Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "So, you seen that face on mars? Yeah,I think aliens created it. No, no, no it is just a natural landform, stuff like this happen all the time. I think the face is just a natural landform because in the text below the pictures it says, Global Survey spacecraft reveal a face on Mars for what really is: a mesa\n\nThree details of why I think the face on mars is a natural landform is. One in the article it said few scientist believed the face was an alien artifact. Two to see the artifact in the article it said, the face had to peer through wispy clouds to see. Three a theorist says, it is equivalent to a butte or mesa-landforms found common around the American West.\n\nConclusion:I think the face on Mars is just a landform because says in the article that NASA's mars Global Survey said the face was a mesa.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hello Mr. senetor, my name is PROPER_NAME and i want to talk about some inportant stuff. For on i want to keep the electoral Collage . This is a syste that has been happeing since our founding fathers have been on earth. Its where they vote for the pesident and vice president of United States of America. Now you want to get ride of this great tradistion that we do. I know sometimes we might get confused and vote for the wrog candidate. But that is not all of us. Everyone thinks its a disastor factor. The electoral collage will improve and will keep improving.\n\nIn the text it says \" The electoral college is widely rgarded as an anachronism, a non-democratic method of selecting a priesedent that ought to be overuled By declaring the candidate who recives the most popular votes the winner . The advocates of this positionare correct in arguuing that the electorl collage method is not democrticin a modern sence. It is the electors who elect th president, not the people . When you vote fora pesidentian candidate youre actually voting for slate of electores.\"\n\nThats what the text said and we dont want that. Us the people want to vote for who we want to. This will be something big if we can keep this thing going. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you really want your children living in a world covered in smog and crouded streets? It is shown that all of our development sense World War II has been centered on the car and this really needs to chang.\n\nFirst off studies show that passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in europe.. And those number are 4 times higher in America, the land that you are raising your children in has the highest amount of greenhouse gases on the planet right now. If we could just do what the people in Paris did we can easily fight this smog epidemc. In Paris the put a law out were people with even-numbered license plates had to leave their cars at home or the would face a $31 dollar fine. then they carried out the rule the next day for people with odd-numbered license plates. This rule cut down the congestion by almost 60 percent in the capital. And after five days of this new act the smog over paris finally left.\n\nAlso in Colombia they have a program that is some what like paris whish is having a huge turnout. Many people are saying that the car free day \"is a good way to take away stress and lower air pollution\". The funny part is that this event is spreading troughout the neighboring countries. This day without cars is part of an improvement campaign that began in the mid-1990s. and it has seen the construction of 118 miles of bike paths, which is the most amount in all Latin American city's. SO why is it takening the U.S so long to jump into this program?\n\nThe final thing we need to talk about is that even though fewer and fewer people are getting their licenses its still not enough. And even though the researchers say that \"America is past its love affair with cars\" its still not enough. To truely make a change people like you and me need to get up and actually do something. Even if we can't get the goverment or state to pass it. We as a community can put our own no car days into action and just start walking.\n\nNow that you know the risks about this rising epidemic known as smog how do you feel about the way the world is looking? And how esay it would be to just fix what we have be doing such a thing as walking. But truley is this a world you want to raise your children in? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Great Opportunities of Seagoing Cowboys\n\n\"He knew it was the opportunity of a lifetime\". The Seagoing Cowboys program lets us help countries in need of food, animals, and much more. People should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program because of the traveling, the experince, and the opportunity to help others in need.\n\nFirst of all, Seagoing Cowboys get to travel around the maginficent world. Some might say that it is not worth it because they might get hurt, however,they travel overseas, letting them see the marvels of the oceans.We can also tour an excavated castle in Crete and see all wonderful places at the Panama Canal on their way to pleading countries. In my opinion, joining has its benifets. You can awe at many beautiful places, and might be inspired.\n\nSecondly, the experience would be wonderful. Some will argue and say that you might not even have an experinece at all, but in my belief, anybody can have an experinece during your time at the program. We sail all over the gigantic world and help hundreds of pleading people. You can take a gondola ride in Veinice, Italy, and see the Acropolis in Greece, which was very special. I believe that the experience gives us a lifetime of memories after our journies.\n\nFinally, being a Seagoing Cowboy gives us the opportunity to help people in need. Some might say that you can get badly injured while trying to help others, but it is vital to say that it is more important helping people in need. It is the oppertunity of a lifeime. The cattle boat trips were unbeliveable opportunities for a small town boy.We get to help contries recover their food supplies, animals, and more. Join the Seagoing Cowboys because we get to save hundreds of people, which leaves a good feeling in us for helping others.\n\nIn conclusion, others should join the Seagoing Cowboys program because of the traveling, the experince, and the opportunity to save others in need. Being a Seagoing Cowboy is much more than an adventure, it opened the world to us. If you want to help others, please consider joining the Seagoing Cowboys program. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\n\"The American people should consider themselves lucky...\" \"What is the Electoral College?\" by the Office of the Federal Register, \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" by Bradford Plumer, and \"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our depised method of choosing the President\" by Richard A. Posher, these 3 passages were compared about electoral votes. Which one to for the people would choose, either in favor of keeping the Electoral College or changing to election by popular votes for the U.S. president? Answer: You should be able to keep the Electoral College so every person has their right in voting and it would be equal equal.\n\nWhether the people don't care about who's gonna get it or not going to, it would still be better off voting and trying to get that person elected. \"..the electoral college is unfair to voters.\" All the people want is to be equal and have their rights and in order for them to have rights. Instead, of Congress going with just the populars, they should be able to count up all the people's voting choices and let it decide like that. \"The election is only a few swing voters away from catastrophe.\" If the higher people in the Presidency don't take charge soon enough every electoral poll booth we have will turn into a big mess with horrible, unexpected things coming.\n\nIf all things were possible, do you really think this world would be having these arguments or 'hard choices'. \"A tie in the nationwide electoral vote is possible because the total number of votes is an even number.\" Does that mean we should go with the popular votes if it's a tie? Yes, well if it's an even number it happens rarely enough where you don't see it often. \"Voters are the people who want to express rather than people who think a single vote will decide.\" The people eho think one vote will decide more than the other's is wrong because what if that person had expressed their vote and the other choice would've won.\n\n\"The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational.\" Not everything you do will be fair in life. Other words, yes give your opinion and hope that you'll be heard and it will help. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Thet face on the red planet was not made by aleans it haped naturaly. Also theres no prove that the aleans did it just like people think that the pyramids were helped by aleans to build the pyramids. But the face looks like an egypion pharaohs face. What we can see is that it looks like a humans face. The face was first seen in a Hollywood film and think the face is bona fide.\n\nBut NASA still has no prov of alean ecestens. NASA took a pictur of the face and proved it was a nateral formland and that there was no aleans but not evryone was oky with that. Other studed the pictur and ther were alean markungs hidden by haze. So NASA went back even tho it was going to be hard work. They zoomed in as much as posebl. They colled see things that looked like littele airplanes ,or Egygtian-style pyramids or even small shacks.\n\nLike on Earth ther are things that look like other rhing but cant be ecsplandd how they were formed or how they were formed by. That is my finel conclusion of the face that if marked on the red planet. I think it was made naturaly. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "i belive that a electoral college COULD work if you get a proper way of selecting so it stated that there are 538 electors meaning 538 ideas and this is just facts the majority of people who are there are white not saying that thats wrong but what i am saying is that we need equal races so lets say three presidents are to pick from one is white(democratic) the second one is hispanic (republican) (more specificly mexican you will see why thats important later) and the third is african american(republican) so the 538 electors lets say 421 of them are white and 90 are african american so now total is 511 and now lets say 27 are hispanic (all races of hispanic) so I AM NOT saying that all the whites are gonna pick the white one. and all hispanic ones are gonna pick the hispanic ones etc. but i am saying that since 421 are white there gonna have a thing in comman with the white president why because there white same with all the races in the college but more specificly the white ones because of there past so i sugggest that we have and equal or close to equal amount of all races so americans korean mexican irish german polish chinease ghana etc. etc.\n\nnow like i said in the first paragraph the hispanic one in mexican now why that would be important is that since he is mexican a lot of ignorant people are gonna say he cant be president he needs to be born in merica well that is true but the thing is he is from america but his ethnicity is mexican so realy i should have refraised that he is mexican american meaning that the little loop whole has just been closed so he can be president but for the people who are still dumb and cant exept another race you still have hope if you look on the map of american the electoral college with the sencond most electors is in good old texas with 38 voters (the most goes to cali but thats not important) and what does texas have well one of the highest rates of mexican imigrants one of the highests numbers of kkk members you know racist stuff so yea with texas having one of the most i dont see an colored president in a long time i still have now idea why another guy cant be friends with some one cause there colored life is like a box of crayons one color the people like more and all the others they hate cant we all just be color blind so now im gonna hit you with some truth because the states with some of the highest rate of blacks and hispanics also have the lowest number of electors im not saying that the goverment said colored people there lets give them 5 voters its like that because the states with more black and hispanic people are also some of the poorest states in america so its not all the goverments fault good job america.\n\nso how do we fix that well i say that the goverment should send money to not only to the state itself but to the citys in them so give some money to detroit and chigago without them we wouldent have the worst team in the nba (just kidding) and a team that had a legend so i also say take the number of states with more electors and transfer them to the smaller ones so take 10 from texas and give them to main and 15 from cailfonia and give them to all small state know what im saying or nah.\n\nso on to the next thing that they need to fix so it says that the most populer vote becomes presidet seems pretty legit exept for the fact that its not legit at all if have some one that has done so much like serve in the military fought in afginistan or somthing like and he can do oficial stuff then he deserves it but if a actor runs for president some one like eddy murphey vs obama whos gonna win starts with and e and ends with a y who is it eddy murpey he will always win how do you think arnald shwazinager became govener of califonia and i know he had so skill if office but still a old man who uses steroids vs a middle aged man who know alot about being a president so i say we should get rid of the populer vote and pick the one with skill we should let the three best run america for one month each and see how each one does at the if we lose evrething well then they weren a good president now were they so yea it could work. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"America's love affair with it's vehicles seems to be cooling\" says Elisabeth rosenthal. To understand rosenthal's perspective, it is easier to suggest that America's car usage is decreasing slowy. This isn't necessarily bad in the sense that it has certain postive effects. The advantages of limiting car usage includes an increase in security and health, along with a decrease in pollution and dependence.\n\nFirstly, when car usage is limited security and health is more likely to be gauranteed. The feeling of being secure is highly important to individuals everywhere. For example, many people in colombia used public transportation during a car free day \"leaving the streets of this capital city \", according to Andrew Selsky, \"eerily devoid of traffic jams\". The complications that stem from traffic jams end with a feeling of unconfidence. The plan to get from point A to B was more simple just a second ago. This complication in your personal plans leads you to become stressed as a feeling of doubt overcomes all thoughts. If car usage was limited, there would be a control on how much traffic accumalates thus minimizing chance of stress. As Heidrun Walter states \"when i had a car i was always tense. I'm much happier this way\". not only does car usage minimize conditions detrimental to health, it also enlarges your capacity for excercise. The main purpose of the car is to get someone from one place to another. when an important job takes over your personal life, it becomes difficult to do things most enjoyed in life. limits on car usage forces you to stay in shape. According to Andrew Selsky \"parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughot the city\". Less cars means healthier and natural situations. With parks and sport centers becoming more effecient, it becomes easier to find a more physically active population. Overall, less usage on cars minimizes stress and increases health.\n\nSecondly, limting car usage becomes beneficial to the enviorment. Now a days people have become annoyed with others who care so passionatley about the enviorment. If you look behind their constant cries for action, there are solid facts. Yes;pollution is bad for the enviorment. Yes; a bad envorment means unhealthy living. Yes; cars are one of the main contributors to pollution in the enviorment. A pattern of less car usage, as Elisabeth Rosenthal states \"will have beneficial implications for carbon emissions and the enviorment\". The less use of cars, the less pollution in the enviorment. One must observe limiting car usage as an opportunity to create a cleaner world and better future. The effects of pollution in the enviorment is completley dangerous and we, the car users, are to blame.\n\nAdditionally, it would lower the dependence on cars. Many people today find that their car is so useful. While it has many features and is a form of transportation, many do not figure what they would do if they did not have such a possesion. The development of people and their interaction with technology has left a wide gap between historic, natural ways and what is thought of as modern society. Being dependent is not always good for individuals. As david goldberg says \"all our development since world war II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\". Many people could disagree and wonder why it is necessary to change our ways especially if we are so highly devloped. If being developed means being dependent on a harmful machine, then it could not be effective devlopment. According to Elisabeth Rosenthal \"cash-strapped americans could not afford new cars, and the unemployed were't going to work anyway\". Many people can't have the precious luxury of private transportation in the first place. Those who have had it have become distant to a more natural society. Peope have become so use to having cars that they have become oblivious to the significant effects. With limits on car usage , these effcts could be controlled.\n\nTo conclude, the advantages of limiting car usage is an increase in health, along with a decrease in pollution, and less dependence on cars. limiting car usage is a positive way to enfore an organized and clean enviorment, and ensure health and security of those who live in it. This is one reason America can be reffered to as a succesful country. It is not that America has decreased use of vehicles, but the fact that they have done what is best for majority. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Could you imagine sitting behind a wheel of a driveless car? The thought may sound good, but in reality it's worse. Automakers should prevent making driveless cars. Driveless cars are dangerous, and a waste of money.\n\nDriveless cars are dangerous. In the state of Indiana about five out of ten smart cars are bought each day. About one out of three cars are wrecked each day. The features of normal cars are already distracting. Let alone make a driveless car. In paragraph eight, it states \"wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" If a driver got bored waiting on their turn they could easily fall asleep. What if they fell into a deep sleep? That would be even more dangerous. Also, easier for a wreck to occur. The driver could easily get distracted by their phone or anything. All of these situations are dangerous. Nobody should take the risk of hurting someone or themselves.\n\nDriveless cars are a waste of money. In paragraph ten, it stated \"Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020.\" Here in Indiana, a Mercedes-Benz run about $80,000. Imagine spending that much on just one car. You can buy two for just that one price. People will spend that amount on a new car, but not college. Around the world, two out of three students miss out on college. Imagine your mother spending that much on a new driveless car instead of college for you. Wouldn't that hurt your feelings?\n\nDriveless cars are dangerous, and a waste of money. Automakers should prevent making driveless cars. You can save about ten lives a day by preventing driveless cars. May we all strive to help save a life. I wouldn't waste my money on a driveless car, and neither should you.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The planet called \" Earth Twin\" is called Venus. Venus is the most alike planet to earth density and size. Another name for Venus is the \"Evening star\" because not only its the closest to look liike eath density ans size it also the closest planet to earth. So at night you can look you and see Venus. Venus even had some space craft send to the planet but noe of the survived the landing on the planet over three decades.\n\nThis planet surface and atomspher both have extream conditons. The atomspher of venus is 97 percent carbor doxide and the clouds rain corrosive surface acid. And the surface is over 800 degrees fahreheit and the peressure is 90 time than earth. Even thought Mercury is closter to the sun Venus has the hottest surface. And thats because of the weather patters and the voclanos. Or it because the powerful earth quakes or the lighting strike.\n\nThe NASA want to still try to send thing to this planet it lear thing they cant touch. They know the probly they have to solve before they really send anything up there. There was people in the 1800s trying to figur out Venus mistorys and people even going over that to see if they miss anything. Alot of researchers was trying to past the challenge but didnt know how because the heat of the planet was messing upthe rocket they was sending and there tryinh to fiuger out that problem now. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear state senator, I am against the decison to keep the\n\nElectoral College one reason because the candidate running for President isnt being voted for their electors are.\n\nI agree it should change to election by popular vote.\n\nI agree with the election by popular vote because as i stated the people do not vote for the candidate they vote for the electors representing the candidate , then in the passage I learned the electors then elect the President , as I was reading i saw a few name s mentioned in favor of , as it was stated Abolishing the electoral college .\n\nAs I read i saw why some might say keep the Electoral College , Al Gore ran for President and won by popular vote thanks to the electoral college , maybe becasue its a by luck situation because it was two parts you had to win as President , they may dont see it as a fault on Electoral College part because it did say he won by popular vote thanks to the electoral college.\n\nBob Dole agree with the choice of abollishing the Electoral College , some says its unfair outdated , and irrational . The decison to keep the Electoral College should is a win or lose situation because as i read i didnt see a lot of proof of people being for the decison on keeping the Electoral College to make the right decison they sh ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A new technology, known as the Facial Action Coding System, was developed by Doctor Paul Eckman. This system attempts to decipher human emotions, which is simply unneeded. The technology detects movement of the 44 muscles in a human face and uses this to label the emotion the person is feeling. In a classroom, this technology is not valuable because humans already calculate emotions more accurately and quickly than the Facial Action Coding System, because common comptuers cannot use the software, and because the system would needlessly waste class time.\n\nFirst, this technology is completely pointless because humans already calculate emotions quicker and more accurately than the Facial Action Coding System. The only thing the system does it add an extra step to calculating emotions. In the article, it says \"you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\"\n\nWith the new technology, the computer creates a model of the face, detects movement of muscles on the face, then compares the expression on the face to a neutral face, then after all of that, it finally tells you how the person is feeling.\n\nWhy would a person look at a computer to learn what another person is feeling when he or she could do it? This can be applied to the classroom because teachers can tell how their students are responding to a particular lesson. For example, teachers call on students who are not paying attention just to get their attention. Teachers do not need this new technology because they are already great at sensing when a student is confused or bored.\n\nIn addition, this technology would be hard to put in classrooms around the United States because it cannot work on a common computer. In the article, it states \"your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile.\" This means that in order to put the Facial Action Coding System into schools nationwide, new computers would be needed which would cost a great amount of money that simply is not worth is. As it is, schools already run tight budgets so the money that is needed for the new technology would take away from other neccessities that schools need. The teachers of schools that have the system would have to be trained on how to use it, not to mention the Technology Department employees. Frankly, the ends do not justify the means in this situation.\n\nFinally, the technology would waste a great amount of class time, for no good reason at all. Multiple times throughout my day at school, teachers cannot figure out how to turn on the Smartboard or projector to teach a lesson. How would the Facial Action Coding System be any different? Teachers struggle to use simple technology like Smartboards or projectors, so using the Facial Action Coding System would just be asking for more problems. The amount of class time that would be wasted trying to set up the system would be ridiculous. As is, my teacher teach until the bell rings, and any wasted time would be time wasted that could be used for teaching.\n\nAlthough the Facial Action Coding System is a cool new technology, it would not be valuable to classrooms. This technology is pointless because humans already can calculate emotions base on facial expressions. In addition, the system would be hard to implement into classrooms nationwide because the system cannot work on a common computer. Finally, class time would be needlessly wasted. Simply put, the classroom is better off without the Facial Action Coding System. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Studying the planet Venus is worth studying but its worth despite the dangers of it because Venus is second closes planet to Earth. People often called Venus as 'Earth's twin\" because of there terms of size. Scientists believe that planet Venus probably is coverered with large about of oceans and could support any form of life. Another reason why we should discuffer is that in Paragraph 4 it talks about how is that Venus have some features like for exsaple Venus has a surface of rocky sediment has valleys, mountains, and craters. The planet Venus can be our somewhat be our nearest option for planetary vist.\n\nThe reason that its hard for scientists to study Venus is that no spacecraft could survivr in a landing formore then a few hours. Another reason why its defficult to land in paragraph 3 it says \"On the plants surface temeratures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric is over 90 times greather than what we experience on our won planet.\" This gives a exsample of how dangerous and hard it could be to study Venous. NASA had an idea for sending humans to study Venus, and that idea is creating a possible solution to the histile conditions on the surface of Venus. That would allow people to float above the fray.\n\nFinally i believe that studying the planet Venus is worth studing for but its worth despite of the danger of it because we can probably discuffer life or any lifing thing in Venus. We possably find some resourses that Venus have that could help us or change thing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear senator. One thing I like is people trying to get an education. just like me, im on my way on becoming a person who dedacates him or herself to thier job no matter what. one way to make a good education is to work hard, get plentey of sleep, and eat right! to make the day better. another way is staying in school. and you may say oh, school's boring , no fun , or just plain dumb. But did you ever figure to you that if you go to class for one day, it could reflect. How? well just think this, deciding wether or not you want to skip class or go to class, the day in class is like a year in college and a year of not going to school, could be a day in jail. so think about it, do you want to stay in class or do you want to stay in a cell, well that's your choice on wether you want to choose a good one or not. \"anyway lets talk about something else shall we?\" lets see what should we talk about.... OH! I know, lets talk about Electoral college. do you know what it is? electoral college is a process not a place. electoral college is the founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president by a popular vote of qualified citizens. the process consists of a selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for president and vice president and the electoral votes by congress. i think that the congress is making a good dicision on keeping it this way to elect the presedent. so if you think the same good. because thats one way our socity is a step closer on becoming the perfect socity. do you think so? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus,sometimes called the \"Evening star,\" is one of the brighest points of light in the night sky. however the nickname is misleading since venus is actually a planet.\n\nVenus has proved itself to be a very challenging place to examine. Despite the challenges we have to take risks to examine the planet Venus because Venus is referred to as Earth's \"twin\", Earth is the closest planet to Venus in density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too. Earth,Venus and mars orbit the sun at different speeds. Venus has the the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mecury is closer to our sun. Astronomers are facinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.Sometimes Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for planetry visit, a crucial considration given the long time frames of space travel. Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of venus.\n\nWorking hard to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value because human curiosity will lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I claim that the author does support theides of studying very well becausethe travels on earth should not be limited because it may be very dangerous .\n\nThe evidence or explanation that supports my claim is that it says so many thing that are drangeous like \"Not a single spaceship has touched down on venus in more than tree decades.Numerous factors contribute to venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximityto us. And it also says \"A thick atmosphereofalmost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. Even more challrnging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmosphere. The sufaces temperatures average is over 800 and its pressure is 90 times bigger that what it was. This is some information of my evidence that the author supports his ides that studying venus is a worthypursuit despite the dangers.\n\nVenus can provide only limited insighton ground conditions because most forms of light cannotpenertrate the dense atmosphere.The most important thing is that researchers cannot take saples of rocks,gas, or anything in venus.Therefore scientists want to do a mission going to understand venus .Researchers are working on innovations so the machines can last more time to knowledge.There making electronics made of silicon carbide,and they have been tested.\n\nThis is why i claim that the author supports the idea of studyng venus.I think its dangerous.And scientest orany researcher shouldnt go for its safty.In conclusion Thats my claim for the authors support. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In 1976 a face appeared on Mars and later it would become the Face on Mars. NASA has released a few images of this so-called \"Face\" on Mars which conspiracy theorists have been attacking since the start. They believe that aliens somehow created the Face, but why would aliens want to create a face on Mars?\n\nIf aliens did indeed create the Face, then why have we not seen them? Wouldn't there be at least some evidence of alien life forms there? Why haven't these aliens tried to come to Earth? The only ppossible answer is that the Face simply is a natural landform, created by Mars itself.\n\nSome other conspiracy theorists believe that NASA is hiding information from us, but why would they do that if they are low on funding and could use the publicity? The article states that \"defenders of NASA budget wish there was an ancient civilization on Mars,\" so that assumption can be overruled. NASA presented all the information that they had about the Face to the public. NASA even seemingly tried to see if there were any alien markings by going back to it every time that they could. If they were really hiding something about the face from us, wouldn't it have been easier to not show the face at all?\n\nThe pictures that NASA showed us are not very detailed, and if the Face was created by aliens who were more advanced and intelligent than us, then why is it not bigger? Why is it not more detailed? Why isn't there anything else around it? If an ancient alien civilization created it they would have needed somewhere to live and stay in order to create it, but the article states that NASA saw no other structures around it.\n\nThere are many strange looking features on planets. On Earth we have heart-shaped islands and strange craters, and Mars has some rocks that look like animals. It is not uncommon for us to mistake something for something else. Sometimes we want it to be something else so badly that it does-to us, and I think that for the conspiracy theorists\n\nsaw what they wanted to see. What they wanted to see was a face built by aliens and so they do, and now they are trying to justify their accusations with \"facts\". ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Help wanted!\n\nThe Seagoing Cowboys program is in need of help from other herders.\n\nWhy would anyone want to do this? With the program, you are able to help out other people, do things you typically would not do, and have fun.\n\nI think it is beneficial to join the Seagoing Cowboys program because you are able to help out people.\n\nIt is important to help people because not only does it benefit them, it benefits you as well by bringing joy in to your life.\n\nIn the text it states that in 1945,\n\nWorld War 2 was over in Europe, and many countries were left in ruins.\n\nThis is just one reason why this program is beneficial.\n\nAnother reason why I think that joining the Seagoing Cowboys program is beneficial is becuase you get to do different things in your free time that you would not normally get to do.\n\nIn the text it says that they got to tour many places.\n\nMy final reason why I think that joining the Seagoing Cowboys program is beneficial is because you get to have fun.\n\nIn the text, it says that while they were unloading the animals, they played baseball, volleyball, table tennis, fencing, boxing, reading and even whittling.\n\nThese are just a few reasons why I think that people who join the program will have lots of fun.\n\nIn conclusion to all of this, I think the Seagoing Cowboys program is beneficial to all. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What if we always knew what everyone was feeling? It sounds like it would be great if we could always detect one another's facial expressions. However, every human being has a different individuality which sets them apart from everyone else. That individuality is what makes that person unique, and can effect the way that a technological device percieves them. Everyone thinks differently, learn in different ways, and expierence different things.\n\nWhile it seems like reading the expressions of one another may be a good thing, you cannot depend on the technology when you do not even know how accurate the technology is. By the way that the technology is described, it seems that the process reads one's emotions based off 6 basic emotions: happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. However, humans feel much more than these 6 emotions. We can feel emotions such as confusion, passion, and boredom. If the technology is basing some one's emotions off those 6 universal emotions, the data cannot be completely accurate because those emotioins do not work together to create boredom or even confusion. The feeling of confusion is a comeplelty different emotion, it is not affected or made up of one's happiness or anger. A person cannot detect confusion simply from reading only 6 universal emotions.\n\n\"'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.' Dr. Huang predicts. 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor,'\"(D'Alto). While that would be particularly useful in an academic field, it may not work as well as anticipated. Every human being is unique and different, so therefore, they can become confused for different reasons or get bored of different things. What one student may find boring, another may find quite interesting. If that lesson plan changes for the student who is becoming disegaged in the lesson, it will affect the other student who use to find the lesson interesting, it may cause that student to then become confused or disinterested. That is a flaw with technology, it cannot benefit everyone equally because every human being is uniquely different and can be affected in different ways.\n\nMany tend to hide their true feelings simply because they do not want others to know their true emotions. To read students' emotions in that way is an invasion of one's privacy. When people are sad, they hide that feeling because they either do not want to think about what is making them sad, or becuase they do not want to make the people around them sad as well. Reading the facial expressions of people, especially those who conceal their emotions, is similar to reading one's thoughts, which invades their private thoughts and emotions. When some one is hiding their emotions, that is their private feeling and should not be shared nor invaded unless with permission granted by that person.\n\nAll-in-all, the technology cannot be proven to be accurate since it can only read 6 emotions and many people expirence a much more vast variety of emotions, than the simple 6 universal emotions. Including the fact that everyone is unique in the way that htye think and project emotions and thoughts differently. The technology also cannot change the plans for students effectively since a change for one student could harm another student academically. And finally, to read one's emotions, including the emotions that they conceal would be invading their privacy. People hide their emotions for a reason, and those emotions should be kept to them, they should not be read because they are considered one's personal thoughts. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless Cars\n\nDriverless cars are coming in the future. In the future, no one will probably need to buy cars because they won't need them. According to Google cofounder Sergey Brin, that will happen. He sees a future with a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars form a public- transport taxi system. The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus. There are many great things about driveless cars, but there are some bad things as well.\n\nDriverless cars are really beneficial. Driverless cars have way more senors and alerts than regular cars. For example, if the car is about to back up into an object, the driver's seats will vibrate to let you know. Also, within the past 10 years, sensors on the driverless cars have become way more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers. The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage alone.\n\nDriverless cars are also very safe to use. The cars can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mile per hour, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel. Even though the word \"driverless\" may scare you, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. Which means you are still somewhat in control of the car. The cars may be able to steer, accelerate and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. The driver must stay alert and be ready to take over when the time comes. The car can quickly get the driver's attention whenever a problem occurs. GM has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object. Other options under consideration are flashing lights on the windshield and other heads-up displays. Basically, while the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver. (Paragraph 7)\n\nDriverless cars are going to become the next big thing. They won't just become beneficial to you, but everyone else as well. The cars would only use half the fuel that today's taxi use. Which is a huge deal because we as a whole, we use a lot of fuel. Also, it will offer more flexibility than a bus. Just imagine that. Google cofounder Sergey Brin believes these such cars would fundamentally change the world, and everyone else should believe that too. (Paragraph 1)\n\nSome people may agrue that letting a car be in control is just absurb. You never know what the car might do. It could end up causing you to end up in a wreck, or maybe it won't slow down and the brakes won't work. Even though you are alert, what can you do if something goes wrong? Nothing. If the car can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves there is not a whole lot you can do to stop it. You just never know with a driverless car. You are putting yourself ar risk while you are in the car because you are not 100% in control of the car and that is not safe.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars are very safe and have major benefits. Some people may be scared of letting a car be in a control, instead of them being in control of the car. But no one should have nothing to worry about. As long as you stay alert, you should be fine. Even though the car can do many things by itself, it still sends you heads up when it needs your assistance. Driverless cars coming very soon in the near future. Try them and see how they are.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" is a monument created by aliens, and i do believe that their was a alien life on this planet, says Dr. Chase. \" With no living evidence Dr. Chase i do know that this monument was made naturally by mars, caused by wheathering, says i Dr. Clay.\n\n\"Since we do not have a real answer to how the face was made, if it was made naturally or even made by aliens which we all know do not exist, i suggest to just let the public get over it, says I\" \" But since the media and everyone around the world thinks that the aliens and the Egyptians were envolved in this, i say again to just let the media know that it was just a myth, says I\"\n\n\" We should just let the media know that it was caused by natural causes by mars since thier are many storms their, says I.\" \" the world should not be in panic, and that we have fewer problems and no aliens,says I\" ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nI think we should get rid of the Electoral Collage vote. It's not fair that a majority of people get to vote extra. The candidate's get to choose people who will vote for the person who picked them just bc they picked them. They probbaly dont have good reasons on the they pick that candidate they just pick him/her because they picked that person. They candidate who did win the election their electorial voters get a przie just for helping them win the election. And the others well they get nothing. It's not fair to the other people who voted for their apponite. All they get is a \"Thanks for voting\". Presidents voters get a cerification for helping them when. It's not fair to everyone else. Sometimes they candidate they picked to win isn't even a good presidant. They can't hold up to their side of the deal. the President says he/she will fix our economy and then the economy drops. They say they will prvovied a better education for students and they don't. Two electors from the same state can go to Congress. The candidates pick people from the states who know that the will vote for that specific candidates. In 2000 campaign, in total, seventeen sates didn't see the candidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina. In 25 of the largest media market a majority of voters did not go see any of the campaign ads. Candidates will bribe voters and Electorial Collage voters just to vote for that candidate and not they other. It's not fair to the other candidte who plays by the book for losing to someone who goes around the book to get more votes just to be President. Again I think we should get rid of the Elctorial Collage vote. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The students of today are the leaders of tomorrow. This statement directly portrays that students have the potential to grow and do outstanding things. In order for this growth, a student must be well educated in his or her school teachings, and must be confident in his or her learning. The Facial Action Coding System is a new technological device that can read a person's facial expression. Using this innovative technology, a teacher can thoroughly recognize if a student is understanding the material, and is confident in their studies. The use of this face-reading technology for students is essential towards a student's overall education, as well as personal confidence.\n\nEducation in the classroom is very valuable towards a student's growth. Due to personal experience, a student does not only need the education itself, but needs to understand the education for more knowledge. This facial-reading computer can clarify if a student is actually understanding the education. For example, Dr. Huang stated, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" Therefore, if a student is struggling, \"Then it can modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" Therfore, this directly shows that the technology created can increase a student's performance in school. This can allow the teacher, or the program, to help the student understand more information when a student is struggling. This innovative technology can result in positive changes in student's education and school environments.\n\nA student must be confident in what he or she is learning to advance in school. Without confidence, a student is often lost and loses hope in their personal ability. With confidence, a student is proud and is ready for any assignment given to them. This new innovative technology, the Facial Action Coding System, can determine whether a student is confident in their studies. As Dr. Huang stated, the technology studies facial expressions and muscles to determine what expression is being conveyed. Using this technology can allow the teacher, or the program, to determine if you are happy, proud, and understanding the material, or if you are angry, distraught, and unhappy with the material. This allows the teacher to provide personal help, so that therefore, they can provide understanding and you are more confident, and ready for subsequent information. This technology can help provide confidence for students in their respective studies.\n\nUsing the Facial Action Coding System in school environments would prove to be very beneficial and valuable. Through the ability of this new technology, understanding the education would greatly increase among students who need extra study tools and material. Confidence could be measued through the technology and help could be provided, so that students are better prepared mentally and physically for future assignments. This innovation could be used to guide the students of today, into leaders of tomorrow", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author states very clearly how beneficial studying Venus would be, despite all the dangers. Even after learning how harsh the conditions are on ground level, for some reason, the author still believes the danger would be worth it. Though my own opinion may vary from the author's, they still give very convincing reasons for their point of view. According to the article, the main two reasons Venus would be beneficial for humans to study would be the amount of information that could be learned about the landscape of Venus millions of years ago, and to satisfy human curiosity while having the satisfaction completing a challenge we have been faced with for centuries.\n\nThough the author gives several convinving reasons for studying Venus, perhaps the most influential would be the amount of information we could gain about the past landscape of Venus. In paragraph four, the author discusses that Venus displays several features similar to Earth, meaning it is possible Venus used be a whole lot like Earth. As stated directly in paragraph four, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth today.\" Solely based off the information provided in this quote, the author has already begun to convince me learning more about Venus might actually lead to some pretty extraordinary discoveries. What this quote is saying is millions of years ago Venus may have been the planet with the most liveable conditions...instead of Earth. If scientists were able to discover this much, just imagine all the other life forms and food webs that could be uncovered. To reinforce their opinion on Venus potentislly being liveable in the past, the author states, \"Furthermore, recall that Venus can cometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel,\" at the end of paragraph four. What the author is saying in this quote is at this point, all we have to do is find out how to brave the conditions of Venus. As for travel time, Venus is practically our neighbor, so no worries there.\n\nA secondary reason the author provides as to why humans should study Venus is to satisfy human curiosity while accomplishing a very large task that has troubled humans for centuries. The author states this idea in paragraph eight when saying, \"...but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" In this quote, the author is saying due to the fact that humans are extremely curious, we will likely find ourselves in a predicament with similar tough challenges in the future, so we may as well begin working through some of them now. When one sets out to complete a task, they should not stop halfway, but follow through until the problem is solved. They also should not quit because they believe the challenge is too hard. If one is able to stick with their guts and do what needs to be done, they will reap the benefits. Whether those benefits be winning a tough volleyball match or finally sending a human to Venus, it doesn't matter. What does matter is that we do not stop believing in ourselves and our ability to accomplish the seemingly impossible.\n\nIn conclusion, the author has given many, specifically two, very convincing reasons as to why we should continue to study Venus. The main two reasons are the amount of information we could gain about the past landscape of Venus, and satisfying human curiosity while accomplishing a very large task which has troubled humans for centuries. Based on the authors suggestions on why humans should continue to study Venus, I have considered changing my mind and agreeing that the dangers would be worth it. It is important to have knowledge about the past of our solar system, and it would be very interesting to know if Venus was once able to support various forms of life. I also feel that the author made a good point in stating that we are already this far into studies, so we should not give up now. Humans are always going to be insatiably curious, so by not finding a solution to this problem now, we are just placing this challege upon the generation following us. After all, curiosity technically never killed the cat. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars, also known as autonomous cars are dreams from the future. We have all seen them in movies. Today's innovations are begining to make autonomous cars a tangible concept. In fact,they are already being designed. Driverless cars have been imagined since the General Motor's concept car. The first autonomous cars were driven by radio signals and magnets, but these things proved to be too impractical. The development of futuristic cars are a contraversial topic. I believe that driverless cars should be developed because they are gas-efficient, time-saving, and safer\n\nDriverless cars save time. During the time spent driving, someone could be doing their homework, or reading a book. Drivers can continue their daily life by drinking morning coffee or eating breakfast. Drivers would not need to be alert and focused on the street when their attention could be better used elsewhere. Instead of the time spent driving they could manage their time. For example, on a roadtrip, the mom could be preparing dinner instead of driving. Instead of driving an EMT could already be working on an inured person. This time would allow faster medical attention and save lives. These concepts are entirely possible with future innovations. However, is still room for improvement. Cars still require human assistance to navigate through tricky areas. GM vibrates the seat and Google simply announces it.\n\nWhich brings us to our next topic, gas. Gas is an unrenewable resource, meaning once it is depleted, it is gone forever. Sergey Brin says that the new driverless car will use half of the fuel of a modern day taxi. These cars could change the world. If we consume less fuel, as a result, the fuel will last longer. This will also reduce emissions and pollution. With pollution reduced, the effects of global warming will also be reduced, preserving endangered animals. Autonomous cars would allow for time for scientists to search for a new sources of fuel. Driverless cars are also more flexible than buses.\n\nSome people may argue that driverless cars are dangerous. If the car were to malfunction and the passenger is unable to assist, it could result in a crash. The liability is huge, for on whom would the blame be placed? Once a perfected model of a driverless car emerges, this danger is eliminated. Many accidents are made while the driver is texting, or under the influence. Many driver's get distracted. With autonomous cars, these factors do not matter. The car will safely navigate you to your destination no matter what you are doing. Automatic functions have already prevented numerous accidents. Antilock breaks detect danger and prevent uncontrollable skids or rollovers.\n\nMaps, sensors, computers, and radars, are Innovations we did not have in 2000. At the rate we are learning and inventing new things, driverlesscars will be here in no time. BMW's \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" can already steer, accelerate,and brake themselves. I support the development of autonomous cars, because they are time-saving, pollution-reducing, and safer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "After readig this excerpt, it is very interesting because it saying why Venus is very dangerous. Scientists are working on getting to Venus and discovering this planet. Venus's nickname is the \"Evening Star\", and is one of the brightest planets. Venus is the second planet from our sun.\n\nThe author explains that Venus is right round the corner and they have sent humans to Venus and no spacecraft survived the landing for after a few hours. The author explained why this is why not a single spaceship has touched down onto Venus after more than three decades, today theyf ound some features of Venus where the surface is rocky climate and includes features such as the valleys, mountains and craters. Venus has the hottest temperature in the solar system, even the sun is super hot.\n\nNASA is still studying Venus and still working on sending humans to Venus to get more features, the temperatures would be burning at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit. Hopeful NASA can work on this project and get to see Venus more and show pictures to the world!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Even though there are many perks attributed to them, driverless cars will more than likely cause many more problems than they will solve. They are incapable of responding to accidents that happen to other vehicles, let alone reacting to an accident or a possible accident to themselves. They can have navigation errors or may react to what could be seen as an oncoming car, but it might just be some animal or a harmless object. Even in movies, the driverless cars end up having problems or malfunctioning quite a bit. And even with all the technology put into them, the cars still are not actually driverless.\n\nDriverless cars cannot react to an accident like a human could, even thoug \"safety is a big concern,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming). A human would swerve out of the way, speed up, or slow down. When something happens, the driverless cars \"alert the driver,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming) so that he or she may take control. In the short amount of time that it would take for the vehicle to alert the driver and for the driver to take control, disaster could be avoided, but due to this lack of reaction time, accidents could be unavoidable. Drivers must be alerted to any accidents that don't even include the car, forcing the driver to take control and navigate his or her self.\n\nDriverless cars still require the driver to do a lot of the work. Drivers must take control of their vehicles when \"pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents,\" (Driveless Cars Are Coming). Some driverless cars are not even able to drive themselves unless under very specific conditions, such as specially made roads that are designed specifically so that the car may navigate itself. Although the driverless cars are supposed to \"mimic the skill of a human at the wheel,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming), there are many situations, some already listed, that they are unable to do what humans do.\n\nEven if driverless cars are mass-produced, they will still have to move alongside many people with normal cars. This could cause a variety of problems and setbacks, as human drivers may not provide the regular pattern that the driverless cars and the roads create. Human spontaneousness may interfere with the driverless cars and their sensors designed to alert the occupant of danger. This may cause a driverless car to swerve or react to some small movement of a car driven by a human, while if a human were driving, they would not have reacted, seeing as well as doing this regularly, they understand that there is no risk or danger to them.\n\nDriverless cars will be of little entertainment interest to people. Drivers would \"get bored waiting for their turn to drive,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming). If the occupant of the car got bored, he or she might doze off or get distracted. With this distraction, they will take longer to react to the need to take control of the car, if they react at all. Drivers will get bored of driverless cars, quickly reverting back to regular cars, thus causing many companies to lose money due to how much they invested in all the technology required to create the driverless cars. Some people would even buy the vehicles in the first place due to lack of interest.\n\nDue to all the money put into the driverless cars, they are going to be very expensive and out of the ordinary worker's price range. With all the technology put into the discovery and creation of driverless cars, there is a going to be an extremely high cost. Sometimes the technologies required to make these vehicles are \"simply too expensive to be practical,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming). Very few people would be able to afford these cars, so there would be little buyers for the companies. They are using devices that at one point in time \"cost two hundred million dollars,\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming). Companies would end up losing more money than they would gain if they invested in driverless cars.\n\nAlthough many arguments cannot be proven until they are out and on the road in regularity, driverless cars should not be created for normal use. They can cause many problems on the road. They are unsafe and unentertaining to the occupants. They may have navigation issues when faced with and accident or a work zone or some form of traffic diversion. If driverless cars are produced, they may not stay popular for any long period of time.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article Driverless Cars Are Coming, they talk about the positive and negative things that could happen. This essay is going to be against the article because a driverless car doesn't sound safe to some. If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer? If you are in a car but the car is driving itself, what are you suppose to do if the car has a malfunction and you cant control it? Just because it is on television doesn't mean it needs to be brought to life so accidents can happen.\n\nIn the article it says \"These smart-road systems worked surprisingly well; but they required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was to expensive to be practical.\" People are not going to want to go on the interstate and there be construction twenty-four seven. If there was a new driverless car that came out every five to ten years then maybe there would be enough money saved up to start a new upgrade on the road for the new driverless cars. The places making these cars are having to make them for new starters and for experienced drivers because new drivers need more senors then experienced drivers do.\n\nAso some people know, before you can maake these cars you have to have if approved and make sure they are safe enough to be on the roads. Traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars. Even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in oreder to cover liability in the case of an accident. Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009. People would probably like to know what specific conditions they are refering too.\n\nSome people are smarter than others and they know right from wrong. But also people have a better and even greater chance of not being hurt. Say you are driving down the road and a child runs out infront of you, does the car automatically stop or does it hit the child. If a teen is given a driverless car, they would probably have too much fun with it. The cars would also need a gps so that you could let it know where to take you because its not going to know automatically want to go to grandmas house that night.\n\nPeople today are probably wondering how much these cars cost, do they have insurance, what happens if i have an accident or are the cars even safe. If a car is not proven safe then no one needs that car and it will not be approvedd by the lawmakers. People go out and spend money on renewing their liscenses, and taking the test all of their life to find out a driverless car will probably sometime in the future take over.\n\nA driverless car is not needed in this world. It is already dangerous out there with the cars we have, it would be best ti stick with the cars that we can drive, not driverless. Driverless cars could make the world even more dangerous if there was a malfunction with it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Alot of people may think that the Face on Mars is just an alien artifact but , their are many things that point to that its just a natural landforms. The texture ,weather ,and all other factors that happpen on a planet to make\n\nup its features.\n\nPeople may think that the Face on Mars is a part of a one ancient alien civilization. Wich might be true but its a higher possibiity that it was just a rock. Mars is known to be a dust rocky planet . In fact they even have dust storms on mars. It very well coulfd have just been a dust storm and the dust uncovered a rock tht happen to look like a face.\n\nAlso the weather also could have had something to do with the Face on Mars. In paragraph 8 of the article the writer shows that the weathe on mars was not all that good. He says that it was cloudy and the camera had to get past wispy clouds. If you put this into factor this could have just as well tempered with the photo of the so called Face on Mars. They picture could have came out blurry so it might have looked like a face but couldnt see what it really was.\n\nThese are all factors that can lead to the Face on Mars not really being a face. At the end of the day its your opinion. But before you choose a side atleast look at the information and facts given to you. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In many places, people drive cars. We know that driving a vehicle can lead to all kinds of pollution because of the fuel we use to power them. Because of this reason, people have decided to stop driving their cars, or take time off from driving them. Places such as Germany, America, and even Paris, France, have stopped using their vehicles as frequently.\n\nIn Vaubun, Germany, many have given up their cars and have deicded to walk to where they need to go. Their streets are completely \"car free\", except where the tram to downtown Freiburg runs, and some streets on one edge of the community. You are allowed to own a car, but you can only park at the edge of a development, but you have to buy a space for $40,000, along with your home. for this reason, 70 percent of the population does not own a car and 57 percent sold their car to move to Vaubun. Some families say they're much happier wtihout a car.\n\nIn Paris, France, a partial driving ban has been enforced. On some days, motorists with even numbered license plates were told to leave their cars at home or they would suffer a fine. Then the next day this would apply to people with an odd numbered car. Almost 4,000 people where fined and twenty-seven people had their cars impounded. This ban was enforced because of the amount of smog that is in Paris.\n\nPollution is a very bad issue, and people driving cars do not help at all. All of the driving is very bad and it needs to be stopped. Programs which stop people from driving cars is very helpful. The partial bans on cars and banning them completely will definetly help the world, the air, and humans too! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There is new techlogy being tested to show decect human emotions on a computer. First one could an app to calcute whatever someone is feeling. Also it could advance and have a computer see what the human is feeling. And finally the third is researchers on a project could help have a better way for humans and computers to intereact with each other.\n\nAn app software is being tested to calcuate the human emotion. In paragraph 1-3 the article states that computer progress begins when the computer constrcted 3-D\n\ncomputer model of the face. Also in parargraph 3 the aritcle states basic emotions like being happy, surprised, angry, disgust,fear and sadness. This tells us that the app creates a model of the face in 3-D and what some of the emotions might be.\n\nThe computer can also detect a facial expression. In paragraph 4 the artcle states that using video imagery the new emotion-recognition software tracks the facial expression. Also in paragraph 4 the artcle explains that it can also track mixed emotions. This shows us that that the software tracks emotion by 3-D computer model.\n\nResearchers want better communication wuth humans and their computers. In paragraph 6 the article talks about how the Mona Lisa demonstraction is really intended to bring a smile to your face about what the computer can do. Also in paragraph 6 the artcile gives an example saying that when you smile a similar ad may appear bur if you frown the next ad will appear. This tells us that the software watches for your emotions and depending your reaction to the ad.\n\nComputer software test lab could be a thing. The article talks about the different ways a computer can commincate with a human. Also talks about how computers can detect human emotion. This software can detect and communicate with humans knowing how they feel. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the excerpt of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus'' the author mainly talks about how planet Venus is referred as planet Earth's twin and, says how it would be effective, great, and worthy enough to be able to learn more and explore Venus. While the author despites the dangers of visiting and exploring Venus he thinks that its worthy enough that if we study enough and are able to prepare our selfs for a rough adventure, we would be able to break through and show the world that anything is possible.\n\nVenus is worthy enough to explore and learn more about because of all the possiblities we are might being able to have such as, new resources, experiencing new life forms, different elements for the periotic tabe, and so much more. Being able to find these things we would be able to change our life styles here on planet Earth. It would be very benefical for everyone by helping change the way people live and help reduce polution and transportation using the resources we find on Venus.\n\nIn the excerpt the author states in the fourth paragraph ''Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it way well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.'' This is to show that since we have more people interested and fasenated enough to want to help make going to Venus possible it would be much easier to get more information and experiments into our hands to make the trip possible.\n\nAll though there is many dangers out there that we may not know about, we should be majorly prepared for the expoditon that we would have some of our brave poeple do.\n\nVenus is a Earth-like planet so our people would be trained to be able to know what to do in certin situations and coming along obstical courses\n\nsuch as what are listed in the fourth paragraph '' Valleys, mountins, and craters.''\n\nFor being well prepared for the first time, the expodition would have not been easy, but it would have been acomplished. After acomplishing the first trip to Venus, we will be more prepared and be able to take on the things we were not able to take on the first time. Over time we would be super familiar with Venus we would most likely be able to have human living life form settling on Venus like we do Earth.\n\nIn conclusion, being able to acomplish this tremendous goal we would be able to strive on for more coming in our way and find different paths to make our life style, our planet and our enviorement much more succesful. These new things will lead us on into more in the universe and having humans be more succsesful than ever. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hes meaning it dangerous because its the coldest planet to earth and no only that it has a think cover with 97 percent dioxide. There clouds is highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus atmosphere. There surface is 800 fahrenheit and the atmosphere pressure is 90 times greater than our own planet. There are way more powerful than we have ever seen on earth. He said its our sister planet is so ninhospitable so why are we talking about even going.NASA want to send human to study venus. NASAs possible solutiont ton the hostile condutions on the surface would allowscientists to float above fray. that mean things like planes and jets fly over altitude to fly over stroms the temp would be 170 degress from a car floating above so we dont have worry about the unstable ground conditions\n\nso staying out the way basically and if you thing about it it doesnt even got that hot on parts of the earth inleast there a big and bad storm but the air pressure would be like sea level on earth and that information should be more than enought to go vist venus its simply just to dangerous ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars seem to be unneccesary . Our world is being run down by technology that is not needed. Just cell phones alone are damaging our focus from school,work, and even our familys .\n\nDriverless cars may seem high-tech and amusing but our focus would totally be off road . We as people would be eating,dazing,on the phone, and changing music . In The Article\n\n\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" they state \"we have to interpret the driving fun in a new way\" but they are under estimating what we could do about or saftey! In California,Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia it is illegal to even test a computer-driven car !\n\nIf an accident occured how could anyone determine who's fault it was when it could possibly even be the cars fault , literally. This may even cause the manufacturer problems due to it being the cars fault. Some individuals may even throw all the blame on the car when it was that individuals fault, this would result in so much conflict .\n\nWhen driving a car your focus goes towards the road and your surroundings . We witness whats going on around us . We control what we do and where we go . Driving a car may be complicated but it is a skill we have all can manage to learn. Why change the way we migrate just to become lazy.\n\nBy taking advantage of driverless cares instead of self mobility they create obsticles. They will now have to approach the law and things will have to be passed so why go through that mess. The age to be allowed to drive will be droped, No more driving school or anything of that sort.\n\nBy 2020 they enviroment we live in will change. poeple dont even walk to parks anymore, they ride hoverboards. our society is changing for the worste but the easiest . If they way we consider to do things is pertainable then why change it, why make it different? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think the Facial Action Coding System is valuable in a classroom because it helps the student get a better understanding of the lesson. For example if a student is confused about what to do the computer will detect this and modify the lesson so that the student would be more successful. In my opinion i think this would help out alot in the classroom because many students get confused or bored while doing work and most of the time its because they do not understand. with the new technology this would limit confused students and may save the teacher the time of having to explained the instructions again. it may also prevent the student from giving up or recieving a bad grade on the assignment due to preforming poorly. Although we can determine another human's emotions sometimes it is difficult because a person might smile at you but may be hurt inside so you may take this as if the person is ok. the person may also have mixed emotions which gives a person a different emotion instead of the correct emotion or how the person is really feeling. However with the computer you'll never br mistaken and can always find out a person real expression regardless if they are forcing a smile or not. In the article it states that when a person smiles muscles called the zygomatic major will lift the corner of their mouth and when a person is forcing a smile their mouth strectch sideways instead of upward. but how would a teacher know the difference if they are not aware of this. This new technology helps out with that and makes things better not only for the student but for the teacher as well.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In Germany life goes on without a car as people can see that. But cars do reallly excite in germany but they just have big garages for them. THey only have two place to park which is you have to own a house in order to have a parking space for your car. Automobiles are taking to Chicago and Shanghi in order to find a home. The gas to the cars is mostly found in Europe and the 50 percent is found in the United States.\n\nIn New York the Suburbs will spread out homes on private garages were dream towns come homes. The cars will be found all over the world. but there for there is two ways to get gas for them. Cars will around during The World War2 as the passage is saying. Now during this time they are making more better cars in this world for people could move around, dont matter if its a truck a car they would find a way too move you around the world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Declaration of Independence granted us the right to control our government. Thomas Jefferson once stated, \"When a nations government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of its people to abolish it and establish a new government.\" After viewing the articles Source 1:\"What Is the Electoral College?\" by the Office of the Federal register, Source 2: \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" by Bradford Plumer, and Source 3:\"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\" by Richard A. Posner it seems clear that the Electoral Colleges have lessened the power of the people in our nation. With the Electoral College method of selecting our nations new president the people of our nation become less empowered, they may cast their vote but the choice of president is never truly theirs. The Electoral Colleges drive people away from voting because they see the election as if their vote will not matter. To further empower the citizens of the United States the Electoral Colleges should be abolished.\n\nThroughout our nations history the majority vote has lost due to being outvoted when it comes to Electoral Colleges. Because of the majoity vote losing out to Electoral Colleges, people have come to believe their vote will not matter in the long run. In Source 2 Plumer declares, \"faithless electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's canidate\". With this method of selection for our country's president, the vote is never certain. The slate of electors that the people essentially vote for may or may not stick to the original plan. This ties back into people losing hope that their vote will not matter because they trust the electors to vote their canidate into office, when the electors could go either way. Another key point is, the canidates may not campaign in states that have a lower number of electoral votes. In Source 1 the Office of the Federal Register also asserted, \"Most states have a 'winner-take-all' system that awards all electors to the winning presidential canidate\". Due to the Electoral College system being based off population some states have more of a say than others. Whenever a state decides their votes for Electoral Colleges the state typically contributes every vote it has to one canidate. When this occurs the state's people may be misrepresented.\n\nElectoral Colleges do not reflect the democratic style of government we have had for hundreds of years. In Source 3 Posner states, \"it is the electors who elect the president, not the people\". Ever since the United States has been around our lifestyle has been purely democratic. The people are supposed to the empowering body of our government and their voice is the one that should be heard. But since we have the Electoral College the voice of the people has become muffled. No longer is the presidential election a democratic event, but one that is decided through the votes of only a few chosen American citizens. Plumer observed in Source 2 that, \"During the 2000 campaign, 17 states didn't see the canidates at all\". If the people of America are truly part of our governing body then they must see the canidates and hear what they have to say. The Electoral College has driven canidates away from states that will not have much say. These states are then left to make a decision for themselves and decide based on their personal preference, they are never able to truly hear what these canidates may or may not have to offer.\n\nOn the other hand, Electoral Colleges do have a lack of uncertainty. As Posner said in Source 3, \"the dispute over the outcome of an Electoral College vote is possible but it's less likey than a dispute over the popular vote\". The Electoral College provides the American people with a certainty of outcome. Whenever a state decides where its Electoral votes are going the canidate typically wins by a landslide electoral-vote victory.\n\nAlthough the Electoral College has a few appealing qualities, it is mostly an unfair system for the United States. The colleges should not have the power to decide the president, that should be the people that reside in the country's choice. Thomas Jefferson spoke of the people taking control of their country's government and the citizens of America should do just that if they are ever to escape the grasp of the Electoral Colleges. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that making a decision to develop or even introduce the idea of having computers read our emotions is wrong and creepy, what would be the point? no one likes ads so having your computer read your face just to bring up more? it makes no sense when you can get pop up ads that can relate to rcent searches. to me it would be a waste of time and a waste of money and energy.\n\nTo me this would not be valuable. this coding sysytem to read emotions to me would be completely useless, think of having to take out every computer in every school just to add a feature to know if your smiling or frowning. makes no sense when we already have phones that have face ID/ face recognition that can do that for us. when the article started using examples of different muscles in the face, that was confusing and seemed pointless to know, if this is an accuarate system or app, they should just make it and let us find out for ourselves.\n\nI think using anything that has to do with our face when it comes to technology is unlocking our devices for privacy, i rather know my device is safe from my own face then a password on a keyboard that can be readily accessed if wrotten down. think about adding this mentioned feature of the system reading your emotions. you have a computer tell you what your own personal emotions are but how accurate can this be, if it says you are feeling a certain way and you feel something completely different, then is this considered fale advertising?\n\nIs this going to be an app or an entire software system? if you can easily access your windows or chrome web browser store and get a free download or even pay for it, will it be an app? because i guarantee no one will pay a high amount of money just so they can have a computer read you your own emotions, its\n\npointless and would have no effect besides unlocking your system or device.\n\nWhat if someone passes by and it grabs a part of THEIR face, what if the things around you grab ahold of the system and it produces false information? i understand maybe if it shows anger or boredom it can remind you to keep working but what if students have concentration problems really bad and cant focus like everyyone elseand the program still doesnt help, do we just keep those kids lost? this program seems like an insane waste of time just to have feedback on how they THINK you feel. just because my lips or eyes are in a certain position doesnt mean im feeling that way, i could be in the best mood ever and move my muscles into a shape and would the results be same? would they be real to what i actually feel? or will it come back as im happy and faking it? i think svcientists should invest their money, time, and effort into something that would actually help us instead of something that has no vbalue and is pointless to classrooms, the workplace, or in general. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Exploring New Places\n\n\"Studying the planets is a amazing thing,\" said my science teacher. When studying the planets there is a lot of information to take in. The atomposhere on Earth is very different from the atmosphere in space. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. Scientists should study Venus because it has similarites to Earth, they have the idea of sending humans to Venus, and also studying the dangers of Venus can help scientists conclude their idea of what it is like there.\n\nVenus is known as Earth's twin. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" it states in paragraph 4 \"Today, Venus still ahs some features that are analogous to those on Earth.\" This proves that Venus has some identical features to those that Earth has. It also states in paragraph 4 \"The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\" This also proves that Venus has some similar characteristics like Earth. This is how the Earth is similar to Venus and why scientist should continue to study the planet, consdering its dangers.\n\nThe idea of sending humans to Venus is a topic up for debate by many scientists. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author explains how NASA has the idea of sending humans to Venus. It states in paragraph 5 \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray.\" This shows how scientists have come up with a way to send humans to Venus, even though no human has set foot on another planet. The author also states in paragraph 5 \"Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not excceed Earth levels.\" This also shows how the radiation of Venus is not much different than Earth's and it would not exceed higher on Venus, so a human would be safe from radiation on Venus. Sending humans to Venus is another reason why the author suggests studying Venus is a worthy pursiut even though it has many dangers.\n\nWith many great exeptions of studying Venus and sending humans there, the author also shows the dangers of Venus. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author states in paragraph 3 \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" This proves that is dangerous to travel to Venus with high tempertures that would burn a human alive. The author also states in paragraph 3 \"Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun.\" This also proves that Venus has expentionally high temperatures that no human can face. These are the dangers that the author takes into consideration when sending humans to Venus.\n\nIn conclusion, the author from \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. After evaluating the article, the author supports the idea of studing Venus. Scinetists should study Venus because it has similarities to Earth, they have the idea of sending humans to Venus, and also studying the dangers of Venus can help scientists conclude their idea of what it is like there. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Isn't it crazy that technology has come so far that a computer can read a persons exact emotion right down to the exact calculation? Yes, there is now computer software that can read emotions, right down to the percent of each emotion. This software, created by Professor Thomas Huang and collaborated with Professor Nicu Sebe. This kind of technology should be known to everyone, especially kids in school.\n\nThis software knows every muscle in the face and understand the anatomy of these muscles. \" Movement of one or more muscles is called an 'action unit'. Then Dr. Huand relies on the work of psychlogists, such as Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of FACS (Facical Action Coding System). Eckman has classified six basic emotions- happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness- and then associated with each characteristic movoments of the facial muscles.\" This process can read every muscle in the face and link an emotion with the given expression. It can even identify mixed emotions by weighing different units. For a human, isn't always easy to read mixed emotions.\n\n\"In fact, we humans perform this same impressive 'calculation' every day.\" Yes, humans read peoples faces on a day to day basis and can usually figure out the nonverbal emotion of a person, but for a person who doesn't know anatomy, this can be hard to place the exact emotion with the facical expression they are looking at. This software can even tell when a person is faking a smile, which again, isn't always easy for a human to pick up on. \"its all about those muscular action units.\" Which, is very important for a kid to know.\n\nTechnology is all around people every day, and kids know how to work technology better than most other people; therefore, they should be taught this new software and understand it. This new technology can really do wonders \" 'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,' Dr. Huand predicts. 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.' \" All kids learn in different ways, which can become a struggle for students. It isn't easy trying to learn when you just cannot understand it the way it is being taught to you, and this technology could completely change that. School could become way less stressful if it is being modified for each students understanding.\n\nA lot of human communuication is nonverbal, with different signals and facial expressions humans make, its not always easy for a person to understand these nonverbal signals. Which, is why this technology could be revolutionary to kids in school.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars: are they really safe? There are many points to go with the postitive and negative things about driverless cars. Both sides have very important points to make. There are, however, many more negatives than positives. Three negative points that will be discussed in this essay are: driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers, driverless cars would worsen the amount of car malfunctions and put many people in danger, and there is an increased risk of car crashes if driverless cars are used.\n\nTo begin, driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers. If a driverless car were to fail to do a task correctly, that mistake could result in an accident. This accident would then bring up the question, \"who is at fault?\" When this question surfaces, many drivers will blame the car manufacturing company, bringing up the point that the car itself failed and not the driver. When this point is brought up, many car manufacturing companies will have to fight lawsuits and have to appear in court. This court showing would result in a large conflict for the company and for the driver, seeing as many people outside of the issue would take sides. The issue would become a large problem for the world, and would be easily settled if driverless cars were not mad to begin with.\n\nAlso, driverless cars would increase the amount of car malfunctions that could happen on the road, resulting in an increased danger when going out on the roads. Driverless cars could malfunction in many ways. For example, they could fail to alert the driver when they need to take over, they could fail to communicate that something is wrong with the car itself, or they could fail to drive correctly. Each of those malfunctions could cause serious problems on the road, and put many people in even more danger than they are already in. Although there are many more malfunctions that could happen with a driverless car, they could all be prevented if driverless cars were not let out on to the streets.\n\nThe third point is that driverless cars increase the risk of car accidents. Car accidents happen in many ways. If a driver is distracted, if a car malfunctions, if there is a road block, etc. With driverless cars, many drivers will become more distracted, feeling as though they dop not need to watch the road at all and can do whatever they please. However, that is not the case. With a driverless car, people need to be on a higher alert than they would with a regular car: making sure the car does not malfunction, and keeping an eye out for the worst. If a driver were to become too distracted, they would not be watching the road closely enough, and are putting many lives in danger. If the car were to try and get the driver's attention for assistance through an area the car felt it could not drive through, the driver would be too distracted and the car could crash.\n\nTo conclude, there are multiple negative effects driverless cars would have if they were used. Driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers, driverless cars would worsen the amount of car malfunctions, resulting in many lives put in danger, and with driverless cars there is an increased risk of car crashes. Driverless cars are a bad idea, and should not be put on the roads. They put many people in danger. Driverless cars: are they really safe? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear, State senator we should keep the Electoral college. The college is a process,not a place. The process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for president and vice. The counting of electoral voters by congress. State's entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its congressional delegation.\n\nThe college is widely regarded as an anachronism. The Electoral college despite its lack of Democratic Pedigree. We shouldnt have to change to election by popular vote for President. The Electoral college looks like a big help to President. The founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president. The collge has many electors.270 electoral voters is required to elect the president.\n\nUnder 23rd amendemnt of constitution district of columbia is allocated 3 electors. It could be arugues the Electoral college method of selecting the president may turn off potential voters. There may be a few things i dont agree with about the Electoral college. I dont like how voters dont vote for the presidnt but for slate of electors. The Electoral college is one by far the best things, It dont need to be taken from us. Many good things the college does.\n\nState Senator, We should keep the Electoral college. The process is great. There are many great things about the Electoral college. Its a big help with alot. Theres no dobut about the College. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the Article \" The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" states in many pargraphes about the human race setting out to reach furhter into space for more inhabitable places for life like our second neighbor, \"Venus\".\n\nHence the reason why? Alot of people have their own conspiracy theories about it. Like the world coming to an end or running out of resources for the human race to continue. NASA however has an idea to send humans to study Venus. By using a \"blimp like vehicle hovering 30 so miles above Venus terrain\" states the author. That from the point of view they have they can study them based off of their own eyes and captured pictures.\n\nReasons to these predicaments is astronomers and scientist are highly fascinated to the \"Venus\" planet only because it is the closest to any earth like planet than any other one in our solar system. Venus has problems that can be dealt with. The harsh temperatures of over 500 degrees Farenheit and the 97% carbon dioxide levels.\n\nVenus is often called earths twin from time to time and for many reasons not many plantes started out with water the way earth band venus did. People always state from times that \"earth and venus are the same its only because venus itself is alot more harsh then earth\" NASA agrees with alot of reasons. They also realize the time it took people to adapt from years and years of living on the earth. So they will think the same sxact thing when it comes to venus.\n\nNASA even states \"Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans\". However if they were to proceed to try and hover over the planetoid they would only have limited insights on the ground conditions. The light cannot penetrate the atmosphere of the planet for it being so dense and stormy.\n\nFor NASA striving to meet the challenges presented by venus has value. Human curiosity is something that lurks all over NASA but they often question if it will lead us into \"intimidating endeavors\". The Author states \" Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of\n\nimmagination and innovation\". ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the prompt it talk about how Venus is just like the Earth and we might have been able to have life their beofre the Earth was discovered. The author talks about how Venus could have been a huge help is the past and that NASA should go and discover all of the abilities in can do that are just as equal to what Earth can do. The author suggests that we have some type of drone go there and find out what types of life it has or what it can hold. It is said that our curiosity will soon get the better of us and we will end up exploring it anyways.\n\nThe author supposts the idea of Venus being a place that we should explore by stating in the eight paragraph that we should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and inovation. The author also states the fact that we should strive to meet the challenge that Venus hold for us so that we are able to discover new things about our world in so many ways possible.\n\nIn conclusion i beleive that the author does beleive that we should explore the world and discover what new things we can do and how we should see what Venus and other planets can provide us with and how we can make new discoveries. Our solar system has so many different exciting things that we have not even discovered yet. We should be taking the chance that we have right now and explore what is out in the world and how it can help us with many issue we have already in the world today.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "the story \" The Challenge of Exploing Venus \" is an informative piece about the dangers and the risks of traviling to Venus. The author breaks down what the exploration would be and he decribes it as a very hard task humans have never done before. The author talks abou hovering above the planet to try and research ground level things, He decribes that task as hard because of the lack of visbility and light but he was certin it ws possible.\n\nThe author proceeds to go on about the dificulities of this space exploreation but is still driven to research. he said venus is a twin planet to earth. Also known as the siser planet or the evening star. the planet is very similar in size and was once a canadate for life.\n\nIm concluding that this was a very informative piece and the author supports the idea well. venus should be our next universal conquest.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) may provide assistance to students with their studies and improve test scores. FACS is a software innovation, developed by Professor Thomas Huang of the Beckman Institute of Advanced Science, that allows humans and technology to communicate in a more efficient way. This may be beneficial for students and teachers in their classrooms.\n\nTo begin, the Facial Action Coding System may be useful in a classroom. It can track a student's facial movements to identify their expressed emotion(s). For example, the text states \"By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions...\" When conveying emotions, the technology will be able to recognize it. If there are negative emotions being expressed, this may be valuable information to the teacher. \"They even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one.\" The technology can even identify the difference between real and fake emotions! Even though it may make students feel uncomfortable and invaded, there is a high chance that they will get used to the new technology. Technology is advancing everyday, and it may bring a positive impact in education.\n\nFurthermore, classroom technology may be able to recognize the emotions students feel and modify the lessons. Based on the text, Dr. Huang predicted that \"a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This innovation may be resourceful. There are times when teachers aren't aware of their students' stuggles and won't change the way they teach. With this new technology, computers may recognize the way the students feel about lesson plans. If they are not interested in the way they are being taught, the lessons may be modified to meet their needs. Although, this is only a prediction. It may be possible that it will not change a student's mind set, but it is possible that the software may change their worth ethics. Students may become more comfortable with learning if they are taught in a way they can understand and be interested in. Students may academically improve. FACS may also change peoples' emotions.\n\nAdditionally, one of this demonstration's purposes is to positively increase moods. FACS did a test run on the Mona Lisa and this demonstration \"is really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it shows just how much this computer can do.\" In a classroom, when a teacher does an activity as a test run and their students enjoyed it, the teacher may do it again. This computer software is the same idea. If a student were to like a certain lesson, the software may allow the student to learn the next concept in a similar fashion. However, there are times when students may try to conceal their emotions due to issues they may be having. One of the primary points of this program is to improve moods and produce positivity. FACS can help students to cope with their troubles in a way. \"According to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them.\" The system tries to make students feel pleased, and it may produce better attitudes and emotions.\n\nOverall, the Facial Action Coding System is a development that may positively impact a student with their education. Communication between humans and technology may become easier, and this transition can be beneficial for future generations. Teaching styles can be better planned in order for at least a majority of students to improve their studies. With a positive attitude towards schooling, students will be able to challenge themselves academically. This technology may help them strive for greatness in education and in themselves.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Exploring Venus\n\nShould we risk people's lives to gain knowledge on Venus? Venus should not be our main goal to explore, we could never live there. Venus has an atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide so we could never live there so we should not waste time on exploring it. We should not explore Venus because humans could never live there, no spacecraft so far has survived the landing for more than a few hours, and finally it will waste money.\n\nWe should not explore Venus because we could never live there so we have no reason to explore it and waste our money. In the Article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" it says, \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus.\" Humans can not live without oxygen so to explore a planet that has 97 percent of carbon dioxide in their atmosphere seems unnessisary. \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" That line from \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" article states that humans today could never survive in Venuses atmosphere, much less step foot on its surface.\n\nAnother reason why we should not explore Venus is because no space craft has stayed on its surface for more than a few hours. In \"Challenge of Exploring Venus\" it says, \"Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" We should not waste our resourses, money, and time on a planet we can do nothing on. \"A single spaceship has not touched down on Venus in more than three decades.\" This line alone should give enough evidence for why we should not explore Venus.\n\nFinally, we should not explore Venus because it will waste money. A quote from \"Challenge of Exploring Venus\" says, \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\" Astronomers should not waste money to look into a planet that was like Earth a long time ago, but spend money, time, and resurce on planets that can now be Earth-like. \"The value of returning to Venus seems indisputable.\" This is why we should not waste money or man power on a mission that would waste on. We should aslo not send people to Venus because most likely they wont make it back.\n\nIn conclution, humans should focus on a planet that could become another Earth, not Venus that was once like Earth a long time ago. Astronomers should not waste manpower, time, money, and reasources on exploring Venus. If we did explore Venus we could learn more about it and learn what happened to it to make it so non-Earth-like like it is now, but it would come at a huge price. Overallwe should not explore Venus because humans could never live there, no spacecraft so far has survived the landing for more than a few hours, and finally it will waste money.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is in the best interest of the people that you do away with the Electoral College. When people vote, they want it to be a direct vote to the election, not a vote for their chosen candidate's electors. The Electoral College should be abolished because it doesn't guarantee your vote, the House's selection can't be expected to reflect the will of the people, and swing voters could cause a catastrophe.\n\nTo begin, the Electoral College should be abolished because it doesn't guarantee your vote. As stated before, when you vote, there is no say in who actually wins the election. You are voting for electors who then vote for the President. While it is a rare occurance, those Electors may betray you and vote for the other party, cancelling your vote totally out. If a candidate gets the most popular votes, that doesn't guarantee them as President, because they still have to get the Electoral College's votes. In the third source titled, \"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\" by Richard A. Posner, it reads, \"It happened in 2000, when Gore had more popular votes than Bush yet fewer electoral votes, but that was the first time since 1888.\" This sentence means that President Bush won with fewer popular votes and more electoral votes. If their was no Electoral College, Al Gore would've won the election. The people would've thought that Al Gore was going to win, and they were probably in for a surprise when they saw that Bush had won with fewer popular votes. It just goes to show that an election can go either way, and there is no closure for a candidate until it is actually announced who won.\n\nNext, the House's selection can't be expected to reflect the will of the people. Say a Republican candidate gets a majority of the popular votes, but the Democratic candidate wins because he is chosen by the Electoral College. The people of the United States might actually feel betrayed because they felt that the Republican party could benefit the economy and society best, and that President might not be up-to-par and disappoint the people. Also in the third article, it reads \"...to feel that their votes do not count, that the new president will have no regard for their interests, that he really isn't their president.\" The statement really says a lot about both sides of the argument. If there is an Electoral College and if their isn't an Electoral College, people could still feel this way. If a candidate who has less popular votes wins, then those states that voted for him/her might feel as if they \"will have no regard for their interests\".\n\nLastly, swing voters could cause a catastrophe. Swing states could be considered manipulative because they all know that the popular vote rests in their hands. Will it be Democratic or Republican? You never know. The candidates focus mainly on campaigning in these states because these are the ones that are half and half, states such as Ohio. While there are thoughtful voters, there are also ones who could care less about who the President is and just want to keep America on the edge of her seat while they decide who they want to vote for. In the second source, \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" is says \"In 1976, a tie would have occured if a mere 5,559 voters in Ohio and 3,687 voters in Hawaii had voted the other way.\" The states are swing states and they truly determine the fate of the election. As said before, those states get the most attention from the candidates, who try to make themselves as appealing as possible. In the second source as well, the author says \"During the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad.\" Rhode Island and South Carolina are states that are almost entirely for one party so there is no use in the opposite party going there to try and persaude them to change their minds because it is most likely not going to happen. While they may feel neglected, it's just how it is.\n\nTo conclude, the Electoral College should be banished because it doesn't guarantee your vote, the House's selection cannot be expected to reflect the will of the people, and swing voters could cause a catastrophe. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People know that Venus is the secound planet closes to the sun and that its thick atmosphere is alomost 97 percent cabron dioxide. Scientist want to know where our next habitable planet is. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has a way for humans to stay safe from Venus's conditions. NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. The author suggests that stuying Venus is a worthy pursit despite the dnages it presents because they found ways how it is similar to Earth and avoids the conditions.\n\nNASA has a strong way for humans to survive the conditions from Venus while doing their studying. They explain how Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray with a blimp-like vechile howvering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape.Just as our jet airplanes travel as high in the sky above many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way. Since scientists would be 30 plus miles above the ground, the temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degress Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to the sea level that is on Earth. They would also have abundant amount of solar power, but the radiation conditions wouldn't exceed Earth levels.\n\nNASA has also been working on other approaches to examing the planet. They are testing some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide in a chamber simulaing the chaos of Venus's landscape and the material has lasted for about three weeks. They are also looking back into mechanicla computers which was used during World War ll, but these machines make calculations by using gears, levers, and it doesen't require electronics at all. Modern computers are more enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but they are more delicate whenit comes to extreme physical conditions. By comparisn, systems that uses mechanical parts can be made to be more resisitant to pressure, heat, and other foreces.\n\nAll in all, this means studying Venus is worth it despite the conditions it presents because this can help us decide if this is the next planet to live on. By doing the stuff NASA has been for many years, this will help us evolve into something else and make us more modern. Many people would be willing to join the field of being a scientist or astronuant. Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venushas value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endevors.Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts, but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation of exploring different parts of the galaxy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have been a great way of transportation that has been around since the early days. It's a fast and simple way of getting to where you need to be at the right time. However, there are many downsides to cars, also, especially when it deals with environmental circumstances. Therefore, car use should be limited due the fact that limitng car use will reduce greenhosue gasses, conserve resources we need in order to live that is nonrenewable, and allows for communities to be more connected by preserving the environment.\n\nTo begin with, car usage is becoming a major issue for the world today due to pollution. Greenhouse gasses are being leaked into the atmosphere each day to cars' transmission fuels. According to Source 1, it states, \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe... and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.\" These gasses damage ecosystems, and leave many environments unstable due to its destruction. It can also effect human beings, also. According to Source 2, the passage says, \"Paris typically has more smog than other European capitals... Last week Paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter compared with 114 in Brussels and 79.7 in London, Reuters found.\" This pollution that is occuring around the world can damage our health if not taken care of. By limiting car usage, it would not only benefit the environment, but our health also.\n\nPreceding on, along with the benefits of the envionment and our health, limiting car usage will also save help save many resources we use in cars that is nonrenewable resources. Nonrenewable resources are resources that can not be replaced when it is used up. These resources are resources that are important to our every day lives, as we've gotten used to having these resources and would suffer without them. According to Source 2, it states, \"Diesel fuel was blamed, since France has... [a] tax policy that favors diesel over gasoline. Diesels make up 67 percent of vehicles in France, compares to 53.3 percent average of diesel engines in the rest of Western Europe, according to Reuters.\" Diesel is an important nonrenewable resouce that we need that is causing pollution and smog in many places. By limiting the car usage, it would conserve these resources.\n\nFuthermore, limiting car usage would also help bring many communities together. If a whole community got together and decided to limit car usage with the whole community involved, it would give a sense of unity and benefit the community, also. An example of this was the residents of Vauban, Germany. In Source 1, the passage states \"As a result, 70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here. 'When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,' said Heidrun Walter, a media trainer and mother of two, as she walked verdant streets where the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children drown out the occasional distant motor.\" Due to the limiting of driving cars, many people actually felt more of a sens of relief rather than with cars. In Source 3, it says, \" Bogota, Colombia -In a program that's set to spread to other countries, millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday, leaving the streets of this capital city eerily devoif of traffic jams. It was the third straight yeat cars have been permitted for the Day Without Cars in this capital city of 7 million. The goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog.\" This community was able to come together as a whole in order to reach the goal of reducing smog and allowing for an alternative transportation method. By limiting car usage, communities are able to act more of a community rather than individuals.\n\nAll in all, limiting car usage would be beneficial to the world. The advantages of limiting car usage would be the reduction of greenhouse gasses and smog, the conservation of nonrenewable resources used in cars, and making communities stronger by coming together to stop the driving of cars. Cars are a big and major part of the world today, but it can be more beneficial to limit it rather than continue it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the artical it give the example of smiling at a certain ad or frowning at another and the computer will no longer show you ads like that. I believe that the FACS software can be very useful in schools and other places. So here are some reasons that I believe that we should use this new software in our schools.\n\nThe new FACS software would be very useful in our schools because, like it states in the artical and by Dr. Huang, the computer could recognize when a child using the computer is starting to get bored. The computer could then change the way it is presenting that particular lesson to make it more interesting and enjoyable. This software could help bring up the overall grades by the student(s) because they now have an interest in learning the subject at hand.\n\nIn the artical it shows that this software could recognize the subtle emotions made by the Leonardo da Vinici's painting of Mona Lisa. FACS can recognize the facial expressions made by a child or teenager and recognize the six (happiness, surprise, anger, discust,fear and sadness) basic emotions, just like us people do in our everyday lives. The software can also recognize mixed emotions; FACS has found that the Mona Lisa is displaying 83 percent happiness, 9 percent discust, 6 percent fear, and 2 percent of anger.\n\nStudies have found that when you are sad and fake a smile it can make you just a little bit happier. When moving your facial muscles it not only shows emotions, but also can produce them. When studying a lesson and a child is looking sad' the software could alter the lesson to, lets say, make the child laugh. Everyone knows that laughter is the best medicine. It may not make the child happy over all but it could brighten their day and make the lesson more appealing.\n\nSo, in conculsion I feel that the FACS software could be useful in schools and just about anywhere. There are so many things that this software could do to help in our everyday lives, from making lessons more enjoyable, to showing ads that you are interested in. FACS is just overall a good software to help computers figure out emotions and maybe brighten up the day. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever heard of the face on earth? I am pretty sure you have.\n\nI understand that you have a way of thinking that the face was created by aliens.Well I am here to prove to you that the face is just a natural landform. In this essay I will write an essay to convince someone that the Face is just a natural landform and was not created by aliens as others may somewhat believe.\n\nHere at NASA twenty five years ago something out of the ordinary happened close to or around Mars. We sent a spacecraft out to circle the planet and take pictures of the possible landing sites for the second ship to land when it saw a head shaped figure about two miles away that seemed to stare at the cameras from a region of the Red Planet called Cydonia. But then we figured that it was a martian mesa. Only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharoh. It was also thought\n\nof as a \"huge rock formation .... which resembles a human head...formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and a mouth.\"Afterwards the images where sent out and the media went bananas.\n\nSometime in April of 1998 Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped a photo ten times sharper than the original spacecraft photos. Millions of anxious internet surfers were waiting when the first image first appeared on a website revealing a natural landform. There was never an alien to begin with. But not everyone was still pleased with the results of there not being aliens. Some skeptics said that there may have perhaps ben alien markings were hidden by haze.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke's participaition in the Seagoing Cowboys program made him want to be apart of that program because he got invited to travel to Europe to he help and he wanted to be helpful. I know this because in the text it states,\"He was working two part-time jobs in a grocery store and a bank when his friend Don Reist invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat.\"I also knew why i was why he wanted to go but he probably had a little doubt but couldn't resist the opertunitiy. I know this because in the text it states,\"He knew it was an oppertunity of a lifetime.\"\n\nIt allowed him to experience ad ventures and visit many unique places because when he heard about the \"Seagoing Cowboys\" had to help Europe get food and supplies ever since World War 11. In the text it state's,\"It was 1945,World War ll was over in Europe, and many contries were left in the ruins.\"The text also state's,\"To help these contries recover their food suplies, animals, and more, 44 naitions joined together to form UNRRA (the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitaitin Administraition).\"The text also state's,\"Luke signed up.\"He signed up because he wanted to help and make a different.\n\nLuke can convince you all to join the Seagoing Cowboys by telling you all the oppertunities and chances you will get ,and I know you will have a wiled adventure. I know this because in the text it state's,\"The cattle-trip were an unbelievable ppertunity for a small town boy\",he says. The text also state,\"Besides helping people, I had side benefit seeing Europe and China.\"\n\nThats how I know you all would like to join the \"Seagoing Cowboy's\"program.\n\nI know that you would all like adventures and learning about all the unique stuff they do on a boat for 2 weeks or longer to get across the Atlantic to China, to behonest I would probably get sea sick after a while. In the text it states,\"It took two weeks to cross the the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern of the United States and a month to get to China.\"The text also states,\"They had to be fed and watered two or three times a day.\"\n\nIt was very difficult sometimes to be on a boat for about a month because you have to keep everything clean and lift hay and oats on the boats and do all of your jobs all of the time. I know this because in the text it states,\"Bales of hay bags of oats had to be pulled up from the lower holds of the ship. I also know it was probaly a little difficult because the text also states,\"Stalls had to be cleaned.\"I could tell that was very hard by the sound of it and how I can picture it happening. I would still say it would be a very cool thing to do. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is hard to imagine being a scientist at NASA, But if i was a scientist at NASA discussing the face with someone who thought it was an alien structure, I would use three pieces of evidence to support the claim that its just a natural land form. The first piese of evidence would be Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera took a picture ten times sharper then the original photos. The secouned piece of evidence i would use would be Malin's team captured a photo using the camera's maximum resolution. The third piece of evidence i would use would be the picture showed the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa.\n\nThe first piece of evidence, On April 5, 1998, The MArs Surveyor flew over the cydonia for the first time. Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera took a picture ten times sharper then the original photos. What the photo revealed was a natural land formation not an alien monument.\n\nThe secouned piece of evidence, Malins team captured a photo using the cameras maximum resolution. In the Viking photo the pixels were only 43 meters, But every pixel was 1.56 meters in the 2001 photo. That means in a image three times larger than the pixel size you would see objects such as airplans, pyramids or small shacks in the photo.\n\nFinally the third piece of evidence, The picture showed the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. Which is a common land formation around the American West.\n\nThouses are the three pieces of evidence i would use to support my claim and convince someone that the face is just a landformation.\n\nMichael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera took a picture ten times sharper then the original photos revealing a natural land formation. Malin's team captured a photo using the camera's maximum resolution that would have shown any ariplans or pyamids. Finnaly is is equivalent to landformations on earth. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the first source its explain what a Electoral College is which is not a place it's a process the finding fathers established it in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a Congress vote and by a popular vote of qualified citizens. Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the eledtors where they vote between a President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. The Electoral College has about 538 electors a majority of 270 are electoral votes is required to elect the President by which your state entitled allotment of electors equals the numer of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators. The 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of the Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. For this reason, in the following discussion, the word \"state\" also refers to the District of the Columbia.\n\nThe second source talks about the Indefensible Electoral College:Why even the best best-laid defenses of the system are wrong like in the first sentence \"What have Richard Nixion, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the AFl-CIO all, in their time, agreed on? The answer is Abolishing the electoral college! They're not alone; according to a Gallup poll in 2000, taken shortly after Al Gore--thanks to the quirks of the electoral college--won the popular vote but lost the presidency, but over 60 percent of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now. This following year voter have expect another close election in which the popular vote winner could again lose the presidency but yet the electoeral college still has its defenders. What give?...\n\nThe last source for the story talks about the defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President. Electoral College is widely regared as an anachronism and a non-democratic method of selecting a president that ought to be [overruled] by declasring the candidate who receives the most popular votes the winner. The advocatesos this postion are coorect in arguing that the Electoral College method is not democratic in a modern sense ... it is the electors who elect the president, not the people. Your votes for a presidential candidate your're actually voting for a slate of electors. There are a selects of parties that a slate of electors trusted to vote for the party's nominee. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "venus is consideree as a planet beause it's the second planet on hour solar system bt it have something difference to the other planets on our solar system, venus orbit at a different speed around the sun. we said the venus is the second planet in our solar system so that means it's the closest planet to the sun but sometimes it can be located right at the\n\ncorner.\n\nvenus has been a difficult planet to humans to study, it's so challenging.\n\nsomething that makes venus challenging is that a thick atmostphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blanked venus,\n\nin my on opinion it's something good because it can protect animals and other things that live in venus bus i also think it's something bad because it do not let humans to visit and learn about that planet because it could be dangerous for humans because no body knows what can happen to humans if they try to live in other panets like if their were living at the Earth because the atmospheric preasure is 90 times greater than in te Earth, sohumans would'nt survive to the preasure of that atmosphere.\n\ni think that if humans start like experience they may one they visit other planets. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The topic of driverless cars will be argued until there arent any humans left. But to simply have a driverless car woud be like having an irresponsible parent. Cars were formally made for us to have an easier way of transportation; and now we want cars tha can dive themselves. Taking the taxi away from taxi drivers would put them out of business; As well as Uber Drivers and other assistants. How would the generations after us know what to do in an emergency if the driverless car werent able to function on its own? What would happen to the data base of a company if its system crashed, how would signals get out from the cars routers?\n\nHaving driverless cars would be a bad idea, for one it would take the place of a taxi driver which would take away jobs. Googles cofounder Sergey Brin says \"...a future with a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars form a public-transportation taxi system. The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of todays taxis and offer far more flexibility that a bus. He believes such cars would fundamentally change the world.\" Another reason I wouldnt condone in the submitting of driverless cars would be to save the generation after me. Letting fresh young adults use driverless cars wouldnt teach them how to drive. Which means they wouldnt know what to do in case of an emergency. Yes there would be a manual that you'd have to read. But when it comes to fixing technology and mechanics, humans need a hands on experience which would help them in case they dont know what to do if the car becomes driverless. Finally, what would happen in a storm if the connection didnt go through or the companys system crashed? Would that mean the car isnt driverless? \"...For starters, they needed a whole lot of sensors. Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive rardr sensors, a GPS receiver,a nd an inertial motion sensor.\" With all of this technology needed to properly produce a smart/ driverless car, would it be necessary? having this much technology, there would be too many technical difficulties. Which would lead into the owners of the car paying for more that what was even expected.\n\nThe world of technology today has help us for the better or worse. With smartphones being able to locate people, cars, and places around the world. ToSending a typed papre to your teacher just in time before grades come in. Technology has been tremendously heplful. but to have a 18 year old behind thw wheel of a driverless car not knowing what what to do in case of an emergency or the car having a mal-function would be pointless to buying your first car. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challege of Exploring Venus,\" the author says that further study of the planet Venus would be a worthy pursuit for humanity. Closer examination of Venus presents many dangers, but despite this, the author still believes that learning more about Venus would be worth while. The author supports his belief by explaining some of the curiosities that draw humans to Venus--such as the posibilty of having had life previously--, by comparing Venus to our home planet of Earth, and by exploring some of the ideas for how Venus could be explored.\n\nIn order to convince the reader that further exploration of Venus is worth the risk, the author peaks the reader's interest with ideas about the planet. The author knows that the idea of life existing outside of Earth is common thought for most people, so he tosses out the possiblity of Venus having previously supported life. He states that Venus was likely covered in oceans previously and, \"could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" Life on other planets has fascinated people for generations, and the author decides to use this to try and convince the reader that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers its presents.\n\nThe author continues to explain the reasons to further explore Venus, which he begins to aid with facts. The author describes how close Venus is to Earth, relatively speaking. He says that at times Venus is the closest planet to Earth. The author also decsribes the similarities that Venus has to Earth, including size, density, and surface. This author uses facts that support his claim to try and convince the reader of his idea, which works well in this case.\n\nLike any good argument, the author highlights some counter arguments, and then gives possible solutions. For example, the author explains the harsh conditions of Venus such as high temperature and high atmospheric pressure. The author even tells the reader that, \"no spacecraft has survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" All of these seem like deal breakers, but the author does a good job of countering these points with solutions. The author describes ideas from NASA, such as a \"blimp-like vehicle\" that would float about thirty miles above the surface of Venus and avoid many of the harshest conition. He also disusses the use of electronics made of silicon carbide that would be better equipped to handle the intense conditions of Venus. The author looks at flaws in his idea, and finds solutions to them.\n\nThe author of this article believes that while studying Venus poses some challenges and dangers, but that it would be worth it. He explains why people are interested in Venus, and why it is a task that can be accomplished. He looks at counter points to his idea, and finds ways around them. This author effectively supports his idea that studying Venus is worth the dangers it presents.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are starting to make it into the world. These cars have chips and different items that allow the car to drive alone, but will tell the the driver that he/she needs to take over the wheel when the car can not make it through a sitution. These cars are a bad idea for the world and can be very dangerous. The cars have a self driving system and tell the driver to take the wheel when needed, but what if the driver has fallen asleep or has had something happen to them, they will not be able to take control of the car. Therefore, self driving cars are a bad idea for the world.\n\nDriverless cars do not allow the world to be driverless. People will still have to drive the cars when something happens that the car can not handle. The article states, \"Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash,\" but what if that next mile something in the car goes wrong and the car crashes. Google explains how their cars are not completey driverless. The cars will alert the driver to take over when the car can not handle the sitution that they are in. So, what is the big difference between someone driving the cars full time or having a car that drives itself unless something happens?\n\nThere is no difference when it comes to picking the right choice. The driveless car is a fault and can not keep people safer on the roads. People could eaisly get unfocused and not pay attention to the warning sign that the car gives to take over. If the car tells the driver so many times to take over the driver could get use to the signal and not pay attention when the signal goes off. For these cars to work they way they have to work \"they [need] a whole lot of sensors.\" What would happen of the builder of the car forgets to put a sensor in, or one of the sensors does not get programed the right way? Then when the car is driving something happens because a sensor was not placed or had a default. Then who will the blame be placed on? The driverless car or the actual driver who was told by a sign that they needed to take over, but the sign never came because a sensor was missing. The world would most likely believe that the driver was not paying attention and that it is their fault.\n\nNow the car does have some really nice features, but can these features live up to the name? The cars have \"sensors [that] can cause the car to apply breaks on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine,\" that is a nice feature but again what if the sensor quits working. The whole idea of a driverless car is a good idea until a person finds out that they must trust sensors to alert them when they need to take over. In the article it talks about how there could be a object of some sort that keeps the driver awake and alert incase they have to take over. What if the driver gets so into the object that is supposed to keep them alert that they do not feel or see the signal. Another thing that could go wrong is if the driver thinks that they will not have to drive the car they may turn around to take of kids in the back and not see the sensor or feel it. Then you have a bad crash that puts not only a single person in trouble but several people.\n\nThe whole idea of driverless cars is a good idea, but with good ideas there are things that can go wrong that people have to think about. A driverless car is a serious thing to think about before they get soild to the public. The people who create the cars need to be able to promsie that the cars are one-hundred percent safe to the public and that they are trust-worthy. The people who make the cars can not promise that one-hundred percent becuase they can only make the cars to their best and after it is the a dealer shop they can not take back what happens. These cars could make a lot more crashes happen and that could lead to a rise of death rates. These cars are not super trust-worthy, therefore, they should not be put out of the market for people to buy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The electotral college doesnt work in my opinion. It has too many flaws such as you are voting for a state. Thanks to the electoral college the 2000 election was a disaster. The electoral college system is unfair in a way because if your from some where with a lot of points your going to win that state. And if you win lots of small states it doesnt matter because someone can win two big states and beat you. Obviously candidates arent going to spend a lot of time in a state they know they have no shot of winning.\n\nIn 2000 17 states didnt get to see any candidates, because the candidates didnt consider them big states.\n\nOn the off chance that those electors won the statewide election, they would go to congress and Kerry would get 34 electoral votes. Who are the electors in the first place? It dopends on the state. Sometimes state conventions, sometimes the states partys central comitee, sometimes the presidential candidates themselves. Can voters control whom their electors vote for? Not always. Do voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate? Sometimes.\n\nThe electotral college doesnt work in my opinion. It has too many flaws such as you are voting for a state. Thanks to the electoral college the 2000 election was a disaster. The electoral college system is unfair in a way because if your from some where with a lot of points your going to win that state. And if you win lots of small states it doesnt matter because someone can win two big states and beat you. Obviously candidates arent going to spend a lot of time in a state they know they have no shot of winning. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Some people think there is life on other planets and some don't, but in 1976 many people thought NASA had found life on Mars. In 1976 Viking 1 took a photo of mars which looked like a face on the planet's suface. Many believed that this was a sign of life on Mars.\n\nMany of the NASA scientists didn't believe that the face was alien related, but it became a priority for NASA. Soon the Mars Global Surveyor was sent to take more pictures of the face to better find out what it was.\n\nIn 1998 the Mars Global Surveyor reached the red planet and took the pictures NASA needed. The pictures it took were more detailed then the ones in 1976. At home, thousands of people waited for the image that the Mar Gobal Surveyor took to reach to web.\n\nThe reveal was a natural landform and not alien artifact after all. Still some people didn't belive that\n\nNASA was hiding something. Even though NASA and it's supporters said they would have wanted it to be alien.\n\nSome people still believe NASA is and was hiding something, but we may never know.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System is a system that will construct a 3-D computer model of the face and use muscle movements to figure out what you are communicating emotionally. With that being said, will this information given by the system be valuable in a classroom? Here are my reasons why I believe it would be valuable to both the students and teacher in the classroom.\n\nIn a classroom, you have a wide range of personalities. Students may feel shy or uncomfortable asking questions. If a teacher asks how well the class is dealing with the subject, a student may say they are dealing well with the subject when they really are not. Dr. Huang says is,\"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication...So computers need to understand that, too.\" A teacher in a classroom can understand verbal communication but maybe only slight emotional communication. Having a Facial Action Coding System (FACS) in your computer can help it to understand the majority of what a student may really be feeling about the subject.\n\nA lot of times today classrooms are packed with students, also giving a wide range of abilities. This range of ability doesn't allow teachers time to help the struggling students. In paragraph six Dr. Huang says, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored...then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" If we had this technology, it could help students to keep up with the rest of their class by changing how the lesson is taught depending on the individual.\n\nThis technology would have the capability to figure out more easily the emotions of a student and be able to relay that back to the teacher. A teacher may think that a class is enjoying the subject based on what they say or what they act like, when in actual fact this may not be the case. According to the text, \"To an expert, faces don't lie; these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a 'smiling' politician or celebrity isn't being truthful.\" This technology can understand if students are not relating well with the style of teaching that is available and then make this information available to the teacher. The teacher can then look at what the students really feel like in their class, and then adapt the style or structure of class to facilitate more engagement and interaction from the students.\n\nTherefore I believe that the use of this new technology would be valuable. FACS would be able to help struggling students do better than they are in their subjects by changing the lesson depending on their emotions. It would be able to modify the lesson for a student so that they may more easily understand. It would be able to help teachers to understand how their students feel in the classroom and so they can more easily facilitate the students different learning styles. This system would help the whole classroom function more effectively.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this essay there will be details and examples of technology where you can tell emotions of a character that tries to hide it in pictures. In text it says she is not fully happy she is 83% happy , 9% disgusted, 6% fearful, and 2% angry.\n\nUsing this techonology would be good, because in pictures you could figure out emotios from the picture. In the text it say imagine being able to detct exactly how other people are feelings, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\n\nIt says that we humans use the same caluculations everyday when we can tell the emotions and feelings of our peers. This technology would be like a emotion calculator for pictures and paintings.\n\nIn this essay I gave details on what the 3D tecnology does , it showes a picture emotions when want not to be seen. All paitings show emotions and some of the emotions are hard to see, but this technology could help you see it better. It could help you calculate the exact percentage of all the emotions in a picture. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" I think it's a good idea and a bad idea. The reason why is because how are people going to learn how to drive and take drivers ed with those cars.\n\nOne of the bad ideas are what if someone wants to learn how to drive and they cannot do it on their own. We need to have cars for drivers ed that actually drive. They need to keep the cars for us because some people enjoy driving by themself and alot of the do it because it is very enjoying to do when you are bored and you can goto your friends house. The cars would not change the world because of how they are and most people would not like them for what they are.\n\nSome of the good things are that the cars have went half a million miles without crashing.\n\n\"So far Google cars aren't truly driverless yet; they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through road work or accidents.\" The car can use the brakes by itself without the human actually pressing it and it has antilock brakes. This car can only handle speeds up to 25 mph. Special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel.\n\nAnother bad idea is I think that the Google cars would not be that smart as we would on the road. They would be so slow to get to places and you would be late to work. You would never be on time going 25 mph. Police officers would not be needed anymore because nobody could go over the speed limit or drive the cars fast. If something messes up they do not even have a auto turn off sensor to stop the car if something malfunctions so you would be in deep trouble.\n\nOverall I think we should not get these Driverless cars because they would be bad for hauling stuff or going to work. It is bad because Google would not be that smart with GPSING on the road and it could not drive by itself on the road. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Seagoing Cowboy program is a program where you help people in destress who don't have food. This program is a great program helping people is what you do. Not only helping but somtimes you get to check out the place where you were sent so it is also like a vacation.\n\nI think you or someone you know should join this program. I think it would be fun because in the text Luke Bomberger who was a former Sea Cowboy he got to go site seeing and check out some pretty cool places. One of those cool places is the Acropolis in Greece. Another reason you or a person you know should join is because in the text luke says that after you are done delivering the resources you get to play games and tournements on the boat. Also it is a good way to use time while on sea.\n\nThe Seagoing Cowboys are a huge help when there is a big crisis and the real thing that matters is that you are helping people out that is a good thing to remeber. Those are my reason to join the Seagoing Cowboys program and you will not regret it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this story A cowboy who rode the waves luckes participation in the seagoing cowboys program allowed him to exerience adventures and vistit many unique places. The text states that after his high school graduation luck had no idea that his life would change. The text also states that after his high school graduation he was working at two places but got part time and then his friend invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat and lucke sayed yes y wouldn't he say no to his friend. And he went there when world war 2 had just ended he was helping them get food and other stuff they needed. In the story it says that he became a seagoing cowboy and was helpng out the countries that had just ended war. After helping them out in stuff they needed they got free time to get to rest or to do stuff that was in the place where they had the animals in. I feel like they helped a lot after war and they did really good at helping good thing we don't have wars in our world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I beileve that the use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable because you can tell how a person is feeling and depending on how there feeling you might be able to help them out if there depressed.I used evidence from the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" to support my caim.\n\nThis new technology is a way for humans and computers to communicate better. The computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face and uses this method called \"action unit\" which is a movement of one or more muscles (human muscles). Dr.Paul Eckman the creator of FACS ( Facial Action Coding System) has classified six basic emotions which are-happiness, suprise, anger, disgust,fear,and sadness. Eckman also classified whats associated with each characteristic movements of the facial muscles.\n\nThe new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements in a real face or in a painted face for example, the Mona Lisa.The software can even identify mixed emotions and each expression that is compared against a neutral face. Humans can explain the same facial expressions as the computer for example,you can tell how your friend is feeling just by looking at his or her face.\n\nIn conclusion this is why I think the Facial Action Coding\n\nSystem is valuble in the student classroom and I personaly think its cool to but thats my opinon whats yours? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars have been a part of human fascination for quite some time now. These majestic machines have been on television in movies such as \" I, Robot\" and in television series such as \" Extant\". Even though the driverless cars on television seem to work without human control, reality suggests that these types of cars are not completely established. However, these cars are most definitely in the making. Currently, driverless cars can be both good and bad to the human population. They are good, because they allow humans to relax behind the wheel, and they assisst the driver by alerting them when something happening on the road could be harmful to them. These cars are bad, because they are made from technology and humans will pay less attention to what is going on, on the road they are driving on. Luckily, these cars have not harmed any humans or claimed any lives, so in this case, the good outweighs the bad.\n\nDriverless cars help to add knowledge and protection to the driver of the car. These smart cars are able to sense things that maybe humans were not able to see. The text says, \" The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage\"(5). The smart cars can prevent humans from getting into crashes and also gives the driver a few extra eyes when watching the road. Essentially, these cars are very helpful and could prevent many crashes that could have already been avoided. Even though these cars are not 100% capabke of being driven without some sort of human directive, the improvement thus far has been rather astonishing. However, there is no reason to doubt that these cars are able t oprvent crashes,and alert the driver for when they need to take control over the wheel.Thse may be a few reasons why the cars are good for humans , but there are many other reasons why these cars are beneficial.\n\nSmart cars are benefifial to the growth of the economy. These driverless cars rely solely on technology, and technology is a great \"booster\" of the economy. The economy rose when the invention of the first smart phone entered the market, and the same thing can happen with a smart car. The text says, \" The cars he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus. He believes such cars would fundamentally change the world\"(1). The future of the smart cars could enhance the existing transportation system, which would cut down on the annul cost of running a bus station, train station, etc. Not only to mention, people may enjoy the cars even more than the existing ways of transportaion, because it is fascinating, and there will not be too many more people than there are seats. Also, gas is a crucial part of the economy, and reducing the use of gas intake would lead to more advancements in other areas of the economy. This could lead to the advancement in an artificial life form, or mind , or something along those lines.\n\nIn conclusion, smart cars are appearing to be a good addition to the transportation era. They will assisst the driver, alert the driver, and boost the economy. These are all things that are needed, becase too many crashes take place each day, and no one can be trusted when driving an automobile. The world needs a change and the economy needs\n\na crutch to lie on. There is no doubt that smart cars are able to do these things in every way possible. Even though there are some things that are not too particularly great about the smart cars, these cars have too many perks to just throw aside. Also, some people may not be interested in this type of change, but once they see the great things about these cars and check their driving history, they are sure to change their perspective. Although these carrs are not 100% available to all people, one day they will be and the world will be a much better place.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The universe is a weird place. It is filled with places no one fully understands. Exploring those places that people do not fully understand is important. The author support the idea of studying Venus well.\n\nThe author gives good reasons by talking about what we could gain. In the text the author writes, \"not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". This sentence from the article helps support the claim by telling us we would gain insight in the planet. The sentence also helps support the claim by telling us the exploration of Veus would also make us more curious about space which will help with exploring other planets.\n\nThe author gives us information that we have already learned about Venus. In the text the author writes, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth\". This sentence from the article helps support the claim by telling us information to help support why we should explore. The sentence also helps support the claim by telling that the planet could have been like earth a long time ago which shows it might be habitable if we can learn to control the dangers.\n\nThe positives outweigh the negatives. In the the text the author writes, \"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface\". This sentence helps support the claim by saying if Venus is so bad why are we trying to find ways to explore it. The sentence also helps support the claim by showing that there is a reason to explore Venus.\n\nThe idea of studying Venus was well supported by the author. Exploring those places that people do not fully understand is important. It is filled with places no one fully understands. The universe is a weird place.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Why are driverless cars a good idea and why are they a bad idea? I think driverless cars are both good and bad ideas. I think they are a good idea because they can be very helpful to people that have a certain type of disabilty. They help with the camera when you are backing out and have a sensor if you are getting close to something. Like in the BMW it has many different funtions in it. It alerts the human driver when a situation occurs and when there is an accident or work zones ahead. Thats when the driver has to take control of the vehicle. The car also has flashing lights on the windshield and other heads up displays.\n\nEven though many people like it, the question is if there was an accident who's fault would it be. I think it would be the car manufacturer's fault because they were made to be able to do all that stuff with all the technology in it. Even though everything has a problem with it, if it is a driverless car I think they should make sure it has zero problems with it before they let them go out for people to buy them. It cannot be the drivers fault because they are not driving it they are just sitting in the seat and are sipposed to be trusting the car.\n\nIn all thoughts i think the driverless car would be a great idea if it was guarenteed zero problems. Also even though it would be really expensive I think other car places should give them a try in the future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Just cause it looks like a face it does not mean there are aliens. When have there ever been real signs of aliens. Even if there where they would have shown themselves to astronuts. Honestly alien most likely would not be scared of us realelisticy.\n\nIf aliens where real they weapons and mind would probaly be more advanced. They would have to have made homes, spacecrafts and probably guns as well. Think about it it has to be a natural land form just look at the our worlds natural land forms. Im sure there are landformes that look like faces or objects somewhere. So it must be a landform that is the only way because aliens would have showed them selves by now it is just that simple.\n\nThe eyes where probly shadow on a rock that looks like a face and that probable the truth. Also its impossible for somthing to live with out oxygen and there are no trees meaning no oxegen. It also either really hot or really cold mening somthing would either over heat or if cold freeze and that is my argument.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think it's better to have a car because people that are driverless would get all lazy because they don't have to drive. People that needs to learn how to drive wouldn't be able to because they cars drives by itsself. People shouldn't be lazy to drive. Maybe one day when your in a hurry and the car you got is driving so slow that your going to be late to your appointment or whatever you going to. It would nice if they cars could tell them turn her or watch out or something like that. So the car can warn you guys incase of accendent.\n\nPeople should be responsible to drive theirselves to wherever they want to go. What if the car breaks down?? They won't have a way to go anywhere without it working. They would still have to buy the pieces or whatever to fix the car. if it was your own car you wouldn't even mind to buy the stuff you need because you know it's yours. Most people would be walking to places they need to go for the same reason of not having a car. The car could hurt the drivers. Safety is the most important thing in any car in the earth. People that drive with car be getting into acciedents imagine having cars that drives themselves. It would be worser for people. If the car goes to the other way where its not suppose to and get hit the person is the one that going to get the consequences for the cars action. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Remember how the cars in some movies could drive all by themselves? Have you ever thought that those cars could really exist in real life. Our lives. Well we might just be able to make that dream a reality.\n\nGoogle cofounder Sergey Brin says that he envisions a time in the future where our public transportation system is a fleet of driverless cars. Crazy right? But it's not as far fetched as it seems to be. We have already started working our way towards this idea many years ago.\n\nMany people think that this is a dream that can not be reached and that it only exists in the world of science-fiction. But these cars do exist! Google has had a car that could drive without a driver since 2009. But it can only drive independently under specific conditions. These cars from Google have driven over half a million miles without an accident. Granted they still aren't fully driverless but they are getting there.\n\nSome people think that having driverless cars on the roads would be very expensive and also dangerous. But the manufacturers have already thought about those problems.\n\nThe first thing many people are concerned about when it comes to driverless cars is the amount of safely these cars can offer. First of all they are not completely driverless just yet. Humans do have control over the car and they would require the driver to remian alert and ready to take over whenever the car can not drive on its own, like navigating on roads that are under constuction and around accidents. The car is programed to alert the driver if they are in a situation where the car can not drive on its own and requires the driver to take over.\n\nThere are also many new technologies that are being developed and that are developed that would be used to increase the safety of the cars. Like how the car will alert the driver by either flashing lights on the windshield to notify the driver that they should take over. Manufacturers are also considering to install cameras to the car. Some cars today have a feature that is similar to this already. Some of the newer models have a camera in the back of the car to help assist the driver with backing out of a driveway or a parking lot. Other cars have sensors in the front that will make the car automatically break if an object or person is in the way of the car. Remember that the already present safety features, such as seat belts and aribags, will not be taken away. But instead additional features will be added.\n\nPutting aside safety these driverless cars also have another advantage. When families go on long car trips or if they are going on vacation a driverless car would be really handy. The mom and or dad will not have to worry pulling all nighters to drive. They could essentially get some rest. The car would notify them if they need to take over.\n\nThis is also a way to make driving seem fun and not like a chore. Some manufacturers think that by bringing these cool new features they can make driving fun again. Another added bonus is that these cars can decrease the amount of accidents that are caused by teenagers and decrease the number of accidents in a whole. Sensory devices would alert the driver if something is coming ahead or if they are on their phones, the car would notify them when its time to pay attention to the road, granted the driver should always be looking at the road. In this way the in-car system can actually be considered as a safety feature.\n\nTesla has projected a release for a car that would be capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time in 2016. Many car companies such as Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan also plan to have cars that can drive by themselves by 2020. So it is a possibility to have or see such a car in our lifetime.\n\nIn the future people hope that one day what we see in science-fiction movies and books could be brought into our world. To make the driverless car a reality and not just something that some one imagined. Our world would be so much different with these new cars.There are many cars out there they are getting close to becoming driverless but none have made it all the way just yet. But we are slowly making our way to that goal. But with every new idea and invention we grow closer to our destination each day. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars should continue to be develop and made more efficiently. These cars will help keep the driver and it's passengers safe in the future if the manufacturers continue to test and develop these driverless cars. It is also important that the human race continues to advance in everything it can. As time goes on things will change and the human race will eventually be forced to evolve with it.\n\nDriverless cars have been around since 2009 accourding to the article. Google being one of the main benifactors has had their cars\n\ndrive \"more than half a million miles without a crash\"(para 2). These cars still have a human driver and the car is made to alert the drive when the car cannot do a funtion on it's own. For example if there was an accident to get around or roadwork the car would alert the driver. Google is still trying to change their driverless cars and make them even more safe for those who are in and or around the car.\n\nSafety is a huge issue with driverless cars and the manufacturers who make them have come to make safety one of their main priorities. Google changed a Toyota Prius by adding sensors all around the car. Theses sensors are placed in areas where the vehicle should be able to detect almost anything that goes by them between a certain range. So, it depends how close or farway an object is for the sensor to detect it. Google even added a \"dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings.\"(para 4).\n\nAll in all, the benifits of having a driverless car in our future would be neverending. If there were ways to reduce deaths due to car accidents or texting while driving then it should happen. Safety should be key when it comes to automated vehicles and the next step for safety with vehicles will be with using driverless cars. Driverless cars are the future and they will be what our next generation uses. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator, it is more favorable to keep the splendid method of the Electoral College and not to change it to election by popular vote for the United States President. The Electoral College method is more perferable because it helps to advoid run-off elections, and less numerical values.\n\nUsing the Electoral College to vote is more efficent because of it's aid to advoid run-off elections. As Richard A. Posner states,\" The Electoral College advoids the problem of elections in which no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.\" It also can help candidates running for president to advoid going to states that they know whose vote will have no effect. For example, Democrats in Texas and Republicans in California or how Nixon in 1968 and Clinton in 1992 both had only a 43% plurality of the popular votes while winning a majority in the electoral college. There isn't even any pressure for run-off elections when no candidate wins a majority vote that was cast leading to a clear winner.\n\nFurthermore, using the Electoral College to select the President can help to reduce numerical values. Even though a citizen's vote doesn't automatically go to the candidate running for office and actually selects the electors that will select the President, the amount of votes it reduced greatly. The Electoral College consists of 538 electors, rather than a estimate of 500 million votes total. Only a majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect a President. This includes one for each member in the House of Representatives and two for Senators. With most states having a winner-take-all system it even more so reduces the numerical value to that of just electors to vote for the winning presidential candidate while voters in toss-up states are more likely to pay closer attention to the campaign. Those voterss are more likely to be more thoughtful on average. They also receive the most information and attention from candidates.\n\nAlthough, some articles and people consider the Electoral College method to be unfair to voters. Bradford Plumer says,\"Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning.\" Even so, knowing their vote will have no effect, they will have kess incentive to pay attention to the campaign than they would if the president were to be picked by popular vote.\n\nContinuing, as was said before to the State Senator, it's a much more favorable idea to forward with the Electoral College method rather than popular vote because it will help advoid many time-consuming problems like run-off elections and high numerical values. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is on of the two closest planets to our planet Earth. Venus is the second closest planest to the sun but it about the same size as Earth. They say that there is a thick layer of 97% carbon dioxide. That is really bad for us to in take in to our bodies. Venus has an sulfuric acid atmosphereand the planet's temp avreage is 800 degrees fahrenheit. There are alot of different charcterstics with in Venus but nun of them good for human life. It has a really high pressure and heat there is alot of wad weather on Venus witch would make it impossibale to live on or try to put living things on that planet.\n\nVenus might have been an Earth like planet long ago. Its most likely had oceans and other bodies of water many many years ago. NASA sends their people there to go do some reasearch and gather new imformation. This new imformation will help us look at the changes on Venus from many many years ago to now. NASA keeps all the documents close to up to date and they check there reasearch more then once. They go back and document every little change that has happen on Venus and other planets as well.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Computers, we all like using computers it's one of the things more used around the world. Computers are use at work, school, home, hospitals and ect. Since computers are use so much around the world it's only right that people keep making new advance computers that can change the future. How advance can computers get.? Well by reding this article it shows the new level of computer that people have made.\n\nNew software from Prof. Thomas Huang, of the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Ilinois, working in collaboration with Prof. Nicu Sebe of the University of Amsterdam that can reed how you feel even do if you fake it. According with the article it says this new 3-D computer model of the face, all 44 major muscle in the model most move like a human muscle, so it can detect the feeling. They classified six basic emotions: happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness, and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles. This it's crazy it says if you not smiling right, like happy there a video imagery that recognition software tracks these facial movements in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa. Some times we have trouble describing the look in our friend face if they happy sad or ect., but Dr. Huang observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions.\n\nI personal think this is a bad ideal, becuase people feeling its very personal. Example\n\nif someone in your family die and you feel so sad put you don't want people to know about it and here comes a computer and detects your feeling and people going to start asking, \"oh hey, why are you so sad\" and that will make people more mad. I mean i could work sometimes like if you see a girl and the computer detects that she sad and need someone, you could go and try to make her happy and see if that changes something. I think a lot of people won't like it either because they think it's violationg their feelings. I think this computer will work if only used the right way, i mean for something good or to help people be happy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars should not be used by people in the near future.\n\nDriverless cars which are those cars could drive by themselves and take us wherever we desire. There are lots of benefits we can get by driving a driverless car, but there are still lots of concerns about the driverless cars. There are three main reasons that driverless cars should not be used. The technology, safety, and the responsibilities of owners and manufacturers.\n\nFrom the passage first we know is that even though Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009, but it is still not a driverless car. According to the passage,\"but so far, Google cars aren’t truly driverless; they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents.\" So it is saying that the this technology is not advanced enough for drivers. Even though they could reduce the mimic of the skill of a human but people still have to learn how to use this new technology. It is still a long way to go.\n\nSecond, safety is a big concern. Accroding to the passage,\"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars.\" We can see that it is a bid problem of how to test driverless cars. In the passage, the founder of the Google Car project said,\"“There was no way, before 2000, to make something interesting. The sensors weren’t there, the computers weren’t there, and the mapping wasn’t there.\" Cell phones and computers will not harm people even if they are not easy to use. But cars are difference, they are pretty much effect our safety. What if it have some problems happen? What if the driverless cars are not safety? Government have to consider those kind of questions.\n\nLast, who habve the responsibilities of the cars, as the question in the passage,\"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault—the driver or the manufacturer?\" Also it takes time to create new traffic laws, which the government need to pass the laws and test all of them.\n\nAs a result, driverless cars should not be used by peole because of the technology, safety problems and the responsibilities.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear, State Senator\n\nI have recently read articles about the electoral vote system currently in place in the united states.\n\nThe electoral vote system elects other people, called electors, to vote for the people. They basically vote for president, if you and many others vote for him/her. I believe the electoral vote system is glitchy, outdated, and confusing to some.\n\nThe electoral vote system can be manipulated and unfair. The electors can be choosen by state conventions, state central committees, and the candidates running for president. If the president can choose his electors, could'nt he replace the orignal electors for new ones that will guarantee a vote for him. The peoples vote would'nt matter. This situation happened in the two-thousand election when George W. Bush won the election with more indivisual votes than electoral votes. This violates our constitution which states, the government is controlled by the people and allows for change if enough people in the US want it. If you've ever noticed that during the presidential election, candidates don't come to certain states. In the electoral system, each state has a winner-take-all system. When the state goes over their electoral votes, the winner with the most electoral votes takes all of them, while the electoral votes of the opponent gets no votes toward him. This can cause mayhem, the non-counted votes can make a big diffrence in the election. In nineteen-seventy six their would have been a tie if 9,246 voters in Hawaii and Ohio voted the opposing side. The elections come close and without the popular vote which accounts for millions of people in America, we may have had better elections with less debates. The electoral college contains 538 electors, out of those 538 their only 270 are mandatory to vote. Each elector equals each member in your states House Of Represenatives and add two for the senate. California has a population of 35 million and wyoming has a population of 500,000. Wyoming having 5 electors and california having 55. This doese'nt make sense because if a state may have a higher population than wyoming but yet still have less electors. The system is very confusing in these ways causing some to vote for the wrong candidate and others thinking they are voting for the right candidate they believe is true .\n\nThe electoral votes are'nt the worst because we are still showing our democracy, showing off Americas greatnest in its government. The electoral vote crisis in two-thousand rarely happens. This situation has'nt happened since eightteen-eighty eight, its a rare occurance. Electoral votes also make the playing field even. If we had popular votes in place, then wouldnt the presidents have a landslide if they went to all the biggest populated states. The electoral votes can allow ties and close elections to happen instead of land slides in many elections.\n\nThe electoral votes should be replaced. Even so they even out the playing field and the occurence of rigged electoral votes happen, it still doese'nt make up for the both elections lost in eightteen-eighty eight and two thousand. If we dont change the electoral votes soon, the occurance of electoral vote sabotage will occur more often causing an unfair government to be in place. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You should join the Seagoing Cowboys. They are a great group of people who help others. Once you join you won't regret it, and you will fit right in. You will be able to help people, and you be able to see eveything around the world. You will be on the sea for weeks, but you will have enough food to survive. It may not be your type of job, but I got used to it. It will boost your awareness of what it is like in other countrys.\n\nI crossed the Atlantic sixteen times and I loved it because i saw a lot of the world. It teaches you to be greatful of what you have because a lot of countries don't have a lot. You will have a lot of dangerous jobs, but i believe you can do it. I had a adventures some were amazing and others were just to feed the animals. So you should come and try out for the Seagoing Cowboys.\n\nThere is a lot of fun you can have because i foun a lot of fun on the ship. After you give food and water away you fell good for helping. You have to turn sixteen to join the Seagoing Cowboys. Come and join the Cowboys im sure you will love it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article, \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" talks about a new technology and program that is being developed to help computers get an idea on human expressions and emotions. They've started by creating a 3D model and arranging the information based on muscle movement. However, one of the examples the articles brings up is the computers being used in a classroom full of students being able to change the way of learning style based on their expressions.\n\nI believe that using a computer to sense the mood by analyzing students' faces is not neccessary. Humans can detect emotions a lot better than a program can since we're a lot more used to seeing a constant use of emotions among everyone. \"We humans perform this same impressive \"calculation\" every day - For instance, you can probabaly tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" This quote shows that we can perfectly handle calculating an emtion by ourselves, so there would be no need to have a program do it aswell, even if they have a similar aspect.\n\nPeople all around the world have different emotions and displays on how they express themselves. There's a very large variety of them, and of course not everyone can know every single part of it at first, but we can quickly learn and get a good idea of them. \"The facial expressions for each emotion are universal, even though idividuals often show varying degress of expression... The software can even idetinfy mixed emotions.\" This quote shows that Dr. Huang is fully aware of the variety of expressions all around us, but it doesn't help the fact the even though some might be look happy, doesn't mean that they are; Since people look and express differently, nobody can 100% always pinpoint their exact emotion.\n\nAnd finally, teacher's, - especially expirenced ones - have a general idea how students are going to react. There's nothing new about the fact that a student might not be completely interested into or undestand a topic, and we all know that since we've all been there ourselves. \"A classroom computer could recongnize when a student is becoming confused or bored, it could modify the lesson\" This quote shows an example on how it could help a confused or bored student, however teachers make up activities like that all the time; Also it's very hard to be appealing to everyone since everyone is different and perfers a different learning style.\n\nSo in conclusion, we don't need to use a computer program to identify students' emotions. We can do everything that the computer program does all by ourselves and even analyze a lot more than what it could do. It's uneccessary to use this type of technology for such things that are small and can easily be fixed by ourselves. Everyone is different and prefers a different way of being taught, it can be hard for a program to be appealing to every single student in the classroom, so it's no different from a teacher. This program can be helpful in other events, but it's not needed in a school.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author, starts by talking about how Venus is part of our solar system and some facts about the planet. They try to support thier ideas on studying Venus as a worthy pursuit and dangers by first listing the similarities it has with our earth and then transitions toward thier topic. The author explains very well, many times by using examples and facts to support their idea about how Venus is a worthy pursuit in the scinece field, but at the same time they also counter with the many dangers that are eminent.\n\nFirst, the author describes the dangers with facts and statistics about Venus and the amosphere and how dangerous and harmful it is. Like in paragraph three, they stated \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide\" Which readers know is impossible for humans to survive under. Then they talk about the temperatures which is over 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The author does a really good job at then comparing the temperature on Venus with the temperature on earth by telling us that is is over 90 times greater than what is experienced on earth. Comparing is an effect way of making readers understand the difference and especially when it shows the numbers written all out. Then, they continue to support thier cause by talking about frequent natural disaster that cause havoc which some already excist on earth. This makes Venus looks so much more harmful and uninhabitable than it already did.\n\nLater in the passage, they transition to the benefits of studying about Venus and it is a somewhat smooth transition since the aurthor has already set up thier claim in paragraph two by stating plenty of similarities between the earth and Venus so readers can get and understanding of Venus. So in paragraph four, when the author entered, it was very smooth with a question on why the scientists even bothered and they countered by answering the question which helped support the authors overall claim. Another thing that shows how well the author has supported the idea of Venus worth studying is they list more similarities like in paragraph four they talk about how Venus had similar features like \"valleys, mountains, and craters.\" This gave readers a sense of imagery and later supports the imagery and landscape by giving a reason of why that is important like it is out nearest option for travel. This make the author sound much more credible.\n\nFinally, in the article, the author supports both of thier ideas by talking about NASA and thier ideas on the space travel. Paragraph five and six help explain why traveling to Venus is so hard, but still so worthwhile. They state, that it is diffcult by listing the extreme conditions even if they were to get close and still survive. Then in paragraph six they list the risks and the sample and different pictures they could have taken but the dangers were too high. This helps show readers the real limit and possiblity at the same time.\n\nTherfore, the author throughly explains thier idea and supported it very well with different techniques and different ways of explanation. The author has already done very well in adressing how traveling to Venus had its advantages but getting there and actually surviving the dangers is very hard. They did very well in explaining the dangers with facts and statistics. Then later also explained throughly with claims and backup information. This shows that this author was very prepared and supported thier idea exquisitely. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my opinion, you should become a Seagoing Cowboy. As a Seagoing Cowboy, you get to explore many new places such as the Atlanic Ocean, new places in the United Stated, and China. To cross the atlantic ocean from the eastern coast of the United States, it only takes around two weeks, and about a month to get to China.\n\nCaring for animals always kept me busy. They had to be fed and watered two or three times a day. Bales of hay and bags of oats had to be pulled up from the lower holds of the ship we were traveling on, and all of the stalls had to be cleaned. Helping out on my aunts farm helped prepare me for hard work, but not for all of the dangers of the sea. Takes my word for it, being a Seagoing Cowboy, was one of the best expiriences of my life, and I know you would enjoy doing it too. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article it talks a lot about emotional expressions and how the new software can tell if you mad or upset or happy or not. Technology can not read the emotional expessions of students in a classroom is valuable.\n\nIn the Making Mona Lisa Smile story they talk a lot about how the new software technology called the Facial Action Coding System. Tthey talk about how when somebody is upset or bored the new software technology would realize that you would be upset. In the Making Mona Lisa Smile story they also talked about how your facail expression. Your facial expressions would tell a lot more then what you would say like if your were to be mad or anything and you say that your not your face would say different. In the text it states that \"then it could modify the lesson , like an effective human instructor.\"\n\nIn the Making Mona Lisa Smile ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I joined the Seagoing Cowboys program. It allowed me to visit unique places I would have never visited with the salary I made. This all happened by my friend. The Seagoing Cowboys let me see the world. It was an adventure of a lifetime.\n\nYou should really join the program, because it's like you visited places people usually don't visit on a day-to-day basis. On the ship you can choose to do many jobs. I chose to have a job as a night watchman. The watchmen got to watch over the animals on the boat.\n\nOn the ship you an never get bored, because there are Table-tennis tournaments, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and games that helped pass time on the ship. I did some of these acitvites myself, I might add. After the animals were unloaded, it was the best time. We\n\nhad a lot of time on our hands. We also got to play some volleyball and baseball games in the homes where the animals had been housed.\n\nNot only do you get to travel the world, but you also get to help countries in need of supplies and other recources. \"We arrived August 14,\" There is this rush of excitement when I helped people get food and supplies for their families and communities. It is one of the best feelings ever known to humankind.\n\nThe UNRRA was hiring \"Seagoing Cowboys\" so Don and I signed up for this opportunity. I would never trade an expirence like this. It may take months to do this job, but it is all worth it. You can create a better world by doing this. I never knew about this untill a friend talked about this to me. His name was Don Reist.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author made a great point about how we should still or should study Venus. Even though it might be dangerous there is a goood reason why we should still study it. For example lets say you want to do a carreer that is about being a mechanic but you want to make your own car. what would you do to accomplish that? well of course you would study and even though it might be dangerous cause you might get shoked or might crash for a few times. Anyways back about Venus, Venus is a very very hot planet. We are still studying other planets like how they were made. Even though we still can't get stuff on Venus we can still study what things we could send to venus and again the stuff may not be able to survive or last long but it's a attempt we should try. In paragraph 5 says that NASA possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Vnus would allow scientist to float above the fray. Even though there is a problem there will always be a solution to a problem , just by studying can that be possible.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are many factors that makes Venus a very challenging planet for humans to study. Although Venus is the closest planet to Earth, there are many risks that have made it a very challenging place to examine more closely. Venus is the second planet from the sun which makes it very hard to achieve missions. All of the previous missions were unmanned because no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours. In the article \"The Challenging of Exploring Venus,\" the author supports his claim that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents by telling the reader about Venus's thick atmosphere, NASA's possible solution to Venus's hostile conditions, and all of the forms of light that it cannot penetrate.\n\nStudying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite a challenge it presents, like Venus's thick atmostphere. The planet's surface and the atmospheric pressure is much more greater than what people experience on Earth. The temperature is so much greater that it would crush a submarne. Paragraph 3 states, \"Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun.\" There are too many risks from this planet being the hottest planet in the solar system, for people to explore it. It wouldn't be safe for people to experience this incredibly hot planet.\n\nAnother challenge that studying Venus brings to the reader, is NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus. Vehicles would be hovering miles above the landscape to avoid the ground conditions by staying up and out of the way. Paragraph 5 states, \"At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth.\" It could be very dangerous with people many miles above the surface, along with the termpature very high. Although it's survivable for humans, it's still very dangerous.\n\nAnother challenge that studying Venus brings to the reader is all of the forms of light that it cannot penetrate. Since the light isn't penetrating the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography effectively, people only receive limited insite on ground conditions on Venus. People have to look at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet to even get a little bit of insight. Paragraph 6 says, \"Therefore, scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks.\" Since researchers can't take samples of things like gas, or rocks from a distance, they are working on innovations that would allow their machines to last long enought to help with their knowledge of Venus.\n\nStudying Venus has many challenges to go along with it. Although studying this planet is a worthy pursuit, some dangers were presented by telling the reader about Venus's thick atmosphere, NASA's possible solution to Venus's hostile conditions, and all of the forms of light that it cannot penetrate. Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system which makes it hard for people to explore it if the pressure is so high. Vehicles hover miles above the landscape to avoid the ground conditions by staying up and out of the way. Since it's so hard to get close the Venus because of its risks, people have to look at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet to even get a little bit of insight. Although there are many dangers that come with exploring Venus, people get so much out of the result if researchers get to exploring what they needed to, to inform the rest of the people. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is no secret that students of this generation tend to get bored too easily.\n\nThe current generation is used to constantly being around technology and mobile devices.\n\nWhen they are forced to sit down infont of teachers for multiple hours a day, their brains seem to drain and turn off.\n\nThey become uninterested and stop caring about their learning.\n\nThey do not allow themselves to learn at their maximum potential.\n\nAnother thing that happens is that teachers aren't able to detect if an individual student is lost or confused.\n\nSome sudents are too afraid to ask for help.\n\nDue to that, the students are left behind.\n\nTechnology that reads emotions could change all of that. Facial Action Coding System could change all of this.\n\nFACS could be beneficial for the future.\n\nFACS has the ability to determine how a student is feeling.\n\nFACS could determine if a student is either bored or confused during a lesson.\n\nThe machine can use this information to switch up the lesson\n\nto intrigue a student, but could also switch up the lesson to explain information in a more detailed way so a stuggling student can catch up.\n\nIn \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" paragraph 6 stated, \"\"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" Dr. Huang predicts. \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective instructor.\"\" In this statement Dr. Huang, the creator of FACS, stated that in the future the system could make the education environment more effective for students.\n\nStudents would be more intrigued and would understand a lesson much more.\n\nA Facial Action Coding System could only bring benefits to the future of education.\n\nA facial coding system would attract the interest of a student.\n\nStudent would no longer have to stay confused.\n\nStudents would get the help they need, and an interesting class that allows students to care for their education more.\n\nA computer that can detect a student's emotions holds excessive value.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People are lining up, waiting for hours on end to vote for a new president of the United States. That president won every single person's vote, but did not become presient. He did not become president because the ellectoral college voted for the other person. That is unfair because no matter what the citizens say, they are not even completly sure that the president they voted for was going to win. For example, in the year 2000, a little bit after Al Gore, they won the popular vote, but they did not win the presidency because they did not win the electoral vote, according to Source 2. Citizens of the United States should be allowed to a direct vote because in 2000, 60 percent of voters voted that they prefer a direct election, and because the voters are not voting for the president, they are voting for a slate of electors.\n\nTo begin, according to source 2, \"If you lived in Texas, for instance, and wanted to vote for John Kerry, you would vote for a slate of 34 Democratic electors pledged to Kerry. On the off-chance that those electors won statewide election, they would go to Congress and Kerry would get 34 electoral votes.\" This quote from Source 2 is explaining what your vote couts for when you go to elect for a president. Those electors are anyoen who doesn not own a public office. Who elects the electors is the state.\n\nIn addition, this year voters can expect another close election in which the popular vote winner could again lose the presidency and yet, the electoral college still has its defenders, states in source 2.\n\nAll in all, the electoral college is unfair to voters, because the winner takes it all system does not work in every state. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supported his idea very well. He explained how\n\nexploring Venus is going to be a challenge and why it is possible for it to happen.\n\nThe author said it is going to be a challenge because Venus atmosphere is dangerous. In paragraph 3 it say \"Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" It already sound challenging. Also the average temperture is over 800 degrees. That is inhabitable.\n\nThose aren't the only problems. To go further than the tempertures, it also has erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes.\n\nThe author question us. In paragraph 4 he ask \"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?\" He starts to explain how Venus was \"the most Earth-like planet our solar system.\" Then he stated \"what are the options for making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive?\"\n\nThe author say NASA has \"one particulary compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus.\" Have the scientists float above Venus. The author said \"Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape.\" The author starts to explain the benefits of them doing that. Then he gave some problems it could have with doing that idea. He also explained how the technology from the 1940s can help with this project.\n\nIn conclusion, the author did a very good job with this article. He gave details and supporting details to help us understand the article. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hello there, I'm Luke Bomberger, I was asked to recuild new members. I believe if your part of the Seagoing Cowboys you'll have the time of your life, come on now just take a look at me.\n\nI have crossed the Atlantic Ocean 16 times and Pacific Ocean twice before.\n\nIf you do not believe that you will have the time of your life then you will not believe all the beautful places or imagtheant. You may not want to come because you do not believe in what I say to be true. \"The cattle-boat trips were an unbelivable opptuntiy for a small-town boy\", like myself.\n\nThe fun bit is when you get to take care of the animals or when the animals had been unloaded and the space where the animals used to be are free, you can go there, and play games like baseball,volleyball, table-tennis, fancing, and boxing or read a good, nice (or not so nice)\n\nbooks.\n\nI rember that when I was a young boy, I used to work at my aunt's farm. I'm a hardworking person, that is not really used to the sea during my second trip. The effect that was caused me not being use to the sea was I had a job as a night watchman, I had to check on the animals every hour. Then one day I was doing my daily rottone when a storm hit and I lose my blance, I'm lucky that I'm okay thought.\n\nAt the end of my adventures I realise that I have learned so much about others and their ways of life. Thanks to Seagoing Cowboys I have done many good deeds, and my family host a number of international students and exchange visitors for some years and I do hope for many more to come. Thank you all for coming to the the indorceiner of the Seagoing Cowboys program!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You may think that the landform that resembles a human face is proof that there is alien life on Mars, but it actually does not prove anything. There are many reasons that the mesa could be there, and alien life is the least likely. Mesas are common around the area that the face was found, and recent pictures have proved that it is just a landform. Even taking the picture on a cloudless, sunny day proved nothing. It is simply a landform, and nothing more.\n\nYou might argue that it is unlikely that the landform is a mesa because it isn't natural, or that it looks unnatural. While it does look unnatrual, they are actually very common around the area that the face was found. Saying that it can't be a mesa because mesas aren't common simply isn't true. Cydonia has many mesas, the face included. There are plenty of mountains on Earth, and we all know that those aren't man-made. No one talks about one certain mountain that is man-made, while the rest aren't. Why should Mars be any different? They are all natural landforms, there isn't one that's just man made.\n\nYou may also argue that the first picture was taken on a day that was cloudy, or that the picture was unclear. You would be correct, which is why NASA went back eighteen years later and took the photo again on a cloudless, clear and sunny day. The picture was taken in summer, which is generally pretty cloudless in Mars. There was practically nothing that might obstruct the view of the \"face\", and what did we find? Nothing. We found a landform, just like we had found eighteen years earlier. There was nothing to obstruct the view. That means that when we did look and find nothing, that there was nothing there.\n\nYou still might not be convinced. You might say that we simply weren't close enough to find any strange alien markings, or that camera's quality wasn't good enough to see any of the strange alien markings, but that would also be correct. We took a picture of the mysterious \"face\" three times. Once in 1976, once in 1998, and finaly in 2001. Each time the picture was taken, the camera's quality was better. Each pixel in the 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to the 43 meters in the 1976 photo. With the image being that detailed, we would have been able to spot things as small as shacks next to the mysterious \"face\". We didn't, however. We found nothing except for the landmark, which proves that it is nothing more than an unusual landmark.\n\nIn conclusion, there is countless proof that the \"face\" on Mars is nothing more than an unusal mesa. Mesas are common in Cydonia, which is where the landmark was spotted. We have taken three photos, the quality better with each, and each time nothing other than the landmark was spotted. We even went back to take the photo on a cloudless, clear and sunny day with our best camera yet, and we still found nothing. That is all the proof that I need, and it's all the proof you need. There is nothing on Mars other than an unusual landmark, that happens to look like a face. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nI am in favor of changing to election by popular vote for the president of the United States and I know I'm not alone on this one. \"Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the AFL-CIO all, in their life time agreed on? Answer: Abolishing the electorial college!\" That's not enough well, \"Over 60 percent of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now.\" 60 percent is more than a half, now it says over 60 percent which would be past 60 percent. Remember the disaster factor , it is unfair to voters, and what if there is a tie in the electoral vote.\n\nFirst of all, lets just take it into thought that it is unfair to voters. How? Well, \"Beacuse of the system winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance in winning, focusing only on the tight races in the \"swing\" state.\" In 2000, the campaign that was going on, well 17 states did not see the candidates at all. Also, including Rhode Island and South Carolina. What about the fact that, \"Voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad.\" Not even one. Some might say that it doesn't matter if they have a campaign ad or not, believe me, I've heard it before. Having a campiagn ad shows people what you want to do, how you want to help, how you want to make a change, ect... I don't understand how unfair it can be to people.\n\nSecond of all, what would happen if there was a tie in the electoral vote? Well then, the election would be passed to the House Of Representatives, state delegation vote on the president. \"Because each state casts only one vote, the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represnt 35 million voters.\" The election is only a few swing voters away from catastrophe.\n\nThird of all, lets just go back to memory lane and revisit the\n\nDisaster Factor . This was the single best argument against the electoral college. \"The Americans people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century;the system allows for much worse.\" State legislatures are technically responsible for picking electors. \"In the same vein, \"faithless\" electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please....\" Want that to happen again now?\n\nThank you for reading and understanding my point. You have an opinion and I respect that, but I also have one too. Sometimes they just need to be heard. So lets just say that it s unfair to voters, there could be a tie, and lets not forget the Disaster Factor. \"The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. Have a good day.\n\nThank you for your time. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many peeple own a car and later one more will but the car usage is limited. Some familys just want two or three cars or the insucre dont want the same people having to many cars on their name because it can caused a problem. A car owner iwll buy a space for $40,000 just for it car or cars\n\nIn the world like 70% of the families dont own a car at least not even one. And at least 57% sold a car to move somewhere because they need the money. In paris 4,000 drivers where fined with a 22-euro fine($31) because they had old lisnce plates and they had thier car impount because of the way they reacted to the fine. In the U.S.A had a uniqiu car culture because it buiold the model-t car in detriot\n\nBut in April 2005 had low milages meaning not many people used cas that much or didnt own that much cars but in April 2013 the number of miles was increased by 9% and that nine percent is getting bigger and bigger because we are now having teenagers owning their lelinces and they will want a car for them selfs. So this will take the 9% even higher each year ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of driverless cars is a very innovative and good thing, because these cars are better for the environment, they help the driver out, so that the full responsibility of driving doesn't lay on the driver, and because they are so advanced that they can help prevent accidents.\n\nThese cars are very innovative and a positive thing, because these cars use half of the gas that all the cars use in our modern world. And this is something positive because the less fuel we use, the less we hurt our environment.\"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today’s taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" This quote is showing how the less use of these fuels will be an overall better change for the world.\n\nThese cars are very innovative and a great thing, because even if the driver will still need to remain focused on the road in case of anything that the car can't sensor, the cars still handle most of the driving and this can help the driver because they won't be as prone to have accidents as before, because the responsibility of driving all the way isn't on them. \"The car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel. In fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" This quote shows how the car isn't completely driverless, and that both the cars and the humans can drive themselves, but when the computer needs the human to do something it will let them drive, and when the human needs the car to drive, it will go on it's own. This is a good thing because both the humans and the car will play a role in driving.\n\nThese cars are also an innovative and good thing, because they have sensors which are built within them, that can help prevent accidents from happening when either the human or the car is driving itself. \"For starters, they needed a whole lot of sensors. Google’s modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor. The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car’s surroundings. The combination of all this input is necessary for the driverless car to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel.\" This quote is showing how the cars are made totally prepared to fight and help prevent accidents. This is such a good thing because the car is constantly updating what is around it so that neither humans nor the cars are damaged while driving. This is also good because if more people begin using these cars, then there would be much less accidents.\n\nIn conclusion, I feel like these cars are such a great thing, and that they are a much more progressive invention, and that these cars will help in the progression of society, and there will be less accidents, easier driving and of course, the environment wouldn't be taking in as much harsh fuels. Even though in the rare case of an accident in these cars, the blame will be put on the humans, these cars are still a great thing, and I think this would be a great move if the world started using these cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think the Face is a natural landform because there really no such thing as a aliens or aliens creating a face on Mars. I seen in the article that the Face was form by a a huge rock formation. I agree with Michael because i would do the same thing try to take more picture to see if it's a real natural landform and show it on the a web site showing people that it's really is a natural landform and it's just not a alien monument.\n\nThe Face is a natural landform because before some people think it's aliens creating the face. The scienctists found out that it's have to be another Martin mesa around Cydonia showing a shadows that could look like Egyptian Pharaoh when they were at the Face. They noted that the face was a huge rock formation showing a human head with eyes, nose, and mouth. The second time they look at it they was discovering a picture they took and the picture of 1976 picture and say that it's grow 1.56 meters. They also noted that the digital image 3 times was bigger than pixel size.\n\nThe conclusion of the Face of Mars is that the Face is just natural landform and not something aliens created. It's was formed by a huge rock formation and rock come from land or Earth. In the article they cluely said that the Face is a landforn that was a Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa landform common around the west of American. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "venus ,sometimes is called the \"Evening star,\" is one of the brightes points of the light in the night sky\n\nmaking it simplee for\n\neven on amateur stargazers to spot. often referred ro as Earth's \"twin\n\nvenus is the clostes planet to earth in trems of density and size and occasionaly the closest in distance too.i think the atmospear of almost 97 precent of carbin dioxide blankets venus even more challenging\n\nare the clouds of hilighy.\n\nCorrosive sulfuric acid in venus apmospear\n\non the planets surface it is the largest p;anet on the earths surface int the title wave in the summer it is the best thing that have ever happednt o the world andf then they also thougght they would fly over it multapl time just to make surtin people mad and then they azll have the best bound that cna never be broken and then they all fight and start A war that still has not ended at all this year is 2019 my nan passed away for fighing in the war and bc of the venus mcfly trap and then they also had the parts of the thing that they made\n\nif our sisters planet is so inhopsitable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral College is a easy, yet hard way of a candidate becoming the President of the United States. The Electoral college was created by how ever many majority of the electoral votes will become the new president. This brings many issues within the U.S. . The popularity vote does not matter in a situation like this and is not likely relied on to decide who the president will be. The Electoral College is not right, it's unfair, and is very controversial. The argument though is that with the Electoral College the votes which are dominant have a better chance of the two nominees not having the same amount of votes rather than if it was relied on by the popularity votes. This still though does not resolve nor question that the Electoral College needs to be replaced.\n\nInitially, the Electoral College is not right at all. The electoral votes in the U.S. combined throughout all the states equals 538 votes. Popularity votes which are votes that have an advantage of the election are more than tens of thousands if not more. This is an example on how the Electoral College works. An example of this is in the source by \"Reasons to keep our despised method of chooosing the President\" it states, \" Nixon in 1968 and Clinton in 1992 both had only 42 percent of the popularity vote but won through the electoral votes because they had bigger states voting for them making them win that election\". This shows how the Electoral College is not right and should reverse the value of electoral and popularity voting(Poshner, 22).\n\nAdditionally, the Electoral College voting is very unfair because many sources giving have shown to people that many candidates have had less popularity vote but have won through the majority of the electoral votes. This is unfair because popularity votes mean popularity votes which are votes that are of the majority of all votes. Unfortunately, the popularity votes do not count. As said in the source \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" it states, \" if you wanted to vote for John Kerry and you lived in Texas the vote would go to 34 Democratic electors that pledged to Kerry\". This is why popularity vote should be the deciding factor of who becomes the next President. If every election would be based on popularity vote the candidate won each of those elections would probably all change due to the fact that so many elections have won based on electoral vote(Plumer,10).\n\nTo end with, the Electoral College is so controversial. Out of more than two hundred years of elections many have been close and many have been a mile away from each other. The electoral vote decides it all though. The main problem with this process is how it is set-up. The electoral vote is dominent over the popular vote, but it shouldnt be. The electoral vote has made bad decisions yet good decisions throughout the hundreds of years its been around and the main reasin for electoral votes are to keep the candidates running not have the same number of votes so that they won't have to have another election and voting cast. \"It is also really controversial since the voting also might rely on the political party that the candidate is running for\", as stated by \"What is the Electoral College\". This Electoral College seems to go by how big the state is, the bigger the state the more electoral votes that state has; the smaller the state the less electoral votes that that state has(Federal Register, 5).\n\nIn conclusion, the Electoral College is unaccurate, lazy, unreasonable, yet successful. This process by many sources of evidence have concluded that there are in fact many holes in this system. Yet some sources have proved how the Electoral College has helped decide the outcomes and have stopped run-off elections. The Electoral College is unfair, not right and controversial and has also proved that it has pros to all these cons as well. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The aouthor want to know is in venus people can live ove there. The sientificts try to probe maybe in years the humans can live there like marth they do\n\nquiz with robots they send camaras to take pictures for see how is ove there. The NASA do a lot spedittions to marth but no to much too venus and venus are one of the most big planets in the solar system. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is the organisation them work in all about space.\n\nNASA is working to make a bettter oportunitys to know more about venus they send robots to venus or marth and the moom too. they make a better oportunitys to study venus, for example they simpilified electronics, A thick atmospere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus the conditions are so far more extrteme then anything humans can resest is different the encounter on Earth.\n\nThe environment of venus is so different then the Earth is a many sustans contaminate or can be radioactic for the reason the NASA do expedition to venus for see how look like venus, to take simbiontecs or just taste the environment. These devices were first envisioned in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940 during the World Ward II. By comparison, systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces.\n\nThe NASA wnat to make more experimrnt with people but they not are there yet because can be dangers or like anyone wanna go to venus if they don't know if is save or if is dangers for they judt experiment with robots right now just with robots for now. They stell doind more test sending more robots for do more test for know if can Humans live in venus or in can people go for do experiment with the environment. They go more to the moom but they start goint to othe planets for know more about if Humans can live in other planets so basically that's what NASA wanna do it study planets. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is the second planet from the sun and is very dangerous to explore because of its characteristics. In the article The Challenge of Exploring Venus the author does a good job at describing the challenges NASA would face and how exploring Venus could lead to break throughs in science and space exploration.\n\nIn the article the authors states many challenges NASA would face and how if they were successful it could lead to the exploration of other planets. In the article the authors reason to explore Venus is \" human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" The author is trying to explain to the reader that this could be the first step to space exploration and could lead to the exploration of the rest of our solar system. A mission to Venus would also lead to great break throughs in science. The new information and data found from collecting rocks and other materials on Venus could benefit many lives back on Earth. Exploring Venus would also create new understandings of science and physics and help scientist understand how different properties work with each other. This could lead to new medicines that could save lives all around world and could also lead to new technology that wold benefit humanity as a whole. New elements would be found which could also benefit humanity.\n\nExploring Venus could create new break throughs in science and the understanding of science. This could be a great use when developing new technologies that could benefit Earth and could lead to the exploration of other planets and even nearby solar systems.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.