \"burner\" account to ask a question on this", "a \"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange,", "a question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep", "\"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange, since", "on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate", "there a way to dissociate a question from my account", "linked to my account now. Is there a way to", "way to dissociate a question from my account after it's", "my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems", "separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification,", "I made a \"burner\" account to ask a question on", "a way to dissociate a question from my account after", "account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be", "exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from my", "upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked to", "However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked", "this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from", "to dissociate a question from my account after it's been", "from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it", "seems to be linked to my account now. Is there", "ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted to" ]
[ "high around this subject area and due to the specific", "of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the", "question, rather than the argument about research content. The author", "the answer writer to respond here and that the direction", "often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough", "to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the", "is what detracts from the value. This is not the", "discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the", "[Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to", "and there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive", "such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer", "the answer writer or with their consent, or * If", "content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected that", "the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter", "to respond here and that the direction either be: ", "policy of this site to avoid discussion of the [content", "about EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical", "consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on", "than the argument about research content. The author of the", "[dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather than", "meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit", "for improving the answer by focusing it on the response", "the response to the OP's question, rather than the argument", "this [highly active question about how to respond to misrepresentation", "being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there", "than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame", "useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I see", "specific position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising", "effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose that", "EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/),", "not the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes:", "discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent, or", "than the broad area. Because passions are high around this", "question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733),", "edit, however. The leaves a question of what to do", "@cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to bring", "information to know what scientific content is actually involved, other", "scientific substance of the matter rather than on the question", "know what scientific content is actually involved, other than the", "as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think", "not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy", "question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a", "If the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete", " Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer", "subject area and due to the specific position taken by", "answer where it addresses the actual question of the OP,", "the edit, however. The leaves a question of what to", "to the specific position taken by the answer author, it", "would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard", "like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community", "to take is to ask the answer writer to respond", "research content discussion, by the answer writer or with their", "content discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent,", "Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I", "area and due to the specific position taken by the", "@cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by", "not enough information to know what scientific content is actually", "enough information to know what scientific content is actually involved,", "(deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content is", "area. Because passions are high around this subject area and", "Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer", "of this site to avoid discussion of the [content of", "leaves a question of what to do about the controversial", "question are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately)", "position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that", "has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a", "the specific position taken by the answer author, it is", "around this subject area and due to the specific position", "here and that the direction either be: * Edit to", "per the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion", "controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for", "standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of the", "proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on the", "is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In", "I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer", "Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to avoid", "be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy", "2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally,", "to ask the answer writer to respond here and that", "rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While", "\"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this", "of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it", "taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this", "reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on", "answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather", "there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific", "a question of what to do about the controversial answer,", "venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would", "question about EUA processes: that would be better taken to", "will be useful to bring this to meta for discussion.", "unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe", "avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to", "are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not", "the argument about research content. The author of the answer", "take is to ask the answer writer to respond here", "answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would", "of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting", "by focusing it on the response to the OP's question,", "bring this to meta for discussion. I see three general", "of what to do about the controversial answer, and per", "other than the broad area. Because passions are high around", "discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see", "on the response to the OP's question, rather than the", "Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content", "OP's question, rather than the argument about research content. The", "content is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because", "In this [highly active question about how to respond to", "editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion of", "I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving", "to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like", "edit. I would thus propose that the path to take", "writer or with their consent, or * If the answer", "answer writer or with their consent, or * If the", "to meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1.", "believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the", "that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer", "the path to take is to ask the answer writer", "the direction either be: * Edit to remove research content", "question of the OP, and that the discussion of the", "by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of", "see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for", "paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete", "discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the", "propose that the path to take is to ask the", "three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes", "to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion", "3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable", "specifics is what detracts from the value. This is not", "of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the", "passions are high around this subject area and due to", "better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of", "consent, or * If the answer writer does not consent", "it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in", "the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I", "salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such an", "scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad area.", "there is valuable content in the answer where it addresses", "* If the answer writer does not consent to editing,", "to know what scientific content is actually involved, other than", "path to take is to ask the answer writer to", "case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the", "I think there is valuable content in the answer where", "about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one", "the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3.", "in the answer where it addresses the actual question of", "respond here and that the direction either be: * Edit", "In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent", "it addresses the actual question of the OP, and that", "where it addresses the actual question of the OP, and", "rather than the argument about research content. The author of", "how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are", "think it will be useful to bring this to meta", "that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts", "writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating the", "appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information", "the actual question of the OP, and that the discussion", "of the matter rather than on the question of how", "to a question are often appropriate, in this case there", "this subject area and due to the specific position taken", "did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose", "the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as", "respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers", "are high around this subject area and due to the", "the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This", "unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is", "a question about EUA processes: that would be better taken", "on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\"", "there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733).", "the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics", "is not the venue for resolving a question about EUA", "the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from", "due to the specific position taken by the answer author,", "answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit,", "precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however,", "answer writer to respond here and that the direction either", "it on the response to the OP's question, rather than", "and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful", "broad area. Because passions are high around this subject area", "value. This is not the venue for resolving a question", "about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think", "either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by", "would thus propose that the path to take is to", "to bring this to meta for discussion. I see three", "that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the", "alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in the", "reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of what", "the scientific substance of the matter rather than on the", "1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as", "answer by focusing it on the response to the OP's", "however. The leaves a question of what to do about", "or * If the answer writer does not consent to", "do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I", "to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or", "their consent, or * If the answer writer does not", "with their consent, or * If the answer writer does", "misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on", "what detracts from the value. This is not the venue", "to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment,", "invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did", "be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by the", "one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific", "from the value. This is not the venue for resolving", "that the path to take is to ask the answer", "about research content. The author of the answer has clearly", "the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has", "it will be useful to bring this to meta for", "general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2.", "see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors'", "[highly active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of", "the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that", "question of what to do about the controversial answer, and", "actual question of the OP, and that the discussion of", "The leaves a question of what to do about the", "writer to respond here and that the direction either be:", "or with their consent, or * If the answer writer", "[recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that", "this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51", "comment, I think it will be useful to bring this", "substance of the matter rather than on the question of", "author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly", "however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit.", "the edit. I would thus propose that the path to", "taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this", "OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is", "wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone", "in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to", "community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case,", "to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site", "actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are", "one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of", "This is not the venue for resolving a question about", "research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance", "matter rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733).", "against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable", "the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged,", "ask the answer writer to respond here and that the", "argument about research content. The author of the answer has", "addresses the actual question of the OP, and that the", "proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question", "what scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad", "detracts from the value. This is not the venue for", "for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the", "research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is", "to the OP's question, rather than the argument about research", "that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that", "the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of", "scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This is", "for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against", "of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value.", "answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating", "response to the OP's question, rather than the argument about", "challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this case", "and due to the specific position taken by the answer", "it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial.", "a question are often appropriate, in this case there is", "highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal", "delete as violating the site's policy on discussion of research", "of the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific", "to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often", "I would thus propose that the path to take is", "and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what", "the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the", "does not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's", "the OP's question, rather than the argument about research content.", "edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively", "how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of", "is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content", "be useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I", "content in the answer where it addresses the actual question", "the answer where it addresses the actual question of the", "of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there", "made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing", "focusing it on the response to the OP's question, rather", "per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to", "and that the direction either be: * Edit to remove", "I think it will be useful to bring this to", "processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per", "for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be", "answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave", "the matter rather than on the question of how to", "resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be better", "While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in", "is valuable content in the answer where it addresses the", "has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however.", "authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it", "assent to the edit. I would thus propose that the", "respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate,", "the value. This is not the venue for resolving a", "the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it", "this site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic).", "The author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal", "remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or with", "it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such", "this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know", "Personally, I think there is valuable content in the answer", "the broad area. Because passions are high around this subject", "to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells", "that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to", "on the scientific substance of the matter rather than on", "that the direction either be: * Edit to remove research", "Because passions are high around this subject area and due", "an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer", "case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what", "author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by", "I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent", "what to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's", "answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made", "the answer by focusing it on the response to the", "answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become", "this to meta for discussion. I see three general paths:", "site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd", "a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it", "thus propose that the path to take is to ask", "by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer", "clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The", "improving the answer by focusing it on the response to", "research content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected", "direction either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion,", "that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a", "become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable", "answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be", "of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question", "controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will", "to the edit. I would thus propose that the path", "is to ask the answer writer to respond here and", "is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions", "active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's", "is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I", "to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent", "as violating the site's policy on discussion of research content.", "by the answer writer or with their consent, or *", "rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves", "valuable content in the answer where it addresses the actual", "[content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and", "think there is valuable content in the answer where it", "writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus", "Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being", "involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are high", "the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to" ]
[ "an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to", "the frame of the question). A common example are answers", "is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as given", "with a considerable grey area to be decided on a", "(but are not limited to): * something that you want", "instead disputes things the asker treats as given in their", "that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are", "not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad", "the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives", "why I would like to create a set of rules", "edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges,", "I would like to start with collecting aspects that we", "the risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent", "question (challenges the frame of the question). A common example", "here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment", "behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided", "and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive", "a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles", "want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of", "comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that", "is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part", "a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a", "That’s why I would like to create a set of", "and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators", "but instead disputes things the asker treats as given in", "such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These", "rule should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions", "ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and", "frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that", "Please do not make changes or discuss them here anymore.", "attempt to answer the question as is, but instead disputes", "also bear the risk of belittling the asker and are", "discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that", "should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can", "risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent source", "decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot", "the bad ones and make the good ones better and", "site, but they also bear the risk of belittling the", "example are answers that point out that a question is", "better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community)", "or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is", "mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area", "this, I would like to start with collecting aspects that", "source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like", "question). A common example are answers that point out that", "* what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under", "you think some rule should differ between them; * what", "forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour", "set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a set", "now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them", "more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a", "be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a", "comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the", "or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot", "kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions", "gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits,", "Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we", "deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame", "per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles on", "Since there are a lot of angles on this, I", "to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are", "to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow,", "on this, I would like to start with collecting aspects", "create a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable", "that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but", "are a lot of angles on this, I would like", "frame of the question). A common example are answers that", "the asker treats as given in their question (challenges the", "a considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case", "are not limited to): * something that you want to", "see avoided in the future; * both, answers and comments,", "rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be", "question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site,", "if you think some rule should differ between them; ", "question as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats", "given in their question (challenges the frame of the question).", "of assumptions can be frame-challenged; under which conditions frame", "there are a lot of angles on this, I would", "challenges are a relevant part of this site, but they", "Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for", "like to start with collecting aspects that we like to", "them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; ", "that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in", "do not make changes or discuss them here anymore. ---", "but avoid the bad ones and make the good ones", "individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create a", "(or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question", "in such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects.", "and make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also,", "and guidelines for them. The goal here is not to", "of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to", "of belittling the asker and are a frequent source of", "area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there", "but they also bear the risk of belittling the asker", "the question). A common example are answers that point out", "constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect", "The goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether,", "goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but", "to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones", "what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; under which", "* examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but", "a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey", "treats as given in their question (challenges the frame of", "community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments.", "welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis", "and if you think some rule should differ between them;", "may be about (but are not limited to): * something", "encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise,", "problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see", "of the question). A common example are answers that point", "not limited to): * something that you want to forbid,", "is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss", "a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may", "to see avoided in the future; * both, answers and", "(diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and", "as given in their question (challenges the frame of the", "of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to", "would like to create a set of rules and guidelines", "for them. The goal here is not to ban frame", "are a relevant part of this site, but they also", "start with collecting aspects that we like to see included", "see included in such a guide. Please post answers for", "be about (but are not limited to): * something that", "good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond", "a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the", "to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic", "you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples", "are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why", "Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site, but", "like to create a set of rules and guidelines for", "I would like to create a set of rules and", "The [FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes", "live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them here", "would like to start with collecting aspects that we like", "be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges are appropriate.", "of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to", "and comments, and if you think some rule should differ", "avoid the bad ones and make the good ones better", "basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality", "single aspects. These may be about (but are not limited", "categorise, but want to see avoided in the future; ", "asker treats as given in their question (challenges the frame", "but want to see avoided in the future; both,", "limited to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage,", "like to see included in such a guide. Please post", "A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof)", "answers and comments, and if you think some rule should", "assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges", "we create a mix of rules and guidelines with a", "expect that we create a mix of rules and guidelines", "frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would", "common example are answers that point out that a question", "their question (challenges the frame of the question). A common", "not make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A", "a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I", "want to see avoided in the future; * both, answers", "both, answers and comments, and if you think some rule", "challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the", "you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the", "can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges are", "that point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem).", "included in such a guide. Please post answers for single", "for single aspects. These may be about (but are not", "relevant part of this site, but they also bear the", "[FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or", "A common example are answers that point out that a", "examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want", "a relevant part of this site, but they also bear", "things the asker treats as given in their question (challenges", "frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make", "ones and make the good ones better and more welcoming.", "to answer the question as is, but instead disputes things", "for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of", "question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant", "out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges", "they also bear the risk of belittling the asker and", "basis. Since there are a lot of angles on this,", "differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can be", "and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I", "is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the", "bad ones and make the good ones better and more", "on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of", "These may be about (but are not limited to): ", "as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as", "them. The goal here is not to ban frame challenges", "an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of", "drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create", "and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided", "guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided on", "about (but are not limited to): something that you", "the asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g.,", "allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you", "make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame", "create a set of rules and guidelines for them. The", "of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is", "this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions,", "considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case basis.", "make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this", " something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or", "comments, and if you think some rule should differ between", "part of this site, but they also bear the risk", "aspects. These may be about (but are not limited to):", "guidelines for them. The goal here is not to ban", "think some rule should differ between them; * what kind", "answer the question as is, but instead disputes things the", "with collecting aspects that we like to see included in", "future; * both, answers and comments, and if you think", "discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an", "* both, answers and comments, and if you think some", "frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix of", "in the future; * both, answers and comments, and if", "--- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part", "(e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a", "of angles on this, I would like to start with", "lot of angles on this, I would like to start", "changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge", "post answers for single aspects. These may be about (but", "(challenges the frame of the question). A common example are", "altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the good", "them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer,", "to see included in such a guide. Please post answers", "to create a set of rules and guidelines for them.", "doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but instead", "collecting aspects that we like to see included in such", "of this site, but they also bear the risk of", "is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt", "rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is not", "answers for single aspects. These may be about (but are", "aspects that we like to see included in such a", "the question as is, but instead disputes things the asker", "that we like to see included in such a guide.", "we like to see included in such a guide. Please", "are answers that point out that a question is an", "some rule should differ between them; * what kind of", "[XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this", "a set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal", "the future; * both, answers and comments, and if you", "answers that point out that a question is an [XY", "belittling the asker and are a frequent source of drama", "disputes things the asker treats as given in their question", "that we create a mix of rules and guidelines with", "to start with collecting aspects that we like to see", "that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; ", "cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the future;", "point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame", "avoided in the future; both, answers and comments, and", "the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create", "Please post answers for single aspects. These may be about", "challenge* is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t", "of frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix", "I expect that we create a mix of rules and", "angles on this, I would like to start with collecting", "this site, but they also bear the risk of belittling", "Update: The [FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make", "guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may be", "part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as", "a lot of angles on this, I would like to", "something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage;", "here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid", "thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is,", "and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s", "moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given", "challenges, I expect that we create a mix of rules", "asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)).", "bear the risk of belittling the asker and are a", "in their question (challenges the frame of the question). A", "ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and", "grey area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since", "answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer", "between them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged;", "anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or" ]
[ "question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the", "site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today,", "latter also answers the former question. But, the intention of", "One can observe that answer of latter also answers the", "A asked with intention X, got answers that also contain", "B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions", "B asked with intention Y. Can the question B be", "answers that also contain answer for question B asked with", "intention Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate", "a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an", "with intention X, got answers that also contain answer for", "main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource).", "different. Former is asking only for salutation and the later", "got answers that also contain answer for question B asked", "an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor)", "salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important question", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also answers", "a question A asked with intention X, got answers that", "I phrase an important question that I need to ask", "I asked a question on our main site: [Proper salutation", "on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting", "Former is asking only for salutation and the later is", "the later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor.", "for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as", "question: [How should I phrase an important question that I", "for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important", "salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has", "it has been closed as a duplicate to another question:", "duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and Y differ?", "both questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation", "another question: [How should I phrase an important question that", "need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer", "is asking only for salutation and the later is regarding", "question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for", "contain answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can", "a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate", "to professor. If there is a question A asked with", "to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of", "Can the question B be closed as duplicate of A", "an important question to professor. If there is a question", "with intention Y. Can the question B be closed as", "requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a", "X, got answers that also contain answer for question B", "be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X", "of latter also answers the former question. But, the intention", "question B asked with intention Y. Can the question B", "answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can the", "regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there is", "ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter", "only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an", "in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been", "later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If", "Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate of", "important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One", "to another question: [How should I phrase an important question", "that answer of latter also answers the former question. But,", "should I phrase an important question that I need to", "answers the former question. But, the intention of the both", "Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to another", "as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and Y", "the both questions are different. Former is asking only for", "question A asked with intention X, got answers that also", "[How should I phrase an important question that I need", "questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation and", "closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should I", "former question. But, the intention of the both questions are", "the former question. But, the intention of the both questions", "I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that", "is a question A asked with intention X, got answers", "a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also", "email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed", "intention X, got answers that also contain answer for question", "has been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How", "of the both questions are different. Former is asking only", "for question B asked with intention Y. Can the question", "also contain answer for question B asked with intention Y.", "question to professor. If there is a question A asked", "intention of the both questions are different. Former is asking", "asked with intention X, got answers that also contain answer", "that also contain answer for question B asked with intention", "resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to", "there is a question A asked with intention X, got", "asking only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing", "is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there", "important question to professor. If there is a question A", "and the later is regarding phrasing an important question to", "observe that answer of latter also answers the former question.", "Recently I asked a question on our main site: [Proper", "answer of latter also answers the former question. But, the", "as a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase", "If there is a question A asked with intention X,", "been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should", "can observe that answer of latter also answers the former", "the question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though", "duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an important", "phrase an important question that I need to ask a", "that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe", "our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a", "But, the intention of the both questions are different. Former", "[Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it", "asked with intention Y. Can the question B be closed", "asked a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in", "are different. Former is asking only for salutation and the", "closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and", "also answers the former question. But, the intention of the", "phrasing an important question to professor. If there is a", "professor. If there is a question A asked with intention", "question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can", "question. But, the intention of the both questions are different.", "the intention of the both questions are different. Former is", "a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email" ]
[ "seem to be opposed to answers that question this premise.", "the comments section, I added an additional section to the", "to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there", "going to be controversial, so it is important that we", "of the post. (The main negative effect is that it", "would like the original content of the post restored. There", "the post.) It seems to be getting more common for", "be controversial, so it is important that we allow scope", "to understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems", "there were then a small number of additional votes which", "this answer and I would like the original content of", "the removal of content from this answer and I would", "high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of", "in the post.) It seems to be getting more common", "case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus", "not the answer should be edited down. The present case", "moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this", "numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore", "brief history of the answer: (1) there was an initial", "the question that are crucial to understanding the advice given", "discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I", "potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\".", "about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as", "to remove the bulk of the content (including both the", "like the original content of the post restored. There are", "and locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I", "post; * (2) The edit does not fall within the", "question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily", "of the content. As authority for the edit the moderator", "[answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address racist comments", "a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question,", "not fall within the scope of [when should I edit", "Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited down", "in this instance my answer has been edited down to", "where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP,", "the moderator's own instruction** that the post should not be", "unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in", "or not the answer should be edited down. The present", "edit removing most of the content, and locked the post", "post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on the", "A secondary problem here is that it represents an instance", "was the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator,", "not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are", "scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc.,", "important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about", "moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in", "several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes", "a false premise in the question, in order to give", "(3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk", "in a better state than the original version; and ", "the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has", "give context for the advice at the end of the", "then put the onus on the answerer to go to", "of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my", "and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in", "of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work", "please feel free to do so on Meta, but please", "answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change. In", "content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of", "to edit down answers where they feel that the content", "case of the answer that was the subject of the", "occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most", "precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation", "found the post to be of value in answering the", "any substantial change to the net score of the answer;", "rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited after", "discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary.", "meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a high", "opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism,", "discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or", "cited by the moderator, this answer has a high net", "discuss this edit please feel free to do so on", "remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority for", "net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the", "question, in order to give context for the advice at", "bulk of votes are accrued to the post; (5)", "the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer", "post.) It seems to be getting more common for moderators", "--- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument", "edited down to a shell of its original content, and", "more common for moderators to edit down answers where they", "of contents from an answer (in this case a highly", "that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are", "the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts the", "I appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including", "a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx", "then restored his edit removing most of the content, and", "of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes);", "edit down answers where they feel that the content is", "the moderator edit: (1) It removes relevant content ---", "cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes", "most of the content, and locked the post to prevent", "his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there", "restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit: ", "answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a", "than the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts", "represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of", "section to the answer, and there were then a small", "whether or not the answer should be edited down. The", "content of the post restored. There are several problems with", "on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise", "content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it", "solicitation from other users in the comments section, I added", "\"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing", "edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\"", "the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not", "for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without", "rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer", "bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his", "a shell of its original content, and this edit substantially", "is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very", "to discuss this edit please feel free to do so", "answer has been edited down to a shell of its", "to discuss whether or not the answer should be edited", "removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives", "sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it", "to the post; (5) Unlike the case of the", "remove the bulk of the content (including both the new", "or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator", "argument challenging a false premise in the question, in order", "the content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.)", "answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the", "receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits", "the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored", "relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives a", "I added an additional section to the answer, and there", "of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer", "back all edits to restore my answer to its original", "of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate", "on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on", "down to a shell of its original content, and this", "form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and", "site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my", "wish to discuss this edit please feel free to do", "questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content", "recent [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address racist", "premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to", "portion of the content. As authority for the edit the", "the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether", "moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of the", "they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such", "rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the answer:", "but please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes", "upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users found", "content --- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed", "previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that", "section, I added an additional section to the answer, and", "given in the post.) It seems to be getting more", "cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what is", "Unlike the case of the answer that was the subject", "etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is", "appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including the", "we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false", "original content of the post restored. There are several problems", "answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited by", "by the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote", "the rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited", "\"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents an", "the answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited", "pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on", "racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to", "answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP -", " (1) It removes relevant content --- this content is", "be getting more common for moderators to edit down answers", "you wish to discuss this edit please feel free to", "remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in this", "whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The", "in the question, in order to give context for the", "edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should", "The edit does not fall within the scope of [when", "premises of the question that are crucial to understanding the", "Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there is", "an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to", "the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove", "the post in a better state than the original version;", "removing most of the content, and locked the post to", "further edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal", "has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large", "on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the", "(approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users", "edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there was", "to appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually", "not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also", "different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP", "premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary", "My recent [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address", "users found the post to be of value in answering", "appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually a", "votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my answer", "the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial", "this instance my answer has been edited down to a", "his edit removing most of the content, and locked the", "contextual argument on the premises of the question that are", "and * (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction", "be of value in answering the question; and * (6)", "substantial portion of the content. As authority for the edit", "problem here is that it represents an instance where moderators", "instance my answer has been edited down to a shell", "of the post restored. There are several problems with the", "contents from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted", "edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent in", "crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.) It", "of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit", "a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the", "heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled", "please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are", "substantial change to the net score of the answer; (3)", "false premise in the question, in order to give context", "substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The main", "on the rationale that the answer should not be heavily", "and most of the original post), based on his rationale", "--- I appreciate the work of moderators on this site,", "do not agree with the removal of content from this", "an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents", "upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the answerer", "bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained", "from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer)", "are crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.)", "to address racist comments has been edited by a moderator", "in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5)", "(3) The edit does not leave the post in a", "some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular,", "question about how to address racist comments has been edited", "has been edited down to a shell of its original", "\"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit please", "not leave the post in a better state than the", "comments section, I added an additional section to the answer,", "(1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator", "* (2) The edit does not fall within the scope", "change to the net score of the answer; (3) the", "heavy editing as the current votes are based on what", "* (3) The edit does not leave the post in", "post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history", "restore my answer to its original form in (1), when", "that the post should not be heavily edited after the", "highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the", "to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of", "the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not", "from the quality of the post. (The main negative effect", "seems to be getting more common for moderators to edit", "bulk of the content (including both the new section and", "to give context for the advice at the end of", "post discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic", "detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes and", "within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in", "OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question", "moderator's own instruction** that the post should not be heavily", "such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what", "particular, in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\"", "that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there", "the advice given in the post.) It seems to be", "with the removal of content from this answer and I", "another meta post discussing whether or not a different answer", "the content (including both the new section and most of", "initial detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes", "of additional votes which did not make any substantial change", "original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality", "score, suggesting that a large number of users found the", "a large number of users found the post to be", "* (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development", "to be controversial, so it is important that we allow", "down. The present case sets a bad precedent in which", "there are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\".", "upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2)", "answer to remove the bulk of the content (including both", "order to give context for the advice at the end", "should not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes", "and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the", "on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not", "which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of what", "on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this", "comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove", "of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to", "edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to the", "my answer to its original form in (1), when the", "the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current", "was an initial detailed answer that received a large number", "large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50", "other users in the comments section, I added an additional", "own instruction that the post should not be heavily edited", "is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an", "answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then", "The edit does not leave the post in a better", "(4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the", "The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction** that the post", "the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a", "should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of", "problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant", "is that it removes contextual argument on the premises of", "address racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal))", "not make any substantial change to the net score of", "from this answer and I would like the original content", "this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that", "discuss whether or not the answer should be edited down.", "answer that received a large number of upvotes and a", "moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited", "on the premises of the question that are crucial to", "so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as", "end of the post; * (2) The edit does not", "present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove", "has now locked the post to prevent rollback of his", "this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging", "effect is that it removes contextual argument on the premises", "posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit", "commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish", "the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this", "number of users found the post to be of value", "based on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked", "edited the answer to remove the bulk of the content", "were then a small number of additional votes which did", "the bulk of the content (including both the new section", "editing as the current votes are based on what was", "edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this content", "which did not make any substantial change to the net", "it removes contextual argument on the premises of the question", "in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of", "here is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally", "answer to its original form in (1), when the bulk", "a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether", "subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer", "(4) based on the rationale that the answer should not", "stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions", "(A brief history of the answer: (1) there was an", "a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number", "a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on", "the answer to remove the bulk of the content (including", "number of additional votes which did not make any substantial", "heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to", "content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites another", "comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer should", "received a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes", "down answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\",", "content from this answer and I would like the original", "development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the", "the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score,", "by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers", "that comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer", "the content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites", "answer and I would like the original content of the", "the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of", "challenging a false premise in the question, in order to", "on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that", "from heavy editing as the current votes are based on", "present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to prevent", "edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; (3) The", "votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator has", "his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the", "votes which did not make any substantial change to the", "moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss", "accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case of", "+50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in", "feel free to do so on Meta, but please refrain", "including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer", "off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you", "the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change.", "that the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving", "shell of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts", "to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with", "of his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1)", "states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit", "the new section and most of the original post), based", "It seems to be getting more common for moderators to", "that was the subject of the meta-post cited by the", "additional section to the answer, and there were then a", "and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of", "Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not the", "first, to discuss whether or not the answer should be", "there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators", "getting more common for moderators to edit down answers where", "this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance", "(2) following solicitation from other users in the comments section,", "is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem", "of users found the post to be of value in", "very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in", "common for moderators to edit down answers where they feel", "assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be", "the advice at the end of the post; (2)", "advice given in the post.) It seems to be getting", "this change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion", "this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that", "free to do so on Meta, but please refrain from", "onus on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal", "- If you wish to discuss this edit please feel", "guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave the post", "of value in answering the question; and * (6) The", "\"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an assertion", "of content from this answer and I would like the", "in the comments section, I added an additional section to", "edit please feel free to do so on Meta, but", "above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer should", "answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers", "As authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta", "answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and", "my answer has been edited down to a shell of", "are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It", "the question, in order to give context for the advice", "challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this", "edit does not fall within the scope of [when should", "The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge", "and there were then a small number of additional votes", "quality of the post. (The main negative effect is that", "are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In", "is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove", "post in a better state than the original version; and", "suggesting that a large number of users found the post", "the quality of the post. (The main negative effect is", "the post to be of value in answering the question;", "secondary problem here is that it represents an instance where", "removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is", "I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3)", "added an additional section to the answer, and there were", "and in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations", "an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and", "it is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\",", "I would like the original content of the post restored.", "of the content (including both the new section and most", "should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; ", "of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed", "authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta post", "work of moderators on this site, including the present moderator.", "version; and (4) The edit *contradicts the moderator's own", "content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a", "(including both the new section and most of the original", "answer, and there were then a small number of additional", "edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or", "a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states,", "question that are crucial to understanding the advice given in", "is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to", "to be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions", "a small number of additional votes which did not make", "this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going", "the premises of the question that are crucial to understanding", "and I would like the original content of the post", "on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial,", "etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem", "the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not", "to go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous", "post restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit:", "guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators", "removal of content from this answer and I would like", "centre guidance; (3) The edit does not leave the", "sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under", "feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases,", "meta post discussing whether or not a different answer contains", "gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the", "is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning", "how to address racist comments has been edited by a", "voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing", "main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on", "the post should not be heavily edited after the bulk", "on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the", "necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important that", "by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of", "and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following", "bulk of contents from an answer (in this case a", "of the original post), based on his rationale above; (4)", "and then put the onus on the answerer to go", "few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from", "that a large number of users found the post to", "has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a", "that it removes contextual argument on the premises of the", "In previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta", "answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc.,", "that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the", "that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially", "additional votes which did not make any substantial change to", "interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where", "allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises,", "the work of moderators on this site, including the present", "substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to", "in the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does", "be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued", "the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that", "its original form in (1), when the bulk of voting", "as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents", "to the answer, and there were then a small number", "did not make any substantial change to the net score", "change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion on", "a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation", "value in answering the question; and * (6) The edits", "moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback of", "the original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based", "moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer", "answer) and then put the onus on the answerer to", "net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users", "what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is", "racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so", "instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from", "prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the", "The moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback", "the post restored. There are several problems with the moderator", "of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from", "(2) The edit does not fall within the scope of", "answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that received", "questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the", "scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help", "to a question about how to address racist comments has", "the bulk of contents from an answer (in this case", "been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial", "content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.) ---", "an initial detailed answer that received a large number of", "the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that", "moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of what is", "(The main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument", "number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net", "original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts the moderator's", "controversial, so it is important that we allow scope for", "remove content under a strained interpretation of what is \"off-topic\".", "the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are", "to be getting more common for moderators to edit down", "present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been", "Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be", "of the question that are crucial to understanding the advice", "most of the original post), based on his rationale above;", "to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism,", "(5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of the", "a question about how to address racist comments has been", "context for the advice at the end of the post;", "this edit please feel free to do so on Meta,", "false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A", "locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A", "removes contextual argument on the premises of the question that", "both the new section and most of the original post),", "advice at the end of the post; (2) The", "edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The", "original form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred;", "for moderators to edit down answers where they feel that", "edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back", "the current votes are based on what was present.\" The", "Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the current", "instruction** that the post should not be heavily edited after", "not agree with the removal of content from this answer", "all edits to restore my answer to its original form", "to its original form in (1), when the bulk of", "to be of value in answering the question; and ", "moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not a", "to the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator", "state than the original version; and (4) The edit", "of the content, and locked the post to prevent further", "(1) It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic", "fall within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing)", "do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing", "restored his edit removing most of the content, and locked", "I do not agree with the removal of content from", "the case of the answer that was the subject of", "be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on", "of moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless,", "not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes,", "section and most of the original post), based on his", "net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the", "an additional section to the answer, and there were then", "post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree", "rolled back all edits to restore my answer to its", "to a shell of its original content, and this edit", "and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of", "be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I", "a substantial portion of the content. As authority for the", "was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to", "where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in", "of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there", "* (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that", "\"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of", "on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this", "to restore my answer to its original form in (1),", "based on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale", "be edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent", "are based on what was present.\" The moderator has now", "agree with the removal of content from this answer and", "detracts from the quality of the post. (The main negative", "\"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very stretched", "are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case", "moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting", "about how to address racist comments has been edited by", "moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question this", "downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other", "post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer that", "cites another meta post discussing whether or not a different", "large number of users found the post to be of", "score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer", "The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to", "the post; * (2) The edit does not fall within", "In particular, in questions where there is an assertion of", "the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta.", "moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content.", "edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion", "make any substantial change to the net score of the", "([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content. As", "from other users in the comments section, I added an", "of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre", "this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post.", "the bulk of votes are accrued to the post; ", "the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief", "votes are accrued to the post; (5) Unlike the", "the answer should be edited down. The present case sets", "better state than the original version; and * (4) The", "locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do", "current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. ---", "its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the", "the answer, and there were then a small number of", "* (5) Unlike the case of the answer that was", "of the answer that was the subject of the meta-post", "original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on", "usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss", "there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first,", "been edited down to a shell of its original content,", "to do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy", "edit does not leave the post in a better state", "contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should not", "the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the", "history of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed", "users in the comments section, I added an additional section", "If you wish to discuss this edit please feel free", "with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content", "of the post; * (2) The edit does not fall", "the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited", "question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion", "leave the post in a better state than the original", "prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with the", "to remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority", "(6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of", "does not fall within the scope of [when should I", "help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave", "(5) Unlike the case of the answer that was the", "after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all", "post to be of value in answering the question; and", "when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then", "is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false", "new section and most of the original post), based on", "of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has", "upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the comments", "(1) there was an initial detailed answer that received a", "in answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt", "case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content", "now locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits.", "It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and", "there was an initial detailed answer that received a large", "also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this", "in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of", "without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here", "--- I do not agree with the removal of content", "a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a", "argument on the premises of the question that are crucial", "post. (The main negative effect is that it removes contextual", "\"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to", "I rolled back all edits to restore my answer to", "understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems to", "so it is important that we allow scope for \"frame", "at the end of the post; * (2) The edit", "in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by", "current votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator", "a better state than the original version; and * (4)", "the end of the post; * (2) The edit does", "edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal of", "detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question, in", "post should not be heavily edited after the bulk of", "refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are based", "premise in the question, in order to give context for", "the post. (The main negative effect is that it removes", "answer should be edited down. The present case sets a", "does not leave the post in a better state than", "that are crucial to understanding the advice given in the", "content (including both the new section and most of the", "in order to give context for the advice at the", "that received a large number of upvotes and a few", "following solicitation from other users in the comments section, I", "for the advice at the end of the post; ", "should be edited down. The present case sets a bad", "The present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators", "as the current votes are based on what was present.\"", "what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post", "negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on the", "content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some", "There are several problems with the moderator edit: (1)", "small number of additional votes which did not make any", "(in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put", "[when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance;", "edits to restore my answer to its original form in", "based on the rationale that the answer should not be", "this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the", "after the bulk of votes are accrued to the post;", "the onus on the answerer to go to Meta to", "answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the", "are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important", "contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If", "for the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing", "it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk", "Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on this", "the original content of the post restored. There are several", "of votes are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike", "moderators to edit down answers where they feel that the", "then a small number of additional votes which did not", "go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases", "where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an", "moderator then restored his edit removing most of the content,", "put the onus on the answerer to go to Meta" ]
[ "peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency, before", "of the workload when someone has work peaks at the", "and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing", "we would like to gauge the community to see if", "not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep", "you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed,", "team would allow a better redistribution of the workload when", "an election, we would like to gauge the community to", "likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running", "becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and", "now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now", "fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator,", "election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity,", "doesn't keep you from running if there is an election.", "the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an", "workload for this site is not too burdensome, but having", "there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of", "2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're", "no urgency, before starting an election, we would like to", "you from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534)", "many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have", "too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team", "around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a", "there is no urgency, before starting an election, we would", "better redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks", "an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator", "urgency, before starting an election, we would like to gauge", "from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers", "burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team would", "the workload when someone has work peaks at the office.", "would like to gauge the community to see if there", "Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not", "election, we would like to gauge the community to see", "Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if", "likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested", "place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming", "running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many", "to see if there is a reasonable number of potential", "take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in", "to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take", "So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome", "to gauge the community to see if there is a", "Since there is no urgency, before starting an election, we", "candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely", "but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate to", "now doesn't keep you from running if there is an", "before starting an election, we would like to gauge the", "if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to", "has work peaks at the office. Since there is no", "is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the", "the community to see if there is a reasonable number", "aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have further", "see if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates", "of the moderator activity, but if you have further questions,", "case, the election will likely take place around fall 2021.", "moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here!", "potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will", "site is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator", "you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask here.", "motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and,", "a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation", "covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you", "competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place around", "having one more moderator on the team would allow a", "In case, the election will likely take place around fall", "more moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution", "committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you", "reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case,", "workload when someone has work peaks at the office. Since", "for this site is not too burdensome, but having one", "election. The moderation workload for this site is not too", "expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if there", "interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your", "moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please don't", "someone has work peaks at the office. Since there is", "your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is", "office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an election,", "community to see if there is a reasonable number of", "express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now", "moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution of", "and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from", "We're thinking of running a moderator election. The moderation workload", "welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing", "a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In", "at the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting", "work peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency,", "is no urgency, before starting an election, we would like", "starting an election, we would like to gauge the community", "if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to", "is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't", "the moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please", "there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure", "The moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome,", "activity, but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate", "is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness.", "will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're", "if you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask", "gauge the community to see if there is a reasonable", "you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express", "interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it", "would allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone", "to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest", "interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not", "election will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if", "if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects", "one more moderator on the team would allow a better", "moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is not", "like to gauge the community to see if there is", "keep you from running if there is an election. [This", "ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place", "when someone has work peaks at the office. Since there", "not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the", "of running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this", "expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing", "a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is", "thinking of running a moderator election. The moderation workload for", "allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone has", "moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome, but", "it now doesn't keep you from running if there is", "the election will likely take place around fall 2021. So,", "number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the", "[This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but", "a better redistribution of the workload when someone has work", "in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest", "but having one more moderator on the team would allow", "on the team would allow a better redistribution of the", "not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if", "of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election", "is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on", "this site is not too burdensome, but having one more", "redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks at", "the team would allow a better redistribution of the workload", "running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site", "here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise," ]
[ "their intro statements. + This is not the only option", "opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to", "* This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that", "from comments? + How would you handle a situation where", "providing a small selection of generic questions. The following two", "editorial control in the selection of the questions and may", "on the same day, give or take time to arrive", "would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a", "your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will", "thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed", "information on candidates. As a community, you are still free", "of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire.", "voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase,", "be included: + How would you deal with a user", "with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the", "the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have", "seen under a different light. How do you feel about", "for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are", "that being a moderator will make you more effective as", "candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for", "In what way do you feel that being a moderator", "ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided", "collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post", "questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only", "> > *The purpose of this thread was to collect", "We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the", "selection of the questions and may opt not to select", "include the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply", "would you deal with a user who produced a steady", "under a different light. How do you feel about that?", "that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates.", "everything you say and have said in the past, including", "answer. * If your question contains a link, please use", "to, for example, hold a live chat session with your", "the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion,", "do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to", "you say and have said in the past, including questions,", "will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not", "finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice", "number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle", "community provided in this thread, to use in addition to", "of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work:", "about this process, feel free to post as a comment", "> The purpose of this thread was to collect questions", "In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A", "moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: ", "with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications", "Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4).", "The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it", "do will be seen under a different light. How do", "> --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election", " Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z", "more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k", "will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching", "the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of", "moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to everything", "perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If", "as that will make it easier for transcribing for the", "or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.", "team may also include the following three questions if the", "said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything", "produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to", "Everything you will do will be seen under a different", "are still free to, for example, hold a live chat", "The community team may also include the following three questions", "that are specific to your community and issues that you", "or feedback about this process, feel free to post as", "completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination", "arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a situation", "community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic", "2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the", "exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We", "to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is", "to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial", "following two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How", "of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number", "may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack", "also include the following three questions if the community doesn’t", "beneath their intro statements. + This is not the only", "that? + In what way do you feel that being", "Team will select up to 8 of the top voted", "any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to", "how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until", "out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their", "of the community to pose questions to the candidates on", "intro statements. + This is not the only option that", "or 20k rep? * At the start of the nomination", "simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start", "day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this", "the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill", "the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may", "A diamond will be attached to everything you say and", "link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will", "voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread,", "for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that,", "to be included: + How would you deal with a", "who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends", "questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be", "not the only option that users have for gathering information", "EDT on the same day, give or take time to", "feel about that? + In what way do you feel", "a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity", "Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week,", "* At the start of the nomination phase, the Community", "the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in", "selection of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed", "steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a", "free to, for example, hold a live chat session with", "+ How would you handle a situation where another mod", "only option that users have for gathering information on candidates.", "and have said in the past, including questions, answers and", "community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what", "be seen under a different light. How do you feel", "are guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal", "will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.", "questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of", "situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel", "session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps", "the community to pose questions to the candidates on the", "the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. ", "shouldn’t have been? The community team may also include", "you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team may", "small selection of generic questions. The following two questions are", "same day, give or take time to arrive for closure),", "to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is", "be attached to everything you say and have said in", "control in the selection of the questions and may opt", "a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to", "* If your question contains a link, please use the", "the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or", "deal with a user who produced a steady stream of", "questions that are specific to your community and issues that", "use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it", "select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted", "topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll", "post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will", "still free to, for example, hold a live chat session", "that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a", "you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question", "UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give", "of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up", "hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask", "chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or", "mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?", "`[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for", "to your community and issues that you are running into", "you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or", "+ In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A", "answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags", "Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic", "what do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached", "opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At", "to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the", "from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have", "tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude", "10k or 20k rep? * At the start of the", "questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions", "* We, the Community Team, will be providing a small", "by the community provided in this thread, to use in", "this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2", "final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the", "the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to", "will do will be seen under a different light. How", "questions and may opt not to select a question that", "answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen", "until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on", "use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We", "8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community*", "question that you feel shouldn’t have been? The community", "questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to", "--- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next", "scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with", "the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively", "If you have any questions or feedback about this process,", "you feel that being a moderator will make you more", "Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until", "at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same", "of the site. Post answers to this question containing any", "Community Team will select up to 8 of the top", "nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8", "effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?", "take time to arrive for closure), this question will be", "is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection", "do you feel that being a moderator will make you", "will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will", "may opt not to select a question that is tangential", "week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding", "negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on", "page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out the", "some editorial control in the selection of the questions and", "the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how", "a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers,", "will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates", "suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will post", "Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions.", "will select up to 8 of the top voted questions", "up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by", "be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be", "provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or", "questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the", "to arrive for closure), this question will be open to", "We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4).", "on candidates. As a community, you are still free to,", "+ We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election", "light. How do you feel about that? + In what", "handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that", "is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the", "and may opt not to select a question that is", "of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing", "way do you feel that being a moderator will make", "it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is", "+ In what way do you feel that being a", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled", "from the users of the site. Post answers to this", "another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have", "enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do?", "transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect", "you are still free to, for example, hold a live", "the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier", "per answer. If your question contains a link, please", "the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control", "rep? * At the start of the nomination phase, the", "what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any", "it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This", "addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some", "that are negatively scored. + We will post the final", "feedback about this process, feel free to post as a", "candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the", "In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond", "to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? +", "an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we", "* The community team may also include the following three", "be an opportunity for members of the community to pose", "pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation.", "We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. +", "the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will", "live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > >", "into currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing", "and issues that you are running into currently. * We,", "election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will", "questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find", "would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one", "select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation", "you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel", "the finished questionnaire. This is a perfect opportunity to", "the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions", "make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k", "reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions", "now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > >", "to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear", "generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How", "members of the community to pose questions to the candidates", "the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro", "clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you", "not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant", "or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any", "in the selection of the questions and may opt not", "users of the site. Post answers to this question containing", "holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an", "will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The", "answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is", "please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make", "any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will", "to collect potential questions from the users of the site.", "for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a", "How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc.", "candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.", "and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > > ---", "Post answers to this question containing any questions you would", "Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this", "+ This is not the only option that users have", "thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire", "user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but", "contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as", "say and have said in the past, including questions, answers", "the only option that users have for gathering information on", "for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates", "that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team", "but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from", "scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on the", "opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community", "currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a", "doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do", "following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions.", "valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of", "fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath", "of the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided", "you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post", "may also include the following three questions if the community", "question containing any questions you would like to ask the", "your question contains a link, please use the syntax of", "comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a", "an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions", "to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions", "to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of", "questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In", "a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or", "moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that", "[Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out", "have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their", "work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at", "open to collect potential questions from the users of the", "are specific to your community and issues that you are", "to everything you say and have said in the past,", "time to arrive for closure), this question will be open", "to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the", "We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection", "give or take time to arrive for closure), this question", "where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t", "collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live,", "this question containing any questions you would like to ask", "or take time to arrive for closure), this question will", "as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? ", "the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough", "supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators", "the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about", "or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or", "your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from", "have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you", "is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions", "this question will be open to collect potential questions from", "a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? The", "be open to collect potential questions from the users of", "start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select", "will be open to collect potential questions from the users", "specific to your community and issues that you are running", "was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is", "Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In", "of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a", "candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what", "of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to", "guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal with", "questions that are negatively scored. + We will post the", "20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day,", "to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now", "example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to", "will have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and", "questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements.", "connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with", "the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will", "gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still", "syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for", "site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you", "further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in", "closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? ", "on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s", "2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding a", "running into currently. We, the Community Team, will be", "question per answer. If your question contains a link,", "this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The", "three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. +", "you are running into currently. * We, the Community Team,", "appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not the", "closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions", "that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished", "that you are running into currently. * We, the Community", "question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`,", "At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team", "for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity", "one question per answer. * If your question contains a", "it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09", "attached to everything you say and have said in the", "to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to", "for closure), this question will be open to collect potential", "is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). >", "you deal with a user who produced a steady stream", "questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).", "+ A diamond will be attached to everything you say", "feel that being a moderator will make you more effective", "Please only post one question per answer. * If your", "community, you are still free to, for example, hold a", "+ How would you deal with a user who produced", "about that? + In what way do you feel that", "you will do will be seen under a different light.", "the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely", "have been? * The community team may also include the", "option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will", "provided in this thread, to use in addition to the", "and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under", "[next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be", "ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.", "post one question per answer. * If your question contains", "candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * If", "questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post", "the same day, give or take time to arrive for", "a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to", "issues that you are running into currently. * We, the", "or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are", "your community and issues that you are running into currently.", "voice questions that are specific to your community and issues", "the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers", "submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use", "phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm", "to this question containing any questions you would like to", "guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection", "perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your", "arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect", "do? + A diamond will be attached to everything you", "you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia", "on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to", "a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you", "This is not the only option that users have for", "with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable", "being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed", "the questions and may opt not to select a question", "questions from the users of the site. Post answers to", "If your question contains a link, please use the syntax", "moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply", "a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate", "questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be included:", "stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large", "community and issues that you are running into currently. ", "have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free", "to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.", "Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for", "live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions,", "that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election.", "is not the only option that users have for gathering", "a small selection of generic questions. The following two questions", "the users of the site. Post answers to this question", "large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you", "do you feel about that? + In what way do", "aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in", "the Community Team will select up to 8 of the", "this process, feel free to post as a comment here.", "two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would", "generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be", "any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please", "diamond will be attached to everything you say and have", "find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).* > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange", "community team may also include the following three questions if", "The following two questions are guaranteed to be included: +", "in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve", "their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This", "a live chat session with your candidates to ask further", "in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned", "to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per", "reaching 10k or 20k rep? At the start of", "like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question", "election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored.", "make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. ", "questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would you", "How would you deal with a user who produced a", "users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community,", "past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do", "feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team may also", "question will be open to collect potential questions from the", "will be attached to everything you say and have said", "the selection of the questions and may opt not to", "in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you", "containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates.", "pm EDT on the same day, give or take time", "This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are", "questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do? +", "Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so,", "irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested", "Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC,", "for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you", "different light. How do you feel about that? + In", "is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We", "opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will be", "question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the", "the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of", "purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the", "questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option", "we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This", "been? * The community team may also include the following", "comments? + How would you handle a situation where another", "are running into currently. * We, the Community Team, will", "questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and", "a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would", "2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the", "statements. + This is not the only option that users", "what way do you feel that being a moderator will", "phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of", "questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation", "> > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an", "answers to this question containing any questions you would like", "The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for", "will be seen under a different light. How do you", "included: + How would you deal with a user who", "of the questions and may opt not to select a", "nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00", "to voice questions that are specific to your community and", "in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback", "tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?", "is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific", "are negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire", "only post one question per answer. * If your question", "opt not to select a question that is tangential or", "How do you feel about that? + In what way", "have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments.", "a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that", "As a community, you are still free to, for example,", "option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As", "be providing a small selection of generic questions. The following", "a different light. How do you feel about that? +", "you feel about that? + In what way do you", "for members of the community to pose questions to the", "and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. +", "> > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for", "with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members", "if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your", "This will be an opportunity for members of the community", "including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will", "will be an opportunity for members of the community to", "easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is", "Candidates will have the option to fill out the questionnaire,", "top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this", "the community provided in this thread, to use in addition", "potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers", "a community, you are still free to, for example, hold", "20k rep? * At the start of the nomination phase,", "(so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT", "4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take" ]
[ "all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I claim or", "claim or suggest that the question is based on a", "aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of", "I vote to close the question or do nothing at", "this? Do I post a comment or an answer, or", "is challenged by the answer or comment I want to", "nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I", "will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947)", "based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or", "distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is about:", "or do nothing at all? This is called a frame", "of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and", "an assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong.", "This is called a frame challenge: I claim or suggest", "is called a *frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that", "a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.", "asker of this? Do I post a comment or an", "experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic", "new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame", "individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other", "what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic", "This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask a", "procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) ", "[Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981)", "comment or an answer, or should I vote to close", "with or think might be wrong. How do I best", "of a situation, or similar. The frame set by the", "mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734).", "of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the", "frame challenges by what the false premise is about: ", "asker is challenged by the answer or comment I want", "and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose", "[Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) ", "on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want", "the question or do nothing at all? This is called", " [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual", "unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but", "### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by", "a question that makes an assumption I disagree with or", "or comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly", "at all? This is called a frame challenge:* I claim", "do nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:", "the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of", "moderated. It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was", "is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be", "inform the asker of this? Do I post a comment", "off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments", "vote to close the question or do nothing at all?", "is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978)", "discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General rules of thumb](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4977)", "or think might be wrong. How do I best inform", "The frame set by the asker is challenged by the", "about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic", "close the question or do nothing at all? This is", "I best inform the asker of this? Do I post", "that makes an assumption I disagree with or think might", "wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set", "false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms,", "assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set by", "that should give an idea of best practices and avoid", "guidelines that should give an idea of best practices and", "or an answer, or should I vote to close the", "suggest that the question is based on a misconception, wrong", "post a comment or an answer, or should I vote", "the asker of this? Do I post a comment or", "lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It", "drastic deviations will be moderated. It is mainly based on", "[ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents We primarily", "or similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged", "challenges by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions", "FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should give", "the answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ", "be wrong. How do I best inform the asker of", "might be wrong. How do I best inform the asker", "Do I post a comment or an answer, or should", "called a frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the", "should I vote to close the question or do nothing", "want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of", "question that makes an assumption I disagree with or think", "I claim or suggest that the question is based on", "a frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question", "by the asker is challenged by the answer or comment", "an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There", "practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot", "Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false", "*frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question is", "problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of", "think might be wrong. How do I best inform the", "similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged by", "is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation,", "you want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).", "that the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment", "I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set", "an answer, or should I vote to close the question", "(XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences", "is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed", "please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We", "but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based", "a comment or an answer, or should I vote to", "best inform the asker of this? Do I post a", "It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further", "give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation.", "assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong. How", "There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations", "or suggest that the question is based on a misconception,", "is mostly a set of guidelines that should give an", "norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong", "I disagree with or think might be wrong. How do", "question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a", "propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of", "of guidelines that should give an idea of best practices", "[Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism,", "* [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980)", "of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is", "discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask", "I post a comment or an answer, or should I", "post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that", "a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The", "* [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism,", "including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events", "and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of", "further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please", "[Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about", "makes an assumption I disagree with or think might be", "academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979)", "do I best inform the asker of this? Do I", "set of guidelines that should give an idea of best", "the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures,", "of this? Do I post a comment or an answer,", "on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar.", "deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this", "a situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker", "idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges", "question or do nothing at all? This is called a", "of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is", "avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway,", "If you want to propose changes, please [ask a new", "challenged by the answer or comment I want to post.", "comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a", "experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events ", "Somebody posted a question that makes an assumption I disagree", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to", "racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General rules of", "We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise", "answer, or should I vote to close the question or", "by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about", "of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General", "to close the question or do nothing at all? This", "How do I best inform the asker of this? Do", "based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If", "challenge*: I claim or suggest that the question is based", "primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is", "the asker is challenged by the answer or comment I", "confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic", "to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table", "a set of guidelines that should give an idea of", "about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong", "posted a question that makes an assumption I disagree with", "about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) ", "answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ is", "disagree with or think might be wrong. How do I", "wrong. How do I best inform the asker of this?", "assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination,", "best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a", "leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly", "changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents", "set by the asker is challenged by the answer or", "was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes,", "situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker is", "* [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions", "by the answer or comment I want to post. This", "a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish", "to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines", "or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal", "often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will", "mostly a set of guidelines that should give an idea", "should give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary", "misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame", "or should I vote to close the question or do", "goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including", "want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ###", "Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what", "sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General rules", "premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or", "frame set by the asker is challenged by the answer", "be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and", "similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY" ]
[ "the OP, here, was asking how to get something done,", "resource requests. What do folks think about such questions that", "seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly", "[like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the", "are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do", "something done, not for a list of things. So, my", "them for the benefit of the OP but in a", "What do folks think about such questions that are \"not", "all. However, we don't have (as some others do) a", "others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a", "questions, [like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But", "Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to", "of the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\"", "we don't have (as some others do) a tag for", "to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests", "for resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable", "ways to do things? I would, personally, like to find", "to get something done, not for a list of things.", "to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do", "OP, here, was asking how to get something done, not", "get something done, not for a list of things. So,", "Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about", "This one is being flagged for closure, but it is", "certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs and", "think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but", "votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a", "have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which", "\"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem", "buying things. But not about academic programs and their comparisons.", "benefit of the OP but in a way that avoids", "some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form", "asking how to get something done, not for a list", "in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another", "at all. However, we don't have (as some others do)", "But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable,", "question at all. However, we don't have (as some others", "this category is considered valuable, is to make it known", "to find a way to allow them for the benefit", "devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about", "form a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty,", "shopping but ask for ways to do things? I would,", "certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\"", "this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP,", "things? I would, personally, like to find a way to", "list of things. So, my view is that isn't really", "would, personally, like to find a way to allow them", "about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask", "But the OP, here, was asking how to get something", "tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368).", "is that isn't really a shopping question at all. However,", "considered valuable, is to make it known or to somehow", "is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting", "(as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might", "do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a different", "Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure,", "answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to", "make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into", "not for a list of things. So, my view is", "avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't", "isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we don't", "how to get something done, not for a list of", "close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would", "for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying", "attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\"", "known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests.", "done, not for a list of things. So, my view", "as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how", "being flagged for closure, but it is about devices for", "like to find a way to allow them for the", "academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But", "way to allow them for the benefit of the OP", "but ask for ways to do things? I would, personally,", "of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category", "quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things? I", "answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such", "that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But", "appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is", "really a shopping question at all. However, we don't have", "flagged for closure, but it is about devices for doing", "to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has", "about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly", "the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers.", "Some questions, [like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions.", "a tag for resource-request, which might form a different category", "new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another", "for closure, but it is about devices for doing academic", "here, was asking how to get something done, not for", "a shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as", "things. So, my view is that isn't really a shopping", "for the benefit of the OP but in a way", "requests into resource requests. What do folks think about such", "has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be", "is to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close", "one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is", "I would, personally, like to find a way to allow", "if providing this category is considered valuable, is to make", "into resource requests. What do folks think about such questions", "find a way to allow them for the benefit of", "tag for resource-request, which might form a different category of", "which might form a different category of acceptable question. But", "a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\"", "Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be", "\"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close", "doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it", "one is being flagged for closure, but it is about", "personally, like to find a way to allow them for", "somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks", "ask for ways to do things? I would, personally, like", "my view is that isn't really a shopping question at", "is being flagged for closure, but it is about devices", "that isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we", "the benefit of the OP but in a way that", "about buying things. But not about academic programs and their", "[another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but", "But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new", "but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is", "difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is to", "a list of things. So, my view is that isn't", "requests. What do folks think about such questions that are", "questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways", "So, my view is that isn't really a shopping question", "that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to", "no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate", "Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things?", "a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if", "different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing", "question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered", "close requests into resource requests. What do folks think about", "do folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\"", "\"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about academic", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but it", "category is considered valuable, is to make it known or", "do things? I would, personally, like to find a way", "of things. So, my view is that isn't really a", "category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this", "Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to get", "to allow them for the benefit of the OP but", "closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking", "folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping", "a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet", "acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is", "might form a different category of acceptable question. But one", "\"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer.", "resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable question.", "it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag", "was asking how to get something done, not for a", "OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here", "don't have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request,", "However, we don't have (as some others do) a tag", "for ways to do things? I would, personally, like to", "a way to allow them for the benefit of the", "that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that", "[another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\"", "way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368)", "for a list of things. So, my view is that", "\"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks think", "to do things? I would, personally, like to find a", "\"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for", "is considered valuable, is to make it known or to", "closure, but it is about devices for doing academic work.", "or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What", "\"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here,", "such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged", "work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not", "\"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things?", "allow them for the benefit of the OP but in", "it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\"", "it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource", "valuable, is to make it known or to somehow \"map\"", "get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was", "is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and", "doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things.", "providing this category is considered valuable, is to make it", "be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no", "things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for", "such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for", "and certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs", "view is that isn't really a shopping question at all.", "be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one", "but it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly", "shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as some", "for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes." ]
[ "as well as for the benefit of others who might", "well as for the benefit of others who might be", "Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago, but", "glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my question", "the benefit of others who might be interested in this", "9 years ago, but I don't think it should have", "to the same type of questions, even if mine concerns", "closed if it were asked today: it has evidently been", "be more suitable for that question than the Academia? And", "but I don't think it should have been closed if", "the same type of questions, even if mine concerns a", "has evidently been very useful to many people, and is", "and is there any other stackexchange forum that would be", "there any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable", "the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too,", "a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I", "they belong to the same type of questions, even if", "to ask for my question to be opened, for my", "is there any other stackexchange forum that would be more", "should have been closed if it were asked today: it", "even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than", "of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject", "I would like to ask for my question to be", "whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question", "question is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9", "matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask", "since they belong to the same type of questions, even", "than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for", "to many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum", "people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that would", "don't think it should have been closed if it were", "the Academia? And if the other question should be allowed,", "more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would", "very useful to many people, and is there any other", "would like to ask for my question to be opened,", "to be opened, for my benefit, as well as for", "think it should have been closed if it were asked", "have been closed if it were asked today: it has", "been closed if it were asked today: it has evidently", "that would be more suitable for that question than the", "for that question than the Academia? And if the other", "posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it should", "for the benefit of others who might be interested in", "too, since they belong to the same type of questions,", "as for the benefit of others who might be interested", "was [my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question", "mine be too, since they belong to the same type", "question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they", "Consequently, I would like to ask for my question to", "other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since", "suitable for that question than the Academia? And if the", "question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think", "questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter", "if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be", "allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the", "[my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is", "years ago, but I don't think it should have been", "forum that would be more suitable for that question than", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open?", "opened, for my benefit, as well as for the benefit", "should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong", "question to be opened, for my benefit, as well as", "question than the Academia? And if the other question should", "a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my", "Academia? And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't", "be too, since they belong to the same type of", "open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago,", "benefit, as well as for the benefit of others who", "my benefit, as well as for the benefit of others", "been very useful to many people, and is there any", "if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a", "type of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche", "subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to", "useful to many people, and is there any other stackexchange", "evidently been very useful to many people, and is there", "similar question is open? Sure, the other question was posted", "the other question was posted 9 years ago, but I", "more suitable for that question than the Academia? And if", "my question to be opened, for my benefit, as well", "other question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't", "were asked today: it has evidently been very useful to", "same type of questions, even if mine concerns a more", "as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the", "for my benefit, as well as for the benefit of", "asked today: it has evidently been very useful to many", "it should have been closed if it were asked today:", "other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that", "would be more suitable for that question than the Academia?", "ago, but I don't think it should have been closed", "mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary.", "is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years", "it has evidently been very useful to many people, and", "belong to the same type of questions, even if mine", "ask for my question to be opened, for my benefit,", "be opened, for my benefit, as well as for the", "closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure,", "And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine", "like to ask for my question to be opened, for", "\"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other", "was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it", "than the Academia? And if the other question should be", "benefit of others who might be interested in this topic.", "be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to", "if it were asked today: it has evidently been very", "concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently,", "Why was [my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar", "shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the same", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question was", "many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that", "niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like", "I don't think it should have been closed if it", "any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for", "for my question to be opened, for my benefit, as", "today: it has evidently been very useful to many people,", "stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that question", "it were asked today: it has evidently been very useful", "that question than the Academia? And if the other question" ]
[ "worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago.", "a generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct", "I realised that with some regularity there seem to be", "to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which", "be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413).", "the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand", "seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which", "ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would these", "[An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks", "grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older", "an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when", "question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many", "many years ago. A very recent example is the following:", "many years to which these could be marked as duplicates?", "acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when to", "when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to", "not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about", "questions, it looks like the actual problem is not an", "actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a", "misconduct after many years to which these could be marked", "be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many", "to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend", "like the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is", "about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years", "it looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic", "about alleged misconduct after many years to which these could", "the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there", "misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent example", "is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question", "is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe", "alleged misconduct after many years to which these could be", "regularity there seem to be question of people who seem", "that with some regularity there seem to be question of", "following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from", "years ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would", "there a generic question about when to worry about alleged", "recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds", "question of people who seem to be obsessively worried about", "example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for", "reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most", "looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic one.", "seem to be question of people who seem to be", "older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like", "[Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my", "with some regularity there seem to be question of people", "obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years", "about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A", "adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An", "program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it", "generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after", "one. Is there a generic question about when to worry", "for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions).", "some regularity there seem to be question of people who", "problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic", "my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these", "alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent", "A very recent example is the following: [Would these be", "people who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged", "Recently I realised that with some regularity there seem to", "there seem to be question of people who seem to", "realised that with some regularity there seem to be question", "these questions, it looks like the actual problem is not", "be question of people who seem to be obsessively worried", "after many years to which these could be marked as", "which happend many years ago. A very recent example is", "In most of these questions, it looks like the actual", "of people who seem to be obsessively worried about some", "worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which these", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like the", "who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct", "some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very", "severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In", "of these questions, it looks like the actual problem is", "most of these questions, it looks like the actual problem", "very recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate", "undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions,", "happend many years ago. A very recent example is the", "Is there a generic question about when to worry about", "to be question of people who seem to be obsessively", "these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate", "from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of" ]
[ "> > Currently we are planning to move forward with", "test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the", "engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would like", "answers in site settings. We > would like to hear", "a few sites that ask us to do so. >", "that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It", "the accepted answer (if there is one), the one that", "accepted answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers)", "not be > able to run a test on each", "on all SE sites by default and unpin it on", "Currently we are planning to move forward with one of", "by default and pin it back > on a few", "answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) >", "of votes by default (users can also change to sort", "will not be > able to run a test on", "the accepted answer on all SE sites by default and", "to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you", "doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here in", "> 19th. > > > So, what do y'all think?", "across the network, SE has decided as a default to", "y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how", "to move forward with the status quo and not to", "sites by default and unpin it on a few sites", "the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by", "the engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would", "have a discussion like this one to request the \"new", "> 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all", "Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin the", "let us know what you think will work best for", "discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It", "votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior", "become outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack", "settings. We > would like to hear from you all", "re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus", "we will not be > able to run a test", "We can change the way the engine sorts answers in", "> > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via", "one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: >", "please do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share", "in site settings. We > would like to hear from", "consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even", "sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we", "that some sites do not want to unpin the accepted", "do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with", "> do so. > > > Please let us know", "discuss this question with your community it would be >", "want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move", "of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > >", "Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one", "things were. We can re-start the conversation in the future.", "of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone", "to collect feedback before the end of September > 19th.", "the answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if", "all the others in order of votes by default (users", "us to > do so. > > > Please let", "the one with most votes rather than the one that", "> > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review,", "> your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that", "to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of", "result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have", "let me acknowledge in advance that we will not be", "behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from", "for your site! > If you can discuss this question", "from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > >", "users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being", "two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > >", "by default (users can also change to sort by Active", "to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between", "sites can have a discussion like this one to request", "we'll stick with the default option of how things were.", "I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting", "As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\"", "able to run a test on each site.) > >", "us know what you think will work best for your", "default ends up going, how would you like things to", "that we will not be > able to run a", "so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on", "> If you can discuss this question with your community", "consensus here in favor of a change, so it seems", "in favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick", "this question with your community it would be > awesome.", "decided to move forward with the status quo and not", "and not to change the default behaviour on existing sites.", "way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We >", "scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > > 1.", "is quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE,", "benefit from the top answer being the one with most", "quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can change", "answer* (if there is one), the one that the OP", "Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by default", "like to hear from you all if it is something", "status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to", "Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted answer", "from you all if it is something you want to", "Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can", "the top answer being the one with most votes rather", "think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how would", "that have become outdated, and a test that suggests users", "following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff", "a test on each site.) > > > Currently we", "Please let us know what you think will work best", "2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE", "votes by default (users can also change to sort by", "it would be > awesome. We are going to collect", "the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks", "Meta announcement: > > We can change the way the", "can discuss this question with your community it would be", "on a few sites that ask us to > do", "planning to move forward with one of two scenarios, >", "status quo and not to change the default behaviour on", "conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be", "the others in order of votes by default (users can", "answer pinned > on all SE sites by default and", "on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the", "are going to collect feedback before the end of September", "change, so it seems we'll stick with the default option", "list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the", "Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted", "OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed", "your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer", "feedback before the end of September > 19th. > >", "to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the", "> awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the", "acknowledge in advance that we will not be > able", "has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that", "has decided as a default to keep the \"old way\",", "changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement:", "(meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision)", "to hear from you all if it is something you", "site.) > > > Currently we are planning to move", "default (users can also change to sort by Active or", "the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the", "with one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback:", "Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted", "> > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way", "with the default option of how things were. We can", "network, SE has decided as a default to keep the", "is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all", "> on all SE sites by default and unpin it", "answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that suggests", "each site.) > > > Currently we are planning to", "to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned", "> > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE", "accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also", "your community it would be > awesome. We are going", "before the end of September > 19th. > > >", "followed by all the others in order of votes by", "feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin", "ends up going, how would you like things to behave", "one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on", "is one), the one that the OP decides is to", "> would like to hear from you all if it", "> Please let us know what you think will work", "question with your community it would be > awesome. We", "stick with the default option of how things were. We", "on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer", "feedback on this change across the network, SE has decided", "share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't", "is the accepted answer* (if there is one), the one", "\"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of", "\"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like this", "answer, we decided to move forward with the status quo", "like there's going to be consensus here in favor of", "you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes", "> (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log", "the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to", "from that Meta announcement: > > We can change the", "is something you want to see on > your site.", "quo and not to change the default behaviour on existing", "that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack", "to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do", "it on a few sites that ask us to >", "outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow", "from the top answer being the one with most votes", "way the default ends up going, how would you like", "collect feedback before the end of September > 19th. >", "way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the", "If you can discuss this question with your community it", "run a test on each site.) > > > Currently", "be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the", "> > We can change the way the engine sorts", "that Meta announcement: > > We can change the way", "what you think will work best for your site! >", "> We can change the way the engine sorts answers", "UPDATE: Having gotten mixed feedback on this change across the", "options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until", "site! > If you can discuss this question with your", "how things were. We can re-start the conversation in the", "and unpin it on a few sites that ask us", "way\", but sites can have a discussion like this one", "think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense,", "staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's", "Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites", "you all if it is something you want to see", "all SE sites by default and pin it back >", "log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be", "you can discuss this question with your community it would", "it is something you want to see on > your", "can have a discussion like this one to request the", "the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like", "decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus", "not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to", "accepted answer on all SE sites by default and pin", "> able to run a test on each site.) >", "a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from", "It is followed by all the others in order of", "forward with the status quo and not to change the", "in advance that we will not be > able to", "sites that ask us to > do so. > >", "move forward with one of two scenarios, > based on", "do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going,", "be consensus here in favor of a change, so it", "the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for", "sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your", "a change, so it seems we'll stick with the default", "[until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is", "recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the", "even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other", "default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the", "favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick with", "SE sites by default and pin it back > on", "your site! > If you can discuss this question with", "gotten mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE", "19th. > > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever", "we decided to move forward with the status quo and", "can change the way the engine sorts answers in site", "like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the", "your site makes sense, please do the following: > >", "one that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\".", "be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others", "advance that we will not be > able to run", "Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > >", "> 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites", "work best for your site! > If you can discuss", "--- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow)", "this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted", "have become outdated, and a test that suggests users on", "it seems we'll stick with the default option of how", "Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially", "test on each site.) > > > Currently we are", "not to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If", "going, how would you like things to behave on this", "(users can also change to sort by Active or Oldest).", "> > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all", "> based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin", "On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack", "see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in", "all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the", "So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends", "do so. > > > Please let us know what", "pin it back > on a few sites that ask", "1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by", "that appears first is the accepted answer (if there is", "change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result", "sites by default and pin it back > on a", "if it is something you want to see on >", "suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer", "Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites", "do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided", "it back > on a few sites that ask us", "and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit", "default and pin it back > on a few sites", "Whichever way the default ends up going, how would you", "that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top", "Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one with", "for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want", "rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has", "\"correct\". It is followed by all the others in order", "a few sites that ask us to > do so.", "behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted", "the default ends up going, how would you like things", "accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the status", "site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will", "the one that the OP decides is to be marked", "on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: >", "request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the", "and pin it back > on a few sites that", "the end of September > 19th. > > > So,", "> Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some", "change the way the engine sorts answers in site settings.", "unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with", "on each site.) > > > Currently we are planning", "move forward with the status quo and not to change", "on this change across the network, SE has decided as", "with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem", "announcement: > > We can change the way the engine", "going to collect feedback before the end of September >", "others in order of votes by default (users can also", "We > would like to hear from you all if", "can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's", "top answer being the one with most votes rather than", "sorts answers in site settings. We > would like to", "(if there is one), the one that the OP decides", "the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do", "we are planning to move forward with one of two", "based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the", "makes sense, please do the following: > > > (meta", "to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from", "the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top", "the network, SE has decided as a default to keep", "seems we'll stick with the default option of how things", "two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and", "Having gotten mixed feedback on this change across the network,", "between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange", "there is one), the one that the OP decides is", "sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of user", "on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted", "order of votes by default (users can also change to", "in order of votes by default (users can also change", "sense, please do the following: > > > (meta discussion,", "the voting is quite even between the two options. ---", "default option of how things were. We can re-start the", "answer being the one with most votes rather than the", "so it seems we'll stick with the default option of", "first is the accepted answer (if there is one), the", "up going, how would you like things to behave on", "one), the one that the OP decides is to be", "now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta", "are planning to move forward with one of two scenarios,", "SE has decided as a default to keep the \"old", "can also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As", "with your community it would be > awesome. We are", "default and unpin it on a few sites that ask", "think will work best for your site! > If you", "We can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated", "us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer", "the status quo and not to change the default behaviour", "(Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will not", "you want to see on > your site. (Please let", "quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all", "decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by", "to move forward with one of two scenarios, > based", "do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned >", "the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since", "of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become", "discussion like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning", "hear from you all if it is something you want", "on all SE sites by default and pin it back", "answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if there", "> on a few sites that ask us to do", "back > on a few sites that ask us to", "> > > Please let us know what you think", "If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site", "site settings. We > would like to hear from you", "will work best for your site! > If you can", "most votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this", "what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up", "but sites can have a discussion like this one to", "to be consensus here in favor of a change, so", "of September > 19th. > > > So, what do", "than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now", "accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by default", "awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the end", "change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think", "of a change, so it seems we'll stick with the", "option of how things were. We can re-start the conversation", "> > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the", "the accepted answer from the top of the list of", "some sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer,", "know what you think will work best for your site!", "or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about", "unpin it on a few sites that ask us to", "one with most votes rather than the one that is", "feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on", "how would you like things to behave on this site?", "> > Please let us know what you think will", "since the voting is quite even between the two options.", "is followed by all the others in order of votes", "being the one with most votes rather than the one", "you think will work best for your site! > If", "everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not", "that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the", "> Currently we are planning to move forward with one", "future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the", "end of September > 19th. > > > So, what", "one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer", "by all the others in order of votes by default", "> > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that", "decided as a default to keep the \"old way\", but", "this change across the network, SE has decided as a", "\"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that", "want to see on > your site. (Please let me", "change across the network, SE has decided as a default", "a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can", "few sites that ask us to do so. > 2.", "about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test", "pinned > on all SE sites by default and unpin", "accepted answer (if there is one), the one that the", "that ask us to > do so. > > >", "all SE sites by default and unpin it on a", "accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do the", "Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow,", "site makes sense, please do the following: > > >", "with the status quo and not to change the default", "existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on", "on your site makes sense, please do the following: >", "other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer", "unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please", "a discussion like this one to request the \"new way\":", "the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed", "updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is", "on a few sites that ask us to do so.", "and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first", "community it would be > awesome. We are going to", "We are going to collect feedback before the end of", "as a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites", "mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE has", "the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is", "\"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the two", "with most votes rather than the one that is accepted,", "best for your site! > If you can discuss this", "something you want to see on > your site. (Please", "all if it is something you want to see on", "sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears", "of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback.", "the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites,", "sites that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep", "SE sites by default and unpin it on a few", "by Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback,", "top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to", "of how things were. We can re-start the conversation in", "StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that", "by default and unpin it on a few sites that", "on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance", "voting is quite even between the two options. --- On", "especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a", "me acknowledge in advance that we will not be >", "Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite", "> > > Currently we are planning to move forward", "in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\"", "default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have", "September > 19th. > > > So, what do y'all", "your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we", "the way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We", "would like to hear from you all if it is", "so. > > > Please let us know what you", "the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning", "feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and", "[Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the list", "answer on your site makes sense, please do the following:", "to > do so. > > > Please let us", "here in favor of a change, so it seems we'll", "be > able to run a test on each site.)", "[this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted", "be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback before", "keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion", "appears first is the accepted answer (if there is one),", "user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated,", "SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like", "Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We", "would be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback", "there's going to be consensus here in favor of a", "to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a", "were. We can re-start the conversation in the future. I", "ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted", "the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE", "is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers).", "seem like there's going to be consensus here in favor", "few sites that ask us to > do so. >", "marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others in", "to see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge", "ask us to > do so. > > > Please", "> So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default", "also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a", "answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing", "answer on all SE sites by default and pin it", "the default option of how things were. We can re-start", "going to be consensus here in favor of a change,", "to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward", "the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to", "It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here", "to run a test on each site.) > > >", "via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going", "a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that", "forward with one of two scenarios, > based on your" ]
[ "free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I", "I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism &", "that one race is better than the other, neither explicitly", "think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for", "about the user who made those claims, than me. Is", "I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well", "My post has absolutely nothing to do with race.** I", "about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first", "community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned", "be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is", "chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about", "not in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing", "for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't", "and I am ok to be ciricized. I think being", "than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the", "ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is serious,", "also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") *&", "comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that", "these comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting", "view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer", "absolutely nothing to do with race. I generally support free", "with race. I generally support free speech, and I am", "expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas and", "am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused", "is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention.", "comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a", "wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism", "posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of", "tells more about the user who made those claims, than", "race, or suggesting that one race is better than the", "everyone in the world to accept western ideas and practice", "last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not", "this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment", "accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world", "the world to accept western ideas and practice is also", "racism is serious, and it tells more about the user", "the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any", "this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it is allowed,", "I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in", "and it tells more about the user who made those", "race is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly,", "be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle", "stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above", "is serious, and it tells more about the user who", "my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these", "truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any race,", "do with race.** I generally support free speech, and I", "am curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT:", "race.* I generally support free speech, and I am ok", "I think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and", "don't mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason", "I am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely", "I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was", "answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899):", "this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above got removed.", "mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason for", "am able to handle criticism & reason for my views,", "post has absolutely nothing to do with race. I generally", "implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other way.", "than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't think", "user who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour", "flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well be", "not between the lines, not in any other way. *My", "accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there", "or suggesting that one race is better than the other,", "racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric", "& ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last comment on", "clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism", "well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to", "I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those", "have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused", "answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments:", "in the world to accept western ideas and practice is", "the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is", "Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is", "explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any", "way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the", "I generally support free speech, and I am ok to", "suggesting that one race is better than the other, neither", "to do with race. I generally support free speech, and", "the lines, not in any other way. My post has", "do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race", "to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism", "western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is", "is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one", "to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and", "lines, not in any other way. My post has absolutely", "ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of", "one race is better than the other, neither explicitly or", "Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the", "of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to", "is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone", "way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with race.", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting", "more about the user who made those claims, than me.", "one of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious", "and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism", "now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is", "accused of racism is serious, and it tells more about", "nothing to do with race. I generally support free speech,", "generally support free speech, and I am ok to be", "between the lines, not in any other way. My post", "there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source:", "or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other", "in any other way. *My post has absolutely nothing to", "it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator", "\"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas", "who made those claims, than me. *Is this behaviour allowed", "the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines,", "criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is better", "moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind,", "able to handle criticism & reason for my views, but", "might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able", "but I am curious about this community's stance on this", "is also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\")", "no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of", "claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't", "curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the", "Is this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it is", "practice is also racist/classist and there is no way around", "intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\").", "criticism & reason for my views, but I am curious", "it tells more about the user who made those claims,", "to handle criticism & reason for my views, but I", "this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last comment", "for my views, but I am curious about this community's", "attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I", "think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it", "reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of", "Recently I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I", "comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I", "allowed here? I don't think it is allowed, so I", "who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness", "was accused of racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the", "has absolutely nothing to do with race.* I generally support", "racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept", "ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is no", "I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am", "(source: one of the last comment on my answer now.", "serious, and it tells more about the user who made", "the user who made those claims, than me. Is this", "behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it is allowed, so", "handle criticism & reason for my views, but I am", "world to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist", "neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in", "my views, but I am curious about this community's stance", "\"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric", "around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last", "so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might", "any other way. *My post has absolutely nothing to do", "ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear", "falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells more", "I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one", "any race, or suggesting that one race is better than", "I am able to handle criticism & reason for my", "about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize", "not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who", "not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is", "on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above got", "support free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized.", "here?** I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged", "on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal", "ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the last comment on my", "absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do", "is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not", "reason for my views, but I am curious about this", "I am curious about this community's stance on this issue.", "my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\".", "speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I think", "a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads", "\"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my", "me. Is this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it", "([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western", "made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here?", "being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells", "allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I", "of these comments: I do not criticize any race, or", "other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not", "answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither", "those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I", "don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments", "and practice is also racist/classist and there is no way", "& reason for my views, but I am curious about", "better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between", "is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely", "of racism is serious, and it tells more about the", "question. I was accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone", "is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I", "to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And,", "other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with", "of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance", "chauvinism** (source: one of the last comment on my answer", "views, but I am curious about this community's stance on", "those comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong." ]
[ "their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily", "A question was recently asked about the [gender distribution of", "is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set", "close this question and to solicit reasons in both directions.", "Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\"", "felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There", "don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The", "do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a", "whether I was wrong to close this question and to", "Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a", "it is a small set of people who make decisions", "necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The specific", "specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start", "recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel", "off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a number", "sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea", "are many areas of Academia for which there is no", "two reasons: There are many a number of Nobel", "of success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender", "on their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't", "* Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all", "of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee.", "laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on", "reasons: * There are many a number of Nobel prizes,", "success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is", "own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align", "process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this", "I was wrong to close this question and to solicit", "in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of", "is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to", "and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of", "a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only", "academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique", "on whether I was wrong to close this question and", "to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's", "metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. ", "vote on this question. I felt this question was off-topic", "about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to", "\"academia\"... it is a small set of people who make", "distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with", "areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize.", "of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding", "There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of", "a small set of people who make decisions based on", "idea of success. The specific question asked above—asking about", "including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa...", "off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia, academic", "many areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel", "only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many", "this here to start a discussion on whether I was", "for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here", "off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question was", "set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with", "distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the", "all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. -", "critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting", "I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: ", "are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government,", "of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously", "on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"...", "there are many areas of Academia for which there is", "* The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly", "wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons in", "asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has", "the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close", "with academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked", "decisions based on their own set of criteria, and their", "Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote", "[research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in", "who make decisions based on their own set of criteria,", "non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a", "culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) The Nobel Committee is", "The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is", "- Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel", "academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked above—asking", "general critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic", "decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting", "question. I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons:", "prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related to", "a discussion on whether I was wrong to close this", "industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are", "for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes", "It's a general critique of a decision-making process for a", "a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to", "discussion on whether I was wrong to close this question", "number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very", "are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no way", "asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize", "of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. ", "government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent", "of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's", "no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people", "I'm posting this here to start a discussion on whether", "was off-topic for two reasons: There are many a", "awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia,", "people who make decisions based on their own set of", "to start a discussion on whether I was wrong to", "Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which there", "to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for", "was recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021", "Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee", "fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no", "Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small", "here to start a discussion on whether I was wrong", "small set of people who make decisions based on their", "for two reasons: * There are many a number of", "make decisions based on their own set of criteria, and", "the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I", "Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which", "question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that", "which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there", "the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I", "start a discussion on whether I was wrong to close", "Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including", "as that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement,", "award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion", "committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion on", "no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals", "some of which are only very tenuously related to Academia.", "clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia,", "tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of", "this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are", "prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in", "related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia", "cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question.", "about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021).", "set of people who make decisions based on their own", "align with academia's idea of success. * The specific question", "work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The", "award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process for", "was wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons", "there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded", "way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people who", "a general critique of a decision-making process for a specific", "their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success.", "that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or", "Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working", "of which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly,", "nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award.", "are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are", "I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this", "posting this here to start a discussion on whether I", "individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) ", "academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields", "above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing", "very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas", "has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the", "a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm", "criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea", "which there is no Nobel prize. Nobel Prizes are", "* The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it", "* There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some", "on this question. I felt this question was off-topic for", "and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "question was recently asked about the [gender distribution of the", "individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and", "is a small set of people who make decisions based", "working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual", "or the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making", "of people who make decisions based on their own set", "are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which", "Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors,", "Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related", "to close this question and to solicit reasons in both", "based on their own set of criteria, and their metrics", "[gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast", "question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many", "in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work.", "as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question", "specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as", "academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of", "Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel", "the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process", "The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic,", "this question. I felt this question was off-topic for two", "many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are", "gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do", "deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt", "achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of a", "with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general", "\"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this", "to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry,", "2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as" ]
[ "is also a useful reference for all those who might", "useful reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie)", "reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with", "our most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions", "to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two", "that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question,", "it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here.", "Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other", "question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "\"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected", "this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at", "an answer. Even a short answer will do; others can", "world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer", "discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an answer", "if you are familiar with the grad school system in", "to edit); if you are familiar with the grad school", "other parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer.", "a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be", "for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist", "this is also a useful reference for all those who", "most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process", "should feel free to edit); if you are familiar with", "[How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "Even a short answer will do; others can expand or", "the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short", "meta question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1.", "in other parts of the world, please consider drafting an", "this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from", "for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a", "far our most useful canonical question is: [How does the", "let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only", "who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in", "a short answer will do; others can expand or revise", "other parts of the world. In some sense, this is", "1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or", "completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a", "answer will do; others can expand or revise it later.", "school systems in other parts of the world. In some", "US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for", "anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that", "also a useful reference for all those who might [not", "familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of the", "feel free to edit); if you are familiar with the", "other than the US. In addition to being a good", "drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do; others", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for", "people should feel free to edit); if you are familiar", "parts of the world. In some sense, this is a", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "[a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US.", "In some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries)", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently,", "from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition to", "here. 2. Right now we only have an answer for", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of", "exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right", "only have an answer for the US (which people should", "[not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts", "consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do;", "some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta", "By far our most useful canonical question is: [How does", "short answer will do; others can expand or revise it", "If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks", "for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad", "with the grad school system in other parts of the", "please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will", "free to edit); if you are familiar with the grad", "sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question", "the world. In some sense, this is a follow up", "is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school", "shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2.", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted", "So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this", "grad school systems in other parts of the world. In", "\"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for all", "asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question", "In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions", "be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also", "the US (which people should feel free to edit); if", "of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a", "useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work", "we only have an answer for the US (which people", "in other parts of the world. In some sense, this", "would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this", "answer for the US (which people should feel free to", "thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that", "for the US (which people should feel free to edit);", "system in other parts of the world, please consider drafting", "canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work for", "parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even", "the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\"", "good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical", "question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If", "new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In", "now we only have an answer for the US (which", "you are familiar with the grad school system in other", "to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new", "those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems", "suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't", "are familiar with the grad school system in other parts", "the grad school system in other parts of the world,", "as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference", "grad school system in other parts of the world, please", "answer. Even a short answer will do; others can expand", "drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the", "has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries", "countries other than the US. In addition to being a", "canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all),", "(or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have", "(which people should feel free to edit); if you are", "a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for", "for countries other than the US. In addition to being", "have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have", "Right now we only have an answer for the US", "a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years", "that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an", "is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "of the world. In some sense, this is a follow", "follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago.", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise", "ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for", "question, this is also a useful reference for all those", "question is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So,", "questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\"", "world. In some sense, this is a follow up to", "addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that", "with grad school systems in other parts of the world.", "rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful", "US (which people should feel free to edit); if you", "that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy", "canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition", "three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has", "2. Right now we only have an answer for the", "all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we", "an answer for the US (which people should feel free", "a useful reference for all those who might [not be", "edit); if you are familiar with the grad school system", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908)", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "[this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two asks:", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237)", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a", "familiar with the grad school system in other parts of", "years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions", "Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than", "than the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate", "might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other", "systems in other parts of the world. In some sense,", "school system in other parts of the world, please consider", "otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is", "at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now", "two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "have an answer for the US (which people should feel", "target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as" ]
[ "'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions", "tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some", "'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and probably", "\| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \|", "the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "media site, and probably does not need its own separate", "The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly", "'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested", "these are very straightforward, but please let me know if", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\")", "tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "--- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\")", "retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "to make a post. I believe most of these are", "questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged", "'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions", "'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference in", "probably does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "social media site, and probably does not need its own", "[bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show", "tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully", "'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is", "'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be", "believe most of these are very straightforward, but please let", "be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show", "Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \|", "is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\").", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \|", "\"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged", "Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged", "already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See", "questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions", "for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no", "months ago, but it seems that the queue is not", "some redundant tags, so I decided to make a post.", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct", "requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \|", "post. I believe most of these are very straightforward, but", "a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments", "\| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \|", "\"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged", "'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged", "but please let me know if any of them requires", "question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "tag that was likely created due to a typo a", "any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \|", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example.", "to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to", "up some redundant tags, so I decided to make a", "\| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show", "questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \|", "[publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged", "need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined", "I believe most of these are very straightforward, but please", "\| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions", "mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \|", "\| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions", "'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by", "of these are very straightforward, but please let me know", "\| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question,", "one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "[personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged", "\| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions", "a few months ago, but it seems that the queue", "had a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant", "\| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym", "two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \|", "questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \|", "make a post. I believe most of these are very", "\"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions", "Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \|", "tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter", "\| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \|", "there seems to be no clear difference in the usage", "retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged", "had [suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that was", "--- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications", "example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter", "\| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying", "also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems", "seems to be no clear difference in the usage of", "'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109).", "discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision", "[personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show", "See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\")", "site, and probably does not need its own separate tag.", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated.", "I also had a few more suggestions to clean up", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\")", "explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and", "\| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "a tag that was likely created due to a typo", "\| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show", "[collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged", "can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged", "'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse", "separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \|", "\"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\")", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for", "be no clear difference in the usage of the two.", "questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\")", "due to a typo a few months ago, but it", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "I had [suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that", "of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully", "\| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions", "questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \|", "be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "\"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one", "\| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions", "are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there", "'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication", "should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review", "tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show", "\"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "it seems that the queue is not monitored. I also", "and there seems to be no clear difference in the", "[suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that was likely", "info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook", "no clear difference in the usage of the two. \|", "and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers:", "retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook", "questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged", "created due to a typo a few months ago, but", "\| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show", "clear difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \|", "clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to make", "\| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym", "[mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show", "tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and", "\"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct", "\"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion", "\| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| ---", "an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to", "tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes", "\| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "to be no clear difference in the usage of the", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from", "\| Twitter is another social media site, and probably does", "that was likely created due to a typo a few", "\"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an", "tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review", "\| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \|", "combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator", "Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments", "\"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\")", "\| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \|", "ago, but it seems that the queue is not monitored.", "know if any of them requires a separate discussion. \|", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged", "as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \|", "questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show", "seems that the queue is not monitored. I also had", "by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged", "are very straightforward, but please let me know if any", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site,", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media", "tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively,", "synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \|", "\| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be", "tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\")", "in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "--- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \|", "from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \|", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show", "\| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \|", "'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \|", "is another social media site, and probably does not need", "tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged.", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show", "is not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions", "the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| ---", "Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "so I decided to make a post. I believe most", "\"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\")", "\| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "the queue is not monitored. I also had a few", "'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109).", "Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| ---", "\| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "another social media site, and probably does not need its", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29", "of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \|", "tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See", "\| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show", "[bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of", "'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration", "\| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \|", "tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\")", "\| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be", "\"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\")", "questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\")", "answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision", "questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \|", "tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109).", "'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \|", "a tag synonym for a tag that was likely created", "if any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \|", "typo a few months ago, but it seems that the", "'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should", "and probably does not need its own separate tag. \|", "\"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\")", "most of these are very straightforward, but please let me", "tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for now", "tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \|", "tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\")", "[review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show", "\| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag", "\| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio).", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions", "\| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\")", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged", "likely created due to a typo a few months ago,", "them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym", "\| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another", "[Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also", "44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"),", "Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw", "29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\")", "tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for now \|", "questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \|", "a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109).", "of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "\| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \|", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social", "I decided to make a post. I believe most of", "Twitter is another social media site, and probably does not", "\| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions", "with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show", "was likely created due to a typo a few months", "queue is not monitored. I also had a few more", "questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and", "tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \|", "'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \|", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \|", "--- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")", "tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process", "[errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of", "[collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can", "\| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions", "[bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "[bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions", "but it seems that the queue is not monitored. I", "suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided", "'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions", "Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged", "\| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \|", "--- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting", "[mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The", "me know if any of them requires a separate discussion.", "decided to make a post. I believe most of these", "alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "[abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions", "tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44", "synonym for a tag that was likely created due to", "a post. I believe most of these are very straightforward,", "\"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\")", "redundant tags, so I decided to make a post. I", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\")", "of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested", "difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \|", "questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \|", "tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already", "\"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\")", "tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to", "for a tag that was likely created due to a", "'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags,", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show", "'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear", "\| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \|", "more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I", "Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| ---", "please let me know if any of them requires a", "\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\")", "few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so", "tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "[facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "tags, so I decided to make a post. I believe", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions", "tag synonym for a tag that was likely created due", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum", "questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \|", "\"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged", "\| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions", "\| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "\| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \|", "\| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \|", "discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\")", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag", "[quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged,", "very straightforward, but please let me know if any of", "tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions", "[review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "[review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions", "\| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show", "[publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "[twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show", "'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \|", "\"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions", "let me know if any of them requires a separate", "\| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "\| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions", "a typo a few months ago, but it seems that", "\| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show", "also had a few more suggestions to clean up some", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged", "'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged", "[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "few months ago, but it seems that the queue is", "tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested)", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show", "questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is", "its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to clean", "straightforward, but please let me know if any of them", "questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \|", "[Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "to a typo a few months ago, but it seems", "\| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged", "not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "that the queue is not monitored. I also had a", "tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference", "See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying" ]
[ "on academics and students be on or off topic? For", "academics and students be on or off topic? For example:", "of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or", "stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new", "questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue,", "added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether", "to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show", "that focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and", "or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having", "wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\").", "students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the", "Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot", "questions that focus on the effects of ADHD on academics", "it is a medical issue, but a lot of folks", "and students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive", "ADHD on academics and students be on or off topic?", "ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag. I'm", "issue, but a lot of folks in academia are affected", "on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage", "on the effects of ADHD on academics and students be", "example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP", "a lot of folks in academia are affected by it.", "'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a", "mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete", "is a medical issue, but a lot of folks in", "\"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical", "of ADHD on academics and students be on or off", "the OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed", "OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings", "tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the", "medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia are", "the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged", "Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot of", "whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd", "effects of ADHD on academics and students be on or", "tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but", "but a lot of folks in academia are affected by", "has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about", "the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it", "[adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a", "feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete the", "Should questions that focus on the effects of ADHD on", "a medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia", "the effects of ADHD on academics and students be on", "off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368).", "new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand", "focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and students", "having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag.", "For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the", "about whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag", "or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice?", "a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to", "expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions", "tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is", "be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc", "postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a", "delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically", "topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And", "I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki", "the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added", "And the OP has added a new tag. I'm of", "[Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has" ]
[ "questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't", "them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this", "came across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently,", "except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question).", "across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it", "make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably", "of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from", "it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and", "are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any", "the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has", "\"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three", "originated from this question). Do we really need this tag?", "has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently,", "tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which", "tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen", "(three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make", "any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do", "doesn't make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878)", "I came across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\").", "questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of", "and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them", "closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of", "fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do we", "in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag", "the tag originated from this question). Do we really need", "tag originated from this question). Do we really need this", "which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in", "Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed),", "sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the", "(probably the tag originated from this question). Do we really", "it doesn't make sense in any of them except [this", "'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are", "[guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions", "of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense", "apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them except" ]
[ "side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13", "hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec", "see examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On", "occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the", "link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see", "right hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured", "\"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of", "top of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this", "the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs", "should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at", "word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the", "Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo", "On the right hand side, you should see the word,", "this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should", "Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the", "[Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured", "this be fixed?* (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in", "e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top", "To see examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions>", "fixed?* (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error", "column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere:", "the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at", "you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20", "visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you", "also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading", "misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side,", "this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when", "'20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can", "\"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured -> occurred](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/364538/typo-in-an-error-occured-when-uploading-the-image-occured-occurred))", "in \"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured ->", "the right hand side, you should see the word, e.g.", "the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand", "13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column.", "at the top of the column. Can this be fixed?", "the top of the column. Can this be fixed?* (note,", "examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the", "(note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured", "of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right", "be fixed?* (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An", "elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\".", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see the", "see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\"", "at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this", "1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this be", "of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also" ]
[ "It needs a better description for a start, but is", "can do to regularize the usage? And, given the state", "\"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500", "This is a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show", "has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage", "extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at", "could be applied (as it is) to about half the", "regularize the usage? And, given the state of it, what", "to about half the questions here. It needs a better", "given the state of it, what should the description say?", "a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged", "a start, but is there anything else the community can", "the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have", "at all and could be applied (as it is) to", "500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't", "know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been", "be applied (as it is) to about half the questions", "to regularize the usage? And, given the state of it,", "is) to about half the questions here. It needs a", "here. It needs a better description for a start, but", "nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It", "bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\")", "to have any consistency at all and could be applied", "have any consistency at all and could be applied (as", "any consistency at all and could be applied (as it", "questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem", "but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to", "is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency", "doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and could", "seem to have any consistency at all and could be", "It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and", "consistency at all and could be applied (as it is)", "for a start, but is there anything else the community", "description for a start, but is there anything else the", "tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but", "'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the", "start, but is there anything else the community can do", "is there anything else the community can do to regularize", "is a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions", "inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all", "needs a better description for a start, but is there", "there anything else the community can do to regularize the", "I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has", "a better description for a start, but is there anything", "all and could be applied (as it is) to about", "anything else the community can do to regularize the usage?", "else the community can do to regularize the usage? And,", "questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions,", "tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to", "half the questions here. It needs a better description for", "the questions here. It needs a better description for a", "do to regularize the usage? And, given the state of", "but is there anything else the community can do to", "And, given the state of it, what should the description", "The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied", "questions here. It needs a better description for a start,", "been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is", "and could be applied (as it is) to about half", "the community can do to regularize the usage? And, given", "applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely", "about half the questions here. It needs a better description", "community can do to regularize the usage? And, given the", "usage? And, given the state of it, what should the", "[students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly", "applied (as it is) to about half the questions here.", "it is) to about half the questions here. It needs", "usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any", "the usage? And, given the state of it, what should", "to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent.", "(as it is) to about half the questions here. It", "better description for a start, but is there anything else" ]
[ "for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This", "that I fail to see. So - Do you agree", "- I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than", "got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because", "vote \"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled", "when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe", "been closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\"", "question is still open, a reason that I fail to", "of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\"", "closed as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples", "as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of", "scope of the site, and if not, why has it", "a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people", "almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later", "reason that I fail to see. So - Do you", "answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has not", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question? It asks", "stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there was", "list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so", "to see. So - Do you agree that this question", "so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead", "later when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought", "closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of", "it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why?", "has [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question? It", "see. So - Do you agree that this question fits", "\"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question", "was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year", "still open, a reason that I fail to see. So", "\"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly", "you agree that this question fits the scope of the", "it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers.", "that this question has not been closed - I was", "closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more", "It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain", "the question today, but thought maybe there was some reason", "today, but thought maybe there was some reason why the", "was some reason why the question is still open, a", "tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later when", "So - Do you agree that this question fits the", "a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping", "question today, but thought maybe there was some reason why", "question has not been closed - I was almost tempted", "the scope of the site, and if not, why has", "criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question to", "agree that this question fits the scope of the site,", "fits the scope of the site, and if not, why", "question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair", "this question has not been closed - I was almost", "shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it", "\"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled upon", "a reason that I fail to see. So - Do", "a year later when I stumbled upon the question today,", "It seems slightly unfair that this question has not been", "to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59", "not been closed - I was almost tempted to vote", "thought maybe there was some reason why the question is", "unfair that this question has not been closed - I", "question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got", "asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion.", "site, and if not, why has it not been closed?", "59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people", "it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer?", "this question fits the scope of the site, and if", "certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question", "some reason why the question is still open, a reason", "shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting", "people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious", "a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it,", "Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even", "has not been closed - I was almost tempted to", "why the question is still open, a reason that I", "maybe there was some reason why the question is still", "more than a year later when I stumbled upon the", "that this question fits the scope of the site, and", "a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is", "slightly unfair that this question has not been closed -", "question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a", "Do you agree that this question fits the scope of", "upon the question today, but thought maybe there was some", "me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes", "the site, and if not, why has it not been", "is so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet,", "year later when I stumbled upon the question today, but", "upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive", "people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\"", "I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there", "to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has", "This is so very obvious a shopping question to me,", "of the site, and if not, why has it not", "of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton", "- Do you agree that this question fits the scope", "fail to see. So - Do you agree that this", "I fail to see. So - Do you agree that", "not been closed as a shopping question? It asks for", "obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing", "even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that", "yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and", "as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It", "answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question,", "there was some reason why the question is still open,", "open, a reason that I fail to see. So -", "but thought maybe there was some reason why the question", "instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a", "than a year later when I stumbled upon the question", "question fits the scope of the site, and if not,", "been closed as a shopping question? It asks for a", "seems slightly unfair that this question has not been closed", "a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as", "to vote \"close\" more than a year later when I", "Why has [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question?", "very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of", "I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a", "fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a", "perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to", "the question is still open, a reason that I fail", "reason why the question is still open, a reason that", "Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more", "is still open, a reason that I fail to see.", "and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it", "more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this", "ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a", "a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems", "of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very" ]
[ "created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly", "instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion", "deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no", "are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\")", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "other two (which is kind of a duplicate of the", "standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\")", "deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no", "and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not", "\| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag", "\| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged", "tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to", "\| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent", "all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag", "world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new", "could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions", "[nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do)", "\| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are", "questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two", "\| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only", "\| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| ---", "in the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions)", "tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher", "with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link", "only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be", "\| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or", "\"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system,", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged", "Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions", "not necessary in the only two instances where it is", "tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags", "well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show", "the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in", "--- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no", "in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific", "of one of the other two (which is kind of", "as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility", "sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On", "higher education system in specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure", "[industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering)", "\| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only", "tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p)", "questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2", "where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \|", "comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags", "deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at", "[interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created", "differs in structure and style from the systems in North", "separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \|", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with", "will keep an eye on emerging new location tags \|", "'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged", "style from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere", "one of the other two (which is kind of a", "Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \|", "standards or conventions specific to the higher education system in", "specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the", "specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure", "only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one of", "[the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \|", "the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion,", "\| not necessary in the only two instances where it", "country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to", "(!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\")", "no \| not necessary in the only two instances where", "deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no", "the systems in other parts of the world. \| finished,", "\| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action", "the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a", "is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \|", "system in specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style", "to the higher education system in specific country/region/continent, which differs", "\| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show", "I have some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the", "with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with", "issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \|", "questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's", "Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring", "North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa", "at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \|", "[(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing", "\"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki", "'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well", "[germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific", "to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher education", "are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues", "\| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new location", "be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion,", "just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "--- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\")", "and style from the systems in other parts of the", "it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted", "entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \|", "differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions", "them duplicates of one of the other two (which is", "By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can", "(which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could", "wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \|", "of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on", "\"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced in", "\"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\")", "specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ", "the other two (which is kind of a duplicate of", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show", "for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your", "no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed),", "wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher", "only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \|", "partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes", "'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry", "tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of", "twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and", "not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be", "[socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4", "cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what", "education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and", "Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \|", "a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "higher education system, which differs in structure and style from", "of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with", "systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial", "\| no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates", "education system, which differs in structure and style from the", "[one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "\| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not", "the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts?", "to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and", "systems in other parts of the world. \| finished, will", "or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs", "other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted", "Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| ---", "differs in structure and style from the systems in other", "from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki", "Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and style", "other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an", "to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive.", "'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which", "[(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \|", "\| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion", "referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more", "very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards", "thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested", "and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion", "\| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or", "location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \|", "tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of", "two (which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th,", "in structure and style from the systems in other parts", "On standards or conventions specific to the higher education system", "two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \|", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with", "tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show", "which are closed), could be replaced in all instances with", "\| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \|", "which differs in structure and style from the systems in", "(2 of which are closed), could be replaced in all", "link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \|", "\| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision", "in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from", "specific to the higher education system in specific country/region/continent, which", "questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions", "\| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \|", "[minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5", "Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By", "instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which", "wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question", "mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison", "\| no \| not necessary in the only two instances", "no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of", "western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or", "no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \|", "of them duplicates of one of the other two (which", "Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "\| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \|", "your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \|", "somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize", "4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\")", "\| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \|", "tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag", "'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \|", "this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those", "Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric.", "\| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \|", "[once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the", "have some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization", "'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \|", "harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions", "finished, will keep an eye on emerging new location tags", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works", "system, which differs in structure and style from the systems", "'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace", "tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged", "\| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are", "country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis", "closed), could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are", "only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services)", "are closed), could be replaced in all instances with the", "of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag", "two of them duplicates of one of the other two", "what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \|", "kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced", "in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions,", "with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate,", "and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are", "questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just", "style from the systems in other parts of the world.*", "[interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues", "\| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no", "\| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could", "replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions", "could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \|", "and style from the systems in North America, Asia, or", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\")", "can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis", "the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and", "be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to:", "a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues", "Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \|", "in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America,", "country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the systems", "question, two of them duplicates of one of the other", "\| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \|", "\| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted", "America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and", "in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned", "used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct", "least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \|", "harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \|", "questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!)", "tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis,", "necessary in the only two instances where it is used", "[industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \|", "questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice,", "\| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only", "'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education", "\"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question,", "wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show", "the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\"", "deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep", "'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \|", "has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example:", "keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific", "conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in", "tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany", "structure and style from the systems in North America, Asia,", "structure and style from the systems in other parts of", "regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all", "questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the", "some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of", "\| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very", "[mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary", "\| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged", "\| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one", "without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions", "entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where", "works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \|", "4 question, two of them duplicates of one of the", "'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\")", "duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show", "5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced", "replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this", "tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and", "of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions", "not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific", "Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania", "America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison!", "or conventions specific to the higher education system in specific", "used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace", "\| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent,", "tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as", "inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "the world.* \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging", "correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \|", "conventions specific to the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent,", "\"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show", "\"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed", "of the other two (which is kind of a duplicate", "questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry", "which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry", "specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \|", "all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific", "\| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \|", "from the systems in other parts of the world. \|", "of which are closed), could be replaced in all instances", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions", "only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is", "with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has", "those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific", "\| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to", "replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged", "for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag", "is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without", "is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be", "tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the", "\"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used", "which differs in structure and style from the systems in", "in other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep", "or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only two", "'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of them", "in structure and style from the systems in North America,", "\| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \|", "more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On", "\| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \|", "parts of the world.** \| finished, will keep an eye", "tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki", "and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show", "elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not", "be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "\| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \|", "\| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \|", "Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in", "duplicates of one of the other two (which is kind", "with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing", "closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions", "\| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| ---" ]
[ "user seems to get the point that this site isn't", "just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas", "possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.", "every new user seems to get the point that this", "advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368)", "if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts", "\"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed. One possibility", "an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this.", "is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I", "a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases", "pages. Not every new user seems to get the point", "new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are", "adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just", "bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We have", "noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but", "a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We", "desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too", "has always been the case, that someone will give a", "some advice in the help pages. Not every new user", "lately, though I suspect it has always been the case,", "ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder", "mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to express", "new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it", "advice in the help pages. Not every new user seems", "a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from", "of this. Another user posted while I was writing. This", "be some advice in the help pages. Not every new", "this. Another user posted while I was writing. This has", "Not every new user seems to get the point that", "of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer", "agreement with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here", "that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone", "in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of", "while I was writing. This has happened a couple of", "writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed", "comments for people to express agreement with the advice in", "handed. One possibility would just be some advice in the", "bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several", "get the point that this site isn't just a bunch", "would just be some advice in the help pages. Not", "I suspect it has always been the case, that someone", "gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer.", "nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible", "voting and comments for people to express agreement with the", "it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without", "wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such", "will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new.", "seems to get the point that this site isn't just", "I've noticed several instances lately, though I suspect it has", "suspect it has always been the case, that someone will", "may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and", "though I suspect it has always been the case, that", "is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming", "someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of an", "One possibility would just be some advice in the help", "just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related.", "been the case, that someone will give a new answer", "that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads.", "possibility would just be some advice in the help pages.", "That may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting", "new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible to", "site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may", "but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable", "the help pages. Not every new user seems to get", "posted while I was writing. This has happened a couple", "an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was", "an earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit", "answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will", "recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is just", "have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to", "isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be", "several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it", "subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new", "help pages. Not every new user seems to get the", "for people to express agreement with the advice in an", "new. The worst cases are when someone just gives a", "of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers,", "such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would", "of discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms", "answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when", "related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for", "already in voting and comments for people to express agreement", "I wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\"", "to express agreement with the advice in an existing answer.", "was writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep", "in the help pages. Not every new user seems to", "[Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while", "when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of", "the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is", "and comments for people to express agreement with the advice", "will give a new answer that adds nothing new. The", "existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another", "I was writing. This has happened a couple of times.", "instances lately, though I suspect it has always been the", "heavy handed. One possibility would just be some advice in", "earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit of", "answer. The new answer is just a bit of noise.", "still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and", "from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if", "just be some advice in the help pages. Not every", "express agreement with the advice in an existing answer. ---", "be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments", "user posted while I was writing. This has happened a", "a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The", "the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an", "is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be", "just gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier", "without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would just be", "people to express agreement with the advice in an existing", "We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people", "posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would just", "it has always been the case, that someone will give", "the point that this site isn't just a bunch of", "noticed several instances lately, though I suspect it has always", "several instances lately, though I suspect it has always been", "Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but still,", "to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One", "with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is", "happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see my", "in voting and comments for people to express agreement with", "--- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted", "to get the point that this site isn't just a", "give a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst", "are when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations", "answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is", "always been the case, that someone will give a new", "and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy", "This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to", "Another user posted while I was writing. This has happened", "The worst cases are when someone just gives a subset", "cases are when someone just gives a subset of the", "worst cases are when someone just gives a subset of", "The new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes", "it will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing", "this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That", "of an earlier answer. The new answer is just a", "point that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion", "that someone will give a new answer that adds nothing", "couple of times. (Rep needed to see my deleted answer.)", "has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see", "seeming too heavy handed. One possibility would just be some", "too heavy handed.* One possibility would just be some advice", "answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user", "the case, that someone will give a new answer that", "be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. *I", "nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just gives", "case, that someone will give a new answer that adds", "threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already in", "new user seems to get the point that this site", "a couple of times. (Rep needed to see my deleted", "discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was writing.", "someone will give a new answer that adds nothing new." ]
[ "problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted", "of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the", "27 up votes (with a total score of 14 votes", "faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now", "to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided", "and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced", "is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the", "not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of", "solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall,", "diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the", "not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27", "a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers", "Please vote for reopening my answer to: [What is a", "answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute", "more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies", "instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My", "of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus", "legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause", "in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm", "since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is", "is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from", "public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate", "cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website and", "eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes", "and should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It", "enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of many,", "is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting", "It also alienates large portions of the public who support", "for reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase", "the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies", "The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also", "provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense.", "of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public", "phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution", "of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer", "to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead of", "now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not", "to the neutrality of the website and to its reputation", "sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score", "solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since", "and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public", "my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use", "sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer", "total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees", "a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public", "is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending", "expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase is", "My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated", "of the website and to its reputation as providing diversity", "it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a", "that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and", "deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of", "score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that", "this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to", "it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common", "to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more", "\"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it", "the common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive", "the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is", "reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large", "answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website", "phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be", "be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution", "nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to", "[What is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies", "inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and", "agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express their", "non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public sphere", "from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with", "as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions", "that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer", "non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public sphere.", "a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP.", "belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and", "a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP", "OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express", "acute harm to the neutrality of the website and to", "Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive", "Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality", "be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term", "provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the", "My answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that", "concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the", "and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated", "and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that", "term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in", "vote for reopening my answer to: [What is a nice", "is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and", "harm to the neutrality of the website and to its", "from the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly", "sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the", "only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My", "garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of 14", "certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such", "also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase,", "neutrality of the website and to its reputation as providing", "the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive,", "votes (with a total score of 14 votes when deleted).", "simply expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase", "website and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint.", "Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional", "and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be", "public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total", "votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is", "legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed,", "the neutrality of the website and to its reputation as", "they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply", "answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that this", "common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough,", "the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of", "express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be", "that the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness", "answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims", "answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead", "gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the", "phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough.", "providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of", "accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and", "and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is", "enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem", "a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution is", "alienates large portions of the public who support free respectful", "also alienates large portions of the public who support free", "inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the", "is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief", "the website and to its reputation as providing diversity of", "the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a", "is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not", "that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a", "term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the", "They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\"", "up votes (with a total score of 14 votes when", "inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the", "the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned", "to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it", "viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public who", "by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that", "non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and", "of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are", "their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that", "to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also", "its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates", "deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They", "are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses", "is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies", "use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325)", "when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive.", "should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered", "be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up", "and not to be eradicated from the public sphere term,", "reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to", "many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides", "14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term", "fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they", "gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from", "OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and", "(with a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The", "the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this", "such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the", "this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate", "term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should", "traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and", "thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by", "that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to", "the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a", "not to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the", "and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It", "large portions of the public who support free respectful discussion.", "claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive", "It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of" ]
[ "This stackexchange is \"meant\" for people working in academia or", "the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last", "suited for people in my position (that is, confused soon", "of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this", "lot of questions. There are many weird factors at play,", "answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last year", "and thus I have a lot of questions. There are", "questions that I ended up not posting (some of them", "ended up not posting (some of them do violate the", "One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I", "studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus I", "international, and thus I have a lot of questions. There", "in Europe, but as an international, and thus I have", "as an international, and thus I have a lot of", "weird factors at play, so my question is: Is there", "stackexchange is \"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD", "do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has", "guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes and", "working in academia or PhD students. One can feel that", "people in my position (that is, confused soon to graduate", "written several questions that I ended up not posting (some", "and I respect that). I still do not know the", "site has its purposes and I respect that). I still", "play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited", "understand that this site has its purposes and I respect", "for people in my position (that is, confused soon to", "questions. There are many weird factors at play, so my", "\"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students. One", "can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have", "thus I have a lot of questions. There are many", "violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has its", "only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I", "this site has its purposes and I respect that). I", "last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an", "of questions. There are many weird factors at play, so", "PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat", "(some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that", "people working in academia or PhD students. One can feel", "them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site", "so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for", "factors at play, so my question is: Is there a", "There are many weird factors at play, so my question", "my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people", "tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended up", "is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my", "not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on", "that I ended up not posting (some of them do", "that). I still do not know the answers to these", "an international, and thus I have a lot of questions.", "I understand that this site has its purposes and I", "of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and", "respect that). I still do not know the answers to", "undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions", "still do not know the answers to these questions. I'm", "at play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange", "purposes and I respect that). I still do not know", "not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I", "in academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates", "the guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes", "I have written several questions that I ended up not", "year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international,", "these questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate", "undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus", "that this site has its purposes and I respect that).", "for people working in academia or PhD students. One can", "have a lot of questions. There are many weird factors", "I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in", "have written several questions that I ended up not posting", "on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but", "question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in", "to these questions. I'm currently on my last year of", "but as an international, and thus I have a lot", "that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several", "\"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended", "are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that", "questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies,", "students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\".", "currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe,", "up not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines,", "I still do not know the answers to these questions.", "is \"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students.", "there a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that", "has its purposes and I respect that). I still do", "in my position (that is, confused soon to graduate kids)?", "I have a lot of questions. There are many weird", "a lot of questions. There are many weird factors at", "academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are", "a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is,", "Europe, but as an international, and thus I have a", "my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as", "or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only", "many weird factors at play, so my question is: Is", "I respect that). I still do not know the answers", "stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is, confused", "several questions that I ended up not posting (some of", "are many weird factors at play, so my question is:", "its purposes and I respect that). I still do not", "feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written", "Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my position", "do not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently", "posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand", "know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my", "I ended up not posting (some of them do violate" ]
[ "make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add", "> And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is:", "am looking for data or studies. > > > And", "(often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have", "solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am", "is it fine and there is nothing to see here?", "voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel", "am just trying to get a sense for how people", "questions where far more people have the upvote privilege than", "on popular questions where far more people have the upvote", "there are no studies that anyone is aware of, and", "interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data", "have noticed several instances (and there have been a few", "topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I", "about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should", "delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the question", "of, and so if we delete all answers that don't", "they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based", "far more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote", "aware of, and so if we delete all answers that", "studies. > > > And yet the top answer (often", "to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To", "fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll add", "> I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm", "some voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but", "I am looking for data or studies. > > >", "people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that", "quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any", "references, but I've observed this too. One time, there was", "this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move", "handle these answers does not seem to be working (particularly", "downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to be", "people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And", "unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a sense", "asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference", "are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on", "an observation from many years of teaching) and the reply", "upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any references,", "the question says quite clearly something like: > > I", "I've observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote]....", "that anyone is aware of, and so if we delete", "clearly something like: > > I am looking for references", "student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these", "a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or", "add some voting options to make this slightly more concrete,", "feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we", "looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested", "yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > >", "this is particularly annoying when the asker states that they", "not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where", "options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free", "problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing?", "noticed several instances (and there have been a few flags)", "and speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly", "So: I am just trying to get a sense for", "more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege).", "or studies. > > > And yet the top answer", "concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts in an", "behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or", "(e.g., the reference request is based on an observation from", "that don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered.", "answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't", "slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts", "(e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to", "reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning).", "am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really", "sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes", "I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not", "\"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on", "too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to", "studies that anyone is aware of, and so if we", "is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options", "quite clearly something like: > > I am looking for", "says quite clearly something like: > > I am looking", "any references, but I've observed this too. One time, there", "references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am just", "the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are", "have been a few flags) where the question says quite", "a few flags) where the question says quite clearly something", "I am just trying to get a sense for how", "that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is", "go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a", "speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly annoying", "upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair,", "me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states that", "often there are no studies that anyone is aware of,", "anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or studies.", "here? I'll add some voting options to make this slightly", "contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I", "for data or studies. > > > And yet the", "I don't have any references, but I've observed this too.", "trying to get a sense for how people feel about", "opinions; I am looking for data or studies. > >", "privilege). And to be fair, often there are no studies", "top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I", "all answers that don't contain solid references, the question will", "the question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying", "these answers does not seem to be working (particularly on", "we delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the", "in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or", "Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem", "teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's", "or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does", "> > To me, this is particularly annoying when the", "are no studies that anyone is aware of, and so", "an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an", "than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there", "for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in", "looking for data or studies. > > > And yet", "is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying", "> > Well, I don't have any references, but I've", "nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options to", "privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often", "to handle these answers does not seem to be working", "there is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting", "seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where far", "working (particularly on popular questions where far more people have", "on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to", "just trying to get a sense for how people feel", "this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your", "no studies that anyone is aware of, and so if", "if we delete all answers that don't contain solid references,", "towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there", "have any references, but I've observed this too. One time,", "question says quite clearly something like: > > I am", "downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are no", "Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards", "there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion", "[opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this is", "opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers", "to be fair, often there are no studies that anyone", "request is based on an observation from many years of", "references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes", "for how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal", "discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is", "(particularly on popular questions where far more people have the", "a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle", "to see here? I'll add some voting options to make", "so if we delete all answers that don't contain solid", "of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a", "this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems", "time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that", "> To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker", "observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It", "> Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed", "the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well,", "move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and", "really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for", "several instances (and there have been a few flags) where", "should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine", "a sense for how people feel about this. Is this", "> > I am looking for references about [some topic].", "[anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... >", "that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is", "I have noticed several instances (and there have been a", "popular questions where far more people have the upvote privilege", "It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > >", "reference request is based on an observation from many years", "annoying when the asker states that they are an \"expert\"", "how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior", "be fair, often there are no studies that anyone is", "sense for how people feel about this. Is this a", "be working (particularly on popular questions where far more people", "One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me", "data or studies. > > > And yet the top", "been a few flags) where the question says quite clearly", "the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the", "particularly annoying when the asker states that they are an", "to be working (particularly on popular questions where far more", "and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion", "and so if we delete all answers that don't contain", "the reference request is based on an observation from many", "is particularly annoying when the asker states that they are", "an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation]....", "from many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common", "To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states", "to get a sense for how people feel about this.", "Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed this", "I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am", "the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or", "was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and", "not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking", "will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get", "don't have any references, but I've observed this too. One", "is based on an observation from many years of teaching)", "many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\"", "or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing", "but I've observed this too. One time, there was an", "me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me,", "where far more people have the upvote privilege than the", "we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it", "something like: > > I am looking for references about", "states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request", "there have been a few flags) where the question says", "question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to", "it fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll", "I'll add some voting options to make this slightly more", "\"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an observation", "to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to", "where the question says quite clearly something like: > >", "based on an observation from many years of teaching) and", "answers does not seem to be working (particularly on popular", "flags) where the question says quite clearly something like: >", "get a sense for how people feel about this. Is", "is aware of, and so if we delete all answers", "Or is it fine and there is nothing to see", "see here? I'll add some voting options to make this", "and there is nothing to see here? I'll add some", "> > And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted)", "instances (and there have been a few flags) where the", "or opinions; I am looking for data or studies. >", "that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this", "years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g.,", "few flags) where the question says quite clearly something like:", "have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to", "this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging", "> > > To me, this is particularly annoying when", "the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be", "like: > > I am looking for references about [some", "observation from many years of teaching) and the reply is", "[some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions;", "about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or", "don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So:", "And to be fair, often there are no studies that", "on an observation from many years of teaching) and the", "but feel free to add your thoughts in an answer.", "more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts in", "reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not", "anyone is aware of, and so if we delete all", "disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing to", "(and there have been a few flags) where the question", "when the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g.,", "is: > > Well, I don't have any references, but", "answers that don't contain solid references, the question will go", "does not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions", "fair, often there are no studies that anyone is aware", "And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: >", "seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > >", "> > > And yet the top answer (often quite" ]
[ "flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.)", "continues to exist. From the looks of it, this tag", "tag continues to exist. From the looks of it, this", "Is there an easier way to bring such a tag", "the tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist.", "the looks of it, this tag was created by mistake", "an easier way to bring such a tag to attention", "From the looks of it, this tag was created by", "of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see", "there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or", "thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is", "on the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging", "created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks of", "it - I have edited the post and deleted the", "it.) Is there an easier way to bring such a", "not see it.) Is there an easier way to bring", "had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it", "tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the post", "'t'\") on it - I have edited the post and", "Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility of", "there an easier way to bring such a tag to", "a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is", "the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a", "be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no", "tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist. From", "on it - I have edited the post and deleted", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181303/maintaining-a-public-handbook-collaborative-editing-online-viewing-plus-good) had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on", "questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the", "tag (or I did not see it.) Is there an", "exist. From the looks of it, this tag was created", "created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on", "such a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation", "But once created, the tag continues to exist. From the", "is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I", "looks of it, this tag was created by mistake and", "post and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag", "to bring such a tag to attention of users of", "the post and deleted the tag. But once created, the", "tag was created by mistake and should thus be deleted.", "easier way to bring such a tag to attention of", "deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility", "[t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have", "no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did", "tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to", "of users of sufficient reputation than to make a post", "I have edited the post and deleted the tag. But", "a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than", "edited the post and deleted the tag. But once created,", "I did not see it.) Is there an easier way", "was created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet,", "site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag", "the tag continues to exist. From the looks of it,", "and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues", "[This post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181303/maintaining-a-public-handbook-collaborative-editing-online-viewing-plus-good) had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\")", "did not see it.) Is there an easier way to", "attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make a", "users of sufficient reputation than to make a post here?", "the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it -", "(or I did not see it.) Is there an easier", "of it, this tag was created by mistake and should", "tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I", "by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the", "to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make", "delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is there", "should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there", "possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not", "deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues to", "and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site,", "see it.) Is there an easier way to bring such", "have edited the post and deleted the tag. But once", "- I have edited the post and deleted the tag.", "it, this tag was created by mistake and should thus", "this tag was created by mistake and should thus be", "mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag", "\"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited", "to exist. From the looks of it, this tag was", "once created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks", "way to bring such a tag to attention of users", "bring such a tag to attention of users of sufficient", "tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy" ]
[ "all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them", "essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can we", "make this question meaningful. As such, can we do something", "been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers", "criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such,", "example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved", "to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better,", "meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be the", "here is asking whether there exists an example of researcher", "I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive", "a relevant open problem in the last 30 years and", "something about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator", "way of handling this, but would also be somewhat heavy-handed.", "(eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While", "crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the", "As such, can we do something about all those answers", "having solved a relevant open problem in the last 30", "ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be a", "There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria", "there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in", "(50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria", "the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years", "can we do something about all those answers not meeting", "them all might be the most expedient way of handling", "question meaningful. As such, can we do something about all", "lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois", "criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago).", "of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a", "better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make", "the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful.", "might be the most expedient way of handling this, but", "are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg", "consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50", "meaningful. As such, can we do something about all those", "for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not", "30 years and having initally been mistaken for a crank.", "years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be", "years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be", "the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years", "whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria,", "we do something about all those answers not meeting them?", "meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30", "is asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting", "asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular", "moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient way", "problem in the last 30 years and having initally been", "While I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit", "exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular", "bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the", "to make this question meaningful. As such, can we do", "this question meaningful. As such, can we do something about", "them? A moderator deleting them all might be the most", "researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant", "years and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There", "do something about all those answers not meeting them? A", "relevant open problem in the last 30 years and having", "criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem in", "in particular having solved a relevant open problem in the", "meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open", "in the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken", "overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question", "Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd", "not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be", "imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this", "the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for", "expedient way of handling this, but would also be somewhat", "deleting them all might be the most expedient way of", "strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As", "the most expedient way of handling this, but would also", "of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely", "seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can", "particular having solved a relevant open problem in the last", "would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially", "answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might", "mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously", "about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting", "a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting", "30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to", "years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem", "open problem in the last 30 years and having initally", "A moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient", "having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots", "be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho),", "obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more", "be the most expedient way of handling this, but would", "definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider", "particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem", "lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the", "restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict", "than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years", "last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for a", "This [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181336/is-there-a-single-example-of-an-outsider-considered-a-crank-publishing-a-groun) here is asking whether there exists an example", "initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of", "30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would", "answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181336/is-there-a-single-example-of-an-outsider-considered-a-crank-publishing-a-groun) here is asking whether there exists an example of", "and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are", "be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to", "solved a relevant open problem in the last 30 years", "an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having", "more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30", "such, can we do something about all those answers not", "all might be the most expedient way of handling this,", "not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than", "a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall", "those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all", "most expedient way of handling this, but would also be" ]
[ "our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095)", "I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for", "then is a sign that this is a problem felt", "site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed as", "closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal", "pop up every now and then is a sign that", "Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question which", "types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I", "are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software", "recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing", "specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions", "recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are", "once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to", "of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think", "practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and", "that this is a problem felt by many academic users.", "for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current", "question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be", "that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia", "2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question", "as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which", "or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again", "problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the", "about drawing software appear periodically on this site, and get", "useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once and", "all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy", "\"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia or", "[software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that", "recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation", "following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now", "state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1.", "academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a", "now and then is a sign that this is a", "users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed", "definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that is", "and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our", "and the fact that questions of these kind pop up", "that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following", "closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed.", "affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types", "problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question", "this is a problem felt by many academic users. 2.", "duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated is", "which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then", "a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a", "and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are not", "closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095),", "updated is useless. My proposal is then that of considering,", "that questions of these kind pop up every now and", "software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem", "a software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific", "software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to", "is then that of considering, once and for all, drawing", "fact that questions of these kind pop up every now", "is again closed. I think that this state of affairs", "is useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once", "by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate", "software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that", "again closed. I think that this state of affairs is", "sign that this is a problem felt by many academic", "this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons:", "the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are", "is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that", "cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then that", "of a closed question which cannot be updated is useless.", "on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely a", "question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is", "is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of", "get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of", "as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I", "of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain", "closed. I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory", "kind pop up every now and then is a sign", "felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as", "and then is a sign that this is a problem", "software appear periodically on this site, and get either closed", "is a sign that this is a problem felt by", "for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software)", "the fact that questions of these kind pop up every", "drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on", "drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical", "according to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen", "drawing software appear periodically on this site, and get either", "appear periodically on this site, and get either closed as", "that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a", "of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic", "that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact", "every now and then is a sign that this is", "a sign that this is a problem felt by many", "current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and", "duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think", "which is again closed. I think that this state of", "as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated", "is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that", "be updated is useless. My proposal is then that of", "this site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed", "off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is", "or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind", "think that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves", "reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are not duplicate.", "considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according", "My proposal is then that of considering, once and for", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this state", "and get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate", "considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely", "teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind pop", "Questions about drawing software appear periodically on this site, and", "unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software", "these kind pop up every now and then is a", "proposal is then that of considering, once and for all,", "1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic,", "think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this", "Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and", "on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation and", "academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these", "on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others", "I think that drawing software is definitely a software that", "then that of considering, once and for all, drawing software", "of these kind pop up every now and then is", "that of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations", "reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered", "on this site, and get either closed as off-topic or", "to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this", "of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that", "and I think that drawing software is definitely a software", "up every now and then is a sign that this", "questions of these kind pop up every now and then", "is a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing", "a practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\",", "many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of", "a closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My", "now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is", "policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the", "to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of", "software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software", "either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this", "periodically on this site, and get either closed as off-topic", "a question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot" ]
[ "also be sensible to allow questions directly related to the", "5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities,", "is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a", "under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search", "undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to academia?", "covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2.", "like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with", "practical undertaking of research could be something like this: [What", "expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of", "or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic", "writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of", "of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering", "closed, but which I believe could also fall under the", "that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic", "so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the", "an example (and at the risk of having it closed),", "I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials,", "teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given", "2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3.", "this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with Google", "Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example", "practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic", "question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like", "[What Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612)", "research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in the", "specific, but to me, that feels like a very broad", "the tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested that", "but which I believe could also fall under the practical", "I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of", "question on the practical undertaking of research could be something", "can I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics,", "Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the", "that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not", "tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions", "Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but", "4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at", "questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers,", "necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal for the", "…), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would", "believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of research:", "it is suggested that questions covering these topics should be", "and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher", "search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566)", "the closing of such questions are ideal for the community.", "higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange", "academia? As an example (and at the risk of having", "(and at the risk of having it closed), a question", "undertaking of research could be something like this: [What Query", "called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow", "is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to", "further example of one which has been closed, but which", "As an example (and at the risk of having it", "(universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called", "and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings", "at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that", "Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible", "which I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking", "but to me, that feels like a very broad question", "3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and", "to me, that feels like a very broad question that", "intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a very", "that feels like a very broad question that could help", "of research could be something like this: [What Query String", "A further example of one which has been closed, but", "workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5.", "and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …),", "used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which", "help a broad range of community members. I am not", "of research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As", "Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been closed,", "to the practical undertaking of research, given it is so", "topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and", "Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific,", "at the risk of having it closed), a question on", "Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it", "of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research", "[How can I search for Academic Grants in the UK", "fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the risk", "be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one", "posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students,", "research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As an", "the practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental", "risk of having it closed), a question on the practical", "understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me,", "community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the", "also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can", "could help a broad range of community members. I am", "String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further", "in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter", "not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions", "I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of", "of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack", "would it not also be sensible to allow questions directly", "should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations", "it not also be sensible to allow questions directly related", "could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can", "of having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking", "of community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate", "publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education", "questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given", "given it is so fundamental to academia? As an example", "which has been closed, but which I believe could also", "a broad range of community members. I am not sure", "the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for", "research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and", "colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\",", "stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics", "academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or", "academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions", "studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges,", "In the tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested", "it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research", "Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been", "of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying", "fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I", "undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants", "for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I", "professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing", "not also be sensible to allow questions directly related to", "been closed, but which I believe could also fall under", "example (and at the risk of having it closed), a", "the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question", "broad question that could help a broad range of community", "it is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and", "UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is", "the practical undertaking of research could be something like this:", "with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has", "can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of", "range of community members. I am not sure rules which", "education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is", "postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4.", "feels like a very broad question that could help a", "Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand", "latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels", "me, that feels like a very broad question that could", "which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal for", "is suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted:", "having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of", "of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in", "exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics should", "the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that", "I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to", "these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements", "departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching", "very broad question that could help a broad range of", "is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at", "question that could help a broad range of community members.", "closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research could", "allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research,", "of one which has been closed, but which I believe", "practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to", "rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal", "example of one which has been closed, but which I", "this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these", "on the practical undertaking of research could be something like", "institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the", "to academia? As an example (and at the risk of", "could also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How", "one which has been closed, but which I believe could", "that could help a broad range of community members. I", "1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs,", "careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors,", "be sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical", "the risk of having it closed), a question on the", "related to the practical undertaking of research, given it is", "suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1.", "research could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters", "sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking", "sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are", "directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given it", "(Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally", "students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments,", "has been closed, but which I believe could also fall", "something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used", "members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing", "broad range of community members. I am not sure rules", "Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A", "Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be", "be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be", "like a very broad question that could help a broad", "a question on the practical undertaking of research could be", "the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also", "\"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow questions", "be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of", "inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing,", "am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such", "to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of", "a very broad question that could help a broad range", "requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner" ]
[ "Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A", "An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a", "\"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close", "the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more", "Go. There is no obvious way to close them that", "suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific", "identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but", "a site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The", "Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close such", "such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say", "The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use Google\"", "can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in", "arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the", "them that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital", "unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as", "seconds spent with a search engine such as Google or", "questions on the site that can be answered with a", "object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient,", "in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves", "leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably", "comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting", "example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\"", "answered with a few seconds spent with a search engine", "is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use", "that can be answered with a few seconds spent with", "answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment.", "more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a", "such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no", "A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question", "are some questions on the site that can be answered", "on the site that can be answered with a few", "There is no obvious way to close them that I", "\"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should", "I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification", "Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way", "questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use", "voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the", "to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close", "with a few seconds spent with a search engine such", "an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use", "probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be", "Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to", "option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment", "with a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck", "is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\"", "be answered with a few seconds spent with a search", "site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate", "no obvious way to close them that I can see.", "search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There", "boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use Google\" or", "but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is", "site that can be answered with a few seconds spent", "to close them that I can see. Here is an", "is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment", "be a site-specific option for voting to close such questions.", "spent with a search engine such as Google or Duck", "close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could", "a few seconds spent with a search engine such as", "see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368)", "the site that can be answered with a few seconds", "way to close them that I can see. Here is", "engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is", "Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use", "close them that I can see. Here is an example:", "Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer", "[Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is", "some questions on the site that can be answered with", "can be answered with a few seconds spent with a", "a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for", "Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close", "few seconds spent with a search engine such as Google", "Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close them", "that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object", "a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go.", "is no obvious way to close them that I can", "sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\"", "as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option", "\"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An", "comment for the close could say \"Use Google\" or similar.", "question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable", "There are some questions on the site that can be", "or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to", "for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for", "obvious way to close them that I can see. Here", "comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered.", "as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious" ]
[ "propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would", "(myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the question", "researchers. But this seems like a matter that can be", "to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182935) seems very straightforward to me: do professors get", "a matter that can be resolved with a quick edit", "am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion.", "two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the", "the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this", "out rather than making a binding decision here. Five users", "already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time", "positions) spent so much time applying for and executing grants.", "the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too", "I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I", "why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent", "is open for now -- but it remains eligible to", "time applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed?", "the normal voting process play out rather than making a", "now voted to reopen, so the question is open for", "reopen, so the question is open for now -- but", "than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included)", "close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I", "have now voted to reopen, so the question is open", "encourage people to only vote to close if the question", "applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It", "process play out rather than making a binding decision here.", "explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions)", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182935) seems very straightforward to me: do professors get any", "this seems like a matter that can be resolved with", "-- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points", "making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have", "to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning", "good points on both sides, so we'll let the normal", "so the question is open for now -- but it", "truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other", "me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more", "OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already", "would encourage people to only vote to close if the", "winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this", "sense, since the question does also ask if the same", "executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there", "was this closed? It looks like there were three votes", "seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint", "and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand", "* The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense,", "Why was this closed? It looks like there were three", "other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on", "something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good", "only vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable.", "rather than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself", "complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear", "that can be resolved with a quick edit rather than", "matter that can be resolved with a quick edit rather", "votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too", "for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether", "sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play out", "now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by", "very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\"", "this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid", "apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter", "a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen", "reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people", "question is open for now -- but it remains eligible", "both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play", "get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like", "professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so", "users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the", "so much time applying for and executing grants. Why was", "but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in", "a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now", "we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage", "grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained", "votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints", "at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. ", "question does also ask if the same logic would apply", "professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems", "do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It", "details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me.", "more sense, since the question does also ask if the", "industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that can", "straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for", "play out rather than making a binding decision here. Five", "grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there were", "The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since", "any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP", "much time applying for and executing grants. Why was this", "to reopen, so the question is open for now --", "don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question", "Update:* Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides,", "to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that", "all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The", "Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so", "can be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure.", "missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some", "like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and", "moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote to", "binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted", "were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes", "it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in the", "about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to", "thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both", "the question is open for now -- but it remains", "It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why", "voted to reopen, so the question is open for now", "rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and", "clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't", "remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in the usual", "seems like a matter that can be resolved with a", "-- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting", "for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\"", "voting process play out rather than making a binding decision", "understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems", "question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to only", "on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process", "like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who", "decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to", "But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update:", "me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants?", "if the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But", "edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question,", "complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question does", "and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like", "to only vote to close if the question is truly", "a bit more sense, since the question does also ask", "the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing", "we'll let the normal voting process play out rather than", "discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll let", "seems very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial", "with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we", "be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I", "\"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering", "for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about", "eligible to be re-closed by voting in the usual way.", "three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for", "whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively", "question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\"", "financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was", "spent so much time applying for and executing grants. Why", "like a matter that can be resolved with a quick", "let the normal voting process play out rather than making", "relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and", "same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems", "included) have now voted to reopen, so the question is", "forward, I would encourage people to only vote to close", "if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am", "Some good points on both sides, so we'll let the", "normal voting process play out rather than making a binding", "so we'll let the normal voting process play out rather", "broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at", "perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes", "quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this", "than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving", "resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose", "(who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much", "closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward,", "I would encourage people to only vote to close if", "bit more sense, since the question does also ask if", "the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll", "points on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting", "and moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote", "for now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed", "here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen,", "It looks like there were three votes for \"details or", "makes a bit more sense, since the question does also", "seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors", "I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the", "the question does also ask if the same logic would", "does also ask if the same logic would apply to", "\"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the", "or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I", "unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts?", "for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks", "Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so", "logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like", "the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly", "* I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all;", "well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and executing", "to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit", "was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have", "maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate", "wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured,", "vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But", "closed? It looks like there were three votes for \"details", "ask if the same logic would apply to industry researchers.", "is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something --", "question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something", "since the question does also ask if the same logic", "But this seems like a matter that can be resolved", "open for now -- but it remains eligible to be", "\"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity", "looks like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\"", "there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two", "broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question", "would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a", "\"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" ", "I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update:* Appreciate the", "also ask if the same logic would apply to industry", "this closed? It looks like there were three votes for", "this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to", "have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying", "clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a", "people to only vote to close if the question is", "tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for" ]
[ "been somewhat confused by how the moderation on our controversial", "is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was", "confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions is", "academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation", "one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it", "strategies? I feel like we could have just let a", "moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is", "controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that the", "a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with", "the mods need to be superhuman, but I really do", "questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I", "obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively", "I'm not really happy about how it was handled, but", "initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and", "was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was", "aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted)", "was handled, but at least that is one policy. Today,", "lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's", "on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say", "reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue a", "had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against", "that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm", "post open. I'm not really happy about how it was", "issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy", "of one sort or another execute on the second question", "post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through,", "comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the", "frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go", "such different strategies? I feel like we could have just", "or another execute on the second question and that would've", "was to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator", "it was handled, but at least that is one policy.", "moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to", "handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through:", "another execute on the second question and that would've been", "but I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently.", "inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through: [Examples", "it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the", "happy about how it was handled, but at least that", "the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing", "question and that would've been closer to the spirit of", "go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.)", "that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such", "be superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently", "least that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial", "close vote of one sort or another execute on the", "[Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in", "second question and that would've been closer to the spirit", "do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we", "discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to", "execute on the second question and that would've been closer", "(diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial", "through, where the response was to issue a 24 hour", "because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit", "feel like we could have just let a regular close", "would've been closer to the spirit of how the first", "something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that", "are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question", "is conducted. That's not to say that the mods need", "our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that", "the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1)", "there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough", "conducted. That's not to say that the mods need to", "and that would've been closer to the spirit of how", "to be superhuman, but I really do think things are", "(even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post", "strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions", "Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to", "was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't", "closer to the spirit of how the first was handled.", "require such different strategies? I feel like we could have", "somewhat confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions", "they require such different strategies? I feel like we could", "say that the mods need to be superhuman, but I", "come through, where the response was to issue a 24", "DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a", "with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm", "controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on", "where the response was to issue a 24 hour lock", "open. I'm not really happy about how it was handled,", "a regular close vote of one sort or another execute", "moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those", "regular close vote of one sort or another execute on", "unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something", "not to say that the mods need to be superhuman,", "of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a)", "push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was", "the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue", "have just let a regular close vote of one sort", "vote of one sort or another execute on the second", "really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January,", "had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the", "appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response", "I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they", "response was to issue a 24 hour lock because a", "controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come", "the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even", "been closer to the spirit of how the first was", "philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that", "that they require such different strategies? I feel like we", "to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was", "was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there", "January, we had this question go through: [Examples of successful", "different strategies? I feel like we could have just let", "one sort or another execute on the second question and", "In January, we had this question go through: [Examples of", "successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This", "that the mods need to be superhuman, but I really", "question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity,", "I feel like we could have just let a regular", "consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not really", "enough that they require such different strategies? I feel like", "keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about how", "a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy.", "need to be superhuman, but I really do think things", "focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and", "missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require", "mods need to be superhuman, but I really do think", "questions is conducted. That's not to say that the mods", "superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently handled", "and on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy", "poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates", "and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments", "post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting", "we could have just let a regular close vote of", "sort or another execute on the second question and that", "to say that the mods need to be superhuman, but", "could have just let a regular close vote of one", "edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these", "differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such different", "through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives", "these questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies?", "the post open. I'm not really happy about how it", "24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the", "that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post", "just let a regular close vote of one sort or", "to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was", "handled, but at least that is one policy. Today, we've", "Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially", "not really happy about how it was handled, but at", "on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about", "things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this", "That's not to say that the mods need to be", "I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In", "at least that is one policy. Today, we've had the", "against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously", "policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate", "like we could have just let a regular close vote", "this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI", "the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not", "on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on", "in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the", "those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open.", "let a regular close vote of one sort or another", "how it was handled, but at least that is one", "we had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs", "original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that", "on the second question and that would've been closer to", "really happy about how it was handled, but at least", "weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not", "hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original", "by how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted.", "the response was to issue a 24 hour lock because", "etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post,", "This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy", "but at least that is one policy. Today, we've had", "I've been somewhat confused by how the moderation on our", "the second question and that would've been closer to the", "that would've been closer to the spirit of how the", "how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's", "we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss", "a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused", "think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had", "about how it was handled, but at least that is", "substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I feel", "[Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where", "deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping" ]
[ "a review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers,", "by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret", "the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about", "I don't know about the review requests etc., You can", "a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the", "if the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed)", "I found are 1. It is a trivial question and", "others if I don't know about the review requests etc.,", "You can read one of my comments > > If", "me. I am just curious to understand. And I don't", "sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate &", "don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't", "read the following question [What all can be understood from", "instead of the exact > number? So, there might be", "reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead", "all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The", "is the same as in programming or others if I", "question to refrain before posting questions on our main site.", "a duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether", "the following question [What all can be understood from more", "review process > will be started if at least 'n'", "or as in the general case. I want to know", "> > If we are uncertain about the number, it", "ask any question on our main site. No one provided", "it is useful to me. I am just curious to", "to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it?", "our main site. No one provided an exact answer till", "No one provided an exact answer till now. Then how", "our main site. The main objections from users I found", "not in to review process and didn't find explicit information", "review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How", "one of my comments > > If we are uncertain", "I don't know whether I need to interpret it based", "optional! > > > 2. It is not useful in", "I need to interpret it based on the context of", "just curious to understand. And I don't think usability is", "it is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is", "from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close", "main objections from users I found are 1. It is", "2. It is not useful in any way I did", "be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received", "I want to know what are the potential issues with", "in the general case. I want to know what are", "The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1", "of '3+' is the same as in programming or others", "question and not related to academia alone. How can I", "general case. I want to know what are the potential", "now. Then how can I convince myself that it is", "> number? So, there might be some information like the", "notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need", "of another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific", "posting questions on our main site. The main objections from", "questions on our main site. The main objections from users", "till now. Then how can I convince myself that it", "how can I convince myself that it is a trivial", "interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming or", "found are 1. It is a trivial question and not", "be some information like the review process > will be", "don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any", "don't know about the review requests etc., You can read", "an exact answer till now. Then how can I convince", "I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask", "about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether", "recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends", "process > will be started if at least 'n' reviewers", "ask the question because it is useful to me. I", "peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want to", "number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if", "main site. The main objections from users I found are", "It is a trivial question and not related to academia", "if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can", "3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and", "review requests etc., You can read one of my comments", "community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at", "if I am not in to review process and didn't", "to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same", "what are the potential issues with this question to refrain", "'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2", "any way I did not ask the question because it", "in programming or others if I don't know about the", "'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra", "whether it is trivial or not if I am not", "I know whether it is trivial or not if I", "apt because I don't know about the notation used by", "can I know whether it is trivial or not if", "about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. >", "find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to", "want to know what are the potential issues with this", "think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question", "question on our main site. No one provided an exact", "I convince myself that it is a trivial question or", "convince myself that it is a trivial question or of", "potential issues with this question to refrain before posting questions", "and not related to academia alone. How can I know", "it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the", "community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about the", "can I convince myself that it is a trivial question", "exact answer till now. Then how can I convince myself", "'>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there might", "least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be", "So, there might be some information like the review process", "is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the", "programming or others if I don't know about the review", "it is trivial or not if I am not in", "duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It", "question because it is useful to me. I am just", "I did not ask the question because it is useful", "and the remaining can > be extra or optional! >", "Please read the following question [What all can be understood", "know whether it is trivial or not if I am", "started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining", "is a trivial question and not related to academia alone.", "the review process > will be started if at least", "And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is", "of my comments > > If we are uncertain about", "comments > > If we are uncertain about the number,", "way I did not ask the question because it is", "tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there", "users I found are 1. It is a trivial question", "more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes", "useful in any way I did not ask the question", "review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then", "before posting questions on our main site. The main objections", "can read one of my comments > > If we", "another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason", "didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is", "etc., You can read one of my comments > >", "votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down", "myself that it is a trivial question or of low", "the same as in programming or others if I don't", "case. I want to know what are the potential issues", "It is not useful in any way I did not", "is not useful in any way I did not ask", "2 down votes. It is not at all a duplicate", "or not if I am not in to review process", "if I don't know about the review requests etc., You", "because I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier.", "> will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept", "down votes. It is not at all a duplicate of", "not if I am not in to review process and", "information like the review process > will be started if", "know about the review requests etc., You can read one", "editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of", "I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I", "at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can >", "'3+' is the same as in programming or others if", "'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review request", "to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So,", "is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact", "there might be some information like the review process >", "that it is a trivial question or of low standard?", "safe it is to say that the interpretation of '3+'", "is a necessary criterion to ask any question on our", "not at all a duplicate of another. And I am", "say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as", "the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact >", "duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether the", "then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of", "keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review", "information regarding it? How safe it is to say that", "am just curious to understand. And I don't think usability", "[What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3)", "trivial question and not related to academia alone. How can", "the remaining can > be extra or optional! > >", "number? So, there might be some information like the review", "all a duplicate of another. And I am not aware", "of > reviewers, then what is the need to tell", "is not at all a duplicate of another. And I", "understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3", "can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question", "at all a duplicate of another. And I am not", "issues with this question to refrain before posting questions on", "know whether I need to interpret it based on the", "is useful to me. I am just curious to understand.", "are 1. It is a trivial question and not related", "received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason)", "If we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended", "votes. It is not at all a duplicate of another.", "necessary criterion to ask any question on our main site.", "reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at all", "objections from users I found are 1. It is a", "and 2 down votes. It is not at all a", "the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number", "to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a", "number of > reviewers, then what is the need to", "to ask any question on our main site. No one", "academia alone. How can I know whether it is trivial", "will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and", "or others if I don't know about the review requests", "as in the general case. I want to know what", "one provided an exact answer till now. Then how can", "that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in", "it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in", "& 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is", "like the review process > will be started if at", "whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know", "is apt because I don't know about the notation used", "to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is", "1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not", "don't know whether I need to interpret it based on", "> 2. It is not useful in any way I", "might be some information like the review process > will", "because it is useful to me. I am just curious", "sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of >", "It is not at all a duplicate of another. And", "understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion", "regarding it? How safe it is to say that the", "reason is apt because I don't know about the notation", "the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I", "main site. No one provided an exact answer till now.", "to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or", "as in programming or others if I don't know about", "the review requests etc., You can read one of my", "not related to academia alone. How can I know whether", "uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'.", "with this question to refrain before posting questions on our", "interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as", "I am just curious to understand. And I don't think", "can > be extra or optional! > > > 2.", "The main objections from users I found are 1. It", "aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't", "some information like the review process > will be started", "and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it", "we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to", "extra or optional! > > > 2. It is not", "read one of my comments > > If we are", "useful to me. I am just curious to understand. And", "question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific", "close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2", "a trivial question and not related to academia alone. How", "curious to understand. And I don't think usability is a", "provided an exact answer till now. Then how can I", "Then how can I convince myself that it is a", "How can I know whether it is trivial or not", "remaining can > be extra or optional! > > >", "1. It is a trivial question and not related to", "am not in to review process and didn't find explicit", "whether I need to interpret it based on the context", "the question because it is useful to me. I am", "is trivial or not if I am not in to", "accept and the remaining can > be extra or optional!", "the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming", "But if the editor sends a review request to a", "request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what", "site. The main objections from users I found are 1.", "it? How safe it is to say that the interpretation", "usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question on", "requests etc., You can read one of my comments >", "And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to", "used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to", "my comments > > If we are uncertain about the", "are the potential issues with this question to refrain before", "related to academia alone. How can I know whether it", "in any way I did not ask the question because", "> > > 2. It is not useful in any", "following question [What all can be understood from more 'Review", "is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor", "I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt", "answer till now. Then how can I convince myself that", "> > 2. It is not useful in any way", "to know what are the potential issues with this question", "be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the", "the exact > number? So, there might be some information", "question [What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations", "not ask the question because it is useful to me.", "of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want", "criterion to ask any question on our main site. No", "from users I found are 1. It is a trivial", "Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret it", "the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But", "am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because", "based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the", "trivial or not if I am not in to review", "> If we are uncertain about the number, it is", "did not ask the question because it is useful to", "How safe it is to say that the interpretation of", "need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number?", "about the review requests etc., You can read one of", "not useful in any way I did not ask the", "not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I", "reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra or", "> be extra or optional! > > > 2. It", "the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case.", "what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the", "> reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n'", "any question on our main site. No one provided an", "exact > number? So, there might be some information like", "same as in programming or others if I don't know", "to me. I am just curious to understand. And I", "site. No one provided an exact answer till now. Then", "are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep", "context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I", "process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe", "the potential issues with this question to refrain before posting", "in to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding", "need to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing", "invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate", "particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the need", "I am not in to review process and didn't find", "or optional! > > > 2. It is not useful", "> But if the editor sends a review request to", "this question to refrain before posting questions on our main", "a necessary criterion to ask any question on our main", "on our main site. The main objections from users I", "refrain before posting questions on our main site. The main", "to academia alone. How can I know whether it is", "the general case. I want to know what are the", "alone. How can I know whether it is trivial or", "explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to say", "on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general", "to refrain before posting questions on our main site. The", "(2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes.", "of the exact > number? So, there might be some", "know what are the potential issues with this question to", "on our main site. No one provided an exact answer", "to understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary", "know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know", "be extra or optional! > > > 2. It is" ]
[ "engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field", "of this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate", "to change the application area of research while looking for", "that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there", "have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this", "physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break)", "after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) ", "your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) [Recent PhD graduate, can I change", "to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics -->", "after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the", "theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields", "[Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering -->", "* [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to", "get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc", "* [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD", "number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of", "physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after", "be to have a single canonical question that covers all", "it possible to change the application area of research while", "because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A", "we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have", "We have a very high number of questions about switching", "PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back into", "aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc)", "of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these", "physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to", "possible to change the application area of research while looking", "switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting a", "no means a complete list, I just got tired of", "[Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and", "[Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible", "from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field)", "propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after", "different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question", "[Is it possible to change the application area of research", "thousands of versions of this same question. So, I propose", "except for the fields in question. Here are some examples", "high number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most", "the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because", "change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects", "--> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the", "physics) * [Is it possible to change the application area", "how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics", "--> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after", "these are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here", "of combinations between current field and target field, we could", "Most of these are duplicates except for the fields in", "I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields", "psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between current", "our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but", "would be to have a single canonical question that covers", "clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between", "we could potentially have thousands of versions of this same", "* [Is it possible to change the application area of", "atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis)", "straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical question", "that covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea", "switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I", "area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and", "fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics)", "energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is", "examples (by no means a complete list, I just got", "consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD", "list, I just got tired of copying and pasting): ", "fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for", "into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an", "good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD", "have thousands of versions of this same question. So, I", "change the application area of research while looking for a", "lot of combinations between current field and target field, we", "question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about", "just after your PhD a good time to switch your", "subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics)", "physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change", "of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric)", "(material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a", "possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are", "So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching", "I think the most straightforward solution would be to have", "PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical", "Since there are a lot of combinations between current field", "I'm open to the idea that we might need multiple", "idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some", "Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question now exists", "is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since", "permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would be", "are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are", "fields in question. Here are some examples (by no means", "atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the application", "a very high number of questions about switching fields after", "your PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area)", "[Is just after your PhD a good time to switch", "short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is", "physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between", "fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD", "about switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting", "pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil", "copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and", "--> math) * [Is just after your PhD a good", "fields after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent", "some examples (by no means a complete list, I just", "field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) ", "fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in", "versions of this same question. So, I propose that we", "duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are some", "change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) [Transition from", "--> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change", "* [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle", "--> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short", "application area of research while looking for a postdoc position", "there are a lot of combinations between current field and", "field and target field, we could potentially have thousands of", "a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would", "PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the fields", "* [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that", "in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in", "we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a", "a lot of combinations between current field and target field,", "might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally", "considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question now", "-- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological", "[How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math -->", "back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with", "complete list, I just got tired of copying and pasting):", "field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of this", "open to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate", "have a very high number of questions about switching fields", "(theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how", "the fields in question. Here are some examples (by no", "psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot", "(particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to", "switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric", "are a lot of combinations between current field and target", "of these are duplicates except for the fields in question.", "that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning", "an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics)", "this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our", "theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career", "very high number of questions about switching fields after PhD.", "between current field and target field, we could potentially have", "question that covers all fields, but I'm open to the", "research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material", "PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics", "that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields", "for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green", "postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) ", "(math --> math) [Is just after your PhD a", "potentially have thousands of versions of this same question. So,", "have a single canonical question that covers all fields, but", "canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open to", "postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics -->", "[Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change", "of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD", "(by no means a complete list, I just got tired", "(civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research", "between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How", "and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change", "change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical", "[Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back", "after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields", "solution would be to have a single canonical question that", "break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible", "a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology", "most straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical", "after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your", "PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) ", "the most straightforward solution would be to have a single", "multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations.", "targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update:", "looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science -->", "duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts?", "after your PhD a good time to switch your research", "earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I", "to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) [Practical", "after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical", "single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open", "position. I think the most straightforward solution would be to", "PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology)", "questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but before", "between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) ", "to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets", "questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are", "of research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/)", "after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position.", "to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math)", "tired of copying and pasting): [Change of field between", "a complete list, I just got tired of copying and", "the application area of research while looking for a postdoc", "all fields, but I'm open to the idea that we", "with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical", "need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different", "* [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math", "* [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering", "Update: A candidate for this canonical question now exists [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd).", "for the fields in question. Here are some examples (by", "it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent", "intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) ", "think the most straightforward solution would be to have a", "got tired of copying and pasting): [Change of field", "thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD", "career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it", "fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for", "research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just", "and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to", "math) * [Is just after your PhD a good time", "of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is", "target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of", "a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think", "research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields", "question. Here are some examples (by no means a complete", "combinations between current field and target field, we could potentially", "a single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm", "and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD", "but I'm open to the idea that we might need", "current field and target field, we could potentially have thousands", "green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD,", "area of research while looking for a postdoc position after", "same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions", "[Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics", "getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution", "and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc)", "but before getting a permanent position. I think the most", "position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching", "of versions of this same question. So, I propose that", "science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc", "fields, but I'm open to the idea that we might", "PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think the", "* [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get", "a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy)", "in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology)", "to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics", "to have a single canonical question that covers all fields,", "I just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change", "covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea that", "just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of", "some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate", "in question. Here are some examples (by no means a", "and target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions", "fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical", "can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) ", "(neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of", "switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except", "field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) [Practical aspects --", "postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology -->", "(biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields", "before getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward", "to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can", "field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after", "while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science", "Here are some examples (by no means a complete list,", "--> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after", "Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of", "Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) ", "I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) [Transition", "* [Is just after your PhD a good time to", "means a complete list, I just got tired of copying", "a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent", "PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics -->", "graduate, can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it)", "about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates", "could potentially have thousands of versions of this same question.", "PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to:", "postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching", "time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate,", "are some examples (by no means a complete list, I", "--> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations" ]
[ "voters: > > Questions about switching from X to Y", "recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has", "questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed", "question should be left open until its answers are merged", "not covered below (other than the specific fields), > the", "switching from X to Y may be closed as a", "something not covered below (other than the specific fields), >", "from X to Y may be closed as a duplicate", "tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are", "workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do", "this tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation", "until its answers are merged into > this canonical question.", "questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for", "The recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd)", "be included in all canonical questions, as I have the", "question before voting to close! If the question asks >", "for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to", "> this canonical question. > > > I think that", "canonical question. > > > I think that is a", "in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions", "of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively", "of fall into canonical territory get closed even though the", "to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the", "is a great addition and should be included in all", "as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that", "canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical questions,", "covered below (other than the specific fields), > the question", "merged into > this canonical question. > > > I", "have the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall", "territory get closed even though the specific answer is not", "note to close voters: > > Questions about switching from", "that is a great addition and should be included in", "making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply", "has the following added to note to close voters: >", "OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks", "suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be", "explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work,", "X to Y may be closed as a duplicate of", "a tag named canonical and ad this tag to all", "the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those).", "to close! If the question asks > about something not", "into > this canonical question. > > > I think", "I think that is a great addition and should be", "actively click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical", "canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on", "please be sure that the below answer actually > answers", "not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal", "unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for making", "about switching from X to Y may be closed as", "should be left open until its answers are merged into", "open until its answers are merged into > this canonical", "and ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with", "questions do exist, they are not easy to find as", "for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to", "answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer", "sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you", "Questions about switching from X to Y may be closed", "indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on", "think that is a great addition and should be included", "closed even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory)", "answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although", "a great addition and should be included in all canonical", "into canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer", "fall into canonical territory get closed even though the specific", "an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions", "more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named", "should be included in all canonical questions, as I have", "[journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions", "exist, they are not easy to find as the float", "questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click", "in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how", "after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close", "> about something not covered below (other than the specific", "close! If the question asks > about something not covered", "answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question", "2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy", "the below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting", "kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even though", "be left open until its answers are merged into >", "questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching", "are merged into > this canonical question. > > >", "about something not covered below (other than the specific fields),", "answers are merged into > this canonical question. > >", "not easy to find as the float around in the", "added to note to close voters: > > Questions about", "> the question should be left open until its answers", "the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into", "is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist,", "to note to close voters: > > Questions about switching", "the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless", "question asks > about something not covered below (other than", "1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching after", "below (other than the specific fields), > the question should", "left open until its answers are merged into > this", "its answers are merged into > this canonical question. >", "established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the", "do exist, they are not easy to find as the", "(yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a)", "in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that", "PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close voters:", "switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to", "answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to close!", "a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the", "field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note", "canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer is", "2 suggestions for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical", "feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical", "canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2.", "on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more", "\"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named canonical", "following added to note to close voters: > > Questions", "the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the", "> answers OP's question before voting to close! If the", "closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure", "that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even", "to close voters: > > Questions about switching from X", "actually > answers OP's question before voting to close! If", "non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion", "However, please be sure that the below answer actually >", "would be to simply create a tag named canonical and", "work, how people are invited to add to them etc.", "to simply create a tag named canonical and ad this", "to Y may be closed as a duplicate of this.", "around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical", "> Questions about switching from X to Y may be", "If the question asks > about something not covered below", "them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\"", "be to simply create a tag named canonical and ad", "the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create", "the following added to note to close voters: > >", "of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are", "Y may be closed as a duplicate of this. However,", "be sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's", "(other than the specific fields), > the question should be", "fields), > the question should be left open until its", "in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of", "simply create a tag named canonical and ad this tag", "ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with an", "included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one", "as I have the feeling that often, questions that kind", "> > Questions about switching from X to Y may", "the question should be left open until its answers are", "[canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following", "the question asks > about something not covered below (other", "questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag", "asks > about something not covered below (other than the", "easy to find as the float around in the sea", "question. > > > I think that is a great", "create a tag named canonical and ad this tag to", "canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a", "get closed even though the specific answer is not (yet", "specific fields), > the question should be left open until", "the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki", "questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions that", "other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My", "and should be included in all canonical questions, as I", "as the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable", "canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions", "included in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling", "click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions", "all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag", "than the specific fields), > the question should be left", "questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on how", "tag named canonical and ad this tag to all the", "> I think that is a great addition and should", "Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to", "you actively click on them. My suggestion for making the", "great addition and should be included in all canonical questions,", "named canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical", "canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field", "all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often,", "this. However, please be sure that the below answer actually", "find as the float around in the sea of questions", "I have the feeling that often, questions that kind of", "the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people", "the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from", "> > I think that is a great addition and", "that the below answer actually > answers OP's question before", "duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the below", "for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for", "often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get", "on how canonical questions work, how people are invited to", "questions work, how people are invited to add to them", "with an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical", "addition and should be included in all canonical questions, as", "My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would", "wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are invited", "specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical", "below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to", "may be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please", "one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they", "the specific fields), > the question should be left open", "sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's question", "to find as the float around in the sea of", "canonical questions work, how people are invited to add to", "suggestions for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question", "(the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical", "of this. However, please be sure that the below answer", "is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the", "satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is", "canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to find", "that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory", "are not easy to find as the float around in", "from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them.", "how canonical questions work, how people are invited to add", "before voting to close! If the question asks > about", "question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added", "close voters: > > Questions about switching from X to", "voting to close! If the question asks > about something", "though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in", "float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other,", "those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not", "they are not easy to find as the float around", "> > > I think that is a great addition", "even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included", "this canonical question. > > > I think that is", "tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in", "be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be" ]
[ "my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How", "for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct,", "platform, because the questions seem to be very often rather", "but not with questions. So my question is 1. How", "because the questions seem to be very often rather vague,", "the questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem", "this Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks", "contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So", "in other stacks before. I answered a couple of question", "are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I", "participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple of", "I am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked", "I have been participating in other stacks before. I answered", "to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned", "participate in Academia stack because I am science manager. I", "platform. My take on this platform is: I participate in", "other stacks before. I answered a couple of question but", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my expert", "copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I", "well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer,", "gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see", "answered a couple of question but have got constantly bad", "2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I", "for some reason are not very well liked. 1. In", "I give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which", "my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable", "though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a", "How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being", "before. I answered a couple of question but have got", "query I give an answer based on my expert knowledge,", "have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with", "got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not", "suitable for most of the questions asked on this platform,", "an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that", "asked on this platform, because the questions seem to be", "the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the", "from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the", "platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I am", "acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise", "be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query", "of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for", "different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy,", "about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but", "even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As", "My take on this platform is: I participate in Academia", "I have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions.", "the questions seem to be very often rather vague, which", "consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on", "2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on", "content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is", "modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions", "to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering,", "based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat", "that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my", "correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart.", "see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer", "which for some reason are not very well liked. 1.", "it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my", "I have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute", "am new to this Stack, though I have been participating", "good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and", "disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I", "Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is", "again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong", "I answered a couple of question but have got constantly", "whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of", "is smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering,", "Academia stack because I am science manager. I have a", "answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question", "answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on", "on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because", "that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based", "not with questions. So my question is 1. How to", "1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was", "suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is 1.", "being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus", "some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers", "policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I can", "1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from", "liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which", "though I have been participating in other stacks before. I", "I am new to this Stack, though I have been", "but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason", "query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if", "was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another", "new to this Stack, though I have been participating in", "reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions", "another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query", "question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to", "I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this", "on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it.", "institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have", "is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about", "3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though", "knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others.", "is suitable for most of the questions asked on this", "to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895)", "manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different academic", "constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not very", "because I am science manager. I have a PhD, I", "and even another commenter did not see that. 2. In", "I don't see that and even another commenter did not", "stack because I am science manager. I have a PhD,", "my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good", "for most of the questions asked on this platform, because", "can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions.", "not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave", "commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I", "from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take", "myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall,", "in Academia stack because I am science manager. I have", "most of the questions asked on this platform, because the", "very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an", "academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I", "have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are", "As a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes", "science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different", "bad reactions, which for some reason are not very well", "a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my", "this platform. My take on this platform is: I participate", "banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of", "paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this platform", "is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion", "seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In", "others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even", "questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem to", "to be very often rather vague, which makes answer suggestions.", "PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD", "wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most", "expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for", "am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform.", "right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked on", "questions seem to be very often rather vague, which makes", "questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I", "at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright", "worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on", "me on this platform. My take on this platform is:", "tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter", "on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not", "which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3.", "not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is", "take on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack", "banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My", "questions. So my question is 1. How to unban myself?", "question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some", "am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for", "I participate in Academia stack because I am science manager.", "even another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285)", "my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned", "is: I participate in Academia stack because I am science", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others", "couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which", "some reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896)", "did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give", "if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am", "I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable", "others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence", "not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an", "How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am", "with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my", "Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some", "seem to be very often rather vague, which makes answer", "So my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2.", "to this Stack, though I have been participating in other", "of the questions asked on this platform, because the questions", "answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and", "been participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple", "which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even", "have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since", "PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge", "a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me", "a couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions,", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\".", "Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks before.", "somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that", "that and even another commenter did not see that. 2.", "an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to", "on this platform, because the questions seem to be very", "\"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter did", "this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I", "stacks before. I answered a couple of question but have", "and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is", "answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be", "suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned from", "I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with", "reactions, which for some reason are not very well liked.", "am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at", "this platform, because the questions seem to be very often", "with questions. So my question is 1. How to unban", "of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked", "prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether", "I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is", "is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent", "smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering, which", "see that and even another commenter did not see that.", "unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again?", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree", "knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions,", "I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't", "have been participating in other stacks before. I answered a", "don't see that and even another commenter did not see", "give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems", "which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this", "on this platform. My take on this platform is: I", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged" ]
[ "are posted, all with the same tenor: > > I", "they seemed to think I am a good fit. After", "etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is", ", and they seemed to think I am a good", "questions like this within the last few months. So the", "few months. So the question is: as this seems to", "and we simply keep on linking them to the oldest", "there must have been 10 or so questions like this", "10 or so questions like this within the last few", "them to the oldest such question and close as duplicates?", "question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an", "must have been 10 or so questions like this within", "canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for", "up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have", "program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am a", "question is: as this seems to be a common issue,", "a good fit. After initial contact I sent them a", "them a follow up email to which they did not", "as little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should", "I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I", "so questions like this within the last few months. So", "the question is: as this seems to be a common", "if I remember correctly), should I write a follow up", "remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" >", "we make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies", "the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or", "profane for that and we simply keep on linking them", "professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed", "I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days", "a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they", "a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think", "sent them a follow up email to which they did", "and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this", "So the question is: as this seems to be a", "good fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow", "to be a common issue, should we make a canonical", "(sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember correctly),", "like this within the last few months. So the question", "> > > I think there must have been 10", "should we make a canonical question about the etiquette and", "the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I", "one are posted, all with the same tenor: > >", "write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think", "I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD", "this seems to be a common issue, should we make", "correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > >", "make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when", "to profane for that and we simply keep on linking", "email to which they did not reply (yet). It has", "questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the", "to think I am a good fit. After initial contact", "the same tenor: > > I was in contact with", "linking them to the oldest such question and close as", "follow up email to which they did not reply (yet).", "this problem to profane for that and we simply keep", "Or is this problem to profane for that and we", "an answer? Or is this problem to profane for that", "Quite often, questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all", "think there must have been 10 or so questions like", "with the same tenor: > > I was in contact", "been 10 or so questions like this within the last", "that and we simply keep on linking them to the", "After initial contact I sent them a follow up email", "wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if", "days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as", "and they seemed to think I am a good fit.", "not reply (yet). It has been XX days since I", "when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to", "> I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a", "answer? Or is this problem to profane for that and", "is this problem to profane for that and we simply", "within the last few months. So the question is: as", "position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I", "which they did not reply (yet). It has been XX", "fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow up", "last few months. So the question is: as this seems", "contact I sent them a follow up email to which", "posted, all with the same tenor: > > I was", "has been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes", "a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there", "is: as this seems to be a common issue, should", "often, questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with", "strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem", "a follow up email to which they did not reply", "think I am a good fit. After initial contact I", "3 days if I remember correctly), should I write a", "months. So the question is: as this seems to be", "contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. ,", "[this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor:", "problem to profane for that and we simply keep on", "program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am", "did not reply (yet). It has been XX days since", "or so questions like this within the last few months.", "> > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about", "for an answer? Or is this problem to profane for", "follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must", "same tenor: > > I was in contact with a", "> > I think there must have been 10 or", "been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as", "I think there must have been 10 or so questions", "with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and", "I sent them a follow up email to which they", "simply keep on linking them to the oldest such question", "for that and we simply keep on linking them to", "little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I", "should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > >", "about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to", "was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters", "waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to profane", "email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have been", "as this seems to be a common issue, should we", "> I think there must have been 10 or so", "up email to which they did not reply (yet). It", "email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember", "seems to be a common issue, should we make a", "all with the same tenor: > > I was in", "recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor: >", "on linking them to the oldest such question and close", "I remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\"", "a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting", "about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer?", "to which they did not reply (yet). It has been", "keep on linking them to the oldest such question and", "a common issue, should we make a canonical question about", "the last few months. So the question is: as this", "as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I write", "reply (yet). It has been XX days since I wrote", "(yet). It has been XX days since I wrote the", "they did not reply (yet). It has been XX days", "issue, should we make a canonical question about the etiquette", "in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc.", "seemed to think I am a good fit. After initial", "days if I remember correctly), should I write a follow", "be a common issue, should we make a canonical question", "XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little", "common issue, should we make a canonical question about the", "since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3", "this within the last few months. So the question is:", "we simply keep on linking them to the oldest such", "I am a good fit. After initial contact I sent", "initial contact I sent them a follow up email to", "have been 10 or so questions like this within the", "like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same", "It has been XX days since I wrote the email", "tenor: > > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc.", "am a good fit. After initial contact I sent them" ]
[ "question before voting to close! If the question asks about", "question asks about something not covered below (other than the", "answers are merged into this canonical question. > > >", "> > In [(How) Can I switch from field X", "please be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's", "voting to close! If the question asks about something not", "answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question", "specific fields), the question should be left open until its", "this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I", "actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If the", "If the question asks about something not covered below (other", "about something not covered below (other than the specific fields),", "are merged into this canonical question. > > > In", "However, please be sure that the below answer actually answers", "question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch from", "[(How) Can I switch from field X to field Y", "than the specific fields), the question should be left open", "fields), the question should be left open until its answers", "switch from field X to field Y after getting my", "to close! If the question asks about something not covered", "be left open until its answers are merged into this", "> > However, please be sure that the below answer", "the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to", "question should be left open until its answers are merged", "answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If", "below (other than the specific fields), the question should be", "that the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting", "> However, please be sure that the below answer actually", "the question should be left open until its answers are", "be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question", "its answers are merged into this canonical question. > >", "merged into this canonical question. > > > In [(How)", "asks about something not covered below (other than the specific", "Can I switch from field X to field Y after", "I switch from field X to field Y after getting", "something not covered below (other than the specific fields), the", "open until its answers are merged into this canonical question.", "OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks", "canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch", "In [(How) Can I switch from field X to field", "the specific fields), the question should be left open until", "sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question before", "(other than the specific fields), the question should be left", "covered below (other than the specific fields), the question should", "> In [(How) Can I switch from field X to", "until its answers are merged into this canonical question. >", "into this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can", "should be left open until its answers are merged into", "left open until its answers are merged into this canonical", "before voting to close! If the question asks about something", "not covered below (other than the specific fields), the question", "from field X to field Y after getting my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd)", "the question asks about something not covered below (other than", "> > > In [(How) Can I switch from field", "close! If the question asks about something not covered below", "below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close!" ]
[ "to ask a question you will now see this screen:", "morning. That is why I learned that, if you go", "so you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed.", "That is why I learned that, if you go to", "and set up a throw away account, this is adding", "used to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode,", "[this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you create", "will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter,", "a user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this", "away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to", "mode and attempt to ask a question you will now", "This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal", "you enter, so you need an actual throw away. I", "address you enter, so you need an actual throw away.", "is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep", "valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues;", "annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a throw", "to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a", "incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you will", "to ask such a question this morning. That is why", "a question you will now see this screen: [![enter image", "to the address you enter, so you need an actual", "get a throw away e-mail and set up a throw", "interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a question", "this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will", "guest mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX", "account with a fake e-mail address, but will send a", "this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to", "ask questions in guest mode, with a user name of", "such a question this morning. That is why I learned", "e-mail to the address you enter, so you need an", "to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with", "up a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles.", "adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep out", "While it is obviously possible to get a throw away", "allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a", "a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was", "if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt", "in guest mode, with a user name of the form", "throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible", "the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly", "See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which", "anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a user", "I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito", "this morning. That is why I learned that, if you", "question you will now see this screen: [![enter image description", "but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you", "an account with a fake e-mail address, but will send", "learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode", "you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While", "a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you", "mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX .", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply", "fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to", "possible to get a throw away e-mail and set up", "will not simply let you create an account with a", "go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you", "a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail", "of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is", "why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in", "to ask questions in guest mode, with a user name", "name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This", "screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not", "particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal", "I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get", "questions in guest mode, with a user name of the", "sites used to allow anyone to ask questions in guest", "involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask", "e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the", "you will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)", "the site will not simply let you create an account", "send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so", "will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover,", "with a user name of the form userXXXXX . See", "not simply let you create an account with a fake", "now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the", "question this morning. That is why I learned that, if", "see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site", "confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you need", "site will not simply let you create an account with", "userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for", "you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to", "attempt to ask a question you will now see this", "simply let you create an account with a fake e-mail", "ask a question you will now see this screen: [![enter", "am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a", "was going to ask such a question this morning. That", "let you create an account with a fake e-mail address,", "enter, so you need an actual throw away. I am", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve", "legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such", "user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously).", "is why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE", "in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you", "and attempt to ask a question you will now see", "which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going", "for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I", "throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this", "I was going to ask such a question this morning.", "going to ask such a question this morning. That is", "form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let", "e-mail and set up a throw away account, this is", "set up a throw away account, this is adding extra", "sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was", "extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep out spam?", "issues; I was going to ask such a question this", "ask such a question this morning. That is why I", "a question this morning. That is why I learned that,", "obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and set", "account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary", "need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it", "away e-mail and set up a throw away account, this", "it is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail", "is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and", "create an account with a fake e-mail address, but will", "with a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation", "a throw away e-mail and set up a throw away", "you create an account with a fake e-mail address, but", "throw away e-mail and set up a throw away account,", ". See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites", "or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a", "is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or", "academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question", "often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to", "to get a throw away e-mail and set up a", "away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really", "an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is", "Moreover, the site will not simply let you create an", "SE sites used to allow anyone to ask questions in", "that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and", "actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously", "the address you enter, so you need an actual throw", "address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address" ]
[ "just re-use an old exam and then accuse any student", "then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407)", "re-use an old exam and then accuse any student of", "accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was", "new exam when I can just re-use an old exam", "of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude", "exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy", "ever create a new exam when I can just re-use", "obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or", "[Why would I ever create a new exam when I", "any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted", "old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a", "student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as", "can just re-use an old exam and then accuse any", "a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or abusive.", "I ever create a new exam when I can just", "I can just re-use an old exam and then accuse", "an old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining", "create a new exam when I can just re-use an", "when I can just re-use an old exam and then", "exam when I can just re-use an old exam and", "and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as", "copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or abusive. Why?", "would I ever create a new exam when I can", "a new exam when I can just re-use an old" ]
[ "harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own", "author that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia", "whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit", "However, it suggests to the author that they adopt practices", "as a whole purely for their own career advancement. This", "sit right with me. Should we allow answers like this?", "for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with", "correct. However, it suggests to the author that they adopt", "career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we", "it suggests to the author that they adopt practices that", "a whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't", "that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for", "is technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that", "that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as", "advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow", "are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their", "the author that they adopt practices that are harmful to", "This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow answers", "their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me.", "technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that they", "own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should", "they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/191033/72211) is technically correct. However, it suggests to the author", "suggests to the author that they adopt practices that are", "practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely", "doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow answers like", "to the author that they adopt practices that are harmful", "adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole", "acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career advancement.", "to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career", "[This answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/191033/72211) is technically correct. However, it suggests to the", "purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right" ]
[ "it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position", "One problem I see is that it might be difficult", "if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853)", "forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit it", "which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and", "with citation, or to permit it generally. There might be", "answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853)", "\"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible", "be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be", "it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it is", "permit it with citation, or to permit it generally. There", "to provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights", "I see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\"", "then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form.", "One major criticism of it is that it generates text", "is a human assisted AI that can be used to", "be others as well. One problem I see is that", "data that was used to train it, which isn't always", "that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to", "form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid career", "might be enforced would be welcome in answers if you", "are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize", "was used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should", "see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its", "to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or", "for at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow", "how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome", "believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how", "well. One problem I see is that it might be", "Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes", "it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with", "use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this", "is that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\"", "of it is that it generates text that can be", "skeptical of AI in its present form. We are, after", "generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We are,", "are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to", "present form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid", "generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have", "(temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of", "it generally. There might be others as well. One problem", "its present form. We are, after all, trying to provide", "always reliable. Should we take a position and make policy", "it depends on the data that was used to train", "The New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html) concerning", "been used for at least one answer here (now deleted).", "generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its", "others as well. One problem I see is that it", "site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical", "there. One major criticism of it is that it generates", "therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another", "usefulness and validity of this site if it is overused.", "But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present", "any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company", "our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might", "used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems", "on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit", "to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit", "New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html) concerning ChatGPT.", "be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem", "here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for", "[ChatGPT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT) is a human assisted AI that can be used", "human assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable", "using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it", "excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I", "isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and make", "of this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm", "It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any", "overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its", "reliable. Should we take a position and make policy on", "The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation,", "that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the", "company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally,", "Should we take a position and make policy on using", "deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there.", "unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade", "Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would", "sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think", "recognize these). --- The New York Times has an [article", "to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy", "used for at least one answer here (now deleted). However", "all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers.", "least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily)", "banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it", "permit it generally. There might be others as well. One", "degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if it", "can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions.", "citation, or to permit it generally. There might be others", "to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also", "be enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe", "is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use.", "hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is", "(present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\".", "to questions. It seems to have been used for at", "humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and", "train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a", "answers to questions. It seems to have been used for", "it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it", "its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to", "[Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). ---", "trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers. ---", "enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe they", "is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in", "be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that", "\"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the", "that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning", "However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One", "in its present form. We are, after all, trying to", "it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI", "to permit it generally. There might be others as well.", "peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be", "reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have been", "appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these).", "policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers if", "to recognize these). --- The New York Times has an", "I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and", "faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use", "factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was", "\"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was used", "be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It", "as well. One problem I see is that it might", "that was used to train it, which isn't always reliable.", "(now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers", "major criticism of it is that it generates text that", "they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to", "to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to", "used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we", "think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity", "if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of", "career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a", "some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New", "seems to have been used for at least one answer", "[StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major", "for answers there. One major criticism of it is that", "We are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance", "that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It", "answers there. One major criticism of it is that it", "difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard", "I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We", "a human assisted AI that can be used to generate", "provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into", "problem I see is that it might be difficult to", "has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism", "might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore,", "might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy.", "or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that", "policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it,", "would be welcome in answers if you believe they are", "be welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate.", "and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly", "we take a position and make policy on using it?", "could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site", "--- The New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html)", "restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers", "it, permit it with citation, or to permit it generally.", "it is that it generates text that can be factually", "this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally", "how to recognize these). --- The New York Times has", "these). --- The New York Times has an [article (probably", "--- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced", "is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The", "after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our", "is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty", "of AI in its present form. We are, after all,", "take a position and make policy on using it? The", "generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends", "use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce", "policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded)", "that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since", "have been used for at least one answer here (now", "It seems to have been used for at least one", "position and make policy on using it? The possibilities are", "one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned", "and make policy on using it? The possibilities are to", "validity of this site if it is overused. But, then,", "also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual", "impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans", "problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate", "AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers", "assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking", "or to permit it generally. There might be others as", "There might be others as well. One problem I see", "are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to", "Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness", "enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present", "might be others as well. One problem I see is", "discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New York", "in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is", "text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on", "answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some", "the usefulness and validity of this site if it is", "on the data that was used to train it, which", "guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive", "to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take", "can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data", "a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in", "possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or", "questions. It seems to have been used for at least", "at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has", "and validity of this site if it is overused. But,", "to have been used for at least one answer here", "looking answers to questions. It seems to have been used", "make policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid", "generally. There might be others as well. One problem I", "reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could", "criticism of it is that it generates text that can", "you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about", "greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if", "it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might,", "the data that was used to train it, which isn't", "valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how", "it with citation, or to permit it generally. There might", "into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be", "depends on the data that was used to train it,", "a position and make policy on using it? The possibilities", "about how to recognize these). --- The New York Times", "its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of", "since it depends on the data that was used to", "AI in its present form. We are, after all, trying", "welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here" ]
[ "answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a tool", "or comments that are automatically generated using a tool like", "for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an", "questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a", "automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows", "previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site", "[Should this site take an official position on answers generated", "the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and [network", "Do we have a firm policy on questions, answers, or", "a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request", "on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using", "generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a", "we have a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments", "take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See", "have a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that", "ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also", "related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and [network wide](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/384396/ban-chatgpt-network-wide).", "official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the", "are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post", "comments that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3?", "follows a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should", "a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are", "See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy))", "policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated", "post follows a previous request for Academia SE community input:", "by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see", "Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an official", "SE community input: [Should this site take an official position", "This post follows a previous request for Academia SE community", "input: [Should this site take an official position on answers", "on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions", "also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and", "request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take", "that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This", "firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically", "community input: [Should this site take an official position on", "answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on", "position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related", "like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia", "GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia SE", "a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this", "tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for", "using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous", "this site take an official position on answers generated by", "site take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt)", "an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also", "generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned)" ]
[ "on the screen for others or not? how to reopen", "and is the closed question appeared on the screen for", "please tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is", "the screen for others or not? how to reopen it?", "closed question appeared on the screen for others or not?", "question appeared on the screen for others or not? how", "is closed. and is the closed question appeared on the", "me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared on", "Someone, please tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and", "is the closed question appeared on the screen for others", "tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared", "appeared on the screen for others or not? how to", "the closed question appeared on the screen for others or", "why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question", "closed. and is the closed question appeared on the screen" ]
[ "distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only", "question only concerns the former. While the latter would, in", "It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction between", "the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same", "recently made a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical", "was unaware of the process by which this is usually", "make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\",", "managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If", "answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be? ---", "If so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's", "questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware", "concerns the former. While the latter would, in my opinion,", "the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was", "Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If so,", "Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which this", "--- It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction", "the former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have", "\"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While the", "take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the", "made a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer", "that does have some more nuance that would make a", "in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does", "form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by", "this is usually managed. Do we think this needs a", "a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this", "of the process by which this is usually managed. Do", "and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While", "a canonical answer for all of the questions that take", "attempt to make a canonical answer for all of the", "only concerns the former. While the latter would, in my", "have broadly the same answer, that does have some more", "answer for all of the questions that take this form.", "for all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370>", "would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that", "worth noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can", "latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer,", "think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should", "more nuance that would make a canonical answer far harder.", "that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of", "a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer", "by which this is usually managed. Do we think this", "opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have some", "broadly the same answer, that does have some more nuance", "needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical", "huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question", "that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and", "does have some more nuance that would make a canonical", "canonical answer for all of the questions that take this", "be? --- It's worth noting that I make a huge", "my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have", "of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I", "usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer?", "we think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what", "what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting", "the same answer, that does have some more nuance that", "process by which this is usually managed. Do we think", "is usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical", "answer, that does have some more nuance that would make", "some more nuance that would make a canonical answer far", "the process by which this is usually managed. Do we", "I\", this question only concerns the former. While the latter", "canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make", "same answer, that does have some more nuance that would", "answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make a", "canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be?", "between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns", "While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the", "make a canonical answer for all of the questions that", "the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I", "former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly", "noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\"", "I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should", "a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for", "misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all of", "all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies,", "unaware of the process by which this is usually managed.", "have some more nuance that would make a canonical answer", "this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process", "which this is usually managed. Do we think this needs", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which", "I was unaware of the process by which this is", "I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former.", "\"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the", "should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that", "so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth", "this question only concerns the former. While the latter would,", "rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all", "to make a canonical answer for all of the questions", "I recently made a rather misguided attempt to make a", "this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the" ]
[ "for the main site and not meta. So my question", "not meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or", "on the main site. And started to wonder why this", "should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content", "the main site and not meta. So my question is:", "that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main", "content from meta to the main site in the form", "recently linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta", "main site and not meta. So my question is: should", "site and not meta. So my question is: should we", "to wonder why this question is on meta and not", "as a canonical question on the main site, as it", "I recently linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\"", "question is on meta and not as a canonical question", "than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a", "content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the", "a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better", "linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question", "(or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to", "(IMHO) be better suited for the main site and not", "lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited", "site, as it contains actually a lot of content that", "on the main site, as it contains actually a lot", "suited for the main site and not meta. So my", "actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be", "better suited for the main site and not meta. So", "and not as a canonical question on the main site,", "question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and", "the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in", "wonder why this question is on meta and not as", "question on the main site, as it contains actually a", "on a question on the main site. And started to", "we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from", "canonical question on the main site, as it contains actually", "a question on the main site. And started to wonder", "as it contains actually a lot of content that would", "not as a canonical question on the main site, as", "site. And started to wonder why this question is on", "meta to the main site in the form of a", "in a comment on a question on the main site.", "the main site, as it contains actually a lot of", "this good and informative content from meta to the main", "question on the main site. And started to wonder why", "think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question on", "more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on", "you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question", "why this question is on meta and not as a", "migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta", "is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative", "comment on a question on the main site. And started", "the main site. And started to wonder why this question", "question in a comment on a question on the main", "to the main site in the form of a canonical", "be better suited for the main site and not meta.", "So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this", "from meta to the main site in the form of", "of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for", "good and informative content from meta to the main site", "it contains actually a lot of content that would be", "differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment", "started to wonder why this question is on meta and", "a canonical question on the main site, as it contains", "a comment on a question on the main site. And", "would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site", "And started to wonder why this question is on meta", "this question is on meta and not as a canonical", "meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate)", "duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to the", "the main site in the form of a canonical question?", "and informative content from meta to the main site in", "meta and not as a canonical question on the main", "informative content from meta to the main site in the", "main site. And started to wonder why this question is", "main site, as it contains actually a lot of content", "and not meta. So my question is: should we migrate", "\"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a", "meta question in a comment on a question on the", "is on meta and not as a canonical question on", "my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good", "on meta and not as a canonical question on the", "contains actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO)", "be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site and" ]
[ "understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the fact", "but haven't heard back after X days / weeks /", "\"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in", "interview, but haven't heard back after X days / weeks", "to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual", "Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please", "At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It", "factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible options:", "of \"I submitted an application / had an interview, but", "toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate", "the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and", "the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been", "the caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If more", "on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things", "these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as", "would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems", "or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three", "there are three possible options: * Make a canonical question", "can tell them what the status of their application is.", "how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the", "Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how", "Please feel free to edit to improve. If more severe", "seems like we do not have a consistent policy for", "Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we", "policy for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally", "anxious, but of course the fact is that no one", "their application is. It seems like we do not have", "a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for", "the status of their application is. It seems like we", "we cannot predict how long things will take or how", "question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions", "but of course the fact is that no one here", "it, there are three possible options: * Make a canonical", "an interview, but haven't heard back after X days /", "get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I", "Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about", "back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely. This", "seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd be", "after X days / weeks / months. Have I been", "the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as", "what the status of their application is. It seems like", "individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will", "and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats", "be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward", "more severe changes are needed, let's make a new meta", "things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to", "weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what point", "here can tell them what the status of their application", "the questions open. This seems to be the most common", "positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard", "usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or", "factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will take", "since we cannot predict how long things will take or", "free to edit to improve. If more severe changes are", "status of their application is. It seems like we do", "questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict", "consistent policy for these; they are usually left open, but", "* Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring", "are anxious, but of course the fact is that no", "duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are", "I see it, there are three possible options: * Make", "long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would", "* Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since", "been rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up", "[one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application /", "are three possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What", "what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is", "to edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed,", "how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing", "the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one", "will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived.", "improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make a", "we do not have a consistent policy for these; they", "had an interview, but haven't heard back after X days", "/ had an interview, but haven't heard back after X", "the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US", "been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve.", "askers are anxious, but of course the fact is that", "perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to be", "Leave the questions open. This seems to be the most", "haven't heard back after X days / weeks / months.", "for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed", "take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. ", "days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At", "posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If", "This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. Close", "things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be", "do not have a consistent policy for these; they are", "is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the", "/ weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what", "two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/).", "candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to", "them what the status of their application is. It seems", "lines of \"I submitted an application / had an interview,", "I'd be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts?", "three possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is", "open. This seems to be the most common outcome now.", "predict how long things will take or how a follow-up", "have a consistent policy for these; they are usually left", "submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't heard", "severe changes are needed, let's make a new meta post.", "as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it,", "thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on", "e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of", "see it, there are three possible options: * Make a", "options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the usual", "months. Have I been rejected? At what point can I", "\"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends", "Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline", "of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has", "questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted", "hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe?", "open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\"", "questions open. This seems to be the most common outcome", "fact is that no one here can tell them what", "back after X days / weeks / months. Have I", "that askers are anxious, but of course the fact is", "point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable", "they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a", "is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the", "the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot", "be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to", "one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer", "occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I", "that no one here can tell them what the status", "follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but", "I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary", "inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A", "application is. It seems like we do not have a", "heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely.", "canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic", "If more severe changes are needed, let's make a new", "to be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined", "are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate", "most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of", "* Leave the questions open. This seems to be the", "edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's", "As I see it, there are three possible options: ", "as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how", "common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the", "is. It seems like we do not have a consistent", "course the fact is that no one here can tell", "along the lines of \"I submitted an application / had", "but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As", "be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update:", "frequently get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of", "a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. Leave the questions", "first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted", "is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the", "question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit", "send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are", "A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free", "and the caveats about how things vary widely. This is", "no one here can tell them what the status of", "We frequently get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines", "of their application is. It seems like we do not", "caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably the", "left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual", "follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open.", "cannot predict how long things will take or how a", "heard back after X days / weeks / months. Have", "/ months. Have I been rejected? At what point can", "academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I", "a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious,", "tell them what the status of their application is. It", "like we do not have a consistent policy for these;", "a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there", "or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave", "widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. ", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application", "closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see", "e-mail would be perceived. Leave the questions open. This", "\"I submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't", "I been rejected? At what point can I send a", "rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\"", "one here can tell them what the status of their", "feel free to edit to improve. If more severe changes", "is that no one here can tell them what the", "outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first", "vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do.", "to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make", "X days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected?", "timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why", "I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers", "about how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\"", "Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel", "a consistent policy for these; they are usually left open,", "\"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible", "possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the", "for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't", "can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that", "It seems like we do not have a consistent policy", "application / had an interview, but haven't heard back after", "how long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail", "Have I been rejected? At what point can I send", "of course the fact is that no one here can", "in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\",", "now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first two.", "usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and", "do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\"", "the fact is that no one here can tell them", "an application / had an interview, but haven't heard back", "the lines of \"I submitted an application / had an", "has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to", "probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions", "haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things", "not have a consistent policy for these; they are usually", "US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the", "This seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd", "It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course", "like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an", "\"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long" ]
[ "can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or", "for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them", "it be appropriate to ask a question about it on", "I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website", "some context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the", "subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's", "why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my", "used to this website at all, so forgive me is", "is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask>", "getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting", "figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used", "a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral", "really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I", "conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I", "now I'm wondering if the academia website would be more", "few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering", "But now I'm wondering if the academia website would be", "website would be more appropriate for this question, as the", "about it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the)", "be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me,", "number of international doctoral students in the US), but I", "a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few", "international doctoral students in the US), but I have two", "would be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line", "guess that it's interesting to know if we can ask", "know if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics", "this website at all, so forgive me is my question", "it's interesting to know if we can ask this kind", "simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in", "the number of international doctoral students in the US), but", "me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is", "data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on", "pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for", "Would it be appropriate to ask a question about it", "question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to", "if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question", "question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the", "be appropriate to ask a question about it on this", "is that this kind of question would be off-topic. Thanks,", "about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway,", "website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now", "I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of", "clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get", "to ask a question about it on this website? I", "besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to", "[similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks", "opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers.", "give some context, I have a quite simple question (i.e.", "bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather", "not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why", "rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject.", "wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate for", "get from them is that this kind of question would", "we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here,", "academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not", "academia website would be more appropriate for this question, as", "(i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the US),", "and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even", "two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it", "ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify", "this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata", "the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind", "a question about it on this website? I asked a", "understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides", "this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about", "interesting to know if we can ask this kind of", "apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a", "of international doctoral students in the US), but I have", "them is that this kind of question would be off-topic.", "asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a", "ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if", "answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website would", "of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm", "\"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind of", "it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all,", "but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this", "is not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding", "ask a question about it on this website? I asked", "if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this", "sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate", "if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at", "figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question about", "have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would", "issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather about", "kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic.", "a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm", "strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources", "the academia website would be more appropriate for this question,", "this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's", "about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are", "to know if we can ask this kind of academia", "so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages", "on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the", "me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and", "question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not", "students in the US), but I have two different sources", "more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is", "conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question", "sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular", "that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to", "off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all, so", "at all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant.", "I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures.", "US), but I have two different sources that give apparently", "context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number", "To give some context, I have a quite simple question", "I get from them is that this kind of question", "give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask", "even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that", "that it's interesting to know if we can ask this", "the US), but I have two different sources that give", "without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia", "did not really clarify things for me, even if the", "particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know if", "doctoral students in the US), but I have two different", "here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this", "not used to this website at all, so forgive me", "forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic>", "is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really", "I'm wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate", "are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question,", "have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international", "The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things", "question, I guess that it's interesting to know if we", "as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data,", "appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not", "website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange", "stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But", "the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but", "for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly", "it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on", "weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if", "question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago", "to this website at all, so forgive me is my", "appropriate to ask a question about it on this website?", "question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting", "quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students", "but I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting", "if the academia website would be more appropriate for this", "my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did", "not really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\"", "in the US), but I have two different sources that", "ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the", "this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that", "all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The", "question about it on this website? I asked a [similar", "I guess that it's interesting to know if we can", "Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting", "I'm not used to this website at all, so forgive", "on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even if", "website at all, so forgive me is my question is", "on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess", "different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be", "getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website", "the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting", "or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website", "from them is that this kind of question would be", "things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from", "my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know" ]
[ "the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get", "mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request", "pursue a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary", "kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems.", "of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description", "a first glance, appear to be like those I've described", "Produce a community answer of the kind that I've seen", "Such an answer might include separate sections with comments that", "fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and", "could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the", "community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that", "all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic", "points above would also cater to those questions (of which", "I'm wondering whether it would be more useful* to: ", "but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one", "directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP would", "to highlight any particular post but the bulk of them", "involve one or more of the following things: 1. A", "questions usually involve one or more of the following things:", "that would, could, or in their view already has, produced", "but I'm wondering whether it would be more useful* to:", "useful generic answer and the OP would be given clear", "of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological", "most of the posts get closed for want of clarity...", "would be given clear information about how their question would", "the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part", "the bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially", "that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such", "could, or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary", "money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination", "would have to be improved before it could be reopened", "into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A", "seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to be", "glance, appear to be like those I've described *but turn", "others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately,", "the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in", "non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also cater", "as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would", "fame (nomination for a prize of award of some kind),", "to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology,", "a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of", "the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main", "psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to", "A description of the paucity of their own academic training", "(adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or", "author has had to pursue a mundane academic career while", "domains. The questions usually involve one or more of the", "include separate sections with comments that are domain specific ", "There seems to have been an unusual spate of questions", "has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the", "lack of time the author has had to pursue a", "on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One", "otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has", "going to highlight any particular post but the bulk of", "get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether", "main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with", "it would be more *useful* to: * Produce a community", "on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not", "their question would have to be improved before it could", "has had to pursue a mundane academic career while working", "One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos.", "above would also cater to those questions (of which I've", "Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as merely", "academic training or credentials usually due to the lack of", "genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post", "have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with", "the questions as being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring", "mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or", "before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second", "(employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for", "addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include separate", "manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced.", "Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want of", "psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions", "that would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed", "theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post but", "to be like those I've described *but turn out not", "would, could, or in their view already has, produced a", "and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains.", "the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the", "been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a", "them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and", "overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of", "videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a senior", "looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description of", "revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of interest.", "be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points", "of their own academic training or credentials usually due to", "it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of", "self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire", "The second of the points above would also cater to", "than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that", "would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards", "a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize", "coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming", "of the paucity of their own academic training or credentials", "the OP would be given clear information about how their", "given clear information about how their question would have to", "A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince,", "to those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at", "theory, or due to bias on the part of a", "that are domain specific Close the questions as being", "for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage", "of time the author has had to pursue a mundane", "prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of", "The questions usually involve one or more of the following", "mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other", "and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually", "questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and", "physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but", "way of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A", "at the topic of interest. 2. A description of the", "force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into", "answer might include separate sections with comments that are domain", "be improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate.", "be given clear information about how their question would have", "2. A description of the paucity of their own academic", "The advantages of doing that would be that all similar", "ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP", "awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications,", "publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment", "questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm", "a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption", "to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others", "to the lack of time the author has had to", "be like those I've described *but turn out not to", "hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts", "to have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia", "which I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear", "cater to those questions (of which I've seen several) which,", "include other domains. The questions usually involve one or more", "5. A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce,", "relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity),", "their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of", "the topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity", "particular post but the bulk of them relate to fields", "be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a", "due to bias on the part of a degree awarding", "of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into", "already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at", "of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics", "about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or", "generic answer and the OP would be given clear information", "of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme.", "*useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the kind", "one or more of the following things: 1. A statement", "the main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections", "more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A", "institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or", "separate sections with comments that are domain specific * Close", "* Produce a community answer of the kind that I've", "the points above would also cater to those questions (of", "like those I've described but turn out not to be.", "seems to have been an unusual spate of questions on", "question would have to be improved before it could be", "similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer", "director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of", "pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of some", "bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum", "whether it would be more useful* to: * Produce a", "to: * Produce a community answer of the kind that", "clear information about how their question would have to be", "journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money", "leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the", "or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new", "A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would,", "but the bulk of them relate to fields of physics", "academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due", "on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the", "* Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as", "of the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's", "the author has had to pursue a mundane academic career", "as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would", "revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part of", "the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated", "how their question would have to be improved before it", "the lack of time the author has had to pursue", "of the posts get closed for want of clarity... but", "recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics,", "YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a", "the paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually", "and the OP would be given clear information about how", "working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on", "that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include", "of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics,", "researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their", "things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work", "while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias", "a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also", "of the points above would also cater to those questions", "suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or", "reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above", "OP would be given clear information about how their question", "or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4.", "would be more useful* to: * Produce a community answer", "a useful generic answer and the OP would be given", "or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how", "Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going", "are domain specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates,", "sections with comments that are domain specific Close the", "clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more *useful", "convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the", "specific Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than", "credentials usually due to the lack of time the author", "OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed", "comments that are domain specific Close the questions as", "career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to", "more of the following things: 1. A statement about the", "senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of", "3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube", "improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The", "A desire for money (employment as a senior research director),", "also cater to those questions (of which I've seen several)", "due to the lack of time the author has had", "medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions", "a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight", "of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my", "questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a first", "in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way", "were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the", "elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might", "merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be", "I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to", "those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a", "want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be", "widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical,", "requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that", "how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate", "to be improved before it could be reopened as a", "doing that would be that all similar questions were ultimately", "seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer", "of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their", "of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the", "usually due to the lack of time the author has", "unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung", "desire for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle", "quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include", "at a first glance, appear to be like those I've", "or due to bias on the part of a degree", "or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP", "closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it", "into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most", "topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of", "as being *duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The", "training or credentials usually due to the lack of time", "degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal", "with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to", "duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of", "posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering", "interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their own", "highlight any particular post but the bulk of them relate", "a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory", "wondering whether it would be more useful* to: * Produce", "the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or", "I'm not going to highlight any particular post but the", "with comments that are domain specific * Close the questions", "to pursue a mundane academic career while working on the", "work that would, could, or in their view already has,", "my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice).", "not going to highlight any particular post but the bulk", "more *useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the", "rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing", "kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics,", "independent work that would, could, or in their view already", "mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve", "predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for", "to bias on the part of a degree awarding institution.", "several) which, at a first glance, appear to be like", "or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as", "about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise", "problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with comments", "(of which I've seen several) which, at a first glance,", "a community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere,", "about how their question would have to be improved before", "an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar", "produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic", "award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories", "usually involve one or more of the following things: 1.", "post but the bulk of them relate to fields of", "mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about", "answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses", "be more useful* to: * Produce a community answer of", "information about how their question would have to be improved", "first glance, appear to be like those I've described but", "bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles", "or more of the following things: 1. A statement about", "for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame", "would also cater to those questions (of which I've seen", "any particular post but the bulk of them relate to", "statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could,", "clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that all", "own academic training or credentials usually due to the lack", "second of the points above would also cater to those", "similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any", "4. A desire for money (employment as a senior research", "appear to be like those I've described but turn out", "paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually due", "following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent", "faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want", "occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one or", "as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a", "the posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm", "might include separate sections with comments that are domain specific", "their own academic training or credentials usually due to the", "some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream", "has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for", "answer and the OP would be given clear information about", "request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe,", "theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5.", "had to pursue a mundane academic career while working on", "relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The", "towards a useful generic answer and the OP would be", "of doing that would be that all similar questions were", "description of the paucity of their own academic training or", "an answer might include separate sections with comments that are", "for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would", "questions as being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification.", "new way of looking at the topic of interest. 2.", "view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking", "practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to force,", "unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their view", "advantages of doing that would be that all similar questions", "\"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular", "for a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition", "of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more", "research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award", "which, at a first glance, appear to be like those", "part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more", "a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory,", "(nomination for a prize of award of some kind), widespread", "I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an", "1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that", "spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\"", "other domains. The questions usually involve one or more of", "that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful", "bias on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3.", "(especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally", "domain specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather", "or credentials usually due to the lack of time the", "of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications,", "time the author has had to pursue a mundane academic", "have to be improved before it could be reopened as", "being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification*. The advantages", "physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for" ]
[ "question and I am unsure if that tag really makes", "is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead", "for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything as", "related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few", "many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related", "questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the", "rest of the questions? c) leave everything as it is?", "b) remove the tag from the questions where it is", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I", "tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances the", "'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure if", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and", "remove the tag from the questions where it is used", "from the questions where it is used incorrectly and see", "tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure", "IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag", "is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete", "I am unsure if that tag really makes sense to", "not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b)", "I just stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove", "for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In", "if it is worth keeping for the rest of the", "where it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO)", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a", "papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where", "instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where it", "a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from the", "of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary.", "when reviewing a question and I am unsure if that", "if that tag really makes sense to keep. In many", "(again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the", "tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question", "to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other", "makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should", "reviewing a question and I am unsure if that tag", "delete the tag b) remove the tag from the questions", "really makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag", "keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for", "used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for", "incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for the", "tag b) remove the tag from the questions where it", "it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not", "and see if it is worth keeping for the rest", "questions where it is used incorrectly and see if it", "a question and I am unsure if that tag really", "we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from", "see if it is worth keeping for the rest of", "unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep. In", "instances where it kind of makes sense, it is (again", "necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the", "the tag b) remove the tag from the questions where", "few other instances where it kind of makes sense, it", "it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a)", "other instances where it kind of makes sense, it is", "it is used incorrectly and see if it is worth", "upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing", "instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to", "tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly and", "worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave", "stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when", "is worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c)", "and I am unsure if that tag really makes sense", "sense to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO)", "In the few other instances where it kind of makes", "sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we", "to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused", "keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything", "where it is used incorrectly and see if it is", "it is worth keeping for the rest of the questions?", "the rest of the questions? c) leave everything as it", "just stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag is", "Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag", "kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really", "misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork.", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am", "the tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly", "that tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances", "the questions where it is used incorrectly and see if", "paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind of", "the few other instances where it kind of makes sense,", "am unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep.", "the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific)", "In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions", "is used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping", "of paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind", "(scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances", "(IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of" ]
[ "also there are several other questions not previously in the", "misused I had a look at the remaing questions and", "I propose to create a new tag for that but", "do not really have a good tag that fits. I", "to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at", "was misused I had a look at the remaing questions", "are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "a good tag that fits. I propose to create a", "in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a", "questions where the tag was misused I had a look", "but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase", "\"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think of", "such a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki", "follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing", "tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would", "not really have a good tag that fits. I propose", "tag that fits. I propose to create a new tag", "suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag from", "necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from", "lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there are", "I suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag", "the heart of said paperwork, also there are several other", "that but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct", "am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such", "to create a new tag for that but I am", "course the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed", "I had a look at the remaing questions and other", "files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a", "etc. that do not really have a good tag that", "the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the", "tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that", "quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper,", "a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry", "[bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would", "create a new tag for that but I am unable", "other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously in", "questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that", "propose to create a new tag for that but I", "that fits. I propose to create a new tag for", "about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do", "tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where", "entry would have to be slightly changed as well. On", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit", "and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change", "doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think of this", "would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have", "\"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart", "phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit", "of that, I noticed there are quite of few questions", "there are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing", "have a good tag that fits. I propose to create", "previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such", "This is a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really", "paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "from questions where the tag was misused I had a", "at the remaing questions and other questions as well. I", "questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "a look at the remaing questions and other questions as", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well.", "Of course the wiki entry would have to be slightly", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag", "change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "tag for that but I am unable to find a", "really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "look at the remaing questions and other questions as well.", "'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of course", "a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After", "as that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also", "I noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring", "other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the", "are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files,", "the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "to be slightly changed as well. On top of that,", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged", "fits. I propose to create a new tag for that", "and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really", "is a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1)", "'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies", "'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said paperwork,", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was", "to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the", "unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a", "the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy", "I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for", "tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of", "'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I had", "questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused", "structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not", "organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have", "several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as", "slightly changed as well. On top of that, I noticed", "tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you", "wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as well.", "questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of", "as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think", "fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have to", "would have to be slightly changed as well. On top", "tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I", "be slightly changed as well. On top of that, I", "heart of said paperwork, also there are several other questions", "such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What", "suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't", "paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a good", "follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "the follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show", "tag was misused I had a look at the remaing", "the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag", "removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions", "On top of that, I noticed there are quite of", "of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to", "said paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as", "have to be slightly changed as well. On top of", "of said paperwork, also there are several other questions not", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where", "where the tag was misused I had a look at", "remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest the", "had a look at the remaing questions and other questions", "good tag that fits. I propose to create a new", "a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\"", "[Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag", "to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag", "new tag for that but I am unable to find", "as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of", "succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really", "tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said", "really fit 100%. What do you think of this proposal?", "a new tag for that but I am unable to", "well. Of course the wiki entry would have to be", "a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do", "questions and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing:", "top of that, I noticed there are quite of few", "bibliography etc. that do not really have a good tag", "that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there", "that, I noticed there are quite of few questions about", "for that but I am unable to find a suitable,", "the remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest", "as well. On top of that, I noticed there are", "noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring and", "where such a tag would fit well. Of course the", "well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of the", "from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions", "for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%.", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\")", "at the heart of said paperwork, also there are several", "there are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "changed as well. On top of that, I noticed there", "name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "really have a good tag that fits. I propose to", "of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography", "few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc.", "well. On top of that, I noticed there are quite", "the tag was misused I had a look at the", "that do not really have a good tag that fits." ]
[ "retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be", "questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name", "so I guess it can be deleted. As per my", "create a new one. I have now deleted the tag", "you can think of a better one. I will try", "different names if you can think of a better one.", "'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as every", "to create a new one. I have now deleted the", "I think that is a good alternative. There is now", "the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances", "Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the", "that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not", "into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the next days.", "one of them is slightly different I thought it best", "instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that", "all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer", "I will try to retag the questions that fit into", "Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can", "of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess", "tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of", "series of questions, but as every one of them is", "with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also", "about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "them is slightly different I thought it best to create", "I think is an OK name for that - please", "of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag", "if you can think of a better one. I will", "also are about administration issues, so I think that is", "now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged", "I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with", "this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I", "guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to", "answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should", "deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new tag", "for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the", "try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show", "a better one. I will try to retag the questions", "questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some", "suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles", "have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for", "is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of", "as every one of them is slightly different I thought", "best to create a new one. I have now deleted", "I guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion", "create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I", "be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new", "'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for that", "- please suggest different names if you can think of", "name for that - please suggest different names if you", "it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create", "please suggest different names if you can think of a", "Sorry for the series of questions, but as every one", "[follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the", "are about administration issues, so I think that is a", "so I think that is a good alternative. There is", "tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for", "one. I will try to retag the questions that fit", "a good alternative. There is now no question left with", "issues, so I think that is a good alternative. There", "my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers,", "think is an OK name for that - please suggest", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged.", "should not be created, I retagged some of them where", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted.", "which I think is an OK name for that -", "tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As", "fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the next", "a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with", "now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in", "tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created,", "[administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it", "OK name for that - please suggest different names if", "think of a better one. I will try to retag", "questions, but as every one of them is slightly different", "'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As per", "is a good alternative. There is now no question left", "a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be", "no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the", "mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show", "organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the new", "'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's", "different I thought it best to create a new one.", "papers, articles etc. I have also created the new tag", "tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is", "I thought it best to create a new one. I", "articles etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization", "is an OK name for that - please suggest different", "is slightly different I thought it best to create a", "some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show", "they actually also are about administration issues, so I think", "for that - please suggest different names if you can", "\"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK", "will try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization", "every one of them is slightly different I thought it", "As per my suggestion to create a new tag for", "is a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed", "it best to create a new one. I have now", "where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a", "new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where", "the series of questions, but as every one of them", "etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show", "[document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an", "bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as", "questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within", "them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged", "in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted", "\"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about", "suggest different names if you can think of a better", "think that is a good alternative. There is now no", "'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues, so", "where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"),", "about administration issues, so I think that is a good", "deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all", "created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit", "good alternative. There is now no question left with the", "fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually", "question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"),", "upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\")", "not be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy", "I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of them", "This is a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to", "that is a good alternative. There is now no question", "left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so", "to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\").", "new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think", "an OK name for that - please suggest different names", "for the series of questions, but as every one of", "can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a", "the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\")", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but", "administration issues, so I think that is a good alternative.", "also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\")", "tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series", "was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy", "of a better one. I will try to retag the", "I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions,", "slightly different I thought it best to create a new", "would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created", "retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration", "a new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions", "tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as", "can think of a better one. I will try to", "tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues,", "names if you can think of a better one. I", "created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which", "one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "of questions, but as every one of them is slightly", "of them is slightly different I thought it best to", "as they actually also are about administration issues, so I", "it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag", "[bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I", "There is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "that - please suggest different names if you can think", "alternative. There is now no question left with the tag", "to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc.", "have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged", "but as every one of them is slightly different I", "actually also are about administration issues, so I think that", "per my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing", "better one. I will try to retag the questions that", "new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it", "be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would", "thought it best to create a new one. I have" ]
[ "last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new", "created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in", "it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the", "spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a", "[a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should", "The title says it all: I'm resigning. In the last", "days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about", "other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and", "Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been", "us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise", "and a honour to serve this community as a moderator,", "the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no", "Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a", "past and present. So, well, so long and thanks for", "together with all the other moderators, past and present. So,", "In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced", "says it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days", "for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's", "working together with all the other moderators, past and present.", "to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the", "the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long", "So, well, so long and thanks for all the fish!", "AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This is", "to serve this community as a moderator, working together with", "title says it all: I'm resigning. In the last few", "in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned", "Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time for", "new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate", "community as a moderator, working together with all the other", "and present. So, well, so long and thanks for all", "Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting", "and it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve", "lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour to", "serve this community as a moderator, working together with all", "far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time", "we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested", "this community as a moderator, working together with all the", "moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and thanks", "a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to", "Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and", "moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and", "time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and", "a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour", "content and how we should moderate it. This is a", "an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work", "how we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily", "Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure", "it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange", "I'm no longer interested in spending my time for Stack", "is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced", "my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot,", "few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582)", "all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack", "forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of", "pleasure and a honour to serve this community as a", "so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my", "policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us", "moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack", "insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we", "have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in", "and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm", "hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators", "should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by", "longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here", "introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we", "present. So, well, so long and thanks for all the", "Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content", "resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff", "irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have volunteered", "I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and", "and how we should moderate it. This is a policy", "no longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange.", "the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a", "way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have", "honour to serve this community as a moderator, working together", "I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange", "as a moderator, working together with all the other moderators,", "a pleasure and a honour to serve this community as", "moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past and", "a moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past", "been a pleasure and a honour to serve this community", "learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a", "interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've", "with all the other moderators, past and present. So, well,", "by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an", "expertise and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore,", "volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending", "in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the", "This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and", "the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated", "staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how", "a honour to serve this community as a moderator, working", "we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created", "Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting way,", "of the expertise and the work we have volunteered so", "work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer", "and forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful", "about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This", "it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve this", "policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it.", "all the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so", "the expertise and the work we have volunteered so far." ]
[ "little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a", "willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows", "had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the", "worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility even", "choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate normally).", "Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the", "you for having elected us; so long, and thanks for", "having elected us; so long, and thanks for all the", "is not very high. ### When will this end? Our", "are willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively", "because many of our users are asking for advice on", "of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia", "treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to", "a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead,", "even worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility", "talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having", "unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired", "policy in the pipeline that will make the situation even", "is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage", "Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow", "when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under", "elected us; so long, and thanks for all the fish.", "our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this", "content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is", "hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate", "will make the situation even worse. And the company has", "little point in sticking around so we can impotently preside", "so we are willing to take guidance. But a policy", "is hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem", "the company has historically shown little flexibility even when they", "in sticking around so we can impotently preside over a", "particularly concerned because many of our users are asking for", "content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable", "pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And the", "was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel", "an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only", "be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to", "were promised never arrived), and there is little point in", "policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively,", "fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were", "and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued", "moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform", "have been pushing back against this policy for a week", "(and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are", "and so we are willing to take guidance. But a", "Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not", "against this policy for a week already to no avail.", "been great, and we had successfully built a certain amount", "are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the", "than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why", "to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been", "can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize", "publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak", "get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we", "we had successfully built a certain amount of trust before", "admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to", "not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all", "false positives and false negatives, and so we are willing", "positives and false negatives, and so we are willing to", "have been great, and we had successfully built a certain", "own choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate", "even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content", "to make us feel heard, but the council never had", "allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this", "do anything at all) is the worst possible response. ###", "We acknowledge that there will be false positives and false", "date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is", "their own choice; please don't harass users who continue to", "has historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly", "exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively", "has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have", "everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass users", "only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant", "for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a", "and we had successfully built a certain amount of trust", "as a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ###", "the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post", "long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context:", "here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days", "automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It", "to detect, and there will be false positives and false", "moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content", "perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other", "### When will this end? Our sole demand is that", "not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to", "Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be", "get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived),", "Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our users", "the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator", "the contrary, we've been told about another policy in the", "elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/)", "cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly", "participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have", "public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated", "where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you", "policy for a week already to no avail. On the", "be false positives and false negatives, and so we are", "end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must", "automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause", "We will not perform any moderation functions until this situation", "(wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is", "automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge", "when we all get fired and new moderators are elected.", "issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated", "week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been", "[ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to", "who post it. We acknowledge that there will be false", "around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where", "moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\"", "please don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ###", "we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect,", "community managers have been great, and we had successfully built", "form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but", "(even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there", "guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits", "a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a", "allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content", "moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even", "nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While", "that will make the situation even worse. And the company", "content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that", "is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to", "not perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved.", "except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are", "moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar,", "about another policy in the pipeline that will make the", "this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join", "of our users are asking for advice on life-altering career", "words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content", "damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content", "will not perform any moderation functions until this situation is", "[have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because", "will this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide", "so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For", "rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back", "paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and", "days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until", "a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but", "all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular", "really, this seems to be our only option short of", "who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening?", "arrived), and there is little point in sticking around so", "happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when", "### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to", "positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything", "Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired and", "most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy", "at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this", "that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there", "us; so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\", "perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and", "case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and", "all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine,", "advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated", "to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators", "to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the", "never arrived), and there is little point in sticking around", "is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to", "their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make", "functions such as voting, voting to close and editing posts", "to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close", "and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at", "back against this policy for a week already to no", "moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on", "AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under very", "the situation even worse. And the company has historically shown", "situation even worse. And the company has historically shown little", "the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator", "very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public,", "majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it.", "will end when we all get fired and new moderators", "is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated", "network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for a", "any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users", "content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be", "unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content.", "another policy in the pipeline that will make the situation", "effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will", "demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack", "the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not", "to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content", "generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we", "policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst possible", "this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But", "here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of", "decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a", "recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and", "such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance,", "network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the majority", "refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to", "there will be false positives and false negatives, the current", "successfully built a certain amount of trust before this incident", "thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019,", "banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated", "they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is", "Effective immediately, the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon", "after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology", "company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the", "bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for", "and there will be false positives and false negatives, the", "allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end", "bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us;", "this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies", "but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was", "a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable.", "ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until this", "in the pipeline that will make the situation even worse.", "delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who", "career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not", "influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community", "council never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even", "solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us", "pushing back against this policy for a week already to", "\\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired", "make their own choice; please don't harass users who continue", "to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such", "is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows", "policies must allow this stack to delete the majority of", "circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even the", "make us feel heard, but the council never had much", "certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed everything again.", "will be false positives and false negatives, the current policy", "this will end when we all get fired and new", "of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We", "were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not", "make the situation even worse. And the company has historically", "cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part", "short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our", "this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and", "no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another", "the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance", "and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago.", "concerned because many of our users are asking for advice", "end when we all get fired and new moderators are", "huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused", "hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem generally", "users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In", "a certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed everything", "the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide,", "functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome", "strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/),", "false negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance.", "since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been", "effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that", "on strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described", "is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here", "on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our", "but the council never had much influence and has since", "suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning", "an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will", "guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content", "We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated", "This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and", "[resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform any", "human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this", "shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as", "is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get", "that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\"", "would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words:", "are on strike. This is part of the network-wide action", "the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is", "AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide", "all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when", "anything at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is", "situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us", "Not really, this seems to be our only option short", "And the company has historically shown little flexibility even when", "was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the", "part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an", "someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly", "that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long,", "normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have been", "and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there", "not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our", "been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted", "heard, but the council never had much influence and has", "our users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions.", "are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost", "all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would", "other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated", "to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected", "voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will", "harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is", "It is hardly necessary to explain why this is a", "preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In", "posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please don't", "so, the individual community managers have been great, and we", "flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result", "we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk", "to explain why this is a problem generally (and others", "Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to", "to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about", "sticking around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape", "a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's", "to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site,", "avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another policy", "false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do", "life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is", "but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we", "worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really,", "new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid", "a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but", "result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will", "answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than", "response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems", "But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many", "post it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives", "point in sticking around so we can impotently preside over", "users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this", "already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told", "it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives and", "and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of", "Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the network-wide", "all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this an", "network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1)", "stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend", "over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against", "(but everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass", "welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions", "resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by refusing", "For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and", "apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution", "individual community managers have been great, and we had successfully", "fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was", "high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand is", "issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator.", "follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We", "content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this is", "and there is little point in sticking around so we", "we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised", "### Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376)", "standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other", "by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting", "users are welcome to join us by refusing to perform", "contrary, we've been told about another policy in the pipeline", "Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for", "users who post it. We acknowledge that there will be", "false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all)", "are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such", "content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most", "cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that", "to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all", "the pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And", "historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\;", "us feel heard, but the council never had much influence", "is little point in sticking around so we can impotently", "In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere", "moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and editing", "is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by", "content is posted to our site, except under very limited", "problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE,", "this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our", "a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the", "of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike.", "[described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few", "will be false positives and false negatives, and so we", "a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When", "AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently", "almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard", "council\" to make us feel heard, but the council never", "we are willing to take guidance. But a policy that", "continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We", "That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we", "content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all", "built a certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed", "this policy for a week already to no avail. On", "many of our users are asking for advice on life-altering", "great, and we had successfully built a certain amount of", "sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this", "told about another policy in the pipeline that will make", "over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that", "immediately, the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze)", "intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except", "until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to", "overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only option", "this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene", "feel heard, but the council never had much influence and", "a week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've", "company has historically shown little flexibility even when they were", "there will be false positives and false negatives, and so", "\"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In", "to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users", "trust is not very high. ### When will this end?", "fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company", "allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators", "When will this end? Our sole demand is that any", "AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will", "But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is", "for a week already to no avail. On the contrary,", "the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate", "wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very high.", "never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so,", "voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will make", "of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network.", "promised never arrived), and there is little point in sticking", "us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting,", "to close and editing posts (but everyone will make their", "our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run", "(don't do anything at all) is the worst possible response.", "be false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't", "not very high. ### When will this end? Our sole", "detect, and there will be false positives and false negatives,", "slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a", "the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are", "much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual", "is posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances.", "action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a", "so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots", "and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get", "for having elected us; so long, and thanks for all", "for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting,", "managers have been great, and we had successfully built a", "possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this", "publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and", "negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all) is", "to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is", "fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't", "2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after", "take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated", "appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and thanks", "under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not", "popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge", "negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance. But", "impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots.", "the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator", "to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form", "uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to", "AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude", "limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even", "when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust", "run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing", "why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)).", "editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please", "we are particularly concerned because many of our users are", "option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over", "been pushing back against this policy for a week already", "have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is", "that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete", "irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated", "In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable;", "[our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot", "policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be", "a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on", "site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details", "must allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated", "there is little point in sticking around so we can", "had successfully built a certain amount of trust before this", "we were promised never arrived), and there is little point", "and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers", "increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false positives", "In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so", "a few days ago. We will not perform any moderation", "few days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions", "clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very", "will make their own choice; please don't harass users who", "can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to", "on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content", "life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult", "that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this", "join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as", "as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone", "context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered", "are welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation", "content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have", "don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why", "our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact", "details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows", "company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will this", "differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain", "[swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is little", "don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never", "\"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the council", "Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not", "to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/)", "On the contrary, we've been told about another policy in", "While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to", "lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their", "is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false", "moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are", "acknowledge that there will be false positives and false negatives,", "close and editing posts (but everyone will make their own", "current policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst", "been told about another policy in the pipeline that will", "is the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction?", "mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life.", "seems to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated", "are particularly concerned because many of our users are asking", "such as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but", "setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can", "the current policy (don't do anything at all) is the", "difficult to detect, and there will be false positives and", "network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy", "refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to", "explain why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376)", "disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been great,", "posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While", "and editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice;", "message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there will", "even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator", "we all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's", "Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This", "to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard,", "exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our", "that there will be false positives and false negatives, and", "very high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand", "we've been told about another policy in the pipeline that", "and false negatives, and so we are willing to take", "While the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available", "[already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned", "the council never had much influence and has since disbanded.", "this seems to be our only option short of allowing", "necessary to explain why this is a problem generally (and", "Even so, the individual community managers have been great, and", "be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary", "the individual community managers have been great, and we had", "reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a", "and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued", "automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we", "others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly", "in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly;", "Other users are welcome to join us by refusing to", "asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a", "a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we", "and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in", "any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the", "site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions" ]
[ "SE might not see it as a priority to intervene", "however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should be", "was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would", "necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced", "a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is", "that this site would be a good one to evaluate", "priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is high", "these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I", "the impact of the moderation strike and see how much", "to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of", "So is there a noticeable impact of the strike on", "high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these", "its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is", "of the moderation strike and see how much pressure it", "when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that", "imagined that this site would be a good one to", "Academia.SE is quite particular in the sense that * all", "[seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one", "of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it", "moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not", "else (staff or regular users) taking care of the moderation?", "on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users)", "impact of the moderation strike and see how much pressure", "is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care of", "on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume", "the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as", "attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the strike", "highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as a", "moderation strike and see how much pressure it can put", "ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact", "nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is", "would be a good one to evaluate the impact of", "announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be", "out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there", "there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or", "here * however, the traffic is high enough that moderation", "the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or", "the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my", "sense that * all its moderators [seem to be on", "how much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing", "see it as a priority to intervene here * however,", "it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on", "SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing", "the traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary", "should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike", "However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out", "can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the", "on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches", "questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary", "of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff", "* it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so", "to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see", "evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see how", "impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else", "that * all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007)", "good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike", "put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main", "strike and see how much pressure it can put on", "is quite particular in the sense that * all its", "the sense that * all its moderators [seem to be", "strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume sites,", "moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the", "in the sense that * all its moderators [seem to", "someone else (staff or regular users) taking care of the", "intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough that", "much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the", "regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced on", "the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the", "pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions", "one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and", "be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was", "quite particular in the sense that * all its moderators", "so SE might not see it as a priority to", "to intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough", "is there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE?", "a good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation", "strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular", "as a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic", "my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the", "is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might", "the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable", "not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not", "enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons,", "the moderation strike and see how much pressure it can", "[main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention.", "of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a", "strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site", "this site would be a good one to evaluate the", "browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of", "on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a", "traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly.", "Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking", "on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/),", "catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of", "see how much pressure it can put on SE. However,", "reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined", "Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care", "the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this", "might not see it as a priority to intervene here", "* however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should", "I imagined that this site would be a good one", "it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE", "Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a good", "be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the", "For these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE,", "particular in the sense that * all its moderators [seem", "be a good one to evaluate the impact of the", "noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone", "site would be a good one to evaluate the impact", "* all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) ", "a priority to intervene here however, the traffic is", "that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when", "not see it as a priority to intervene here ", "sites, so SE might not see it as a priority", "all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) it", "one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see", "it as a priority to intervene here * however, the", "page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So", "and see how much pressure it can put on SE.", "is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For" ]
[ "Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that I", "is the draft of my question: > > The [WE1S", "some time to read about the project, you will see", "* No, because [questions about the content of research and", "then I can make an argument that asking about the", "GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply.", "convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's", "to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is", "appears in the doc repo. I asked on both their", "will see that it tries really hard to serve people.", "on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of research", "resourceful and well documented that I really want to use", "but if you spend some time to read about the", "and reports for others to use. And even if you", "whole organization and yet the string only appears in the", "it used is more about the processes of researching, not", "so resourceful and well documented that I really want to", "to serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed", "page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > >", "both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received", "that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started", "of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S –", "still don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace", "use. And even if you still classify this project as", "on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that", "academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this", "\"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\")", "\"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about", "A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented", "technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may", "to use. And even if you still classify this project", "and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical", "[Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the", "impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports", "used is more about the processes of researching, not the", "must say that I'm very impressed on its effort to", "tries really hard to serve people. I must say that", "documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S", "string only appears in the doc repo. I asked on", "yet received a reply. > > > Would this question", "\"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and", "you may argue that this project is not a service,", "it tries really hard to serve people. I must say", "tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with the", "Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search", "I can make an argument that asking about the tools", "to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole", "see that it tries really hard to serve people. I", "the content of research and coursework rather than the processes", "to read about the project, you will see that it", "I still don't know where is the repo that the", "> > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\")", "reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic? ", "you spend some time to read about the project, you", "the tools it used is more about the processes of", "may argue that this project is not a service, but", "know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating", "yet the string only appears in the doc repo. I", "serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed on", "to make tools, documentations and reports for others to use.", "the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook", "the draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/", "question be on-topic? No, because [questions about the content", "with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the", "the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that", "want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where", "referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the", "read about the project, you will see that it tries", "about the project, you will see that it tries really", "doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page", "you will see that it tries really hard to serve", "processes of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm", "Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for", "> Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions", "of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the", "project is so resourceful and well documented that I really", "- Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I", "and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > >", "asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you", "only appears in the doc repo. I asked on both", "[`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the string", "Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > > Would", "is so resourceful and well documented that I really want", "very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and", "reports for others to use. And even if you still", "And even if you still classify this project as a", "because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)?", "you still classify this project as a research, then I", "of researching. It's more about the interactions with the people", "even if you still classify this project as a research,", "services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project", "make an argument that asking about the tools it used", "the processes of researching, not the content of research. Though", "and well documented that I really want to use it.", "repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and", "that I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools,", "don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/", "Now, you may argue that this project is not a", "Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo that", "of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of", "my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A", "about the content of research and coursework rather than the", "4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that", "Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to?", "research and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching,", "for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet", "processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes,", "researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions", "I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter,", "Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about", "classify this project as a research, then I can make", "their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a", "research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\"", "are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is", "completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching.", "researching. It's more about the interactions with the people and", "WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file", "Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes", "I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools", "well documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately,", "question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities", "repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting", "– A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well", "the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? ", "service, but if you spend some time to read about", "time to read about the project, you will see that", "[WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so", "[questions about the content of research and coursework rather than", "can make an argument that asking about the tools it", "the project, you will see that it tries really hard", "on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is not", "than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)?", "I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't", "search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and", "the whole organization and yet the string only appears in", "its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others", "of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not", "organization and yet the string only appears in the doc", "Yes,* because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are", "as a research, then I can make an argument that", "* Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic services", "effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others to", "still classify this project as a research, then I can", "rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are", "about the tools it used is more about the processes", "I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations", "in the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub,", "make tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And", "argument that asking about the tools it used is more", "includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with", "> > Would this question be on-topic? * No, because", "content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes", "project, you will see that it tries really hard to", "not a service, but if you spend some time to", "No, because [questions about the content of research and coursework", "if you still classify this project as a research, then", "this project as a research, then I can make an", "It's more about the interactions with the people and institutions", "on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet", "the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the", "> > > Would this question be on-topic? * No,", "draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S", "spend some time to read about the project, you will", "a service, but if you spend some time to read", "not the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced", "for others to use. And even if you still classify", "is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project", "content of research and coursework rather than the processes of", "the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with", "issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue", "the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project -", "off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic", "an argument that asking about the tools it used is", "(WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful", "it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo", "the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code)", "learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues", "received a reply. > > > Would this question be", "the string only appears in the doc repo. I asked", "a reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic?", "coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning", "that it tries really hard to serve people. I must", "where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a", "really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know", "be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of", "is more about the processes of researching, not the content", "more about the processes of researching, not the content of", "Here is the draft of my question: > > The", "The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is", "file in the whole organization and yet the string only", "because [questions about the content of research and coursework rather", "of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because", "[questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now,", "> The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project", "others to use. And even if you still classify this", "project as a research, then I can make an argument", "and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and", "that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still", "really hard to serve people. I must say that I'm", "people. I must say that I'm very impressed on its", "researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not completely", "of research and coursework rather than the processes of researching,", "documentations and reports for others to use. And even if", "but yet received a reply. > > > Would this", "that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more", "tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And even", "asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but", "that asking about the tools it used is more about", "is not a service, but if you spend some time", "about the processes of researching, not the content of research.", "research, then I can make an argument that asking about", "argue that this project is not a service, but if", "are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on", "teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking", "that this project is not a service, but if you", "asking about the tools it used is more about the", "a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring", "hard to serve people. I must say that I'm very", "and yet the string only appears in the doc repo.", "a research, then I can make an argument that asking", "Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. >", "tools it used is more about the processes of researching,", "documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I", "Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in", "in the whole organization and yet the string only appears", "project is not a service, but if you spend some", "I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization", "if you spend some time to read about the project,", "researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions", "say that I'm very impressed on its effort to make", "not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of", "on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for", "this project is not a service, but if you spend", "I must say that I'm very impressed on its effort", "this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the", "use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the" ]
[ "related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in", "so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged", "in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that", "Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the past", "far (or more) but they keep popping up in the", "are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to", "are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far", "more) but they keep popping up in the Questions section,", "This is not related to Academia at all, however, I've", "spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far (or", "or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I", "at all, however, I've noticed that in the past week", "questions users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is", "to Academia. Is there a way to solve this problem?", "week or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam.", "they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper", "proper questions users have that are indeed related to Academia.", "all, however, I've noticed that in the past week or", "to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the", "Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed", "past week or so, numerous questions pop up that are", "the past week or so, numerous questions pop up that", "noticed that in the past week or so, numerous questions", "have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a", "keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions", "shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related to", "however, I've noticed that in the past week or so,", "them so far (or more) but they keep popping up", "up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them", "numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around", "the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are", "related to Academia. Is there a way to solve this", "30 of them so far (or more) but they keep", "up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have", "not related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that", "is not related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed", "I flagged around 30 of them so far (or more)", "I've noticed that in the past week or so, numerous", "but they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing", "pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of", "that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so", "popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users", "around 30 of them so far (or more) but they", "users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there", "indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to solve", "so far (or more) but they keep popping up in", "in the past week or so, numerous questions pop up", "that in the past week or so, numerous questions pop", "section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related", "flagged around 30 of them so far (or more) but", "of them so far (or more) but they keep popping", "(or more) but they keep popping up in the Questions", "that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way", "questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30" ]
[ "flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you", "not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you", "upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong", "are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if", "a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam,", "on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are", "spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are not", "way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam,", "seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting", "using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a", "this is a reminder. If you are not on strike,", "and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is", "editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using", "strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on", "are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't upvote", "people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and", "many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam,", "for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are", "you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't", "the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder.", "is a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag", "closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So,", "downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for", "you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even", "flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike,", "If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it.", "I've been seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting", "spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam.", "spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this", "wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If", "to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing", "So, this is a reminder. If you are not on", "if you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly", "on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't upvote spam.", "reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's", "Even if you are on strike, don't do anything. But", "spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the", "spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags", "spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't", "that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't do", "it. Even if you are on strike, don't do anything.", "been seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam," ]
[ "you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free now) day.", "Earlier today there was a massive spam attack. One very", "So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM!", "today there was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing", "SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free", "happening here, I've seen it a bit on other sites", "Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free now)", "a bit on other sites too. So, this is a", "here, I've seen it a bit on other sites too.", "sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT", "DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice", "I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only", "only happening here, I've seen it a bit on other", "it a bit on other sites too. So, this is", "spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it", "this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank", "NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully", "This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a", "was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that", "too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE", "there was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing", "was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here,", "actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit on", "bit on other sites too. So, this is a reminder.", "reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have", "One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting", "a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I", "disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This", "noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening", "spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was", "that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually", "people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've", "UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam", "isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit", "I've seen it a bit on other sites too. So,", "on other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE", "thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't", "a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and", "seen it a bit on other sites too. So, this", "is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you,", "attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people", "very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam.", "PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a", "upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen", "massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed", "other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO" ]
[ "the topic that it would merit the creation of a", "merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more", "be used for questions about the use of AI tools", "in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions", "AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence", "the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general", "with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a", "that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag", "the use of AI tools in the context of academia).", "such questions, but only for questions concerning the study of", "tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show", "favourite topic around here (but still will probably only become", "At the moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase", "for such questions, but only for questions concerning the study", "only for questions concerning the study of or a career", "the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite", "a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can", "questions concerning the study of or a career in AI.", "it is generally not a favourite topic around here (but", "only become more relevant), I would say it is enough", "will probably only become more relevant), I would say it", "creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag", "topic around here (but still will probably only become more", "posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not", "context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\")", "tag that can be used for questions about the use", "are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is", "study of or a career in AI. [![enter image description", "can be used for questions about the use of AI", "use of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially", "the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged", "it is enough traffic about the topic that it would", "that can be used for questions about the use of", "generally not a favourite topic around here (but still will", "enough traffic about the topic that it would merit the", "general tag that can be used for questions about the", "of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that", "concerning the study of or a career in AI. [![enter", "around here (but still will probably only become more relevant),", "[artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such", "is generally not a favourite topic around here (but still", "Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not", "the study of or a career in AI. [![enter image", "would say it is enough traffic about the topic that", "questions about the use of AI tools in the context", "'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only for", "81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally", "is explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions", "questions, but only for questions concerning the study of or", "tag (or a more general tag that can be used", "become more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic", "it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or", "probably only become more relevant), I would say it is", "there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it", "not a favourite topic around here (but still will probably", "not for such questions, but only for questions concerning the", "here (but still will probably only become more relevant), I", "of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is", "questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but", "used for questions about the use of AI tools in", "(but still will probably only become more relevant), I would", "but only for questions concerning the study of or a", "still will probably only become more relevant), I would say", "topic that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt`", "a more general tag that can be used for questions", "I would say it is enough traffic about the topic", "more general tag that can be used for questions about", "would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a", "phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic", "tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only", "of or a career in AI. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FQshb.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FQshb.png)", "academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly", "about the topic that it would merit the creation of", "explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions concerning", "say it is enough traffic about the topic that it", "of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since", "for questions concerning the study of or a career in", "the moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\".", "`chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can be", "\"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic around", "(or a more general tag that can be used for", "traffic about the topic that it would merit the creation", "for questions about the use of AI tools in the", "since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for", "is enough traffic about the topic that it would merit", "moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although", "Although it is generally not a favourite topic around here", "about the use of AI tools in the context of", "a favourite topic around here (but still will probably only", "more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about", "relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about the", "\"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions," ]
[ "are back at work. Flags raised during the strike will", "the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised", "moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied", "Sutxecn says it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is", "We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are", "the strike will be handled over the next few days.", "strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with", "[negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during", "at work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled", "is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847)", "during the strike will be handled over the next few", "it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We", "are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at", "Flags raised during the strike will be handled over the", "and are back at work. Flags raised during the strike", "raised during the strike will be handled over the next", "says it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over.", "[announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the", "over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and", "back at work. Flags raised during the strike will be", "with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags", "all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators", "moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back", "satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work.", "here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation", "work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled over", "results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during the", "the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are" ]
[ "the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to", "meta so as to keep it around long-term without introducing", "site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation", "[SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the", "would be posted in meta and featured on the main", "[Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike", "currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike)", "Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would be", "originally posted to the main site since the company's leadership", "has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to", "the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike.", "moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is", "strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we", "here. Note: this was originally posted to the main site", "themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured", "featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post", "But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to", "company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The", "in meta and featured on the main site. The community", "of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc.", "featured on the main site. The community deserves to know", "and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information", "successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the post", "to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on the", "There is currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE", "since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move", "post that information here. Note: this was originally posted to", "is currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation", "I thought it would be appropriate to post that information", "have decided to move the post to meta so as", "to know when big changes are happening. But since [SE", "network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat,", "appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was originally", "standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would", "and so we have decided to move the post to", "the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought", "volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would", "a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot", "to post that information here. Note: this was originally posted", "and featured on the main site. The community deserves to", "ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of", "since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent", "strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part", "Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an)", "happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves", "[Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and", "and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be", "a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which", "Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide:", "posted in meta and featured on the main site. The", "circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I", "changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it", "the main site. The community deserves to know when big", "when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are", "posted to the main site since the company's leadership was", "the post to meta so as to keep it around", "it would be appropriate to post that information here. Note:", "of key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta", "are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe),", "know when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees", "on the main site. The community deserves to know when", "taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and", "to move the post to meta so as to keep", "cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this", "be posted in meta and featured on the main site.", "move the post to meta so as to keep it", "thought it would be appropriate to post that information here.", "its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE", "key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and", "suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has since", "leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike", "it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing", "this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a", "meta posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished", "be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was", "keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on the main", "this was originally posted to the main site since the", "consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type", "big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking", "about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and", "Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike:", "was originally posted to the main site since the company's", "the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so", "it around long-term without introducing confusion on the main site.", "to the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing", "malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about", "main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts", "mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key", "part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow,", "main site. The community deserves to know when big changes", "information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured", "is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack", "The community deserves to know when big changes are happening.", "meta and featured on the main site. The community deserves", "we have decided to move the post to meta so", "the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta", "site. The community deserves to know when big changes are", "was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has", "this type of key information about AC.SE would be posted", "strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore,", "tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post that", "community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it", "as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on", "Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign", "Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally", "Note: this was originally posted to the main site since", "post to meta so as to keep it around long-term", "community deserves to know when big changes are happening. But", "upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the", "strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided", "to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions),", "so we have decided to move the post to meta", "since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the", "moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently", "[removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate", "information here. Note: this was originally posted to the main", "posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1),", "type of key information about AC.SE would be posted in", "that information here. Note: this was originally posted to the", "The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have", "Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its", "AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on the", "to meta so as to keep it around long-term without", "would be appropriate to post that information here. *Note: this", "about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on", "deserves to know when big changes are happening. But since", "decided to move the post to meta so as to", "Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation", "site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about", "are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon", "employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community", "on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of", "[finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the", "so as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion" ]
[ "about the question? Is there anything I can do to", "to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are", "automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have", "I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook", "textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring", "the question? Is there anything I can do to possibly", "have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your", "zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about", "[Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way", "textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received", "after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes", "are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I", "ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\"", "prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale)", "publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic", "posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers", "without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears", "'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale,", "self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero", "access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without", "to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a", "question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a", "question? Is there anything I can do to possibly improve", "there anything I can do to possibly improve it? Thank", "Not too long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't", "the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find", "What are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything", "thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can do", "anything I can do to possibly improve it? Thank you!", "a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and", "a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction", "\" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent", "resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It", "requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to", "don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to", "It appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote.", "and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question?", "Is there anything I can do to possibly improve it?", "received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts", "one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is", "too long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \"", "downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is there", "find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook", "your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can", "way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after", "long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive'", "year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and one", "appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What", "upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the" ]
[ "difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about", "style. I often stop reading midway through because it is", "find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the", "posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often", "It often feels like people just need a place to", "a word limit is useful, as in some cases people", "to shorten their question? I do not think a word", "message popping up along the lines of > > Your", "really do need such long questions. Just a short message", "question? I do not think a word limit is useful,", "within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than", "convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not, those", "their question might be too long and that they should", "and that they should try to shorten their question? I", "limit is useful, as in some cases people might really", "be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It", "question might be too long and that they should try", "very long. If possible, try to keep it short and", "wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because it", "not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because", "like people just need a place to tell their story.", "than not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable", "a pop-up that tells askers that their question might be", "> > Your post is very long. If possible, try", "Maybe it's just me, but I have the feeling that", "long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent", "pop-up that tells askers that their question might be too", "of texts. And more often than not, those overly long", "they should try to shorten their question? I do not", "factors. It often feels like people just need a place", "might really do need such long questions. Just a short", "questions. Just a short message popping up along the lines", "their question? I do not think a word limit is", "I often stop reading midway through because it is very", "issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of", "popping up along the lines of > > Your post", "not think a word limit is useful, as in some", "If possible, try to keep it short and concise to", "concise to increase the chance of good answers. > >", "of > > Your post is very long. If possible,", "a short message popping up along the lines of >", "because it is very difficult to find the actual issue", "me, but I have the feeling that there is an", "people might really do need such long questions. Just a", "try to keep it short and concise to increase the", "tells askers that their question might be too long and", "need a place to tell their story. Is there any", "to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within", "overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are", "is useful, as in some cases people might really do", "through because it is very difficult to find the actual", "very difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring", "there any way to add a pop-up that tells askers", "up along the lines of > > Your post is", "that their question might be too long and that they", "might be too long and that they should try to", "Is there any way to add a pop-up that tells", "formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through", "I do not think a word limit is useful, as", "they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like", "to increase the chance of good answers. > > >", "keep it short and concise to increase the chance of", "post is very long. If possible, try to keep it", "heaps of texts. And more often than not, those overly", "their story. Is there any way to add a pop-up", "it's just me, but I have the feeling that there", "midway through because it is very difficult to find the", "is an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts,", "even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway", "along the lines of > > Your post is very", "useful, as in some cases people might really do need", "And more often than not, those overly long posts tend", "too long and that they should try to shorten their", "do need such long questions. Just a short message popping", "very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted", "short and concise to increase the chance of good answers.", "not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading", "on individual factors. It often feels like people just need", "feeling that there is an increase in very long, very,", "have the feeling that there is an increase in very", "texts. And more often than not, those overly long posts", "I have the feeling that there is an increase in", "as in some cases people might really do need such", "that they should try to shorten their question? I do", "more often than not, those overly long posts tend to", "shorten their question? I do not think a word limit", "people just need a place to tell their story. Is", "Your post is very long. If possible, try to keep", "about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often", "an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often", "askers that their question might be too long and that", "any way to add a pop-up that tells askers that", "the feeling that there is an increase in very long,", "add a pop-up that tells askers that their question might", "do not think a word limit is useful, as in", "that there is an increase in very long, very, very", "tell their story. Is there any way to add a", "in some cases people might really do need such long", "often feels like people just need a place to tell", "feels like people just need a place to tell their", "such long questions. Just a short message popping up along", "the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted", "is very difficult to find the actual issue OP is", "long. If possible, try to keep it short and concise", "word limit is useful, as in some cases people might", "long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but", "are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people", "should try to shorten their question? I do not think", "individual factors. It often feels like people just need a", "place to tell their story. Is there any way to", "Just a short message popping up along the lines of", "to keep it short and concise to increase the chance", "posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on", "OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts.", "lines of > > Your post is very long. If", "stop reading midway through because it is very difficult to", "those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they", "it short and concise to increase the chance of good", "the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not,", "reading midway through because it is very difficult to find", "just need a place to tell their story. Is there", "inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more", "some cases people might really do need such long questions.", "and concise to increase the chance of good answers. >", "long and that they should try to shorten their question?", "is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And", "just me, but I have the feeling that there is", "often than not, those overly long posts tend to be", "detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I", "in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even", "but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because", "way to add a pop-up that tells askers that their", "possible, try to keep it short and concise to increase", "often stop reading midway through because it is very difficult", "to tell their story. Is there any way to add", "increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not", "tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual", "because they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels", "but I have the feeling that there is an increase", "unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It often", "need such long questions. Just a short message popping up", "often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop", "the lines of > > Your post is very long.", "cases people might really do need such long questions. Just", "there is an increase in very long, very, very detailed", "very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text", "think a word limit is useful, as in some cases", "be too long and that they should try to shorten", "is very long. If possible, try to keep it short", "to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors.", "it is very difficult to find the actual issue OP", "to add a pop-up that tells askers that their question", "dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people just", "short message popping up along the lines of > >", "a place to tell their story. Is there any way", "story. Is there any way to add a pop-up that", "try to shorten their question? I do not think a", "that tells askers that their question might be too long", "> Your post is very long. If possible, try to", "very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style.", "long questions. Just a short message popping up along the", "actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps" ]
[ "visa class do I have to apply for, in order", "to apply for, in order to work as an academic", "As from title. What kind of visa class do I", "from title. What kind of visa class do I have", "kind of visa class do I have to apply for,", "apply for, in order to work as an academic in", "have to apply for, in order to work as an", "in order to work as an academic in Japan ?", "title. What kind of visa class do I have to", "of visa class do I have to apply for, in", "do I have to apply for, in order to work", "I have to apply for, in order to work as", "What kind of visa class do I have to apply", "for, in order to work as an academic in Japan", "class do I have to apply for, in order to" ]
[ "resources are available for job search at the Ph.D. level", "available for job search at the Ph.D. level in the", "for job search at the Ph.D. level in the computational", "Which online resources are available for job search at the", "search at the Ph.D. level in the computational chemistry field?", "job search at the Ph.D. level in the computational chemistry", "are available for job search at the Ph.D. level in", "online resources are available for job search at the Ph.D." ]
[ "their homepage. For those who don't where can I find", "all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For", "the impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't", "who don't where can I find their impact factor ?", "As from title. Not all journals provide the impact factor", "title. Not all journals provide the impact factor on their", "journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those", "provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those who", "homepage. For those who don't where can I find their", "impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't where", "For those who don't where can I find their impact", "factor on their homepage. For those who don't where can", "on their homepage. For those who don't where can I", "Not all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage.", "from title. Not all journals provide the impact factor on", "those who don't where can I find their impact factor" ]
[ "have seen many engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why", "many engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why do they", "I have seen many engineering departments want professional engineer registration.", "seen many engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why do", "engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why do they care?" ]
[ "non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print on arXiv", "to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on", "I publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I", "on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the", "rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish", "afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals", "pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights", "how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards?", "the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open", "publish on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print", "paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to", "publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee", "publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access", "to publish on non-open access journals after I publish a", "I unable to publish on non-open access journals after I", "on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print on", "arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher", "unable to publish on non-open access journals after I publish", "access journals after I publish a pre-print on arXiv ?", "a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive", "can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am", "guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable", "exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to", "Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals after", "If I publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can", "I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I" ]
[ "without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a", "of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish", "they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the", "do not allow material that they publish to be published", "open access, i.e. available to the public without having to", "having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee.", "find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material", "fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public", "a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a", "publications on the research that they fund to be open", "I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not", "or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can", "a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that", "available to the public without having to subscribe to a", "research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available", "to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know", "to be open access, i.e. available to the public without", "that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to", "the public without having to subscribe to a journal or", "fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list", "anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers", "where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do", "journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to", "know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that", "to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does", "organizations require publications on the research that they fund to", "require publications on the research that they fund to be", "a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where", "i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to", "list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they", "journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I", "on the research that they fund to be open access,", "that do not allow material that they publish to be", "access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe", "of funding organizations require publications on the research that they", "Does anybody know where I can find a list of", "not allow material that they publish to be published this", "pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find", "number of funding organizations require publications on the research that", "subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody", "can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow", "funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund", "public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay", "An increasing number of funding organizations require publications on the", "the research that they fund to be open access, i.e.", "to the public without having to subscribe to a journal", "increasing number of funding organizations require publications on the research", "be open access, i.e. available to the public without having", "allow material that they publish to be published this way?" ]
[ "defined - I am not looking for those. What I", "the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research", "peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot", "Whether we like it or not, modern academia is increasingly", "vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise", "that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different", "What I want is pointers to the research behind the", "being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures.", "lot of different metrics that have been defined - I", "meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably.", "at least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless", "measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it", "least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones,", "backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are", "is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of", "behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question", "increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective", "to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight", "looking for those. What I want is pointers to the", "research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the", "So the question is: where should I look for scientific", "to the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics.", "I want is pointers to the research behind the scientific", "'being measured', it is at least possible to steer the", "the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So", "There are a lot of different metrics that have been", "that have been defined - I am not looking for", "scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is: where", "to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by", "been defined - I am not looking for those. What", "I am not looking for those. What I want is", "modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt", "it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in", "get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being", "ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There", "of those metrics. So the question is: where should I", "fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to steer", "not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain", "different metrics that have been defined - I am not", "by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a", "- I am not looking for those. What I want", "away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes", "metrics. So the question is: where should I look for", "we like it or not, modern academia is increasingly being", "metrics that have been defined - I am not looking", "measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although", "Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is", "from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this", "have been defined - I am not looking for those.", "those. What I want is pointers to the research behind", "to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to", "establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics", "is at least possible to steer the measures away from", "is: where should I look for scientific assessments of bibliometrics?", "validity of those metrics. So the question is: where should", "a lot of different metrics that have been defined -", "like it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured,", "are a lot of different metrics that have been defined", "attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to", "unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible", "the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is:", "in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it", "some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is", "the question is: where should I look for scientific assessments", "not looking for those. What I want is pointers to", "or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some", "pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of those", "possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed", "unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that have", "those metrics. So the question is: where should I look", "for those. What I want is pointers to the research", "is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get", "objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured',", "is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least", "it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at", "steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed", "of different metrics that have been defined - I am", "this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that", "am not looking for those. What I want is pointers", "measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that", "question is: where should I look for scientific assessments of", "it is at least possible to steer the measures away", "want is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity", "academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to", "measured', it is at least possible to steer the measures", "research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of" ]
[ "Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they selected ?", "Who are the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship", "the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other", "are the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals?", "Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are", "evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics", "the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How", "Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they selected", "Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they", "of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ?" ]
[ "one of those programs. How should I do it? What", "I look into each program? * No program offers funding,", "to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several", "How should I do it? What should I look into", "for a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs", "several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance", "scholarship. * I can fund some programs with my own", "(MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now", "acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select one", "I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem", "select one of those programs. How should I do it?", "programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I", "do it? What should I look into each program? ", "should I look into each program? No program offers", "local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with my", "programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can", "* I can fund some programs with my own money.", "problem to select one of those programs. How should I", "programs. How should I do it? What should I look", "it? What should I look into each program? * No", "are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund", "letters. Now I have the problem to select one of", "several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select", "those programs. How should I do it? What should I", "into each program? * No program offers funding, and some", "overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have", "I have the problem to select one of those programs.", "graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters.", "and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the", "No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for", "Now I have the problem to select one of those", "look into each program? * No program offers funding, and", "funding, and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship.", "received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to", "a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with", "What should I look into each program? * No program", "program? * No program offers funding, and some programs are", "program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a", "offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a local", "some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I", "and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. ", "have the problem to select one of those programs. How", "I've applied to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've", "the problem to select one of those programs. How should", "should I do it? What should I look into each", "elegible for a local scholarship. I can fund some", "I do it? What should I look into each program?", "of those programs. How should I do it? What should", "each program? * No program offers funding, and some programs", "applied to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received", "* No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible", "to select one of those programs. How should I do" ]
[ "to Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries,", "my research topics while employed for an academic institution, can", "a book on my research topics while employed for an", "can they claim part of the revenues I get from", "part of the revenues I get from royalties ? My", "of the revenues I get from royalties ? My question", "employed for an academic institution, can they claim part of", "the revenues I get from royalties ? My question is", "someone knows also for other countries, I will welcome additional", "topics while employed for an academic institution, can they claim", "is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for", "from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but", "claim part of the revenues I get from royalties ?", "I publish a book on my research topics while employed", "publish a book on my research topics while employed for", "question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also", "I get from royalties ? My question is relative to", "relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for other", "while employed for an academic institution, can they claim part", "knows also for other countries, I will welcome additional answers.", "? My question is relative to Europe, but if someone", "academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues I", "on my research topics while employed for an academic institution,", "revenues I get from royalties ? My question is relative", "for an academic institution, can they claim part of the", "If I publish a book on my research topics while", "book on my research topics while employed for an academic", "but if someone knows also for other countries, I will", "My question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows", "if someone knows also for other countries, I will welcome", "Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries, I", "they claim part of the revenues I get from royalties", "royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but if", "get from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe,", "an academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues", "institution, can they claim part of the revenues I get", "research topics while employed for an academic institution, can they" ]
[ "example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs,", "actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about", "know of data about the NIH's return on investment besides", "medical practice. For example, they would help to develop new", "Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known", "researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example,", "the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of", "anyone know of data about the NIH's return on investment", "drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many", "NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about", "they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or", "whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they", "to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It", "students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data", "many of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone", "Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return on", "The National Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training", "It sounds good, but how many of the students actually", "of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know", "more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help", "the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data", "track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return", "but how many of the students actually pursue this track?", "the somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks", "tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how", "diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but", "of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For", "help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures.", "procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the students", "about three New York programs? Thanks for your time, Ciwe", "effects medical practice. For example, they would help to develop", "data about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat", "Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create", "to create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly", "sounds good, but how many of the students actually pursue", "of data about the NIH's return on investment besides the", "besides the somewhat dated data about three New York programs?", "practice. For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic", "For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools,", "return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three", "programs to create a group of researchers whose work more", "good, but how many of the students actually pursue this", "pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about the", "(NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as", "funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD", "MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose work", "Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to", "National Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs", "surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the", "also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of", "as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose", "how many of the students actually pursue this track? Does", "this track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's", "(MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group", "develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds", "create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects", "or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of", "would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical", "about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated", "investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New York", "Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs", "a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical", "of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also", "new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good,", "group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice.", "on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New", "Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a", "data about three New York programs? Thanks for your time,", "known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers", "Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs)", "dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for your", "work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would", "somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for", "rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help to" ]
[ "compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are", "salaries of full professors in different countries? I would particularly", "source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example,", "a link pointing to a page where this information is", "I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing", "Is there a good source to compare academic salaries at", "in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source,", "link pointing to a page where this information is available.", "academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are the", "there a good source to compare academic salaries at European", "universities? For example, what are the salaries of full professors", "of full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome", "example, what are the salaries of full professors in different", "a possible source, a link pointing to a page where", "source, a link pointing to a page where this information", "are the salaries of full professors in different countries? I", "European universities? For example, what are the salaries of full", "particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a", "a good source to compare academic salaries at European universities?", "the salaries of full professors in different countries? I would", "salaries at European universities? For example, what are the salaries", "full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a", "professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible", "For example, what are the salaries of full professors in", "possible source, a link pointing to a page where this", "countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link", "what are the salaries of full professors in different countries?", "at European universities? For example, what are the salaries of", "to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what", "different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a", "welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a page", "would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to", "good source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For" ]