messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus is worth the dangers it presents. Our planet has become so technolicaly advanced that it would be possible to dp more research on the planet venus. Even with the technology we have now it would be possible to study venus from 30 miles up in the air. Modern computers are also very quick. Also known that venus could have had possible life but NASA needs to to further research. Our plantet has become so advanced with technology and inivating new things that research can be done so that we can study Venus. As we know that venus is the closest to the sun it ¨has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system.¨ The surface is on adverage of 800 degrees and far to hot to land and study with the space gear we have now. The gear we have can not withstand the heat from the planet and is why we have yet to have a successful landing. With modern computer being ¨flexible,pwerful, and quick.¨ they can get thigns done faster and efficiently with the heat. Over time of we keep inavading new products that can withstand heat more research can be done. Human curiosty is also growing on what is going on with venus. With the ¨atmosphere being 97% carbon dioxide¨ and ¨highly corrosive acid¨ it gets very hot. The furthest humans can get to studying venus is just by pictures because nasa has to stay 30 miles up in the air. That would still be around 130 degrees in the air. So even with the heat research can still be done but with a little more time and inavation it can become more successful and get us on the ground. Current progress on research is going very smoothly. NASA has been studying ways to make their machines work with the heat.¨some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus surface and have lasted for 3 weeks in venus´s conditions.¨ This shows that we are making quick progress from not even being able to land on the planet from making machines last 3 weeks in the heat. Venus is a worthy puruit despite the dangers it presents. Objects are being made to withstand more heat and last longer. Human curisity is growing and so is our technoligical society. With a little more time the dnagers the plantet venus holds can be taken by nasa and research can be made.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Computers in the classroom are becoming more normal as technology and the education systems evolve. For now though, they are simply machines being controlled by teachers or the students themselves. As the technological field grows, ways of teaching and helping students learn is also growing. A recent invention called the Facial Action Coding System, or FACS, has allowed for computers to recognize and evaluate human emotions based on which muscles are being used in the expression. These technologies could be very useful to the classroom, allowing for the lessons to adapt to the students facial expressions or amount of interest. Being engaged in the classroom varies between students and it can be difficult to get some students involved if the lessons are less interesting to those students. With the FACS, or other similar technologies, the students can learn about the things that make school exciting to each individual. The computers will be able to recognize what the students are feeling about what they are learning and adapt each individual students ciriculum. FACS will allow the lessons to revolve around the students instead of the students around the lessons. Not only can the students become more excited with school and learning but the students will want to be more involved with the class. School can be a place of empty thoughtss for students if they feel the classes they were given, or chose, are not interesting for them. Although key subjects would still be mandatory,the other classes that students can take can be expanded upon. This technology will be able to read the expressions of every student and how well they are progressing in understanding. The lessons will adapt to the speed and understanding of individuals to go at ones own pace. With lessons being adapted to pace, school could take longer amounts of time for some, although that can be controlled with longer school years to allow students to graduate or advance when that student is ready. Technology and education are merging, and being more widespread and helpful to teachers across America. As of now though, none of the technology used in education is extremely advanced. More technology is being manufacture and invented to assist in many different fields as well. These include the facial recognition software created by scientists and programmers. With learning though, these softwares can be applied to many different aspects of the American education. The technology will be able to change the education system for good.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Unmasking the Face on Mars In May of 2001, NASA sent a spacecraft, Viking 1, to space to circle Mars and to take photos of this red plant to see if there were anywhere for its sister ship, Viking 2, to land. While Viking 1 was taking pictures of Mars, it captured an image of a face. Scientist thought it was just another Martian mesa, which is pretty common actually. But this one had unusal shadows that made it look like a face of an Egyptian Pharaoh. Few days after recieving the photo from Viking 1, NASA released the picture to the public for everyone to see. Along with the photo it captioned \"huge rock formation... which resembles a human head... formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth.\" Many people refered to this as the \"Face on Mars\". Many civilians thought that this was created by ailens which is untrue. They also thought that the Face is bona fide, evidence of life on Mars, conspiracy theorists said this was evidence that NASA would rather hide. NASA captured as many good photos as they could of the \"Face\" over the 18 years Viking 1 was in space. In April of 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time. Micheal Malin and his Mars Orbiter camera team captured a photo ten times sharper that the photo Viking 1 had took. Many web surfers were anxiously waiting to see the photo. But many people were dissapointed when they read that the \"Face\" was just a natural landform, there was no alien monument what-so-ever.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The secnd venus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and different speeds. In planet venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers one of the brightest points of light the sky making evidence form the conclusion to explanation earth. In 97percent carbon dioxide blankets venus temperatures average over 800b degrees. The venus is reputation of the humans to study despite its proximity to us. The different of 97 percent carbon dioxide is planet venus. In earth venus and Mars other time to venus terms humans is sometime right around corner. The 800 digrees fahreheit average temperature over acid in venus. In 90 times greater experience anything humans encounter on earth. The enviroment wopuld crush even a submarine accustomed in planet venus. The planet venus our oceans and would liquefy many metals. The system even though mercury is closer to our sun. The vesusian geology powerful sky planet venus and earth or oceans. The carbon dioxide is blankets venus. There are far more extreme than anything humans ecounter on earth, such an enviroment would in crush accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our are oceans and would liquity many metals and planet venus. In planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys mountains and craters in hawaii oceans earth is different productive. The earth venus still has some features that are analogus to those on earth planet venus is different the carbon dioxide. The temperature in planet venus at around 170 degrees fahrenheit but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on earth. The humans solar power would be plentiful and radition would not exceed earth levels because the temperature in planet venus is different. The photography and videography ineffective more importantly cannot take samples or rock gas or anything form ditance in planet venus the conduct a thorough mission to undertand. I think of them as challenges many researchers are working on innovations that woould allow our machines to last long enought to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge. The studying venus for example some simplifed electronics made of silicon metals and planet venus is difficult. The divices were first envisioned in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940s during in planet venus. In the challenge presented by venus has value not only because of the planet itself the human curiosity will likely lead us into many earth. In earth beyond should not be limited by dangers to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation. The diffrences in speed mean that sometimes right around the cornert to vantage examine more closely. The spacecraft to land on this cloud draped worl good reason since no landing for more than planet venus. The working on other approaches to stuying planet venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The driverless car is said to be more convienent, environmentally friendly, and safer. The cars see a promising future of using almost half the fuel of a taxi and being more flexible than public bus transportation. On the downside, to have these cars fully accepted into everyday society, there must be many measure taken to insure the safety of the people. The cost for driverless cars could be very high too. To make a car that is fully packed with sensors and hundreds of automated functions may be too coslty. Lastly, the people that need the jobs of taxi drivers and bus drivers will ultimately have to look for new jobs if the idea of the roads being dominated by driverless cars comes true. The driverless cars are detrimental in the fact that they can become quite costly, many laws will have to be put in place to accomodate their arrival, and many jobs will be pushed out if the new cars were to take over the roads. The plan for these driverless cars to be as available and more convenient than public transportation means that the cars will have to be widely available in small and big cities alike. To be able to mass produce so many high-tech cars would have to be very costly. Although the car itself is said to fun on half as much fuel than taxis is a plus side, but to manucature these cars would probably produce a fiar amount of waste too. To pay for the mass production of these cars, would the tax rate be even higher? Would there also be a fee for using these cars for transportation also? In regards to that, these cars may just be too expensive that it out-weighs the convenience of it. To have cars like this out on the roads, there must be many laws put in place for any scenarios that these cars could bring up. The types of accidents and faults that could happen are numerous and may add on to the insurance fees the people already have. Since these cars are purely techological-based, there will be the argument of who is at fault whenever there is an accident. The laws accomodating these new cars could become very complicated and difficult to establish since the safety of the people comes first. The possibility of these cars becoming so popular that people might not need cars anymore might be a problem for people who have a job in public transportation. Taxi and bus drivers will be out of jobs when these cars take over. The production of these cars do not open up enough job opportunities to counter that detrimental effect either. The cars could be very convenient to people with disabilities though. People with mobility problems could have a good use for these driverless cars. Even so, there are already chauffers for people with dibilitating conditions. The new driverless cars may be convenient to take people to and from easier, the cost and social effects might be too detrimental that it out weighs the pros. There will have to be more laws established and many people will be out of jobs. Technology is continually advancing, but perhaps it should advance in a different direction.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There has been a controversy about whether we should make efforts to fight climate change. I think it's necessary, and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs. First, it affects our life negatively. It has been reported that there has been an increase in the sea level on account of melted ice, which can be ascribed to global warming. Such a situation will lead to a loss of living habitats around the globe. Take some scientific reports as an example. Many scientists have detected that the sea level will rise about 6 meters in 2100 because of the melted ice in the south pole and Greenland. As a result, innumerable tropical islands and low latitude areas will be drowned. Second, it will bring countless natural disasters. It's expected that global warming will influence the precipitation largely, which can boost the probability of fierce hurricanes. In the past years, the US and the UK experienced the attack of fierce hurricanes several times. From 1095-1930, there were about 3.5 times hurricanes annually; and from 1995 to 2002, this number ascended to 8.4 times. It's worth mentioning that every attack of hurricanes kills hundreds and thousands of lives, and can cause a loss of millions of dollars. Third, it brings about diseases. Due to the extreme climate caused by climate change, those affected places provide a superb growing environment for viruses; creatures like mosquitoes and rats grow rampantly in those areas. As a consequence, they can spread diseases quickly and broadly. Take Malaria as an example. Malaria has killed numerous people in Africa. It is spread through mosquitoes, it always takes place in tropical areas because of the wet environment. In conclusion, I believe climate change is a huge problem, and it should be tackled as soon as possible.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "No i cannot image the world with driverless cars. I dont think it would be safe to have driverless cars. Havin a all car be controlled by electronics there might be some malfunctions or people will just think since the car is driving itself they dont even have to pay attention to the road. For a person to not have to controll a car and just ride I would say would make people less focus and lazy. Having a computer operrate your car would not be a safe choice. Sometimes your computer have malfunctions so what if your car have one. Driverless cars are basicaly a computer driving you and at any given moment it can lose control and crash into another car. Although it would be safe option for people who are drunk or cant drive, but there are already some really good solutions for drunk people or people cant drive. There is Uber you can get a ride to where you need to go and dont have to worrry about operrating a car because there is someone else driving you. Some people already lose focus when they are driving a car, so no having to actually drive a car would not be a good thing to have around for people who lose there focus easily. Alot of people would think that they dont have to pay attintion to the road sense they don't have to actually drive the car until something complicated happens. Although the car can break on its own there still can be a chance that a accident might acur. The twenty first century has alot of lazy people in it. Not having to opperate a car would make people lazier. There are alot people that just don't want to go places because they dont feel like driving. So as a conclusion I say keep the cars how they are. If they want to fix something make the cars take less gas to fill up. I don't thin making cars be able to driverless would be safe or a good idea.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" the author describes the new facial recognision technology called the Facial Action Coding System(FACS). This system claims to read emotion expressions. I think that the FACS could help sience in understanding the emotions and muscle relationship and think it is a valuble thing in classrooms. Some possitive thing about the new technology are adaptation and improvment. With this new technology we can use it to adapt different things like ads and school lessons. Ads can sometimes completely take out the interest on the viewers for the video and can be sometimes unpridictable. This has happend numerous times in classrooms when a teacher wants to show a documentary that is all ready slighty borring and an ad showing an exciting new superheroes movie comes up So now you have the entire class talking about it and not paying any atention to the documentary about Charles Darwin and what he did. Having these distracting ads adapt to what the audience is feeling could help bring down the amount of times this happens. The FACS could also help in computer lesson planing. If the FACS would be installed in a computer the computer would be able to realise that a student is no longer paying attencion becouse of boredom. So system can then improve what the lesson has by chnging the order around to give the student a more personalised lesson thus having the student learn easier. There are some bad feedback as well. If the FACS system succeds in improving the academic scores of the students the school administration might deside that the teacher are no longer needed to teach the student, the students could just study in there cmputers. Another way the FACS could not be so good is that it is likely to be very expencive and there is ways a possibility it can malfunction and give unwanted changes in lessons and other sections in which it would be used. In conclusion I think that the FACS could be of great help in the world if it could be 100% reliable. This system could benifit the every day use if used corectly and I think that the FACS could help sience in understanding the emotions and muscle relationship. I think it is a valuble thing in classrooms.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "When it comes to emergency issues, some said that they should only rely on help from other nations to solve the problems, while other individuals think that the incidents can be deal with by supports in the country. I personally disagree with the statement that we depend on global scale cooperations to solve the crisis, since there could be drawbacks to counting on foreign supports. Firstly, it takes more time for anther nations’s support to arrive. Since the problem is urgent, counting on help from other countries could lead to miss the best opportunity to deal with the situation immediately. Also, local support team who are located closer to the site can respond to the issue immediately by gathering up resources and planning the solutions. All in all, local people can respond to the problem more quickly in order to mitigate the situation. Secondly, it is hard to organize support teams and resources come from different countries when an emergency crisis occurred, since the situation could be chaotic with the spread of misleading informations. Also, the language barrier could be a difficulties since not all foreign personnel familiar with the local language and customs, so it might be difficult for them to support in the site. On the other hands, local emergency services personnel can communicate directly with the victims using their native language, which can speed up the processes and avoiding misunderstanding. As a result, domestic rescues are more supportive due to familiarity of local culture and language. Overall, I support that urgent situations can be solved by national emergency services with faster respond time and the knowledge of local environment.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Although the school system has advanced quite far in recent history, there are still plenty of clear problems with the way children receive their education. Many students are constantly stressed out and are not truly learning the material because of it. Additionally, each student may have a different learning style, so it is not helpful to teach them in large groups with the same methods. The recent innovation of FACS (Facial Action Coding System) can be utilized by schools to vastly improve the way children are educated. Many issues with the education system could be improved upon, if not completely eradicated, with the use of facial recognition technology within classrooms. As mentioned in paragraph 6 in the article, FACS can be used to recognize when a student is confused. Schools could take advantage of this technology to notify teachers when a student is struggling with material, and help them get back on track. This would allow teachers to adapt their teaching style to best suit each student. Furthermore, all different ages of students today are constantly stressed out with the massive workload that is forced upon them each day. One of the many consequences of this is that the students may not actually be learning the material beceause of how focused they are on the responsibilities they have for other classes. A facial recognition system such as FACS could be programmed to detect when a student's facial expression demonstrates stress, and notify the school so they can proactively help the student cope with this stress before the situation worsens. This will help the student relax and focus better. The potential of this technology is huge, as it could be used to improve every student's life, both inside and outside of school. If schools were to have the ability to help students with any material they don't understand the first time and asist them in coping with or eliminating stress, it would make the experience of going to school much more enjoyable. This would motivate students to do their best to be successful in school, which would drastically improve their life, as well as society in general. If all schools manage to overcome the technical and monetary difficulties of implementing FACS in teaching, it would benefit everybody in many ways.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have you ever wondered what it would be like if the world had cars that drove on their own? This would be a bad thing, and could potentially cause more accidents. The three main reasons this is a bad idea are; the cost is extrememly high, people may not pay attention, and the cars can't completely drive on their own. The first problem with smart cars, is that the cost for the equipment and technology is too expensive. According to the article, the track for General Motor's concept car required massive upgrades to the roads that exist today, and the price was just too expensive to be practical. Google's modified Toyota Prius has, and uses, a rotating sensor on the roof, position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a GPS receiver, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, an internal motion sensor, and four automotive radar sensors. Just imagine the money it would take to put all of that into each car that is made by google. The people just simply can afford it. Just the spinning sensor on the roof uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. It is the most important thing on the car, and probably the most expensive. The next problem with these experimental cars would be that the human inside the car may not be paying attention. The cars are designed with entertainment and information systems on the inside of the car, for the driver to use while waiting for their turn to drive. They do have a button to turn them off instantly when the driver needs to take over, but what if the driver continues to use them while drving.These may very well distract the driver, and could lead to an accident. The car has warnings , but what if the driver thinks that the car can handle driving on its own, even with the warnings? The driver may think that he or she is safe because they are in a smart, driverless car. Even with all of the enertainment systems, the driver will have nothing to keep them alert and awake in the long stretches of time that the car will be driving on its own. The driver may very well fall asleep. The last and final problem with these smart cars are the fact that they are not completely driverless. The driver still needs to be at the wheel when the car is in motion. The cars can not control themselves at speeds over 25mph. This means that on most roads, the car would not be able to drive itself. The cars cannot back out of driveways or work their way through work zones, and accidents, so the driver would still have to be ready to take the wheel in times of need. In conclusion, the idea of a smart, driverless car is very dangerous. The production of thses cars may lead to over expensive and too high prices, distractions/ falling asleep while in the car, and possible accidents because the car cannot drive through certain obtructions on its own. The cars could be very dangerous to society, and may cause many more accidents than are currently happening in today's world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "yes year old could find offensive book talks race bad way Now man walks finds offensive book race take shitchuration new level like maby demand taking shelf somthing else If women walks son daughter find dirty nasty book sex drugs guns knifes So yes offensive book taken shelf book books public libeary Only reason books taken shrelf public libeary alot kids pearents read research homework And public libaery take offensive book shelf",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I Luke Bomberger am a veteran seacowboy. The segoing cowboy program isn't all hard work. You should join the program because it is a chance of a lifetime, you visit cool places, and you get to have fun. The cowboy program is meant for you. This a one time offer. You don't know how long this opperation will be running. When my friend asked me to do I thought, \"I knew this was an opportunity of a lifetime.\" I decided I am going to go. You should go too. Another reason you should go is that you travel all over the world. You get to see things that you would never imagen. The places were unbelieveble. When I was a cowboy, \"I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special. Another event I remeber was in Venice were we road a gondola on the streets of water. I always liked the end of the trips because after all the hard work we had fun. We had had so many games. \"The cowboys played baseball and volleyball games in the empty holds where animals had been housed. Table-tennis tournaments, fencing, boxing, reading, and whittling.\" with all these games we never wanted to leave the sea. If you came too, you could do play too. We spent so much time having fun I knew it was the best decision I made. After all those years I stopped, but I still remember the adventure. Most of all I remember it was a chance of a lifetime, all the trips we made, and all the fun we had. The trip was definintly worth it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the futuristic movies cars have always been the main attraction. The idea of driverless cars excites everyone about another step into the future that is shown on television. Driverless cars should continue to come into existance because the car will be smarter, safer and it's relaxing and fun. To begin, driverless cars should be produced because the car alone is smarter. Manufactures realized that making smarter roads would be too expensive, so why not make smarter cars? The normal cars that are used world wide will be enhanced to become driverless. Not only is it just the idea of the car being driverless but all of the things the car does that makes it driverless. Google's modified Toyota Prius is a smart car but not driverless. The Toyota Prius alone \"uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reviever, and an inertial motion sensor.\" If a normal smart car has these many upgrades, imagine what a driverless car would bring to the table. Another example would be in 2013, BMW announced the \"Traffic Jam Assistant.\" The car can drive up to 25 mph and also has special touch sensors to make sure that the driver never takes their hands off of the wheel. Secondly, driverless cars will be very safe. Manufactuerers hope to bring an in-car entertainment and information system that uses heads-up displays. This system can turn displays off instantly when they feel that the driver needs to take control again. This is something that isn't yet available to drivers who like to try and text and drive. Cars now such as the GM has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing up into an object. On the other hand, the Google car verbally announces when the driver should get ready to take over. Manufactures also are considering using cameras that watch the driver to make sure they keep their eyes on the road when driving. Though the main conflict on safety issues is, who is at fault when there is an accident, the driver or the manufacturer? The prompt states that \"Automakers are continuing their work on the assumption that the problems ahead will be solved.\" The Automakers will continue to fix any problems that may lead to electrical mishap and a law will be made on who will be at fault if an accident does occur. Lastly, driverless cars are relaxing and fun. Getting a driverless car would give the driver alot of time to just relax if they do not feel like driving. Putting the car on its autopilot would give the driver time to return a phone call or text without having to worry about the road. Considering that the car will alert you when it's time for you to take control again. The question \"wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" arises but Dr. Werner Hubur, a BMW project manager driver answers the question with \"We have to interpret the driving fun in a new way,\" such as the in-car entertainment center. Not only will the entertainment center be fun, but it'll also turn off when it is time for the driver to take control of the wheel again. In conclusion, the idea of driverless cars can have a long debate but the reasons driverless cars should continue to come into existance is because they're smarter, safer all of while being more relaxing and fun.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "la monalisa was creater by one of the best drawing artis ever existed in this life. La monalisa is in French Paris, lots of people go during vacations or even during a work flight because if part of the history of the worls not lots of people gets to see her closly these days because its so importand and there would never be one like it you might stand 7 ft away from it thats the closet that your gonna see it lots of the peole that have gone there say that its the most beautiful art that they have ever seem in tgeir life. Most french people already know how it looks like and how it is bevause its part of their history party of their culture and if you star searching who are the most artis people you probably find that most of them are french peoole which is pretty impresis because the best art is over there so they get it from the culture they have artis skills in their blood. Forgot to tell ya the monalisa its a 3-D art piece which in those times it wasnt easy to creat a piece like that and still now days. it has 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles . You can hardly tell that the monalisa from differents way if she is happy, sad or anger its a one kind of piece which you probably get to see once in your life time.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "To prove to my fellow collegues about the \"Face on Mars\" thing was naturally made, not by alien lifeforms, i have decided to write this paper. This face has shodows and yes it does make it look like it has eyes, nose, and mouth, but that just really what we want to see if you were told it was a face you would've beleived it. The article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" has a lot of suspense and it does indeed pull the reader in, and towards the end they break down the scientific facts. They use examples of here on earth and they talk about the showdows. They even talk about how the resolution of photos could change the perspective of those photos. This face shaped mound on mars has just thrown all the theories out and has caused a big worry in the world. Personally I did not see the face until i had read through the article pretty much pin-pointing all of the features, so i went back to the picture of the face and that when i did see it. One persons theory has caused problems for everything from t. v. to conversations. The fact of the matter is that when you look at this mound and you are told its a face you are most likely gonna beleive that concept until you get the scientific facts and you read them and you probably still wont beleive it, because as humans there has always got to be something that drives you to be excited. Its in our genetics and our concept is just going to be stuck with until there is an actual reasoning that can be proven. In this paper i have mostly talked about my beleifs, but everyone has their own beleifs and I know that we can not fully prove there is life on other planets, but whatever makes you strive fo answers be my guest. I am not here to judge you or shoot down your answers. I am here to give you once again another concept.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The technogy that there using it looks wonderful explain every single details how the techonology works and how the testing are. It explain that they make a machine that can read face and pictures just like the Mona Lisa face, they describe that Mona lisa have 83 percent happy , 9 percent disgusting, 6 percent fearful and 2 percent angry. They explain this just because of a software computer read Mona Lisa face. The coumputers are very smart at this time but a computer that reads face is a little bit complicated because they can do almost everything that a human wants but reading face is not so hard. Using technology to read emotions expressions of students in classroom is not so good because students can read faces too. A lot of people can read faces even if your mad or not people can see emotional in other faces . The process of the software computer begin when the computer constructus a 3-D computer model of the face. it explain that thhe computer jus move muscle and the way faces move like in paragraph 3 describe \" all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an action unit \". this mean that they read the muscle in the face to explain what motion humans do. Reading faces is not so hard you can see people if they are happy,angry or sad is not so hard if see someone laughing you can tell that the person is happy or something make happy that person, like in the artticle say \" In fact, we humas perform this same impressive \" calculation \" every day . For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" this mean that most people can show feelings on their face. Of course some people have trouble to describe faces because some people doesn't show feelings and other do. How people feel it depends on them. most people are happy and others sad but every single people can be happy it depends on them not in other persons. The people that are always happy are the ones who thinks positive the ones that love their self a machine can read their faces but the machine doesn't know that humans can change their mind in less than an minute we can be happy and then we can be sad for a sad news but for the computer it will take time to know when human change emotions because it has to read I again the whole face , compare to us the human can see fast when other person get sad. like a quote it say \"The Mona Lisa desmonstrate ir really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it shows just how much this computer can do\". this mean that the computer is smart it can read faces . The technology is good for in some reason but reading faces too easy for human and humans doens't need a computer to tell hom the other person is feeling becuase humans can read faces too. their is no reason that human need a computer to tell them when ever a person is sad or happy. Humans can just look at their faces just to see of they are happy or sad.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Are you ready for an adventure? Do you want to visit unique places while on the job? If so, then joining the Seagoing Cowboys will quench your thirst for adventure and exploration. The Seagoing Cowboys program changed my life forever. I recommend anyone searching for an exciting time to join the program. During my time participating in the program, I got to tend to cattle and have time to do recreational activities like playing baseball, volleyball, or even just simply reading. However, this program is not for the soft, but for those who are willing to live and work on a boat for long periods of time. I have gone on nine trips, the most of any Seagoing Cowboy. I still remember those exhilirating adventures of traveling all over the world. Joining the Seagoing Cowboys is a great choice and something you won't regret. I never look back and think of my time as a Seagoing Cowboy a waste of time. Those years were my most exciting years of my entire life.Everyone should give this program a shot. I strongly recommend this program to everyone. Those are the reasons why I believe you should join the Seagoing Cowboys.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In ancient times,the women was known as weak figures in comminuty.Both male and female are indulge in variety of qualities and abilities.some works can't be conducted by women,due to this issue that community suggest ladies should be behind of the gents.I will argue that public should be dominant for their behavior. Firstly,it is disbutable fact ,whether a job or a profession is decided upon the qualifications and the personality of the candidate,not under the circumstances of empathy and traditional myths.Moreover,though,women are strong desired category when it comes to hope and the target.There is no replacement for a pain that mom holds throughout the maternal process.She overcomes every drastic situation throughout the 9 months period.That would be the proper example for the current issue.Eventhough men reputed to be gigantic and strongest person,yet the gift of bearing child has given to women by the almighty. Secondly and more importantly,location where girls present is a place where known to be a heaven.If it a workplace with heavy works or a department of any authority ladies willing to fill the whole path from enlightenment.So there will always be a balance if there are both genders involved in any situation or target.since childhood we have believed that there will always be a women beside a successful man,from our personal achievements can see that it is indeed a truth.In spite of that there were great leaders who are women in many countries,who got succeeded with their aims and targets of huge achievements for the benefits of countries. By way of conclusion,society as a whole,we should consider both geneders with same prospect.even for professional or personal criteria.Then there will be a huge achievement for the society's growth.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It would be a good and worthy pursuit because it is what we call are \"twin\" planet due to size and density but yet it is to dngerouse to be able to travle ther because it is to close to the sun and you would ony be able to be on Venus for no more than a few hours on the plant and we dont have the resources to be able to send men to Venus constantly due to the matelas that we are limited on and soon enough we would run out the things that men will need to be able to stay and make it to Venus alive and still have the resouces to be able to make it back to earth with out having complacations on weather there are going to make it there and back with the limited amout of resouces that they will be sent with",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\" I mean teacher need to know when his students is not in the mood to do stuff and when they are having a bad time.\" a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. computer is very important now in this 21s no matter what you doing you need a computer to do it. computer is like life now you seen technology everywhere where that come from? and their have different kind of computer though some computer have the ability to recognize the sebtlet facial movement and can read our mind, our feelings we express, they even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced smile. I don't have enough imformation to tell you where this technology come from? we have different kind of technology, like computer, phone, etc. those are some technologies that really important to human. computer we seen computer everywhere at school, at work, at home, computer is everywhere this technology is very important to human we can go to the internet on computer to do search everything and knows what going on in this earth. We have new computer software that have some abilities to do thing, like read your mind phone is the kind of technology that really important to human. phone been used for the first time in 20s by somewho i don't remember his name but that not the since the point. but with that phone we can connect to others no matter where they are no matter how far are they we seen phone everywhere though In conclusion computer is kind of technology that really important to human imagine computer replace human or read your mind, your future, control your body but that not the since the point this new software is very important, like it's can tell you when people is having a good time on the internet, or see how people feelings when they are doing something and tell you when people give you a fake smile in life they have some people who are give you fake smile straigh up to your face but do you think we really need this software? to tell us what peole think or feelings.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Has driverless cars ever came to your mind before? To think that car companies and Google are working on these futuristic things are mind blowing. In a few years we could be in the future era of cars. Cars like this would change the world. They would use less fuel, help improve safety, and allow the driver to have fun. First reason driverless cars would help improve our life is they use less fuel. Having to use less fuel would save people big money. The cars would be able to travel more miles per gallon. Since these cars will only need half as much fuel, people could select cars not based on how much gas they use, This would allow customers to choose the car they really want. Second reason driverless cars would help improve our life is they can decrease the number of car crashes. Inside all these cars are loads of sensors. These sensors help the car stop, slow down, or brake automatically. By having this kind of technology, the car accidents around the country would drop. That also means more people would buy these cars knowing they are safe. Last reason driverless cars would help improve our life is because they would allow the \"driver\" to have fun and relax. Some of the manufacturers would put in-car entertainment and information systems in the car. These display systems could turn of instantly in case the driver wanted to take over the car. Drivers in the car could also text if they wanted too. They would not have to worry about hitting someone or something. Driverless cars would greatly improve our society. They would use less fuel to save us more money, decrease car accidents, and make drivers less bored. It could take many more years for these type of cars to come. They might not even come for another 20 years. When they do, we will all be living in the future era of cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear Local Newspaper I nt know I understanding correctly honestly thinking advancing technology Quickly rethink worst mistake could ever make computers tech handey coordination also give useful knowledge Lastly computers help us stay close family friends Fisrt people say use computer every day increase knowledge This could ba simple going discovering latest news This ten times easier going waiting news stone want details I took survey students say use thier computer every night read thier social studies science unit computer advances away like learning advances away want Second chrildrens doctor states Computers give children handeye coordination need enhance sports I agree Sports baseball soccser basketball need great deal handeye coordination Without handeye coordination students well end quiting I know I trouble sports long time I would give If teens gave sports wouldt anyining keep fit one would lead hundred kids obesity problem Lastly away advancing computers maens away family friends connectionds Computers offer many sites facebook myspace connect loved ones You also go sype chat video chat Yes maybe computers away time family year Do nt want time You make time limts nt spend whole time computer This way took loved ones would want one crushing oceans child wants talk see grandparents In conclusion I remember talking laughing friends computer sick could cheer Dont take away Keep enhancing computers I advance knowledge increase handeye coordination get see far friends family",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The features setting essay entitled Do Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit affect cyclist tagonizing manner He dehydrated exhausted due conditions environment cyclist became dehydrated lack water also scorching heat desert He sweat much point lost enormous amount bodily fluids The cyclist also traveling unpaved road required energy traveling one paved Therefore cyclist became exausted almost died These ways environment cyclist affected",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In narrative Do Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit Joe Kurmaskie cyclist affected deadly negative way setting The cyclist travelling The high deserts California June It hot hot infact author realized could drop heatstroke anytime This unbearable heat coupled crippling hilly terrain enough reduce cyclist stale severe dehydration Obviously exactig positive effect The swelting heat merciless hills setting would quite awful locations stop rest replenish eyeishes diverting water supply However There one sight building structure kind The cyclist incomplete isolation miles arid desert sweating sun heating upon toiled steep unyielding hills clearly setting affecting cyclist horribly negative way",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There has been an interesting debate recently whether learning about the past has any beneficial for individuals or its more detrimental ? However ,in the following essay i will discuss both arguments and highlight my opinion which side the notion that learning from past can bring alot of advantages to our life . The general perception sets forth that past has gone and we as human beings live in present and look forward to move into the future . So looking behind us will not bring alot of benefits that can influence our life in a positive way , those people who believe in this rely on the facts that past will never repeat himself .Likewise , living in present and trying to learn from old stories has little values in a matter how to change the future . However , personally i absolute disagree with this notion , and think that past can teach us many valuable lessons which can pave our future in way that we prohibit ourself to make same mistakes that our ancestors have done in past . For instance , by looking at the history of people in Europe ,we can see that during the earliest of twentieth century , people there went through a hostile conflict and as a result of that ,millions of lives have been lost as a price of anger and avarice . Afterwards , 100 years passed and nowadays people in Europe are taught to solve their problems away from violence and have a better understanding for their future . In summary , while living in present and working for future is our mainly aim , i strongly believe that taking history in consideration and glimpse of the past will help individuals for creating a better environment to live in and prosperous future endeavour.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Today first day I patient I couldnt believe I proud This I patient I line waiting ice cream teenage girl went counter said CAPS I somewhere ten minutes dont get line moving Im going talk waiterger All guy said Im sorry waight everybody line front gets remain you CAPS kidding me yelled stopped way thats I knew ridiculous I looked Im inpatient I waited line I got counter I said Do deal lot people like handled situation calmly And said yeah lot people like around truly sad So would like order I told order walked home I walked home I felt proud Im never gon na inpatient",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I am for the development of these cars. These cars would be able to help us with so much. There would be some pros and cons to this argument. There are a few states that have made it illigeal to even produce or try these cars out. These cars would be able to help so many people who cant do many things on their own. Some people with disablities don't normally drive themselves places due to the fact that they are disablied. They wouldn't really drive but they could be in the drivers seat. They point out in the articale that the car has an automatic break system so if they wouldnt be able to use the breaks the car could just stop itself. The pros to this car is, you wouldn't always have to be holding the stearing wheel. Now if they had the system to where you could fall asleep but be woken up before something bad happens that would be great. The cons to this car are, that you wouldn't to be able to much of anything due to the fact that you have pay attention to the road incase something bad was going to happen. It's would also be bad if the car had gotten into an accident due to the fact the car didnt warn you and you were not paying attention. After people hear about that the car didnt warn you or even help you to stop the cause of this accident not many people would want to buy that car. There are a few states such as California, Nevada, Flordia, and the District of Columbia who have led the country to the use of limited use of semi-autonomous cars. Manufacturers believe more states will follow these states as soon as the cars are proven reliably safe. There are a few states that have even made it illegal to test computer operated cars. Even if the laws do change they are worried about what would happen in an accident. What if you die? Is it yours or the cars fault? I am for the development of these cars because they can help many disabled people. You would be able to take your eyes off the road even if we don't now. Even if states still want to ban this car even after it was tested for safety. I still agree that these cars should be in more development and tested more before they are evenaloud to be sold.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "From what I have read, I think that driverless cars is a bad idea. I, and other people, would be a lot a safer if there were sensors to stop the car, warn the driver, and overall preventing the car to crash. If the world were to continue the road of driverless cars, most people aren't going to get a lot of experience in the field of driving. My overall answer to this passage is that I would argue and disagree on somethings, becuase driverless cars is not a good idea, a lot of people wouldn't get a whole of experience in driving a car, and that it is safer to use sensors. The wonders of having car with no driver is a bad idea. Becuase there is going to be a lot more instructions on how to operate, what the warnig signs of the car, and the overall layout of the car and it's contents. More energy and money is being spent to build a car without a driver than needed. You can't really rely on the car to do the driving almost 100% of the time, because you could be in a car crash/collision if the some of sensors go out. The engine wouldn't start as often because of the battery has to produce more energy to run the entire car, include the sensors and other gizmos. The only good thing that a driverless car can do is stop if the driver were to have a stroke, a heart attack, or just pass-out for some particular reason. If the car is driving on its own most of the time, how would the person learning to drive gain any experience? The driver would hardly gain any experience because the car is mostly the driving. The drivers out with a car that can drive similar to the average driver, will only know how to shift gears, turn the car on, and follow the road and the signs next to the road. Most of the people who want to know how to drive don't want to read a manual that is probably more than 300 pages long. For example: the first 50 pages explain how to turn on the car, move foward and stop. The next 50 explain what buttons to push and when to use them. The 3rd set of 50 explain what and how the gears of the car. The 4th set of 50 exlplain what the car should get, how to read the things on the dashboard, and pictures of that car. The rest of the pages explain what the car has, what sensors there are, and a few contacts if something bad were to happen to the car. Since most people believe that driverless cars is the best thing that was ever invented (but not made the cars public yet, only the information), I prefer to have the person in full control over everything and have the sensors do there best to warn the driver. I don't like the idea of having the cars drive themselves most of the time, because what if something that the car is programmed to do, happened at the wrong time and place, and you can't do a thing about since the car does what it is programmed to do. That's why I prefer a warning because it's the drivers fault for either ignoring or not paying any attention to those warnings. Granted it may not be the safest way to the SOCIETY's standards because of the number of auto collisions per year. If SOME teachers were cold enough, but still have a kind heart, they would make there students not screw around on their phones or TALK to other people and distract others from there work, then we wouldn't have this type of problem. In the first paragraph, last sentence, I said that driverless cars were a bad idea because of several things could go wrong, drivers will be even more inexperienced, and that sensors are better. I feel that America, and other countries, might follow the road of corruption because some stupid policies, and how we favor one thing that doesn't apply or effect of the world in any way, shape, or form. I think nobody is going to step up to the plate and change what messes we have made.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The abitilty to read a student's expressions is very valuable. It could be used to better suit a lesson plan for the students by finding what peaks the student's interest the most, and finding what makes the student lose interest. This information could be used to help teachers and students have a more productive and fun time in the classroom, and make school enjoyable for everyone. The information that can be read off of a students face can be valuable in a classroom because it can help tailor lesson plans to be more invigorating and fun for students, help techers develop more interactive and fun lesson-plans that can keep the students interested longer, and also detect unusual emotions, or certain expressions a teacher may not be able to see. This information that could be read off of a student face can help tailor the lesson plan specifically to that student by showing what that student is interested in. According to Dr Huang in the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" \"most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication\". That means we as humans express how we are feeling through our emotions, with a machine to read our emotional response to something could help suggest things that people show interest in, or not. This information could help a student who wants to be a scientist see what all a scientist does, or what they have done in the past. The information read off of their face during a certain subject's lessonplan could help schools better prepare students for what they will be facing in the future. For instance, if a student who had shown lots of interest in a subject's lesson plans at the beginning of the lesson, but now are showing progressivly less interest, the software could help the teacher or student stay focused on the lesson by introducing an activity or game to help the students apply what they had learned instead of being bored and forgeting everything they were learning. This kind of software could also help students and teachers stay engaged longer in subjects. In the article, the program finds all the emotions shown on someones face, It found that Mona Lisa was 83 percent happy, 9 percent discusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.The software could be used to measure how students feel during one subject, versus another. This can help steer students towords classes and careers that will interest and challenge them. The student would be constantly challenged more than they would have going down the normal path, and now instead has their own, specially tailored plan of classes to prepare them individually for their career and interests. The software could also be used in situatuions outside of the classroom, such as hallways or public gatherings. It could be used to spot people with possibly the opposite facial or emotional response than other peoplearound the same situation. This could help people better detect possible issues like deppression earlier and help people with this issue faster. As the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile' stated, \"Empathy(feeling someone else's emotional state) may happen because we unconsiously imitate another person's facial expressions.\" This means that if one persons emotion differs, there is an issue. The FACS would be able to detect these differences where the person displaying them may not even know. The software would create many possibilities to detect trends and what people may be doing at certain times of day, and better prepare authorities for what they may have to deal with as far as crimes or fires. This software can gather lots of valuable information to help the classroom and public become better, safer, and more productive enviroments. The detection of someones expression is everything. From knowing what, how, or why to cheer someone up, to helping prepare people for the future more efficiently. This software Would hold lots of valuable information that we currently would take years to collect and predict. This could possibly help with problems we havent even thought of yet. The information that this software could provide is extremely valuable for the classroom enviroment because of its ability to read expressions. This ability to read expression would help to better tailor lesson plans, career choices, and identify possible social disorders among people who wouldn't even know.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "A computer that reads our emotional expressions?? That sounds awesome! I could see that helping in many ways, but then again not everything is one hundred percent perfect. I believe that using the technology to ready emotional expressions would helpful to students in all types of situations. For example, say a student is not happy at home or how things are going for them, using the technology could hellp the teacher or couselor understand the student ad try to help him or her in any way possible. Sometimes maybe a student just migt not understand something and they'd be confused on a subject. A teacher could use the technology to see wether or not students understand and help them out more with whatever help they need. Some students may not feel comfrotable with talking to other about their problems it could possibly only make things worse. Overall, I believe this kind of technology would be more helpful in many ways. Sure they'll be some negtives that come with it but its nothing anyone can't handle.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In words author Katherine Paterson All us think book hope none children children taken shelf But I right remove book sheld that work I abhor then also exactly right everyone else And books shelf us countless books world offend someone one way another If everyone expect feelings accounted everyone mistaken Everyone right discover thoughts others long keep mind always pleased outcome Certain books carrying harsh opinions uncencored material found every shelf As many years student I come find books containing vulgar images language play CAPS describes crude ways Our class surprised language sexual innuendos involved described black ram nemesis Comments books mold young mind thinking name calling appropriate Unfortunately children learn nature select authors world outside classroom also discusses strumpet CAPS Once mind aware adult matters look world completely different Life must hard children books magazines show racy pictures girls advertisements products Magazines threshold adult matters Once teenager child view vibrant advertisements beautiful models selling products begin lose sense reality childhood The photoshopped images tall tan thin models make girl s head ponder way life They begin wearing shorter skirts dieting tanning ad saw magazine Who would nt want like model When every actress singer model begin looking like godesses men picture perfect girl ones see billboards After men picture ultimate female images see women never able add qualifications A whole cycle underappreciated obsession perfect makes media powerful In conclusion world become absorbed unrealistic fantasies racy books magazines provide Crude comments found classics powerful influence mind Advertisements magazines cause sense worthlessness women feeling unfulfillment men Are going control re life let media",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "As time goes on, there are many aspects of life that change, technology being a huge factor in today's world. A lot of things come from technology, the advancement of it has helped people in many ways possible, but many people ask what the downfalls are or if could we take technology too far. Scientists today are experimenting with driverless cars which doesn't always rely on a person to control it. While it is a cool thing, some people fear that this could cause a lot of accidents in the community and be a negative thing rather than it being positive. I personally think it is a good thing and there are many reason to consider advancing into it. The first reason I think driverless cars should be a thing is the convinence of it. Technology has proven to be more reliable than people in a lot of cases, such as a taxi. With driverless cars, you don't have to worry about getting into an accident because of the efficency of the technology used in the car itself. I think it is safer in most ways because of the smart sensors and brakes to prevent wrecks that are put onto the car. Overall the response on smart cars can out do any of that of a human driver. Another factor that comes into play with smart cars is how it compares to humans. Lawmakers say that the best safety is from an alert driver. Today there are a lot of people that aren't so alert, such as people that are intoxicated or just tired. Wrecks as we know are a big issue and a lot of them come from people that aren't alert because of them drinking or using other drugs, now I'm not saying this is most people, but quite a few. Another thing is roadrage, people tend to get mad behind the wheel because of slow traffic or other causes thar cause accidents or incidents that cause the law to come into play. The last reason I think we should consider driverless cars is efficiency. In the passage, driverless cars would have sensors that cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, which in general allows for better response. Imagine if you were driving and got distracted, something bad could happen really fast. That would never happen with a driverless car since the main goal of the car is to get to any destination. The efficiency comes in to where the person in the driver seat could take over at any time in case of something in the way or just bad traffic issues. There are many ways for the car to notify the driver to take over such as vibrating seats or sensors to tell the driver what to do. In conclusion, I think that driverless cars are a thing that we should continue to strive towards. They are convinent to use, are considered really safe, and compared to humans, will be better overall. Traffic issues would go down as well as accidents originally caused by human drivers. You also wouldn't have to get bored on the drive since they have ideas of having a screen to watch entertainment on while the car is driving. Driverless cars in conclusion would be a good idea to improve on in the future.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author creates moods memoir seem possitive The first mood shown loving mood In paragraph three states All cultures came together great solidarity friendship This shows immigrants came would descriminated came together became familyAnother mood created careness Narciso Rodriguez s parents showed much love support towards Paragraph five says They came selflessly many immigrants give children better life This quote shows even Narciso born parents thinking Narciso s parents wanted child good life A final mood would happiness Narciso happy alot gratitude parents Narciso quotes I always grateful parents love sacrifice By Narciso saying shows much loves parents happy living The author creates different moods throughout entire excerpt",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Face-to-face interaction with individuals is being replaced by the usage of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter. Do the benefits outweigh the minus. This essay illustrate that, the pros include speed and benefit, and the cons are the deprivation of live communication First and foremost, the biggest benefit of social media is that it has shortened distances from hours to seconds. When there was no online environment people relied on phone calls or emails to communicate, and they frequently had to wait months or even years to see family members who were living away from home. However, with the introduction of various options like Facebook and Twitter, this has decreased the amount of time it takes to connect. Second, for politicians who blog, social networks have emerged as the most successful channel for reaching a large audience and, of course a good PR company. In the following paragraph, we'll discuss how today's youth form friendships. The majority of children today only have online friendships, which makes it difficult for them to communicate in real time or express their emotions. Also on the Internet teenagers feel their impunity and permissiveness because of this. There have been many cases of suicide due to cyberbullying of so-called haters In conclusion the use of social media, has supplanted face-to-face engagement with people. Do the pros outweigh the minus, and this essay demonstrate that the advantages include quality and speed, but the disadvantages include the absence of live communication.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I am Jacob Bomberger. I am a sea going cowboy and I have crossed the Atlantic ocean 16 times, and the pacific 2 times. Being a sea cowboy is a great way to serve people in war. I have been to many places, I have been seeing sites and serveing countries for a long time. My friend Don Reist invited me on a trip to Europe on a cattle boat in 1945, and that is when it all began. You should participate in the sea cowboys program because it is a great way to see sites, go traveling and make new friends. I have been to many different countries like Europe, Greece, China, Italy, and Crete! You could see these sites too if you join the sea cowboys program too. It is also a very good way to make friends to. I have made friends with the people on the boats with me and the people i meet in different countries. Taking care of the animals was a great way for me to pass the time and helping my aunt Katie's farm made it alot easier. We arrived in Europe right after the pacific war. After Europe we packed our animals and headed up to Greece. I turned 18 before reaching greece so i was old enough to get drafted into the millitary, But they told me that i should just keep doing what im doing. The sea cowboys program is a great way to do millitary service to. . Being a sea cowboy is more than an adventure, It helped me see the world and know exactly what is going on in other contries. I think you should join the sea cowboy program because it would be a learning experience for all. The sea cowboy programis a life changing expirence that i think you would enjoy!",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have you ever thought about life without cars? In VAUBAN, Germany the people have given up their cars and there streets are car free. In Paris, they enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. In BOGOTA, Columbia millions of Columbians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses to work during car free day. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities, and legislators are starting to act, If cautiously. In VAUBAN, Germany 70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\" said Heidrun Walter. As you walk Verdant streets where you can here the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children drowning out the occasional distant of motors. In Paris, diesels make up 67 percent of vehicles in France, compared to a 53.3 percent average of diesel engines in the rest of Western Europe. On Monday motorists with even numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 31 dollar fine. Almost 4,000 drivers were fined. In BOGOTA, Columbia there goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. Violators faced a 25 dollar fine. Being car free is a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution. Parks and sport centers blooming, no traffic just people and there everyday life. The United States is the birthplace of the Model T,the home of Detroit, the place where Wilson Pickett immortilized \"Mustang Sally.\" Presidents Obama's ambitious goals to curb the United States green house gas emission is slowly working. The number of miles driven per person is nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995. New York's new bike sharing program and its skyrocketing bridge and tunnel tolls reflect those new priorities, as do a proliferation of car sharing programs across the nation. In conclusion, life without cars keeps life fresh. Cars are destroying the earth from smog. We will be much happier people with out cars. Having to see all the children and all the wonderful people actually having a good time with there families. Cars are every where but if we can reduce the amount of cars being driven maybe we can save the earth from air pollution.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear I understand one trying decide whether computers bad people I one thing computers turning society antisocial becoming obese alot cyber bullying happens via computers You learn read stated earlier computers many problems social lives You see much population spends least hours ween computer When typically watching videos tweeting friends This swim like activity really pulling us away social lives There many sites allow chat friends leave messages wall really communicating In way taking away social skills need later You ca nt get job instant messaging person talk face face But able email Plus much prone using thus nothing bad grade Now problem see occuring You work computer This activity monitor lets everyday since comes home plays computer time exercising Finally come last issue cyber bullying Over teens faced sort cyber bullying life When teens sion facebook twitter signing depression When teen starts get bullied usually become sad leads grades go lower due lack concentration leads depressed could make either commit suicide join gangs andor start making bad But prevent time people spend computers And I think benifit In conclusion I believe bad society I think amount time could lives I think look deep say understand need healthier",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Based excerpt The Mooring Mast building Empire State Building many obstacles builders overcome Some practical obstacles building landmark law airships flying low complete dirigible mooring equipment nt installed greatest obstacle nature surrounding Empire State BuildingThe first obstacle builders overcome law airships flying low urban areas The problem flying low dirigibles could nt even try attempt reach building In December one dirigable approached mast could nt get close enough fearing forceful winds would cause run sharp spires As nt problem dirigible mooring equipment nt even installed meant newspapers delivered would caught dangling ropes dirigable could get tiring The greatest obstacle nature Winds top building really strong due violent wind currents could cause dirigable keep moving even tied mastOverall nature weather huge obstacle",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think several books I would want child mine pick read I soon I seen I going writing one flashed head like lighting The book choosing called CAPS The book CAPS young girl grew without father Her mother never wanted talk knew way going make matters worse The young girl grew dream daddy s little girlThat s wanted life She sit thought little much ask After years passed finally got nerve go hunt father She went leaving mother behindHer mother always pumped head father good That would better without But went hunt father faith lord After saying many prayers lord finally thought thatShe knew hunt going take So went hoping anwsers That needed solve heartace pain That could walk knowing somewhere world father would waiting It s sun beginning sit noticed little old southern bell Sitting front porch wooden rocking chair She went kissed forehead tears filled eyesHer said now dear must crying lump throat asked do know I find father answered yes Dear laying bed That s face began glow She went old cottage find father lying bed writing She nervous help sit talked fatherHer father told wrote letter everydayThat s letters year She told father I ve never recieved letter entire life span That s clicked mother never let check mail After years passed finally found father Truth father daughters life mother nt want part life She whatever took keep apart even meant going aganist law orders Father explained mother needed look heavy drugs time Back nothing could take daughter mother The reason I choose book I young father left I ve never chance get know family The pain growing without either mom dad tuff You cry many tears try patch holes heart Sometime s bleed still seemeds find s way After reading book I always wondered called They called took blame father walking life Many children growing without mom dad There s higher percentange single parent family s days beforeJust like book kids take blame parnet If I could take book shelf I would child needs reminded pain went throughWould looking child All children want know loved someone cares themIf going types books needs form parnets fill giving permission If age s total fine They re age able handle going feeling alone",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Education plays a pivotal role in children’s developmental years, and the quality of which requires the dedication of both students and teachers. Unfortunately, it is found that children in schools are not engrossed in study. Does this mean that teachers are unqualified or are students themselves to blame? What are the remedies to overcome this problem? Adolescents’ innate characteristics should be brought into close scrutiny. Children, as non-grownups, are generally less self-disciplined. This means that they are ofttimes unable to control their concentration, easily affected by distractions such as a sudden sound or an idea that pops up and is unrelated with the class. Each time students get sidetracked, they would miss the important points that teachers are elaborating. To combat this productivity-damaging weakness, there should be more research on strengthening children’s concentration. The ability to focus on important tasks for a longer duration of time could keep students from absent-mindedness and boost learning efficiency. Another cause of this problem is attributed to ineffective teaching. These days, many teachers are not doing a good job. They constantly adopt teacher-centred methods in class, without taking into account students’ preferences. This inappropriate method could demotivate students, making them lose interest in study. The solution would be to opt for a student-centred attitude. Teachers could integrate into their class livelier and more inspiring elements, so that the classes they teach would be more in line with young people’s taste. With an intense interest in what the teachers are saying, the students would voluntarily engross themselves in these absorbing topics. In summary, adolescents’ shortcoming in self-discipline and the mechanical teaching strategy chosen by teachers are held accountable for pupils’ inability to focus on study. The suggested recipes are to enhance those young people’s concentration and to put a higher value on what they are fond of.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves Beginning - resson to join You should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys , because you will have the opportunity to go to many places such as different cities, and countries places you never been before that you been hoping your entire life to go. You can see many animals , Animals you never seen before. Being a Seagoing Cowboy means you get to experince many things in the world. you could be the person to tell everyone that how you made an trip to the Pacific Ocean , Atlantic Ocean , New Orleans, and mabey even to Flordia. Middle - Luke claims Luke claims that he had no idea his life would change soon after his high school graduation. Luke also claims that he finds times to have fun on board ,exspecially on return trips after the animals has been unloaded. August 14 Luke claims that the Pacific war was ended. He claims that the Cattle -boat trips were an unbelievable opportunity for a small town boy he says. He claim seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special. End- If i were you i would go ahead and participate in being a Seagoing Cowboy because it seems really fun and awesome. think of how many places you would be visting.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Many people believe that the art such as music and painting are necessary topics for kids at some education institutions whilst some do think it is not mandatory. In this essay, I will discuss the positive sides of the the given statement as well as the negative sides. Firstly, I will explore the way art affects the creativity of the children. Secondly, I will discuss the time waste by children who are not interested in art and would like to focus on different subjects. In my opinion, the art improves the imagination of the children and shapes their future. Furthermore, some lectures such as theatre and music help kids to socialize and make new friends at school age. For instance, many young people are introverted during the first years of their studies. Therefore, art courses at elementary school encourage them to be more extroverted in their social life throughout the beginning of the education years. On the other hand, not every kid should be forced to take the same art classes because some might have completely different desires. Moreover, when a young person is obligated to take an art class that they are not good at, this might break their motivation especially if they are compared to their classmates who are good at the given art courses. For example, everyone should be free to choose the lectures that they are interested in as some children may be more active in sports or quantitative subjects rather than arts. In conclusion, they are cons and pros to having art courses as a kid. I believe studying art is quite important at younger ages since it improves creativity as long as the choice belongs to the children.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Many people believe that the pressing issues of environment can be curbed by raising the price of automobiles and fuel. This essay agrees with this viewpoint as it can lead to less pollution and traffic on the roads. Primarily, majority of the people are concerned about the heightened problem of environment, which has become so filthy due to manhandled practices. It is often seen that in every household people are having two or three cars, which not only lead to heavy traffic on roads but also put pressure on our surroundings as these motor vehicles emit poisonous gases. For example, in north America, on an average every young member of a family has a vehicle, which leads to increased level of carbon emission. Therefore, it has been decided by certain section of people to elevate the price of auto mobiles and petrol, to regulate the environmental conditions. Furthermore, the government could implement the theory of demand and supply inversely, by curbing the supply of vehicles and fuel, as the level of pollution has increased globally, which is responsible for global warming. Had the supply of these products controlled at an early stage, the demand would have been automatically reduced. This has become an alarming issue now, which needs to be regulated by the authorities. However, there are some people who are against this trend and do not want any increase in prices as they feel it would be an unnecessary financial burden on them. For instance, many people are already bearing the numerous monthly expenses and the rising prices will give an additional monetary load. To conclude, although, there are people who are against this idea of soaring prices, I agree that the authorities should elevate the prices to cut down the usage and demand, otherwise, the existence on the earth would be next to impossible.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars are coming close to becominga reality. In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" They talk about how people barely have to do anything while driving it's just the car doing all of the work. This is good in some aspects but also bad. The author presents both positive and negative aspects of driverless cars. There are positive and negative aspects of the driverless car but the negative out way the positive. For example, if you get into a car accident it would cause great confusion because people wouldn't know who to blame for the accident. \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" Another example of negative aspects is the traffic law changes. This can affect the whole country, changing laws can be dangerous because we would still need new traffic laws that contribute to the driverless cars. Most likely that would present a problem of its own because we would take a longer time trying to figure new laws to be put into place. The writer states, \"... traffic laws are written eith the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" These negative aspects outweigh the positive aspects of driverless cars. In conclusion,The negative aspects of the driverless cars outweigh the positive aspects of it. There is no time for a fast law change while the driverless cars are on the street. The confusion of who to blame after a car accident is an eminent threat. Using these details from the article, I am against the development of these driverless cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Few people believe that children should be given some money as a weekly allowance to spend as they wish, and others prefer not to do it, thinking that it is not fruitful. When we hand over money to children, we make them realize the importance of expenditure and savings at an early stage of life, which will be very helpful for them as they grow old. For instance, my neighbour follows this practice and give 5 dollars per week to her child. I remember, there was a time when she wanted an expensive toy, and had to save her pocket money for 1 year in order to get it. This way not only she learnt about savings, but she also understood, which items are worth spending on. However, providing money to children can sometimes be the cause of major problems, as the parents have no control over how the child will use it. For example, one of my friend’s son used the money he received to impress others in his school, and spent it on the items he can show-off, like the latest toy or buying expensive dessert. This increased peer pressure on the poor students of his class who started demanding money from their parents as well. This is not a favourable situation for the poor family as they barely have the money to raise their kids. In conclusion, my opinion is that money should not be handed to children to make expenses on their own. Rather, it is a better idea to keep their spendings under adult supervision, so that we can guide them about the positives and negatives of their spendings. I do not think it is a wise decision to give weekly allowance to kids.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think offensive avavible kids intill old enough read listen I think need removed shelves put away Because hurtful dirty younger kids could prevented removed shelves I belive magazines put away put sections Music movies could put sections also Internet could blocked certain websites Luckly time live people prevent things happen like adults And people watch tell young stuff This I think could easily prevent put removed taken shelves If offensive remove dont worry children reading",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars. What are they? They are the future altohugh no one knows that 100% I believe that they are becasue as my generation and as the next generation grows sure we are all verry smart but we dont use our potential anymore at all. For example this is one of the esiest test and yet some people still fail it. How I do not know the answer to that. Anyways my point is that we are lazy really lazy and we want people/ AI's to do our jobs and objectives for us so we dont have to put in any work. Has it always been this way? sometimes I ask myself this question and no it hasent. I have whitnessed many things in my lifetime and I have done a lot in my lifetime. Personaly the google car is great I have seen them and many poeple I know have tested them, But what have we learned about evolution its good and bad well just think of the whole Jurasic Park story the pople want more they get more and then they somehow mess it up. There are many people who belive it is good and then there are the ones who think it is bad I personaly think it is a step in the wrong way, becasue it makes us worse as a human race. Sure not everyone would be able to afford one but eventualy they will and we will al be like the movie Walle have you seen that movie its messed up a bunch of overweight people in a space ship probably becasue they had self driving cars lets be real. All jokes aside we could and it is verry likely to end up like that. Not just from self driving cars but also from thinks that will come after that maybe next we will have self flying planes and that would put me ou tof my job of being a pilot. Just think of how many kids dreams are being crushed that want to be drivers for people they can't do that anymore because all the cars will be driving themselvse. Yea think about all the little kids dreams you are crushing. Also what would happen to insurance on cars if you mess up now is it your fault or the cars fault and then in turn the manufactures fault. This was what paragraph nine was about. This would crush our economy, sure people would be buying the car-> Great for the company-> Not great for jobs. maybe you could tell those insurance companies and drivers \"Hey since we took your job and messed up your whole life lets put you in a factory where you can build more cars like the ones that ohh wait rememer those the ones that TOOK YOUR JOB\" yea happy ending right? People would get payed a lot less and if google was the only one who released it then that is called a monopaly yes you thinking like the game yea you know where you try to buy out basicaly the whole economy just for one thing and you better hope you dont land on the go to jail spot becasue if you do your SOL (well im sure you know what that means). i hope i made someone laugh not its not the best essay but you have gottent this far and i hope you laughed at least a little. \"Ohh but wait theres more for only $4.99 you could own your verry own self driving car and (wait for it) and free airfreshener\" well thats dandy lets buy one i got to get that google airfreshener it probably smells amazing. No it doesnt you know why because it doesnt exist. probably does honestly. So there are two ways you can go about this the world can get stupider and stupider with this evolution and the people in the world its like a circus not good at all but then AI would control the world ohh thats fine lets just you know give our nukes to computer and hope that it doesnt get mad at us and blow us up. see then the AI would hold the most power in the world the president would be like one atom in sometihng that has 100,000,000 atoms thats like a fly on a winsheild its powerless. You know you shouldnt kill flys on winsheilds you know why? hmm ill tell you later you just have to keep reading. this is probably a pain for you to read. But this is very well what could happen in not my lifetime nor yours becasue your obviosuly older than me whoever is grading this paper. Im guessing about a few generations that self driving cars will be the norm maybe my lifetime probably not thought hmm I dont know. Ohh yes that was just my introduction are you read for the next two paragraphs that you have to read. Well first guess what this one is also wabout self driving cars but it is about there saftey (with more jokes). Why does the car cross the road??? ... To get to the other side I know pretty good I came up with that one myself. Ohh wait they die thats what happends when you kill flys on the winsheild the fly dies after it cries and tries to synthisize. you know as a human you can control that, but as a car that is opperated by an AI it wouldnt know if you kiled the fly or not it could just turn on the wippers and gone that fly is. Also the person is at risk if the car messes up and your not paying attention then waht happens you could get hurt really badly and whoes fault is it then how do you prove in court that the car crashed not you or what if the car wanted to crash becasue it didnt like you and you treated it poorly. Also whay happens if you are speeding and then the cop pulls you over and says sir do you know how fast you were going and you so no my car was driving itself sorry sir. Then is it your fault or the cars. In the end it all boils down to a few things you know after it evaporates. you have you and your car and its your choice in the end.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "My belives of the \"Driveless Cars\" are very negative. First of all how are these cars? How much money will be needed to make and buy these cars? Who will buy them? The most important question is \"What benifets do we get out of these cars? First of just how safe are these cars? As stated in paragraph 9 \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers.\" That means that these cars must be 100% safe for indiveduals to drive. Another thing to keep in mind is that whos are people to blame if the technology fail? In this case the we wouldn't know who is to blame in case of a jury. Court problems could be dificult to solve do to this case. Another negative side to these Driveless Cars is that how much money will it take for these companies to make. How much money is the government going to use in a car that could fail it's dutties when the goverenment could use that money for better things like army supplies, Global Warming, or even on Chareties. All that money could be used for many good and reasonable items. That is another great point in why we cant make these unreasonable cars. Now lets say these cars won't fale. How many people are going to be able to buy them? We cant just make a lot of driveless cars if not many people are going to be able to afford them. Most of all they need to funktion well and be affordable. But my most important question is what do these cars benefit to us? Are they going to bring us safe home? Will they take care of young adults while being in them alone? We have the right to know all of these questions before they even come out. In the end those are all my belives in why these cars are a bad idea from these manufacturer. We do not need failing technology out in our human driven roads. Our cars are fine the way they are driven by humans and not by some failing computer driven technology! It will be another reason in why humanity will end.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "For many people politics is a very serious topic that people strongly believe in. recently, there has been alot of contraversy about keeping the Electoral College process or changing the election by popular vote, in my opinion the Electoral college process was established to prevent the option of President by popular vote that just dosnt seem fair. Citizens are going to be angry either way the president is elected because its about who is running our country and representing it, not about how he or she is elected. We as American citizens should have the right to choose/vote for the president we want representing our country . From my knowledge, Under the Electoral college system, voters vote not only for the president, but for a slate of electors. \"Richard Nixon, Jimmy carter, Bob Dole, the U.S. chamber of commerce, and the AFL-CIO all, in their time agreed on getting ride of the electoral college!\" for example Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the presidency, over 60 percent of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now. Why dosnt the goverment just give us what we want? if 90% of votes go to a candidate, then why would they not get the presidency? its common sense. The electoral college process has the govenor prepare a \"Certificate of ascertainment\" listing all of the candidates who ran for president in your state along with the names of the respective electors. the certificate also declares the winner of the election so people arent even aloud to have a say in the voting process. \"during the 2000 campaign seventeen states didnt even see the candidates at all, and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didnt get to see a single campaign ad.\" I think that is completly irrational. The electoral college is widely regarded as a non-democratic way of selecting a president that ought to be overruled by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular votes. If the electoral vote happened to be a tie then the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives, where state delegations vote on the president. of course we would have no control over the vote if that happened so we would just have to accept it. I hope i have made my point across about the Electoral college system. your feedback is always a good thing",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "If I were in this sigtuation I would defenitly use the claim that aleans are not real in my essay. One example I would use would be to ask him(her) how many natural strange rock formations are their on earth. The only possibal answer would be more than he or her could count. That simpley prooves my point evan more. One other thing that I would say would be \"if aliens made it... why dont they come back to take care of it. If you study earths history you would find that most if not all ancient or religious artifact is protected. If this happened on earth and supposed we do think aliens are real and sufisticsted then why wouldent they go by the same practice. The third point that I would make would be if, they could create a rock form of that size would suggest thst they are revolutionized and would have large civilazations. Yet we have found no proof of any alien cicies or districts. so in conclusion I would all in all say that my pionts are more than convincing and that he should be the wiser by now. And if he isnt... Too bad for him.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I feel that driverless cars can be benificial to the human race. Driverless cars may be benificial but many people are most likely against or skeptical about driverless cars. These cars are cars that do not need humans to control them and they can move on there own. A lot of driverless cars have already been invented but they are not fully driverless. As stated in the article \"Driverless Cars are Coming.\" it is said that the company Google have had these types of cars since 2009. So they are nothing new to society it's just that a lot of people have never heard of this concept. I feel like it's a great idea. Just imagine having a taxi, or \"Uber\" now a days, to drive you wherever you want to go. Driverless cars will require less gasoline than other types of cars. They may not even require any gasoline nobody really knows yet. Google modified a Toyota Prius to use estimating sensors on the rear left wheel and a 3-D rotating sensor on the roof to judge what items are around it. The rotating sensor is used to establish how the car drives. The sensor on the roof does this by seeing what items are around it and making a three dimensional shape of what the car or the sensor see that that item is. General Motors created a futuristic road in the 1950s. They did this because they thought that it would be better for cars to have to drive on a road instead of the car having to do all of the things a driver can do by itself. They found out that it would have costed a humongous ammount of money and it was not practical. After that some college students/Engineers at Berkeley tried something similar except instead of cable it was magnets. They tried to make the car read in binary code which they would implement into these things called smart-road systems. This also required a large sum of money and again it was to expensive and not very practical. With the smarter road systems out of the way it opened up a new oppurtunity for manufactureres. They could now work on smarter cars. Nobody knew how much smarter though. Sensors in the Google cars were nothing new. They started maked speed sensors at the wheels of cars to activate antilock brakes back in the 1980s. Since then the sensors have just become more advanced and now they have been able to detect and respond to certain things that could be hazardous to the driver. The information in the sensors cause the car to activate and reduce power to the engine and other things such as brakes. Further improvements are being added to sensors to make it more driver friendly and safer for the drivers. No car manufacturer has made a car that does not have to be driven yet. They do not drive themselves most of them just assist the driver so he or she doesn't have to worry about all of the things that are essencial to driving a vehicle. In 2013 BMW (Car Manufacturer) announced that they are developing \"Traffic Jam Assistant.\" This car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 miles per hour. Special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps a hold of the wheel. So the main question is why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver? Well actually psychological aspects of automation are really a challenge and we need to interpret the driving in a fun way. So basically we need to make it a fun thing for the drivers to not have to drive. So car manufacturers were talking about activating a heads-up-display (HUD). These HUD's would make the trip to wherever your destination is less boring. Me personally I don't think it's such a good idea to have a HUD in a car because people will have trouble focusing on the road. People would probably like a nice thing to do while they are bored but what if in that little instance that the car just happens to lose control. You will be paying attention to something else and not the road. People have there phones anyways so I don't even see what the big deal is about these HUD's in cars. Just a waste of expenses is all I see. So to answer the question. Yes I am a fan of the driverless car and yes I do think that they should be implemented in our lives, but I also think that the car manufacturers should talk over some of the features that they're wanting to put on this car.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "We, the people of the United States, live in a car happy society. Every teenager can't wait until their 16th birthday because, for mostly every kid, that means that they go get their drivers liscense and possibly their very own car. Also, adults always look at getting a nice luxurious car and the top make and model of that year. Well, without a shadow of doubt, we should adopt the plan to cut down our usage of cars. It seems very successful considering 70% of Vauban's families don't own cars. It is detramental to our country. In case you haven't noticed lately but there is alot of polution in the air. According to article 1 , anywhere up to 50 percent of car-intensive areas in the US make up the greenhouse gas emissions. It is depressing seeing all of this smog and polution in the air everyday. Just a little heads up but the polution increases every single day we use cars. It is a shame seeing such an extravogant and extraordinary country go to crap due to polution. If you want to see how every state is going to look if we keep relying on cars then go to California and see how much of an eye sore it is. Cars are one of the major factors responsible for smog and polution. Polution from your car can lead to animals dying and especially humans dying from your automobile. People today care alot about making and having alot of benjamins ( money ). Everyone wants to be rich and have the most expensive types of stuff, lets face it who doesn't. If you cut back on putting money towards your car then that would save you a ton of money. Just imagine if you didn't own a car, think about all of the things you would't have to buy and pay for. Cars are expensive just to buy in the first place let alone having to pay for gas and maintain it and all of that stuff that needs to be done to it. Also say goodbye to the mechanic visits and having to deal with the stress that comes from them. It would cost less money to not own a car and just take city transportation via bus or taxi or even car pool. You could even go the healthy route and ride your bike or walk to places close by. There are many cheaper ways of getting places besides cars. Cars can be very dangerous at times and driving can be as well. You are at a greater risk of getting into a car accident than getting into a bicycle accident. Car accidents happen everyday and most of the time they are fatal. Coming from personal experience trust me, being in a car accident is not fun and is really scary and nerveracking. It can also haunt you for the rest of your life. I almost lost my dad a couple years ago due to a terrible car accident that we were involved in that wasn't our fault. He hasn't worked since that day because he hasn't been healthy enough to do what he was doing. We both, still to this day, feel the gruling affects from that accident physically, mentally, and emotionally. It took a toll on us and there isn't a day that goes by that I don't wonder what would of been if we didn't get into that accident. So wouldn't you feel more safe in a bus knowing that your less likely to get hurt than in a car. Without question it is neccesary to cut back on car usage and start going green and using public transportation instead. Cars are a crucial part of our polution today and that can easily change. All signs point towards the better option being to take a step back from cars for a little bit and see what the result is. Atleast once a week say that you can't use cars as transportation. This idea seems very good and well thought out and it will definetly show improvements that we want to see. So lets do it and see how much it affects our country. I know it will change it and make it better!",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emotions. Do we really need that to identify our emotions, feelings or making us smile? In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author describes how a new technology identifies peoples emotions. We don't need the technology to read our emotional expression. \"Imagine being able to detect exactly how other people are feeling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\" We all try to hide our emotions, but there are people that could help us. Like friends or family they might make you smile when you're feeling down. Everyone has feelings and we sometimes express it to people we get along. The Facial Action Coding Sysytem is not going to make us smile everyday, we all go through something in life. \"For example, it you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" People are not going to express their feelings on every ad that tells you how you feel. These technology of calculating your emotions are not going to be helpful. It's frusterating when a lot of people tell you to smile and that it looks pretty on you, when you don't want to smile. They don't know what we are going through in life. \"In the real smile, the zygomatic major lift the corners or your mouth. But in a false smile, the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and a different muscle.\" Everyone fakes a smile somtimes for any reasons. In conclusion, the technology that calculates your emotions are not going to work. Maybe Mona Lisa had so many emotions that poeple used that technology to fake her facial expression. There are people that can't even smile from all the pain they have in mind. So why do we need a technology to tell us our emotions when we know how we feel?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "25 years ago something hysterical happen around Mars. NASA'S spacecraft called Viking 1 was circumnavigating the planet, snapping photos of possible landning sites for the other spacecraft viking 2. When Viking 2 was found, it was a shadow likeness of a human face. It was huge, its length was two miles from end to end. The caption noted it was huge rock formation, but it resembles a human head formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth. That does not mean it was an alien, it just means that thats the way the natural landform formed. The \"Face on Mars\" has been everywhere from Hollywood films to grocery store checkout lines for 25 years. Very few scienists believe that he Face was an alien artifact, phtographing Cydonial became a priority for NASA and Mars Global Surveyor arrived at the Red Planet in Septemebr and the year of 1997, about eighteen long tirinig years after the Viking mission concluded. It says in the story that the team which is called MOC snapped a picture ten times sharper that the original Vikings photograph. Thousands of peoples anxiety were coming out when they searched the web waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site revealing the answer. The answer is a Natural landform, there was no alien monument after all. On April 8, 2001 a war summer day in Cydonia. Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough for a second look. \"We had to roll the spacecraft 25 degrees to center the Face in the field of view,\" said Garvin. Malin's crew captured and extraordinary image using the camera's absolute maximum resolution. Each pixel in he 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 viking photo. But as a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times better and bigger that pixel size. So if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they where. The picture actually reveals that there is a martian equivalent of butte or mesa landforms common around the American West.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Space is such an amazing and mysterious place. There are so many things we haven't explored in space, such as, Venus. The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" believes we should examine Venus despite the dangers that come with examining it. The reasons why author believes we should explore Venus even with all the dangers is because, Venus is the closest thing related to Earth, density and size wise, it seemed to have life on its surface in the past, making it elligible as another planet where other humans can live, and the last reason why the author thinks we should study Venus is just to get more information on a planet that is so fascinating and (occansionally) close to Earth. Venus is so close to Earth that we are able to see it, occasionally. Its also close to Earth in terms of density and size. What if Venus could become more like Earth? Its roughly the same size, so we should study it more and support the spacecrafts being sent to Venus. The author supports the spacecrafts being sent to space because he includes in the article that,az \"Because Venus is sometimes right around the corner-in space terms-humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world.\" Venus is so close we should explore it very closely, despite the risks. Earth is where we live currently, but what if we could could live on Venus too? Venus has shown that, in the past, it had water and probably supported many forms of life. Earth is getting overpopulated, we need to find other places to live, Earth can only get so full. Currently, Venus has a very boiling hot surface, so no human could actually live there without the help of technology, but what if we could study the surface of Venus more to see if we can make Venus support life again. The author puts many ideas in the article that support humans on Venus, for example he puts the NASA idea of scientists making a \"blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape.\", to study Venus, up close. The author understands the dangers of trying to research Venus up close. He mentions the dangers of how hot is is, \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Farenheit\", and how dense and thick it is, \"A thick atomsphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus.\", but he believes that Venus should still be explored, despite all these risks that could kill humans if they got too close and melt spacecrafts, which is a quite a lot of money lost. Venus is just so close sometimes, that it would be a let down to let it get so close and not explore it. In conclusion, the author truly thinks that Venus should be explored even with all the risks invovled. The reasons why he believes this is because Venus is very closely related to Earth, physically, Venus has shown to have been able to support life in the past, making it another planet where humans can live, and the last reason is that Venus is so close (occasionally) so we should take that opportunity and make the most out of it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author created loving accepting mood memoir He first talking familys dinner table The author says My parents always kept arms door opened many people considered family knowing would us CAPS This shows parents would help anyone treat anyone like family time need Second author describes mood seven He opens It simple house parents welcomed refugees celebrate arrival country I celebrated first birthdays CAPS His parents loving caring celebrated complete strangers family arrival Lastly author ends memoir powerful sentence I never forget parents turned simple house home CAPS The author completes mood stating parents created home loving caring accepting refugees came United States Throughout author s memoir creates mood loving caring accepting",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author supports this idea by throwing in little things like proof and trying to convince you to study Venus is a worthyu pursuit despite the dangers .He also used NASA the text says \" NASA is working on other approaches to studing venus.\" thernhe gives us an example ssome simplifed electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the condtions. the text says. the text also states \"Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contibute meanninhfully to our knowledge of venus\" Thats so when can have the infomation for anybody eals that wants to know about it. and they are working on simpifed electoronics so we can acess venus alot easyer and the stuff to make it wont be hard to find. And the texts states NASA's possible soution to the hostiile conditing on the sufface of venus would allow scientists to flot above the fray. So they are thinking about sending humans to venus also but they tell us the ups and downs to that how they would the flot to the face of it and how they have to convies people to go up there. Over all The Author did very good at supporting his idea by throwing in NASA facts and telling us about the things there working to get up to venus and hoe they plan on sending humans uo there to. Any why we should keep on studying venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think mood passage The Blueprints Lives mood passage I ve thanked repeatedly I believe meas thank full parents provided himher good home Another reason I think mood story I never forget new parents turned Simple house home I think means mood I believe article",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "For or against the development of these driverless cars? Simply, I am against these cars for multiple reasons. In this response I am going to explain why this is what I chose and my understanding for the others opinions. My first example why I am against these cars is because we, as a country, have people who take advantage of the things we have and how they are supposed to be used. For example what if a parent lets the kid sit in the drivers seat and lets them \"drive\" per say because the car can drive on it's own. What if their is an emergancy, you can not move your child quick enough to move out of the way. Theres two lives because we were so self dependant on these cars. My second example why I am against these cars is because, us as people get tired and what if someone, say has been driving all night, wanted to take a quick nap. Let's say this nap turns into a good rest and the person is deeply sleeping. What if that person does not wake up in case of an emergancy and the person gets into a crash? That is risking your own life and other lives around you. My Last example why I am against these cars is because, what if their is a sortage in the technology? Say the person is texting on their phone and not paying attention and relies on that signal to keep them aware of the road condions and any in coming problems in the way. Well say there is a sortage and the signal is not going off and the person is unaware of what is going on around him. There goes another crash and another life that did not need to be wasted because of a car. In conclusion, we should think twice about these cars in our community and how they will affect lives around us. I see why some people may like the ideas of these cars, because it is less fuel used and less money spent but is that really worth the chance of losing your lives? This is what I believe about the driverless cars and why I believe them.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have ever waited something seemed away seemed take get end paid I I took get also know NUM CAPS I wake get ready I beat When I got I wait line minutes find room I would taking test It took take test With three breaks However I done exited room engulfed crowd kids taking test I met mom gave encouraging smiles big hugs Since three best friends also took got solo way afterwards roamed campus It turned great day",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars is an insanely dumb idea. I think this idea is ridicolous. This idea cold cause serious if not fatal injuries. I don't think most people would use this appropriately. If we have had partially driverless cars on the past,and they haven't been released into the streets then obviously there is something wrong. The main reason I think that we shouldn't sell thes cars is because citizens would buy them just to sleep in the car while the car is taking them to their destinantion. Some people are very deep sleepers. So in that cas people could possibly lose their lives if the car doesn't do what is needed to do to wake the driver up. Also I feel like allowing these cars to be used will stop some kids from learning how to drive, which im only fifteen and there is no way im not learning how to drive. This would make kids even lazier than they are now. What if a kid was in the car by theirself and they decided that they want to drive, even though they can't. That will be another corpse that should not have happened.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "If we were to limit our usage of our motor vehile's we'd salvage & try to repair our earth's polution problem. If we could switch over from using cars to bikes or any way of transportation not run on gas or anything that cause's damage to our O-zone , then i believe people would become healthier & more fit from the exercise of getting from one destination to another. Using motor vehicles is a lazy way of getting from place to place. but if we can comit to not using them or even just some days you dont drive then I believe we could help today's obieceity atleast a little bit. If we could even limit driving in the big rural city's where everything is closer than in urban areas. I understand using motor vehicles to get from one far destination to another but their & back every single day is just destroying our earth. Polution is another effect driving does to the earth. In the German suburbs they have given up cars , people could learn some things about them. Their putting in effort to help save our earth from polution & other harmful things that come from driving so much for decades & decades. I would love to live in a healthy & clean environment if we could work together to stop polution & damage to our O-zone perminantly. I love my life & would not want to end it any time soon. We were given life to enjoy ourselfs & be happy. Not to destroy oursleves along with it. Driving only causes polution & damage their are people that live in such poluted area's they cant leave their house because its bad that theyll get extremely sick. if we could chane that not only our world would be better but civilation as well.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The auther suggests that studying is a worthly pursuit despite the dangers it presents. Like Venus is even more challanging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venu's atmopsheric. Its more extreme than anything that a human encounter on earth. Venus has the hottest suface temperature of any planet in our solar system. Venus would be the place where there would be lots of problems like not easy conditions. when using phones, tablet to acid or heat capable of melting tin. I feel like we would need more advanced things from earth in Venus because Venus would have the hottest suface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though mercury is closer to the sun. \"It would the most challenging in exploring venus\". The venusian geology and the weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightningstrikes to probes seeking to land on its surface. And the most entresting thing is that somtimes Mars and Venus are closer to earth. Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has a value, not only because of the insight on the planet in how it had lots of bad things, but we still would have the good things that would we need to make people to survive in venus. Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The development of driverless cars has been going on quite some time now. I think that since they have already wasted all this time and money trying to build a self driven they should keep on working and trying to build a car that is completely 100% self driven. There are many positive aspects of having a self driven car, but there are also some negative aspects. One of the positive aspects of having a self driven car is you would no longer have to suffer trying to stay awake on long car trips. You could just set the destination for your car climb in the backseat and take a long nap until you reach your destination. Or you could watch a movie until you get there. Another positive aspect is you would be able to text while the car is driving. You would be able to do that because the car is driving itself so you don't have to have your eyes on the road the entire trip. One of the most positive aspects of a self driven car is there would most likely be a large decline in car accidents. If there's a decline in car accidents that would also mean there would be a decline in deaths because of car crashes. Now for the negative aspects. One of the negative aspects of a self driven car is there would have to be a ton of law changes. The laws would need to change because like the passage said \"traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times\". Because of that most states don't allow self driven cars to even be tested. That is one law that would need changed because if you continue to develop the car and its still illegal to drive then you have just wasted a lot of time and money to make a car you can't drive. Another negative aspect is someone \"driving\" a self driven car and they get in an accident and someone gets hurt, who should be at fault, the driver or the person who made the vehicle? Another negative aspect is that the car still isn't 100% self driven. The human in the vehicle still has to take control sometimes to navigate through certain situations. Like I said in the beginning there are both positive and negative aspects of a self driven car. I think they should continue to develop the car because it could be very useful in the future. With that being said I don't think I would ever want to own one because I like to be in control of my vehicle, but I would like to test one out someday.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "From reading the article \"Driveless Cars Are Coming\", I have figured out that driveless cars have been a long time coming. People have been thinking and working on them for years now. There are pros and cons to driveless cars. For the most part driveless cars would not be a bad idea to throw into the world. If driveless cars passed the laws, you would not have to do much work going places, with time the cars are going to get better and more high tech, and they seem to be safe. Someone gets into their car and does not have to worry about touching the steering wheel, they just have to turn the car on. That is what it would be like if driveless cars come in the future. The family or a person can just sit in their car without paying attention to the road. On the other hand, a person does have to pay some attention to the cars actions because the car might need their help. For the most part, driveless cars would make life more easy-going. Some people dread having to drive long distances to get to the location they are going to but with driveless cars, it would be no trouble to hop in the car and sit in there while the car does it all for you. The best part about technology is it is always improving. People are always discovering better ways to do things and improvements in how to do those things. With driveless cars, they can be doing many tests on them and trying out different ways til they get the driveless car reliable for people to trust. Everything improves over the years and driveless cars are one of them. In the future, people are going to find more advanced ways to put in the driveless car to make it a better, more trusting car. Only a hand full of states are allowing limited use of semi-autonomous cars. Most states have concerns but some states are willing to work with the manufactorers. If more states allow their state to test computer-driven cars, it would make it easier to find ways to improve on the car. Driveless cars are a big deal and they need to be the safest they can be for the roads they will be on. So far the driveless cars can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves and it is only 2016. The future holds so much more. Although there are many things that need to be worked on before they let driveless cars on the road, it is a good idea to keep improving the vehicles. If people keep working hard at it, no telling what the driveless car will be like over the years. It is important to make the best car possible. There is already so many great things going for the driveless car. If they keep testing the cars and finding ways to make it better, it will eventually make a very safe driveless car.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Back when Viking 1 took the original photo of the Face on Mars, people have thought that it was an alien symbol. NASA as since debunked this theory. With the improved pictures from the Mars Global surveyor, it is very clear to see that it is a natural landform, just like those on Earth. The Face on Mars is easily identified as a natural landform. The Face on Mars cannot be an alien artifact because it has been proven to be a mesa by photographs, is thought to be alien because of movies and magazines, and was created by shadows. One of the best ways to prove that things exist is through pictures. This was shown to be true by the most recent picture of the Face, back in April 8, 2001. By this most recent picture, it is clear to see that the \"eyes and nose\" of the Face were created by shadows casted by the rock formations. With the 1998 picture, it was thought that something might be hidden behind the clouds present that day. Since this most recent picture was taken on a clear day, there is no way that it could be confused for something else, or anything could be hidden. Along with clear photographs, the Face is only relevant because of theorist and popular culture. Like the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" says, \"The Face on Mars has since become a pop icon.\" The author goes on to say that it has starred in a movie, books, and magazines. If the Face hadn't become so famous, it is possible that theorist wouldn't even have claimed it as alien artifact. The final reason that the Face couldn't be a face is because it was created by shadows. If the face had been viewed by the Viking 1 on a different day, it is possible that nobody would have thought that it was a face. As can be seen by the different photos, which were likely taken at different times of day, the shadows are much less prevolent on the mesa. It is still recognizable as the Face, but only very slightly. Along with that, there are also many also possible landforms that, under the right circumstances, looks like a face because of shadows. Based on all of the evidence, it is impossible to think that the Face on Mars was created by aliens. Even with all of the pictures taken, and most references being from the media, and how the creation was based on the time of day, it is difficult to believe that people still believe this. While some people might still believe this, there are many ways that this has been proven wrong. These are just a few of them.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Beep! Beep! Everyday people around the world drive to accomidate their busy schedule. With so many vechicles swarming the streets of the world there is bound to be conquences. Although it is impossible to understand how todays actions will affect the future. We can hypothesise that by reducing car usage we can preserve the world by lowering emissions and conserving rescources, create stronger communities, and keep cities beautiful. Today nations around the world are working to create communties that offer an enjoyable life without the use of a car. For example in Vauban, Germany a suburban community has made car use generally forbidden. if fact poeple themselves are pushing for a way to avoid cars. In article one it was reported that \"57 percent of Vauban's families sold a car to move to that community.\" One mom reposrts how she enjoys to be able to walkdown the streets listening to the sound of children playing(Article 1). In America teenagers are driving later because they don't feel the need to drive. In article four Elisabeth Rosenthal has found that her children would rather find summer jobs that they can acess without the use of car. In Bogota, Columbia the citizen have been enjoying the 118 miles of bicycle paths that have been in place since the mid-1990s. Today they continue to be enthratled with a carless city with the pop ups of new parts and sport centers. now citizens can take a stroll and visit resturants and upscale shopping districts all without the use of the car(Article 3). With the renewal of city centers the old life in suburbs has become less and less appealing. Even more importantly reducuding drivers would help perserve the world. the idea is that by limiting the cars on the road emissions can be brought down. in responce to smog conditions Paris, France took the intitive to issue a partial driving ban. Article 2 Paris bans driving due to smog explains how Paris went about this feat \"On Monday motorists with even numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fibne. The same would apply to odd-numbered plates the following day.\" During that week congestion was down 60 percent. they took this drastic approach becuase they were nearing the amount of smog in one ofthe most polluted city in the world, Beijing, China. According to article 4 recently in america researchers have found that the rate of car ownership is dropping. \"Many sociologists believe that is this pattern persists it wil have beneficila implications for carbon emissions and the environment, since transportation is the second largest source of america's emissions\"(Article 4). One thing is for certian the current trends is leading to less cars and the creation odf additional methods of transportation such as Ford and Mercedes who have already started to create a \"broader product range beyond the personal vechicle\"(Source 4). Although Bill Ford along with other car companies would suffer from the conversion he surprisingly has been pushing for a world without cars(Article 4). In fact at the mobile world Convention in 2012\"Bill Ford laid outr a business plan for a world in which personal vechicle ownership is impractical or underirable. He proposed partening with telecommunications industry to create cities in which pedestrian, bibycle, private cars, commercial and public transportation office are woven into a connected network to save time, connserve resources, lower emissionsand imporve safety(Article4).The world is certianly moving toward a world were car emissions are reduced, life is more enjoyable, and world city maintian their charm. By invovling yourself in this new type of world you are ensuring that future generations get to experience the same beuatiful world that exists today. There are big plans for this world join them.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "As climate change has become a severe issue to deal with in recent years, an increasingly popular idea rises advocating that climate change prevention is unnecessary, and that we should learn to get along with it. While I agree that living with climate change will be unavoidable for us in the future, I can see no reason for us to put aside our plans to cease the development of global warming. For the first part, it is commonly known that the main cause leading to climate change is ozone layer depletion. As the ozone layer of the Earth’s atmosphere serves as the shield protecting us from sun rays and heat, its gradual loss exposes our planet directly to the Sun. Since our technology has not been enough for us to solve the problem, the damage caused to the ozone layer is irreversible. We have no choice but to encounter the consequences ourselves. On the other hand, although we can foresee that the progress of global warming will continue, actions taken to slow the process should not be quitted for we only have one home planet. As climate change goes on, the globe’s temperature will soon reach the tipping point for an environment that humans can live in. Therefore, our effort to prolong its development is essential. We are temporizing for the scientists to find a solution. In conclusion, all methods need to be considered if they are potentially useful to the global warming issue. Both prevention and adaptation to it should be conducted at the same time.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There have always been debates among people about studying art at school. Some believe in usefulness of this knowledge, but others are convinced that it is just waste of time. Both sides have their arguments, however, I am more inclined to agree with those who consider this subject worth studying. On the one hand, the great majority of adults cannot credibly argue that understanding of modern and art and classic music have helped them a lot in building their career or personal life. In this case, the idea of spending more time learning foreign languages and more practical things as math and physics seems to be quite reasonable. After all, according to common sense and statistics very few professions or occupations really require diving into art, even though most of schools have obligatory subjects of art in their programs regardless of inclinations of every particular child. For example, music was my most hated subject in school and seemed not to have influenced on my personality at all. On the other hand, a well-rounded person who has in-depth knowledge and skills in arts definitely develops one’s brain in such ways that enhance creativity and imagination. These qualities are very valuable in the modern world and could become a strategic advantage in fighting for higher positions and better jobs. A good illustration of such correlation is research, conducted in American schools. It discovered a significant improvement in test results within math and science classes which were involved in arts curriculum. In conclusion, both points make sense, however I believe that arts have a great impact on human’s outlook and schools have to provide opportunities for all to have access to art subjects, taking into account talents and desire of pupils and their parents.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Having your own car can be great, but it's hurting the earth. So much pollution comes from cars, about fifty percent of the greenhouse gases in America are from cars. Cities have put bans on driving causing people to find our ways to get to work, cities like Vauban, and all of the driving causes pollution. In Pairs, France, there was so much pollution and smog in the air, people with even number plates coiuldn't drive one day, and odd numbered plates the next, it was like this for five days. In Bogota, Colobmbia, there's one day every year where cars are banned, taxis and public buses arre still permitted though. \"It's a good oportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution\" said Carlos Arturo Plaza when asked what he thought about the idea of they day. Two more Colombian cities partook in the event this year. In Vauban, Germany, many people have given up their cars. Having a car is allowed, but there are only two places to park, in a large garage, or a spot that cost $40,000 along with the home they buy. Vauban's streets are completely car-free other than the downtown area where the tram runs. 70 percent of Vauban families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold their cars to move their. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\" , said Heidrun Walter, a resident of Vauban. As mentioned, about fifty percent of the greenhouse gases in America are from cars. Only about 12 percent in Europe. France is one of the most polluted countries in Europe because of it's tax on gasoline, that is not on diesel fuel. Diesels make up 67 percent of France compared to the 53.3 percent average of the rest of Western Europe. Paris has more smog than other European capitals, Paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter compared to London's 79.7! The use of personal transportation should decrease because of how it's effecting out planet. The air is getting worse for us and we can control that! If we start driving less, or taking public transportation we can cut back a lot.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In this argument we are going to talk about space aged cars ans how we are trying to develope them. To be completely honest they arnt going to work, well at least not yet. there are to many things wrong with them as of now, and I am going to tell you the three main reasons why we shouldnt have these cars on the road yet. These self operated cars can be usefull, but there are some downsides to the idea. lets say you get in a wreck with a person who has a self moving car, who is going to pay for your ca repair bills? the person who was in the self operating car wont because they didnt do it, and we all now that the gopvernment wont pay for a damn thing unless it will help them out in some way, or paying people who dont work , but we wont get into that. Anyway it is unsafe to have a auto controlled car for insurance reasons and how that would work. Do you know haw much slower that this world would be if everyone could only go 25 mph. It would be a very slow world. People would have to change their schedules to wake up early enough to make it to their work or school while only going 25 mph maximun speed. peoples life could be in danger if one of these machines malfuntion, or just stop working. I mean the only time i can see this idea ever being practical is at night if someone gets off of work really late and is tired; they could have it auto pilot just incase they fall asleep. Overall i dont think this is a very good idea yet. if they can make some inprovements this could be a legitamete idea, but as of now i hink we are better off with our man operated vehicles.there are to many risks and not enough payout for what it is worth.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In essay Do Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit Joe Kurmaskie features setting affect cyclist old people around along time cant ask advice theyre old old give information wouldnt know talking A better piece advice solo cyclist would Never accept travel advice collection oldtimers havent left confines porches sine Carter office That features setting examples essay",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Most people can't live without there car but in Vauban, Germany Street parking, driveways, and home garages are completely \" car-free \". Experts say that tis a huge inpediment to current efforts it reduces greenhouse gas emission. Only transport people have there is bikes, walking, or buses. They seem to like this way better then taking a car back and forth throughtut the day. Paris has also taking part in this after days of near pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. People were ordered to leave there cars at home if not will be fined. Congestion went down 60 percent in the captial of france when people left there cars at home. Exceptions were maded to were they allowed people to use plug in cars and cars caarring 3 or more passengers. Eventually the smog cleared out maybe not using your cars all the time might be a good thing to do. Another Interrestiing Thing In BOGOTA, Colombia, Colombians hiked,biked. skated, or took buses to work during a car-free day leaving streets eerily devoid or traffic jams. most colombians said that its a good optunity to take aays stress and lower air pollution. With people not really using there cars anymore parks and aports centers bloomed and rush our restrictions have dramatically cut traffic. In America President Obama's ambitious goals to curb the United States' greenhouse gas emission studides have shown that fewer cars, driving less and getting fewer licences as each year goes by. So maybe friving less and really taking buses,taxis,walking, and riding bikes is a really good way to get arounfd instead of driving a car all the time buying gas and polluting te air maybe be better for the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars are becoming a more and more popular topic among both younger and older generations. The idea of having a driverless car brings both a positive and negative outlook. In my opinion, driverless cars should not be the ideal car of the future. Although they can be safer, there are still multiple ways they can go wrong. As stated in paragraph 9, \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?\" (Driverless Car Are Coming), there could arise a problem of who is at fault for injuries. Car manufacturers could be sued, and eventually, companies will go out of service, leaving future drivers with a smaller selection of cars. Another concern is about cars' computers getting hacked. There are a lot of people in this world who could/would try to hack these cars. If they eventually get cars to be completely driverless and the person in the driver's seat falls asleep, the car could get hacked and lead them to nowhere. If that person has enemies and their enemies hacked their car, then the potential death rate will go up. Last, future drivers will not know how to drive as well since driverless cars barely use humans to drive. If an emergency happens to where the car stops working properly (such as a blackout in multiple cities due to drastic electricity usage), they will not have a lot of the skills needed to drive the car. Driverless cars should not become the car of the future. There are too many negative scenarios that could possibly happen: more accidents, people wanting to sue companies, and blackouts. This is why I believe we should stick to regular cars instead of driverless cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The diagram illustrates a comparsion of different sweet foods' acid level produced in a mouth through a measure of their pH values. The higher acidity produced is, the lower pH value is shown. Fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey are selected in this analysis. By and large, the lowest level of pH value between sweet foods is cane sugar, dropping to 3.5 points in the first 5 minutes after it is eaten. And its pH value stays at points below 5.5 at which tooth decay occurs, of 25 minutes' duration. Honey remains its pH level above 5.5 points except the first 15 minutes. Going into the detail in regard to their acidity produced by minutes, the pH value of cane sugar dramatically slumps in the first 5 minutes, reaching 3.5 points. Its pH value rises steadily to 5.5 points after 30 minutes gone, lasting 25 minutes under the level of tooth decay. Simultaneously, fruit sugar is the second lowest of pH value, falling to 4 points in the first 5 minutes. Followed by an increase to 5.5 points after 15 minutes later, the pH value of fruit sugar shows a further upward to 7 points after 35 minutues elapsed. In contrary, there is a level off in the pH value of honey between the first 5 and 10 minutes, accounting for approixmate 4.8 points after dropping. After that, its pH value has a big jump to 7 points, the normal acid level in the mouth, after 25 minutes gone.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Globally, traffic congestion is become a serious issue in metro cities and towns. The main reasons for the problems are the inefficient roads and the increase number of private cars on roads. Fortunately, these could be tackled effectively by increasing taxes and constructing new roads or parallel structures. Firstly, many roads in the big cities have not been constructed to accommodate soaring traffic. Due to this, during rush-hours, the narrow roads often tend to be congested, and vehicles hardly find way to go smoothly. In Mumbai, roads using currently were built by the British rulers more than two centuries ago and these are insufficient to meet the growing demand, for instance. Similarly, since many people prefer to travel on their own cars instead of depending on the public transportation, this also worsen the scenario even further. Despite the above-mentioned difficulties, these are to be curbed by adopting sets of new strategies. The obvious one could be imposing extra taxes on private cars, eventually, not only reduce privately owned cars but the taxed people may start using public transports as well. Similarly, in order to combat heavy traffic, the government need to allocate fund to construct under and over passages, along with tube services, to reduce the volume. This has been a proven method adopted by many western-countries: Australia, the USA, Canada and so on. I, therefore, firmly believe that these two steps will minimise the hurdle effectively. In conclusion, congestion on roads is severe in many busy cities and towns. Levying carbon taxes and constructing flyovers or underground transportations would reduce increased volume of vehicles resulting from private car ownership and narrow roads.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I disagree, there should not be andy driverless cars in the future. This is because if there were to be an accident and the car were driverless it were to be on the manufactures and that would mean that the cars were not as safe as it guarenties. Therefore that would lead to many recless mistakes and companies would lose money which would intintionally lead to not enough funds to fix and make sure that the cars will be safer. Also, If a car were driverless how would it know the correct and incorrect way to drive without a drivers experience and skill? That would lead to a greater amount of accidents because the car may not know the right way to drive in different countries or cities. Would the car have to be programmed with all the worlds driving techniques and rules? Not all states and countries have the same laws and road rules, wouldnt the manufactuers have to be able to program all of the worlds rules and techniques to beable to make it safer also? Not all companies will be able to get a hold on all the tech and programing for that so not all of the cars will be able to drive in different places and states because the car would become disfunctional. Also there is always the risk of an accident weither the car is driverless or not so therefore the statement of a driverless car is indeed false advertisement, it is even more false because the driver will not be in control to prevent the accident if one were to happen. Would it be safer for the enviorment? If driverless cars were to be invented would there be a lot more factories and bussinises opening? Thata would not be safe for the enviorment because the factories would cause pollution and more trees and forests would have to be torn down in order to creat more bussinises. Therefore creating a driverless car would be a bad idea at least until it has better and safer ground to be to the attention of the people.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In most people's life, music takes a special place. No matter if one's favourite is classical, pop, rock, or rap, it can help people distract their attention from unwanted thoughts, alleviate stress, or even reduce pain. My strong belief is that music has a significant psychological effect in maintaining mental health, and some of its most vital impacts are visible on mood and stress. Music can induce extremely strong changes in people's mental states. There are several everyday examples that highlight the tranquillizing effect of music. Many people find out merely by instinct that they tend to calm down by listening to their favourite tunes. When someone feels anxious before an important exam, a medical visit, or a long-awaited date, music can provide a couple of minutes escape from these stressful situations, on our way to the event's venue. Soft music is also frequently utilized during meditative activities, such as yoga or relaxation. Additionally, people can come across the same type of calming tunes in dental or medical settings as well. However, these are quite passive coping techniques. On the other hand, there are more active possible mechanisms by which music can reduce stress. When dancing or working out to upbeat music, people decrease their stress levels through movement. It can be an even more efficient way to let the harmful energies behind because of a two-way effect: music tends the soul, while the movement is good for the body, reducing tension in the muscles. In summary, based on the above-reviewed examples of how music can be helpful in stress-relief, we can see that there is two possible mechanism, a passive and an active, which can play a role in this phenomenon.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Criminal activities have risen dramatically among young offenders in many metropolitan cities all over the world. This situation stems from several FACTORS and should be addressed by some effective solutions. There are two culprits of the globally increasing rate of young criminals. Firstly, domestic violence happening throughout childhood has an adverse effect on youngsters. Because minors may witness aggressive behaviours among their parents or even be a victim of child abuse which lead to violent thoughts in their mind, they can take the same actions to others when they grow up. Secondly, due to the development of the internet and technology, many young people can access violent content which is not strictly controlled or examined. For example, the young generation can be addicted to violent video games or thrillers including many sexual assaults and homicides and then try to imitate these behaviours in the real life. A number of measures should be adopted to mitigate the increasing number of juvenile delinquents. The primary solution is the cooperation between families and schools in educating the young generation. Parents should set a good example for their children and prevent them from being exposed to toxic content on the Internet. Another notable measure to solve this problem would be for governments and local authorities to pass strict rules to tackle major crimes as a deterrent to minors. For instance, in Vietnam, the national government has set tough legislation related to cyberspace, such as fining cyberbullies and deterring juvenile delinquents through community service. In conclusion, there are several reasons leading to the growth of young offenders in many large cities and strong remedies should be taken to reduce this trend.It is predicted that unless these solutions are applied, the problems associated with young criminals will continue to rise significantly in the future.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars, also known as autonomous cars are dreams from the future. We have all seen them in movies. Today's innovations are begining to make autonomous cars a tangible concept. In fact,they are already being designed. Driverless cars have been imagined since the General Motor's concept car. The first autonomous cars were driven by radio signals and magnets, but these things proved to be too impractical. The development of futuristic cars are a contraversial topic. I believe that driverless cars should be developed because they are gas-efficient, time-saving, and safer Driverless cars save time. During the time spent driving, someone could be doing their homework, or reading a book. Drivers can continue their daily life by drinking morning coffee or eating breakfast. Drivers would not need to be alert and focused on the street when their attention could be better used elsewhere. Instead of the time spent driving they could manage their time. For example, on a roadtrip, the mom could be preparing dinner instead of driving. Instead of driving an EMT could already be working on an inured person. This time would allow faster medical attention and save lives. These concepts are entirely possible with future innovations. However, is still room for improvement. Cars still require human assistance to navigate through tricky areas. GM vibrates the seat and Google simply announces it. Which brings us to our next topic, gas. Gas is an unrenewable resource, meaning once it is depleted, it is gone forever. Sergey Brin says that the new driverless car will use half of the fuel of a modern day taxi. These cars could change the world. If we consume less fuel, as a result, the fuel will last longer. This will also reduce emissions and pollution. With pollution reduced, the effects of global warming will also be reduced, preserving endangered animals. Autonomous cars would allow for time for scientists to search for a new sources of fuel. Driverless cars are also more flexible than buses. Some people may argue that driverless cars are dangerous. If the car were to malfunction and the passenger is unable to assist, it could result in a crash. The liability is huge, for on whom would the blame be placed? Once a perfected model of a driverless car emerges, this danger is eliminated. Many accidents are made while the driver is texting, or under the influence. Many driver's get distracted. With autonomous cars, these factors do not matter. The car will safely navigate you to your destination no matter what you are doing. Automatic functions have already prevented numerous accidents. Antilock breaks detect danger and prevent uncontrollable skids or rollovers. Maps, sensors, computers, and radars, are Innovations we did not have in 2000. At the rate we are learning and inventing new things, driverlesscars will be here in no time. BMW's \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" can already steer, accelerate,and brake themselves. I support the development of autonomous cars, because they are time-saving, pollution-reducing, and safer.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "This time I patient friend live apartment building hang time One day I go carnival I noticed wasnt liking said she scared rollercoasters I told wont big deal go big rides The day carnival came I exsited got really scared go therides I told could go smallest ride After went oh wasnt scared much Than wall walking saw ride one bigest rides said go I told wonted I could go sure ride kept going differnt bigger rides wall walking said thanks patience I good friend In summary time I patience friend",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think driverless cars are a great invention. Driverless cars would make everyone's lives easier. It would save lots of time, and even keep people safer. I think everyone should have access to self driving cars. This technology could help us improve our lives, and open a new world of technology for us. I strongly agree with Google cofounder, Sergy Brin, on his ideas about public transportation. Public transportation systems that self drive would be amazing. It would indeed change the world. These cars would make transportation extremely easy, and replace old cars. These cars could also make driving even more safer for people. The self driving cars have sensors that can auto brake. This could prevent many accidents in the future, and maybe save lives. Although this technology may help, it all lies on the driver. This technology may cause carless drivers. All in all, the technology of driverless cars could make driving safer than it is today. Overall, I think that driverless cars are a good idea. They are safer for people, and young drivers. Also, they are just convienient for us. It would improve out quality of life. I would like to see these care implemented into our daily lives.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Should books magazines movies found offensive removed shelves I think book magazine movie stay shelf even found offensive If offensive one person nt mean every person Everyone view subject offensive I nt think person wrote book magazine meant offensive They writing thought went along story people took offense book magazine But nt argue like I said author probably nt mean offensive In conclusion books stay shelves Everyone different point view The author probably didnt mean book magazine offensive",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "what is your argrument on driverless cars? Do you think there safe or not? Do you think they will turn out a disater or some of the best cars in the world. I will give you some of my opions on driverless cars. One of the first bad thing that can come out of this car is more accisdents if not built correctly.another bad example of why this car should not be put on the road is because one of the important sensor can stop working at any time and cause health problems like a heart attack, it might not warn the person in time to take controll the car and they could end up getting really scared. Good things that can come out of this car is it can help elderly get around easier without them having to do alot of work and move around. another good thing that can come out of this car is gas perfencienty, less gas will be needed to go farther places because the driverless car uses it smartly.one last good thing that can come out of this type of vehical is it can save childrens life by stopping emmidietly if a kid runs out infront of the car because of senseors in front bumber. I think I would allow driverless cars on the raod because it can make transportation easier for the whole world. But I would make sure it passes all saftey test and crash proof test before letting the first person buy one. This is my feelings on driverless cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars are the future of transportation and should continue to be developed. In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" the author offers several positive aspects of driverless cars. Driverless cars allow the driver to bring in-car entertainment that use the heads-up display. This display dissappeares when the driver is need, making it a safety feature (Paragraph 8). This feature along with other technology keep the vehicle safe. The driverless cars use high-tech equipment such as sensors, cameras, a gps receiver, and lasers to allow safety for the passengers inside while the car drives itself. Some driverless cars can drive up to 90 percent of the time on their own, only needing the driver to take control in heavy traffic and heavy construction. Cars will be able to drive themselves at a higher percent of the time as technology advances. Several automotive companies, such as Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that fully drive themselves by the year 2020 (paragraph 10). These driverless cars would use half the fuel of todays cars and offer far more flexibility for public transportation than a bus. Due to these reasons one can determine that driverless cars are the future of transportation and should continue to be developed and researched by automotive companies. These driverless cars would fundamentally change the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Besides being totally awesome, driverless cars could be extremely beneficial to the people in general. The many sensors on these vehicles help to to ensure the safety of the passengers as well as the human driver. People new to driving, elder drivers, and maybe even drivers udner influence would have an enormous amount of pressure allieved, therefore preventing the many deaths caused by vehicular accidents. Sensors like that of the modified Toyota prius; the rotating sensor dubbed \" LIDAR\", the position estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, the GPS reciever, and other valuable equipment to secure the name of safety towards the vehicle. The death toll caused by reckless driving could be critically lowered because of the advancement and use of this technology. Now there is the argument of what if the tech fails, or if there is a special situation with the road. Heads up displays and other alerting software should be able to alert you if the vehicle needs human accompaniment to ensure that you still remain in control in these crucial incidents. That being said, it is still advised that the driver remain alert at all times while on the road, preventing the need of these alert systems being used heavily. The psycological changes this type of car can bring are unprecedented, because the people in general don't have access to these cars in the first place, because of safety concerns. Laws that pretain to driving were made to ensure the safety of the people in",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Is it a really a good thing to read someone emotions? well it is, if you see someone who's mad, sad, fearful, you can help them to calm down, to feel better, or to feel less scare. emotions really lets someone to show everyone how they feel. But using the Facial Action Coding System (or FACS) on classroom full with students could be a good/bad idea. One teachers can see if students are confuse or lost, two they see if there's something wrong with one of the students, three some students don't want their's teachers to be in their's problems. Before I explain more about why it's a good idea for teachers, I want to talk about how i feel about FACS. It something that i never heard about and i think it's somewhat a good idea, but i dont recommaning it to put it in a A.I. It would get a bit weird and creepy if it's in a robot, but that's how i feel about it. Back to the topic, if a teacher is given out a lesson and some students don't get it they use the FACS to see if they get it or don't. They can even use it as they teach and see what they in to work on long until they understand the lessons or topics. You know how some teachers would ask the class how are they doing before they start the lesson? well there are some teachers who don't ask that but do care for their's students. If they use the FACS before they start class and see someone depress or sad they can wirte their names down on a note or peice of paper and after class or school they talk to them one on one to see whats wrong or if there ok. they can even try to help them or make them feel better. There are some students who need help or need to talk with someone, but they chose not to get help because they feel like it's gonna make it worst for them. I know some people who really need some help but they dont want to get help, but we had they FACS in my school they get help faster. than again they would get mad with teachers fast becuase they don't teachers to help them with their problems. Thats what's I got to say about the FACS being a classroom. It would be really helpfull for teachers, but some students would be annoy by it easily or would think that teachers are trying to be apart of there personal lives.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus is called the \"Evening Star\" for it shines bright in the midnight sky when we can see it. Venus could've supported life at one point in time. Venus is very close in density and size of Earth, some call Venus our sister-like or twin planet. The Astronomers are so fascinated by this planet because is so much like earth it could've had life on it at one time. \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth,\" the Author stated. Venus also has mountains, craters, and valleys just like Earth. We don't know much about the planet, so we might as well get to a lot more about to see what the possiblilities are of our planets end. \"Our travel on Earth and beyound should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.\" We should explore and find new things instead of just in our solar system. To know more about space and get a better idea of what is to come an will happen. Venus could've supported life at one time, some say this is why it's so close in size. It's our \"twin,\" it has a lot of features Earth has. Even though we don't know a whole lot about Venus we hopefully will in the future.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It has been highly debatable topic these days that Whether the government should allot the funds for the recreation field, or focus on the health wellbeing and education for the public. I completely agree with this statement due to certain and specific reasons. There are plethora of reasons that can explain well that the authorities need to consider spending money on education and health. The primary factor that could be taken into account is that arts plays indispensable role in the developing the positive environment. This is because artists are using the recycle materials to create a useful art. To illustrate, In India, empty walls on the roads are painted with colours and gives amazing feature when walking. In addition to this, it supports thé efforts of you g children who are performing good in arts field and lack knowledge in other ares of study. While, I also believe thát health and education sectors should have equal access to the money provided by the government. This is due to the cause thắt education considered as ả significant tool that can ensure bright future of any nation. People who are below poverty are not able to study due to financial instability, hence free educational services must be introduced to these minor families. The eminent example of free education can be seen in UK where the government is taking the whole responsibility of their educational until the age of 18 in case of financial crisis. Apart from this, health sector must introduce the free health services to promote thè health and wellness, since all of the individuals are paying huge amount of taxes while they were working. Therefore, it is necessary that government needs to help them in later age when they are unable to pay for their health conditions. In conclusion, I accept that government needs to give some money to arts field, while I believe that Health and educational departments require same amount of money, and should never be neglected.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the ultramodern epoch, it is a point of debate that the group of teen agers should help to poor people who have not money or things to live of life. Undoubtedly, this notion remains successful in keeping the majority in its favour. The upcoming paragraphs would cast light on my argument related to very conception. I wholeheartedly concur with the statement that those people who belong from 13 to 18 should do something for community. These myriad reason in favour of my argument, intelligent pupils should help to children those have not house for living and they are lived in footpath side of the road. They have not money for eat to food then how they start their study in school. Pupils should help to them in study for unpaid because if they will educate they can achieve some good jobs and this effect is also good impact on country economy. To add a few more reason, how can one forget about? , there is some also have cons this. To justify the some, there is epitome of if juvenile doing unpaid work in community they will face some problem. They are also student and they have not lot of time. If they will go help for community they can loss of study. Apart from all this they will disappoint from the people who are also working for community. And they will see the people who cannot get job from the Government and in good company. Even they are well educated and have high degree from university. This is definitely bad impact on student. They will distract from their study. On a final note, I am of the opinion there are different pros and cons about help to community as there is not any plausible argument against the very phenomenon.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author supports his idea well because, he brought up the claim that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it present, because Venus is not only a planet but also a twin to earth, which means that we humans can live on there, if there was to be a evolutionary or global breakout on the earth and meteors were to destroy earth and extinct everything the second time, we would have somewhere to go, so it is worth a chance for our survival and not only our survival, maybe theres an overpopulation in all the countries, instead of killing kids or to put them to cryo sleep or stop adults from having more kids they could go to venus. The author already said in paragraph 5 it says that \" The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study venus.\" They dont need to force people to go, but to ask for volunteers, and they don't need to have intelligent to go to venus or even be experience they just need to be able to bring samples like the rocks, the dirt, the water, the plants. So that they could bring it back and we could experiment on them, is the water edible, is the rock acidic or poisinous, can the dirt be used for agricultural things. It says in paragragh 6 \" more importantly, researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas or anything else, from a distance\", so they would need humans to go and examine this things, so it is a worthy pursuit despite the danger, because we should think about what it brings to the table not what it takes away.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think the author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthly pursuit despite the dangers because the author explains about it very well with many examples. I have four evidence why I thought the author supports the idea well from the article. For the first evidence from paragraph 1 and 2, it explains about Venus which is his main theme of his idea. It says \"one of brightest points of light in the night sky\". It's doesn't directly relate to the author's idea, but it helps us to understand and have an idea of what is he going to talk about as a introduction. For the second evidence from paragraph 3, it explains about what affect and challenging about exploring Venus and why with couple of examples. Firstable, it talks about atomosphere, temperatures of surface, and atmospheric pressure.For atomosphere, it says \"a thick atomosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus\". For temperatures of surface and atmospheric pressure, it says \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees\" ,\"Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system\" and \"90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet\". Those facts are really suppot the author's idea because it tells us an exact number and how different from our planet Venus is. For the third evidence from paragraph 6, it explains about ship prbiting or hovering safely. It says \"most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense of atomosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective\" and \"scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks\". It tells us why it is hard to research and have risks clearly by using facts of situation right now. It also makes us think that it is actually sounds difficult even though we didn't really learn specificly about it before. For the last evidence from paragraph 7, it explains about electronics. It says \"Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible. and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme physical condition\". Electronics are really important in our life, so it make us think that it is hard if electronics don't work well. In conclusion, I think the author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthly pursuit despite the dangers because the author gives us not only about enviroment resons, but also about many different ways of resons and examples with facts to explain and support his idea. They are also very aculate because he gives us an exact number for evidence, so it made me think the same way as the author thinks.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In this article, \"Making the Mona Lisa Smile,\" the author suggested in paragraph 6 that this technology could be used in the classroom. I agree that this kind of technology could be beneficial to schools, due in part too two reasons. One, it could help teachers understand kids who have mental disabilites better. Two, using this technology, the teachers can tailor their lessons to interest and engage the students to teach them more. Three, in the guidance office specifically, the counselors could use FACS to see the true reactions to the questions they ask students if they think that the student is being abused or bullied in or out of school. For mental disabilites, I feel that the possibilities could heighten the understanding between student and teacher for a number of reasons. People who have Autism, who perhaps don't how to express as much emotion as their peers, can finally feel somewhat understood and learn to express themselves better. Kids with Anxiety can get out of that situation that is stressing them out and get the help that they need before an anxiety attack gets even worse. Kids with Depression can be helped by their teachers or counselors before they get hurt. Kids with ADHD can be spotted and helped when they reach a point where they are no longer focused on the lesson, and the teacher can ask them if they need to slow down or if they need help understanding the problem. A tailored experience for a specific class can be crutial to some students educations. For example, if the teacher were teaching a new lesson and the students started showing signs of distress, the instructor could ask the students if they were all getting the material, and ask if they needed to slow down. Also, in some classes, like the social sciences and English classes, some teachers like to play games to try to engage the students, and sometimes, all that the student really needs is some quality study time to cement the material in their brains. But in some classes, like a rigorous science class, a break from intense studying might be in order. If a student is stressed by a neighbor, then the teacher could rearrage the seating chart. If the students have an averse reaction to the teachers testing conditions, then they could see that it changes. If the lessons are boring the students, then a lesson plan change could help energize the learning enviorment. In the guidance office, possibilities run rampant as well. One common occurance in almost any school enviorment is bullying, which could be spotted and chipped away at to get rid of and resolve the conflicts between the students. Also, if a teacher believes a student to be a victim of abuse, whether it be of a physical, emotional, verbal, or even sexual kind, they could ask few questions and see the true reactions of the students to help them better than they could if the student was reluctant to speak up. This way, the student does not really have to voice their horror and can get the help they need without the need to speak and relive the experiences that brought them there. (Also, outside of the school, the parents of the students could be brought in and questioned to see the true truth.) This technology could better our school systems, and better public schools to perhaps the same calibar as private schools. The students could learn more, feel more comfortable coming to school and participating due to finally feeling understood and welcome, and more students can get out of bad experiences, whether at home or a school.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In excerpt The Mooring Mast Marcia Amidon Lsted builders obstacles overcome building dock dirigibles The builders think mast would work It said paragraph nine architects could simply drop morning mast top flat roof A thousandfoot dirigible moored top building held single cable tether would add stress buildings frame The buiders modify building As said paragraph ten Rather building utilitarian mast ornamentation architects designed shinny glass chromenickle stainless steel tower would illinated frome inside steppedback design imitated shape building The obstacles builders overcame let use mast efectly",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I believe book music mvies magazines etc removed shelves taken offensive Poeple putting stuff making others feel happy Althought might think putting stuff papers movies nt hurt people Well guess movies stuff deal sexual relationships For example gender marrage say people marry sex They make fun like others take offensive Very little people like sex By us putting book movies making song make feel offensive best way go Another one special needs movie book deal people putting others special problems Although nt show thier sad nt mean nt offened way Families special needs child sister brother mom dad nt like much someone outs something problem Also feel really upset sometimes get mad Most importantly books movies making fun people nt lot stuff It s fault nt money buy stuff like others For example nice house nice clothes families problems trying pay rent bills one parent working A lot parents work gettin laid even gettin paid Worst famliy member like someone lives house go hospital whe go hopstial pay bills Some families hospital year year nt money pay new stuff house people live In conclusion believe shoukd take certain books movies mafazines ect shelves taken offensive We nt know rude something makes fun someone way s late Many people really nt like see something thats offensive They nt know react get frustrated",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Over the years pollution has increased drastically. \"All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change,\" said David Goldberg, an offical of Transportation for America (In German Suburb, Life goes On Without Cars P7).\" In Vauban, Germany they have been developing a suburban community without cars. \"70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move there (In German Surburb, Life Goes On Without Cars P3).\" Limiting car usage has been changing the world. A resident of Vauban, Heidrum Walters, a media trainer and mother of two said \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\" (In German Suburb, Life goes On Without Cars P3).\" Without cars people are more at ease and relaxed. \"Vauban, completed in 2006, is an example of growing trend in Europe, the United States and elsewhere to separate suburban life from auto use, as a component of a movement called \"smart planning.\"( In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without cars P4).\" Some people know that one of the main causes of pollution is from cars. \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe... and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive ares in the United States (In German Suburbs, Lifes Goes On Without Cars).\" Because of all the pollution Paris \"After days of near-record pollution, has enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city (Paris bans driving due to smog P10).\" Pollution has been slowly decreasing from hybrid cars and other means of transportion. In Bogota, Colombia they have also gotten into the spirit in reducing air pollution. \"In a program that's set to spread to other countries, millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses to work during a car-free day, leaving the streets of this capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams (Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota P20).\" \"It was the third straight year cars have been banned with only buses and taxis permitted for the Day Without Cars in this capital city of 7 million (Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota).\" A businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza said \"It's a good opportunity to take stress and lower air pollution\" as he rode a two-seat bicycle with his wife (Car-free day leaving is spinning into a big hit in Bogota).\" As more and more countries try to find new ways to reduce pollution good things are starting to happen all over the world. People are starting to feel less tension and stress. It's also another way for people all around the world to exercise, go outside and enjoy the beautiful blue sky with friends and family.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "With the development of the world, there is a spike in damages caused to the environment. Some states that increasing fuel prices is the optimal method to fight this global issue of nature. I partially agree that the reduction of fuel costs may have a positive impact however, there are a lot of ways to accomplish the same effect. In this essay, I will discuss alternative methods to save the biosphere apart from meddling with the fuel industry. Firstly, when the prices of petroleum and diesel are increased, there will be a reduction in the number of consumers. If the usage of fuels enriched with carbon is less, there will be a significant reduction in the emission of carbon dioxide which is a direct toxic pollutant that intensifies the depletion of the ozone layer resulting in global warming. For instance, in 2022 there was a major drop in the supply of petroleum in Sri Lanka which led to skyrocketing prices and this resulted in many people choosing eco-friendly options like bicycles. The research studies later showed the emission rate of pollutant gases by vehicles was reduced by fifty per cent in that year. So, increasing the fuel prices will reduce the number of buyers thus, reducing the negative impact on nature. On the other hand, just decreasing the price would not address the root cause of this problem. Encouraging the use of natural energy sources like wind power and solar power would be a positive endorsement. For example, when people use automobiles powered by hydro or solar power, then there is zero toxic waste. So, finding alternative efficient ways to replace petrol and diesel could be beneficial in tackling global environmental issues. Moreover, if the concept of car-pooling and public transportation is developed, then there is a great decline in bad outcomes. In conclusion, a price reduction of oils would aid in finding answers to international environmental problems but, there are a number of other ways which address the root cause thereby tackling a larger fraction of the problems in an efficient way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I'm against this car idea. So many people get hurt or even killed because of technology and trying to put technology in a car would just make it worse. Yes it would be better on gas because it would be electric, but thats the only positive thing I see out of this. Like the article says \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault the driver or the manufacturer?\" Someting like this could start a lot of fights with car companys and inserince. I would be easy to blame the car because of \"tech problems\" so the car company looks bad to other people. So the car company losses custemers. The car always needs a real human to drive the car. Yes the car can be quick, but what if the car just swerves off the rode so many people would get hurt from a car thats doesnt have a human drining the car. People hate when there kids text and drive. Why would a parent what there kid having a car that drives it self and just full of technology? That just make the parents more nevers for there kid to go out on any day. Plus people tht arent good with technology in the frist place and they get a car like that that would be crazy. To have some one who can't use a high tech phone like the Iphone would be unsafe to the world. If the world had a car that didn't need a human driver a lot of taxi drivers would loss out of a job. The only reason they got the job because they can't do school very well, so their last resort was to become a taxi driver. With these cars people would losse thier jobs. So thats all the reasons that I think about the cars I don't think we should have them it just to risky.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author concludes story paragraph several significant reasons Throughout story Saeng struggles past overcoming The paragraph helps bring sense closure story When Saeng returns home hibiscus tells mother couldnt help unable overcome past Saeng said II failed test When says the test means ability cope loss grandmother homeland overcome In concluding paragraph Saeng says retake test She said When snows melt geese return hibiscus budding I take test again In conclusion author uses concluding paragraph bring closure story emotional obstacles Saeng faces",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.