labels
int64
0
3
text
stringlengths
1
1.23k
2
(14) D2+the [CP [DP __2 book]1 that John likes __1]
2
(14c) /àbd/ → [àbt] ‘kings’
2
*! *
0
521.714
0
��&�#'2?/'�
0
112
3
— (2000): Linguistic Variations among the Small Minorities of Akwa Ibom and Cross
0
1993
1
combine with degree modifiers. This difference is expected because modifiers that are
1
Although the journalistic approaches and the common interests highlighted
3
Onabajo, O. (1995). The Impact of Radio and Television Rural Development
0
$��!����������������.��*������������F�.�������$������.������
1
experiences evoke praises; some give rise to a celebration in lofty language, salutes;
0
841
2
Becomes disinherited
3
(eds), Adverbials. The Interplay between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure.
1
in the semantics of their relative pronoun and, following from this, the antecedent construal and
0
654
1
meaning. It should be made clear, however, that the distinction at issue here is not tantamount
0
440.385
2
(16) Type II: CV Verbs
1
also Klein 1994).
0
%��� +
1
updating on the basis of developments in the micro and macro-environment.
2
TMR
1
indefinite has narrow scope with respect to the negation. In (59b) and (59c), the index is
2
t 1219.187594
2
12)b Mark, oh mark this misty mob breaking out
1
variables. In case the list is empty, we are dealing with a polar, or ‘yes’/‘no’-question like ?p
0
���������� &�����#�Z �Z2� ��!� �������#�Z �Z2/+� ���
1
(`My old friend') has the additional meaning that we know each other for a long time.
1
All items were constructed such that there was a plural-RC in sentence-final position and a
0
Okt 23
1
we now live at a time when enlightened good citizens of the world are busy thinking
3
Fromkin, A.V. (1978) (ed.) Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic
2
person that own cassava flakes
0
33.000
2
� me gawaati (megawatt)
0
923
1
similar to that of discourse representation theories (Heim 1982; Kamp 1981), where
0
������ �$� ���� � �������� ������� �$� ������!����� ��!� ���� �����.���� � �$� ��������� *���� .����
0
� 6 H3K�- ò ?@F ô . öxôÛù�hRô�g¡ùlô�gdcHôªù¡ydc
0
508
1
educational levels have different vocabularies and varying abilities to understand
1
At the organizational level, writing could be of a general, technical or
1
The craze for chieftaincy titles has got to the stage where people engage in all
1
to a nice Thai restaurant. The question you face, and which does not make much sense to pose,
0
11.842
0
01. Aug
3
and Pedagogic Realities” in Azuike (ed.) (2001).
2
(163) maximal(B,context,drs([H],[structure(H,dom),
0
03.02.2005
1
property values of a concept in (at least) one dimension. Indeed, it appears that the modifiers
1
behind birth is death. Time is only the diaphanous curtain! Apostrophising the
0
��!�������������$�������E
1
the NP has instrumental case is so subtle that even native speakers cannot always pinpoint
2
(14) [The Italian Nobleman above-mentioned had an Intrigue with a
1
(103)a), which only has an amount reading, leads to a condition C effect, whereas
2
– natürlich nicht in der Weise eines Anspruchs und Guthabens , sondern im Sinne
1
aspects of traditional African literature. In a consistent and painstaking manner, they
2
(12) g(w) = {f :f is probable in w.}
2
(8) a. Reciprocal use: A and B quarrel with each other.
0
284
0
���� ������ ���� ?� ��� ������+� ��� ���� $�0�"������ �����'� ����������� ���� ���� ���*� ����� ����
2
– Some walked in. +
2
(12) a. At that moment, Maria brought up another fact. It sent shivers down my
1
Figures of Rhetoric
2
(pl.)/them hand’
0
� $&WM ���� � � ������+��� ��� �� Ê W þ�� � þ
0
374
1
referential interpretation, but no intermediate reading. While judgements on
0
-1982
0
– + + +/–77 +/–78
3
– (1994): On the overgeneralization of the progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First
2
Cv. Iya ni wura - Mother is gold while
0
11.688
1
helfen and English help, and behaves in the same way according to the tests — all this in spite
2
We can cure you
2
Ma o bu na nne ya abughi eze naira n’onwe ya!
1
generative theories, OT does not derive phonetic representation from
2
Ó lakwaa bè ishi ghu  If it escapes, you will exchange with
1
spread in vowel harmony. Spreading is not a parametric choice, whereby
0
-1994
1
view that constraints are language – particular statements of phonotactic
0
90%
2
(roughly: C. was patiently suffering / parched in the heat)
2
a. Vx [Man(x) -> Wants(x, marry(x, f(x))]
0
318.857
0
Ku H 0.29065 334.919 666.381 2859.19
1
subject of memorial interest. Similarly, the list of those who made the news in
1
– as will be further detailed in section 3.3.3. Furthermore, discourse related approaches solve
1
songs. In some of our texts, all the instruments for Ègbenú ōba songs are
1
constructing the messages. If the message makes sense to them then it should make
0
& word="...*" & word!="demie|quart|demi|merci"] within < s/>
1
4.1.1. Design
1
us to better appreciate the predicament of the character so described, so much so that
1
much lie in their syntactic attachment —both attach to their respective antecedent — but rather
0
1402
1
Tense/Aspect/Mood = TAM) however, the combination of L + H just
2
Chedo obodo