messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In memoir narciso rodriguez The blueprints Lives The mood author created memoir grateful author created mood still grateful abought parents left behind family friends Jobs better life also mood grateful passed rich culinary skills Also grateful livving simple house wonderful neighbors freinds I think mood created author grateful memoir good things life stuff gratefull",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars may seem like the solution to many traffic and tranportaion problems--but are they really? If these cars continue to be developed, more and more money is going to go into the project. Driverless cars is a project that simply does not need to be addressed today in time. I am completely against driverless cars. In paragraph nine, the statement was made that lawmakes know exactly how to accomplish street saftey, and that it is achieved the best with alert drivers. I'm against the developing of the care because why should corporations spend huge amounts of money on a driverless car? Think about it. With all the money that is being spent to \"fix\" something that doesn't need to fix, the corporations or United States of America, could use it to open up more homeless people shelter and help our own economy. Having cars that drive themselfves is not an issue that should even be focused on. Driverless cars are a fanstasy that does not need to be fullfilled. The cars still need tremendous amounts of work in almost every way possible. For example, in paragraph seven and eight, it talks about how the driver would still need to be alert. What if the driver gets bored or tired or falls asleep? Well, apparently some of the options are to install cameras to watch that the drivers are focused on the road, and there's the consideration of flashing lights on the windsheild. These options most definetely not work on every driver. In the daytime, the flash might even be noticable to the driver (especially if the driver fell asleep). As for the camera, that is just creepy becasue there are so many hackers and updates on technology that someone may figure out a way to hack into that camera to watch and track you. Also in paragraph seven, it talks about how important it is to get the driver's attention when manual, but what if the person is completely disconcentrated. For example, what if the driver got out of the seat to go check on his fighting kids in the back? The driver gives the car an extremely large amount of trust because it's \"driverless.\" So many things about the driverless car need to be fixed and touched up and reinvented. With the invention of a car like this, very large amounts of rearranging, remaking, and organizing would have to made. The United States of America ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT NEED TO BE WORRYING ABOUT REINVENTING LAWS FOR A \"DRIVERLESS\" CAR. So many accidents may occur because of the amounts of trust that the driver would give the car. As talked about in paragraph nine, so many liabilites would have to covered and cleared in an accident. There is also the question of who would be at fault in case of an accident--\"the driver or the manufacturer? In conclusion, driverless cars should not be developing in this point of history. The United States of America has other bigger and more important problems that should be focused on. There is absolutely no need to waste money on \"driverless\" cars that still need a driver--ironic huh? Driverless cars only bring more problems into socitey than solutions and that is why I am against driverless cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There is no doubt that these days information technology has invaded our space and dominated our home leisure and work. However, the question: is dominating our lives by this technology have a negative or positive impact on our lives? Is considered one of the most controversial issues today. In this essay, I am going to examine this phenomenon from both viewpoints. On one side of the argument, some people argue that the benefits considerably outweigh the disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is integrating technology in every aspect eases our lives and decreases hardworking. For example, advanced houses with integrated voice commands give the person the ability to achieve multiple tasks without any physical activity. Moreover, the technology allows people to connect multiple devices with an email address and control them remotely. One good illustration of that you can switch on and off your home AC while you are at work by the WIFI technology. On the other hand, it is also possible to consider it with the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact using advanced technology increase the number of unhealthy people. People often have this opinion because people become lazier, and their daily activity dramatically decreases making them prone to diseases. As we have seen, there are no easy answers to this question. On balance, however, I tend to believe that using advanced information technology should be limited to simple tasks, so at any point if a technical error happened you can resume your life without any obstacles.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Nowadys, the number of out of school youth who are jobless is increasing. The rise in youth unemployment iss going to negatively affect them in many aspect such as lead more crimes and get mental diseases. This cause by they do not have enough money to continue their studies and vacancies in companies with high requirements for their degrees. To solve this problem government need support urgently needed to ensure the future of the young. This essay will discuss the problems as well as possible solutions for this issue. On the one hand, there are several reasons why youth unemployment cause problems to themselves as well as the community. Firstly with the individuals joblessness is a cause of serious problems. Beside they unable to maintain their lives, they also can not be a part of the community. It leads they could get some mental diseases which able to hinder their activites. Secondly, for the society or whole , with the increasing youth joblessness, to maintain their life they could get some job illegally such as robbery and stealing. On the other hand, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problems of the unemployment that government should invest more money in education. By this way, young people will be prepare essential knowledge and skill to get a suitable job. For example, in Vietnam, using unemployer for manual working wile trainning their skill untill they able to carry out the main missions. In conclusion, the high youth uunemployment is a big problems for all countries and solutions should be urgently deployed to solve this problem.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "All kid s style books people like scary funny romance books really take offense We think taking books shelf would affect one person people mature enough read grown books magazines libraries types syles different people might look little harder find right book I agree books magazines taken offensive All libraries different types books example elemantry school library grown teenager books middle school little kid books We also think peer presure effect books magaiznes kids read example I middle school friends reading romance books I still reading I change reading style fit s exactly I Books offensive content nt taken shelf I believe offensive books library ignore get book cant take grown books kids know suppose reading Libraries different style books fit everyone s taste look right book suites take books offensive style shelf judge book s cover",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Patience important help successful many things In school patience important things wait Being patience game chess checkers important persons makes move thinking move make counter attack Patience important playing games schoolwork Patience also waiting For example everyone excited eve cant wait till morning patient wait till morning Also birthday dont know youll get instead peeking patient open presents Patience helpful skill",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author is giving us all this information on venus. Venus is the closest planet earth in trems of density and size, and venus is the secound planet from the sun. Venus of course has more powerful weather then we do here at earth so that why they say that it is possible that venus was like earth with water and living thng years ago. They have eruoting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, frequent lighting. Venus has the hottes surface temperature of any other planet even thuogh Mercury is the closest planet to the sun. Researchers cannot take samples of rocks, gas, or anything else, from a distance. They may want to test more thing further in to venus but at some piont they cant take any of it cuased of the effect that can cuase or danger they can be in, o that way the wat to make stronger machines to go out to Venus so that they could make more invistigacion on in Venus. Nasa is working to get more studing of venus if possible, they had some simpliied electronics that lasted for 3 weeks. They are lokking for simething stronger that last more then 3 weeks so that they can get more studing on Venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear computers wonderful tool bear many positive impacts society first computers created numerous forms communication Also enable us create age research In addition computers given us amazing ways entertain computers incredibly positive effetct people One reason computers positive effect humans developed many ways communicate people world First one fantastic program instant messaging given us amazing ability hold conversation one people world able respond within instant In recent survey people said prefer instant messaging type communication beside face face talking second computers come webcams built actually see person communicating I friend move recently able see remain friends even though nt live town I m sure similar experience occured someone know Finally popular program facebook changed communication forever People see things go info whereever want Although wonderful computers established incredible ways communication A second reason computers positively import people created numerous research One example would phenomenon search engine google Google almost everything help people finding schools use computer resources us allow research fact much availbale In addition computers created many opportunities people learn billions web existance studies shown people found website conataining information relevant research book Computer reason research contuined thrive continue made Finally computers established amazing entertainment people ages First video websited youtube created place people watch music videos creative films enjoy If ca nt get tickets concert want going online watch music videos person much cleaper alternative second jaming websites less expensive go online play similar games charge Finally websites appropriate funny stories posted fantastic way get laughter comic without leaving couch would nt prefer stay home rather going nt necessary computers incredible way achieve quick un expensive entertaiment todays economy In conclusion computers impact proper many positive ways re established forms communication research entertainment forever change society Therefore I invite join demonstrate icrredible strenght computers",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The features setting essay Rough Road Ahead Do Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit greatly affected cyclist In beginning mans journey confident abilities I rode morning strong legs smile face The cyclist prepared exciting day setting supported feeling The cool pines rushing rivers Yosemite name written setting began change water ran cyclist s attitude changed He traveling high deserts California June without much water begun feel desperate As abandoned buildings deserted towns appeared went despair At point tumbleweeds crossed path ridiculously larg snake really look like diamondbackblocked majority pavement front me He middle nowhere one around setting lost hope surviving He thought going die heat stroke water left short rolling hills extremelyly hot sun The cyclist affected features setting going confidence desperation despair relief changes setting caused change attitude throughout journey",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There is no doubt that the problem of pollution has a huge impact not only on the environment but on humanity health as well. And the question of whether to raise up the value on cars fuel or not is extremely topical today. I tend to feel that it is a quite reasonable idea and i will give some reasons for it. To start with the price changes, we have a big probability percentage that people will put up with this and it wil not work, but on the other hand if the government suggests environmentally friendly kinds of transportation or other alternatives such as comfortable public transport, more bike paths around the city and not only on the downtown area. Another great example of replacement fuel vehicle is electro cars. But it is quite clear that such cars need special charging stations, which are rare in small cities all the more so in the countryside. Furthermore, I believe that the biggest influence on ecology have manufacturing companies. It is well known that the effects of their exhaust emissions are much bigger than traffic fumes. Finally, we should remember that bigger factories with great capital should be held responsible for the consequences but not the common people. To conclude, I do understand the opposing view, which is that gas should not be pricey because it is no surprise that society got used to it. Nevertheless, I suggest that the pushy method is the quickest and easiest way to preserve our planet. Notably, though, I think that it needs to be a gradual process, based on careful support rather than sudden demanding law by the strict government.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There is an ongoing debate about whether customs and traditional ways of behaviour are still relevant in today's modern life. Although some argue that many customs are outdated and no longer serve a purpose, others believe that these traditions are an essential part of our culture and should be preserved. In my opinion, I agree with the latter group and believe that many customs and traditional ways of behaviour are worth keeping. Firstly, customs are an essential part of our cultural identity. They help us understand where we came from, and they provide us with a sense of belonging. Our traditions are what make us unique, and they connect us to our heritage. For example, the celebration of festivals and ceremonies is a tradition deeply ingrained in many cultures. These events bring people together and provide a platform to exchange ideas and share cultural experiences. As a result, traditional ways of behaviour are essential in promoting cultural diversity and social cohesion. Secondly, many customs and traditional ways of behaviour have practical benefits that are still relevant today. For instance, the practice of eating together as a family is a tradition that has been passed down through generations.p, and it has been shown to have many benefits, including improved communication and stronger family relationships. Similarly, many customs and traditional ways of behaviours that promote respect, honesty, and integrity are still essential in modern life. These values are universally recognized as positive, and they help to foster strong communities and relationships. In conclusion, even though some argue that customs and traditional ways of behaviour are outdated and no longer relevant, I believe that they are an essential part of our culture and should be preserved.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Everyone nowadays is so used to driving a car here and there even if it would just be five minutes on foot, but what if you started limiting your car usuage? Making your feet be your gas instead of a pump when the distance is close enough, and even biking occasionally. Limiting car usuage may sound like a bad thing, but it has many advangtages such as reducing pollutin, increasing saftety for human beings, and even opeing options for alternative transportion. Cars release a great amount of polluants into the air increasing smog in some areas worse than others, like in Paris, China, and other places. Providing or opening your mind to other ways to get from one destination to the next, would reduce the smog thats in the air. This simple action as close to 70% of the population pitching in can result in a healthier environment, and some people may agree with Heidurn Walter. She says \"When I had a car I was always tense. Im much happier this way.\" Not only that, people who do not agree or get rid of their transportion vechicles will be fined. For example, in Germany you have to pay $40,000 if you want to get a car owner space and this does not include the money you have to spend on your house. Than, in Paris 4,000 drivers were fined $31 dollars after not leaving their cars home after a public annocement was made to do so. This shows that opening this can increase health, or make an environment cleanier. Plus, you actually inforcing something that is good for the environment will get people to participate, such as a fine. Hearing engines roar and cars zoom pace is a sound all too familar with citizens who walk or ride constantly. It can be quite on the thrilling side crossing the streets or even walking down a busy rode when you know being hit is a possibly. Limiting car usage can decrease the risks or heavy weighted vechicles hitting biking, or walking citizens that dont have a chance against the weight. This increases saftety, bumping into another human or being nugded by a bike wont affect your body as much as a 500 pound or even heavier car crashing into a 100 pound person. Like, Carlos Arturo said \"It's a good opportuinity to take away stress...\" meaning the stess that comes with a car. The money for gas and the risk or hitting someone or being hit is taken away when on foot or on bike. This shows limting car usage isnt only increasing the safety or people walking or biking, it also takes away stess factors like money, fixing a car if it needs repair, and other factors. Finally, having alternate forms of transportion can open your eyes to a whole need world. Instead of constanly beiong locked in your 4 door honda prison or your house you're outside seeing new people and increasing social interaction. Not only this, but you're getting excerise and maintaining your health or builing it. Which is another reason to limit the amount we use our cars. This shows that doing so can not only increase saftery, and money, but health and social oppurtunitys. In conclusion, limiting car usage has many advangtages even if you dont realize it and our soiciety could benefit a lot from it. Like, when it comes to the safety of the next generation, the present, or the previous. Than, it can even take away stress that come with a vechicle and even increase health and social gathering.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Exploring Venus clearly has it's challenges. The exploration of an unknown area always has benefits with the information that can be uncovered, but it is almost never easy. Planets in general all hold many barriers for studying done by scientists and researchers. The author of this article suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents by proving that Venus may have once been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system, and that Venus is the nearest option for a planetary visit. The author also claims that The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has a solution to make visiting Venus safer. First of all, the author says that Venus may have once been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. In the text, it says, \"Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too.\" Venus is or once was clearly somewhat similar to Earth, and that will help scientists to be able to find out information about our own planet along with another planet that may seem the most reasonable to study. In the text, it also says,\"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probabnly covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\" All of these characteristics of Venus make the planet more interesting and reasonable for studying. Considering the fact that the planet is very similar to Earth, the planet may also give us insight of our own planet, with the similarities that can and have already been drawn. Secondly, Venus is the nearest option for a planetary visit. In the text, it says, \"Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel.\" This clearly proves that studying Venus is worth the pursuit because it is not going to take as long as other planets will to get to. Traveling in space, as the author said, can take a very long time, and that makes Venus a lot more accessible than most other planets. Studying Venus cuts down a major barrier that scientists and astronomers would have to work around for many other planets, and that is time. Lastly, NASA has a solution to make studying Venus safe. In the text, it says, \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray...At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" NASA's solution solves many problems with studying Venus. The many factors like air pressure, heat, and radiation are lowered to survivable numbers for humans. Without this solution from NASA, the conditions of Venus are not survivable for a time period long enough to actually gain any information about the planet. In the text, it also explains that scientists and researchers would need to get up closer in order to actually gain insight about the planet. Although this is true, NASA is working on other solutions like simplified electronics made of silicon carbide that can last for up to three weeks in the conditions of Venus. All of these solutions can help to make studying Venus less risky and dangerous, and therefore worth the risk. In conclusion, studying Venus provides a true challenge to scientists, researchers, and more. The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" provides evidence to researchers and scientists that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers because Venus is or was very similar to Earth. The author also says that Venus is accessible because of it's distance from Earth and the time it would take to reach it. The author also provides NASA's solutions to the dangers of studying Venus. The advantages of studying Venus have been proven, but much must be done before any up close studying will occur.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Lukes ponit of view is to convince others to join the seaongoing coboys program.To do so you must be willing to go out to sea to feed people of the war that went on. It will take two wweks to get to Euope and a month to get to China.But you have to make sure the animals are healthy. Also you hav to give them watter on very hot days on borad the ship.Last you have to check on them every hour. The first reason luke wants people to join is to help people in need. So they can have more help and more hands to feed the animals on the journy ahead.And so there is more clothes and more aid to help injerd people. and to help unload animals. that is the first reason people should join. The second reason people should join is because of the great seanery. You get to play games on the way back to get more supplys.And it can open the world.It can make people aware of the suffering of other people that lost there home. And maybe lost family in the destruction that the war made. The tird reason to join is to be happy that you are helping people that cant help what the have lost. And to get thanks from people that you helped. Also raise awarness to let people get help. To donate caned food supplys.and new clothin to peple who need it more. In conclusion it would be nice if outheres would join this program. Also you can help the animals. You will be fed on the trip. and you can get very good at helping others with social skills. And you will be very good at being a farmer with animals.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The idea allowing dirigibles dock top Empire State building unrealistic lack identification possible flaws plan As new form transportation dirigbles safe This proven true German dirigble Hindenburg exploded In addition significant obstacle adressed plan created problem location In crowded streets New York City suspending flamable dirigibles population unsafe This location also obstacle equipment needed land dirigible lead weights The use lead weights way dirigibles unimaginable possible dangerous situations could create The creators idea solely designed system top Empire State building incorporate futuristic form transportation make building unique The Empire State building builders encountered many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock concept far past capabilities age",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Hot topics in today's world are pollution and global warming. While there is still debate, many people agree that cutting down society's use of cars would help the world be a better place. Greater limitation of car use will reduce pollution and better society. To commence, reduction of car use will reduce pollution. Pollution is essentially hurting the planet as a whole, as well as all the organisms living in it. In fact, Paris, France, has recently taken action against car use effectively. According to Robert Duffer, \"[The smog] rivaled Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\" In only a few days, after banning half of the diesel and gas-run cars in the cities per day, \"The smog cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party to rescind the ban for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday.\" If such a change can happen in under a week, the entire world could benefit greatly from adopting similar policies. In the U.S, things are also turning around for the better. According to The New York Times 's article, \"The End of Car Culture,\" \"transportaion is the second largest source of America's emissions, just behind power plants.\" This is largely due to car culture in the U.S, which is fortunately declining. In fact, in the same article, it is said \"As of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995.\" This shows that America is well on it's way to becoming a greener nation without having to make dramatic changes to it's way of life. Continuing, more limited car use can better society, or at least work in a community. Society is currently too dependant on cars. However, Vauban, Germany is starting to change that. In another New York Times article, Elisabeth Rosenthal states, \"70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here.\" The remaining thirty percent of people hardly use their own cars for anything more than distant traveling, as most of Vauban's streets are \"car-free.\" This can show that a population of people, (in this case over 5,000 of them) can survive without constantly being behind a wheel. In another case, in Bogota, Columbia, there is a designated holiday to celebrate not using cars. Appropriately titled, \"Day Without Cars\" is an annual event held in order \"to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog,\" according to the Seattle Times's Andrew Selsky. While it may sound silly, the event had a huge turnout in spite of bad weather. Other cities joined into the fun after a few years, and also in the article, Enrique Riera, the mayor of a Paraguay town, said of the event, \"'These people are generating a revolutionary change, and this is crossing borders.'\" The simple effort to better the world has brought people together for a good cause. In retrospect, the idea of declining the use of cars will help humanity as a whole greatly. Doing so would simultaneously slow down the destruction of the Earth for all organisms inside of it, and also help the human race better itself socially.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Should materials books music movies magazines etc removed shelves found offensive Censorship huge deal depending ask go find necessary kids get things found librarys think s important Books important parts peoples lives learning etc also read many different reasons topics books written right could innapropriate possibly someones beliefs religion I personally think censorship necessary keep things librarys thngs shouldnt available anyone walk pick shelf library maybe materials innapropriate children people find offensive kept away different secluded section library clearly labeled purpose room people clearly know wo nt really risk chance stumbling upon materials Another reason censorship necessary things anyone could find library offensive innapropriate found easy easier internet anyone anytime day censorship enough remove effect show movie internet site could minds todays young people children violence drugs language racism found almost everything today Todays children young people taught whats wrong even think s dumb unecassary time mature hopefuloly see whay taught things always try stay away things seen movies magazines books mostly get involved activities Censorship I still believe necessary even though I know innapropriate harmful things todays culture Even though I know harmful see effect could future done people saw things movies books even heard music could see hear people affected things would know stay away bad things go along whats right In conclusion censorship necessary could future everyone lead right hopefully make right decision stay away harmful books movies music magazines things alike",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Studying Venus is a worthy pusuit despite the dangers because we get to know more about Venus and in the future we might get to live there. Venus are almost like earth. One of the challenging thing about Venus is a thick atmosphere. And closest to the earth. Venus is like Earth because is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size. And also the closest in distance. But the orbit of the sun move at different speed. Since is the closest, Human sent spacecraft to Venus. It is the challenging planet for human to study. Venus has thick atmosphere. I think it will be hard to survive. The temperature is over 800 degree and the atmosphere is 90 times greater than Earth. Venus also have the hottest temperature. Venus may once have been the most Earth like planet. It was probably covers largely with oceans and forms of life. The challenge of visiting Venus has value and we get to see how it look like from the insight. Also human curiosity will lead us intimidating endeavors.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "On birthday I turning I happy Well I happy big sisters getting thing together party mom work We everything party thing juice pop food candy chips icecream cake My mom suppose pick got work Then time open gifts After opened gifts time cake icecream We icecream cake I didnt cry scream like baby sister still I I act year old My mom called told us running little late would get cake When mom got home cut cake I took first bite I said worth wait I happy I waited like big kid I even happier I",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars should be used in the near future. I believe that drivless cars can be very benefical in the near future. Driverless cars will be very useful because the people of our country are getting more lazy as time goes by. There are many benefits and many concerns when it comes to driveless cars. Driverless cars should be used in the near future because they are benefical by their technology used, sensors, and functions. The technology used for the driverless cars are very beneficial compared to an average car. When the article states, \"The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. The combination of all this input is necessary for the driverless car to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel.\" This quote shows that the technology used for the driverless cars are very beneficial and above an average car. With the driverless car having sensors it can mimic the skill of a human at wheel which is a amazing. Sensors are not new in technology. The sensors used for the driverless car are one of its many benefits. The article says, \" The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing better response and control than a human driver could manage alone. Further improvements in sensors and computer hardware and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more driving tasks on their own.\" This quote shows that the use of sensors is more safer and leads to cars that can handle more and more driving tasks on their own. The driverless car's functions are out of this world. The driverless car for the most part can work well indepently, but may need the drivers help in certain situations. The article states, \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notfiy the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" This shows that driverless cars have very important and benefical functions, but may need the drivers help in certain circumstances. Driverless cars will be very benefical in the near future. There is a lot of debate between the driverless cars as to whether they should be used or not in the near future. The driverless car has its many pros and cons. The driverless car has many special qualities and should be improved to be used in the future. The driverless cars should be used because of their technology used, sensors, and functions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "My opinion on the idea that a AI, app or whatever programming can detect every emotion to the dot and percent of the human exspression is not right. I think its just another scam toy out on the market. I think we all rely too much on tech I mean to say it can read us like a book is not right, human emotions are very complex and can change ranges and moods with minutes if not seconds now how could a machine read that? Another thing is it can read if you feel disgusted, happy, sad, etc? the amount of different emotions and human is capable of having at once is simply amazing. No AI could read something like that. So in concluson i do not thing is reliable to use that, our brains are capable of procecing so many emotions at once and its all personal, not on any shared channel. No AI could hack that.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In \"The Challenge of Eploring Venus,\" the author supports the idea that Venus is a worthy planet for exploration. Even though it is very dangerous to explore he/she explains how Venus might be one of the planets humans will want to vist because it could hold secrets to our planets birth and death. Then they tell in full detail how we could possibly vist Venus safely. These few key details help the author build and support the suggested idea that we should vist Venus. First we must know that going to Venus will not be easy for humans to do. In the text the author writes,\"A thick Atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highy corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" This further proves that Venus is going to be a serious challenge for man kind to vist because of the crazy condtions humans will have to face. In order to vist venus safely we need to be able to plan a way to survive Venus's extreme conditions. In the text the author provides examples of how humans will do so such as,\"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our Jet airplains travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying out of their way.\" This futher proves that traveling to Venus in the furture is possible. Also that scientists are coming up with ways on how we can safely get to Venus's surface. Most importantly Venus could help us understnad more about space. In the text the author writes,\"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further vists to its surface? Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\" This point further proves that Venus is a place humans should want to explore because it could hold answers for Earths begginings and how it might end. Also Venus could hold secrets about our universes beggining and end. In concusion the author proves that Venus should be further investigated because even though it faces many dangers it is possible to vist. Also visting Venus could give humans valuble information on our planets life as well as unlock keys to how our universe could have begun and is going to end. The author does more than an perfect job at telling why humans should go to Venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "What Lies Ahead It will be a scary day when driverless cars become the new normal. Imagine roads filled with cars, but the drivers are like unalert zombies. Sure having cars that drive themselves sounds splendid, but would the benefits really outweigh the cons? For many people learning to drive and getting their license is a huge milestone. It is like one step closer to becoming an independant adult. I can't imagine teens growing up and never learning to drive. That would be like not learning to swim! Driving is a skill that people need to aquire even if driverless cars become popular, because machines fail. You can't always depend on machines to be accurate all of the time. You might be thinking that machines don't make mistakes as often as humans, but humans are the ones that make the machines. What happens if you are riding in a driverless car and it just stops working? Will you just sit there and wait to die? In the passage it says that most driverless cars aren't actually driverless, they need assistance from humans. The fact that the car does most tasks like steering, accelerating, and braking makes it easy for humans to get distracted. Most people get distracted by their cellphones alone! If they thought they could totally rely on the car to do what they needed, they would probably be totally unaware of their surroundings. There is a reason that only a few states allow the use of semi-autonomous cars. The laws are written for cars that are controlled by humans. The laws in place currently would not be suffecient for self driving cars. Sure the laws could be changed, but who gets to decide what the guidless to self driving cars should be? Human brains are easily adaptable, but machines need to be programmed. What happens when a car faces a situation that it isn't ready for? Also, what happens if someone hacks into the car's system and makes it malfunction? There could be a computer virus that would cause all the cars in the world to crash. Although I do think there are lots of cons to driverless cars, I do acknowledge the benefits. Early versions of semi-driverless cars have been somewhat successful by driving half a million miles without a crash. However, that doesn't mean that totally autonomous cars will be successful. I think certain feautres on cars like cruise control are a huge benefit, but I don't know if I'm willing to trust machines to take the steering wheel yet. Who knows, maybe fifteen years from now I will own my own driverless car, but there are some huge advances that need to be made first.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The face on mars that you guys keep hearing about is not in fact a piece of landscape made by aliens. It is a just a form of land like we have; moutains,rivers, pyramids and stuff like that.Just because it's on a different planet doesn't mean it was made by aliens. Do you think the moutains, rivers, and pyramids on earth were made by aliens? Well I did some research on some on this stuff and I looked in a artical called \"Unmasking the Face of Mars.\" The text said,\" Scientist figured it was another Martain mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharoh.\" What that information was telling me is that the the pictures they took made it look like a Egyptian pharoh something that's on earth, a shape or some what, so if the planet has wind blowing on it like on our world then the sand on the planet can make a shape of anything. I also was reading in this artical and I saw that it said,\" There was no alien monument after all.\"What does that tell you and if you don't believe me I got another explination. In the artical I was reading the text also states that,\" It reminds me most of the Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho,\" says Garvin. \" That's a lava dome that takes the formor an islolated mesa about the same height as the face on mars\". I that information quality enough for you. I mean we have volcanos the same size as that form rock. Even though I got some of this information from an artical dosen't mean it's not true even though you guys got that false information from an artical your selves. I know it's the truth because if their were Martains who did this don't you think we would have saw traces of someone building it like hammers and ladders ect. If you really look at the photo it just looks like craiters and sink holes making the shape of a face.I know you played in the sand before and you know that it can just slide through or fall and move by its self. Thats all it really is to this arguement you opposed with me and if you don't wanna believe me make a ship and go see it for yourself. My final claim is that it is not made by aliens, it's just a natural landform.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You should join the Seagoing Cowboys program for many reasons. One reason that you should join is because it is an opportunity of a life time. Another is becasue you get to help people. A side benifit of that is that you get to see Europe and China. It will also open your eyes to be more aware of people in other countries and their needs. If you join the Seagoing Cowboys program you will get an opportunity of a lifetime. In the article Luke said that he couldn't say no on joining the program because he knew it was an opportunity of a lifetime. You also would get to help people in need from World War ll. You would also have the benifits of seeing Europe and China. In the article he said \"Besides helping people, I had the side benifit of seeing Europe and China......\". Last but not least it will open your eyes and make you more aware of people in other countries and their needs. At the end of the article Luke claimed that being a Seagoing Cowboy made him more aware of people of other countries and their needs. In conclusion you should join the Seagoing Cowboys because you will be living the opportunity of a lifetime .You will also get to help people that need help after the disasters of World War ll. It will open your eyes to the people of other countries and their needs too. As well as letting you see Europe and China, while you are working! Please consider joining the Seagoing Cowboys and help around the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think that it is not valuble because a computer is not that smart to identify a humans facial expressions. I am against the value of this technology to read students's emotional expressions because the facial expressions for each emotion are universal, \" observes Dr. Haung,\" even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression''(like not smiling as broadly). Using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa. By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions (as in da Vinci's masterpiece). Each expression is compared against a neutral face(showing no emotion). In paragraph 5 it talks about how human perform this same impressive \"calculation\" every day. For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the looks on her face. Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc. Yet Dr. Haung observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as a electronic code. Perhaps Dr. Huang's emotion algorithms are a different sort of\" Da Vinci Code\"! In conclusion, I don't think that FACS will actually work on human facial expressions because the technology we have now is ancient and it is too old to come up with a system that will tell our human facial expressions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear Local newspaper I think computers great sources They help us instanly find something Computers helpful easy use Once mastered computer feels like almost anything Computers great also negative effects us I like computers I going say I When people get computers s like re another world When computer alot less socal would computer On nt know alot people addicted computers They get stay forever The act like neccesity computer every day I computer websites like Compters get really annoyting sometimes They distract people alot Like day sister I going walking nt go would nt help us exercise nt using In economy important socal skills Instant messaging people nt mean going socal skills You actually get talk people face face When I computer long I know I know eyes start hurt This bad eye sight People sit houses stare bright screen They know blinding must stay computers long These reason use computer I saying evil contraption I m saying use computer info work games things You could outside fun instead sitting house get Go make real breathing friends person",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Every day we receive constant announcements from the mainstream media sent by selling companies that try to catch our attention on their products. This essay will argue that customers can easily fall into the trap of the advertisements' persuasive influence to purchase a particular product and suggest measures to safeguard ourselves from being sold. Advertisements are the most effective way for companies to acquire customers and attract a wide range of clients. Every publicity spot is designed to awaken a specific portion of democracy's interest and push them to purchase a product they did not even plan to buy. For example, behind a ten-second announcement hides a massive amount of work performed by economists, psychologists and marketing experts to make it look more attractive and persuasive. Provided that these people know how to manipulate the mass through mediatic instruments, I believe publicity does influence our choices, both at a conscious and unconscious state, in a highly effective way. On the other side, advertisements can only spread through mainstream communication channels, namely TV, phones, newspapers and billboards. Therefore, one possible method to avoid getting influenced by them is to disconnect from these tools when we feel overwhelmed by the quantity of news and commercials popping out from our mobile: one can avoid temptations by fleeing from them. Another measure that can be taken into account to preserve our willpower when purchasing an item is recognizing that advertisements might not tell the truth. Although they give the illusion of promoting something unique and unreplaceable, their expectations are disappointed when customers receive it at their houses. To conclude, people are constantly bombarded by commercial spots, promoting videos or pictures that strive to convince us we need what their companies sell. In my opinion, ordinary people are definitely influenced by these powerful tools even though they might not recognize them. However, there are some solutions that people can adopt to safeguarding themselves as aware customers, such as fleeing from the mediatic stream of news and commercials and keep their eyes wide open, wary about what advertisements may and may not show.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Face: Alien Artifact or Natural Landmark Do you think that the \" Face on Mars\" is an alien artifact or is just a natural landform on Mars? Well, in my own personal opinion I believe that it is a natural landform because, in 1998 NASA went back to Mars, and took 10 pictures to get the perfet shot. I also believe this because, landforms are common around the American West. Although, some my think the picture is an alien artifact, it is not because NASA went back to Mars with an even better camera and, took even more pictures of the Face. First of all, I believe that the Face is a natural landform because, in 1998 NASA went back to Mars, from their 1976 expidition, to see if the conspericy theories were correct, and they weren't. In the passage it says,\" And so on April 5, 1998, when Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time, Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the origninal Viking photos.\" It also says,\" the image first appeared on a JPL wed site, revealing... a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all.\" I used these sentences because, they prove that NASA is corret, there wasn't any alien activity. I believe that the Face of Mars is an natural landform because, landforms are common around the American West. The passage says,\" What picture actually shows is the Martian equivialent ofa butte or mesa- landforms are acually common around the American West.\" I used thi sentence because, it shows that the landform wasn't a once-in-a-life-time sort of thing, you see them quite offten actutally. That is also something that people who don't believe NASA never take under consideration. Some people may believe that the Face is an alien artifact, but in all truthfulness it is a natural landform. I say this because, in 2001 NASA got some amazing cameras to take the best pictures that they could possibly take to prove themselves right. In the passage it says,\" Malin's team captured an extraordinary photo using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.\" I used this because, it proves that NASA has worked really hard to get high quality photos of the Face. In conclusion, I believe the Face is nothing more that a natrual landmark on Mars because, NASA went to Mars to get more pictures, after their mission in 1976, in 1998. I also belive this because, landforms are common in the American West area. Although, some may believe that the Face is an alien artifact it is not because NASA got high qualiy photos to prove it 2001. What do you think the Face is?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" in NASA they are arguing and discussing what or who made the face. Some NASA people are thinking that the face was made naturaly. Others are saying that aliens used rocks and other things to create it. The face on Mars is probaly naturally made because if you look at the images in the beginnig of the article, it has three different dates. If you look at the first one, 1976, you can see the face clearly. In 1998, the face is starting to get a little blery. Now at 2001, you barely see the face, in fact there is not a face anyone. If this face was man-made or made by aliens, the shouldn't the face be more clearly in 1976. If man did make this face, how would they get there in the first place. The face on Mars would be naturally made, cause no human or alien could make this.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "NO MOTORVEHICLES? Yeah I know sounds crazy but it is actually very true and very helpful to our \"Mother Nature\". Around the world there have been an ample amount of experiments and even permanent instances that show off the marvelous wonders of no motor vehicles. From the alps of Vauban, Germany to down the street in Paris, France to even meet the other side of the world in Bogota, Colombia. Where there have been complete motor vehicle banning even going to the extreme of redesigning the whole city just to fit there suburban type customs but without the vehicles. Even just a simple banning for two days on motor vehicles just to clean up the air from time to time. As well as having a yearly event where all motor vehicles except for buses and taxis are banned all day long. In Vauban, Germany they host home to about 5,500 residents within a rectangular mile. With absolutely no motor vehicles, they are forbidden. I think its actually pretty nice to have a suburban town where the whole town doesnt even have room for motor vehicles. Roads, street parking, parking lots, driveways, and home garages all do not exist in this town. They take it to the extreme where as to live in the town if you own a motorvehicle you MUST sell your motor vehicle first. 70 perecent of families do not own cars and 57 perecent sold a car to move into Vauban. And if you are to own a car you must purchase your own car space at the very edge of the city wich cost up to $40,000, along with the price of your home. Alot of people around the world support this even here in the United States the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities and legislators are begining to act. After Paris came to a near record pollution level they enforced a parial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. One Monday motorists with even numbered license plates were demanded to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine or the the equivalant of $31. The same would apply to the odd numbered plated that following tuesday. Near 4,000 drivers were fined according to a international news agency headquatred in London. Paris typically has more smog than other European capitals with 147 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter compared to 114 in Brussels, and 79.7 in London. There smog rate was so bad they rivaled the city of Beijing, China which is known as the most polluted city in the world. The congestion in was down 60 percent in the capital of France after five-days of incredibly increasing smog. But with the ban the smog cleared up enough Monday for the ruiling french party to rescind the ban for the odd numbered plates by Tuesday. It was the third consecutive year that motor vehicles besides buses and taxis were baned from the capital of Bogota, Colombia. But this third year other major cities like Cali and Valledupar, joined the event. This day is specifically without cars is part of an improvement campain that began in Bogota in the mid-1990's as an improvement campain. And it has worked it has cleaned up the environment in all three cities. Parks and sport centers have also blosssomed throughout the city. Unequal, jagged sidewalks have been replaced by smooth sidewalks and rush hour has dramatically cut traffic out of the picture while restaurants and upscale shopping districts have been on the rise. This culture is very quickly spreading throught the entire world. Even here in the United States, President Barack Obama",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think real offensive stuff censored It wrong make fun joke people Mocking dissability like movies made Well actually movie I ve seen called The guy made fun special olympic team lied dissability get money racing beating team races totally fineThat would something I would want take shelves reason mock dissability I would nt know decides goes shelves maybe depending offensive information tells something shouldnt brought",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "What is the face on Mars? The face of Mars is called a mesa which is a type of landform. Many people believe that this landform wasn't a creation of Mars or mother nature, but others may beileve other wise. This creation has many facts to back up its existence such as a spacecraft watching it at all time, no life has been found, and how could they have created it. So in all alians could'nt have build such a formation only Mars her self could have. Spacecrafts have help us with so many thing when it come to the topic of outerspace. These technological pieces of art help us find spots to land, help use to see whats the aera is like and so on. But one thing the space craft has proven is that aliens doent exist on mars. The Viking 1 was taking photos at all times of the surface of Mars, so how could have thes so called 'aliens' make it. This question is simple because they couldn't. And based on the information there is no one on Mars so how could it have been. Mars is a planet not suitable to sustain life on his. Mars does not have suitable breathing air so the likely hood of life beeing there is slim. Most people think aliens have created this hugh structer, but even if there was life on mars how could they have created this structer. Building a structure of this size would take a long period of time that the spacecraft would have eventualy picked up. And by not haveing the right equepment the 'aliens' couldnt have done it. Building a big structure like this would take time, but would also take a lot of heavy lifting. This landformation is to big to becreated by hand or by hands. The only real logical way that this structure could have been created is by technology, and the only technology even close to Mars is the spacecraft the Viking 1. So it would be impossible for any thing to build soemthing of that size in that amout of time with little resources. There is a possibility that there could have been something else that created this structure. But we cant look over the fact that there was been no finding of life on Mars. This structures is called a mesa and earth as countless of them so to see one on Mars couldnt be that much of a shocker. And the face appears because of indents in the rock that are slowly going away. So in all its very unlikely that aliens created this landform. Aliens couldnt have build such a creation only Mars her self could have. This is proven on the information about the spacecraft, how theres no life on Mars, and the creation of it all disprove the fact that aliens could have build this landform. So now hopefully you know who didnt create these wonderus landform of Mars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear Florida Senator, I believe that we should not have the Electoral College no more. We are giving people false hopes that there vote counts when it really does not. We see on TV ads that we should vote and let our voices be heard but when in reality it is not. Didn't Lincoln once say \"A nation founded by the people for the people by the people...\" he was saying that we should let people have a a voice in everything that happens in America, but we can not even have a voice in who we wanted as president. We give all the power to the Electoral College but not to the people. In 2000 Al Gore won the popular votes but lost the presidency. What type of system is this where we vote for who we want but get who we do not want. What the whole reason to vote if the Electoral College vote is more important then our. Beside voting for the president we want we vote for the slate of electors who elect the president. We don't even know who these mysterious Electoral College are they can vote for a president just because he is in the Democratic Party,we have no ideas why. In 2000 we had the biggest election crisis in a century; the system allows for much worse when it came to Electoral College. \"Consider that state legislatures was technically responsible for the picking electors, and that those electors could always defy the will of the people.\" Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the presidency. The people vote was not heard in that year,because they wanted Al Gore respresenting by the Democratic Party but we got Geroge W. Bush. I have never heard of a more unfair voting system before. Where were our rights the freedom of speech then, it was no where to be found. I feel that voting for who never we want should be in the Bill of Rights. So it okay to a gun for safety in our bag but itnot okay to vote for what we want. On most basic level, the Electoral College is unfair to voters, because of the winner-take-all-system in each state. Some candidates do not spend that much time in states they know they have no chance of winning. In 2000 campaign, seventeen states did not get to see Geroge Bush or Al Gore these states were Rhodes Island with 3 electoral votes and South Carolina with 9 electoral votes. Candidates mostly only visit the states with the most like Florida with 29 and Texas with 38. They do not care about the other states they only care about who have the most electoral votes. Each party selects slate of electoral they trust to vote for the party nominee and they have rarely been betrayed. It is could be true that the winner of electoral vote will not win base off of the national popular vote. But it is most likely not to happen again like in 2000 when Al Gore had more popular votes then Bush. The Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to have trans-regional appeal. So no Electoral can have a solid favorite they must vote on who would most likely chance America for the better. But if the Al Gore vs. Bush happen once what stop it for happening again the reason why it happen was because we had Electoral College so to stop it. We Must stop it. Florida state Senator as much of a good idea it is to have at some point in time it will go wrong. All good things, have bad endings. So I think it better to stop it now before things for the wrongs like Americans just stop voting becasue we all know our votes do not mean a thing when it come to Electoral College votes.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus may be the most brightest points of light in the night sky, but it is the most fascinating planet. Venus, also known as the \"Evening Star,\" has many interesting facts including how it is Earth's like twin. Which because of that has various forms of life and is the nearest option for planetory visits. Venus is the second planet closest to the Sun but is also the closest to Earth. Either in terms of density and size. Venus has various forms of life which include valleys, mountains, and craters. Althogh Venus is the nearest option for planetory visits there are many dangers to those who travel there. On Venus' surface, the \"temperatures travel average over 800 degrees faherheit, adn the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our planet.\" Even with the dangers, NASA is working through ways to still examine this amazing planet. NASA has certain jet airplanes that can travel in high altutides which hopefully will allow them to float above Venus and stay out of its way. Venus, yes has many dangers, but with the right equipment it is surviable for humans. With our fast growing technology, astromomers will soon be able to explore Venus and its fascinating ways.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "What would happen if you got into a driverlesscar and you got hurt? Who's fault would it be yours or the manufactures? I am against driverless cars because they aren't safe, they could malfuntion, and it could cause lots of court trouble when deciding who's fault a car accident was. Driverless cars are not safe to ride in. They don't know what to do when it comes to getting around an accident, navigation through roadwork, how to deal with complicated traffic issues, and they don't even know how to pull in and out of drive ways or pull over. I would not trust a car that can't even get out of the drive way or stop on the side of the road. If it can't do these things people could get very hurt because the car doesn't know what to do. I wouldn't get a driverless car for fear of not being safe. Driverless cars can malfunction. These cars could malfunction and put anybody in harms way because of something that went wrong. We know that they don't know how to pull over, pull in or out of a driveway,deal with traffic issues, or go around roadwork and accidents. They obviously aren't safe to ride in and on top of that everything with technology at some point malfunctions and messes up. The question is do you want to be in the car when it does that? What if it takes the wrong route and you become lost, what if it stops moving and causes and accident? I don't want to be the person who had the malfunctioning driverless car that hurt someone do you? We know that they aren't safe and that they can malfunction but whose going to pay for that? You or the manufacturer? What if it's not your fault and the car messes up and instead of the company taking responsibilty for what happened you have to. There are going to be tons of cases that will fight about who's fault it is and you may never actually know butone of you still has to pay the expensises of the car and not everyone can do that. Some peole can't afford to pay that cost of the damage that the car makes but sometimes it's not going to be fair and people will still have to do it. Laws will have to be changed to about traffic and liability and not everyone is going to agree with them and it can cause trouble. It's to much trouble to pay for the messes the cars make on the streets and in the court room. We know that the driverless cars aren't safe, they can malfunction, and that they can cause trouble in the court room. I wouldn't put myelf in danger by waiting till something happend to be against it. I don't want people to wait till someone gets hurt, lost, or loses money in a court case to realize that we shoul not have driverless cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In Germany-Residents of this rising community are suburban pioneers, Leaving in where few soccer mums are at or commuting executives have ever gone before: they must have giving up their cars. \"It's about forbidden border lines and in this experimental\". The new district on the outskirts of Freiburg, of the French and Swiss border not to say \"Vauban's streets are completely Car free\". There is to be said to be a dowtown Freiburg runs, and a few streets on on edge on the community. However the thing is there is Car ownership it all comes down to only those who have $40,000, along with a house. As the result states, only Vauban's families don't own cars the estimate is 70 percent. And the other half has 57 percent cars to move here. \"When I had a car life was always tense. I'm say that \"Heidrun Walter you Sir, haven't enjoyed life as much But atleast you are still in shape that't is for sure !\" Vauban, completed in 2006 , is the best example growing trending topic in the roots of Europe, the United states have much different ways to travel then else-where to separates suburban life from the the life style the U.S(United states) and made it a chance to start a new begining a new era, with car's to make a new component that is givin to them is called \"smart planning.\" The Automobiles are linchpin of the suburbs, where the middle-class families are from Chicago to Shanghai to have the nerve to make their homes. And as we know that, that's what the experts say, for now they shall say that. And there is a huge impimentation to current efforts to decrease life's drastically reducing greenhouse from the tailpipes as it was said to be done . . . . Passenger cars are resonsible for 12 percentof the gass emissons in Europe . . . and it's said to be that, \"50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.\" While it has been two decades to make the cities less denser then before, and better for walking , plans are all falling into the concept of the suburbs . . . Vauban, home to the 5,500 residents within a rectangular squre mile, it might be the most advanced experimentation in low-car suburban life has had. But its still a change as we precepts are adopted around the world to make the suburan race to be more compacted to get more accessability to public transportation, with less space for parking. In other words in this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on the main street that is, If rather than in malls along some distant highway. The artical states that \"All of the development in this same old War in World War II to center their main attentions , That the car will have to change\", said by David Goldberg, an official Transportation Licencing for the America, a fast-growing coalition of hundereds of groups in the United States . . . who are premoting new communities that are less dependent on cars, Mr. Goldberg says adding on: \"How much will you be willing to drive as it is important as you whether you have a hybird.\" Levittown and Scarsdale, New York suburbs with spread-out homes with private dreams in towns in the late 1950s and still exerting a strong appeal. But some new suburbs may well look more Vauban-like, not only did the developing of the countries but also in the developing of the world, where emissionsives from such in increase number rating of private cars are owned by the burgeoning middle class are choking cities and such. In other words, In the United States the Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.E.V.P.A) are premoting \"car reductions\" communities, and the legistlative branch are starting to take an act, if cautiously is what it takes. Many experts expect public transportation is serving the suburbs to play a much more larger role in a new six-year federal transportational bill to be approved this year, Mr. Goldberg claims and says. In previous past bills, 80 percent of appropriations have by gone to law gone to the highways and only 20 percent to other of these highly organized transportaions. Hopefully this contant won't be Copy righted as it says by the Autor Elisabeth Rosental all of this is for educational practices. Hopfully you guys will enjoy this essay.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Computers much talked subject Did know homes least one computer And goes Some people nt like true hand people I computer much example help writing I play games socialize social networking sites IM s even help order product form website like Like I said I computer I use help write At school english I would use computer help writing prompt I also use write conclusions science labs There lot kids well really helpful That one reasons I think computers beneficial society Another reason I think computers beneficial society play games like world warcraft CAPS classics like CAPS There millions people play games computer Also socialize social networking sites like twitter also IM friends IM stands messaging kind like email except instantaneous friend conversation computer Also video chatting kind like phone except see person re talking computer almost like person videochatting meeting face face A third reason I feel computers beneficial society order product internet form shop websites For example I got also bulb house wearing dad going buy bulb It things like make life much easier way people nt drive store buy something wait week two product arrive These kinds things make feel computers beneficial society I know might best reasons quite important Being able type essays play games socialize order products form websites amazing These reasons I others love computers But I question like dislike computers",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" did a decent job at discussing how studying Venus is worth the time and money. The author discusses intresting topics such as the idea that there were oceans and even life on Venus at one point. Though these would be nice, there are also many dangers listed. The author makes it very clear that there are many dangers that would come with studying Venus. Some of these dangers are 97% carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, clouds made of corrosive sulfuric acid, 800 degree heat, and atmospheric pressure 90 times greater than Earth. The author then goes on to say that these challenges could be avoided in some ways. A solution the author proposes is an idea made by NASA to make a \"blimp-like vehicle\" that would let explorers observe in less extreme heat and much less pressure. From there, the author states that solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed Earth levels, which is immediatley followed by \"not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" Though this would make many people think that Venus' exploration is possible, the author then brings up more skeptisism with the ideas of of photography and videography not being effective and not being able to get samples without people touching the ground. The author had conving points that would make sense for anyone to want to visit mars, but were overshadowed with doubt that it could actually happen. Therefore, the question is raised if it is worth continuing to use millions of dollars and the possibility of losing life to learn what a planet was like in the past which as of now is not capable of sustaining life.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The UNRRA progam is a great progam for people who want to help around the world. Also, if you are into going on trips o different places this is great for you. They travel all around the world helping and they also get to see knew things! You should come join because you can help around the world! Many people love to help and around the world and you should try it. On the first time my friend Don and I went on the trip it was great how we could help people after the war. Like how we brought a cago of 335 horses along with enough hay and outs to feed them. We wanted always make sur ethat we cleaned all the mess the war's had left behind. You should also come to he program because you have the benifet of visiting all inds of places like Greece, China, Europe, and more. By the time I was discharged in in 1947, I been on nine trips. That is more than any other Seagoing Cowboy. I got to see the Acropolis in Greece and it was ver special. Also, in Crete I toured and excavated a castle. Then at the Panama Canal I marvled. Going on the Atantic Ocean was awesome too! I went on it about 16 times in my years of being a Seagoing Cowboy. It took about two wees to cross it from the astern coast of the United States. To get to China it took a month to get there. Caring fro the animals kept me busy as we crossed the seas. They had to be fed two or three times a day. The time I almost wnet overboard was very scary, but I loved doing what I did. it was very awesome helping around the world, going to all of the those amazin places, and traveling the Atlanic many times. I may have gottenhurt and times were rough, but I wouldn't chane being a Seagoing Cowboy for anthing. I was onne amazin adventure I will never forget.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Would you really want a car that's called \"Driverless Car\" but still need to be in the drivers seat and paying attention most of the time? I am against the \"driverless car\" not only it seems like a bad idea, but a dangerous issue as well. Driverless cars are just a way for people to become more lazy than they already are. First, we have many other technology that are coming more popular. Like the hoverboards, it is one step closer to becoming the people off of WALL-E. Being too caught up in the lastest technology. Doing this would just make us want more and more, needing someone to make something bigger and better. Second, the driverless cars are very dangerous. The text says,\"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" This is just one out of the many examples why driverless cars are dangerous. Also, the text says, \" Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver?\" No one wants a car that can't be driven by itself. They will get tired of waiting for their turn or waiting until something bad happens so they can take the wheel and drive the car themselves. But mostly, who could even afford a driverless car anyways. The cost for a car like that would cost a fortune. The only type of people who would be driving cars like that would be celeberties and people who are stupid rich that can buy whatever they want. Money wold be a big problem in this suatition. All in all, driverless cars are dangerous, too expenssive, and pure laziness if you cant drive your own car.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have ever read something found offensive upsetting made mad Do think certian books nt allowed library content A lot books music movies magazines days contain things hurtful society protray bad images certian social groups In society many different groups people lot thier opinions view different things To I think library I think different ages people go many different groups people types books Taking concideration I believe everything allowed public libraries I think seperate places books magazines movies adults I think take away things bad offensive could displeasing find things interesting enjoy reading In case people would come library anymore read enjoy reading find interesting By saying things seperating books age groups good thing younger children running around library pick something looking I also believe would benefit someone comes library looking book really know go age group would see everything recommended From experience I know I read books looked magazines I probably looked I young This mean need take shelves maybe placed area someone age able find So next time go library see something offensive remember lot different people world might find think offensive interesting",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "May 24, 2001 NASA found a natural landform on Mars. There was big debates on wiether this was alien or natrual. There was no proof that it was alien, but there was proof that it was a natural lanform. And that its shadows form a face. Evidence that proves that the Face on Mars is a natural landform is when they snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photo it just revealed a natural landform, there was no proof of aliens. But some were still not believing this. So the sent another spacecraft out to take maxium resolution pictures, which just showed that the Face is a natural landform. In cinclusion the Face on Mars is truly just a natural landform. There was no evidence that helped prove that the Face on Mars was connected to alien life forms. But they did have a lot of evidence suporting that the Face was just a natural landform and the face features were caused by shadows.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The invention of the automobile revolutionized the way humans traveled from place to place in the 20th century, but now since we have entered the 21st century, people are beginning to question why we implement the automobile so much into our lives. The automobile should not be so interconnected within our lives, in fact, limiting it's usage would have many advantages. These advantages include cutting down on our carbon footprint, and reducing the amount of stress and congestion within our streets. Restricting the usage of the automobile can benefit the enviroment immensly. After all, transportation is the second largest source of pollution in the US, so restricting automobiles can severly reduce the impact of carbon emissions on our enviroment (Rosenthal). If we don't take action now, and start cracking down on pollution from carbon emissions, our cities will develop smog problems similar to what Beijing experiences, which is one of the most polluted cities in the world (Duffer). Fortunetly for Paris, a week of partial driving bans helped clear the five days of near-record pollution it was experiencing, and it helped it return to normal (Duffer). If five days of reducing the number of drivers by half manages to clear the smog from Paris, it's possible to delay or even halt the risng of global warming across the planet if the globe decides to enact restrictions on car usage. Therefore, restricting car usage could have inumerable benefits for our enviroment. Another advantage of restricting car usage would be a reduction in the amount of stress and congestion crowding our city streets. For instance, when Paris enacted the weeklong half ban on automobile usage, congestion was down 60% in the city's streets (Duffer). Another instance of a city banning automobiles is Bogota, Columbia, which bans cars one day a year. The goal is intended to promote alternative transportation in the city, and this leaves the \"streets of this capital city eeirly devoid of traffic Jams\" (Selsky). Many citizens enjoy this day, and resident Carlos Arturo Plaza described the day as \"a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution\" (selsky). A city called Vauban in Germany are pioneering a new type community where no cars are permitted within the city, and the only area they are permitted are the outskirts of the city. This orientation benefits the residents by elimating most of the noise and stress of car engines running, and instead replacing them with the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children (Rosenthal). A resident of the pioneer city, Heidrun Walter, said \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\" (Rosenthal). Therefore, limiting car usage collosally reduces the pandomonium and congestion we experience everyday in our lives due to automobiles. All in all, restricting car usage poses numerous advantages for everyone. The advantages include reducing our impact on the enviroment by cutting down carbon emissions, as well as decreasing the amount of stress and congestion found in our city streets.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Artificial intelligence technology has grown exponentially, which has led to robots replacing humans in jobs. In the future it is possible that robots will do the majority of the menial jobs; however, the tasks which require complex social understanding would be still done by humans. This essay will discuss why it is unlikely that all jobs would be taken over by artificially intelligent machines. Most of the professions which do not require the skill of abstract thinking would be taken over by robots in the future. This will be possible as machines will be able to do these tasks much faster and with more mechanical precision than humans.In factories, for example, automated stations can do the work faster and also work round the clock, thus reducing the human workload and eliminating human error. Another reason would be the cost-effectiveness of the robots compared to the humans. Employers won't have to worry about additional payments for the workers. For these reasons, the jobs which can be automated will be done by robots in the future. Conversely, some jobs would be only done by humans as they would require complex social understanding. It is highly unlikely that robots in the future would be able to understand and accurately solve problems that require emotional or abstract thinking. For instance, jobs in the psychological, education and medical sectors would be still done by humans. Robots won't be able to achieve social evolution as things like compassion, and social awareness cannot be programmed. In conclusion, most of the jobs in the future will be done by robots in the future. While, simple and unskilled tasks will be taken over by artificial; however, jobs that require complex social understanding will always be done with the help of humans. Ultimately, not all jobs can be taken over by artificially intelligent robots.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author presents both positive and negative of driverless cars.The author thinks most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers. The presently traffic laws have a human driver in control at all times because of the safe cars that they have. They also have illgal computers for the driven cars. The new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. This paragragh is about the driven test and how it can control people or humans. The driving test can control people when they do not pay attention to others when when walking by and when their on their phones texting and calling where ever they go. It can really hurt people when you do not pay attention from what is in your way while everyday. By taking a driving test you have to do everything right when you took the test if you do not the will think they made a mismake by letting you drive. You can not go over the speeding limit, watch for cars, have your seat belt on at all time when you get in a car crash. The last paragraph is going to be about is how to protect yourself from a car crash. To protect yourself from a car crash is to handle driving functionat speed up to 25 mph but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel so it want go the other way and crash into something when turning the other way. Cars deleoped so far are completely driverless. You have to have skills to know how to drive really good and not drive so fast. Also you should be perpared to take over the wheel when it is time to take a driver test.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Everybody wants to have a successful career for their future. It is totally based upon the people's thinking about how they can make their better career. Many think of a studying in universities and some are for jobs after school. This essay will state both their views. Firstly, Studying at universities can give you much information about related to your field. They believe after school, people should applied into colleges for further studies, that can help them about their interest. However, In schools, we studied only basics from which they can't get any work in the modern world. For instance, They studied in the universities will get them a better job with a good wedge. Furthermore, They also think that for the good academics, The people should need to know their intelligence, so they can get a better career. Subsequently, Having a job after schools can give you experience about living skills. They believe that the people should prove their excellence by doing various jobs. Many people are doing service work after the school for updating their life skill and experience. However, some are taking a job due to lack of money for further studies. For example, the people who are not much rich cannot send their children for further studies. They struggle after the schools taking any job. After that, they are upgrading them by collecting intelligence from their job and gets a promotion in their task. To conclude, Many people are like to do further studies or also wants mastery in their field, can be their success. Furthermore, the people who want to do a job for their excellence, so they also can get better future from that. Selecting any option, It will not decrease your goals, but a lack of intelligence can do.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars seem like a wonderful idea but produce so many threats that it may not be worth it. In my opinion driverless cars are a mistake. Even though the idea is good, it is not very practical at all. Basically self-driving car manufacturers are asking drivers to trust our lives to sensors and blinking lights. Self driving cars still rely on humans to take over when things get too difficult. Even though google has been testing automated driving systems since 2009 they still can't use them practically on the roads. What happens when you're sitting down using the heads-up displays meant to keep you busy and you start to drift off? Sure the car has noises and vibrations to wake you up, but some people are heavy sleepers that won't be woken up even by all that commotion. And even if it does wake you up it would have to be a sudden, loud noise or movement and that can induce panic causing the driver to swerve off the road. Then you have crashes, lawsuits, and injury or even death. That is another point that must be addressed. Who is to blame when the inevitable crashes occur? Is it the driver's fault for trusting in the technology, or is it the manufacturers fault for producing systems that arent perfect enough to trust our lives with. And what about drivers who refuse to trust the systems in the first place? How will the cars react against the human element. Many people are against these self-driving cars and will refuse to trust their lives to robots. Humans are unpredictable and often times don't pay attention to the road, or drive under the influence leaving an element of surprise that the robots have to react to in a split second. And a middle class family or even upper class might be reluctant to spend the money on the cars and systems nescessary to allow for automated driving. Self-driving cars are not the future. Automobile deaths are decreasing every year as cars get safer and more reliable. There is no reason to introduce a new problem that will just cause more deaths and inevitably end in tradgedy. Humans should not put their lives in the hands of sensors, that's just blind stupidity. The lawsuits, cost, and having to put full trust into a computer should be proof enough.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It has become progressively common for the general populace to travel worldwide. In my opinion, the key catalyst for this positive development is a rise in middle-class income and advances in aviation. The most frequently cited rationale for people opting to visit foreign countries is the convenience of travelling. This argument rests on the fact that over the last century, we have experienced a concomitant increase in wages of companies and the global middle-class. For example, this can be most apparently seen in myriad working-class employees with disposable income, who are now able to go on holiday in different countries at least once or twice a year. Furthermore, thanks to cheaper airfares, which have complemented this reform and consequently, individuals nowadays are not afraid to fly. Thus, the accumulated evidence has reasoned why increasing numbers of the citizenry can afford international travel. Conceding the cause for this notion, I would contend that the ability to travel outside the homeland brings in several opportunities. This is predicated on the assumption that most of our former generation in the past lived and died to where they were born and lacked broad knowledge of the world. For instance, contrary to this is a salient illustration in youths, who now can effortlessly understand the world around them and set foot in numerous global attractions like the Louvre Museum and the Old Trafford Stadium. Moreover, with the advent of commercial flights and widespread coverage of social media, the youngsters can access a tremendous amount of information about airlines, accommodation, where to eat and what to do while on holiday. Therefore, being able to visit new destinations other than the home country confers a valid standpoint as we have witnessed the positive and tangible impact on the young generation. In conclusion, international travel is a sign of improved prosperity of a nation and we should be grateful for its contribution. In my final thought, governors and aviation regulators should propose a more holistic approach in order to prevent any potential threats to the environment due to an excessive amount of travelling internationally.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "What I think about driveless cars is that it could be benifitual to the everyday workaholic but not the someone who doesnt plan their day. There are positive things to having driveless cars and their are negitives things too. Some advantages to having driveless cars would be it would be less car accidents. That would reduct death by car accidents. Another thing would he would give you time in the vehicle to do the things you need to get done before you reach the destantion your going to, such as if your going to a meeting and you have a powerpoint to finish. They also would make roadtrips or long drives more safe because human errors would be gone if the human isn't driving. As the passage says the driveless taxi system would use less fuel and more flexable than taking a bus route. For bigger cities this would be a great way to keep emmissions down and keep this air cleaner. However, their are some negitive things too. Like would the driveless car have the sensor capability to slow down when on a bumpy road or driving in the direction of a large pothole. Then you would have to worry about a blow out or damage to the driveless vehicle's wheels. You would have to think about repair costs of the vehicle's wheel if it has a bunch of sensors too. I would think that the driveless vehicle would have trouble in a rural area or on farmland where there aren't streets, just dirt roads. I would also think what would the vehicle do in the event of a crash on a freeway? would it stop and shut down in the middle of the roadway, or would it need the human to take control during the accident? Also what if the vehicle was in the path of an emergency vehicle? Would the driveless car be aware? The idea of something going wrong is too great of a chance. With all the innovative ideas about driveless vehicles on the roadway, Im unsure if its a good idea or a bad one, but I do think it would be something to use for a big city and see how it would work out. It is a cool futuristic idea but are we effecient enough to trust vehicles to drive themselfs safer than a human? Im not sure but, its a good idea to try.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Patientce hard example walk office must patiently wait turn see Patience another word wait wait see But instead people say cant patiently wait see But instead people say cant CAPS wait see Patience hard people Many people patiently wait see another example CAPS familys go road trip say mom gon na get weakness well sign patience Whats ever I would say someone came said patience I would say wait wait turn dos wait wait us get",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars: are they really safe? There are many points to go with the postitive and negative things about driverless cars. Both sides have very important points to make. There are, however, many more negatives than positives. Three negative points that will be discussed in this essay are: driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers, driverless cars would worsen the amount of car malfunctions and put many people in danger, and there is an increased risk of car crashes if driverless cars are used. To begin, driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers. If a driverless car were to fail to do a task correctly, that mistake could result in an accident. This accident would then bring up the question, \"who is at fault?\" When this question surfaces, many drivers will blame the car manufacturing company, bringing up the point that the car itself failed and not the driver. When this point is brought up, many car manufacturing companies will have to fight lawsuits and have to appear in court. This court showing would result in a large conflict for the company and for the driver, seeing as many people outside of the issue would take sides. The issue would become a large problem for the world, and would be easily settled if driverless cars were not mad to begin with. Also, driverless cars would increase the amount of car malfunctions that could happen on the road, resulting in an increased danger when going out on the roads. Driverless cars could malfunction in many ways. For example, they could fail to alert the driver when they need to take over, they could fail to communicate that something is wrong with the car itself, or they could fail to drive correctly. Each of those malfunctions could cause serious problems on the road, and put many people in even more danger than they are already in. Although there are many more malfunctions that could happen with a driverless car, they could all be prevented if driverless cars were not let out on to the streets. The third point is that driverless cars increase the risk of car accidents. Car accidents happen in many ways. If a driver is distracted, if a car malfunctions, if there is a road block, etc. With driverless cars, many drivers will become more distracted, feeling as though they dop not need to watch the road at all and can do whatever they please. However, that is not the case. With a driverless car, people need to be on a higher alert than they would with a regular car: making sure the car does not malfunction, and keeping an eye out for the worst. If a driver were to become too distracted, they would not be watching the road closely enough, and are putting many lives in danger. If the car were to try and get the driver's attention for assistance through an area the car felt it could not drive through, the driver would be too distracted and the car could crash. To conclude, there are multiple negative effects driverless cars would have if they were used. Driverless cars would increase the amount of legal conflicts between car manufacturers and drivers, driverless cars would worsen the amount of car malfunctions, resulting in many lives put in danger, and with driverless cars there is an increased risk of car crashes. Driverless cars are a bad idea, and should not be put on the roads. They put many people in danger. Driverless cars: are they really safe?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I do not think driverless cars should be a \"thing of the future\". Many things could go wrong if you let technology take over your driving. Drivers and passengers could get injured, the technology could malfunction, and the cars are not completely driverless. The car would not be completely safe for the drivers or anyone else in the car. First, people in the car could be seriously injured. If there is no way of knowing who's responsibilty it is that someone is injured there could be many problems. Someone could be injured in the car because they don't have as much control over the car as a regular car would. A person who is hurt in this car could end up with a lot of problems. People in the driverless car could be injured. Second, the car could malfunction. Malfunctions of the car could lead to many problms.The driver could be driving down the road and something happens with the technolgoy and the driver loses control of the car. If the car is about to hit something and it doesnt let the driver know it needs to take over, the car could crash. The driverless car could malfunction and cause wrecks or injuries. Third, the car is not completely driverless. The driver still has to control the car if needed. The driver may not be paying attention when they need to take over. This could cause the driver to not be fully ready to stop the car. They may not stop fast enough and crash into another car or object. Not being a completely driverless could be a big issue for not only the owner, but the manufacturers as well. Driverless cars should not be used in the future. They could cause injuries, the car could malfunction, and the car is not completely driverless. It may not be completely safe for the driver or the passengers in the car. Many problems can occur from using the driverless car.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Cars have become a part of our modern day culture since the invention of the first model. Many countries around the world have an abundance of car buyers and users, however others are taking into consideration alternatives. The advantages of limiting car usage include relief from stress of cars upon individuals and reduced emissions in the environment. Cars put forth a lot of stressful trouble upon users. These vehicles are designed to transport a person or people from point A to point B, however cars are for personal use that can cost an immense amount of money. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\" said Heidrun Walter about her new \"car-free\" lifestyle (Rosenthal,3). This ideaology is spreading throughout all Europe as more alternate transportations are provided by the government. As Selsky mentioned in Source 3, locations, such as parks and sports centers with uneven sidewalks, have been replaced with broad, smooth ones for citizen's use. Moreover, many cities have provided a bicycle program to promote less usage of cars. These steps towards change help convince people that there are alternatives out there, and that we aren't limited to just buying a car and license to go to places. Additionally, the limitation of car usage help establish a better and healthier environment for everyone. Cars emulate lots of dangerous gases that may harm our precious earth, many of which are responsible for the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect causes gases to be trapped in the atmosphere which harms our ozone layer and creates a smog-like appearance on our cities. Paris is an example of a polluted city as civilians battle against threatening smog from emissions of diesel cars in France (Duffer,8). Many actions towards progressive behavior have increased the likelihood of limited car usage, such as tolls throughout cities and fines up to $25 for violators of laws. These enforcements will ensure that the environment is capable of maintaining generation after generation at a stable pace. To conclude, many countries are pondering choices of opportunites to promote less usage of cars, while some are on their way to solve these issues, limitations on car usage have a variety of advantages for ourselves and the environment. These limits help reduce stressful situations, as well as provide a healthier ecosystem to live and prosper.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The idea that, besides earning money, firms should have public responsibilities, remains a source of controversy. While I agree that firms should focus on their businesses, I believe that they could have a duty to society. There are many reasons why firms should maximise their profits. The most important reason is that firms can use their capital to expand their productions. By doing so, these companies can create more job opportunities for local people and contribute to improving the quality of life in some areas in the next years. Another reason is that the higher profits companies earn, the more taxes they pay to the government. Thus, authorities can have more revenue to spend on key fields, including agriculture and medical care. However, companies should have social duties. Firstly, production processes have resulted in serious environmental issues such as air and water pollution. For example, the irresponsible discharge of chemical wastes into rivers has polluted water sources, leaving a legacy of cancer deaths in the future. Therefore, companies should install waste treatment systems to solve chemical wastes before discharging them into rivers. Secondly, by participating in philanthropic actions, enterprises can enhance their public image. For instance, big corporations such as Vinamilk and Coca Cola should launch campaigns to help those who are less fortunate, provide scholarships and give charitable donations. Through these activities, companies can not only promote their image but also raise their sales figures. In conclusion, although making profits is one of the most fundamental principles when a company conducts their businesses, I think that they should have public responsibilities.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Texting and driving is a big cause of deaths. So if you can't multitask while driving what makes manufactures think you stop what you are doing on a dime and go to controlling an entire vehicle, you cant therefor there is no point in buying or even making driverless cars. Driverless cars are a negative and im against them people only see the part where they won't have to drive but see what type of risk they're taking such as putting there life and there passenger lives in danger. I could be texing someone on my phone or drinking a non acholic beverage and the car alert comes on alerting me that it is time for me to take the wheel and that means i would have to stop drinking put the cap on the bottle and find a place to sit it and put my foot on the gas or brake and control the steering wheel by the time i could do all this the car could either be crashed or even off the road. Why buy or even make a car that you would still have to manually drive, therefore driverless cars are pointless. Multitasking is already a difficult thing to achieve when driving examples such as eating and driving texting and driving and drinking and driving and it doesn't have to be an acholic beverage. Manufactoring driverless cars are a waste of time and money so dont make them it will also keep drivers, passengers, and innocent people alive.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Concentrations issues among school children are increasing nowadays. This essay will discuss the major problems associated with this along with some pragmatic solutions to sort it out. A variety of problems are associated with students’ decreasing attention span. Primarily, the excessive use of mobile devices is harming their ability to concentrate. To exemplify, continuous mobile notifications disturbs the overall experience of the class, as students cannot avoid the urge to check their devices frequently, leading to a short attention span. Secondly, changing roles in the family are affecting mentally. It has been observed that children with both working parents face emotional detachment, as parents usually are busy working and earning, resulting in major depression and focusing issues. For instance, increased cases of depression among school children proves emotionally deprived mental situation. There are two effective solutions to resolve this issue. One way to tackle this is the structured and monitored use of mobile devices on campus. Institutes should install CCTV cameras in classrooms as well as in laboratories to monitor students’ actions. Another way to mitigate this situation is, parents should provide emotional support to their children and they must closely monitor their school activities. For example, helping in their child’s assignments can be one of the best ways to participate in their life, making them feel heard and understood. In conclusion, this essay highlighted the causes of decreasing focus among school children and this essay also presented solutions to these are twofold monitoring cell phone use and increasing family intimacy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I beleive that the development of self driving cars would better our future. The introduction of self driving cars is a positive because they give the driver more freedom to do other productive things, they still give the driver some control over the car incase bad condition come up, and they use many different sensors to ensure the passengers safety. Self driving cars give people the freedom to do more productive things instead of driving. This is helpful because people could get more work done in the car. Which in some cases people can commute many hours, giving them valuable time to work. A concern with this could be distracting the driver from being alert incase the car needs assistance. Although as stated in the article \"Some manufacturers hope to do that by bringing in-car entertainment and information systems that use heads-up display. Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over\". This means that drivers could use the systems already put in the cars that are regulated by the car itself so that if there is an emergency, the car can shut down the devices. The cars are smart enough to know when they should let the passeneger take over. This is important because it shows you that the cars still give you control in certain situations, and they only drive in conditions that would otherwise be easy. Stated in the article, it says \"In 2013, BMW announced the development of \"Traffic Jam Assistant\". Th car can handle driving functions at speeds of up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel. In fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless\". This means that if the car starts to lose control or go into bad conditions, the passenger can take over. The cars that are modified to be self driven are highly equipped with technology to help the car. Stated in the article \"Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reciever, and a inertial motion sensor... The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the cars surroundings\" These sensors all make the car have the important information to make decisions just like a human would when behind the wheel. I think that self driving cars would be a positive because they give the driver free time to be productive, they still give the driver control in certain situations, and they use many sensors to ensure the safety of the passengers.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In order Empire State Building dock dirigibles blimps many obstacles overcome architects One obstacles Empire State Building s frame If thousandfoot dirigible moored top building single cable tether would add tremendous stress foundation building due dirigibles load wind pressure Another obstacle architects faced safety Because dirigibles used hydrogen highly flammable gas instead helium high risk dirigible exploding threatening dense population downtown New York City Possibly greatest obstacle architects face high winds On top Empire State Building winds constantly shifting due violent air currents Even lead weights could used weigh control docked dirigible would still unsafely dangling pedestrians streets Those obstacles architects Empire State Building faced attempt dock dirigibles",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "People use cars everyday, but limiting car usage can be very beneficial. There are many advantages when limiting car usage. Limiting car usage can clear smog, reduce traffic, and it make people less stressed. Many people use cars, but that number has decreased over the last few years. There are many other ways to get to a place rather than using cars. We are now open to many options of transportation. Cars can be used, but there should be limits. Limiting car usage can clear pollution, particularly smog. For example,\"Automobiles are the linchpin of suburbs, where middle-class families from Chicago to Shanghai tend to make their homes. And that, experts say, is a huge impediment to current efforts to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions rom tailpipes\"(Rosenthal). Cars are an impediment to the efforts of trying to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. With the limiting of car usage, those greenhouse gas emissions can surely decrease a lot. It will make the air healthier for people to live, and for future generations. Smog and greenhouse gas emissions can reduce greatly if cars have limited usage. Not using cars can make people happy,less stressed out, and relieved of tension. People don't have to worry about their cars, and paying for gas and other things when they don't use their cars. For instance,\"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\"(Rosenthal). A woman is saying he is happier when he doesn't use his car. Another example is \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution\"(Selsky). Both of those claims are very true. It does take away stress for him, while it reduces pollution. That's a win-win. With less stress and tension, people will be happier in their lives and there might be less problems in society. Limiting car usage can have really great impacts on people's happiness. Reducing the usage of cars can also reduce traffic, making it easier for other people that use cars. In France,\"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital\"(Duffer). 60 percent is a big amount of traffic. I'm pretty sure that that would satisfy alot of people. No traffic means less accidents, and less people worried about being late to school or work. Only a crazy person would actually want to be in traffic. There would also be less noise of cars, and more peaceful sounds . Limiting the usage of cars can guarantee the satisfaction of people that normally go through traffic, and those who don't like it. There are many reasons to limit the usage of cars because there are so many advantages. People will be less stressed and more happy, there will be less traffic, and the air will be less polluted with smog and greenhouse gas emissions. The possibilites are endless. It is very simple; less cars, more benefits. People need to realize that having cars may have some benefits when trying to get somewhere, but it makes more sense not to because there are so many advantages. Limited car usage can benefit people in many ways.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have you heard the scoop about \"driverless cars\" yet? well many powerfull people in the world actually are. They actually have some very good points about them, but there always is a bad in every good too. First I'll explain the good fetures about these driverless cars in my opinion or \"position\" if you will. these cars are very good for using the telephone while driving. Also if you would like to eat a snack or have the ability to be mobile inside your car you can.Many people have a hard time getting around because of there limit to things they could do in their past such as one exzample as navigation. Another good feature about these cars are the gas ability is less. There also is sensors that allow the car to be able to detect when there is danger of an accident around. Those are just a few of the good features of the driverless cars. Next i would like to share some of the bad features of the driverless car in my opinion or \"position\" if you will. I believe that one of the biggest arguments twoards these cars is accident responsibility. Many manufacturers will become upset and astonished when it is their heads on the line if i may. They dont want anything to do with the causes of accidents made either by the cars or the drivers. The people want to blame others but themselves for the accident causes. Thats just how the world is today. Some other reasons that really affect these cars are that poeple have said things like, \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver\"? and these questions need to be answered. The people most likely would get bored and tired of waiting around all day waiting for the car to need to be assisted and i agree with that. Also this is just a start to a completely far ahead future, and nobody can predict it. Those are just a few of the bad reaons about the driverless car. So there you have it, now that you kindave have an idea about these driverless cars many people can do the reaserch on them more and really dig deep into what many powerfull people in the world are saying about these cars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The builders empire state buildings many problems allowing dirigibles dock Things wind actual docking people getting safely The actual docking impractical would nearly impossible connect winch The wind main reason fate mast First wind current strong pilot would difficult time getting close enough The captain Navy dirigible Los Angeles approached mooring mast could get close enough tie forceful winds Also even could tie back dirigible would swing around fiercefuly So builders dealing impractical task",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think computers benefit us They allow us interact people talk family far away help us school gives us easy access information much people usually family friends live away computer allows us interact The computer lets us email instant message play games friend websites like facebook see recent pictures It s easy interact family friends live far away internet allows us The computer nt let talk family friends lets meet new people interact new people world It let s make new friends play games chat The computer really helps stay touch people s easy convinent way The next thing computer helps us entertains us Children hiper homework done nt anything computer let s us play games chat friends watch movies videos load picture etc It alot us Kids could hang school go computer allows want go home parents know safe away drugs alcohol bad things get Just kids like computer nt mean s thing Kids athletic always playing sports always hiper computer helps go away They go school hours go basketball football practice sometimes need break The computer nt always fun s useful The computer helps us school It allows us type essays projects It also allows us easy information help write essays Websites like google bing easy websites help us get good accurate information whatever topic The computer useful comes school As see computer important lives makes life alot easy s choice much want spend But matter computer definatly benefits us",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Challenge of Exploring Venus. Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too. Earth, Venus, and Mars, these three planets are very simuler. Often referred to as Earth's \"twin\". But Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers study. I mean Venus is dificault to a there and study. A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blanket's Venus. In article dais, on the Venus's surface, temperatures average over 800 degree Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our Sun. This mean, we can go live there, because Venus has hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system. However, NASA has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. But I think its impossible to study Venus. I mean NASA will not succeed this project. Because, Venus has 800 degrees surface temperature, and almost 97 percent carbon dioxide in their air. So Venus is dangerous and dificualt to study.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The face on mars is a natural landformation. People beleive it was made by aliens but it was not mars like earth has mesa's and they are huge rock formations like mountain and it was proven thanks to newer images with higher resolution. It was first discovered by a ship called viking 1 who was taking pictures of mars to see where it's sister ship viking 2 could land and it captured The Huge Face but due to low resolution they could not make it all the way out and they believed that it was a sculpture of a egyptian pharo. But in the last paragraph it says \"What the picture actually shows is the martian equivalent of a butte or mesa landforms common to earth around the american midwest\". Which may be because The Red Planet once had water and caused the rocks to decay in a wierd way making The Huge Face.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I am a regular boy who just graduated high school and has no idea what is in store for me. I am 17 going on 18 and I just graduated high school now my freind Don wants to take me to Europe. The seagoing cowboys is fun, safe, and helpful. First of all, Seagoing Cowboys is fun. When they're done taking care of the animals we can play volleyball games in the mean time. Some people who disagree might say that it is a waste of time, just playing games, that's just their opinion. Over on the fun side, we can also play baseball for fun. I can tell each and every one of the Seagoing Cowboys, are having the time of their lives on our ship. Next, it is safe for the cowboys. The ship is espeicialy safe with the war over there's nothing to worry about on that ship. Some people might say that the ship is not safe for people just because I fell. To add on to the fact that the ship is safe they dont have to worry about getting drafted, because the draft board will make you do the Seagoing Cowboys as your service. I can tell from this information the crew is as safe as can be. Last but not certainly least, the program is helpful to other people and animals. It helps the animals get to another location so that the owners can rebuild their farm. Some of the people who are against the cowboy idea might say that because they're playing games that they're not taking care of the animals. From this information you can tell that the cowboy program is more helpful than you thought before. The Seagoing Cowboys program is fun, safe, and helpful to people and animals. Now that I found out what's in store for me I'm probably going to do this for a very long time. Help me out with this argument go to www.seagoingcowboys.com and vote for this program.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author talks about how earth and Venus are referred as \"twins\" in paragrapth two that could mean future space travel to Venus and checking it out more if there wasnt a thick atmosphere with sulfuric acid and could crush a submarine. If we was able to explore Venus without having to fail and not sucesfuly land im sure we could have alot of stuff to study and bring back to examin there could be something there that could cure some illnesses or something. Since Venus is to dangerous to explore as of now they are currently trying to make something that will last longer then it did before Venus was probably covered with oceans and supported other life forms that is not known since the area isnt suitable for us now but its posible there is lifeform that stays on venus we shall see whenever they invent something that can last long enough to get enough information they have made silicon carbide that has lasted three weeks in the conditions The author gives alot of information on the topic and seems to support exploring Venus",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The mood created author happiness gratefulness Reading made feel thankful The author thanks parents several times He talks learned cook parents says I eternally grateful paragraph paragraph I always grateful parents love sacrafice I think specific quotes memoirs show grateful author feeling Reading made feel grateful I think parents sacrificed I also think sentence paragraph supports author wanting feel grateful They came selflessly many immigrants give children better life I also think happy author looking back life states I never forget parents turned simple house home This made mood become happy",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Why do you think aliens created it? Aliens did not create this it is a natural landform. The face breaks and gets more real each couple of years. If aliens created this then they couldn't of had NASA's Mars Global Survey spacecraft reveal the Face of Mars , it is a mesa. A mesa is natural so therefor it has to be a natural landform. I think it is real because they got a lot of facts about the mesa and if it was fake they couldn't of gotten facts on it. They seen a image and the note said it was a human head. Now if it was created by aliens and then it couldn't be a human head. I think it is real and so should you. Believe what they say becaue it is real and they are not making it up. This mesa was not created by aliens. Aliens are not even real in the real world. So believe what they say because i think it is real. If you dont think it is real then see if you can find facts about maybe even more facts than they found. If you cant find more facts then them it is obviously not true about it be created by aliens.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The pie chart illustrates the rates of destination of university graduate student in anthropology right after they are graduated, while the additional table compares the salaries of the three types of anthropologists employees who already worked for five years. Overall, the full-time worker became one of the biggest interest fields that the graduate anthropology student wanted to be involved, while the part-time work-post study became the lowest field of interest by the student. After five years of working, the government sector became the highest salary types of employment for an anthropologist. The full-time work field accounted for 52% of the anthropologist student in one university which is taking the biggest part of the destination for the anthropologist graduate student to start a carrier. Also, followed by part-time work at 15 %, unemployed at 12% and full-time postgraduate study and not known, which are 8% each. Likewise, the lowest field of destination for a fresh graduate student is part-time work and postgraduate study, which is only for 5% student in the whole university. Turning to, the salaries of anthropologist that worked for five years in freelance consulting accounted for 40 % for the amounts of 75,000-99,999 and 100,000 or more while the range of 25,000-49,999 only took 15 % of the employee and the range of 25,00-49,999 took the smallest rates of the employee, which is only for 5%. In the other hand, 50 % of the Government sector employee received 100,000 or more for the salaries, while only 5 % to get the range 25,000-49,999. Finally, the private company can afford 35% of their employee to getting 50,00-74,999 range of salary, while only 10% of them can get 50,00-74,999.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Nowadays tv plays a major role in our life. It is considered by some people that types of a program can effect on kids behavior.While others believe that amount of time plays more role in their behavior.Before arriving at my position both the sides of arguments will be analyzed further. To begin with,why the childern get attracted by charecters.To answer it, kids are unmature they do not know what is real and what it reel.They think everything is a real which they watch on the tv.For example,The survay revealed by America that after watching Harry porter every kids get attached by this movie like eating same foods, wearing same cloths as well as dilogues.Another one is, if pupil watch thriller film on a daily, it can effect on their a daily life.Regarding this they can get more aggressive and rude with the famliy along with friends .For instance,the data was cocluded by London that 70% of kids are aggressive in recent time because of thriller film. On the other hand,some think a time can influence them.It can be affected them due to if they watch the tv unlimited time it can harm their brain as well as a mental health.To explain it, the kids watch the televison for 5 hours without rest they will lost in the reel world they think they are in movie.Also it can damage their eyes and heart they will not talk in proper way.For example, cambridge university has found that if children see television more than five hour, will not behave like normal person. In conclusion, it is true that number of time period can damage the children in many way.I believe that the types of programs are more dangerous for them.these sireas or movies can make aggressive and rude them in normal life.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Hi my name is Luke Bomberberg and I want you to join my program because it is a nice thing to do for the sick people. It may take a long time to get there and back but hey its worth the wait to help the sick. You also get to explore new places around the world with me and my friend,it also gets you exercising because there is a lot of heavy things like the hay barrels. This programis also really really safe. annother thing is that there are about 335 horses, so if you are affraid of horses then this program isn't for you. In 1945 we went to New Orleans to get started with our program on the SS Charles W. Wooster. I turned 18 when we finally made it to Greece wich meant that I could be drafted for military servrice. By the time I was discharged in 1947 I had made nine trips,the most of any Seagoing Cowboy. It took about two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern coast of the United States and a month to get to China. When I was a little boy,helping out on my aunt Katie's farm had prepared me for hard work,but not from the dangers at sea. On my second trip I served as night watchman. My job was to check on all the animals every hour every night. One rainy night after making my hourly report to the captain I slid down a slippery ladder on my backside. My heart raced as I shot feet first toward an opening on the side of the ship. A small strip of metal aalong the edge stopped my slide keeping me from flying overboard into the dark Antlantic. I found time to have fun on board,especially",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "in some places around the world, a growing number of house owners are becoming more curious about the historic past of the houses they live in. Adding financial value, unavoidable maintenance and growing relations are why this curiosity is newly formed, these historic intelligence could be acknowledged in several ways. People's Curiosity could be caused by a range of reasons. firstly, I Imagine that knowing the building's history could add some economical value to it. this is so that these homeowners could gain better prices whenever they plan to sell or rent out their properties. secondly, by gathering more information about the age of their assets, preventive maintenance can be regularly carried out to increase their lifespan. lastly, awareness of the building’s past could strengthen the residents’ relationships by sharing one house's history. Different ways are used to search for information regarding a building’s history. Such details can be obtained from the town’s local library, where old archives are kept and surely reliable. Moreover, Online websites can be a way to learn more about the historic facts wanted. Furthermore, asking the elderly can give the data needed about the old days. For example, it is often the oldest community members who know the past more than the others as they may have been alive when some historic events really happened. In conclusion, many reasons can make people more eager to know about their houses' past. Such knowledge can be obtained from different resources such as the town’s local library, online websites and the old aged memory.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "They are a lot of houses or building that have long history and it is interested to find out the history of behind that instruction. In this easy we will discuss the reasons why people like to find out the history for the building the live in, and the different way they can follow to find out the history they looking for. In one hand, 80% houses in Denmark are old houses and have history, for example the house that I live in now it is from 1960 and I am so interest to find out more about it. The reasons that I am interesting to find it out because the instruction of the house it is so different and small and made from old stone and have old design In other hand, there is different way you can research on the history about the houses or building you are interested in. first from historical book, when you ready the history about the country the mention a lot how the old people building their houses or building or the they the reason the building it. Second from story going from generation to generation. For example, older people telling the history of the houses or building the living in. In conclusion, to find out the history of the houses or building is becoming more interested to people. And there is sever way to find out the history of the building, from the historical book or from story going from generation to generation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Movies and television do express the future with driverless cars and hovering cities but in the real world, are driverless cars a good idea? Cars that can drive themselves seems hard to believe and may have some good and helpful outcomes, but does that cancel out all the negativities? Google cofounder Sergey Brin sees a driverless car that uses half of fuel that regular cars use today which is helpful with financial issues, but the Brin doesn'y express the price of the gas for these cars or how far they can travel before they are empty. In paragraph four and five, the author talks about manufacturers that are experimenting with these cars and how they can drive safely on sensor tracks. On an actual road, there are no sensors so how would a driverless car drive safely on the road if it needs sensors? The last two paragraphs talk about if there was an accident, who would be in charge of it? They also explain that the cars still can't drive in construction zones, so there is a case where hazardous actions can occur. Even though there are some positivites towards driverless cars, there are still a lot dangerous wrecks that can occur with them including fatal ones. Brin and the author may see the future as they do in movies, but they still have improvements and a long way to go before that time comes.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "January 23rd, 2015 Greetings Mr. Senator, There is one particular issue that has been boggling my brain recently. It is none other than the electoral college system. Irrational, unfair , and outdated is exactly what the electoral college system is. Isn't the virtues of American's built on foundations such as rationality, equality/fairness, and mobility? The head of the United States government isn't even elected to the standards that we, the American people, hold ourselves to. Mr Senator, I agree with the clause \"majority rules\" to an extent, with \"winner takes all\" being on the whole other side of the ball park. If Americans had a straight voting system, meaning no electoral college, where simply stated, whichever candidate recieves the most votes wins, the process in which we elect our government head would hold truer to our values. With our current system, hundreds of thousands of Americans votes don't matter. This mass of people is citizens of eligibility to vote. Where are there rights? What does this say about our system? The \"winner takes all theory\" ignores voters. If a state leans 51% democrat, then the entire state is accounted for the democratic party. What about those 49% of republicans. Where does their vote go? - down the toliet along with the credibility and accuracy of the electoral college. Now, if this predicament occurs in near half of our 50 states, a candidate who did not recieve the popular vote will reign triumphant over a candidate who a majority of the American people elected to be their new president. According to, \"The Indefensible College\", by Bradford Plummer, Americans lose out on more than just an acountable vote. Candidates don't even spend time in the states they are certain of having no chance in winning. Logically, candidates only spend their time in the \"swing states\" where they could possibly steal al of that states eleectoral college votes (lines 13-20). Shockingly 17 states didn't see a single candidate during the 2000 election (lines 20-21). We sure did suceed and ignoring hundreds of thousands Americans there. This neglect isn't the fault of the candidates though. Where shall i place the blame, Mr. Senator? There is no childish, frivilolus blame to be placed. Simply stated, the fault lies in our electoral college system. The candidates are just playing the game of the electoral college. The counterclaim for my argument may suggest that the certainty of outcome and the expulsion of run-off elections is enough to substantiate the electoral college. Are you saying that America doesn't have the time to recount votes to ensure the prosperity of the American people. Is that the messege you want to project? It sure isn't coming off well. The certainty of outcome is ludicrous as well. Source 3, \"In Defense to the Electoral College\", even admits that the electoral college is a non-democratic method of selecting a president (lines 15-17). Liars, we are liars then. Americans project an image of America to the world that we are a peacful democracy. However, if the way that we select our leaders isn't even democratic, why are we portraying this false mirage. The electoral college is an anachronism (lines 15- 16). We are a stage four country on the demographic treansitions model. Therefore, our aspirations should be looking forward and not rooted in the past. Mr. Senator, I know you are a sensible man who cares about the people he represents. The people's right to vote matters, yes? Do not be so arrogant as to ignore the people who elected you. May I direct you to the preamble to our constitution? Isn't that the sole foundatio of our government? The electoral college system is a mock of the American people and an outdated idea that does not fit in with our current state as a whole. A win by the popular vote is much more commendable by a landslide victory on false pretences. Thoughtfully, PROPER_NAME",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 6.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The tax system in some countries varies a lot, but this has a lot of benefits for education and healthcare. In my opinion healthcare and education should be the responsibility of the government. On the one hand, many people believe that the government is responsible for providing healthcare, for example, the government is able to provide support to all people when they have an unfortunate accident or suffer a disease that is easily treatable. Additionally, they can support education for all ages because some families can support a child to study, for example in lower class areas where a person can pay for a child to study, and the government should assist these people. In contrast, some people believe that healthcare and education should not be funded by taxes because they believe it is unfair for education and healthcare to be funded by taxes. For example, some people work hard and should pay more taxes than others, and these people think they cannot afford healthcare and education. Therefore, although the tax has some pros and cons, I believe that as long as countries have a fair tax, everyone will support it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Taking books shelves change anything children goin different place find book book store Other librabies like If I seen book I knew I wasnt suppose read I knew good music book magazie I would get cause thats children explore books read look feel know im suppose read make show prof age give Really dont understand sum books stores people dont want u reading Sum children dont read see pick book read good eoungh But always age group thats suppose read books But smae time cant keep child away world brings The book put reason walked past I feel like reason children listen music time track relate way person would understand So feel song thren another person would hear Thats sum parents want hear Magazines tells alot things show much younger minds Im father self would want son age looking naked girl adds pron books kind parents sometimes hard child let lot things But feel knows whats best u What ever tell wrong cause already That would lead things behide backs But want learn easy way aways hard way",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Are you confused, angry, or sad? What if a computer could help you understand more to take away your confusion. Technology has been advancing little by little and we are at the point in time where a computer is now able to read your face and emotions. Two professers have been working hard to create a new software that can recognize emotions. They are developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate. The use of technology in the classroom is huge. Most students are now learning lessons planned by their techers' via laptops and etc. Sometimes students struggle to comprehend their teahcer's lessons and tend to be confused because of the way they are taught. Every student learns a different way and sometimes the teacher runs out of options to help the student understand. Now, computers have a different mind. They are more \"intelligent\" than humans. They can program different things for different people. This new software could be very valubale in a classroom because it can help explain things in ways that a teacher can't and will be able to adjust to the students comprehension. Math can be a very stressful and difficult subject to comprehend. Sometimes teachers cant explain how to solve an equation easily which is how computers could help do those things. If you're reading through your teachers lesson and see his/her explanation on how to solve but you don't quite understand it, you tend to make a face of confusion. The computer may read that and see that you are having difficulty understanding the issue and may make the work easier for you to understand. Last but not least, some student's tend to get frustrated or annoyed and decide to give up. A student giving up is not a good thing because they then don't learn what they were meant to learn. The computer may notice that a child is getting annoyed or upset and can find a different more fun and entertaining way to help the student. Just a simple change in the form of the lesson may give a student motivation to learn instead of quitting and giving up. Sometimes all a student needs is for something to be adjusted to their understanding and level. This software created by two professers could be very valuable in a classroom. There are many benefits it could bring but there are some problems it could cause as well. Overall, this software will have a positive effect to help a child know they can be helped to understand what they dont. It could produce a new learning enviornment to the students comprehension and many test grades and etc could improve.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Some people believe that people who read for enjoyment will have better imagination and language abilities than those who watch TV. I completely agree with this statement. I think that reading books can provide us several benefits. First, we could enhance our imaginative thinking skills efficiently. To explain, there are no images in books, so readers have to use their imagination to visualize the characters and plot of the story. As a result, our imagination will be leveled up quickly. Second, our language skills might be improved after reading numerous books. By reading books, we will have a chance to access the words directly; therefore, we could expand our vocabulary and learn different grammatical structures in an easier and more efficient way. In addition, I believe that the advantages of book reading in improving our language capabilities and imagination power are better than watching TV. The language which is being used on television has been simplified to be suitable for all kinds of viewers. We cannot enhance our language skills if we are just using simple words as words from channels or television film series. Moreover, reading books requires more concentration than television. All television watchers just need to listen to the conversations or the line to get the plot - which is a passive way- while book readers need to use their imaginative skills and also their brain to understand the story. After all, our imaginative thinking and linguistic skills will be developed through reading books better than watching television.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The reason I think people should sign up for the Seagoing Cowboy program is because you go places where you will probably never get to see. If you do sign up for the program you will get to take care of animals,clean stallls and,water and feed them,I think it would be good for the kids to get out of there normal rutine on their phones,video games. I think it would be an amazing experience just because i love people and helping them would make me feel better if I just helped one person. That will get you places in life if you help people in need, it makes you feel good about yourself. That is the reason i think people should sign up for the program. Luke Bomberger had no idea that his life would change soon after his high school graduation. He was working two part-time jobs in a grocery store and a bank when his friend Don Reist invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat. Luke couldn't say no. He knew it was an adventure opportunity of a lifetime. This paragraph is filled details that agrue with people who don't want to go to Europe on a cattle boat to Europe. The reason I want people to go on a cattle boat and trasnport animals,food and,water for the nedding people, is because I want people to get out and explore the world and see what is going on around them, and get off there phones and ipads. People need to get see more than just there phone screenand explore, like The Amazon, the jungles that are in Jamica and everywhere like that. I think it would be good for people to get out, even if you don't have enough money. Still get out of the house and explore. That is why I want people to get out more and sign up for the a Seagoing Cowboy program.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In present. My country has a lot of sell the houses. Because problem from the lower economies and the social society and the politices. Old house and new house are difference for each people. I think history of house is better than building house. Because old house has a many memory for member in the house. When I was young I live in old house. With wall in the my room has a signature pen and a lot of cartoon sticker with my brother and sister. I can remember it. We live in one room and one bed. We are happiness. Second, I think old house is wanted by conservative people so much. It is many value price. Because older people produced the house by wood with high skill worker carpenter. Example In my village near my house, A journalist was seller his house. He got 50,000,000 Thai Bath. Because the house make by expensive wood so can not find in present. Today, Some wood can not use for build to house. It is illegal. So, In the long time, Older house have many value prices more than new house. If you have old houses when you do not want it you can make money, But If you have new house If you bored you house, when you buy you got lower prices. It is about history from something has increased sharply value by time.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "A commonly held belief is that music of the 21st century is harmful to children due to its lyrics and negative messages. However, there is an opposing argument which claims that music can have a positive influence over the new generation. In this essay, I am going to elaborate on both opinions and show why I approve modern music. To begin with, it is well-known that music has always had a powerful impact. Since ancient times it has been changing the way people think. Older people still consider present-day songs being detrimental for a child to listen to them. This is because composers and songwriters include too much violence and other inappropriate behaviours in their lyrics in the recent decade. For instance, nowadays rap genre is not what it used to be. It is full of swearing, violent language and most importantly - using narcotics. Consequently, some youngsters can be influenced by this genre which is harmful to them. On the other hand, we cannot neglect the significant",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless Cars Are Coming Why do people think its good to drive cars thats drive them places? Cars can put you in so much danger that you wouldn't expect your self to be in at the time you are drive. So many thing can happen while you are in the car and you wouldn't even know. You can end up going to the wrong place and the car wouldnt even know. so have a driveless car nah i wouldnt want it im all the way against that. Have a driveless car can be very dangerous you can be in so much danger when you are in a driveless car like in the passage it say that \"within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers\". How would you know if that is true? Wow by someone telling that it is or somebody testing your car out before you drive it. People dont always tell the truth about there brand you see they siad in the passage that \" within 10 years \" key words 10 years all of the things they done put ion there cars in 10 years you wouldnt know if the car was good or bad for you. It can turn around in put you im so much danger and you wouldn't even expect that from a car that the dealer told you so much good about. So much thing can happen while you are in that car. People fall asleep while drive all the time. Some people just dont watch the rode, they be to busy on there phone. Now what if your driveless car was just ride and the machine shut off and have you start drive out of no were. You wouldn't even no because the machine had cut off and it didn't even say anything before it had cut off. An you was just in your car relaxing and on your phone and then BOOM a big crash would happen, that would be your life. You wouldn't want a machine that messes up your life its better off get a car that your can drive on your own 24/7. So much things can happen in a driveless car. While have a driveless car you can put in a destination and they will end up send you to a spot that you didnt even want to go. You could be going on a road trip and wanted to go to texas and the driverless car just sends you some were else and you would be so anger. You could let a friend brorrow your car to go to a doctors appointment and they wouldn't know how to frunction your car when they see a rode bllock a head like in the passage it had said \" They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves. but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigation through work zones and around accidents. This means ther human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires\". and your friend wouldn't even know. So have a driveless car nahh im okay so many things can happen that people diont even think about. It can put you in danger. You wouldn't know what will happen and plus it can send you to the wrong destination. So why do people want driveless cars i really dont know but i wouldn't take that chance at all. The ones who do buy it have fun the ones who don't good thinking.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear local Newspaper I ting computers good u get learn people like famous people deid long time ago Computers good u get learn places like texas Learning places fun Having computer good u get serf web could play games see alot times like You could talk frends far Talking mySpace yahoo website could talk tiferent people met trew wed",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The industrial revolution has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for a large section of the world population. But it has not been able to catch up with the ever-increasing population that has more than doubled in the last half a century. In this essay we will discuss specifically how lack of growth aspirations of nations deprives its citizens of means to feed itself and how too much of it causes environmental impact for the next generation. To begin with, we should understand that the immediate solution to the hunger problem is by alleviating people from their poverty. This can be done by creating employment opportunities through the introduction of free-market policies by the government which can help incubate new businesses and also existing businesses to thrive. It is clearly a win-win situation all around because it is an organic way to solve a systemic problem. On the other hand, traditional means of growing food such as agriculture and horticulture will have to be scaled to meet the growing demand of the population. This will mean acquiring land through deforestation and creating new water systems by building dams. Although this would create employment opportunities for the local people, it will also affect the environment because the flora and fauna will be completely destroyed. The entire ecosystem that depended on them will also vanish over a period of time affecting the future generations and subjecting them to unknown challenges. Today's generation has to make sure the economy continues to grow such that earning opportunities are available for everyone. But at the same time, it also has to ensure that investments are made in inventing technology that will reduce dependencies on natural resources which cannot be replenished as fast as we consume them.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Based excerpt obstacles builders Empire State Building faced attempting allow dirigibles dock one obstacle thier expanded use New York City lack suitable landing area also saw opportunity Empire State Building mooring mast added top building would allow dirigibles anchor several hours refueling service let passengers Also dirigibles docked means electric winch hauled line front ship tied mast In conclusion obstacles builders Empire State Building faced allow dirigibles docked",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "For the time being, a great amount of money for investing in the health condition of people has never failed to provoke debates. There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over who should be allocated on healthy life’s qualities. In my point of view, I am well convinced that the normal inhabitants and those in ill health should be spent money for their health. Indisputably, allocating a sum of money to enhancing the healthy lifestyle of residents is an outstanding investment, especially in the nutrient products to maintain their physical health. Since absorbing a wide range of fundamental nourishments from a wealth of classifications fresh ingredients such as pork meat, juicy fruits and vegetables, can facilitate one’s body and field them to be in a good shape to make sure that all of the inhabitants on global have a decent and well-being function of physical health. For example, youngsters nowadays have a tendency to lead a healthy lifestyle by consuming a lot of nutrient products and taking a gym course to revamp their strength and prevent urgent diseases like diabetes and cancer. Hence, spending a large number of funds on boosting a healthy lifestyle to get away from illness can act as the most significant tactic. Whilst the redeeming features of allocating money to residents’ health are widely acknowledged, people who are in a bad condition of physical health also should be invested in. Specifically, those who are already ill really need the help from surroundings associated with medical treatments, which can help them to easily back to work and live as a normal shelter and make them stop thinking that they have already become a serious burden in their own family as well as society. As an illustration, patients who are in a dangerous situation due to the rampant COVID-19, already need some remarkable methods like Pfizer's Inc vaccines which help them to prevent the widespread of this urgent virus. Hence, investing an amount of money in protecting unlucky patients from pressing problems also plays a vital role. To sum up, both ordinary people and those in ill health should be invested in spending funds with a view to improving their health condition. In my opinion, each has its own perks, it is more optimal to combine both mentioned factors.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In recent years, some people believe that it is good to share information about scientific research, business and the academic field to many people. Others reckon that such informations are too important or too valuable to be share for free. Here are discussions of the statements and my opinion. By development of the technology, people can more likely to access to valuable information such as experimental results and interviewing results of citizens than before. Some people use it for their academic interests or for the business strategies, so that people believe that such information contribute to companies profits or individuals' advantages in academic. For example, many of the medical students read dissertation of diseases, which were written in the past. By reading and using the scientific information students will become excellent professionals. On the other hand, people can access informations from any countries via internet. Recently, increasing the cyber crimes is the serious problem all over the world. Therefore some people reckon that it is too risky to share valuable informations. If information on valuable national research results is leaked, the country would had enormous loss for the economy. To sum up ,sharing as much informations as possible is useful for the everyone to improve their academic skills and contribute to their companies, while easier access to every aspects of informations might bring disadvantages such as information leakage or cybercrime. In my opinion, I mostly agree with it is good to share information, but I believe the source of information needs to be careful not to misuse the sources.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It is believed by some that there are plenty of troubles. Also, it boils down to one thing government officials have figured out the best way to solve them. Some urgent problems can be eliminated through international participation. I partly agree with this opinion based on two reasons including knowledge and facilities, which I will discuss in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, science and knowledge have played a vital role in finding a solution. Furthermore, there are kinds of problems in every society. While a lot of urgent troubles can be able to solve with self-government. Some problems need to be from other nations to find out the best choice since there are many open-minded people in other places who can state a credible way for a problem. So, we can use this potential source to look for a proper solution to our troubles which are solved hard. For example, when a problem has come about in a factory and our engineers can not find a way to repair it. Moreover, the government can ask for international engineers. On the other hand, sometimes there are not enough facilities to cut down a problem in a country. In this situation, the government can ask for help from others who use their facilities. In addition, we can save money and time, as well authorities have speared their international relationships. For example, there are a few treatment devices which are applied to therapy of special diseases which we can use to solve the medical problems of ill individuals in our country. In conclusion, all countries involved with many troubles and some urgent problems need to ask for help from other nations. I believe that the other international countries have knowledge and facilities which can help us to figure out a proper way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Using this type of technology can be somewhat unsafe to students in classrooms, beacsue what if they aren't happy and someone uses the Facial Action Coding System, but then reveals how the person really feels. More into the future it has gotten to a point that companies will stop at nothing for growth and development. But these things can cause a major unbalnce to everyone. Just like the Facial Action Coding System, this thing can be someones enemy, becasue maybe this person can be against the whole thing. And using it on some one that didn't want to be used could lead the person to do bad things. On the other hand, other people can come foward and say \"it is time for change\" and be all happy, and the next thing you know is that the world is run be robots. Change is good, but it can also lead to destruction and caos. That is why we have to be careful with what we do in future, because what we do now can harm some innocent life that didn't deserve it. The passage alson states that Leonardo used knew how \"Mona Lisa\" felt when he was drawing her. At first he didn't know if she was smiling. But then he just let is go and began to draw. And now we are here, to the future and people wanting to knoww how another perosn feels by using a computer. Like i've stated before, change can go in a good or bad way. There is no way saying it could be both or could be something completly different. We just got to be careful with what we have now or they may be no future.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The communities state that gadget usage by young people will impact their future when facing advanced technology. But some others explain that is a bad situation for kids if they depend on gadget usage. In my opinion, I believe that the parent will protect their family from gadget usage illness. I will discuss some reasons why people must protect themselves from the bad habit of using the gadget. I start with the lack of conditions on psychology the person has devoted time to the phone. This situation puts the consumer in their comfort zone, and they feel that they do not need other people to communicate. In the long situation, this condition will make that people be introvet. For example, a kid with his/her gadget playing in the room but their friend playing too without a gadget. This situation shows that the kid with a gadget does not want to follow their friend together. Next, I will discuss how gadget usage correlates with our health indirectly. The person who devotes much time to gadgets will have less movement. For instance, They play with gadgets rather than do exercise. This condition will improve the risk be obesity in young period. This old needs a rich movement to increase their bond density and muscular mass. In fact, the younger ones only stay in their room and do not have any movement, just lying in bed for a long time. In conclusion, a child who devotes time to the gadget harms psychologically and biologically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Exploring another planet may be fun, but how would you like to live in a different planet? Venus is the second planet from the sun, but it's hard to study this mysterious planet because of the different risk that may be on the planet. Many people have tried to visit this planet but had no success. The reason of not accomplishing this goal is because of the many dangers that are within the planet. Although it may seem fun to go study another planet, some may consider it to be a major risk due to the fact that: It's a new planet with no knowlage of knowing what might happen, high or low tempretures, and challenges that may come to getting to know this planet. Many scientist sent numerous spacecraft to Venus but unfortunetly none has maintaine to last the newly planet for more than a few hours. In the text it states, \"Maybe this issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades\"(The Challenge of Exploring Venus, ph.2). However, people may ask why vist this planet, we have other planets that are more closer. Well studies have shown that Venus is the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. In the text it states, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth\"(The Challenge of Exploring Venus, ph.4). So, the only difference of the Earth, and Venus is the tempreture they have. In any planet, you don't happen to know the tempretures in the planet. Many plantes have high or low tempretures, and some may even have toxic air for us humans. In Venus the air is mostly made up of carbon dioxide and corrosive sulfuric acid. In the text it states, \"97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus\" and \"Clouds of highly corrosive sulfic acid in Venus's atmosphere\"(The Challenge of Exploring Venus, Ph.3). Wanting to go vistit another planet is meaning having to wear special gear so you dont get sick due to the different air it has from Earth. Furthermore, the text also states, \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet\"(The Challenge of Exploring Venus, Ph.3). Having high degrees is very dangerous for us humans, especially if we've never encountered this problem here on Earth. Austrounots are very brave people, they do all these studies for us so we could understan how another planet functions. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) do send humans (Austrounots) to go study Venus, but they don't particuarly land on the planet. In the text it states, \"NASA's possible solution to the hostlie condition on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray\"(The Challenge of Exploring Venus). This motion is leting the humans hover over the planet and it helps protect the people from any harmful ground conditions by not touching the planets surface. In conclusion, it is fun to study another planet, yes it may seem harmful but in reality the NASA people do know what they are doing and yes they will watch over you and protect you. They",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In memoir Narciso Rodriguez main mood created author I think mood happiness To Narciso whole entire family family important thing No one leaves family member In neighborhood mostly lived Spanish Cuban Italian immigrants All cultures came together great solidarity friendship Narciso s parents came selflessly many immigrants give children better life even though meant leaving behind families friends careers country loved When I read memoir I felt happy reading It let know families really nothing everything Narciso s family close caring one another family thing matters",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The future technologies are improving, and the driverless car becomes popular these days. People dream about driving without the driver; car of course, taxi, bus, train, and air plane. It can bring us convenience. A lot of companies already started working on their driverless vehicles project, it will take huge part of the market in the future. Driverless car can lead our future technology. It seems useful and practical. However, everything has their pros and cons, so does driverless car. In my opinion, driverless car can't driving without the driver, but it can help drivers drive easily and safely. Here is my articles to support my opinion. First, it can ruin people's job. A lot people make money from working in the transportation company, if driverless car gets popular, nobody will need a taxi driver or a bus driver anymore. Pilots of trains and planes will no longer needed as well. It is hard to get a job these days even if you graduate the decent college, the driverless car will make this worse. Second, the sensors and auto systems can help the drivers to drive, but it can't control all process of driving. Sometimes the computer doesn't work properly as our desktops or laptops do, it can cause errors any time. Sometimes driving needs human's ability, especial it's a sudden situation. Third, the problem of responsibility. For example, if your driverless car hits the person in front of you, it is ambiguous to figure out who has the responsible for the accident. The car company, and the customers will argue to blame each other. Driverless car can bring convenience to us. It seems very helpful, but it also has obivous problems. People are improving technologies right now at this time as well. But the important thing is people should think more carefully of pros and cons of the future technologies rather than just chasing the benefit in front of them.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Inroduction: In this article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" it talks about how Venus is the hottest planet even though Murcury is closer to the sun. It also talks about the NASA how they sending humans to sudy Venus. The author suggest that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers its presents because its cool to learn all the things about Venus but its also is a dangerous place to go to study it. I say that because in paragraph 3 they said \"Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere\". You wil have to keep ur helment on when you go to Venus because Sulfric acid is a very dangerous chemcial , and if you inhale that or your skin come in contact with that ; you might died. Venus is the hottest planet, Vnus had the hottest surface tempertaure of any planet in our solar syate, even when Murcury is closer to our sun. For example \" On the panets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenhiet, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we exprience on our own planet\". I chose that because it explains how hot it is and how dangerous it can be. Another great example is that \"Beyond high pressure and heat, Venusian geology and wether present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes , powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\" The reason i chose that is because Venus can cause alot of dangerous things but also its fasinating what Venus can do and how Venus is. NASA is using so much technology so they can get as much information on Venus and how it works. So they going to keep senidn humans to that planet to figure out is Venus was just like Earth. For example \" Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\". I chose that because it just texplained why NASA keep sending humans out to Venus. Furthermore \"Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth.\" I chose that because they getting more and more details on how Venus was just like Earth in some ways. For example \" The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familar feature s such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\" I cose that because that can be another option for humans to go there if something happenes to Earth and we can have somewhere else to live. For example \"NOt easy conditions, but suvivable for humans\". I chose that because it lets you know that even though its dangerous its still a good place for humans. To sum things up I think its worthy to study Venus because you can learn so much about Venus and how its so much like Earth. For example \"Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expande o meet the very edges of imagination and innovation\". I chose that because even though its dangerous you should still go visit venus and have a good imagination on how it would be if it was just like earth. It's a lot different and experiental because you get to leave earth and study more thing then just whats on earth. It's also challenging but its also so cool to see so much different things and it can be scary because you soooo many miles away from home; every second you in space is a year that pass by. Conculsion: Just go to have fun but also study and see kind of things you will find out , out there. For example \"Earth's \"twin\", Venus is the clostest planet to Earth in term of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too.\" Thats also a fact that Venus can be just like Earth because its right next to the Earth.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The technology we are using in classrooms grows more and more every day. It helps us learn and grow as students and makes work in the classroom be more enjoyable. The technology being developed could be used in classrooms to make the lesson switch if kids grow bored or tired of it, and can also help them get to learn it easier. The possibilities of what this could do are very high, but it can also change the way kids think about school and possibly push them to want to learn more. The technology to read a students emotions can have a very good setup for how schools are with each individual person and how they learn, and make sure they will know what they are doing. This is good because it can teach kids, but while they are learning, they can grow tired of the lesson or get bored, and this software can make the lesson change and possibly make it more enjoyable for the students to learn, and could change the way they are during the lesson. If the kids emotions are reflecting on how the lesson goes for them, then they could want to go to school and really be active with learning and this could be a very good change that schools need. It would push the kids to do good and help them get the full education, while also seeing how their emotions are about the work put in. Reading their emotions can help to make the lesson plan better for that student, and make them really enjoy it. As it says in paragraph 6, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, then it could modify the lesson like an effective human instructor.\" This can mean the lesson will switch, and help the kids to better understand what they are learning to make sure it is being taught in ways that they can understand. The Facial Action Coding System can be a very useful tool in the classroom and can help students reach their full potential when learning, since this technology can help modify the lesson if they are confused or bored. The way that the students can learn with this technology is endless and can be used for a lot of good in schools, and can possibly help them better understand what they are doing better than the teacher could since it will be able to understand their emotions and modify the work given. All in all, this technology has a great potential to do a lot of good for schools and the children in them, and also give them the full education that they need to grow.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus is the closest planet to the earth in terms of density and size( paragraph 2). Also the second planet from the sun. There has been numerous spacecraft sent to Venus. Every mission failed, no spacecraft survived the landing for more han a fiew hours. Venus is a challenging planet for humans to study. Almost 97 percent carbon dioxide is around Venus. The atmoshere pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet (paragraph 3). Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though murcury is closer to the sun(paragraph 3). We could not survive on the planet Venus. Venus may have been the planet that had alot of earth-like features in the solar systems. The planet Venus probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like earth(paragraph 4). The earth has valleys, mountains, and craters, and maybe venus once did too. NASA has one compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. A vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfreindly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way(paragraph 5). We can't fly to Venus 30 or so miles above, our jet planes wont make it. NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. Its not east to, Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it come to extreme physical conditions. Yes our earth compares some features to Venus but it is highly dangerous for us humans to go to Venus. If spacecraft cant suceed to go to Venus, how is anybody else to. The earth-like planet called Venus is facinating because there could have once been moutains and earthly things like that, but its far too dangerous. Maybe in the Future NASA could find a way to Venus with all human lives to live and succed and the mission would become accomplished.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Have you ever been in school and not understood, didn't want to do it, or just was bored with your school work. I think mostly everyone in the world has gone throw that and that can affect you in the future, also on and what you have learned in school. I think this new computer sytem can help and change that. One it helps the teacher find better way to teach there students. Two it helps the children learn better. Finally it can be that start of new inventins to help the children work and learn better in school. The fist reason why i think this computer system would help in schools is becuse it can help the techer find better way to teach there students. Teacher can get reports on what students emotions are during a lesson to see if there needs to be a change. This can also help let teachers know mostly which students need more help that others. Also with students who are just bored with the lesson and it makes them not want to work. This can be supported by paragraph six\"A classrom computer could reconize when a student is confused r bored\" Dr. Huang predicts\"Then it could modify the lesson, ike an effectiv human instructor.\" The second reason why i think this system would be valuable in school is because it helps the kids learn better. One it can chnge the lesson when it sees a child is behind to help them catch up, confused to help them understand better, or bored to make the lesson more enterting to help hem focuse. This idea chan chage so many students lives for the better. This is why i think it would help students learn better. Finally I think it can help start new ideas to help better school. If this compuer system works it can inventors start to think of new ideas to make school an easier place to learn. This can help people make inventins for even more things like what kinds of foods students should eat to find when a student has something that been bring harm t other students . This is only a few of the many reasons why this cud help start the ideas for new inventions on how to make school better. In conclusion i think this computer system i valuable and can make school a etter place. One because it an help teacher. Two it helps children lern better. Lastly it can lead to new ideas to make school better. How do you feel about this new computer system do you thin its valuabel.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI that evaluates essays. Assign a score between 0 and 6 to each essay. 0 is the worst, 6 is the best. Provide only the numerical score without any explanation.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In 1976, NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft was snapping pictures of possible landing spots for Viking 2, when it noticed a human face staring right at it. A few days later, NASA released the photo publically, and it caught on fire. The face has since become a pop icon, and appeared in a Hollywood film, books, magazines, radio talk shows, and haunted a grocery store's checkout line. It has even attracted conspiracy theorists that think NASA is hiding alien life on Mars. But they are all incorrect. The face was discovered in the Cydonia region of Mars. In Cydonia, mesas are common, and this one just happened to have an unusual shadow. NASA also unveiled the images to the public, proving they had nothing to hide, otherwise they would have kept this secret. NASA also stated they wish there was an anicent civilization on Mars. And Jim Garvin, chief scientist of NASA's Mars Exploration Program said it is equivalent to a earth butte or mesa. Imagine if you were a scientist and saw a face on Mars. You would've been astounded and amazed. That is exactly what mission control felt like when they saw this bizarre looking landform. But they quickly discovered it was just another Martian mesa. The face was discovered in the Cydonia region of Mars. In Cydonia, mesas are common, and this one just happened to have an unusual shadow. NASA also unveiled the images to the public, proving they had nothing to hide, otherwise they would have kept this secret. NASA also stated they wish there was an anicent civilization on Mars. NASA took another picture in 2001. This picture looked nothing like the picture in 1976 of a face. This is because NASA used more advanced cameras than it did in 1976 to come up with a clearer image of the mesa. The camera used in the 2001 photo had new high-resolution images and 3D altimetry. Also, each pixel in the camera in 1976 covered 43 meters. The camera in 2001 had each pixel cover 1.56 meters. You can also discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than pixel size. That's a huge difference in picture quality. You can see NASA's not trying to hide anything. The picture was not leaked, so we know NASA meant to show the public the picture. Don't listen to the cospiracy theorists. There are no conspiracies or theories. Just an oddly shaped shadow of a Martian mesa.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.