labels
int64
0
3
text
stringlengths
1
1.23k
1
glänzen / gleam specidies a concept of light emission: it is light emission by reflexion at a
1
The derivation of a ser sentence is represented in (15).
1
what we are thinking about.
2
& INSTR (e, I) & LEG (I) & I < paul & y = paul-I & MOVED-ITEM (e, y)
2
(10) Complement Clause (past under past sentences)
2
(125) A boy bought exactly three boats.
1
The second category of sources are the mass media, print and electronic.
0
11.455
1
predicate does not apply to the subject referent“ (Maienborn 2005:172).
2
(15) Representation of second sentence of (13)
3
Olatunji. O.O. Features of Yoruba Oral Poetry. Ibadan: UPL, 1984.
2
(If you are killed by the mighty
2
(15) snúa sig
0
Da H 0.43219 1127.46 1871.88 2689.84
2
(17) a. Abdù yaa yayyàagà lìttàttàfân
3
- (1990), Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child
0
260.000
1
Their chase and ultimate destruction calls for some super-natural prop. Those who
2
Definition 1 (Optimal Inquiry) Given a set of interlocutors A with states (σ)i∈A a discourse
0
���!� �� �� �������
0
�����������������$����������������������.������0���'�
2
(A dogged hunter).
0
39.615
0
� ð 4 Q�ò�O ò¡ô
1
look. As the narrative voice says while talking of Mitchell Socrates “... but after the
1
- Sigidi in Tafawa Balewa LGAs with 775 speakers
2
QBRIGHTNESS = {…, q2b, q2c, …} (brightness values, excluding at least the
1
452 Four Decades in the Study of Languages & Linguistics in Nigeria
1
situation si via the R relation. R is a free parameter, and si is a free variable for specific topic
1
lexical representation of verbs suggested by Bierwisch (1988). I assume for ser (9) the lexical
0
856 Language, Literature & Culture in a Multilingual Society
1
1.1 Theoretical Framework
2
(12) a) the picture [which Bill liked] and [which Mary hated]
0
��� ����� ���������� &
2
(3) We always let those boysi play with those girls j [whoi, j know one another from elemen-
1
— as shown in Frey 2004b and elsewhere and as we shall point out below — we analyse
1
In the city, his name is famous because of his wealth!
1
I propose that, indeed, we need a fixed, and selective, representation of that part of conceptual
1
tun mit ‘to team up with s.o.’, übereinstimmen mit ‘to come to an agreement with s.o.’, sich beratschlagen mit ‘to
0
541
3
troubled river
2
things
1
negative developments? This in itself raises serious questions about the conventional
1
vowels. For instance, the differences between /u/ on a high tone and /u/ on a
1
identified, the optimal candidate is chosen by a series of ranked constraints.
1
- - Analysis of Variance - -
1
to which the choice of the indefinite depends on the value for man, while (60b) is the
0
33.846
0
408
0
� éMòÀì°î�éæì|ø���í°éæì"ýùéæí�òJî¼é��xê�ì"éÜí°í"ôõøùî�ë;�\y�v���u���÷Fôªï�è�ï�è�é�ø��ðý ôõøJö�íf�ëéÜòJî�ôõî���#laxö�ê�êNøùí°éï°èDòÀï��JêNéÜì:ñ è�òJî�ñæé��Uè�ô í:í"êNéMòJúJéæì-
0
333
1
In example 4)e, the speaking voice bares its mind about the Eastern Nigerian
1
of message content.
0
30.857
2
(130) above.
0
interview ............................................................................................................................... 277
1
"' Farkas focuses on a sorncwhlll different case, namely on indefinites in the scope ot'sorne operator. She
2
- *Paedamol ne doit pas être administrer en cas allergie au
0
1164
1
revolution is more like a mutiny. This is because it had shaky foundations and was
1
variable into the descriptive material of the indefinite, the extension of the descriptive
0
������&2B/+����������
2
(16) a. 'Inho-ka'.[sr"[s PRO/caki-ka ka]-ko] sipheha-n-ta}O ,
2
n'ulò ngwa n gwa! is now carried to my house.
0
300
0
� ÜG#pÜ��:]`r�á ��wn�Rä_Y+q>r�}Eu�t
3
Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
0
� Ekiin lyàwó - (Mustapha 1969)
1
Usually, news, information or other kinds of messages are products of the
0
35.798
0
469
2
(17) *Mali nem lit at egy-egy gyereket se.
2
(11) B ∈ Dfun(A) ⇔ 〈A, B〉 ∈ Drel
1
(14) ., iS ,;.~possible syntactic representations .corresponding to the basic operator structure
2
& λX.[P(X)(W)] = λX.[P(X)(W’)]
1
more or less acceptable (2.9 on a scale from 0 to 5), less than the positive controls (3.6) but
1
regard these two forms as co-variants.
0
-100
1
content of the writing.
0
(*),+�-/.102)43�35),6'+87:9
2
(`Please give me the big/small toys.’)
0
� $vWM ���� ����·ªþ �S�� (���*\ � ô�`3aWô�g¡ù¡c�e
1
available in the extra-text.
2
autosegmental phonology, as below:
0
1203
2
(14) a. We lost the battle because we didn’t have the soldiers of the Imperial Army.
3
Philadelphia: Benjamins.
2
v + t v t v
1
� Nominal in-
1
Bandele-Thomas makes the point that people are the way they are because of the
2
(104) Five programs each of which two students use require a password.
0
31.512
2
(17) #The cake was delicious, but I never tasted it.
0
455
1
event and state concepts may specify termination conditions: it is certainly part of our
1
edge of any [-ATR] root specification is aligned with the edge of the
1
eke out a living. In the text, Lakemfa remembers nostalgically his adolescent years as
2
(109) Ewajest studentk争
1
where the oval distinguishes the possibilities I conceive of as maybe actual from those I have
0
"