subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | 5f4v8c | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 149 |
programmingcirclejerk | dividebyzero14 | dahlfqj | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>I didn't believe the title could possibly be a direct quote. Wow.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 69 |
programmingcirclejerk | Jonno_FTW | dai8r2i | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|> except:
pass
Taught me that i can ignore nearly every problem. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | burakku-kigyou | dai8bwo | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>> I grew up with a keyboard in my hands
Maybe teaching kids to program is a bad idea after all.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | wolf2600 | dahnchk | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>I didn't believe the title could possibly be a direct quote. Wow.<|eor|><|sor|>Why do you think this sub has so many readers?<|eor|><|sor|>Probably from jealousy.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | skulgnome | dahxg0j | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>Is this a new trend among hipsters to ~~pretend to~~ learn low level programming?<|eor|><|sor|>No, hipsters have always done this<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | wolf2600 | daho2x2 | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>I didn't believe the title could possibly be a direct quote. Wow.<|eor|><|sor|>Why do you think this sub has so many readers?<|eor|><|sor|>Probably from jealousy.<|eor|><|sor|>When I see someone coding on a macbook with lots of stickers, I'm so jealous.<|eor|><|sor|>Especially if it has the light-up apple logo. I wish my HP logo lit up. =\<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | MarcusPope | daidya3 | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>I didn't believe the title could possibly be a direct quote. Wow.<|eor|><|sor|>Why do you think this sub has so many readers?<|eor|><|sor|>Probably from jealousy.<|eor|><|sor|>When I see someone coding on a macbook with lots of stickers, I'm so jealous.<|eor|><|sor|>Especially if it has the light-up apple logo. I wish my HP logo lit up. =\<|eor|><|sor|>Finally!!!! My HP Envy 17-3277nr lives up to its name!!! Someone is actually envious of my light up HP logo!!!!
Edit: If anyone knows how to turn it off I'd appreciate the help.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | er5te | daibqzs | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>wow I thought it was going to be something that isn't retarded poetry which he likely didn't actually think of at the time and just came up with while writing this post
related Q:Is it possible to ever "catch up" to kids who have been coding since they were 10, when you're starting undergrad computer science in your mid 20's?
A: both groups are equally saturated with retards<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | 3131961357 | dai4kel | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>at least it's in the correct asm syntax<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | Capashinke | daip2lm | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|> except:
pass
Taught me that i can ignore nearly every problem. <|eor|><|sor|>He lived as he died - dangerously.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | Arkaad | dak7om8 | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>He didn't even talked about getting a tattoo of it.
I'm so disappointed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | wolf2600 | daixg79 | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>I didn't believe the title could possibly be a direct quote. Wow.<|eor|><|sor|>Why do you think this sub has so many readers?<|eor|><|sor|>Probably from jealousy.<|eor|><|sor|>When I see someone coding on a macbook with lots of stickers, I'm so jealous.<|eor|><|sor|>Especially if it has the light-up apple logo. I wish my HP logo lit up. =\<|eor|><|sor|>Finally!!!! My HP Envy 17-3277nr lives up to its name!!! Someone is actually envious of my light up HP logo!!!!
Edit: If anyone knows how to turn it off I'd appreciate the help.<|eor|><|sor|>I've found several strips of electrical tape to be a cure-all for annoying LEDs.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | backltrack | daicn1o | <|sols|><|sot|>These two lines of assembly code taught me the importance of history and remembering the past during the journey to the future. I'm going to print it on a sticker and put on my new MacBook Pro when it arrives.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/If-there-is-a-piece-of-code-youd-hang-on-your-wall-what-would-it-be/answer/Tal-Binder<|eol|><|sor|>>Israel <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | nightmaar | 11s3br9 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 151 |
programmingcirclejerk | king_ricks | jcbrs0w | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications in Rust. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now Go programmers can create an application.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 174 |
programmingcirclejerk | JayRaccoonBro | jccctzc | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>I tried to get chatgpt-4 to make me a greasemonkey script to do some probably simple bullshit, but I don't know javascript so I let it take the wheel. it took several hours of back and forth and only started working after I fed it multiple stackoverflow answers and the first results I could find on google about error messages that came up. the resulting code was a nightmare to look at and took a lot of manual modification but it worked in the end.
so what i'm saying is AI can now successfully replicate the average 10x programmer. this subreddit is doomed<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 118 |
programmingcirclejerk | james_pic | jcc61ww | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>It's not truly the singularity unless ChatGPT5 is written by ChatGPT4.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 94 |
programmingcirclejerk | spicyboi404 | jcc8bhq | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>>singularity
Crazy people rule?<|eor|><|sor|>Me when language model produces language: <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 86 |
programmingcirclejerk | GodlessPerson | jcbrgms | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>>singularity
Crazy people rule?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | jccr8ix | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>0x Programmer: make me an extension that transcribes youtube videos
ChadGPT: [do it yourself lol](https://i.imgur.com/oPTaeEU.png)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmingcirclejerk | wubscale | jcd2uwf | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications in Rust. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now Go programmers can create an application.<|eor|><|sor|>Okay ChatGPT4, write an application that autoexpands Rust's `foo().bar()?.baz` into `(match foo().bar() { Err(err) => return Err(err.into()), Ok(x) => x}).baz` for maximum Gopher readability<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | UnShame | jcdt8ca | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>> This program is seriously too close to becoming self organizing and once it can do that, hands are completely off the wheel at that point
Looks like prompt engineers are going to be out of jobs sooner than expected.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | pandakekok9 | jcdsehl | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>\>entire application
\>chrome extension
kek<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | Schmittfried | jcepfbs | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>in my experience GPT cant write code for shit. It simply does not understand OOP well enough to design something worth using.<|eor|><|sor|>On the other hand, most deveopers understand OOP well enough to never design something worth using.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | jcdlfun | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications in Rust. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now Go programmers can create an application.<|eor|><|sor|>rust taking credit for features developed by other languages
GPT taking credit for rust code developed by other people
a universe in balance<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | Arcticcu | jcco5b7 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>I tried to get chatgpt-4 to make me a greasemonkey script to do some probably simple bullshit, but I don't know javascript so I let it take the wheel. it took several hours of back and forth and only started working after I fed it multiple stackoverflow answers and the first results I could find on google about error messages that came up. the resulting code was a nightmare to look at and took a lot of manual modification but it worked in the end.
so what i'm saying is AI can now successfully replicate the average 10x programmer. this subreddit is doomed<|eor|><|sor|>Oh no.. that's my process, except more efficient, and I'm a certified 10xer (my mom told me I'm special). Singularity..<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | SnasSn | jceay41 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>0x Programmer: make me an extension that transcribes youtube videos
ChadGPT: [do it yourself lol](https://i.imgur.com/oPTaeEU.png)<|eor|><|sor|>"This code is left an as exercise for the reader"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | NoDadYouShutUp | jce5mtg | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>in my experience GPT cant write code for shit. It simply does not understand OOP well enough to design something worth using.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | king_ricks | jcd6r4f | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications in Rust. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now Go programmers can create an application.<|eor|><|sor|>Okay ChatGPT4, write an application that autoexpands Rust's `foo().bar()?.baz` into `(match foo().bar() { Err(err) => return Err(err.into()), Ok(x) => x}).baz` for maximum Gopher readability<|eor|><|sor|> use std::env;
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::{self, Read};
use regex::Regex;
fn main() -> io::Result<()> {
let args: Vec<String> = env::args().collect();
let mut input = String::new();
if args.len() > 1 {
let filename = &args[1];
let mut file = File::open(filename)?;
file.read_to_string(&mut input)?;
} else {
io::stdin().read_to_string(&mut input)?;
}
let output = transform_code(input);
println!("{}", output);
Ok(())
}
fn transform_code(input: String) -> String {
let re = Regex::new(r"(\w+)\(\)\.(\w+)\?\.(.*)").unwrap();
let result = re.replace_all(&input, |caps: ®ex::Captures| {
format!(
"(match {0}().{1}() {{ Err(err) => return Err(err.into()), Ok(x) => x }}).{2}",
&caps[1], &caps[2], &caps[3]
)
});
result.into_owned()
}<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | Xoepe | jce3gp1 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>That entire subreddit is so nutty they are outjerking us<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | seaborgiumaggghhh | jcc86b5 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>Brb buying gold<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | GasolinePizza | jcdetar | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>>singularity
Crazy people rule?<|eor|><|sor|>That whole sub is pretty nuts, yeah.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | 404UsernameNotFound1 | jcebd29 | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications in Rust. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now Go programmers can create an application.<|eor|><|sor|>Okay ChatGPT4, write an application that autoexpands Rust's `foo().bar()?.baz` into `(match foo().bar() { Err(err) => return Err(err.into()), Ok(x) => x}).baz` for maximum Gopher readability<|eor|><|sor|> use std::env;
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::{self, Read};
use regex::Regex;
fn main() -> io::Result<()> {
let args: Vec<String> = env::args().collect();
let mut input = String::new();
if args.len() > 1 {
let filename = &args[1];
let mut file = File::open(filename)?;
file.read_to_string(&mut input)?;
} else {
io::stdin().read_to_string(&mut input)?;
}
let output = transform_code(input);
println!("{}", output);
Ok(())
}
fn transform_code(input: String) -> String {
let re = Regex::new(r"(\w+)\(\)\.(\w+)\?\.(.*)").unwrap();
let result = re.replace_all(&input, |caps: ®ex::Captures| {
format!(
"(match {0}().{1}() {{ Err(err) => return Err(err.into()), Ok(x) => x }}).{2}",
&caps[1], &caps[2], &caps[3]
)
});
result.into_owned()
}<|eor|><|sor|>Doesn't seem to work - doesn't match the second set parentheses and matches everything after the end
​
Correct regex: `(\w+)\s*\(\s*\)\s*\.\s*(\w+)\s*\(\s*\)\s*+\?\s*\.\s*(\S+)`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | HorseRadish98 | jcc23zn | <|sols|><|sot|>ChatGPT4 can now write entire applications. It looks like we're advancing at an even faster rate than what was thought possible, now anybody can create an application.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/11rodut/chatgpt4_can_now_write_entire_applications/<|eol|><|sor|>Come on gang! Looks like there are some people over there who are doubting the technology! Let's downvote them to hell!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | adotinthevoid_ | 10aifa9 | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 147 |
programmingcirclejerk | brogus_amogus | j44gl0h | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 127 |
programmingcirclejerk | adotinthevoid_ | j44flui | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|soopr|>> I mean, if a handful guys at SerenityOS can write a web browser from scratch in just a few years surely Google can muster enough manpower to rewrite Chromium in Rust in a couple of years?<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 63 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | j44i4vw | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>As someone who has used [Ritual](https://rust-qt.github.io/), I can confirm that Rust/C++ interop is on the same level of difficulty as writing a web browser from scratch<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmingcirclejerk | stone_henge | j45oze9 | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|soopr|>> I mean, if a handful guys at SerenityOS can write a web browser from scratch in just a few years surely Google can muster enough manpower to rewrite Chromium in Rust in a couple of years?<|eoopr|><|sor|>this but unironically<|eor|><|sor|>we have successfully extended the clean build time of chromium to infinity<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | Bizzaro_Murphy | j45e879 | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|soopr|>> I mean, if a handful guys at SerenityOS can write a web browser from scratch in just a few years surely Google can muster enough manpower to rewrite Chromium in Rust in a couple of years?<|eoopr|><|sor|>this but unironically<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | CarolineLovesArt | j45xuwi | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|sor|>Just sell opinionated as a feature<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | DXPower | j466lwz | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|sor|>Just sell opinionated as a feature<|eor|><|sor|>Sorry, Go already has that patented<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | affectation_man | j45k4vi | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>Just don't write bugs, then there's no need to do either<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | brogus_amogus | j470nep | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|sor|>lol the doubly implicit /uj and /s<|eor|><|sor|>Using /uj and /s is like explaining the joke, it completely ruins it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | CarolineLovesArt | j45y2yf | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>As someone who has used [Ritual](https://rust-qt.github.io/), I can confirm that Rust/C++ interop is on the same level of difficulty as writing a web browser from scratch<|eor|><|sor|>This difficulty exists to ensure that all code will be rewritten eventually in a moral programming language.
/uj Did you start on the rewrite yet to replace the legacy code?
/rj Did you start on the rewrite yet to replace the legacy code?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | james_pic | j467wgq | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|soopr|>> I mean, if a handful guys at SerenityOS can write a web browser from scratch in just a few years surely Google can muster enough manpower to rewrite Chromium in Rust in a couple of years?<|eoopr|><|sor|>this but unironically<|eor|><|sor|>Refactoring is for people too cowardly to rewrite.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | pandakekok9 | j45zvzr | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|soopr|>> I mean, if a handful guys at SerenityOS can write a web browser from scratch in just a few years surely Google can muster enough manpower to rewrite Chromium in Rust in a couple of years?<|eoopr|><|sor|>this but unironically<|eor|><|sor|>we have successfully extended the clean build time of chromium to infinity<|eor|><|sor|>They just need more unified building, trust me it works<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | etaionshrd | j4ahazy | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>Just don't write bugs, then there's no need to do either<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>No nation states that Im aware of are trying to 0-day TeX<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | alecStewart1 | j46ej07 | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|sor|>Just sell opinionated as a feature<|eor|><|sor|>What is this, Ruby on Rails?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | j46yui3 | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>He has a point, integrating Rust into an existing project is an exercise in pain. Obviously it's C++'s fault for not anticipating Rust's every design decision more than 25 years before Rust existed, and not Rust's fault for both the language and tooling being too opinionated and unstable to work with anything else.<|eor|><|sor|>lol the doubly implicit /uj and /s<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | Volt | j4bob5k | <|sols|><|sot|>I believe Google is putting too much effort into bringing interop between C++ and Rust. Why not simply rewrite the core of Chromium in Rust?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34361820<|eol|><|sor|>Just don't write bugs, then there's no need to do either<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Not everyone are Knuth. Tex is also incredibly stable with barely any new features being added to it. It has only seen 10 minor updates since 1990.
Its a different story when you need to deliver new features every week.<|eor|><|sor|>> Its a different story when you need to deliver new features every week.
Just don't do that<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | nigrxe | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 149 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | gz1ply1 | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>STORING DATA ON A DRIVE SOUNDS LIKE A BLOCKCHAIN PROBLEM. WE SHOULD REPLACE DRIVES WITH BLOCKCHAINS! DUCKSUCKBINGLE LEMON PARTY TO BUY INTO MY ICO!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 86 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gz1qp7t | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>STORING DATA ON A DRIVE SOUNDS LIKE A BLOCKCHAIN PROBLEM. WE SHOULD REPLACE DRIVES WITH BLOCKCHAINS! DUCKSUCKBINGLE LEMON PARTY TO BUY INTO MY ICO!<|eor|><|sor|>L1 cache as blockchain, prove me wrong<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | gz1rmj1 | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|sor|>> science police
>
> goes against the scientific process
Yep, nothing less scientific than peer review<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gz1qntj | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | gz214yx | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|sor|>blockchain obsession is a symptom of zoomers who don't know what filesystems are because of phones<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | gz20zch | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>STORING DATA ON A DRIVE SOUNDS LIKE A BLOCKCHAIN PROBLEM. WE SHOULD REPLACE DRIVES WITH BLOCKCHAINS! DUCKSUCKBINGLE LEMON PARTY TO BUY INTO MY ICO!<|eor|><|sor|>L1 cache as blockchain, prove me wrong<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>If you think about it, LISP is a blockchain, because anything that has links is the same as anything else that has links. I did a marijuana once and I'm basically a genius but lazy<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | gz21131 | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>Holy fucking shit. I want to fuck the blockchain so goddamn bad. I can't stand it anymore. Every time there's an ICO I get a massive erection. I've seen literally every reddit post about it online. My dreams are nothing but constant fucking sex in the ledger. I'm sick of waking up every morning with six nuts in my boxers and knowing that those are nuts that should've been photographed and NFT'd.<|eor|><|sor|>> I've seen literally every reddit post about it online.
ok but how far did you read into the manga<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gz25frk | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|sor|>> science police
>
> goes against the scientific process
Yep, nothing less scientific than peer review<|eor|><|sor|>Meta-analysis is
## LITERALLY
facism<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | gz1r40h | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|soopr|>Abstract: this comment is unjerk reply to the comment by ProfessorSexyTime et al.
If the fundamental problem is ensuring reproducibility, isn't it enough that one credible person can falsify the reproducibility of the experiment? Honest question.
I might have been wrong, because I neither have nor would ever dwell into the academia and it's politics. But propositioning blockchain as a solution definitely seems jerk to me. It's not a problem of storing copies, if anything there could be problem with how dissent / falsification can be silenced politically.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | infinite-red | gz1r473 | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>STORING DATA ON A DRIVE SOUNDS LIKE A BLOCKCHAIN PROBLEM. WE SHOULD REPLACE DRIVES WITH BLOCKCHAINS! DUCKSUCKBINGLE LEMON PARTY TO BUY INTO MY ICO!<|eor|><|sor|>This already exists. Bit torrent token. Checkmate, jerkers.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gz24mjj | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>STORING DATA ON A DRIVE SOUNDS LIKE A BLOCKCHAIN PROBLEM. WE SHOULD REPLACE DRIVES WITH BLOCKCHAINS! DUCKSUCKBINGLE LEMON PARTY TO BUY INTO MY ICO!<|eor|><|sor|>L1 cache as blockchain, prove me wrong<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>If you think about it, LISP is a blockchain, because anything that has links is the same as anything else that has links. I did a marijuana once and I'm basically a genius but lazy<|eor|><|sor|>No wonder its so slow.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gz1yxs5 | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|soopr|>Abstract: this comment is unjerk reply to the comment by ProfessorSexyTime et al.
If the fundamental problem is ensuring reproducibility, isn't it enough that one credible person can falsify the reproducibility of the experiment? Honest question.
I might have been wrong, because I neither have nor would ever dwell into the academia and it's politics. But propositioning blockchain as a solution definitely seems jerk to me. It's not a problem of storing copies, if anything there could be problem with how dissent / falsification can be silenced politically.<|eoopr|><|sor|>there are not good incentives to reproduce others work. An experiment takes time, you need to get the correct methodology, and it costs money. More importantly, it's much more rewarding to create a paper with a novel idea than a paper the tries to reproduce another one.<|eor|><|sor|>Exactly. Whats the point of nullifying the entire ring if no one is going to put in the time to replicate results? The issue of reproducibility is because people dont have the time/money/incentive to do it, because many papers are trash, and because the peer review processes is often arbitrary and often doesnt look close enough at the fine details of a paper (because, again, it takes a ton of time, even if youre not trying to reproduce).
Tools will not solve the reproducibility issue. Its the entire academic incentive structure thats broken.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | THICC_DICC_PRICC | gz2ia0y | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>[More context]
> If someone gets contradicting result the replication score of the entire ring can be nullified or in case of intentional manipulation with data negated.
>> But you have the same basic problem as now - youd need some sort of science police to control it, which goes against the scientific process. Essentially its a problem of establishing trust in an untrusted system.
Yea, I can't imagine any other way to store copies of research, say on separate devices or on like a portable device of sorts, other than blockchain. <|eor|><|soopr|>Abstract: this comment is unjerk reply to the comment by ProfessorSexyTime et al.
If the fundamental problem is ensuring reproducibility, isn't it enough that one credible person can falsify the reproducibility of the experiment? Honest question.
I might have been wrong, because I neither have nor would ever dwell into the academia and it's politics. But propositioning blockchain as a solution definitely seems jerk to me. It's not a problem of storing copies, if anything there could be problem with how dissent / falsification can be silenced politically.<|eoopr|><|sor|>there are not good incentives to reproduce others work. An experiment takes time, you need to get the correct methodology, and it costs money. More importantly, it's much more rewarding to create a paper with a novel idea than a paper the tries to reproduce another one.<|eor|><|sor|>Reproducibility is like writing tests for science. No one wants to do that shit<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | kz393 | gz3e1es | <|sols|><|sot|>"[Ensuring scientific research is replicable] actually makes it sound like a blockchain problem."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27244881<|eol|><|sor|>"Everything is a blockchain" is a natural extension of "Everything is an ordered pair"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | rohitkg98 | majkj1 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 146 |
programmingcirclejerk | OctagonClock | grsoely | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 108 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | grsxj9w | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>*20% syntax preference, 70% reluctance to learn new things, 20% iamverysmart and 20% library preferences.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | grssren | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>oh man I need to post this to /r/python brb<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmingcirclejerk | stone_henge | grsqhct | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine having a fun job where you produce novel solutions to new problems<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | ClownPFart | gru8zar | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>PG is jerk personified.<|eor|><|sor|>n-gate brutally murdered PG a few weeks ago and I have to share it bc its awesome
[http://n-gate.com/hackernews/2021/02/21/](http://n-gate.com/hackernews/2021/02/21/)
>Paul Graham takes a break from telling people how to think, in order to focus on a more general-interest topic with a broader audience: himself. The result is a fourteen-thousand-word morass constituting the slug track left by a spoiled clown with no meaningful contributions to make to anything. Hackernews continues to be in love. One focus of their adoration is Paul Graham's toy programming language, Bel, which also serves as a flawless analogy for its author: presented with every chance to succeed, recipient of years and years of people's time and attention, only to turn out to be a completely ineffective collection of text on a website, of use to nobody.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | grszea8 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine having a fun job where you produce novel solutions to new problems<|eor|><|sor|>all problems have already been solved in Common Lisp, even if the solutions haven't been written down. Such imagination is pointless.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | angry_mr_potato_head | gru7ry6 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>oh man I need to post this to /r/python brb<|eor|><|sor|>Hey, you leave us Pythonistas out of it. Hang on, I'm going to make a basic HTTP request with a library that isn't in the standardlib.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | UsingYourWifi | grsy7n5 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine having a fun job where you produce novel solutions to new problems<|eor|><|sor|>If I wanted that I'd have become a plumber.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | disintegore | gruppuu | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>I thought "glue code" meant "code you write while sniffing glue", or as I like to call it, Lisp<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | stone_henge | grszuyp | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine having a fun job where you produce novel solutions to new problems<|eor|><|sor|>all problems have already been solved in Common Lisp, even if the solutions haven't been written down. Such imagination is pointless.<|eor|><|sor|>There exists a program in Lisp that logically refutes your argument. It's just that no one has written it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | xigoi | gruxf96 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>This is why Go is my favorite language. I just love libraries with lots of duplicate structures: `IntBinaryTree`, `FloatBinaryTree`, `StringBinaryTree`, <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | grt17xp | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>*20% syntax preference, 70% reluctance to learn new things, 20% iamverysmart and 20% library preferences.<|eor|><|sor|>> 70% reluctance to learn new things
At least 80%<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | raze4daze | grv6v76 | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>> No, the fun is not over at all. Programming has always been 98% people gluing together library calls and 2% people doing more ambitious things.
stuck in the 98% gang who up<|eor|><|sor|>not smart enough for anything else represent<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty005 | grt169u | <|sols|><|sot|>The base state of programming is gluing together library calls. Since glue code can be written in any language, most programmers' language preferences are really library preferences.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1373926244673323008<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?
EDIT: Oh it's a pg tweet. Nevermind<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine having a fun job where you produce novel solutions to new problems<|eor|><|sor|>If I wanted that I'd have become a plumber.<|eor|><|sor|>Fact check: you are a plumber.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | THICC_DICC_PRICC | m51wec | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 151 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gqxjfvs | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>yeah well they fucking deserve it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 172 |
programmingcirclejerk | FinJoTheGreat | gqxyqaf | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 97 |
programmingcirclejerk | Pierogi314 | gqxnjw3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>Downvoted by fossils<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | gqxzwzx | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>I only ship my software to the Nintendo DS, so I could hardcode memory addresses.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | etaionshrd | gqy6eas | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>Who needs memory when you have a whole kilobyte of vector registers<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | disintegore | gqymtp1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>> Don't believe me? Microsoft says the same thing
and they know a thing or two about attacking users<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | gqyaehu | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>Who needs memory when you have a whole kilobyte of vector registers<|eor|><|sor|>Registers are cheap these days, any half decent CPU will have more than it needs. If you don't have Intel AMX you don't deserve my TODO cli app.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | BillyIII | gqy5wjm | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>Downvoted by fossils<|eor|><|sor|>They hated Him for He has spoken the truth.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gqzadg8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>> I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory
Might I interest you in [kempe](http://hackage.haskell.org/package/kempe/src/docs/manual.pdf)?<|eor|><|sor|>> ##Internals
> Kempe maintains its own stack and stores the pointer in rbp.
> Kempe procedures do not require any registers to be preserved across function calls.
Well, what a relief!
> ## C Calls
> When exporting to C, kc generates code that initializes the Kempe data pointer (rbx). Thus, one should avoid calling into Kempe code too often!
Oh, well, naturally...
> Note that the Kempe data pointer is static, so calling different Kempe functions in different threads will fail unpredictably.
Good to know. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | Blaz3 | gqzrupr | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>yeah well they fucking deserve it<|eor|><|sor|>Was just about to say "why is this considered a bad thing? Users are the enemy."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | ChakaChaka26 | gqzefdy | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>> Don't believe me? Microsoft says the same thing
and they know a thing or two about attacking users<|eor|><|sor|>wouldn't it be funny if Microsoft had a memory safe, garbage collected language similar to java<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | gqyg4v9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>Using anything but Rust is a show that you have violated the Hippocratic oath of Programmers.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | lord_braleigh | gqz9qla | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>Seriously curious and not looking for a fight, what are the issues with Rusts approach on memory usage?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj This isnt really the sub where we fight about stuff or talk seriously but JBlow has an [actually good talk](https://youtu.be/4t1K66dMhWk) about how safe rust encourages game programmers to write an ad hoc memory allocator using indices and a Vec as a replacement for pointers and malloc, subverting the borrow checkers purpose.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Salax_ | gqy8gmc | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>I only ship my software to the Nintendo DS, so I could hardcode memory addresses.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj did DS use ASLR? Was 3DS the first console where they started using it?<|eor|><|sor|>I dont think the 3DS did either. If it did, it wasnt very good, considering the number of savegame exploits.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gqzavjh | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>If only we had somewhere else to put our data...
...\**snaps*\* by George! The CPU itself!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | Mcpg_ | gqy6g8w | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>this but unironically<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | etaionshrd | gqy6l04 | <|sols|><|sot|>Using C is an attack on your users, end of story.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/m4te42/comment/gqwkljj<|eol|><|sor|>C is immoral because memory safety is a moral imperative
Java and C# are for 1xers who need garbage collectors as a crutch
Zig and Rust are newfangled fads that all the kids are going to regret years later
C++...
I think we can all agree that the only viable solution is not to allocate memory<|eor|><|sor|>I only ship my software to the Nintendo DS, so I could hardcode memory addresses.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj did DS use ASLR? Was 3DS the first console where they started using it?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.