Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Is it an aliens face or is it not an alien face. I am here to tell you its not an aliens face. I'm a NASA worker here to tell you multiple things that it can not be an alien. I will explain to you why it's not an alien. What the face on Mars could possibly be besides an allien. What the artifact is made of, and how I've showed you how it is not real.\n\nThere is multiple ways this item is not an alien. One way is in the picture of the artifact is a face like form. Many people think that the aliens have strange faces. Another thing is why, would an alien be inside mars. The way the artifact is coming out of mars the alien couldn't have fallen and face planted. The artifacts face also looks farley close to a humans face.\n\nWell there are many things the artifact could be. One could be is there is a rock coming out of mars that has a face like form. Another thing is that gases could be trapped and pushing it out and have that shape. What if it is like a hill and somthing happened to it. The rover on mars could have possibly done the face look. There are many diffrent things it can be.\n\nThe artifact maybe made of many diffrent things. One I'm sure is the sand like material on mars. Another is probably rock formations that have formed on mars. Carvings out of mars have things to do with it I'm sure. I'm sure it had help from gases to help it. There are multiple things that it could be made up of.\n\nHave I got you to think it is not an alien. Yes some, but some no, which is possible with humans. Some people are going to think yes it is real. Then some of you after hearing the pros and cons are rethinking it. People coming her said that they weren't going to change there mind its true. Which people are diffrent in allways and they are diffrent with thinking to.\n\nWell know I have given you pros and cons on which it is. We talked about why I think it is not an alien.\n\nWhat the artifact could possibly be on Mars. What the artifact is made of which is multiple things. Then we decided who thinks it is still an alien and who thinks it is not. We may never know what it actually was but we will be researching this for awhile.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author of \"The Challenge of Exploering Venus,\"\n\nsupports the idea of studying Venus really well. By giving strong evidence it even makes me want to explore Venus. The author is very compelling in he or she's argument that we should explore Venus.\n\nThe evidence in this article is very factual. For example the author states how the conditions of venus are suvivable but not easy to live in. Then the author backs it up with evidence from scientist and NASA. Also the dangers of pursuing this mission could be deadly. In which at that point is it worth it. decideing that is very challenging. Knowing that Venus has harsh conditions and having hotest suface in our solor system ,dispite Mars being closer to the sun, it is still dangerous for us. The author also states that we couldn't take photo's of this voyage if it every happens. So we couldn't prepare people or children of the suvear conditions of this planet.\n\nIn conclusion I think that the auther did a fantastic job supporting he or she's claim. Their is some spots that I would like some type of solution to like the photography. In this article the author was on the ball with evidence and support.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1/26/15\n\nDear state senator,\n\nI want to take the time to speak my mind and said whats wrong with the clectoral college. The electoral college is a process, not a place that what i've read. The founding fathers established it in the constitution between election of the president by a vote in congress and election of the president by a popular vote of qualified citizen. The electoral college consists of 538 elctors. a majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the president. each candidate running for president in your state has his or her own group of electors.\n\nUnder the electoral collage system, votets vote not for the prisident, but for slate of elector who there elect the presient. the single best argument against the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor. the amercan people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest electoin crisis in a century. consider that state legislatures are technically resonsible for picking electors and those electors could always defy the will of the people. each state casts only one vote, the single representative from wyoming, representing 500,000 voters,would have as much say 55 representatives from california, who represent 35 millon votes. that many voters vote one party for president and another for congress.\n\nthe electoral college is widely regarded as an anachronism, a non-democratic method of selecting a president taht ought to be overruled by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular votes the winner. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are a great invention and they should be allowed. Driverless cars are going to be the future so lets just face it and let it happen. If the cars haven't gotten into any wrecks with over half a million miles drove I would rather take my chances on that then humans trying to drive because humans cause mistakes all the time and there is nothing we can do about it. Granted they are not truly driverless, but they can still alert the human in the car when they need to take over and when they need to be paying attention to the road. Here is why they should be allowed: they are safe and haven't got into any wrecks with drving more then half a million miles, when they can't handle or navigate through a situation they turn it over to human control, and this is going to be future.\n\nIf the cars haven't got into an wrecks with over half a million miles drove then the chances of them getting into wrecks is going to be very slim. People would much rather take their chances on them driving without wrecking then a human driving and getting into a wreck and taking someones life. It is just a lot safer that way. They have so many sensors and cameras on them that the car itself knows practically everything that is going on around it. The car itself will be capable of making sure the person in the driving seat is always paying attention to the road also, so that if there is a situation where the human needs to take control of the vehicle they can do so. Another positive to this is that the cars will use half of the gas of today's taxis and will be far more flexible than a bus. If the cars are capable of knowing whether the person in the driver seat is paying attention; then they are very capable of knowing what is going on while navigating the roads.\n\nThe cars on capable of knowing when to turn the car back over to human control, which is very good because the cars won't be able to handle every situation because they are just computers. When the cars come up onto construction or a wreck they can turn it over to human control. This is one of the best features because the cars won't be able to know what they should do or where to go to stay out of harms way. Some in certain situations it is very smart to allow human control. The cars are even capable of allowing the person to know when to take control of the vehicle and get it through situations. The seats can vibrate to allow the human in the car to know when to take control or the car itself can announce when the human needs to take control. The cars can even light up or have flashing lights to get the attention of the human in the car. So while the driver watches the road, the car can watch the driver.\n\nThis is future of how cars will be. If the cars have got into less wrecks driving more then half a million miles than a person has driving a quarter of a million miles; I don't see why someone would want to argue the safety of them. Obviously the car itself is more capable of being safe than humans can. This is the future of how cars will be so why fight it? I don't see a reason to fight it. If the cars caused a lot of wrecks or were in a lot of wrecks I would see a reason to fight it, but they haven't been in any wrecks. It's the future and if it's meant to happen it's going to happen.\n\nThe cars should be allowed because they are safe and haven't got into any wrecks, when they can't handle or navigate a situation they turn it over to human control, and this is going to be future. The cars haven't gotten into any wrecks driving more then over half a million miles, so obviously they are very safe. When the cars can't handle a situation they turn it over to human control so they can navigate through the situation. This is going to be the future of cars and they are obviously more safe than humans driving themselves. So I agree that the cars should be allowed. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Being a Seagoing Cowboy is fun! My friend Don Reist invited me to go to Europe in a cattle boat. It sounded fun, the chance to travel around the world and go see places I've dreamed about. I mean how could you pass up an offer like that? So, of couse I said yes. It was 1945, World War II had just ended in Europe, and countries needed help recovering from the war. To help these countries recover more than 44 countries joined together to make the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration or the UNRRA. This program hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" (that's what I was) to take care of the horses, young cows, and mules while the animals were on the ship. Don and I signed up of couse it sounded fun, and I had helped my Aunt Katie on her farm when I was a boy so I has some exspirence. Finally we received our orders to report to New Orleans, I couldn't wait to go out and help people. We had arrived on August 14, that's the day the Pacific war had ended. When we got our seaman's papers we boarded to SS Charles W. Wooster, we were heading to Greece, I was so excited. In cargo we had 335 horses plus enough oats and hay to feed of the horses.\n\nI had turned 18 before I had arrivede at Gresse, so that meant I could be drafted for military service, but when my draft board had leanred I was on a cattle-boat trip be just told me to keep doing what I was doing. In the service you help people and help to fight for your country and if he told me to keep doing what I was doing that means I'm doing something that is going to help people in a big way. The cargo is going to help feed people in need because of the war destroying their food supplies. Not only did I help people, I also got to see Europe and China. Seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special. Also taking a Gondola ride in Venice, Italy was amazing too! The city with streets of water was beautiful. I also go to tour an excavated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on my way to China.\n\nOn theses trips I got to meet new people and see new places. I got to help people in need, and that felt good. It feels good when you see someone that's suffering because their home was destroyed and when you help them they have a smile on their face. Taking care of the cattle, horses, and mules was fun. We also found the time to have fun on board, especially on the return trips after all the animals had been unloaded. Us cowboys played baseball and volleyball in the empty hold where the animals were housed. We had table-tennis tournaments, boxing, reading, fencing, whittling, and games aslo helped us pass the time.\n\nThere are so many opertunities when you're a Seagoing Cowboy. \"It opened up the world to me.\" \"It made me more aware of people in other countries and their needs.\" I took an offer of a life time, and you should too! Most importantly to me I know I helped people and I made a difference!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The driverless car is an idea that has been in circulation for as long as 60 years. It should be known that so far, there is no such thing as a fully driverless car, just one that only requires little assistance from the driver. Driverless cars can prevent accidents from distractions, get better gas mileage, and can keep the driver safe from other obstacles. Driverless cars should be put on the roads.\n\nA driverless car can help reduce traffic accidents. In 2015, there were nearly 35,000 crashes due to texting and driving. In a nation where we are always connected to what is going on, texting and driving has become an issue. A driverless car can prevent many of those 35,000 crashes by allerting the driver of an obstacle or a potential situation that could cause an accident. The text states, \"... All [smart cars] are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills...\" In a world full of distractions accidents are nearly inevitable, but with a smart, driverless car, many of those accidents can be prevented.\n\nNot only can driverless cars prevent texting and driving car accidents, but they can prevent drunk driving accidents. In 2015, there were nearlt 45,000 accidents in America alone due to driving while intoxicated. In those 45,000 accidents, there were nearly 40,000 deaths. A smart, driverless car can prevents these accidents from both the intoxicated and sober drivers. The text states, \"This necessitates the car being ready to quickly get the driver's attention whenever a problem occurs.\" This could help if a drunk driver were driving recklessly, then a sober driver could be warned of the obstacle and take precautionary measures. The smart, driverless car does not encourage drunk driving, but can keep other sober drivers on the road safe if it does happen.\n\nDriverless cars also are said to have increased gas mileage. THe text states, \"The car he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis...\" Scientists have proven that climate change is real. Niel Offman, a scientist at The British Institute of Science and Technology, said, \"Temperatures in the 21st century are an average one degree celcius higher than in 1950. Once cause is the added carbon emmissons in the atmosphere.\" The carbon emissions are caused by cars and natural gas powered machines. If a driverless car can cause less carbon emissions, then it has the potential to slow climate change. Slowing climate change can have many effects including decreased loss of habitat and less extinction of animals. Since driverless cars can have better gas mileage, then that would mean a decrease in carbon emissions and a growth retardant to climate change.\n\nA smart, driverless car can change the safety of the nation. Driverless cars can prevent the accidents from distracted driving such as texting and driving, and they can also keep the driver of the smart car safe by notifications of obstacles and problems such as drunk drivers. Smart, driverless cars also have the potential to change the worls through less carbon emissions with better gas mileage. Smart, driverless cars would benefit this nation if they were incorporated into the daily lives of the American citizen.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear, Senator\n\nI'am a conserend voter that belives you should represent the people of your party and should apose the electoral college. It causes an unnecissary complication for voting for who will represent the face of the best country on earth. We the people do not want to get the wrong president to represent the majority of the population. The chances of an indefined out come through electoral college may be low but when it comes down to the presidency nothing should be left to chance.\n\nThe voters should know how the system of voting for president. They are the ones that deside so they should know how there vote can be used to have the greatest affect. Bradford Plumer states \"voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate...sometimes\". A democracy is when the people deside the destiny of there country. For them not to know what there chosing takes power out of the hands of the people.\n\nThe Winner-takes-all system is ok when your on the playground as a childs it does not work in the real world. This system creates Swing States. Acording to Richard A. Posner \"method of awarding electoral votes induces the candidates to focuse their campaign efforts on the toss-up sates\". This draws attention away from other states. Bradford Plumer explanes that \"During the 2000 campaign, seventeen sates didn't see the candidates at all\". He also clames \"puting the fate of the presidency in the hands of a few swing voters in ohio\". This is not right each vote should be just as important as anyother and no state should be the desiding outcome in an election.\n\nChance is a crazy thing. If there is a chance of something happening and it's given time it will happen. A number of weird outcomes can happen with electoral college. One outcome is the posibility of having a tie. Richard A. Posner explains\"A tie in the nationwide electoral vote is possible because the total number of votes-538- is an even number\". If a tie happens the represenetives vote for the people and because each state has one vote per electoral college...\"55 representatives from california, who represent 35 millon voters.\". Second posible out come is the majority vote goes to one canadite and the electoral college goes to the other. For example Bradford Plumer wrote\"This year voters can expect another close election in which the popular vote winner could again lose the presidency.\" These are just two of the odd outcomes of electoral colleges could cause.\n\nElectoral college don't solve problems but creat them. The best way to put it is this...\"It's official: The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. The best arguments in favor of it are most assertions without much basis in reality. And the arguments against direct elections are spurious at best.\"~(Bradford Plumer)~ ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wondered how close the world is to having a transportation sytem where human error is a minimal factor? According to the article 'Driverless Cars Are Coming' the possibility of this might be sooner than expected. Google has been developing driverless cars since 2009 and as they have had time to research and imporve their technology, the idea of driverless cars becoming a mainstream way of travel seems more and more feasable. Even though there are a load of issues that come up when the term driverless car is used, I believe that if executed correctly, this system could be very beneficial to people and to the enviroment.\n\nOne of the main reasons I am in favor of driverless cars is that they could bring deadly accidents and careless driving to a minimal. The article states that if car companies were to mass produce these cars, one of the first things they would do is add in a heads up display and possibly entertainment systems so while waiting your turn to drive. This can stop people from texting and being on their phones while driving and not paying attention to the road. Additionally, having an intelligent artificial intelligence driving the car for the most part would make it much more difficult for accidents to occur and would make driving a much more safer, enjoyable experience.\n\nDriving is a very important part of day to day life and making a large fundamental change to that seems like a daunting task at first. There is a way to approach this idea of driverless cars however and by making it an enjoyable, safe experience, it is certainly possible to get people to catch on and to make it a mainstream way of travel. Driverless cars are still a work in progress however as they progess and our technology advances some day soon there might be cars that drive themselves while we sit and enjoy the ride. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless cars are coming\". I thought that its a great idea to make driverless cars. The reasons are pubic transportation systems, could improve roads, and makes it safer for drivers. Thats why I think they they should develope self driving cars.\n\nTransportatation for people is really critacl because they need to get places fast and in a safe way. The cars would use half the fuel of today's taxis and flexibilty than a bus said the aricle on the fisrt paragh. Which leads to the point in where\n\nsafer transportsion means there should be safer roads.\n\nSafer roads is one of the biggest things the world should have. In the 3rd pragrah its says, \"the track was embedded with an electrical cable that sent radio signals to a reciver on the front end of the car.\" What this is saying is that if the roads would be contraled by people , but the people would be contraling the cars so they can navagate in where the care would be going. Then if we navagate the car it means we can make the driver safe.\n\nKeeping the driver safe is a really good thing to do. To do this is by having alot of sensors in the car and also out side of the car. In paragrah number 7 in the articel it says, \" they can steer, acclerate, and brake themselves, but all are disinged to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skilles, such as navigating through work zones. What this means is that humans driver have to be alerted to take over. This is a good thing becasue we could add another sensor which can navagate threw work zones so that the drive does not have to crash.\n\nFinally, I think that drivless cars should be around the world so that people would get to places faster and be much safer and not crush and get sude by other people. Also, I hope that other states in america are able to pass the law for self driving cars to take place. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Understanding the exact emotion of a human being is a giant leap for the science community, and I say that we should use this technology in classrooms. The relationship between students and teachers is strong, but how does a teacher know that a student is paying attention or just lying to try and end the discussion sooner? Student faces are hard to understand by just simply looking at them, some could look bored but are actually paying attention or the opposite could be happening. Using such technology could improve the understanding of student reactions, such as helping the teacher know when to modify the lesson for the student to better understand, and it could even improve the learning of future doctors and surgeons taking medical classes.\n\nLessons in certain classes can be very difficult for every student to understand. Some are fast learners and catch on before others, others might need the lesson to slow down just to get a grasp on what is really being taught. Using the Facial Action Coding System could really improve the understanding in teachers of who really gets the lesson and can continue and who doesn't understand and just really needs more help. As mentioned in paragraph 6 by Dr. Huang, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored... Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" Schools around the world are using technology more and more every day, so installing such a system to help understand confusion and boredom could be very useful for schools everywhere.\n\nDoctors and surgeons need to know as much as they can gather from the human body, in which they learn all they know in classrooms. Having this system in classrooms could inprove the future of the medical field, starting by understanding which muscles control a body part and how the body reacts. Students taking these classes can use the program to learn how the face modifies itself to show emotions, from joy to sadness. As mentioned in paragraph 5, even artists such as da Vinci used anatomy to create art by studying how the face moves and shows emotion. Using this program can help doctors expan their knowledge of human anatomy rise to the next level.\n\nEveryday, people use their emotions to express how they feel,and using that in the classroom can really improve relationships between the peers. Explained in paragraph 5 once again, humans use calculations to figure out how a friend is feeling, but we can't tell the exact muscle causing that emotion. Using such a system can improve relationships between friends and help people have a better understanding of how a person really feels.\n\nHuman emotions are difficult to understand all over the globe, but using this program in simple places such as the classroom can improve the atmosphere and make learning topics a breeze. Teachers could better understand how a student is reacting to a lesson and modify their teaching methods so everyone can understand. Students trying to get a medical degree can use the program to understand which muscles are used without having to disect a person or take years to learn something that can be found out in mere minutes. Understanding others can improve the world of emotions, even if it just starts in a classroom.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Seagoing Cowboys Program\n\n\" I need a job. But I don't know what I want to do.\" Come join a program.\n\nThereis a\n\nprogram that is called the Seagoing Cowboys program. This passage will tell you what the Seagoing Cowboy program is, and what you could do if you joined.\n\nIf you like animals, or just want a job. Come join the Seagoing Cowboy program. What we do is take care of animals that were shipped over seas. Some of those animals were cows, horses, and mules.That means that you would have to go overseas, but you would aslo get to go to the most amazing places in the world. Including Greece, Europe, China, Crete, and Italy! Not only do you get to go there, but you would get to see the Acropolis in Greece, get a tour of the castle in Crete, and take a gondola ride in Venice, Italy. You would aslo go on the Atlanic Ocean and also get to expeirence cool things.\n\nI don't know about you, but ever since I have started this program I have had so much fun! I was working at a grocery store and a bank, but now I do the best program anybody could ask for. I love it and you would to if you would like to join! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Possibility of Exploration on Venus\n\nIn the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author explains the research done about Venus, and possible exploration to this neighboring planet of ours. Throughout the entirety of this article, the author gives thorough reasoning in explaining why the risks are worth this exploration to Venus.\n\nVenus is one of our neighboring planets along with Mars. Venus is closer to the sun. We have had the chance to send many spacecrafts to some parts of our solar system; the moon, mars, in Earth's atmosphere. We have attempted to send some in the direction of Venus. But because of the extreme weather on the planet, no spacecraft has lasted more than a few hours on the planet. This planet has harsher storms, burning heat, and lightning has struck the space craft some times now, it seems like the planet just does't want to be explored.\n\nVenus's climate is very harsh compared to the climate here on Earth. With the planet's surface tempurature at an average of 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the pressure is 90 times greater. It could crush a submarine, even one that could sustain the pressure of going all the way to the bottom of the ocean. If the sub was strong enough to sustain the pressure, it would still most likely be melted by the heat. Besides the climate and pressure, there is also the thick atmosphere containing almost 97 percent of carbon dioxide. Plus the clouds of highly currosive sulfuric acid.\n\nAstronomers are really pushing this exploration because it is believed that Venus was once an Earth, filled with large oceans and has sustained life. It seems there have been signs of rocky sediments in the surface, along with valleys, mountain ranges, and craters. This is quite a motivation for astronomers to find out if there was once a planet out there, just like us, that once sustained life, and could still be a possibility of life remaining.\n\nNot only are astronomers striving to gain more knowledge, but also to because this could be the next step into further exploration out there. \"Human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Our travels on Earth should not be limited by danegrs and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagingation and innovation.\" The author explicitely gives reason as to why this exploration is so important, not just for knowledge, but for the possibility to learn from this and move forward with research. We could gain new technology, make more discoveries, and even find a planet out there where our life could be sustained. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I don't think they should make driverless cars. Cars are made to make people safe driverless cars won't be that safe. Who would put laser beams in a car.I dont think that if they do make driverless cars that Google out of all the car companies. Goolge putting in a rader system, GPS, and other piontless things.\n\nSebastian Thurn the founder of the Google Car project thinks, antilock brakes and driver assistance still seem a long way from the dream of calling a driverless cab to take you wherever you went. He also believes that the technlogy has finally begun to catch up to the dream.\n\nIn 2013, BMW announced the development of the traffic jam assistant. The car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 MPH, but special touch sensors make sure the driver is keeping thier hands on the wheel.GM has developed car seat the vibrate when the driver is in danger.\n\nWouldn't drivers get bored waiting for there turn to drive. The psychlogical aspects of automation are really a challenge, adimts Dr. Werner Huber, a BMW project manger driver. Some displays can turn off instantly when the driver needs to take over someting not available to drivers.\n\nAutomakers are continuting their work on the assumption that the problems ahead will be solved. Tesla has a projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Mercedes- Benz, Audi, and Nissan will be able to drive themselves by 2020. I believe that they shouldn't make driveless cars in the future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "NASA might have been wrong about the \"Aliens\" creating this face on mars.These reasons why I know that is because of paragraphs in the text that halped learn why it was made.\n\nParagraph two states that \"There must have been a degree of surprise among mission control at the Jet Propulsion Lab then the face appeared on their monitors\" but later found out that it was a \"Martian mesa\" made things look like an \"Egyptian Pharoh\" so it must have been the planet that made the face.\n\nParagraph seven states that on April 5,1998 Micheal Malin snapped a picture of the face and Proved it to be a natural landform.Witch proves that it wasnt made by aliens just another landmark that was made by another planet just like ours has landmarks theirs has one to even more than one but we just dont know about it yet or \"NASA\" doesnt want to tell the world about it.\n\nThese reasons helped learned why Mars also known as \"The Red Planet\" has no life on it and \"The Face\" was made by the planet not by anyother life on mars.If there were any life on mars NASA wouldnt tell the world anyway. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "New and innovative things are created as the future grows near. Many of this inventions or discoveries help to advance our society, knowledge, and efficiency, however some of these inventions might seem like a step toward success, or like the most efficient thing possible, but it can also be a danger to the society. Driverless cars are one of these dangerous inventions. Although driverless cars might seem like the next big thing that allows the busy workers of today to multitask, can it also be a threat to the well-being of others?\n\nDriverless cars are likely to appeal to people in today's society for two main reasons that contradict each other. One of these reasons being that today's society consists of some of the most overbooked, not only adults, but teenagers as well. A driverless car likely peeks the interest of people like this because it allows them to multitask and have additional time to do homework or prepare a presentation for an important meeting, etc.\n\nThe second main reason that contradicts the appeal to the first group of people, is that some people in today's society are also incredibly lazy. With so many inventions that make things easier in life, a driverless car is just another one. In today's society, technology is so advanced that people don't need to be face to face to communicate or \"express\" feelings with one another, so why would you if you don't have to? People can order food to be delivered to their homes, so why go to the store when you don't need to? People can use hoverboards to go down the street, so why walk when you don't need to? And so on. Although a driverless car won't be replacing any \"physical activities\" like walking or going to the store, etc. it does add to the lazieness of people in today's society.\n\nAlthough a driverless car can be served as a way to be more efficient and productive for some of the busiest people today, and can be a time for some of the lazier people in today's society to get in an extra twenty minutes or so of sleeping, it defeats the \"guidelines\" of a driverless car. Althougn a driver in a driverless car does not need to do any of the driving unless instructed otherwise by the car, the driver still does need to stay alert with there eyes on the road at all times in order to be on the lookout for any construction, accidents, etc. to avoid. Although people are instructed to continuing being alert even though they do not need to drive for the most part, knowing how people are today, many will just ignore this instruction or forget about it, which could put people's lives at risk.\n\nOne of the biggest issues that can arise with a driverless car, is it mechanics and liability. Although after being thouroughly tested by Google, and it is reported that after driving more than half a million miles the cars did not crash, there is always a chance that there could be an accident. Although there is always this chance with normal cars and drivers, this can be more possible with driverless cars because the driver might not be alert like they should be, and there is a construction site that the car was not aware of, or the cars automatic brakes malfunction and the car crashes, etc.\n\nNo matter what type of car it is, there is always a chance that something could go wrong. However, it is not only that driverless cars could be more dangerous than normal cars, but people in society today could be what sets these cars apart. With nearly everything automatic, people might take advantage of this feature and think that it protects them from everything, and be reckless with their actions. So, it is not that driverless cars could be more dangerous and a bigger threat to society, it is that people today could be more dangerous, more reckless, and bigger threat to society if they were provided with driverless cars. Therefore, it is is not that driverless cars are not ready for people in today's society, people in today's society are not ready for driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of the Facial Action Coding System technology is to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom which is not valuable to a classroom. In my honest opinion I believe it is very unnecessary. The first reasoning is that this technology that was developed was developed for a very different purpose than the usage of a classroom. My second reasoning is that the technology doesn't even claim to detect the boredness of the students. Others may argue that it will help students in a positive way but they are completely wrong because it will do up to nothing for them. All these reasonings combined are the main factors as to why i believe that the usage of this technology is not valuable in the school environment.\n\nMy first reasoning as to why i believe that this facial and emotional recognition technology is not valuable in a classroom setting is because the sole purpose as to why it was built was to detect emotions in an individual. It was not developed to help students make learning easier in any way. According to the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto, \"New software has been developed that improves the accuracy in percieving the emotions of others. This new software, the Facial Action Coding System, has promising application for a variety of industries.\" This is evidence that helps support my claim because it is a statement that explains the purpose of this new technology which is only for the detection of emotions in the face of humans and not to help young students to advance their school life. Also, according to the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto, \"By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions (as in da Vinci's masterpiece). Each expression is compared against a neutra face (showing no emotions).\" This statement/quote is evidence of my claim because again it states the true purpose of this technology and what it is truly used for; not once in that statement had it discussed how it would help students better their education.\n\nMy second reasoning as to why i believe this technology is not best fit for the school environment is because the technology is used to only detect 6 emotions and using it to help teachers combat \"boredom\" within their student is not one of them. The article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto states, \" Eckman has classified six basic emotions-hapiness,surprise,disgust,fear and sadness- and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles.\" This is evidence because the quote clearly states that the emotions that are detectable are not inclusive to boredome if the technology can't detect boredom\n\nor confusion then how can it help with the students. The article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto also states, \"'A classroom computer could recognize when a students is becoming confusesd or bored,' Doctor Huang predicts.\" This is evidence of my claim/reasoning because this statement by the creater of this technology even says it COULD happen which leads us to infer that it probably would not happen anytime soon, meaning that although this technology is smart it still may not be able to help students out.\n\nOthers may argue that the usage of this Facial Action Code System will help students positively in the classroom but they are completely wrong. This system may not even help them at all. According to the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto, \"'Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,' notes Dr.Huang 'So computers need to understand that, too.'\"\n\nThis is evidence as to why those that argue it is a positive effect is wrong because the inventer of this technology basically stated the technology has more to understand (such as the emotional communications of humans), meaning that this technology may not fully comprehend all of the emotions of not just humans but students if this technology was to be placed in the classroom settings. Also according to the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' by Nick D'Alto, \"'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.' The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive-for video games or video surgery.\" This is evidence because it states what it could do for a students which is adding more cartoon expresions\n\nand thats basically about it. It doesn' really help out a students when theyre confused just because there are more animated cartoons.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe that the Facial Action Coding System is not a valuable usage in a classrrom of students. First, the technology was built for asole purpose of detecting facial emotions and not to help students in any way but add cartoons. Second, the technology is not advanced enough to even detect emotions of boredom in students , it can only detect six emotions in which bored is not one. Others may argue that it will positively impact the students but they are completely wrong because it literally does nothing for them. Finally, in my most honest opinion this technology is mainly useless in a classroom which is why it is clearly not valuable in a classroom environment that includes students. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I write this to the Senator of Florida.\n\nEvery four years a president is elected to become what is the Commander and Chief and sole representative of the United States of America. Because we as a country are a democracy, \"the people\" get to choose the president. We go every four years, starting at the age of 18 and so on, to vote or to choose who we want to represent us as Americans. Who we want to run this country. Who we want to lead us both to sucess and trust that they will do all in their power to keep us safe. But are we, the people, really choosing who we want? Just like President Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, the U.S Chamber of Commerce, and the AFL-CIO, I believe that we are not choosing at all but we are voting for a state of electors, who in turn choose a president for us.\n\nThe electoral college is very unfair to voters.\"according to a Gallup poll in 2000, taken shortly after Al Gore_ thanks to the quirks of the electoral college - won the popular vote but lost the presidency, over 60 percent of voters would prefer a direct election...voters can expect another close election in which the popular vote winner could lose the presidencey. (The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid deeefenses of the system are wrong By: Bradford Plumber) If you wanted to vote for a specific president you would have to elect the state electors pledged to that president and hope they pick them. At times the electors have the right idea and other times the electors get confused and choose the wrong person. Other times the elector could even be biased or even racist (in rare cases), and choose the one person that you do not see running this country.\n\n\"Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races in the \"swing\" states. During The 2000 campaign, seventeen states didnt see the cadidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the larrgest media markets didn't get to see a single campain ad.\" That is, because the electors are the ones that choose. The candidates don't even attempt to campaign in places they know they wont get a vote on. The cadidates will try to win over the bigger states first to gain more electoral votes to win.\n\nI see the electoral college as an unfair way for the people to vote for president. If we are truley a democracy, then we should change from using the electoral college to the use of popular vote, or direct election. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1/27/15\n\nDear State senator,\n\nThe Electoral College is a system where electors vote for the people off of the states votes . Where some eletors may stera from the beeten paath , but there is no reason to change the system now.\n\nMost people do not understand what the Elecoral College system, but in; \"\n\nIn Defense of the Elector College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing th Ppesident\n\n\"(by Richard A. Posner ) points out its \"\n\nit is the electors who elect the president, not the people. when you vote for a presidential candidate ypu're actually voting for s slate of electors..\n\n\". Meaning a group of people in each state vote for the the presidnt . This is importent to know because it lets peopple know that their vote narow down the choeses . Although the electoral college system givesthe eletion an electon a \"winer takes all \" feel .\n\nSome people may believe that their vote doesnt matter because of the electoral college system, but as \"\n\nWhat Is the Electoral Collge?\n\n\"( bay the Office of Federal Register) points out that \"\n\nMost states have a winner-take-all' system that awards all electors to the winning presidential candidate .\". Which says that in some states the electors vote for whom-ever the majoratiy of the state voted for. That is suggnifucnt because it shows that the peoples vote do matter.\n\nOn the other hand the elector college system is not perfict. Eventhough most states have \"winner-take-all\" system, there may be a \"\n\n' fathless' electros have occaionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please .\" as informed by \"\n\nThe Indefensibel Electoral College:Why even the best-iaid defense of the system are wrong\n\n\" ( by Bradford Plamer ) is showing that though the electors are asspost to vote off of the states over all vote , that some electors will follow their own personal oppion. This shows that the systom is not as good as gold .\n\nThe Electoral College is where electors vote for the people , but they vot off of the over all moajoraty, and the system my be fladed a little . Changing the Electoral College would be like changing the Constatosion . ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"all our developments since world war 2 has been centeres on the car\". now we need to start limiting the car usage and start walking so people can get healthier. they can be less pollution in the air. people can save money instead of having to put gas or fix a problem the car has.\n\nif we limit our car usage people would start walking wich is good. people are getting so used to cars that they have no excersise all they do is get in there car go to work and home wich is not good. if we limit the car usage all those people will have to walk wich would be better so they can have some type of excersise. if people needed to travel far distances they would have public transportation.\n\nif we do limit the car usage there will be less pollution in the air. and if there is less pollution in the air there will be less congestion. there would be less smog in the air. where would be less people getting sick.\n\nanother advantage we will have is that people will be saving money. people wouldnt have to pay for gas. since people are walking they wouldnt have to pay for car insurance. people wont need to pay for car damages. and with all the money that people save most people wouldnt go in debt.\n\nthis are some reasons why i think we should limit car usage. now you write to inform our citizens why we should limit the car usage. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever been in a arguement? Well in this story you going to witness a arguement about how a coyboy is trying to convince his friends to join and help people around the world.I want to help people around the world! I like that i have to get out of bed knowing that im going to make somones day.\n\nI tried to awake up on time in order for me to be there early but i was to late i have already missed it \"dang!\" i screached! i tried to get there on time because if i dont i'm going to get in trouble and if i get in trouble i wont be able to go and help peope around the world. I had a perfect idea i could recruit my friends and say thst i was late because i was trying to find people to work with me so i could get the job done faster and more efficiantley\n\nWhen i got there to my friends house, they were on there couch waiting for me because i told them that i would be there. I said,\" listen i have something to say, its very important, i need you guys to help me and try to get me out of loeing my job.\"\n\nDeep down inside of me i was scared of what they would say. i asked,\"can you work with me?\" They cried with laughter after what i said and i was very hurt of that. They said no and i was about to leave when i heard one of them insult me then i argued and tried to persuade them but id did no good. i yelled, \"why cant you just be nice just for a little bit and he said its my final descion NO!''\n\nI like helping people around the world! i like that i get out of bed knowing that i'm going to make somones day.i tried to get my friends to help and get there act straightened but it didnt work so i guess that i have to do it by myself and i guess that i will. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is called the \"evening Star\" because it is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. Venus is the second planet form our solar system that we have and it is not that far from Eath. There is a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets Venus. The tempature average 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\n\nThese condiotions can effect humans on earth. Astronomers are saying that Venus was probably like Earth with trees, valleys, mountains and a largely ocean on Venus. In Venus the Surface is at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. It could affect the atmosphere because of the carbon dioxide and the heat from the planet.Many researchers cannot take anyhting from the planet such as rocks, gas , or anything else, because it is very hot and it is too much for the astronauts also it is a high risk.Researchers are trying to invent a machine tht could take the heat, also last long for them so they can get information and study the planet. They have made electronics made out of silicon carbide and they have been tested in a chamber with the tempature ike Venus, yet it only lasted for 3 weeks.\n\nSpacecraft don't even last that long when they got to Venus because of the hot tempature, which is planet surface arounf 800 Fahrenheit. Venus has many values and could do something good for us humans on Earth because of many problems going on in Earth. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Why do kids look forward to the weekend? It is because they do not find school fun, but if classrooms adapted to using the Facial Action Coding System, kids would love it when they are at school.\n\nDr. Huang, a profesor at Beckman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Amsterdam, stated, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" It is very important to recognize when students are confused or bored because when that happens, the student tends to zone out or not pay attention which results in the student not comprehending anything that the teacher is teaching.This can cause lower test scores for the student, which hurts his or her grade point average and it lowers the class average.\n\nThe text states, \"Eckman has classified six basic emotions...\" (D'Alto 3). If Facial Action Coding System is able to recognize that a student is sad or scared and can possibly send a notification to the teacher's computer, then the teacher will be able to notify the guidance counselor. This can result in the student being capable to return to a happy mindset which will not only benefit the student's academic life but it will also benefit the student's personal life.\n\nDr.Huang also stated, \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" Why can boys spend hours playing video games? It is because they find them fun. If technology were to modify lessons which allowed them to be more appealing for students, then students would spend the hours in school excited to learn and engaging in school activities instead of constantly glancing at the clock waiting for dismisal. Being able to modify lessons would be amazing in the world of education.\n\nAs technology progresses, there is no downside to schools adapting to it as well. Which is why, classrooms should use the Facial Action Coding System.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" written by Nick D'Alto, he discusses the pros and cons of advancedments in face recognition technology. With the new technology constructed by Prof. Thomas Huang and Prof. Nicu Sebe, it gives people the ability to use a software to recognize what emotion someone is feeling based off of their facial features. Despite this major advancement there are certain times it should not be used for. Prof. Thomas Huang's software should be utilized for recreational use and safety, however, it should not be introduced to the classroom.\n\nNew technology never fails to amaze people due to its never before seen qualities. This technology is no different, Huang's Facial Action Coding System is revolutionary. The ability to distinguish someones emotions from a photo can be beneficial in so many places. A couple places that this technology would benefit would be for browsing the internet and when interviewing or interrigating someone. If this technology was utilized while people surf the web it could enhance your results dramatically. In the text it mentions how this could be beneficial\n\nwhile shoping online \"For example, if you smile when a Web ad appears on you screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different\" (D'Alto 6). This shows how the technology has the potential to revolutionalize the way that you surf the web. Another place this technology would be beneficial would be in interviews or interrogations. While interviewing someone, it is important to know if the canidate is genuinly excited or happy about the job oppurtunity. As for the interrogations, if a criminal does something bad, but refuses to tell the truth. This can be used to find out if they are being truthful or if they are showing an emotion that displays guilt \"these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a \"smiling\" politician or celevrity isn't being truthful\" (D'Alto 8).\n\nThis technology would be the most useful in these places. However, one place that this should never be seen is in schools.\n\nImagine teaching a class aware of a supernatural technology that is able to nearly read minds. Now imagine a whole class full of students making silly faces and their computers to try and see if the emotional recognition will change something. This technology would come as more as a distraction in a majority of schools. Already, technology is sweeping across the nations educational system and causing havoc for thousands of teachers. This technology would just come as another avoidable distraction caused by technology. Furthermore, introducing this technology into schools might make parents and students feel unsteady. Why would someone want a computer decifferring their emotions, if they are private and held to themselves for a reason. Parents might not like this idea for the same reason. They are aware that emotions are private, unless you decide to set them free.\n\nHowever, the idea of introducing it to schools had all of the right intents. \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\" (Huang 6). However, being able to recognize if a student is board or dozeing off is not hard to do for teachers. Technology does not need to take over the teachers love for preying on a kid who is not paying attention. Teachers are able to successfully do everything this technology is able to do, and possibly at a more effecient rate due to the novity of this software.\n\nAlthough this technology is revolutionary in various amounts of ways it will only be effective if it is used it the right places, and at the right times. It will be interesting to see the future of the Facial Action Coding System. As technology continues to advance it is important that people recognize what will and will not be valuable in a classroom enviroment. This piece of technology is one of those things that will not enhance learning in the classroom/\\. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine if something could keep students up and ready to learn throughout an entire lesson that they couldn't care less about? It seems like an unlikely scenerio more likely. Most students are interesting in every single class that they're required to take, it's almost enivitable. Keeping students interest in a subject is what keeps them wanting to keep learning it. It could be life-changing to be able to have a computer that is able to keep a students interest in what they're learning up.\n\nAdding something like this in to schools nationwide could be very manditory to keep students successful. It's not new to anyone that if something bores you, you probably have no desire in keeping it in your memory. If something is uninteresting, it's an instinct to want to find practically anything better to occupy you. There could be a computer designed in order to scan a student's emotion to detect whether or not they're bored. If the student seems to be disconnecting, the assignment could make the next question a different scenerio with a similar topic.\n\nIn the passage, it says that the FACS enables computers to be able to read your expressions in a way that can alter the experience for each individual. \"Being able to modify the lesson, just like an instructor.\", is a key component.\n\nNot only could the computer be able to keep you from getting bored, but if you're entertained by the assignment it is also able to continue questions similar to the one that catches your attention. School is boring for a lot of people because of their disconnection for the materials that they are learning. Being able to connect each different student to a similar assignment could be groundbreaking. Discussing something each student can relate to is valuable in keeping everyone engaged.\n\nLet's take students that are homeschooled for example. Nowadays it's easier to homeschool children thanks to the internet. Some kids to work better alone without much instruction, but most need something to keep them from getting distracted. Not having a teacher to stay on you to do your work could cause people to disassociate from the required task. It's just like having a teacher one on one working with a student.\n\nTo further my position in this argument, I believe that these computers will be very valuable in classrooms everywhere. A lot of schools in this century use computers for a broad majority of their lessons. Doing assignments on paper seems to be the minority now. This already makes it hard for teachers to be able to connect to their students, which many children need. This computer is somewhat like an individual instructor for each person in the classroom. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the paragraph it talks about how the planet Earth has a \"twin\" which is Venus. It's the most Earth-like planet on the solar system.The auother asks \"If the sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?\" Venus is a worthy pursit despite the dangers it presents for these reasons. Long ago, Venus had probably been covered with large oceans, and lives could have been formed in the planet Venus. Venus, today, still has some features just like Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediments, valleys, mountain, creatures and other Earth-like species.On Venus you can also use technology old technology called mechcanical computers. These devices were first envisioned in the 1800s as well in the 1940s during World War ll. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and scientist has been exploring Venus and how much people can act just on Earth. Just like on Earth our travels and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts it should expand to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation. Not everyone can be scared without having to try it out. Everything is new and different and also scary but not just because of that people should stop. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People over the years that have been talking about cars that drive themselves have found this topic very interesting because of the phrase\" Cars that drive themselves\". Yes it sounds interesting and very cool and far into the future but there are downsides to this idea and there are some good sides. It depends on the people that you ask because some could say oh no way! Then there are some that could say oh yes way! Then you have to think of it this way, are these futuristic cars even safe for humans to be in?\n\nDriverless cars do sound really cool to me because then you don't really need to do anything but sit back and watch. Then again I just don't think that I would want a car that drives itself only because of the dangers it kind of puts you in. For example, in the passage it states that these cars have all of these sensors on it that can keep you safe while you're driving it, well what do you do if while that car is driving and one of the sensors malfunctions and there is a car running a stop sign while it's your turn to go what do you do? You won't even see the car coming from the side of you and that sensor malfunctioned so it can't alert the car then you get smacked into by the other vehicle. These cars do come with very dangerous factors and possibilities that can happen at any given moment. So yes these cars are cool but I would never get one for myself.\n\nIn paragraph two when it talks about how television and movies have been fascinated with cars that drive themselves, I think it can be a bad thing for them doing that. That's because the way movies and TV portray the driverless cars is so unreal but others who don't understand that well, they could be in a good amount of danger. For example in the movie Transformers, every single one of those cars drive themselves. They steer themselves, they can open their own doors, they can do all of this stuff and someone who actually believes that that is what these manufacturers are coming out with, then they are wrong because they think that it will be able to do that stuff and while they're distracted BOOM! They just got t- boned by another driver because the person wasn't paying attention. These cars could really cause a lot of danger to society.\n\nDriverless cars are way too dangerous to me, I feel like people would be irrisponsible with them and cause harm to the community. I'm against cars that drive themselves for right now until they can proove to me that these cars are 100% safe. Like we all know today there are crazy drivers out thtere and with them on the road with a car like this, that could put a ton of people in danger. To help prove my whole point in paragraph 9 it says that \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer\"? Well here is the thing, it said if the technology fails. That means that there is a chance of the technology failing and causing harm, just like a lot of other technology can do. For example, some sort of saw to cut wood or metal. If one of those things malfunctions and a blade goes flying it could hit someone and easily kill them. Not all technology is 100% fool proof so that is why I wouldn't trust this driverless car.\n\nSo once again I do not support the creation of one of these driverless vehicles because of a safety issue. Even if this car does have all of these sensors on it that doesn't mean that it is totally safe because you still have all of these other crazy drivers on the road that could potentially smack into if they aren't paying attention or even if you aren't paying attention. Yes in the movies these cars do look really cool but I don't think that they need to be created and brought into real life. I say that we just stick to what we already do. That's having actual people drive the car instead of having a computer programmed into the car driving it. Now I know people don't drive 100% either but what if the technology fails and someone dies in a crash? Then what do you do? You definitely can't blame the person for something that a company made malfunctioning. We the people just need to stop and think about what all could happen if you let a computer drive your two to three ton vehicle. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology today is crazy. It keeps expanding and getting bigger, better, and faster. Recenltly scientist have made a computer that has the power and technology to read emotions in students and in other people. I feel like this shouldnt be used in a classroom.\n\nI feel that a computer shouldnt be able to tell wether or not a human being is sad or mad, it shouldnt be able to tell our emotions. Our emotions is for us to handle. Yes, us humans can tell when people we know are sad or down, but computers should not. People would use the computer for somthing else, like to see others emotions. Peoples emotions should keep to their self. It isnt for a computer or other humans to now, because its your emotion.\n\nYes, this could be valuable for some things, like movies, and video games. THis is not something we could use everyday in a classroom. We could use the computer to see whats wrong with a student. Once we figure out whats wrong with the student, for instance lets say the child is sad. The child is so sad, he cant work or do anything, and us humans cant notice it because he is hiding it. We could use the computer to see what emotions he is having. Once we figure that out we could help him, by doing somthing that makes him happy.\n\nThis computer couldnt be valuable in a classroom. If a teacher assigned their students to make a project over the expressions of a human.\n\nThen the coputer would take forever to load. Each human expresses their emotions in a different way. One could be hiding it better than the other. Therefor the computer could get the students emotions wrong, and the students could fail. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Life without a car in the vaubans family did not seem like a big deal. Mainly seventy percent of them did not own a car at all,some of them just got rid of their cars to move to the vauban's street. They sound like they much happier without a car because having a car for them is too tense.\n\nhowever some of the childrens did own at least bicycle. Somehow middle-class famillies from other places to shangai tend to make their homes. Experts find that people who have a car are responsable for twelve percent of greenhouse gas emissons in europe. In the united state up to fifty percent in some car-intensive areas. They separated surban life from car use to smart planning.\n\nEfforts have been made in the last two decades to make cities denser,they are now thinking about the suburbs. the vauban experienced the most advanced experiment in low-car surburban life. They're trying to make suburbs more compact and more reliable to public transportation. After that new approach, they have placed a walk away on main street like the highways rather than the malls. Surburbs play a huge role in a new six year federal transportation. Most of appropriations had by law went to highways and only twenty percent to other places.\n\nWhen pollution started strict rules were made. Many people were to leave they car home or pay a twenty euro fine .On monday even-numbered licences plate had to leave they car and the odd-numbers on the following days. In total 4,000 drivers were fined ,cars was getting impounded for reaction to the fine. People still think its was better then the car fre. Rivaled beijing and china are the most polluted cities in the world because they much more populated.\n\nAccording to obama ambitious goals researchers think that people should buy fewer cars getting less licences as we're moving on each year. People would soon realize that obama real goal was to end the culture of car \"the end of car culture\". ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The advantages of limiting car usage would be better because passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in europe. And up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the united states. Diesel fuel was blamed since france has a tax poilcy that favors diesel over gasoline. Diesels make up 67 percent of vehicles in france, compared to a 53.3 percent average of diesel engines in the rest of western europe, according to reuters.\n\nThe day without cars is part of an improvement campaign that began in bogota in the mid-1990s. It has seen the consruction of 118 miles american city, according to mockus, the city's mayor. Parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have dramaticly cut traffic; and new resturants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up.\n\nI think that this a great idea to do and demographic shifts in the driving population suggest that the trend may accelerate. There has been a large drop in the percentage of 16- to -39 year olds getting a licenses as they age, mr. sivak's research has found. A study last year found that driving by young people decreased 23 percent between 2001 and 2009. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are many reasons in which a person may have the good point of view on the driverless car and the bad ones. There are many good features that are included in this car that just makes someone want to get one. One of these features include all the safety concerns that these big companies have insured to really prtoect the people, and this is a huge positive side on the driverless cars. I say this because there are families and kids and parents dont want anything happening to thier children. Also the fact that the car has sensers according to the article that shows a 3-D model of the car and its surroundings, which is updated constantly.\n\nThen, comes the fact that these drivers may get bored since the car is doing all the work. The solution to this is to add fun features according to Dr. Werner. These fun features include bring in car entertainment and information systems, yet turns off when thendriver needs to be alert. Its like being in a cab. This car is compared to a cap because you can call the car whenever you need it, and on the brighter size it uses way less fuel.\n\nAlthough the diverless cars come with many upsides it does has its downfalls. One major concern is the question, \"if the technology fails and someone is injured, who's at fault.\" This makes the assumptions tomthe traffic laws by saying,\"The only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" As the result of this arguement many states have mase it illegal to even test drive these computer-driven cars.\n\nAnother downside is why have a driverless car when the driver has to stay alert. This leaves to the concern of the publics saftey because the fact that the driver may not respond to the alert fast enough or what if the driver is texting. The solution to this problem according the BMW is bringing in seats that vibrate when the driver needs to be alert. Also projecting flashing lights on the windshield when the driver has to be alert.\n\nEven though the new driverless car sounds fun and exciting to even get one, but there is many postitive sides and negative sides. Therefore many features that are yet to come still need furthur testing. This testing might include test driving and also many saftey test that is a major concern in any manufacturing company. We the people will just have to see what the on going years brings us and what Mercedes Benz, Audi, and nissan brings us in 2020. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus also sometimes called \"the evening star\" is consider one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. Venus is considered a \"twin\" to Earth because it is the second planet from sun and becuse it is the closest to Earth in size and density and also the closest in distance.\n\nVenus also neighbors other planets an example is in paragraph 2 \"Earth, Venus, and Mars, our other planetary neighbor, orbit the sun at different speeds. These diferences in speed mean that sometimes we are closer to mars and other times to Venus. because Venus is sometimes right around the corner-in space terms-humans have sent numerous spacecrafts to land on this cloud-draped world.\"\n\nVenus has surface temperatures that are up to \"800 degrees Fahrenheit\" and the atmosphere is \"90%\" stronger than what we experience on earth. Venus also makes up \"97% of carbon dioxide\" so we would not be able to breath with also the planet being to hot to step on. they have also had unmanned missions on Venus for example in paragraph 2 \"Each previous mission was unmanned, and for a good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" NASA is also working on some other approaches to study Venus for example in paragraph 7 \"some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamer simulating the chaos of Venus's surface aand have lasted for three weeks in such conditions.\"\n\nNASA has also planned to take a look at technology called mechanical computers, how they were developed? An example would be in paragraph 7 \"These devices were first envisioned in 1800's and played an important role in the 1940's during World War 2.\" NASA is hoping in the future to make a sucessful test launch to Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people believe that driverless cars are coming. They think that humans will basically have computerized taxis. I do not belive this will happen nor do I want it to happen. Yes, companies have been working on computerized cars for years, however I dont believe they would be profitable. I have multiple reasons why I dont support driverless cars and why I dont believe they will be profitable.\n\nThe first reason that I dont think driverless cars are a good idea is the fact that they would be way to expensive. For one thing, new vehicles are pricey enough now. Think of how much the cost would sky rocket if they had all of those sensors and could drive themselves. If this were the case then the middle class wouldnt be able to afford vehicles let alone the people in poverty. Also, more than likely all of the roads would have to be upgraded to have sensors or magnets in them. Upgrading roads would be way too expensive and it would be nearly impossible to upgrade all of them.\n\nThe next reason I do not support driverless cars is the safety issue. I personally believe that the first driverless cars released would cause an unbeleivable amount of wrecks. It just wouldn't be worth doing. You can't put driverless cars on the road with cars that are being driven. Humans and computers dont think alike and there would be too many accidents.\n\nThe last reason that I dont support driverless cars is the arguement of who is responsible if there is an accident. No matter how great these cars are there will be accidents, and when there are accidents everyone will be pointing fingers. Is it the drivers fault? Or is it the cars fault? It would be very difficult to figure that out because it could be either ones fault. This would bring up a very difficult question and in my opinion is the biggest reason that there shouldnt be driverless cars.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe driverless cars are a horrible idea. There would be so many problems. They would be more trouble than they are worth. Honestly, if you think about it, how hard is it to drive a car? Not that hard. Most adults in the U.S. can do it and do it daily. Why would a company go to all the trouble to make a car that can drive itself? There is simply no gain for everyday Americans.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Is the Facial Action Coding System Useful in Classrooms?\n\nWhat if there was a machine capable of not only reconizing, but also understanding feelings via facial expressions? There actually is a machine that could do that. It is called the Facial Action Coding System, or FACS. This technology could be very useful in classrooms, it could reconize the emotions of the students, it could help identify or even prevent certain situations before they even happen by identifying a problem, and it could help give teachers much needed feedback on the class that they wouldn't verbally recieve.\n\nFACS constructs a 3-D model of the face. It takes into account all 44 maajor facial muscles to determine the feelings or emotions of a person. For example, if you raise your forntalis pars lateralis, or the mucles above your eyes, you are displaying surprise. Using this technology in classrooms could help learn the emotions of students and show how they are feeling.\n\nIdentifying emotions in the classroom could be very useful. Students on average sit in classrooms for 6-8 hours a day. Their emotions are still developing and they themselves are still maturing. Sometimes, students may have breakdown or outburst because of various reasons. A student might be stressed out about their grades and begin to preform poorly. Usinng FACS this behavior could be predicted and prevented, letting the teacher know that that student needs a little extra encouragement or more academic assitment. Also, the school enviroment has many variables aside from classrooms alone and that could also cause problems. A student who becomes angry at their classmates has the possibilty of putting them in trouble, It coould either lead to a fight, confrontation, bullying, an other things. Yet, if the problem could be determined becore it could even start, it could help defuse or prevent the situation from escalating resulting in a safer learning enviroment. Considering this FACS could become a very useful additions to the schools as a community.\n\nFACS could not only help the school as a whole, but more specifically, it could help the teachers. Dr. Huang claimes that, \" Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" Using this statement we can recognize that not all information and feedback is being recieved by neither student nor teacher. A teacher's job is to help educate and prepare their students for the future. However, that becomes difficult when a single teacher has to take responsibilty of a large ammount of students. Some students express their concerns and questions but others choose to remain silent. Using FACS a teacher could now determine which students are confused and worried and which students are doing fine. By using this information a teacher could offer additional help for a student that a student wouldn't normally ask for. Knowing where to focus on and which students need help could help a teacher tremendously. It would facilitate a teacher's job and help them teach with greater efficientcy.\n\nFacs would recognize student's emotions, help identify and prevent certain situations before they occur, and it would give teachers feedback on the class that they wouldn't recieve otherwise. FACS would help education by targeting students that are well of and students that need additional help instead of having a teacher assume the whole class is confused or content. FACS is an innovative piece of technoly that could bring forth a new age of education if placed in schools.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Did you know that Earth has a twin? The planet Venus also known as the Evening Star is the closest planet to our planet Earth. It is relatible by the terms of density and size but sometimes it is the closest in distance as well. It also could possibly be able to live on as well.\n\nVenus is full of clouds of high corrosive sulfuric acid. The planet is also very hot too as the surface being over 800 degrees fahrenheit. Venus also has some features the Earth have like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning srtikes and Oceans.The planet also have a surface of rocky sediment and valleys, mountains, and even craters.\n\nVenus is survivable for humans but it's most likely we won't go there. Temperatures would be warm thirty plus miles abouve surface at 170 degrees fahrenheit. The air pressure would be fairly close to the sea level on Earth. The only solution to the conditons on Venus is to use vehicles to float above the scoldin hot and rocky surfaces.\n\nThis proves that Venus is Earth's twin because it is fairly relatable to the planet. Venus has the same features as Earth like Volcanoes, earthquakes, etc. It is also liveable on because the air pressure on the planet is close to the Earth. who knew we had a twin planet?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology is constatnly advancing and evolving. Advanced technology allows peolpe to accomplish tasks faster, with little effort. Although technology makes life easier, it takes away from the human aspect of things. Driverless cars are one example of advanced technology that limits human interaction with technology. This technology is a great advance in automechanics, but overall, it is unwise and dangerous to impliment driverless cars into society.\n\nTraditionally, driving is an activity that requires thought and reasoning. Some situations encountered while driving are more than a simple directional decisions. In many cases, driving requires the driver to make decisions based on the affect that choices may have on others. For example, a driverless car cannot make the decision to run a red light because it is to dangerous to brake on icy roads. A driverless car cannot asses the situation, consider the effects on others in an emotional sense, and make a decision. A driverless car can only do what it is programmed to do; it cannot think. Driverless cars are dangerous due to the fact that technolgy is not designed to weigh emotional situations.\n\nIn many states, testing driverless cars is illegal. It is also illegal to operate a driverless car in many states. This is due to the fact driving laws were designed for cars operated by actual people. \"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times\". (P.9) The safety of driverless cars is such a controversy because of legal reasons. Machines were designed to be \"perfect\"; they were designed to factor out human error. Even though machines eliminate human error, machines can fail. The safety of driverless cars is a concern because the opperator is constanly at risk of technological failure The driverless car could fail, resulting in an accident or death. Legally, \"if the technology fails and somebody is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?\" Driverless cars are such a legal controvery to due risks of injury caused by technological failure.\n\nIn conclusion, technology is an ever-advancing, time saving idea that can have negative apsects. Technology takes away from human/mechanical interaction. Specifically, driverless cars are dangerous and they take away necessary human control. They are a risk and a danger to those operating driverless cars. Driverless cars can also be dangerous to those around the operator. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Author suggest that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit depsite the dangers it presents. To be honest, going to Venus would be idiotic, find a suitable and survivable place for humans would make sense, and the author does state it.\n\nI do believe we should go to other planets, I believe that God only made one life inhabitable place from the proof I've gathered, but I was a Evolutionist and Paleontologist at the age of 5. I believe we could one day inhabit planets like Earth and find suitable places, and I've always been astonished with space, because its amazing. Now I will tell why I believe the author is great at showing his/her perspective.\n\nWe shouldn't go on Venus, but in Paragraph 5, NASA came up with a possible solution. \"Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way. At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\"\n\nThe only problem to the previous solution is that the farther you go up the less insight you can get, In Paragraph 6, the author states \"However, peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective. More importantly, researches cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else, from a distance. Therefore, scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks. Or maybe we should think of them as challenges,. Many researches are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus.\"\n\nSo yes, Nasa does have some flaws and some great ideas. But personally I believe that we should use a filtering system, so that the hot air inside is pushed outside with cold air refurbishing the insides of the rover. Some thick strengthy metal would be used against the walls of the rover, would make it heavier, but it would give us more time, the Cameras would need to be covered with some thick heat resistant glass. And the insides would be lined with heat resistant metal and wires. Find a cool place on the planet with out sattelites to minimize heat and give us more time or for example instead of 170 degrees it will only be 150 degrees, which is still bad but it would be alot less stressful.\n\nUs, as a people will always strive for new and interesting wonders, and it is the great minds of our societies that lead us one step further into the future. If a great danger faces us, it is those people we look to for answers for our many questions.\n\nThe author states \"Despite the risks, or maybe we should think of them as Challenges.\" Challenges lead to creativity, and with creativity, our world is improved in more ways then one. Thus, we must push on to new lengths and stretch our understanding and see with unclouded eyes.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "the author suggests that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The author suggestion means that its way interesting to study instead of worring about he dangers it could cause. In paragraph 3 it says that the venus are far mor extreme than anything humans encounter on earth such as environment would crush even a submerine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals. And he talks about how interesting the venus is. It says venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system even though mercury is closer to our sun. In paragraph 4 the author says that why are scientist even discussing further visits to its surface. In this paragraph he tells us about how dangerouse venus is to our planet. it says various forms of life on earth. Today venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth. Now the NASA are sending humans to study venus. But in paragraph 5 it says NASAs possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. But however NASA decided to work on other approaches to studying venus. There example is to simplify electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the choas of venus surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions(paragraph 7). And honesty my oppinion i think that it seems dangerouse and interesting at the same time but still risky to study abour or examine ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the Article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\", author Nick D'Alto claims that the United States should start using their new technology equipment called \"FACS\". This new technology FACS is a new computer software that allows computures to identify human emotions. In the text it states, \"The facial expressions for each emotions are universal.\" Meaning that the computer will recognize almost any facial expression\n\nthat a person makes.\n\nIn the text it states, \"The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face, all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles.\" This is how this computer all started and began in the making of a facial expression computer. This computer will one day be able to know how you are feeling that day based of off how your facial expression is.\n\nThe facial expression computer will also help college studies and labs all over the world. In the text it states, \"By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions as it did in Da Vinci's masterpiece, each expression is compared against a neutral face.\" By using this technology studies have came to the conclusion of how Mona Lisa was feeling in Da Vinchi's famous artwork piece.\n\nIn the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" Nick D'Alto talked about this newley developed technology, that allows computers to recongize human facial expressions. I am for the use of this new technology becuase it can lead to greater opportunities in the technology world and the whole world. This technology will unlock new ways on how people look and study the life of human beings. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If people participated on joining the Seagoing Cowboys then it would be better because then they can help people that are stuck in world war 2. If more people joined then it would help becaus then people would have different kind of things to do. So people should participate on joining the Seagoing Cowboys.\n\nPeople should participate on joining because if there is more people then it's better because then it wouldn't take lots of time to do everything. People could get in groups and split to help people that are hurt or that are worried to get killed because of world war 2. If people participated then they could help out and help out on the ship because the horses had to be fed 2 or 3 times a day. Each person will have something to do if they particpated. if people joined then when they were all done then they could've got something because they helped out people that were in danger. When they have done what they had to do then they would get time to play when they went back to their base or to the United States.\n\nSo if people helped then it would've been more easier to do things. They would have gave lots of people food and supplies because they were in Europe whe the world war 3 started. So then different armies joined and they helped out but it would be better if more people joined to help. If people joined then it meant that they care about people when they are in danger.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.Venus is the second planet from our sun. A thick atmosphere of about 97 percent of carbon dioxide covers Venus. Venus also has some features that are simular to those on\n\nEarth. Chaos of Venus's surface have lasted for three weeks in such conditions. Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation. Peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditons because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective. The planet Venus has\n\na surface rocky sediment and includes famliliar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters. Venus is often referred to as Earths twin Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occastionally the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closestin distance.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "venus is the evening star is one of the planets of the space the light in the night in the sky , is a actually a planet\n\nin the solar system\n\nand is the second planent from our sun.\n\nvenus is the closest planent t earth . Earth , venus and mars our other planetary neighboor orbit the sun at different speeds. the humans hace sent numerous spacecraft survived the landing.\n\nthe atmosphere o venus is the 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets.\n\non the surface the temparature average our 800 degrees and the pressre ofatmospheric is 90 times greater.\n\nvenus has the hottest surface tem[perature of any people in our solar system.\n\nthe astronomers are fascinated by venus becase it may well once have been the most. thee planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features.\n\nthe aeronautics and space administration (NASA) has one particulary compelling idea for sending humans to study venus.\n\ntemperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees fahrenheit.\n\nthe radiation would not esceedearth levels.\n\ntherefore scientist seeking to conduct a thorugh mission to undersztand venus would need to get up cloase and personal despite the risks.\n\nthe NASA is other approaches to studyng venus , and the project new is looking back to and old technilogy called mechanical computers.\n\nthese devices were firstenvisioned in the 1800 s and played an important role in the 1940s during worl war 11 . the just imahuine exposing a cell phobe or tablet to acid or heat capable of melting tin.\n\nour travels in the\n\nearth and beyong should not be limited by dangers and doubts.\n\nthe veru edges of imaguination and innovation for the (NASA) ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Mona Lisa, she's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. At least according to some new computer software that can recognize emotions. Thomas Huang, the beckman institute for advanced science at the University of Illinois, working in collaboration of the Unversity of Amsterdam and his colleague are experts at developing better way for human and computer to communicate to each person or online. For computer can use homework research to recognize the subtle facial movement the human use to express how they feel about the computer's using in it. The fact, they perform this same impressive for calculation for every day. Most of them would have trouble their issue of describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried and etc. The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a big smile to your face. By the way, making you happy face in this experiment also make you feel slightly happy to your face. Making faces could be reveal so they have a much of the science of emotions.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face of a friend that doesn't show much is hard to tell what emotions\n\nis feeling, but with the technology, we can tell exact emotions they are feeling.\n\nWith technology today, we can tell what a person is feeling by scanning their face with computers. We can tell how a person is feeling just by scanning their face and seeing how the face muscles are in place, like when you are smiling, you feel happy and you mouth muscles are pointed upwards. With this technology we can tell if a person is lying or not just by scanning their face which could help people solve cases on a suspect. This is a great way for students to learn how to know what a person is feeling just by scanning the other persons face which could help them out.\n\nTechnology is always growing and will in the future, and with this face scanner we can tell how a person is feeling just by scanning their face. This could help people like detectives that need to solve cases on a suspect that could give false information, so you'll scan the suspects face to see if they are lying just by seeing where the muscles are around your face, and with this technology, we can helpeveryone and teach them how to tell what a person is feeling.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are our future, whether we want them to be or not. Since the first inventions people have always been opposed to new things. Driverless cars should not be one of them. They should be excepted because well, they are a good idea.\n\nThink about something machine made. Anything at all. If you have two of those, compare them. Are they identical? Let's be honest, machines are perfect in what they do. Unlike humans, machines can all be programed the same, and will each do the same thing just as well as any other one would. Humans, on the other hand, make mistakes. If all cars are programmed the same way, they would all drive and react to situations the same way. In other words, they could be programed to always follow the speed limit and other laws. Some people just don't care about that sort of thing. No one would get hurt, even if you spent the whole night drinking. The driverless cars today give the ones of the future a bad rep. Technology is quickly improving. If you think all the sensors and other gadgets on todays cars are cool, wait until todays brainiacs really get down to working on them. You have to remember though, humans do make mistakes. Malfunctions are likely to happen, but if they do, way less people would be getting hurt compared to today.\n\nHow many people die due to texting and driving every year? Driverless cars could stop that from happening. Ever again. All those crosses you may see on the side of the road are a sign to what could be avoided. Driverless cars could stop putting those up all together. The people involved in making todays driverless cars are already putting something together. While you're sitting in your car that's driving itself, you may get bored. Pop up entertainment systems are already under consideration. Though today the driver will be alerted to any hazard on the road, and the pop up would be put away, that would not be the case in the future. You could text away and the car could handle any situation the road throws at it. I do believe, however, that people should still learn how to drive. If the car does fail, and stop working, the person in the vehicle should be able to take control of it and get it off of the road.\n\nPeople against this new innovation have good reasons as to why they are. I understand not being in control can worry many people, but driverless cars that work the way I explained are far from becoming a reality. The people of the future can slowly be weaned into this new car. To them, owning a car that drives itself will be no different then how we feel about our cars today. These cars are the future, a future in which accidents are a rarity and stupid people behind the wheel can't hurt anyone on the road anymore. So don't be afraid of this new idea, embrace it. Driverless cars, when completed and working to the best of their ability could save many lives, and lead the world to a new exciting future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "driverless cars would be perfect for oue society. it woould make transportation alot easier. it would become enjoyed by many. like would be somewhat easier. things would get done alot faster , and roads would be safer. people would enjoy it.\n\none thing that is great about these cars is that 99 percent of them will never crash . which would help out alot with lower the death rates from car accidents. these days teens enjoy texting, and most of them text while driving. with the driverless car you able able to do so without risking you or anyone else's life. even when you have to take over the wheel, the car will alert you in some way.\n\nwith the car being able to control it's self safety rates will increase. driving would be alot easier. the cars will continously become more efficent. they will continue to become safer and safer. which would really help decrease the high rates of car accidents that we've been having. with all the newer adjustments that will be made to the cars roads would be alot better. people will really enjoy the new updates. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" i chosed to be on the maunufacturers side becuase the sensor is a good and safe idea for us people that drive. they can ster, accelerate,and break by themselves. There are some sensor that have a vibration in the seat it tells you when your vehicle is in danger backing into a danger.\n\nobject . Also using heads up displays when your driving like some thing are not available like trying to text and call someone on the phone.\n\nThe driverless car is a great idea beacuse the car tells you when you should break. Reason why this is a good ideas it can steer for you what if it really slippery out and you have no controll the sensor will help you keep calm of the car. The sensor tell you when you should go fast and slow down. this may reduce the amount of car crashes.\n\nThe senor that vibrate when you are driving is a well thought process because is your driving of the rode your seat will virbate telling you your off the road. also it tells you when you need to get back in your lane when you are driving. this will reduce car crashes because it helps indacte where you are driving.\n\nlastley the camera and the beeping noise the car will make helps you move out the way. the sensor tells you when you are too close to a dangerous object so you should stop. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Mr. Senator,\n\nI'm writing you this letter to discuss that we should keep the Electoral College. I think we should keep it because it's only a fair enough way of voting it is more consistant than others because if we voted by popular vote it wouldn't be much fair because as soon as most people found out there was a black president running they were against it the thought it was the worst idea ever. Instead of giving Mr. Obama the chance he deserved most people were against him. So if it wasn't for the Electoral College Mr. Barck Obama wouldn't have gotten the chance he deserved. Romeney also could've won but that's not the way Electoral College works when voting you are actually voting for a slate of electors and they chose the president.\n\nThe electoral collage some people might call it unfair or a disaster factor because it's not the people chosing the president it's the electors. The popular vote just chooses which person is more well liked not who people think will make the country a better place and so far no one is doing so. The Electoral college has a slate of trusted electors that has a certain party's nominee and the trust is rarely ever betrayed. Despite the Electoral College's lack of democratic process it's certainty of outcome is good as for example Obama's winning he received 61.7 percent of the elctoral vote compared to 51.3 percent of the popular vote.\n\nThe Electoral College also should be kept because it prevents Run-Off Elections elections when no canidate receives majority of the votes. This why I think we should keep the Electoral College and not change over to the popular voting method. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Car's. Relyed on by many people. Used to go anywhere and everywhere. They are comfortable and cool to look at, but are they really as great as everyone think's they are? They pollute, they cause accident's, they destroy the enviornment and they cost a lot of money and sometime's it's more then people have. Yes, car's make everything easier for you but what happen's when there is a bad traffiv day and you are already late to work. Sometime's car's arent alway's a great thing.\n\nGas. The first thing I think of when I hear about car's. They put so many toxin's in to the air that can kill everything around them. In the article it talk's about Paris banning car driving due to the fact that the smog or gas coming fromm the car's was becoming unbareable. Congestion was down 60% due to the fact that the smog had intensified. Beijing, China happen's to be the one of the most polluted citie's in the world due to car's. The fuel in car's is pushed out the exhaust pipe when the car is driving which then pollute's the air which make's it hard for thing's that need air such as the surrounding animal's, plant's and human's such as our self's.\n\nAnother thing that cause's problem's with car's is the fact that traffic jam's and accident's that are just waiting to happen at any moment. Someone who doesn't know how to drive very well hit's someone else and it cause's an accident leaving people hurt. Not to mention the stress and the road rage that driving put's on people. Going outside and walking to work or going to the park with out all the problem's of being stuck in a car and enjoying the fresh air is a great way to start any day. On the day that Bogota, Colombia decided to have a car-free day people had hiked, biked,skated,and walked. These are thing's that I'm sure people wouldn't have done if they were still allowed to still drive their car.\n\nHow would car's drive if they didn't have the road's that we build? How do the road's get there? They get put down where there used to be tree's and land. People destroy and take apart the earth and the put down road's and building's. What do people plan to do when they have taken down all the tree's and used all the space that the earth has to offer? There will be nothing left. Car's are great and all, I understand that they are fast and they make life simplier but people are getting lazy and they are starting to not care about their surrounding's and it's sad.\n\nCar's are not cheap. They take time and money. When a car has a problem or break's down you have to pay to get it fixed. You have to pay to put gas in your car and depending on how much gas your car need's, it can put a hole in your wallet. Car's. We use them, rely on them to take us where we want to go, use them for entertainment such as Nascar and Monster Truck's. One day all the car's will be gone and then what will the world do. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are still some disputes about the true \"identity\" and origin of the Face on Mars. It is most likely just a natural landform, but some people disagree. Some people believe that it was created by aliens. However, since there is no legit proof of aliens even being real, how could you prove that they did this? NASA also has high-resolution photographs that make it pretty clear that it's just a natural landform. It may have taken several tries to collect all of the needed data to back this up, but the scientists did it so now we know.\n\nAs I briefly mentioned before, there is no proof of alien life actually existing. So, then, why are people convinced that it was aliens? Yes, it may have a strange shape, but that doesn't mean anything. There are strange shaped things here on Earth but people don't accuse it of being alien. Now, I do understand that this is in space, and on a different planet, but still; there are way more logical explanations. It's normal for there to be landforms on planets. That's simply the deal here.\n\nThe scientists also collected high-resolution photos of the Face. When the best photo was taken in 2001, it was made clear that this was just a landform, similar to some in the American West. It was just a formation that looked suspicious from far away. If you looked at the zoomed in picture, it just looks like a jumble of rocks. People just need to think realistically.\n\nThere is, however, a couple small reasons why people see a possibility of this being done by aliens. One of the pictures was taken from behind a small wispy cloud. This gave some people enough reason to believe that there could be alien markings hidden by the haze. Another reason people have for believing this is extraterrestrial work is that there have been some unexplainable sightings and findings that may point to alien life existing. There is no actual facts or proof, but enough has happened without logical explanations to convince certain people of this theory.\n\nI respectfully refute these points. The idea of alien markings being hidden is a stretch. There was an even clear picture taken more recently that showed no alien markings. It proved that it was just a landform. There's really not that much more to it. In response to the few unexplainable things that may point to alien life, we have no way to tell what's really out there. If there is something, then it's doing a pretty good job of staying hidden, or undiscovered because we have no cold, hard proof of anything. For some things there are just no logical answers. There's always going to be something we don't know. It's probably the most reasonable to just stick to the facts we already have, and learn to accept the most likely stories. Yes, it's okay to believe or hope that there is something out there, but people should also realize that they need to think reasonably in certain matters, especially when there's proof, like in this case.\n\nThis is a very strong argument. There are many ways that a person could keep going on and on, explaining each detail to its full extent, but I think all the most important information has already been mentioned. People should accept the facts. There is always going to be someone who disagrees, but every argument is like that. There is way more proof pointing to the conclusion that the Face is just a landform. You might still think something different, but I think I've made it clear why I have so much reason to believe what I believe. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Its not a good to thing to come up with some new technologie because you probabaly dont know what people been through. You dont no if sonmbody family remember passed or it could be anything iknow i wouldnt want no new technologie about my feelings.\n\nMy evidence i got out the article is imagine being able to detect exactly how other person feeling i got that out the article to help me withmy answer. Thats how i found out my answer cause i got it out the article.\n\nThe main point of me saying my opion is because how the lady looking in this picture it look like she dont look to happy or less she just making up fake smile to hide her pain.\n\nIn article two it says could you calculate your emotions like math my opion of that is no but in the way it seems like people could calculate your emotions like math.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my experience at working with NASA I haven't ever experienced them dancing with the truth , or lying as you so bluntly say. As a scientist working at NASA I would tell the public if there was a life form living on Mars , but as far as research goes there isn't a life form there. There is not a life form on Mars , but there is a landform there. If there was a life form there I would be the first one to tell you , because I know what it feels like to be left out on details that involves your life , your well being , what could possibly change your life forever , but don't worrry you can count on me to give you the details you so badly crave. Details you might not be ready for.\n\nThe text states that , \" We photographed the Face as soon as we could get a good shot at it.\" We did our best. We wouldn't want our money wasted for no reason , so we treated yours with the same respect. We were all eager to see if there was a life form on Mars. I remember waking up and getting to work early just to see for myself. If there was one. I have never been more disappointed with any thing that happened in space. I love space and stars more than anything that's why I work at NASA , but this time it really let me down. Now that I think about it wasn't just me who got let down it was thousands , if not millions of people.\n\nThe thousands , millions , or hundreds , of people looking forward to seeing a life form on Mars got let down. The people who got their hopes up and couldn't accepts the fact that life foms didn't exist. They couldn't accept the fact that life forms didn't exist turn to find someone to blame for crushing their dreams. The people who had to face their wrath was NASA. Those people became the ones with conspiracy theories. Finding the fault in someone else. Someone had to be lying. Finding someone to blame for their let down seemed a little easier for them. Why fight when there's proof? The text states that , \" In fact , it was hard work.\" Hard work. People like me , working hard to get these pictures and people still aren't stastisfied. We work hard to discover news things to show the public , but someone has to be knocked everyting down. We do our best , but our job isn't easy. I'm not saying yours is , but its never easy with people riding down your back constantly wanting more and never being satisfied. No matter how hard we try. Why does there always have to be someone trying to tear you down?\n\nWe took pictures. In the pictures we saw landforms. Land forms can make a place spectuatlar. We can make Mars spectualar. We don't need things to live on Mars to make it great. Its perfect the way it is. The more people who realized this will make my job and other people at NASA jobs , just a little bit easier. I admire that you beileve so strongly in a cause , but maybe you should find a new cause. A cause that's worth all the effort you put in to it. A cause that apprecaites all the effort you put into it.\n\nIn conclusion , I'm sorry to admit it , but there's no life form on Mars. It's unfortunate. I know we all wanted there to be life there. I wanted there to be life there , but I will continue my job , and continue trying to find new life forms on other planets. Maybe one day we'll find one , and I can't wait for that day. Hopefully it happens in my lifetime. It's not easy working at NASA , but you have the oppurtunity to help make our job a little bit smoother. Please beileve us when we tell you there's no life form some where. I promise you the second we find some life form somewhere we'll let you know.We'll let you know if we find a new star , planet , or galaxy. We'll let you know if there's anything happening that coiuld change your life that's happening that's involing NASA. I promise I'll you let you know , and I won't let anyone stop me!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Before reading this passage, I had no idea of anything being trully driverless. I couldn't imagine a world with driverless cars, but i guess it's going to happen sooner or later. I think that it is a big step in the industrial world, but I don't think it's practicle for day to day life because it is dangerous, it will cost a great amount of money from who know's where if the government funds it, and it will cause a lot of problems between the manufacturer and the costomer.\n\nMy first reasoning for this project to be dangerous is because no one knows how long the computer inside can stand doing all these things for the human driver. The driver might not know what's really going on with the car or how to use it. Something may happen between the computer in the car and the driver wanting to drive it. The driver may be incapable to drive a such advanced car and might not know what to do in a dangerous situation that might occur. Thousands of bad things can happen with this new invention. The computer may go dead and the driver or passenger may get hurt badly, and this goes for my third point.\n\nThe cost of these new cars has to be very expensive. If this does take off and is a very popular thing, the more of these cars that are made, the more money will have to be used to make them. If the government goes for them and tries to fund and support them, then the citizens of this country may have to pay a great amount of tax dollors to support the making of all of these expensive cars. If people are not happy about this happening, and it does, and their money is going to that cause, then more problems will arise from that. I think that would be last thing that anyone would want to happen. If we do have to start paying tax money towards that and they fail, a big outcome from that might happen, and even more money could be lost in result.\n\nMy third and final point is that it could cause great problems between the consumer and the manufacturer. If something were to happen while the driverless car was in control and the driver wasn't really involved and that person got hurt, someone will be to blame. It was either the customer's fault for not paying attention and taking over, or it was the machines fault for messing up in the first place. The whole point of these cars is to make the roads a safer place by making the driving perfect, so there shouldn't be any doubt in anyones mind that these automated cars would let the customer down. This arguement could go on forever if this really happened. It could very well happen, and it could be a very scary outcome.\n\nThe things that are happening in this time with inventions and upgrades are un thinkable. No one from three decades ago would imagine a world like this so advanced in the technology we all have, and to think that there would be a driverless car on top of that. In the end, it's just an opinion on whether this will fit now, or if it's just a mess up waiting to happen. Soon enough, these cars will end up coming, and whether you like them or not, you'll still be amazed by what people are doing today.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The claim that the author supports the idea that studing Venus is worth pursuit despite the dangers because they maybe the issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decade. The dangers and pursuit are higly high risks for people and NASA.It is dangers because Venus is the secound planet from our sun and the atmosphere in Venus is almost 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets. Even more challenging is that the clouds are highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus atmosphere. On the plant surface,temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on earth. The despite to go Venus is that they are hoping to look for something their because the plant has surface rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys,mountains,and craters. Somethings that we some how have they call Venus Earths sister. That why I think it so despite that NASA wants to see what else Venus got that the plants sister does not have.\n\nAn explanation of the article that supports my claims are when the author says this \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value,not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself,but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Also when they said \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.\"Venus is also dangers for people because it has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system,even though Mercury is closer to our sun.\"Beyond high pressure and heat,Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes,powerful earthquakes,and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\"\n\nMy conclusion to the authors writting is that they will not end up sending people to Venus because its to risky. They will end up sending newer technoligi up their so that they could see what the sister of Earth got. Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth -like planet in our solar system. Venus is most likely the most compared planet to Earth. Is to dangers for people because its the secound planet hottest then the Sun. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My name is Kavontae Anderson & i am against these driverless cars. The cars are controlled by technology and basically robots. If you have a driverless car they are going to be focused on one thing, and thats getting you to where you hvae to go. That is not the only thing a good driver should be focused on. When you drive, not only do you have to focus on where you're going, you should focus on the other cars around you because you don't know what kind of drivers are out there. The fancy cars may drive by there self and have cameras but will that stop them from getting into an accident? A car can swerve over so quick and the cameras may not even notice.\n\nWhenever they allow driverless cars in most states, its going to create aot of work for the goverment. You have to create new laws, and you would have to qualify for those laws. The best way to keep it is like we have now. We now have cars that may stop and park on their own, and personally that seems to be enough for me. Why would someone want to spend money on a robot car that just drives on its own? The only things thats doing is just making people wanna text while their car is being operated by something they don't even understand. The first reason people will most likely be in danger is the fact that they are going to feel like they don't have to do anything but just sit there. Whenever you have to just watch the rode it can get boring and you might wanna watch a movie on your phone but if you look down you might get a warning to take contol and something happens before you can even look up. Then whose fault will that be? Thats only going to get the car companies sued because the people who bought the cars are gonna be injured and want to blame the car company for warning them too late.\n\nCars that require drivers are better, they offer more and if you drive somewhere you can go the way you want to unlike the driverless cars, they might take you a longer way than what you want. If you drive by your self YOU can take any short cut that you want. GM has created cars that have seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger. Some people may get scared easily and a vibrating seat when the car is silent and their mind is on something else can create a panic attack, then what happens? The car and the driver can be at risk all because the seat scared them. I think that if you want to have a driverless car you should just call a taxi so you can sit in the back and have someone else drive for you. If they create driverless taxis that will cause alot of people to lose their job and that will make the crimerate to go up because they might find another job and it's gonna make them angry and wanna take their frustration out on other people.\n\nWhen someone buys a driverless car they might have to take a class on that to teach them how to work with the cars operating system and thats doing too much. The point that i am gettin at is that if you need a liscense to drive and they come out with these driverless cars that a waste of your learning skills and people shouldn't even have to go through that if they are going to make you get a driverless car thats so pointless because you should have to have rquirements to operate one, and if they don't have any then i am going to stick with my arguement because self driving is more traditional and that's the way it should be. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A claim for against the value of using technology to raed your emotion. Yes people are with this idea. But some are not ok with with it. And some just dont know.\n\nPeople are with the idea of technology reading the emotion expresion of student. It would develpoing better ways for humans and computer to communicate. But caculating emotions is like math homework. the prossess being when a computer constructs a 3-D computer modle of the face, all 44 major muscles in the modle must move like human musles. Movements of one or more muscles is called an action unit. then this is classified six basic emotion-happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness. In fact we humans perform ths same inpressive caculation every day. For instance you can probably tell hpow a freind is feeling simply by the look on their face.\n\nWhile looking in the mirror. Dose your face expression in the mirror suggest an emotion? in fact these are the instructions for a face that lookis happy. Its all about thouse muscular action units. They even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a force on. By the way making a happy face in this experiment also make you feel slightly happy. According to the faicial feedback theory of emotion, moving your facal muscles not only expresses emotion, but also may even produse them.\n\nA claim for against the value of using technology to raed your emotion.Yes people are with this idea. But some are not ok with with it. And some just dont know. but at the end i support the idea. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "How do you see life with driverless cars? Safe or unsafe? In my opinion I chose unsafe. I am against driverless cars for these reasons. In paragraph 9, lawmakers even say that safety is best achieved with alert drivers, In some states it is even already illegal just to test drive computer driven cars, and last whos really at fault in an accident? How do we judge whos at fault if no ones really driving and could people use these cars as an exuse to drink and drive sinse there not really driving? There are many questions and reasons I have against driveless cars.\n\nIn paragraph 9 of the article, \"Driveless Cars Are Coming,\" it states, \"lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers.\" We as Americans should trust in the people who propose all of our laws especially to keep us safe. Why wouldnt you trust someone who sets the boundaries of your life? if they say regular cars will be safer shouldnt we all strive to keep our country and the people in it and surrounding us safe?\n\nIn some states it is already illegal to even just test drive computer driven cars. If it is illegal to test drive them, that just shows how dangerous they really must be. Also if they are illegal in some states would they have to continue to drive regular cars while the other staes drove driveless cars? I think that would be more dangerous to mix the two types of cars on the roads. I could see even more accidents happening because of that.\n\nLast, this is probally something about everyone could agree with, whos fault would accidents be? Police and other people would have to put in alot more effort into deciding whos fault the accident would be and sometimes they probally could be more likely to be false. If no ones driving the car then that means the manufacturers could always be at fault. Could you really rely your life on a car? I dont think I could. And even if you chose to not drive a driveless car, some people might still be in fear because they will still be driving on the same roads as them.\n\nThese our my reasons for being against driveless cars. Some people will disagree but i strongly do believe the roads will be safer as we continue to drive with regular self driven vehicles. Again with lawmakers knowing that safety is best achieved with alert drivers, in some states it is already illegal to even test drive them, and who's fault it would be in the accident, we will all be safer with self driven cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Self Car\n\nIn the today life, technology is a big part of the world. People don't evan have to walk anymore because, they have Hoverboards; a skateboard like device that moves off the sense of you. Now someone wants to create a car that will allow you not to have to drive. Technology is soon to change the world. Though, will we still have control?\n\nTodays people will pay any amount for technology. Just for a phone people will pay $800. That much money can go toward four phones that will do just the same as that one, or evan go toward your bills. So, if they will pay $800 for a phone, just think how much they will pay for a car that works itself. A self working car manufacturer would make millions off this creation. The percent of laziness in the world is very high therefore, the probability of this car being the top seller, is also high.\n\nA self operating car, some may say is a very good idea for many reasons. The car will steer, accelerate, and brake itself but, it is mainly designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skill. Instead of calling a cab, and spending lots of money for a stranger to drive you around you can have your own car drive you around. Self cars many seem expensive, but in the end it may save you money. Though is it really safe?\n\nA robot being in control of your life. Does that sound nice? Your going to buy a car for thousands of dollars just so it can drive itself, but you still have to put your input in. So why not drive yourself? In order to make this car alot of things would have to change in the world. First off, the government will have to create roads for the cars, and where will that money come from? Us! Some manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road. So while you are watching the road the car is watching you. Is that not scary? You basically throw your money down the drain because, you buy a car for lots of money that you think will do much more than it really will.\n\nAutomakers are continuing their work on the assumption that the problems ahead will be solved, but solving these problems may only cause more. People want to create a future where no one buys cars because, they don't need them anymore. You put your life in the hands of a robot, then when something happens and you die, who is to blame? You, the car, or the manufacturer?\n\nYes, there are many deaths on the roads today, but will a \"safe car\" really make things safer?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think there is some good things about the Electroal College but some things I do not agree. Overall I believe that we should change the Electoral College. It takes to much time add all the votes and the persents to see who got the most of the votes. Than the senate and the house of representative talk about is and check if they counting is right. Not every one gets to vote.\n\nMaybe if all people got to vote it will be better and will be ble to find out a better count because each state has so many electoral votes. The thing I don't like is that not everyone has the right to vote and the should. It should be a freedom to vote after this is a free country. We also have the freedom of speech why can't we have a freedom to vote. I may understand that not all people are from this country but reall who is thatb is what make us different but, if we would understand it well be better for every to vote. That way it will be more fair than having only those that qulify.\n\nAnother thing is that when we vote the add up how mant people voted for this person and how many voted for the other and that n there they decided who won that state. add up the electoral vote but what happens to the other who wanted the other person they get pushed away and it should be like that. Those people should get a say in who the want too not automaticly be part of the one who won that state.\n\nWe should change the way we vote for our persident in the way it will become more equal and not asume it is right. To me the elctoral college just rounds up the vote in the state elector. We should and give everyone a chance too vote of course they would be 18 and older but, aleast to try maybe the outcome well be better and more fair towards to election. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The new technology called the Facial Action Coding System is very valuable. This new technology will be very useful in a classroom full of students that one teacher may not be able to handle all on their own. The Facial Action Coding System will help deal with many problems by reading a students face. This may help deal with situations a teacher can not figure out on their own. This software may be able to tell the teacher when the student is confused, upset, or even when the student is bored and needs a more interactive subject or way of learning.\n\nWhen a student is confused, they may not ask for help to a teacher. The child may be too shy or nervous to ask for a simple example or explanation. This software program will be helpful because it will be able to read the students confused face and tell a teacher that the student needs help. In the short story in paragraph six it states, \"most communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" This explains how not all people will use words to explain what they are feeling. These students may never speak up for themselves or have the courage to ask a question without the program being here to help deal with the childs needs.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System will not only help with students life in the classroom, but it may also help with a students feelings deeper within. The software will be able to pick out the students who are very upset, and need to talk about their emotions to another person. If a student has a sad face in class, the program may be able to identify what is wrong with the child, and it could notify this information to a teacher or a well trusted adult. In paragraph five of this story it states, \"most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\" By having this computer software, it could help out with a students mental emotional feelings as well.\n\nThis program will also be very helpful in providing a fun learning environment for the students. In the middle of paragraph six it explains how a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming bored. It also states that if you smile when a website advertisement pops up on the computer screen it will show more advertisements like that one. If a person frowns when this pops up, it willl show a different, more appealing advertisement. This can be very useful in a classroom. It may make the students more interested in learning. The students might even be more excited to learn now, because the computer will know that the students happy facial experssions mean they are enjoying the type of way the program is teaching them.\n\nThe new Facial Action Coding System will be extremeley helpful in a classroom. The students will have a more positive learning environment with this software. The new technology will not only be able to help with a students mental emotions, but it will help them be in a happier state of learning. This new system be more helpful for the students and for the teachers. The Facial Action Coding System is exactly what a school should be using for a overall better work place.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Limiting car usage can be a good effect but also can cause a lot of stress. In source 2 it tells how on Monday motorists with even numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or they would get fine with a $30 dollar charge. An it happened to odd numbered plates the next day. I dont htink thats a good thing to go by because some people might have jobs hoe are they suppose to go to work? other than a city bus.\n\nSource 3 tells me In German Suburb they do things without cars. An it say that 70 percent of Vauban's families dont own cars. An the people who do have cars 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe are responsible for it. Source 2 also talks about a even that they have that last all day. The event is to not use cars during the whole day. Lots of otheer countries thought that it was a good idea so they joined into the evnet. The day without cars is part of a improvement campaign that started in Bagota in the mid-1990s. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I do not think that driverless cars are necessary. As we know, a lot of drivers now aren't responsible while driving manually. How could they handle an automatic car? I also feel that not only will this car be very expensive to perchase, but learning how to use the car will cost a lot of money as well. Those who have been driving cars manually would need a lesson on how to control these automatic cars because it is completely different from what the whole world is used to. It would be like driver's school; therefore, that would be pretty expensive.\n\nTo begin with, cars now are already very advanced (sensors, gps, cars that can be charged, etc.) There are even sensors to help the driver on the steering wheel. Secondly, automatic cars such as these are illegal to drive is a lot of states, as someone could be injured or killed if the computer-cars fail. I don't believe driveless cars are any more safer than manual cars for this reason. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that the author of the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" did an amazing job writing this. I didnt see any spots where he had maybe used the wrong words or punctuation mistakes throught the whole story.\n\nThe author had great vocab choise and knew how to use some good words. For example in paragraph two he talks about how they have sent many probes to Venus unmanned because it is such a \"clout-draped world'; Almost 97 percent of Venus's atmosphere contains carbon dioxide. I also found it interesting how he is questioning the reader throught majority of the story. For exampe in paragraph four it states, \"The value of returning to Venus seems indisputible, but what are the options for making such a mission for both safe and scientifially productive?\"\n\nTo wrap up my summarization I think that the author did a great job with this story about Venus. His word choice was really great throught the whole story. The punctuation was amazing as well as his fluency. He stated some really cool facts about Venus I would've never knew about. He made me want to keep reading.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The role a car plays in the life of an individual has made changes through out the years. There never was a significant meaning to having a car; it just meant having a vehicle that can get you from point A to point B. As the human society continues to progress with the creations of technology, the use of cars has diminished greatly in different parts of the world. Not being able to use a car seems like there is no bright side, but there are actually many advantages on limiting car usage.\n\nThe United States always had this recognition of being one of the world's prime car cultures. \"The first Model T cars were born in the U.S. It has also been the place where Wilson Pickett immortalized 'Mustang Sally.\" President Barack Obama identifies in the article,\n\nThe End of Car Culture, his dreams for the U.S \"to curb the United State's geen house gass emissions will get a forturious assist from an incipent shift in American behavior.\" Going back to the article as reference, studies show \"americans are buying fewer cars, driving less, and getting fewer licenses as each year goes by... as of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak... there was also a drop in percent of 16- to 39- year olds getting a license.\" The cause of the downfall in car usage can be pointed towards a few factors; internet making telecommuting possible, the renewal of center cities, and the rise of cellphones and car-pooling apps. It is not because society assumes cars are becoming of no use, the role of technological improvements are making things a lot easier than how things were in the 1960's. The United states has the option of using cars or not, in other places like Paris, the option to drive has become a choice made out of a person's own power.\n\nParis, France is a location that anyone dreams of visiting. The city is beautiful but the levels of smog have made it impossible for people to enjoy the views of the city. According to the article,\n\nParis bans driving due to smog , \"it has been enforced to the citizens of a partial driving ban in order to clear the air... people were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine which is $31 in the United States.\" The way things are organized in Paris goes by a person's license plate number. In correlation to the article, \"congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifiying smog.\" However, not all of the cars used in Paris, France were banned. Those cars that are plug-ins, hybrids, and cars carrying three or more passengers were allowed to roam the street of Paris. A good majority, 67 percent, of vehicles in France are made up of diesel, and that kind of fuel were the ones to blame since gasoline was not in favor in a city like that one. In the same way, places like Bogota, Colombia, had similar situations as the peolpe that live in France.\n\nIn the country of Colombia there has been a day dediated to doing things with no car; it's a car-free day. In contrast to how banning driving is in Paris, Bogota, Colombia has everyone participate in this 24 hour event. If a person were to violate the rule they are to face $25 fines. The article,\n\nCar-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota, explains that \"millions of Colombians hike, bike, skate, or take buses to work during the car-free day.\" Just like the goals in Paris, Colombia has goals to promote alternatice transportation and reduce smog. A businessman, Carlos Arturo Plaza, explains \"it's good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution.\" No one would everythink that driving is as stressful as going to work. When put into mind, things begin to make sense. The early mornings of road rage people encounter makes their entire day a little more stressful than what it should be. Driving is a wonderful advantage but there is always more than just a car. Colombia's main goal, as expressed in the article \"is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog.\"\n\nIn the end of it all cars have always been in the making; trying to find new ways to improve and modernize. Although cars may have had significant meanings in the older times, as society continues to prosper in technological making, cars are beginning to be identified as material objects that are not as important. They are just in use for people to get from one place to the next when other things are not working. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article ¨Driverless Cars Are Coming¨ shows where cars in the future may take a stand. Considering how far we have came along in the advancement of human technology it is almost inevitable to expect advance driverless cars to become popular, for the good or bad. The article brings out some of the pros and cons of having driverless cars. I feel that these cars are unessacary as well as unsafe.\n\nA concern that we should all have is the safety of these driverless cars. How quick can a sensor detect a\n\nchild running across the street or a car jumping in front of you? The paragraphs try to dismiss this problem by showing the technology that is equipped on the driverless cars. The sensors and cameras supposledly are able to react. If you take into consideration the fact that these cars have been worked on since 2009, you would think they would have been made safe enough to be put into action. Yet there are still states where it is even illegal to test these driverless cars. Another reason I feel there is no need for these cars is the cost of them. These cars are probably gonna cost a fortune after adding up the cost of the technology its gonna take to supply these cars. All around the world many of people starve to death and live in proverty, yet car companies would expect us to spend money on these cars just to save us the worry of driving. Its not like driveing is such a pain you would need a computerized car to do it for you. My final reason is that these cars will cause complications when they are in accidents. As paragraph 9\n\nof ¨Driverless Cars Are Coming¨ mentions, when accidents occur there is the controversial issue of who would be at fault, the driver or manufacturer. Insurance companies would have a hard time debating these matter as well.\n\nConcluding that these cars are unsafe, cost too much, unessecarily cause contriverial issues, I dont look forward to seeing advancement in these cars. These are a few reasons why I position my self on the argument against further development of these driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author suggests that studying Venus is a worthwhile pursuit despite the dangers it presents because ''...may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system''.\n\nIf that's the case, we should most definitely try to explore Venus. It would be hard but possible because NASA has ''compelling ideas for sending humans to study Venus''. Their idea was to ''allow scientists to float above the fray''. Meaning they would be about 30 miles or so in the air avoiding Venus's harsh ground conditions. Since their about 30 miles above the surface, the temperatures would be a cozy 170 degrees Fahrenheit, the air pressure would close to that of sea levels on Earth and radiation would not exceed Earth's levels. This isn't easy conditions for humans but it's survivable.\n\nHowever, hovering over Venus from a ship above the planet is safe but it can't get us certain information that we'll need like samples of gas, rocks, or anything else. But the good news is, NASA is working on other alternatives to study Venus. An example of this would be, ''...simplified electronics made of silicon carbide that have been tested in a chamber simulating the choas of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks...'', Another example would be, mechanical computers. Mechanical computers are devices that make calculations by using gears and levers and do not require electronics what so ever. Though modern computers are powerful, they tend to be weak when it comes to extreme physical conditions. ''By comparison,systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces''.\n\nIn conclusion, We will eventually get to Venus and when we do, we will not only gain insight on the planet, but we will also get to see what human curiosity can lead us to. Our travels in space should not be limited by doubts and dangers because without doubt and danger how will we expand our horizons and learn? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What an accomplishment, inventing new technology that can read facial expressions. From a smile to a frown, the FACS computer can tell it all. Students should be able to use the FACS computers in class because they will be highly beneficial to their education.\n\nTo start off, students will greatly benefit from the use of the FACS computer because the computers will be great teachers. Since the computer can detect the students feelings, it can alter the lessons in ways the student can benefit from most. Some students are too shy and or nervous to ask questions in class and may go on without fully understanding the lesson taught. Teachers will not sometimes realize when a student is not up to speed with the lesson and need help, but the FACS computer will. By recognizing a student's facial expressions, the computers will teach them in ways they do understand, and by doing so, it willl create a higher chance of understading for the student.\n\nAnother reasons is that it can help students gain a better future. If a student does poorly in school, many troubles may come their way. From getting in trouble with their parents to not passing high school, there are many risks for students when they do not understand what they are being taught. On the contrary, if they do understand, it will result in better grades which can lead to feeling of accomplishment and intelligence and that can highly affect where they end up in their later lives. Most likely than not, better education means a better future. With the help of FACS, we can choose to build a better future for all of humanity.\n\nLast but defintely not least, FACS will help both teachers and students tremendously. The computers can help the teachers get through to the students and help them fully understand the lesson being taught. If a teacher is teaching something that the class does not understand, the computer can take over and do what the teacher cannot do, read the students faces. By doing so, the computer will unlock their emotions until it can read that they're happy with the way it's teaching. Also in benefit for students, they will get to learn in different ways. Both a human and computer teacher will for sure drill in any lesson and help them pass plus.\n\nAlthough some might view FACS in lights of glory, others will think otherwise. In their opinions, students learning from robots instead of human teachers may not be effective and only cause disturbance. They might also believe that teachers and students will slack off because they might take it in as a robot doing everything for them.\n\nTo wrap it all up in a neat little bow, students will highly benefit from using FACS computers so they should be able to have access to them. The FACS computers will pose as great teachers for students, it will help them build a better future, and it will lend a helping hand to both students and teachers. These are the reasons why students should be allowed to use FACS. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine you are a NASA scientist discussing the face seen on Mars with a person a person who thinks it could have been alien life form that created it. Do you think it was just a natural landform or do you believe in alien life form doing this? NASA believes it is just a natural landform. NASA made a discovering on Mars that they believe looks very much like a face though they say it is just a nartural landform many others disagree, there is not any life form on Mars, aliens are just theory, and it looks similar to the landform in west America Idaho Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain.\n\nFirst, there is not any life form on Mars. NASA has not yet caught any living creature on Mars when observing Mars and taking pictures of it. They have not been able to find any other things to point toward life on the Red Planet. For example in the passage it says \"...you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size...if objects in this picture like airplanes on the fround or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shack, you could see what they were!\". So this quote proves there is no life form on mars because they would have seen it.\n\nSecond, aliens are just a theory that has been around for years and years. The meth of aliens have been around for decades but still no one has ever seen one some may believe they have but mistakeing it for other objects or even seen them in their dreams and thought it was real maybe. In this example it shows that this is a strange find but could very well be just a landform \"Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first apperaed on JPL web site, revealing . . . a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all.\" this was found in paragraph seven of the passage, saying there was no life form when they discoverd this picture of a natural landform.\n\nFinally, some have said it looks like the natural landform MIddle Butte in the Snake River Plain in Idaho, west America. Like in this quote from the passage, \" That's lava dome that takes the form of a isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars.\", proving it is just a landform and no more then that. Though this could open up another opportunity to discover is there lava or water on Mars.\n\nThough NASA discovered this face and would of loved if it came from an alien\n\nthat was not the case, don't you agree? There is still no life form on Mars today, as for the theory of alien, and the Idaho plain land mark looked just like the landform on Mars, were all are fact to prove this was just a strange land mark of Mars. And now we know this thanks to NASA's research.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As technology advances through modern times, previously impossible technologoies and processes become feasible. One such technology that fits this description is the driverless car. While the driverless car in the past seemed nothing more than a popular topic in science fiction, the technology of driverless cars has become very real in recent years, with companies such as Google and Tesla developing their own driverless cars. Driverless cars should be developed and used as they are extremely convenient and provide greater levels of safety for humans.\n\nThe convenience of driverless cars are clear to see. A driverless car would be able to take over the control of the car during the mundane activities of everyday driving, such as being stuck in slow traffic or a monotonous drive down the interstate. In 2013, BMW began development on a \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" which would allow a car to take over control from the driver during slow driving situations when there is little skill required from a driver. Imagine that the next time a person was stuck in traffic, they could just let the car take over while he or she relaxed, unfrustrated by the stop and go movement of cars in a traffic jam. Another positive feature of driverless cars is that, according to Google cofounder Sergey Brin, they would consume about half as much gas as standard cars do today. This would be better for both the driver, as he or she would spend less on gas, and the environment, as there would be less consumption of fossil fuels and less emission into the atmosphere. The convenience of a driverless car is undeniable.\n\nAnother key reason as to why driverless cars should be developed is that they could provide greater safety for passengers. In the current state of driving, the majority of accidents are caused by human error. These errors can come in various forms, whether it be a person not braking soon enough, driving through a red light, or operating his or her vehicle recklessly. These prevalent problems that continually cause accidents for humans could be stopped completely if autonomous cars were used. Autonomous cars would be programmed so that they wouldn't go dangerously fast, and their sensors would warn them when to brake and how much pressure to apply to the brake. The issue of drunk driving would also become less of a problem as the car would have control of the wheel and wouldn't make the same judgement errors than an intoxicted driver might. Driverless cars can only become safer.\n\nSome might argue that driverless cars aren't truly autonomous yet, and that issues could appear if there is a system error with the car. While it is true that competely driverless cars aren't available yet, companies such as Google and Tesla are continually developing driverless cars to handle more and more driving situations, and the only time that a driver is required to take over control of the wheel is in complex situations such as maneuvering through roadwork or a car accident. While system errors could occur, these issues would become increasingly uncommon the further that the technology of autonomous cars is developed, and legislature would not allow the legalization of completely driverless cars until it is shown that the likelihood of an error is either extremely unlikely or non-existent. As time goes on, driverless cars can only improve and become safer and more convenient for drivers.\n\nDriverless cars will continually be developed to create the safest and most convenient riding experience for passengers. While some flaws exist today and there are still some instances which require human skill at the wheel, these instances are becoming less and less common due to improving software and the use of sensors in these vehicles. Driverless cars are the future of the driving experience. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The advantages of limiting car usages is that it lowers green house gases, less traffic, and a reduction in enviromental problems.\n\nBy lowering green house gases our enviroment will be better. Less lung porblems or other desieses. fresher air and less enviromental problems like global warming. Even smog in Paris or Beijing, even China.\n\nNo traffic to worry about, no lights to stop at for 10 minutes. The only thing that could make you late for work or school would be you walking to slow or taking a transit or subway. Also, people will be fined for parking in the wrong area, making people want to drive less.\n\nA reduction in enviromental problems. Like, global warming or green house gases. less trees would be cut down for parking lots or paved streets.\n\nThe advantages to limiting car usage would be that it lowers green house gases, less traffic, and a reduction in enviromental problems. Such as global arming, green house gases, and smog. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that driverless cars should be allowed.\"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers , and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers\"(driverless cars are coming). for this reason driverless cars should be permitted on the road.\n\nHistory of smart cars. special smart cars have been being developed since the late 1950's by General Motors. at first it was only a car that ran on an electrical track but everything evolved in the 1980's with sensors that they could put on cars. They starting using sensors on wheels and using the newly created antilock brakes. Over the course of the next ten years the sensors that these multiple companies put on these cars evolved into something even more advanced. New technologies also made self driving cars more safe technologies like self braking tires, power redusing engines and better reaction time. \"Antilock brakes and driver assistance still seem a long way from the dream of calling a driverless cab to take us whereever we desire, but Sebastian Thrun, founder of the google Car project, believes that the technology has finally begun to catch up to the dream\" (driverless cars are coming)\n\nLaws toward driverless cars. There are few laws focused toward driverless cars because they don't follow the same regulations that people have to follow because there not real cars. In quite a few states it's illegial to have driverless cars because of driver and pedestrisan safety. \"As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars\" (driverless cars are coming)\n\nFuture plans for driverless cars. Car companies are hoping that with advanced technology in the near future some of these problems will resolve with the better more advanced technology. \"Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on auto pilot 90 percent of the time\" quite a few more companies such as Mercedes- Benz, Audi, and Nissan are projecting to have driverless cars by the year 2020 that is along time away and technology can change dramitically in 4 years worth of time.\n\nIn conclusion driverless cars should be aloud to be on the road in the near future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is a negative aspect to the future. It is a negative aspect because if Driverless cars are invented that can cause more accidents and more people will think that texting is okay\n\nbecause these new cares are being invented and they will not have to be in charge of anything. The future with a transportation system would change the world into a worse place.\n\nMy position on driverless cars is that it will help some that can not drive good as others but the ones who will always count on their car now for anything will not know what to do if something were to happen suddenly. When this car alerts you on an accident ahead of you or getting through traffic the people will have no idea what to do because they will rely on this driverless car to get them through. \"Manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch the drivers are remaining focused on the road.\" What this quote is trying to illustrate is that the manufacturers would put cameras into the cars to test and see if the driver is still paying attention to the road even though it is a driverless car or if becasue it is a driverless car they will be distracted by something on there cellular device. Also, driverless cars is more dangerous than a person driving by itself because what if something where to happen to this car, or the system stopped working and the person that was not paying attention caused a huge accident. My position on driverless cars is that it still isn't driverless because you would still have to be alert to take over.\n\nThe article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is a dangerous invention that the manufacturers are coming up with because they think that this world would be better but other people might think the opposite. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever heard of the Face on Mars? If so do think it's just a landform, or do you think it holds alien life? If you haven't ever heard of it, which one would you go with? Would you go with the one that sounds cooler, or the one that holds the true facts inside? It's not that tough of a decision if you are given all of the facts to help you choose. By looking at the cold hard facts the answer should be any easy and simple choice. Luckliy for you we have the true facts that will help you to make the more educated decsion on which is right and which is just a fib.\n\nMany people who are known as conspiracy theorists believe that the Face is evidence for life on Mars. Although it may seem like that would be an awesome answer it is a false one. There is no evidence supporting it to have been created by aliens. Scientists have taken closer looks inside of it to prove just that. Even though at first a few of them believed that the Face was an alien artifact, they have collected data since then proving wrong. In 1997, some scientists went back and took new pictures of the Face, allowing them to appear much clearer than the ones taken in 1976. Even though new photos were taken some people were still unhappy because at the time the pictures were taken it happened to be during the cloudy time of the year on Mars. Getting this complaint scientists yet again tracked down the Face on a cloudless summer day and were able to take an absolutely priceless photograph. From using this photo scientists were able to get supporting evidence that the Face is just a natural landform. Looking at the picture you could see that the Martian was really just like a butte or a mesa. One scientist even said that it reminded him of the Middle Butte in Snake River Plain of Idaho. This butte is actually a lava dome that takes the shape of an isolated mesa which is also about the same size as the Face.\n\nThe evidence in this argument can only support the claim that the Face on Mars is just a natural landform. There is nothing what so ever saying that the Facce was built by aliens, that aliens live in it, or that aliens even exist on Mars. Many people try to say these kinds of things to just make it sound like we aren't the only ones who live in this galaxy. I get that it would be pretty cool if the assumption was real, but there is just no real evidence that supports it. There is more evidence toward it being a landform than anything else. Scientists even said that it resembles a butte or a mesa, much like the ones that are found out in the American West. If there was any evidence for aliens having created it, or it being an alien artifact it would have shown up in the photo taken in 2001. This photo would have allowed the scientists to have been able to see if there were any items such as airplanes, Egyptian-style pyramids, or small shacks. The only thing that was detected was that it looked like buttes and mesas found in the great American West.\n\nIn conculsion there is much more evidence pointing toward the Face on Mars being a landform than it being an alien creation or artifact. Supporting details for those accusations would have appeared in the picture taken in 2001. Although they weren't people still believe that it could have to do with alien lifeforms, but that's just crazy since there is nothing to uphold that story and make it true. The Face is just a landform and it can be proven that it is just one when you look at the photo from 2001. Through that photo you can see that it appears and looks like landforms found here inside the U.S. If that isn't enough evidence, then I don't know what is because how can you not believe that The Face on Mars is just a landform when scientists have proved it and when you can see it inside of a picture of it. The Face on Mars is a magnificent landfrom there that resembles landforms of those found on Earth.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Their are three reasons why Luke's point of view convince people that they should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program. One reason was that it was an expirience of a life time,he does what he likes to do,and he gets free time to do fun things. Thoes are the reasons why Luke's point of view convinces others to participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program.\n\nI can support this answer that the Seagoing Cowboy's program was an expirience of a life time when the passage says \"but the Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure for Luke Bomberger\".\"It opended up a new world for him\". I can also support that it was an exprirence of a life time when the text says,\"I'm greatful for this for this opportunity,\"he says.\"It makes me more aware of people in other contries and their needs.\"thats the reason that it was an expirience of a life time.\n\nI can support that he gets to do what he likes to when the texts says that \"Biside helping people ,I had a side benifitt of seeing\n\nEurope and China. I can also support that he likes what hes doing when the text says \"Luke also tored and excavatede Crete and marvoloues at the Panamna Canal on his way to China.\"\n\nI can support that found free time to do fun thing when the text says the cow boys played baseball and volleyball table tennis and more fun things. They also boxed read whiting and more those are the reasons how he got to do fun things\n\nIn conclusion he did alot of things to inspire people to be a Seagoing Cow boy. If mre people were like hime the world would be a better place. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System is a type of technology that can help alot of things that go wrong and it can also be bad.\n\nThis kind of technology can be and cannot be as valuable to read he students emotions because the students will have different emotions each time you read their emotions. So this technology can be valuaable because when you can read the students emotions like if there is something that is bothering them and they dont say anything, this technology can help the staff and teachers know what is going on. and it could be bad because the student who's emotions you are reading is maybe not comfortable with you reading their emotions, so you can get in trouble. So in conclusion this i am nuteral to this type of technology because i believe that it can be good or bad. No t just one or the other. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Challenges of Exploring Venus is highley dangerous to land and to live on. Its sometimes called the \"Evening Star\". Its the brightest points of light in the night sky. in our solar system Venus is the second planet from our sun. Humans have sent numerous meaning lots of aircrafts to land on Venus. Since there not been a successful space air craft that survived the landing for than a few hours. issues explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades. Venus's reputation as a challenging plant for humans to study. The planet's surface temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit.\n\nVenus is a hard planet to explore on giving the fact that its 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The Solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed on Earth levels. Temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit. Most importantly researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else, from a distance. Many of our researchers are working on making innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus. Other studies show that NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted up to at least three weeks in such conditions. By comparison systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure and heat and in all other forces.\n\n\"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" would take more than a few years for our researchers to figurer a way to collect the data from the planet. NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. Venus has value not because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself. But also because of human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doughts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "the use technology more useful to read the emotional expressions of the students is valuable is because teaches the students spmething that they never known.\n\nthe articles making mona lisa smile is a claim is because the using of technology to read students emotional expressions makes them think about how can technology so our emotional expressions and the only way to do that is by seeing a friends feeling and by seeing the facial muscles move and precisley enough to show it .\n\nfoor computers to show emotions it has to see the 44 major muscles model and how they move when they react to the emotions if the major muscles model don't move in the computer then we won't be able see the emotions .\n\nthe ways you can sse if youre showing a emotion is going to a mirror and see waht is happening to show emotion iis raie your lips at the corners of your mouth, then squint your eyes slightly to produce wrinkling at the corner of yours eyes, whild holding that raise the outer parts of the cheeks up toward your eyes. and thats what can to do to show emotions.\n\nIn conclusion, technology that is called FACS can show huaman emotions byy showing what creates them by show the mona lisa painting and what caused her to smile and this considers this valuable to the student so they can learn about this. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Seeing all of the positives and negatives of driverless cars, I do not not think driverless cars should be developed. There are some great things provided with driverless cars but I think the negatives over rule the positives of these cars. Therefore, I do not support the development of them.\n\nAs stated in the article the car must be able to know what to do when there is road work or an accident and the cars we have now that are partically driverless are not capitable of such things yet. Even if these cars were programed to know what to do in many different situations, like in road work or accidents, there is always the chance the car is not programed to know what to do in one of these particular situations because it is that common or it is something new.\n\nIn the process of making these cars completely driverless in the meantime the car still needs an attentive person in the driver seat so the car can be taken over when it needs assistance. Which can be very dangerous, considering the driver can fall asleep or not be paying attention. In the article it is brought up how some manufacturers have ideas on how to keep the drivers focused so they are prepared to take over the car when needed. Such as in-car entertaiment or flashing lights. But these features could potentially stop working at any time while it is driving itself and if there is nothing to alert the driver to take over the car this can result in many dangerous accidents. Then it will have to be decided who is responsible for the accident the person or manufacturer? Which brings me to my next point.\n\nIn the article it is mentioned how new laws would need to be created if driverles cars are developed. Which means a lot of time spent making up a bunch of new laws for driving these special car when there are already the well known laws of driving. Meaning these laws must be clearly stated and known, especially with them being new laws. If the laws are not well known then that can cause problems if there is a case where the car malfunctions and there was an accident and the person who owns the cars does not know every new law or may thought they understood the new laws but there is more to it than that person thought. This can create a lot of confusion and problems in these cases. If someone who owns a driverless car lets someone else be the \"driver\" of the car and does not know everything they should then who should be held reliable for any probelms that could occur?\n\nIn conclusion, making driverless cars is not something that should be developed. There are way too many things that could go wrong dealing with the driverless cars. Anywhere from the programing of the car, the person driving the car, to the laws dealing with these special cars. There should not be different sets of laws just because you have a car that must be drove by a human or a driverless car. That creates too much confusion on not only the owner of their particular car but also on law inforcers and courts. There should only be one set of laws for driving that way there is less confusion and commplications. Also, not having a bunch of new laws means there is less pointing fingers to whose fault the situation is, because the people involoved with the situation should know what the already known laws are. So that is why I do not believe the developent of driverless car should happen.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Hurry up Don!\", yelled Luke . Don came out to the deck . \"We're almost at the station.\", said Don . \"Then I guess we have to to hurry up if we want poeple to join the Seagoing Cowboys program.\" said Luke excited. When the ship finally arrived Luke and Don went out to get a quick snack, and while at it convincing other people to join the Seagoing Cowboys program.\n\nAs soon as luke and Don found a place to get a quick snack both had a bit of an issue. Both Luke and Don we're on the other side of the room becasue of all the poeple in there. \"It's full in here. A million poeple must be in here!\" ,yelled Luke . Don heard luke's joke but thought that it wasn't very funny. Don yelled \"We should start convining poeple to join the Seagoing Cowboys program.\" Luke Shouted \"Yes I think we should. \"\n\nBoth Luke and Don had not been quite lucky .Only three poeple wanted to join . \" We should try another time. \" ,said Luke . The men that wanted to join , signed up and got the job. \" We're going to reach land in a couple of days.\", said Luke \"Well for now we work hard on our jobs right now.\" , said Don . The crew had a meeting that the Seagoing Cowboys we're running low on men. All have either died or had retried.\n\nWhen Luke arrived at the Station, Luke couldn't wait any longer for Don so Luke left him behind . Luke was determined to get more men on the crew. Luke went to lots and different places. Today Luke felt luckier now that he was carring a rabbit's foot for luck with him. I must get lots of poeple on the Seagoing Cowboys program. At the end of the Day,Don was desperteand worried for Luke if he was or wasn't going to make it on time. The boat was leaving Luke shouted that he found lots of poeple that wanted to join .\n\nFrom that day and on the crew was careful and cautious. And had dozens more poeple wanted to join because war was happing again.\n\nTo be Continuted", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To many people the idea of a driverless car can seem a long time from here but it is actualy closer than you think. In 2016 Tesla is making a car that drives itself 90% of the time. But with these new technologies people are divided on the idea of 100% driverless cars.\n\nWith driverless cars being a possibility in the near future the technology can really help people who otherwise would not be able to be in a car by themselves. For example a blind man would be able to go some were without the need of another person. Or a physicly disabled person could enjoy a road trip by themselves.\n\nAlthough some people would say that the cars are really expensive, well you would be right they are expensive but in 2016 Tesla the same company developing the 90% selfdriving car is releasing a new battery powerd car. And yes this has been available for years but this car is a step in the right derection. The car is said to be afordable with a price tag in the $20,000 dollar range. And these cars ususaly came with a $100,000 price tag and as you see with this car it is easy to think that the driverless cars could be afordable in a couple years. And with Tesla taking the first leap into this technology you can expect great results.\n\nWith Driverless cars roaming the street it is fully possible to end all crashes. The cars wouldn't have human input which in turn would cancel the possability of human errors. And with the creation of self driving cars us as humans would advance with better technology and this would be a boost to help push are limits in the auto industry.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear,\n\nMr. Senator\n\nI am a student at SCHOOL_NAME, and in my opinion we should change to election by popular vote for the president of the United Stastes. Thats my opinon because you would know excacly how many people actually picked the president of the united states. Some people might make a mistake and pick somebody they don't want so if you do it by paper, and give people what the president will do for us peolpe might make the right choise.\n\nSo if you really feel the need of taking down the collage go ahead and do it. It will be better and in the future we can make another one and make it bigger and better then the one we have right know. It might hurt some people I know that, but once we get the new one they won't be so dissaponited because you got ridd of the old one. So make a good choise. Most people say \"but it is like a home to me\" they might be saying that because thats what everybody says so take that one down and build a bigger and better one then the one we have today.\n\nI know there is the bigger states but you can always split it boys one one side and all the girls on the other .\n\nLook at obama he was suppose to make are country a better place but he is making it worse. so maby if we get a look at them and they tell us what they are going to do right in front of us we might pick a president that is acually going to do what he says, and not make our school lunch so horribale and so little. I'm not tring to be mean to Mr. Obama but he said he was going to make change we all thought it was going to be good change but NO he is making the biggest mistakes. I know we wall make mistakes but he said he was going to make change and so far he is making bad changes.\n\nI'm not saing he is bad president but he said he was going to make change i just wish it was good and not bad. I have lived in the united states all my life and I have never seen this much bad change. I hear alot of bad stuff like world war 3 going to happen and i think to my self and think is this whta the world has came to.\n\nSo let's make the good choise and lets get ridd of that collage.\n\nWith all do respect,\n\nMiriannette Reyes ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on driverless cars I want them to be made. I'm gonna create an argument for the deleopment of these driver;ess cars.\n\nPeople imagine all the time about what gonna happen in the future. Will we see floating cars or hoverboards. People wounder everyday what will the future be like well this is what we are trying todo. Make your dreams and woundering about the future come to relife.\n\nGoogle cofounder Sergey Brin wants to change the future. He envision a future were a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars. Like all the movies and video games have been long fascinated with cars that could drive themselves.\n\nBack in the 1950's, General Motors created a concept car thatcould run on a special test track. Smart roads the special test track where the track was embedded with an electrical cable that sent radio signals to a reciever on the front end of the car. Now tell me this wasn't that cool or not who knew people was thinking about driverless cars long before we had the technoligy todo it but it was all just a concept car. Soon or later without the option of smarter roads the maufacturers had to turned to a smarter cars. But the big question here is how much smarter did the cars need to be?\n\nPeople are scared to change once they see something new they back away from it. States are banning cars that are computer-driven. I'm here to prove that smart cars are safe to drive. Smart cars are safier than we human's are. When our human race drive we have a chance to get in a car wreck. When we do we put our trust in the car to protect us from getting hurt but what if the car it self can prevent from even the wreck from happening. Smart car could detect and stop a lot faster than humans can it would stop the car before we have the time to react.\n\nNot to say humans are dumb but the smart cars are equal or even smarter than we are. Study shows that when people about to get in a wreck that most of the time when they try to hit the brake they end up hitting the gas peddle not the brake but if you had the smart car. It would stop right there and then before you get in a car wreck. Today we have electric cars yeah they save us on gas but the car can only have so much electric. In a different country people design a road where it charges a car while you still driving it now how cool is that. Law need to stop getting in that way or else we won't beable to grow.\n\nThat why we should have smart cars they can save lives. Yeah things can go wrong but even one make mistakes but what you do with them what truely amazing. If someone get in a wreck it'll be the person fault because the car warns you soemthing about to happen. Even in today cars if you get in the wreck\n\nits not the company fault it's yours. it's not the cars fault you didn't pay attention.\n\nMy conclusion to my argument is that we should be aloud to test build and drive smart cars may even one day save your life. You may not always like it but it's someone dream to make the future a better place. Like keeping this country safe is your's.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "i think that technology is valuable because you can tell when peoples expressions show they have a emotion like when their eyebrows go up their surprised or if their lips tighten up their angry so that's really cool because you can tell when their mad, sad,happy and thats how people can tell someone is having a bad day or just sad over something really bad so thats why i agree cause i always wanted to know what people are feeling.\n\nthis evidence i got it from the article saying that thieir having technology where you can tell what people are feeling inside of them or if their mad at you or other stuff so its really cool that they invented this technology cause now people can see peoples emotions and we could never do that.\n\nthe whole point of this article is about inventing a technology where everyone can tell what your emotions are and what your body expresses those are your emotions and thats how people know what your are expressing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is an article about Venus. The article gives us infromation about venus and the conditions of it as well.\n\nIt also includes infromation from NASA (The National Aeronautics and Space Administartion).\n\nEven though after reading the passage, Venus sounds like a huge death trap, the author still suggetsts that Venus is a planet worth investing in and gathering informationon. However, the author doesn't include enough deatil about why Venus should be explored and researched. In this essay, I will use evidence and or informtion to suggest that the author does a poor job with naming reasons why Venus should be looked at.\n\nTo begin, the author states that Venus would be a challenge to study. \" While Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of Earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely.\" This statement suggests that Venus could result in seroius injuries if one was to make its way over to the planet. Also stated in the article, \"no spacecraft has survived the landing for more than a few hours,\" meaning that death would occur more often than not at all. Also, the environment of Venus indicates that there would be trouble if someone actually managed to survived the landing.\n\nErupting volcanoes, earthquakes, and lightning strikes as well as a temperature of 800 degrees fahrenheit provides us with enough information that humans wouldn't be able to stand the extreme conditions.\n\nIn conclusion the author did a poor job. The author did a poor job with explaining how worthy the pursuit of Venus would be to explore. The author offers more reason as to why Venus should be left untouched. Venus is really challenging planet to explore. The conditions are far too extreme for any human. And the percentage on losing your life is high. Think about it, is Venus really worth it? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports his idea by giving many examples towards the text. He provied enough support towards his idea. The idea of studying Venus is worthy despite the dangers. With the information provied we can determind that the author gave enough reasons. For example \"These conditions are far more extreme than anything human encounter on Earth.\"(para.3.) What its trying to tell us is that Venus is a planet in which in life is nothing close to ours. The planet is buring hot due to the fact it's closer to the sun. Explaining that life in Venus isn't possible human.\n\nScientists take a big role, they are the ones that plan everything. The amount of time and effort placed into their work determines if we get to travel to Venus. For example \"scientists seeking to conduct a through mission to understand Venus would need to get uo close and personal despit the risks.\"(para.6.) Getting up close and looking at the real thing there... standing in front of you, unsure on what to to do. Everything around you looking brand new, thats what the scientists want,, To be able to look at the Venus in person, the authour supports this claim by supporting deatil.\n\nAfter reading the passage I am able to infer the main idea, which was the author supporting his idea of Venus is worthy pursuit despite the dangers. The infernace I was able to capture,\"human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally imtimidating endeavors.\"(para.8.) This paragraph gives us the idea of us humans. We could be told one millions times not to do somehting, but at the of the day we all end uo doing it like it or not. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There is alot of advantages to limiting cars. Is there disadvantages? Yes, there is, but limiting cars can also be dangerous, well because the Law Enforcements needs cars and so does the Fire Department or even hospitals. The Law Enforement needs cars to catch criminals faster, and the Fire Departments need cars so they can save us from fires and to save cats from trees, how do they even climb up there? who knows, and the hospital needs them to save patients or to get them to the hospital faster so doctors can save them, but i personally think its a great idea to have limited cars.\n\nFirst of all alot of people would lose their jobs due to limited cars, such as mechanics, car dealers, etc. mechanics will go out of business because of no business and so will the car dealers, and if cars dealers dont sell many cars, the company might go out of business too, but its good because they might think of building better cars like the hybrid so we wont have much pollution or wont have to use natural gas. In the suburbs of Germany 70 percent of Vauban's families dont own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move there. \"when i had a car i was always tense. Im much happier this way,\" said Heidrun Walter a resident in the suburb.\n\nAnother advantage is that it is much more peaceful and quiet. \"the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children drown out the occasional distant motor\" this sentence from the \"Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\" explains that it is very peaceful because theres no noise, no pollution and much more healthier people because they ride bikes everywhere and walk alot, and theres no pollution so theres probably people who dont have breath in nasty air of cars. Even the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities, and legislators are even starting to do the same.\n\nPeople that have no cars most likely walk alot and ride bikes, or even run, well because of that the amount of stress people have is probably very low, because of low stress people are happier, and thats because excersize relieves stress and even reduce headaches or other health problems. Even the death rate will go decrease because there will less car accidents, and car accidents are the numer one reason of death and the United States. In Bogota they were in their third year where cars were banned but only buses and taxis were permitted for the Day Without Cars in this capital city of 7 million. Their goal is to promote alternative tranportation to reduce nasty smog and violators faced a $25 fines, the turnout of this was large, despite the gray clouds that dumped occasional rain showers. \"The rain hasnt stopped people from participating,\" said the Mayor of Bogota\n\nIn conclusion the advantages of limited cars are great and the people of Car-less cities or areas are much happier without them, people are healthier, less stressed and even have less health problem due to it, but who will save the cats from climbing trees? maybe they wont climb it because of no pollution or scary car noises. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author talks about venus being a dangreours planet to be studying becsue they have tried to send spaceships to go to venus and their has been no spaceship that has touched down on venus for more then three decades. No spaceship has survived the landing for more then a few hours . the thick atmosphere of almost the amount of 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets . the also have clouds that highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus atmosphere. The surface temp averages around 800 degrees and the atmosphare pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our planet . venus in the hottest planet on the solor system even tho mercury is closer to our sun .. the also get lots of geology and weather presents additional impediments example that he gave were volcanoes , powerful earthquakes and lots of lightning strikes .These are some reasons and evendence that the author gives to prove that venus is a dangerous place that they are trying to study more on .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Can you imagine a time in future with driverless cars? Recently, I was introduced to an article named \"Driverless Cars are Coming\". Since 2009, Google has been working on cars that are semi-autonomous. Apparenlty, the cars are able to drive themselves for more than half a million miles without a crash. Although, the Google cars are not truly driverless. I belive that the development of these cars should be stopped immeditately.\n\nEveryone knows that the automobile has been around for years now. People depend on their cars to take them from point A to B all around the world. Since the autonomous cars are not even completely liable, why should we trust them? In paragraph 2, the text states that they can not navigate through roadwork accidents. Therefore, they'll need the driver to take over. Worst case scenario: the driver isn't paying attention.\n\nSo, say that these cars are ran by GPS. If not, how else would the cars be ran? Where I come from, there are many drop zones. What if the car loses signal and completely malfunctions? At least, with a normal automobile, you can attempt to navigate yourself to the proper destination.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe that autonomous cars should not be developed. I say if you can control something manually, go for it. Our world today already depends on technology too much! Technology can only run so far. Putting my life into some computer-generated hands isn't exactly on my to-do list. Some things, in my opinion, should just be left to us humans. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driveless cars in the near futures on roads, driving people to and from their destination. Suppose that an accident happens in the process of having a driveless car; what will happen to the driver or the manufacturers? The driveless car brings both a positive and negative aspects in this type of situation. In positive terms, the car will change the world and many ublic transportation along with it. Though there are also negative terms to driveless cars on the road with humans in and outside of the cars enviroment. What are the thoughts of having a drivless car in the near future? In ceratin opinions, the driveless car has more of a negative out come in the near furture.\n\nLet's talk about the postive aspects of the driveless care. In many manufaturer's view, the driveless car is believed to be a fundamental change in our world. Why is that? Google cofounder Sergey Brin foresees that the cars will use half the fuel of today's taxi and offer far more flexibility than a bus as stated in the passage. The cars needs lots of sensors to be created in order to work on the road. Improvements in the sensors along with the computer hardware and software are making it much more easier for the car to drive on it's own task.\n\nIn the negative aspect of driveless car would be the safety system in the car, laws, and accidents. Is the car really actually safe to drive in terms of being computerized like all other machines? In the passage the statement, \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills...\" This statement in the passage states that humans must still remain behind the wheels at all time in case of taking care of the cars situations. Many manufacturers are developing ways for the car to alert when danger is near. In terms of laws, it focuses of humans to be safe when they are driving on\n\nthe roads. Traffic laws are writtten for only safe car that has a human in control at all times. In case of an accident with a driveless car, who is there to blame for the accident? Is it the manufacturers or the driver in the car. The question is quite debatable.\n\nIn all honesty, the driveless car should not be driven untill it is proven to have been able to drive the humans without having some them take control over the car. The car also has to be certified of safety, so that the people of the roads and in the car are safe at all times. Yes, Google has a car that has been driven independently since 2009. The thought makes people wonder if it is the time to have driveless cars. Google cars though aren't quite driveless meaning they still alert the drivers on when to take over and during complicated traffic issues. So in this agrument, the driveless car should be more observed before being on the roads.\n\nIn all of the argument, the driveless car has both a postive and negative aspects in terms of being driven. In terms of safety, laws, and accidents the car has not been fully proven to be driving with the human in there and having the human take over in case of certain situtations. In conclusion, the driveless car should not be driven in the near future because humans and cars still need to be more developed.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this this world, we do not know what the future holds. However far as manufacturing, the topic of discussion is driverless cars. Google cofounder of Sergy Brin evisions a future with a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars from a public transport taxi system. Driverless cars may actually be made in the future. Driverless cars are extremly dangerous and shouldnt even be talked about or thought about any longer.\n\nDriverless cars are dangerous because they could loose control and crash. Lots of people could be injured or die from this uncontrolled car. The manufactures could make a mistake when making the car or worse, they could forget to put the brakes in the car. What good is a car without any brakes? They could forget to put in the acceleration. Driverless cars are not fit for the road at all. They also arent fit for the highway.\n\nIn paragraph 9, the first sentence states, \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe\". The laws wouldnt be keeping none of us safe if driverless cars were made legal. The car could loose its sense of direction and take you in the middle of nowhere. How would you get back home? How would you get to a phone? Theres no way these cars should be made legal anywhere on the globe.\n\nIf you were to get hurt in one of these cars, no one would give you the attention you deserve. Nobody would be on your side at all. Car manufacturers would tell you its your fault. In paragraph 9 it talk about the trafic laws changing. Traffic laws should stay just how they are. They should not change anything. Do they not want us to be safe?\n\nThe future holds no precautions for the U.S. This idea is outrageous to think about. Nobody should ever be put in danger when getting into their car. By making driverless cars, manufacturers are putting us in lots of danger. I object completly on the idea of making driverless cars anywhere in the U.S. You should feel the same.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The development of these Driverless Cars is a waste of money, and it is another pathway to technology enslavement. To create these cars takes millions of dollars, and there is a cut off of avaliability to the general public. Safety is another issue that Driverless Car owner's have to face, and when it comes to getting into an accident who is to blame?\n\nThe money used toward Driverless Cars could be used on something so much more significant. When it comes down to reparing something on the car it could also take thousands, even millions of dollars. In the text the founder of the Google Car project states, \"Radar was a device on a hilltopthat could cost two hundred million dollars. It wasn't something you could buy at Radio Shack.\" So, finding these complex items the car needs could be like finding a needle in a haystack, and cost an arm and a leg.\n\nThere are different ways to alert the driver when he or she needs to take over it can go from \"vibrating seats\", a simple \"announcement\", or flashing \"heads-up displays.\" Although, the car somewhat drives itself it still needs assistance, which totally defeats the purpose of a \"Driverless Car\". If the car is not equipped with a vibrating seat, then the driver must keep their attention to the road at all times, or in other words \"heads-up\" at all times.\n\nAcccidents on the road and who to blame. If someone were to get into a wreck with another car, \"who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" We should be able to trust a Driverless car, right? Saftey is the biggest concern for everyone, but it is not logical if you are not in full control. These cars could face problems such as hackers, people that can tap into your car and be in control of your car. How can these things be prevented?\n\nConclusivley, Driverless Cars should not be a main priority for the public right now. The companies manufacturing these vehicles should consider every mishap, virus, and hacker for the safety of the public. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of Facial Action Coding System in schools could be seen in many veiwpoints. Ones such as agreement and disagreement among parents and teachers.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System would get a lot of agreeing parents and teachers. The teachers would have the advantage of seeing how there students feel in order to better educate them and to connect with each student individually. Teachers would be able to keep childrens interested in the lesson longer, lowing the chances of any one student to fail a class or course. Parents would also agree because they could see how their child feels, they could get a better grasp of how their child is even behind the mask of emotion they wear.\n\nOn the other hand, some parents and teachers may argue that the Facial Action Coding System wouldn't be helpful or handy for them or their students. Teachers could argue the fact that a computer that reads emotion would cause great distraction in a common class. The Facial Action Coding System could prove to take over whole lessons or classes simply becasue one students sudden emotional change and although that is a good thing for that individual, the other students are now at a disadvantage for their learning experiance. Parents could argue that the Facial Action Coding System could stur up emotion between family members and it could cause negative emotions to arise. These cases could be proven by a family member trying to hide a suprise or maybe they have something wrong and don't understand how to tell other family members. This emotion reading computer could potentually rip families apart from the over honesty the computer would tell about any one persons emotions.\n\nIn conclusion the Facial Action Coding System can be both good in bad in certain cases. I feel that this system should be left in the hands of professionals, like law enforcement, in order to catch criminals. In the average home or school though, I feel that its better to not have them. It could cause more damage than good or by doing good, could stear the learnig feild completely off course.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that the technology to read the emotion expression of the students in the classroom is valueable. It can show how people really feel and waht types of emotions they have at that time. This can aslo help people when they are drawing pictures to see what moods they have in their pictures .Yes I think that this well be helpful this can help people in the further when they are making pictures and they want the picture to have a certain mood.\n\nOne good example that they use in the storie would have to be when they tell about the that the \"Mona Lisa is 83 percent happy , 9 perecent disgusted , 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.\" I think that can come to good use like how do they know all of this form one picture. An how can this one 3-D computer do all of this on a picture . How can the computer tell the model of your face and how can they tell all 44 major muscles in in your body . They also tell how you can do is your self by looking in the mirror . An thy give you you the steps to try it out youself and what you need to do. I think that this computer is going to be good use for people thta studie pictures for a living it can tell them thing that they would not be able to see with there eyes. The storie tells about the muscles called orbicularis oculi pars palpabraeus and what it dose to the picture . An you cant do this on your computer at home and that it wont be able to handle it .An your facial muscles not only expresses emotions.\n\nIn conclusion I think that this would be good to have in a class room setting. I thin that this would rely help people that want study this kind of thing in collage . An it would be as geat idea to put it in schools so that they can start when they are in school and it can help them if thats what they want to do they get done with school. I that this 3-D computer will come in good uses on other old pictuers to tell the mood in the pictures.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" by Nick D'Alto, the author describe how a new technology system called Facial Action Coding can identify human emotions. According to the article of this technology, you can identify the students emotional expressions. I think it is a valuable computer system. Most of the students do not like to express their self a lot and can be going through a hard time. I think the FAC sytem would comes in handy in a clasroom to really tell how a student is feeling.\n\nStudents in a classroom can be confused about a subject that a teacher had taught but he or she is way too shy or nervous to ask the teacher for help. These kinds of problem could drop the students grade. In paragraph 6, Dr.Huang said \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" this system can really be valuable to the teachers because they can identify student emotions without even asking them and making them nervous. Dr.Huang also said \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" meaning that the communication between human are noverbal most of the time because they do not always express their true emotions.\n\nThe use of the Facial Action Coding System also can tell if a student is happy or sad! A student might be unhappy and he or she would smile striaght to your face without any false expressions. The FAC system have a muscular action units. They can indicate the difference between a forced smile and a real smile. According to the article, in a real smile, zygomatic major (muscles that begin at your cheek bones) lift the corners of your mouth. In a false smile, the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and a different muscle, the risorius. The teachers can use a classroom computer system to capture the students true emotions. The teachers can help a students if the teacher knows how a student is feeling.\n\nHowever, not all students would like the teachers to use the FAC system on them. think about it, how would you feel if your feelings are being capture in a computer system? Students also like to keep their emotions secret and would not like to express. But it is the teacher job to help out a student. A student might be feeling very unhappy inside but shows no emotional expression to the real world and might gave up on their live. I think the computer system in a classroom would be vaulable and can be really useful for the teachers and some students who would like the teachers to know how they are feeling without them expressing their selves. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The study the ability of humans to read subatle changesin facial expressions, thast they appiled reverse correlation technique to reveal visual features that mediate understanding of emotion expressed by the face. Suprising finding were that (1) the noise added to test face image had profound effect on the facail expression and (2) in most every istance the new expression was meaningful.\n\nAll 44 major muscles in the mode must move like human muslces. Movemment of one or more mucles is called an \"action unit\" Then Dr. Pual Eckam, creator of (FACS) Ekman has classified six basic emotions- happeniess, suprise, anger, disgust, feat and sadness. In the text it states,\"The soft wear is the latest innovatiobn from Prof. Thomas Huang, of the Beckman Institiute for Advance Science at the University of\n\nIllinois.\" Dr. Huag and colleague are experts at developing better ways fo humans and computers to communicate. The faical expressions for each emotion are univeral, observers Dr. Huang, even thought individuals often show varying degrees of expression (like smiling broadly). Using video imagery, the new emotion-recqizing softwear facture these movements.\n\nThe study the ability of humans to read subatle changesin facial expressions, thast they appiled reverse correlation technique to reveal visual features that mediate understanding of emotion expressed by the face. The process begins whwne the computer constructs a 3-D comupter Model.\n\nThe study the ability of humans to read subatle changesin facial expressions, thast they appiled reverse correlation technique to reveal visual features that mediate understanding of emotion expressed by the face. Facial expression not only expresses emtions but also even help reproduce them. The thought of making faces could reveal so much about the science of emotions.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have been the main focus of developement for many years now. Engineers attempt to create sufficient cars every time a new model is planned. Many citizens of the United States are slightly aware of the environmental damage that is caused by the cars, yet still do no think twice when it comes to driving anywhere. Many countries around the world have set fines and laws against using cars and have seemed to produce a positive outcome. These countries offer many different alternatives to using cars, creating a well developed society.\n\nWhile cars are a huge advantage to modern day society, they take a big toll on our environment. According to Elisabeth Rosenthal, from the\n\nNew York Times\n\nCompany, cars are the \"second largest source of America's emission\" proving how much we rely on cars (source 4 paragraph 34).She also writes about numbers terrifying to the future generations. United States is responsible for 50 percent greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes while Europe is only responsible for 12(source 1 paragraph 5). 50 percent is proof that Americans are too reliable on transportation sources like streets, main roads, and highways. Paris was able to clear the air from pollution. According to Robert Duffer from the\n\nChicago Tribune ,after enforcing a driving ban, the air cleared after an almost record setting pollution fog (source 2 paragraph 10). Places in Asia like Beijing, China are just filled with smog in the air. The citizens walk around with masks because of the heavy pollution. That is physically dangerous for not only the adults, but the children of the communities. There has to be some alternatives to using cars in excess. Almost anything can be an advantage but when it is used too much, it will always be dangerous.\n\nEven though cars are important to commerce within society, many alternatives can be taken to help lower the usage of cars. In places like the capital of Columbia, they have found a way to travel places and limit the car use. Andrew Selsky, from the\n\nSeattle Times , speaks of this matter. He claims that there has been \"construction of 118 miles of bicycle paths\" in the city of Bogota (source 3 paragraph 27). Not only does this allow the citizens to be environmentally friendly, but it gives them a chance to exercise, which leads to better health. It is noticable the the healthier people tend to be more lifting than the sluggish, corpulent citizens. In Barcelona, Spain, being a vehicle owner is simple undesired. Other means of transportation like walking or bycycling have been the desired means of getting places. Even Bill Ford, the chairman of Ford Motor Company, admits to the impractical use of cars in excess. There are some many different ways the we can reduce the use of Cars in the American nation.\n\nWith the ability of using bikes to arrive at destinations, many places have seen the improvements in reduced traffic jams. What Americans hate the most are traffic jams. Think about those times when 10 minutes have slipped away in the morning and you are running late then there is a traffic jam. Millions in Columbia participated in hiking or biking and it left the street nearly empty (source 3 paragraph 20). The citizens were smart enough to recognize when they need a car. When going to work that is only 5 miles away, they take the extra time to reduce the usage of the streets. France experienced the same result, reducing traffic congestion by 60 percent, and then lowering the smog that had covered them (source 2 paragraph 14). This leaves the street safer for drivers and pedestrians. It also reduces the heavy noise from motored vehicles.\n\nMany nations have improved their societies by reducing the use of cars. In result, the air pollution is reduced, the health benefits improve, and the traffic congestion is heavily reduced. Not only can reducing our relience on cars benefit our genertaion, but it can benefit the generations to come. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I do not think cattle boating is a good idea.It is very dangerous,and you don't even have to think about why it is.Remember when Luke slid down the ladder,starting to sliding off the boat,but a metal peice caught his pants,and he made it alive with broken ribs?Thats dangerous dont you think?Thats not it eighther<because you sse im justgetting started.What if the metal peice wasn't there,or the metal peice was aiming for his eye or worse?Cattle boating is also dangerous because you can get stranded.For example,what if a giant storm came, and it caused the ship to go off course and you end up in the middle of no where?Also do you remember when Luke said he gets to see a lot of amazing places,well what if you became stranded on the worse places a human can never be?Now what if your food slid off the boat?Or a giant creature attacked the ship.Your life would be over.This is why I think cattle boating is dangerous.Instead of thinking twice about going,you need to think a million times about going,or dont go at all.Thats what I suggest.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You should join the Seagoing Cowboys because you get to have free time on the upper deck of the ship. You could play cool games and you get to stay active. You get to watch and feed the horses on the ship. You also get to help a lot of people if you join the Seagoping Cowboys.\n\nSecond, you have a lot of fun by playing baseball, volleyball, fencing, boxing, and you could also read a book. On the way there you could give the horses there oats or there hay if they we're hungry. You can also take a tour around a castle in all types of cities and towns. If you want to get off of the ship you can take a boat ride in Italy with the streets of water.\n\nThird, you also have to be careful when you do the job cause you can slip off of a ladder and fall into the water. You could also lose the horses and they could fall into the water. He had done more than 9 trips back and forth to a lot of countries and cities. It makes you more aware of people and other cities and countries.\n\nFourth, you could go and see any capital you what of your favorite place. You could do the job after you graduate high school you give the people supplies and you give them animals. You have to travel around the sea 16 times or more depending on how long you want to do it. More than 44 countries went together to form the UNRRA the United Nations relief and Rehabilitation.\n\nIn conclusion, being a Seagoing Cowboy opens up the world for some people. It is hard work so you have to have strength and skills. You can't join the military when doing the job.\n\nYou always stay aware if someone is having trouble you think back to your job and help them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The development of these cars would be a good idea. They have not had any crashes while using their cards. Their cars have many good things in their cars that would help the world to discover thiefs and killers. They have not create any harm or dangerous things.\n\nTheir cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash. Which is good because they were being safe and the materials created in their cars also helped them. They are being so safe that when you were to pull in and our of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, they would take over for you because of safety.\n\nTheir cars have position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver and and inertial motion sensor. These things help you keep track of your destination and how far you drove. These also help you to mimic the skill of a human at the weel. The sensors detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers. The sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on the wheels and reduce power from the engine, making far better response and control than a human driver could manage alone. So when you were driving in this car and were to have an accident, you could easily be safe because of the sensors.\n\nThe development of these cars should be allowed. These cars can help you get to your destination faster with safety and help you control the vehicle. It will improve your skills for driving. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Wouldn't you like to be able to do your make up in the car without worrying about crashing? Or perhaps bring back a loved one that passed away due to crashing or a mobile accident? With the driveless cars i think that you could. Accidents are one of the greatest problems in not only america but in whole world. You wont be able to bring back a loved one that passed away butity will be more preventable now. I think that driveless cars will be a great idea.\n\nPeople die every day due to mobile accidents. For example i have an uncle that past away because he was in an accident. The whole family was destroyed, it shook our lifes up. With the driveless cars i feel like accidents will reduce by alot.\n\nThe drivelss cars will be very helpful. For example not every morning you wake up on time, if your running late you could do your make up in the car while your on way to work or wherever you need to be. Also if you need to take a call or you need to text someone, you wont have to worry about crashing and putting peoples lifes on risk because the car drives itself. Lastly, taking care of your kids, everyone has or has a baby in the car and know the struggle when they cry or get hungry, its not so pleasing but with the driveless car you would easly be able to assist them.\n\nSafety wouldnt be a big issue. You wouldnt have to care or be worried that your children are going to get run over because with the driveless care it was sensors for it to stop when its near an oblect or the seat will start buzzing for you to to stop. The driveless car would still be steerable incase soemthing goes wrong or it doesnt stop.\n\nMany things will be prevented with the driveless cars such as deaths and dangerous injuries. You could assist your children, do your needs, and most importantly theirnwill be more safety for everyone. Thats why i think that having driveless cares are a good idea. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this essay, I will support my idea that the strange \"Face of Mars\" is just a natural formation. There is not to much evidence leaning either way, but I feel that it leans more twards being natural. We have not landed and investigated it yet. I have some evidence to support my idea. After reading this essay, I am sure that you will understand my point of view.\n\nI belive that the face of mars is natural. First, It is just a large rock formation that could have just occured naturally. Second, There is no other sign of life on mars. Third, It only resembles a face, it is not perfect. It is still controversial because we cannot examin it face to face. We only have the images that the space shuttles took from 1976 through 2001. Just because it is a formation on a different planet, it doesn't mean it was created by aliens.\n\nWhen God created the universe, did He say that He created little green men to live on the different planet? No. He said that the only intelligent being, with His breath in our lungs, that he created was use. Although, He did say He created the wonders of this universe. I would call the face a wonder, wouldn't you? God created one planet with the perfect design for life, and that planet is our home Earth. This is why I think that the Face of Mars is just a natural landform, and that there is no life on Mars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.